The present exemplary embodiment relates to document processing systems such as printer, copier, multifunction devices, etc., and operating methods to transfer an image from an intermediate surface to a media substrate.
Traditional Intermediate Belt Transfer (IBT) systems using semiconductive back-up rolls (BUR) and biased image transfer rolls (ITRs) at a second transfer require constant BUR or ITR voltage control. The voltage is determined by a feed-forward control algorithm with a complex look-up table that depends on paper weight, paper size, temp, humidity, and simplex vs duplex in order to control the transfer field and maintain adequate transfer latitude. This system requires an enormous amount of sensitivity testing, algorithm development and confirmation testing. Experiments show that even mature, carefully constructed constant voltage control algorithms often set voltages far enough from the optimal voltage to significantly degrade image quality.
Disclosed is a transfer nip design that enables a simpler, more accurate/robust control algorithm. The second transfer nip is modified to enable a constant current control system similar to that employed at first transfer.
Incorporation by Reference
The following patents and patent application publications are totally incorporated herein by reference:
U.S. Pat. No. 7,512,367 to Parks, entitled “Ultrasonic Backer for Bias Transfer Systems,” issued Mar. 31, 2009.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,177,572 to DiRubio et al., entitled “Biased Charge Roller with Embedded Electrodes with Post-Nip Breakdown to Enable Improved Charge Uniformity,” issued Feb. 13, 2007.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,665 to DiRubio, entitled “Method and Apparatus Using a Biased Transfer Roll as a Dynamic Electrostatic Voltmeter for System Diagnostics and Closed Loop Process Controls,” issued Aug. 26, 2003.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,606,477 to Thompson et al., entitled “Method to Control Pre- and Post-Nip Fields for Transfer,” issued Aug. 12, 2003
U.S. Pat. No. 6,600,895 to Fletcher et al., entitled “Printing Machine and Method Using a Bias Transfer Roller Including at Least One Temperature-Maintaining Device,” issued Jul. 29, 2003.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,399 to Law et al., entitled “Bias Transfer Members with Fluorinated Carbon Filled Fluoroelastomer Outer Layer,” issued Dec. 15, 1998.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,613,173 to Kunzmann et al., entitled “Biased Roll Charging Apparatus Having Clipped AC Input Voltage,” issued Mar. 18, 1997.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,420,677 to Gross et al., entitled “Method and Apparatus for Extending Material Life in a Bias Transfer Roll,” issued May 30, 1995.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,321,476 to Gross, entitled “Heated Bias Transfer Roll,” issued Jun. 14, 1994.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,164,779 to Araya et al., entitled “Image Forming Apparatus with Dual Voltage Supplies for Selectively Charging and Discharging an Image Bearing Member,” issued Nov. 17, 1992.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,851,960 to Nakamura et al., entitled “Charging Device,” issued Jul. 25, 1989.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,781,105 to Meagher, entitled “Constant Current Biasing Transfer System,” issued Dec. 25, 1973.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,912,586 to Gundlach, entitled “Xerographic Charging,” issued Nov. 10, 1959.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0304408, to DiRubio et al., entitled “Multi-Color Printing System and Method for High Toner Pile Height Printing,” published Dec. 10, 2009.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0133729 to Thompson et al., entitled “Method to Control Pre- and Post-Nip Fields for Transfer,” published Jul. 17, 2003.
Brief Description
In one embodiment of this disclosure, described is a method of marking an image on a media substrate using an intermediate image transfer printing apparatus, the intermediate image transfer printing apparatus including a photoreceptor surface; an exposure station operatively associated with the photoreceptor surface; a developer system operatively associated with the photoreceptor surface; an intermediate image transfer surface operatively associated with the photoreceptor surface; and an image transfer nip operatively associated with the intermediate image transfer surface, the image transfer nip including a Backup Roll and a Paper Escort Apparatus to engage a media sheet, and one or more of the Backup Roll, Paper Escort Apparatus and the image transfer surface including a dielectric material, the method comprising a) forming an electrostatic image on the photoreceptor surface representative of an image to be marked on a media substrate using the exposure system; b) developing the electrostatic image on the photoreceptor surface with toner material using the developer system to generate a developed image; c) transferring the developed image from the photoreceptor surface to the intermediate image transfer surface; d) advancing the developed image on the intermediate image transfer surface to the image transfer nip; and e) generating an electric field across the image transfer nip utilizing a constant current source operatively connected to the Backup Roll and the Paper Escort Apparatus, whereby, the generated electric field transfers the developed image from the intermediate image transfer surface to a media sheet.
In another embodiment of this disclosure, described is an intermediate image transfer marking apparatus comprising a photoreceptor surface; an exposure station operatively associated with the photoreceptor surface; a developer system operatively associated with the photoreceptor surface; an intermediate image transfer surface operatively associated with the photoreceptor surface; an image transfer nip operatively associated with the intermediate image transfer surface, the image transfer nip including a Backup Roll and a Paper Escort Apparatus configured to engage a media sheet, and one or more of the Backup Roll, Paper Escort Apparatus and intermediate image transfer surface including a dielectric material; and a controller operatively associated with the photoreceptor surface, the exposure station, the developer system, the intermediate image transfer surface and the image transfer nip, the controller configured to execute a process of marking an image on a media substrate using the intermediate image transfer marking apparatus, the process comprising a) forming an electrostatic image on the photoreceptor surface representative of an image to be marked on a media substrate using the exposure system; b) developing the electrostatic image on the photoreceptor surface with toner material using the developer system to generate a developed image; c) transferring the developed image from the photoreceptor surface to the intermediate image transfer surface; d) advancing the developed image on the intermediate image transfer surface to the image transfer nip; and e) generating an electric field across the image transfer nip utilizing a constant current source operatively connected to the Backup Roll and the Paper Escort Apparatus.
In still another embodiment of this disclosure, described is an intermediate image transfer marking apparatus comprising a photoreceptor drum; an exposure station operatively associated with the photoreceptor drum; a developer system operatively associated with the photoreceptor drum; an intermediate image transfer surface operatively associated with the photoreceptor drum; an image transfer nip operatively associated with the intermediate image transfer surface, the image transfer nip including a Backup Roll and a Paper Escort Apparatus configured to engage a media sheet, and one or more of the Backup Roll, Paper Escort Apparatus and intermediate image transfer surface including a dielectric material; a fuser; and a controller operatively associated with the photoreceptor drum, the developer system, the intermediate image transfer surface and the image transfer nip, the controller configured to execute a process of marking an image on a media substrate using the intermediate image transfer image marking apparatus, the process comprising a) forming an electrostatic image on the photoreceptor drum representative of an image to be marked on a media substrate using the exposure system; b) developing the electrostatic image on the photoreceptor drum to generate a developed image using the developer system; c) transferring the developed image from the photoreceptor drum to the intermediate image transfer surface; d) advancing the developed image on the intermediate image transfer surface to the image transfer nip; e) generating an electric field across the image transfer nip utilizing a constant current source operatively connected to the Backup Roll, the Paper Escort Apparatus and the dielectric material, whereby the generated electric field transfers the developed image from the intermediate image transfer surface to a media sheet; and f) fusing the image transferred to the media sheet using the fuser.
Referring to
With reference to
U.S. Pat. No. 3,781,105 discloses some examples of a biased image transfer roll used in a xerographic printer. Notably, image transfer rolls can also be referred to as a bias transfer roll (BTR). Some of the details disclosed therein may be of interest as to teachings of alternatives to details of the embodiment herein.
Referring now to
Notably, the electric field of the first biased image transfer roll 12 in the nip region 232 can be affected by an electrical field generated by components of the xerographic printer 10 passing through the nip region 232. The voltage (VBTR) applied to the shaft 228 of the first biased image transfer roll 12 shifts in response to changes in the operating properties of subsystems 22, and the electrical field of the various components of the subsystem 22.
Before describing the particular features of the present disclosure in detail, an exemplary xerographic printer 10 will be further described, which can be a black and white or multicolor copier or laser printer. To initiate a copying process, a multicolor original document is positioned on a raster input scanner (RIS) which captures the entire image from original document which is then transmitted to a raster output scanner (ROS) 37. Alternatively, as in the case of a printer, RIS type data is communicated to a printer for rendering. The raster output scanner 37 illuminates a charged portion of a photoconductor 64 of a photoconductor drum (OPC) 38, or photoconductor drums 38, of a xerographic printer 10. Notably, a charging station 60 including a corona generating device or other charging device generates a charge voltage to charge the photoconductive surface 64 prior to the raster output scanner 37 illuminating the photoconductor 64. While a photoconductor drum 38 has been shown and described, the present disclosure is not so limited, as the photoconductor surface 64 may be a type of belt or other structure, without departing from the broader aspects of the present disclosure. The raster output scanner 37 exposes each photoconductor drum 38 to record one of the four subtractive primary latent images.
Continuing with
Referring again to
Referring again to
As shown in
With reference to
Referring again to
Continuing with reference to
Referring again to
As shown in
The sheet transport system 80 directs the sheet for transport to a fusing station and removal to a catch tray. Each photoconductor drum 38 also includes a cleaning station including an optional pre-clean subsystem 48, and a cleaner subsystem 49 for removing residual toner. An erase lamp subsystem 50 removes residual charge.
The foregoing description should be sufficient for purposes of the present disclosure to illustrate the general operation of a xerographic printer 10 or copier incorporating the features of the present disclosure. As described, a xerographic printer 10 may take the form of any of several well-known devices or systems. Variations of specific xerographic processing subsystems or processes may be expected without affecting the operation of the present disclosure.
As discussed in the Background section, traditional Intermediate Belt Transfer (IBT) systems using semiconductive back-up rolls (BUR) 40, intermediate transfer surfaces such as belts 18, and biased image transfer rolls (ITRs) 82 at a second image transfer, require constant BUR or ITR voltage control. Conventionally, the voltage is determined by a feed-forward control algorithm with a complex look-up table that depends on paper weight, paper size, temp, humidity, and simplex vs duplex in order to control the transfer field and maintain adequate transfer latitude. This system requires an enormous amount of sensitivity testing, algorithm development and confirmation testing. Experiments show that even mature, carefully constructed constant voltage control algorithms often set voltages far enough from the optimal voltage to significantly degrade image quality.
Disclosed is a second transfer nip design that enables a simpler, more accurate/robust control algorithm. The conventional second transfer nip is modified to enable a constant current control system similar to that employed at the first image transfer. Four examples are provided. These examples describe specific simple electrical biasing schemes, but other electrical biasing schemes are possible.
Replace the conventional grounded biased second image transfer roll 82 associated with a paper escort apparatus with one of the following:
a) a small diameter negative charging photoreceptor coupled with an appropriate erase lamp, AC corona device (corotron, dicorotron or scorotron) or AC BCR (Biased Charging Roll) to neutralize the drum after transfer. For examples of BCRs, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,851,960; 5,164,779; 5,613,173; and 2,912,586. (Notably, utilizing an AC discharge device instead of a photodischarge erase lamp, the drum is only required to have a dielectric coating, not a photosensitive coating. In addition, a dielectric overcoat of a conformable conductive foam provides additional opportunities for transfer nip optimization.)
b) a dielectric coated metal drum; and
c) a dielectric coated conformable conductive foam.
In each arrangement, a), b) and c), a constant negative DC current is applied to bias a BUR 40, and the a) photoreceptor, b) metal drum or c) conductive foam is grounded, thereby providing a transfer of toner from the intermediate ITB to the paper.
Replace the conventional conductive back-up roll (BUR) 40 with one of the following:
a) a small diameter positive charging photoreceptor coupled with an appropriate erase lamp, AC corona device (corotron, dicorotron or scorotron) or AC BCR to neutralize the drum after transfer. (As in Example 1, a photosensitive drum is not required with an AC discharge device and a dielectric overcoat of conductive foam provides additional opportunities for transfer nip optimization.)
b) a dielectric coated metal drum; and
c) a dielectric coated conformable conductive foam.
In each arrangement, a), b) and c), a constant positive DC current is applied to bias the ITR 82 and the a) photoreceptor BUR, b) dielectric coated metal drum BUR or c) dielectric coated BUR 40 with conformable conductive foam is grounded, thereby providing a transfer of toner from the intermediate ITB to the paper.
Replace semiconductive Paper Escort ITB associated with a Paper Escort Apparatus with one of the following:
a) a grounded negative charging photoreceptor belt coupled with an appropriate erase lamp, AC corona device (corotron, dicorotron or scorotron) or AC BCR (biased charging roll) to neutralize the belt after transfer. (As in Example 1, utilizing an AC discharge device instead of a photodischarge erase lamp, the belt is only required to have a dielectric coating, not a photosensitive coating.); and
b) a dielectric coated ITB 18.
In each arrangement, a) and b), a constant negative DC current is applied to bias the BUR 40, and the a) photoreceptor belt or b) ITR 82 inside the paper escort apparatus is grounded, thereby providing a transfer of toner from the intermediate ITB to the paper.
Replace the conventional semiconductive intermediate ITB with a semiconductive ITB including a dielectric layer. In this arrangement, the detailed electrical biasing scheme will be dependent on other design details. In one embodiment a constant positive DC current is applied to bias the Paper Escort ITR and the BUR is grounded, thereby providing a transfer of toner from the intermediate ITB to the paper. In another embodiment a constant negative DC current may be applied to bias the BUR and the ITR is grounded, thereby providing a transfer of toner from the ITB to the paper.
Notably, other variations of this example are described below.
As previously stated, Intermediate Belt Transfer (IBT) systems employ multiple constant current biased ITRs (Image Intermediate Transfer Rolls) behind the belt for 1st transfer from the photoreceptor drums to the ITB. They also employ constant voltage applied to the Backup Roll (BUR) or Image Transfer Roll (ITR) for a second image transfer from the ITB to paper utilizing a paper escort apparatus including a biased ITR located behind the paper escort image transfer belt. The electrical and power supply control design is set up to try and control the electric field in the transfer nips which provides the force required to transfer toner.
In the 1st transfer the photoreceptor drum acts as an insulator in the dark. Therefore essentially all of the current flow is due to the movement of surfaces carrying charge that has been deposited during air breakdown. In this case, constant current mode is constant charge deposition mode, which means it's a close approximation to constant field mode. To make constant current mode robust (i.e. closer to constant field mode), transfer current may be varied modestly as a function of the image transfer roll (ITR) and intermediate image transfer belt (ITB) electrical properties as they vary due to manufacturing variation, temperature, humidity and aging. Typically, however, it is not necessary to vary the current to insure sufficiently constant field.
In conventional biased ITR and biased paper escort ITB second transfers from an intermediate image transfer belt (ITB) to paper systems, the component electrical properties are all resistive. The resistivity of each layer of the ITR, biased ITB, ITB, and BUR components (see
If one or more layers of any of the components is an insulator, then IOhmic=0 and ITotal=IAir
As previously discussed,
To enable robust constant current control as disclosed herein, at least one layer of the ITR and/or Paper Escort ITB and/or BUR and/or Intermediate ITB must be sufficiently insulating to prevent static (ohmic) current flow between the high voltage power supply and ground. For example, but not limited to:
With reference to
As previously discussed, this disclosure, and the exemplary embodiments contained herein, changes the design of the second image transfer system by replacing one of the base elements (ITR, Paper Escort ITB, BUR, or Intermediate ITB) with a capacitive (i.e., insulating or dielectric) element to simulate the 1st transfer electrical design allowing implementation of constant current 2nd transfer bias control. Since the capacitive item will remain charged after the 2nd transfer step, an additional electrical discharge step is required. If a photosensitive device (such as a photoreceptor OPC drum or photoreceptor belt) is used, this can be accomplished with a low cost erase lamp. If a non-photosensitive device is used then this would require an AC charging device such as an AC biased charge roll (BCR) or AC corotron, scorotron, dicorotron, etc. (An AC discharge device could also be used with a photoreceptor). (An insulative layer within the intermediate transfer surface may not require an additional discharge device if there is sufficient air breakdown in 1st transfer to neutralize the belt)
The capacitive element can be added to either the “top” or the “bottom” of the 2nd transfer system. In the current 2nd transfer system, negative voltage is applied behind the intermediate transfer belt (surface) (ITB) by the backup roll (BUR), or positive voltage is applied to the ITR. (See
This disclosure enables a simple, constant current control algorithm for the high voltage power supply that generates the transfer field. In the simplest implementation, the current required to insure a constant transfer field would be independent of the paper weight, temperature, RH, simplex/duplex, and paper coating. In practice, the current may not be a perfect surrogate for transfer field, in which case minor changes in the control current may be required for stress conditions. The current may also be varied to accommodate different paper widths. In short, this disclosure eliminates the need for highly complex LUTs (Look-Up Tables) required by the constant voltage system currently in use.
This disclosure provides a much more robust control algorithm and more stable/robust print quality: In a transfer nip containing a dielectric surface (like an OPC), the current is a direct measure of the transfer field. In order to maintain a constant current, the high voltage power supply automatically varies the applied voltage to insure a nearly constant transfer field independent of variation in temperature, RH, the substrate properties, ITR properties (resistivity, k=dielectric constant, etc.), Intermediate ITB properties (resistivity, k, etc.), and Paper Escort ITB properties (resistivity, k, etc.).
This disclosure enables rapid, straight forward, low cost re-optimization of the bias control algorithm if there are major design and/or system/platform changes. The target transfer current may need to be changed if there is a major redesign of key nip components or if the process speed is changed (platform variations). A relatively small effort would be required to find the new optimal current set point.
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2912586 | Gundlach | Nov 1959 | A |
3781105 | Meagher | Dec 1973 | A |
4851960 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5164779 | Araya et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5321476 | Gross | Jun 1994 | A |
5420677 | Gross et al. | May 1995 | A |
5613173 | Kunzmann et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5849399 | Law et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6600895 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606477 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611665 | DiRubio et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
7072599 | DiRubio et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7177572 | DiRubio et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7512367 | Parks | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20030133729 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20090297235 | Nishimura | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304408 | DiRubio et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120051801 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |