This invention relates to image polarimeters to analyze polarization components of light, and more specifically to the use of a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) Micro-Mirror Array (MMA) to form the image polarimeter.
Imaging detectors, such as focal plane arrays, generally include an array of pixels, each pixel including a photo-detector that generates a signal responsive to light generated or reflected by an object. These signals are collected and combined such that a digital image of the object can be created and read out as a sequence of frames. Filter arrays are widely used in commercial imaging systems to provide hyperspectral or polarimetric capability. For example, digital cameras use fixed-in-place pixelated filter arrays or color wheels for color (RGB) photography. These filters reduce the amount of light that reaches the imaging pixel (for example, a red filter reflects blue and green light). Polarimeters can be used to analyze two or more polarization components of light. A partial list of techniques for polarimetry includes Jones calculus, Mueller calculus and Stokes parameters.
Stokes parameters are a set of values that have been utilized to describe a polarization state of light. In particular, Stokes parameters describe light in terms of total intensity (I), a fractional degree of polarization (p) and shape parameters of a polarization ellipse. As shown in
The images associated with each are I0, I45, I90 and I45QWP. The Stokes parameters are given as follows:
Other polarizations for the four polarizers than the standard 0/45/90/45QWP are possible but would require a different set of equations to compute the Stokes parameters. Other sets of polarizations would be equivalent to the standard values for which the equations are well known.
As shown in
The Degree of Polarization DOP is defined as (based on light intensity):
where Ipol is the intensity of the sum of the polarization components, and Itot is the total intensity of the beam.
Similarly, we can define the Degree of Linear Polarization, DOLP as
where Ilinpol is the intensity of the sum of the linear polarization components, and Itot is the total intensity of the beam.
The Degree of Circular Polarization, DOCP is the ratio of S3 to S0,
The polarized image 12 may be the DOP, DOLP or the DOCP.
Several other parameters can be derived from Stokes parameters, including ellipticity, eccentricity, azimuth angle and the length of the major and minor axes in a polarization graphical representation.
The component polarized images I0, I45, I90 and I135 can be obtained in different ways. In one approach, axially rotating polarizers and waveplates generate a time-sequence of component polarized images I0, I45, I90, I45QWP, I0, I45, I90, I45QWP . . . . Each batch of component polarized images must be co-registered to account for any time-varying changes to the optical system such as jitter. Furthermore, this approach requires motors to rotate the polarizers and waveplates, which require volume and prevent compact packaging of the imaging system. In another approach, a 2×2 filter having linear polarizers having angular values of Θ1=0°, Θ2=45°, Θ3=90° and Θ4=45° QWP, respectively, can be placed just in front of or integrated onto the FPA. The linear polarizers may be dielectric coatings. The QWP may be a discrete waveplate or may be integrated with the linear polarizer coating as a birefringent material of a specified thickness, a dielectric coating or a wire grid. The primary drawback to this approach is that if the existing FPA is replaced with a more recent FPA with higher resolution, smaller pixels etc. either the filter in front of the FPA has to be replaced or the new FPA most be fabricated with the requisite polarization coatings.
The following is a summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not intended to identify key or critical elements of the invention or to delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description and the defining claims that are presented later.
The present invention provides an image polarimeter in which a MEMS MMA is divided into two or more segments and the mirrors in each segment are provided with a polarizer of a given polarization. The mirrors in each segment are tipped and tilted to steer polarized light onto different portions of an optical detector. In certain configurations the mirrors may also be pistoned to reduce aberrations. Each frame that is read out from the detector includes two or more distinct component polarized images having different polarizations P0, P2, . . . of the same scene to fully characterize the polarization properties of the scene. Since the mirrors only tip/tilt/piston in the dead period between frames, no components are moving during image acquisition and co-registration of the component polarized images is simple.
In an embodiment, an image polarimeter includes an image forming system configured to collect light to form an image of a scene and a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) Micro-Mirror Array (MMA) positioned at or near an aperture stop of the image forming system. The MEMS MMA comprises a plurality of mirrors responsive to command signals to at least tip and tilt about first and second axes, respectively. The MEMS MMA is segmented into two or more segments with each segment including a plurality of mirrors; the mirrors in a given segment having polarizers that impart the same polarization with the polarizers in the two or more segments imparting different polarizations P0, P1, . . . . The MEMS MMA responsive to command signals to tip and tilt the mirrors in the respective segments to reflect and steer polarized light having at least two different polarizations at respective steering angles to respective non-overlapping portions of a pixelated optical detector. A focusing element (e.g. the mirrors themselves or two or more lenses placed after the MEMS MMA) focus the polarized light to form two or more component polarized images I0, I1, . . . of the same image of the scene on the respective portions of the optical detector. A MEMS MMA controller is configured to generate the command signals to drive the MEMS MMA.
The number of segments and the different polarizations may be selected to implement Jones calculus, Mueller calculus and Stokes parameters or other polarimetry techniques. To provide the component polarization images to compute Stokes parameters, the MEMS MMA is segmented into four segments in which the polarizers provide different polarizations P0, P1, P2 and P3 from which the Stokes parameters can be derived. Most commonly, P0=0 degrees, P1=45 degrees, P2=90 degrees and P3=QWP45 degrees.
In an embodiment, the MEM MMA mirrors may also be able to piston in translation along a third axis to provide three degrees-of-freedom (3DOF). In general, piston can be used to reduce aberrations in the component polarized images. More specifically, piston can be used to reduce aberrations caused by discontinuities between adjacent mirrors in given segment that are tipped/tilted at nominally the same steering angle, by discontinuities along a surface of the mirrors in a given segment tipped/tilted to focus the polarized light, or by temporal variations such as atmospheric distortion or thermal heating. A nominal fixed piston contribution can be computed for each mirror in a given segment to reduce aberrations for a fixed steering and or fixed focus.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention provides an image polarimeter in which a MEMS MMA is divided into two or more segments and the mirrors in each segment are provided with a polarizer of a given polarization. The mirrors in each segment are tipped and tilted to steer polarized light onto different portions of an optical detector. In certain configurations the mirrors may also be pistoned to reduce aberrations. Each frame that is read out from the detector includes two or more distinct component polarized images having different polarizations P0, P2, . . . of the same scene to fully characterize the polarization properties of the scene. Since the mirrors only tip/tilt/piston in the dead period between frames, no components are moving during image acquisition and co-registration of the component polarized images is simple. The number of segments and the different polarizations may be selected to implement Jones calculus, Mueller calculus and Stokes parameters or other polarimetry techniques.
Without loss of generality, an embodiment of the image polarimeter in which an MEMS MMA is configured to produce the component polarization images in a single frame will be described to support the computation of Stokes parameters. It is understood that the specific number of segments, hence component polarization images, and the specific polarizations of those images can be readily adapted for other polarimetry techniques including but not limited to Jones calculus and Mueller calculus. The embodiment also includes the mirror “piston” capability, which can be used to reduce aberrations in the component polarization images due to steering or focus artifacts or temporal distortions such as atmospheric distortion or thermal heating. It is understood that such mirror “piston” capability is not required but is an added and beneficial feature of certain MEMS MMA implementations. For simplicity and clarity, the embodiment uses the standard polarization values of 0/45/90/QWP45. It is understood the other polarization values may be used requiring new equations to map the component polarization images to the Stokes parameters but which are equivalent to the standard polarization values.
Referring now to
Image polarimeter 100 includes an image forming system 102 configured to collect light to form an image of a scene. A pixelated optical detector 104 such as a focal plane array (FPA) is positioned at or near an image plane of the system. A read out integrated circuit (ROIC) 106, coupled to or integrated with the FPA, reads out an image frame 108 at a frame rate. Each frame includes an imaging period in which to receive and integrate incident photons to form the image and a dead period that effectively separates the frames.
A MEMS MMA 110 is placed at or near (as close as possible) to an aperture stop 112 of the image forming system. All of the light rays collected from the scene crosses at the aperture stop such that each portion of the aperture contains the same image of the scene. MEMS MMA 110 includes a plurality of mirrors responsive to command signals to tip and tilt about first and second axes, respectively, and to piston in translation along a third axis in three degrees-of-freedom (3DOF). The MEMS MMA is segmented (via command signals) into four segments 112a, 112b, 112c and 112d. The segments may be equally dimensioned quadrants of the FPA but that is not required. Each segment includes a plurality of mirrors. The mirrors in a given segment have polarizers that impart the same polarization while mirrors in different segments have polarizers that impart different polarizations. More specifically, the mirrors in segments 112a, 112b, 112c and 112d are provided with polarizers that impart polarizations P0 114a, P1 114b, P2 114c and P3 114d, respectively, equal to 0, 45, 90 and QWP45 degrees, respectively. Depending upon the optical band of interest, the polarizers may be a dielectric coating or a wire grid array configured to impart a linear polarization of a particular angular value. The polarizers and QWP are applied as coatings or embedded into the surface of the mirrors.
A MEMS MMA controller 116 is configured to generate command signals to MEMS MMA 110 to tip and tilt the mirrors in the respective segments to reflect and steer polarized light having polarizations P0, P1, P2 and P3 at respective steering angles to respective non-overlapping portions 118a, 118b, 118c and 118d of FPA 104. Once configured, the steering angles, hence the tip and tilt of the mirrors, for each segment are nominally fixed to direct light from a particular segment of the MEMS MMA to particular portion of the FPA. In this configuration, the mirrors are also tipped and tilted to focus the polarized light from each segment to form the component polarized images I0=I0 120a, I1=I45 120b, I2=I90 120c and I3=I45QWP 120d. The tip/tilt required to nominally focus the polarized light onto the detector can also be pre-calculated and fixed. Piston can be used to reduce the discontinuities between adjacent mirrors that tip/tilt to steer or focus the polarized light onto the detector. This piston contribution can also be pre-calculated and fixed. The MEMS MMA controller can access a lookup table (LUT) for the command signals to drive tip, tilt and focus to provide the nominal steering angle and focus. To augment the mirror capability to focus the light or to remove focusing from the MMA altogether, four lenses can be placed between the MEMS MMA and the FPA to focus the polarized light onto the respective portions of the FPA.
ROIC 106 reads out an image frame 108 at a frame rate. Each image frame 108 contains the four component polarized images 120a, 120b, 120c and 120d. A single frame fully characterizes the polarization properties needed to compute the Stokes parameters.
A computer 124 processes the four component polarized images 120a, 120b, 120c and 120d to compute DOP, DOLP or DOCP, which can be visualized as a polarimetric image 126. Computer 124 may also be configured to employ a suite of correction algorithms 128 (atmospheric distortion correction, thermal heating) that process the component polarized images 120a, 120b, 120c and 120d to assess the quality of the images e.g. focus, SNR, clarity, etc. and compute a dynamic piston for each mirror in each segment of the MEMS MMA. The tip/tilt values may be adjusted as well but this dynamic aberration correction is typically primarily a piston effect.
The nominal tip/tilt/piston to focus the polarized light and direct that light to the corresponding portion of the FPA is known and fixed. The dynamic component of piston and possibly tip/tilt, is only used to actuate the mirrors in the dead period between frames. As a result, no components are moving during image acquisition and co-registration of the component polarized images is simple. A one-time calibration is sufficient.
As best shown in
The MEMS MMA is preferably capable of tipping and tilting over range of at least −15°×+15° to steer over a range of +/−30°×30° and pistoning (translating) over a range of at least +/−15 microns (at least one-half wavelength in either direction) piston at a rate of at least 1 KHz (<1 millisecond). Further, the MEMS MMA must have a sufficient number of mirrors, mirror size/resolution, fill factor, range of motion, response time, response accuracy and uniformity across the array.
One such MEMS MMA is described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,444,492 entitled “Flexure-Based, Tip-Tilt-Piston Actuation Micro-Array”, which is hereby incorporated by reference. As shown in
Referring now to
As shown in
While several illustrative embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Such variations and alternate embodiments are contemplated, and can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5404375 | Kroeger et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5854702 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6181450 | Dishman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6271953 | Dishman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6327063 | Rockwell | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6567574 | Ma et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
7593641 | Tegge, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7660235 | Alicherry et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8301027 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305578 | Mudge | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8368889 | Schwiegerling | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8823848 | Chipman | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8983293 | Frankel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9473768 | Uyeno et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9477135 | Uyeno et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9857226 | LeMaster | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10243654 | Uyeno | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10444492 | Hopkins | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10718491 | Raring et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
10969598 | Fest et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998965 | Tong et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11042025 | Uyeno et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11333879 | Uyeno | May 2022 | B2 |
11815676 | Uyeno | Nov 2023 | B2 |
20020141689 | Qian et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020196506 | Graves et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030081321 | Moon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030185488 | Blumenthal | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040072540 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081466 | Walther et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040141752 | Shelton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040258415 | Boone et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031255 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050100339 | Tegge | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122566 | Cicchiello | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050288031 | Davis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060038103 | Helmbrecht | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070031157 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036480 | Wu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080050064 | Sakai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100149533 | Fest | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166430 | Alten | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120002973 | Bruzzi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120008133 | Silny et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120114337 | Aoki | May 2012 | A1 |
20120155885 | Hannah et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168605 | Milanovic | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130271818 | Bastien | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140063299 | Fest | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150099476 | Beals | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150172218 | Beshai | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150311981 | Inagaki et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150378242 | Auxier et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160003677 | Pezzaniti et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160043800 | Kingsbury | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160234703 | Aldana et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160294472 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170293137 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180231715 | Bishop et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190066320 | Uyeno et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190154921 | Xing et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200244359 | Csonka et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20210088776 | Uyeno et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210091854 | Uyeno | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210092260 | Uyeno et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 10, 2022”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Apr. 19, 2022”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/871,602, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2020”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/871,602, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 24, 2021”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/871,602, Response filed Feb. 8, 2021 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2020”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2021”, 35 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, Response filed Dec. 1, 2021 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2021”, 16 pgs. |
“Mirrorcle Technologies MEMS Mirrors—Technical Overview”, Mirrorcle Technologies, Inc., (2018), 7 pgs. |
Kim, et al., “Demonstration of large-angle nonmechanical laser beam steering based on LC polymer polarization grating”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 8052 80520T, (May 13, 2011), 13 pgs. |
“High Contrast IR Wire Grid Polarizers”, Edmund Optics, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.edmundoptics.com/f/high-contrast-ir-wire-grid-polarizers/14797/>, (Accessed Sep. 4, 2021), 1 pg. |
“Mid-Wave Infrared (MWIR) and Long-Wave Infrared (LWIF) Waveplates”, Edmund Optics, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.edmundoptics.com/f/mid-wave-infrared-mwir-and-long-wave-infrared-lwir-waveplates/14317/>, (Accessed Sep. 4, 2021), 2 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, filed Aug. 31, 2020, Electronically Steered Inter-Satellite Optical Communication System With Micro-Electromechanical (MEM) Micromirror Array (MMA). |
“MEMS Mirror Array—Beam Steering Mode”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHIUU3kKtzM>, (Aug. 10, 2017), 2 pgs. |
Rodriguez, et al., “Beam steering by digital micro-mirror device for multi-beam and single-chip lidar”, Proc. SPIE 10757, Optical Data Storage 2018: Industrial Optical Devices and Systems, (Sep. 14, 2018), 7 pgs. |
Ryf, et al., “MEMS tip/tilt and piston mirror arrays as diffractive optical elements”, Proc. SPIE 5894, Advanced Wavefront Control: Methods, Devices, and Applications III, (Aug. 30, 2005), 12 pgs. |
Tsou, et al., “Extended-image spatial tracking technique for deep-space optical downlinks”, Proc. SPIE 3762, Adaptive Optics Systems and Technology, (Sep. 27, 1999), 101-109. |
Tuantranont, et al., “Optical beam steering using MEMS-controllable microlens array”, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical vol. 91, Issue 3, (Jul. 15, 2001), 363-372. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240402016 A1 | Dec 2024 | US |