The present invention relates to imaging devices, and more particularly, to imaging devices having micromachined ultrasound transducers (MUTs).
A non-intrusive imaging system for imaging internal organs of a human body and displaying images of the internal organs transmits signals into the human body and receives signals reflected from the organs. Typically, transducers, such as capacitive transduction (cMUTs) or piezoelectric transduction (pMUTs), that are used in an imaging system are referred to as transceivers and some of the transceivers are based on photo-acoustic or ultrasonic effects. In general, a MUT includes two or more electrodes and the topology of the electrodes affects both electrical and acoustic performances of the MUT. For instance, the amplitude of acoustic pressure generated by a pMUT increases as the size of the electrodes increase, to thereby improve the acoustic performance of the pMUT. However, as the size of the electrodes increases, the capacitance also increases to degrade the electrical performance of the pMUT. In another example, the amplitude of acoustic pressure at a vibrational resonance frequency of the pMUT is affected by the shape of the electrodes. As such, there is a need for methods for designing electrodes to enhance both acoustical and electrical performances of the transducers.
In embodiments, a micromachined ultrasonic transducer (MUT) includes an asymmetric top electrode. The areal density distribution of the asymmetric electrode along an axis has a plurality of local maxima, wherein locations of the plurality of local maxima coincide with locations where a plurality of anti-nodal points at a vibrational resonance frequency are located.
In embodiments, a micromachined ultrasonic transducer (MUT) includes a symmetric top electrode. The areal density distribution of the symmetric electrode along an axis has a plurality of local maxima, wherein locations of the plurality of local maxima coincide with locations where a plurality of anti-nodal points at a vibrational resonance frequency are located.
In embodiments, a transducer array includes a plurality of micromachined ultrasonic transducers (MUTs). Each of the plurality of MUTs includes an asymmetric top electrode.
In embodiments, an imaging device includes a transducer array that has a plurality of micromachined ultrasonic transducers (MUTs). Each of the plurality of MUTs includes a symmetric top electrode. The areal density distribution of the symmetric electrode along an axis has a plurality of local maxima and wherein locations of the plurality of local maxima coincide with locations where a plurality of anti-nodal points at a vibrational resonance frequency are located.
References will be made to embodiments of the invention, examples of which may be illustrated in the accompanying figures. These figures are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Although the invention is generally described in the context of these embodiments, it should be understood that it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to these particular embodiments.
Figure (or “FIG.”) 1 shows an imaging system according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, specific details are set forth in order to provide an understanding of the disclosure. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the disclosure can be practiced without these details. Furthermore, one skilled in the art will recognize that embodiments of the present disclosure, described below, may be implemented in a variety of ways, such as a process, an apparatus, a system, or a device.
Elements/components shown in diagrams are illustrative of exemplary embodiments of the disclosure and are meant to avoid obscuring the disclosure. Reference in the specification to “one embodiment,” “preferred embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or “embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, characteristic, or function described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure and may be in more than one embodiment. The appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” or “in embodiments” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment or embodiments. The terms “include,” “including,” “comprise,” and “comprising” shall be understood to be open terms and any lists that follow are examples and not meant to be limited to the listed items. Any headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and shall not be used to limit the scope of the description or the claims. Furthermore, the use of certain terms in various places in the specification is for illustration and should not be construed as limiting.
In embodiments, the imager 120 may be used to get an image of internal organs of an animal, too. The imager 120 may also be used to determine direction and velocity of blood flow in arteries and veins as in Doppler mode imaging and also measure tissue stiffness. In embodiments, the pressure wave 122 may be acoustic waves that can travel through the human/animal body and be reflected by the internal organs, tissue or arteries and veins.
In embodiments, the imager 120 may be a portable device and communicate signals through the communication channel 130, either wirelessly (using a protocol, such as 802.11 protocol) or via a cable (such as USB2, USB 3, USB 3.1, USB-C, and USB thunderbolt), with the device 102. In embodiments, the device 102 may be a mobile device, such as cell phone or iPad, or a stationary computing device that can display images to a user.
In embodiments, more than one imager may be used to develop an image of the target organ. For instance, the first imager may send the pressure waves toward the target organ while the second imager may receive the pressure waves reflected from the target organ and develop electrical charges in response to the received waves.
