Patent Grant
11886040
The present disclosure relates to an imaging lens and an imaging apparatus.
In recent years, an imaging element such as a charge coupled device (CCD) or a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) used in combination with an imaging lens has been greatly reduced in size and increased in the number of pixels included therein. According to this, an imaging apparatus comprising the imaging element has also been reduced in size, and it is required that an imaging lens mounted on the imaging apparatus is configured to be small in size by minimizing the number of lenses while ensuring favorable optical performance.
As an imaging lens in consideration of achieving reduction in size, for example, a lens system disclosed in JP5830638B is known. JP5830638B discloses a single focus lens system in which the number of lenses is 6 to 8.
By the way, the demand for the imaging lens is becoming stricter year by year, and higher performance is required. In addition, an imaging lens having a small F-number may be required depending on an imaging environment and/or an imaging target. However, the lens system disclosed in JP5830638B does not have an F-number small enough to meet this requirement.
The present disclosure has been made in view of the above circumstances. An object of an embodiment of the present invention is to provide an imaging lens which has a small F-number and has high optical performance by satisfactorily correcting various aberrations, and an imaging apparatus comprising the imaging lens.
Specific means for solving the above problem includes the following aspects.
An imaging lens according to a first aspect comprises: only eight lenses consisting of, in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens that has a negative refractive power, a second lens that has a negative refractive power, a third lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an image side surface is convex, a fourth lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an object side surface is convex, a fifth lens that has a negative refractive power, a sixth lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an image side surface is convex, a seventh lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an object side surface is convex, and an eighth lens that has a negative refractive power, as lenses having refractive powers. Assuming that an Abbe number of the fifth lens at a d line is νd5, Conditional Expression (1) is satisfied, which is represented by
νd5<23 (1).
An imaging lens according to a second aspect comprises: only eight lenses consisting of, in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens that has a negative refractive power, a second lens that has a negative refractive power, a third lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an image side surface is convex, a fourth lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an object side surface is convex, a fifth lens that has a negative refractive power, a sixth lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an image side surface is convex, a seventh lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an object side surface is convex, and an eighth lens that has a negative refractive power, as lenses having refractive powers. Assuming that a distance on an optical axis between the second lens and the third lens is Db23 and a focal length of a whole system is f, Conditional Expression (2) is satisfied, which is represented by
0.8<Db23/f<7 (2).
An imaging lens according to a third aspect comprises: only eight lenses consisting of, in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens that has a negative refractive power, a second lens that has a negative refractive power, a third lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an image side surface is convex, a fourth lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an object side surface is convex, a fifth lens that has a negative refractive power, a sixth lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an image side surface is convex, a seventh lens that has a positive refractive power and of which an object side surface is convex, and an eighth lens that has a negative refractive power, as lenses having refractive powers. Assuming that a composite focal length of the fourth lens, the fifth lens, and the sixth lens is f456 and a focal length of a whole system is f, Conditional Expression (3) is satisfied, which is represented by
3<f456/f<28 (3).
In at least one of the imaging lenses according to the first, second, and third aspects, it is preferable that, in the third lens, an absolute value of a radius of curvature of the image side surface is smaller than an absolute value of a radius of curvature of an object side surface.
In at least one of the imaging lenses according to the first, second, and third aspects, it is preferable that, in the fourth lens, an absolute value of a radius of curvature of an image side surface is larger than an absolute value of a radius of curvature of the object side surface.
In at least one of the imaging lenses according to the first, second, and third aspects, it is preferable that, in the sixth lens, an absolute value of a radius of curvature of the image side surface is smaller than an absolute value of a radius of curvature of an object side surface.
In at least one of the imaging lenses according to the first, second, and third aspects, it is preferable that, in the seventh lens, an absolute value of a radius of curvature of an image side surface is larger than an absolute value of a radius of curvature of the object side surface.
In at least one of the imaging lenses according to the first, second, and third aspects, it is preferable that any one of the following conditional expressions or any combination of two or more thereof is satisfied.
−8<f1/f<−0.5 (4)
−8<f12/f<−0.5 (5)
f45/f<−0.5 (6)
2<f23/f<30 (7)
0.5<f6/f (8)
0.5<f7/f (9)
3<TL/f<20 (10)
0.5<Bf/f<5 (11)
0.6<ED8r/Bf<2.2 (12)
Here,
f1: focal length of first lens
f: focal length of whole system
f12: composite focal length of first lens and second lens
f45: composite focal length of fourth lens and fifth lens
f23: composite focal length of second lens and third lens
f6: focal length of sixth lens
f7: focal length of seventh lens
TL: sum of distance on optical axis from object side surface of first lens to image side surface of eighth lens and back focal length as air conversion distance
Bf: back focal length as air conversion distance
ED8r: effective diameter of image side surface of eighth lens
An imaging apparatus according to the fourth aspect comprises at least one of the imaging lenses according to the first, second, and third aspects.
