The present invention relates to an imaging lens which forms an image of an object on a solid-state image sensor such as a CCD sensor or a C-MOS sensor used in an imaging device.
In recent years, it becomes common that camera function is mounted in various products, such as information terminal equipment, home appliances, automobiles, and the like.
Development of products with the camera function will be made accordingly.
The imaging lens mounted in such equipment is required to be compact and to have high-resolution performance.
As a conventional imaging lens aiming high performance, for example, the imaging lens disclosed in the following Patent Document 1 has been known.
Patent Document 1 (CN106526803A) discloses an imaging lens comprising, in order from an object side, a first lens with positive refractive power having a concave image-side surface, a second lens with negative refractive power having a concave image-side surface, a third lens with positive refractive power having a convex image-side surface, a fourth lens with negative refractive power having concave surfaces on both sides, a fifth lens with positive refractive power having a concave object-side surface and a convex image-side surface, and a sixth lens with negative refractive power having a concave image-side surface.
However, in lens configurations disclosed in the Patent Document 1, when a low profile and a low F-number are to be realized, it is very difficult to correct aberrations at a peripheral area, and excellent optical performance can not be obtained.
The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide an imaging lens with high resolution which satisfies demand of the low profile and the low F-number in well balance and excellently corrects aberrations.
Regarding terms used in the present invention, “a convex surface (a surface being convex)”, “a concave surface (a surface being concave)” or “a flat surface (a surface being flat)” of lens surfaces implies a shape of the lens surface in a paraxial region (near the optical axis). “Refractive power” implies the refractive power in a paraxial region. “A pole point” implies an off-axial point on an aspheric surface at which a tangential plane intersects the optical axis perpendicularly. “A total track length” is defined as a distance along the optical axis from an object-side surface of an optical element located closest to the object to an image plane. “The total track length” and “a back focus” is a distance obtained when thickness of an IR cut filter or a cover glass which may be arranged between the imaging lens and the image plane is converted into an air-converted distance.
An imaging lens according to the present invention comprises, in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens with negative refractive power having an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, a second lens with positive refractive power in a paraxial region, a third lens with the negative refractive power in a paraxial region, a fourth lens with the positive refractive power in a paraxial region, a fifth lens having a flat object-side surface and a flat image-side surface that are aspheric, and a sixth lens with the negative refractive power having an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region.
According to the imaging lens having an above-described configuration, the first lens achieves a wide field of view by strengthening the refractive power, and coma aberration, astigmatism and distortion are properly corrected. Furthermore, when the first lens has the object-side surface being convex in the paraxial region, spherical aberration and the distortion are properly corrected.
The second lens achieves reduction in a profile, and properly corrects the astigmatism and the distortion.
The third lens properly corrects chromatic aberration, the spherical aberration, the astigmatism and the distortion.
The fourth lens achieves reduction in the profile, and properly corrects the astigmatism and the distortion.
When the fifth lens has the flat object-side surface and the flat image-side surface in the paraxial region, the astigmatism, field curvature and the distortion are properly corrected by aspheric surfaces formed on both sides without affecting a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.
The sixth lens properly corrects the chromatic aberration, the astigmatism, the distortion and the field curvature. Furthermore, when the sixth lens has the image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region, a back focus can be secured while maintaining the low profile.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the first lens has an image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region.
When the first lens has the image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region, the coma aberration, the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the second lens has an image-side surface being convex in the paraxial region.
When the second lens has the image-side surface being convex in the paraxial region, a light ray incident angle to the image-side surface of the second lens can be appropriately controlled, and the astigmatism can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the third lens has an image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region.
When the third lens has the image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region, the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the fourth lens has an image-side surface being convex in the paraxial region.
When the fourth lens has the image-side surface being convex in the paraxial region, a light ray incident angle to the image-side surface of the fourth lens can be appropriately controlled, and the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the sixth lens has the image-side surface formed as an aspheric surface having at least one pole point in a position off the optical axis.
When the sixth lens has the image-side surface formed as the aspheric surface having at least one pole point in a position off the optical axis, the field curvature and the distortion are properly corrected, and a light ray incident angle to an image sensor is appropriately controlled.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (1) is satisfied:
−9.55<(T1/f1)×100<−1.00 (1)
where
T1: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the first lens to an object-side surface of the second lens, and
f1: a focal length of the first lens.
The conditional expression (1) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the first lens to the object-side surface of the second lens, and the focal length of the first lens. When a value is below the upper limit of the conditional expression (1), the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the first lens to the object-side surface of the second lens is prevented from being too small, and a light ray incident angle to the object-side surface of the second lens is appropriately controlled. Furthermore, the refractive power of the first lens is prevented from being too small, and the chromatic aberration can be properly corrected. On the other hand, when the value is above the lower limit of the conditional expression (1), the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the first lens to the object-side surface of the second lens is prevented from being too large, and the refractive power of the first lens is prevented from being too large, and reduction in the profile is achieved.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (2) is satisfied:
0.02<T2/T3<0.60 (2)
where
T2: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the second lens to an object-side surface of the third lens, and
T3: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the third lens to an object-side surface of the fourth lens.
The conditional expression (2) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the second lens to the object-side surface of the third lens, and the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the third lens to the object-side surface of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (2), the third lens is arranged at an optimum position, and aberration correction function of the lens becomes more effective. As a result, reduction in the profile can be achieved, and the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (3) is satisfied:
−15.50<f6/D6<−1.50 (3)
where
f6: a focal length of the sixth lens, and
D6: a thickness along the optical axis of the sixth lens.
The conditional expression (3) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the focal length of the sixth lens, and the thickness along the optical axis of the sixth lens. When a value is below the upper limit of the conditional expression (3), refractive power of the sixth lens is prevented from being too large, and the astigmatism, the field curvature and the distortion can be properly corrected. Furthermore, the thickness along the optical axis of the sixth lens is prevented from being too large, and reduction in the profile can be achieved.
On the other hand, when the value is above the lower limit of the conditional expression (3), the refractive power of the sixth lens is prevented from being too small, and the chromatic aberration can be properly corrected. Furthermore, the thickness along the optical axis of the sixth lens is prevented from being too small, and the formability of the lens is improved.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (4) is satisfied:
−2.45<r2/r4<−0.45 (4)
where
r2: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the first lens, and
r4: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the second lens.
The conditional expression (4) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the first lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the second lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (4), refractive powers of the image-side surface of the first lens and the image-side surface of the second lens are suppressed from being excessive. As a result, reduction in the profile can be achieved, and the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (5) is satisfied:
0.65<r1/f<4.00 (5)
where
r1: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the first lens, and
f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.
The conditional expression (5) defines an appropriate range of the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the first lens. When a value is below the upper limit of the conditional expression (5), the coma aberration and the astigmatism can be properly corrected. Furthermore, the thickness along the optical axis of the sixth lens is prevented from being too large, and reduction in the profile is achieved. On the other hand, when the value is above the lower limit of the conditional expression (5), the spherical aberration and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (6) is satisfied:
0.80<r12/D6<3.00 (6)
where
r12: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the sixth lens, and
D6: a thickness along the optical axis of the sixth lens.
The conditional expression (6) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the sixth lens and the thickness along the optical axis of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (6), refractive power of the image-side surface of the sixth lens can be maintained, and the thickness along the optical axis of the sixth lens can be secured. As a result, the astigmatism, the field curvature and the distortion can be suppressed, and the formability of the sixth lens is improved.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (7) is satisfied:
14.00<vd6<36.00 (7)
where
vd6: an abbe number at d-ray of the sixth lens.
The conditional expression (7) defines an appropriate range of the abbe number at d-ray of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (7), the chromatic aberration can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (8) is satisfied:
−10.00<(D1/f1)×100<−1.00 (8)
where
D1: a thickness along the optical axis of the first lens, and
f1: a focal length of the first lens.
The conditional expression (8) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the thickness along the optical axis of the first lens and the focal length of the first lens. When a value is below the upper limit of the conditional expression (8), the thickness along the optical axis of the first lens is prevented from being too small, and the formability of the lens is improved. Furthermore, refractive power of the first lens is prevented from being too small, and the chromatic aberration can be properly corrected. On the other hand, when the value is above the lower limit of the conditional expression (8), the thickness along the optical axis of the first lens is prevented from being too large, and reduction in the profile can be achieved. Furthermore, refractive power of the first lens is prevented from being too large, and the coma aberration, the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (9) is satisfied:
0.90<D2/D3<4.70 (9)
where
D2: a thickness along the optical axis of the second lens, and
D3: a thickness along the optical axis of the third lens.
