IMPACT SENSING DEVICE AND HELMET INCORPORATING THE SAME

Abstract

An impact sensing device including a plurality of accelerometers orthogonally oriented with respect to each other and attachable at a body location, each capable of producing signals indicative of impacts. An integrated circuit is configured to determine the magnitude and direction of the impacts based on the signals and operative to activate an indicator when the magnitude exceeds a first threshold based on the direction of the impact and when the magnitude exceeds a second threshold more than a selected number of times. A head injury coefficient is determined based on the magnitude and a duration of the impact, and the threshold level of acceleration is expressed in terms of a head injury coefficient value, which is determined by empirically correlating a head injury coefficient measured at the body location and a head injury coefficient measured at the center of mass of a human head resulting from an impact.

Description

BACKGROUND

Concussion, or mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI), is the most common type of traumatic brain injury. Sports-related concussions have increased over the years. This may be related to the increased physical stature of athletes and the intensity of contact sports over time. Frequently defined as a head injury with a temporary loss of brain function, concussion can cause a variety of physical, cognitive, and emotional symptoms.

The human body generally is built to protect the brain from traumatic injury. Cerebrospinal fluid surrounds the brain beneath the skull. The skull provides the hardened exterior protection, while the cerebrospinal fluid provides a hydraulic “cushion” that protects the brain from light trauma. However, severe impacts or forces associated with rapid acceleration and deceleration may not be absorbed by this cushion. As they are understood, however, concussions are likely caused by impact forces, in which the head strikes or is struck by an object. In other instances, concussion may be caused by impulsive forces, in which the head moves without itself being subject to blunt trauma, such as in the case of severe whiplash.

Concussive forces may engage an individual's head in a manner that causes linear, rotational, or angular movement of the brain. In rotational movement, the head turns around its center of gravity, and in angular movement it turns on an axis not through its center of gravity. Concussions and their proximate causation remain the center of study and debate. However, it is generally accepted that the threshold amount of blunt force for concussion is approximately 70-75 g (g indicates the force of gravity). Impacts to the individual's head of this magnitude and greater are thought to adversely affect the midbrain and diencephalon. The forces from the injury are believed to disrupt the normal cellular activities in the reticular activating system located in these areas. Such disruption may produce loss of consciousness, which often occurs in concussion injuries.

The prior art has produced a wide array of protective equipment, such as helmets, mouth guards, and other headgear in an attempt to reduce the number of sports-related concussions. However, diagnosis, especially during a sporting event, remains undeveloped in the art. Typically, concussion diagnosis is based on physical and neurological exams, duration of unconsciousness and post-traumatic amnesia. Various neuropsychological tests are used to measure cognitive function. However, the tests may be administered hours, days, or weeks after the injury to determine whether there is a trend in the patient's condition. Frequently, athletes and coaches are too focused on the sporting event and not on the athlete's current or long-term health. Accordingly, basic initial symptoms are overlooked or ignored by some athletes and coaches in the “heat of battle.” Unfortunately, the prior art has, heretofore, not provided safe and reliable mechanisms for detecting the likelihood of concussion-related injury.

SUMMARY

This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary, and the foregoing Background, are not intended to identify key aspects or essential aspects of the claimed subject matter. Moreover, this Summary is not intended for use as an aid in determining the scope of claimed subject matter.

Disclosed herein is an impact sensing device comprising an accelerometer capable of producing a signal that is indicative of acceleration and an indicator, such as a light emitting diode (LED), that has an active state and an inactive state. The impact sensing device also includes an integrated circuit that is operative to receive the signal from the accelerometer and operative to cause the indicator to be in the active state if the signal reaches a selected threshold level.

In an embodiment, the impact sensing device includes at least one accelerometer capable of producing signals indicative of multiple impacts and an integrated circuit configured to receive the signals and activate an indicator, such as a visual indicator, when the signal exceeds a selected first threshold level. The integrated circuit is also configured to activate an indicator when the signals from multiple impacts exceed a selected second threshold level a certain number of times. The impact sensing device may include an item attachable to the body of a person, such as a head band, helmet, or chin guard, for example. The visual indicator may be in the form of a multicolor light emitting diode. In another embodiment, the visual indicator may include multiple indicators. Furthermore the impact sensing device may include an indicator for each of the first and second threshold levels.

