IMMUNO-BASED RETARGETED ENDOPEPTIDASE ACTIVITY ASSAYS

REFERENCE TO A SEQUENCE LISTING SUBMITTED VIA EFS-WEB

The content of the ASCII text file of the sequence listing named “18496USC6_ST26.xml” which is 215 kb in size was created on Apr. 2, 2024 and electronically submitted via EFS-Web herewith the application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

The ability of Clostridial toxins, such as, e.g., Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), BoNT/A, BoNT/B, BoNT/C1, BoNT/D, BoNT/E, BoNT/F and BoNT/G, and Tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT), to inhibit neuronal transmission are being exploited in a wide variety of therapeutic and cosmetic applications, see e.g., William J. Lipham, Cosmetic and Clinical Applications of Botulinum Toxin (Slack, Inc., 2004). Clostridial toxins commercially available as pharmaceutical compositions include, BoNT/A preparations, such as, e.g., BOTOX® (Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA), DYSPORT®/RELOXIN®, (Ipsen Ltd., Slough, England), PURTOX® (Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA), XEOMIN® (Merz Pharmaceuticals, GmbH., Frankfurt, Germany), NEURONOX® (Medy-Tox, Inc., Ochang-myeon, South Korea), BTX-A (Biogen-tech Ltd., University, Yantai, Shandong, China); and BoNT/B preparations, such as, e.g., MYOBLOC®/NEUROBLOC® (Solstice Neurosciences, Inc., South San Francisco, CA). As an example, BOTOX® is currently approved in one or more countries for the following indications: achalasia, adult spasticity, anal fissure, back pain, blepharospasm, bruxism, cervical dystonia, essential tremor, glabellar lines or hyperkinetic facial lines, headache, hemifacial spasm, hyperactivity of bladder, hyperhidrosis, juvenile cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, myoclonic disorders, nasal labial lines, spasmodic dysphonia, strabismus and VII nerve disorder.

A Clostridial toxin treatment inhibits neurotransmitters and neuropeptide release by disrupting the exocytotic process used to secrete the neurotransmitters and neuropeptides into the synaptic cleft. There is a great desire by the pharmaceutical industry to expand the use of Clostridial toxin therapies beyond its current myo-relaxant applications to treat sensory nerve-based ailment, such as, e.g., various kinds of chronic pain, neurogenic inflammation and urogenital disorders, as well as other disorders, such as, e.g., pancreatitis. One approach that is currently being exploited to expand Clostridial toxin-based therapies involves modifying a Clostridial toxin so that the modified toxin has an altered cell targeting capability for a neuronal or non-neuronal cell of interest. Called either re-targeted endopeptidase or Targeted Vesicular Exocytosis Modulator Proteins (TVEMPs), these molecules achieve their exocytosis inhibitory effects by using a target receptor present on the neuronal or non-neuronal target cell of interest. This re-targeted capability is achieved by replacing a naturally-occurring binding domain of a Clostridial toxin with a targeting domain showing a selective binding activity for a non-Clostridial toxin receptor present in a neuronal or non-neuronal target cell of interest. Such modifications to a binding domain result in a molecule that is able to selectively bind to a non-Clostridial toxin receptor present on the target cell. A re-targeted endopeptidase can bind to a target receptor, translocate into the cytoplasm, and exert its proteolytic effect on the SNARE complex of the neuronal or non-neuronal target cell of interest.

One group of re-targeted endopeptidase comprises molecules having an opioid targeting domain. These opioid re-targeted endopeptidases comprise an opioid targeting domain, a Clostridial toxin translocation domain, and a Clostridial toxin enzymatic domain. Non-limiting examples of opioid re-targeted endopeptidase, or opioid-TVEMPs, are described in, e.g., Keith A. Foster et al., Clostridial Toxin Derivatives Able To Modify Peripheral Sensory Afferent Functions, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,545; J. Oliver Dolly et al., Activatable Recombinant Neurotoxins, U.S. Pat. No. 7,132,259; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Pat. No. 7,244,437; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Pat. No. 7,413,742; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,338; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. Pat. No. 7,514,088; Keith A. Foster, Fusion Proteins, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0064092; Keith A. Foster, Fusion Proteins, U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0035822; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0048431; Keith A. Foster, Non-Cytotoxic Protein Conjugates, U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0162341; Keith A. Foster et al., Re-targeted Toxin Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2005/023309; and Lance E. Steward, Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Capabilities for Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, International Patent Application WO 2008/008805; each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

One general difference between re-targeted endopeptidases and Clostridial toxins is that because re-targeted endopeptidases typically do not target motor neurons, the lethality associated with over-dosing a mammal with a re-targeted endopeptidase is greatly minimized, if not avoided altogether. For example, opioid re-targeted endopeptidases can be administered at 10,000 times the therapeutically effective dose before evidence of lethality is observed, and this lethality is due to the passive diffusion of the molecule and not via the intoxication process. Thus, for all practical purposes re-targeted endopeptidases are non-lethal molecules. Although this non-lethal property is of great therapeutic benefit, a manufacturing problem arises because the standard activity assay used to manufacture Clostridial toxin-based biologics is a mouse LD₅₀bioassay, a lethality test. S. S. Arnon et al., JAMA 285: 1059-1070 (2001). Currently a mouse LD₅₀bioassay is used by all pharmaceutical manufacturers to express the potency of their Clostridial toxin preparations. In fact, the activity units for Clostridial toxins are mouse LD₅₀units. However, because re-targeted endopeptidases are essentially non-lethal, a mouse LD₅₀bioassay cannot be used to assess the potency of these molecules. Thus, a simple, reliable, validated, and governmental agency acceptable activity assay that can evaluate the integrity of all the steps necessary in re-targeted endopeptidase uptake would be of significant value. The present specification provides novel compositions, cells, and methods for assaying the activity of re-targeted endopeptidases useful for various industries, such as, e.g., the pharmaceutical and food industries, and provides related advantages as well. Such compositions, cells, and methods do not use live animals or tissues taken from live animals, but can evaluate all the steps necessary for re-targeted endopeptidase action.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B show a schematic of the current paradigm of neurotransmitter release and Clostridial toxin intoxication in a central and peripheral neuron. FIG. 1A shows a schematic for the neurotransmitter release mechanism of a central and peripheral neuron. The release process can be described as comprising two steps: 1) vesicle docking, where the vesicle-bound SNARE protein of a vesicle containing neurotransmitter molecules associates with the membrane-bound SNARE proteins located at the plasma membrane; and 2) neurotransmitter release, where the vesicle fuses with the plasma membrane and the neurotransmitter molecules are exocytosed. FIG. 1B shows a schematic of the intoxication mechanism for tetanus and botulinum toxin activity in a central and peripheral neuron. This intoxication process can be described as comprising four steps: 1) receptor binding, where Clostridial toxin binds to a Clostridial receptor complex and initiates the intoxication process; 2) complex internalization, where after toxin binding, a vesicle containing a toxin/receptor system complex is endocytosed into the cell; 3) light chain translocation, where multiple events are thought to occur, including changes in the internal pH of the vesicle, formation of a channel pore comprising the HN domain of Clostridial toxin heavy chain, separation of the Clostridial toxin light chain from the heavy chain, and release of the light chain and 4) enzymatic target modification, where the light chain of Clostridial toxin proteolytically cleaves its target SNARE substrates, such as, e.g., SNAP-25, VAMP or Syntaxin, thereby preventing vesicle docking and neurotransmitter release.

FIG. 2 shows a full dose response to the re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A in the ORL-1Clone #6 clonal cell line overexpressing ORL-1. Specific uptake of Noc/A can be observed in the ORL-1Clone #6 clonal cell line overexpressing ORL-1. The treatment with Noc/A (LHN/A plus binding ligand nociceptin variant) and LH_N/A (LC/A and H_Nwithout any binding domain) performed on ORL-1 stable cell line clone #6 in the ECL ELISA for cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇demonstrated that uptake of Noc/A is specific in this clonal cell line. The clonal cell line also show great sensitivity for Noc/A with an EC₅₀of 1.2 nM.

FIG. 3 shows a full dose response to Noc/A in the SK-N-DZ single-cell derived clones #3 and #22. Specific uptake of Noc/A on SK-N-DZ clones #3 and #22 when compared to LH_N/A (n=4 independent experiments run). Cells were plated on poly-D-lysine 96-well plates in RPMI SFM+N2+B27+NGF. Treatment with compounds was for 22 hours. ECL ELISA for cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇demonstrated that uptake of Noc/A is specific in this clonal cell lines. The clonal cell lines also show great sensitivity for Noc/A with an EC₅₀of 0.3 nM for clone #3 and an EC₅₀of 0.9 nM for clone #22.

FIG. 4 shows an ECL sandwich ELISA assay results from ORL1 ND7 clones 1C11, 4B7, and 4C9 treated with re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A. Parental ND7 and ORL1 ND7 clones were treated for 24 hours with Noc/A followed by two days of incubation. Parental ND7 EC₅₀could not be calculated since it only reached approximately 50% SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage. Clones 4B7 and 1C11 reach more than 80% SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage. EC₅₀values were calculated to be 5.7±0.5, 6.7±1, and 8.6±2 nM respectively.

FIG. 5 shows an anti-nociceptin polyclonal antibodies can block re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A uptake in SK-N-DZ clone #3, clone #22, and AGN P33 ORL-1 clone #6 cell lines. Cells were plated on poly-D-lysine 96-well plates in RPMI SFM+N2+B27+NGF and treated for 22 hours in serum-free media containing with the Anti-nociceptin polyclonal antibodies at different dilutions (0-3 μg/mL) in 1 nM Noc/A.

FIG. 6 shows cells from SiMa clone AF4 and the established cell line PC-12 were treated with the re-targeted endopeptidase Dyn/A at concentrations from 0.017 nM to 1 μM as depicted in the Western blot image. Dose-dependent uptake could be observed for both cell lines.

FIGS. 7A and 7B show normalized BIAcore SPR curves of 7.8 nM of the antibodies 2E2A6, 1D3B8, 3C1A5 and 2C9B10 and commercial MC-6050 and MC-6053. FIG. 7A shows the normalized data for the on-rate of each antibody. FIG. 7B shows the normalized data for the off-rate of each antibody.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present specification provides novel assays for determining the presence or absence of an active retargeted endopeptidase in a sample and for determining the activity/potency of a re-targeted endopeptidase. The novel cell-based assays disclosed in the present specification rely on cells, reagents and detection methods that enable the assay to detect nanomolar quantities of a re-targeted endopeptidase in a sample. The cell-based assays disclosed in the present specification serve to analyze multiple functions a re-targeted endopeptidase, namely, re-targeted endopeptidase binding to a cell surface receptor, internalization of the endopeptidase-receptor complex, enzymatic domain translocation into the cytoplasm, enzymatic domain cleavage of substrate. As discussed further below, the novel methods and compositions can be used to analyze crude and bulk samples as well as highly purified di-chain re-targeted endopeptidases and formulated re-targeted endopeptidase products and further are amenable to automated high throughput assay formats.

Thus, one aspect disclosed in the present specification provides immune response inducing compositions for producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to an epitope comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. Immune response inducing compositions can comprise an adjuvant and an immune response inducing composition including a SNAP-25 antigen, a carrier linked to a SNAP-25 antigen, or a carrier linked to a flexible spacer linked to a SNAP-25 antigen, where the flexible linker intervenes between the SNAP-25 antigen and the carrier. It is envisioned that any and all SNAP-25 antigens that triggers an immune response that produce a α-SNAP-25 antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be useful as a SNAP-25 antigen, including, without limitation, a SNAP-25 antigen derived from a naturally occurring SNAP-25, a SNAP-25 antigen derived from a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25, and a SNAP-25 antigen comprising an immunoreactive fragment of the SNAP-25, the SNAP-25 from a naturally occurring SNAP-25 or a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25. SNAP-25 antigens useful for producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond include, without limitation, SNAP-25 antigens comprising a SNAP-25 peptide having a carboxylated C-terminal glutamine linked to a carrier peptide, including, without limitation SEQ ID NO:38. Other Immune response inducing compositions useful for making α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond include, without limitation, an immune response inducing composition comprising a carrier linked to a flexible linker linked to a SNAP-25 antigen a carboxylated C-terminal glutamine, wherein the flexible linker intervenes between the SNAP-25 antigen and the carrier. It is envisioned that any and all adjuvants can be useful in such an immune response inducing composition, including, without limitation, polyethylene glycol (PEG), monomethoxypolyethylene glycol (mPEG), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), complete and incomplete Freund's adjuvant.

Another aspect disclosed in the present specification provides methods of producing an α-SNAP-25 antibody that can selectively bind to an epitope comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. Aspects of this method comprise the steps of (a) administering to an animal a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition disclosed in the present specification; (b) collecting from the animal a sample containing an α-SNAP-25 antibody or α-SNAP-25 antibody-producing cell; and (c) isolating the α-SNAP-25 antibody from the sample. The methods disclosed are useful for making either α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to an epitope comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond or α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to an epitope comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond.

Still another aspect disclosed in the present specification provides α-SNAP-25 antibodies that selectively bind to an epitope comprising a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. Such α-SNAP-25 antibodies include both naturally-occurring and non-naturally-occurring antibodies, as well as, monoclonal α-SNAP-25 antibodies or polyclonal α-SNAP-25 antibodies. Monoclonal α-SNAP-25 antibodies useful as α-SNAP-25 antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, include, without limitation, the monoclonal α-SNAP-25 antibodies produced from hybridoma cell lines 1D3B8, 2C9B10, 2E2A6, 3C1A5 and 3C3E2.

Yet another aspect disclosed in the present specification provides immuno-based methods of detecting re-targeted endopeptidase activity. Aspects of this method comprise the steps of (a) treating a cell from an established cell line with a sample comprising a re-targeted endopeptidase, wherein the cell from an established cell line is susceptible to re-targeted endopeptidase activity by the re-targeted endopeptidase; (b) isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; (c) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody disclosed in the present specification; and (d) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; wherein detection by the antibody-antigen complex is indicative of re-targeted endopeptidase activity. The α-SNAP-25 antibody of step (c) can optionally be linked to a solid phase support.

Yet another aspect disclosed in the present specification provides immuno-based methods of detecting opioid-TVEMP activity. Aspects of this method comprise the steps of (a) treating a cell from an established cell line with a sample comprising a re-targeted endopeptidase, wherein the cell from an established cell line can uptake a re-targeted endopeptidase; (b) isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; (c) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody disclosed in the present specification; and (d) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; wherein detection by the antibody-antigen complex is indicative of re-targeted endopeptidase activity. The α-SNAP-25 antibody of step (c) can optionally be linked to a solid phase support.

A further aspect disclosed in the present specification provides methods of determining re-targeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in a mammal. Aspects of this method comprise the steps of (a) adding a re-targeted endopeptidase to a test sample obtained from a mammal being tested for the presence or absence of α-re-targeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; (b) treating a cell from an established cell line with the test sample, wherein the cell from an established cell line is susceptible to re-targeted endopeptidase activity; (c) isolating from the treated cells a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; (d) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody disclosed in the present specification; (e) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; (f) repeating steps a-e with a negative control sample instead of a test sample; and (g) comparing the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step (e) to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step (f), wherein detection of a lower amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step (e) relative to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step (f) is indicative of the presence of α-re-targeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies. The α-SNAP-25 antibody of step (d) can optionally be linked to a solid phase support. The control sample in step (f) can also include a positive control sample, in addition to the negative control sample.

Clostridia toxins produced by Clostridium botulinum, Clostridium tetani, Clostridium baratii and Clostridium butyricum are the most widely used in therapeutic and cosmetic treatments of humans and other mammals. Strains of C. botulinum produce seven antigenically-distinct serotypes of botulinum toxins (BoNTs), which have been identified by investigating botulism outbreaks in man (BoNT/A, BoNT/B, BoNT/E and BoNT/F), animals (BoNT/C1 and BoNT/D), or isolated from soil (BoNT/G). While all seven botulinum toxin serotypes have similar structure and biological properties, each also displays heterogeneous characteristics, such as, e.g., different pharmacological properties. In contrast, tetanus toxin (TeNT) is produced by a uniform group of C. tetani. Two other species of Clostridia, C. baratii and C. butyricum, also produce toxins similar to BoNT/F and BoNT/E, respectively.

Clostridial toxins are each translated as a single chain polypeptide of approximately 150 kDa that is subsequently cleaved by proteolytic scission within a disulfide loop by a naturally-occurring protease, such as, e.g., an endogenous Clostridial toxin protease or a naturally-occurring protease produced in the environment. This posttranslational processing yields a di-chain molecule comprising an approximately 50 kDa light chain (LC) and an approximately 100 kDa heavy chain (HC) held together by a single disulfide bond and noncovalent interactions. Each mature di-chain molecule comprises three functionally distinct domains: 1) an enzymatic domain located in the LC that includes a metalloprotease region containing a zinc-dependent endopeptidase activity which specifically targets core components of the neurotransmitter release apparatus; 2) a translocation domain contained within the amino-terminal half of the HC (H_N) that facilitates release of the LC from intracellular vesicles into the cytoplasm of the target cell; and 3) a binding domain found within the carboxyl-terminal half of the HC (H_C) that determines the binding activity and binding specificity of the toxin to the receptor complex located at the surface of the target cell.

The binding, translocation and enzymatic activity of these three functional domains are all necessary for toxicity. While all details of this process are not yet precisely known, the overall cellular intoxication mechanism whereby Clostridial toxins enter a neuron and inhibit neurotransmitter release is similar, regardless of serotype or subtype. Although the applicants have no wish to be limited by the following description, the intoxication mechanism can be described as comprising at least four steps: 1) receptor binding, 2) complex internalization, 3) light chain translocation, and 4) enzymatic target modification (FIG. 1). The process is initiated when the HC domain of a Clostridial toxin binds to a toxin-specific receptor system located on the plasma membrane surface of a target cell. The binding specificity of a receptor complex is thought to be achieved, in part, by specific combinations of gangliosides and protein receptors that appear to distinctly comprise each Clostridial toxin receptor complex. Once bound, the toxin/receptor complexes are internalized by endocytosis and the internalized vesicles are sorted to specific intracellular routes. The translocation step appears to be triggered by the acidification of the vesicle compartment. This process seems to initiate important pH-dependent structural rearrangements that increase hydrophobicity, promote pore formation, and facilitate separation of the heavy and light chains of the toxin. Once separated, the light chain endopeptidase of the toxin is released from the intracellular vesicle into the cytosol where it appears to specifically target core components of the neurotransmitter release apparatus. These core proteins, vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP)/synaptobrevin, synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25) and Syntaxin, are necessary for synaptic vesicle docking and fusion at the nerve terminal and constitute members of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor-attachment protein-receptor (SNARE) family. BoNT/A and BoNT/E cleave SNAP-25 in the carboxyl terminal region, releasing a nine or twenty six amino acid fragment, respectively, and BoNT/C1 also cleaves SNAP-25 near the carboxyl terminus releasing an eight amino acid fragment. The botulinum serotypes BoNT/B, BoNT/D, BoNT/F and BoNT/G, and tetanus toxin, act on the conserved central portion of VAMP, and release the amino terminal portion of VAMP into the cytosol. BoNT/C1 cleaves syntaxin at a single site near the cytosolic membrane surface. The selective proteolysis of synaptic SNAREs accounts for the block of neurotransmitter release caused by Clostridial toxins in vivo. The SNARE protein targets of Clostridial toxins are common to exocytosis in a variety of non-neuronal types; in these cells, as in neurons, light chain peptidase activity inhibits exocytosis, see, e.g., Yann Humeau et al., How Botulinum and Tetanus Neurotoxins Block Neurotransmitter Release, 82(5) Biochimie. 427-446 (2000); Kathryn Turton et al., Botulinum and Tetanus Neurotoxins: Structure, Function and Therapeutic Utility, 27(11) Trends Biochem. Sci. 552-558. (2002); Giovanna Lalli et al., The Journey of Tetanus and Botulinum Neurotoxins in Neurons, 11(9) Trends Microbiol. 431-437, (2003).

Re-targeted endopeptidases generally substitute the naturally-occurring di-chain loop protease cleavage site with an exogenous protease cleavage site. See e.g., Dolly, J. O. et al., Activatable Clostridial Toxins, U.S. Pat. No. 7,419,676, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Although re-targeted endopeptidases vary in their overall molecular weight because of the size of the targeting moiety, the activation process and its reliance on cleavage at the exogenous cleavage site to produce a di-chain molecule is essentially the same as that for Clostridial toxins. See e.g., Steward, L. E. et al., Activatable Clostridial Toxins, U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0005313; Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity For Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,075; Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity for Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0241881, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, an immune response inducing composition for producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. As used herein, the term “immune response inducing composition” refers to a composition comprising a SNAP-25 antigen which, when administered to an animal, stimulates an immune response against the SNAP-25 antigen, thereby producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. The term “immune response” refers to any response by the immune system of an animal to an immune response inducing composition. Exemplary immune responses include, but are not limited to, cellular as well as local and systemic humoral immunity, such as, e.g., CTL responses, including antigen-specific induction of CD8+ CTLs, helper T-cell responses, including T-cell proliferative responses and cytokine release, and B-cell responses including, e.g., an antibody producing response. The term “inducing an immune response” refers to administration of an immune response inducing composition or a polynucleotide encoding the immune response inducing composition, where an immune response is affected, i.e., stimulated, initiated or induced.

An SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition comprises a SNAP-25 antigen. As used herein, the term “antigen” refers to a molecule that elicits an immune response and includes, without limitation, peptides, polysaccharides and conjugates of lipids, such as, e.g., lipoproteins and glycolipids. As used herein, the term “SNAP-25 antigen” refers to any antigen which has a carboxyl-terminus at the P1 residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond that can elicit an immune response. A SNAP-25 antigen used in an immune response inducing composition must be large enough to be substantially unique in sequence, thus reducing the possibility of producing antibodies that are cross reactive against antigens other than SNAP-25. In addition, a SNAP-25 antigen used in an immune response inducing composition must be small enough to only trigger an immune response substantially against a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P1 residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, thus increasing the possibility of producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can distinguish a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P1 residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 lacking a carboxyl-terminus at the P1 residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. Furthermore, it is also very desirable to generate α-SNAP-25 antibodies of a single amino acid sequence in a good yield that are reproducibly selective and which bind with acceptable avidity in order to permit the design of a highly sensitive assay.

The sequence surrounding a BoNT/A cleavage site present in SNAP-25 is denoted as P₅-P₄-P₃-P₂-P1-P1′-P₂′-P₃′-P₄′-P₅′, with P1-P1′ representing the scissile bond. Upon cleavage by retargeted endopeptidase, the resulting cleavage products produced comprise a fragment including the P5-P4-P3-P2-P1 sequence and a fragment including the P₁′-P₂′-P₃′-P₄′-P₅′. Thus, as used herein, the term “SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond” refers to any SNAP-25 having the P₁residue as its carboxyl-terminal amino acid. For example, Q197-R198 of human SNAP-25 (SEQ ID NO:5) represents the P₁-P₁′ scissile bond for the BoNT/A cleavage site. As such, “SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus glutamine of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond” would be any SNAP-25 cleavage product having a glutamine at its carboxyl-terminal amino acid where the glutamine represents Q₁₉₇of the scissile bond. As another example, K₂₀₄-H₂₀₅of Torpedo marmorata SNAP-25 (SEQ ID NO:16) represents the P₁-P₁′ scissile bond for the BoNT/A cleavage site. As such, “SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus lysine of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond” would be any SNAP-25 cleavage product having a lysine at its carboxyl-terminal amino acid where the lysine represents K₂₀₄of the scissile bond. The SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from the BoNT/A cleavage site can be modified to enhance the immunogenicity of a SNAP-25 antigen, a hapten, or any other antigenic compound that is immunogenic, non-immunogenic, or weakly immunogenic when not associated with the modification. In an aspect of this embodiment, the carboxyl-terminal P₁residue from the scissile bond of a SNAP-25 antigen can be carboxylated. Carboxylation increases the desired immunogenic properties of a SNAP-25 antigen in two respects. First, because charged amino acids enhance immunogenicity, adding a COO⁻ group to the carboxyl-terminal residue will increase the overall immunogenicity of a SNAP-25 antigen. Second, because the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond is in a charged state upon cleavage, adding a COO⁻ group to the carboxyl-terminal residue will better mimic the actual antigen that the α-SNAP-25 antibodies disclosed in the present specification are designed to selectively bind.

In an aspect of this embodiment, the amino-terminal residue from a SNAP-25 antigen can be modified by the addition of an amino acid adapted to attach the SNAP-25 antigen to a carrier protein, such as, e.g., a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), an ovalbumin (OVA), a thyroglobulin (THY), a bovine serum albumin (BSA), a soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI), or a multiple attachment peptide (MAP). For example, a cysteine residue can be placed at the amino-terminus in order to conjugate the carrier protein KLH.

Thus, an embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be, e.g., at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, at least 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least 18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 25, or at least 30 amino acids in length. In another embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be, e.g., at most 5, at most 6, at most 7, at most 8, at most 9, at most 10, at most 11, at most 12, at most 13, at most 14, at most 15, at most 16, at most 17, at most 18, at most 19, at most 20, at most 25, or at most 30 amino acids in length. In still another embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be, e.g., between 7-12 amino acids, between 10-15 amino acids, or between 13-18 amino acids.

In another embodiment, the SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprises SEQ ID NO:33. In aspects of this embodiment, the SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprises SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:38, or SEQ ID NO:39. In a further embodiment, the SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprises SEQ ID NO:40.

In yet another embodiment, the SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprises SEQ ID NO:41. In aspects of this embodiment, the SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprises SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, SEQ ID NO:44 SEQ ID NO:45, SEQ ID NO:46. In a further embodiment, the SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprises SEQ ID NO:47.

It is envisioned that any and all SNAP-25 antigens that triggers an immune response that produces α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be useful as a SNAP-25 antigen. Thus, amino acid sequence variants comprising SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:38, SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, SEQ ID NO:44, SEQ ID NO:45, or SEQ ID NO:46 can be useful as a SNAP-25 antigen to trigger an immune response that produces α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. Thus, in an embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen can substitute at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, or at least 5 amino acid substitutions, deletions or additions to the SNAP-25 antigens comprising SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:38, SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, SEQ ID NO:44, SEQ ID NO:45, or SEQ ID NO:46. In still another embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen can have at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity to the SNAP-25 antigens comprising SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:38, SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, SEQ ID NO:44, SEQ ID NO:45, or SEQ ID NO:46.

It is envisioned that one or more carriers may be linked to a SNAP-25 antigen in order to enhance the immunogenicity of a SNAP-25 antigen that is immunogenic, non-immunogenic, or weakly immunogenic when not associated with the carrier. Non-limiting examples, include, e.g., a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), an ovalbumin (OVA), a thyroglobulin (THY), a bovine serum albumin (BSA), a soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI), or a multiple attachment peptide (MAP). As is well known in the art, a non-antigenic or weakly antigenic antigen can be made antigenic by coupling the antigen to a carrier. Various other carrier and methods for coupling an antigen to a carrier are well known in the art. See, e.g., Harlow and Lane, supra, 1998a; Harlow and Lane, supra, 1998b; and David W. Waggoner, Jr. et al., Immunogenicity-enhancing carriers and compositions thereof and methods of using the same, U.S. Patent Publication No. 20040057958 (Mar. 25, 2004). An epitope can also be generated by expressing the epitope as a fusion protein. Methods for expressing polypeptide fusions are well known to those skilled in the art as described, for example, in Ausubel et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Supplement 47), John Wiley & Sons, New York (1999). As the carboxyl-terminal end of the SNAP-25 antigen must be the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, a carrier must be linked to the amino end of the SNAP-25 antigen.

It is envisioned that one or more flexible spacers may be linked to a SNAP-25 antigen in order to enhance the immunogenicity of a SNAP-25 antigen that is immunogenic, non-immunogenic, or weakly immunogenic when not associated with the flexible linkers. A flexible spacer increases the overall peptide length of the SNAP-25 antigen and provides flexibility, thereby facilitating the proper presentation of the SNAP-25 antigen to the immune cells. As a non-limiting example, a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition can comprise a SNAP-25 antigen linked to one or more flexible spacers in tandem to better present SNAP-25 antigen to immune cells, thereby facilitating the immune response.

A flexible space comprising a peptide is at least one amino acid in length and comprises non-charged amino acids with small side-chain R groups, such as, e.g., glycine, alanine, valine, leucine or serine. Thus, in an embodiment a flexible spacer can be, e.g., at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, or at least 10 amino acids in length. In another embodiment, a flexible spacer can be, e.g., at least 1, at most 2, at most 3, at most 4, at most 5, at most 6, at most 7, at most 8, at most 9, or at most 10 amino acids in length. In still another embodiment, a flexible spacer can be, e.g., between 1-3 amino acids, between 2-4 amino acids, between 3-5 amino acids, between 4-6 amino acids, or between 5-7 amino acids. Non-limiting examples of a flexible spacer include, e.g., a G-spacers such as GGG, GGGG (SEQ ID NO:57), and GGGGS (SEQ ID NO:58) or an A-spacers such as AAA, AAAA (SEQ ID NO:59) and AAAAV (SEQ ID NO:60). A flexible spacer is linked in-frame to the SNAP-25 antigen as a fusion protein.

As discussed above, a flexible spacer is used, in part, to increase the overall peptide length of the SNAP-25 antigen. For example, a 5-10 amino acid SNAP-25 antigen can have its overall length increased by linking a 3-5 amino acid flexible space to the amino-end of the SNAP-25 antigen. As another example, a 5-10 amino acid SNAP-25 antigen can have its overall length increased by linking a 4-6 amino acid flexible space to the amino-end of the SNAP-25 antigen. As another example, a 5-10 amino acid SNAP-25 antigen can have its overall length increased by linking a 7-10 amino acid flexible space to the amino-end of the SNAP-25 antigen. As another example, a 7-12 amino acid SNAP-25 antigen can have its overall length increased by linking a 1-3 amino acid flexible space to the amino-end of the SNAP-25 antigen. As another example, a 7-12 amino acid SNAP-25 antigen can have its overall length increased by linking a 4-6 amino acid flexible space to the amino-end of the SNAP-25 antigen. The increased length provided by the flexible spacer allows for the selection of a small sized SNAP-25 antigen, thereby increasing the likelihood that the SNAP-25 antigen will only trigger an immune response substantially against a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, thus increasing the possibility of producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can distinguish a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 lacking a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond.

It is envisioned that a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition disclosed in the present specification can optionally comprise a SNAP-25 antigen disclosed in the present specification and one or more adjuvants. As used herein, the term “adjuvant” when used in reference to a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition refers to any substance or mixture of substances that increases or diversifies the immune response to a SNAP-25 antigen. An immune response inducing adjuvant can, for example, serve to reduce the number of immunizations or the amount of antigen required for protective immunization. The use of immune response inducing adjuvants in an immune response inducing composition is well known. The main objective of these adjuvants is to allow an increase in the immune response. Non-limiting adjuvants include, e.g., liposomes, oily phases, including, without limitation, the Freund type of adjuvants, such as, e.g., Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA); Freund's incomplete adjuvant (FIA); sapogenin glycosides, such as, e.g., saponins; carbopol; N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine (commonly known as muramyl dipeptide or “MDP”); and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Such adjuvants are generally used in the form of an emulsion with an aqueous phase, or, more commonly, may consist of water-insoluble inorganic salts. These inorganic salts may consist, for example, of aluminum hydroxide, zinc sulfate, colloidal iron hydroxide, calcium phosphate or calcium chloride. Aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)₃) is a commonly used adjuvant. Currently, the only FDA-approved adjuvant for use in humans is aluminum salts (Alum) which are used to “depot” antigens by precipitation of the antigens. Adjuvants provided above are merely exemplary. In fact, any immune response inducing adjuvant may be used in an immune response inducing composition disclosed in the present specification as long as the adjuvant satisfies the requisite characteristics for inducing an immune response.

A carrier disclosed in the present specification may also act as an adjuvant. Specific adjuvants and methods of making and using are described in, e.g., Gupta et al. Vaccine, 11: 993-306, 1993; Arnon, R. (Ed.) Synthetic Vaccines 1:83-92, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla., 1987; and David W. Waggoner, Jr. et al., Immunogenicity-Enhancing Carriers and Compositions Thereof and Methods of Using the Same, U.S. Patent Publication No. 20040057958 (Mar. 25, 2004). Additional adjuvants include any compound described in Chapter 7 (pp 141-227) of “Vaccine Design, The Subunit and Adjuvant Approach” (eds. Powell, M. F. and Newman, M. J.) Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Volume 6, Plenum Press (New York). Examples from this compendium include Muramyl Dipeptide (MDP) and Montanide 720. Molecules such as Poly Inosine:Cytosine (Poly I:C) or plasmid DNA containing CpG motifs can also be administered as adjuvants in combination with antigens encapsulated in microparticles. In another example, the adjuvant is an agent that facilitates entry of the antigenic compound into the cytoplasm of a cell such as listeriolysin, streptolysin or a mixture thereof.

Thus, in an embodiment, a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition comprises a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated carboxyl-terminal glutamine linked to a carrier peptide. In aspects of this embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated carboxyl-terminal glutamine comprises SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:38, or SEQ ID NO:39. In another aspect of this embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen comprises SEQ ID NO:40. In aspects of this embodiment, the carrier peptide is a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), an ovalbumin (OVA), a thyroglobulin (THY), a bovine serum albumin (BSA), a soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI) or a multiple attachment peptide (MAP).

In another embodiment, a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition comprises a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated carboxyl-terminal lysine linked to a carrier peptide. In aspects of this embodiment, SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated carboxyl-terminal lysine comprises SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, SEQ ID NO:44, SEQ ID NO:45, or SEQ ID NO:46. In another aspect of this embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen comprises SEQ ID NO:47. In aspects of this embodiment, the carrier peptide is a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), an ovalbumin (OVA), a thyroglobulin (THY), a bovine serum albumin (BSA), a soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI) or a multiple attachment peptide (MAP).

In yet another embodiment, a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition comprises a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated C-terminal glutamine linked to one or more flexible linkers and a carrier peptide wherein the flexible linkers intervene between the SNAP-25 antigen and the carrier peptide. In aspects of this embodiment, SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated carboxyl-terminal glutamine comprises SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:38, or SEQ ID NO:39. In another embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen comprises SEQ ID NO:46. In aspects of this embodiment, the carrier peptide is a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), an ovalbumin (OVA), a thyroglobulin (THY), a bovine serum albumin (BSA), a soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI) or a multiple attachment peptide (MAP). In aspects of this embodiment, the flexible linker is a G-spacer or an A-spacer.

In still another embodiment, a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition comprises a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated C-terminal lysine linked to a flexible linker and a carrier peptide wherein the flexible linker intervenes between the SNAP-25 antigen and the carrier peptide. In aspects of this embodiment, SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated carboxyl-terminal lysine comprises SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, SEQ ID NO:44, SEQ ID NO:45, or SEQ ID NO:46. In another aspect of this embodiment, a SNAP-25 antigen comprises SEQ ID NO:47. In aspects of this embodiment, the carrier peptide is a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), an ovalbumin (OVA), a thyroglobulin (THY), a bovine serum albumin (BSA), a soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI) or a multiple attachment peptide (MAP). In aspects of this embodiment, the flexible linker is a G-spacer or an A-spacer.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, a method for producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. An α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be produced by a wide variety of methods that are well known in the art. Specific protocols for making and using antibodies as well as detecting, and measuring antibody binding specificity, binding affinity and binding avidity are known in the art. See, e.g., ANTIBODIES: A LABORATORY MANUAL (Edward Harlow & David Lane, eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2^nded. 1998a); and USING ANTIBODIES: A LABORATORY MANUAL: PORTABLE PROTOCOL No. I (Edward Harlow & David Lane, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1998b); Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, 2001; and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 2004; David Anderson et al., Therapeutic Polypeptides, Nucleic Acids Encoding Same, and Methods of Use, U.S. Pat. No. 7,034,132 (Apr. 25, 2005); and Beatriz M. Carreno et al., Antibodies Against CTLA4, U.S. Pat. No. 7,034,121 (Apr. 25, 2006).

As a non-limiting example, α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be produced by injecting an animal, such as, e.g., a rabbit, a goat, a mouse or another mammal, with one or more injections of an immune response inducing composition disclosed in the present specification. As another non-limiting example, α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be produced by injecting an egg, such as, e.g., a chicken egg, with one or more injections of an immune response inducing composition disclosed in the present specification. The antibody titer in the immunized animal can be monitored over time by standard techniques, such as with an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using immobilized antigen or a cell-based activity assay. If desired, polyclonal antibodies for an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be isolated from the mammal (e.g., from the blood) and further purified by well known techniques, such as protein A affinity chromatography to obtain the IgG fraction, or by affinity purification against the peptide used for producing the antibodies.

As another non-limiting example, α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be produced using a hybridoma method. See e.g., Chapter 6 Monoclonal Antibodies, pp. 196-244, Harlow & Lane, supra, 1998a; and Chapter 7 Growing Hybridomas, pp. 245-282, Harlow & Lane, supra, 1998a; and Goding, pp. 59-103, Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice, Academic Press, (1986). In this method, a host animal, such as, e.g., a mouse, a hamster, or another appropriate host animal, is typically exposed to one or more injections of a SNAP-25 antigen disclosed in the present specification to elicit lymphocytes that produce or are capable of producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that will specifically bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. The antibody titer in the immunized animal can be monitored over time by standard techniques, such as with an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using immobilized antigen or a cell-based activity assay. Alternatively, the lymphocytes can be immunized in vitro using a suitable cell culture line. At an appropriate time after immunization, e.g., when the antibody titers are highest, antibody-producing cells are isolated from the animal. Generally, either peripheral blood lymphocytes are used, if cells of human origin are desired, or spleen cells or lymph node cells are used, if non-human mammalian sources are desired. The isolated antibody-producing cells are fused with an immortal cell line using a suitable fusing agent, such as polyethylene glycol, to form a hybridoma cell. Immortalized cell lines are usually transformed mammalian cells, particularly myeloma cells of rodent, bovine and human origin. Typically, a murine myeloma cell line is fused with splenocytes harvested from an appropriately immunized mouse to produce the hybridoma. Preferred immortal cell lines are mouse myeloma cell lines that are sensitive to culture medium containing hypoxanthine, aminopterin and thymidine (HAT). Any of a number of myeloma cell lines can be used as a fusion partner according to standard techniques, e.g., the P3-NS1/1-Ag4-1, P3-x63-Ag8.653 or Sp2/0-Ag14 myeloma lines. Hybridoma cells resulting from the fusion are then selected using HAT medium, which kills unfused and unproductively fused myeloma cells (unfused splenocytes die after several days in culture because they are not transformed). The culture medium in which the hybridoma cells are grown can then be assayed for the presence of α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. For example, hybridoma supernatants can be screened using α-SNAP-25 positive media in an immunoprecipitation assay, in vitro binding assay, such as, e.g., a radioimmunoassay (RIA) or an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA), or in a cell-based activity assay. Such techniques and assays are known in the art. See e.g., Chapter 11 Immunoprecipitation, pp. 421-470, Harlow & Lane, supra, 1998a; Chapter 12 Immunoblotting, pp. 471-510, Harlow & Lane, supra, 1998a; Chapter 14 Immunoassays, pp. 553-612, Harlow & Lane, supra, 1998a. Additional studies can then be done to determine whether the antibody is also unreactive to a SNAP-25 lacking a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. The binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody can also be determined, e.g., by Scatchard analysis. See, e.g., Peter J. Munson and David Rodbard, Ligand: A Versatile Computerized Approach For Characterization of Ligand-Binding Systems, 107(1) Anal. Biochem. 220-239 (1980). After the desired hybridoma cells are identified, limiting dilution procedures are used to isolate clones originating from a single cell until a clonal cell line expressing the desired monoclonal antibody is obtained. Those antibodies sufficiently selective for a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond and bind with sufficiently high avidity are chosen for further characterization and study.