The conditional expression (9) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the thickness along the optical axis of the second lens and the thickness along the optical axis of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (9), the thicknesses along the optical axis of the second lens and the third lens can be appropriately balanced. As a result, reduction in the profile is achieved, and the formability of the second lens and the third lens is improved. In addition, by satisfying the conditional expression (9), the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (10) is satisfied:
0.30<f4/f<1.70 (10)
where
f4: a focal length of the fourth lens, and
f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.
The conditional expression (10) defines an appropriate range of refractive power of the fourth lens. When a value is below the upper limit of the conditional expression (10), the positive refractive power of the fourth lens becomes appropriate, and reduction in the profile can be achieved. On the other hand, when the value is above the lower limit of the conditional expression (10), the spherical aberration, the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (11) is satisfied:
−10.00<f1/f4<−0.80 (11)
where
f1: a focal length of the first lens, and
f4: a focal length of the fourth lens.
The conditional expression (11) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the focal length of the first lens and the focal length of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (11), refractive powers of the first lens and the fourth lens can be appropriately balanced. As a result, reduction in the profile can be achieved, and the chromatic aberration, the coma aberration, the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (12) is satisfied:
0.40<f1/f6<9.00 (12)
where
f1: a focal length of the first lens, and
f6: a focal length of the sixth lens.
The conditional expression (12) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the focal length of the first lens and the focal length of the sixth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (12), refractive powers of the first lens and the sixth lens can be appropriately balanced. As a result, the chromatic aberration, the coma aberration, the astigmatism, the field curvature and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (13) is satisfied:
|r3|/r4<−1.50 (13)
where
r3: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the second lens, and
r4: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the second lens, and
The conditional expression (13) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the second lens and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the second lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (13), refractive powers of the object-side surface of the second lens and the image-side surface of the second lens can be appropriately balanced. As a result, the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (14) is satisfied:
−1.10<r2/r4/r6<−0.10 (14)
where
r2: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the first lens,
r4: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the second lens, and
r6: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the third lens.
The conditional expression (14) defines an appropriate range of a relationship among the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the first lens, the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the second lens, and the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (14), refractive powers of the image-side surfaces of the first lens, the second lens and the third lens, respectively can be appropriately balanced. As a result, the coma aberration, the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (15) is satisfied:
30.00<r2/T2 (15)
where
r2: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the first lens, and
T2: a distance along the optical axis from an image-side surface of the second lens to an object-side surface of the third lens.
The conditional expression (15) defines an appropriate range of a relationship between the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the first lens and the distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the second lens to the object-side surface of the third lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (15), the wide field of view can be achieved, a light ray incident angle to the object-side surface of the second lens can be appropriately controlled, and the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (16) is satisfied:
−0.90<r4/f<−0.20 (16)
where
r4: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the second lens, and
f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.
The conditional expression (16) defines an appropriate range of the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the second lens. When a value is below the upper limit of the conditional expression (16), the spherical aberration and the distortion can be properly corrected. On the other hand, when the value is above the lower limit of the conditional expression (16), the astigmatism can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (17) is satisfied:
0.90<|r7|/f<20.00 (17)
where
r7: a paraxial curvature radius of an object-side surface of the fourth lens, and
f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.
The conditional expression (17) defines an appropriate range of the paraxial curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (17), the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the imaging lens having the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the following conditional expression (18) is satisfied:
−0.80<r8/f<−0.15 (18)
where
r8: a paraxial curvature radius of an image-side surface of the fourth lens, and
f: a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.
The conditional expression (18) defines an appropriate range of the paraxial curvature radius of the image-side surface of the fourth lens. By satisfying the conditional expression (18), the astigmatism and the distortion can be properly corrected.
According to the present invention, there can be provided an imaging lens with high resolution which satisfies demand of the low profile and the low F-number in well balance, and properly corrects aberrations.
Hereinafter, the preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail referring to the accompanying drawings.
The imaging lens according to the present invention comprises, in order from an object side to an image side, a first lens L1 with negative refractive power having an object-side surface being convex in a paraxial region, a second lens L2 with positive refractive power in a paraxial region, a third lens L3 with the negative refractive power in a paraxial region, a fourth lens L4 with the positive refractive power in a paraxial region, a fifth lens L5 having a flat object-side surface and a flat image-side surface that are aspheric, and a sixth lens L6 with the negative refractive power having an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region.
A filter IR such as an IR cut filter or a cover glass is arranged between the sixth lens L6 and an image plane IMG (namely, the image plane of an image sensor). The filter IR is omissible.
An aperture stop ST is arranged between the first lens L1 and the second lens L2, and correction of aberrations and control of an incident angle of a light ray of high image height to an image sensor become facilitated.
The first lens L1 has the negative refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having the object-side surface being convex and an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, a wide field of view is achieved, and spherical aberration, coma aberration, astigmatism and distortion are properly corrected.
The second lens L2 has the positive refractive power and is formed in a biconvex shape having an object-side surface and an image-side surface being both convex in the paraxial region. Therefore, reduction in the profile is achieved, and the astigmatism and the distortion are properly corrected.
The second lens L2 may be formed in a meniscus shape having the object-side surface being concave and the image-side surface being convex in the paraxial region (near the optical axis X) as in the Example 8 shown in
The third lens L3 has the negative refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having the object-side surface being convex and an image-side surface being concave in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, the chromatic aberration, the spherical aberration, the astigmatism and the distortion are properly corrected.
The third lens L3 may be formed in a biconcave shape having the object-side surface and the image-side surface being both concave in the paraxial region as in the Examples 10 and 11 shown in
The fourth lens L4 has the positive refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being concave and an image-side surface being convex in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, reduction in a profile is achieved, and the astigmatism and the distortion are properly corrected.
The fourth lens L4 may be formed in the biconvex shape having the object-side surface and the image-side surface being both convex in the paraxial region as in the Examples 7, 8 and 9 shown in
The fifth lens L5 substantially has no refractive power, and is formed in a shape having an object-side surface and an image-side surface that are flat in a paraxial region (near the optical axis X). Therefore, the astigmatism, the field curvature and the distortion are properly corrected by aspheric surfaces formed on both sides without affecting a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens.
The sixth lens L6 has the negative refractive power and is formed in a meniscus shape having an object-side surface being convex and the image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region. Therefore, the chromatic aberration, the astigmatism, the distortion and the field curvature are properly corrected while securing a back focus.
The sixth lens L6 may be formed in a shape having the object-side surface being flat and the image-side surface being concave in the paraxial region as in the Examples 2, 4 and 5 shown in
The image-side surface of the sixth lens L6 is formed as the aspheric surface having at least one pole point in the position off the optical axis. Therefore, the field curvature and the distortion are more properly corrected and a light ray incident angle to the image sensor can be appropriately controlled.
Regarding the imaging lens according to the present embodiments, it is preferable that all lenses of the first lens L1 to the sixth lens L6 are single lenses. Configuration only with the single lenses can frequently use the aspheric surfaces. In the present embodiments, all lens surfaces are formed as appropriate aspheric surfaces, and the aberrations are favorably corrected. Furthermore, in comparison with a case in which a cemented lens is used, workload is reduced, and manufacturing in low cost becomes possible. Furthermore, the imaging lens according to the present embodiments makes manufacturing facilitated by using a plastic material for the lenses, and mass production in a low cost can be realized.
The material applied to the lens is not limited to the plastic material. By using glass material, further high performance may be aimed. It is preferable that all of lens-surfaces are formed as aspheric surfaces, however, spherical surfaces easy to be manufactured may be adopted in accordance with required performance.
The imaging lens according to the present embodiments shows preferable effect by satisfying the following conditional expressions (1) to (18).