In an embodiment, the impact sensing device is in the form of a chin guard having a shell sized and configured to receive a person's chin. The accelerometer and integrated circuit may be contained in the shell and disposed between the shell and a soft inner cuff disposed in the shell. The chin guard may also include a strap that is connectable to a helmet. In an embodiment, the strap includes a button snap attached to the strap and connectable to a helmet, wherein the button snap includes contacts operative to activate the impact sensing device when connected to the helmet.

In another embodiment, the impact sensing device includes a plurality of accelerometers orthogonally oriented with respect to each other, each capable of producing a signal indicative of an impact. In this case, the integrated circuit is configured to determine the magnitude and direction of the impact and activate the indicator when the magnitude exceeds a selected threshold based on the direction of the impact.

Also contemplated is a method for indicating when a user has received a potentially traumatic impact or impacts. In an embodiment the method comprises establishing a first and second threshold levels of acceleration for at least one direction of interest and attaching a plurality of accelerometers to a user at a body location. The method also comprises establishing a maximum number of impacts at the second threshold level. Each accelerometer is orthogonally oriented with respect to each other and each capable of producing a signal indicative of an impact. The magnitude and direction of the impact is determined based on the signals from the accelerometers. An indicator is then activated if the magnitude exceeds the threshold levels of acceleration. The method may further include establishing a primary first threshold level of acceleration for a first direction and a secondary first threshold of acceleration for a second direction, wherein the first threshold level is greater than the second threshold level. In an embodiment, the first direction corresponds to the front of the user's head and the second direction corresponds to a side of the user's head.

The method may include determining a head injury coefficient based on the magnitude and a duration of the impact, and wherein the threshold levels of acceleration are expressed in terms of a head injury coefficient value. The head injury coefficient value is determined by empirically correlating a head injury coefficient measured at the body location and a head injury coefficient measured at the center of mass of a human head resulting from an impact.

These and other aspects of impact sensing device will be apparent after consideration of the Detailed Description and Figures herein. It is to be understood, however, that the scope of the invention shall be determined by the claims as issued and not by whether the given subject matter addresses any or all issues noted in the Background or includes any features or aspects recited in this Summary.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the impact sensing device, including the preferred embodiment, are described with reference to the following figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various views unless otherwise specified.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a helmet with a chin strap that incorporates an integrated impact sensing device according to a first exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged partial perspective view showing the impact sensing device shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a cut away top plan view of the impact sensing device shown in FIGS. 1 and 2;

FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view of the impact sensing device shown in FIGS. 1-3;

FIG. 5 is an enlarged partial perspective view of the impact sensing device shown disengaged from the helmet;

FIG. 6 is an impact sensing device according to a second exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 7 is an impact sensing device according to a third exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 8 is an impact sensing device according to a fourth exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 9 is an impact sensing device according to a fifth exemplary embodiment in the form of a helmet chin strap;

FIG. 10 is a partially transparent perspective view of the chin strap shown in FIG. 9 illustrating the placement of circuit boards therein;

FIGS. 11A and 11B is a representative flow diagram illustrating steps in the operation of the impact sensing device;

FIG. 12 is an LED indicator system state diagram;

FIGS. 13A-13E are schematic diagrams illustrating the impact sensing device's circuitry according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 14 is a top plan view of the main board of the impact sensing device according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 15 is a bottom plan view of the main board shown in FIG. 14;

FIG. 16 is a top plan view of the daughter board of the impact sensing device according to an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 17 is a bottom plan view of the daughter board shown in FIG. 16;

FIG. 18 is a parts list for the main board shown in FIGS. 14 and 15;

FIG. 19 is a parts list for the daughter board shown in FIGS. 16 and 17;

FIG. 20 is a schematic representation of the relative location of an impact sensing device to the center of mass of a human head;

FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram of representative impact zones; and

FIG. 22 is an impact sensing device according to a sixth exemplary embodiment in the form of a mouth guard.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments are described more fully below with reference to the accompanying figures, which form a part hereof and show, by way of illustration, specific exemplary embodiments. These embodiments are disclosed in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. However, embodiments may be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.

