Image processing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9159101
  • Patent Number
    9,159,101
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 15, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 13, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
An image of a check may be presented for payment in a banking system in place of the physical paper check. The check to be deposited can be collected from a depositor using a scanner. A web site, accessed through a depositor's web browser, can be used to drive the process of collecting the check, but in some contexts (e.g., in less popular computing environments, such as those that do not run the most popular operating systems), it is economically infeasible to obtain the certificates that would be used to allow a program executing in the web browser to control the scanner. Thus, a depositor can be instructed to capture and upload images of the check in the form of files, where the image files are then presented for payment through a banking system.
Description
BACKGROUND

A check is a negotiable instrument. Formally, a check is an order that a “drawer” (the party who writes the check, and from whose bank account the money is to be drawn) issues to a “drawee bank” (the bank at which the drawer's money is located), and the order instructs the drawee bank to pay a “payee” (the party to whom the check is written). A check is negotiated by the payee's presenting the check to the drawee bank. The presentment process is normally initiated by the payee's bank, which presents the check to the drawee bank when the payee deposits the check with his or her bank.


Presentment of a check is normally done through the Federal Reserve or a commercial banking system. Traditionally, the mechanism by which this presentment occurs is by tendering the paper check through the banking system. The paper check is physically transmitted to the drawee bank, which either accepts and pays the paper check upon receipt, or declines payment and returns the paper check. Technological and legal developments, such as procedures set forth in the Check-21 law, allow images of checks (sometimes referred to as “substitute checks”) to be presented electronically without presentment of a paper copy. Thus, starting the presentment process may involve collecting an image of the check rather than obtaining the original paper check. Check scanners have traditionally been available to read the Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line at the bottom of the check, and this information can be used for presentment. However, it is possible to present an ordinary image of a check, where the image is collected with ordinary image scanning equipment.


A customer can take the paper check to a bank for deposit and have the bank scan the check to obtain an image. However, it is also possible to collect the image of the check from the customer who is depositing the check.


SUMMARY

An image of a check to be presented for payment can be collected from a banking customer using the customer's scanning equipment. The customer can scan the check into one or more files (e.g., one file for the front, a second file for the back). The files can then be uploaded to a server operated by the customer's bank, and the images contained in the files can be presented through the banking system for payment by the drawee bank.


The customer's bank may operate software, such as software provided on a web site, that guides the customer through the process of obtaining the check images. For example, the customer may visit the bank's web site, and the web site may instruct the customer to obtain images of both sides of the check, may instruct the customer how to position the check in the scanner, may instruct the customer as to what image format and/or resolution to use, etc. The web site may also guide the user through the process of delimiting the boundary of the check, such as by identifying a corner of the check. The bank's software can also perform certain verifications on the check, such as verifying the check against legibility and/or size standards, verifying that there is an endorsement on the back of the check, verifying that the amount of money written on the check matches the amount that the customer has indicated in a deposit request, etc.


This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram of a user interface that requests that a depositor enter an amount of a deposit.



FIG. 2 is a diagram of a user interface that requests that a depositor provide an image of a first side of a check.



FIG. 3 is a diagram of a user interface that requests that a depositor provide an image of a second side of a check.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an example process whereby an image of a check is received and presented for payment.



FIG. 5 is a diagram of an example user interface in which a user marks a boundary of a check.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of various stages that can be performed after an image of a check is received by a bank from a depositor.



FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example environment in which checks may be deposited and presented.



FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an example computing environment in which example embodiments and aspects may be implemented.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A web site can guide a user through the process of collecting images of a check to be deposited. In some cases, the web site can provide software, such as a browser-executable applet, that drives the process of collecting images by operating the customer's scanner. For example, after the customer enters an amount of a check to be deposited, the software provided on the web site can instruct the user to place the check in the scanner bed and to click a button when ready. The software can then cause the scanner to be started, can collect the image in an appropriate format and resolution, and can then upload the image for deposit. The software can repeat the process for both sides of the check, in order to obtain images of the front and the back.


Having the web site drive the image-collection process may be simple for the customer (e.g., the bank depositor who uses the web site), since the customer may not have to address issues such as what to name the file, what format or resolution to use. Having the web site drive the process also may avoid, for the customer, the process of identifying particular files to be uploaded. However, certain permissions may be used in order to allow the web site's software to operate the scanner. Scanners are normally operated by a device driver, such as a TWAIN driver. For security reasons, the driver may require certain certificates to be used before allowing a program to operate the scanner that the driver controls. Since users often transparently download programs to run in their web browsers without realizing that they are downloading programs, programs such as applets, scripts, etc., that run in web browsers often present a particular security risk, and a driver may require such a program to obtain a certificate before it allows the program to control the scanner. Each scanner (or the scanners within a brand-mate family), may have its own driver. The drivers may be different for different operating environments—e.g., the same scanner may use a different driver depending on whether it is being operated from an environment based on one of the WINDOWS operating systems, an environment based on one of the operating systems used in APPLE computers, an environment based on a version of the LINUX operating system, etc. Each driver may use different certificates. Moreover, the different environments may use various different environment-specific technologies to allow the scanner to be controlled from a remote web server. Since the bank that operates the web site does not know what scanning equipment or operating environment its customer will be using, it may need to obtain a large number of certificates, and may need to interface with a large number of different technologies, to support a large number of scanner-environment combinations, in order to allow its software to control scanners for a variety of customers.


At present, most consumers use computers whose environment is based on one of the WINDOWS operating systems. Thus, it may make sense from a cost-benefit perspective, for a bank to obtain the certificates to operate a wide variety of scanners in environments based on the WINDOWS operating systems, and to support the technology that allows the scanner to be controlled within that environment. However, it may not make sense from a cost-benefit perspective for the bank to obtain the certificates to operate lesser-used scanners, or scanners in environments other than those based on the WINDOWS operating systems. Thus, an alternative mechanism for obtaining an image of the check may be used. One example of such a mechanism is to have the customer scan an image of the check (or separate images of the front and back of the check) into a file, and then upload the file(s) to the bank's server for presentment through a banking system.


Turning to the drawings, FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 show examples of user interfaces that could be presented to a user in order to obtain a deposit amount and the appropriate check images. These user interfaces could be presented through a web site—e.g., by delivering to a depositor's computer or other machine, web pages that cause these user interfaces to be displayed on the depositor's browser. However, these user interfaces could be presented using any mechanism.


In FIGS. 1-3, the depositor is asked to enter an amount of a check to be deposited, and is then asked to provide scanned images of the front and back of the check. Thus, in FIG. 1, user interface 100, the depositor is requested to enter the amount of a check to be deposited into box 102. This amount can be entered in the form of text. When the depositor has entered the amount of the check to be deposited, the depositor may click button 104, indicating that he or she is “finished.” FIG. 1 shows an example in which the depositor is requested to enter an amount of a single check to be deposited. However, the depositor could also be given a set of boxes to enter an arbitrary number of checks, or could be asked to enter an aggregate amount of a deposit covering several checks, or could be asked for an amount of a deposit in any other way.



FIG. 2 shows user interface 200, which requests that the depositor enter a name of a file containing an image of the front of the check to be deposited. The name, and optionally the path, of the file can be entered into box 202. When the depositor has entered the name of the file, he or she can click button 204 to indicate that he or she is “finished” entering the name. The name can be entered either by the depositor typing the name as text into box 202. Or, as another example, the depositor can be presented with a file navigation user interface 206. The depositor may click button 208 (“browse”) to access file navigation user interface 206. File navigation user interface 206 may show the depositor's local and/or network folder structure, and allow the depositor to navigate through folders and files to obtain the name of the file containing the image. When the depositor has selected the name of the file, the name (or name and path) of the file may appear in box 202 as if the depositor had typed the name (or name and path). User interface 200 could also include information and/or instructions for the depositor about the rules that govern the nature of the image to be provided—e.g., text could be displayed or communicated in user interface 200 that advises the depositor as to the format of the image to be provided (e.g., JPEG), the resolution of the image (e.g., 200 dpi), other parameters (e.g., turning on grayscale for the scan), etc. As another example, the depositor could be shown examples of “good” and “bad” scans—e.g., an image could be shown to the depositor indicating an example of scan that would be accepted, and another image could be shown to the depositor indicating an example of a scan that would not be accepted. A scan that would not be accepted might be shown as being smudged, or crooked, or obscured in some manner. There are a variety of reasons for which a scan might not be accepted, and examples demonstrating any one or more of these reasons could be shown to the depositor.



FIG. 3 shows user interface 300, which is similar to user interface 200 but asks the depositor to enter the name of a file containing an image of the back of the check instead of the front. Like user interface 200, user interface 300 may have a box 302 into which the depositor can enter the name of the file containing the appropriate image, a button 304 that the depositor can click when he or she is finished entering the file name, a browse button 306 that the depositor can use to access a file navigation user interface similar to that shown in FIG. 2 and previously discussed. Additionally user interface 300 may inform and/or instruct the depositor as to issues concerning format, resolution, other parameters, etc.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an example process whereby an image of a check is received and presented for payment. It is noted that the process of FIG. 4, as well as the process discussed subsequently in connection with FIG. 5, are both described, by way of example, with reference to a web server that interacts with a depositor by communicating through a network with a browser running on the depositor's machine. However, these processes may be carried out in any system, and are not limited to the scenarios described. Moreover, these flow diagrams show examples in which stages of a process are carried out in a particular order, as indicated by the lines connecting the blocks, but the various stages shown in these diagrams can be performed in any order, or in any combination or sub-combination.


At 402, an amount of a check to be deposited is received. For example, a user interface (such as user interface 100, shown in FIG. 1) may be used to ask a depositor for the amount of a check to be deposited. As previously noted, the depositor may be given the opportunity to enter an amount of a single check, a list of amounts for plural checks, an aggregate total amount of plural checks, etc. At least one such amount is received at 402.


At 404, a name of a file that contains an image of the front side of the check is received. For example, a user interface (such as user interface 200, shown in FIG. 2) may be used to obtain the name (or name and path) of a file that contains an image of the check. The user may have already scanned the check and placed the image in a file, or the user can be instructed to scan the check (or a side of the check) at the time that the file name is to be received. The file whose name is entered may be uploaded to a server, such as a web server operated by the bank with which the check is to be deposited.


At 406, a name of a file that contains an image of the back side of the check is received. For example, a user interface (such as user interface 300, shown in FIG. 3) may be used to obtain the name (or name and path) of a file that contains an image of the check. As with 404, the user may already have scanned the check into an image file, or can be instructed to do so. The file whose name is entered may be uploaded to a server, such as a web server operated by the bank with which the check is to be deposited.


At 408, the boundaries the check are received. For example, the user may be asked to draw a boundary on the image to indicate which part of the image is the check, and which part is merely background due to the fact that amount of area scanned is generally larger than a check. One way to obtain an indication of the location of this boundary is to ask the user to scan the check by placing the top and left edges of the check directly abutting the top and left sides of the scanner bed. Thus, the top and left edges of the boundary of the check are defined by the edges of the scanning sight. Presuming that the check is a rectangle, the bottom and right edges that define the remaining portion of the boundary can be indicated by a single point in the bottom, right corner of the check. An example of this technique is shown in FIG. 5.



FIG. 5 shows a check 502, which has been scanned. Sight 504 indicates the area that has been scanned, and it can be seen that left edge 508 and top edge 510 of check 502 abut the left and top edges of the scan sight. By placing a marker (such as dot 506) in the right, bottom corner of the check, the rectangular boundary of the check is defined. Thus, it can be determined from the position of the marker which portion of sight 504 contains an image of a side of check 502, and which portion contains background. The portion that contains the image can later be used to present the check for payment through a banking system. It is noted that the marker can be positioned through various mechanisms. For example, a web server that implements the process of collecting a deposit request and check images from a depositor can download software (e.g., a plug-in, an applet, a script, etc.) that executes in the depositor's browser and allows the depositor to position a marker such as dot 506 with a pointing device, such as a mouse, trackpad, etc. This program could be used to place the marker on the image before the image is uploaded to the bank's server. As another example, the bank's server could receive the image, and then send a copy or modified version of the image back to the depositor's web browser to be operated on the program. For example, after the upload of the image, the bank's web server could cause a new window to be opened with a page containing the image, and a script, applet, plug-in, etc., that allows the depositor to place the marker. Any mechanism to allow the depositor to place the marker could be used.


Returning to FIG. 4, certain types of verifications may be performed (at 410) on the check images that have been received. For example, the images could be verified to determine they are in an acceptable format, at an acceptable resolution, or that the amount of the check shown on the front of the check matches the amount stated by the depositor, or that the back of the check contains an endorsement, or that the check complies with size standards (or other standards) according to applicable law such as the Check-21 law. In one example, the system may check that the images are in the JPEG format, or that the images are at least 200 dpi in resolution, or that the capture of the image preserves grayscale. Resolution and/or grayscale can be addressed as part of the process of verifying that the image is in an acceptable format, or compliance with resolution and grayscale parameters could be checked separately. A comparison of the amount of the check as stated by the depositor with the amount written on the check can be performed by using optical character recognition (OCR) on the check to determine the amount that it states. Or, as another example, the check could be examined by a human and compared with the amount entered by the depositor. Similarly, the presence of an endorsement on the image of the back of the check could be detected using OCR (or some other type of image processing), or could be evaluated by a human.


At 412, the images of the front and back of the check are presented for payment through a banking system. For example, a banking system such as the Federal Reserve or a commercial banking system may operate a server to which these images can be provided, and the images can be presented to the drawee bank through such system. An example of a banking system is shown in FIG. 7, and is discussed subsequently.



FIG. 6 shows an example of various stages that can be performed after an image of a check is received by a bank from a depositor. For example, when images of a check are from a depositor by the bank's web server, certain processing can be performed on the image to prepare the check for presentment through a banking system. FIG. 6 shows examples of stages of such processing. It should be noted that 602, 604, and 606, as shown in FIG. 6, provide additional detail of features that are discussed previously in connection with 410 in FIG. 4.


At 602, the files containing the image may be evaluated to determine whether they are in an appropriate format. For example, features of the images, such as file format (e.g., JPEG, GIF, TIF, etc.) may be evaluated. In one example, the depositor may be instructed to upload the images in JPEG format, and an image may be rejected if the evaluation at 602 determines that the image is in a different format. Additional features that may be evaluated include resolution of the image, the presence of grayscale, compliance with legal standards such as Check-21, etc.


At 604, a verification may be performed to determine that the amount of money written on the check corresponds to the amount of the check reported by the depositor. For example, the image of the front of the check can be evaluated by an OCR process, read by a human, etc., and this amount can be compared to the amount of the deposit as entered by the depositor.


At 606, the image of the back of the check may be evaluated to determine the presence of an endorsement. For example, an OCR process, or other type of image processing, may be performed to determine whether the image contains an endorsement. Or the image can be given to a human to evaluate for the presence of an endorsement.


At 608, the images of the check may be converted to an appropriate format for presentment through a banking system. For example, the banking system may impose certain standards such as file format, headers, metadata, etc. The images may be modified and/or packaged to comply with these standards prior to presentment of the check images through a banking system.



FIG. 7 shows an example environment in which checks may be deposited and presented. Depositor 702 may be a customer of financial institution 712. Financial institution 712 may, for example, be a bank, but could also be any other type of financial institution, such as an investment company, an insurance company, etc. Depositor may operate a computer 704, which may be located at depositor 702's residence, but could also be located in any other place. Computer 704 may be connected to image capture device 706, which may be a scanner, camera, etc. Computer 704 may be connected to other machines through network 708. The Internet is an example of network 708, although computer 704 could be connected to other machines through any network.


One example of a machine that computer 704 could be connected to through network 708 is server 710, which, in this example, is a server operated by depositor 702's financial institution 712. Server 710 may operate software that implements a web site, and depositor 702 may use that web site to interact with financial institution 712, for example by tendering checks for deposit into an account with financial institution 712 through the web site. As previously discussed, one way that a depositor could tender a check for deposit is to provide scanned images of the check and to upload the images to a web site associated with a bank. If depositor 702 uses image capture device 706 to scan images of a check, and then uses a browser running on computer 704 to upload such images to server 710 through network 708, then this scenario would be one example of the subject matter described herein. However, the subject matter described herein encompasses other scenarios.


Financial institutions 716 and 718 are financial institutions such as banks, investment companies, insurance companies, etc. They may also include a clearinghouse or a national central bank (such as the Federal Reserve or a branch thereof). Financial institutions 712, 716, and 718 may communicate with each other via a network 714. Network 714 may be a publicly-accessible network, such as the Internet, but also may be a private network. For example, financial institutions 712, 716, and 718 may have security issues when they communicate with each other that do not apply to ordinary communications, and thus network 714 may provide security features that network 708 does not. However, network 714 could be any type of network.


Account 722, in the example of FIG. 7 is an account that depositor 702 maintains at financial institution 712. Depositor 702 may be in possession of a check that is drawn against account 724 maintained at financial institution 718 (in which case financial institution 718 is the drawee). Depositor 702 may deposit the check into account 722 by delivering the check to financial institution 712, where such delivery may be in the form of physical delivery of the original paper check, sending an image of the check, etc. Upon receipt of the check (whether in paper form, image form, or otherwise), financial institution 712 may clear the check by presenting the check through a banking system, such as banking system 720. Presentment of the check may be made directly to drawee financial institution 718, or could be made to an intermediary financial institution, such as a branch of the Federal Reserve, a correspondent bank, a clearinghouse, etc. The intermediary bank can be a government actor (as in the case of the Federal Reserve in the United States, or the central bank of another country), or it could be a commercial actor, such as a correspondent bank or clearinghouse.


In one example, the check is cleared by presenting the check to financial institution 716, which may, for example, be a regional branch of the Federal Reserve, along with a request for payment. Financial institutions 712 and 718 may each have accounts at financial institution 716. Financial institution 712 may create a substitute check using an image provided by depositor 702, and may present the substitute check to financial institution 716. Upon receiving the substitute check, financial institution 716 may identify financial institution 718 as the drawee bank—e.g., by using the nine-digit routing number that is normally printed on checks in the United States. Financial institution 716 may then present the substitute check to financial institution 718 and request that the check be paid. If financial institution 718 agrees to honor the check, then financial institution 716 may then settle the check by debiting funds from an account of financial institution 718 and crediting funds to an account of financial institution 712.


It will be appreciated that the preceding examples are for illustration, and not limitation. For example, financial institution 718 may have a relationship with financial institution 712, and financial institution 712 may use this relationship to clear the check directly with financial institution 718, while bypassing the Federal Reserve, other national central bank, or clearinghouse. In addition, accounts 722 and 724 could be held at the same financial institution 712, in which case the check may be cleared internally.


The subject matter described herein may be implemented through the use of a computer system, or other type of device that has some computing mechanism(s). FIG. 8 shows an example computing environment in which example embodiments and aspects may be implemented. The computing system environment is only one example of a suitable computing environment and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality.


Numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations may be used. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use include, but are not limited to, personal computers (PCs), server computers, handheld or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, embedded systems, distributed computing environments that include any of the previously-described systems or devices, and the like.


Computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer may be used. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Distributed computing environments may be used where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network or other data transmission medium. In a distributed computing environment, program modules and other data may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.


With reference to FIG. 8, an example system for implementing aspects described herein includes a computing device, such as computing device 800. In its most basic configuration, computing device 800 typically includes at least one processing unit 802 and memory 804. Depending on the exact configuration and type of computing device, memory 804 may be volatile (such as random access memory (RAM)), non-volatile (such as read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, etc.), or some combination of the two. This most basic configuration is illustrated in FIG. 8 by dashed line 806.


Computing device 800 may have additional features/functionality. For example, computing device 800 may include additional storage (removable and/or non-removable) including, but not limited to, magnetic or optical disks or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in FIG. 8 by removable storage 808 and non-removable storage 810.


Computing device 800 typically includes a variety of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by computing device 800 and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media.


Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Memory 804, removable storage 808, and non-removable storage 810 are all examples of computer storage media. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can accessed by computing device 800. Any such computer storage media may be part of computing device 800.


Computing device 800 may also contain communications connection(s) 812 that allow the device to communicate with other devices. Communications connection(s) 812 is an example of communication media. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared and other wireless media. The term computer readable media as used herein includes both storage media and communication media.


Computing device 800 may also have input device(s) 814 such as keyboard, mouse, pen, voice input device, touch input device, etc. Output device(s) 816 such as a display, speakers, printer, etc. may also be included. All these devices are well known in the art and need not be discussed at length here.


It should be understood that the various techniques described herein may be implemented in connection with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the presently disclosed subject matter, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the presently disclosed subject matter. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computing device generally includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device. One or more programs may implement or utilize the processes described in connection with the presently disclosed subject matter, e.g., through the use of an API, reusable controls, or the like. Such programs are preferably implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language, and combined with hardware implementations.


Although example embodiments may refer to utilizing aspects of the presently disclosed subject matter in the context of one or more stand-alone computer systems, the subject matter is not so limited, but rather may be implemented in connection with any computing environment, such as a network or distributed computing environment. Still further, aspects of the presently disclosed subject matter may be implemented in or across a plurality of processing chips or devices, and storage may similarly be effected across a plurality of devices. Such devices might include personal computers, network servers, and handheld devices, for example.


Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described previously. Rather, the specific features and acts described previously are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.

Claims
  • 1. An image processing system comprising: a memory;a processor in communication with said memory, and configured to:receive, via a network from a depositor-controlled computing device, a file comprising an image of a negotiable instrument and an indication of where, in the image, an edge of the negotiable instrument is located, the indication being superimposed on the image of the negotiable instrument and being a representation of input via the depositor-controlled computing device; anddetermine which portion of the image to present for processing based on the indication.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the indication comprises where, in the image, a corner of the negotiable instrument is located.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the indication indicates which part of the image comprises the negotiable instrument and which part comprises background.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the representation is of a manual input.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the indication is the representation of the manual input from a pointing device of the depositor-controlled computing device.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the manual input is input by a user associated with the depositor-controlled computing device.
  • 7. The system of claim 4, wherein the processor is configured to communicate with a network browser running on the depositor-controlled computing device; and wherein the processor is configured to download software to the depositor-controlled computing device, the software configured for execution via the network browser of the depositor-controlled computing device to configure the depositor-controlled computing device to process the manual input related to the negotiable instrument received from the pointing device.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the processor, in response to receiving the file comprising the image of the negotiable instrument, is further configured to: send, via the network to the depositor-controlled computing device, a system image of the negotiable instrument for display using the depositor-controlled computing device in order for a depositor at the depositor-controlled computing device to input the manual input on the displayed system image, the system image being based on the image of the negotiable instrument.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the system image comprises a copy of the image of the negotiable instrument.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the system image comprises a modification of the image of the negotiable instrument.
  • 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the sending of the system image to the depositor-controlled computing device causes the depositor-controlled computing device to display the system image in a new window for input of the manual input on the displayed system image.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to receive a first image of a first side of the negotiable instrument and a second image of a second side of the negotiable instrument; and wherein the indication received from the depositor-controlled computing device comprises a first indication of where, in the first image, a first edge of the first side of the negotiable instrument is located and a second indication of where, in the second image, a second edge of the second side of said negotiable instrument is located.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the first indication is indicative of a first corner the negotiable instrument in the first image; and wherein the second indication is indicative of a second corner the negotiable instrument in the second image.
  • 14. A processor-implemented negotiable instrument deposit method, comprising: receiving, via a network from a depositor-controlled computing device, a file comprising an image of a negotiable instrument and an indication of where, in the image, an edge of the negotiable instrument is located, the indication being superimposed on the image of the negotiable instrument and being a representation of input via the depositor-controlled computing device;determining which portion of the image to present based on the indication; andpresenting at least the portion of the image to a banking system.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the indication comprises where, in the image, a corner of the negotiable instrument is located.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the indication indicates which part of the image comprises the negotiable instrument and which part comprises background.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the representation is of a manual input.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the indication is the representation of the manual input from a pointing device of the depositor-controlled computing device.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, further comprising downloading software to the depositor-controlled computing device, the software configured for execution via a network browser of the depositor-controlled computing device to configure the depositor-controlled computing device to process the manual input related to the negotiable instrument received from the pointing device.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising, in response to receiving the file comprising the image of the negotiable instrument, sending a system image of the negotiable instrument for display using the depositor-controlled computing device in order for a depositor at the depositor-controlled computing device to input the manual input on the displayed system image, the system image being based on the image of the negotiable instrument.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the system image comprises a copy of the image of the negotiable instrument.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the system image comprises a modification of the image of the negotiable instrument.
  • 23. The method of claim 20, wherein sending of the system image to the depositor-controlled computing device causes the depositor-controlled computing device to display the system image in a new window for input of the manual input on the displayed system image.
  • 24. The method of claim 14, wherein receiving a file comprises receiving a first image of a first side of the negotiable instrument and a second image of a second side of the negotiable instrument; and wherein the indication received from the depositor-controlled computing device comprises a first indication of where, in the first image, a first edge of the first side of the negotiable instrument is located and a second indication of where, in the second image, a second edge of the second side of said negotiable instrument is located.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the first indication is indicative of a first corner the negotiable instrument in the first image; and wherein the second indication is indicative of a second corner of the negotiable instrument in the second image.
  • 26. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising computer-readable instructions configured for execution using a network browser running on a depositor-controlled computing device, the instructions configured, upon execution to: enable a user associated with a depositor-controlled computing device to input an indication of an edge of a negotiable instrument on a digital image of the negotiable instrument;receive input of the indication of the edge of the negotiable instrument in the digital image of the negotiable instrument from the user of the depositor-controlled computing device, the indication being superimposed on the digital image of the negotiable instrument; andsend, via a network to an image processing system, the digital image of the negotiable instrument and the indication of the edge in order for the image processing system to determine, based on the indication of the edge, which portion of the digital image to present for processing.
  • 27. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 26, wherein the indication is configured to indicate a corner of the negotiable instrument in the digital image.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/301,433, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/877,307, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. This application is related by subject matter to the following commonly assigned applications, the entirety of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/877,335, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/877,367, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/877,382, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/877,404, each filed on Oct. 23, 2007, and each entitled “Systems And Methods For Obtaining An Image Of A Check To Be Deposited”.

US Referenced Citations (375)
Number Name Date Kind
3341820 Grillmeier Sep 1967 A
3576972 Wood May 1971 A
3593913 Bremer Jul 1971 A
3620553 Donovan Nov 1971 A
3648242 Grosbard Mar 1972 A
3816943 Henry Jun 1974 A
4002356 Weidmann Jan 1977 A
4060711 Buros Nov 1977 A
4128202 Buros Dec 1978 A
4136471 Austin Jan 1979 A
4205780 Burns Jun 1980 A
4264808 Owens Apr 1981 A
4305216 Skelton Dec 1981 A
4321672 Braun Mar 1982 A
4523330 Cain Jun 1985 A
4636099 Goldston Jan 1987 A
4640413 Kaplan Feb 1987 A
4644144 Chandek Feb 1987 A
4722444 Murphy Feb 1988 A
4727435 Otani et al. Feb 1988 A
4774663 Musmanno Sep 1988 A
4790475 Griffin Dec 1988 A
4806780 Yamamoto Feb 1989 A
4837693 Schotz Jun 1989 A
4890228 Longfield Dec 1989 A
4927071 Wood May 1990 A
4934587 McNabb Jun 1990 A
4960981 Benton Oct 1990 A
4975735 Bright Dec 1990 A
5022683 Barbour Jun 1991 A
5053607 Carlson Oct 1991 A
5157620 Shaar Oct 1992 A
5159548 Caslavka Oct 1992 A
5191525 LeBrun Mar 1993 A
5220501 Lawlor Jun 1993 A
5237159 Stephens Aug 1993 A
5265008 Benton Nov 1993 A
5321816 Rogan Jun 1994 A
5350906 Brody Sep 1994 A
5373550 Campbell Dec 1994 A
5419588 Wood May 1995 A
5422467 Graef Jun 1995 A
5504538 Tsujihara Apr 1996 A
5583759 Geer Dec 1996 A
5590196 Moreau Dec 1996 A
5594225 Botvin Jan 1997 A
5598969 Ong Feb 1997 A
5602936 Green Feb 1997 A
5610726 Nonoshita Mar 1997 A
5611028 Shibasaki Mar 1997 A
5630073 Nolan May 1997 A
5668897 Stolfo Sep 1997 A
5673320 Ray Sep 1997 A
5677955 Doggett Oct 1997 A
5679938 Templeton Oct 1997 A
5680611 Rail Oct 1997 A
5691524 Josephson Nov 1997 A
5737440 Kunkler Apr 1998 A
5751842 Riach May 1998 A
5830609 Warner Nov 1998 A
5832463 Funk Nov 1998 A
5863075 Rich Jan 1999 A
5870456 Rogers Feb 1999 A
5870724 Lawlor Feb 1999 A
5878337 Joao Mar 1999 A
5897625 Gustin Apr 1999 A
5903878 Talati May 1999 A
5903881 Schrader May 1999 A
5910988 Ballard Jun 1999 A
5917931 Kunkler Jun 1999 A
5924737 Schrupp Jul 1999 A
5926548 Okamoto Jul 1999 A
5930778 Geer Jul 1999 A
5937396 Konya Aug 1999 A
5940844 Cahill Aug 1999 A
5982918 Mennie Nov 1999 A
5987439 Gustin et al. Nov 1999 A
6012048 Gustin Jan 2000 A
6021202 Anderson Feb 2000 A
6029887 Furuhashi Feb 2000 A
6030000 Diamond Feb 2000 A
6032137 Ballard Feb 2000 A
6038553 Hyde Mar 2000 A
6073119 Borenmisza-Wahr Jun 2000 A
6085168 Mori Jul 2000 A
6097834 Krouse Aug 2000 A
6097885 Rayner Aug 2000 A
6105865 Hardesty Aug 2000 A
6145738 Stinson et al. Nov 2000 A
6151426 Lee Nov 2000 A
6159585 Rittenhouse Dec 2000 A
6170744 Lee Jan 2001 B1
6188506 Kaiserman Feb 2001 B1
6189785 Lowery Feb 2001 B1
6195694 Chen et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199055 Kara Mar 2001 B1
6243689 Norton Jun 2001 B1
6278983 Ball Aug 2001 B1
6282826 Richards Sep 2001 B1
6304860 Martin Oct 2001 B1
6314452 Dekel Nov 2001 B1
6317727 May Nov 2001 B1
6339658 Moccagatta Jan 2002 B1
6363164 Jones et al. Mar 2002 B1
6390362 Martin May 2002 B1
6397196 Kravetz May 2002 B1
6413305 Mehta Jul 2002 B1
6417869 Do Jul 2002 B1
6425017 Dievendorff Jul 2002 B1
6429952 Olbricht Aug 2002 B1
6449397 Che-chu Sep 2002 B1
6450403 Martens Sep 2002 B1
6464134 Page Oct 2002 B1
6470325 Leemhuis Oct 2002 B1
6505178 Flenley Jan 2003 B1
6574609 Downs Jun 2003 B1
6578760 Otto Jun 2003 B1
6587837 Spagna Jul 2003 B1
6609200 Anderson Aug 2003 B2
6643416 Daniels Nov 2003 B1
6661910 Jones et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672452 Alves Jan 2004 B1
6682452 Quintus Jan 2004 B2
6695204 Stinson Feb 2004 B1
6726097 Graef Apr 2004 B2
6728397 Mcneal Apr 2004 B2
6742128 Joiner May 2004 B1
6755340 Voss Jun 2004 B1
6781962 Williams Aug 2004 B1
6786398 Stinson Sep 2004 B1
6789054 Makhlouf Sep 2004 B1
6829704 Zhang Dec 2004 B2
6844885 Anderson Jan 2005 B2
6856965 Stinson Feb 2005 B1
6883140 Acker Apr 2005 B1
6902105 Koakutsu Jun 2005 B2
6913188 Wong Jul 2005 B2
6931591 Brown Aug 2005 B1
6934719 Nally Aug 2005 B2
6957770 Robinson Oct 2005 B1
6961689 Greenberg Nov 2005 B1
6970843 Forte Nov 2005 B1
6993507 Meyer Jan 2006 B2
6996263 Jones et al. Feb 2006 B2
6999943 Johnson Feb 2006 B1
7004382 Sandru Feb 2006 B2
7010507 Anderson Mar 2006 B1
7016704 Pallakoff Mar 2006 B2
7039048 Monta May 2006 B1
7062768 Kubo Jun 2006 B2
7113925 Waserstein Sep 2006 B2
7114649 Nelson Oct 2006 B2
7139594 Nagatomo Nov 2006 B2
7140539 Crews Nov 2006 B1
7163347 Lugg Jan 2007 B2
7181430 Buchanan Feb 2007 B1
7197173 Jones et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200255 Jones Apr 2007 B2
7216106 Buchanan May 2007 B1
7249076 Pendleton Jul 2007 B1
7290034 Budd Oct 2007 B2
7299970 Ching Nov 2007 B1
7299979 Phillips Nov 2007 B2
7313543 Crane Dec 2007 B1
7321874 Dilip Jan 2008 B2
7321875 Dilip Jan 2008 B2
7325725 Foss, Jr. Feb 2008 B2
7343320 Treyz Mar 2008 B1
7349566 Jones et al. Mar 2008 B2
7377425 Ma May 2008 B1
7379978 Anderson May 2008 B2
7385631 Maeno Jun 2008 B2
7386511 Buchanan Jun 2008 B2
7391897 Jones Jun 2008 B2
7391934 Goodall et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392935 Byrne Jul 2008 B2
7421107 Lugg Sep 2008 B2
7440924 Buchanan Oct 2008 B2
7447347 Weber Nov 2008 B2
7460108 Tamura Dec 2008 B2
7461779 Ramachandran Dec 2008 B2
7477923 Wallmark Jan 2009 B2
7480382 Dunbar Jan 2009 B2
7489953 Griffin Feb 2009 B2
7490242 Torres Feb 2009 B2
7497429 Reynders Mar 2009 B2
7506261 Statou Mar 2009 B2
7512564 Geer Mar 2009 B1
7536440 Budd May 2009 B2
7539646 Gilder May 2009 B2
7542598 Jones Jun 2009 B2
7548641 Gilson et al. Jun 2009 B2
7609873 Foth et al. Oct 2009 B2
7620231 Jones Nov 2009 B2
7647275 Jones Jan 2010 B2
7672940 Viola Mar 2010 B2
7702588 Gilder Apr 2010 B2
7873200 Oakes, III et al. Jan 2011 B1
7900822 Prasad et al. Mar 2011 B1
7949587 Morris et al. May 2011 B1
7970677 Oakes, III et al. Jun 2011 B1
7996316 Smith et al. Aug 2011 B1
20010042171 Vermeulen Nov 2001 A1
20020001393 Jones Jan 2002 A1
20020016763 March Feb 2002 A1
20020052841 Guthrie May 2002 A1
20020065786 Martens et al. May 2002 A1
20020075524 Blair Jun 2002 A1
20020084321 Martens Jul 2002 A1
20020107809 Biddle et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116329 Serbetcioglu Aug 2002 A1
20020118891 Rudd Aug 2002 A1
20020120562 Opiela Aug 2002 A1
20020138522 Muralidhar Sep 2002 A1
20020147798 Huang Oct 2002 A1
20020150279 Scott Oct 2002 A1
20020152161 Aoike Oct 2002 A1
20020152164 Dutta Oct 2002 A1
20020152165 Dutta et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152169 Dutta Oct 2002 A1
20020171820 Okamura Nov 2002 A1
20020178112 Goeller Nov 2002 A1
20030005326 Flemming Jan 2003 A1
20030023557 Moore Jan 2003 A1
20030038227 Sesek Feb 2003 A1
20030055756 Allan Mar 2003 A1
20030055776 Samuelson Mar 2003 A1
20030081824 Mennie May 2003 A1
20030105688 Brown Jun 2003 A1
20030105714 Alarcon-Luther et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030167225 Adams Sep 2003 A1
20030191615 Bailey Oct 2003 A1
20030191869 Williams Oct 2003 A1
20040010466 Anderson Jan 2004 A1
20040012496 De Souza Jan 2004 A1
20040024626 Bruijning Feb 2004 A1
20040024708 Masuda Feb 2004 A1
20040057697 Renzi Mar 2004 A1
20040058705 Morgan Mar 2004 A1
20040066031 Wong Apr 2004 A1
20040069841 Wong Apr 2004 A1
20040078299 Down-Logan Apr 2004 A1
20040080795 Bean et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103296 Harp May 2004 A1
20040109596 Doran Jun 2004 A1
20040122754 Stevens Jun 2004 A1
20040138974 Shimamura Jul 2004 A1
20040148235 Craig Jul 2004 A1
20040158549 Matena Aug 2004 A1
20040165096 Maeno Aug 2004 A1
20040170259 Park Sep 2004 A1
20040210515 Hughes Oct 2004 A1
20040236647 Acharya Nov 2004 A1
20040236688 Bozeman Nov 2004 A1
20040245324 Chen Dec 2004 A1
20040252679 Williams Dec 2004 A1
20040260636 Marceau Dec 2004 A1
20040267666 Minami Dec 2004 A1
20050033645 Duphily Feb 2005 A1
20050033685 Reyes Feb 2005 A1
20050033695 Minowa Feb 2005 A1
20050035193 Gustin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038754 Geist Feb 2005 A1
20050044042 Mendiola Feb 2005 A1
20050044577 Jerding Feb 2005 A1
20050049950 Johnson Mar 2005 A1
20050075969 Nielson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050078336 Ferlitsch Apr 2005 A1
20050086140 Ireland Apr 2005 A1
20050086168 Alvarez Apr 2005 A1
20050096992 Geisel May 2005 A1
20050097046 Singfield May 2005 A1
20050108164 Salafia May 2005 A1
20050108168 Halpin May 2005 A1
20050131820 Rodriguez Jun 2005 A1
20050149436 Elterich Jul 2005 A1
20050168566 Tada Aug 2005 A1
20050171899 Dunn Aug 2005 A1
20050171907 Lewis Aug 2005 A1
20050177499 Thomas Aug 2005 A1
20050177518 Brown Aug 2005 A1
20050182710 Anderson Aug 2005 A1
20050188306 Mackenzie Aug 2005 A1
20050209961 Michelsen Sep 2005 A1
20050252955 Sugai Nov 2005 A1
20050269412 Chiu Dec 2005 A1
20050278250 Zair Dec 2005 A1
20050281471 LeConte Dec 2005 A1
20050289030 Smith Dec 2005 A1
20060004660 Pranger Jan 2006 A1
20060025697 Kurzweil Feb 2006 A1
20060039629 Li Feb 2006 A1
20060045321 Yu Mar 2006 A1
20060047593 Naratil Mar 2006 A1
20060053056 Alspach-Goss Mar 2006 A1
20060059085 Tucker Mar 2006 A1
20060080245 Bahl Apr 2006 A1
20060085357 Pizarro Apr 2006 A1
20060102704 Reynders May 2006 A1
20060106691 Sheaffer May 2006 A1
20060106717 Randle May 2006 A1
20060110063 Weiss May 2006 A1
20060112013 Maloney May 2006 A1
20060115110 Rodriguez Jun 2006 A1
20060115141 Koakutsu et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060118613 McMann Jun 2006 A1
20060144924 Stover Jul 2006 A1
20060144950 Johnson Jul 2006 A1
20060161501 Waserstein Jul 2006 A1
20060206506 Fitzpatrick Sep 2006 A1
20060214940 Kinoshita Sep 2006 A1
20060229976 Jung Oct 2006 A1
20060229986 Corder Oct 2006 A1
20060238503 Smith Oct 2006 A1
20060242062 Peterson Oct 2006 A1
20060242063 Peterson Oct 2006 A1
20060249567 Byrne Nov 2006 A1
20060279628 Fleming Dec 2006 A1
20060282383 Doran Dec 2006 A1
20070016796 Singhal Jan 2007 A1
20070019243 Sato Jan 2007 A1
20070022053 Waserstein Jan 2007 A1
20070031022 Frew Feb 2007 A1
20070050292 Yarbrough Mar 2007 A1
20070058851 Quine Mar 2007 A1
20070063016 Myatt Mar 2007 A1
20070075772 Kokubo Apr 2007 A1
20070077921 Hayashi Apr 2007 A1
20070080207 Williams Apr 2007 A1
20070082700 Landschaft Apr 2007 A1
20070084911 Crowell Apr 2007 A1
20070086642 Foth Apr 2007 A1
20070086643 Spier Apr 2007 A1
20070094088 Mastie Apr 2007 A1
20070100748 Dheer May 2007 A1
20070129955 Dalmia Jun 2007 A1
20070136198 Foth et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070140594 Franklin Jun 2007 A1
20070143208 Varga Jun 2007 A1
20070156438 Popadic Jul 2007 A1
20070168265 Rosenberger Jul 2007 A1
20070171288 Inoue Jul 2007 A1
20070194102 Cohen Aug 2007 A1
20070241179 Davis Oct 2007 A1
20070255652 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20080002911 Eisen Jan 2008 A1
20080021802 Pendleton Jan 2008 A1
20080040280 Davis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052182 Marshall Feb 2008 A1
20080059376 Davis Mar 2008 A1
20080063253 Wood Mar 2008 A1
20080071721 Wang Mar 2008 A1
20080080760 Ronca Apr 2008 A1
20080086421 Gilder Apr 2008 A1
20080103790 Abernethy May 2008 A1
20080117991 Peddireddy May 2008 A1
20080119178 Peddireddy May 2008 A1
20080133411 Jones et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147549 Ruthbun Jun 2008 A1
20080156438 Stumphauzer Jul 2008 A1
20080219543 Csulits Sep 2008 A1
20080247629 Gilder Oct 2008 A1
20080249931 Gilder Oct 2008 A1
20080262953 Anderson Oct 2008 A1
20090108080 Meyer Apr 2009 A1
20090141962 Borgia Jun 2009 A1
20090171819 Emde et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090171825 Roman Jul 2009 A1
20090173781 Ramachadran Jul 2009 A1
20090190823 Walters Jul 2009 A1
20090252437 Li Oct 2009 A1
20090281904 Pharris Nov 2009 A1
20090313167 Dujari Dec 2009 A1
20100007899 Lay Jan 2010 A1
20100312705 Caruso et al. Dec 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0 984 410 Mar 2000 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (112)
Entry
White, J.M. et al., “Image Thresholding for Optical Character Recognition and Other Applications Requiring Character Image Extraction”, IBM J. Res. Development, Jul. 1983, vol. 27, No. 4 (12 pgs).
Ritzer, J.R. “Hinky Dinky helped spearhead POS, remote banking movement”, Bank Systems and Equipment, vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 1984 (1 pg).
Dinan, R.F. et al., “Image Plus High Performance Transaction System”, IBM Systems Journal, 1990 vol. 29, No. 3 (14 pgs).
Gupta, Amar et al., “An Integrated Architecture for Recognition of Totally Unconstrained Handwritten Numerals”, WP#3765, Jan. 1993, Productivity from Information Technology “Profit” Research Initiative Sloan School of Management (20 pgs).
Masonson, L., “Check Truncation and ACH Trends—Automated Clearing Houses”, healthcare financial management associate, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mLm3276/is—n7—v47/ai—14466034/print, 1993 (2 pgs).
Zhang, C.Y., “Robust Estimation and Image Combining” Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ASP Conference Series, 1995 (5 pgs).
Kornai Andras et al., “Recognition of Cursive Writing on Personal Checks”, Proceedings of International Workshop on the Frontiers in Handwritting Recognition, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Sep. 1996, (6 pgs).
De Queiroz, Ricardo et al., “Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Model for Compound Image Compression”, 1998 (14 pgs).
Rivlin, Alice M. et al., Chair, Vice Chair—Board of Governors, Committee on the Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism—Federal Reserve System, “The Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism”, Jan. 1998 (41 pgs).
Tygar, J.D., Atomicity in Electronic Commerce, in ACM Networker, 2:2, Apr./May 1998 (12 pgs).
Anderson, Milton M. “FSML and Echeck”, Financial Services Technology Consortium, 1999 (17 pgs).
“Full Service Direct Deposit”, www.nonprofitstaffing.com/images/upload/dirdepform.pdf. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2001, (2 pgs).
Craig, Ben, “Resisting Electronic Payment Systems: Burning Down the House?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Jul. 1999 (4 pgs).
Rose, Sarah et al., “Best of the We: The Top 50 Financial Websites”, Money, New York, Dec. 1999, vol. 28, Iss. 12 (8 pgs).
Furst, Karen et al., “Internet Banking: Developments and Prospects”, Economic and Policy Analysis Working Paper 2000-9, Sep. 2000 (60 pgs).
“Middleware”, David E. Bakken, Encyclopedia of Distributed Computing, Kluwer Academic Press, 2001 (6 pgs).
Palacios, Rafael et al., “Automatic Processing of Brazilian Bank Checks”. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2002 (28 pgs).
Wallison, Peter J., “Wal-Mart Case Exposes Flaws in Banking-Commerce Split”, American Banker, vol. 167, No. 8, Jan. 11, 2002 (3 pgs).
Heckenberg, D. “Using Mac OS X for Real-Time Image Processing” Oct. 8, 2003 (15 pgs).
Burnett, J. “Depository Bank Endorsement Requirements,” BankersOnline.com, http://www.bankersonline.com/cgi-bin/printview/printview.pl, Jan. 6, 2003 (3 pgs).
Blafore, Bonnie “Lower Commissions, Fewer Amenities”, Better Investing, Madison Heights: Feb. 2003, vol. 52, Iss 6, (4 pgs).
“Direct Deposit Authorization Form”, www.umass.edu/humres/library/DDForm.pdf, May 2003 (3 pgs).
“Electronic Billing Problem: The E-check is in the mail” American Banker—vol. 168, No. 95, May 19, 2003 (4 pgs).
Oxley, Michael G., from committee on Financial Services; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, 108th Congress, 1st Session House of Representatives report 108-132, Jun. 2003 (20 pgs).
Shelby, Hon. Richard C. (Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs); “Check Truncation Act of 2003”, calendar No. 168, 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-79, Jun. 2003 (27 pgs).
Knestout, Brian P. et al., “Banking Made Easy” Kiplinger's Personal Finance Washington, Jul. 2003, vol. 57, Iss 7 (5 pgs).
Oxley, Michael G., from the committee of conference; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act” 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-291, Oct. 1, 2003 (27 pgs).
Public Law 108-100, 108 Congress; “An Act Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 Stat. 1177 (18 pgs).
Johnson, Jennifer J., Secretary of the Board; Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Part 229, Regulation CC; “Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks”. Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2009, (89 pgs).
Mohl, Bruce, “Banks Reimbursing ATM Fee to Compete With Larger Rivals”, Boston Globe, Boston, MA, Sep. 19, 2004 (3 pgs).
The Automated Clearinghouse, “Retail Payment Systems; Payment Instruments Clearing and Settlement: The Automated Clearinghouse (ACH)”, www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/booklets/retailretail—02d.html, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Dec. 2005 (3 pgs).
“Two Words Every Business Should Know: Remote Deposit,” Canon, http://www.rpsolutions.com/rpweb/pdfs/canon—rdc.pdf, 2005 (7 pgs).
Wells Fargo 2005 News Releases, “The New Wells Fargo Electronic Deposit Services Break Through Banking Boundaries in the Age of Check 21”, San Francisco Mar. 28, 2005, www.wellsfargo.com/press/3282005—check21Year=2005 (1 pg).
Constanzo, Chris, “Remote Check Deposit: Wells Captures a New Checking Twist”, Bank Technology News Article—May 2005, www.americanbanker.com/btn—article.html?id=20050502YQ50FSYG (2 pgs).
German Shegalov, Diplom-Informatiker, “Integrated Data, Message, and Process Recovery for Failure Masking in Web Services”, Dissertation Jul. 2005 (146 pgs).
Credit Union Journal, “AFCU Averaging 80 DepositHome Transactions Per Day”, Credit Union Journal, Aug. 15, 2005 (1 pg).
Federal Check 21 Act, “New Check 21 Act effective Oct. 28, 2004: Bank No Longer Will Return Original Cancelled Checks,” Consumer Union's FAQ's and Congressional Testimony on Check 21, www.consumerlaw.org.initiatives/content/check21—content.html, Cited in patent No. 7,873,200, as dated Dec. 2005 (20 pgs).
BankServ, “DepositNow: What's the difference?” Cited in patent No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (4 pgs).
BankServ, Product Overview, http://www.bankserv.com/products/remotedeposit.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (3 pgs).
Blue Mountain Consulting, from URL: www.bluemontainconsulting.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Apr. 26, 2006 (3 pgs).
Remotedepositcapture, URL:www.remotedepositcapture.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (5 pgs).
Onlinecheck.com/Merchant Advisors, “Real-Time Check Debit”, Merchant Advisors: Retail Check Processing Check Conversion, http://www.onlinecheck/wach/rcareal.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006.
“Compliance with Regulation CC”, http./www/federalreserve.gov/Pubs/regcc/regcc.htm, Jan. 24, 2006 (6 pgs).
Chiang, Chuck, The Bulletin, “Remote banking offered”, http://bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060201/BIZ0102/602010327&templ . . . Feb. 1, 2006 (2 pgs).
Federal Reserve Board, “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, FRB, http://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/truncation/, Mar. 1, 2006 (1 pg).
Fest, Glen., “Patently Unaware” Bank Technology News, Apr. 2006, Retrieved from the internet at URL:http://banktechnews.com/article.html?id=2006403T7612618 (5 pgs).
Bank Systems & Technology, Untitled Article, May 1, 2006, http://www.banktech.com/showarticle.jhtml?—article ID=187003126, “Are you Winning in the Payment World?” (4 pgs).
Digital Transactions News, “An ACH-Image Proposal for Check Roils Banks and Networks” May 26, 2006 (3 pgs).
RemoteDepositCapture.com, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 6, 2006, “BankServ Announces New Remote Deposit Product Integrated with QuickBooks” (3 pgs).
RemoteDepositCapture.com, “PNC Bank to Offer Ease of Online Deposit Service Integrated with QuickBooks to Small Businesses”, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 24, 2006, (2 pgs).
Dias, Danilo et al., “A Model for the Electronic Representation of Bank Checks”, Brasilia Univ. Oct. 2006 (5 pgs).
“Check Fraud: A Guide to Avoiding Losses”, All Net, http://all.net/books/audit/checkfraud/security.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“What is check Fraud”, National Check Fraud Center, http://www.ckfraud.org/ckfraud.html , Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs).
“Remote Deposit” National City, http://www.nationalcity.com/smallbusiness/cashmanagement/remotedeposit/default.asp; Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“Remote Deposit Capture”, Plante & Moran, http://plantemoran.com/industries/fincial/institutions/bank/resources/community+bank+advisor/2007+summer+issue/remote+deposit+capture.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
“Virtual Bank Checks”, Morebusiness.com, http://www.morebusiness.com/running—your business/businessbits/d908484987.brc, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
Canon, ImageFormula CR-25/CR-55, “Improve Your Bottom Line with Front-Line Efficiencies”, 0117W117, 1207-55/25-1 OM-BSP, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,587 as dated 2007. (4 pgs).
“Its the easiest way to Switch banks”, LNB, http://www.inbky.com/pdf/LNBswitch-kit10-07.pdf Cited in patent No. 7,996,316, as dated 2007 (7 pgs).
“Lesson 38—More Bank Transaction”, Turtle Soft, http://www.turtlesoft.com/goldenseal-software-manual.lesson38.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs).
“Personal Finance”, PNC, http://www.pnc.com/webapp/unsec/productsandservice.do?sitearea=/PNC/home/personal/account+services/quick+switch/quick+switch+faqs, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs).
“Switching Made Easy,” Bank of North Georgia, http://www.banknorthgeorgia.com/cmsmaster/documents/286/documents616.pdf, 2007 (7 pgs).
“Chapter 7 Payroll Programs,” Uniform Staff Payroll System, http://www2.oecn.k12.oh.us/www/ssdt/usps/usps—user—guide—005.html, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (9 pgs).
“Check 21 Solutions,” Columbia Financial International, Inc. http://www.columbiafinancial.us/check21/solutions.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs).
“Direct Deposit,” University of Washington, http://www.washington.edu/admin/payroll/directdeposit.html, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
“Accept “Customer Not Present” Checks,” Accept Check Online, http://checksoftware.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“Customer Personalized Bank Checks and Address Labels” Checks Your Way Inc., http://www.checksyourway.com/htm/web—pages/faq.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (6 pgs).
“Direct Deposit Application for Payroll”, Purdue University, Business Office Form 0003, http://purdue.edu/payroll/pdf/directdepositapplication.pdf, Jul. 2007 (2 pgs).
“Frequently Asked Questions” Bank of America, http://www/bankofamerica.com/deposits/checksave/index.cfm?template-lc—faq—bymail, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (2 pgs).
“Refractive index” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; http://en.wikipedia.org./wiki/refractiveindex.com Oct. 16, 2007 (4 pgs).
Patterson, Scott “USAA Deposit@Home—Another WOW moment for Net Banking”, NextCU.com, Jan. 26, 2007 (5 pgs).
Remotedepsitcapture.com, LLC, “Remote Deposit Capture Overview,” ROC Overview, http://remotedepositcapture.com/overview/RDC—overview.htm, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Mar. 12, 2007 (4 pgs).
Board of Governors of the federal reserve system, “Report to the Congress on the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003” Apr. 2007, Submitted to Congress pursuant to section 16 of the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003, (59 pgs).
Image Master, “Photo Restoration: We specialize in digital photo restoration and photograph repair of family pictures”, http://www.imphotorepair.com, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as downloaded Apr. 2007 (1 pg).
“Save on ATM Fees”, RedEye Edition, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, IL Jun. 30, 2007 (2 pgs).
Associate of German Banks, SEPA 2008: Uniform Payment Instruments for Europe, Berlin, Cited in patent No. 7,900,822, as dated Jul. 2007, Bundesverbankd deutscher banker ev (42 pgs).
Affinity Federal Credit Union, “Affinity Announces Online Deposit,” Aug. 4, 2005 (1 pg).
“Check 21—The check is not in the post”, RedTitan Technology 2004 http://www.redtitan.com/check21/htm (3 pgs).
Hartly, Thomas, “Banks Check Out New Image”, Business First, Buffalo: Jul. 19, 2004, vol. 20, Issue 43, (3 pgs).
Wade, Will, “Early Notes: Updating Consumers on Check 21” American Banker Aug. 10, 2004 (3 pgs).
Rao, Bharat; “The Internet and The Revolution in Distribution: A Cross-Industry Examination”; Technology in Society; 1999; pp. 287-306; vol. 21, No. 3 (20 pgs).
Alves, Vander and Borba, Paulo; “Distributed Adapters Pattern: A Design for Object-Oriented Distributed Applications”; First Latin American Conference on Pattern Languages of Programming; Oct. 2001; pp. 132-142; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (11 pgs).
Kiser, Elizabeth K.; “Modeling the Whole Firm: The Effect of Multiple Inputs and Financial Intermediation on Bank Deposit Rates;” FEDS Working Paper No. 2004-07; Jun. 3, 2003; pp. 1-46 (46 pgs).
DeYoung, Robert; “The Financial Performance of Pure Play Internet Banks”; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives; 2001; pp. 60-75; vol. 25, No. 1 (16pgs).
Archive Index Systems; Panini My Vision X-30 or VX30 or X30 © 1994-2008 Archive Systems, Inc. P./O. Box 40135 Bellevue, WA USA 98015 (2 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,307 dated Sep. 26, 2008 (13 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,307 dated Jun. 10, 2009 (20 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,307 dated Dec. 8, 2009 (29 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,307 dated May 13, 2010 (31 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,307 dated Apr. 25, 2011 (39 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335 dated Sep. 30, 2008 (12 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335 dated Jun. 24, 2009 (21 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335 dated May 14, 2010 (22 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335 dated Sep. 14, 2010 (28 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335 dated Apr. 25, 2011 (30 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,335 dated Nov. 9, 2011 (10 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,367 dated Oct. 2, 2008 (14 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,367 dated Jun. 23, 2009 (24 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,367 dated Dec. 7, 2009 (47 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,367 dated May 13, 2010 (48 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,367 dated Apr. 29, 2011 (75 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,367 dated Nov. 9, 2011 (9 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 dated Sep. 30, 2008 (14 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 dated Jun. 25, 2009 (25 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 dated May 14, 2010 (30 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 dated Sep. 13, 2010 (33 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 dated Apr. 26, 2011 (39 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,382 dated Nov. 9, 2011 (9 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,404 dated Oct. 1, 2008 (11 pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,404 dated May 28, 2009 (16pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,404 dated May 14, 2010 (23pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,404 dated Sep. 10, 2010 (27pgs).
Office Action from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,404 dated Apr. 27, 2011 (14 pgs).
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13301433 Nov 2011 US
Child 13327478 US
Parent 11877307 Oct 2007 US
Child 13301433 US