The present invention relates to a hammer drill and/or chipping hammer having a drive motor, an impact mechanism and a tool fitting for fitting a tool. The impact mechanism has an anvil that is axially displaceable in an anvil guide and acts on the tool. The impact mechanism is equipped with an idle-strike damper element, which acts between the anvil and the tool fitting. The impact mechanism has a guide housing, which engages at least partially around the anvil and/or the tool fitting.
Hammer drills and/or chipping hammers of the type mentioned at the beginning are known in principle from the prior art.
Idle-strike damper elements and rebound-strike damper elements, which are preferably in the form of elastomer damping elements, are used in order to keep force peaks on downstream components and vibrations as low as possible. When the impact mechanism is at the working point, the anvil butts, after each strike, against a typically provided rebound-strike disk and this is absorbed by the rebound-strike damping element.
In the event of too low a pressing force or the breaking away of concrete/stone to be worked on, idle strikes can occur. This means that strikes with full impact energy have to be absorbed by the hammer and in particular the tool fitting itself. In order to protect the downstream components from a force peak of the idle strike, use is typically made of an idle-strike damping element. Idle-strike damping by the idle-strike damper element influences the return speed of the anvil after an idle strike and thus also the deactivation behavior of the hammer.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a hammer drill and/or chipping hammer in which a load on the tool fitting is comparatively reduced.
The present disclosure provides an additional idle-strike damper element, which acts between the tool fitting and the guide housing. The invention has the advantage that a comparatively low anvil return speed can be achieved by two damping elements working against one another. While the idle-strike damper element rebounds during a return movement of the anvil, i.e. after an idle strike, the additional idle-strike damper element that acts between the tool fitting and the guide housing is compressed, and so the anvil is accelerated back only to a comparatively minor extent. This results in turn in a comparatively reduced load on the tool fitting.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the tool fitting is movable in the axial direction relative to the guide housing and/or is arranged at least partially within the guide housing. It has been found to be advantageous if the impact mechanism has a rebound-strike damper element and an additional rebound-strike damper element. The rebound-strike damper element acts preferably between the anvil and the guide housing. It has been found to be advantageous if the additional rebound-strike damper element is arranged so as to act between the tool fitting and the guide housing. As a result of cooperation of the additional idle-strike damper element and additional rebound-strike damper element, it is possible for the tool fitting to be mounted in a floating manner, with the result that a not inconsiderable part of the impact energy of the anvil can already be attenuated.
It has been found to be advantageous if the additional idle-strike damper element and/or the additional rebound-strike damper element is/are spaced further apart from the anvil in the radial direction than the idle-strike damper element and/or the rebound-strike damper element. With respect to the guide housing, the additional idle-strike damper element can be supported in the axial direction by a guide bearing.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, force introduction from the tool fitting into the unit made up of the additional idle-strike damper element and additional rebound-strike damper element takes place by way of a ring or peg protruding in a radial direction from the tool fitting. It has been found to be advantageous if the ring or peg engages, with respect to the axial direction of the anvil, between the additional idle-strike damper element and additional rebound-strike damper element. The ring or peg can be clamped in place in the axial direction between the additional idle-strike damper element and the additional rebound-strike damper element.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the anvil is assigned a contact piece, which is arranged so as to make contact with an idle-strike stop surface on one side and to make contact with a rebound-strike stop surface on the other side. It has been found to be advantageous if the idle-strike stop surface is formed on an idle-strike stop ring comprised by the tool fitting and/or the rebound-strike stop surface is formed on a rebound-strike stop ring comprised by the tool fitting.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the impact mechanism has an idle-strike wedge ring and/or a rebound-strike wedge ring. The idle-strike wedge ring can be arranged between a first bearing of the anvil guide and the idle-strike damper element. It has been found to be advantageous if the rebound-strike wedge ring is arranged between a second bearing of the anvil guide and the rebound-strike damper element. The first and/or the second bearing can be in the form of a plain bearing or of a rolling bearing.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the idle-strike wedge ring is supported on its side facing away from the idle-strike damper element and in the axial direction only against the first bearing. The rebound-strike wedge ring can be supported on its side facing away from the rebound-strike damper element and in the axial direction only against the second bearing.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the contact piece is formed separately from the anvil. The contact piece can advantageously be clamped in place resiliently in the axial direction between the idle-strike damper element and the rebound-strike damper element. It has been found to be advantageous if the contact piece is movable in the axial direction relative to the anvil. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the anvil has a channel extending in the axial direction. Particularly preferably, the contact piece is permanently engaged with the channel.
As an alternative to the contact piece being formed separately from the anvil, the contact piece can be formed in one piece with the anvil. It has been found to be advantageous if the idle-strike damper element, the rebound-strike damper element, the additional idle-strike damper element and/or the additional rebound-strike damper element are in the form of elastomer bodies.
Further advantages will become apparent from the following description of the figures. Various exemplary embodiments of the present invention are shown in the figures. The figures, the description and the claims contain numerous features in combination. A person skilled in the art will expediently also consider the features individually and combine them to form useful further combinations.
In the figures, identical and similar components are denoted by the same reference signs. In the figures:
A preferred exemplary embodiment of a hammer drill and/or chipping hammer 100 according to the invention is illustrated in
The impact mechanism 10 has an anvil 30 that is displaceable in the axial direction AR in an anvil guide 20 and acts on the tool 110. The anvil guide 20 is realized by a first bearing 21 and a second bearing 23 (in the form for example of a rolling bearing here), which are respectively supported both in a radial direction RR and in the axial direction AR against the tool fitting 50.
The impact mechanism 10 has an idle-strike damper element 11, which acts between the anvil 30 and the tool fitting 50 (via the idle-strike stop ring 56). The impact mechanism 10 also has a guide housing 80, which engages at least partially around the anvil 30 and the tool fitting 50. According to the invention, an additional idle-strike damper element 31 is provided, which acts between the tool fitting 50 and the guide housing 80. The tool fitting 50 is movable in the axial direction AR relative to the guide housing 80 and is arranged at least partially within the guide housing 80. If the tool fitting 50 moves further out of the guide housing 80 in the axial direction AR, i.e. to the left in
As is likewise apparent from
The anvil 30 is assigned a contact piece 35, which is arranged so as to make contact with an idle-strike stop surface 12 on one side and to make contact with a rebound-strike stop surface 14 on the other side. In the exemplary embodiment in
A further preferred exemplary embodiment of an impact mechanism 10 is illustrated in
In contrast to the exemplary embodiment shown in
In the state shown in
The impact mechanism in
As is apparent from
The contact piece 35 separate from the anvil 30 is clamped in place resiliently in the axial direction AR between the idle-strike damper element 11 and the rebound-strike damper element 13. In this regard, during operation of the impact mechanism 10, “conventional” striking of the contact piece 35 against the idle-strike stop ring 56 or the rebound-strike stop ring 55 does not occur.
As in the exemplary embodiment in
As is likewise apparent from
As a result of cooperation of the additional idle-strike damper element 31 and additional rebound-strike damper element 33, in this exemplary embodiment, too, the tool fitting 50 is mounted in a floating manner, with the result that a not inconsiderable part of the impact energy of the anvil 30 can already be attenuated.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
19209451 | Nov 2019 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/081267 | 11/6/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/094214 | 5/20/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1873173 | Anderson | Aug 1932 | A |
2685274 | Liddicoat | Aug 1954 | A |
2875731 | Settles | Mar 1959 | A |
3507337 | Franz | Apr 1970 | A |
3828863 | Bleicher | Aug 1974 | A |
3939923 | Aldag | Feb 1976 | A |
4064949 | Chromy | Dec 1977 | A |
4442906 | Simpson | Apr 1984 | A |
4476941 | Buck | Oct 1984 | A |
4585077 | Bergler | Apr 1986 | A |
4798249 | Hoereth | Jan 1989 | A |
5050687 | Prokhorov et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5199833 | Fehrle | Apr 1993 | A |
5573075 | Henry | Nov 1996 | A |
6675908 | Frauhammer | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6732815 | Hanke | May 2004 | B2 |
7013986 | Mikiya | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7445054 | Heep | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7523791 | Aoki | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7588097 | Kamegai | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7806201 | Aoki | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7878265 | Aoki | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7950471 | Loeffler | May 2011 | B2 |
8087472 | Usselman | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8272453 | Ullrich | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8720599 | Ikuta | May 2014 | B2 |
8991517 | Sugiyama | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9272408 | Koch | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9321163 | Onoda | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9656378 | Hartmann | May 2017 | B2 |
9724814 | Yoshikane | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9962823 | Machida | May 2018 | B2 |
20050269117 | Sato et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080217040 | Loeffler et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245220 | Duesselberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100038104 | Baumann | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20160311103 | Wiedner | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20190308308 | Mayr | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
659792 | Feb 1987 | CH |
1042215 | May 1990 | CN |
1706598 | Dec 2005 | CN |
102862149 | Jan 2013 | CN |
0663270 | Jul 1995 | EP |
1238759 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1479485 | Nov 2004 | EP |
2199031 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2314420 | Apr 2011 | EP |
618546 | Feb 1949 | GB |
WO 2009036526 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2010082871 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2013029855 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2015000129 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO 2021094213 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021094214 | May 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report of PCT/EP2020/081266, Feb. 8, 2021. |
International Search Report of PCT/EP2020/081267, Feb. 8, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220362916 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |