Patent Grant
9914011
The subject application relates generally to impact damping, and more particularly to an impact damping mat, an equipment accessory and a flooring system for mitigating impact generated rebound, noise and/or vibration, for example, from high-impact fitness related activities.
Maintaining an active and healthy lifestyle is becoming increasingly important to people and engaging in a regular fitness routine may be part of that lifestyle. In some situations, these fitness routines may include high-impact training such as CrossFit or Olympic lifting where dropping weights on the floor is common. Weights dropped during these high-impact activities may rebound from the floor increasing the risk of injury to nearby persons and the risk of damage to surrounding structures and equipment. These high-impact activities may also generate significant vibrations, some of which may be audible as noise. These vibrations may propagate into and through surrounding structures creating undesirable noise and vibration pollution for nearby persons. Undesirable rebound and noise may also be generated by other high-impact activities unrelated to fitness, such as by moving equipment, by impacts from heavy objects or simply by high-traffic environments. Consequently, mitigating the rebound of objects and the noise they generate may be particularly desirable for locations where these high-impact activities take place, especially when these high-impact activities take place in gyms or other fitness, sports or training facilities located in buildings with other tenants.
Conventional noise mitigating mats and the like are often unsuitable for use with high-impact activities. For example, they may break down under the significant forces generated by the repetitive impacts, or insufficiently reduce rebound and vibrations. A durable and adaptable impact damping mat, equipment accessory and flooring system suitable for high-impact activities is desired.
It is therefore an object to provide a novel impact damping mat, a novel equipment accessory and a novel flooring system.
Accordingly, in one aspect there is provided an impact damping mat comprising: a base layer having a base surface with a plurality of protuberances; a damping layer overlying the base layer; a load distribution layer overlying the damping layer; and an upper layer overlying the load distribution layer and having a planar top surface, wherein the materials and dimensions of the base layer, the damping layer, the load distribution layer and the upper layer cooperate to provide a selected rebound characteristic and a selected sound reduction characteristic.
According to another aspect there is provided an equipment accessory comprising: at least one impact damping zone, each impact damping zone including: a base layer having a base surface with a plurality of protuberances, a damping layer overlying the base layer, a load distribution layer overlying the damping layer, and an upper layer overlying the load distribution layer and having a planar top surface, wherein the materials and dimensions of the base layer, the damping layer, the load distribution layer and the upper layer cooperate to provide a selected rebound characteristic and a selected sound reduction characteristic; and at least one less damped zone adjacent to at least one of the impact damping zones, each less damped zone providing a different selected rebound characteristic and a different selected sound reduction characteristic than the adjacent impact damping zones.
According to another aspect there is provided a flooring system comprising: at least one impact damping zone, each impact damping zone including: a base layer having a base surface with a plurality of protuberances, a damping layer overlying the base layer, a load distribution layer overlying the damping layer, and an upper layer overlying the load distribution layer and having a planar top surface, wherein the materials and dimensions of the base layer, the damping layer, the load distribution layer and the upper layer cooperate to provide a selected rebound characteristic and a selected sound reduction characteristic.
According to another aspect there is provided an equipment accessory comprising: two impact damping zones, each impact damping zone comprising a base layer having a base surface with a plurality of protuberances, the base layer being formed of rubber and having a thickness of 11/16 of an inch, a damping layer overlying the base layer, the damping layer being formed of a polyether urethane material and having a thickness of ½ of an inch, a load distribution layer overlying the damping layer, the load distribution layer being formed of rubber and having a thickness of 5/16 of an inch, and an upper layer overlying the load distribution layer and having a planar top surface, the upper layer being formed of rubber, having a thickness of 1¼ inches and comprising a recessed undersurface from which a plurality of impact pedestals depend, wherein the impact pedestals contact the load distribution layer and space the undersurface from the load distribution layer, defining an interstitial void between the upper layer and the load distribution layer, wherein all of the layers are secured together with an adhesive, and wherein the base layer, the damping layer, the load distribution layer and the upper layer cooperate to provide a coefficient of restitution no greater than 30% and a reduction of a maximum sound level of at least 5 dB from 40 to 63 Hz ⅓ octave bands and at least 13 dB at and above 80 Hz ⅓ octave bands normalized to a conventional ⅜ inch rollout rubber flooring product; a less damped zone located adjacent and between the two impact damping zones, the less damped zone providing a different coefficient of restitution and a different reduction of the maximum sound level than each of the impact damping zones; and a frame at least partially surrounding the two impact damping zones and the less damped zone.