FIG. 1 illustrates a football helmet 2 that includes a shell 5, padding 7, and a face guard 4. Attached to the exterior 8 of the helmet 2 is a chin strap 3 that includes an impact sensing device 10 according to a first exemplary embodiment.

While the exemplary embodiments described herein are directed to a football helmet, the helmet or head gear could be that used for any sport or purpose including for example and without limitation, hockey, wrestling, bicycling, skateboarding, baseball, skydiving, bull riding, motorcycling, auto racing, skiing, snowboarding, boxing, rugby, soccer, construction, etc. Furthermore, although the impact sensing device is shown in this embodiment as part of a chin strap, the impact sensing device 10 could be attached or adhered to the helmet alone or as part of another component of the helmet. For example, the impact sensing device 10 could be attached or adhered directly to the exterior 8 of shell 5. Impact sensing device 10 could be attached or adhered to the interior 6 of the shell 5. Also, the impact sensing device could be incorporated into another component, such as pad 7 or the like. It is also contemplated that the impact sensing device could be incorporated in other various items that attach to the body. For example and without limitation, a head-band, neck-band, sunglasses, glasses, goggles, safety glasses, facemasks, mouth guards, wrist-band, jewelry, and the like. Also, in military applications the impact sensing device could be attached to a helmet or body armor, for example.

With further reference to FIG. 2, the impact sensing device includes an indicator 12 that is operative to indicate when the impact sensing device has sensed a selected threshold of acceleration that is, in this case, indicative of a potentially traumatic impact. Indicator 12 may be in the form of a visual indicator such as a light emitting diode (LED), or as another example an audible indicator, such as a piezoelectric buzzer. In either case the indicator has an active state and an inactive state. Referring now to FIG. 3, the impact sensing device 10 includes an accelerometer 18 that is capable of producing a signal (or signals) that is indicative of acceleration and/or the duration of acceleration. The impact sensing device 10 also includes an integrated circuit 16 that is operative to receive the signal from the accelerometer 18 and operative to cause the indicator 12 to be in the active state if the signal reaches a selected threshold level. The threshold could be a selected amount of g's and/or duration of the acceleration. The impact sensing device 10 also includes a power source in the form of a battery 13, such as a watch battery. The accelerometer 18 may be a single axis or multi axis accelerometer or multiple accelerometers. The interconnection of the components may be accomplished with appropriate wiring, circuitry, and/or a printed circuit board as is know to those skilled in the art. In an embodiment, the impact sensing device includes a plurality of accelerometers oriented orthogonally to each other for sensing acceleration in three axes, as is known in the art. Furthermore, the derivation of the resultant magnitude and direction of an impact based on signals from multiple accelerometers is well understood and may be readily implemented by those of ordinary skill in the art.

In this embodiment, the impact sensing device 10 is encapsulated in a polycarbonate material 14. The indicator 12 may protrude from the polycarbonate such that it is visible or audible. Alternatively, the indicator 12 may be encased with the other components in a clear or translucent material. The polycarbonate material may also include additives, such as an impact additive.

Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5, the impact sensing device 10, in this case, includes a button snap 22 (female portion) that may be attached to a cooperating button snap 24 (male portion) that is secured to the helmet shell 5. In this case the button snap is also used to attach one end of the chin strap. The button snap 22 is incorporated into the circuitry of the device 10 such that the device is inactive when disengaged from the mating snap portion 24. Once the impact sensing device 10 is snapped to the helmet (along with the chin strap 3) the device 10 is activated. This may be accomplished by completing a circuit with the mating snap. Alternatively, the snap 24 depresses a momentary switch located in snap 22. In either case the impact sensing device is inactive when disengaged from the snap 24 and active when engaged with the snap 24. By attaching the impact sensing device 10 to the chin strap 3 the device is retained on the helmet 2 to help prevent it from becoming lost when the device is disengaged. While the exemplary embodiments show the impact sensing device 10 as part of the chin strap 3, the impact sensing device may be separately attached to a helmet or other object in the same manner.

Impact sensing device 10 may also be activated with a conventional on-off switch as is known in the art. It is further contemplated that the impact sensing device could be activated by a pressure or compression switch. Furthermore, the impact sensing device could be activated by movement or by solar exposure, as additional examples.

