This patent document describes a system and method for controlling a laser in an ophthalmic procedure. In more detail, this patent document describes an imaging-controlled laser system for controlling the power of a pulsed ophthalmic laser during capsulotomy and cataract procedures, among others.
Laser systems have become essential for ophthalmic surgery. They have been employed in corneal procedures for some time now with high precision and therefore considerable success. In very recent times applications for other ophthalmic procedures have been contemplated, including cataract procedures.
Lasers can be used for forming high precision cuts. These cuts are created by focusing or directing a rapid sequence of laser pulses to a scan-pattern or point-pattern. The points of the scan-pattern often form a line or layer and the laser pulses are directed to these points by a scanning system that includes deflection devices, mirrors and lenses whose alignment can be changed very quickly. In typical laser systems the pulses can have a duration or pulse length in the nanosecond, picosecond, or even femtosecond range. The pulse repetition rate can be in the kHz to hundreds of kHz range.
The power or energy of the laser pulses can be chosen to exceed a so-called photodisruption threshold. Laser pulses with a power above this threshold can disrupt the ophthalmic tissue at the target points, inducing the formation of bubbles. Lines or layers of these bubbles can weaken the mechanical connection between the tissue-portions on the opposite sides of the bubbles. Often the weakening is substantial, effectively cutting the tissue. Therefore, a subsequent manual procedure can completely separate the tissue portions with ease.
One ophthalmic procedure which could benefit from using such a high precision laser cutting system is cataract surgery. A typical cataract surgery involves a capsulotomy step and a lysis or lens fragmentation step. During lysis, energy is applied to a lens nucleus to liquefy it. During lens fragmentation, or phaco-fragmentation, the nucleus of the lens can be cut into several pieces by scanning the laser along cutting surfaces to enable the subsequent piece-by-piece removal of the nucleus. The capsulotomy involves forming a circular cut on the anterior portion of the capsular bag of the lens to allow the surgeon to access and remove the cut-up pieces of the nucleus.
To optimize surgical laser systems for these complex ophthalmic procedures is a great challenge. However, the optimization promises great returns in terms of the precision and efficacy of the surgical procedures.
One of the challenges of laser cataract surgery is that the procedures of capsulotomy and lens fragmentation can interfere with each other. In advanced laser systems the precision of the surgery can be enhanced by imaging the ophthalmic target tissue prior to the surgery and guide the laser pulses based on the image. If the lens fragmentation is performed first, then, as a surgical by-product, the capsule is expanded considerably and unevenly by the substantial amount of bubbles formed inside the capsule. Therefore, after the lens fragmentation, the capsule and lens has to be imaged for a second time to guide the subsequent circular cut of the capsulotomy. However, imaging the severely photodisrupted and distorted lens can be challenging. Also, the repeated imaging procedure consumes precious surgical time, increasing the discomfort of the patient, potentially undermining the precision of the entire procedure.
On the other hand, if the capsulotomy is performed first, it creates a substantial amount of bubbles in the anterior region of the lens and in the anterior aqueous chamber of the eye. The amount of bubbles is especially high if the lens is in a tilted position before the procedure, as explained below. These bubbles can increase the scattering of the laser pulses of the subsequent lens fragmentation considerably as the subsequent pulses are directed to the inside of the lens and thus propagate through the bubble-rich anterior region. The increased scattering can again potentially undermine the precision of the cataract procedure.
Thus, both sequences of the lens fragmentation and capsulotomy have drawbacks, as the first step can reduce the precision and control of the subsequent step. Therefore, laser systems that reduce, resolve, or eliminate one or more of these drawbacks can offer advantages.
Embodiments of the present invention can provide advantageous functionalities in view of these challenges. In particular, an embodiment of an imaging-based laser system can include a laser-beam system, configured to generate and scan a beam of laser pulses with an adjustable laser-power parameter to points of a scan-pattern in an eye, and an imaging-based laser-controller, configured to image a layer in the eye, to control the scanning of the beam of laser pulses to the points of the scan-pattern, and to control a laser-power parameter of the laser pulses according to the distance of the points of the scan-pattern from the imaged layer.
An implementation of an imaging-based laser system can include a laser that generates and directs a beam of laser pulses into an eye, an imaging system that images a capsule layer of the eye, and a laser control system that controls the laser to direct the beam to spots within a tracking band of the imaged capsule layer with a laser-power parameter above a photo-disruption threshold, and to spots outside the tracking band of the imaged capsule layer with a laser-power parameter below a photo-disruption threshold, wherein the image-based laser system is configured to perform a capsulotomy before a lysis or lens- or phaco-fragmentation during a cataract procedure.
An implementation of an image-guided ophthalmic laser system can include a laser engine, configured to generate laser pulses, a beam modifier, configured to modify a laser-power parameter of the laser pulses, a laser scanner, configured to direct the laser pulses to scanning-points in an eye, an imaging system, configured to image a region in the eye, and a pattern generator, coupled to the imaging system, the beam modifier and the laser scanner, configured to generate coordinates of the scanning-points for the laser scanner, and to associate a laser-power parameter with the scanning-points depending on a distance of the scanning-points from a target-pattern.
In some implementations, a method of performing an imaging-controlled ophthalmic procedure can include imaging a layer in an eye, generating coordinates of points of a scan-pattern, determining a distance of the points of the scan-pattern from the imaged layer, and associating laser-power parameters with the points based on the determined distance.
Implementations and embodiments described in this patent document offer improvements for the above described challenges.
The laser beam of the laser-beam system 110 can be guided into the main optical pathway at a beam-splitter 132-1 that can redirect the beam to an objective 134. The beam can propagate through the objective 134 and through a patient interface 136 to enter into the surgical eye 1.
The surgery can be assisted by imaging the eye 1 with various techniques. A visible imaging light can be used to create a video image that is processed by a video microscope 138. In addition, the imaging-based laser-controller 120 can shine an imaging beam on the eye and form an image based on the returned image beam. This imaging beam can be coupled into and out of the main optical path by a beam-splitter 132-2.
The beam attenuator 114 can include a Pockels cell, a polarizer-assembly, a mechanical shutter, an electro-mechanical shutter, or an energy wheel. Each of these implementations can modify a laser-power parameter of the laser pulses. The laser-power parameter can be a pulse energy, a pulse power, a pulse length or a pulse repetition rate of the laser pulses, among others. The beam attenuator 114 can modify one or more of these laser-power parameters. In a simple implementation, the beam attenuator 114 can shutter or block selected laser pulses. In another, a polarizer assembly can reduce the power of selected laser pulses by adjusting the relative angle of subsequent polarizing filters.
In the embodiment of
Finally,
The pattern generator 124 can signal the generated coordinates of the points of the scan-pattern to the beam scanner 116 with a scanning control signal. Further, the pattern generator 124 can signal the laser-power parameters corresponding to the points of the scan-pattern to the beam attenuator 114 with a power control signal. The laser-power parameter can be a pulse energy, a pulse power, a pulse length or a pulse repetition rate of the laser pulses.
The imaging system 122 can include an ophthalmic coherence tomography (OCT) system, a Scheimpflug imaging system, a scanning imaging system, a single shot imaging system, an ultrasound imaging system, and a video imaging system. Here, the scanning imaging systems can create the image by scanning an imaging beam, whereas single shot imaging systems can acquire imaging information about an imaged area or volume in a single shot. The OCT system can be a time-domain OCT, a frequency-domain OCT, or a spectrometer-based OCT system, among others.
As it has been described above, in order to facilitate the removal of a fragmented nucleus of the lens 220, the cataract surgery typically involves creating a circular capsulotomy cut 250 on the capsular bag 222. As a first step, the imaging system 122 can create an image 252 of the anterior segment of the eye by scanning along a scanning circle 254 and imaging the eye in a depth-range Dimage, defining an image-cylinder 260-i.
In other implementations, the image 252 can include the image of other ophthalmic targets, including corneal layers, portions of the sclera and even retinal layers. The zero depth level can be defined in a large number of ways, using a lens of the objective 134, a reference mirror of the imaging system 122, a level of the patient interface 136, or a level of an ophthalmic structure, such as the cornea 210.
