The present invention relates to power tools, and more specifically to impact tools.
Impact tools or wrenches are typically utilized to provide a striking rotational force, or intermittent applications of torque, to a tool element or workpiece (e.g., a fastener) to either tighten or loosen the fastener. As such, impact wrenches are typically used to loosen or remove stuck fasteners (e.g., an automobile lug nut on an axle stud) that are otherwise not removable or very difficult to remove using hand tools.
The present invention provides, in one aspect, an impact tool including a housing, an electric motor supported in the housing, and a drive assembly for converting a continuous torque input from the motor to consecutive rotational impacts upon a workpiece capable of developing at least 1,700 ft-lbs of fastening torque. The drive assembly includes an anvil rotatable about an axis and having a head adjacent a distal end of the anvil. The head has a minimum cross-sectional width of at least 1 inch in a plane oriented transverse to the axis. The drive assembly also includes a hammer that is both rotationally and axially movable relative to the anvil for imparting the consecutive rotational impacts upon the anvil, and a spring for biasing the hammer in an axial direction toward the anvil.
The present invention provides, in another aspect, an impact tool including a housing and a brushless electric motor supported in the housing. The motor has a nominal diameter of at least 50 mm, a stator with a plurality of stator windings, and a rotor with a plurality of permanent magnets. The impact tool also includes a battery pack supported by the housing for providing power to the motor. The battery pack has a nominal voltage of at least 18 Volts and a nominal capacity of at least 5 Ah. The impact tool also includes a drive assembly for converting a continuous torque input from the motor to consecutive rotational impacts upon a workpiece capable of developing at least 1,700 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 100 amperes of current drawn by the motor. The drive assembly includes an anvil, a hammer that is both rotationally and axially movable relative to the anvil for imparting the consecutive rotational impacts upon the anvil, and a spring for biasing the hammer in an axial direction toward the anvil.
The present invention provides, in another aspect, an impact tool including a housing and a brushless electric motor supported in the housing. The motor includes a stator with a plurality of stator windings and a rotor with a plurality of permanent magnets. The impact tool also includes a battery pack supported by the housing for providing power to the motor. The battery pack has a nominal voltage of at least 18 Volts and a nominal capacity of at least 5 Ah. The impact tool also includes a drive assembly for converting a continuous torque input from the motor to consecutive rotational impacts upon a workpiece. The drive assembly includes an anvil, a hammer that is both rotationally and axially movable relative to the anvil for imparting the consecutive rotational impacts upon the anvil at a rate of no more than 1 impact per revolution of the hammer to provide at least 90 Joules of impact energy to the anvil per revolution of the hammer, and a spring for biasing the hammer in an axial direction toward the anvil.
Other features and aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
With continued reference to
Referring to
The output shaft 50 is rotatable about an axis 54 relative to the stator 46. A fan 58 is coupled to the output shaft 50 (e.g., via a splined connection) adjacent a front end of the motor 42. The impact wrench 10 also includes a trigger 62 provided on the handle portion 26 that selectively electrically connects the motor 42 and the battery pack 34 to provide DC power to the motor 42. In the illustrated embodiment, a solid state switch 64 carries substantially all of the current from the battery pack 34 to the motor 42. The solid state switch 64 is disposed within the grip 27, generally below the trigger 62.
In other embodiments, the impact wrench 10 may include a power cord for electrically connecting the motor 42 to a source of AC power. As a further alternative, the impact wrench 10 may be configured to operate using a different power source (e.g., a pneumatic power source, etc.). The battery pack 34 is the preferred means for powering the impact wrench 10, however, because a cordless impact wrench advantageously requires less maintenance (e.g., no oiling of air lines or compressor motor) and can be used in locations where compressed air or other power sources are unavailable.
With continued reference to
With reference to
The drive assembly 70 includes an anvil 200, extending from the front housing portion 22, to which a tool element (e.g., a socket; not shown) can be coupled for performing work on a workpiece (e.g., a fastener). The drive assembly 70 is configured to convert the continuous rotational force or torque provided by the motor 42 and gear assembly 66 to a striking rotational force or intermittent applications of torque to the anvil 200 when the reaction torque on the anvil 200 (e.g., due to engagement between the tool element and a fastener being worked upon) exceeds a certain threshold. In the illustrated embodiment of the impact wrench 10, the drive assembly 66 includes the camshaft 94, a hammer 204 supported on and axially slidable relative to the camshaft 94, and the anvil 200.
The drive assembly 70 further includes a spring 208 biasing the hammer 204 toward the front of the impact wrench 10 (i.e., in the right direction of
The camshaft 94 further includes cam grooves 224 (
With reference to
Each of the illustrated anvil lugs 220 defines a base or cord dimension 240 (
In some embodiments, the anvil 200 may be interchangeable with anvils of various lengths and/or head sizes. For example, the illustrated anvil 200 is relatively long and may advantageously provide the impact wrench 10 with longer reach.