In operation the impact sensing device 10 is engaged with the snap 24 thereby activating the device. Once the accelerometer 18 senses an acceleration and the integrated circuit 16 determines that the acceleration and/or duration exceeded a selected threshold, the integrated circuit turns on indicator 12 for a predetermined period of time whereby an observer is alerted that the user of the helmet may have sustained a concussion. After a predetermined period of time the indicator 12 is turned off and the impact sensing device is reset. To that end the integrated circuit 16 may include a timer or a separate timer chip may be employed. Indicator 12 may be a multi-color LED that is capable of displaying different colors. Accordingly, the integrated circuit could be programmed to display different colors for different levels of acceleration and/or duration.

FIG. 6 illustrates an impact sensing device 110 according to a second exemplary embodiment. In this embodiment, the impact sensing device 110 is similar to the first embodiment described above except that it includes multiple indicators 112, 115, 117, and/or 130. Indicators 112, 115, and 117 are visual indicators such as LEDs. In this case each indicator could be used for a different axis of the accelerometer where a multi-axis accelerometer is employed. Alternatively, the indicators could be used to signal different levels or durations of acceleration. Also, as mentioned above multi-color LEDs could be used in combination to indicate many levels of acceleration. For example, levels of acceleration of interest range from 50 g to 200 g. Indicator 130 is in the form of a liquid crystal display (LCD). Indicator 130 could be used alone or in conjunction with indicators 112, 115, and 117. Indicator 130 is operative to display a number 132 that indicates the actual level of acceleration in g's that is sustained by the impact sensing device. In addition, indicator 130 could display the duration of the acceleration and toggle between g's and duration. Thus, the indicators 112, 115, and 117 could indicate to an observer from afar that the user has sustained a potentially harmful impact and indicator 130 can communicate the exact level of impact in terms of g's and duration.

FIG. 7 illustrates an impact sensing device 210 according to a third exemplary embodiment. In this case, the impact sensing device 210 is similar to the second exemplary embodiment described above with respect to FIG. 6; however, impact sensing device 210 is incorporated with a chin strap 203. FIG. 8 illustrates an impact sensing device 310 according to a fourth exemplary embodiment. In this embodiment, the impact sensing device 310 is incorporated with a sleeve 303 that may be used in conjunction with a helmet strap, such as a chin strap.

It is also contemplated that the impact sensing device described herein may include circuitry for communicating the g's and duration of an impact to a recording or display device. The impact sensing device may include circuitry and logic as is known in the art, such as Bluetooth, for wirelessly communicating to a recording device/display device. Accordingly, the impact sensing device may connect to the internet (or cloud) directly or via the recording/display device. It is also contemplated that the recording/display device could receive communications from multiple impact sensing devices from each player of a football team, for instance. Thus, a coach on the sideline could monitor the condition of each player in real time.

FIG. 9 illustrates an impact sensing device, according to a fifth exemplary embodiment, in the form of a chin strap. Impact sensing device 410 includes an outer protective chin guard shell 414 with a soft inner cuff 416. With further reference to FIG. 10, outer shell 414 includes at least one circuit board 418 disposed therein, which supports an accelerometer and circuitry for sensing the magnitude and direction of impacts to a wearer's head. Circuit board 418 includes an indicator 412 in the form of a multi-color LED. LED 412 is a three-color indicator: green, yellow, and red (other colors may be used). Inner cuff 416 may be removed from shell 414 for cleaning. Also, inner cuff 416 is removable to allow access to an on/off switch (not shown) that is associated with circuit board 418. Impact sensing device 410 also includes a pair of straps 403(1) and 403(2) which may be attached to a helmet such as a football helmet.

FIG. 22 illustrates an impact sensing device, according to a sixth exemplary embodiment, in the form of a mouth guard. Impact sensing device 710 includes a mouth guard 714 that houses at least one circuit board 718, a battery 713, an indicator 712, and interconnecting circuitry 716. Indicator 712 is in the form of a multi-color LED. LED 712 may be a three-color indicator: green, yellow, and red (other colors may be used). Circuit board 718 supports at least one accelerometer 708 and circuitry for sensing the magnitude and direction of impacts to a wearer's head. Circuit board 718 also includes an antenna 709 for transmitting impact information, such as magnitude and direction. Antenna 709 is operative to transmit impact information to a base station 720, which in turn transmits the impact information to hand held device 724 and/or recording/display device 722. Both the hand held device 724 and the recording/display device 722 display impact information in the form of a list of players 726 that includes the impact direction 728 and magnitude 729 for each player.