By analyzing the image 252, a surgeon can recognize the image 256 of the imaged layer. Based on the z-depth of the imaged layer, the surgeon can decide where to direct the cutting laser beam to form the capsulotomy cut 250. The cutting laser beam is typically scanned along the same scanning circle 254 to form a cut-cylinder 260-c with a depth-range Dcut, typically smaller than Dimage. This way the placement of the cut-cylinder 260-c benefits maximally from the information contained in the image 252, and in particular in the image 256 of the imaged layer. The capsulotomy cut 250 is formed where the cut-cylinder 260-c intersects the lens capsule 222. In practice, the cut cylinder 260-c is often formed as a stack of bubble-circles, where the individual circles are created by directing the laser pulses along a circular scan-pattern at a fixed z-depth to cause photodisruption, followed by the formation of a similar circle at a slightly lesser z-depth.
In some typical cases, the image depth-range Dimage can be 5-10 millimeters, whereas the cut depth-range Dcut can be in the range of 50-200 microns, in some cases 75-150 microns, sometimes approximately 100 microns.
It is noted that the bubbles of the cut-cylinder 260-c can scatter and deflect laser pulses applied in subsequent surgical steps. For example, in a cataract surgery the capsulotomy can be followed by the lens fragmentation or lysis. The bubbles of the cut-cylinder 260-c can negatively impact the precision and efficiency of this subsequent lens-fragmentation by scattering the lens-fragmenting laser pulses.
Fortunately, when a z-axis of the lens 220 is parallel to a z-axis of the laser system 100, the depth range Dcut of the cut cylinder 260-c can be as little as 100 microns, creating only a limited number of bubbles. Thus, in the case of a well-aligned lens 220, the bubbles of the cut-cylinder 260-c introduce only a limited amount of scatter for the subsequent lens fragmentation laser pulses.
As described above, this outcome can be achieved, for example, by the imaging-based laser-controller 120 imaging the capsular bag 222, controlling the scanning of the beam of laser pulses to the points of the scan-pattern, and controlling a laser-power parameter of the laser pulses according to the distance of the points of the scan-pattern from the imaged layer.
The just-described method creates bubbles only in a Dcut proximity of the imaged layer and therefore substantially reduces the number of bubbles to a value close to the number of bubbles for a well-aligned lens. For this reason, the scattering of the subsequent lens-fragmenting laser pulses by these capsulotomy bubbles is substantially reduced. Using the earlier value of Dcut being 400-600 microns for a tilted lens and 100 microns for a non-tilted lens, the present method may reduce the scattering of the lens-fragmenting bubbles by a factor of 4-6: a considerable gain in precision and control.
The above-outlined implementations depend on the knowledge of the distance between the points of the scan-pattern and the imaged layer. Three stages are involved in determining this distance. First, the identity of the imaged layer is identified in the image 252 to determine the image 256 of the imaged layer. Then, the z-depth coordinate of the imaged layer is determined. Finally, the distance of the imaged layer and the points of the scan-pattern can be determined, for example, by taking the difference of the z-depth coordinates of the points of the scan-pattern and the imaged layer at the corresponding angular scanning coordinates, such as at the same angle.
Concerning the first step, the raw image 252 does not isolate or identify the imaged layer explicitly. Thus, establishing the identity of the imaged layer may necessitate an analysis of the image 252. As discussed earlier, this analysis of the image can be performed by the imaging system 122, the pattern generator 124, or the image analyzer 126, possibly assisted by an input from a system operator through the operator interface 128.
For example, on a graphical user interface, or GUI, the operator interface 128 can prompt the operator to fit a model curve 258 to the spots in the image 252 representing the imaged layer. Since in the case of a tilted ellipsoid-shaped lens the image 256 of the imaged layer is typically a sinusoidal curve, the operator interface 128 can display a generic sinusoidal curve 258 on the GUI and prompt the operator to fit this model curve 258 to the layer-spots in the image 252. Once the operator fitted the model curve 258 to the layer-spots in the image 252, the model curve 258 can serve as the image 256 of the imaged layer.
The operator can achieve this task through various approaches: by shifting the model curve 258 by an Xshift in the X direction (i.e. adjusting the angle along the circular scan) and by shifting the model curve 258 by a Yshift in the Y direction (i.e. adjusting the z-depth coordinate). In other implementations the operator can be prompted to adjust the scale of the model curve 258 to the scale of the sinusoidally located layer-spots in the image 252, i.e. to rescale the z-depth of the model curve 258 to fit the z-depth of the layer-spots. Many other fitting techniques can be implemented to achieve analogous functionalities.