Another alternative for preparing an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond is by screening a recombinant combinatorial immunoglobulin library, such as, e.g., an antibody phage display library, with a SNAP-25 peptide and isolate immunoglobulin library members that bind a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. Kits for generating and screening phage display libraries are commercially available, such as, e.g., the Recombinant Phage Antibody System (Amersham GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ); and the SurfZAP™ Phage Display Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Additionally, examples of methods and reagents useful in generating and screening antibody display library can be found in, for example, Ladner et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,409; Borrebaeck et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,712,089; Griffiths et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,885,793; Griffiths et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,255; McCafferty et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,108; Griffiths et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,010,884; Jespers et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,732; Borrebaeck et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,027,930; Johnson et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,471; McCafferty et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,197, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, collecting a sample containing an α-SNAP-25 antibody or α-SNAP-25 antibody-producing cells. As used herein, the term “sample containing an α-SNAP-25 antibody or α-SNAP-25 antibody-producing cell” refers to any biological matter that contains or potentially contains at least one an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. It is envisioned that any and all samples that can contain an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be used in this method, including, without limitation, blood, plasma, serum and lymph fluid. It is also envisioned that any cell capable of producing an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be used in this method, including, without limitation, a CD8 cells, a CTL cell, a helper T-cell and a B-cell. A variety of well known methods can be used for collecting from an individual a sample containing the α-SNAP-25 antibody or α-SNAP-25 antibody-producing cell, see, e.g., Harlow & Lane, supra, 1998a; and Harlow & Lane, supra, 1998b. Similarly, a variety of well known methods can be used for processing a sample to isolate an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. A procedure for collecting a sample can be selected based on the type of antibody to be isolated. As a non-limiting example, when isolating an α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, an appropriate sample can be a blood sample containing such α-SNAP-25 antibodies, whereas when isolating an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, an appropriate sample can be an α-SNAP-25 antibody-producing cell such as a spleen cell or hybridoma.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, isolating an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from the sample. Methods of isolating an such α-SNAP-25 antibodies, such as, e.g., α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond or α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond are well known to those skilled in the art. See, e.g., Harlow and Lane, supra, 1998a; and Harlow and Lane, supra, 1998b. For example, such α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies can be isolated from the sample by well known techniques, such as, e.g., affinity chromatography using protein A or protein G, which provide primarily the IgG fraction of immune serum. Subsequently, or alternatively, a specific SNAP-25 antigen can be immobilized on a column or magnetic beads to purify the α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond by immunoaffinity chromatography. An α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be isolated from the culture medium or ascites fluid by conventional immunoglobulin purification procedures such as, e.g., protein A-Sepharose, hydroxylapatite chromatography, gel electrophoresis, dialysis, or affinity chromatography.

Thus, in an embodiment, a method of producing a α-SNAP-25 antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprises the steps (a) administering to an animal a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition comprising a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxylated C-terminal glutamine linked to a carrier peptide; (b) collecting from the animal a sample containing an α-SNAP-25 antibody or α-SNAP-25 antibody-producing cell; and (c) isolating the α-SNAP-25 antibody component from the sample. In an aspect of this embodiment, the α-SNAP-25 antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond is a polyclonal antibody. In another aspect of this embodiment, α-SNAP-25 antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond is a monoclonal antibody. In a further aspect of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond produced is an IgG subtype. In other aspects of this embodiment, SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition further comprises an adjuvant, such as, e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), monomethoxypolyethylene glycol (mPEG), or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).

In another embodiment, a method of producing α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprises the steps (a) administering to an animal a SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition comprising a SNAP-25 peptide having a carboxylated C-terminal glutamine linked to a flexible linker and a carrier peptide wherein the flexible linker intervenes between the SNAP-25 peptide and the carrier peptide; (b) collecting from the animal a sample containing an α-SNAP-25 antibody or α-SNAP-25 antibody-producing cell; and (c) isolating the α-SNAP-25 antibody from the sample. In an aspect of this embodiment, the α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond is a polyclonal antibody. In another aspect of this embodiment, α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond is a monoclonal antibody. In a further aspect of this embodiment, α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond produced in an IgG subtype. In other aspects of this embodiment, SNAP-25 immune response inducing composition further comprises an adjuvant, such as, e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), monomethoxypolyethylene glycol (mPEG), or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, an isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. As used herein, the term “antibody” refers to a molecule generated by an immune system that was made in response to a particular antigen that specifically binds to that antigen, and includes both naturally occurring antibodies and non-naturally occurring antibodies. As used herein, the term “isolated” refers to separating a molecule from its natural environment by the use of human intervention. For example, an antibody can be a polyclonal antibody, a monoclonal antibody, a dimer, a multimer, a multispecific antibody, a humanized antibody, a chimeric antibody, bi-functional antibody, a cell-associated antibody like an Ig receptor, a linear antibody, a diabody, or a minibody, so long as the fragment exhibits the desired biological activity, and single chain derivatives of the same. An antibody can be a full-length immunoglobulin molecule comprising the V_Hand V_Ldomains, as well as a light chain constant domain (C_L) and heavy chain constant domains, C_H1, C_H2and C_H3, or an immunologically active fragment of a full-length immunoglobulin molecule, such as, e.g., a Fab fragment, a F(ab′)₂fragment, a Fc fragment, a Fd fragment, a Fv fragment. An antibody can be derived from any vertebrate species (e.g., human, goat, horse, donkey, murine, rat, rabbit, or chicken), and can be of any type (e.g., IgG, IgE, IgM, IgD, and IgA), class (e.g., IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM) or subclass (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA1 and IgA2). For general disclosure on the structure of naturally occurring antibodies, non-naturally occurring antibodies, and antigenic compound-binding fragments thereof, see, e.g., Pluckthun in The Pharmacology of Monoclonal Antibodies, vol. 113, Rosenburg and Moore eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 269-315 (1994); Borrabeck, Antibody Engineering, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press 1995), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Naturally-occurring antibodies are usually heterotetrameric glycoproteins of about 150,000 daltons, composed of two identical light (L) chains and two identical heavy (H) chains. Each light chain is linked to a heavy chain by one covalent disulfide bond, while the number of disulfide linkages varies among the heavy chains of different immunoglobulin isotypes. Each heavy and light chain also has regularly spaced intrachain disulfide bridges. Each heavy chain has at one end a variable domain (V_H) followed by a number of constant domains. Each light chain has a variable domain at one end (V_L) and a constant domain at its other end. The constant domain of the light chain is aligned with the first constant domain of the heavy chain, and the light-chain variable domain is aligned with the variable domain of the heavy chain. Particular amino acid residues are believed to form an interface between the light chain and heavy chain variable domains.

The complete antigen-recognition and antigen-binding site is contained within the variable domains of the antibody, i.e., the Fv fragment. This fragment includes a dimer of one heavy chain variable domain (V_H) and one light chain variable domain (V_L) in tight, non-covalent association. Each domain comprises four framework regions (FR), which largely adopting a β-sheet configuration, connected by three hypervariable regions, which form loops connecting, and in some cases form part of, the β-sheet structure. Each hypervariable region comprises an amino acid sequence corresponding to a complementarity determining region (CDRs). Collectively, it the three-dimensional configuration of the six CDR regions that define an antigen-binding site on the surface of the V_H-V_Ldimmer that confers antigen-binding specificity. See e.g., Cyrus Chothia, et al., Conformations of Immunoglobulin Hypervariable Regions, Nature 342(6252): 877-883 (1989); Elvin A. Kabat, et al Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. (1991), each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The constant domains of the antibody are not involved directly in binding an antibody to an antigen, but exhibit various effector functions, such as participation of the antibody in antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity.

A target antigen generally has one or more binding sites, also called epitopes, which are recognized by the CDR-formed antigen-binding site. As used herein, an “epitope” is synonymous with “antigenic determinant” and refers to the site on a target antigen, such as, e.g., a peptide, polysaccharide or lipid-containing molecule, capable of specific binding to an immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor or otherwise interacting with a molecule. Each antibody that specifically binds to a different epitope has a different structure. Thus, one antigen may have more than one corresponding antibody.

Polyclonal antibodies refer to a heterogeneous population of antibody molecules that contain at least two species of antibody capable of binding to a particular antigen. By definition, a polyclonal antibody includes two different antibodies that bind to at least two different epitopes. As used herein, the term “monoclonal antibody” or “monoclonal antibodies” refer to a substantially homogeneous population of antibody molecules that contain only one species of antibody capable of binding a particular antigen i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical except for possible naturally occurring mutations that may be present in minor amounts. By definition, a monoclonal antibody binds to a single epitope. Monoclonal antibodies are highly specific, being directed against a single antigenic site. Furthermore, in contrast to polyclonal antibodies, each monoclonal antibody is directed against a single determinant on the antigen. In addition to their specificity, the monoclonal antibodies are advantageous in that they may be synthesized uncontaminated by other antibodies. The modifier “monoclonal” indicates the character of the antibody as being obtained from a substantially homogeneous population of antibodies, and is not to be construed as requiring production of the antibody by any particular method. For example, the monoclonal antibodies to be used in accordance with the present disclosure may be made by the hybridoma method first described by Kohler et al (1975) Nature 256:495, or may be made by recombinant DNA methods (see for example: U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,816,567; 5,807,715). The monoclonal antibodies may also be isolated from phage antibody libraries using the techniques described in Clackson et al (1991) Nature, 352:624-628; Marks et al (1991) J. Mol. Biol., 222:581-597; for example.

Thus, in an embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises a heavy chain variable domain (V_H) and a light chain variable domain (V_L) that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. In an aspect of this embodiment, the heavy chain variable domain (V_H) is SEQ ID NO:72, SEQ ID NO:74, SEQ ID NO:76, SEQ ID NO:80, SEQ ID NO:82, or SEQ ID NO:133. In another aspect of this embodiment, the light chain variable domain (V_L) is SEQ ID NO:84, SEQ ID NO:86, SEQ ID NO:88, SEQ ID NO:90, or SEQ ID NO:92.

In another embodiment, a nucleic acid sequence encodes an α-SNAP-25 antibody comprising a heavy chain variable domain (V_H) and a light chain variable domain (V_L) that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. In an aspect of this embodiment, the heavy chain variable domain (V_H) is encoded by the nucleic acid sequence SEQ ID NO:71, SEQ ID NO:73, SEQ ID NO:75, SEQ ID NO:77, SEQ ID NO:79, SEQ ID NO:81, or SEQ ID NO:132. In another aspect of this embodiment, the heavy chain variable domain (V_H) is encoded by a nucleic acid sequence that is at least 70% identical to, at least 75% identical to, at least 80% identical to, at least 85% identical to, at least 90% identical to, at least 95% identical, at least 96% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, or at least 99% identical to SEQ ID NO:71, SEQ ID NO:73, SEQ ID NO:75, SEQ ID NO:77, SEQ ID NO:79, SEQ ID NO:81, or SEQ ID NO:132. In yet another aspect of this embodiment, the light chain variable domain (V_L) is encoded by SEQ ID NO:83, SEQ ID NO:85, SEQ ID NO:87, SEQ ID NO:89, or SEQ ID NO:91. In still another aspect of this embodiment, the light chain variable domain (V_L) is encoded by a nucleic acid sequence that is at least 70% identical to, at least 75% identical to, at least 80% identical to, at least 85% identical to, at least 90% identical to, at least 95% identical, at least 96% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, or at least 99% identical to SEQ ID NO:83, SEQ ID NO:85, SEQ ID NO:87, SEQ ID NO:89, or SEQ ID NO:91.

In another embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises a heavy chain variable domain (V_H) CDR1 region, a CDR2 region, a CDR3 region, or any combination thereof that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. In an aspect of this embodiment, the heavy chain variable domain (V_H) CDR1 region is SEQ ID NO:93, SEQ ID NO:94, SEQ ID NO:95, SEQ ID NO:118, SEQ ID NO:119, or SEQ ID NO:120. In another aspect of this embodiment, the heavy chain variable domain (V_H) CDR2 region is SEQ ID NO:96, SEQ ID NO:97, SEQ ID NO:98, SEQ ID NO:99, SEQ ID NO:121, SEQ ID NO:122, or SEQ ID NO:123. In yet another aspect of this embodiment, the heavy chain variable domain (V_H) CDR3 region is SEQ ID NO:100, SEQ ID NO:101, SEQ ID NO:102, SEQ ID NO:124, SEQ ID NO:134, or SEQ ID NO:135.

In another embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises a light chain variable domain (V_L) CDR1 region, a CDR2 region, a CDR3 region, or any combination thereof that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. In an aspect of this embodiment, the light chain variable domain (V_L) CDR1 region is SEQ ID NO:103, SEQ ID NO:104, SEQ ID NO:105, SEQ ID NO:106, SEQ ID NO:107, SEQ ID NO:125, SEQ ID NO:126, SEQ ID NO:127, SEQ ID NO:128, or SEQ ID NO:129. In another aspect of this embodiment, the light chain variable domain (V_L) CDR2 region is SEQ ID NO:108, SEQ ID NO:109, SEQ ID NO:110, SEQ ID NO:111, or SEQ ID NO:112. In yet another aspect of this embodiment, the light chain variable domain (V_L) CDR3 region is SEQ ID NO:113, SEQ ID NO:114, SEQ ID NO:115, SEQ ID NO:116, or SEQ ID NO:117.

In yet another embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody specifically binds an epitope comprising a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. In an aspect of this embodiment, the epitope comprises SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, or SEQ ID NO:37. In an aspect of this embodiment, the epitope comprises SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:40, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, or SEQ ID NO:44.

As discussed above, the sequence surrounding a BoNT/A cleavage site present in SNAP-25 is denoted P₅-P₄-P₃-P₂-P₁-P₁′-P₂′-P₃′-P₄′-P₅′, with P₁-P₁′ representing the scissile bond. Upon cleavage by BoNT/A, the resulting cleavage products produced comprise a fragment including the P₅-P₄-P₃-P₂-P₁sequence and a fragment including the P₁′-P₂′-P₃′-P₄′-P₅′. As used herein, the term “α-SNAP-25 antibodies that selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond” refers to α-SNAP-25 antibodies that selectively bind to any SNAP-25 cleavage product fragment comprising the P₅-P₄-P₃-P₂-P₁sequence, but not to any SNAP-25 cleavage product fragment comprising the P₁′-P₂′-P₃′-P₄′-P₅′ sequence or to any SNAP-25 having an intact P₁-P₁′ scissile bond of a BoNT/A cleavage site. As used herein, the term “α-SNAP-25₁₉₇antibody” refers to an antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus P₁residue that corresponds to glutamine 197 of SEQ ID NO:5. As used herein, the term “α-SNAP-25204 antibody” refers to an antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus P₁residue that corresponds to lysine 204 of SEQ ID NO:16.

As used herein, the term “selectively” refers to having a unique effect or influence or reacting in only one way or with only one thing. As used herein, the term “selectively binds”, or “selective binding” when made in reference to an antibody, refers to the discriminatory binding of the antibody to the indicated target epitope such that the antibody does not substantially cross react with non-target epitopes. The minimal size of a peptide epitope, as defined herein, is about five amino acids, and a peptide epitope typically comprises at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 15, or at least 20 amino acids. A peptide epitope may be discontinuous, i.e., it comprises amino acid residues that are not adjacent in the primary structure of the peptide but are brought together into an epitope by way of the secondary, tertiary, or quaternary structure of the peptide. Furthermore, it is also noted that an epitope might comprise a portion of a molecule other than an amino acid sequence, such as, e.g., a carbohydrate moiety, a lipid moiety like lipoproteins or glycolipids, or a chemically-modified amino acid moiety like a phosphorylated amino acid. In aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can selectively bind a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprising at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 15, or at least 20 amino acids. In other aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can selectively bind a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond comprising at most 5, at most 6, at most 7, at most 8, at most 9, at most 10, at most 15, or at most 20 amino acids.

Selective binding includes binding properties such as, e.g., binding affinity, binding specificity, and binding avidity. See David J. King, Applications and Engineering of Monoclonal Antibodies, pp. 240 (1998). Binding affinity refers to the length of time the antibody resides at its epitope binding site, and can be viewed as the strength with which an antibody binds its epitope. Binding affinity can be described an antibody's equilibrium dissociation constant (KD), which is defined as the ratio Kd/Ka at equilibrium. Where Ka is the antibody's association rate constant and kd is the antibody's dissociation rate constant. Binding affinity is determined by both the association and the dissociation and alone neither high association or low dissociation can ensure high affinity. The association rate constant (Ka), or on-rate constant (Kon), measures the number of binding events per unit time, or the propensity of the antibody and the antigen to associate reversibly into its antibody-antigen complex. The association rate constant is expressed in M⁻¹s⁻¹, and is symbolized as follows: [Ab]×[Ag]×Kon. The larger the association rate constant, the more rapidly the antibody binds to its antigen, or the higher the binding affinity between antibody and antigen. The dissociation rate constant (Kd), or off-rate constant (Koff), measures the number of dissociation events per unit time propensity of an antibody-antigen complex to separate (dissociate) reversibly into its component molecules, namely the antibody and the antigen. The dissociation rate constant is expressed in s⁻¹, and is symbolized as follows: [Ab+Ag]×Koff. The smaller the dissociation rate constant, the more tightly bound the antibody is to its antigen, or the higher the binding affinity between antibody and antigen. The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) measures the rate at which new antibody-antigen complexes formed equals the rate at which antibody-antigen complexes dissociate at equilibrium. The equilibrium dissociation constant is expressed in M, and is defined as Koff/Kon=[Ab]×[Ag]/[Ab+Ag], where [Ab] is the molar concentration of the antibody, [Ag] is the molar concentration of the antigen, and [Ab+Ag] is the molar concentration of the antibody-antigen complex, where all concentrations are of such components when the system is at equilibrium. The smaller the equilibrium dissociation constant, the more tightly bound the antibody is to its antigen, or the higher the binding affinity between antibody and antigen.

Thus, in an embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an association rate constant of, e.g., less than 1×10⁵M⁻¹s⁻¹, less than 1×10⁶M⁻¹s⁻¹, less than 1×10⁷M⁻¹s⁻¹, or less than 1×10³M⁻¹s⁻¹. In another embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an association rate constant of, e.g., more than 1×10⁵M⁻¹s⁻¹, more than 1×10⁶M⁻¹s⁻¹, more than 1×10⁷M⁻¹s⁻¹, or more than 1×10³M⁻¹s⁻¹. In other aspects, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an association rate constant between 1×10⁵M⁻¹s⁻¹to 1×10³M⁻¹s⁻¹, 1×10⁶M⁻¹s⁻¹to 1×10³M⁻¹s⁻¹, 1×10⁵M⁻¹s⁻¹to 1×10⁷M⁻¹s⁻¹, or 1×10⁶M⁻¹s⁻¹to 1×10⁷M⁻¹s⁻¹.

In another embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have a disassociation rate constant of less than 1×10⁻³s⁻¹, less than 1×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, or less than 1×10⁻⁵s⁻¹. In other aspects of this embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have a disassociation rate constant of, e.g., less than 1.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, less than 2.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, less than 3.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, less than 4.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, less than 5.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, less than 6.0×10-4 s⁻¹, less than 7.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, less than 8.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, or less than 9.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹. In another embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have a disassociation rate constant of, e.g., more than 1×10⁻³s⁻¹, more than 1×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, or more than 1×10⁻⁵s⁻¹. In other aspects of this embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have a disassociation rate constant of, e.g., more than 1.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, more than 2.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, more than 3.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, more than 4.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, more than 5.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, more than 6.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, more than 7.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, more than 8.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹, or more than 9.0×10⁻⁴s⁻¹.

In another embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an equilibrium disassociation constant of less than 0.500 nM. In aspects of this embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an equilibrium disassociation constant of, e.g., less than 0.500 nM, less than 0.450 nM, less than 0.400 nM, less than 0.350 nM, less than 0.300 nM, less than 0.250 nM, less than 0.200 nM, less than 0.150 nM, less than 0.100 nM, or less than 0.050 nM. In another embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an equilibrium disassociation constant of more than 0.500 nM. In aspects of this embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an equilibrium disassociation constant of, e.g., more than 0.500 nM, more than 0.450 nM, more than 0.400 nM, more than 0.350 nM, more than 0.300 nM, more than 0.250 nM, more than 0.200 nM, more than 0.150 nM, more than 0.100 nM, or more than 0.050 nM.

In yet another embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an association rate constant of for the intact SNAP-25 of, e.g., less than 1×10⁰M⁻¹s⁻¹, less than 1×10¹M⁻¹s⁻¹, less than 1×10²M⁻¹s⁻¹, less than 1×10³M⁻¹s⁻¹, or less than 1×10⁴M⁻¹s⁻¹. In another embodiment, the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can have an association rate constant of for the intact SNAP-25 of, e.g., at most 1×10⁰M⁻¹s⁻¹, at most 1×10¹M⁻¹s⁻¹, at most 1×10²M⁻¹s⁻¹, at most 1×10³M⁻¹s⁻¹, or at most 1×10⁴M⁻¹s⁻¹.

Binding specificity is the ability of an antibody to discriminate between a molecule containing its epitope and a molecule that does not contain that epitope. One way to measure binding specificity is to compare the Kon association rate of the antibody for a molecule containing its epitope relative to the Kon association rate of the antibody for a molecule that does not contain that epitope. For example, comparing the association rate constant (Ka) of an α-SNAP-25 antibody for a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond relative to a SNAP-25 not comprising that epitope, such as, e.g., a SNAP-25 epitope lacking a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond or a SNAP-25 epitope having an intact P₁-P₁′ scissile bond of a BoNT/A cleavage site. In aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has an association rate constant (Ka) for a SNAP-25 not comprising its epitope(s) of, e.g., less than 1×10⁰M⁻¹s⁻¹, less than 1×10¹M⁻¹s⁻¹, less than 1×10²M⁻¹s⁻¹, less than 1×10³M⁻¹s⁻¹or less than 1×10⁴M⁻¹s⁻¹. In other aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has an association rate constant (Ka) for a SNAP-25 not comprising its epitope(s) of, e.g., at most 1×10⁰M⁻¹s⁻¹, at most 1×10¹M⁻¹s⁻¹, at most 1×10²M⁻¹s⁻¹, at most 1×10³M⁻¹s⁻¹or at most 1×10⁴M⁻¹s⁻¹.

In yet aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has an association rate constant (Ka) for its epitope relative to a SNAP-25 not comprising that epitope of, e.g., at least 2-fold more, at least 3-fold more, at least 4-fold more, at least 5-fold more, at least 6-fold more, at least 7-fold more, at least 8-fold more, or at least 9-fold more. In further aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has an association rate constant (Ka) for its epitope relative to a SNAP-25 not comprising that epitope of, e.g., at least 10-fold more, at least 100-fold more, at least 1,000-fold more or at least 10,000-fold more. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has an association rate constant (Ka) for its epitope relative to a SNAP-25 not comprising that epitope of, e.g., at most 1-fold more, at most 2-fold more, at most 3-fold more, at most 4-fold more, at most 5-fold more, at most 6-fold more, at most 7-fold more, at most 8-fold more, or at most 9-fold more. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has an association rate constant (Ka) for its epitope relative to a SNAP-25 not comprising that epitope of, e.g., at most 10-fold more, at most 100-fold more, at most 1,000-fold more or at most 10,000-fold more.

The binding specificity of an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can also be characterized as a ratio that such an α-SNAP-25 antibody can discriminate its SNAP-25 epitope relative to a SNAP-25 not comprising that epitope, such as, e.g., a SNAP-25 epitope lacking a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond or a SNAP-25 epitope having an intact P₁-P₁′ scissile bond of a BoNT/A cleavage site. In aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has a binding specificity ratio for its SNAP-25 epitope relative to a SNAP-25 not comprising that epitope of, e.g., at least 2:1, at least 3:1, at least 4:1, at least 5:1, at least 64:1, at least 7:1, at least 8:1, at least 9:1, at least 10:1, at least 15:1, at least 20:1, at least 25:1, at least 30:1, at least 35:1, or at least 40:1. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has a binding specificity ratio for its SNAP-25 epitope relative to a SNAP-25 lacking a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond of, e.g., at least 2:1, at least 3:1, at least 4:1, at least 5:1, at least 6:1, at least 7:1, at least 8:1, at least 9:1, at least 10:1, at least 15:1, at least 20:1, at least 25:1, at least 30:1, at least 35:1, or at least 40:1. In still other aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond has a binding specificity ratio for its SNAP-25 epitope relative to a SNAP-25 having an intake P₁-P₁′ scissile bond of a BoNT/A cleavage site of, e.g., at least 2:1, at least 3:1, at least 4:1, at least 5:1, at least 64:1, at least 7:1, at least 8:1, at least 9:1, at least 10:1, at least 15:1, at least 20:1, at least 25:1, at least 30:1, at least 35:1, or at least 40:1.

Binding avidity, also known as functional affinity, refers to the sum total of the functional binding strength between a multivalent antibody and its antigen. Antibody molecules can have more than one binding site (e.g., 2 for IgG, 10 for IgM), and many antigens contain more than one antigenic site. While binding avidity of an antibody depends on the binding affinities of the individual antibody binding sites, binding avidity is greater than the binding affinity as all the antibody-antigen interactions must be broken simultaneously for the antibody to dissociate completely. It is envisioned that an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can selectively bind to any and all epitopes for that antibody.

Thus, in an embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody is an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. In aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody is an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus glutamine or an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus lysine. In other aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody is an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus P₁residue that corresponds to glutamine 197 of SEQ ID NO:5 or an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus P₁residue that corresponds to lysine 204 of SEQ ID NO:16. In still other aspects of this embodiment, an α-SNAP-25 antibody is an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminal amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:38, SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, SEQ ID NO:44, SEQ ID NO:45, or SEQ ID NO:46.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, an immuno-based method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity. The immuno-based methods disclosed in the present specification can be evaluated by several parameters including, e.g., accuracy, precision, limit of detection (LOD), limits of quantitation (LOQ), range, specificity, selectivity, linearity, ruggedness, and system suitability. The accuracy of a method is the measure of exactness of an analytical method, or the closeness of agreement between the measured value and the value that is accepted as a conventional true value or an accepted reference value. The precision of a method is the degree of agreement among individual test results, when the procedure is applied repeatedly to multiple samplings of a homogeneous sample. As such, precision evaluates 1) within assay variability; 2) within-day variability (repeatability); and 3) between-day variability (intermediate precision); and 4) between-lab variability (reproducibility). Coefficient of variation (CV %) is a quantitative measure of precision expressed relative to the observed or theoretical mean value.

An immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification must be able to detect, over background, the presence of an α-SNAP-25 antibody-antigen complex comprising a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. The limit of detection (LOD) of a method refers to the concentration of analyte which gives rise to a signal that is significantly different from the negative control or blank and represents the lowest concentration of analyte that can be distinguished from background.

Thus, in an embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification can detect the LOD of retargeted endopeptidase at an amount that is significantly different from a negative control or blank. In aspect of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 10 ng or less, 9 ng or less, 8 ng or less, 7 ng or less, 6 ng or less, 5 ng or less, 4 ng or less, 3 ng or less, 2 ng or less, 1 ng or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In still other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 900 pg or less, 800 pg or less, 700 pg or less, 600 pg or less, 500 pg or less, 400 pg or less, 300 pg or less, 200 pg or less, 100 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In further aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 90 pg or less, 80 pg or less, 70 pg or less, 60 pg or less, 50 pg or less, 40 pg or less, 30 pg or less, 20 pg or less, 10 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 9 pg or less, 8 pg or less, 7 pg or less, 6 pg or less, 5 pg or less, 4 pg or less, 3 pg or less, 2 pg or less, 1 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 0.9 pg or less, 0.8 pg or less, 0.7 pg or less, 0.6 pg or less, 0.5 pg or less, 0.4 pg or less, 0.3 pg or less, 0.2 pg or less, 0.1 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.

In another aspect of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 100 nM or less or less, 90 nM or less or less, 80 nM or less or less, 70 nM or less or less, 60 nM or less or less, 50 nM or less or less, 40 nM or less or less, 30 nM or less or less, 20 nM or less or less, 10 nM or less or less, 9 nM or less, 8 nM or less, 7 nM or less, 6 nM or less, 5 nM or less, 4 nM or less, 3 nM or less, 2 nM or less, or 1 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 900 pM or less, 800 pM or less, 700 pM or less, 600 pM or less, 500 pM or less, 400 pM or less, 300 pM or less, 200 pM or less, or 100 pM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 100 pM or less, 90 pM or less, 80 pM or less, 70 pM or less, 60 pM or less, 50 pM or less, 40 pM or less, 30 pM or less, 20 pM or less, or 10 pM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOD of, e.g., 10 pM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase, 9 pM or less, 8 pM or less, 7 pM or less, 6 pM or less, 5 pM or less, 4 pM or less, 3 pM or less, 2 pM or less, or 1 pM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.

The limits of quantitation (LOQ) are the lowest and the highest concentrations of analyte in a sample or specimen that can be measured with an acceptable level of accuracy and precision. The lower limit of quantitation refers to the lowest dose that a detection method can measure consistently from the background. The upper limit of quantitation is the highest dose that a detection method can measure consistently before saturation of the signal occurs. The linear range of the method is the area between the lower and the upper limits of quantitation. The linear range is calculated by subtracting lower limit of quantitation from the upper limit of quantitation. As used herein, the term “signal to noise ratio for the lower asymptote” refers to the signal detected in the method at the lower limit of detection divided by the background signal. As used herein, the term “signal to noise ratio for the upper asymptote” refers to the signal detected in the method at the upper limit of detection divided by the background signal.

Thus, in an embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification can detect the LOQ of retargeted endopeptidase at an amount that is significantly different from a negative control or blank. In aspect of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 10 ng or less, 9 ng or less, 8 ng or less, 7 ng or less, 6 ng or less, 5 ng or less, 4 ng or less, 3 ng or less, 2 ng or less, 1 ng or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In still other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 900 pg or less, 800 pg or less, 700 pg or less, 600 pg or less, 500 pg or less, 400 pg or less, 300 pg or less, 200 pg or less, 100 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In further aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 90 pg or less, 80 pg or less, 70 pg or less, 60 pg or less, 50 pg or less, 40 pg or less, 30 pg or less, 20 pg or less, 10 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 9 pg or less, 8 pg or less, 7 pg or less, 6 pg or less, 5 pg or less, 4 pg or less, 3 pg or less, 2 pg or less, 1 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 0.9 pg or less, 0.8 pg or less, 0.7 pg or less, 0.6 pg or less, 0.5 pg or less, 0.4 pg or less, 0.3 pg or less, 0.2 pg or less, 0.1 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.

In another aspect of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 100 nM or less or less, 90 nM or less or less, 80 nM or less or less, 70 nM or less or less, 60 nM or less or less, 50 nM or less or less, 40 nM or less or less, 30 nM or less or less, 20 nM or less or less, 10 nM or less or less, 9 nM or less, 8 nM or less, 7 nM or less, 6 nM or less, 5 nM or less, 4 nM or less, 3 nM or less, 2 nM or less, or 1 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 900 pM or less, 800 pM or less, 700 pM or less, 600 pM or less, 500 pM or less, 400 pM or less, 300 pM or less, 200 pM or less, or 100 pM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 100 pM or less, 90 pM or less, 80 pM or less, 70 pM or less, 60 pM or less, 50 pM or less, 40 pM or less, 30 pM or less, 20 pM or less, or 10 pM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has an LOQ of, e.g., 10 pM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase, 9 pM or less, 8 pM or less, 7 pM or less, 6 pM or less, 5 pM or less, 4 pM or less, 3 pM or less, 2 pM or less, or 1 pM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.

An immuno-based assay useful to practice aspect of the disclosed methods must have a precision of no more than 50%. In aspects of this embodiment, an immuno-based assay has a precision of no more than 50%, no more than 40%, no more than 30%, or no more than 20%. In other aspects of this embodiment, an immuno-based assay has a precision of nor more than 15%, no more than 10%, or no more than 5%. In other aspects of this embodiment, an immuno-based assay has a precision of nor more than 4%, no more than 3%, no more than 2%, or no more than 1%.

An immuno-based assay useful to practice aspect of the disclosed methods must have an accuracy of at least 50%. In aspects of this embodiment, an immuno-based assay has an accuracy of at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, or at least 80%. In other aspects of this embodiment, an immuno-based assay has an accuracy of at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95%. In other aspects of this embodiment, an immuno-based assay has an accuracy of at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, or at least 99%.

An immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification must have a signal to noise ratio for the lower asymptote that is statistically significant and a signal to noise ratio for the upper asymptote that is statistically significant. In aspects of this embodiment, an immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification has a signal to noise ratio for the lower asymptote of, e.g., at least 3:1, at least 4:1, at least 5:1, at least 6:1, at least 7:1, at least 8:1, at least 9:1, at least 10:1, at least 15:1 or at least 20:1. In other aspects of this embodiment, an immuno-based method has a signal to noise ratio for the upper asymptote of, e.g., at least 10:1, at least 15:1, at least 20:1, at least 25:1, at least 30:1, at least 35:1, at least 40:1, at least 45:1, at least 50:1, at least 60:1, at least 70:1, at least 80:1, at least 90:1, or at least 100:1, at least 150:1, at least 200:1, at least 250:1, at least 300:1, at least 350:1, at least 400:1, at least 450:1, at least 500:1, at least 550:1, or at least 600:1.

The specificity of a method defines the ability of the method to measure the analyte of interest to the exclusion of other relevant components, such as, e.g., partially-active or inactive analyte. The selectivity of a method describes the ability of an analytical method to differentiate various substances in a sample. The linearity of a method is its ability to elicit results that are directly, or by a well defined mathematical transformation, proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample. Thus in an embodiment, an immuno-based method disclosed in the present specification can distinguish a fully-active retargeted endopeptidase from a partially-active retargeted endopeptidase having, e.g., 70% or less, 60% or less, 50% or less, 40% or less, 30% or less, 20% or less, or 10% or less the activity of a fully-active retargeted endopeptidase.

The ruggedness of the method is the reproducibility of the test results obtained for identical samples under normal (but variable) test conditions. Robustness of a procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small but deliberate variations in the method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability in normal usage. Thus, whereas ruggedness evaluates unavoidable changes, robustness evaluates deliberate changes. Typical parameters evaluated by ruggedness and robustness include the effects of freeze/thaw, incubation times, incubation temperature, longevity of reagent, sample preparation, sample storage, cell passage number, lots of re-targeted endopeptidase, variability between purifications, and variability between nicking reactions. Robustness parameters for cell-based assays include the cell bank (beginning, middle and end of freeze), cell passage level, cell seeding density, cell stock density (how many days in culture), cell age in flask (waiting time to seeding), incubation time, different plates, excessive amounts of serum, and source of reagents. The system suitability of the method is the determination of assay performance, including the performance of reagents and instruments, over time by analysis of a reference standard or reference molecule. System suitability is stressed in FDA guidance referring to the fact that equipment, electronics, assay performance, and samples to be analyzed, constitute an integrated system. System suitability can be evaluated by testing for parallelism, which is when plotting the log dose versus the response, serial dilutions of the reference and serial dilutions of the samples should give rise to parallel curves.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, a cell from an established cell line. As used herein, the term “cell” refers to any eukaryotic cell susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by a retargeted endopeptidase or any eukaryotic cell that can uptake a retargeted endopeptidase. The term cell encompasses cells from a variety of organisms, such as, e.g., murine, rat, porcine, bovine, equine, primate and human cells; from a variety of cell types such as, e.g., neuronal and non-neuronal; and can be isolated from or part of a heterogeneous cell population, tissue or organism. As used herein, the term “established cell line” is synonymous with “immortal cell line,” or “transformed cell line” and refers to a cell culture of cells selected for indefinite propagation from a cell population derived from an organism, tissue, or organ source. By definition, an established cell line excludes a cell culture of primary cells. As used herein, the term “primary cells” are cells harvested directly from fresh tissues or organs and do not have the potential to propagate indefinitely. An established cell line can comprise a heterogeneous population of cells or a uniform population of cells. An established cell line derived from a single cell is referred to as a clonal cell line. An established cell line can be one whose cells endogenously express all component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate and encompasses the binding of a retargeted endopeptidase to its receptor, the internalization of the endopeptidase/receptor complex, the translocation of the retargeted endopeptidase light chain from an intracellular vesicle into the cytoplasm and the proteolytic cleavage of a SNAP-25. Alternatively, an established cell line can be one whose cells have had introduced from an exogenous source at least one component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate and encompasses the binding of a retargeted endopeptidase to its receptor, the internalization of the endopeptidase/receptor complex, the translocation of the retargeted endopeptidase light chain from an intracellular vesicle into the cytoplasm and the proteolytic cleavage of a SNAP-25. Also referred to as a genetically-engineered cell line, cells from such an established cell line may, e.g., express an exogenous retargeted endopeptidase, such as, e.g., an exogenous ORL1, an exogenous DOR, an exogenous KOR, an exogenous MOR, an exogenous Galanin receptor 1, an exogenous Galanin receptor 2, an exogenous Galanin receptor 3, or any combination thereof.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, a cell from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity. As used herein, the terms “cell(s) susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity,” “cell(s) susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by a retargeted endopeptidase,” or “cell(s) from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by a retargeted endopeptidase” refer to cell(s) that can undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate thereby inhibiting exocytosis and encompasses the binding of a retargeted endopeptidase to its receptor, the internalization of the endopeptidase/receptor complex, the translocation of the retargeted endopeptidase activity chain from an intracellular vesicle into the cytoplasm and the proteolytic cleavage of a SNAP-25. By definition, cell(s) susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity must express, or be engineered to express, at least one retargeted endopeptidase receptor and at least one SNAP-25 substrate. As used herein, the terms “cell(s) that can uptake retargeted endopeptidase” or “cell(s) comprising an established cell line that can uptake retargeted endopeptidase” refer to cells that can undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate thereby inhibiting exocytosis and encompasses the binding of a retargeted endopeptidase to its receptor, the internalization of the endopeptidase/receptor complex, the translocation of the retargeted endopeptidase light chain from an intracellular vesicle into the cytoplasm and the proteolytic cleavage of a SNAP-25. By definition, cell(s) that can uptake retargeted endopeptidase must express, or be engineered to express, at least one retargeted endopeptidase receptor and at least one SNAP-25 substrate.

Thus in an embodiment, cells from an established cell line are susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by, e.g., about 100 nM or less or less, about 90 nM or less or less, about 80 nM or less or less, about 70 nM or less or less, about 60 nM or less or less, about 50 nM or less or less, about 40 nM or less or less, about 30 nM or less or less, about 20 nM or less or less, about 10 nM or less or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects, cells from an established cell line are susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by, e.g., about 9 nM or less, about 8 nM or less, about 7 nM or less, about 6 nM or less, about 5 nM or less, about 4 nM or less, about 3 nM or less, about 2 nM or less, or about 1 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In yet other aspects, cells from an established cell line are susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by, e.g., about 0.9 nM or less, about 0.8 nM or less, about 0.7 nM or less, about 0.6 nM or less, about 0.5 nM or less, about 0.4 nM or less, about 0.3 nM or less, about 0.2 nM, or about 0.1 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. As used herein, the term “about” when qualifying a value of a stated item, number, percentage, or term refers to a range of plus or minus ten percent of the value of the stated item, percentage, parameter, or term.

In another embodiment, cells comprising an established cell line can uptake a retargeted endopeptidase. In aspects of this embodiment, cells comprising an established cell line can uptake, e.g., about 100 nM or less or less, about 90 nM or less or less, about 80 nM or less or less, about 70 nM or less or less, about 60 nM or less or less, about 50 nM or less or less, about 40 nM or less or less, about 30 nM or less or less, about 20 nM or less or less, about 10 nM or less or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects, cells comprising an established cell line possess the ability to uptake about 9 nM or less, about 8 nM or less, about 7 nM or less, about 6 nM or less, about 5 nM or less, about 4 nM or less, about 3 nM or less, about 2 nM or less, or about 1 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In yet other aspects, cells comprising an established cell line possess the ability to uptake about 0.9 nM or less, about 0.8 nM or less, about 0.7 nM or less, about 0.6 nM or less, about 0.5 nM or less, about 0.4 nM or less, about 0.3 nM or less, about 0.2 nM or less, or about 0.1 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, cells from an established cell line that exhibit a selective binding for a retargeted endopeptidase disclosed in the present specification. As used herein, the term “selectively binds”, or “selective binding” when made in reference to a retargeted endopeptidase, refers to the discriminatory binding of a retargeted endopeptidase to the indicated target receptor such that the retargeted endopeptidase does not substantially bind to a non-target receptor. The degree to which cells from an established cell line exhibit selectively binding for a retargeted endopeptidase can be measured by the extent these cells exhibit non-selective uptake for a molecule lacking the targeting domain of the retargeted endopeptidase. One way to assess non-selective uptake for a molecule lacking the targeting domain of the retargeted endopeptidase is to measure the non-selective uptake of a LH_Nfragment. An LH_Nfragment is one that comprises a Clostridial toxin translocation domain and a Clostridial toxin enzymatic domain, but lacks any targeting domain altogether. Non-limiting examples of a LH_Nfragments include a LH_N/A fragment, a LH_N/B fragment, a LH_N/C fragment, a LH_N/D fragment, a LH_N/E fragment, a LH_N/F fragment, and a LH_N/G fragment. An exemplary LH_N/A fragment is SEQ ID NO:146 which is encoded by the polynucleotide molecule SEQ ID NO:147.