FIGS. 13A-13E are schematic diagrams illustrating the impact sensing device's circuitry according to an exemplary embodiment. Corresponding exemplary circuit board layouts are shown in FIGS. 14-17 and associated parts lists are shown in FIGS. 18 and 19. In this case, the impact sensing device includes a main (or mother) board (See FIGS. 13A-13D, 14, 15) including the micro-controller U5, accelerometers A1 and A2, and indicator LED1. A separate daughter board (See FIGS. 13E, 16, 17) includes a third accelerometer U1. While the schematics, circuit boards, and parts lists shown in FIGS. 13A-19 illustrate a particular embodiment, other board layouts and components may be selected.

FIGS. 11A and 11B illustrate a flow diagram 500 of the various processes within the impact sensing device. Beginning with FIG. 11A, the process begins at 502 and flows to step 504 where it is determined whether the impact sensing device is charging. If the device is charging a determination is made as to whether the charging is complete. If the charging is not complete, the indicator LED is illuminated in yellow at 508. If charging is complete, the process continues on to initialize the hardware and software and run a self test routine at step 510. If the self test does not pass at 512, the system is halted at 514. If the system passes at 512, then the impact sensing device is active and continuously monitors magnitude of acceleration at 516. As long as the magnitude of acceleration (Mag) is less than the threshold (Thresh) at 516, the system will continuously read magnitude of acceleration at 520. Once the magnitude has exceeded the threshold the process flows to 518 where the direction from the impact was received by the impact device is recorded. Next, the head injury coefficient (HIC) is calculated over an integral of five milliseconds (5 ms) at step 522.

The HIC score was developed for predicting the probability of a concussion due to an impulse impact applied to the skull in terms of acceleration of the center of mass of the head. The actual HIC score depends on the average acceleration over the duration of the impulse and is given by:

$\mathrm{HIC}\equiv {\left(t_2-t_1\right)\left[\frac{1}{t_2-t_1}{\int }_{t_1}^{t_2}a\left(t\right)t\right]}^{\frac{5}{2}}$

Where the average acceleration is, ā is:

$\stackrel{\_}{a}=\frac{1}{t_2-t_1}{\int }_{t_1}^{t_2}a\left(t\right)t$

HIC score ranges have been established that indicate the expected severity of trauma and degree of concussion associated with a particular impact. These ranges and associated injuries are shown below in Table 1.

TABLE 1
Head Injury			Concussion
Criteria	(M)AIS-Code	Injury	Likelihood
>135	0	Not Injured	No Concussion
135-519	1	Minor	Mild Concussion
520-899	2	Moderate	Severe Concussion
900-1254	3	Serious	Severe Concussion
1255-1574	4	Severe	Severe Concussion
1575-1859	5	Critical	Life Threatening Coma
>1859	6	Maximum	Life Threatening Coma
		(high lethality)

Continuing to FIG. 11B, based on the magnitude and direction of the impact, the indicator threshold is adjusted to indicate the possibility of injury at an equivalent HIC score of 240. Because the impacts from different directions are different distances from the center of mass of the wearer's head (see FIG. 20), the head injury threshold must be adjusted based on the direction. Adjustments to the HIC score thresholds are determined based on empirical testing so that the indicator is activated at the desired equivalent HIC score. For example, if it is determined at 524 that the impact was from the side, a HIC score greater than the side impact threshold of 180 at step 530 will result in the indicator being activated at 536. When activated the LED blinks red for approximately 60 seconds. If the impact is from the front, the HIC score must be greater than the front impact threshold of 260 in order to cause indicator to blink red (see 526, 532, 538). And finally, if the impact is from the rear, the indicator will activate if the HIC score exceeds the rear impact threshold of 240 (see 528, 534, 540) Accordingly, as summarized in Table 2, the HIC scores from each direction are all set to be equivalent to a HIC score 240 at the center of mass of the user's head.