The operator interface 128 can receive the input from the operator in many different ways, including through a keyboard, a touch-screen, a computer-communication channel, an external memory, a flash-drive, an internet connection, a speech-recognition apparatus or a wireless connection.
In other implementations, the determination of the identity and the z-depth of the imaged layer can be performed by the laser system 100 without the input of a surgeon or operator. In particular, the imaging system 122 can be configured to determine the identity and then the z-depth coordinate of the imaged layer by a processor or micro-computer performing a feature-recognition analysis of the image 252. For example, the imaging system 122 can determine the identity and coordinates of the imaged layer by locating local maxima of the gradient of the spot intensity. In other implementations, an edge-recognition algorithm can be used. In these implementations, the imaging system 122 can identify the manifold of the maximum-gradient points as the image 256 of the imaged layer without resorting to fitting a model curve 258. In some implementations, of course, the imaging system 122 can make use of a model curve 258 to identify the image 256 of the imaged layer.
In the above implementations, once the identity of the imaged layer has been determined in the image 252, the z-depth coordinates of the imaged layer can be determined in a straightforward manner, for example, by counting the pixels in the image 252, or using a reference or a look-up table.
For the image analysis, the imaging system 122 can utilize a result of a pre-surgery measurement, statistical data, video image data, ophthalmic coherence tomography image data, or a model-based computation during the determination of the z-depth.
Once the z-depth of the imaged layer has been determined, the imaging system 122 can forward the z-depth and the corresponding scanning coordinates of the imaged layer to the pattern generator 124 to carry out the last stage, the determination of the distance between the imaged layer and the points of the scan-pattern, generated by the pattern generator 124. This stage can be carried out, for example, by subtracting the z-depth coordinates of the points of the scan-pattern from the z-depth coordinates of the imaged layer that correspond to the same scanning variable, such as the same scanning angle.
Finally, having determined the distance of the points of the scan-pattern from the imaged layer, the pattern generator 124 can associate a laser-power parameter above a photodisruption threshold with those points that are closer to the imaged layer than a predetermined distance, and associate a laser-power parameter below a photodisruption threshold with those points that are farther from the imaged layer than the predetermined distance, as described in relation to
In some implementations, the imaging system 122 only captures the image 252 but does not identify the imaged layer or determine its z-depth coordinates. In these embodiments, the imaging system 122 can simply forward the unprocessed image 252 to the pattern generator 124 without analyzing it. The pattern generator 124 can receive the image 252, identify the imaged layer and determine the z-depth coordinate of the imaged layer corresponding to a scanning coordinate along an image scan.
As above, in some implementations, the pattern generator 124 can determine the z-depth of the imaged layer by performing a feature-recognition analysis of the received image 252. In other implementations, the pattern generator 124 can receive an operator input through the operator interface 128 during the process of determining the z-depth of the imaged layer, as described before.
In these implementations, once the z-depth coordinates of the imaged layer have been determined, the pattern generator 124 can define a tracking band 257 as a manifold of the points of the scan-pattern that are within a predefined distance from the coordinates of the imaged layer. Then the pattern generator 124 can associate a laser-power parameter above a photodisruption threshold with points of the scan-pattern inside the tracking band 257, and a laser-power parameter below a photodisruption threshold with points of the scan-pattern outside the tracking band 257.
Yet other implementations of the laser controller 120 may include an image analyzer 126 that can determine the z-depth coordinate of the imaged layer corresponding to a scanning coordinate along an image-scan. As was illustrated in
The image analyzer 126 can identify the imaged layer and determine the z-depth coordinate of the imaged layer by performing a feature-recognition analysis of the image 252. In other implementations, the image analyzer 126 can determine the z-depth coordinate by making use of an operator input through an operator-interface 128.
The operation of the laser system 100 can be demonstrated on the example of the capsulotomy procedure, where the imaged layer is the lens capsule 222 between the lens 220 and the aqueous anterior chamber 230. In this case, the scan-pattern corresponds to the cut-cylinder 260-c intersecting the lens capsule 222 at the capsulotomy cut 250. The pattern generator 124 can associate a photodisruptive laser-power parameter with points inside a tracking band 257 related to the intersection 250 of the cut-cylinder 260-c and the lens capsule 222, and a non-photodisruptive laser-power parameter with points outside the tracking band 257.