−9.55<(T1/f1)×100<−1.00 (1)
0.02<T2/T3<0.60 (2)
−15.50<f6/D6<−1.50 (3)
−2.45<r2/r4<−0.45 (4)
0.65<r1/f<4.00 (5)
0.80<r12/D6<3.00 (6)
14.00<vd6<36.00 (7)
−10.00<(D1/f1)×100<−1.00 (8)
0.90<D2/D3<4.70 (9)
0.30<f4/f<1.70 (10)
−10.00<f1/f4<−0.80 (11)
0.40<f1/f6<9.00 (12)
|r3|/r4<−1.50 (13)
−1.10<r2/r4/r6<−0.10 (14)
30.00<r2/T2 (15)
−0.90<r4/f<−0.20 (16)
0.90<|r7|/f<20.00 (17)
−0.80<r8/f<−0.15 (18)
It is not necessary to satisfy the above all conditional expressions, and by satisfying the conditional expression individually, operational advantage corresponding to each conditional expression can be obtained.
The imaging lens according to the present embodiments shows further preferable effect by satisfying the below conditional expressions (1a) to (18a).
−8.75<(T1/f1)×100<−1.70 (1a)
0.03<T2/T3<0.50 (2a)
−14.00<f6/D6<−2.50 (3a)
−2.15<r2/r4<−0.75 (4a)
0.95<r1/f<3.50 (5a)
1.20<r12/D6<2.75 (6a)
19.00<vd6<31.00 (7a)
−8.50<(D1/f1)×100<−1.70 (8a)
1.40<D2/D3<4.15 (9a)
0.50<f4/f<1.45 (10a)
−8.50<f1/f4<−1.30 (11a)
0.60<f1/f6<7.50 (12a)
−2000.00<1|r3|/r4<−2.00 (13a)
−0.95<r2/r4/r6<−0.20 (14a)
36.00<r2/T2<220.00 (15a)
−0.80<r4/f<−0.35 (16a)
1.05<1r71/f<16.50 (17a)
−0.70<r8/f<−0.20 (18a)
The signs in the above conditional expressions have the same meanings as those in the paragraph before the preceding paragraph.
In this embodiment, the aspheric shapes of the aspheric surfaces of the lens are expressed by Equation 1, where Z denotes an axis in the optical axis direction, H denotes a height perpendicular to the optical axis, R denotes a paraxial curvature radius, k denotes a conic constant, and A4, A6, A8, A10, A12, A14, A16, A18 and A20 denote aspheric surface coefficients.
Next, examples of the imaging lens according to this embodiment will be explained. In each example, f denotes a focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens, Fno denotes an F-number, w denotes a half field of view, ih denotes a maximum image height, and TTL denotes a total track length. Additionally, i denotes a surface number counted from the object side, r denotes a paraxial curvature radius, d denotes a distance of lenses along the optical axis (surface distance), Nd denotes a refractive index at d-ray (reference wavelength), and vd denotes an abbe number at d-ray. As for aspheric surfaces, an asterisk (*) is added after surface number i.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 1.
The imaging lens in Example 1 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 2.
The imaging lens in Example 2 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 3.
The imaging lens in Example 3 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 4.
The imaging lens in Example 4 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 5.
The imaging lens in Example 5 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 6.
The imaging lens in Example 6 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 7.
The imaging lens in Example 7 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 8.
The imaging lens in Example 8 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 9.
The imaging lens in Example 9 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 10.
The imaging lens in Example 10 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
The basic lens data is shown below in Table 11.
The imaging lens in Example 11 satisfies conditional expressions (1) to (6), and (8) to (18) as shown in Table 12.
In table 12, values of conditional expressions (1) to (18) related to Examples 1 to 11 are shown.
When the imaging lens according to the present invention is adopted to a product with the camera function, there is realized contribution to the low profile and the low F-number of the camera and also high performance thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2019-108019 | Jun 2019 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11852788 | Nitta | Dec 2023 | B2 |
20150098137 | Chung et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150219879 | Zhao | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150241662 | Hashimoto | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160139369 | Jung | May 2016 | A1 |
20180299648 | Hsueh | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
106526803 | Mar 2017 | CN |
106597637 | Apr 2017 | CN |
108931844 | Dec 2018 | CN |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210364761 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16895623 | Jun 2020 | US |
Child | 17391829 | US |