	TABLE 2
		Head CM HIC	Indicator Equivalent HIC
	Rear	240	240
	Front	240	260
	Side	240	180

As shown in FIG. 21, the left and right impact zones are symmetric. An impact between 0 and 30 degrees will register as hits from the front and hits between 45 degrees and 135 degrees will register as side hits. Between roughly 30 degrees and 45 degrees there is a transition region where hits can register as either from the front or the side.

While the threshold levels, equivalent HIC score, and impact zones are specifically defined above with respect to the exemplary embodiment, these variables may be adjusted depending on many factors as necessary. For example, the thresholds may be adjusted depending on the type of helmet. Furthermore, the threshold and equivalent HIC score may be changed based on the wearer's variables, such as for example, age, weight, height, etc. The HIC score may be adjusted to provide more or less of a safety factor or to reduce false tripping, as examples.

In another embodiment, the impact sensing device is configured to evaluate impacts with respect to at least two different thresholds. In one instance, impacts are compared to a first threshold level that is indicative of immediate injury, for example. If a single impact is greater than this first threshold level the impact sensing device's integrated circuit immediately activates an indicator. In this embodiment, the impact sensing device also compares impacts with a second threshold level. If the impact sensing device senses impacts greater than the second threshold level for more than a selected number of impacts, the impact sensing device's integrated circuit activates a second indicator. This multi-threshold configuration is responsive to the concern that impacts, which on their own may be minor, can have a dangerous cumulative effect over a given period of time. As an example, the impact sensing device could be configured to activate the second indicator if the device receives more than ten impacts, each exceeding 50 g's in a single day. As with the threshold level and the number of impacts, the time period is configurable as desired.

In this embodiment, the first and second indicators may be different LED indicators, or may be different colors of a multi-color LED. Furthermore, the integrated circuit may be configured with additional thresholds each with a corresponding maximum allowable number of impacts. As explained above, the threshold levels may be defined in terms of HIC score associated with a particular impact zone. Also, the thresholds may be defined as g-force, linear, rotational, or angular acceleration, or any derivative or component of force or impact.

Referring now to FIG. 12, the LED indicator state diagram 600 is discussed. System state 602 may be either charging 604, switched off 612, or switched on 618. When the impact protection device is charging at 604, the external charger is attached at 606 and a charging state indication at 608 indicates a steady yellow light. Once the device reaches a full charge, the LED is turned off at 610 indicating that the device is fully charged. When the device is switched off at 612, there is no LED indication indicated at 614 and the system is halted at 616. When the device is switched on at 618, the system is checked for nominal voltage at 620, and if the nominal voltage test passes, it continues to a circuit self test 622. If the circuit self test 622 passes, the LED full color cycle is executed at 624 wherein the LED is cycled through red, yellow, and green colors. At this point, the device is active and ready to measure and indicate possible head injury levels requiring attention. At 626, the device measures impacts and continuously monitors the system voltage at 628, wherein if the system voltage is less than nominal, the yellow indicator is illuminated at 632. As long as the nominal voltage remains constant at 630, the device calculates the head injury coefficient formula based on the input from the accelerometers at 634. At 636, if the equivalent HIC level is less than 240, the LED indicator is illuminated green at 636. If the equivalent HIC level is greater than or equal to 240, the indicator blinks red for 60 seconds and then resets at 642.

Also, contemplated are methods for indicating when a user has received a potentially traumatic impact to the head according to the present disclosure. The methods thus encompass the steps inherent in the above described structures and operation thereof. Broadly, one method could include providing an impact sensing device as described above, establishing at least one threshold level of acceleration, receiving a magnitude of acceleration from the impact sensing device, and indicating if the magnitude exceeds the threshold of acceleration.

Methods for establishing threshold levels of acceleration to be used in conjunction with an impact sensing device are also contemplated. For example, such a method could include correlating acceleration measured at the chin and acceleration measured at the center of mass of a human head resulting from an impact. The correlation may be expressed in terms of HIC score as explained above. Moreover, a correlation could be established for various zones of impact to a users head, such as those discussed above with respect to FIG. 21. In an embodiment, the correlation may be established by attaching an impact sensing device to a headform. In this case, the head form is a human analog incorporating an accelerometer located at its center of mass. Such human analog head forms are well known in the art. The impact sensing device may be in the form of a chin strap attached to a football helmet, for example. The correlation is established by impacting the head form with a suitable impactor and recording the difference in acceleration measured by the impact sensing device and the head form. A suitable impactor is available from Biokinetics of Ottowa, Ontario, Canada. The procedure may be repeated to establish an average difference in acceleration measurements between the impact sensing device and center of mass. Furthermore, the procedure may be repeated from different directions relative to the head form to establish correlations for various impact zones. The correlation data may be stored in the impact sensing device as thresholds for activating the impact indicator. While the above methods are described with respect to an impact sensing device in the form of a chin strap other types of items securable to a person may be used in the same manner.