In embodiments, the device 102 may have a display/screen. In such a case, the display may not be included in the imager 120. In embodiments, the imager 120 may receive electrical power from the device 102 through one of the ports 216. In such a case, the imager 120 may not include the battery 206. It is noted that one or more of the components of the imager 120 may be combined into one integral electrical element. Likewise, each component of the imager 120 may be implemented in one or more electrical elements.
In embodiments, the user may apply gel on the skin of the human body 110 before the body 110 makes a direct contact with the coating layer 212 so that the impedance matching at the interface between the coating layer 212 and the human body 110 may be improved, i.e., the loss of the pressure wave 122 at the interface is reduced and the loss of the reflected wave travelling toward the imager 120 is also reduced at the interface. In embodiments, the transceiver tiles 210 may be mounted on a substrate and may be attached to an acoustic absorber layer. This layer absorbs any ultrasonic signals that are emitted in the reverse direction, which may otherwise be reflected and interfere with the quality of the image.
As discussed below, the coating layer 212 may be only a flat matching layer just to maximize transmission of acoustic signals from the transducer to the body and vice versa. Beam focus is not required in this case, because it can be electronically implemented in control unit 202. The imager 120 may use the reflected signal to create an image of the organ 112 and results may be displayed on a screen in a variety of format, such as graphs, plots, and statistics shown with or without the images of the organ 112.
In embodiments, the control unit 202, such as ASIC, may be assembled as one unit together with the transceiver tiles. In other embodiments, the control unit 202 may be located outside the imager 120 and electrically coupled to the transceiver tile 210 via a cable. In embodiments, the imager 120 may include a housing that encloses the components 202-215 and a heat dissipation mechanism for dissipating heat energy generated by the components.
In embodiments, the substrate 402 and the membrane 406 may be one monolithic body and the cavity 404 may be formed to define the membrane 406. In embodiments, the cavity 404 may be filled with a gas at a predetermined pressure or an acoustic damping material to control the vibration of the membrane 406. In embodiments, the geometrical shape of the projection area of the top electrode 412 may be configured to control the dynamic performance and capacitance magnitude of the pMUT 400.
In embodiments, each MUT 400 may by a pMUT and include a piezoelectric layer formed of at least one of PZT, KNN, PZT-N, PMN-Pt, AlN, Sc-AlN, ZnO, PVDF, and LiNiO3. In alternative embodiments, each MUT 400 may be a cMUT. In
In embodiments, the five vibrational modes 500, 510, 520, 530, and 540 may be associated with five vibrational resonance frequencies, f1, f2, f3, f4, and f5, respectively. In
In
In
In the third vibrational mode 520, the MUT 522 may have two nodal points and three anti-nodal points (or equivalently, three peak amplitude points) 525, 526, and 527. In embodiments, the shape of the top electrode of the MUT 522 may be symmetric and similar to the shape of the top electrode 412.
In
In embodiments, if the top electrode has a symmetric shape, the MUTs may operate in the symmetric vibrational modes 500, 520 and 540. In embodiments, the geometrical shape of the top electrode may be changed so that the MUT may vibrate in one or more asymmetric vibrational modes as well as symmetric vibrational modes. In
In
In general, the acoustic pressure performance, which refers to the energy of an acoustic pressure wave generated by each MUT at a frequency, may increase as the peak amplitude of the MUT increases at the frequency. As depicted in
In embodiments, the location 625 where the height H 641 is maximum is the same as the location 503 where the anti-nodal point (i.e. peak amplitude) of the vibrational mode 500 occurs. As a consequence, the MUT 620 may have strongest acoustic response at the frequency f1, as indicated by the circle 602, where f1 corresponds to the first symmetric vibrational mode (500).
As depicted in
In embodiments, the ratio of L2733 to L1731 may be adjusted to control the locations 726 and 728 of the local maxima of the areal density distribution. For instance, the ratio of L2733 to L1731 may be greater than 1.05. In embodiments, the ratio of H1735 to H2737 may be adjusted to control the acoustic response at the frequency f2. For instance, the ratio of heights H1735 to H2737 may be greater than 1.05.
In embodiments, the distribution of areal density 760 of the top electrode 722 may affect the acoustic response of the MUT 720. As described in conjunction with
As depicted, the areal density distribution 860 may have local maxima at three locations 824, 825, and 826. Also, these three locations 824, 825, and 826 respectively coincide with the locations 525, 526, and 527 where the anti-nodal points of the third symmetric vibrational mode 520 are located. As a consequence, the MUT 820 may have the strongest acoustic response at the frequency f3, as indicated by the circle 802.
In embodiments, the ratio of L3844 to L4846 may be adjusted to control the location 824 of the local maximum of the areal density distribution. For instance, the ratio of the ratio of L4846 to L3844 may be equal to and greater than 10. In embodiments, the ratio of H3850 to H4852 may be adjusted to control the acoustic response at the frequency f2. For instance, the ratio of H4852 to H3850 may be equal to or greater than 1.05.
In embodiments, the areal density distribution 960 may have local maxima at three locations 924, 925, and 926. Also, these three locations 924, 925, and 926 may coincide with the locations 534, 535, and 537 where the anti-nodal points of the vibrational mode 530 are located. As a consequence, the MUT 920 may have the strongest acoustic response at the frequency f4, as indicated by a circle 902.
In embodiments, the areal density distribution 1060 may have local maxima at five locations 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, and 1028. Also, these five locations 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, and 1028 may coincide with the locations 544, 545, 546, 547, and 548 where the peak amplitudes of the vibrational mode 540 are located. As a consequence, the MUT 1020 may have the strongest acoustic response at the frequency f5.
In embodiments, as described in conjunction with
For the purpose of illustration, only five vibrational modes f1-f5 are shown in
It is noted that each of the MUTs 302 in
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the particular forms disclosed, but to the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/180,308, filed Feb. 19, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/833,333, filed Mar. 27, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/951,121, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,648,852, filed Apr. 11, 2018.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2808522 | Dranetz | Oct 1957 | A |
3088323 | Walter et al. | May 1963 | A |
4156800 | Sear et al. | May 1979 | A |
4211949 | Brisken et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4375042 | Marcus | Feb 1983 | A |
4445063 | Smith | Apr 1984 | A |
4517842 | Twomey et al. | May 1985 | A |
4630465 | Hatton | Dec 1986 | A |
4654554 | Kishi | Mar 1987 | A |
4668906 | Ekstrand | May 1987 | A |
4709360 | Martin et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5488956 | Bartelt et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5520187 | Snyder | May 1996 | A |
5548564 | Smith | Aug 1996 | A |
5825117 | Ossmann et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5945770 | Hanafy | Aug 1999 | A |
6051895 | Mercier | Apr 2000 | A |
6108121 | Mansell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
7382635 | Noda | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7532093 | Pulskamp et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
8004158 | Hielscher | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8626295 | Doron et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9067779 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9479875 | Hall et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
10106397 | Kim | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10648852 | Akkaraju et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10656007 | Akkaraju et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10969270 | Akkaraju et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11039814 | Akkaraju et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11143547 | Akkaraju et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
20020109436 | Peng et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040039246 | Gellman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040085858 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050134574 | Hill | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146247 | Fisher et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148132 | Wodnicki | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050200242 | Degertekin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060113866 | Ganor | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070103697 | Degertekin | May 2007 | A1 |
20070197922 | Bradley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205698 | Chaggares et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080009741 | Hyuga | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080048211 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090001853 | Adachi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090250729 | Lemmerhirt | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100168583 | Dausch et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100225204 | Hamann et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256501 | Degertekin | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100301227 | Muntean | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327695 | Goel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110051461 | Buchwald et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110218594 | Doron et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120091543 | Torashima et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120103096 | Kandori | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127136 | Schneider et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120187508 | Adler et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120206014 | Bibl et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120250454 | Rohling et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289897 | Friend et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120294201 | Kurokawa et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120319174 | Wang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130039147 | Witte et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130234559 | Ermolov | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130293065 | Hajati et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130294201 | Hajati | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331705 | Fraser | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140019072 | Alles | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140117812 | Hajati | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145561 | Jin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140219063 | Hajati et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140220723 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225476 | Degertekin et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140328504 | Stephanou et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150097468 | Hajati et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150250452 | Jin et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265245 | Von Ramm et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160027991 | Suzuki | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160045935 | Yoon et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160105748 | Pal et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107194 | Panchawagh et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160136686 | Brock-Fisher | May 2016 | A1 |
20160136687 | Lewis, Jr. et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160262725 | Boser et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170021391 | Guedes et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170209121 | Davis, Sr. et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170232474 | Oralkan et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170309808 | Hada et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170319180 | Henneken et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322290 | Ng et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170368574 | Sammoura | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180153510 | Haque et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190176193 | Shulepov | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190316957 | Akkaraju et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190316958 | Akkaraju et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200205776 | Dekker et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200266798 | Shelton et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210069748 | Bircumshaw et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210078042 | Bircumshaw et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210151661 | Kwon et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210172788 | Akkaraju et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210236090 | Akkaraju et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210364348 | Akkaraju et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220193722 | Bircumshaw et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220304659 | Bircumshaw et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1445872 | Oct 2003 | CN |
102577436 | Jul 2012 | CN |
104271266 | Jan 2015 | CN |
105310718 | Feb 2016 | CN |
106500824 | Mar 2017 | CN |
106999163 | Aug 2017 | CN |
3453056 | Mar 2019 | EP |
S61223683 | Oct 1986 | JP |
S6276392 | Apr 1987 | JP |
H02218983 | Aug 1990 | JP |
H06350155 | Dec 1994 | JP |
2007088805 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007510324 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2008510324 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2009165212 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2012129662 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2013123150 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2014000122 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014127921 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2015521409 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2016503312 | Feb 2016 | JP |
2018502467 | Jan 2018 | JP |
2018046512 | Mar 2018 | JP |
20110039815 | Apr 2011 | KR |
WO-2006123300 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007099696 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2010100861 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2011026187 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2011033887 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2012117996 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO-2013043906 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013158348 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2015131083 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO-2017025438 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO-2017132517 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO-2017182344 | Oct 2017 | WO |
WO-2017216139 | Dec 2017 | WO |
WO-2018102223 | Jun 2018 | WO |
WO-2019164721 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO-2019199397 | Oct 2019 | WO |
WO-2019199398 | Oct 2019 | WO |
WO-2019226547 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO-2020028580 | Feb 2020 | WO |
WO-2021050853 | Mar 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/218,656, inventors Kwon; Haesung et al., filed Mar. 31, 2021. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/364,381, inventors Mantravadi; Naresh et al., filed Jun. 30, 2021. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/364,397, inventors Kwon; Haesung et al., filed Jun. 30, 2021. |
APC International, Ceramic manufacturing series—poling PZT ceramics. https://www.americanpiezo.com/blog/ceramic-manufacturing-series-poling-pzt-ceramics/ [1-3] (2016). |
Assef et al., A reconfigurable arbitrary waveform generator using PWM modulation for ultrasound research. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 12:24 [1-13] (2013). |
Choudhry et al., Comparison of tissue harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal disease. RadioGraphics: Imaging and Therapeutic Technology 20:1127-1135 (2000). |
Dahl, Ultrasound beamforming and image formation, http://people.duke.edu/-jjd/RSNA_USbeamforming.pdf [Slide presentation] (c. 2005). |
Dausch et al., Theory and operation of 2-D array piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducers. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 55(11):2484-2492 (2008). |
Doerry, Generating nonlinear FM chirp waveforms for radar. Sandia Report, SAND2006-5856:1-34 (2006). |
Felix et al., Biplane ultrasound arrays with integrated multiplexing solution for enhanced diagnostic accuracy in endorectal and transvaginal imaging. http://www.vermon.com/vermon/publications/Felix_UFFC_2005.pdf (2005). |
Goldman, Apple's Lightning connector and you: what you should know. CNET Sep. 19, 2012: https://www.cnet.com/news/apples-lightning-connector-and-you-what-you-should-know/ (2012). |
Guedes et al., Aluminum nitride pMUT based on a flexurally-suspended membrane. IEEE 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference:12169346 (2011). |
Hajati et al., Three-dimensional micro electromechanical system piezoelectric ultrasound transducer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101:253101 (2012). |
Harput, Use of chirps in medical ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Group, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, PhD Thesis, Dec. 2012. |
Hill et al. The Role Radius of Curvature Plays in Thiolated Oligonucleotide Loading on Gold Nanopartictes. ACS Nano 3(2):418-424 (2009) Retrieved on Sep. 2, 2021 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241534. |
Karki, Signal conditioning piezoelectric sensors. Texas Instruments Application report, SLA033A:1-5 (2000). |
Khuri-Yakub et al., Capacitive micro machined ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and therapy. Journal of Micromech Microeng. 21(5):054004-054014 (2011). |
Lach et al., Piezoelectric materials for ultrasonic probes. http://www.ndt.net/article/platte2/platte2.htm NDTnet 1(9):1-9 (1996). |
Lee et al., Wafer-to-wafer alignment for three-dimensional integration: a review. Journal of MicroElectroMechanical Systems 20(4):885-898 (2011). |
Lu et al., High frequency piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer array for intravascular ultrasound imaging. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS):06765748 (2014). |
Martin, Introduction to B-mode imaging. Cambridge University Press; Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and equipment, 2nd Edition. Chapter 1:1-10 (2010). |
Mina, High frequency transducers from PZT films. Materials Science and Engineering Thesis; Pennsylvania State University:1-199 (2007). |
Moazzami et al., Electrical characteristics of ferroelectric PZT thin films for DRAM applications. IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices 39(9):2044-2049 (1992). |
Orenstein Scanning in pain—sonographers seek relief from job-related hazard. Radiology Today 10(8):24 (2009). |
Ovland, Coherent plane-wave compounding in medical ultrasound imaging. NTNU-Trondheim, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Master of Science Thesis, 1-62 (Jun. 2012). |
PCT/US2017/063163 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 15, 2018. |
PCT/US2019/021501 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 12, 2019. |
PCT/US2019/021515 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 31, 2019. |
PCT/US2019/033119 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 9, 2019. |
PCT/US2019/044528 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2019. |
PCT/US2020/050374 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2021. |
PCT/US2020/050374 Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Nov. 13, 2020. |
PCT/US2021/024667 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 8, 2021. |
PCT/US2021/025109 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 7, 2021. |
PCT/US2021/039977 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2021. |
PCT/US2021/039994 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2021. |
Pye et al., Adaptive time gain compensation for ultrasonic imaging. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 18(2):205-212 [abstract] (1992). |
Rodriguez et al., Low cost matching network for ultrasonic transducers. Physics Procedia 3:1025-1031 (2010). |
Smyth, Design and modeling of a PZT thin film based piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer (PMUT). MSME Thesis, MIT:1-156 (2012). |
Spectral doppler. http://www.echocardiographer.org/Echo%20Physics/spectral%20doppler.html (2017). |
Szabo. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out. Elsevier Academic Press, ISBN: 0-12-680145-2 (572 pgs) (2014). |
Trots et al., Synthetic aperture method in ultrasound imaging. InTech Press; Ultrasound Imaging, Masayuki Tanabe (Ed.). http://www.intechopen.com/books/ultrasound-imaging/synthetic-aperture-method-in-ultrasound-imaging. Chapter 3:37-56 (2011). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/820,319 Office Action dated May 14, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/951,118 Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/951,121 Office Action dated May 6, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/951,121 Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/833,333 Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/837,800 Office Action dated May 7, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/180,308 Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2021. |
Wang et al., Broadband piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer (pMUT) using mode-merged design. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (IEEE-NEMS 2015):15260900. Xi'an, China, Apr. 7-11, 2015. |
Wang et al., Zero-bending piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer (pMUT) with enhanced transmitting performance. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 24(6):2083-2091 (2015). |
Zhang et al. Double-SOI wafer-bonded CMUTs with improved electrical safety and minimal roughness of dielectric and electrode surfaces. Journal of microelectromechanical systems 21(3):668-680 (2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220205836 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17180308 | Feb 2021 | US |
Child | 17697837 | US | |
Parent | 16833333 | Mar 2020 | US |
Child | 17180308 | US | |
Parent | 15951121 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 16833333 | US |