The anvil 200a includes a head 232a with a plurality of axially-extending splines 233a that collectively define a spline pattern (
The anvil 200a includes anvil lugs 220a, each defining a base or cord dimension 240a and a nominal contact area 244a where the hammer lugs 218 contact the anvil lug 220a. (
Thus, in some embodiments, the impact wrench 10 may have an anvil 200, 200a with a head 232, 232a having a cross-sectional width of at least 1-inch. This relatively large head size may be used for high-torque fastening tasks beyond of the capabilities of typical battery-powered impact tools.
Referring to
In operation of the impact wrench 10, an operator depresses the trigger 62 to activate the motor 42, which continuously drives the gear assembly 66 and the camshaft 94 via the output shaft 50. As the camshaft 94 rotates, the cam balls 228 drive the hammer 204 to co-rotate with the camshaft 94, and the hammer lugs 218 engage, respectively, driven surfaces of the anvil lugs 220 to provide an impact and to rotatably drive the anvil 200 and the tool element. After each impact, the hammer 204 moves or slides rearward along the camshaft 94, away from the anvil 200, so that the hammer lugs disengage the anvil lugs 220. As the hammer 204 moves rearward, the cam balls 228 situated in the respective cam grooves 224 in the camshaft 94 move rearward in the cam grooves 224. The spring 208 stores some of the rearward energy of the hammer 204 to provide a return mechanism for the hammer 204. After the hammer lugs 218 disengage the respective anvil lugs 220, the hammer 204 continues to rotate and moves or slides forwardly, toward the anvil 200, as the spring 208 releases its stored energy, until the drive surfaces of the hammer lugs 218 re-engage the driven surfaces of the anvil lugs 220 to cause another impact.
The impact wrench 10 may be operable in a first mode to deliver two blows or impacts to the anvil 200 per revolution of the camshaft 94 and additionally or alternatively in a second mode to deliver a single blow or impact to the anvil 200 per revolution of the camshaft 94. Components of the impact wrench 10 (e.g., the spring 208, the camshaft 94, and/or the hammer 204) may be replaced or modified to operate the impact wrench 10 in either the first mode or the second mode.
For example,
Table 2 provides a comparison between various aspects of the drive assembly 70, which can be used to operate the impact wrench 10 in the first mode, and the drive assembly 70′, which can be used to operate the impact wrench 10 in the second mode. Optionally, the drive assembly 70′ can also be used to operate the impact wrench 10 in the first mode when the motor 42 is operated at a lower speed, as discussed in greater detail below.
It is evident when comparing the graph 250 and the graph 250′ that the hammer 204′ is displaced a greater axial distance than the hammer 204 before reaching their respective rearmost axial positions. In addition, the area A2 is greater than the area A1, indicating that more kinetic energy is transferred to the anvil 200 per impact in the second mode than in the first mode. Finally, the period 262′ is greater than the period 262, indicating that fewer impacts per minute are delivered in the second mode than in the first mode.
As the hammer 204′ reaches its forwardmost axial position, the first hammer lug 218A′ impacts the first anvil lug 220A, and the second hammer lug 218B′ impacts the second anvil lug 220B, as shown in
The precise amount of rotation of the hammer 204′ may vary due to rebound effects. In the illustrated embodiment, the hammer 204′ rotates between 345 degrees and 375 degrees between successive impacts. In addition, when operating in the second mode, the first hammer lug 218A′ always impacts the first anvil lug 220A, and the second hammer lug 218B′ always impacts the second anvil lug 220B.
Table 3 includes experimental results illustrating the fastening torque that the impact wrench 10 is capable of applying to a fastener when operating in the first mode (i.e. delivering two impacts per revolution). As defined herein, the term “fastening torque” means torque applied to a fastener in a direction increasing tension (i.e. in a tightening direction). Table 3 lists the current drawn by the motor 42 and the peak fastening torque exerted on five different 1½ inch bolts over the course of ten seconds. The motor 42 used in these tests was a BL60-30 motor having a nominal diameter of 60 mm and a stator stack length of 30 mm.
Accordingly, as illustrated by Table 3, the drive assembly 70 of the impact wrench 10 converts the continuous torque input from the motor 52 to deliver consecutive rotational impacts on a workpiece, producing at least 1,700 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 100 A of current drawn by the motor 42. In some embodiments, the drive assembly 70 delivers consecutive rotational impacts on a workpiece, producing at least 1,700 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 80 A of current drawn by the motor 42.
In some embodiments, the drive assembly 70 delivers consecutive rotational impacts on a workpiece, producing at least 1,800 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 100 A of current drawn by the motor 42. In some embodiments, the drive assembly 70 delivers consecutive rotational impacts on a workpiece, producing at least 1,800 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 80 A of current drawn by the motor 42.
In some embodiments, the drive assembly 70 delivers consecutive rotational impacts on a workpiece, producing at least 1,900 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 100 A of current drawn by the motor 42. In some embodiments, the drive assembly 70 delivers consecutive rotational impacts on a workpiece, producing at least 1,900 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 80 A of current drawn by the motor 42.