Accordingly, the impact sensing device and associated methods have been described with some degree of particularity directed to the exemplary embodiments. It should be appreciated, though, that the technology of the present application is defined by the following claims construed in light of the prior art so that modifications or changes may be made to the exemplary embodiments without departing from the inventive concepts contained herein.

Claims

1. An impact sensing device, comprising: at least one accelerometer capable of producing signals indicative of an impacts;an indicator; andan integrated circuit configured to receive the signals and activate the indicator when the signals exceed a selected first threshold level a selected number of times.

2. The impact sensing device of claim 1, wherein the indicator is a visual indicator.

3. The impact sensing device of claim 1, further comprising an item attachable to the body of a person.

4. The impact sensing device of claim 1, wherein the integrated circuit is configured to activate the indicator when the signal exceeds a selected second threshold level.

5. The impact sensing device of claim 3, wherein the item is a helmet.

6. The impact sensing device of claim 3, further comprising a shell sized and configured to receive the person's chin, wherein the accelerometer and integrated circuit are contained in the shell.

7. The impact sensing device of claim 6, further comprising a soft inner cuff disposed in the shell.

8. The impact sensing device of claim 6, further comprising a strap connectable to a helmet.

9. The impact sensing device of claim 8, further comprising a button snap attached to the strap and connectable to a helmet, wherein the button snap includes contacts operative to activate the impact sensing device when connected to the helmet.

10. The impact sensing device of claim 1, including a plurality of accelerometers orthogonally oriented with respect to each other, and wherein the integrated circuit is configured to determine the magnitude and direction of the impact and activate the indicator when the magnitude exceeds a selected threshold based on the direction of the impact.

11. An impact sensing chin guard, comprising: a plurality of accelerometers orthogonally oriented with respect to each other and each capable of producing signals indicative of impacts;first and second visual indicators;an integrated circuit configured to receive the signals and determine the magnitude and direction of the impacts and activate the first indicator when the magnitude of an impact exceeds a selected first threshold based on the direction of the impact, and activate the second indicator when the magnitude of the impacts exceeds a selected second threshold a selected number of times;a shell sized and configured to receive a person's chin; andan inner cuff disposed in the shell, wherein the accelerometers and integrated circuit are interposed between the shell and the cuff

12. The impact sensing chin guard of claim 11, further comprising a strap connectable to a helmet.

13. The impact sensing chin guard of claim 11, wherein the visual indicators are a multicolor light emitting diode.

14. A method for indicating when a user has received a potentially traumatic impact or impacts, the method comprising: establishing a first threshold level of acceleration for at least one direction of interest;establishing a second threshold level of acceleration for at least one direction of interest;establishing a maximum number of second threshold level of acceleration impacts;attaching a plurality of accelerometers to a user at a body location, each accelerometer orthogonally oriented with respect to each other and each capable of producing signals indicative of impacts;determining the magnitude and direction of the impacts based on the signals;activating a first indicator if the magnitude an impact exceeds the first threshold level of acceleration; andactivating a second indicator if the magnitude of the impacts exceeds the second threshold level of acceleration more than the maximum number of times.

15. The method according to claim 14, including establishing a primary first threshold level of acceleration for a first direction and a secondary first threshold of acceleration for a second direction.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the primary first threshold level is greater than the secondary first threshold level.

17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the first direction corresponds to the front of the user's head.

18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the second direction corresponds to a side of the user's head.

19. The method according to claim 14, including determining a head injury coefficient based on the magnitude and a duration of the impact, and wherein the first and second threshold levels of acceleration are expressed in terms of a head injury coefficient value.

20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the head injury coefficient value is determined by empirically correlating a head injury coefficient measured at the body location and a head injury coefficient measured at the center of mass of a human head resulting from an impact.