Thus, in an embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit selective binding for a retargeted endopeptidase. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit selective binding for a retargeted endopeptidase that represents, e.g., at least 75% of the total activity assayed, at least 80% of the total activity assayed, at least 85% of the total activity assayed, at least 90% of the total activity assayed, or at least 95% of the total activity assayed. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit selective binding for a retargeted endopeptidase that represents, e.g., about 75% to about 100% of the total activity assayed, about 80% to about 100% of the total activity assayed, about 85% to about 100% of the total activity assayed, about 90% to about 100% of the total activity assayed.

In another embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit minimal non-selective uptake of a LH_Nfragment. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit non-selective uptake of a LH_Nfragment that is, e.g., at most 25% of the total uptake measured, at most 20% of the total uptake measured, at most 15% of the total uptake measured, at most 10% of the total uptake measured, or at most 5% of the total uptake measured. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit non-selective uptake of a LH_Nfragment that is, e.g., about 0% to about 25% of the total uptake measured, about 0% to about 20% of the total uptake measured, about 0% to about 15% of the total uptake measured, about 0% to about 10% of the total uptake measured, or about 0% to about 5% of the total uptake measured.

In yet another embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit minimal non-selective uptake of a LH_N/A fragment. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit non-selective uptake of a LH_N/A fragment that is, e.g., at most 25% of the total uptake measured, at most 20% of the total uptake measured, at most 15% of the total uptake measured, at most 10% of the total uptake measured, or at most 5% of the total uptake measured. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit non-selective uptake of a LH_N/A fragment that is, e.g., about 0% to about 25% of the total uptake measured, about 0% to about 20% of the total uptake measured, about 0% to about 15% of the total uptake measured, about 0% to about 10% of the total uptake measured, or about 0% to about 5% of the total uptake measured.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, cells from an established cell line that exhibit a sufficient number of receptor binding sites on the plasma membrane to confer sensitive and selective binding for a retargeted endopeptidase. An equilibrium saturation binding assay measures the total and non-specific binding of a ligand at various concentrations. The equilibrium dissociation constant (K_d) for the ligand and the maximal number of receptor binding sites, Bmax, can be calculated from the specific binding using non-linear regression analysis. Specific binding is calculated by subtracting the non-specific binding of a ligand from the total binding observed. K_dis the concentration of ligand required to reach half-maximal binding and is measured in terms of molarity. Bmax is the maximal number of binding sites present on the plasma membrane and is measured in terms of pmol/mg, pmol/cell, fmol/cell, or sites/cell.

Thus, in an embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit a sufficient number of receptor binding sites on the plasma membrane to confer sensitive and selective binding for a retargeted endopeptidase. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit a Bmax value of, e.g., at least 0.1 fmol/cell, at least 0.2 fmol/cell, at least 0.3 fmol/cell, at least 0.4 fmol/cell, at least 0.5 fmol/cell, at least 0.6 fmol/cell, at least 0.7 fmol/cell, at least 0.8 fmol/cell, at least 0.9 fmol/cell, or at least 1.0 fmol/cell, for the targeting ligand of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line exhibit a Bmax value of, e.g., at least 1 fmol/cell, at least 2 fmol/cell, at least 3 fmol/cell, at least 4 fmol/cell, at least 5 fmol/cell, at least 6 fmol/cell, at least 7 fmol/cell, at least 8 fmol/cell, at least 9 fmol/cell, or at least 10 fmol/cell, for the targeting ligand of a retargeted endopeptidase.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, cells from an established clonal cell line susceptible to re-targeted endopeptidase activity that are more stable than cells from the parental cell line from which the clonal cell line was derived. As used herein, the term “stable” refers to cells from an established clonal cell line for a particular passage number that exhibit a relative EC₅₀, sensitivity, efficacy, well-defined upper asymptote, and/or a well-defined dose-response curve for re-targeted endopeptidase activity that is similar to the values for relative EC₅₀, sensitivity, efficacy, well-defined upper asymptote, and/or a well-defined dose-response curve exhibited by cells from the parental cell line from which the clonal cell line was derived, at the same or similar passage number, where the same assay conditions and the same re-targeted endopeptidase are used in both assays.

Thus in an embodiment, cells from an established clonal cell line are more stable as compared to from the parental cell line from which the clonal cell line was derived. In an aspect of this embodiment, cells from an established clonal cell line are more stable as compared to the parental SK-N-DZ cell line. In another aspect of this embodiment, cells from an established clonal cell line are more stable as compared to the parental SK-N-DZ cell line ATCC CRL-2149. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established clonal cell line are more stable for, e.g., at least 5 more passages, at least 10 more passages, at least 15 more passages, at least 20 more passages, at least 25 more passages, or at least 30 more passages, as compared to from the parental cell line from which the clonal cell line was derived. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established clonal cell line are more stable for, e.g., at least 5 more passages, at least 10 more passages, at least 15 more passages, at least 20 more passages, at least 25 more passages, or at least 30 more passages, as compared to from the parental cell line from which the clonal cell line was derived.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, cells from an established clonal cell line susceptible to re-targeted endopeptidase activity that are stable over a plurality of cell passages. As used herein, the term “stable” refers to cells from an established clonal cell line for a particular passage number that exhibit a relative EC₅₀, sensitivity, efficacy, well-defined upper asymptote, and/or a well-defined dose-response curve for re-targeted endopeptidase activity that is similar to the values for relative EC₅₀, sensitivity, efficacy, well-defined upper asymptote, and/or a well-defined dose-response curve exhibited by cells from the same established clonal cell line, but from a prior passage or passages, where the same assay conditions and the same re-targeted endopeptidase are used in both assays.

Cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification can exhibit a consistent sensitivity for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over a plurality of cell passages. As used herein, the term “sensitivity for re-targeted endopeptidase activity” refers to the lowest dose that an assay can measure consistently above the signal detected by a non-treatment control or background signal.

Thus, in an embodiment, cells from the established clonal cell line exhibit a sensitivity for re-targeted endopeptidase activity for any given passages that is e.g., 100 nM or less, about 80 nM or less, about 70 nM or less, about 60 nM or less, about 50 nM or less, about 40 nM or less, about 30 nM or less, about 20 nM or less, about 10 nM or less, about 1 nM or less, about 0.9 nM or less, about 0.8 nM or less, about 0.7 nM or less, about 0.6 nM or less, about 0.5 nM or less, about 0.4 nM or less, about 0.3 nM or less, about 0.2 nM or less, or about 0.1 nM or less of a re-targeted endopeptidase. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from the established clonal cell line exhibit a sensitivity for re-targeted endopeptidase activity for any given passages that is, e.g., about 0.01 nM to about 100 nM, about 0.01 nM to about 75 nM, about 0.01 nM to about 50 nM, about 0.01 nM to about 25 nM, about 0.01 nM to about 20 nM, about 0.01 nM to about 15 nM, about 0.01 nM to about 10 nM, about 0.01 nM to about 5 nM, about 0.001 nM to about 100 nM, about 0.001 nM to about 75 nM, about 0.001 nM to about 50 nM, about 0.001 nM to about 25 nM, about 0.001 nM to about 20 nM, about 0.001 nM to about 15 nM, about 0.001 nM to about 10 nM, or about 0.001 nM to about 5 nM of a re-targeted endopeptidase.

In another embodiment, cells from the established clonal cell line exhibit a sensitivity for re-targeted endopeptidase activity that is about 100 nM or less, about 75 nM or less, about 50 nM or less, about 25 nM or less, less about 20 nM or less, about 15 nM or less, about 10 nM or less, or about 1 nM or less for, e.g., 5 or more cell passages, 10 or more cell passages, 15 or more cell passages, 20 or more cell passages, 25 or more cell passages, 30 or more cell passages, 35 or more cell passages, 40 or more cell passages, 45 or more cell passages, or 50 or more cell passages. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from the established clonal cell line exhibit a sensitivity for re-targeted endopeptidase activity that is about 100 nM or less, about 75 nM or less, about 50 nM or less, about 25 nM or less, less about 20 nM or less, about 15 nM or less, about 10 nM or less, or about 1 nM or less for, e.g., about 15 to about 60 passages, about 20 to about 60 passages, about 25 to about 60 passages, about 30 to about 60 passages, about 35 to about 60 passages, about 40 to about 60 passages, about 45 to about 60 passages, about 50 to about 60 passages, about 15 to about 50 passages, about 20 to about 50 passages, about 25 to about 50 passages, about 30 to about 50 passages, about 35 to about 50 passages, about 40 to about 50 passages, about 15 to about 40 passages, about 20 to about 40 passages, about 25 to about 40 passages, or about 30 to about 40 passages.

Cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification can exhibit a consistent relative efficacy of re-targeted endopeptidase uptake or re-targeted endopeptidase activity over a plurality of cell passages. As used herein, the term “relative efficacy” refers to how well the upper asymptote for the re-targeted endopeptidase activity detected in the current assay run compares to the upper asymptote for the re-targeted endopeptidase activity detected in a reference standard, a reference molecule, or a reference passage number used on that assay. As used herein, the term “signal to noise ratio for the upper asymptote” refers to the signal detected in an assay at the upper limit of detection divided by the signal detected by a non-treatment control or background signal. The upper limit of detection is the highest dose that an assay can measure consistently before saturation of the signal occurs.

Thus, in an embodiment, cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification can exhibit a well defined upper asymptote over a plurality of cell passages and maintain a signal to noise ratio that is consistent and adequate for the assay. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification must have a well defined signal to noise ratio for the upper asymptote for re-targeted endopeptidase activity of, e.g., at least 3:1, at least 4:1, at least 5:1, at least 6:1, at least 7:1, at least 8:1, at least 9:1, at least 10:1, at least 15:1, at least 20:1, at least 25:1, at least 30:1, at least 35:1, at least 40:1, at least 45:1, at least 50:1, at least 60:1, at least 70:1, at least 80:1, at least 90:1, or at least 100:1, at least 150:1, at least 200:1, at least 250:1, at least 300:1, at least 350:1, at least 400:1, at least 450:1, at least 500:1, at least 550:1, or at least 600:1, over, e.g., 5 or more cell passages, 10 or more cell passages, 15 or more cell passages, 20 or more cell passages, 25 or more cell passages, 30 or more cell passages, 35 or more cell passages, 40 or more cell passages, 45 or more cell passages, or 50 or more cell passages. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification must have a well defined signal to noise ratio for the upper asymptote for re-targeted endopeptidase activity of, e.g., at least 3:1, at least 4:1, at least 5:1, at least 6:1, at least 7:1, at least 8:1, at least 9:1, at least 10:1, at least 15:1, at least 20:1, at least 25:1, at least 30:1, at least 35:1, at least 40:1, at least 45:1, at least 50:1, at least 60:1, at least 70:1, at least 80:1, at least 90:1, or at least 100:1, at least 150:1, at least 200:1, at least 250:1, at least 300:1, at least 350:1, at least 400:1, at least 450:1, at least 500:1, at least 550:1, or at least 600:1, over, e.g., about 15 to about 60 passages, about 20 to about 60 passages, about 25 to about 60 passages, about 30 to about 60 passages, about 35 to about 60 passages, about 40 to about 60 passages, about 45 to about 60 passages, about 50 to about 60 passages, about 15 to about 50 passages, about 20 to about 50 passages, about 25 to about 50 passages, about 30 to about 50 passages, about 35 to about 50 passages, about 40 to about 50 passages, about 15 to about 40 passages, about 20 to about 40 passages, about 25 to about 40 passages, or about 30 to about 40 passages.

Cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification can exhibit a well defined dose-response curve for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over a plurality of cell passages. As used herein, the term “dose-response curve” refers to the how well the raw data fits the statistical model of choice for that assay. As a non-limiting example, a sigmoidal curve with a four parameter logistics fit is a dose-response curve for an enzymatic activity assay, such as, e.g. a potency assay. As another non-limiting example, a ligand binding with one site saturation fit is a dose-response curve for a ligand/antibody binding assay.

Thus, in an embodiment, cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification exhibit a well defined dose-response curve for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over a plurality of cell passages. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification exhibit a well defined dose-response curve for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over, e.g., 5 or more cell passages, 10 or more cell passages, 15 or more cell passages, 20 or more cell passages, 25 or more cell passages, 30 or more cell passages, 35 or more cell passages, 40 or more cell passages, 45 or more cell passages, or 50 or more cell passages. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification exhibit a well defined dose-response curve for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over, e.g., about 15 to about 60 passages, about 20 to about 60 passages, about 25 to about 60 passages, about 30 to about 60 passages, about 35 to about 60 passages, about 40 to about 60 passages, about 45 to about 60 passages, about 50 to about 60 passages, about 15 to about 50 passages, about 20 to about 50 passages, about 25 to about 50 passages, about 30 to about 50 passages, about 35 to about 50 passages, about 40 to about 50 passages, about 15 to about 40 passages, about 20 to about 40 passages, about 25 to about 40 passages, or about 30 to about 40 passages.

Cells from an established cell line disclosed in the present specification can exhibit a consistent relative EC₅₀value for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over a plurality of cell passages. As used herein, the term “relative EC₅₀” or “relative EC₅₀value” refers to an EC₅₀value for re-targeted endopeptidase activity that is normalized against the EC₅₀calculated for a reference standard, a reference molecule, or a reference passage number used on that assay.

Thus, in an embodiment, cells from an established clonal cell line exhibit a consistent relative EC₅₀for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over a plurality of cell passages. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established clonal cell line exhibit a consistent relative EC₅₀for re-targeted endopeptidase activity that is, e.g., about ±10%, about ±20%, about ±30%, about ±40%, about ±50%, about ±60%, about ±70%, or about ±75% the relative EC₅₀for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over, e.g., 5 or more cell passages, 10 or more cell passages, 15 or more cell passages, 20 or more cell passages, 25 or more cell passages, 30 or more cell passages, 35 or more cell passages, 40 or more cell passages, 45 or more cell passages, or 50 or more cell passages. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established clonal cell line exhibit a relative EC₅₀for re-targeted endopeptidase activity that is, e.g., about ±10% to about 75%, about ±10% to about 70%, about ±10% to about 60%, about ±10% to about 50%, about ±10% to about 40%, about ±10% to about 30%, or about ±10% to about 20% the relative EC₅₀for re-targeted endopeptidase activity over, e.g., 5 or more cell passages, 10 or more cell passages, 15 or more cell passages, 20 or more cell passages, 25 or more cell passages, 30 or more cell passages, 35 or more cell passages, 40 or more cell passages, 45 or more cell passages, or 50 or more cell passages.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, a retargeted endopeptidase. As used herein, the term “retargeted endopeptidase” is synonymous with “Targeted Vesicular Exocytosis Modulator Protein” or “TVEMP.” Non-limiting examples of retargeted endopeptidase are disclosed in, e.g., Keith A. Foster et al., Clostridial Toxin Derivatives Able To Modify Peripheral Sensory Afferent Functions, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,545; Clifford C. Shone et al., Recombinant Toxin Fragments, U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,617; Conrad P. Quinn et al., Methods and Compounds for the Treatment of Mucus Hypersecretion, U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,440; Lance E. Steward et al., Methods And Compositions For The Treatment Of Pancreatitis, U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,998; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Patent Publication 2002/0037833; Keith A. Foster et al., Inhibition of Secretion from Non-neural Cells, U.S. Patent Publication 2003/0180289; J. Oliver Dolly et al., Activatable Recombinant Neurotoxins, WO 2001/014570; Keith A. Foster et al., Re-targeted Toxin Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2005/023309; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/376,696; Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity For Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,075; Dolly, J. O. et al., Activatable Clostridial Toxins, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/829,475; Foster, K. A. et al., Fusion Proteins, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059093; and Foster, K. A. et al., Non-Cytotoxic Protein Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059105, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Non-limiting examples of retargeted endopeptidases include SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:130, and SEQ ID NO:131.

Thus in an embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a retargeted endopeptidase. In aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a retargeted endopeptidase disclosed in Keith A. Foster et al., Clostridial Toxin Derivatives Able To Modify Peripheral Sensory Afferent Functions, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,545; Clifford C. Shone et al., Recombinant Toxin Fragments, U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,617; Conrad P. Quinn et al., Methods and Compounds for the Treatment of Mucus Hypersecretion, U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,440; Lance E. Steward et al., Methods And Compositions For The Treatment Of Pancreatitis, U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,998; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Patent Publication 2002/0037833; Keith A. Foster et al., Inhibition of Secretion from Non-neural Cells, U.S. Patent Publication 2003/0180289; J. Oliver Dolly et al., Activatable Recombinant Neurotoxins, WO 2001/014570; Keith A. Foster et al., Re-targeted Toxin Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2005/023309; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/376,696; Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity For Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,075; Dolly, J. O. et al., Activatable Clostridial Toxins, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/829,475; Foster, K. A. et al., Fusion Proteins, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059093; and Foster, K. A. et al., Non-Cytotoxic Protein Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059105, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In aspects of this embodiment, a retargeted endopeptidase is SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:130, or SEQ ID NO:131.

In another embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a retargeted endopeptidase having, e.g., at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with a retargeted endopeptidase disclosed in Keith A. Foster et al., Clostridial Toxin Derivatives Able To Modify Peripheral Sensory Afferent Functions, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,545; Clifford C. Shone et al., Recombinant Toxin Fragments, U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,617; Conrad P. Quinn et al., Methods and Compounds for the Treatment of Mucus Hypersecretion, U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,440; Lance E. Steward et al., Methods And Compositions For The Treatment Of Pancreatitis, U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,998; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Patent Publication 2002/0037833; Keith A. Foster et al., Inhibition of Secretion from Non-neural Cells, U.S. Patent Publication 2003/0180289; J. Oliver Dolly et al., Activatable Recombinant Neurotoxins, WO 2001/014570; Keith A. Foster et al., Re-targeted Toxin Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2005/023309; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/376,696; Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity For Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,075; Dolly, J. O. et al., Activatable Clostridial Toxins, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/829,475; Foster, K. A. et al., Fusion Proteins, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059093; and Foster, K. A. et al., Non-Cytotoxic Protein Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059105, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In another embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a retargeted endopeptidase having, e.g., at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with a retargeted endopeptidase of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:130, or SEQ ID NO:131.

In other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a re-targeted endopeptidase having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more non-contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to a retargeted endopeptidase disclosed in Keith A. Foster et al., Clostridial Toxin Derivatives Able To Modify Peripheral Sensory Afferent Functions, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,545; Clifford C. Shone et al., Recombinant Toxin Fragments, U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,617; Conrad P. Quinn et al., Methods and Compounds for the Treatment of Mucus Hypersecretion, U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,440; Lance E. Steward et al., Methods And Compositions For The Treatment Of Pancreatitis, U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,998; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Patent Publication 2002/0037833; Keith A. Foster et al., Inhibition of Secretion from Non-neural Cells, U.S. Patent Publication 2003/0180289; J. Oliver Dolly et al., Activatable Recombinant Neurotoxins, WO 2001/014570; Keith A. Foster et al., Re-targeted Toxin Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2005/023309; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/376,696; Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity For Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,075; Dolly, J. O. et al., Activatable Clostridial Toxins, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/829,475; Foster, K. A. et al., Fusion Proteins, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059093; and Foster, K. A. et al., Non-Cytotoxic Protein Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059105, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a re-targeted endopeptidase having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more non-contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to a retargeted endopeptidase of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:130, or SEQ ID NO:131.

In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase variant having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to a retargeted endopeptidase disclosed in Keith A. Foster et al., Clostridial Toxin Derivatives Able To Modify Peripheral Sensory Afferent Functions, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,545; Clifford C. Shone et al., Recombinant Toxin Fragments, U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,617; Conrad P. Quinn et al., Methods and Compounds for the Treatment of Mucus Hypersecretion, U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,440; Lance E. Steward et al., Methods And Compositions For The Treatment Of Pancreatitis, U.S. Pat. No. 6,843,998; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Patent Publication 2002/0037833; Keith A. Foster et al., Inhibition of Secretion from Non-neural Cells, U.S. Patent Publication 2003/0180289; J. Oliver Dolly et al., Activatable Recombinant Neurotoxins, WO 2001/014570; Keith A. Foster et al., Re-targeted Toxin Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2005/023309; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/376,696; Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity For Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,075; Dolly, J. O. et al., Activatable Clostridial Toxins, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/829,475; Foster, K. A. et al., Fusion Proteins, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059093; and Foster, K. A. et al., Non-Cytotoxic Protein Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2006/059105, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase variant having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to a retargeted endopeptidase of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:130, or SEQ ID NO:131.

In yet another embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from an opioid retargeted endopeptidase. Non-limiting examples of opioid re-targeted endopeptidase, or opioid-TVEMPs, are described in, e.g., Keith A. Foster et al., Clostridial Toxin Derivatives Able To Modify Peripheral Sensory Afferent Functions, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,545; J. Oliver Dolly et al., Activatable Recombinant Neurotoxins, U.S. Pat. No. 7,132,259; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Pat. No. 7,244,437; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Pat. No. 7,413,742; Stephan Donovan, Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods For Treating Pain, U.S. Pat. No. 7,415,338; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. Pat. No. 7,514,088; Keith A. Foster, Fusion Proteins, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0064092; Keith A. Foster, Fusion Proteins, U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0035822; Lance E. Steward et al., Multivalent Clostridial Toxin Derivatives and Methods of Their Use, U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0048431; Keith A. Foster, Non-Cytotoxic Protein Conjugates, U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0162341; Keith A. Foster et al., Re-targeted Toxin Conjugates, International Patent Publication WO 2005/023309; and Lance E. Steward, Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Capabilities for Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, International Patent Application WO 2008/008805; each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

In yet another embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase activity being detected is from a galanin retargeted endopeptidase. Non-limiting examples of galanin re-targeted endopeptidase, or galanin-TVEMPs, are described in, e.g., Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capability and Enhanced Targeting Activity, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,043 (Jul. 11, 2007); Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity For Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,052 (Jul. 11, 2007); and Steward, L. E. et al., Modified Clostridial Toxins with Enhanced Translocation Capabilities and Altered Targeting Activity For Non-Clostridial Toxin Target Cells, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/776,075 (Jul. 11, 2007), each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, a SNAP-25. As used herein, the term “SNAP-25” refers to a naturally-occurring SNAP-25 or a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 which is preferentially cleaved by a retargeted endopeptidase. As used herein, the term “preferentially cleaved” refers to that the cleavage rate of SNAP-25 by a retargeted endopeptidase is at least one order of magnitude higher than the cleavage rate of any other substrate by a retargeted endopeptidase. In aspects of this embodiment, the cleavage rate of SNAP-25 by a retargeted endopeptidase is at least two orders of magnitude higher, at least three orders of magnitude higher, at least four orders of magnitude higher, or at least five orders of magnitude higher than that the cleavage rate of any other substrate by retargeted endopeptidase.

As used herein, the term “naturally occurring SNAP-25” refers to any SNAP-25 produced by a naturally-occurring process, including, without limitation, SNAP-25 isoforms produced from a post-translational modification, an alternatively-spliced transcript, or a spontaneous mutation, and SNAP-25 subtypes. A naturally occurring SNAP-25 includes, without limitation, SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24, or one that substitutes, deletes or adds, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24.

As used herein, the term “non-naturally occurring SNAP-25” refers to any SNAP-25 whose structure was modified with the aid of human manipulation, including, without limitation, a SNAP-25 produced by genetic engineering using random mutagenesis or rational design and a SNAP-25 produced by in vitro chemical synthesis. Non-limiting examples of non-naturally occurring SNAP-25s are described in, e.g., Steward, L. E. et al., FRET Protease Assays for Clostridial Toxins, U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,567; Fernandez-Salas et al., Lipophilic Dye-based FRET Assays for Clostridial Toxin Activity, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0160561, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 may substitute, delete or add, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24.

Thus in an embodiment, a SNAP-25 is a naturally occurring SNAP-25. In aspects of this embodiment, the SNAP-25 is a SNAP-25 isoform or a SNAP-25 subtype. In aspects of this embodiment, the naturally occurring SNAP-25 is the naturally occurring SNAP-25 of SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24. In other aspects of this embodiment, the SNAP-25 is a naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., at least 70% amino acid identity, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24.

In another embodiment, a SNAP-25 is a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25. In other aspects of this embodiment, the SNAP-25 is a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, or SEQ ID NO:4. In other aspects of this embodiment, the SNAP-25 is a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more non-contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the SNAP-25 is a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24.

A SNAP-25 can be an endogenous SNAP-25 or an exogenous SNAP-25. As used herein, the term “endogenous SNAP-25” refers to a SNAP-25 naturally present in the cell because it is naturally encoded within the cell's genome, such that the cell inherently expresses the SNAP-25 without the need an external source of SNAP-25 or an external source of genetic material encoding a SNAP-25. The expression of an endogenous SNAP-25 may be with or without environmental stimulation such as, e.g., cell differentiation. By definition, an endogenous SNAP-25 can only be a naturally-occurring SNAP-25 or variants thereof. For example, the following established cell lines express an endogenous SNAP-25: BE(2)-M17, Kelly, LA1-55n, N1E-115, N4TG3, N18, Neuro-2a, NG108-15, PC12, SH-SY5Y, SiMa, SK-N-DZ, and SK-N-BE(2)-C.

As used herein, the term “exogenous SNAP-25” refers to a SNAP-25 expressed in a cell through the introduction of an external source of SNAP-25 or an external source of genetic material encoding a SNAP-25 by human manipulation. The expression of an exogenous SNAP-25 may be with or without environmental stimulation such as, e.g., cell differentiation. As a non-limiting example, cells from an established cell line can express an exogenous SNAP-25 by transient or stably transfection of a SNAP-25. As another non-limiting example, cells from an established cell line can express an exogenous SNAP-25 by protein transfection of a SNAP-25. An exogenous SNAP-25 can be a naturally-occurring SNAP-25 or variants thereof, or a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 or variants thereof.

Thus in an embodiment, cells from an established cell line express an endogenous SNAP-25. In aspects of this embodiment, the endogenous SNAP-25 expressed by cells from an established cell line is a naturally-occurring SNAP-25. In other aspects of this embodiment, the endogenous SNAP-25 expressed by cells from an established cell line is SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24. In yet aspects of this embodiment, the endogenous SNAP-25 expressed by cells from an established cell line is a naturally occurring SNAP-25, such as, e.g., a SNAP-25 isoform or a SNAP-25 subtype. In other aspects of this embodiment, the endogenous SNAP-25 expressed by cells from an established cell line is a naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., at least 70% amino acid identity, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24.

In another embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express an exogenous SNAP-25. In an aspect of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a naturally-occurring SNAP-25. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express the naturally-occurring SNAP-25 of SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a naturally occurring SNAP-25, such as, e.g., a SNAP-25 isoform or a SNAP-25 subtype. In still other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., at least 70% amino acid identity, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24.

In another aspect of the embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more non-contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally occurring SNAP-25 having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7, SEQ ID NO:8, SEQ ID NO:9, SEQ ID NO:10, SEQ ID NO:11, SEQ ID NO:12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO:14, SEQ ID NO:15, SEQ ID NO:16, SEQ ID NO:17, SEQ ID NO:18, SEQ ID NO:19, SEQ ID NO:20, SEQ ID NO:21, SEQ ID NO:22, SEQ ID NO:23, or SEQ ID NO:24.

Assays that detect the cleavage of a SNAP-25 after exposure to a retargeted endopeptidase can be used to assess whether a cell is expressing an endogenous or exogenous SNAP-25. In these assays, generation of a SNAP-25 cleavage-product would be detected in cells expressing a SNAP-25 after retargeted endopeptidase treatment. Non-limiting examples of specific Western blot analysis, as well as well-characterized reagents, conditions and protocols are readily available from commercial vendors that include, without limitation, Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA; Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, and Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, CA. It is understood that these and similar assays for SNAP-25 cleavage can be useful in identifying cells expressing an endogenous or an exogenous SNAP-25.

As non-limiting examples, Western blot analysis using an antibody that recognize a SNAP-25 cleavage product or both the cleaved and uncleaved forms of SNAP-25 can be used to assay for uptake of retargeted endopeptidase. Examples of α-SNAP-25 antibodies useful for these assays include, without limitation, α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibody SMI-81 (Sternberger Monoclonals Inc., Lutherville, MD), mouse α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody CI 71.1 (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany), α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibody CI 71.2 (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany), α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibody SP12 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antiserum (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany), α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antiserum (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antiserum S9684 (Sigma, St Louis, MO).

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, a retargeted endopeptidase receptor. As used herein, the term “retargeted endopeptidase receptor” refers to either a naturally-occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor or a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor which preferentially interacts with a retargeted endopeptidase in a manner that elicits a retargeted endopeptidase activity response. As used herein, the term “preferentially interacts” refers to that the equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of retargeted endopeptidase for a retargeted endopeptidase receptor is at least one order of magnitude less than that of retargeted endopeptidase for any other receptor at the cell surface. The equilibrium dissociation constant, a specific type of equilibrium constant that measures the propensity of an retargeted endopeptidase-retargeted endopeptidase receptor complex to separate (dissociate) reversibly into its component molecules, namely the retargeted endopeptidase and the retargeted endopeptidase receptor, is defined as KD=Ka/Kd at equilibrium. The association constant (Ka) is defined as Ka=[C]/[L][R] and the disassociation constant (Kd) is defined as Kd=[L][R]/[C], where [L] equals the molar concentration of retargeted endopeptidase, [R] is the molar concentration of a retargeted endopeptidase receptor, and [C] is the molar concentration of the endopeptidase-receptor complex, and where all concentrations are of such components when the system is at equilibrium. The smaller the dissociation constant, the more tightly bound the retargeted endopeptidase is to its receptor, or the higher the binding affinity between retargeted endopeptidase and retargeted endopeptidase receptor. In aspects of this embodiment, the disassociation constant of retargeted endopeptidase for its receptor is at least two orders of magnitude less, at least three orders of magnitude less, at least four orders of magnitude less, or at least five orders of magnitude less than that of retargeted endopeptidase for any other receptor. In other aspects of this embodiment, the binding affinity of a retargeted endopeptidase that preferentially interacts with its receptor can have an equilibrium disassociation constant (KD) of, e.g., of 500 nM or less, 400 nM or less, 300 nM or less, 200 nM, or less 100 nM or less. In other aspects of this embodiment, the binding affinity of a retargeted endopeptidase that preferentially interacts with its receptor can have an equilibrium disassociation constant (KD) of, e.g., of 90 nM or less, 80 nM or less, 70 nM or less, 60 nM, 50 nM or less, 40 nM or less, 30 nM or less, 20 nM, or less 10 nM or less. As used herein, the term “elicits a retargeted endopeptidase activity response” refers to the ability of a retargeted endopeptidase receptor to interact with a retargeted endopeptidase to form a endopeptidase/receptor complex and the subsequent internalization of that complex into the cell cytoplasm.

As used herein, the term “naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor” refers to any retargeted endopeptidase receptor produced by a naturally-occurring process, including, without limitation, retargeted endopeptidase receptor isoforms produced from a post-translational modification, an alternatively-spliced transcript, or a spontaneous mutation, and retargeted endopeptidase receptor subtypes. A naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor includes, without limitation, naturally occurring opioid receptors like a opiate-like receptor 1 (ORL1), a 5-opioid receptor (DOR), a κ-opioid receptor (KOR), and a μ-opioid receptor (MOR), such as those described in Christopher Evans et al., Opioid Receptor Genes, U.S. Pat. No. 6,265,563; Christopher Evans et al., Methods of Screening Modulators of Opioid Receptor Activity, U.S. Pat. No. 6,432,652; Christopher Evans et al., Opioid Receptors and Methods of Use, U.S. Pat. No. 7,282,563; and Christopher Evans et al., Delta Opioid Receptor Proteins, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0219925, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Other examples of a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor includes, without limitation, the galanin receptor 1, the galanin receptor 2, and the galanin receptor 3. Naturally occurring opioid receptors from other vertebrate species are known in the art, such as, e.g., primate, cow, dog, mouse, rat, chicken, and fish, and can be used in aspects of the present specification.

A naturally occurring ORL1 includes, without limitation, SEQ ID NO:25 and SEQ ID NO:26, or one that substitutes, deletes or adds, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:25 or SEQ ID NO:26. A naturally occurring DOR includes, without limitation, SEQ ID NO:27 and SEQ ID NO:28, or one that substitutes, deletes or adds, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:27 or SEQ ID NO:28. A naturally occurring KOR includes, without limitation, SEQ ID NO:29 and SEQ ID NO:30, or one that substitutes, deletes or adds, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:29 or SEQ ID NO:30. A naturally occurring MOR includes, without limitation, SEQ ID NO:31, or one that substitutes, deletes or adds, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:31.

A naturally occurring galanin receptor 1 includes, without limitation, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, and SEQ ID NO:138, or one that substitutes, deletes or adds, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, or SEQ ID NO:138. A naturally occurring galanin receptor 2 includes, without limitation, SEQ ID NO:139, or one that substitutes, deletes or adds, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:139. A naturally occurring galanin receptor 3 includes, without limitation, SEQ ID NO:140, or one that substitutes, deletes or adds, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:140.

As used herein, the term “non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor variant” refers to any retargeted endopeptidase receptor produced with the aid of human manipulation or design, including, without limitation, a retargeted endopeptidase receptor produced by genetic engineering using random mutagenesis or rational design and a retargeted endopeptidase receptor produced by chemical synthesis. Non-limiting examples of non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor variants include, e.g., conservative retargeted endopeptidase receptor variants, non-conservative retargeted endopeptidase receptor variants, retargeted endopeptidase receptor chimeric variants and active retargeted endopeptidase receptor fragments.

As used herein, the term “non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor” refers to any retargeted endopeptidase receptor whose structure was modified with the aid of human manipulation, including, without limitation, a retargeted endopeptidase receptor produced by genetic engineering using random mutagenesis or rational design and a retargeted endopeptidase receptor produced by in vitro chemical synthesis. A non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor may substitute, delete or add, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more amino acids from SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140.

Thus in an embodiment, a retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor such as, e.g., ORL1, DOR, KOR, or MOR. In aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a retargeted endopeptidase receptor isoform or a retargeted endopeptidase receptor subtype. In aspects of this embodiment, the naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor is the naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor of SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, or SEQ ID NO:31. In other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., at least 70% amino acid identity, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, or SEQ ID NO:31.

In another embodiment, a retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor, such as, e.g., a genetically-engineered ORL1, a genetically-engineered DOR, a genetically-engineered KOR, or a genetically-engineered MOR. In other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, or SEQ ID NO:31. In other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more non-contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, or SEQ ID NO:31. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, or SEQ ID NO:31.

In another embodiment, a retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor such as, e.g., galanin receptor 1, galanin receptor 2, or galanin receptor 3. In aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a retargeted endopeptidase receptor isoform or a retargeted endopeptidase receptor subtype. In aspects of this embodiment, the naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor is the naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor of SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140. In other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., at least 70% amino acid identity, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140.

In another embodiment, a retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor, such as, e.g., a genetically-engineered galanin receptor 1, a genetically-engineered galanin receptor 2, or a genetically-engineered galanin receptor 3. In other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140. In other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more non-contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, the retargeted endopeptidase receptor is a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140.

A retargeted endopeptidase receptor can be an endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor or an exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor. As used herein, the term “endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor” refers to a retargeted endopeptidase receptor naturally present in the cell because it is naturally encoded within the cell's genome, such that the cell inherently expresses the retargeted endopeptidase receptor without the need an external source of retargeted endopeptidase receptor or an external source of genetic material encoding a retargeted endopeptidase receptor. Expression of an endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor may be with or without environmental stimulation such as e.g., cell differentiation or promoter activation. For example, the following established cell lines express at least one endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor: AGN P33, Neuro-2a, SiMa, and SK-N-DZ. An endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor can only be a naturally-occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor or naturally-occurring variants thereof.

As used herein, the term “exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor” refers to a retargeted endopeptidase receptor expressed in a cell through the introduction of an external source of retargeted endopeptidase receptor or an external source of genetic material encoding a retargeted endopeptidase receptor by human manipulation. The expression of an exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor may be with or without environmental stimulation such as, e.g., cell differentiation or promoter activation. As a non-limiting example, cells from an established cell line can express one or more exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors by transient or stably transfection of a polynucleotide molecule encoding a retargeted endopeptidase receptor, such as, e.g., an ORL1, a DOR, a KOR, a MOR, a galanin receptor 1, a galanin receptor 2, or a galanin receptor 3. As another non-limiting example, cells from an established cell line can express one or more exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors by protein transfection of the retargeted endopeptidase receptors, such as, e.g., an ORL1, a DOR, a KOR, a MOR, a galanin receptor 1, a galanin receptor 2, or a galanin receptor 3. An exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor can be a naturally-occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor or naturally occurring variants thereof, or non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor or non-naturally occurring variants thereof.

Thus in an embodiment, cells from an established cell line express an endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor. In aspects of this embodiment, the endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor expressed by cells from an established cell line is a naturally-occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor. In other aspects of this embodiment, the endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor expressed by cells from an established cell line is SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140. In yet aspects of this embodiment, the endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor expressed by cells from an established cell line is a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor, such as, e.g., a retargeted endopeptidase receptor isoform or a retargeted endopeptidase receptor subtype. In other aspects of this embodiment, the endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor expressed by cells from an established cell line is a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., at least 70% amino acid identity, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140.

In another embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express an exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptor. In an aspect of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a naturally-occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express the naturally-occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor of SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor, such as, e.g., a retargeted endopeptidase receptor isoform or a retargeted endopeptidase receptor subtype. In still other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., at least 70% amino acid identity, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, orSEQ ID NO:140.

In another aspect of the embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% amino acid identity with SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more non-contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally occurring retargeted endopeptidase receptor having, e.g., 1 or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, 20 or more, 30 or more, 40 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more contiguous amino acid substitutions, deletions, or additions relative to SEQ ID NO:25, SEQ ID NO:26, SEQ ID NO:27, SEQ ID NO:28, SEQ ID NO:29, SEQ ID NO:30, SEQ ID NO:31, SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, SEQ ID NO:138, SEQ ID NO:139, or SEQ ID NO:140.

In another embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express an exogenous ORL1, an exogenous DOR, an exogenous KOR, an exogenous MOR, or any combination thereof. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a naturally-occurring ORL1, a naturally-occurring DOR, a naturally-occurring KOR, a naturally-occurring MOR, or any combination thereof. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally-occurring ORL1, a non-naturally-occurring DOR, a non-naturally-occurring KOR, a non-naturally-occurring MOR, or any combination thereof. In still other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express either a naturally-occurring ORL1 or a non-naturally-occurring ORL1, a naturally-occurring DOR or a non-naturally-occurring DOR, a naturally-occurring KOR or a non-naturally-occurring KOR, a naturally-occurring MOR or a non-naturally-occurring MOR, or any combination thereof.

In yet another embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express an exogenous galanin receptor 1, an exogenous galanin receptor 2, an exogenous galanin receptor 3, or any combination thereof. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a naturally-occurring galanin receptor 1, a naturally-occurring galanin receptor 2, a naturally-occurring galanin receptor 3, or any combination thereof. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express a non-naturally-occurring galanin receptor 1, a non-naturally-occurring galanin receptor 2, a non-naturally-occurring galanin receptor 3, or any combination thereof. In still other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line are transiently or stably engineered to express either a naturally-occurring galanin receptor 1 or a non-naturally-occurring galanin receptor 1, a naturally-occurring galanin receptor 2 or a non-naturally-occurring galanin receptor 2, a naturally-occurring galanin receptor 3 or a non-naturally-occurring galanin receptor 3, or any combination thereof.

Cells that express one or more endogenous or exogenous re-targeted endopeptidase receptors can be identified by routine methods including direct and indirect assays for re-targeted endopeptidase uptake. Assays that determine retargeted endopeptidase binding or uptake properties can be used to assess whether a cell is expressing a retargeted endopeptidase receptor. Such assays include, without limitation, cross-linking assays using labeled retargeted endopeptidase, such as, e.g., [125I] retargeted endopeptidase, see, e.g., Noriko Yokosawa et al., Binding of Clostridium botulinum type C neurotoxin to different neuroblastoma cell lines, 57(1) Infect. Immun. 272-277 (1989); Noriko Yokosawa et al., Binding of botulinum type CI, D and E neurotoxins to neuronal cell lines and synaptosomes, 29(2) Toxicon 261-264 (1991); and Tei-ichi Nishiki et al., Identification of protein receptor for Clostridium botulinum type B neurotoxin in rat brain synaptosomes, 269(14) J. Biol. Chem. 10498-10503 (1994). Other non-limiting assays include immunocytochemical assays that detect retargeted endopeptidase binding using labeled or unlabeled antibodies, see, e.g., Atsushi Nishikawa et al., The receptor and transporter for internalization of Clostridium botulinum type C progenitor toxin into HT-29 cells, 319(2) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 327-333 (2004) and immunoprecipitation assays, see, e.g., Yukako Fujinaga et al., Molecular characterization of binding subcomponents of Clostridium botulinum type C progenitor toxin for intestinal epithelial cells and erythrocytes, 150(Pt 5) Microbiology 1529-1538 (2004), that detect bound re-targeted endopeptidase using labeled or unlabeled antibodies. Antibodies useful for these assays include, without limitation, antibodies selected against retargeted endopeptidase and/or antibodies selected against a retargeted endopeptidase receptor, such as, e.g., ORL1, DOR, KOR, MOR, galanin receptor 1, galanin receptor 2, or galanin receptor 3. If the antibody is labeled, the binding of the molecule can be detected by various means, including Western blot analysis, direct microscopic observation of the cellular location of the antibody, measurement of cell or substrate-bound antibody following a wash step, flow cytometry, electrophoresis or capillary electrophoresis, employing techniques well-known to those of skill in the art. If the antibody is unlabeled, one may employ a labeled secondary antibody for indirect detection of the bound molecule, and detection can proceed as for a labeled antibody. It is understood that these and similar assays that determine retargeted endopeptidase uptake properties or characteristics can be useful in identifying cells expressing endogenous or exogenous or retargeted endopeptidase receptors.

Assays that monitor the release of a molecule after exposure to a retargeted endopeptidase can also be used to assess whether a cell is expressing one or more endogenous or exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors. In these assays, inhibition of the molecule's release would occur in cells expressing a retargeted endopeptidase receptor after retargeted endopeptidase treatment. Well known assays include methods that measure inhibition of radio-labeled catecholamine release from neurons, such as, e.g., [3H] noradrenaline or [3H] dopamine release, see e.g., A Fassio et al., Evidence for calcium-dependent vesicular transmitter release insensitive to tetanus toxin and botulinum toxin type F, 90(3) Neuroscience 893-902 (1999); and Sara Stigliani et al., The sensitivity of catecholamine release to botulinum toxin C1 and E suggests selective targeting of vesicles set into the readily releasable pool, 85(2) J. Neurochem. 409-421 (2003), or measures catecholamine release using a fluorometric procedure, see, e.g., Anton de Paiva et al., A role for the interchain disulfide or its participating thiols in the internalization of botulinum neurotoxin A revealed by a toxin derivative that binds to ecto-acceptors and inhibits transmitter release intracellularly, 268(28) J. Biol. Chem. 20838-20844 (1993); Gary W. Lawrence et al., Distinct exocytotic responses of intact and permeabilised chromaffin cells after cleavage of the 25-kDa synaptosomal-associated protein (SNAP-25) or synaptobrevin by botulinum toxin A or B, 236(3) Eur. J. Biochem. 877-886 (1996); and Patrick Foran et al., Botulinum neurotoxin C1 cleaves both syntaxin and SNAP-25 in intact and permeabilized chromaffin cells: correlation with its blockade of catecholamine release, 35(8) Biochemistry 2630-2636 (1996). Other non-limiting examples include assays that measure inhibition of hormone release from endocrine cells, such as, e.g., anterior pituitary cells or ovarian cells. It is understood that these and similar assays for molecule release can be useful in identifying cells expressing endogenous or exogenous or retargeted endopeptidase receptors.

Assays that detect the cleavage of a SNAP-25 substrate after exposure to a retargeted endopeptidase can also be used to assess whether a cell is expressing one or more endogenous or exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors. In these assays, generation of a SNAP-25 cleavage-product, or disappearance of the intact SNAP-25, would be detected in cells expressing a retargeted endopeptidase receptor after a retargeted endopeptidase treatment. Non-limiting examples of specific Western blot analysis, as well as well-characterized reagents, conditions and protocols are readily available from commercial vendors that include, without limitation, Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA; Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, and Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, CA. It is understood that these and similar assays for SNAP-25 cleavage can be useful in identifying cells expressing endogenous or exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors.

As non-limiting examples, Western blot analysis using an antibody that recognizes SNAP-25-cleaved product or both the cleaved and uncleaved forms of SNAP-25 can be used to assay for uptake of a retargeted endopeptidase. Examples of α-SNAP-25 antibodies useful for these assays include, without limitation, SMI-81 α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibody (Sternberger Monoclonals Inc., Lutherville, MD), CI 71.1 mouse α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany), CI 71.2 α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibody (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany), SP12 α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antiserum (Synaptic Systems, Goettingen, Germany), α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antiserum S9684 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antiserum (Abcam, Cambridge, MA).

Aspects of the present disclosure provide cells that through genetic manipulation or recombinant engineering are made to expresses an exogenous SNAP-25 and/or one or more exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors. Cells useful to express an exogenous SNAP-25 and/or one or more exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors through genetic manipulation or recombinant engineering include neuronal cells and non-neuronal cells that may or may not express an endogenous SNAP-25 and/or one or more endogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors. It is further understood that such genetically manipulated or recombinantly engineered cells may express an exogenous SNAP-25 and one or more exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors under control of a constitutive, tissue-specific, cell-specific or inducible promoter element, enhancer element or both. It is understood that any cell is useful as long as the cell can be genetically manipulated or recombinantly engineered to expresses an exogenous SNAP-25 and/or one or more exogenous retargeted endopeptidase receptors and is capable of undergoing retargeted endopeptidase activity.

Methods useful for introducing into a cell an exogenous polynucleotide molecule encoding a component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate, such as, e.g., a SNAP-25, an ORL1, a DOR, a KOR, or a MOR, include, without limitation, chemical-mediated delivery methods, such as, e.g., calcium phosphate-mediated, diethyl-aminoethyl (DEAE) dextran-mediated, lipid-mediated, polyethyleneimine (PEI)-mediated, polylysine-mediated and polybrene-mediated; physical-mediated delivery methods, such as, e.g., biolistic particle delivery, microinjection, protoplast fusion and electroporation; and viral-mediated delivery methods, such as, e.g., retroviral-mediated transfection, see e.g., Introducing Cloned Genes into Cultured Mammalian Cells, pp. 16.1-16.62 (Sambrook & Russell, eds., Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, Vol. 3, 3^rded. 2001); Alessia Colosimo et al., Transfer and Expression of Foreign Genes in Mammalian Cells, 29(2) Biotechniques 314-318, 320-322, 324 (2000); Philip Washbourne & A. Kimberley McAllister, Techniques for Gene Transfer into Neurons, 12(5) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 566-573 (2002); and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley and Sons, pp 9.16.4-9.16.11 (2000), each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. One skilled in the art understands that selection of a specific method to introduce a polynucleotide molecule into a cell will depend, in part, on whether the cell will transiently or stably contain a component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate. Non-limiting examples of polynucleotide molecule encoding a component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate as follows: ORL1 polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:61 or SEQ ID NO:62; DOR polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:63 or SEQ ID NO:64; KOR polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:65 or SEQ ID NO:66; MOR polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:67; galanin receptor 1 polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:141, SEQ ID NO:142, or SEQ ID NO:143, galanin receptor 2 polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:144, or galanin receptor 3 polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:145, and SNAP-25 polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:68, or SEQ ID NO:69.

Chemical-mediated delivery methods are well-known to a person of ordinary skill in the art and are described in, e.g., Martin Jordan & Florian Worm, Transfection of Adherent and Suspended Cells by Calcium Phosphate, 33(2) Methods 136-143 (2004); Chun Zhang et al., Polyethylenimine Strategies for Plasmid Delivery to Brain-Derived Cells, 33(2) Methods 144-150 (2004), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Such chemical-mediated delivery methods can be prepared by standard procedures and are commercially available, see, e.g., CellPhect Transfection Kit (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ); Mammalian Transfection Kit, Calcium phosphate and DEAE Dextran, (Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, CA); Lipofectamine™ Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA); ExGen 500 Transfection kit (Fermentas, Inc., Hanover, MD), and SuperFect and Effectene Transfection Kits (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA).

Physical-mediated delivery methods are well-known to a person of ordinary skill in the art and are described in, e.g., Jeike E. Biewenga et al., Plasmid-Mediated Gene Transferin Neurons using the Biolistics Technique, 71(1) J. Neurosci. Methods. 67-75 (1997); John O'Brien & Sarah C. R. Lummis, Biolistic and Diolistic Transfection: Using the Gene Gun to Deliver DNA and Lipophilic Dyes into Mammalian Cells, 33(2) Methods 121-125 (2004); M. Golzio et al., In Vitro and In Vivo Electric Field-Mediated Permeabilization, Gene Transfer, and Expression, 33(2) Methods 126-135 (2004); and Oliver Gresch et al., New Non-Viral Method for Gene Transfer into Primary Cells, 33(2) Methods 151-163 (2004), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Viral-mediated delivery methods are well-known to a person of ordinary skill in the art and are described in, e.g., Chooi M. Lai et al., Adenovirus and Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors, 21(12) DNA Cell Biol. 895-913 (2002); Ilya Frolov et al., Alphavirus-Based Expression Vectors: Strategies and Applications, 93(21) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 11371-11377 (1996); Roland Wolkowicz et al., Lentiviral Vectors for the Delivery of DNA into Mammalian Cells, 246 Methods Mol. Biol. 391-411(2004); A. Huser & C. Hofmann, Baculovirus Vectors: Novel Mammalian Cell Gene-Delivery Vehicles and Their Applications, 3(1) Am. J. Pharmacogenomics 53-63 (2003); Tiziana Tonini et al., Transient Production of Retroviral- and Lentiviral-Based Vectors for the Transduction of Mammalian Cells, 285 Methods Mol. Biol. 141-148 (2004); Manfred Gossen & Hermann Bujard, Tight Control of Gene Expression in Eukaryotic Cells by Tetracycline-Responsive Promoters, U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,758; Hermann Bujard & Manfred Gossen, Methods for Regulating Gene Expression, U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,618; David S. Hogness, Polynucleotides Encoding Insect Steroid Hormone Receptor Polypeptides and Cells Transformed With Same, U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,578; David S. Hogness, Polynucleotide Encoding Insect Ecdysone Receptor, U.S. Pat. No. 6,245,531; Elisabetta Vegeto et al., Progesterone Receptor Having C. Terminal Hormone Binding Domain Truncations, U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,791; Elisabetta Vegeto et al., Mutated Steroid Hormone Receptors, Methods for Their Use and Molecular Switch for Gene Therapy, U.S. Pat. No. 5,874,534, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Such viral-mediated delivery methods can be prepared by standard procedures and are commercially available, see, e.g., ViraPower™ Adenoviral Expression System (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) and ViraPower™ Adenoviral Expression System Instruction Manual 25-0543 version A, Invitrogen, Inc., (Jul. 15, 2002); and AdEasy™ Adenoviral Vector System (Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, CA) and AdEasy™ Adenoviral Vector System Instruction Manual 064004f, Stratagene, Inc. Furthermore, such viral delivery systems can be prepared by standard methods and are commercially available, see, e.g., BD™ Tet-Off and Tet-On Gene Expression Systems (BD Biosciences-Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) and BD™ Tet-Off and Tet-On Gene Expression Systems User Manual, PT3001-1, BD Biosciences Clontech, (Mar. 14, 2003), GeneSwitch™ System (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) and GeneSwitch™ System A Mifepristone-Regulated Expression System for Mammalian Cells version D, 25-0313, Invitrogen, Inc., (Nov. 4, 2002); ViraPower™ Lentiviral Expression System (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) and ViraPower™ Lentiviral Expression System Instruction Manual 25-0501 version E, Invitrogen, Inc., (Dec. 8, 2003); and Complete Control® Retroviral Inducible Mammalian Expression System (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and Complete Control® Retroviral Inducible Mammalian Expression System Instruction Manual, 064005e.

Thus, in an embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain a polynucleotide molecule encoding a component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate. In another embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain a polynucleotide molecule encoding a plurality of components necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain a polynucleotide molecule encoding ORL1, DOR, KOR, MOR, or SNAP-25. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:61, or SEQ ID NO:62 encoding ORL1. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:63, or SEQ ID NO:64 encoding DOR. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:65, or SEQ ID NO:66 encoding KOR. In still other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:67 encoding MOR.

In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:141, SEQ ID NO:142, or SEQ ID NO:143 encoding Galanin receptor 1. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:144 encoding Galanin receptor 2. In still other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:145 encoding Galanin receptor 3. In further aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity transiently contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:68 or SEQ ID NO:69 encoding SNAP-25.

In another embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain a polynucleotide molecule encoding a component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate. In another embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain a polynucleotide molecule encoding a plurality of components necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain a polynucleotide molecule encoding ORL1, DOR, KOR, MOR, or SNAP-25. In aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:61, or SEQ ID NO:62 encoding ORL1. In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:63, or SEQ ID NO:64 encoding DOR. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:65, or SEQ ID NO:66 encoding KOR. In still other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:67 encoding MOR.

In other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:141, SEQ ID NO:142, or SEQ ID NO:143 encoding Galanin receptor 1. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:144 encoding Galanin receptor 2. In yet other aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:145 encoding Galanin receptor 3. In further aspects of this embodiment, cells from an established cell line susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity stably contain the polynucleotide molecule of SEQ ID NO:68 or SEQ ID NO:69 encoding SNAP-25.

As mentioned above, an exogenous component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate, such as, e.g., a SNAP-25, an ORL1, a DOR, a KOR, a MOR, a Galanin receptor 1, a Galanin receptor 2, or a Galanin receptor 3, disclosed in the present specification can be introduced into a cell. Any and all methods useful for introducing such an exogenous component with a delivery agent into a cell population can be useful with the proviso that this method transiently introduces the exogenous component disclosed in the present specification in at least 50% of the cells within a given cell population. Thus, aspects of this embodiment can include a cell population in which, e.g., at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% of the given cell population transiently contains an exogenous component necessary for the cells to undergo the overall cellular mechanism whereby a retargeted endopeptidase proteolytically cleaves a SNAP-25 substrate, such as, e.g., a SNAP-25, an ORL1, a DOR, a KOR, a MOR, a Galanin receptor 1, a Galanin receptor 2, or a Galanin receptor 3, disclosed in the present specification. As used herein, the term “delivery agent” refers to any molecule that enables or enhances internalization of a covalently-linked, non-covalently-linked or in any other manner associated with a polypeptide into a cell. Thus, the term “delivery agent” encompasses, without limitation, proteins, peptides, peptidomimetics, small molecules, polynucleotide molecules, liposomes, lipids, viruses, retroviruses and cells that, without limitation, transport a covalently or non-covalently linked molecule to the cell membrane, cell cytoplasm or nucleus. It further is understood that the term “delivery agent” encompasses molecules that are internalized by any mechanism, including delivery agents which function via receptor mediated endocytosis and those which are independent of receptor mediated endocytosis.

A delivery agent can also be an agent that enables or enhances cellular uptake of a covalently linked component, like SNAP-25, ORL1, DOR, KOR, MOR, Galanin receptor 1, Galanin receptor 2, or Galanin receptor 3, such as, e.g., by chemical conjugation or by genetically produced fusion proteins. Methods that covalently link delivery agents and methods of using such agents are described in, e.g., Steven F. Dowdy, Protein Transduction System and Methods of Use Thereof, International Publication No WO 00/34308; Gérard Chassaing & Alain Prochiantz, Peptides which can be Used as Vectors for the Intracellular Addressing of Active Molecules, U.S. Pat. No. 6,080,724; Alan Frankel et al., Fusion Protein Comprising TAT-derived Transport Moiety, U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,980; Alan Frankel et al., TAT-derived Transport Polypeptide Conjugates, U.S. Pat. No. 5,747,641; Alan Frankel et al., TAT-derived Transport Polypeptides and Fusion Proteins, U.S. Pat. No. 5,804,604; Peter F. J. O'Hare et al., Use of Transport Proteins, U.S. Pat. No. 6,734,167; Yao-Zhong Lin & Jack J. Hawiger, Method for Importing Biologically Active Molecules into Cells, U.S. Pat. No. 5,807,746; Yao-Zhong Lin & Jack J. Hawiger, Method forImporting Biologically Active Molecules into Cells, U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,339; Yao-Zhong Lin et al., Sequence and Method for Genetic Engineering of Proteins with Cell Membrane Translocating Activity, U.S. Pat. No. 6,248,558; Yao-Zhong Lin et al., Sequence and Method for Genetic Engineering of Proteins with Cell Membrane Translocating Activity, U.S. Pat. No. 6,432,680; Jack J. Hawiger et al., Method for Importing Biologically Active Molecules into Cells, U.S. Pat. No. 6,495,518; Yao-Zhong Lin et al., Sequence and Method for Genetic Engineering of Proteins with Cell Membrane Translocating Activity, U.S. Pat. No. 6,780,843; Jonathan B. Rothbard & Paul A Wender, Method and Composition for Enhancing Transport Across Biological Membranes, U.S. Pat. No. 6,306,993; Jonathan B. Rothbard & Paul A Wender, Method and Composition for Enhancing Transport Across Biological Membranes, U.S. Pat. No. 6,495,663; and Pamela B. Davis et al., Fusion Proteins forProtein Delivery, U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,817, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

A delivery agent can also be an agent that enables or enhances cellular uptake of a non-covalently associated component, like SNAP-25, ORL1, DOR, KOR, MOR, Galanin receptor 1, Galanin receptor 2, or Galanin receptor 3. Methods that function in the absence of covalent linkage and methods of using such agents are described in, e.g., Gilles Divita et al, Peptide-Mediated Transfection Agents and Methods of Use, U.S. Pat. No. 6,841,535; Philip L Felgner and Olivier Zelphati, Intracellular Protein Delivery Compositions and Methods of Use, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0008813; and Michael Karas, Intracellular Delivery of Small Molecules, Proteins and Nucleic Acids, U.S. Patent Publication 2004/0209797, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Such peptide delivery agents can be prepared and used by standard methods and are commercially available, see, e.g. the CHARIOT™ Reagent (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA); BIO-PORTER® Reagent (Gene Therapy Systems, Inc., San Diego, CA), BIO TREK™ Protein Delivery Reagent (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and PRO-JECT™ Protein Transfection Reagent (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL).

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase. As used herein, the term “sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase” refers to any biological matter that contains or potentially contains an active retargeted endopeptidase. A variety of samples can be assayed according to a method disclosed in the present specification including, without limitation, purified, partially purified, or unpurified retargeted endopeptidase; recombinant single chain or di-chain retargeted endopeptidase with a naturally or non-naturally occurring sequence; recombinant retargeted endopeptidase with a modified protease specificity; recombinant retargeted endopeptidase with an altered cell specificity; bulk retargeted endopeptidase; a formulated retargeted endopeptidase product; and cells or crude, fractionated or partially purified cell lysates from, e.g., bacteria, yeast, insect, or mammalian sources; blood, plasma or serum; raw, partially cooked, cooked, or processed foods; beverages; animal feed; soil samples; water samples; pond sediments; lotions; cosmetics; and clinical formulations. It is understood that the term sample encompasses tissue samples, including, without limitation, mammalian tissue samples, livestock tissue samples such as sheep, cow and pig tissue samples; primate tissue samples; and human tissue samples. Such samples encompass, without limitation, intestinal samples such as infant intestinal samples, and tissue samples obtained from a wound. As non-limiting examples, a method of detecting picomolar amounts of retargeted endopeptidase activity can be useful for determining the presence or activity of a retargeted endopeptidase in a food or beverage sample; to assay a sample from a human or animal, for example, exposed to a retargeted endopeptidase or having one or more symptoms of botulism; to follow activity during production and purification of bulk retargeted endopeptidase; to assay a formulated retargeted endopeptidase product used in pharmaceutical or cosmetics applications; or to assay a subject's blood serum for the presence or absence of neutralizing α-retargeted endopeptidase antibodies.

Thus, in an embodiment, a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase is a sample comprising any amount of a retargeted endopeptidase. In aspects of this embodiment, a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase comprises about 100 ng or less, about 10 ng or less, about 1 ng or less, about 100 pg or less, about 10 pg or less, or about 1 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase. In other aspects of this embodiment, a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase comprises about 1 μM or less, about 100 nM or less, about 10 nM or less, about 1 nM or less, about 100 nM or less, about 10 nM or less, about 1 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. As used herein, the term “SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond” refers to a cellular component containing the SNAP-25 cleavage product. It is envisioned that any method suitable for enriching or isolating a SNAP-25 component can be useful, including, without limitation, cell lysing protocols, spin-column purification protocols, immunoprecipitation, affinity purification, and protein chromatography.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, an α-SNAP-25 antibody linked to a solid phase support. As used herein, the term “solid-phase support” is synonymous with “solid phase” and refers to any matrix that can be used for immobilizing an α-SNAP-25 antibody disclosed in the present specification. Non-limiting examples of solid phase supports include, e.g., a tube; a plate; a column; pins or “dipsticks”; a magnetic particle, a bead or other spherical or fibrous chromatographic media, such as, e.g., agarose, sepharose, silica and plastic; and sheets or membranes, such as, e.g., nitrocellulose and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). The solid phase support can be constructed using a wide variety of materials such as, e.g., glass, carbon, polystyrene, polyvinylchloride, polypropylene, polyethylene, dextran, nylon, diazocellulose, or starch. The solid phase support selected can have a physical property that renders it readily separable from soluble or unbound material and generally allows unbound materials, such as, e.g., excess reagents, reaction by-products, or solvents, to be separated or otherwise removed (by, e.g., washing, filtration, centrifugation, etc.) from solid phase support-bound assay component. Non-limiting examples of how to make and use a solid phase supports are described in, e.g., Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, supra, (2001); and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, supra, (2004), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Aspects of the present disclosure comprise, in part, detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond and a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. It is envisioned that any detection system can be used to practice aspects of this disclosed immuno-based method, with the provision that the signal to noise ratio can distinguish to a statistically significant degree the signal from the antibody-antigen complex from the background signal. Non-limiting examples of immuno-based detection systems include immunoblot analysis, like Western blotting and dot-blotting, immunoprecipitation analysis, enzyme-linked immunosorbent analysis (ELISA), and sandwich ELISA. The detection of the signal can be achieved using autoradiography with imaging or phosphorimaging (AU), chemiluminescence (CL), electrochemiluminescence (ECL), bioluminescence (BL), fluorescence, resonance energy transfer, plane polarization, colorimetric, or flow cytometry (FC). Descriptions of immuno-based detection systems are disclosed in, e.g., Michael M. Rauhut, Chemiluminescence, In Kirk-Othmer Concise Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (Ed. Grayson, 3rd ed, John Wiley and Sons, 1985); A. W. Knight, A Review of Recent Trends in Analytical Applications of Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence, Trends Anal. Chem. 18(1): 47-62 (1999); K. A. Fahnrich, et al., Recent Applications of Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence in Chemical Analysis, Talanta 54(4): 531-559 (2001); Commonly Used Techniques in Molecular Cloning, pp. A8.1-A8-55 (Sambrook & Russell, eds., Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, Vol. 3, 3^rded. 2001); Detection Systems, pp. A9.1-A9-49 (Sambrook & Russell, eds., Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, Vol. 3, 3^rded. 2001); Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence, (Ed. Allen J. Bard, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2004), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

A sandwich ELISA (or sandwich immunoassay) is a method based on two antibodies, which bind to different epitopes on the antigen. A capture antibody having a high binding specificity for the antigen of interest, is bound to a solid surface. The antigen is then added followed by addition of a second antibody referred to as the detection antibody. The detection antibody binds the antigen to a different epitope than the capture antibody. The antigen is therefore ‘sandwiched’ between the two antibodies. The antibody binding affinity forthe antigen is usually the main determinant of immunoassay sensitivity. As the antigen concentration increases the amount of detection antibody increases leading to a higher measured response. To quantify the extent of binding different reporter systems can be used, such as, e.g., an enzyme attached to the secondary antibody and a reporter substrate where the enzymatic reaction forms a readout as the detection signal. The signal generated is proportional to the amount of target antigen present in the sample. The reporter substrate used to measure the binding event determines the detection mode. A spectrophotometric plate reader is used for colorimetric detection. Chemiluminescent and electrochemiluminescence substrates have been developed which further amplify the signal and can be read on a luminescent reader. The reporter can also be a fluorescent readout where the enzyme step of the assay is replaced with a fluorophore and the readout is then measured using a fluorescent reader. Reagents and protocols necessary to perform an ECL sandwich ELISA are commercially available, including, without exception, MSD sandwich ELISA-ECL detection platform (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD).

Thus, in an embodiment, detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising an α-SNAP-25 antibody that selectively binds to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond and a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond can be performed using an immuno-blot analysis, an immunoprecipitation analysis, an ELISA, or a sandwich ELISA. In aspects of this embodiment, the detection is performed using a AU, CL, ECL, or BL immuno-blot analysis, a AU, CL, ECL, BL, or FC immunoprecipitation analysis, a AU, CL, ECL, BL, or FC ELISA, or a AU, CL, ECL, BL, or FC sandwich ELISA.

Aspects of the present disclosure can be practiced in a singleplex or multiplex fashion. An immuno-based method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity practiced in a single-plex fashion is one that only detects the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising an α-SNAP-25 antibody and a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. An immuno-based method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity practiced in a multiplex fashion is one that concurrently detects the presence of two or more antibody-antigen complexes; one of which is the antibody-antigen complex comprising an α-SNAP-25 antibody and a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; and the other(s) of which is antibody-antigen complex to a second, third, fourth, etc. different protein. A second protein can be used, e.g., as an internal control to minimize sample to sample variability by normalizing the amount of α-SNAP-25/SNAP-25 antibody-antigen complex detected to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected for the second protein. As such, the second protein is usually one that is consistently expressed by the cell, such as a house-keeping protein. Non-limiting examples of a useful second protein, include, e.g., a Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH), Syntaxin, cytokines. Methods of performing an immuno-based assay in a multiplex fashion are described in, e.g., U. B. Nielsen and B. H. Geierstanger, Multiplexed Sandwich Assays in Microarray Format, J. Immunol. Methods. 290(1-2): 107-120 2004); R. Barry and M, Soloviev, Quantitative Protein Profiling using Antibody Arrays, Proteomics, 4(12): 3717-3726 (2004); M. M. Ling et al., Multiplexing Molecular Diagnostics and Immunoassays using Emerging Microarray Technologies, Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 7(1): 87-98 (2007); S. X. Leng et al., ELISA and Multiplex Technologies for Cytokine Measurement in Inflammation and Aging Research, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 63(8): 879-884 (2008), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Thus, in one embodiment, an immuno-based method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity practiced in a single-plex fashion by only detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising an α-SNAP-25 antibody and a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. In another embodiment, immuno-based method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity practiced in a multiplex fashion by concurrently detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising an α-SNAP-25 antibody and a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond and at least one other antibody-antigen complex to a protein other than SNAP-25, such as, e.g., GAPDH or Syntaxin.

Aspects of the present disclosure provide, in part, a method of determining re-targeted endopeptidase immunoresistance. As used herein, the term “re-targeted endopeptidase immunoresistance” means a mammal that does not fully respond to a re-targeted endopeptidase therapy, or shows a reduced beneficial effect of a re-targeted endopeptidase therapy because the immune response of that mammal, either directly or indirectly, reduces the efficacy of the therapy. A non-limiting example of reduced efficacy would be the presence in a mammal of at least one neutralizing α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibody that binds to a re-targeted endopeptidase in a manner that reduces or prevents the specificity or activity of the re-targeted endopeptidase. As used herein, the term “re-targeted endopeptidase therapy” means a treatment, remedy, cure, healing, rehabilitation or any other means of counteracting something undesirable in a mammal requiring neuromodulation using a re-targeted endopeptidase or administering to a mammal one or more controlled doses of a medication, preparation or mixture of a re-targeted endopeptidase that has medicinal, therapeutic, curative, cosmetic, remedial or any other beneficial effect. Re-targeted endopeptidase therapy encompasses, without limitation, the use of any naturally occurring or modified fragment thereof, in any formulation, combined with any carrier or active ingredient and administered by any route of administration.

Aspects of the present disclosure provide, in part, a test sample obtained from a mammal being tested for the presence or absence of α-re-targeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies. As used herein, the term “test sample” refers to any biological matter that contains or potentially contains at least one α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibody. An α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibody can be a neutralizing α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibody or a non-neutralizing α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibody. As used herein, the term “neutralizing α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibodies” means any α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibody that will, under physiological conditions, bind to a region of a re-targeted endopeptidase in such a manner as to reduce or prevent the re-targeted endopeptidase from exerting its effect in a re-targeted endopeptidase therapy. As used herein, the term “non-neutralizing α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibodies” means any α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibody that will, under physiological conditions, bind to a region of a re-targeted endopeptidase, but not prevent the re-targeted endopeptidase from exerting its effect in a re-targeted endopeptidase therapy. It is envisioned that any and all samples that can contain α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibodies can be used in this method, including, without limitation, blood, plasma, serum and lymph fluid. In addition, any and all organisms capable of raising α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibodies against a re-targeted endopeptidase can serve as a source for a sample including, but not limited to, birds and mammals, including mice, rats, goats, sheep, horses, donkeys, cows, primates and humans. Non-limiting examples of specific protocols for blood collection and serum preparation are described in, e.g., Marjorie Schaub Di Lorenzo & Susan King Strasinger, BLOOD COLLECTION IN HEALTHCARE (F.A. Davis Company, 2001); and Diana Garza & Kathleen Becan-McBride, PHLEBOTOMY HANDBOOK: BLOOD COLLECTION ESSENTIALS (Prentice Hall, 6^thed., 2002). These protocols are routine procedures well within the scope of one skilled in the art and from the teaching herein. A test sample can be obtained from an organism prior to exposure to a re-targeted endopeptidase, after a single re-targeted endopeptidase treatment, after multiple re-targeted endopeptidase treatments, before onset of resistance to a re-targeted endopeptidase therapy, or after onset of resistance to a re-targeted endopeptidase therapy.

Aspects of the present disclosure provide, in part, a control sample. As used herein, the term “control sample” means any sample in which the presence or absence of the test sample is known and includes both negative and positive control samples. With respect to neutralizing α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibodies, a negative control sample can be obtained from an individual who had never been exposed to re-targeted endopeptidase and may include, without limitation, a sample from the same individual supplying the test sample, but taken before undergoing a re-targeted endopeptidase therapy; a sample taken from a different individual never been exposed to re-targeted endopeptidase; a pooled sample taken from a plurality of different individuals never been exposed to BoNT/A. With respect to neutralizing α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibodies, a positive control sample can be obtained from an individual manifesting re-targeted endopeptidase immunoresistance and includes, without limitation, individual testing positive in a patient-based testing assays; individual testing positive in an in vivo bioassay; and individual showing hyperimmunity, e.g., a re-targeted endopeptidase vaccinated individual.

It is further foreseen that α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibodies can be purified from a sample. α-Re-targeted endopeptidase antibodies can be purified from a sample, using a variety of procedures including, without limitation, Protein A/G chromatography and affinity chromatography. Non-limiting examples of specific protocols for purifying antibodies from a sample are described in, e.g., ANTIBODIES: A LABORATORY MANUAL (Edward Harlow & David Lane, eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2^nded. 1998); USING ANTIBODIES: A LABORATORY MANUAL: PORTABLE PROTOCOL NO. I (Edward Harlow & David Lane, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1998); and MOLECULAR CLONING, A LABORATORY MANUAL, supra, (2001), which are hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, non-limiting examples of antibody purification methods as well as well-characterized reagents, conditions and protocols are readily available from commercial vendors that include, without limitation, Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL; and Zymed Laboratories, Inc., South San Francisco, CA. These protocols are routine procedures well within the scope of one skilled in the art.

Thus, in an embodiment, a sample comprises blood. In aspect of this embodiment, the sample comprises mouse blood, rat blood, goat blood, sheep blood, horse blood, donkey blood, cow blood, primate blood or human blood. In another embodiment, a sample comprises plasma. In an aspect of this embodiment, a test sample comprises mouse plasma, rat plasma, goat plasma, sheep plasma, horse plasma, donkey plasma, cow plasma, primate plasma or human plasma. In another embodiment, a sample comprises serum. In an aspect of this embodiment, the sample comprises mouse serum, rat serum, goat serum, sheep serum, horse serum, donkey serum, cow serum, primate serum and human serum. In another embodiment, a sample comprises lymph fluid. In aspect of this embodiment, a sample comprises mouse lymph fluid, rat lymph fluid, goat lymph fluid, sheep lymph fluid, horse lymph fluid, donkey lymph fluid, cow lymph fluid, primate lymph fluid or human lymph fluid. In yet another embodiment, a sample is a test sample. In yet another embodiment, a sample is a control sample. In aspects of this embodiment, a control sample is a negative control sample or a positive control sample.

Aspects of the present disclosure provide, in part, comparing the amount of SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond detected in step (d) to the amount of SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond detected in step (e). In an embodiment, the amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the test sample is higher as compared to the amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the control sample. In an aspect of this embodiment, a higher amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the test sample as compared to a positive control sample indicates a reduction in or lack of re-targeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in the mammal. In another aspect of this embodiment, an equivalent amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the test sample as compared to a negative control sample indicates a reduction in or lack of re-targeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in the mammal. In another embodiment, the amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the test sample is lower as compared to the amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the control sample. In an aspect of this embodiment, a lower or equivalent amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the test sample as compared to a positive control sample indicates an increase in or presence of re-targeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in the mammal. In another aspect of this embodiment, a lower amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the test sample as compared to a negative control sample indicates an increase in or presence of re-targeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in the mammal.

It is envisioned that any and all assay conditions suitable for detecting the present of a neutralizing α-re-targeted endopeptidase antibody in a sample are useful in the methods disclosed in the present specification, such as, e.g., linear assay conditions and non-linear assay conditions. In an embodiment, the assay conditions are linear. In an aspect of this embodiment, the assay amount of a re-targeted endopeptidase is in excess. In another aspect of this embodiment, the assay amount of a re-targeted endopeptidase is rate-limiting. In another aspect of this embodiment, the assay amount of a test sample is rate-limiting.

Aspects of the present disclosure can also be described as follows:

- 1. A method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity, the method comprising the steps of: a) treating a cell from an established cell line with a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase, wherein the cell from an established cell line is susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by a retargeted endopeptidase; b) isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; c) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; and d) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; wherein detection by the antibody-antigen complex is indicative of retargeted endopeptidase activity.
- 2. A method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity, the method comprising the steps of: a) treating a cell from an established cell line with a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase, wherein the cell from an established cell line is susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by a retargeted endopeptidase; b) isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; c) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody linked to a solid phase support, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; and d) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; wherein detection by the antibody-antigen complex is indicative of retargeted endopeptidase activity.
- 3. A method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity, the method comprising the steps of: a) treating a cell from an established cell line with a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase, wherein the cell from an established cell line is susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by a retargeted endopeptidase; b) isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; c) fixing the SNAP-25 component to a solid phase support; d) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; and e) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; wherein detection by the antibody-antigen complex is indicative of retargeted endopeptidase activity.
- 4. A method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity, the method comprising the steps of: a) treating a cell from an established cell line with a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase, wherein the cell from an established cell line can uptake retargeted endopeptidase; b) isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; c) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; and d) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; wherein detection by the antibody-antigen complex is indicative of retargeted endopeptidase activity.
- 5. A method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity, the method comprising the steps of: a) treating a cell from an established cell line with a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase, wherein the cell from an established cell line can uptake retargeted endopeptidase; b) isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; c) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody linked to a solid phase support, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; and d) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; wherein detection by the antibody-antigen complex is indicative of retargeted endopeptidase activity.
- 6. A method of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity, the method comprising the steps of: a) treating a cell from an established cell line with a sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase, wherein the cell from an established cell line can uptake retargeted endopeptidase; b) isolating from the treated cell a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; c) fixing the SNAP-25 component to a solid phase support; d) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; and e) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; wherein detection by the antibody-antigen complex is indicative of retargeted endopeptidase activity.
- 7. A method of determining retargeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in a mammal comprising the steps of: a) adding a retargeted endopeptidase to a test sample obtained from a mammal being tested for the presence or absence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; b) treating a cell from an established cell line with the test sample, wherein the cell from an established cell line is susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity; c) isolating from the treated cells a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; d) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; e) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; f) repeating steps b-e with a negative control sample instead of a test sample, the negative control sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase and a serum known not to contain α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; and g) comparing the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step e to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f, wherein detection of a lower amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step e relative to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f is indicative of the presence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies.
- 8. A method of determining retargeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in a mammal comprising the steps of: a) adding a retargeted endopeptidase to a test sample obtained from a mammal being tested for the presence or absence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; b) treating a cell from an established cell line with the test sample, wherein the cell from an established cell line is susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity; c) isolating from the treated cells a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; d) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody linked to a solid phase support, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; e) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-retargeted endopeptidase antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; f) repeating steps b-e with a negative control sample instead of a test sample, the negative control sample comprising a re-targeted endopeptidase and a serum known not to contain α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; and g) comparing the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step e to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f, wherein detection of a lower amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step e relative to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f is indicative of the presence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies.
- 9. A method of determining retargeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in a mammal comprising the steps of: a) adding a retargeted endopeptidase to a test sample obtained from a mammal being tested for the presence or absence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; b) treating a cell from an established cell line with the test sample, wherein the cell from an established cell line is susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity; c) isolating from the treated cells a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; d) fixing the SNAP-25 component to a solid phase support; e) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; f) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; g) repeating steps b-f with a negative control sample instead of a test sample, the negative control sample comprising a re-targeted endopeptidase and a serum known not to contain α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; and h) comparing the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step g, wherein detection of a lower amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f relative to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step g is indicative of the presence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies.
- 10. A method of determining retargeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in a mammal comprising the steps of: a) adding a retargeted endopeptidase to a test sample obtained from a mammal being tested for the presence or absence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; b) treating a cell from an established cell line with the test sample, wherein the cell from an established cell line can uptake retargeted endopeptidase; c) isolating from the treated cells a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; d) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; e) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; f) repeating steps b-e with a negative control sample instead of a test sample, the negative control sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase and a serum known not to contain α-re-targeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; and g) comparing the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step e to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f, wherein detection of a lower amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step e relative to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f is indicative of the presence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies.
- 11. A method of determining retargeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in a mammal comprising the steps of: a) adding a re-targeted endopeptidase to a test sample obtained from a mammal being tested for the presence or absence of α-re-targeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; b) treating a cell from an established cell line with the test sample, wherein the cell from an established cell line can uptake retargeted endopeptidase; c) isolating from the treated cells a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; d) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody linked to a solid phase support, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; e) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; f) repeating steps b-e with a negative control sample instead of a test sample, the negative control sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase and a serum known not to contain α-re-targeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; and g) comparing the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step e to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f, wherein detection of a lower amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step e relative to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f is indicative of the presence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies.
- 12. A method of determining retargeted endopeptidase immunoresistance in a mammal comprising the steps of: a) adding a retargeted endopeptidase to a test sample obtained from a mammal being tested for the presence or absence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; b) treating a cell from an established cell line with the test sample, wherein the cell from an established cell line can uptake retargeted endopeptidase; c) isolating from the treated cells a SNAP-25 component comprising a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond; d) fixing the SNAP-25 component to a solid phase support; e) contacting the SNAP-25 component with an α-SNAP-25 antibody, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an epitope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product; f) detecting the presence of an antibody-antigen complex comprising the α-SNAP-25 antibody and the SNAP-25 cleavage product; g) repeating steps b-f with a negative control sample instead of a test sample, the negative control sample comprising a retargeted endopeptidase and a serum known not to contain α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies; and h) comparing the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step g, wherein detection of a lower amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step f relative to the amount of antibody-antigen complex detected in step g is indicative of the presence of α-retargeted endopeptidase neutralizing antibodies.
- 13. The method of 1-3 and 7-9, wherein the cell is susceptible to retargeted endopeptidase activity by about 500 nM or less, by about 400 nM or less, by about 300 nM or less, by about 200 nM or less, by about 100 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 14. The method of 4-6 and 10-12, wherein the cell can uptake about 500 nM or less, by about 400 nM or less, by about 300 nM or less, by about 200 nM or less, by about 100 nM or less of retargeted endopeptidase.
- 15. The method of 1-6, wherein the sample comprises about 100 ng or less, about 10 ng or less, about 1 ng or less, 100 fg or less, 10 fg or less, or 1 fg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 16. The method of 1-6, wherein the sample comprises about 100 nM or less, about 10 nM or less, about 1 nM or less, about 100 nM or less, about 10 nM or less, about 1 nM or less, about 0.5 nM or less, or about 0.1 nM or less, of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 17. The method of 1-12, wherein the presence of an antibody-antigen complex is detected by an immuno-blot analysis, an immunoprecipitation analysis, an ELISA, or a sandwich ELISA.
- 18. The method of 1-12, wherein the method has a signal-to-noise ratio for the lower asymptote of at least 3:1, at least 5:1, at least 10:1, at least 20:1, at least 50:1, or at least 100:1.
- 19. The method of 1-12, wherein the method has a signal-to-noise ratio for the higher asymptote of at least 10:1, at least 20:1, at least 50:1, at least 100:1, at least 200:1, at least 300:1, at least 400:1, at least 500:1, or at least 600:1.
- 20. The method of 1-12, wherein the method can detect the EC₅₀activity of, e.g., at least 100 ng, at least 50 ng, at least 10 ng, at least 5 ng, at least 100 pg, at least 50 pg, at least 10 pg, at least 5 pg, at least 100 fg, at least 50 fg, at least 10 fg, or at least 5 fg of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 21. The method of 1-12, wherein the method can detect the EC₅₀activity of, e.g., at least 10 nM, at least 5 nM, at least 100 nM, at least 50 nM, at least 10 nM, at least 5 nM, at least 1 nM, at least 0.5 nM, or at least 0.1 nM of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 22. The method of 1-12, wherein the method has an LOD of, e.g., 10 pg or less, 9 pg or less, 8 pg or less, 7 pg or less, 6 pg or less, 5 pg or less, 4 pg or less, 3 pg or less, 2 pg or less, 1 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 23. The method of 1-12, wherein the method has an LOD of, e.g., 100 nM or less, 90 nM or less, 80 nM or less, 70 nM or less, 60 nM or less, 50 nM or less, 40 nM or less, 30 nM or less, 20 nM or less, or 10 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 24. The method of 1-12, wherein the method has an LOQ of, e.g., 10 pg or less, 9 pg or less, 8 pg or less, 7 pg or less, 6 pg or less, 5 pg or less, 4 pg or less, 3 pg or less, 2 pg or less, 1 pg or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 25. The method of 1-12, wherein the method has an LOQ of, e.g., 100 nM or less, 90 nM or less, 80 nM or less, 70 nM or less, 60 nM or less, 50 nM or less, 40 nM or less, 30 nM or less, 20 nM or less, or 10 nM or less of a retargeted endopeptidase.
- 26. The method of 1-12, wherein the method can distinguish a fully-active retargeted endopeptidase from a partially-active retargeted endopeptidase having 70% or less, 60% or less, 50% or less, 40% or less, 30% or less, 20% or less, or 10% or less the activity of a fully-active retargeted endopeptidase A.
- 27. The method of 1-12, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody binds an eptiope comprising a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue from the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product.
- 28. The method of 27, wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody has an association rate constant for an epitope not comprising a carboxyl-terminus glutamine of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond from a SNAP-25 cleavage product of less than 1×10¹M⁻¹s⁻¹; and wherein the α-SNAP-25 antibody has an equilibrium disassociation constant for the epitope of less than 0.450 nM.
- 29. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody has a heavy chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:72, SEQ ID NO:74, SEQ ID NO:76, SEQ ID NO:80, and SEQ ID NO:82; and a light chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:84, SEQ ID NO:86, SEQ ID NO:88, SEQ ID NO:90, and SEQ ID NO:92.
- 30. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises at least the V_HCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:93, the V_HCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:94, the V_HCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:95, the V_HCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:118, the V_HCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:119, or the V_HCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:120.
- 32. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises at least the V_HCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:96, the V_HCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:97, the V_HCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:98, the V_HCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:99, the V_HCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:121, the V_HCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:122, or the V_HCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:123.
- 33. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises at least the V_HCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:100, the V_HCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:101, the V_HCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:102, or the V_HCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:124.
- 34. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises at least the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:103, the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:104, the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:105, the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:106, the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:107, the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:125, the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:126, the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:127, the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:128, or the V_LCDR1 of SEQ ID NO:129.
- 35. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises at least the V_LCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:108, the V_LCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:109, the V_LCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:110, the V_LCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:111, or the V_LCDR2 of SEQ ID NO:112.
- 36. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises at least the V_LCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:113, the V_LCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:114, the V_LCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:115, the V_LCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:116, or the V_LCDR3 of SEQ ID NO:117.
- 37. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody comprises a heavy chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO:93, SEQ ID NO:121 and SEQ ID NO:100; and a light chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO:105, SEQ ID NO:110 and SEQ ID NO:115.
- 38. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody selectively binds the SNAP-25 epitope of SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:147 or SEQ ID NO:148.
- 39. The method of 27, wherein the isolated α-SNAP-25 antibody selectively binds the SNAP-25 epitope of SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:40, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, or SEQ ID NO:44.