In the present specification, it should be noted that the terms “consisting of” and “consists of” mean that the imaging lens may include not only the above-mentioned elements but also lenses substantially having no refractive powers, optical elements, which are not lenses, such as a stop, a filter, and a cover glass, and mechanism parts such as a lens flange, a lens barrel, an imaging element, and a camera shaking correction mechanism.
For a lens including an aspherical surface, the sign of the refractive power, the surface shape of the lens, and the radius of curvature are assumed as those in the paraxial region unless otherwise specified. Reference signs of radii of curvature of surface shapes convex toward the object side are set to be positive, and reference signs of radii of curvature of surface shapes convex toward the image side are set to be negative. The term “a lens having a positive refractive power” and the term “a positive lens” are synonymous. The term “a lens having a negative refractive power” and the term “a negative lens” are synonymous. The term “a back focal length” is the distance on the optical axis from the lens surface closest to the image side to the focal position on the image side.
The term “a focal length” used in the conditional expression is a paraxial focal length. The values of the conditional expression are values on the d line basis. The “d line”, “C line”, and “F line” described in the present specification are emission lines, and the wavelength of the d line is 587.56 nm (nanometers), the wavelength of the C line is 656.27 nm (nanometers), and the wavelength of the F line is 486.13 nm (nanometers).
According to the embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to provide an imaging lens which has a small F-number and has high optical performance by satisfactorily correcting various aberrations, and an imaging apparatus comprising the imaging lens.
Hereinafter, embodiments of an imaging lens of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
The imaging lens 1 comprises only eight lenses consisting of, in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens L1 having a negative refractive power, a second lens L2 having a negative refractive power, a third lens L3 having a positive refractive power, a fourth lens L4 having a positive refractive power, a fifth lens L5 having a negative refractive power, a sixth lens L6 having a positive refractive power, a seventh lens L7 having a positive refractive power, and an eighth lens L8 having a negative refractive power, as lenses having refractive powers. An image side surface of the third lens L3 is convex. An object side surface of the fourth lens L4 is convex. An image side surface of the sixth lens L6 is convex. An object side surface of the seventh lens L7 is convex. The above configuration related to the imaging lens 1 will be referred to as a basic configuration.
The first lens L1 and the second lens L2, which are the first and second lenses from the object side, are configured to be negative lenses, in which a negative refractive power is provided on the object side, and the negative refractive power is shared between the two lenses, whereby it is easy to suppress distortion. The first lens L1 may be, for example, a negative meniscus lens convex toward the object side. In such a case, it is easier to suppress distortion. The second lens L2 may be, for example, a negative meniscus lens convex toward the object side. In such a case, it is easier to suppress distortion.
The third lens L3 and the fourth lens L4 are configured to be positive lenses, whereby it is easy to correct spherical aberration. The convex surfaces of the third lens L3 and the fourth lens L4 are configured to face each other, and by this configuration, it is easier to correct spherical aberration. In the third lens L3, it is preferable that an absolute value of a radius of curvature of the image side surface is smaller than an absolute value of a radius of curvature of an object side surface. In such a case, it is easy to correct spherical aberration and astigmatism. In the fourth lens L4, it is preferable that an absolute value of a radius of curvature of an image side surface is larger than an absolute value of a radius of curvature of the object side surface. In such a case, it is easy to correct spherical aberration and astigmatism.
The fifth lens L5 is configured to be a negative lens, whereby it is easy to satisfactorily correct chromatic aberration. The fifth lens L5 may be, for example, a biconcave lens. In such a case, it is easy to give a strong negative refractive power to the fifth lens L5, and it is easier to satisfactorily correct chromatic aberration.
The sixth lens L6 and the seventh lens L7 are configured to be positive lenses, whereby it is easy to correct spherical aberration. The convex surfaces of the sixth lens L6 and the seventh lens L7 are configured to face each other, and by this configuration, it is easier to correct spherical aberration. In the sixth lens L6, it is preferable that an absolute value of a radius of curvature of the image side surface is smaller than an absolute value of a radius of curvature of an object side surface. In such a case, it is easy to correct spherical aberration and astigmatism. In the seventh lens L7, it is preferable that an absolute value of a radius of curvature of an image side surface is larger than an absolute value of a radius of curvature of the object side surface. In such a case, it is easy to correct spherical aberration and astigmatism. The sixth lens L6 may be, for example, a biconvex lens. The seventh lens L7 may be, for example, a biconvex lens.