In some detail, the cataract procedure 350 can include an imaging 360 of the capsule 222, e.g. by an OCT imaging system, followed by a capsulotomy 370, and completed by a lens fragmentation 380. Since the capsulotomy 370 does not deform the lens 220, there is no need for a second imaging, in contrast to the procedure 300.
Next, the method 400 can include a generating 430 of coordinates of points of a scan-pattern, and a determining 440 of a distance of the points of the scan-pattern from the imaged layer. These steps can be performed for example, by the pattern generator 124.
The method 400 can further include an associating 450 of laser-power parameters with the generated points based on their determined distance. The tasks 420 to 450 can include receiving possible inputs 422-452 from an operator of the laser system 100 through the operator interface 128.
The method can also include a signaling 460 of the generated coordinates of the points of the scan-pattern to the beam scanner 116 and a signaling 470 of the corresponding laser-power parameters to the beam attenuator 114.
An example for such a target pattern can be a chop pattern 500, including the chop-planes 500-X and 500-Y. Such chop patterns 500 can be used for lens fragmentation.
In contrast, embodiments of the laser system 100 can associate laser-parameters depending on the distance of the points of the scan-pattern from the chop planes 500-Xt and 500-Yt.
In other implementations, the cutting surface can be a circular surface-segment, a spiral surface-segment, a corneal access cut and a limbal relaxing cut.
In some implementations, the pattern generator 124 can be configured to associate the laser-power parameters with the points of the scan-pattern depending additionally on a distance of the points from an ophthalmic layer, imaged by the imaging system 122.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention or of what can be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features can be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination can be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4164222 | Prokhorov et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4198143 | Karasawa | Apr 1980 | A |
4235529 | Kawase et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4465348 | Lang | Aug 1984 | A |
4520816 | Schachar et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4533222 | Ishikawa | Aug 1985 | A |
4538608 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Sep 1985 | A |
4554917 | Tagnon | Nov 1985 | A |
4638801 | Daly et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4764005 | Webb et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4881808 | Bille et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4901718 | Bille et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907586 | Bille et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5048946 | Sklar et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5049147 | Danon | Sep 1991 | A |
5054907 | Sklar et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5098426 | Sklar et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5112328 | Taboada et al. | May 1992 | A |
5139022 | Lempert | Aug 1992 | A |
5246435 | Bille et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5255025 | Volk | Oct 1993 | A |
5286964 | Fountain | Feb 1994 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5336215 | Hsueh et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5391165 | Fountain et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5439462 | Bille et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5493109 | Wei et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5549632 | Lai | Aug 1996 | A |
5656186 | Mouron et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5738676 | Hammer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5779696 | Berry et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795295 | Hellmuth et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5936706 | Takagi | Aug 1999 | A |
5954648 | Van Der Brug | Sep 1999 | A |
5954711 | Ozaki et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5994690 | Kulkarni et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004314 | Wei et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6095648 | Birngruber et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099522 | Knopp et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6137585 | Hitzenberger et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6254595 | Juhasz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288784 | Hitzenberger et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314311 | Williams et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317616 | Glossop | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6337925 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377349 | Fercher | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379005 | Williams et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6451009 | Dasilva et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454761 | Freedman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6497701 | Shimmick et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6529758 | Shahidi | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6579282 | Bille et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6623476 | Juhasz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6687010 | Horii et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6730074 | Bille et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741359 | Wei et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6751033 | Goldstein et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755819 | Waelti | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763259 | Hauger et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769769 | Podoleanu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775007 | Izatt et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6863667 | Webb et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6887232 | Bille | May 2005 | B2 |
6899707 | Scholler et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6932807 | Tomita et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6991629 | Juhasz et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7006232 | Rollins et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018376 | Webb et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027233 | Goldstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7061622 | Rollins et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072045 | Chen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072047 | Westphal et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079254 | Kane et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7102756 | Izatt et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113818 | Podoleanu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126693 | Everett et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130054 | Ostrovsky et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133137 | Shimmick | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139077 | Podoleanu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145661 | Hitzenberger | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148970 | de Boer | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7184148 | Alphonse | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7207983 | Hahn et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7248371 | Chan et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7268885 | Chan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7280221 | Wei | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7307733 | Chan et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310150 | Guillermo et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312876 | Chan et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319566 | Prince et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329002 | Nakanishi | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330270 | O'Hara et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330273 | Podoleanu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335223 | Obrebski | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336366 | Choma et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7342659 | Horn et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347548 | Huang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352444 | Seams et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7355716 | de Boer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364296 | Miller et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365856 | Everett et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365859 | Yun et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370966 | Fukuma et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7371230 | Webb et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7372578 | Akiba et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7388672 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390089 | Loesel et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7400410 | Baker et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402159 | Loesel et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426037 | Ostrovsky et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433046 | Everett et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452077 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7452080 | Wiltberger et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461658 | Jones et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466423 | Podoleanu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470025 | Iwanaga | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477764 | Haisch | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480058 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480059 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7488070 | Hauger et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7488930 | Ajgaonkar et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7492466 | Chan et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7503916 | Shimmick | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508525 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7535577 | Podoleanu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7537591 | Feige et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7557928 | Ueno | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7575322 | Somani | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593559 | Toth et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602500 | Izatt et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7604351 | Fukuma et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7614744 | Abe | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630083 | de Boer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7631970 | Wei | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633627 | Choma et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643152 | de Boer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7797119 | De Boer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813644 | Chen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7898712 | Adams et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8262646 | Frey et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8382745 | Naranjo-Tackman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394084 | Palankar et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010022648 | Lai | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020013574 | Elbrecht et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020082466 | Han | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097374 | Payne et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133145 | Gerlach et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020198516 | Knopp | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030090674 | Zeylikovich et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030206272 | Cornsweet et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040039378 | Lin | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059321 | Knopp et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040151466 | Crossman-Bosworth et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040243233 | Phillips | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010109 | Faul | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015120 | Seibel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021011 | LaHaye | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050173817 | Fauver et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192562 | Loesel et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201633 | Moon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203492 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215986 | Chernyak et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050284774 | Mordaunt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286019 | Wiltberger et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288745 | Andersen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020172 | Luerssen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060077346 | Matsumoto | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100613 | McArdle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060179992 | Kermani | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187462 