This document relates to reducing the data complexity for analysis and bandwidth required of autonomous vehicle images.
Autonomous vehicle navigation is a technology for sensing the position and movement of a vehicle, and based on the sensing, autonomously controlling the vehicle to navigate towards a destination. Autonomous vehicle navigation can have important applications in transportation of people, goods and services. One of the components of autonomous driving, which ensures the safety of the vehicle and its passengers, as well as people and property in the vicinity of the vehicle, is analysis of images taken from vehicle cameras. The images may be used to determine fixed or moving obstacles in the path of autonomous vehicle.
Disclosed are devices, systems and methods for processing images of an area surrounding a vehicle. In some embodiments, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors may be used to acquire the images based on reflections captured from the surrounding area. In one aspect, a method for processing an image taken from an autonomous vehicle is disclosed. The method includes receiving a raw image from a camera, the image including three values for each of three primary colors, and/or selecting one of the three values for each pixel in the image and discarding the other two values, wherein the selecting is performed in a pattern. The method may further include performing preprocessing on the reduced image, and/or performing perception on the preprocessed image to determine one or more outlines of physical objects in a vicinity of the autonomous vehicle.
The method may further include the following features in any combination. The selecting may reduce a data size of the raw image by a factor of ⅔. The pattern may be a Bayer pattern. The Bayer pattern may be a red-green-green-blue pattern assigned to a 2-pixel by 2-pixel array repeated across the raw image. The pattern may include a greater number of green pixel values than both red and blue. The pattern may be selected such that a value of every other pixel along a row in the reduced image corresponds to green value of the raw image. The pattern may be selected such that a value of every other pixel along a column in the reduced image corresponds to green value of the raw image. The generating the reduced image may be performed using one or more color-selective filters. Each x-y value in the pattern may be from one of three possible values. The preprocessing may be performed on the image from the sensor array without human perception image enhancement. The human perception image enhancement may include one or more of de-mosaicing, white balancing, and noise reduction. The preprocessing may not include scaling one or more pixels' R, G, or B value for white balancing. The preprocessing may not include reconstruction a full color image from incomplete color samples output from the sensor array overlaid with a color filter array for de-mosaicing. The preprocessing may not include noise reduction, wherein noise reduction includes reduction of salt and pepper noise, wherein a noisy pixel bears little relation to the color of surrounding pixels, or reduction of Gaussian noise. The preprocessing may include image cropping. The preprocessing may include image resizing. The preprocessing may include image compression. The sensor array may be a camera.
In another aspect, the above-described method is embodied in the form of executable code stored in a computer-readable program medium.
In yet another aspect, a device that is configured or operable to perform the above-described method is disclosed. The device may include a processor that is programmed to implement this method.
The above and other aspects and features of the disclosed technology are described in greater detail in the drawings, the description and the claims.
Pictures taken by still or video cameras are typically intended for human viewing. The pictures are in full color with high resolution in three primary color such as red (R), green (G) and blue (B). Image processing including vision tasks such as object detection, semantic segmentation, and others typically use processed, well rendered images that are intended for human eyes. However, images for use by machines do not need to have the same characteristics as images intended for human viewing. For example, de-mosaicing, white balancing, color reduction, and other image processing may not be necessary for machine vision used for autonomous vehicles. Since the foregoing image processing tasks do not add additional information, they may not be needed or be useful for machine images. Not performing some processing tasks such as white balancing, which can cause over exposure, also improves the images. Moreover, the amount of data required to represent an image for machine use is less than the full color RGB representation of an image.
In some example embodiments, the RGB information for each pixel in an image may be reduced so that instead of each pixel having intensity values for each of R, G, and B, each pixel has only one intensity corresponding to R, G or B. A predetermined pattern of R, G, and B may be assigned to the array of pixels in an image. By reducing the number of intensity values per pixel from three to one, the data required to represent the image is reduced to ⅓ of the data needed for a full color RGB image. In this way, the amount of data needed to represent an image is reduced to ⅓ while maintaining color sensitivity needed for colored objects in the image. Reducing the amount of data needed to represent the image reduces the bandwidth needed to transfer the image in a fixed amount of time or allows the image to be transferred or processed in less time. Both of these improve machine vision performance and responsiveness. As an illustrative example, a camera image with a size of 200 pixels by 300 pixels has 60,000 pixels. If each pixel is represented by an 8-bit red (R) value, an 8-bit green (G) value, and an 8-bit blue (B) value, the total number of bits required to represent the color image is 300 (pixels)×200 (pixels)×8 (bits)×3 (colors)=1,440,000 bits. By applying the pattern to select one of R, G, or B, for each pixel in a pattern, the number of bits needed to represent the image is reduced to 480,000. The foregoing is an example for illustrative purposes. Other numbers of pixels per image or bits of resolution per color can also be used.
At 110, an image is received form a camera or LiDAR or other image generating device. For example, an image from a solid-state camera such as a charge coupled device (CCD) camera is received. The camera may have separate outputs for R, G, and B or may have a composite output. As an example, R, G, and B may each be represented by 8-bit luminance values or may be represented by analog voltages. In another example, the image may be from a multi-spectral Light Detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor. Each “color” may be represented by an 8-bit or another bit resolution value.
At 120, the data required to represent the raw image is reduced. For example, the RGB information for each pixel in an image may be reduced so that instead of each pixel having intensity values for each of R, G, and B, each pixel has only one intensity corresponding to R, G or B. By reducing the number of intensity values from three to one, the data required to represent the image is reduced to ⅓ of the data needed for a full color RGB image. In this way, the amount of data needed to represent an image is reduced to ⅓ while maintaining color sensitivity needed for colored objects in the image. Pixels may be selected to be R, G, or B based on a pattern such as a Bayer pattern which is further detailed with respect to
At 130, the reduced image is preprocessed. The preprocessing is minimized to increase processing speed and reduce computational complexity. For example, demosaicing and white balancing may be eliminated and basic pre-processing such as image cropping and resizing may be maintained.
At 140, perception is performed on the preprocessed image. Perception results include object bounding boxes. See, for example,
At 150, the perception result is provided as an output. The output may be used by further image processing tasks related to identifying objects and controlling the vehicle to avoid the objects.
Advantages of the disclosed techniques include the generation of a one-channel image compared to the three-channels (RGB) for usual images. This reduces the space required for storage by ⅔, and reduces the data rate or time for transmission, or a combination of data rate and time for transmission. The second advantage is reduced computational requirements because the image has less data to process and many preprocessing steps are eliminated. Another advantage is that the reduced image causes performance improvement because the raw data even though reduced has more information due to the reduced preprocessing (e.g., removed white balancing which may cause over-exposure).
A Bayer pattern is an example of a color filter array (CFA). In some example embodiments, a color filter array different from a Bayer pattern can be used. Generally, the red, green, and blue colors used in a Bayer pattern can be transformed into another group of three colors where different combinations of the other group of three colors can be combined to cause the appearance of all other visible colors just as red, green, and blue can. Furthermore, a color filter array in some example embodiments may include four instead of three basic colors. For example, a patterned CYGM filter (cyan, yellow, green, magenta) can be used, or a patterned RGBE filter (red, green, blue, emerald) can be used as a CFA. Moreover, in some example embodiments, a CFA may add pixels that are not color filtered including a CMYW (cyan, magenta, yellow, and white) CFA.
Some example implementations may be described as following examples.
1. A method for processing an image, comprising: receiving an image including an x-y array of pixels from a sensor array, each pixel in the x-y array of pixels having a value selected from one of three primary colors, based on a corresponding x-y value in a mask pattern; generating a preprocessed image by performing preprocessing on the image; and performing computerized perception on the preprocessed image to determine one or more outlines of physical objects.
2. The method of example 1, wherein the mask pattern is a Bayer pattern.
3. The method of example 2, wherein the Bayer pattern is a red-green-green-blue pattern assigned to a 2-pixel by 2-pixel array repeated across the raw image.
4. The method of example 1, wherein the pattern includes a greater number of green pixel values than both red and blue.
5. The method of example 1, wherein the pattern is selected such that a value of every other pixel along a row in the reduced image corresponds to green value of the raw image.
6. The method of example 1, wherein the pattern is selected such that a value of every other pixel along a column in the reduced image corresponds to green value of the raw image.
6. The method of example 1, wherein, each x-y value in the pattern is from one of three possible values.
7. The method of example 1, wherein the image is generated using one or more color-selective filters.
8. The method of example 1, wherein the preprocessing is performed on the image from the sensor array without human perception image enhancement.
9. The method of example 8, wherein the human perception image enhancement includes one or more of de-mosaicing, white balancing, and noise reduction.
10. The method of example 1, wherein the preprocessing does not include scaling one or more pixels' R, G, or B value for white balancing.
11. The method of example 1, wherein the preprocessing does not include reconstruction a full color image from incomplete color samples output from the sensor array overlaid with a color filter array for de-mosaicing.
12. The method of example 1, wherein the preprocessing does not include noise reduction, wherein noise reduction includes reduction of salt and pepper noise, wherein a noisy pixel bears little relation to the color of surrounding pixels, or reduction of Gaussian noise.
13. The method of example 1, wherein the preprocessing includes image cropping.
14. The method of example 1, wherein the preprocessing includes image resizing.
15. The method of example 1, wherein the preprocessing includes image compression.
16. The method of example 1, wherein the sensor array is a camera.
17. A computer apparatus comprising a processor, a memory and a communication interface, wherein the processor is programmed to implement a method recited in one or more of examples 1 to 16.
18. A computer readable program medium having code stored thereon, the code, when executed by a processor, causing the processor to implement a method recited in one or more of examples 1 to 16.
Implementations of the subject matter and the functional operations described in this patent document can be implemented in various systems, digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing unit” or “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.
A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random-access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this patent document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described in this patent document should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.
Only a few implementations and examples are described and other implementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this patent document.
This patent document claims priority to and benefits of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/656,924, entitled “IMAGES FOR PERCEPTION MODULES OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES,” filed on Apr. 12, 2018. The entire content of the above patent application is incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this patent document.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6084870 | Wooten et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6263088 | Crabtree | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6594821 | Banning et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6777904 | Degner | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6975923 | Spriggs | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7103460 | Breed | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7689559 | Canright | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7742841 | Sakai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783403 | Breed | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7844595 | Canright | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8041111 | Wilensky | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8064643 | Stein | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082101 | Stein | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8164628 | Stein | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175376 | Marchesotti | May 2012 | B2 |
8271871 | Marchesotti | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8346480 | Trepagnier et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8378851 | Stein | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8392117 | Dolgov | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401292 | Park | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412449 | Trepagnier | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8478072 | Aisaka | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8553088 | Stein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8706394 | Trepagnier et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718861 | Montemerlo et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8788134 | Litkouhi | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8908041 | Stein | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8917169 | Schofield | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8963913 | Baek | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8965621 | Urmson | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8981966 | Stein | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8983708 | Choe et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8993951 | Schofield | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002632 | Emigh | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9008369 | Schofield | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025880 | Perazzi | May 2015 | B2 |
9042648 | Wang | May 2015 | B2 |