EXAMPLES
Example I—Screening of Candidate Cell Lines for Endogenous Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Receptor Expression

The following example illustrates how to identify established cell lines possessing the re-targeted endopeptidase uptake capacity required to develop a cell-based potency assay.

1. Growth of Stock Culture of Candidate Cell Lines.

To grow the cell lines, a suitable density of cells from the cell line being tested were plated in a 162 cm²tissue culture flask containing 30 mL of a suitable growth medium (see Table 1), and grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% or 10% carbon dioxide until cells reached the desired density.

TABLE 1

Media Used in Cell Line Screening.

Cell Line
Serum Growth Media Composition

SiMa and
RPMI 1640, 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin, 2 mM L-Glutamine

SiMa clones

PC12
RPMI 1640, 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 10% equine serum, 2 mM

GlutaMAX ™, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin

N18
90% DMEM, 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM Glutamine, 2 mM glucose

ND8/34

NG108-15

SK-N-DZ
90% DMEM, 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 4 mM Glutamine, 4 mM glucose,

SK-N-F1
0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 1.5 g/L NaHCO₃

SK-N-SH

BE(2)-C
EMEM(11090-081, Gibco), Ham's F12 (11765-054, Gibco), 10% heat-inactivated fetal

SK-N-BE(2)
bovine serum, 2 mM Glutamine, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids,

SH-SY5Y

ND3, ND7,
DMEM media with 2 mM Glutamine (Invitrogen, Cat #. 11885), 10% Fetal Bovine Serum

ND15
(Invitrogen, Cat #. 16140), and 1x antibiotic/antimycotic

Neuro-2a
EMEM, 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM Glutamine, 0.1 mM non-essential

amino acids, 1.5 g/L NaHCO₃, 1 mM Sodium pyruvate

2. Screening of Cells Expressing Target Receptor on Cell Surface.

The cell lines were screened for the presence of the desired target receptor using flow cytometry and/or ligand binding assays. Although the examples below used reagents to identify opioid or opioid-like receptor in the plasma membrane, the approaches disclosed below can be used to identify the cognate receptor for any of re-targeted endopeptidase.

a. Identification of Cell Lines Using Flow Cytometry.

To identify cells comprising established cell lines that express target receptors for a retargeted endopeptidase on the cell surface, flow cytometry analysis was conducted. Cells for each candidate cell line were grown as described in Section 1, trypsin-treated, washed in staining buffer comprising 1×PBS, 0.5% BSA, and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 3 minutes. Pelleted cells were resuspended in staining buffer and about 2.0×10⁶cells were transferred to new tubes, two for each receptor tested. To screen for the presence of an opioid or opioid-like receptors, about 2.0-5.0 μL of α-ORL-1 RA14133 (Neuromics, Edina, MN), α-DOR rabbit polyclonal antibody RA10101 (Neuromics, Edina, MN), α-KOR rabbit polyclonal antibody RA10103 (Neuromics, Edina, MN), or α-MOR rabbit polyclonal antibody RA10104 (Neuromics, Edina, MN), was added to one tube and the mixture was incubated at 4° C. for 1 hour. The second tube was incubated at 4° C. for 1 hour without any antibodies and served as a negative control. After the antibody incubation, 1.0 mL of staining buffer was added to each tube and centrifuge at 1200 rpm for 3 minutes. The cell pellet was washed once more with 1.0 mL of staining buffer. The cell pellet was resuspend in 200 μL of staining buffer, and 2.0 μL of goat anti-rabbit IgG FITC antibody was added to each tube and incubated at 4° C. for 1 hour in the dark. After incubation with the secondary antibody, 1.0 mL of staining buffer was added to each tube and centrifuge at 1200 rpm for 3 minutes. The cell pellet was washed once more with 1.0 mL of staining buffer and the pellet resuspend in 500 μL of staining buffer. The sample was analyzed using a flow cytometer and the data was displayed as an overlay the anti-receptor antibody staining over the rabbit IgG FITC staining.

The results indicate that. Of the cell lines tested, ORL-1 was expressed on the cell surface of about 50% of the cells comprising SiMa, SiMa P>33, clone H10, ND7, and SK-N-DZ established cell lines; was expressed on the cell surface of between about 25% to about 50% of the cells comprising SH-SY5Y and ND15 established cell lines; and was expressed on the cell surface of less than about 25% of the cells comprising ND3, ND8, N18, and Neuro-2a established cell lines (Table 2). The results also indicate that KOR was expressed on the cell surface of about 50% of the cells comprising SH-SY5Y and ND7 established cell lines; was expressed on the cell surface of between about 25% to about 50% of the cells comprising SiMa clone H10, SiMa P>33, ND15, and Neuro-2a established cell lines; and was expressed on the cell surface of less than about 25% of the cells comprising ND3, ND8, and N18 established cell lines (Table 2). The results also revelaed that MOR was expressed on the cell surface of about 50% of the cells comprising ND7, ND15, and SiMa P>33 established cell lines; was expressed on the cell surface of between about 25% to about 50% of the cells comprising SH-SY5Y, SiMa clone H10, ND8, and Neuro-2a established cell lines; and was expressed on the cell surface of less than about 25% of the cells comprising ND3 and N18 established cell lines (Table 2). The α-DOR rabbit polyclonal antibody RA10101 failed to work properly and no useable data was generated.

b. Identification of Cell Lines Using Ligand Binding.

To identify cells comprising established cell lines that express target receptors for a retargeted endopeptidase on the cell surface, ligand binding analysis was conducted. Cells from the candidate cell lines to be tested were seeded on a black-clear bottom 96-well plate for about 4 hours to promote attachment. To screen for the presence of an opioid or opioid-like receptors, media was then aspirated from each well and replaced with 50 μL of ligand solution containing either 0 (untreated control), 0.001 nM, 0.01 nM, 0.1 nM, or 1 nM of FAM-nociceptin (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Burlingame, CA); or either 0 (untreated control), 0.001 nM, 0.01 nM, 0.1 nM, or 1 nM of FAM-dynorphin A (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Burlingame, CA). Cells were incubated with the ligand solution for 1 hour in the 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide. The cells were washed to remove unbound ligand by washing the cells three times with 100 μL of 1×PBS. The plate was scanned on the Typhoon (Ex 488 and Em 520 nm), and then read on the M5 Plate Reader (Ex 495 and Em 520 nm) for RFU signals. The results indicate that cells comprising the SiMa clone H10, SH-SY5Y, and SK-N-DZ established cell lines bound nociceptin, whereas cells comprising the SiMa clone H10 also bound Dynorphin (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Cell lines Expressing Target Receptors on Cell Surface

Cell Lines Identified

Flow Cytometry

Target
More than 50%
25% to 50%
Less than 50%
Ligand Binding

Receptor
Expression
Expression
Expression
Nociceptin
Dynorphin A

ORL-1
AGN P33, SiMa,
SH-SY5Y, ND15
ND3, ND8, N18,
SiMa clone
—

SiMa clone H10,

Neuro-2a
H10, SH-SY5Y,

ND7, SK-N-DZ

SK-N-DZ

DOR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

KOR
SH-SY5Y, ND7
SiMa clone H10,
ND3, ND8, N18
—
SiMa clone H10

AGN P33, ND15,

Neuro-2a

MOR
ND7, ND15, AGN
SH-SY5Y, SiMa
ND3, N18
ND
ND

P33
clone H10, ND8,

Neuro-2a

Using a similar approach, cell lines comprising cells having cognate receptors for other re-targeted endopeptidases can be identified by FAM-labelling the targeting domain for these endopeptidases and screening cell lines as described above.

3. Single Dose Screening of Candidate Cell Lines Using Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Molecule.

To determine whether a cell line was able to uptake the appropriate re-targeted endopeptidase molecule, a suitable density of cells from a stock culture of the cell line being tested was plated into the wells of 24-well tissue culture plates containing 1 mL of an appropriate serum growth medium (Table 1). The cells were grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide until cells reached the desired density (approximately 18 to 24 hours). To assess the uptake of an opioid re-targeted endopeptidase, the growth media was aspirated from each well and replaced with either 1) fresh growth media containing no opioid re-targeted endopeptidase (untreated cell line) or 2) fresh growth media containing 30 nM for the nociceptin re-targeted endopeptidase (Noc/A) or 100 nM for the dynorphin re-targeted endopeptidase (Dyn/A) (treated cell line). After an overnight incubation, the cells were washed by aspirating the growth media and rinsing each well with 200 μL of 1×PBS. To harvest the cells, the 1×PBS was aspirated, the cells were lysed by adding 50 μL of 2×SDS Loading Buffer, the lysate was transferred to a clean test tube and the sample was heated to 95° C. for 5 minutes.

To detect for the presence of both uncleaved SNAP-25 substrate and cleaved SNAP-25 products, an aliquot from each harvested sample was analyzed by Western blot. In this analysis, a 12 μL aliquot of the harvested sample was separated by MOPS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using NuPAGE® Novex 12% Bis-Tris precast polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA) under denaturing, reducing conditions. Separated peptides were transferred from the gel onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA) by Western blotting using a TRANS-BLOT® SD semi-dry electrophoretic transfer cell apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). PVDF membranes were blocked by incubating at room temperature for 2 hours in a solution containing Tris-Buffered Saline (TBS) (25 mM 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol hydrochloric acid (Tris-HCl)(pH 7.4), 137 mM sodium chloride, 2.7 mM potassium chloride), 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaureate), 2% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), 5% nonfat dry milk. Blocked membranes were incubated at 4° C. for overnight in TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate), 2% BSA, and 5% nonfat dry milk containing either 1) a 1:5,000 dilution of an α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibody as the primary antibody (SMI-81; Sternberger Monoclonals Inc., Lutherville, MD); or 2) a 1:5,000 dilution of S9684 α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antiserum as the primary antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Both α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal and rabbit polyclonal antibodies can detect both the uncleaved SNAP-25 substrate and the SNAP-25 cleavage product, allowing for the assessment of overall SNAP-25 expression in each cell line and the percent of SNAP-25 cleaved after re-targeted endopeptidase treatment as a parameter to assess the amount of re-targeted endopeptidase uptake. Primary antibody probed blots were washed three times for 15 minutes each time in TBS, TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). Washed membranes were incubated at room temperature for 2 hours in TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate), 2% BSA, and 5% nonfat dry milk containing either 1) a 1:10,000 dilution of goat polyclonal anti-mouse immunoglobulin G, heavy and light chains (IgG, H+L) antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA) as a secondary antibody; or 2) a 1:10,000 dilution of goat polyclonal anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G, heavy and light chains (IgG, H+L) antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA) as a secondary antibody. Secondary antibody-probed blots were washed three times for 15 minutes each time in TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). Signal detection of the labeled SNAP-25 products were visualized using the ECL Plus™ Western Blot Detection System (GE Healthcare, Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) and the membrane was imaged and the percent of cleaved quantified with a Typhoon 9410 Variable Mode Imager and Imager Analysis software (GE Healthcare, Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The choice of pixel size (100 to 200 pixels) and PMT voltage settings (350 to 600, normally 400) depended on the individual blot.

Based on the detection of SNAP-25 cleavage product, the following cell lines exhibited uptake of 30 nM Noc/A: BE(2)-C, N18TG2, Neuro-2a, SiMa, SK-N-BE(2)-C, and SK-N-DZ (Table 3); whereas the following cell lines exhibited uptake of 100 nM Dyn/A: N18TG2, Neuro-2a, PC12, and SiMa. Some of these sensitive cell lines were tested with lower doses of compounds and/or with full dose responses.

TABLE 3

Single-Dose Screening of Candidate Cell Lines Using Retargeted Noc/A and Dyn/A

30 nM
100 nM

Noc/A
Dyn/A

Cell Line
Description
Source
Uptake
Uptake

BE(2)-C
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2268
Yes
NT

N18TG2
Mouse neuroblastoma
DSMZ ACC 103
Yes
Yes

ND3
Mouse neuroblastoma/primary neonatal rat
ECACC 92090901
NDA
NDA

DRG hybrid

ND7/23
Mouse neuroblastoma/primary rat DRG
ECACC 92090903
No
No

hybrid

ND8
Mouse neuroblastoma/primary neonatal rat
ECACC 92090904
NDA
NDA

DRG hybrid

ND15
Mouse neuroblastoma/primary neonatal rat
ECACC 92090907
No
No

DRG hybrid

Neuro-2a
Mouse neuroblastoma
ATCC CCL-131
Yes
Yes

NG108-15
Mouse neuroblastoma/rat glioma hybrid
ECACC 88112302
No
NT

PC12
Rat pheochromocytoma
ATCC CRL-1721
NT
Yes

SH-SY5Y
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2266
No
NT

SiMa
Human neuroblastoma
DSMZ ACC 164
Yes
Yes

SK-N-BE(2)-C
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2271
Yes
NT

SK-N-DZ
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2149
Yes
NT

SK-N-F1
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2142
No
NT

SK-N-SH
Human neuroblastoma
ECACC 86012802
No
NT

NT: Not tested.

NDA: No detectable amount of SNAP-25 was deteced in this cell line.

Using a similar approach, cell lines comprising cells having cognate receptors for other re-targeted endopeptidases can be assessed for retargeted endopeptidase uptake.

Example II—Screening of Candidate Clonal Cell Lines Endogenous Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Receptor Expression

1. Single Dose Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Screening of Candidate Clonal Cell Lines from a Parental SiMa Cell Line.

Companion patent application Zhu Hong et al., Cell Lines Useful in Immuno-Based Botulinum Toxin Serotype A Activity Assays, U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/160,199 discloses clonal cell lines derived from a parental SiMa cell line that were useful in a BoNT/A potency assay, as described in Ester Fernandez-Salas, et al., Immuno-Based Botulinum Toxin Serotype A Activity Assays, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/403,531, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. To determine whether these clonal cell lines were able to uptake the appropriate re-targeted endopeptidase, each was screened using an ECL sandwich ELISA assay.

To prepare a lysate treated with a retargeted endopeptidase, a suitable density of cells from a stock culture of the cell line being tested was plated into the wells of 96-well tissue culture plates containing 100 μL of an appropriate serum growth medium (Table 1) overnight. The media from the seeded cells was aspirated from each well and replaced with fresh media containing either 30 nM of a Noc/A retargeted endopeptidase or 80 nM of a Dyn/A retargeted endopeptidase. After a 24 hour incubation, the cells were washed by aspirating the growth media and rinsing each well with 200 μL of 1×PBS. To harvest the cells, 1×PBS was aspirated, the cells lysed by adding 30 μL of Lysis Buffer comprising 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100 to each well, and the plate incubated on a shaker rotating at 500 rpm for 30 minutes at 4° C. The plate was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4° C. to pellet cellular debris and the supernatant was transferred to a capture antibody coated 96-well plate to perform the detection step.

To prepare an α-SNAP-25₁₉₇capture antibody solution, the α-SNAP-25₁₉₇mouse monoclonal antibody contained in the ascites from hybridoma cell line 2E2A6 (Example XI) was purified using a standard Protein A purification protocol.

To prepare an α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution, α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antibody S9684 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was conjugated to Ruthenium(II)-tris-bipyridine-(4-methylsulfonate) NHS ester labeling reagent (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD). The conjugation reaction was performed by adding to 30 μL of distilled water reconstituted MSD SULFO-TAG™ stock solution to 200 μL of 2 mg/mL α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies and incubating the reaction at room temperature for 2 hours in the dark. The labeled antibodies were purified using a standard spin column protocol and the protein concentration determined using a standard colorimetric protein assay. The absorbance of the α-SNAP-25 antibody/MSD SULFO-TAG™ conjugate was measured at 455 nm using a spectrophotometer to determine the concentration in moles per liter. The detection antibody solution was stored at 4° C. until needed. Long term storage of unused aliquots was at −20° C.

To prepare an α-SNAP-25 solid phase support comprising an α-SNAP-25₁₉₇capture antibody, approximately 5 μL of the appropriate α-SNAP-25₁₉₇monoclonal antibody solution (20 μg/mL in 1×PBS) is added to each well of a 96-well MSD High Bind plate and the solution is allowed to air dry in a biological safety cabinet for 2-3 hours in order to liquid evaporate the solution. Blocked plates were sealed and stored at 4° C. until needed.

To detect the presence of a cleaved SNAP-25 product by ECL sandwich ELISA, the capture antibody-bound wells were then blocked by adding 150 μL of Blocking Buffer comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent (GE Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ) and 10% goat serum (VWR, West Chester, PA) at room temperature for 2 hours. The Blocking Buffer was aspirated, 25 μL of a lysate from cells treated with re-targeted endopeptidase was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 4° C. for overnight. Plate wells were washed three times by aspirating the cell lysate and rinsing each well three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing, 25 μL of 5 μg/mL α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent in 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate) was added to each well, sealed, and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour with shaking. After α-SNAP-25 detection antibody incubation, the wells were washed three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing 150 μL of 1× Read Buffer (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD) was added to each well and the plates were read using a SECTOR™ Imager 6000 Image Reader (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD). The raw data was collected using the ECL imager.

The results indicate that the parental SiMa cell line as well as clonal cell line H10 showed good uptake of the Noc/A retargeted endopeptidase (Table 4). In addition, these results reveal that many cell lines exhibited uptake of the Dyn/A retargeted endopeptidase (Table 4). Three clonal cell lines (1E11, AF4, and DC4) showed good uptake of the Dyn/A retargeted endopeptidase; eleven clonal cell lines (1E3, 2D2, 2D6, 3D8, 5C10, 5F3, 1BB10, BF8, CG8, CG10, and DE7) exhibited moderate uptake of the Dyn/A retargeted endopeptidase; and (3B8, 2B9, CE6, YB38, 4C8, 2F5, AC9, CD6, DD10, YF5) showed minimal uptake of the Dyn/A retargeted endopeptidase. Some of these candidate cell lines were tested in a full dose-response assay with the corresponding retargeted endopeptidase.

TABLE 4

Single-Dose Screening of Candidate Clonal

Cell Lines Using Retargeted Noc/A and Dyn/A

30 nM Noc/A
80 nM Dyn/A

Cell Line
Uptake
Uptake

AGN P33
+++
NT

A10
−
NT

D11
−
NT

H1
−
−

H10
+++
−

1D4
NT
−

2E4
NT
−

3D5
NT
−

3G10
NT
−

4D3
NT
−

BB3
NT
−

CC11
NT
−

DF5
NT
−

YB7
NT
−

BE3
NT
−

4B5
NT
−

2B9
NT
+

2F5
NT
+

3B8
NT
+

4C8
NT
+

AC9
NT
+

CD6
NT
+

CE6
NT
+

DD10
NT
+

YB8
NT
+

YF5
NT
+

1E3
NT
++

2D2
NT
++

2D6
NT
++

3D8
NT
++

5C10
NT
++

5F3
NT
++

BF8
NT
++

BB10
NT
++

CG8
NT
++

CG10
NT
++

DE7
NT
++

1E11
NT
+++

AF4
NT
+++

DC4
NT
+++

NT: Not Tested

−: no uptake;

+: minimal uptake;

++: moderate uptake;

+++: good uptake

2. Full Dose Response Screening of Candidate Cell Lines.

Established cell lines identified above, were subsequently evaluated using a full dose response of the appropriate re-targeted endopeptidase. Cells from the different cell lines were plated in 96-well plates and exposed to various concentrations of Noc/A (0, 0.14 nM, 0.4 nM, 1.23 nM, 3.7 nM, 11.1 nM, 33.3 nM, and 100 nM) or of Dyn/A (0.017 nM, 0.05 nM, 0.15 nM, 0.45 nM, 1.4 nM, 4.1 nM, 12 nM, 37 nM, 111 nM, 333 nM, and 1000 nM) for 24 hours. Retargeted endopeptidase-containing medium was then removed and replaced with fresh complete medium. Plates were incubated another 24 hours under 5% CO₂at 37° C. to allow for the cleavage of SNAP-25. Cells were lysed in the lysis buffer (Table 5) and plates centrifuged to eliminate debris. The lysates were used either in a Western blot assay or in a sandwich ELISA.

For the Western blot analysis, samples were assayed for the presence of both the intact SNAP-25 and the SNAP-25 cleavage product as described in Example I.

For the sandwich ELISA, ELISA plates coated with 2E2A6 monoclonal antibody were blocked with 150 μL Blocking Buffer at room temperature for 2 hours. After blocking buffer was removed, 25 μL of cell lysate was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 4° C. for 2 hours. Plates were washed three times with PBS-T and 25 μL of SULFO-TAG NHS-Ester labeled detection anti-SNAP25 pAb antibody at 5 μg/mL in 2% blocking reagent in PBS-T was added to the bottom corner of wells. The plates were sealed and shaken at room temperature for 1 hour, followed by three washes with PBS-T. After washes were completed, 150 μL of 1× Read Buffer per well was added and the plate was read in the S16000 Image reader. To determine the sensitivity of each one of the cell lines tested, and EC₅₀value was calculated for each cell line. The values for the Noc/A retargeted endopeptidase are summarized in Table 5. Full dose response of retargeted endopeptidase Dyn/A were only performed in PC12 and clone AF4. In both cases the assay did not reach an upper asymptote and an EC₅₀could not be calculated. The lower dose that produced a signal for the AF4 clone was 12 nM for both cell lines.

TABLE 5

Full-Dose Screening of Candidate Cell Lines Using Retargeted Noc/A and Dyn/A

EC₅₀
EC₅₀

Noc/A
Dyn/A

Cell Line
Description
Source
Uptake
Uptake

AGN P33
Human neuroblastoma
—
5-10
nM
NT

BE(2)-C
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2268
NT
NT

N18TG2
Mouse neuroblastoma
DSMZ ACC 103
NT
NT

N18
Mouse Neuroblastoma
ECACC 88112301
>100
nM
NT

ND3
Mouse neuroblastoma/primary neonatal
ECACC 92090901
NDA
NT

rat DRG hybrid

ND7/23
Mouse neuroblastoma/primary rat DRG
ECACC 92090903
>100
nM
NT

hybrid

ND8
Mouse neuroblastoma/primary neonatal
ECACC 92090904
NDA
NT

rat DRG hybrid

ND15
Mouse neuroblastoma/primary neonatal
ECACC 92090907
>100
nM
NT

rat DRG hybrid

Neuro-2a
Mouse neuroblastoma
ATCC CCL-131
30
nM
NT

NG108-15
Mouse neuroblastoma/rat glioma hybrid
ECACC 88112302
NT
NT

PC12
Rat pheochromocytoma
ATCC CRL-1721
NT
>1000 nM

SH-SY5Y
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2266
NT
NT

SiMa
Human neuroblastoma
DSMZ ACC 164
30
nM
NT

SiMa clone AF4
Human neuroblastoma
—
NT
>300 nM

SiMa clone H1
Human neuroblastoma
—
>100
nM
NT

SiMa clone H10
Human neuroblastoma
—
20
nM
NT

SK-N-BE(2)-C
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2271
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2149
0.5-2
nM
NT

SK-N-F1
Human neuroblastoma
ATCC CRL-2142
>100
nM
NT

SK-N-SH
Human neuroblastoma
ECACC 86012802
>100
nM
NT

NT: Not tested.

NDA: No detectable amount of SNAP-25 was deteced in this cell line.

Using a similar approach, clonal cell lines comprising cells having cognate receptors for other re-targeted endopeptidases can be screened and assessed for retargeted endopeptidase uptake.

Example III—Evaluation of Growth Conditions on Retargeted Endopeptidase Uptake in Candidate Cell Lines

The following example illustrates how to determine culture conditions, growth and differentiation, for established cell lines that maximize re-targeted endopeptidase uptake.

1. Effects of Cell Differentiation and Trophic Factors on Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Uptake of Candidate Cell Lines.

To determine whether cell differentiation or the present of trophic factors in the growth media improved re-targeted endopeptidase uptake, cell lines exhibiting good uptake of Noc/A were tested with different media compositions. A suitable density of cells from a stock culture of the SiMa P>30 cell line being tested was plated into the wells of 96-well tissue culture plates containing 100 μL of a serum-free medium containing RPMI1640, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin, 2 mM L-Glutamine, supplemented with B27, and N2, or 100 μL of a serum-free medium containing RPMI1640, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin, 2 mM L-Glutamine supplemented with B27, N2, and NGF (Nerve Growth Factor, 100 ng/mL). These cells were incubated in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide until the cells differentiated, as assessed by standard and routine morphological criteria, such as growth arrest and neurite extension (approximately 1 to 2 days). As a control, a suitable density of cells from a stock culture of the cell line being tested was plated into the wells of 96-well tissue culture plates containing 100 μL of an appropriate growth medium (Table 1) without or with NGF (100 ng/mL). These undifferentiated control cells were grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide until cells reach the desired density (approximately 18 to 24 hours). The media from both differentiated and undifferentiated control cultures was aspirated from each well and replaced with fresh media containing either 0 (untreated sample) or to various concentrations of Noc/A (0.14, 0.4, 1.23, 3.7, 11.1, 33.3, and 100 nM). After a 24 hours treatment, the cells were washed and incubated for 24 hours in retargeted endopeptidase-free media in order to increase the amount of SNAP25₁₉₇produced. Cells were then washed and harvested for the ECL sandwich ELISA assay as described in Example 1l.

Effects of trophic factors were also tested on the SK-N-DZ cell line. SK-N-DZ cells were plated on a poly-D-lysine coated 96-well plate at 25,000 cells per well in eight different SM media (Table 6) for 72 hours. Cells were treated in the same eight media with Noc/A at doses of 0, 0.3 nM, 3 nM, and 30 nM. After a 24 hour treatment, the cells were washed and incubated for 24 hours n retargeted endopeptidase-free media in order to increase the amount of SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product produced. Cells were then washed and harvested for the Western blot assay as described in Example 1.

Differentiation did not have an effect on Noc/A uptake in the SiMa>P30 cell line while it seemed to improve uptake in the SK-N-DZ cell line. The basal media had a significant effect on Noc/A uptake in the SK-N-DZ cell line with RPMI1640 comprising trophic factors N2 and B27 being the best combination. The presence of NGF in the media did not seem to improve uptake in the two cell lines tested.

TABLE 6

Effects of Trophic Factors and Cell Differentiation

on Noc/A Uptake of Candidate Cell Lines.

EC₅₀Noc/A Uptake

Undifferentiated
Differentiated
AGN P33
SK-N-DZ

DMEM, 10% FBS
—
NT
>30
nM

DMEM, 10% FBS, N2, B27
—
NT
3
nM

DMEM, 10% FBS, N2, B27, NGF
—
NT
3
nM

DMEM, 10% FBS, N2, B27, RA
—
NT
>30
nM

RPMI1640, 10% FBS
—
NT
10
nM

RPMI1640, 10% FBS, N2, B27
—
7.2 nM
1
nM

RPMI1640, 10% FBS, N2, B27,
—
9.1 nM
1
nM

NGF

RPMI1640, 10% FBS, N2, B27, RA
—
NT
10
nM

—
RPMI1640, N2, B27
10.2 nM
1
nM

—
RPMI1640, N2, B27, NGF
9.8 nM
0.6
nM

NGF: Nerve Growth Factor;

RA: Retinoic Acid

NT: Not tested

Using a similar approach, the growth and differentiation conditions for clonal cell lines comprising cells having cognate receptors for other re-targeted endopeptidases can be assessed.

Example IV—Development of Established Cell Lines Expressing Exogenous Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Receptors

The following example illustrates how to make an established cell line expressing an exogenous receptor for a re-targeted endopeptidase.

1. Transfection of Target Receptor into Cells Comprising a Candidate Cell Line.

The re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A comprises the nociceptin targeting domain which is the natural ligand of Opioid Receptor Like-1 (ORL-1). To obtain an expression construct comprising an open reading frame for an ORL-1, the expression construct pReceiver-M02/ORL-1 was obtained from GeneCopoeia (GeneCopoeia, Germantown, MD).

Alternatively, a polynucleotide molecule based on an ORL-1 amino acid sequence (e.g., the amino acid sequences SEQ ID NO:25 or SEQ ID NO:26) can be synthesized using standard procedures (BlueHeron® Biotechnology, Bothell, WA). Oligonucleotides of 20 to 50 bases in length are synthesized using standard phosphoramidite synthesis. These oligonucleotides will be hybridized into double stranded duplexes that are ligated together to assemble the full-length polynucleotide molecule. This polynucleotide molecule will be cloned using standard molecular biology methods into a pUCBHB1 vector at the SmaI site to generate pUCBHB1/ORL-1. The synthesized polynucleotide molecule is verified by sequencing using Big Dye Terminator™ Chemistry 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and an ABI 3100 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). If desired, an expression optimized polynucleotide molecule based on an ORL-1 amino acid sequence (e.g., the amino acid sequences SEQ ID NO:25 or SEQ ID NO:26) can be synthesized in order to improve expression in an Escherichia coli strain. The polynucleotide molecule encoding the ORL-1 can be modified to 1) contain synonymous codons typically present in native polynucleotide molecules of an Escherichia coli strain; 2) contain a G+C content that more closely matches the average G+C content of native polynucleotide molecules found in an Escherichia coli strain; 3) reduce polymononucleotide regions found within the polynucleotide molecule; and/or 4) eliminate internal regulatory or structural sites found within the polynucleotide molecule, see, e.g., Lance E. Steward et al., Optimizing Expression of Active Botulinum Toxin Type A, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0057575 (Mar. 6, 2008); and Lance E. Steward et al., Optimizing Expression of Active Botulinum Toxin Type E, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0138893 (Jun. 12, 2008). Once sequence optimization is complete, oligonucleotides of 20 to 50 bases in length are synthesized using standard phosphoramidite synthesis. These oligonucleotides are hybridized into double stranded duplexes that are ligated together to assemble the full-length polynucleotide molecule. This polynucleotide molecule is cloned using standard molecular biology methods into a pUCBHB1 vector at the SmaI site to generate pUCBHB1/ORL-1. The synthesized polynucleotide molecule is verified by DNA sequencing. If so desired, expression optimization to a different organism, such as, e.g., a yeast strain, an insect cell-line or a mammalian cell line, can be done, see, e.g., Steward, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0057575, supra, (2008); and Steward, U.S. Patent Publication 2008/0138893, supra, (2008). Exemplary polynucleotide molecules encoding an ORL-1 include SEQ ID NO:61 and SEQ ID NO:62.

To construct an expression construct encoding an ORL-1, a pUCBHB1/ORL-1 construct will be digested with restriction endonucleases that 1) excised the polynucleotide molecule encoding the open reading frame of ORL-1; and 2) enabled this polynucleotide molecule to be operably-linked to a pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). This insert will be subcloned using a T4 DNA ligase procedure into a pcDNA3 vector that will be digested with appropriate restriction endonucleases to yield pcDNA3/ORL-1. The ligation mixture will be transformed into electro-competent E. coli BL21(DE3) cells (Edge Biosystems, Gaitherburgs, MD) using an electroporation method, and the cells will be plated on 1.5% Luria-Bertani agar plates (pH 7.0) containing 50 μg/mL of ampicillin, and will be placed in a 37° C. incubator for overnight growth. Bacteria containing expression constructs will be identified as ampicillin resistant colonies. Candidate constructs will be isolated using an alkaline lysis plasmid mini-preparation procedure and will be analyzed by restriction endonuclease digest mapping to determine the presence and orientation of the insert. This cloning strategy will yielded a pcDNA3 expression construct comprising the polynucleotide molecule encoding an ORL-1.

The re-targeted endopeptidase Dyn/A comprises the dynorphin targeting domain which is the natural ligand of κ-opioid receptor (KOR). To obtain an expression construct comprising an open reading frame for an ORL-1, the expression construct pReceiver-M02/KOR-1 was obtained from GeneCopoeia (GeneCopoeia, Germantown, MD). Alternatively, expression constructs encoding the KOR can be synthesized and subcloned using an approach similar to the one described above to produce the expression construct pcDNA3.1/KOR. Exemplary KOR amino acid sequences include SEQ ID NO:29 and SEQ ID NO:30; exemplary polynucleotide molecules encoding a KOR include SEQ ID NO:65 and SEQ ID NO:66.

Similar cloning strategies can be used to make expression constructs encoding other re-target endopeptidase receptors, such as, e.g., pcDNA3.1/DOR or pcDNA3.1/MOR, pcDNA3.1/Galanin receptor 1, pcDNA3.1/Galanin receptor 2, or pcDNA3.1/Galanin receptor 3. Exemplary DOR amino acid sequences include SEQ ID NO:27 and SEQ ID NO:28; exemplary MOR amino acid sequences include SEQ ID NO:31 exemplary Galanin receptor 1 amino acid sequences include SEQ ID NO:136, SEQ ID NO:137, and SEQ ID NO:138; exemplary Galanin receptor 2 amino acid sequences include SEQ ID NO:139; and exemplary Galanin receptor 3 amino acid sequences include SEQ ID NO:140. Exemplary polynucleotide molecules encoding a DOR include SEQ ID NO:63 and SEQ ID NO:64; exemplary polynucleotide molecules encoding a MOR include SEQ ID NO:67; exemplary polynucleotide molecules encoding a Galanin receptor 1 include SEQ ID NO:141, SEQ ID NO:142, and SEQ ID NO:143; exemplary polynucleotide molecules encoding a Galanin receptor 2 include SEQ ID NO:144; and exemplary polynucleotide molecules encoding a Galanin receptor 3 include SEQ ID NO:145.

To introduce an expression construct encoding a re-targeted endopeptidase receptor, cell lines were transfected with an expression construct encoding a re-targeted endopeptidase receptor. To transfect a cell line with an opioid or opioid-like receptor, cells from a candidate cell line were seeded at a density of 1×10⁷cells in a T175 Collagen IV coated flask and grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide until cells reach the desired density. A 4.2 mL transfection solution is prepared by adding 4 mL of OPTI-MEM Reduced Serum Medium containing 200 μL of LipofectAmine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes to 4 mL of OPTI-MEM Reduced Serum Medium containing 20 μg of a pReceiver-M02/ORL-1 or 20 μg of pReceiver-M02/KOR-1. This transfection was incubated at room temperature for approximately 20 minutes. The media was replaced with 8 mL of fresh serum-free and antibiotic-free media and the transfection solution was added to the cells. The cells were then incubated in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide for approximately 16-18 hours. Transfection media was replaced with fresh growth media and incubate cells in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide. After 24 hours, the growth media were replaced with fresh growth media containing the antibiotic G418 at 1 mg/mL in the culture medium (selection medium) and cells were incubated for 7 days. The selection medium was changed every week for a total of 4 weeks (about 90% cells died and were removed during the weekly media changes).

Candidate cell lines transfected with the ORL-1 receptor included SiMa>P30, ND15, ND7, NG108-T15 and SK-N-DZ cell lines. Candidate cell lines transfected with the KOR-1 receptor included SiMa, SiMa>P30, ND15, ND7, NG108-T15 and SK-N-DZ cell lines. Transfected NG108-T15 cells did not survive selection in G418.

2. Single Dose and Dose Response Screening of Stable Transfected Cell Lines Using Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Molecules.