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195076 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206102 | Shimmick | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070013867 | Ichikawa | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070121069 | Andersen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126985 | Wiltberger et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129709 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129775 | Mordaunt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147730 | Wiltberger et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173791 | Raksi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173794 | Frey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173795 | Frey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185475 | Frey et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189664 | Andersen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070216909 | Everett et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219541 | Kurtz | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230520 | Mordaunt et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070282313 | Huang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291277 | Everett et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299429 | Amano | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080033406 | Andersen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049188 | Wiltberger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055543 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080056610 | Kanda | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071254 | Lummis et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088795 | Goldstein et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100612 | Dastmalchi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080281303 | Culbertson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281413 | Culbertson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319427 | Palanker | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012507 | Culbertson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090088734 | Mordaunt | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125005 | Chernyak et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131921 | Kurtz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149742 | Kato et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157062 | Hauger et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161827 | Gertner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168017 | O'Hara et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177189 | Raksi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090268161 | Hart et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100004641 | Frey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100004643 | Frey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100007848 | Murata | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022994 | Frey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022995 | Frey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022996 | Frey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042079 | Frey et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100110377 | Maloca et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137850 | Culbertson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100292678 | Frey et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324543 | Kurtz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022036 | Frey et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110106066 | Bor | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118609 | Goldshleger et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110166557 | Naranjo-Tackman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184392 | Culbertson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184395 | Schuele et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196350 | Friedman et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202046 | Angeley et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110319873 | Raksi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120089134 | Horvath et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120274903 | Sayeram et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1444946 | Aug 2004 | EP |
9808048 | Feb 1998 | WO |
03062802 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2006074469 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007084694 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007106326 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007130411 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2010075571 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011011788 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Arimoto et al., “Imaging Properties of Axicon in a Scanning Optical System,” Nov. 1, 1992, Applied Optics, 31 (31):6652-6657. |
Birngruber et al., “In-Vivo Imaging of the Development of Linear and Non-Linear Retinal Laser Effects Using Optical Coherence Tomography in Correlation with Histopathological Findings,” 1995, Proc. SPIE 2391:21-27. |
Chinn, S.R., et al., “Optical coherence tomography using a frequency-tunable optical source”, Optics Letters, 22 (5):340-342, Mar. 1997. |
European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 10191057.8, mailed Mar. 16, 2011, to be published by the USPTO. |
Fercher et al., “Eye-Length Measurement by Interferometry With Partially Coherent Light,” Mar. 1988, Optics Letters, 13(3):186-188. |
Fercher et al., “Measurement of Intraocular Distances by Backscattering Spectral Interferometry,” May 15, 1995, Optics Comm. 117:43-48. |
Hee, M., et al., “Femotosecond transillumination optical coherence tomography”, Optics Letters, 18(12):950-952, Jun. 1993. |
Huber, R., et al., “Three-dimensional and C-mode OCT imaging with a compact, frequency swept laser source at 1300 nm”, Optics Express, 13(26):10523-10538, Dec. 2005. |
Izatt et al., “Micron-Resolution Biomedical Imaging With Optical Coherence Tomography,” Oct. 1993, Optics & Photonics News, pp. 14-19. |
Kamensky, V., et al., “In situ monitoring of the middle IR laser ablation of a cataract-suffered human lens by optical coherent tomography”, Proc. SPIE, 2930:222-229, 1996. |
Kamensky, V., et al., “Monitoring and animation of laser ablation process in cataracted eye lens using coherence tomography”, Proc. SPIE, 2981:94-102, 1997. |
Massow, O., et al., “Optical coherence tomography controlled femtosecond laser microsurgery system”, Proceedings of the SPIE—Optical Coherence Tomography and Coherence Techniques III, vol. 6627, pp. 662717(1)-662717(6), Aug. 2007. |