According to another aspect there is provided a flooring system comprising: a base layer having a base surface with a plurality of protuberances, the base layer being formed of rubber and having a thickness of 11/16 of an inch, the base layer comprising a plurality of elongate base layer runs placed contiguously in a first direction; a damping layer overlying the base layer, the damping layer being formed of a polyether urethane material and having a thickness of ½ of an inch, the damping layer comprising a plurality of elongate damping layer runs placed contiguously in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction; a load distribution layer overlying the damping layer, the load distribution layer being formed of rubber and having a thickness of 5/16 of an inch, the load distribution layer comprising a plurality of elongate load distribution layer runs placed contiguously in the first direction; and an upper layer overlying the load distribution layer and having a planar top surface, the upper layer being formed of rubber and having a thickness of 1¼ inches, the upper layer comprising a plurality of side-by-side tiles, each of the tiles comprising a recessed undersurface from which a plurality of impact pedestals depend, wherein, for each of the tiles, the impact pedestals contact the load distribution layer and space the undersurface from the load distribution layer, defining an interstitial void between the upper layer and the load distribution layer; wherein all of the layers are secured together with an adhesive; wherein the base layer, the damping layer, the load distribution layer and the upper layer cooperate to provide a coefficient of restitution no greater than 30% and a reduction of a maximum sound level of at least 5 dB from 40 to 63 Hz ⅓ octave bands and at least 13 dB at and above 80 Hz ⅓ octave bands normalized to a conventional ⅜ inch rollout rubber flooring product; and wherein each of the tiles comprises at least one interlocking feature to engage at least one adjacent tile in the plurality of side-by-side tiles.
Embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Turning to
The impact damping mat 10 is made up of a stack of layers comprising a base layer 12, a damping layer 14, a load distribution layer 16 and an upper layer 18. The materials and dimensions of the base layer 12, the damping layer 14, the load distribution layer 16 and the upper layer 18 cooperate to provide the impact damping mat 10 with a selected rebound characteristic and a selected sound reduction characteristic. All of the layers of the impact damping mat 10 are secured together with an adhesive (not shown), such as a silane polymer-based adhesive.
As can be seen in
The impact pedestals 34 depending from the undersurface 24 are cylindrical and contact the load distribution layer 16 to space the undersurface 24 of the upper layer 18 apart from the load distribution layer 16, thereby defining an interstitial void 32 between the upper layer 18 and the load distribution layer 16.
The upper layer 18 also includes a number of interlocking features to enable the impact damping mat 10 to engage one or more adjacent mats, which may have the same, similar or different properties to the impact damping mat 10. In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
As discussed above, the materials and dimensions of the base layer 12, the damping layer 14, the load distribution layer 16 and the upper layer 18 cooperate to provide the impact damping mat 10 with a selected rebound characteristic and a selected sound reduction characteristic. As will be understood by a person skilled in the art, altering the materials and/or dimensions of these layers and/or altering the shape of the protuberances 30, the impact pedestals 34 and the interstitial void 32 may alter the rebound and sound reduction characteristics of the impact damping mat 10 and may facilitate with providing the selected rebound and sound reduction characteristics of the impact damping mat 10.
In this embodiment, the selected rebound characteristic of the impact damping mat 10 is a coefficient of restitution no greater than 30% when a 15 lb bowling ball (for example an undrilled TZone® Indigo Swirl, as sold by Brunswick®) is dropped from a height of 1.0 meters above and onto the planar top surface 22, as per ASTM F2117, and the selected sound reduction characteristic of the impact damping mat 10 is a reduction of the maximum sound level (LFmx) of at least 5 dB from 40 Hz to 63 Hz ⅓ octave bands and at least 13 dB at and above 80 Hz ⅓ octave bands normalized to a conventional ⅜″ rollout rubber flooring product (for example GenieMat™ FIT08, as sold by Pliteg™) when a 15 lb bowling ball (for example an undrilled TZone® Indigo Swirl, as sold by Brunswick®) is dropped from a height of 1.0 meters above and onto the planar top surface 22.
Each of the layers of the impact damping mat 10 may contribute, at least partially, to providing the selected rebound and sound reduction characteristics. That said, the primary purpose of each of the layers is considered to be as follows: the primary purpose of the base layer 12 is to provide the selected sound reduction characteristic; the primary purpose of the damping layer 14 is to provide the selected rebound reduction characteristic; the primary purpose of the load distribution layer 16 is to distribute repetitive high-impact forces and protect the damping layer 14; and the primary purpose of the upper layer 18 is to provide durability to the impact damping mat 10. A person skilled in the art will understand that the layers of the impact damping mat 10 may help to serve other purposes, including other primary purposes, and the above list should not be read restrictively.
It has been found that the impact pedestals 34 may damage the damping layer 14 when the load distribution layer 16 is not provided. For example, without the load distribution layer 16, the impact pedestals 34 may punch disks out of the damping layer 14 in a cookie-cutter-like fashion as repetitive high-impact forces are applied to the impact damping mat 10 and transmitted through the impact pedestals 34. In embodiments where the damping layer 14 is susceptible to such damage, providing the load distribution layer 16 helps to distribute these repetitive high-impact forces and protect the damping layer 14. It will be appreciated that in embodiments where the damping layer 14 is sufficiently resilient to withstand the repetitive high-impact forces (which may include embodiments where the impact pedestals 34 are omitted or designed to minimize damage to the damping layer 14, for example by rounding the bottoms of the impact pedestals 34), it may be possible to omit the load distribution layer 16.
In use, typically, a plurality of impact damping mats 10 are placed contiguously over a horizontal surface to span an area. As will be appreciated, the size of this area will depend on the intended use of the impact damping mats 10. When placed contiguously, the interlocking features may assist with maintaining the positions of the impact damping mats 10 relative to one another. While this is the typical intended use of the impact damping mat 10, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that alternative embodiments are also possible. For example, in some embodiments a single impact damping mat 10 may be used in isolation, or a plurality of impact damping mats 10 may be placed interspersedly rather than contiguously. In some embodiments, the impact damping mats 10 may be used in conjunction with a particular piece of equipment, as will now be described.
Turning to
In this embodiment, the equipment accessory 100 comprises two impact damping zones 152, a less damped zone 156 between the two impact damping zones 152 and a frame 160.
The less damped zone 156 is shaped to be secured to the adjacent equipment, which may help to keep the equipment accessory 100 in proximity to the adjacent equipment during high-impact activities and may facilitate incorporating the equipment accessory 100 in locations with limited floor space.
Each impact damping zone 152 is made up of the same four layers previously described for the impact damping mat 10, which are secured together with the adhesive and provide the same rebound and sound reduction characteristics previously described. However, as can be seen in
The frame 160 surrounds at least part of the two impact damping zones 152 and the less damped zone 156. As can be seen in
Overall, the intent is that a person lifting a weight (such as a barbell with a weight plate on either end from the adjacent power rack) would stand on the less damped zone 156 during lifting and drop their weight on the impact damping zones 152 when done lifting, i.e. a weight plate would land on each impact damping zone 152. Accordingly, the less damped zone 156 is located where a person is likely to stand during lifting and the impact damping zones 152 are located on either side of the less damped zone 156, where the weights are likely to land.
Although it has been previously described that a plurality of discrete impact damping mats 10 may be placed contiguously to cover a large horizontal surface, alternative configurations for covering large horizontal surfaces are also possible, as will now be described.
Turning to
The impact damping zone 252 is made up of the same four layers previously described in the impact damping zone 152, which are secured together with adhesive and provide the same rebound and sound reduction characteristics as previously described. However, each of the layers in the impact damping zone 252 comprises a greater number of runs or tiles, which are placed contiguously to accommodate covering the larger horizontal surface of the floor 270. Additionally, as can be seen in
As can be seen in
Although the layers 212, 214, 216, 218 of the flooring system 200 have been described as covering the entire exposed horizontal surface of floor 270 in the embodiment of
Additionally, in some embodiments, the flooring system 200 may further comprise at least one or a plurality of less damped zones located adjacent the impact damping zone or zones 252. These less damped zone or zones provide a different selected rebound characteristic and a different selected sound reduction characteristic than the impact damping zone or zones 252, and in some embodiments may be the same as the less damped zone 156, previously described. It will be appreciated that a variety of layouts for the zones of the flooring system 200 are possible. For example, each impact damping zone 252 may be surrounded by a less damped zone, or vice versa. Alternatively, a plurality of less damped zones may be interspersed with a plurality of impact damping zones 252. The layout of the zones will depend on the intended use of the flooring system 200 and the surrounding environment. In this way, the flooring system 200 may provide a variety of characteristics selected to suit the needs of each zone.
In one or more of the embodiments discussed above, the adhesive may be a one-component, 100% solids, cross-linking, modified silane polymer-based adhesive. This adhesive may be solvent-free, water-free, and isocyanate-free, non-flammable, have low-odor, negligible VOC content and contain no hazardous chemicals as per OSHA Regulation CFR 1910.1200. This adhesive may be a Class 1 vapor barrier, feature extremely low-permeability ratings, withstand maximum moisture levels of 10 lbs and 90% RH and may be unaffected by concrete slab alkalinity, have good early strength buildup for immediate grab which gradually builds into a tenacious but resilient bond as the chemicals in the adhesive cross-link. This adhesive may also have plasticizer migration resistance that allows installation of a broad variety of vinyl floor products.