In some embodiments, the drive assembly 70 delivers consecutive rotational impacts on a workpiece, producing at least 2,000 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 100 A of current drawn by the motor 42. In some embodiments, the drive assembly 70 delivers consecutive rotational impacts on a workpiece, producing at least 2,000 ft-lbs of fastening torque without exceeding 80 A of current drawn by the motor 42.
The impact wrench 10 can operate at a plurality of different speed settings. In some embodiments, the operating mode of the impact wrench 10 (i.e. the first mode or the second mode) may be dependent upon the speed setting. For example, the drive assembly 70′ enables the impact wrench 10 to operate in the second mode when the motor 42 drives the output shaft 50 at a maximum speed and in the first mode when the motor 42 drives the output shaft 50 at a lower speed (e.g., about 60% of the maximum speed). Thus, in some embodiments, a user may toggle between the first mode and the second mode by varying the operating speed of the motor 42.
Table 4 includes simulated performance data for the impact wrench 10 operating in the first mode and in the second mode at the maximum (100%) speed setting. The performance data was simulated for both a BL60-30 motor and a BL70-35 motor. The last column of Table 4 includes simulated performance data for the impact wrench 10 operating in the first mode at a lower (60%) speed setting.
As illustrated by Table 4, in some embodiments, the hammer 204′ of the drive assembly 70′ is capable of providing at least 90 J of kinetic energy at impact, or “impact energy” per revolution of the hammer 204′ when operating in the second mode. In some embodiments, the hammer 204′ is capable of providing at least 90 J of impact energy per revolution of the hammer 204′ without exceeding 100 A of current drawn by the motor 42. The impact energy of the hammer 204′ in the second mode is significantly greater than the impact energy of the hammer 204 in the first mode. In addition, Table 4 illustrates that the motor 42 may draw less current in the second mode than in the first mode (e.g., approximately 30% less in some embodiments). The second mode may thus be particularly advantageous to overcome static friction when breaking loose stuck fasteners.
Table 5 lists the mass (in kg) and mass-moment of inertia (in kg-m2) for various components of the drive assemblies 70 and 70′.
As discussed above with reference to
The anvil 200b includes anvil lugs 220b, each defining a base or cord dimension 240b and a nominal contact area 244b where the hammer lugs 218 contact the anvil lug 220b. When the head 232b has a nominal width 236b of ¾ inch, the base dimension 240b may be at least 11 mm, and the contact area 244 may be at least 190 mm2. When the head 232b has a nominal width 236 of ½ inch, the base dimension 240 may be at least 11 mm, and the contact area 244 may be at least 150 mm2.
Various embodiments of an impact wrench similar to the impact wrench 10 described above have been developed, including the anvil 200b. Table 6 lists various physical and performance characteristics of such impact wrenches.
Referring to
With reference to
The output shaft 350 is rotatably supported by a first or forward bearing 398 and a second or rear bearing 402 (
Best illustrated in
In operation, the helical engagement between the pinion 382 and the planet gears 386 produces a thrust load along the axis 354 of the output shaft 350, which is transmitted to the rear bearing 402. The bearing 402 is secured against this thrust load by the bearing retainer 406.
Various features of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/631,986, filed on Feb. 19, 2018, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2373664 | Emery | Apr 1945 | A |
2373667 | Emery | Apr 1945 | A |
2564224 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 1951 | A |
2825436 | Amtsberg | Mar 1958 | A |
2881884 | Amtsberg | Apr 1959 | A |
2973071 | Sturrock | Feb 1961 | A |
3068973 | Maurer | Dec 1962 | A |
3070201 | Spyridakis | Dec 1962 | A |
3156334 | Hoza | Nov 1964 | A |
3250153 | Purkey | May 1966 | A |
3352368 | Maffey, Jr. | Nov 1967 | A |
3362486 | Alajouanine | Jan 1968 | A |
3369615 | Maffey, Jr. et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3606931 | Karden | Sep 1971 | A |
3648784 | Schoeps | Mar 1972 | A |
3804180 | Gelfand | Apr 1974 | A |
4002212 | Schoeps | Jan 1977 | A |
4314782 | Beekenkamp | Feb 1982 | A |
4505170 | Van Laere | Mar 1985 | A |
4619162 | Van Laere | Oct 1986 | A |
4719976 | Bleicher | Jan 1988 | A |
4905423 | van Laere | Mar 1990 | A |
5083358 | Jones et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5092410 | Wallace et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5836403 | Putney | Nov 1998 | A |
5888031 | Buck et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6104114 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6158526 | Ghode et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6227308 | Ghode et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6546815 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7032685 | Nakamizo | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7259486 | Yamamoto | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7673702 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7823256 | Engelfried et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7905377 | Krondorfer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918286 | Nagasaka et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934566 | Hlinka | May 2011 | B2 |
8069929 | Sugimoto et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8127974 | Zhang | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8132296 | Di Nicolantonio | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8371394 | