This invention relates to a two-dimensional image sensor with improved light sensitivity.
An electronic imaging system depends on an electronic image sensor to create an electronic representation of a visual image. Examples of such electronic image sensors include charge coupled device (CCD) image sensors and active pixel sensor (APS) devices (APS devices are often referred to as CMOS sensors because of the ability to fabricate them in a Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor process). Typically, these images sensors include a number of light sensitive pixels, often arranged in a regular pattern of rows and columns. For capturing color images, a pattern of filters is typically fabricated on the pattern of pixels, with different filter materials being used to make individual pixels sensitive to only a portion of the visible light spectrum. The color filters necessarily reduce the amount of light reaching each pixel, and thereby reduce the light sensitivity of each pixel. A need persists for improving the light sensitivity, or photographic speed, of electronic color image sensors to permit images to be captured at lower light levels or to allow images at higher light levels to be captured with shorter exposure times.
Image sensors are either linear or two-dimensional. Generally, these sensors have two different types of applications. The two-dimensional sensors are typically suitable for image capture devices such as digital cameras, cell phones and other applications. Linear sensors are often used for scanning documents. In either case, when color filters are employed the image sensors have reduced sensitivity.
A linear image sensor, the KLI-4104 manufactured by Eastman Kodak Company, includes four linear, single pixel wide arrays of pixels, with color filters applied to three of the arrays to make each array sensitive to either red, green, or blue in its entirety, and with no color filter array applied to the fourth array; furthermore, the three color arrays have larger pixels to compensate for the reduction in light sensitivity due to the color filters, and the fourth array has smaller pixels to capture a high resolution monochrome image. When an image is captured using this image sensor, the image is represented as a high resolution, high photographic sensitivity monochrome image along with three lower resolution images with roughly the same photographic sensitivity and with each of the three images corresponding to either red, green, or blue light from the image; hence, each point in the electronic image includes a monochrome value, a red value, a green value, and a blue value. However, since this is a linear image sensor, it requires relative mechanical motion between the image sensor and the image in order to scan the image across the four linear arrays of pixels. This limits the speed with which the image is scanned and precludes the use of this sensor in a handheld camera or in capturing a scene that includes moving objects.
There is also known in the art an electronic imaging system described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,823,186 by Akira Muramatsu that includes two sensors, wherein each of the sensors includes a two-dimensional array of pixels but one sensor has no color filters and the other sensor includes a pattern of color filters included with the pixels, and with an optical beam splitter to provide each image sensor with the image. Since the color sensor has a pattern of color filters applied, each pixel in the color sensor provides only a single color. When an image is captured with this system, each point in the electronic image includes a monochrome value and one color value, and the color image must have the missing colors at each pixel location interpolated from the nearby colors. Although this system improves the light sensitivity over a single conventional image sensor, the overall complexity, size, and cost of the system is greater due to the need for two sensors and a beam splitter. Furthermore, the beam splitter directs only half the light from the image to each sensor, limiting the improvement in photographic speed.
In addition to the linear image sensor mentioned above, there are known in the art image sensors with two-dimensional arrays of pixels where the pixels include pixels that do not have color filters applied to them. For example, see Sato, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 4,390,895, Yamagami, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,323,233, and Gindele, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 6,476,865. In each of the cited patents, the sensitivity of the unfiltered or monochrome pixels is significantly higher than the color pixels, requiring the application of gain to the color pixels in order to match the color and monochrome signals from the pixel array. Increasing gain increases noise as well as signal, causing degradation in the overall signal to noise ratio of the resulting image. Frame in US Patent Application 2003/0210332 discloses a pixel array with most of the pixels being unfiltered, but the color pixels suffer from the same sensitivity deficit as mentioned above.
Therefore, there persists a need for improving the light sensitivity for electronic capture devices that employ a single sensor with a two-dimensional array of pixels.
The present invention is directed to providing an image sensor having a two-dimensional array of color and panchromatic pixels that provides high sensitivity and is effective in producing full color images.
Briefly summarized, according to one aspect of the present invention, the invention provides a system for capturing a color image, comprising:
a) a two-dimensional array having first and second groups of pixels wherein pixels from the first group of pixels have narrower spectral photoresponses than pixels from the second group of pixels and wherein the first group of pixels has individual pixels that have spectral photoresponses that correspond to a set of at least two colors;
b) the placement of the first and second groups of pixels defining a pattern that has a minimal repeating unit including at least twelve pixels, the minimal repeating unit having a plurality of non-overlapping cells wherein each cell has at least two pixels representing a specific color selected from the first group of pixels and a plurality of pixels selected from the second group of pixels arranged to permit the reproduction of a captured color image under different lighting conditions; and
c) means for combining pixels of like color from at least two of the plurality of cells within the minimal repeating unit.
Image sensors in accordance with the present invention are particularly suitable for low level lighting conditions, where such low level lighting conditions are the result of low scene lighting, short exposure time, small aperture, or other restriction on light reaching the sensor. They have a broad application and numerous types of image capture devices can effectively use these sensors.
These and other aspects, objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and appended claims, and by reference to the accompanying drawings.
Because digital cameras employing imaging devices and related circuitry for signal capture and correction and for exposure control are well known, the present description will be directed in particular to elements forming part of, or cooperating more directly with, method and apparatus in accordance with the present invention. Elements not specifically shown or described herein are selected from those known in the art. Certain aspects of the embodiments to be described are provided in software. Given the system as shown and described according to the invention in the following materials, software not specifically shown, described or suggested herein that is useful for implementation of the invention is conventional and within the ordinary skill in such arts.
Turning now to
The amount of light reaching the sensor 20 is regulated by an iris block 14 that varies the aperture and the neutral density (ND) filter block 13 that includes one or more ND filters interposed in the optical path. Also regulating the overall light level is the time that the shutter block 18 is open. The exposure controller block 40 responds to the amount of light available in the scene as metered by the brightness sensor block 16 and controls all three of these regulating functions.
This description of a particular camera configuration will be familiar to one skilled in the art, and it will be obvious that many variations and additional features are present. For example, an autofocus system is added, or the lenses are detachable and interchangeable. It will be understood that the present invention is applied to any type of digital camera, where similar functionality is provided by alternative components. For example, the digital camera is a relatively simple point and shoot digital camera, where the shutter 18 is a relatively simple movable blade shutter, or the like, instead of the more complicated focal plane arrangement. The present invention can also be practiced on imaging components included in non-camera devices such as mobile phones and automotive vehicles.
The analog signal from image sensor 20 is processed by analog signal processor 22 and applied to analog to digital (A/D) converter 24. Timing generator 26 produces various clocking signals to select rows and pixels and synchronizes the operation of analog signal processor 22 and A/D converter 24. The image sensor stage 28 includes the image sensor 20, the analog signal processor 22, the A/D converter 24, and the timing generator 26. The components of image sensor stage 28 are separately fabricated integrated circuits, or they are fabricated as a single integrated circuit as is commonly done with CMOS image sensors. The resulting stream of digital pixel values from A/D converter 24 is stored in memory 32 associated with digital signal processor (DSP) 36.
Digital signal processor 36 is one of three processors or controllers in this embodiment, in addition to system controller 50 and exposure controller 40. Although this partitioning of camera functional control among multiple controllers and processors is typical, these controllers or processors are combined in various ways without affecting the functional operation of the camera and the application of the present invention. These controllers or processors can comprise one or more digital signal processor devices, microcontrollers, programmable logic devices, or other digital logic circuits. Although a combination of such controllers or processors has been described, it should be apparent that an alternative embodiment designates one controller or processor to perform all of the needed functions. All of these variations can perform the same function and fall within the scope of this invention, and the term “processing stage” will be used as needed to encompass all of this functionality within one phrase, for example, as in processing stage 38 in
In the illustrated embodiment, DSP 36 manipulates the digital image data in its memory 32 according to a software program permanently stored in program memory 54 and copied to memory 32 for execution during image capture. DSP 36 executes the software necessary for practicing image processing shown in
System controller 50 controls the overall operation of the camera based on a software program stored in program memory 54, which can include Flash EEPROM or other nonvolatile memory. This memory is also used to store image sensor calibration data, user setting selections and other data which must be preserved when the camera is turned off. System controller 50 controls the sequence of image capture by directing exposure controller 40 to operate the lens 12, ND filter 13, iris 14, and shutter 18 as previously described, directing the timing generator 26 to operate the image sensor 20 and associated elements, and directing DSP 36 to process the captured image data. After an image is captured and processed, the final image file stored in memory 32 is transferred to a host computer via interface 57, stored on a removable memory card 64 or other storage device, and displayed for the user on image display 88.
A bus 52 includes a pathway for address, data and control signals, and connects system controller 50 to DSP 36, program memory 54, system memory 56, host interface 57, memory card interface 60 and other related devices. Host interface 57 provides a high speed connection to a personal computer (PC) or other host computer for transfer of image data for display, storage, manipulation or printing. This interface is an IEEE1394 or USB2.0 interface or any other suitable digital interface. Memory card 64 is typically a Compact Flash (CF) card inserted into socket 62 and connected to the system controller 50 via memory card interface 60. Other types of storage that are utilized include without limitation PC-Cards, MultiMedia Cards (MMC), or Secure Digital (SD) cards.
Processed images are copied to a display buffer in system memory 56 and continuously read out via video encoder 80 to produce a video signal. This signal is output directly from the camera for display on an external monitor, or processed by display controller 82 and presented on image display 88. This display is typically an active matrix color liquid crystal display (LCD), although other types of displays are used as well.
A user control and interface status 68, including all or any combination of viewfinder display 70, exposure display 72, status display 76, image display 88, and user inputs 74, is controlled by a combination of software programs executed on exposure controller 40 and system controller 50. User inputs 74 typically include some combination of buttons, rocker switches, joysticks, rotary dials or touchscreens. Exposure controller 40 operates light metering, exposure mode, autofocus and other exposure functions. The system controller 50 manages the graphical user interface (GUI) presented on one or more of the displays, e.g., on image display 88. The GUI typically includes menus for making various option selections and review modes for examining captured images.
Exposure controller 40 accepts user inputs selecting exposure mode, lens aperture, exposure time (shutter speed), and exposure index or ISO speed rating and directs the lens and shutter accordingly for subsequent captures. Brightness sensor 16 is employed to measure the brightness of the scene and provide an exposure meter function for the user to refer to when manually setting the ISO speed rating, aperture and shutter speed. In this case, as the user changes one or more settings, the light meter indicator presented on viewfinder display 70 tells the user to what degree the image will be over or underexposed. In an automatic exposure mode, the user changes one setting and the exposure controller 40 automatically alters another setting to maintain correct exposure, e.g., for a given ISO speed rating when the user reduces the lens aperture the exposure controller 40 automatically increases the exposure time to maintain the same overall exposure.
The ISO speed rating is an important attribute of a digital still camera. The exposure time, the lens aperture, the lens transmittance, the level and spectral distribution of the scene illumination, and the scene reflectance determine the exposure level of a digital still camera. When an image from a digital still camera is obtained using an insufficient exposure, proper tone reproduction can generally be maintained by increasing the electronic or digital gain, but the image will contain an unacceptable amount of noise. As the exposure is increased, the gain is decreased, and therefore the image noise can normally be reduced to an acceptable level. If the exposure is increased excessively, the resulting signal in bright areas of the image can exceed the maximum signal level capacity of the image sensor or camera signal processing. This can cause image highlights to be clipped to form a uniformly bright area, or to bloom into surrounding areas of the image. It is important to guide the user in setting proper exposures. An ISO speed rating is intended to serve as such a guide. In order to be easily understood by photographers, the ISO speed rating for a digital still camera should directly relate to the ISO speed rating for photographic film cameras. For example, if a digital still camera has an ISO speed rating of ISO 200, then the same exposure time and aperture should be appropriate for an ISO 200 rated film/process system.
The ISO speed ratings are intended to harmonize with film ISO speed ratings. However, there are differences between electronic and film-based imaging systems that preclude exact equivalency. Digital still cameras can include variable gain, and can provide digital processing after the image data has been captured, enabling tone reproduction to be achieved over a range of camera exposures. It is therefore possible for digital still cameras to have a range of speed ratings. This range is defined as the ISO speed latitude. To prevent confusion, a single value is designated as the inherent ISO speed rating, with the ISO speed latitude upper and lower limits indicating the speed range, that is, a range including effective speed ratings that differ from the inherent ISO speed rating. With this in mind, the inherent ISO speed is a numerical value calculated from the exposure provided at the focal plane of a digital still camera to produce specified camera output signal characteristics. The inherent speed is usually the exposure index value that produces peak image quality for a given camera system for normal scenes, where the exposure index is a numerical value that is inversely proportional to the exposure provided to the image sensor.
The foregoing description of a digital camera will be familiar to one skilled in the art. It will be obvious that there are many variations of this embodiment that are possible and are selected to reduce the cost, add features or improve the performance of the camera. The following description will disclose in detail the operation of this camera for capturing images according to the present invention. Although this description is with reference to a digital camera, it will be understood that the present invention applies for use with any type of image capture device having an image sensor with color and panchromatic pixels.
The image sensor 20 shown in
Whenever general reference is made to an image sensor in the following description, it is understood to be representative of the image sensor 20 from
In the context of an image sensor, a pixel (a contraction of “picture element”) refers to a discrete light sensing area and charge shifting or charge measurement circuitry associated with the light sensing area. In the context of a digital color image, the term pixel commonly refers to a particular location in the image having associated color values.
In order to produce a color image, the array of pixels in an image sensor typically has a pattern of color filters placed over them.
The set of color photoresponses selected for use in a sensor usually has three colors, as shown in the Bayer CFA, but it can also include four or more. As used herein, a panchromatic photoresponse refers to a photoresponse having a wider spectral sensitivity than those spectral sensitivities represented in the selected set of color photoresponses. A panchromatic photosensitivity can have high sensitivity across the entire visible spectrum. The term panchromatic pixel will refer to a pixel having a panchromatic photoresponse. Although the panchromatic pixels generally have a wider spectral sensitivity than the set of color photoresponses, each panchromatic pixel can have an associated filter. Such filter is either a neutral density filter or a color filter.
When a pattern of color and panchromatic pixels is on the face of an image sensor, each such pattern has a repeating unit that is a contiguous subarray of pixels that acts as a basic building block. By juxtaposing multiple copies of the repeating unit, the entire sensor pattern is produced. The juxtaposition of the multiple copies of repeating units is done in diagonal directions as well as in the horizontal and vertical directions.
A minimal repeating unit is a repeating unit such that no other repeating unit has fewer pixels. For example, the CFA in
An image captured using an image sensor having a two-dimensional array with the CFA of
The greater panchromatic sensitivity shown in
The complete pattern shown in
These four cells, delineated by heavy lines in
In the case of a minimal repeating unit with four non-overlapping cells, with each cell having two pixels of the same color and two panchromatic pixels, it is clear that the minimal repeating unit includes sixteen pixels. In the case of a minimal repeating unit with three non-overlapping cells, with each cell having two pixels of the same color and two panchromatic pixels, it is clear that the minimal repeating unit includes twelve pixels.
In accordance with the present invention, the minimal repeating unit of
In the following discussion, all cells in
In addition to alternative minimal repeating units of
In order to increase the color photosensitivity to overcome the disparity between the panchromatic photosensitivity and the color photosensitivity, the color pixels within each cell are combined in various ways. For example, the charge from same colored pixels is combined or binned in a CCD image sensor or in types of active pixel sensors that permit binning (see
The previously mentioned approaches for combining signals from same colored pixels within a cell are used singly or in combinations. For example, vertically combining the charge from same colored pixels in
From the foregoing, it will now be understood that there are several degrees of freedom in combining color pixels for the purpose of adjusting the photosensitivity of the color pixels. Well known combining schemes will suggest themselves to one skilled in the art that are based on scene content, scene illuminant, overall light level, or other criteria. Furthermore, the combining scheme is selected to deliberately permit the combined pixels to have either less sensitivity or more sensitivity than the panchromatic pixels. The various ways of combining pixels discussed above are used with image sensors employing any of the patterns described in this disclosure and related disclosures.
To this point the image sensor has been described as employing red, green, and blue filters such that there are two green pixels for every red and blue pixel. The present invention is also practiced with red, green, and blue filters in equal proportions as shown in
The present invention is also usable with pixels having more than three color photoresponses.
Another minimal repeating unit is shown in
Image sensors employing cyan, magenta, and yellow sensors are well known in the art, and the present invention is practiced with cyan, magenta, and yellow color filters.
The present invention is practiced with pixels arrays other than a rectangular array.
Turning now to
For cells 224, 226, and 228 (
Returning to the case of cell 220, regardless of how many signals are digitized for this cell, the image processing algorithm of the present invention further combines the digitized green values to produce a single green value for the cell. One way that a single green value is obtained is by averaging all the digitized green values produced for cell 220. In the event that a cell contains color pixels of differing photoresponses, all the color data within the cell is similarly combined so that there is a single value for each color photoresponse represented within the cell.
It is important to distinguish between the color values pertaining to pixels in the original sensor that captured the raw image data, and color values pertaining to cells within the original sensor. Both types of color values are used to produce color images, but the resulting color images are of different resolution. An image having pixel values associated with pixels in the original sensor is referred to as a high-resolution image, and an image having pixel values associated with cells within the original sensor is referred to as a low-resolution image.
Turning now to
In the Low-resolution Partial Color block 202 (
The Low-resolution Partial Color block 202 processes each cell in a similar manner resulting in an array of color values, one for each cell. Because the resulting image array is based on cells rather than pixels in the original sensor, it is four times smaller in each dimension than the original captured raw image data array. Because the resulting array is based on cells and because each pixel has some but not all color values, the resulting image is a low-resolution partial color image. At this point, the low-resolution partial color image is color balanced.
Looking now at the High-resolution Panchrome block 204, the same raw image data is used as shown in
P22=(P12+P32)/2
An adaptive method can also be used. For example, one adaptive method is to compute three gradient values and take their absolute values:
SCLAS=ABS(P31−P13)
VCLAS=ABS(P32−P12)
BCLAS=ABS(P33−P11)
using the panchromatic values are shown in
SPRED=(P31+P13)/2
VPRED=(P32+P12)/2
BPRED=(P33+P11)/2
Then, set P22 equal to the predictor corresponding to the smallest classifier value. In the case of a tie, set P22 equal to the average the indicated predictors. The panchromatic interpolation is continued throughout the image without regard to cell boundaries. When the processing of High-resolution Panchrome block 204 is done, the resulting digital panchromatic image is the same size as the original captured raw image, which makes it a high-resolution panchromatic image.
The Low-resolution Panchrome block 206 receives the high-resolution panchromatic image array produced by block 204 and generates a low-resolution panchromatic image array which is the same size as the low-resolution partial color image produced by block 202. Each low-resolution panchromatic value is obtained by averaging the estimated panchromatic values, within a given cell, for those pixels having color filters. In the case of cell 220 (
The Low-resolution Color Difference block 208 receives the low-resolution partial color image from block 202 and the low-resolution panchrome array from block 206. A low-resolution intermediate color image is then formed by color interpolating the low-resolution partial color image with guidance from the low-resolution panchrome image. The exact nature of the color interpolation algorithm, to be discussed in detail later, depends on which pattern of pixel photoresponses was used to capture the original raw image data.
After the low-resolution intermediate color image is formed it is color corrected. Once the low-resolution intermediate color image is color corrected, a low-resolution image of color differences is computed by subtracting the low-resolution panchromatic image from each of the low-resolution color planes individually. The High-resolution Color Difference block 210 receives the low-resolution color difference image from block 208 and, using bilinear interpolation, upsamples the low-resolution color difference image to match the size of the original raw image data. The result is a high-resolution color difference image that is the same size as the high-resolution panchromatic image produced by block 204.
The High-resolution Final Image block 212 receives the high-resolution color difference image from block 210 and the high-resolution panchromatic image from block 204. A high-resolution final color image is then formed by adding the high-resolution panchromatic image to each of the high-resolution color difference planes. The resulting high-resolution final color image can then be further processed. For example, it is stored in the DSP Memory block 32 (
The sensor filter patterns shown in
In addition to a single color value, given by the low-resolution partial color image, every cell also has a panchromatic value given by the low-resolution panchromatic image.
Considering the case in which the Bayer pattern is present in the low-resolution partial color image, the task of color interpolation within the Low-resolution Color Differences block 208 (
The first step is to compute two classifier values, the first relating to the horizontal direction, and the second to the vertical direction:
HCLAS=ABS(P4−P2)+ABS(2*P3−P2−P4)
VCLAS=ABS(P5−P1)+ABS(2*P3−P1−P5)
Then, compute two predictor values, the first relating to the horizontal direction, and the second to the vertical direction:
HPRED=(G4+G2)/2+(2*P3−P2−P4)/2
VPRED=(G5+G1)/2+(2*P3−P1−P5)/2
Finally, letting THRESH be an empirically determined threshold value, we can adaptively compute the missing value, G3, according to:
Thus, if both classifiers are smaller than the threshold value, an average of both predictor values is computed for G3. If not, then either HPRED or VPRED is used depending on which classifier HCLAS or VCLAS is smaller.
Once all the missing green values have been estimated, the missing red and blue values are interpolated. As shown in
R3=(R4+R2)/2+(2*G3−G2−G4)/2
Missing blue values are computed in a similar way under similar conditions. At this point, the only pixels that still have missing red and blue values are those requiring vertical interpolation. As shown in
R3=(R5+R1)/2+(2*G3−G1−G5)/2
Missing blue values are computed in a similar way under similar conditions. This completes the interpolation of the low-resolution partial color image and the result is a low-resolution intermediate color image. As described earlier, the low-resolution color differences can now be computed by subtracting the low-resolution panchrome values from each color plane: red, green, and blue in the example just discussed.
Turning now to
It is useful to consider the combining described above with reference to
Although combining has generally been described in the context of color pixels, it is sometimes useful to combine panchromatic pixels. In the case of low light levels or short exposure times, it is useful to combine panchromatic pixels to trade off panchromatic resolution to increase the signal strength of the combined panchromatic pixels. It is important to note that the definitions of adjacent minimal repeating unit, pixels of like color, and similarly positioned pixels apply to panchromatic pixels as well as to color pixels. For example, panchromatic pixels P12 and P15 in
The combining that has been described to this point includes combining pixels of like color or similarly positioned pixels from adjacent minimal repeating units. In some cases, it is useful to combined panchromatic pixels with color pixels. In
It is within the scope of the invention to combine at the same time within a given array of minimal repeating units similarly positioned pixels from adjacent minimal repeating units, pixels of like color from adjacent minimal repeating units, pixels of like color within a minimal repeating unit, and panchromatic and color pixels. It is also understood that a particular arrangement of combining methods is useful at one time depending on the image capture conditions, and a different arrangement is useful at a different time for different image capture conditions, so the combining arrangements can be adjusted dynamically at image capture time. For example, when the overall scene light level is high, panchromatic pixels are not combined, but when the overall scene light level is low, panchromatic pixels are combined with each other or with color pixels in order to improve the signal level.
Examples of the various combining methods described above are shown in
While the minimal repeating units of
In addition to combining pixels in pairs from two adjacent minimal repeating units, it is useful to combine pixels from three or more minimal repeating units.
If a minimal repeating unit of the type exemplified by 400 through 403 in
Note that the minimal repeating unit is the tiling unit that is used to create larger arrays of pixels. The groups of minimal repeating units shown in
Although the examples in the foregoing paragraphs have used minimal repeating units that are variations of the type shown in
The foregoing examples have all shown minimal repeating units that are arranged linearly, either in rows or columns. It is also useful to arrange adjacent minimal repeating units in other ways for the purpose of combining pixels.
Turning now to
As has been previously shown, the present invention includes combining an arbitrary number of pixels, both within a single minimal repeating unit and among multiple adjacent minimal repeating units. As shown in
Each of
Not all sensors produce low-resolution partial color images exhibiting a repeating Bayer pattern of color values. For example, the sensor pattern shown in
The first step is to compute two classifier values, the first relating to the horizontal direction, and the second to the vertical direction:
HCLAS=ABS(G4−G2)+ABS(2*G3−G2−G4)
VCLAS=ABS(G5−G1)+ABS(2*G3−G1−G5)
Then, compute two predictor values, the first relating to the horizontal direction, and the second to the vertical direction:
HPRED=(R4+R2)/2+(2*G3−G2−G4)/2
VPRED=(R5+R1)/2+(2*G3−G1−G5)/2
Finally, letting THRESH be an empirically determined threshold value, the missing value G3 is computed adaptively according to:
Thus, if both classifiers are smaller than the threshold value, an average of both predictor values is computed for R3. If not, then either HPRED or VPRED is used depending on which classifier HCLAS or VCLAS is smaller.
The missing blue values are interpolated in exactly the same way using blue values in place of red. Once completed, the low-resolution intermediate color image has been produced. From there, the low-resolution color differences are computed as previously described.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications are effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/419,574 filed May 22, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,916,362, of Takayuki Kijima et al, entitled “IMAGE SENSOR WITH IMPROVED LIGHT SENSITIVITY”, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein. The present application is related to U.S. Ser. No. 11/191,538 (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0024879), filed Jul. 28, 2005, of John F. Hamilton Jr. and John T. Compton, entitled “PROCESSING COLOR AND PANCHROMATIC PIXELS”; and U.S. Ser. No. 11/191,729 (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2007/0024931), filed Jul. 28, 2005, of John T. Compton and John F. Hamilton, Jr., entitled “IMAGE SENSOR WITH IMPROVED LIGHT SENSITIVITY”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2446791 | Schroeder | Aug 1948 | A |
2508267 | Kasperowicz | May 1950 | A |
2884483 | Ehrenhaft et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
3725572 | Kurokawa et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3971065 | Bayer | Jul 1976 | A |
4047203 | Dillon | Sep 1977 | A |
4121244 | Nakabe et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4390895 | Sato et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4437112 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4567510 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4591900 | Heeb et al. | May 1986 | A |
4606630 | Haruki et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4642678 | Cok | Feb 1987 | A |
4663661 | Weldy et al. | May 1987 | A |
4760441 | Kohno | Jul 1988 | A |
4805024 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807981 | Takizawa et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4823186 | Muramatsu | Apr 1989 | A |
4896207 | Parulski | Jan 1990 | A |
4939573 | Teranishi et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956715 | Okino et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4962419 | Hibbard et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5018006 | Hashimoto | May 1991 | A |
5172220 | Beis | Dec 1992 | A |
5227313 | Gluck et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5244817 | Hawkins et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5264924 | Cok | Nov 1993 | A |
5272518 | Vincent | Dec 1993 | A |
5323233 | Yamagami et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5373322 | Laroche et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374956 | D'Luna | Dec 1994 | A |
5382976 | Hibbard | Jan 1995 | A |
5432906 | Newman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5493335 | Parulski et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5506619 | Adams | Apr 1996 | A |
5596367 | Hamilton, Jr. et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5625210 | Lee et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629734 | Hamilton | May 1997 | A |
5631703 | Hamilton, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5652621 | Adams | Jul 1997 | A |
5670817 | Robinson | Sep 1997 | A |
5773814 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5852468 | Okada | Dec 1998 | A |
5877809 | Omata et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5914749 | Bawolek et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917956 | Ohsawa et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5969368 | Thompson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6011875 | Laben | Jan 2000 | A |
6097835 | Lindgren | Aug 2000 | A |
6107655 | Guidash | Aug 2000 | A |
6115066 | Gowda et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6153446 | Chen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168965 | Malinovich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6243133 | Spaulding et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246865 | Lee | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6271554 | Nozaki et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292212 | Zigadlo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326624 | Chapuis et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6366318 | Smith et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366319 | Bills | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369853 | Merrill et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6429036 | Nixon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441848 | Tull | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441852 | Levine et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441855 | Omata et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6476865 | Gindele | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510283 | Yamagishi | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512838 | Rafii et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515275 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529239 | Dyck et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6594388 | Gindele et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630960 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642962 | Lin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646246 | Gindele et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654062 | Numata et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665449 | He et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6686960 | Iizuka | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694064 | Benkelman | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714243 | Mathur et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6734906 | Hashimoto | May 2004 | B1 |
6757012 | Hubina et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765611 | Gallagher et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6784939 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6809008 | Holm et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813046 | Gindele et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6847397 | Osada | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6869817 | Hwang | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876384 | Hubina et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885819 | Shinohara | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6927432 | Holm et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937774 | Specht et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6943051 | Augusto et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943831 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6972799 | Hashimoto | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6984816 | Holm et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995795 | Losee et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009638 | Gruber et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012643 | Frame | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016089 | Yoneda et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016549 | Utagawa | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7065246 | Xiaomang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7075129 | Parks | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7109051 | Cave et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7148925 | Osada et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153720 | Augusto | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161625 | Hori | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7199830 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206072 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7239342 | Kingetsu et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251054 | Takemoto | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7298922 | Lindgren et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315014 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327504 | Gallagher | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330209 | Osamato | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340099 | Zhang | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343867 | Fraisse et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349016 | Fujii et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7379588 | Loce et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7400332 | Schweng et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400770 | Keaton et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7453129 | King et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454053 | Bryll et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456880 | Okita et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468750 | Mabuchi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485903 | Abe et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7521737 | Augusto | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7577315 | Uvarov et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7615808 | Pain et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7688368 | Kijima et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706022 | Okuyama | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7724292 | Ueno et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7769229 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769230 | Pillman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7807955 | Parks et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821553 | Ellis-Monaghan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7830430 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839437 | Kasai et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7859033 | Brady | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7876956 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7893976 | Compton et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7915067 | Brady et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7916362 | Kijima et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7999870 | Compton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017426 | Brady | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8031258 | Enge et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8076170 | Brady | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8106427 | Parks et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8119435 | Brady | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20010010952 | Abramovich | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010012133 | Yoneda et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010026683 | Morimoto et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010055064 | Minakami | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020020845 | Ogura et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020044209 | Saito | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058353 | Merrill | May 2002 | A1 |
20020130957 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030160886 | Misawa et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030193580 | Okamoto | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210332 | Frame | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040007722 | Narui et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040032516 | Kakarala | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046881 | Utagawa | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090550 | Park | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094784 | Rhodes et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040169747 | Ono et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174446 | Acharya | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207823 | Alasaarela et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212714 | Mikoshiba et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227456 | Matsui | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050001915 | Mabuchi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050094071 | Akiyama et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104148 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110002 | Noda | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116251 | Abe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128586 | Sedlmayr | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135709 | Gusmano et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139945 | Lim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151729 | Akimoto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050221541 | Metzler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231618 | Sugiyama | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248667 | Schweng et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276475 | Sawada | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007337 | Panicacci | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017829 | Gallagher | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017837 | Sorek et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060033129 | Mouli | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043189 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060043393 | Okita et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060043438 | Holm et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060043439 | Koizumi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060044427 | Hu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060044434 | Okita et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060050162 | Nakamura | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055800 | Ackland et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060854 | Wakano et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068586 | Pain | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060088298 | Frame et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060113459 | Yang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060115749 | Toyoda | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060119710 | Ben-Ezra et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060119738 | Kido | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139245 | Sugiyama | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146157 | Toros et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060146158 | Toros et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060186560 | Swain et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187308 | Lim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060192873 | Yaffe | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204122 | Onozawa | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060275944 | Hyun | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002153 | Dierickx | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024879 | Hamilton | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070024931 | Compton | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070029465 | Choi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030366 | Compton | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040922 | McKee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045681 | Mauritzson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070046807 | Hamilton, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069248 | Ohta | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069258 | Ahn | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071433 | Kawanami | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076269 | Kido et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096232 | Hwang | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127040 | Davidovici | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138588 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146522 | Okada et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154202 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070158772 | Boettiger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070159542 | Luo | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177236 | Kijima et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194397 | Adkisson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210244 | Halvis et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223831 | Mei et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235829 | Levine et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244359 | Cabiri et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257998 | Inoue | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268533 | Kijima et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285548 | Gomi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002959 | Border et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012969 | Kasai et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080038864 | Yoo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080074521 | Olsen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080084486 | Enge et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080128598 | Kanai et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080129834 | Dosluoglu | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130073 | Compton et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130991 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144964 | Soinio et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080165815 | Kamijima | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170848 | Wernersson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211943 | Egawa et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218597 | Cho | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080218613 | Janson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219654 | Border et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080297634 | Uya | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090016390 | Sumiyama et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090021588 | Border et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090021612 | Hamilton, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057801 | Goushcha et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096991 | Chien et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101796 | Ladd et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109172 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121306 | Ishikawa | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141242 | Silverstein et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167893 | Susanu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179995 | Fukumoto et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195681 | Compton et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090206377 | Swain et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090289169 | Yang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290043 | Liu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100006908 | Brady | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100006909 | Brady | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100006963 | Brady | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100006970 | Brady et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100059802 | Chen | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091169 | Border et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100141822 | Xue | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149396 | Summa | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157120 | Compton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100302418 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100302423 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309340 | Border et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309347 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309350 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110042770 | Brady | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110059572 | Brady | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073173 | Hwang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110115957 | Brady et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110147875 | Parks et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110310279 | Enge et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 119 862 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0 138 074 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 472 299 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0 528 433 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 954 032 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 035 729 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 206 119 | May 2002 | EP |
1 241 896 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1 322 123 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 411 471 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 209 903 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1594321 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1 612 863 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1 641 045 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 648 160 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1 709 901 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1 808 894 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1 821 128 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2 105 143 | Mar 1983 | GB |
62-246033 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-039293 | Feb 1988 | JP |
04-088784 | Mar 1992 | JP |
61-13310 | Apr 1994 | JP |
2004-304706 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-099160 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-268738 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2007-104178 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-150643 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-271667 | Oct 2007 | JP |
WO 9959345 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 2005079199 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006064564 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006130518 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007015765 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007015982 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007030226 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007051147 | May 2007 | WO |
2007089416 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007089426 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007126288 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007139675 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007145373 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008044673 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008066699 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008066703 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008069920 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008106282 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008118525 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110211109 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11419574 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 13044840 | US |