In one or more of the embodiments discussed above, the base layer may be formed of a material with substantially the following properties: at least 80% recycled rubber, sheet weight of 1.9 lbs/ft2 (9.28 kg/m2), tensile strength per ASTM D412 Die C of 35 psi minimum, elongation at break per ASTM D412 Die C of 60% minimum, compressibility per ASTM F36 @ 50 psi=15%/recovery 85% minimum and @ 100 psi=20%/recovery 85% minimum, type A hardness per ASTM D2240 of 30 durometer, and temperature stability between −40° C. to +115° C. (˜−40° F. to +240° F.). In some embodiments, the base layer may have a thickness of 11/16″ (˜17 mm) and a weight of 203 lbs per 120 ft2. In some embodiments, the base layer may have a thickness of 0″ to 1″ (˜0 mm to 25 mm), inclusive; as will be appreciated, in embodiments where the base layer has a thickness of 0″ (0 mm), the base layer is omitted.
In one or more of the embodiments discussed above, the damping layer may be formed of a highly damped compound such as a microcellular polyether urethane material with substantially the following properties: rubber deterioration/air oven per ASTM D573 of no deterioration, freeze thaw per ASTM C67 of no deterioration, abrasion resistance per ASTM C501 of 77, slip resistance per ASTM E303 of 63 dry and 72.25 wet, slip resistance per ASTM D2047 of 0.601, elongation at break per ASTM D412 of 35.3% and pass a flammability test per ASTM D2859. In some embodiments, the damping layer may have a thickness of ½″ (˜13 mm) and a weight of 0.76 lbs per 1 ft2 (0.155 kg per 1 m2). In some embodiments, the damping layer may have a thickness of ¼″ to 1½″ (˜6 mm to 38 mm), inclusive.
In one or more of the embodiments discussed above, the load distribution layer may be formed of a material with substantially the following properties: wear hardness per DIN 53577 of approximately 4.0 MPa, Shore A hardness per DIN 53505 of 60 (+/−5), compression set per DIN 53517 of approximately 15%, abrasion per DIN 53516 of maximum 200 mm3, tensile strength per EN ISO 1798 of approximately 1.5 N/mm2, elongation at break per EN ISO 1798 of approximately 90%, coefficient of friction per EN 13893:2002 of μ=0.47 (safe), fire resistance per DIN EN 13501-1 of Ef1 (B2), light fastness per DIN EN 105-B02:1999-09 of 2-3, electrostatic properties per DIN EN 1815:1995-06 of 0.5 kV, remaining deformation per EN 433:1994-11 of 0.13 mm and reduction of impact sound pressure level (ALw) per DIN EN ISO 140-8:1998-03 of 18 dB. In some embodiments, the load distribution layer may have a thickness of 5/16″ (˜8 mm) and a volumetric weight (or density) of approximately 66 lbs/ft3 (1 057 kg/m3). In some embodiments, the load distribution layer may have a thickness of 3/16″ to 7/16″ (˜5 mm to 11 mm), inclusive.
In one or more of the embodiments discussed above, the upper layer may be formed of a material with substantially the following properties: at least 80% recycled rubber, wear surface density (durability) of greater than 60 lbs/ft3, acoustical IF09-002 per ASTM E2179 of A26 dB, acoustical A09-009 per ASTM EC423/E795 of SAA=0.14 and NRC 0.15, rubber deterioration/air oven per ASTM D573 of no deterioration, freeze thaw per ASTM C67 of no deterioration, slip resistance per ASTM E303 of 102 dry and 62 wet, slip resistance per ASTM D2047 of 0.81 dry and 0.82 wet, tensile strength per ASTM D412 of 107 psi, elongation at break per ASTM D412 of 165%, tear strength per ASTM D624 of 33.1 lbs/in, compression deflection per ASTM D1667 of 29.5 psi to 25% compression, compression set per ASTM D395 of 4.37% permanent set, flammability per ASTM E648 of Class 2, passing a flammability—burning pill test per ASTM D2859 and flammability—roof covering per ASTM E108 of Class A (premium). In some embodiments, the upper layer may have a thickness of 1¼″ (˜32 mm) and a weight of 22.7 lbs per 3.9375 ft2. In some embodiments, the upper layer may have a thickness of 1″ to 1½″ (˜25 mm to 38 mm), inclusive.
Although the embodiments herein are described as comprising four separate layers, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in alternative embodiments there may be more or fewer layers which cooperate to provide the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristic. For example, in some embodiments the load distribution layer may be omitted and the upper layer may be increased in thickness accordingly, to achieve the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristic. In other embodiments, other layers may be omitted or increased or decreased in thickness.