Cells from the transfected and selected candidate cell lines from the previous section were plated on 96-well poly-D-lysine or Collagen IV coated plates at 1×10⁵cells/well in medium RPMI1640 containing N2 and B27 supplements, and NGF (50-100 ng/ml) for 20±4 hours before compound treatment. Then the cells stably transfected with the ORL-1 receptor were treated with re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A at 30 nM in the same medium for 24±2 hours, except for the SK-N-DZ cell line that was treated at 10 nM. Cells were lysed in 120 μL lysis buffer, and 20 μL of the lysate was mixed with the 2×SDS buffer for the Western Blot assay that was performed as detailed in Example I. All of the cells lines displayed increase uptake of the re-targeted Noc/A compound when transfected with the ORL-1 receptor (Table 7).

TABLE 7

Cell lines stably transfected with ORL-1 tested

with re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A

% Cleaved SNAP25 at 30 nM

Non-

Cell line
Description
transfected
Transfected

AGN P33
Human Neuroblastoma
20%
40%

SK-N-DZ
Human Neuroblastoma
25% @ 10 nM
40% @ 10 nM

ND7
Mouse Neuroblastoma
10%
42%

and rat DRG cells hybrid

ND15
Mouse Neuroblastoma
8%
20%

and rat DRG cells hybrid

NG108-T15
Mouse neuroblastoma/rat
No cells
No cells

glioma hybrid
survive
survive

Cells from the transfected and selected candidate cell lines from the previous section were plated on 96-well poly-D-lysine or Collagen IV coated plates at 1×10⁵cells/well in medium RPMI1640 containing 10% FBS and N2 and B27 supplements for 20±4 hours before compound treatment. The cells stably transfected with the KOR-1 receptor were treated with re-targeted endopeptidase Dyn/A at 100 nM in the same medium for 24±2 hours. Cells were lysed in 120 μL lysis buffer, and 20 μL of the lysate was mixed with the 2×SDS buffer for the Western Blot assay that was performed as detailed in Example 1. All of the cells lines displayed increase uptake of the re-targeted Dyn/A compound when transfected with the human KOR-1 receptor.

3. Selection of Stably Transfected Clonal Cell Lines Exhibiting High Sensitivity by Serial Dilution

The following example illustrates how to identify clonal cells from a stably transfected established cell line that are susceptible to re-targeted endopeptidase action or have re-targeted endopeptidase uptake capacity.

For single cell cloning of the selected cells described above, the limited-dilution cell line cloning method was employed. Cells were trypsinized, counted, diluted to achieve 0.5-1 cell per 100 μL, and plated on selection media in five poly-D-lysine coated 96-well plates at 100 μL per well. Cells were incubated for more than 2 weeks until colonies formed on the bottom of the well. The positive colonies originating from single cells were marked. Pictures of single-cell derived clones were taken using a microscope camera. Cells from wells with single clones were grown for an additional week and transferred into 24 well plates about 4 weeks after cloning started.

For clone selection, the main parameter used to screen for positive clones was the highest amount of SNAP-25 cleavage obtained after Noc/A or Dyn/A treatment measured using the Western Blot analysis with the antibody that recognizes both intact and cleaved SNAP-25. Clones overexpressing ORL-1 were tested with 10 nM and 30 nM re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A overnight as soon as enough cells became available (Table 8). Clones overexpressing KOR-1 were tested with 100 nM re-targeted endopeptidase Dyn/A overnight (Table 9). In addition, clones overexpressing KOR-1 were tested on the Dynorphin binding assay as described in Example 1.

TABLE 8

Single-Dose Screening of Candidate Clonal Cell Lines Stably

transfected with ORL-1 Using re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A

10 nM
30 nM

Cell
Clone
Noc/A
Noc/A
Second screening @

Line
number
Uptake
Uptake
1 nM (% cleaved)

AGN P33
1
+
+
28%

AGN P33
2
++
+++
50%

AGN P33
3
−
+
NT

AGN P33
4
ND
ND
NT

AGN P33
5
−
+
31%

AGN P33
6
++
+++
60%

AGN P33
7
+
+
14%

AGN P33
8
+
+
NT

AGN P33
9
+
+
38%

AGN P33
10
+
++
29%

AGN P33
11
+
+
NT

AGN P33
12
+
+
27%

ND7
1C11
NT
++
NT

ND7
2F3
NT
−
NT

ND7
1D10
NT
−
NT

ND7
1F9
NT
−
NT

ND7
1G10
NT
−
NT

ND7
2D8
NT
−
NT

ND7
2E2
NT
−
NT

ND7
4B7
NT
+++
NT

ND7
3C11
NT
−
NT

ND7
3C3
NT
+
NT

ND7
3E8
NT
−
NT

ND7
3E11
NT
−
NT

ND7
2G3
NT
−
NT

ND7
4D5
NT
+
NT

ND7
4D8
NT
+
NT

ND7
4C8
NT
−
NT

ND7
4C9
NT
+++
NT

ND7
4E8
NT
+
NT

ND7
2E6
NT
++
NT

ND7
4F4
NT
+++
NT

ND7
5D6
NT
−
NT

ND7
5G3
NT
−
NT

ND7
4D5
NT
++
NT

ND15
1C10
NT
+
NT

ND15
1F10
NT
++
NT

ND15
2D8
NT
++
NT

ND15
2E11
NT
−
NT

ND15
2F4
NT
++
NT

ND15
2F10
NT
++
NT

ND15
2F11
NT
−
NT

ND15
3C4
NT
+
NT

ND15
3C7
NT
++
NT

ND15
3E8
NT
+++
NT

ND15
4C8
NT
+
NT

ND15
4D8
NT
+
NT

SK-N-DZ
#2
−
−
NT

SK-N-DZ
#4
−
−
NT

SK-N-DZ
#5
+++
++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#6
NT
++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#7
+
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#8
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#9
+
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#10
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#11
+
+++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#12
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#14
++
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#16
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#17
+
+++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#19
+
+++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#20
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#23
NT
++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#25
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#26
−
++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#27
+
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#28
++
+
NT

SK-N-DZ
#30
++
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#31
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#32
++
++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#33
+
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#34
+++
ND
NT

SK-N-DZ
#35
+
++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#36
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#37
+++
++
NT

SK-N-DZ
#42
−
NT
NT

SK-N-DZ
#43
+
++
NT

ND: Not Determined;

NT: Not Tested.

−: no uptake;

+: minimal uptake;

++: moderate uptake;

+++: good uptake

TABLE 9

Single-Dose Screening of Candidate Clonal Cell Lines Stably

transfected with KOR-1 Using re-targeted endopeptidase Dyn/A

Cell
Clone
100 nM Dyn/A
100 nM Dyn
Selected future

Line
number
Uptake
binding
testing

SiMa
2
−
−
No

SiMa
6
+
+
No

SiMa
8
+
+
No

SiMa
12
+++
++
Yes

SiMa
14
++
++
No

SiMa
20
+
++
No

SiMa
25
++
++
No

AGN P33
1
+++
+
Yes

AGN P33
3
++
+
No

AGN P33
5
++
+
Yes

AGN P33
6
++
+
No

AGN P33
7
+++
+
Yes

AGN P33
8
++
+
Yes

AGN P33
9
+++
+
Yes

AGN P33
10
+++
+
Yes

AGN P33
11
++
+
No

AGN P33
12
+++
+
Yes

AGN P33
14
+
+
No

AGN P33
16
++
+
No

AGN P33
17
+++
+
Yes

AGN P33
21
+
++
No

ND7
A1
+
+
No

ND7
A2
−
−
No

ND7
A3
−
−
No

ND7
A4
−
−
No

ND7
A5
−
−
No

ND7
A6
−
−
No

ND7
A7
−
−
No

ND7
A8
−
−
No

ND7
A9
−
−
No

ND7
A10
−
−
No

ND7
A11
−
−
No

ND7
A12
+++
+++
Yes

ND7
B1
−
−
No

ND7
B2
−
−
No

ND7
B3
−
−
No

ND7
B4
−
−
No

ND7
B5
+
+
Yes

ND7
B6
−
−
No

ND7
B7
−
−
No

ND7
B8
−
−
No

ND7
B9
−
−
No

ND7
B10
−
−
No

ND7
B11
−
−
No

ND7
B12
−
−
No

ND7
C1
−
−
No

ND7
C2
−
−
No

ND7
C3
−
−
No

ND7
C4
−
−
No

ND7
C5
−
−
No

ND7
C6
+
+
No

ND7
C7
−
−
No

ND7
C8
−
−
No

ND7
C9
−
−
No

ND7
C10
−
−
No

ND7
C11
−
−
No

ND7
C12
−
−
No

ND7
D1
−
−
No

ND7
D2
−
−
No

ND7
D3
−
−
No

ND7
D4
−
−
No

ND7
D5
−
−
No

ND7
D6
++
++
Yes

ND7
D7
++
++
Yes

ND7
D8
−
−
No

ND7
D9
−
−
No

ND7
D10
−
−
No

ND7
D11
−
−
No

ND7
D12
−
−
No

ND7
E1
−
−
No

ND7
E2
−
−
No

ND7
E3
−
−
No

ND7
E4
−
−
No

ND7
E5
−
−
No

ND7
E6
−
−
No

ND7
E7
−
−
No

ND7
E8
−
−
No

ND7
E9
−
−
No

ND7
E10
−
−
No

ND7
E11
−
−
No

ND7
E12
++
++
Yes

ND7
F1
−
−
No

ND7
F2
−
−
No

ND7
F3
−
−
No

ND7
F4
−
−
No

ND15
A1
−
−
No

ND15
A2
−
−
No

ND15
A3
+
−
No

ND15
A4
+
−
No

ND15
A5
−
−
No

ND15
A6
++
−
No

ND15
A7
++
−
No

ND15
A8
++
−
No

ND15
A9
+
−
No

ND15
A10
+
−
No

ND15
A11
−
−
No

ND15
A12
−
−
No

ND15
B1
−
−
No

ND15
B2
++
−
No

ND15
B3
−
−
No

ND15
B4
−
−
No

ND15
B5
+++
−
Yes

ND15
B6
+
−
No

ND15
B7
−
−
No

ND15
B8
−
−
No

ND15
B9
−
−
No

ND15
B10
−
−
No

ND15
B11
−
−
No

ND15
B12
−
−
No

ND15
C1
−
−
No

ND15
C2
+++
+
Yes

ND15
C3
−
−
No

ND15
C4
−
−
No

ND15
C5
+
NT
No

ND15
C6
+++
NT
Yes

SK-N-DZ
#11
NT
NT
ND

ND: Not Determined;

NT: Not Tested.

−: no uptake;

+: minimal uptake;

++: moderate uptake;

+++: good uptake

4. Dose Response Screening of Stably Transfected Clonal Cell Lines Using Re-Targeted Endopeptidase.

Candidate stably transfected clonal cell lines from section 3 showing good uptake of the re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A were tested in full dose response experiments to determine sensitivity and efficacy towards the re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A. Cells were plated on 96-well poly-D-lysine or Collagen IV coated plates at 1×10⁵cells/well in medium RPMI1640 containing N2 and B27 supplements, and NGF (50-100 ng/mL) for 20±4 hours before compound treatment. Cells from the parental AGN P33 cell line and the ND7 clonal cell lines were treated with 0, 0.14 nM, 0.4 nM, 1.23 nM, 3.7 nM, 11.1 nM 33.3 nM, and 100 nM of Noc/A in the same medium for 24 hours plus 24 hours incubation in re-targeted endopeptidase free media to allow for cleavage of SNAP-25. Cells from the parental AGN P33 cell line were also treated with 0, 0.03 nM, 0.08 nM, 0.24 nM, 0.74 nM, 2.22 nM, 6.67 nM, and 20 nM of Noc/A in the same medium for 24 hours plus 24 hours incubation in re-targeted endopeptidase free media to allow for cleavage of SNAP-25. Media was removed and cells washed and lysed for the ECL sandwich ELISA assay as detailed in Example 11. The data from the AGN P33 parental and the clonal cell lines stably transfected with the ORL-1 receptor is summarized in Table 10. Clones #2 and #6 demonstrated better sensitivity and efficacy towards the re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A than the parental cell line. Moreover, the increased sensitivity of the new clonal cell lines allowed the use of lower concentrations for the dose-response confirming the new clonal cell lines are more sensitive.

TABLE 10

Summary table of siqnal-to-noise ratios (S/N) and

EC₅₀values of the three most sensitive clones overexpressing

ORL-1 in the AGN P33 background cell line.

Parental
Clone 2
Clone 6
Clone 8

S/N Ratio 0.03 nM/BK

41
26
1.8

S/N Ratio 20 nM/BK

259
522
33.1

S/N Ratio 0.14 nM/BK

S/N Ratio 100 nM/BK

EC₅₀(nM)
6.8 ± 1.1
0.6 ± 0.1
0.7 ± 0.07
0.3 ± 0.2

The data from the ND7 parental and the clonal cell lines stably transfected with the ORL-1 receptor is summarized in Table 11. All the clones tested demonstrated improved sensitivity and efficacy towards the re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A than the parental cell line ND7. Clones 41B7, 1E6, and 1C11 were the most sensitive with EC₅₀values lower than 10 pM.

TABLE 11

Summary table of signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) and EC₅₀values of

the six most sensitive clones overexpressing ORL-1 in the ND7

background cell line.

Parental
1C11
4B7
4C9
4F4
1E6
3E9

S/N
1.7
9.3
11.1
5.3
3.6
5.8
5.1

Ratio

0.14

nM/BK

S/N
53
217
243
126
169
123
121

Ratio

100

nM/BK

EC₅₀
>50
8.6 ± 2
5.7 ± 0.5
33 ± 11
24 ± 5
6.7 ± 1
>30 nM

(nM)

Table 12 summarizes the results obtained with the generation and testing of clonal cell lines overexpressing the ORL-1 receptor in different cell backgrounds.

TABLE 12

Summary of clonal cell lines overexpressing

the Human ORL-1 receptor tested with Noc/A

Stable cell lines

Background

tested with full

Cell Line
Species
dose of Noc/A
EC₅₀(nM)

AGN P33
Human neuroblastoma
Three
0.6-2.5

ND7
Rat neuroblastoma
Six
3.7-8

and DRG hybrid

SK-N-DZ
Human neuroblastoma
None (seven stable
N/A

clones selected for

further studies)

Example V—Development of Clonal Cell Lines from a Parental SK-N-DZ Cell Line

The following example illustrates how to identify clonal cells from a parental established cell line that are susceptible to re-targeted endopeptidase inhibition of exocytosis or have re-targeted endopeptidase uptake capacity.

1. Isolation of Clonal Cell Lines.

During characterization of the SK-N-DZ cell line, it was discovered that the cells comprising this established cell line comprised at least five different cellular phenotypes. To determine whether any one of these phenotypically-distinct cell types was responsible for the susceptibility of this cell line to re-targeted endopeptidase inhibition of exocytosis, two different limited-dilution screens were conducted to obtain single colony isolates for each phenotypically-distinct cell type.

A suitable density of cells from a SK-N-DZ stock were grown in DMEM, 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (heat-inactivated), 0.1 mM Non-Essential Amino-Acids, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM Sodium Pyruvate, 100 U/ml Penicillin, 100 μg/ml Streptomycin, contained in a T175 Collagen IV coated flask. After the second passage, the cells were trypsin-treated to produce a cell suspension and the cell concentration was determined. About 4.0×10⁶cells from this cell suspension was transferred into a 50 mL tube and the cells were dissociated into single cells by repeated vigorous expulsion through an 18.5 gauge needle using a 10 mL syringe. Cells from this disassociated single-cell suspension were then diluted to a concentration of 0.2×10⁶cells/mL by adding 15 mL of fresh growth medium, and 2.5 μL of this dilution was added to 50 mL of fresh growth medium to obtain a concentration of 10 cells/mL. From this final dilution stock, 100 μL of growth medium was added to each well of a 96-well Collagen IV coated plates and the cells were grown undisturbed in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide for four weeks. Four 96-well plates were setup for analysis. After four weeks, each well was microscopically examined to identify growing single colonies, and for each colony identified 100 μL of fresh growth medium was added to each well and the cells were grown undisturbed in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide for two weeks. After two additional weeks of growth, the growing single colonies were trypsin-treated and transferred to a new 96-well plate for continued growth. Once colonies grew to about 1,000 cells, based on visual inspection, the cells were trypsin-treated and each cell-suspension was transferred into a new well from a 24-well Collagen IV-coated plate. The cells were grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide with fresh growth medium being replenished every 2-3 days, if needed. The cells were grown until the culture reached approximately 60% confluence or greater, at which point the cells were trypsin-treated and each cell-suspension was transferred into a 25 cm²Collagen IV-coated flask, based on the confluence of the cells in the 24-well plate. The cells were grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide with fresh growth medium being replenished every 2-3 days, if needed. Once the cells in the flask reached 70-80% confluence, they were frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen until the clonal cell lines were tested to determine their susceptibility to Noc/A inhibition of exocytosis. Of the 384 colony isolates initially setup from both screens, 24 clonal cell lines were selected based on viability and growth criteria and expanded for subsequent screening procedures. Of those, 12 fast growing cell lines were identified.

2. Primary Screen for Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Activity Susceptibility of Cells from a Clonal Cell Line Using a Re-Targeted Endopeptidase.

To determine whether cells from a clonal cell line were susceptible to re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A activity, a primary screen was conducted using an immuno-based method for determining endopeptidase activity.

Thirteen SK-N-DZ clones (#3, #4, #5, #8, #9, #10, #13, #15, #16, #17, #18, #22, and #23) plus SK-N-DZ parental cells were plated on a 96-well plate (unknown cell number per well) in EMEM, 10% FBS, 1×B27, and 1×N2 and incubated overnight. Cells were treated with 1 nM Noc/A for 24 hours. Cells were lysed with 100 μL of lysis buffer for 20 minutes and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes. Fifty microliters of 2×SDS Sample buffer were added to 50 μL of cell lysate and heated at 95° C. for 5 minutes. Ten microliters of protein sample were loaded per lane on 12% NuPage gels and a Western Blot assay was performed as described in Example I. Evaluation of the total SNAP-25 and the cleaved SNAP-25 demonstrated that clones #3, #8, #15, and #22 were at least as good as parental cells for Noc/A uptake. Full dose response treatment and analysis with the ECL sandwich ELISA assay was conducted after the cells were scale up.

3. Secondary Response Screening of Clonal Cell Lines Using Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Molecule.

To determine whether cells from a clonal cell line were susceptible to re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A activity, a secondary screen was conducted using an immuno-based method for determining endopeptidase activity.

To further compare these SK-N-DZ cloned cell lines, the ECL sandwich ELISA assay was carried out. Five clones (#3, #9, #15, #16, #22) plus SK-N-DZ parental cells were plated on one 96-well Poly-D-lysine coated plate per cell line at 25,000 cells per well in RPMI 1640, 10% FBS, 1×B27, and 1×N2 media (no NGF) over the weekend. Cells were treated with Noc/A at doses from 0 to 20 nM (0, 0.03, 0.08, 0.24, 0.74, 2.22, 6.67, 20 nM) for 24 hours. The cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇was quantified with the ECL ELISA assay as detailed in Example I.

Table 13 shows the EC₅₀values and signal to noise for the five clones and their parental cell line. Three clones named #3, #9, and #15 generated lower EC₅₀values (<1 nM) and clone #16 and #22 generated similar EC₅₀values when compared to the parental cell line (˜2 nM). However, the total signals from cleaved SNAP25 were higher in clones #3, #22, and the parental cells. Clones #9, #16, and #15 had lower total signals when compared to the rest of the cell lines.

TABLE 13

Summary table of signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) and EC₅₀values of the

five clones obtained from SK-N-DZ cells by limited-dilution cloning.

Parental
3
9
19
16
22

S/N
2
3
2
2
2
3

Ratio

0.03

nM/BK

S/N
19
27
12
8
14
20

Ratio

20

nM/BK

EC₅₀
2.6 ± 1.5
0.8 ± 0.07
0.7 ± 0.04
0.6 ± 0.1
2.2 ± 0.8
1.9 ± 0.6

(nM)

Conditions for Noc/A treatment on SK-N-DZ clones were optimized and an assay was run comparing clones #3, #15, and #22, and the parental heterogeneous SK-N-DZ cell line. Table 14 shows the result of the comparison and demonstrated that assay optimization has greatly improved the signal to noise for the assay. Clones #3 and #22 were selected for further assay development as they possess excellent sensitivity and efficacy.

TABLE 14

Summary table of signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) and EC₅₀values of three

clones obtained from SK-N-DZ cells using optimized conditions.

Parental
3
15
22

S/N Ratio 0.03 nM/BK
15
8
5
10

S/N Ratio 20 nM/BK
107
89
33
60

EC₅₀(nM)
0.6 ± 0.2
0.9 ± 0.2
0.6 ± 0.1
0.4 ± 0.09

Example VI—Characterization and Comparison of Clonal Cell Lines for Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Uptake

The following example illustrates how to characterize and compare clonal cell lines originated either from an established cell line comprising a heterogeneous population or by transfection of the target receptor and subsequent cloning of the cell line.

To evaluate the specificity or selectivity of re-targeted endopeptidase uptake, non-specific uptake assays were performed using of a re-targeted endopeptidase lacking the targeting domain. For opioid re-targeted endopeptidase, cells from the AGN P33 clone #6 cell line (comprising cells stably transformed with an expression construct encoding an ORL-1 receptor) and the SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines #3 and #22 (comprising cells that express endogenous ORL-1 receptor) were seeded at 150,000 cells per well on a 96-well Poly-D-lysine coated plate in RPMI 1640 serum free media containing N2 and B27 supplements, and NGF (50 ng/mL) and incubated for 20±4 hours at 37° C. in a 5% CO₂incubator before compound treatment. Cells were treated with 8-doses of Noc/A ranging from 0-20 nM or 0-40 nM and/or eight doses of LH_N/A ranging from 0 to 400 nM or 0 to 40 nM in the same medium for 22 hours. Media was removed and cells washed, lysed, and centrifuged to eliminate debris in preparation for a sandwich ELISA assay. An ELISA plate coated with 2E2A6 monoclonal antibody was blocked with 150 μL Blocking Buffer at room temperature for 1 hour. After blocking buffer was removed, 30 μL of cell lysate was added to each well and the plate was incubated at 4° C. for 2 hours. Plates were washed three times with PBS-T and 30 μL of SULFO-TAG NHS-Ester labeled detection α-SNAP25 polyclonal antibodies at 5 μg/mL in 2% blocking reagent in PBS-T was added to the bottom corner of wells. The plate was sealed and shaken at room temperature for 1 hour, followed by three washes with PBS-T. After washes were completed, 150 μL of 1× Read Buffer per well was added and the plate was read in the S16000 Image reader. The results comparing Noc/A uptake relative to the negative control LH_N/A are shown in Table 15 and Table 16. These results indicate that there was good separation between Noc/A and LH_N/A uptake in both cell lines demonstrating specific uptake of Noc/A.

TABLE 15

Non-specific uptake for SK-N-DZ clone #3. Summary

of four independent experiments

% non-specific
SEM (standard error

nM
uptake
of the mean)

0
2
0.5

1
6
0.5

2
8
0.5

5
10
1

15
19
0.9

44
33
1.5

133
65
2.4

400
93
2.3

TABLE 16

Non-specific uptake for hORL-1 #6 cells.

Summary of three independent experiments

% non-specific
SEM (standard error

nM
uptake
of the mean)

0
1
0.2

1
2
0.2

2
3
0.6

5
3
0.3

15
8
1.3

44
12
1.9

133
22
3.0

400
32
3.0

Table 17 summarizes the results for the characterization and comparison of the three cell lines. SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines #3 and #22 possess a sensitivity identical to the primary eDRG and an excellent signal-to-noise to develop a robust assay for re-targeted endopeptidase Noc/A. The AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 is also an excellent candidate with low non-specific uptake and adequate sensitivity.

TABLE 17

Parameter
SK-N-DZ clone 3
SK-N-DZ clone 22
AGN P33 clone 6
eDRG

Cell line species
Human Clonal
Human Clonal
Human Clonal
Rat primary

Cell Receptor
Human ORL1
Human ORL1
Human ORL1
Rat ORL1

Expression
endogenous
endogenous
transfected
endogenous

Dynamic Range
0.03 to 20 nM dose
0.03 to 20 nM
0.04 to 40 nM dose
0.17 to 20 nM dose

response
dose response
response
response

Sensitivity (EC₅₀)
EC₅₀= 0.75 ± 0.1
EC₅₀= 0.8 ± 0.2
EC₅₀= 2.4 ± 0.2
EC₅₀= 0.8 ± 0.15

(N = 10)
(N = 9)
(N = 21)
(N = 6)

ULOQ
20 nM
20 nM
20 nM
10-20 nM

S/N ULOQ/
98 ± 15 (N = 10)
86 ± 17 (N = 9)
385 ± 32 (N = 19)
~300

background

S/N LLOQ/
12 ± 2 (N = 11)
10 ± 2 (N = 9)
29 ± 7 (N = 18)
N/A

background

Specificity vs LH_N/A
≥2 logs (N = 4)
≥2 logs (N = 4)
≥2 logs (N = 3)
N/A

SNAP-25 Expression
Endogenous
Endogenous
Endogenous
Endogenous

Competition with
Full competition
Full competition
Partial competition
N/A

Nociceptin Var.
(n = 4)
(n = 4)
(n = 4)

Inhibition by Ab Anti-
Full competition
Full competition
Full competition
N/A

nociceptin
(n = 4)
(n = 4)
(n = 4)

Inhibition by Anti-868
Partial competition
Partial competition
Partial competition
N/A

Ab
(N = 3)
(N = 3)
(N = 3)

To evaluate the sensitivity of re-targeted endopeptidase uptake, ligand saturation binding assays were performed. The interaction of most ligands with their binding sites can be characterized in terms of binding affinity (NIH Assay Guidance). In general, high affinity binding involves a longer residence time for the ligand at its receptor binding site than in the case of low affinity binding. The dissociation constant is commonly used to describe the affinity between a ligand (L) (such as a drug) and a protein (P) i.e. how tightly a ligand binds to a particular protein. An equilibrium saturation binding experiment measures total and nonspecific binding (NSB) at various radioligand concentrations. The equilibrium dissociation constant or affinity for the radioligand, K_d, and the maximal number of receptor binding sites, Bmax, can be calculated from specific binding (total—NSB) using non-linear regression analysis. The K_dfor the specific binding can be calculated using a one-site binding hyperbola nonlinear regression analysis (i.e. GraphPad Prism) as shown in the equation below, where Bmax is the maximal number of binding sites (pmol/mg, or pmol/cells, or sites/cells), and K_d(nM, pM, etc.) is the concentration of radioligand required to reach half-maximal binding:

$Bound = \frac{B_{\max} \times [L]}{[L] + K_{4}}$

For opioid re-targeted endopeptidase, cells from the AGN P33 clone #6 cell line (comprising cells stably transformed with an expression construct encoding an ORL-1 receptor), the SK-N-DZ parental cell line, and the SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines #3, #15, and #22 (comprising cells that express endogenous ORL-1 receptor) were plated at 200,000 cells per well on a 48-well Poly-D-lysine coated plate in RPMI 1640 serum free media containing 1×N2 and 1×B27 supplements and incubated overnight at 37° C. in a 5% CO₂incubator. Media was removed and cells and 150 μL of Tris binding buffer was added to wells used to assess total binding and 100 μL of Tris binding buffer was added to well used to assess non-specific binding. About 50 μL of 4× final concentration cold nociceptin (2.5 μM to SK-N-DZ cell lines and 1 μM to AGN P33 clonal cell line #6) was added to the non-specific binding wells, and 50 μL of 4× final concentrations of ³H-nociceptin (0 nM, 0.05 nM, 0.1 nM, 0.2 nM, 0.4 nM, 0.8 nM, 1.6 nM, 3.1 nM, 6.3 nM, 12.5 nM, 25 nM, and 50 nM to the SK-N-DZ cell lines and 0, 0.01 nM, 0.02 nM, 0.039 nM, 0.078 nM, 0.156 nM, 0.313 nM, 0.625 nM, 1.25 nM, 2.5 nM, 5.0 nM, and 10 nM to the AGN P33 clonal cell line #6) was added to both the total binding wells and the non-specific binding wells to a final volume of 200 μL. After incubation at 37° C. for 30 minutes, the wells were washed twice in 0.5 mL of cold Washing Buffer. Cells were then denatured in 200 μL 2 N NaOH and transferred to 20 mL scintillation vials containing 5 mL of scintillation fluid. Raw data were used to plot the dose-response graphs and calculate the K_dfor each sample. The raw data obtained were transferred to SigmaPlot v10.0 and One Site Saturation fit was used to define the dose-response curves under the equation category of Ligand Binding. Graphical reports were generated and contained the following parameters: R²(correlation coefficient), Bmax, and K_d±SE (Coefficient±standard error). Graphs of total binding, specific binding, and non-specific binding were obtained on the assay performed on the SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines #3, #15, and #22, and AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 cells. SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines #3 and #22 produced a concentration-dependent and saturable binding of ³H-nociceptin. Under the same experimental conditions, SK-N-DZ clonal cell line #15 produced a dose-dependent response of ³H-nociceptin, but not saturated at the highest dose of 50 nM. Compared to the SK-N-DZ cell lines expressing endogenous ORL-1, cells from the AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 had significantly higher affinity binding to ³H-nociceptin (highest dose was 10 nM versus 50 nM in SK-N-DZ) with low non-specificity binding.

The saturation binding curves of SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines #3, #22, #15 and AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 were used to estimate K_dand Bmax values from three independent binding experiments per cell line performed in three different days. The rank order of these four cell lines is: AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 (Kd=1.86 nM and Bmax=2.9 fmol/cell)>SK-N-DZ clonal cell line #3 (Kd=14 nM and Bmax=0.6 fmol/cell)>SK-N-DZ clonal cell line #22 (Kd=17 nM and Bmax=0.6 fmol/cell)>>SK-N-DZ clonal cell line #15 (K_d>50 nM). To get a saturated dose-response for SK-N-DZ clonal cell line #15, a higher dose range of ³H-nociceptin needs to be used. Table 16 summarizes the data regarding the characterization of the specific plasma membrane nociceptin-binding sites in three SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines, #3, #15, and #22, and AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 stable cell lines. The data showed the following: 1) a high affinity site with very low non-specific binding (K_d, 1.8 nM, and Bmax 2.9 fmol per cell) in the AGN P33 clonal cell line #6; 2) nociceptin-binding can be performed on SK-N-DZ native cells expressing endogenous receptor; 3) AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 had about 10-fold higher affinity to nociceptin than the SK-N-DZ cell lines; 4) as seen in the cell-based potency assay, SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines #3 and #22 (Kd 14-17 nM, Bmax 0.6 fmol per cell) had more receptor sites per cell than SK-N-DZ clonal cell line #15 (not saturable under the same dose range).

TABLE 18

Summary of ³H-nociceptin saturation binding assay for

four leading cell lines (n = 3 independent experiments)

Cell Lines
K_d(nM ± SD)
Bmax (fmol/cell)

SK-N-DZ #3

14 ± 1.6
0.59

SK-N-DZ #15
>50
ND

SK-N-DZ #22
16.7 ± 1.1
0.58

AGN P33 clonal cell
1.86 ± 0.1
2.89

line #6

To evaluate the sensitivity of re-targeted endopeptidase uptake, the amount of re-targeted endopeptidase receptor expressed at the mRNA level was assessed using RT-PCR. The amount of receptor expressed in the cells is an important aspect of the characterization of the cell line being used for testing and it is related to the sensitivity to re-targeted endopeptidases. The amount of expressed re-targeted endopeptidase receptor can also be a tool for screening other potential cell lines and to eliminate cell lines that do not express the target receptor. One method of measuring receptor expression is to quantify the amount of re-targeted endopeptidase receptor mRNA using real time PCR (RT-PCR).

For opioid re-targeted endopeptidase, RNA was isolated from cells of a non-transfected parental SiMa cell line, cells from the AGN P33 clonal cell line #6, cells from the parental SK-N-DZ cell line, and cells from the SK-N-DZ clonal cell lines #3 and #22 grown in either serum free media or media with serum. The mRNA was converted to cDNA and the ORL-1 was amplified and measured real time to determine the relative amount present in each cell line using the following oligonucleotide primers for ORL-1: forward 5′-CACTCGGCTGGTGCTGGTGG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:148) and reverse 5′-AATGGCCACGGCAGTCTCGC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:149). The DNA is quantified by using SYBR® green which fluoresces relative to the amount of double stranded DNA (PCR product) present in the reaction. Plotting the amount of fluorescence vs. number of cycles gives a logistic curve for each reaction. The faster a reaction reaches the linear phase of the curve the more ORL-1 receptor cDNA there is in the reaction. A control RT reaction where no enzyme is added was be used to determine if there is contamination. Since there is no RT enzyme present in this reaction, no cDNA will be produced. A PCR product cannot be produced using a RNA template, so if a PCR curve appears in the −RT reaction, the only possibility is genomic DNA contamination. In the −RT reactions, no PCR plots appears, confirming there was minimal genomic DNA contamination (data not shown). Table 18 lists the cell lines with their CT value. The CT is the number of PCR cycles it took for that corresponding PCR reaction to produce a signal above a set threshold. The amount of ORL-1 receptor mRNA in a cell line can be compared to another by looking at their corresponding CT values. According to the CT values, cells from the AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 had much more ORL-1 mRNA than cells from the parental SiMa cell line in serum free media (Ave CT: 28.6 vs. 17.3) and in media with serum (Ave CT: 26.1 vs. 16.5). Also, there appears to be minimal difference in mRNA obtained from cells at passage 6 vs. passage 16 in the AGN P33 clonal cell line #6. Also, there are minimal differences in CT values and plots in the parental SK-N-DZ cell line vs. clonal cell line #3 and #22. This conclusion is true in cells grown in media with serum and serum free media and reflects the similarity of these cell lines observed in the cell-based potency assay for Noc/A.

TABLE 19

Average CT Values for ORL-1 Expression in Cell Lines

Media
Cell line
CT average

Serum Free Media
SiMa Parental p26
28.6

SiMa hORL-1 clone #6 p6
17.3

SiMa hORL-1 clone #6 p16
17.3

Complete Media
SiMa Parental p26
26.1

SiMa hORL-1 clone #6 p6
16.4

SiMa hORL-1 clone #6 p16
16.6

Serum Free Media
SK-N-DZ
26.3

SK-N-DZ clone #3
25.9

SK-N-DZ clone #22
26.6

Complete Media
SK-N-DZ
26.2

SK-N-DZ clone #3
25.8

SK-N-DZ clone #22
26.4

Example VII—Development of α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibodies that Selectively Bind a SNAP-25 Epitope Having a Free Carboxyl-terminus at the P₁Residue of the BoNT/A Cleavage Site Scissile Bond

The following example illustrates how to make α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond.

1. Generation of α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibodies.

To develop monoclonal α-SNAP-25 antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, the 13-residue peptide CDSNKTRIDEANQ_COOH(SEQ ID NO:38) was designed as a SNAP-25 cleavage product antigen. This peptide comprises a flexible linker region and a N-terminal Cysteine residue for conjugation to KLH and amino acids 186-197 of human SNAP-25 (SEQ ID NO:5) with a carboxylated C-terminal glutamine (SEQ ID NO:38). The generation of monoclonal antibodies to well-chosen, unique peptide sequences provides control over epitope specificity, allowing the identification of a particular subpopulation of protein among a pool of closely related isoforms. Blast searches revealed that this peptide has high homology only to SNAP-25 and almost no possible cross-reactivity with other proteins in neuronal cells. The sequence was also carefully scrutinized by utilizing computer algorithms to determine hydropathy index, protein surface probability, regions of flexibility, and favorable secondary structure, followed by proper orientation and presentation of the chosen peptide sequence. The peptide was synthesized and conjugated to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) to increase immunogenicity. Six Balb/c mice were immunized with this peptide, and after three immunizations in about eight weeks, the mice were bled for testing. The blood was allowed to clot by incubating at 4° C. for 60 minutes. The clotted blood was centrifuged at 10,000×g at 4° C. for 10 minutes to pellet the cellular debris. The resulting serum sample was dispensed into 50 μl aliquots and stored at −20° C. until needed.

A similar strategy based on other SNAP-25 antigens disclosed in the present specification is used to develop α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. For example, the SNAP-25 antigen of SEQ ID NO:45 can be conjugated to KLH instead of the SNAP-25 antigen of SEQ ID NO:38. As another example, the amino acids 186-197 of human SNAP-25 from the SNAP-25 antigen of SEQ ID NO:38 can be replaced with SEQ ID NO:32, SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:40, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, or SEQ ID NO:44.

2. Screening for the Presence of α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibodies.

To determine the presence of an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, comparative ELISA and cell-based cleavage assay were performed using the extracted mouse serum. For comparative ELISA, two fusion proteins were constructed: BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-197of SEQ ID NO:48 and the BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-206of SEQ ID NO:49. BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-197comprised a naturally-biotinylated 16 amino acid BirA peptide of SEQ ID NO:50 amino-terminally linked to a SNAP-25 peptide comprising amino acids 134-197 of SEQ ID NO:5. BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-206comprised a naturally-biotinylated 16 amino acid BirA peptide of SEQ ID NO:50 amino-terminally linked to a SNAP-25 peptide comprising amino acids 134-206 of SEQ ID NO:5. These two substrates were suspended in 1×PBS at a concentration of 10 μg/mL BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-197and the BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-206. The BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-197and the BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-206were coated onto separate plates by adding approximately 100 μl of the appropriate Substrate Solution and incubating the plates at room temperature for one hour. Washed plates were incubated at 37° C. for one hour in 0.5% BSA in 1×TBS containing a 1:10 to 1:100 dilution of an antibody-containing serum derived from one of the six immunized mice (Mouse 1, Mouse 2, Mouse 3, Mouse 4, Mouse 5, and Mouse 6). Primary antibody probed plates were washed four times for 5 minutes each time in 200 μl TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). Washed plates were incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour in 1×TBS containing a 1:10,000 dilution of goat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated to Horseradish peroxidase (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) as a secondary antibody. Secondary antibody-probed plates were washed four times in 200 μl TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). Chromogenic detection of the labeled SNAP-25 products were visualized by chromogenic detection using ImmunoPure TMB substrate kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). The development of a yellow color in the BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-197coated plates, but not the BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-206coated plates, indicated that the α-SNAP-25 antibody preferentially recognized the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product. The resulted indicated that of the six mice used for immunization, three mice (Mouse 2, Mouse 3, and Mouse 4) had higher titers and more specificity towards a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond.

These results were confirmed using an ELISA light chain activity assay. A 96-well Reacti-Bind Streptavidin coated plates (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) were prepared by adding approximately 100 μl of the following Substrate Solution: Rows A-C were coated with 100 μL of BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-197at twelve different concentrations, Rows D-H were coated with 100 μL of BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-206at 10 μg/mL. The plates were washed by aspirating the Substrate Solution and rinsing each well three times with 200 μl TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). Dilutions of BoNT/A were pre-reduced at 37° C. for 20 minutes in BoNT/A Incubation Buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1% fetal bovine serum, 10 μM ZnCl₂, 10 mM dithiothreitol) and 100 μl of the pre-reduced BoNT/A was added to the substrate-coated plates and incubated at 37° C. for 90 minutes. BoNT/A treated plates were washed by aspirating the BoNT/A Incubation Buffer and rinsing each plate three times with 200 μl TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). Washed plates were incubated at 37° C. for one hour in 0.5% BSA in 1×TBS containing a 1:10 to 1:100 dilution of the antibody-containing serum being tested. Primary antibody probed plates were washed four times for 5 minutes each time in 200 μl TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). Washed plates were incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour in 1×TBS containing a 1:10,000 dilution of goat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated to Horseradish peroxidase (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) as a secondary antibody. Secondary antibody-probed plates were washed four times in 200 μl TBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). Chromogenic detection of the labeled SNAP-25 products were visualized by chromogenic detection using ImmunoPure TMB substrate kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). The development of a yellow color, which correlated with the presence of the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product was detected in BoNT/A treated samples, but not untreated controls, using antibody-containing serum derived from all six immunized mice (Mouse 1, Mouse 2, Mouse 3, Mouse 4, Mouse 5, and Mouse 6). Thus, the comparative ELISA analysis indicated that of the mice used for immunization, three mice (Mouse 2, Mouse 3, and Mouse 4) had higher titers and more specificity towards a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond.

For cell-based cleavage assay, a suitable density of PC12 cells were plated into 60 mm²tissue culture plates containing 3 mL of an appropriate serum medium (Table 1). The cells were grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide until cells reached the appropriate density. A 500 μL transfection solution was prepared by adding 250 μL of OPTI-MEM Reduced Serum Medium containing 15 μL of LipofectAmine 2000 (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA) incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes to 250 μL of OPTI-MEM Reduced Serum Medium containing 10 μg of a pQBI-25/GFP-BoNT/A-LC expression construct (SEQ ID NO:51). The pQBI-25/GFP-BoNT/A-LC expression construct comprises a pQBI-25 expression vector (Qbiogene Inc., Carlsbad, CA) whose promoter elements are functionally linked to a polynucleotide encoding the GFP-BoNT/A light chain of SEQ ID NO:52. This transfection mixture was incubated at room temperature for approximately 20 minutes. The media was replaced with fresh unsupplemented media and the 500 μL transfection solution was added to the cells. The cells were then incubated in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide for approximately 6 to 18 hours. The cells were washed and harvested as described in Example II. To detect for the presence of the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product, an aliquot from each harvested sample was analyzed by Western blot as described in Example II, except that the primary antibody used was a 1:1,000 dilution of the antibody-containing serum and the secondary antibody used was a 1:20,000 of mouse α-IgG Horseradish Peroxidase (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). A single band corresponding to the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product was detected in BoNT/A treated samples, but not untreated controls, using antibody-containing serum derived from three mice (Mouse 2, Mouse 3, and Mouse 4). Thus, the cell-based cleavage assay indicated that of the mice used for immunization, three mice (Mouse 2, Mouse 3, and Mouse 4) had higher titers and more specificity towards a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond.

3. Production of Hybridomas.

To make hybridomas producing α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, the spleen from Mouse 2 was harvested three days subsequent to a final “booster” immunization and the spleen cells were fused with myeloma cells P3-X63 Ag8.653 using standard hybridoma protocols. These cells were plated into five 96-well plates and hybrids were selected using HAT medium. Within 8-14 days after fusion, the first screening of the approximately 480 parent clones was carried out using comparative ELISA with the BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-197and the BirA-HisTag®-SNAP-25_134-206peptides coated in two separate plates. The comparative ELISA provided a quick screen method to identify hybridomas producing antibodies specific for the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇. The top 18 clones were subjected to further screening using the cell-based cleavage assay described above and immunostaining of LC/A transfected cells. (Table 20).

TABLE 20

Analysis of Supernatants Containing α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibody

Comparative ELISA
Cell-Based

OD
OD

Assay

SNAP-
SNAP-

SNAP-
SNAP-

Clone
25₁₉₇
25₂₀₆
Ratio_197/206
Ratio_296/197
25₁₉₇
25₂₀₆

1D3
1.805
0.225
8.02
0.13
+++
−

1F12
0.365
0.093
3.92
0.25
−
−

1G10
0.590
0.137
4.31
0.23
++
−

1H1
0.335
0.121
2.77
0.36
−
−

1H8
0.310
0.302
1.03
0.97
+
−

2C9
0.139
0.274
0.51
1.97
−
−

2E2
0.892
0.036
24.78
0.04
++
−

2E4
0.228
0.069
3.30
0.30
+
−

2F11
1.095
1.781
0.61
1.63
−
−

3C1
1.268
0.053
23.92
0.04
++
−

3C3
0.809
0.052
15.56
0.06
++
−

3E1
0.086
0.155
0.55
1.80
0
−

3E8
2.048
0.053
38.64
0.03
+++
−

3G2
0.053
0.158
0.34
2.98
−
−

4D1
0.106
0.218
0.49
2.06
−
−

4G6
0.061
0.159
0.38
2.61
−
−

5A5
0.251
0.106
2.37
0.42
+
−

5F11
0.243
0.061
3.98
0.25
−
−

Clones 1D3, 1G10, 2E2, 3C1, 3C3, and 3E8 were further cloned by limiting dilution because the conditioned media produced by these clones comprised α-SNAP-25 antibodies with a preferential binding specificity having a ratio_197/206of at least 4:1 for the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product relative to the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate and detected the SNAP-25₁₉₇-cleavage product using the cell-based cleavage assay and the immunostaining of PC12 cells transfected with GFP-LC/A. Similarly clones 2C9, 2F11, 3G2, 4D1 and 4G6 were further cloned by limiting dilution because the conditioned media produced by these clones comprised α-SNAP-25 antibodies with a preferential binding specificity having a ratio_206/197of at least 1.5:1 for the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate relative to the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product and detected the SNAP-25₂₀₆-uncleaved substrate using the cell-based cleavage assay. These single-cell derived clones were screened again using comparative ELISA, cell-based cleavage, and immunostaining to confirm their affinity and specificity, and the antibodies were isotyped using standard procedures. Ascites were produced from clones 1D3B8 (IgM.k), 1G10A12 (IgG3.k), 2C9B10 (IgG3.k), 2E2A6 (IgG3.k), 2F11B6 (IgM.k), 3C1A5 (IgG2a.k), and 3C3E2 (IgG2a.k). Clone 3E8 stopped producing antibodies during the cloning process and could not be further evaluated.

4. Evaluation of Binding Specificity of α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibodies.

To evaluate binding specificity of an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, ascites from clones 1D3B8, 1G10A12, 2C9B10, 2E2A6, 2F11B6, 3C1A5, and 3C3E2 were used to detect SNAP-25 cleavage product using the cell-based activity assay, immunocytochemistry and immunoprecipitation.

For the cell-based activity assay, binding specificity was determined by analyzing the ability of α-SNAP-25 antibody-containing ascites to detect the uncleaved SNAP-25₂₀₆substrate and the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product by Western blot analysis. A suitable density of PC12 cells were plated into 60 mm²tissue culture plates containing 3 mL of an appropriate serum medium, grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide until an appropriate cell density was reached, and transfected with the either a transfection solution lacking the pQBI-25/GFP-BoNT/A-LC expression construct (untransfected cells) or a transfection solution containing the pQBI-25/GFP-BoNT/A-LC expression construct (transfected cells) as described above. The cells were washed and harvested as described in Example I. To detect for the presence of both the uncleaved SNAP-25₂₀₆substrate and the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product, an aliquot from each harvested sample was analyzed by Western blot as described in Example I, except that the primary antibody used was a 1:100 dilution of the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody-containing ascites and the secondary antibody used was a 1:20,000 of α-mouse IgG conjugated to Horseradish Peroxidase (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). In addition, three commercially available mouse α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies were tested. SMI-81 (Sternberger Monoclonals Inc., Lutherville, MD), an α-SNAP-25 antibody the manufacturer indicates detects both the uncleaved SNAP-25₂₀₆substrate and the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product, was used at a 15,000 dilution according to the manufacturer's recommendations. MC-6050 (Research & Diagnostic Antibodies, Las Vegas, NV), an α-SNAP-25 antibody the manufacturer indicates detects both the uncleaved SNAP-25₂₀₆substrate and the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product, was used at a 1:100 dilution according to the manufacturer's recommendations. MC-6053 (Research & Diagnostic Antibodies, Las Vegas, NV), an α-SNAP-25 antibody the manufacturer indicates detects only the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product, was used at a 1:100 dilution according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Table 21 indicates the α-SNAP-25 antibody-containing ascites that detected only the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product. The cell-based cleavage assay indicated that ascites produced from clones 1D3B8, 2C9B10, 2E2A6, 3C1A5, and 3C3E2 synthesize an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody having high binding specificity for the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product that allows for the selective recognition of this cleavage product relative to the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate. Commercial antibody SMI-81 detected the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate, but only poorly recognized the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product (Table 21). Surprisingly, commercial antibody MC-6050 only detected the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate, and failed to recognize the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product (Table 21). Even more surprisingly, commercial antibody MC-6050 only detected the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate, and failed to recognize the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product, even though the manufacturer advertises that this antibody selectively detects the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product (Table 21). Thus, this analysis indicates that while 1D3B8, 2C9B10, 2E2A6, 3C1A5, and 3C3E2 exhibit suitable selectivity for the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product, 1G10A12 and 2F11B6 do not. In addition, commercial antibodies SMI-81, MC-6050 and MC-6053 all are unsuitable for the immuno-based methods disclosed in the present application because all failed to selectivity detect the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product.

For immunocytochemistry analysis, binding specificity was determined by analyzing the ability of α-SNAP-25 antibody-containing ascites to detect the uncleaved SNAP-25₂₀₆substrate and the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product by immunostaining. See e.g., Ester Fernandez-Salas et al., Plasma Membrane Localization Signals in the Light Chain of Botulinum Neurotoxin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 101(9): 3208-3213 (2004). A suitable density of PC12 cells were plated, grown, and transfected with either a transfection solution lacking the pQBI-25/GFP-BoNT/A-LC expression construct (untransfected cells) or a transfection solution containing the pQBI-25/GFP-BoNT/A-LC expression construct (transfected cells) as described above. The cells were washed in 1×PBS and fixed in 5 mL of PAF at room temperature for 30 minutes. Fixed cells were washed in phosphate buffered saline, incubated in 5 mL of 0.5% Triton® X-100 (polyethylene glycol octylphenol ether) in 1×PBS, washed in 1×PBS, and permeabilized in 5 mL of methanol at −20° C. for six minutes. Permeabilized cells were blocked in 5 mL of 100 mM glycine at room temperature for 30 minutes, washed in 1×PBS, and blocked in 5 mL of 0.5% BSA in 1×PBS at room temperature for 30 minutes. Blocked cells were washed in 1×PBS and incubated at room temperature for two hours in 0.5% BSA in 1×PBS containing a 1:10 dilution of an ascites from a clonal hybridoma cell line being tested. Primary antibody probed cells were washed three times for 5 minutes each time in 1×PBS. Washed cells were incubated at room temperature for 2 hours in 1×PBS containing a 1:200 dilution of goat polyclonal anti-mouse immunoglobulin G, heavy and light chains (IgG, H+L) antibody conjugated to ALEXA® FLUOR 568 (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA) as a secondary antibody. Secondary antibody-probed cells were washed three times for 5 minutes each time in 1×PBS. Washed cells were prepared for microscopic examination by mounting in VECTASHIELD® Mounting Media (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and coverslipped. Images of signal detection were obtained with a Leica confocal microscope using appropriate laser settings. Table 21 indicates that the α-SNAP-25 antibody-containing ascites that specifically detected the SNAP-25₁₉₇-cleavage product. The immunocytochemistry analysis indicated that ascites produced from clones 1 D3B8, 2C9B10, 2E2A6, 3C1A5, and 3C3E2 synthesize an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody having high binding specificity for the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product that allows for the preferential recognition of this cleavage product relative to the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate.

For immunoprecipitation analysis, binding specificity was determined by analyzing the ability of Protein A (HiTrap™ Protein A HP Columns, GE Healthcare, Amersham, Piscataway, NJ), purified α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies to precipitate the uncleaved SNAP-25₂₀₆substrate and the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product. See e.g., Chapter 8 Storing and Purifying Antibodies, pp. 309-311, Harlow & Lane, supra, 1998a. A suitable density of PC12 cells were plated, grown, and transfected with either a transfection solution containing a pQBI-25/GFP expression construct (control cells, SEQ ID NO:53) or a transfection solution containing the pQBI-25/GFP-BoNT/A-LC expression construct (experimental cells) as described above. The pQBI-25/GFP expression construct comprises an expression vector whose promoter elements are functionally linked to a polynucleotide encoding GFP of SEQ ID NO:54. After an overnight incubation, the cells were washed by aspirating the growth media and rinsing each well with 200 μL 1×PBS. To harvest the cells, the PBS was aspirated, the cells were lysed by adding an Immunoprecipitation Lysis Buffer comprising 50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM EGDT, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton® X-100 (polyethylene glycol octylphenol ether) and a 1× COMPLETE™ Protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Biosciences, Indianapolis, IN) and incubating at 4° C. for one hour. The lysed cells were centrifuged at 3,000×g at 4° C. for 10 minutes to remove cellular debris and the supernatant transferred to a clean tube and diluted to a protein concentration of approximately 1 mg/mL. Approximately 5 μg of purified monoclonal antibody was added to 0.5 mL of diluted supernatant and incubated at 4° C. for two hours. After primary antibody incubation, approximately 50 μL of immobilized Protein G (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) was added to the diluted supernatant and incubated at 4° C. for one hour. The incubated supernatant was washed three times for 30 minutes each time by adding 0.5 mL of Immunoprecipitation Lysis Buffer, centrifuging at 300×g at 4° C. for one minute to pellet the immobilized Protein G, and decanting the supernatant. After washing, the pellet was resuspended in 30 μl of 1×SDS Loading Buffer and the sample was heated to 95° C. for 5 minutes. To detect for the presence of both the uncleaved SNAP-25₂₀₆substrate and the cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product, an aliquot from each harvested sample was analyzed by Western blot as described in Example I, except that the primary antibody used was a 1:1,000 dilution of the α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibody serum (see Example V) and the secondary antibody used was a 1:20,000 of rabbit α-IgG Horseradish Peroxidase (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Table 21 indicates the α-SNAP-25 antibody-containing ascites that specifically pulled down the SNAP-25₁₉₇-cleavage product by immunoprecipitation analysis. The immunoprecipitation analysis indicated that ascites produced from clones 2E2A6 and 3C1A5 synthesize an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody having high binding specificity for the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product that allows for the preferential recognition of this cleavage product relative to the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate.

TABLE 21

Analysis of Clone Ascites Containing α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibody

Immuno-
Immuno-

Cell-Based Assay
cytochemistry
cytochemistry

SNAP-
SNAP-
SNAP-
SNAP-
SNAP-
SNAP-

Clone
25₁₉₇
25₂₀₆
25₁₉₇
25₂₀₆
25₁₉₇
25₂₀₆

1D3B8
++
−
++
−
Not
Not

Tested
Tested

1G10A12
++
++
Not
Not
Not
Not

Tested
Tested
Tested
Tested

2C9B10
++
−
++
−
Not
Not

Tested
Tested

2E2A6
++
−
++
−
++
−

2F11B6
+
+
+
+
Not
Not

Tested
Tested

3C1A5
++
−
++
−
++
−

3C3E2
+
−
Not
Not
Not
Not

Tested
Tested
Tested
Tested

MC-6050
−
+
Not
Not
Not
Not

Tested
Tested
Tested
Tested

MC-6053
−
+
Not
Not
Not
Not

Tested
Tested
Tested
Tested

SMI-81
−/+
++
Not
Not
Not
Not

Tested
Tested
Tested
Tested

5. Evaluation of Binding Affinity of α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibodies

To determine the binding affinity of an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody showing high binding specificity for either the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product or the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate, binding affinity assays were performed on a BIAcore® 3000 instrument using carboxymethyl dextran (CM5) sensor chips (BIAcore, Inc., Piscataway, NJ). Runs were conducted at 25° C. with HBS-EP buffer comprising 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM sodium chloride, 3 mM EDTA, 0.005% (v/v) surfactant P₂₀at a flow rate of 10 μL/min. SNAP-25 peptides comprising amino acids 134-197 of SEQ ID NO:5 (SNAP-25_134-197) or amino acids 134-206 of SEQ ID NO:5 (SNAP-25_134-206) were covalently attached to the surface of the CM5 sensor chips using standard amine coupling. Briefly, the CM5 chips were activated by a 7 minute injection of a mixture of 0.2 M 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide and 0.05 M N-hydroxysuccinimide; the SNAP-25 peptides were then injected in 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.0) for 20 min at a flow rate of 10 μL/min; and unreacted succinimide esters were blocked by a 7-min injection of 1 M ethanolamine hydrochloride, pH 8.5. The immobilized amount of SNAP-25_134-197or SNAP-25_134-206on the chip was reflected by a 100-150 increase in response units (about 0.10-0.15 ng/mm²). Antibody samples comprising either ascites or purified monoclonal antibodies produced from clones 1D3B8, 2C9B10, 2E2A6, 3C1A5, and 3C3E2, as well as, commercially available α-SNAP-25 antibodies were passed over the surface of the CM5 chips allowing an association time of 10 min and a dissociation time of 20 min. The surfaces were regenerated between runs by a 1 minute injection of 10 mM glycine-HCl (pH 2.5) at a flow rate of 15 μL/min. Sensorgram curves were fitted to a 1:1 kinetic binding model with the BIAevaluation 3.0 software.

The results indicate that both 2E2A6 and 3C1A5 were highly specific for cleaved SNAP-25₁₉₇product over SNAP-25 uncleaved substrate (Table 22). When compared to the binding affinities of MC-6050 and MC-6053, 1 D3B6 had an approximately 10-fold higher equilibrium disassociation constant for the SNAP-25 cleavage product relative to these commercial antibodies (Table 22). Interestingly, 2E2A6 had only a slightly lower equilibrium disassociation constant for the SNAP-25 cleavage product relative to these commercial antibodies (0.405 nM versus 0.497 and 0.508)(Table 22). As neither of these commercial α-SNAP-25 antibodies selectively recognized the SNAP-25 cleavage product (Table 21), an equilibrium disassociation constant lower than about 0.5 nM appears, in part, critical to achieve such selectivity. Similarly, when compared to the binding affinities of MC-6050 and MC-6053, 2E2A6 had an about at least one-fold slower off rate/dissociation constant (6.74×10⁻⁵versus 8.82×10⁻⁴s⁻¹and 1.18×10⁻³s⁻¹) (Table 22). This further suggests that an off rate/dissociation constant lower than about 8.82×10⁻⁴appears, in part, critical to achieve selective binding for the SNAP-25 cleavage product. This result is consistent with 1 D31B8, which had an off rate/dissociation constant of 5.78×10⁻⁵s⁻¹(Table 22).

TABLE 22

Analysis of Binding Affinity α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibodies

SPR
1D3B8
2E2A6

Parameter
SNAP-25₁₉₇
SNAP-25₂₀₆^a
SNAP-25₁₉₇
SNAP-25₂₀₆^b

Ka (M⁻¹s⁻¹)
1.06 × 10⁶
—
1.70 × 10⁶
—

(1.66 × 10⁵)
(—)

Kd (s⁻¹)
5.78 × 10⁻⁵
—
1.53 × 10⁻⁴
—

(6.74 × 10⁻⁵)
(—)

KD (nM)
0.050
—
0.090
—

(0.405)
(—)

SPR
3C1A5
2C9B10

Parameter
SNAP-25₁₉₇
SNAP-25₂₀₆^c
SNAP-25₁₉₇
SNAP-25₂₀₆^d

Ka (M⁻¹s⁻¹)
2.17 × 10⁵
—
1.15 × 10⁴
—

Kd (s⁻¹)
2.88 × 10⁻⁴
—
3.11 × 10⁻⁴
—

KD (nM)
1.33
—
27.1
—

SPR
MC-6050
MC-6053

Parameter
SNAP-25₁₉₇
SNAP-25₂₀₆
SNAP-25₁₉₇
SNAP-25₂₀₆

Ka (M⁻¹s⁻¹)
1.78 × 10⁶
3.06 × 10²
2.32 × 10⁶
1.06 × 10²

Kd (s⁻¹)
8.82 × 10⁻⁴
6.07 × 10⁻³
1.18 × 10⁻³

2.56 × 10⁻⁵

KD (nM)
0.497
19,800
0.508
240

^aNo binding was observed when up to 125 nM of α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody 1D3B8 was passed over the surface of the CM5 sensor chip after a 10 minute association time.

^bNo binding was observed when up to 10 μM of α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody 2E2A6 was passed over the surface of the CM5 sensor chip after a 10 minute association time.

^cNo binding was observed when up to 100 nM of α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody 3C1A5 was passed over the surface of the CM5 sensor chip after a 10 minute association time.

^dNo binding was observed when up to 100 nM of α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody 2C9B10 was passed over the surface of the CM5 sensor chip after a 10 minute association time.

To compare the six different antibodies, the on-rate (ka) and off-rate (kd) for each was normalized using a program from the BIA evaluation 4.1 software. For comparison of the on-rates, the data were first individually trimmed by deleting the re-generation portion and the injection spikes, and then normalized to a 0 to 100 scale. For comparison of the off-rate, the data were normalized to the injection stop/top point. This analysis showed that 2C91B10 had a much slower on-rate than the other antibodies (FIG. 7A), and that MC-6053 has a much faster off-rate (dissociation) that the other antibodies (FIG. 7B). The fast off-rate of MC-6053 indicates that this antibody will not perform well in the methods disclosed in the present specification because this antibody will have difficulty staying bound to the substrate antigen during the washing steps.

6. Sequencing of the Epitope from Isolated α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibodies.

To determine the epitope of an isolated α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, the polynucleotide molecule encoding the variable heavy (V_H) and variable light (V_L) chains of the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody produced by hybridomas 1D3B8, 2C9B10, 2E2A6, 3C1A5 and 3C3E2 were sequenced. mRNA was extracted and purified from each hybridoma using standard protocols and reversed transcribed into cDNA using either an oligo dT anti-sense primer or a gene-specific (murine IgG1 CH and kappa CL) anti-sense primer. Specific murine and human constant domain primers were used to amplify the cDNA by PCR after cDNA production to determine the isotype of the antibody. Degenerate V_Hand V_Lprimers were used to amplify the variable domains from the cDNA. For 5′RACE, a homopolymeric dCTP tail was added to the 3′ end of the cDNA. The heavy and light chains were then amplified with an oligo dG sense primer and a gene specific (CH/KC) anti-sense primer. PCR products included the sequence of the signal peptide, variable domains and constant domains up to the anti-sense primer. The PCR products were gel purified to remove small fragments, and cloned into a blunt or TA vector for sequencing. Five independent clones for each chain were sequenced and alignments of V_Hand V_Lchains and consensus sequences were determined. Methods used to determine the V_Hand V_Lamino acid sequences are described in, e.g., Roger A. Sabbadini, et al., Novel Bioactive Lipid Derivatives and Methods of Making and Using Same, U.S. Patent Publication 2007/0281320, and Peter Amersdorfer, et al., Molecular Characterization of Murine Humoral Immune Response to Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Binding Domain as Assessed by Using Phage Antibody Libraries, 65(9) Infect. Immun. 3743-3752, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In addition, commercial services are available to sequence the variable heavy (V_H) and variable light (V_L) chains of an antibody and identify the CDR regions, see, e.g., Fusion Antibodies Ltd., Northern Ireland. In one case, for the 3C1A5 V_Lregion, the amino acid sequence was also determined by separating the affinity purified antibody by high resolution 2DE electrophoresis and then subjecting the protein to peptide fragmentation fingerprinting analysis using high resolution nanoLC-MSMS after proteolytic digestion.

The polynucleotide sequence comprising the V_Hand V_Lchains of the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody produced by the hybridomas disclosed in the present specification is as follows: 1D3B8 V_H(SEQ ID NO:71), 2C9B10 V_H(SEQ ID NO:73), 2E2A6 V_H(SEQ ID NO:75), 3C1A5 V_H(SEQ ID NO:77), 3C3E2 V_Hvariant 1 (SEQ ID NO:79), 3C3E2 V_Hvariant 2 (SEQ ID NO:81), 3C3E2 V_Hvariant 3 (SEQ ID NO:132), 1D3B8 V_L(SEQ ID NO:83), 2C9B10 V_L(SEQ ID NO:85), 2E2A6 V_L(SEQ ID NO:87), 3C1A5 V_L(SEQ ID NO:89), and 3C3E2 V_L(SEQ ID NO:91). The amino acid sequence comprising the V_Hand V_Lchains of the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody produced by the hybridomas disclosed in the present specification is as follows: 1D3B8 V_H(SEQ ID NO:72), 2C9B10 V_H(SEQ ID NO:74), 2E2A6 V_H(SEQ ID NO:76), 3C1A5 V_H(SEQ ID NO:78), 3C3E2 V_Hvariant 1 (SEQ ID NO:80), 3C3E2 V_Hvariant 2 (SEQ ID NO:82); 3C3E2 V_Hvariant 2 (SEQ ID NO:133), 1 D3B8 V_L(SEQ ID NO:84), 2C9B10 V_L(SEQ ID NO:86), 2E2A6 V_L(SEQ ID NO:88), 3C1A5 V_L(SEQ ID NO:90), and 3C3E2 V_L(SEQ ID NO:92). The amino acid sequences comprising the V_Hand V_LCDR domains of the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody produced by the hybridomas 1 D3B8, 2C91B10, 2E2A6, 3C1A5, and 3C3E2 are given in Table 23.

TABLE 23

CDR Sequences of V_H and V_L domains from

α-SNAP-25 Monoclonal Antibodies

SEQ

Identi-
ID

CDR
Sequence
fied In
NO:

V_H
TFTDHSIH
2E2A6
93

CDR 1

2C9B10

3C1A5

V_H
TFTNYVIH
3C3E2
94

CDR 1

V_H
IFTDHALH
1D3B8
95

CDR 1

V_H
YIFPGNGNIEYNDKFKG
2E2A6
96

CDR 2

V_H
YLFPGNGNFEYNEKFKG
2C9B10
97

CDR 2

3C1A5

V_H
YINPYNDGSKYNEKFKG
3C3E2
98

CDR 2

V_H
YIFPGNGNIEYNEKFKG
1D3B8
99

CDR 2

V_H
KRMGY
2E2A6
100

CDR 3

3C1A5

V_H
KKMDY
2C9B10
101

CDR 3

1D3B8

V_H
ARMDY
3C3E2var1
102

CDR 3

V_H
ARMGY
3C3E2var2
134

CDR 3

V_H
ARHLANTYYYFDY
3C3E2var3
135

CDR 3

V_L
RSSQSIVHSNGNTYLE
1D3B8
103

CDR 1

V_L
RTTENIYSYFV
2C9B10
104

CDR 1

V_L
KSSQSLLYTNGKTYLT
2E2A6
105

CDR 1

V_L
KSSQSLLNTNGKTYLT
3C1A5
106

CDR 1

V_L
RASQNIGNYLH
3C3E2
107

CDR 1

V_L
KVSNRFS
1D3B8
108

CDR 2

V_L
NAKSLAE
2C9B10
109

CDR 2

V_L
LVSELDS
2E2A6
110

CDR 2

V_L
LVSKLDS
3C1A5
111

CDR 2

V_L
YASQSIS
3C3E2
112

CDR 2

V_L
FQGSHVPPT
1D3B8
113

CDR 3

V_L
QHHYGTPYT
2C9B10
114

CDR 3

V_L
LQSAHFPFT
2E2A6
115

CDR 3

V_L
LQSSHFPFT
3C1A5
116

CDR 3

V_L
QQSDTWPLT
3C3E2
117

CDR 3

Non-limiting examples of amino acid sequences comprising V_HCDR domain variants of the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody produced by the hybridomas disclosed in the present specification include V_HCDR1 variant SEQ ID NO: 118 for 1D31B8; V_HCDR1 variant SEQ ID NO: 119 for 2C9B110, 2E2A6 and 3C1A5 V_H; V_HCDR1 variant SEQ ID NO:120 for 3C1A5 V_Hand 3C3E2 variant 3; V_HCDR2 variant SEQ ID NO:121 for 1D3B8 and 2E2A6; V_HCDR2 variant SEQ ID NO:122 for 2C91B10 and 3C1A5 V_H; V_HCDR2 variant SEQ ID NO:123 for 3C1A5 V_Hand 3C3E2 variant 3; V_HCDR3 variant MDY for 1 D3B8 and 2C91B10; V_HCDR3 variant MGY for 2E2A6 and 3C1A5 V_H; and V_HCDR3 variant SEQ ID NO:124 for 3C1A5 V_Hand 3C3E2 variant 3. Non-limiting examples of amino acid sequences comprising V_LCDR domain variants of the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody produced by the hybridomas disclosed in the present specification include V_LCDR1 variant SEQ ID NO:125 for 1D3B8; V_LCDR1 variant SEQ ID NO:126 for 2C9B10; V_LCDR1 variant SEQ ID NO:127 for 2E2A6; V_LCDR1 variant SEQ ID NO:128 for 3C1A5; V_LCDR1 variant SEQ ID NO:129 for 3C3E2; V_LCDR2 variant KVS for 1 D3B8; V_LCDR2 variant NAK for 2C9B10; V_LCDR2 variant LVS for 2E2A6; V_LCDR2 variant YAT for 3C1A5; and V_LCDR2 variant YAS for 3C3E2.

Example VIII—Development of α-SNAP-25 Polyclonal Antibodies that Selectively Bind a SNAP-25 Epitope Having a Free Carboxyl-Terminus at the P₁Residue of the BoNT/a Cleavage Site Scissile Bond

The following example illustrates how to make α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 epitope having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond.

To develop α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, the 10-residue peptide CGGGRIDEANQ (SEQ ID NO:46) was designed as a SNAP-25 cleavage product antigen. This peptide comprising a N-terminal Cysteine residue for conjugation to KLH, a G-spacer flexible spacer (GGG) linked to amino acids 191-197 of human SNAP-25 (SEQ ID NO:5) and has a carboxylated C-terminal glutamine. Blast searches revealed that this peptide has high homology only to SNAP-25 and almost no possible cross-reactivity with other proteins in neuronal cells. The sequence was also carefully scrutinized by utilizing computer algorithms to determine hydropathy index, protein surface probability, regions of flexibility, and favorable secondary structure, followed by proper orientation and presentation of the chosen peptide sequence. The peptide was synthesized and conjugated to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) to increase immunogenicity. Before the animals were immunized, naïve rabbits were first screened against cell lysates from candidate cell lines in a Western blot in order to identify animals that had no immunoreactivity to the proteins present in the cell lysates. Two pre-screened rabbits were immunized with this peptide, and after three immunizations in about eight weeks, the rabbits were bled for testing. The blood was allowed to clot by incubating at 4° C. for 60 minutes. The clotted blood was centrifuged at 10,000×g at 4° C. for 10 minutes to pellet the cellular debris. The resulting serum sample was dispensed into 50 μL aliquots and stored at −20° C. until needed.

A similar strategy based on other SNAP-25 antigens disclosed in the present specification is used to develop α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. For example, the SNAP-25 antigen of SEQ ID NO:47 can be conjugated to KLH instead of the SNAP-25 antigen of SEQ ID NO:46. As another example, the amino acids 191-197 of human SNAP-25 from the SNAP-25 antigen of SEQ ID NO:38 can be replaced with SEQ ID NO:33, SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35, SEQ ID NO:36, SEQ ID NO:37, SEQ ID NO:39, SEQ ID NO:40, SEQ ID NO:41, SEQ ID NO:42, SEQ ID NO:43, or SEQ ID NO:44.

2. Screening for the Presence of α-SNAP-25 Polyclonal Antibodies.

To determine the presence of α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, comparative ELISA and cell-based cleavage assays were performed using the extracted rabbit serum as described in Example III. The serum from both rabbits contained α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond. The α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antibodies were designated as NTP 22 and NTP 23.

3. Purification of α-SNAP-25 Polyclonal Antibodies.

To purify α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, NTP 22 and NTP 23 antibodies from rabbit serum were purified using affinity columns containing the SNAP-25 antigen of SEQ ID NO:46.

4. Evaluation of Binding Specificity of α-SNAP-25 Polyclonal Antibodies.

To evaluate binding specificity of an α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibody that can selectively bind to a SNAP-25 antigen having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond, purified NTP 22 and NTP 23 α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies were used to detect cleavage product using the cell-based activity assay, immunocytochemistry and immunoprecipitation as described in Example III. The cell-based cleavage assay, immunocytochemistry analysis and immunoprecipitation analysis all indicated that NTP 22 and NTP 23 α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies did not cross-react with uncleaved SNAP-25. Thus both NTP 22 and NTP 23 have high binding specificity for the SNAP-25₁₉₇cleavage product that allows for the preferential recognition of this cleavage product relative to the SNAP-25₂₀₆uncleaved substrate. Affinity for the antigens can be determined using SPR in the BiAcore as described in Example III.

Example IX
Component and Condition Preparation for a Sandwich ELISA

The following example illustrates how to identify and prepare the components and conditions necessary to perform a sandwich ELISA useful for conducting immuno-based methods of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity by detecting a SNAP-25 cleavage product using an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody specific for a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond.

1. Preparation of Cell Lysates from Cells Treated with Re-Targeted Endopeptidase.

To obtain a re-targeted endopeptidase treated cell lysate for analysis, a suitable density of cells from a stock culture of Neuro-2a was seeded into a T175 flask containing 50 mL of a serum-free medium containing Minimum Essential Medium, 2 mM GlutaMAX™ I with Earle's salts, 1×B27 supplement, 1×N2 supplement, 0.1 mM Non-Essential Amino Acids, 10 mM HEPES. These cells were incubated in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide until the cells differentiated, as assessed by standard and routine morphological criteria, such as growth arrest and neurite extension (approximately 2 to 3 days). As a control, a suitable density of cells from a stock culture of Neuro-2a was seeded into a T175 flask containing 50 mL of an appropriate growth medium (Table 1). These undifferentiated control cells were grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide until 50% confluence was reached (approximately 18 hours). The media from both differentiated and undifferentiated control cultures was aspirated from each well and replaced with fresh media containing either 0 (untreated sample) or 10 nM of a re-targeted endopeptidase. After an overnight incubation, the cells were washed and the cells harvested by lysing in freshly prepared Triton X-100 Lysis Buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100) at 4° C. for 30 minutes with constant agitation. Lysed cells were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min at 4° C. to eliminate debris using a bench-top centrifuge. The protein concentrations of cell lysates were measured by Bradford assay.

2. Preparation and Identification of Sandwich ELISA Components.

To identify an appropriate capture antibody-detection antibody pair an ECL sandwich ELISA analysis was conducted on twenty-six different combinations of capture and detection antibody pairs comprising eleven different α-SNAP-25 capture antibodies and seven different α-SNAP-25 detection antibodies (Table 12). The α-SNAP-25 antibodies used were 2E2A6 and 3C1A5 α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibodies disclosed in the present specification, SMI-81, MC-6050, and MC-6053 α-SNAP-25 mouse monoclonal antibodies disclosed in the present specification, NTP 23 α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antibodies disclosed in the present specification, S9684 α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), H-50 α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), C-18 α-SNAP-25 goat polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), N-19 α-SNAP-25 goat polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), and SP12 α-SNAP-25 mouse polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA).

To prepare the capture antibody solution, the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibodies contained in the ascites from hybridoma cell lines 2E2A6 and 3C1A5 as well as the α-SNAP-25 MC-6050 and MC-6053 monoclonal antibodies were purified using a standard Protein A purification protocol. All other α-SNAP-25 antibodies were purchased as purified antibodies.

To prepare the detection antibody solution, the appropriate α-SNAP-25 antibody was conjugated to Ruthenium(II)-tris-bipyridine-(4-methylsulfonate) NHS ester labeling reagent (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD). The conjugation reaction was performed by adding 30 μL of distilled water reconstituted MSD SULFO-TAG™ stock solution to 200 μL of 2 mg/mL α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies and incubating the reaction at room temperature for 2 hours in the dark. The labeled antibodies were purified using a standard spin column protocol and the protein concentration determined using a standard colorimetric protein assay. The absorbance of the α-SNAP-25 antibody/MSD SULFO-TAG™ conjugate was measured at 455 nm using a spectrophotometer to determine the concentration in moles per liter. The detection antibody solution was stored at 4° C. until needed.

To prepare the solid phase support comprising the capture antibody that is specific for a SNAP-25 cleavage product, approximately 5 μL of the appropriate α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody solution (20 μg/mL in 1×PBS) is added to each well of a 96-well MSD High Bind plate and the solution is allowed to air dry in a biological safety cabinet for 2-3 hours in order to liquid evaporate the solution. The capture antibody-bound wells were then blocked by adding 150 μL of Blocking Buffer comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent (GE Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ) and 10% goat serum (VWR, West Chester, PA) at room temperature for 2 hours. Blocked plates were sealed and stored at 4° C. until needed.

To detect the presence of a cleaved SNAP-25 cleavage product by ECL sandwich ELISA analysis, the Blocking Buffer from stored plates was aspirated from the wells, 25 μL of a lysate from cells treated with re-targeted endopeptidase, as described above, was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 4° C. for overnight. Plate wells were washed three times by aspirating the cell lysate and rinsing each well three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing, 25 μl of 5 μg/mL detection antibody solution comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent in 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate) was added to each well, the plate was sealed, and the sealed plate was incubated at room temperature at room temperature for 1 hour with shaking. After detection antibody incubation, the wells were washed three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing 150 μL of 1× Read Buffer (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD) was added to each well and the plates were read using a SECTOR™ Imager 6000 Image Reader (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD). A ratio was calculated by dividing the signal obtained at the 10 nM dose for each antibody-pair by the signal obtained at the 0 nM dose for each antibody-pair (Table 24). These results indicated that among the twenty-six different combinations of antibody pairs tested, only three antibody pairs had signal-to-noise ratios above 10:1 for the higher dose tested: Pair No. 1 (2E2A6 mouse mAb and S9684 rabbit pAb), Pair No. 4 (3C1A5 mouse mAb and S9684 rabbit pAb), and Pair No. 18 (S9684 rabbit pAb and 2E2A6 mouse mAb). Antibody Pair 1 was chosen for further assay development.

TABLE 24

Screening of α-SNAP-25 Antibody Combinations

Detection
Detection

SNAP-25
SNAP-25
Signal/Noise

Antibody

cleavage
uncleaved
Ratio

Pair No.
Capture Antibody
Detection Antibody
product
substrate
(10 nM/0 nM)

1
2E2A6 mouse mAb
S9684 rabbit pAb
Yes
No
26.6:1

2
2E2A6 mouse mAb
N-19 goat pAb
Yes
No
7.3:1

3
2E2A6 mouse mAb
H-50 rabbit pAb
Yes
No
0.9:1

4
3C1A5 mouse mAb
S9684 rabbit pAb
Yes
No
12.1:1

5
3C1A5 mouse mAb
N-19 goat pAb
Yes
No
1.9:1

6
3C1A5 mouse mAb
H-50 rabbit pAb
Yes
No
0.9:1

7
C-18 goat pAb
S9684 rabbit pAb
No
No
0.8:1

8
C-18 goat pAb
N-19 goat pAb
No
No
0.9:1

9
C-18 goat pAb
H-50 rabbit pAb
No
No
0.9:1

10
H-50 rabbit pAb
2E2A6 mouse mAb
Yes
No
0.9:1

11
H-50 rabbit pAb
C-18 goat pAb
No
No
1.0:1

12
N-19 goat pAb
2E2A6 mouse mAb
Yes
No
0.9:1

13
N-19 goat pAb
C-18 goat pAb
No
No
1.1:1

14
NTP 23 rabbit pAb
N-19 goat pAb
Yes
No
1.2:1

15
NTP 23 rabbit pAb
C-18 goat pAb
No
No
1.1:1

16
NTP 23 rabbit pAb
SP12 mouse pAb
Yes
No
1.3:1

17
NTP 23 rabbit pAb
H-50 rabbit pAb
Yes
No
1.1:1

18
S9684 rabbit pAb
2E2A6 mouse mAb
Yes
No
21.3:1

19
S9684 rabbit pAb
C-18 goat pAb
No
No
0.7:1

20
S9684 rabbit pAb
SMI-81 mouse mAb
Yes
Yes
1.2:1

21
SMI-81 mouse mAb
S9684 rabbit pAb
Yes
Yes
1.1:1

22
SMI-81 mouse mAb
N-19 goat pAb
Yes
Yes
1.0:1

23
SMI-81 mouse mAb
C-18 goat pAb
No
No
0.8:1

24
SP12 mouse pAb
C-18 goat pAb
No
No
1.0:1

25
MC-6050 mouse mAb
S9684 rabbit pAb
Yes
Yes
5.0:1

26
MC-6053 mouse mAb
S9684 rabbit pAb
Yes
Yes
7.1:1

Example X
Immuno-Based Method of Detecting Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Having a BoNT/a Light Chain Enzymatic Activity Using ECL Sandwich ELISA

The following example illustrates immuno-based methods of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity by detecting a SNAP-25 cleavage product using an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody specific for a SNAP-25 cleavage product having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond by ECL sandwich ELISA.

To prepare a lysate from cells treated with a re-targeted endopeptidase having BoNT/A light chain enzymatic activity, a suitable density of cells from an established cell line was plated into the wells of 96-well tissue culture plates containing 100 NL of the appropriate media. These cells were incubated in a 37 00 incubator under 5% carbon dioxide for about 24 hours. The media from the cells was aspirated from each well and replaced with fresh media containing either 0 (untreated sample) or one of the doses determined from a dose-response experiment for that re-targeted endopeptidase. After 24 hours incubation, the cells were washed and harvested.