The eighth lens L8 is configured to be a negative lens, whereby it is easy to satisfactorily correct chromatic aberration. An object side surface of the eighth lens L8 may be concave, for example. The eighth lens L8 may be a negative meniscus lens concave toward the object side, or may be a biconcave lens. In a case where the eighth lens L8 is a negative meniscus lens concave toward the object side, there is an advantage in improving the telecentricity. In a case where the eighth lens L8 is a biconcave lens, it is easier to correct chromatic aberration.
In the example of
Further, in the example of
The imaging lens 1 may be configured to include an aspherical lens having an aspherical shape. In the example of
Next, a preferable configuration relating to the conditional expression will be described. It is preferable that the imaging lens 1 satisfies any one of the following conditional expressions or any combination of two or more thereof.
νd5<23 (1)
0.8<Db23/f<7 (2)
3<f456/f<28 (3)
−8<f1/f<−0.5 (4)
−8<f12/f<−0.5 (5)
f45/f<−0.5 (6)
2<f23/f<30 (7)
0.5<f6/f (8)
0.5<f7/f (9)
3<TL/f<20 (10)
0.5<Bf/f<5 (11)
0.6<ED8r/Bf<2.2 (12)
0≤(R1f+R1r)/(R1f−R1r)<8 (13)
0≤(R2f+R2r)/(R2f−R2r)<5 (14)
0≤(R3f+R3r)/(R3f−R3r)<5 (15)
(R5f+R5r)/(R5f−R5r)≤0 (16)
30<νd1 (17)
30<νd2 (18)
30<νd3 (19)
30<νd4 (20)
20<νd6 (21)
30<νd7 (22)
νd8<30 (23)
Here,
νd5: Abbe number of fifth lens at d line
Db23: distance on optical axis between second lens and third lens
f: focal length of whole system
f456: composite focal length of fourth lens, fifth lens, and sixth lens
f1: focal length of first lens
f12: composite focal length of first lens and second lens
f45: composite focal length of fourth lens and fifth lens
f23: composite focal length of second lens and third lens
f6: focal length of sixth lens
f7: focal length of seventh lens
TL: sum of distance on optical axis from object side surface of first lens to image side surface of eighth lens and back focal length as air conversion distance
Bf: back focal length as air conversion distance
ED8r: effective diameter of image side surface of eighth lens
R1f: radius of curvature of object side surface of first lens
R1r: radius of curvature of image side surface of first lens
R2f: radius of curvature of object side surface of second lens
R2r: radius of curvature of image side surface of second lens
R3f: radius of curvature of object side surface of third lens
R3r: radius of curvature of image side surface of third lens
R5f: radius of curvature of object side surface of fifth lens
R5r: radius of curvature of image side surface of fifth lens
νd1: Abbe number of first lens at d line
νd2: Abbe number of second lens at d line
νd3: Abbe number of third lens at d line
νd4: Abbe number of fourth lens at d line
νd6: Abbe number of sixth lens at d line
νd7: Abbe number of seventh lens at d line
νd8: Abbe number of eighth lens at d line
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (1) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration. In order to ensure favorable resolution performance while reducing an F-number, it is necessary to suppress longitudinal chromatic aberration satisfactorily. Therefore, by satisfying Conditional Expression (1), it is easy to realize a lens system having a small F-number and favorable performance
νd5 of Conditional Expression (1) is more preferably smaller than 21, still more preferably smaller than 20, still more preferably smaller than 19, and still more preferably smaller than 18. Further, νd5 is preferably greater than 16, and in such a case, it is easy to reduce a cost of a material. νd5 is more preferably greater than 17, and still more preferably greater than 17.2. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (1-1) to (1-3).
16<νd5<23 (1-1)
16<νd5<21 (1-2)
17.2<νd5<19 (1-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (2) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, the air gap between the second lens L2 and the third lens L3 can be made large, and it is easy to correct distortion and spherical aberration. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (2) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to reduce the size of the lens system.
Db23/f in Conditional Expression (2) is more preferably greater than 1, still more preferably greater than 1.2, and still more preferably greater than 1.5. Further, Db23/f is more preferably smaller than 5, still more preferably smaller than 4, still more preferably smaller than 3, and still more preferably smaller than 2.5. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (2-1) to (2-3).
1<Db23/f<5 (2-1)
1.2<Db23/R4 (2-2)
1.5<Db23/R3 (2-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (3) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to increase the negative refractive power of the fifth lens L5, and it is easy to correct chromatic aberration. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (3) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to increase the positive refractive power of the fourth lens L4 and the sixth lens L6, and it is easy to correct spherical aberration. By satisfying Conditional Expression (3), it is easy to correct spherical aberration and chromatic aberration.
f456/f in Conditional Expression (3) is more preferably greater than 4, still more preferably greater than 4.5, and still more preferably greater than 5. Further, f456/f is more preferably smaller than 25, still more preferably smaller than 20, still more preferably smaller than 15, and still more preferably smaller than 12. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (3-1) to (3-3).
4<f456/f<25 (3-1)
4.5<f456/f<15 (3-2)
5<f456/f<12 (3-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (4) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to increase the refractive power of the first lens L1, and it is easy to increase the angle of view. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (4) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to prevent the refractive power of the first lens L1 from being excessively strong, and it is easy to correct distortion.
f1/f in Conditional Expression (4) is more preferably greater than −6.5, still more preferably greater than −5.5, and still more preferably greater than −4. Further, f1/f is more preferably smaller than −1, still more preferably smaller than −2, and still more preferably smaller than −2.5. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (4-1) to (4-3).
−6.5<f1/f<−1 (4-1)
−5.5<f1/f<−2 (4-2)
−4<f1/f<−2.5 (4-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (5) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to increase the refractive power of the first lens L1 and the second lens L2, and it is easy to increase the angle of view. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (5) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to prevent the refractive power of the first lens L1 and the second lens L2 from being excessively strong, and it is easy to correct distortion.
f12/f in Conditional Expression (5) is more preferably greater than −6, still more preferably greater than −5, still more preferably greater than −4, and still more preferably greater than −3. Further, f12/f is more preferably smaller than −0.8, still more preferably smaller than −1, and still more preferably smaller than −1.5. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (5-1) to (5-3).
−5<f12/f<−0.8 (5-1)
−4<f12/f<−1 (5-2)
−3<f12/f<−1.5 (5-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (6) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to increase the refractive power of the fourth lens L4, and it is easy to correct spherical aberration.
f45/f in Conditional Expression (6) is more preferably smaller than −1, still more preferably smaller than −2, and still more preferably smaller than −3. Further, f45/f is preferably greater than −20, and in such a case, it is easy to increase the refractive power of the fifth lens L5, and it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration. f45/f is more preferably greater than −18, still more preferably greater than −15, and still more preferably greater than −11. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (6-1) to (6-4).
−20<f45/f<−0.5 (6-1)
−18<f45/f<−1 (6-2)
−15<f45/f<−2 (6-3)
−11<f45/f<−3 (6-4)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (7) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to increase the refractive power of the third lens L3, and it is easy to correct spherical aberration and astigmatism. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (7) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to increase the refractive power of the second lens L2, and it is easy to increase the angle of view and to ensure the back focal length.
f23/f in Conditional Expression (7) is more preferably greater than 3, still more preferably greater than 4, and still more preferably greater than 5. Further, f23/f is more preferably smaller than 25, still more preferably smaller than 22, and still more preferably smaller than 20. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (7-1) to (7-3).
3<f23/f<25 (7-1)
4<f23/f<22 (7-2)
5<f23/f<20 (7-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (8) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to prevent the refractive power of the sixth lens L6 from being excessively strong, and it is easy to ensure the back focal length.
f6/f in Conditional Expression (8) is more preferably greater than 0.8, still more preferably greater than 1, and still more preferably greater than 1.5. Further, f6/f is preferably smaller than 10, and in such a case, it is easy to increase the refractive power of the sixth lens L6, and it is easy to correct spherical aberration. f6/f is more preferably smaller than 8, still more preferably smaller than 5, still more preferably smaller than 3, and still more preferably smaller than 2. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (8-1) to (8-4).
0.5<f6/f<10 (8-1)
0.8<f6/f<5 (8-2)
1<f6/f<3 (8-3)
1.5<f6/f<2 (8-4)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (9) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to prevent the refractive power of the seventh lens L7 from being excessively strong, and it is easy to ensure the back focal length.
f7/f in Conditional Expression (9) is more preferably greater than 0.8, still more preferably greater than 1, and still more preferably greater than 1.5. Further, f7/f is preferably smaller than 10, and in such a case, it is easy to increase the refractive power of the seventh lens L7, and it is easy to correct spherical aberration. f7/f is more preferably smaller than 8, still more preferably smaller than 5, still more preferably smaller than 3, and still more preferably smaller than 2.5. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (9-1) to (9-4).
0.5<f7/f<10 (9-1)
0.8<f7/f<5 (9-2)
1<f7/f<3 (9-3)
1.5<f7/f<2.5 (9-4)
TL in Conditional Expression (10) is the total length of the lens system. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (10) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to prevent the number and shape of lenses from being restricted due to the excessively short total length, and it is easy to ensure favorable resolution performance. Alternatively, by not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (10) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to shorten the focal length with respect to the total length, and it is easy to increase the angle of view. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (10) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to prevent the total length from being excessively long.
TL/f in Conditional Expression (10) is more preferably greater than 5, still more preferably greater than 6, still more preferably greater than 7, and still more preferably greater than 8. Further, TL/f is more preferably smaller than 18, still more preferably smaller than 15, and still more preferably smaller than 12. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (10-1) to (10-3).
5<TL/f<18 (10-1)
6<TL/f<15 (10-2)
8<TL/f<12 (10-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (11) to be equal to or lower than the lower limit, it is easy to sufficiently ensure the back focal length. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (11) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to prevent the lens system from being large due to the excessively long back focal length.
Bf/f in Conditional Expression (11) is more preferably greater than 0.6, still more preferably greater than 0.7, still more preferably greater than 0.8, and still more preferably greater than 0.9. Further, Bf/f is more preferably smaller than 4, still more preferably smaller than 3, and still more preferably smaller than 2. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (11-1) to (11-3).
0.7<Bf/f<4 (11-1)
0.8<Bf/f<3 (11-2)
0.9<Bf/<2 (11-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (12) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to prevent the lens system from being large due to the excessively long back focal length. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (12) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to suppress an increase in the effective diameter, and it is easy to reduce the lens diameter. Note that, the term “effective diameter of the surface” means the diameter of a circle consisting of outermost points in a direction of the diameter (points farthest from the optical axis) among points at which all rays contributing to image formation intersect the lens surface. The effective diameter can be determined based on the size of the imaging surface of the imaging element, for example, in a case where the lens system is used in combination with the imaging element. In a case where the imaging surface is rectangular and the intersection of two diagonal lines of the rectangle passes through the optical axis of the lens system, for example, ½ of the diagonal line may be considered as the maximum image height to determine the effective diameter. In a case where a light shielding member having an opening is disposed in the lens system, the effective diameter may be determined in consideration of the light shielding member.
ED8r/Bf in Conditional Expression (12) is more preferably greater than 0.7, still more preferably greater than 0.8, still more preferably greater than 0.9, still more preferably greater than 1, still more preferably greater than 1.1, and still more preferably greater than 1.2. Further, ED8r/Bf is more preferably smaller than 2, still more preferably smaller than 1.8, still more preferably smaller than 1.7, and still more preferably smaller than 1.6. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (12-1) to (12-3).
0.8<ED8r/Bf<2 (12-1)
1<ED8r/Bf<1.8 (12-2)
1.1<ED8r/Bf<1.7 (12-3)
By allowing the result of Conditional Expression (13) to be equal to or greater than the lower limit, it is easy to correct distortion. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (13) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to increase the angle of view and ensure the back focal length.
(R1f+R1r)/(R1f−R1r) in Conditional Expression (13) is more preferably greater than 1, still more preferably greater than 1.2, and still more preferably greater than 1.4. Further, (R1f+R1r)/(R1f−R1r) is more preferably smaller than 5, still more preferably smaller than 4, and still more preferably smaller than 3. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (13-1) to (13-3).
1≤(R1f+R1r)/(R1f−R1r)<5 (13-1)
1.3<(R1f+R1r)/(R1f−R1r)<4 (13-2)
1.5<(R1f+R1r)/(R1f−R1r)<3 (13-3)
By allowing the result of Conditional Expression (14) to be equal to or greater than the lower limit, it is easy to correct distortion. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (14) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to increase the angle of view and ensure the back focal length.
(R2f+R2r)/(R2f−R2r) in Conditional Expression (14) is more preferably greater than 0.5, still more preferably greater than 1, and still more preferably greater than 1.05. Further, (R2f+R2r)/(R2f−R2r) is more preferably smaller than 4, still more preferably smaller than 3, and still more preferably smaller than 2.5. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (14-1) to (14-3).
0.5<(R2f+R2r)/(R2f−R2r)<4 (14-1)
1<(R2f+R2r)/(R2f−R2r)<3 (14-2)
1.05<(R2f+R2r)/(R2f−R2r)<2.5 (14-3)
By allowing the result of Conditional Expression (15) to be equal to or greater than the lower limit, it is easy to correct spherical aberration and astigmatism. By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (15) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to correct spherical aberration.