Although thicknesses and weights of the layers in the embodiments herein have been described with particular measurements, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that these measurements are exemplary and that these measurements may be varied in some embodiments depending on the high-impact activity for which the embodiment is intended to be used.
Although the base layer, the load distribution layer and the upper layer in the embodiments herein have been described as being made of rubber or at least 80% recycled rubber, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments some or all of these layers may be formed of polyurethane, poly-ether urethane, natural rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), at least 90% recycled rubber, fabric and/or polycarbonate.
Although the damping layer in the embodiments herein has been described as being made of a polyether urethane material, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments the damping layer may be formed of polyurethane, poly-ether urethane, natural rubber, SBR, fabric and/or polycarbonate.
Although the layers of the embodiments herein have been described as being secured together with a silane polymer-based adhesive, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments other adhesives or mechanisms for securing the layers together may be used. For example, in some embodiments such other adhesives may include hot adhesives and/or adhesives that are contact based, pressure sensitive based, 1-part and/or multi-part based, solvent based and/or polymer dispersion based, and such other mechanisms may include mechanical adhesion. In some embodiments, a plurality of the layers or none of the layers may be secured together with an adhesive. For example, none of the layers may be secured together in embodiments where the weight of the layers and/or the environment surrounding the layers are sufficient to hold the layers in place during the high-impact activities for which the embodiment is intended to be used.
Although the base layer, the damping layer, the load distribution layer and the upper layer have been described in the embodiments herein as cooperating to provide the impact damping mat and impact damping zones with the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristic, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments more or fewer layers may cooperate to provide the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristic. For example, in embodiments where the impact damping mat or impact damping zones comprise additional layers, all of the layers may cooperate to provide the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristic. Conversely, in embodiments where the impact damping mat or impact damping zones comprise fewer layers (for example, where the load distribution layer is omitted) the remaining layers may cooperate to provide the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristic. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that all of the layers and features of an embodiment may contribute at least partially to the rebound and sound reduction characteristics. Consequently, what layers and features provide the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristics should not be read restrictively.
Although the coefficient of restitution in the embodiments described herein is selected to be no greater than 30% when a 15 lb bowling ball (for example an undrilled TZone® Indigo Swirl, as sold by Brunswick®) is dropped from a height of 1.0 meters above and onto the planar top surface as per ASTM F2117, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that this selected coefficient of restitution is for exemplary purposes only and that the selected coefficient of restitution may be varied in some embodiments depending on the high-impact activity for which the embodiment is intended to be used. A person skilled in the art will also appreciate that the coefficient of restitution may be measured with a mass other than a 15 lb bowling ball in some embodiments, which may vary the measurement.
Although the reduction of maximum sound level in the embodiments described herein is selected to be at least 5 dB from 40 Hz to 63 Hz ⅓ octave bands and at least 13 dB at and above 80 Hz ⅓ octave bands normalized to a conventional ⅜″ rollout rubber flooring product (for example GenieMat™ FIT08, as sold by Pliteg™) when a 15 lb bowling ball (for example an undrilled TZone® Indigo Swirl, as sold by Brunswick®) is dropped from a height of 1.0 meters above and onto the planar top surface, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that this selected reduction of maximum sound level is for exemplary purposes only and the selected reduction of maximum sound level may be varied in some embodiments depending on the high-impact activity for which the embodiment is intended to be used. A person skilled in the art will also appreciate that the reduction of maximum sound level may be measured over other frequency ranges or with a mass other than a 15 lb bowling ball in some embodiments, which may vary the measurement.
Although the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristic in the embodiments described herein are a coefficient of restitution and a reduction of maximum sound level, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that other characteristics may be selected in some embodiments. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the selected rebound characteristic and the selected sound reduction characteristic will depend on the intended use of the impact damping mat, equipment accessory or flooring system. In embodiments where the objects involved in the high-impact activity are more likely to cause injury to nearby persons or damage nearby structure or equipment, the selected rebound characteristic may be a value that results in less rebound. Conversely, in embodiments where the objects involved in the high-impact activity are less likely to cause injury or damage, the selected rebound characteristic may be a value that results in more rebound. Similarly, in embodiments where sounds are more likely to negatively affect nearby persons, the selected sound reduction characteristic may be a value that results in less noise. Conversely, in embodiments where sounds are less likely to negatively affect nearby persons, the selected sound reduction characteristic may be a value that results in more noise.
Although the impact pedestals have been described as spacing the undersurface apart from the load distribution layer thereby defining a single interconnected interstitial void in the embodiments described herein, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some other embodiments these features may define a plurality of interstitial voids between the upper layer and the load distribution layer.