To prepare the α-SNAP-25 capture antibody solution, the α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody contained in the ascites from hybridoma cell line 2E2A6 was purified using a standard Protein A purification protocol. To prepare the α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution, α-SNAP-25 rabbit polyclonal antibody S9684 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was conjugated to Ruthenium(II)-tris-bipyridine-(4-methylsulfonate) NHS ester labeling reagent (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD). The conjugation reaction, purification of labeled α-SNAP-25 antibody, concentration determination and storage were as described in Example VI.

To prepare the solid phase support comprising the capture antibody that is specific for a SNAP-25 cleaved product, approximately 5 μL of α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody 2E2A6 solution (20 μg/mL in 1×PBS) was added to each well of a 96-well MSD High Bind plate and the solution is allowed to air dry in a biological safety cabinet for 2-3 hours in order to liquid evaporate the solution. The capture antibody-bound wells were then blocked and used directly to detect retargeted endopeptidase activity.

To detect the presence of a cleaved SNAP-25 product by ECL sandwich ELISA analysis, the Blocking Buffer from stored plates was aspirated from the wells, 25 μL of a lysate from cells treated with re-targeted endopeptidase was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 4° C. for overnight. Plate wells were washed three times by aspirating the cell lysate and rinsing each well three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing, 25 μL of 5 μg/mL detection antibody solution comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent in 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate) was added to each well, the plate was sealed, and the sealed plate was incubated at room temperature at room temperature for 1 hour with shaking. After detection antibody incubation, the wells were washed three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing 150 μL of 1× Read Buffer (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD) was added to each well and the plates were read using a SECTOR™ Imager 6000 Image Reader (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD). The collected data was analyzed and the EC₅₀calculated as described in Example VI. For opioid, re-targeted endopeptidases, these results indicated that on average 1.0 nM of Noc/A at the EC₅₀was detected (a range of about 0.3 nM to about 2.0 nM) with a signal-to-noise ratio for the lower asymptote of about 15:1 to about 20:1 and a signal-to-noise ratio for the upper asymptote of about 180:1 to about 300:1.

Example XI
Immuno-Based Method of Detecting Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Activity Using CL Sandwich ELISA

The following example illustrates immuno-based methods of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity by detecting a SNAP-25 cleavage product using an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody specific for a SNAP-25 having a carboxyl-terminus at the P₁residue of the BoNT/A cleavage site scissile bond by CL sandwich ELISA.

Lysate from cells treated with a re-targeted endopeptidase and the α-SNAP-25 capture antibody solution will be prepared as described in Example VII.

To prepare the α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution, α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibody S9684 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) will be conjugated to Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL). The conjugation reaction will be performed by adding to 500 μL of 1 mg/mL α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibodies to a vial containing lyophilized activated peroxidase, mixing the components, and then adding 10 μL of sodium cyanoborohydride. This reaction mixture will be incubated at room temperature for 1 hour in a fume hood. After quenching the reaction, the labeled antibodies will be purified using a standard spin column protocol and the protein concentration will be determined using a standard colorimetric protein assay. The absorbance of the α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibody/HRP conjugate will be measured at 455 nm using a spectrophotometer to determine the concentration in moles per liter. The α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution will be stored at 4° C. until needed.

To prepare the solid phase support comprising the α-SNAP-25 capture antibody that is specific for the SNAP-25 cleaved product, approximately 100 μL of α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody 2E2A6 solution (1 mg/mL in 1×PBS) will be added to each well of a 96-well Greiner white plate and the plates will be incubated at 4° C. overnight, and then any excess antibody solution will be discarded. The capture antibody-bound wells will then be blocked by adding 150 μL of Blocking Buffer comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent (GE Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ) and 10% goat serum (VWR, West Chester, PA) at room temperature for 1 hour. The blocking buffer will be discarded and the plates will be blotted dry on paper towels by inverting and tapping. The capture antibody-bound wells will then be blocked and will be used directly to detect retargeted endopeptidase activity.

To detect the presence of a cleaved SNAP-25 product by CL sandwich ELISA analysis, 50 μL of a lysate from cells treated with retargeted-endopeptidase will be added to each well, the plate will be sealed, and the sealed plate will be incubated on a shaker rotating at 500 rpm at 4° C. for 2-4 hours to overnight. Plate wells will be washed three times by aspirating the cell lysate and rinsing each well three times with 200 μl 1×PBS, 0.05% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing, 100 μL of 1 mg/mL α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibody/HRP detection antibody solution comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent in 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate) will be added to each well, the plate will be sealed, and the sealed plate will be incubated on a shaker rotating at 650 rpm at room temperature for 1 hour. After detection antibody incubation, the wells will be washed three times with 200 μl 1×PBS, 0.05% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing 100 μl of SuperSignal ELISA Pico 1:1 mixture (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL) will be added to each well and the plates will be read using a luminometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at 395 nm. The collected data will be analyzed and the EC50 will be calculated as described in Example VI.

Example XII
Immuno-Based Method of Detecting Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Activity Using Multiplex ECL Sandwich ELISA

The following example illustrates multiplex immuno-based methods of detecting retargeted endopeptidase activity by detecting a SNAP-25 cleavage product using an α-SNAP-25 monoclonal antibody specific for a SNAP-25 cleavage product and a second antibody pair for a different protein.

A re-targeted endopeptidase potency assay can be performed using a multiplex ECL sandwich ELISA. Such an assay is described in companion patent application Ester Fernandez-Salas, et al., Immuno-Based Botulinum Toxin Serotype A Activity Assays, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/403,531, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and can be used using the cell lines and re-targeted endopeptidases and the corresponding cell lines disclosed in the present specification.

Example XIII
Immuno-Based Method of Detecting Re-Targeted Endopeptidase Activity Using Multiplex EC Sandwich ELISA

A re-targeted endopeptidase potency assay can be performed using a multiplex EC sandwich ELISA. Such an assay is described in companion patent application Ester Fernandez-Salas, et al., Immuno-Based Botulinum Toxin Serotype A Activity Assays, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/403,531, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and can be used using the cell lines and re-targeted endopeptidases and the corresponding cell lines disclosed in the present specification.

Example XIV
Immuno-Based Method to Detect Nanomolar Amounts of Retargeted Endopeptidases

The following example illustrates how to perform immuno-based methods of detecting Nanomolar amounts of retargeted endopeptidase activity.

1. Immuno-Based Method of Detecting Retargeted Endopeptidases Using ECL Sandwich ELISA.

To prepare a lysate from cells treated with a retargeted endopeptidase, approximately 50,000 to 150,000 cells from an established cell line suitable for the assay were plated into the wells of 96-well tissue culture poly-D-lysine plates containing 100 μL of the appropriate media (see Examples I and II). These cells were incubated in a 37° C. incubator under 5% carbon dioxide for 24 hours. The media from the cells was aspirated from each well and replaced with fresh media containing either 0 (untreated sample) and the appropriate dose response as described for each retargeted endopeptidase in this application. After a 24 hour incubation, the cells were washed and harvested or incubated for an additional two days without retargeted endopeptidase before harvesting. To harvest the cells, the medium was aspirated, washed with 1×PBS, and lysed by adding 30 μL of Lysis Buffer comprising 50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100 to each well, and the plate incubated on a shaker rotating at 500 rpm for 30 minutes at 4° C. The plate was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4° C. to pellet cellular debris and the supernatant was transferred to a capture antibody coated 96-well plate to perform the detection step.

The α-SNAP-25 capture antibody solution, the α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution, and the solid phase support comprising the capture antibody that is specific for a SNAP-25 cleaved product were prepared as described in Example VII.

To detect the presence of a cleaved SNAP-25 product by ECL sandwich ELISA analysis, the Blocking Buffer from stored plates was aspirated, 25-30 μL of a lysate from cells treated with retargeted endopeptidase was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 4° C. for either 2 hours or 24 hours. Plate wells were washed three times by aspirating the cell lysate and rinsing each well three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing, 25 μL of 5 μg/mL α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent in 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate) was added to each well, the plate was sealed, and the sealed plate was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour with shaking. After α-SNAP-25 detection antibody incubation, the wells were washed three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing, the plates were processed, collected data was analyzed, and the EC₅₀calculated as described in Example VI. These results indicated that on average 1.0 nM of Noc/A at the EC₅₀was detected when using SK-N-DZ clonal cell line #3 cells (a range of about 0.3 nM to about 2.0 nM) with a signal-to-noise ratio for the upper asymptote of about 20:1 to about 300:1. Moreover, on average 3.7 nM of Noc/A at the EC₅₀was detected when using AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 cells (a range of about 2.0 nM to about 5.5 nM) with a signal-to-noise ratio for the upper asymptote of about 20:1 to about 500:1. For the SK12 cells that are specific for the retargeted endopeptidase containing a dynorphin A ligand, on average 8.4 nM of Dyn/A at the EC₅₀was detected when using SK12 cells (a range of about 4.5 nM to about 10.0 nM) with a signal-to-noise ratio for the upper asymptote of about 10:1 to about 20:1. Additionally, on average 8.8 nM of TVEMP-galanin at the EC₅₀was detected when using Neuro-2a clonal cell line #7 cells (a range of about 5.0 nM to about 15.5 nM) with a signal-to-noise ratio for the upper asymptote of about 20:1 to about 200:1. This method can also be performed in a multiplex fashion as described in Example IX.

2. Immuno-Based Method of Detecting Retargeted Endopeptidases Using CL Sandwich ELISA.

Lysate from cells treated with a retargeted endopeptidase and the α-SNAP-25 capture antibody solution will be prepared as described in Example VII. The α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution and solid phase support comprising the capture antibody that is specific for a SNAP-25 cleaved product will be prepared as described in Example VIII.

To detect the presence of a cleaved SNAP-25 product by CL sandwich ELISA analysis, 100 μL of a lysate from cells treated with a retargeted endopeptidase will be added to each well, the plate will seal, and the sealed plate will be incubated on a shaker rotating at 500 rpm at 4° C. for either 2 hours or 24 hours. Plate wells will be washed three times by aspirating the cell lysate and rinsing each well three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.05% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing, 100 μL of 1 mg/mL α-SNAP-25 polyclonal antibody/HRP detection antibody solution comprising 2% Amersham Blocking Reagent in 1×PBS, 0.1% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate) will be added to each well, the plate will be sealed, and the sealed plate will be incubated on a shaker rotating at 650 rpm at room temperature for 1 hour. After detection antibody incubation, the wells will be washed three times with 200 μL 1×PBS, 0.05% TWEEN-20® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate). After washing 100 μL of SuperSignal ELISA Pico 1:1 mixture (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL) will be added to each well and the plates will be read using a luminometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at 395 nm. The collected data will be analyzed and the EC₅₀will be calculated as described in Example VI. This method can also be performed in a multiplex fashion as described in Example IX.

Example XV
Immuno-Based Method to Detect Neutralizing α-Retargeted-Endopeptidase Antibodies

The following example illustrates how to perform an immuno-based method that can detect the presence of neutralizing α-Noc/A antibodies.

Noc/A, is currently being evaluated for treating painful conditions, some of them chronic. With repeated long-term treatment of Noc/A, a patient may develop neutralizing α-Noc/A antibodies to the retargeted endopeptidase leading to immunoresistance. Neutralizing α-Noc/A antibodies will inhibit retargeted endopeptidase activity by stopping the retargeted endopeptidase's uptake into neuronal and other target cells by binding to the targeting ligand and/or the translocation domain (HN) of the retargeted endopeptidase. There is not established assay to determine the presence of the neutralizing α-Noc/A antibodies in patient's blood. It would be more cost and time efficient if a cell-based assay could be developed to detect neutralizing antibodies in patients treated with retargeted endopeptidases.

To detect the presence or absence of neutralizing α-Noc/A antibodies, the immuno-based methods of determining retargeted endopeptidase activity disclosed in the present specification can be used. One way is to determine the amount of SNAP-25 cleavage product present after treatment with various concentrations of Noc/A using a Western blot detection method, the other way was to use an ECL sandwich ELISA detection method.

To prepare a sample comprising neutralizing α-Noc/A antibodies, serum was isolated from blood of a monkey immunized with Noc/A and the antibodies were affinity purified. Rabbits were also immunized with the nociceptin variant peptide, the targeting ligand present in the Noc/A molecule, their serum collected, and the antibodies affinity purified (anti-nociceptin polyclonal antibodies).

To prepare a lysate from cells treated with a sample comprising Noc/A, SK-N-DZ clonal cell line #3 cells and AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 cells were seeded in poly-D-lysine 96-well plates for 16-18 hours. Anti-nociceptin pAb at 0-3 μg/mL was diluted in RPMI SFM (with N2, B27, and NGF supplements) containing 1 nM of Noc/A and the mix was pre-incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Then the solutions were added to the cells and incubated for 24 h before performing the ECL ELISA assay. This anti-nociceptin variant antibody totally blocked 1 nM Noc/A uptake at 1 μg/mL (>90% inhibition) on both cell lines. Anti-Noc/A monkey polyclonal antibody was also assayed these cell lines. Cells were plated in a 96-well poly-D-lysine plate at 100,000 cells per well for 24 hours in RPMI growth media supplemented with N2, B27, and NGF. Anti-Noc/A polyclonal antibodies at 0-20 μg/mL was diluted in media containing 1 nM Noc/A and the mix was pre-incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Then the mix was added to the cells and incubated for 24 h before performing the ECL ELISA assay. Up to 60% inhibition was seen at the higher concentrations of 6-20 μg/mL of anti-Noc/A pAb on the SK-N-DZ cell line and about 30% on the AGN P33 clonal cell line #6 cell line. This may due to the fact that the anti-Noc/A polyclonal antibodies is not specific to the binding site and contains other antibodies that bind other parts of the molecule producing only partial blocking at the concentrations tested. Higher concentrations maybe needed to achieve complete blocking.

To detect the presence of a cleaved SNAP-25 product by Western blot analysis, the media will aspirated from each well, the cells suspended in 50 μL of SDS-PAGE loading buffer, and then heated to 95° C. for 5 minutes. An aliquot from each harvested sample will be analyzed by Western blot as described in Example I, except that harvested samples will be separated by SDS-PAGE using 12% 26-well Criterion gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), and the rabbit polyclonal α-SNAP-25₁₉₇antibody serum will be used as the primary antibody (see Example V). The results will reveal the lowest concentration of retargeted endopeptidase that will produce a detectable band of SNAP-25 cleavage product in the Western blot.

To detect the presence of a cleaved SNAP-25 product by ECL Sandwich ELISA, the media was removed from each well and the cells were lysed as described in Example VI. The α-SNAP-25 capture antibody solution, the α-SNAP-25 detection antibody solution, and the α-SNAP-25 solid phase support were prepared as described in Example VIII. Supernatants were transferred to the α-SNAP-25 solid phase support and an ECL sandwich ELISA assay was performed as detailed in Example VI. The collected data was analyzed and the EC₅₀calculated as described in Example VI, except that the EC₅₀is the serum dilution needed to inhibit the activity of the retargeted endopeptidase to ½ its maximum and the ratio of maximal signal (Signal_Max) to minimum signal (Signal_Min) was obtained by dividing the SNAP-25 cleavage product signal obtained with the highest dilution of antibody by the signal obtained with the lowest antibody dilution.

The results indicate that the presence of neutralizing α-Noc/A antibodies in monkey serum and the presence of α-nociceptin variant antibodies from rabbit could be detected. The activity of the Noc/A molecule incubated in affinity purified antibodies from the immunized animal decreased as the antibody dilution decreased. The same assay will be performed with the Dyn/A and the TVEMP-galanin compounds utilizing the cell lines specific for each compound to be tested.

Example XV
Development of a Cell-Based Assay for a Galanin Re-Targeted Endopeptidase

The following example illustrates how to identify established cell lines possessing the re-targeted endopeptidase uptake capacity required to develop a cell-based potency assay.

1. Growth of Stock Culture of Candidate Cell Lines.

To grow the cell lines, a suitable density of cells from the cell line being tested were plated in a 162 cm²tissue culture flask containing 30 mL of a suitable growth medium (see Table 25), and grown in a 37° C. incubator under 5% or 10% carbon dioxide until cells reached the desired density.

TABLE 25

Summary table of all cell lines and their respective media.

Complete Media (CM)
Serum Free media (SFM)

All from Invitrogen
All from Invitrogen,

Cell type; description; source
(unless otherwise specified)
(unless otherwise specified)

SiMa (Human neuroblastoma cell
RPMI 1640 (90%)
RPMI 1640 (90%)

line, DSMZ# ACC 164,
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, 10%)
NEAA (0.1 mM),

Braunschweig, Germany)
NEAA (0.1 mM),
HEPES (10 mM),

SiMa H1 (cloned cell line from
HEPES (10 mM),
Sodium Pyruvate (1 mM)

SiMa cells)
Sodium Pyruvate (1 mM)
Penicillin (100 U per ml)

Penicillin (100 U per ml)
Streptomycin (100 μg per ml)

Streptomycin (100 μg per ml),
N2 supplement (1x)

B27 supplement (1x)

Neuro-2a
Earle's MEM (90%)
EMEM (90%)

(Mouse neuroblastoma:
Fetal Bovine Serum 10%)
NEAA (0.1 mM),

(ATCC#CCI131, Manassas, VA,)
NEAA (0.1 mM),
HEPES (10 mM),

HEPES (10 mM),
Sodium Pyruvate (1 mM),

Sodium Pyruvate (1 mM),
Penicillin (100 U per ml),

Penicillin (100 U per ml),
Streptomycin (100 μg per ml)

Streptomycin (100 μg per ml)

PC-12
RPMI 1640 (90%)
Differentiation media:

Rat Pheochromocytoma
Dialyzed FBS (5%)
RPMI 1640 (90%)

(ATCC # CRL-1721)
Horse serum (10%)
HEPES (10 mM)

HEPES (10 mM)
Sodium Pyruvate (1 mM)

Sodium Pyruvate (1 mM)
D-glucose (0.5%, Sigma)

D-glucose (0.5%, Sigma)
Penicillin (100 U per ml);

Penicillin (100 U per ml);
Streptomycin (100 μg per ml)

Streptomycin (100 μg per ml)
N2 supplement (1x)

N2 supplement (1x)
Bovine serum albumin (0.2% w/v)

NGF (50 ng per ml, Promega)

P19
Alpha MEM (90%)
Alpha MEM (90%)

Mouse embryonic carcinoma
Bovine Calf Serum (7.5%)
FBS (2.5%)

(ATCC #CRL-1825)
FBS (2.5%)
Penicillin (100 U per ml);

Penicillin (100 U per ml);
Streptomycin (100 μg per ml)

Streptomycin (100 μg per ml)

NEAA: Non-Essential Amino Acids, MEM: Minimum Essential Media. DMEM: Dulbecco's MEM. EMEM—Earle's MEM. Please note PC-12 cells were differentiated in differentiation media and not SFM.

2. Screening of Commercial Cell Lines for Sensitivity to Galanin TVEMP-Galanin Compounds

Commercial cell lines were screened for their sensitivity to TVEMP-galanin compounds as measured by the cleavage of SNAP25 after treatment with the corresponding compounds. Various TVEMP-galanin compounds were used for screening and testing. PC-12, Neuro-2a, SiMa, and P19 cells were plated in serum free media for three days or in CM for one day. These differentiated and naïve cells were treated for 18 hours with TVEMP-galanin Batch A at concentrations of 0 and 75 nM. TVEMP-galanin Batch A showed activity in both PC-12 and Neuro-2a cells as seen by the increased presence of cleaved SNAP25, and Neuro-2a cells in the differentiated condition are more sensitive to TVEMP compounds with galanin ligand, than the naïve cells. The rank order in activity of the cells shows PC-12 have the most activity, followed by Neuro-2a and finally SiMa cells. It was necessary to determine if the uptake was specific for these galanin-retargeted compounds and therefore it was important to test the cells with other compounds that do not contain the galanin ligand. Noc/A is a retargeted compound which contains a nociceptin variant ligand, and LH_N/A (a negative control) a compound that lacks the binding domain. The uptake of LH_N/A is non-specific and should have significantly lower activity than the TVEMP-galanin compound if the cell line possess specific uptake for the retargeted compound. The Noc/A compound has been shown previously to have specific uptake in the SiMa cells and will be used as a baseline to test the cell lines. A favorable cell line should have low uptake of the LH_N/A and the Noc/A compound and high uptake of the TVEMP-galanin compound. Table 26 displays the results from this experiment.

TABLE 26

Screening of PC-12, Neuro-2a, and SiMa cells

at different conditions using TVEMP-galanin.

TVEMP-galanin
TVEMP-galanin

Batch A
Batch B
LH_N/A
Noc/A

Conc. (mg/mL)
0.168
0.175
1.63
1.00

EC₅₀
PC-12, naïve
73.4 ± 10.7
105.6 ± 16.0
>200
72.9 ± 26.9

Values
SiMa, naïve
138.6 ± 43.9
133.8 ± 24.2
>300
48.3 ± 18.1

(nM)
Neuro-2a, naïve
122.4 ± 15.7
116 ± 17.5
>200
>150

SiMa, Dif O/N
>400
>150
>400
16.1 ± 11.9

Neuro-2a Dif 4 d

34.5 ± 7.5
39.7 ± 5.6
105.9 ± 44.3

SiMa, Dif 4 d
101.8 ± 20.5
65.3 ± 7.8
>150
88.7 ± 23.3

TVEMP-galanin Batches A and B, and LH_N/A and Noc/A controls testing on various cell lines and growth/differentiation conditions. Summary chart showing details of each compound tested plus EC₅₀values.

The results show that TVEMP-galanin Batch A and TVEMP-galanin Batch B had plots or EC₅₀values that were either similar to, or only 1-2 fold more active than the negative controls in the cell lines tested. This data implies that the native cells are not sensitive enough and that these cells will have to be transfected with the plasmids encoding galanin receptor proteins GaIR1 or GaIR2 receptors.

3. Stable Transfection of PC-12, Neuro-2a, and SiMa Cells with GaIR.

One day before transfection, cells were seeded at densities of 0.5×10⁶cells/well in either a 6-well Collagen IV coated plate (Cat #354554: BD Biosciences) (SiMa, PC-12) or a 6 well Costar plate (Cat #3516: Corning) (Neuro-2a). Transfections were performed by diluting 12 μl of Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Cat #52758, Invitrogen) in 250 μl Opti-MEM® I Reduced Serum Medium (Cat #3195, Invitrogen) followed by incubation at room temperature for 5 min. Four micrograms of GaIR plasmid DNA was mixed with 0.4 μg pAdVantage™ vector (1 mg per ml, Cat #E1711, Promega) in 250 μl Opti-MEM® I Reduced Serum Media for 5 minutes. After 5 minutes of incubation, the diluted Lipofectamine™ 2000 and the diluted plasmids DNA were mixed and incubated for an additional 20 min at room temperature, for complex formation. In the meantime, the cells were washed with OPTI-MEM® and 0.5 ml OPTI-MEM® was added to each well. After the 20 minute incubation, 0.5 ml containing the complexes of diluted Lipofectamine™ 2000 and diluted plasmids DNA was carefully added to the wells containing cells in 0.5 ml OPTI-MEM®. The plate was incubated at 37° C. for 5 hours, after which 1 ml of complete media was added. The next day, the medium was replaced with growth media for 48 hours. On day 4, after cells were recovered from the transfection, the growth media was replaced with fresh growth media containing Geneticin® (Cat #10131: Invitrogen) at 0.5 mg per ml (1:100 dilution) and incubated for an additional 3 days. On day 7 post transfection, the cells were transferred to a 75 cm Collagen IV flask (Cat #35423: BD Biosciences) containing growth medium and geneticin (0.5 mg per ml, 1:100 dilution). On this transfer, approximately 90% of the cells were dead and were removed during the media change. Growth media containing geneticin (0.5 mg per ml, 1:100 dilution) was changed every two days till day 21.

For the selection of stable cells able to take up galanin TVEMP compounds, the parameters were to screen for clones that produced the highest percentage of SNAP25 cleavage with TVEMP-galanin treatment in the ECL Sandwich ELISA using monoclonal 2E2A6 coated plates for capture and polyclonal SNAP25 (Sigma Cat #S9684) sulfotagged antibody for detection. The EC50 values in Table 27 show that TVEMP-galanin Batch D exhibits at least 10-fold greater uptake than the negative control in the SiMa and Neuro-2a cells transfected with GaIR1 and GaIR2, and only 2-4 fold greater uptake in transfected PC-12 cells. Since the PC-12 transfected cells seem to have lower sensitivity and specificity than the SiMa and Neuro-2a cells they will not be cloned. Also, since the galanin 1-16 mer ligand in the TVEMP-Galanin compounds binds to GALR1 receptor with more affinity than the GALR2, only cells transfected with GALR1 will be cloned. The figure also shows that TVEMP-galanin Batches C and D exhibit 9-10 fold greater uptake than both LH_N/A and the retargeted nociceptin compound TVEMP-nociceptin in the Neuro-2a GaIR1.

TABLE 27

Test of stably transfected but non-clonal populations of SiMa,

Neuro-2a, and PC12 transfected with GalR1 or GalR2 receptors

TVEMP-
TVEMP-

TVEMP-

galanin C
galanin D
LH_N/A
nociceptin

Conc. (mg/mL)
1.260
0.303
1.46
1.00

EC₅₀
SiMa GalR1

36.2 ± 8.6
>300

Values
SiMa GalR2

26.6 ± 6.7
>300

(nM)
PC-12 GalR1

64.1 ± 19.5
202.7

PC-12 GalR2

>150
>300

Neuro-2a
32.2 ± 3.3
40.8 ± 6.0
>300
>300

GalR1

Neuro-2a
35.2 ± 3.1
46.0 ± 6.1
>300
>300

GalR2

The non-clonal selected populations are not a good population of cells to use on a regular basis because they contain a mix of cells expressing different levels of receptor and these populations can change overtime. To obtain stable cell lines derived from single cells, a dilutional cloning approach was initiated. On day 21, the transfected cells were trypsinized, needle-dissociated and counted. The remaining transfected cell lines were frozen for future use. The cells were serially diluted to 10 cells per ml in growth media containing geneticin (0.5 mg per ml, 1:100 dilution). Either 2×96-well Collagen IV coated plates (SiMa, PC-12) or 2×96-well Costar plates (Neuro-2a) were plated at 100 μl per well to achieve 1 cell per well density. The plates were returned to the incubator and left untouched for two weeks for colony formation. After two weeks (day 35), the wells were carefully checked for the presence of single colonies formed on the bottom of the well (the entire well was carefully checked for multiple colonies). When a well was identified with a single cluster of cells, that entire well was carefully scrutinized to make sure that one and only one cluster of cells was present. A picture of that single cluster was taken. If there were any queries about additional clusters, the well was not selected. On day 36, the clones that were selected were detached with TrypLE and 0.5 ml of complete media containing geneticin (0.5 mg per ml, 1:100 dilution) was added to stop the trypsin reaction. This entire volume was transferred to 6-well plates and further diluted with 3.0 ml additional complete media containing geneticin (0.5 mg per ml, 1:100 dilution). The clones were allowed to grow to 90% confluence, then trypsinized again and transferred to 75 cm Collagen IV or Costar flasks with 10.0 ml complete media containing geneticin (0.5 mg per ml, 1:100 dilution). Once the cells were 90% confluent again, the cells were used to either fill three cryovials for frozen storage or used for screening in the ELISA assay for galanin retargeted compounds.

The reference compound TVEMP-galanin Batch C was used to test these clones using two operators performing independent tests. The SiMa GaIR1 clones grew slowly and were not available for testing at this time. Fortunately, the Neuro-2a clones grew faster, and soon sufficient quantities of 8 of the 12 clones were available for testing. These Neuro-2a GaIR1 clonal cells were tested with a full dose range of TVEMP-galanin compounds (0-300 nM) and the results of nine of these clones is shown below. The remaining four clones grew very slowly and were not tested. The selected but non-clonal parental cells were plated along with the clones to use as a benchmark. Table 28 shows the activity of each of the eight clones together with the selected non-clonal Neuro-2a GaIR1 cells, when tested with TVEMP-galanin compound. Out of the eight clones tested, only clones #4, 7 and 12 showed good uptake of the TVEMP-galanin compound with acceptable EC₅₀values. Neuro-2a GalR1clones #1, 3 and 10 did not take up the TVEMP-galanin compound, while clones #5, 11 and 13 together with the non-clonal population generated very high EC₅₀values and no further testing was done with these cells.

TABLE 28

Results of screening Neuro-2a GalR1 single-cell

derived clones with the TVEMP-galanin Batch C.

EC50 ± Std. error (nM)

Plate
Cell type
Operator 1
Operator 2

1
N2A Non-clonal
82.1 ± 9.6
92.0 ± 10.8

1
N2A GALR1 Clone #1
>300
>300

1
N2A GALR1 Clone #3
>300
>300

1
N2A GALR1 Clone #4
39.7 ± 3.4
39.4 ± 6.6

2
N2A Non-clonal
211.2 ± 167.7
116.0 ± 26.8

2
N2A GALR1 Clone #5
202.6 ± 82.9
113.0 ± 18.1

2
N2A GALR1 Clone #7
23.1 ± 3.3
15.5 ± 1.8

2
N2A GALR1 Clone #10
>300
>300

3
N2A GALR1 Clone #7
20.3 ± 1.6
38.0 ± 6.3

3
N2A GALR1 Clone #11
270.0 ± 243
247.0 ± 101

3
N2A GALR1 Clone #12
43.2 ± 5.2
57.5 ± 14.3

3
N2A GALR1 Clone #13
144.1 ± 143
184.7 ± 15.6

4. Characterization of GalR1 Expression in the Clonal Cell Lines

The screening of the clones showed that only clones #4, 7, and 12 are more sensitive than the non-clonal cells. Messenger RNA (mRNA) was extracted from these 3 clones as well as the non-transfected parental and stably transfected non-clonal Neuro-2a cells for characterization by RT-PCR using the RT-PCR conditions described in Example V and the primers described in Table 29.

TABLE 29

Specific GALR1 and GALR2 primers

SEQ ID

Name
Sequence
NO:

GALR1
5′′ CCCCATCATGTCATCCACCT 3′
150

fwd

GALR1
5′ ATGGGGTTCACCGAGGAGTT 3′
151

rev

GALR2
5′ CATCGTGGCGGTGCTTTT 3′
152

fwd

GALR2
5′ AGCGGGAAGCGACCAAAC 3′
153

rev

The results in Table 30 show that the transfected non-clonal cells and clones have much greater amounts of GALR1 mRNA than the parental cells. In the TVEMP-Galanin cell screening, Clone #7 was shown to be the most sensitive to TVEMP-galanin. Clone #7 also is shown to have the highest amount of GALR1 mRNA according to Table 30. The CT values for Neuro-2a GaIR1 clone 7 (Neuro-2a #7) was the lowest, followed by clone 4 and then clone 12. The non-clonals tested at this time provided a CT close to clone 12, however, these cells contain a constantly changing population of cells containing varying concentrations of GaIR1 receptor, and therefore were not considered a good population for future work. Of the three clones with low EC₅₀'s, Neuro-2a clone GaIR1 clone #12 (Neuro-2a #12) grew the fastest, followed by Neuro-2a clone #7 and lastly Neuro-2a clone #4. In addition to its slow growth rate, Neuro-2a clone #4 was not tested further because the sensitivity of Neuro-2a clone #7 was much better than for clone #4.

TABLE 30

Large differences in GALR1 mRNA in Neuro-2a transfected clonal

cells vs. transfected non-clonal and parental cells.

Cell line
Parental
Non-Clonal
Clone 4
Clone 7
Clone 12

Ave CT
32.0
21.7
20.8
19.3
21.6

fold mRNA
1.0
1269.5
2418.7
6793.8
1332.6

change

5. Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Neuro-2a Clones #7 and #12 with TVEMP-Galanin Compounds

The two clones were tested side-by-side in an attempt to identify the most sensitive and selective of the two, so that data could be confidently collected from the best performing clone. Table 31 shows the results of these two clones when treated with TVEMP-galanin Batch C and LH_N/A for sensitivity and selectivity respectively. Both clones exhibit high Signal-to-Noise ratios. Neuro-2a Clone #7 has an EC₅₀of 5.5 nM while the EC₅₀for Neuro-2a clone #12 is 68.4 nM. The Neuro-2a clone #12 has to be tested with a dose range of 0-300 nM, while the Neuro-2a Clone #7 can be tested with a dose range of 0-30 nM to elicit a plateau at the highest concentration used. Both clones show good separation between the LH_N/A and TVEMP-galanin Batch C, Neuro-2a Clone #12 shows some non-specific uptake at the high concentrations, while Neuro-2a Clone #7 does not. As seen in the tabulated results, the range for testing with Neuro-2a #7 cells is 10-fold lower than that for Neuro-2a #12 cells resulting in a10-fold less compound being used for Neuro-2a #7 than Neuro-2a #12. Neuro-2a #7 is 8-fold more selective than Neuro-2a clone #12 when LH_N/A was used as a comparison. The Signal-to-Noise ratio is over 100 for both clones, however a ratio of 10 would be sufficient to develop a cell based potency assay. The EC₅₀for the Neuro-2a #7 clone is 5.5 nM about 12-fold lower than that for Neuro-2a #12, whose EC₅₀is 68.4 nM. The lower dose-range for testing, the 24-fold selectivity over LH_N/A, the high signal-to-noise ratio, the excellent sensitivity resulting in low EC₅₀, and the low amount of protein required for each test, all imply that Neuro-2a Clone #7 would be the clone to go forward with the cell-based potency assay for use in determining potency ratios for TVEMP-galanin compounds.

TABLE 31

Comparison of characteristics of Neuro-2a clone #7 and #12.

Neuro-2a #7
Neuro-2a #12

Range
0-30
nM
0-300
nM

Selectivity
24-fold
3-fold

Signal-to-Noise ratio
190
547

Percent of max LH_N/A signal over
4.3%
37.6%

max TVEMP-Gal signal

EC₅₀
5.5
nM
68.4
nM

Protein required
~1
μg
~10
μg

Neuro-2a # 7 and #12 were treated with TVEMP-galanin Batch C and LH_N/A for 16 hours in CM. Activity was detected using ECL-ELISA.

Example XVI
Generation of Clonal Cell Lines Overexpressing the KOR-1 Receptor for Dynorphin a Retargeted Endopeptidase Uptake

The following example illustrates how to characterize and compare several clonal cell lines originated from an established cell line transfected with the target receptor and subsequent cloning of the cell line. This specific example refers to the identification and characterization of clonal cell lines transfected with hKOR-1 that were first described in Example III, Table 9.

Four of the AGN P33-KOR clones (clones number 8, 9, 10, and 12 Table 9 in Example III) were selected and tested with Dyn/A with a full dose response of 0-150 nM. At the same time, two SiMa-KOR clones (clones number 12, and 16 from Table 9 in Example III) selected and tested with Dyn/A with a full dose response of 0-150 nM. In this experiment, AGN P33-KOR clones 8, 9, and 12 produced very low uptake and were therefore discarded, AGN P33-KOR clone 10 displayed good uptake and an EC₅₀of 30.3 nM was obtained. The two SiMa-KOR clones tested displayed good uptake and an EC₅₀of 26.6 nM was obtained for clone 16 and an EC₅₀of 11.8 nM was obtained for clone 12. These three clones were then tested for sensitivity and selectivity by comparing the uptake of the target Dyn/A compound against the negative control LH_N/A that lacks a targeting ligand and the Noc/A control. The comparison of the three clones and the parental SiMa cells utilizing a full dose response of 0-150 nM is summarized in Table 32.

TABLE 32

EC₅₀Dyn/A
EC₅₀LHN/A
EC₅₀Noc/A

Cell Line
(nM)
(nM)
(nM)

SiMa Parental
>100
>100
5.4

AGN P33-KOR clone 10
9.7
>150
9.4

SiMa-KOR clone 16
10.6
>100
1.6

SiMa-KOR clone 12
4.65
>150
19.7

There was a marked increase in Dyn/A uptake in the KOR-1 transfected clones treated with Dyn/A while the parental SiMa cells showed minimal uptake of the compound (uptake was similar to the negative control LH_N/A). There is some Noc/A in all the cell lines including parental SiMa cells. This is not surprising as uptake of Noc/A in SiMa cells was observed during the assay development for this retargeted compound. Moreover, Noc/A uptake is best in the AGN P33 cell line that was specifically derived for this retargeted endopeptidase. The difference between Noc/A uptake and Dyn/A compound uptake is greater in the clonal SiMa-KOR clone 12 (SK12) cells. In all the graphs, activity of the negative control, LH_N/A, is minimal, showing that in the absence of the binding domain there is no specific uptake in these cell lines and the lowest was in the SK12 cells showing that the uptake of the Dyn/A compound is highly specific. From these results, the SK12 clone was selected for future optimization and characterization.

Optimization studies were performed with the SK12 cells in order to develop a robust, specific and sensitive assay. Several parameters were assayed including plating media and plating densities, treatment media, and treatment time. A summary of the data obtained during the optimization is provided in Table 33.

TABLE 33

Treat-

Medium used
ment
Cells/well

plating
treating
time
25000
50000
75000
100000
150000

complete
complete
6 hr +
51.3
76
13.4
9.2
n/a

o/n

complete
complete
16 hr
21.3
19.0
4.96
4.64
n/a

complete
complete
16 hr
n/a
n/a
n/a
2.1
15.3

serum
serum
16 hr
n/a
n/a
n/a
9.0
12.1

free
free

complete
serum
16 hr
n/a
10.3
5.4
8.97
8.38

free

complete
complete
16 hr
n/a
7.7
4.86
13.72
11.26

serum
serum
16 hr
n/a
11.2
8.5
8.4
9.2

free
free

Table B shows that cells plated at 100,000 cells per well in CM and treated with compounds in CM showed more variability in EC₅₀values from one experiment to the next (4.6; 1.2 and 13.72 nM) while cells plated at 100,000 cells per well in SFM and treated with compounds diluted in SFM provided the best curves and consistent EC₅₀values (9.0 and 8.4 nM). In future, cells would be plated at 100,000 cells per well in SFM and treated with compounds in SFM too.

SK12 plated on PDL plates at 100,000 cells per well in SFM for 24 hours, followed by treatment in SFM for 16 hours yielded the lowest EC₅₀value of 8.4+/−1.1 nM and a Signal-to Noise ratio of 12. Both these values would be acceptable for future use of this cell in CBPA.

Characterization of SK12 Cells with the Saturation Binding Assay

The saturation Binding assay utilized here was described in detail in Example V. Saturation binding studies were performed using the KOR-1 antagonist ³H-diprenorphine to evaluate binding. The total, specific, and non-specific binding were measured in several experiments. A saturation binding curve of ³H-diprenorphine with the receptor was generated from two independent experiments. It appears that about 25% binding is non-specific and 75% specific binding of the molecule to the receptor. The affinity of the molecule to the receptor is adequate at 6.5 nM. The Bmax indicates that there are 23 fmol KOR-1 receptors per cell on the SK12 cells.

Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as molecular weight, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.

The terms “a,” “an,” “the” and similar referents used in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.

Groupings of alternative elements or embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are not to be construed as limitations. Each group member may be referred to and claimed individually or in any combination with other members of the group or other elements found herein. It is anticipated that one or more members of a group may be included in, or deleted from, a group for reasons of convenience and/or patentability. When any such inclusion or deletion occurs, the specification is deemed to contain the group as modified thus fulfilling the written description of all Markush groups used in the appended claims.

Certain embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Of course, variations on these described embodiments will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventor expects skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.

Specific embodiments disclosed herein may be further limited in the claims using consisting of or consisting essentially of language. When used in the claims, whether as filed or added per amendment, the transition term “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claims. The transition term “consisting essentially of” limits the scope of a claim to the specified materials or steps and those that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s). Embodiments of the invention so claimed are inherently or expressly described and enabled herein.

Furthermore, numerous references have been made to patents and printed publications throughout this specification. Each of the above-cited references and printed publications are individually incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

In closing, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Other modifications that may be employed are within the scope of the invention. Thus, by way of example, but not of limitation, alternative configurations of the present invention may be utilized in accordance with the teachings herein. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to that precisely as shown and described.

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	17157281	Jan 2021	US
Child	18392925		US
Parent	16504870	Jul 2019	US
Child	17157281		US
Parent	15593727	May 2017	US
Child	16504870		US
Parent	14695938	Apr 2015	US
Child	15593727		US
Parent	13801711	Mar 2013	US
Child	14695938		US
Parent	12723595	Mar 2010	US
Child	13801711		US

IMMUNO-BASED RETARGETED ENDOPEPTIDASE ACTIVITY ASSAYS

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

Original Assignees

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Provisional Applications (1)

Continuations (6)