One or more processes or apparatuses will be described below with reference to the following Figure(s).
Various apparatuses or processes will be described below to provide an example of an embodiment of each claimed invention. No embodiment described below limits any claimed invention and any claimed invention may cover processes or apparatuses that are not described below. The claimed inventions are not limited to apparatuses or processes having all of the features of any one apparatus or process described below or to features common to multiple or all of the apparatuses described below. It is possible that an apparatus or process described below is not an embodiment of any claimed invention. The applicants, inventors and owners reserve all rights in any invention disclosed in an apparatus or process described below that is not claimed in this document and do not abandon, disclaim or dedicate to the public any such invention by its disclosure in this document.
Experiments were run with immersed hollow fiber membranes, operated according to a batch process with a generally constant flux and within the parameters of paragraph 9. Long cycle times, for example up to 10 times or more longer than in traditional batch processes, were used and the TMP was allowed to reach a set TMP of 70-90% of maximum mechanically allowable TMP before backwashing was conducted. It was found when operated in parallel with an identical membrane and feed water using the traditional batch mode of operation that there is a performance advantage to running with long cycle times and a TMP triggered backwash instead of a time triggered backwash. The membrane TMP (measured after backwashing) increased more slowly in the TMP triggered backwash method (
A potential concern with long filtration periods is that operating at high recoveries increases the solids levels towards the end of a dead end filtration cycle. Depending on the particular membrane module, solids tolerance boundaries may be breached. Accordingly, a solids tolerant module may be desirable. Further, an effective method of cleaning is also desirable. In particular, a cleaning and deconcentration procedure may involve aerating while slowly draining the tank or draining the tank in steps, for example to water levels corresponding to areas prone to sludging or to step through the entire depth of a module, and aerating for a period of time at each step. Some such desludging procedures are described in U.S. Publication No. 2006-0065596 A1 which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by this reference to it. Alternately, maximum concentration may be reduced by a full or partial drain or flush (that is opening a drain but also increasing feed below to keep the membranes immersed) between backwashes or by adding a retentate bleed during the entire, or a later part, of the filtration period.
The results of the experiments discussed above are provided in the following Tables 1 and 2 and
The invention or inventions which are currently claimed in this document are described in the following claims.
This non-provisional application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/798293, filed May 8, 2006, which is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60798293 | May 2006 | US |