Although the impact pedestals are shown and described as cylindrical, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments the impact pedestals may be other shapes or configurations, for example, in some embodiments the impact pedestals may be conoid, polyhedronal, spherical caps, spherical segments, ellipsoidal caps, ellipsoidal segments and/or sinusoidal shaped. In some embodiments the impact pedestals may be hollow. In some embodiments the impact pedestals may be omitted and the undersurface of the upper layer may not be recessed and may be planar, similar to the bottom surfaces of damping layer and the load distribution layer as previously described. In such embodiments, the load distribution layer may be omitted from the impact damping mat.
Although the protuberances are shown and described as being shaped to define a sinusoidal array of peaks and valleys, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments the protuberances may be other shapes or configurations, for example, in some embodiments the protuberances may be conoid, cylindrical, polyhedronal, spherical caps, spherical segments, ellipsoidal caps and/or ellipsoidal segments. In some embodiments the protuberances may be hollow.
Although the interlocking features in the embodiments herein have been shown and described as comprising L-shaped protrusions, gaps and detents wherein each protrusion is adapted to pass through a gap in the side wall of an adjacent mat and engage a detent of that adjacent mat, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments the interlocking features may be adapted to engage other objects such as adjacent equipment, adjacent flooring and/or an adjacent structure. Further, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments the interlocking features may protrude from another layer or from a plurality of layers. For example, an interlocking feature may comprise a first portion extending from the upper layer and a second portion extending from the base layer which cooperate to engage an adjacent object. In some embodiments, the interlocking features may comprise one or a plurality of channel-shapes, crenulations, tabs, slots, protrusions, cut-outs, intrusions, indentations, detents and/or perforations. In some embodiments, the interlocking features may not be wholly located at the periphery of the impact damping mat or a tile thereof. For example, in some embodiments an interlocking feature may comprise a threaded rod which is secured at the periphery of the impact damping mat or tile and extends through the impact damping mat or tile.
Although the less damped zones in the embodiments herein have been described above as being stiffer than the impact damping zones, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments the less damped zone may provide other properties complimentary to their intended use. As will also be appreciated, in embodiments with a plurality of less damped zones, the less damped zones may provide the same or different properties from one another. For example, one or more of the less damped zones may provide increased stability to accommodate weight lifting, while one or more other less damped zones may be softer to accommodate stretching or other activities. Similarly, in embodiments with a plurality of impact damping zones, the impact damping zones may provide the same or different selected rebound characteristics and the same or different selected sound reduction characteristics from each other.
Although the less damped zone has been described above as being formed of wood, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in other embodiments each less damped zone may be formed of other suitable materials such as polyurethane, poly-ether urethane, natural rubber, SBR, fabric, polycarbonate, plywood, gypsum concrete, lightweight concrete, normal weight concrete, oriented strand board, luon, cement board, paper board, gypsum board, particle board, plastic and/or metal.
Although the bottom three layers (the base layer, the damping layer and the load distribution layer) of the equipment accessory and the flooring system have each been described as being in the form of elongate and continuous strips or runs, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that each of these layers may take the form of a plurality of discrete side-by-side tiles, similar to the upper layer previously described. Likewise, while the upper layer has been described as being provided as a plurality of discrete side-by-side tiles, this layer may take the form of one or more elongate and continuous strips or runs, similar to the aforementioned bottom three layers.
Where a plurality of adjacent layers are provided in the form of tiles, one or more tiles from each of these layers may be secured together to form a pre-assembled multi-layer tile. Providing a plurality of layers as tiles and/or pre-assembled multi-layer tiles may facilitate installation, shipment and/or storage of these layers. It may be particularly desirable to provide a layer as a plurality of tiles where that layer is too stiff to be provided as runs that can be rolled up for shipment and/or storage.
Although the equipment accessory has been described above as comprising two impact damping zones and one less damped zone, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments the equipment accessory may comprise one impact damping zone or more than two impact damping zones. Similarly, in some embodiments the equipment accessory may comprise a plurality of less damped zones. As will be appreciated, the composition of the equipment accessory may vary depending on the high-impact activity and the adjacent equipment with which the equipment accessory is intended to be used. In some embodiments the adjacent equipment may not be fitness equipment and may be some other equipment associated with a high-impact activity which may take place in a mechanical room, healthcare facility, studio, school or the like.
Although the less damped zone has been described as being shaped to be secured to the adjacent equipment, in some embodiments, at least one or a plurality of the less damped zone, the frame and the impact damping zones may be shaped to be secured to the adjacent equipment. In some embodiments, at least one or a plurality of the frame, the less damped zone and the impact damping zones may comprise a fastening mechanism to secure the equipment accessory to the adjacent equipment. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the equipment accessory, and the elements thereof, may be adapted to be secured to the adjacent equipment in a variety of ways depending on the adjacent equipment with which the equipment accessory is intended to be used. For example, in some embodiments the less damped zone of the equipment accessory may be shaped to pass between parts of the adjacent equipment and thereby be secured to the adjacent equipment.
Although the interlocking features have been described as omitting the L-shaped protrusion on the sides of the impact damping zones adjacent the frame and the less damped zone in the equipment accessory, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that the interlocking features may vary depending on the composition of the equipment accessory and the adjacent equipment with which the equipment accessory is intended to be used. In some embodiments, the interlocking features may be omitted or different than previously described on various sides of the impact damping zones, for example, in some embodiments the interlocking features on the sides of the impact damping zones adjacent the less damped zone may be adapted to engage the less damped zone, to assist with maintaining the position of the impact damping zones relative to the less damped zone.
Although the horizontal surface in the embodiments herein has been described as a finished floor, subfloor or underfloor surface, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that the impact damping mat, equipment accessory and flooring system described herein are adaptable and can overlie a variety of surfaces in a variety of embodiments. These surfaces may comprise a concrete slab or other materials, for example, plywood, gypsum concrete, lightweight concrete, normal weight concrete, oriented strand board, luon, cement board, paper board, gypsum board and/or particle board.
Although the embodiments of the impact damping mat, equipment accessory and flooring system have been described individually and separately, above, a person skilled in the art will appreciate that these embodiments are intentionally adaptable and should not be read as necessarily distinct. For example, in some embodiments a plurality of the impact damping mats may be placed contiguously to cover all or part of a horizontal surface such that the impact damping mats form a defacto flooring system. Similarly, in some embodiments, the flooring system may only cover a portion of a horizontal surface such that it forms a defacto impact damping mat and/or equipment accessory.
The impact damping mat, equipment accessory and/or flooring system described herein may be used in many environments. For example, the impact damping mat, equipment accessory and/or flooring system can be used to retrofit existing buildings or may be installed in a newly constructed building to mitigate rebound and noise generated from high-impact activities.
Embodiments of the impact damping mat, equipment accessory and flooring system have been described above, and with reference to the drawings for the impact damping mat and equipment accessory. Those of skill in the art will however appreciate that variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope thereof as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/184,352 filed on Jun. 25, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 205271 | Hyatt | Jun 1878 | A |
| 1554179 | Trader | Sep 1925 | A |
| 1940105 | Schmid | Dec 1933 | A |
| 2001916 | Mazer | May 1935 | A |
| 2077617 | Cramer | Apr 1937 | A |
| 2270902 | Rubissow | Jan 1942 | A |
| 2288054 | Walton | Jun 1942 | A |
| 2290622 | Carter | Jul 1942 | A |
| 2337525 | Peik | Dec 1943 | A |
| 2665848 | Smith et al. | Jan 1954 | A |
| 2768091 | Cubberley | Oct 1956 | A |
| 2821254 | Kernen | Jan 1958 | A |
| 2862255 | Nelson | Dec 1958 | A |
| 2940887 | Daly et al. | Jun 1960 | A |
| 2961029 | Rainar | Nov 1960 | A |
| 3026224 | Rogers, Jr. | Mar 1962 | A |
| 3160549 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3311331 | Steimen | Mar 1967 | A |
| 3345245 | Hanusa | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3399103 | Salyer et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
| 3418812 | Khan et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3436042 | Van Goubergen | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3459400 | Rothermel | Aug 1969 | A |
| 3567563 | Haudenchild et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3579941 | Tibbals | May 1971 | A |
| 3641855 | Balle | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3770560 | Elder et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3893619 | Bruner | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3917501 | Ferrucci et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3924907 | Czernik et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3948009 | Bernhard | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3985198 | Kurtze et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4002315 | Van Goubergen | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4060502 | Benton | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4112176 | Bailey | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4143495 | Hintz | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4179067 | Baier | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4190131 | Robinson | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4242391 | Reinhardt et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4244841 | Frankland | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4265398 | Luebke | May 1981 | A |
| 4361614 | Moffitt, Jr. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4428454 | Capaul et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4454181 | Hohn | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4457120 | Takata | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4500037 | Braitsch et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4551362 | Harms et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4566231 | Konsevich | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4637942 | Tomarin | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4672100 | Schonbachler et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4681786 | Brown | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4685259 | Eberhart et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4694627 | Omholt | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4696429 | Ortwein | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4720043 | Ortwein | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4753841 | Noel et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4755408 | Noel | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4771944 | Brister et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4803112 | Kakimoto et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4851500 | Lalwani et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4860506 | Yoshimi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4888927 | Yoshimi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4909003 | Hennigan | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4910935 | Leukel et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4917932 | McClung | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4945697 | Ott et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4957798 | Bogdany | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4967529 | L'Heureux | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4973505 | Bielous | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5016413 | Counihan | May 1991 | A |
| 5060856 | Ortwein | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5096772 | Snyder | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5110660 | Wolf et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5183438 | Blom | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5187905 | Pourtau et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5258222 | Crivelli | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5383314 | Rothberg | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5424099 | Stewart et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5438171 | Schmanski | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5439735 | Jamison | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5472750 | Miller | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5482754 | Crook | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5487501 | Engst et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5527409 | Lanphier | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5572842 | Stief et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5584950 | Gaffigan | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5619832 | Myrvold | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5653099 | MacKenzie | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5714219 | Mashunkashey et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721035 | Dunn | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5738279 | Ihle et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744763 | Iwasa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5766721 | Bussey, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5851338 | Pushaw | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853352 | Login | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867957 | Holtrop | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5873936 | Ogden | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879781 | Mehta et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5956921 | Fleck et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6077613 | Gaffigan | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6182413 | Magnusson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6212838 | Eda | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6213252 | Ducharme | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224707 | Lion | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235367 | Holmes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6251493 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256955 | Lolley et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6291048 | Jerdee et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6372069 | Walls | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6386461 | Wildgoose | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6427925 | Gaudet | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6468631 | Pahl et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6481637 | McQueen | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6541105 | Park | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6595321 | Tompson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6602586 | Kakimoto et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6708896 | Robinson | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6723413 | Walters | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6769834 | Stange | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6786852 | Watterson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6796096 | Heath | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6918215 | Smith | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6920723 | Downey | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6945007 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6990703 | Brown et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7055649 | Tompson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7080712 | Tsuiki et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7096630 | Keene et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7166678 | Dunlap et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7182994 | Scott | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7263028 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7265178 | Maier et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7278588 | English et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7331534 | McQueen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7464791 | Cooksey et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7566374 | Brazier et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7587865 | Moller, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7730684 | Keene | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7730685 | Keene | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| RE41945 | Downey | Nov 2010 | E |
| 7850498 | Yeh | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7987645 | Tinianov | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8015848 | Colon | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8113495 | Downey | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 20010052550 | Janssens | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020005250 | Jerdee et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020015840 | Kakimoto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040079 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020074075 | Brown et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020088193 | Reimers et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119716 | Santhosh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030033779 | Downey | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037508 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040405 | Watterson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030102184 | Brisson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040050482 | Abrams | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040055813 | Tsuiki et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040096645 | Hancy et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123555 | Cole | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127614 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202854 | Esparza | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050023080 | Tompson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050031829 | Crenshaw et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050032447 | Tachibana et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050037174 | Streeton et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050098648 | McQueen | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050126848 | Siavoshai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221039 | Dunlap et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050282465 | McNab | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008612 | Brazier et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060016635 | Downey | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024453 | Setser et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060037815 | Schabel, Jr. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072372 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060097064 | English et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105136 | Brazier et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151908 | Brazier et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060156663 | Mao | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060162997 | Cooksey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165950 | Dodge, III | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167206 | Maier et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189750 | Maier et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060191743 | Pike, Sr. et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205869 | Steidl et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230699 | Keene | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070004306 | Leeser et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172629 | Dodge | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261365 | Keene | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080010930 | Mao | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080081153 | Yeh | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20090283658 | Keene | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100229486 | Keene | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110107700 | Keene | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20120167522 | Pien | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20130139464 | DeLong | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130180187 | Takeshita | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130312364 | Krovats | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140099847 | Tsai | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20150059276 | Valentine | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150345154 | Permesang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160053496 | Sosnowski | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160251862 | Chen | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3407031 | Sep 1985 | DE |
| 4141023 | Jun 1993 | DE |
| 19932991 | Jun 2000 | DE |
| 102013113538 | Jun 2015 | DE |
| 0916629 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0982444 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1447495 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1739253 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 1757750 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 2503206 | Oct 1982 | FR |
| 2824094 | Oct 2002 | FR |
| 841867 | Jul 1960 | GB |
| 1120827 | Jul 1968 | GB |
| 2379934 | Mar 2003 | GB |
| 2428698 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 2437180 | Oct 2007 | GB |
| 48014737 | Feb 1973 | JP |
| 8297492 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 200054610 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 8302127 | Jun 1983 | WO |
| 8700828 | Feb 1987 | WO |
| 9312283 | Jun 1993 | WO |
| 9966144 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| 0155530 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 0235025 | May 2002 | WO |
| 02094550 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| 2004031501 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2004058416 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2006131138 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2007015081 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| 2007082339 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160375296 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62184352 | Jun 2015 | US |
