The invention relates to an impact device for a rock drill or the like, comprising means for delivering a stress pulse at a tool connected to the impact device.
In prior art impact devices, a stroke is generated by means of a reciprocating percussion piston, which is typically driven hydraulically or pneumatically and in some cases electrically or by means of a combustion engine. A stress pulse is generated in a tool, such as a drill rod, when the percussion piston strikes an impact surface of either a shank or a tool.
A problem with the prior art impact devices is that the reciprocating movement of the percussion piston produces dynamic accelerating forces that complicate control of the apparatus. As the piston accelerates in the direction of impact, the drill tends to simultaneously move in the opposite direction, thus reducing the compressive force of the end of the drill bit or the tool with respect to the material to be processed. In order to maintain a sufficiently high compressive force of the drill bit or the tool against the material to be processed, the impact device must be pushed sufficiently strongly towards the material. This, in turn, requires the additional force to be taken into account in the supporting and other structures of the impact device, wherefore the apparatus will become larger and heavier and more expensive to manufacture. Due to its mass, the percussion piston is slow, which restricts the reciprocating frequency of the piston and thus the striking frequency, although it should be significantly increased in order to improve the efficiency of the impact device. However, in the present arrangements this results in far lower efficiency, wherefore in practice it is not possible to increase the frequency of the impact device.
An objective of the present invention is to provide an impact device where the dynamic forces generated by impact operation have less disadvantageous effects than in the prior art arrangements, such devices enabling easier increase of the reciprocating frequency. The impact device according to the invention is characterized by what is disclosed in the appended claims.
According to a basic idea of the invention, a stroke is provided by one or more elastic impact elements, which are subjected to a stress state for storing energy for each stroke. In the stress state, the length of the element changes with respect to its length in a non-stress state, and the stress state of the impact element is suddenly released, whereupon the element tends to return to its rest length and to deliver a stroke, or to direct a stress pulse, at the tool by means of the stored stress energy.
The invention has the advantage that an impulse-like impact movement generated as described above does not require a reciprocating percussion piston, but the change in the length of the elastic impact element is in the order of a millimetre. As a result, there is no need to move large masses back and forth in the impact direction, and the dynamic forces are small compared to the dynamic forces generated by the heavy reciprocating percussion pistons used in the prior art arrangements. Furthermore, such a structure enables an increase of the reciprocating speed without essential deterioration of efficiency.
The invention will be described in more detail in the accompanying drawings, in which
When the impact element is prestressed, e.g. compressed a shown by way of an example in the figure, the impact device 1 is pushed forward so that an end of a tool 3 is pressed firmly against the end of the impact device either directly or via a separate connecting piece, such as a shank or the like. In such a situation, the impact element is suddenly released from compression, whereupon it tends to return to its natural length. As a result, a stress wave is generated in the drill rod or some other tool, and in propagating to the tool end the wave produces a stroke in the material to be processed, similarly as in the prior art impact devices.
In theory, without losses the ratio of the impact element and the prestress thereof or the propagating stress wave, respectively, is such that the length of the stress wave is twice the length of the strained part of the impact element, and correspondingly the strength of the stress wave is half the stress reserved in the impact element for the impact. In practice, these values change due to losses.
If the entire length of the impact element 2 is used, the element is compressed schematically by means of hydraulic fluid supplied to a pressure space 6 behind the piston 4, so that the entire length of the impact element shown to the left of the piston 4 in the figure will be strained. As a result, the length of the impact pulse is approximately twice L1. If a shorter impact pulse of a different shape is desired, for example the support jaws 5a are made to rest on corresponding shoulder 2a, and when the impact element 2 is prestressed, it compresses only at the length between the piston 4 and corresponding shoulder 2a. Consequently, the length of the stress wave propagating to the tool 3 due to the stroke is approximately twice L2. An even shorter stress wave is obtained by means of corresponding shoulder 2b and support jaws 5b. The operating properties of the impact device can thus be changed suitably according to the current tool and the working conditions.
The mechanical structure of the booster piston 11 can be replaced with a hydraulic structure. In such a structure as shown in
The figure also shows a structure of an impact element suitable for implementing the impact device according to the invention. In this embodiment, the impact element is formed of several parallel components, which are of the same length, however. Correspondingly, the length of the impact element is equal to the length of these components, and in other respects the element corresponds to an individual impact element of the same length and with a corresponding cross-section.
Transfer of the stored energy from the impact element to the tool requires the stress to be released rather quickly. However, if the strength and length of the stress pulse transferred to the tool is to be adjusted, it is possible to utilize the release rate of the impact element. In other words, when the impact element is released more slowly, the strength of the stress pulse propagating to the tool can be decreased and the length thereof increased, whereupon the properties of the stroke delivered by the tool at the material to be processed change correspondingly. Even in this case the stress of the impact element is released rather rapidly. In another alternative embodiment of the impact element, one or more parallel solid elements are replaced with a tubular element, if required for constructional reasons.
The invention is described in the above specification and in the drawings only by way of an example and it is not restricted thereto in any way. The essential feature is that a stress pulse is generated in the tool by means of an impact element that is subjected to either compression or tensile stress by a desired force to provide a desired stress state, whereafter the impact element is suddenly released from the stress state so that the tension is discharged either directly or indirectly to the end of the tool and further to the tool.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20011434 | Jul 2001 | FI | national |
This is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/FI02/00590, with an International filing date of Jul. 1, 2002, designating the United States, claiming the priority of Finnish Application No. 20011434, filed Jul. 2, 2001, and published in English by the International Bureau on Jan. 16, 2003, as WO 03/004822. Priority of the above-mentioned applications is claimed and each of the above-mentioned applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
879971 | Locke | Feb 1908 | A |
3162252 | Holland et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3417828 | Duyster et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3570609 | Wise | Mar 1971 | A |
3583498 | Dorm | Jun 1971 | A |
3662843 | Wise | May 1972 | A |
3792738 | Mori et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3887018 | Jayne | Jun 1975 | A |
4082152 | Whitworth | Apr 1978 | A |
4159039 | Kasuga et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4256187 | Barnard | Mar 1981 | A |
4930584 | Chaur Ching et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4993504 | Rodert et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5289887 | Puttmann | Mar 1994 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 070 569 | Dec 1998 | EP |
2 328 342 | Jun 1997 | GB |
WO 9726090 | Jan 1997 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040226752 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/FI02/00590 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10749381 | US |