Ohmi, M., et al., “In-situ Observation of Tissue Laser Ablation Using Optical Coherence Tomography”, Optical and Quantum Electronics, 37(13-15):1175-1183, Dec. 2005. |
Ostaszewski et al., “Risley prism Beam Pointer”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6304, 630406-1 thru 630406-10. |
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/023710 mailed Aug. 24, 2011. |
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/025332 mailed Sep. 16, 2011. |
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/056701 mailed Jan. 12, 2011. |
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/075511 mailed Mar. 12, 2009. |
Sarunic, M., et al., “Instantaneous complex conjugate resolved spectral domain and swept-source OCT using 3×3 fiber couplers”, Optics Express, 13(3):957-967, Feb. 2005. |
Sarunic, M., et al., “Real-time quadrature projection complex conjugate resolved Fourier domain optical coherence tomography”, Optics Letters, 31(16):2426-2428, Aug. 2006. |
Sarunic, M., et al., “Imaging the Ocular Anterior Segment With Real-Time, Full-Range Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography”, Archives of Ophthalmology, 126(4):537-542, Apr. 2008. |
Stern et al., “Femtosecond Optical Ranging of Corneal Incision Depth,” Jan. 1989, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 30(1):99-104. |
Swanson et al., “In vivo retinal imaging by optical coherence tomography”, Optics Letters, 18(21), 1864-1866, Nov. 1993. |
Tao, Y., et al., “High-speed complex conjugate resolved retinal spectral domain optical coherence tomography using sinusoidal phase modulation”, Optics letters, 32(20):2918-2920, Oct. 2007. |
Wojtkowski et al., “In Vivo Human Retinal Imaging by Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography,” Jul. 2002, Journal of Biomedical Optics 7(3):457-463, 7 pages. |
Yun, S.H., et al., “Wavelength-swept fiber laser with frequency shifted feedback and resonantly swept intra-cavity acoustooptic tunable filter”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 3(4):1087-1096, Aug. 1997. |
PCT International Search Report corresponding to PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/051466 dated Apr. 10, 2012. |
Partial International Search Report corresponding to PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035927 dated Aug. 3, 2012. |
PCT International Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051360, filed Sep. 13, 2011. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 9, 2012 for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/040223. |
Aslyo-Vogel et al., “Darstellung von LTK-Läsionen durch optische Kurzkohärenztomographie (OCT) und Polarisationsmikroskopie nach Sirius-Rot-Fäbung”, Ophthalmologe, pp. 487-491, 7-97. |
Bagayev et al., “Optical coherence tomography for in situ monitoring of laser corneal ablation”, Journal of Biomedical Optics, 7(4), pp. 633-642 (Oct. 2002). |
Blaha et al., “The slit lamp and the laser in ophthalmology—a new laser slit lamp”, SPIE Optical Instrumentation for Biomedical Laser Applications, vol. 658, pp. 38-42, 1986. |
Boppart, S., et al., “Intraoperative Assessment of Microsurgery with Three-dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography”, Radiology, 208(1):81-86, Jul. 1998. |
Davidson, “Analytic Waveguide Solutions and the Coherence Probe Microscope”, Microelectronic Engineering, 13, pp. 523-526, 1991. |
Drexler, W., et al., “Measurement of the thickness of fundus layers by partial coherence tomography”, Optical Engineering, 34(3):701-710, Mar. 1995. |
Dyer, R, et al., “Optical Fibre Delivery and Tissue Ablation Studies using a Pulsed Hydrogen Fluoride Laser”, Lasers in Medical Science, 7:331-340, 1992. |
Fercher et al., “In Vivo Optical Coherence Tomography”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, 116(1), pp. 113-114, 1993. |
Fujimoto, J., et al., :Biomedical Imaging using Optical Coherent Tomography, 1994, 67. |
Hammer, D., “Ultrashort pulse laser induced bubble creation thresholds in ocular media”, SPIE, 2391:30-40, 1995. |
Hauger, C., et al., “High speed low coherence interferometer for optical coherence tomography”, Proceedings of SPIE, 4619:1-9, 2002. |
Hee, M., et al., “Optical Coherence tomography of the Human Retina”, Arch Ophthalmol, 113:325-332; Mar. 1995. |
Hitzenberger et al., “Interferometric Measurement of Corneal Thickness With Micrometer Precision”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, 118:468-476, Oct. 1994. |
Hitzenberger, C., et al., “Retinal layers located with a precision of 5 μm by partial coherence interferometry”, SPIE, 2393:176-181, 1995. |
Itoh et al., “Absolute measurements of 3-D shape using white-light interferometer”, SPIE Interferometry: Techniques and Analysis, 1755:24-28, 1992. |
Izatt et al., “Ophthalmic Diagnostics using Optical Coherence Tomography”, SPIE Ophthalmic Technologies, 1877:136-144, 1993. |
Izatt, J., et al., “Micrometer-Scale Resolution Imaging of the Anterior Eye In vivo With Optical Coherence Tomography”, Arch Ophthalmol, 112:1584-1589, Dec. 1994. |
Jean, B., et al., “Topography assisted photoablation”, SPIE, vol. 3591:202-208, 1999. |
Kamensky, V., et al., “In Situ Monitoring of Laser Modification Process in Human Cataractous Lens and Porcine Cornea Using Coherence Tomography”, Journal of biomedical Optics, 4(1), 137-143, Jan. 1999. |
Lee et al., “Profilometry with a coherence scanning microscope”, Applied Optics, 29(26), 3784-3788, Sep. 10, 1990. |
Lubatschowski, “The German Ministry of Research and education funded this OCT guided fs laser surgery in Sep. 2005”, http://www.laser-zentrum-hannover.de/download/pdf/taetigkeitsbericht2005.pdf. |
Massow, O., et al., “Femotosecond laser microsurgery system controlled by OCT”, Laser Zentrum Hannover e.V., The German Ministry of education and research,19 slides, 2007. |
Puliafito, Carmen, “Final technical Report: Air Force Grant #F49620-93-I-03337(1)” dated Feb. 12, 1997, 9 pages. |
Ren, Q., et al., “Axicon: A New Laser Beam Delivery System for Corneal Surgery”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 26(12):2305-2308, Dec. 1990. |
Ren, Q., et al., “Cataract Surgery with a Mid-Infrared Endo-laser System”, SPIE Ophthalmic Technologies II, 1644:188-192, 1992. |
Thompson, K., et al., “Therapeutic and Diagnostic Application of Lasers in Ophthalmology”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 80(6):838-860, Jun. 1992. |
Thrane, L, et al., “Calculation of the maximum obtainable probing depth of optical coherence tomography in tissue”, Proceedings of SPIE, 3915:2-11, 2000. |
Wisweh, H., et al., “OCT controlled vocal fold femtosecond laser microsurgery”, Laser Zentrum Hannover e.V., The German Ministry of education and research, Grants: 13N8710 and 13N8712; 23 slides, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120296319 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |