Compound 3 was synthesised using a manual nitrogen bubbler apparatus on a 0.05 mmol scale using Fmoc-protected Rink Amide MBHA resin (Novabiochem), Fmoc-3-iodo-Tyr-OH (Novabiochem), Fmoc PEG propionic acid (Polypure AS, Cat 15137-1195) and compound 1. All acid functions were pre-activated prior to amide bond formation using HATU/DIEA as coupling reagents with DMF as solvent. Reaction steps were analysed by Kaiser test. Fmoc-deprotection was carried out using 20% piperidine in DMF treating first for 5 minutes followed by 40 minutes with fresh piperidine solution. The cleavage from the resin was carried out in TFA containing 2.5% H2O and 2.5% triisopropylsilane for 2 hours. Crude material was purified by preparative HPLC (column Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 10 μm 250×10 mm; solvents A=water/0.1% TFA and B=acetonitrile/0.1% TFA; gradient 20-40% B over 60 min; flow 5.0 ml/min; UV detection at 214 nm) to give 5-10 mg of white solid. Analysis by LC-MS (column Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 3 μm 2.0×50 mm, solvents: A=water/0.1% TFA and B=acetonitrile/0.1% TFA; gradient 10-80% B over 10 min; flow 0.3 ml/min, UV detection at 214 and 254 nm, ESI-MS positive mode) gave peak expected for [MH]+.
Compound 4 was synthesised using a manual nitrogen bubbler apparatus on a 0.05 mmol scale using Fmoc-protected Rink Amide MBHA resin (Novabiochem), Pmoc-3-iodo-Tyr-OH (Novabiochem), Fmoc-amino-PEG-diglycolic acid (Polypure AS, Cat. 15131-0295) and compound 1. All acid functions were pre-activated prior to amide bond formation using HATU/DIEA as coupling reagents with DMF as solvent. Reaction steps were analysed by Kaiser test. Fmoc-deprotection was carried out using 20% piperidine in DMF treating first for 5 minutes followed by 40 minutes with fresh piperidine solution. The cleavage from the resin was carried out in TFA containing 2.5% H2O and 2.5% triisopropylsilane for 2 hours. Crude material was purified by preparative HPLC (column Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 10 μm 250×10 mm; solvents A=water/0.1% TFA and B=acetonitrile/0.1% TFA; gradient 20-40% B over 60 min; flow 5.0 ml/min; UV detection at 214 nm) to give 5-10 mg of white solid. Analysis by LC-MS (column Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 3 μm 2.0×50 mm, solvents: A=water/0.1% TFA and B=acetonitrile/0.1% TFA; gradient 10-80% B over 10 min; flow 0.3 ml/min, UV detection at 214 and 254 nm, ESI-MS positive mode) gave peak expected for [MH]+.
The identical set of compounds described in Preparation C, Examples 1 and 2 were synthesised where the 3-iodo-tyrosine residue was exchanged for tyrosine. The tyrosine residue was then labelled as the final step using the general procedure described below:
10 μL 0.1 mM Na127I (in 0.01M NaOH, 1×10−mol) was added to a vial containing 200 μL 0.2M NH4OAc buffer (pH 4). This solution was added to the vial containing Na123I (in 0.05M NaOH), which was then transferred to a silanised reaction P15 vial. 5 μL (2.5×10−8mol) of a freshly prepared peracetic acid solution in water (approx. 5 mM) was added to the reaction vial. 17 μL (5×10−8 mol) of a 3 mM solution of substrate in MeOH was added to the reaction vial and the solution mixed by pipetting. The compounds were purified by HPLC, solvent A: 0.1% TFA in water and solvent B: 0.1% TFA in MeCN using a Phenomenex Luna 5 μm C18(2) 150×4.6 mm column. The following gradient was applied:
Radiolabelled compounds 2-4 comprise 127I as an imageable moiety and residue X
as a non-peptidic vector moiety that is an inhibitor for matrix metalloproteinase. Compounds 2 and 3 do not comprise PEG moieties according to the invention and serve as comparison compounds.
Biodistribution studies were carried out in a Lewis Lung mouse Carcinoma model as described in Bae et al, Drugs Exp Clin Res, 2003; 29 (1): 15-23.
Following tail vein injection of the compounds, e the excretion profile was monitored at 5, 30, 60 and 120 minutes. The results are displayed in Table 1.
From the biodistribution results in table 1 it is apparent, that the presence of a PEG containing moiety that comprises 2 to 50 ethylene glycol units in compound 4—i.e. a compound according to claim 1, remarkably improves the biodistribution of the compound in comparison to compounds 2 and 3; the compound is preferably excreted via the renal system.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20042791 | Jul 2004 | NO | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/NO05/00250 | 7/1/2005 | WO | 00 | 12/27/2006 |