(R3f+R3r)/(R3f−R3r) in Conditional Expression (15) is more preferably greater than 0.2, still more preferably greater than 0.3, and still more preferably greater than 0.4. Further, (R3f+R3r)/(R3f−R3r) is more preferably smaller than 4, still more preferably smaller than 3, and still more preferably smaller than 2. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (15-1) to (15-3).
0.2<(R3f+R3r)/(R3f−R3r)<4 (15-1)
0.3<(R3f+R3r)/(R3f−R3r)<3 (15-2)
0.4<(R3f+R3r)/(R3f−R3r)<2 (15-3)
By allowing the result of Conditional Expression (16) to be equal to or less than the upper limit, in the fifth lens L5, it is easy to make the absolute value of the radius of curvature of the object side surface smaller than the absolute value of the radius of curvature of the image side surface, and it is easy to correct coma aberration and astigmatism and to take the long back focal length.
(R5f+R5r)/(R5f−R5r) in Conditional Expression (16) is more preferably smaller than −0.1, still more preferably smaller than −0.2, and still more preferably smaller than −0.3. Further, (R5f+R5r)/(R5f−R5r) is preferably greater than −0.9. In such a case, it is easy to correct spherical aberration or longitudinal chromatic aberration. (R5f+R5r)/(R5f−R5r) is more preferably greater than −0.8, and still more preferably greater than −0.7. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (16-1) to (16-3).
−0.9<(R5f+R5r)/(R5f−R5r)<−0.1 (16-1)
−0.8<(R5f+R5r)/(R5f−R5r)<−0.2 (16-2)
−0.7<(R5f+R5r)/(R5f−R5r)<−0.3 (16-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (17) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration. νd1 is more preferably greater than 35, still more preferably greater than 38, and still more preferably greater than 40. Further, νd1 is preferably smaller than 85, and in such a case, it is easy to reduce the cost and it is easy to select a material having a high refractive index, so that there is an advantage in correcting distortion and increasing the angle of view. In a case where νd1 is configured to be smaller than 85, it is easy to select a material having high chemical resistance, and it is easy to manufacture a highly reliable lens. Since the first lens L1 is a lens closest to the object side and may be exposed to the outside, it is effective to select a material having high chemical resistance. νd1 is more preferably smaller than 80, still more preferably smaller than 60, and still more preferably smaller than 50. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (17-1) to (17-3).
30<νd1<85 (17-1)
35<νd1<60 (17-2)
38<νd1<50 (17-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (18) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration. νd2 is more preferably greater than 35, still more preferably greater than 38, and still more preferably greater than 40. Further, νd2 is preferably smaller than 85, and in such a case, it is easy to reduce the cost and it is easy to select a material having a high refractive index, so that there is an advantage in correcting distortion and increasing the angle of view. νd2 is more preferably smaller than 80, still more preferably smaller than 60, and still more preferably smaller than 50. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (18-1) to (18-3).
30<νd2<85 (18-1)
35<νd2<60 (18-2)
38<νd2<50 (18-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (19) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration. νd3 is more preferably greater than 40, still more preferably greater than 45, and still more preferably greater than 50. Further, νd3 is preferably smaller than 85, and in such a case, it is easy to suppress lateral chromatic aberration. νd3 is more preferably smaller than 80, still more preferably smaller than 70, and still more preferably smaller than 60. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (19-1) to (19-3).
30<νd3<85 (19-1)
40<νd3<70 (19-2)
45<νd3<60 (19-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (20) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration. νd4 is more preferably greater than 40, still more preferably greater than 45, and still more preferably greater than 50. Further, νd4 is preferably smaller than 85, and in such a case, it is easy to suppress lateral chromatic aberration. νd4 is more preferably smaller than 80, still more preferably smaller than 70, still more preferably smaller than 60, and still more preferably smaller than 55. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (20-1) to (20-3).
30<νd4<85 (20-1)
40<νd4<70 (20-2)
45<νd4<60 (20-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (21) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration and lateral chromatic aberration. νd6 is more preferably greater than 25, still more preferably greater than 30, and still more preferably greater than 33. Further, νd6 is preferably smaller than 85, and in such a case, it is easy to reduce a cost of a material. νd6 is more preferably smaller than 80, still more preferably smaller than 70, still more preferably smaller than 60, still more preferably smaller than 50, and still more preferably smaller than 40. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (21-1) to (21-3).
20<νd6<85 (21-1)
25<νd6<60 (21-2)
30<νd6<50 (21-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (22) to be equal to or less than the lower limit, it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration and lateral chromatic aberration. νd7 is more preferably greater than 35, still more preferably greater than 38, and still more preferably greater than 40. Further, νd7 is preferably smaller than 85, and in such a case, it is easy to reduce a cost of a material. νd7 is more preferably smaller than 80, still more preferably smaller than 70, still more preferably smaller than 60, and still more preferably smaller than 50. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (22-1) to (22-3).
30<νd7<85 (22-1)
35<νd7<60 (22-2)
38<νd7<50 (22-3)
By not allowing the result of Conditional Expression (23) to be equal to or greater than the upper limit, it is easy to correct longitudinal chromatic aberration and lateral chromatic aberration. νd8 is more preferably smaller than 23, still more preferably smaller than 21, still more preferably smaller than 20, still more preferably smaller than 19, and still more preferably smaller than 18. Further, νd8 is preferably greater than 16, and in such a case, it is easy to reduce a cost of a material. νd8 is more preferably greater than 17, and still more preferably greater than 17.2. From the above, it is more preferable to satisfy at least one of Conditional Expressions (23-1) to (23-3).
16<νd8<23 (23-1)
16<νd8<21 (23-2)
17.2<νd8<19 (23-3)
A preferable configuration relating to the conditional expression is not limited to a configuration satisfying the range described in the above expression, and includes a configuration satisfying a range obtained by randomly combining the preferable lower limit and the preferable upper limit described above for each conditional expression.
Here, three preferable configuration examples in consideration of the above-described conditional expressions and effects thereof will be described. A first configuration example is an imaging lens that has the basic configuration described above and satisfies Conditional Expression (1). According to the first configuration example, there is an advantage in configuring a lens system having a small F-number while satisfactorily correcting various aberrations, particularly longitudinal chromatic aberration.
A second configuration example is an imaging lens that has the basic configuration described above and satisfies Conditional Expression (2). According to the second configuration example, there is an advantage in reducing the size of a lens system while satisfactorily correcting various aberrations, particularly distortion and spherical aberration.
A third configuration example is an imaging lens that has the basic configuration described above and satisfies Conditional Expression (3). According to the third configuration example, there is an advantage in satisfactorily correcting various aberrations, particularly chromatic aberration and spherical aberration.
Although
The imaging lens 1 may have a function of performing focusing according to a change in object distance. In a case where this function is provided, focusing may be performed by moving the entire lens system, or focusing may be performed by moving only a part of the lens system.
Further, the F-number of the imaging lens 1 is preferably 2.0 or less. By setting the F-number to 2.0 or less, favorable imaging can be performed even in a dark place. The F-number is more preferably 1.8 or less, still more preferably 1.5 or less, and still more preferably 1.2 or less.
In addition, a light shielding member such as a stop for shielding a part of the marginal rays may be disposed between the respective lenses as long as no practical problem regarding the peripheral light amount ratio occurs. With such a member, it is possible to improve the image quality in the peripheral portion of the image formation area.
Furthermore, there is a concern that rays passing through the outside of the effective diameter between the respective lenses may reach the image plane as stray light, thereby causing a ghost image. Therefore, a light shielding member for shielding the stray light may be provided as necessary. The stray light shielding member may be, for example, an opaque coating material applied to a portion of the lens in the outside the effective diameter or an opaque plate material, and may be disposed between any of the lenses as necessary.
The above-described preferable configurations and possible configurations may be combined in any manner and are preferably selected, as appropriate, in accordance with required specifications. By appropriately selecting the preferable configuration, it is possible to realize an optical system having more favorable optical performance and/or being capable of meeting higher specifications. According to the technique of the present disclosure, it is possible to realize an imaging lens that has a small F-number and has high optical performance by satisfactorily correcting various aberrations. In addition, the term “small F-number” as used herein means that the F-number is 2.0 or less.
Next, numerical examples of the imaging lens of the embodiment of the present invention will be described.
Regarding the imaging lens of Example 1, Table 1 shows basic lens data, Table 2 shows values and specifications relating to the conditional expressions, and Table 3 shows aspherical surface coefficients. In Table 1, the column of Sn shows surface numbers in a case where the surface closest to the object side is the first surface and the surface numbers increase one by one toward the image side, the column of R shows radii of curvature of the respective surfaces, and the column of D shows surface distances on the optical axis between the respective surfaces and the surface adjacent to the image side. Further, the column of Nd shows refractive indices of the respective components at the d line, and the column of νd shows Abbe numbers of the respective components at the d line. In the row of the surface on which the light shielding member for shielding a part of the marginal rays is disposed, the diameter of the opening of the light shielding member is added with φ and shown in the column labeled the light shielding member.
In Table 1, signs of radii of curvature of surface shapes convex toward the object side are set to be positive, and signs of radii of curvature of surface shapes convex toward the image side are set to be negative. Table 1 also shows the aperture stop St and the optical member PP. In Table 1, in a place of a surface number of a surface corresponding to the aperture stop St, the surface number and a term of (St) are noted. The surface at the bottom place of Table 1 is the image plane Sim.
In Table 2, FNo. is the F-number, and 2ω is the maximum total angle of view. Table 2 also shows corresponding values of the symbols used in the conditional expressions described above.
In Table 1, the reference sign * is attached to surface numbers of aspherical surfaces, and numerical values of the paraxial radius of curvature are written into the column of the radius of curvature of the aspherical surface. In Table 3, the row of Sn shows surface numbers of the aspherical surfaces, and the rows of KA and Am (m=3, 4, 5, 6) show numerical values of the aspherical surface coefficients for each aspherical surface. The “E±n” (n: integer) in numerical values of the aspherical surface coefficients in Table 3 indicates “×10±n”. KA and Am are the aspherical surface coefficients in the aspherical surface expression represented by the following expression.
Zd=C×h2/{1+(1−KA×C2×h2)1/2}+ΣAm×hm
Here,
Zd: an aspherical surface depth (a length of a perpendicular from a point on an aspherical surface at height h to a plane that is perpendicular to the optical axis and contacts with the vertex of the aspherical surface),
h: a height (a distance from the optical axis to the lens surface),
C: a reciprocal of paraxial radius of curvature,
KA, Am: aspherical surface coefficient, and
Σ in the aspherical surface expression means the sum with respect to m.
In data of each table, a degree is used as a unit of an angle, and mm (millimeter) is used as a unit of a length, but appropriate different units may be used since the optical system can be used even in a case where the system is enlarged or reduced in proportion. Each of the following tables shows numerical values rounded off to predetermined decimal places.
Symbols, meanings, and description methods of the respective data pieces according to Example 1 are the same as those in the following examples unless otherwise noted. Therefore, in the following description, repeated description will be omitted.
The imaging lens of Example 2 comprises only eight lenses consisting of, in order from the object side to the image side, the first lens L1 to the eighth lens L8 as lenses having refractive powers, and has the basic configuration described above. Regarding the imaging lens of Example 2, Table 4 shows basic lens data, Table 5 shows values and specifications relating to the conditional expressions, Table 6 shows aspherical surface coefficients, and
Regarding the imaging lenses of Examples 1 to 9, Table 28 shows corresponding values of Conditional Expressions (1) to (6), Table 29 shows corresponding values of Conditional Expressions (7) to (12), and Table 30 shows corresponding values of Conditional Expressions (13) to (16). In Examples 1 to 9, the d line is used as a reference wavelength. Tables 28, 29, and 30 show values based on the d line.
As can be seen from the above data, the imaging lenses of Examples 1 to 9 each have a small F-number of 1.12 or less, and have high optical performance by satisfactorily correcting various aberrations.
Next, the imaging apparatus according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described.
The imaging apparatus 10 comprises the imaging lens 1, a filter 5, an imaging element 6, and a signal processing unit 7 that performs arithmetic processing of an output signal from the imaging element 6.
The present invention has been hitherto described through embodiments and examples, but the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiments and examples, and may be modified into various forms. For example, values such as the radius of curvature, the surface distance, the refractive index, the Abbe number, and the aspherical surface coefficient of each lens are not limited to the values shown in the numerical examples, and different values may be used therefor.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-107859 | Jun 2018 | JP | national |
The present application is a Continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/JP2019/019953 filed on May 20, 2019, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a) to Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-107859 filed on Jun. 5, 2018. Each of the above applications is hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety, into the present application.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4256373 | Horimoto | Mar 1981 | A |
| 6353504 | Yamamoto | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 20130141629 | Yoshinaga et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20150268460 | Takada | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20160370571 | Togino | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170219820 | Kobayashi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 104076483 | Oct 2014 | CN |
| S54-032319 | Mar 1979 | JP |
| 2001-091832 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001-133685 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2015-210291 | Nov 2015 | JP |
| 5830638 | Dec 2015 | JP |
| 2014088104 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action issued in JP 2018-107859; mailed by the Japanese Patent Office dated Dec. 3, 2019. |
| International Search Report issued in PCT/JP2019/019953; dated Aug. 20, 2019. |
| International Preliminary Report On Patentability issued in PCT/JP2019/019953; completed Nov. 26, 2019. |
| Written Opinion issued in PCT/JP2019/019953; dated Aug. 20, 2019. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210080693 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/JP2019/019953 | May 2019 | US |
| Child | 17102504 | US |