9081385 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9088744 | Grauer et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9111444 | Kaganovich | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117133 | Barnes | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9118816 | Stein | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9120485 | Dolgov | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9122954 | Srebnik | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9134402 | Sebastian | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9145116 | Clarke | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147255 | Zhang | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9156473 | Clarke | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176006 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9179072 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183447 | Gdalyahu | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9185360 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191634 | Schofield | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9214084 | Grauer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9219873 | Grauer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9233659 | Rosenbaum | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9233688 | Clarke | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9248832 | Huberman | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9248835 | Tanzmeister | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9251708 | Rosenbaum | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9277132 | Berberian | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9280711 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9282144 | Tebay et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286522 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9297641 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9299004 | Lin | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9315192 | Zhu | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9317033 | Ibanez-Guzman et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317776 | Honda | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9330334 | Lin | May 2016 | B2 |
9342074 | Dolgov | May 2016 | B2 |
9347779 | Lynch | May 2016 | B1 |
9355635 | Gao | May 2016 | B2 |
9365214 | Ben Shalom | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9399397 | Mizutani | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9418549 | Kang et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9428192 | Schofield | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9436880 | Bos | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9438878 | Niebla | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443163 | Springer | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9446765 | Ben Shalom | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9459515 | Stein | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9466006 | Duan | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9476970 | Fairfield | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9483839 | Kwon | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9490064 | Hirosawa | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9494935 | Okumura et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9507346 | Levinson et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9513634 | Pack et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9531966 | Stein | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9535423 | Debreczeni | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9538113 | Grauer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9547985 | Tuukkanen | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549158 | Grauer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9555803 | Pawlicki | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9568915 | Berntorp | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9587952 | Slusar | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9599712 | Van Der Tempel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600889 | Boisson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9602807 | Crane et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9612123 | Levinson et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9620010 | Grauer et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9625569 | Lange | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9628565 | Stenneth et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649999 | Amireddy et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9652860 | Maali | May 2017 | B1 |
9669827 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9672446 | Vallesi-Gonzalez | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9679206 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9690290 | Prokhorov | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9701023 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9712754 | Grauer et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9720418 | Stenneth | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723097 | Harris | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723099 | Chen | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723233 | Grauer et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9726754 | Massanell et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9729860 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9738280 | Rayes | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9739609 | Lewis | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9746550 | Nath | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9753128 | Schweizer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9753141 | Grauer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9754490 | Kentley et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9760837 | Nowozin et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9766625 | Boroditsky et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9769456 | You et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9773155 | Shotton et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9779276 | Todeschini et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9785149 | Wang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805294 | Liu et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9810785 | Grauer et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9823339 | Cohen | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9911030 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9953236 | Huang | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10147193 | Huang | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10223806 | Yi et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10223807 | Yi et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10410055 | Wang et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20030114980 | Klausner et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030174773 | Comaniciu | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040264763 | Mas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070183661 | El-Maleh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183662 | Wang | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230792 | Shashua | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286526 | Abousleman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080249667 | Horvitz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090040054 | Wang | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090087029 | Coleman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100049397 | Lin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100111417 | Ward | May 2010 | A1 |
20100195908 | Bechtel | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226564 | Marchesotti | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281361 | Marchesotti | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303349 | Bechtel | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110142283 | Huang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110206282 | Aisaka | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110247031 | Jacoby | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120041636 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120105639 | Stein | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140076 | Rosenbaum | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120274629 | Baek | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314070 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130051613 | Bobbitt et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083959 | Owechko | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130182134 | Grundmann et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130204465 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130266187 | Bulan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130329052 | Chew | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342674 | Dixon | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140072170 | Zhang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104051 | Breed | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142799 | Ferguson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143839 | Ricci | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145516 | Hirosawa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140168421 | Xu | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140198184 | Stein | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140321704 | Partis | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140334668 | Saund | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340570 | Meyers | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150062304 | Stein | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150269438 | Samarsekera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150294160 | Takahashi | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310370 | Burry | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312537 | Solhusvik | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150353082 | Lee et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008988 | Kennedy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026787 | Nairn et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160037064 | Stein | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160094774 | Li | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160118080 | Chen | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160129907 | Kim | May 2016 | A1 |
20160165157 | Stein | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160210528 | Duan | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160224850 | Silver | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160275766 | Venetianer et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160321381 | English | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334230 | Ross et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160342837 | Hong et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160347322 | Clarke et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160375907 | Erban | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170048500 | Shi | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170053169 | Cuban et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170061632 | Linder et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170098132 | Yokota | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170113613 | Van Dan Elzen | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170124476 | Levinson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170134631 | Zhao et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170160197 | Ozcan | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177951 | Yang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170301104 | Qian | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170305423 | Green | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170318407 | Meister | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180151063 | Pun | May 2018 | A1 |
20180158197 | Dasgupta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180210465 | Qu | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180260956 | Huang | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180283892 | Behrendt | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180373980 | Huval | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190025853 | Julian | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190065863 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066329 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066330 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066344 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190108384 | Wang et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190120955 | Zhong | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190132391 | Thomas | May 2019 | A1 |
20190132392 | Liu | May 2019 | A1 |
20190132572 | Shen | May 2019 | A1 |
20190210564 | Han | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190210613 | Sun | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190236950 | Li | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190257987 | Saari | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190266420 | Ge | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101068311 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101288296 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101610419 | Dec 2009 | CN |
102835115 | Dec 2012 | CN |
105698812 | Jun 2016 | CN |
106340197 | Jan 2017 | CN |
106488091 | Mar 2017 | CN |
106781591 | May 2017 | CN |
108010360 | May 2018 | CN |
2608513 | Sep 1977 | DE |
890470 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1754179 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2448251 | May 2012 | EP |
2463843 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2761249 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2946336 | Nov 2015 | EP |
2993654 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3081419 | Oct 2016 | EP |
2018129753 | Aug 2018 | JP |
100802511 | Feb 2008 | KR |
1991009375 | Jun 1991 | WO |
2005098739 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098751 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098782 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2010109419 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2013045612 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014111814 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014166245 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014201324 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015083009 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015103159 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015125022 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015186002 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016090282 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016135736 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017079349 | May 2017 | WO |
2017079460 | May 2017 | WO |
2017013875 | May 2018 | WO |
2019040800 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019084491 | May 2019 | WO |
2019084494 | May 2019 | WO |
2019140277 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2019168986 | Sep 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Carle, Patrick J.F. et al. “Global Rover Localization by Matching Lidar and Orbital 3D Maps.” IEEE, Anchorage Convention District, pp. 1-6, May 3-8, 2010. (Anchorage Alaska, US). |
Caselitz, T. et al., “Monocular camera localization in 3D LiDAR maps,” European Conference on Computer Vision (2014) Computer Vision—ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8690. Springer, Cham. |
Mur-Artal, R. et al., “ORB-SLAM: A Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM System,” IEEE Transaction on Robotics, Oct. 2015, pp. 1147-1163, vol. 31, No. 5, Spain. |
Sattler, T. et al., “Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization?” CVPR, IEEE, 2017, pp. 1-10. |
Engel, J. et la. “LSD-SLAM: Large Scare Direct Monocular SLAM,” pp. 1-16, Munich. |
Levinson, Jesse et al., Experimental Robotics, Unsupervised Calibration for Multi-Beam Lasers, pp. 179-194, 12th Ed., Oussama Khatib, Vijay Kumar, Gaurav Sukhatme (Eds.) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014. |
Geiger, Andreas et al., “Automatic Camera and Range Sensor Calibration using a single Shot”, Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1-8, 2012 IEEE International Conference. |
Zhang, Z. et al. A Flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (vol. 22, Issue: 11, Nov. 2000). |
Bar-Hillel, Aharon et al. “Recent progress in road and lane detection: a survey.” Machine Vision and Applications 25 (2011): 727-745. |
Schindler, Andreas et al. “Generation of high precision digital maps using circular arc splines,” 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Alcala de Henares, 2012, pp. 246-251. doi: 10.1109/IVS.2012.6232124. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'07—IEEE Conference, pp. 1-8, 2007. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Harel, Jonathan and Koch, Christof, “Image Signature: Highlighting Sparse Salient Regions”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 194-201, 2012. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Dynamic Visual Attention: Searching for Coding Length Increments”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 21, pp. 681-688, 2008. |
Li, Yin and Hou, Xiaodi and Koch, Christof and Rehg, James M. and Yuille, Alan L., “The Secrets of Salient Object Segmentation”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 280-287, 2014. |
Zhou, Bolei and Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “A Phase Discrepancy Analysis of Object Motion”, Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 225-238, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Yuille, Alan and Koch, Christof, “Boundary Detection Benchmarking: Beyond F-Measures”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'13, vol. 2013, pp. 1-8, IEEE, 2013. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Color Conceptualization”, Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 265-268, ACM, 2007. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Thumbnail Generation Based on Global Saliency”, Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics, ICCN 2007, pp. 999-1003, Springer Netherlands, 2008. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Yuille, Alan and Koch, Christof, “A Meta-Theory of Boundary Detection Benchmarks”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.5985, 2013. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Shi, Jianping and Liu, Jiaying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Revisiting Batch Normalization for Practical Domain Adaptation”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04779, 2016. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Liu, Jiaying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Demystifying Neural Style Transfer”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.01036, 2017. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “A Time-Dependent Model of Information Capacity of Visual Attention”, International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp. 127-136, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. |
Wang, Panqu and Chen, Pengfei and Yuan, Ye and Liu, Ding and Huang, Zehua and Hou, Xiaodi and Cottrell, Garrison, “Understanding Convolution for Semantic Segmentation”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08502, 2017. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Liu, Jiaying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Factorized Bilinear Models for Image Recognition”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05709, 2016. |
Hou, Xiaodi, “Computational Modeling and Psychophysics in Low and Mid-Level Vision”, California Institute of Technology, 2014. |
Spinello, Luciano, Triebel, Rudolph, Siegwart, Roland, “Multiclass Multimodal Detection and Tracking in Urban Environments”, Sage Journals, vol. 29 Issue 12, pp. 1498-1515 Article first published online: Oct. 7, 2010; Issue published: Oct. 1, 2010. |
Matthew Barth, Carrie Malcolm, Theodore Younglove, and Nicole Hill, “Recent Validation Efforts for a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model”, Transportation Research Record 1750, Paper No. 01-0326, College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, date unknown. |
Kyoungho Ahn, Hesham Rakha, “The Effects of Route Choice Decisions on Vehicle Energy Consumption and Emissions”, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, VA 24061, date unknown. |
Ramos, Sebastian, Gehrig, Stefan, Pinggera, Peter, Franke, Uwe, Rother, Carsten, “Detecting Unexpected Obstacles for Self-Driving Cars: Fusing Deep Learning and Geometric Modeling”, arXiv:1612.06573v1 [cs.CV] Dec. 20, 2016. |
Schroff, Florian, Dmitry Kalenichenko, James Philbin, (Google), “FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering”, CVPR 2015. |
Dai, Jifeng, Kaiming He, Jian Sun, (Microsoft Research), “Instance-aware Semantic Segmentation via Multi-task Network Cascades”, CVPR 2016. |
Huval, Brody, Tao Wang, Sameep Tandon, Jeff Kiske, Will Song, Joel Pazhayampallil, Mykhaylo Andriluka, Pranav Rajpurkar, Toki Migimatsu, Royce Cheng-Yue, Fernando Mujica, Adam Coates, Andrew Y. Ng, “An Empirical Evaluation of Deep Learning on Highway Driving”, arXiv:1504.01716v3 [cs.RO] Apr. 17, 2015. |
Tian Li, “Proposal Free Instance Segmentation Based on Instance-aware Metric”, Department of Computer Science, Cranberry-Lemon University, Pittsburgh, PA., date unknown. |
Mohammad Norouzi, David J. Fleet, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, “Hamming Distance Metric Learning”, Departments of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Toronto, date unknown. |
Jain, Suyong Dutt, Grauman, Kristen, “Active Image Segmentation Propagation”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, Jun. 2016. |
MacAodha, Oisin, Campbell, Neill D.F., Kautz, Jan, Brostow, Gabriel J., “Hierarchical Subquery Evaluation for Active Learning on a Graph”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014. |
Kendall, Alex, Gal, Yarin, “What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision”, arXiv:1703.04977v1 [cs.CV] Mar. 15, 2017. |
Wei, Junqing, John M. Dolan, Bakhtiar Litkhouhi, “A Prediction- and Cost Function-Based Algorithm for Robust Autonomous Freeway Driving”, 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, Jun. 21-24, 2010. |
Peter Welinder, Steve Branson, Serge Belongie, Pietro Perona, “The Multidimensional Wisdom of Crowds”; http://www.vision.caltech.edu/visipedia/papers/WelinderEtaINIPS10.pdf, 2010. |
Kai Yu, Yang Zhou, Da Li, Zhang Zhang, Kaiqi Huang, “Large-scale Distributed Video Parsing and Evaluation Platform”, Center for Research on Intelligent Perception and Computing, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, arXiv:1611.09580v1 [cs.CV] Nov. 29, 2016. |
P. Guarneri, G. Rocca and M. Gobbi, “A Neural-Network-Based Model for the Dynamic Simulation of the Tire/Suspension System While Traversing Road Irregularities,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 1549-1563, Sep. 2008. |
C. Yang, Z. Li, R. Cui and B. Xu, “Neural Network-Based Motion Control of an Underactuated Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Model,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 2004-2016, Nov. 2014. |
Stephan R. Richter, Vibhav Vineet, Stefan Roth, Vladlen Koltun, “Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Games”, Intel Labs, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2016. |
Thanos Athanasiadis, Phivos Mylonas, Yannis Avrithis, and Stefanos Kollias, “Semantic Image Segmentation and Object Labeling”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17, No. 3, Mar. 2007. |
Marius Cordts, Mohamed Omran, Sebastian Ramos, Timo Rehfeld, Markus Enzweiler Rodrigo Benenson, Uwe Franke, Stefan Roth, and Bernt Schiele, “The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding”, Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, Nevada, 2016. |
Adhiraj Somani, Nan Ye, David Hsu, and Wee Sun Lee, “DESPOT: Online POMDP Planning with Regularization”, Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, date unknown. |
Adam Paszke, Abhishek Chaurasia, Sangpil Kim, and Eugenio Culurciello. Enet: A deep neural network architecture for real-time semantic segmentation. CoRR, abs/1606.02147, 2016. |
Szeliski, Richard, “Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications” http://szeliski.org/Book/, 2010. |
Chinese Application No. 201910192585.4, First Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2021. |
Queau, Yvain et al., Microgeometry capture and RGB albedo estimation by photometric stereo without demosaicing. Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte, May 14, 2017, pp. 1-7. |
Losson, Olivier & Porebski, A. & Vandenbroucke, Nicolas & Macaire, Ludovic. (2013). Color texture analysis using CFA chromatic co-occurrence matrices. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 117. 747-763. 10.1016/j.cviu.2013.03.001. |
Chinese Application No. 201910192584.X, First Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2021. |
Diamond, Steven et al. Dirty pixels: Optimizing Image Classification architectures for raw sensor data. Arxiv.org/abs/1701.06487 (Jan. 23, 2017). pp. 1-11. |
Li, Zhenghao. PIMR: Parallel and Integrated Matching for Raw Data. Sensors (Basel). Jan. 2, 2016;16(1):54. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190318456 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62656924 | Apr 2018 | US |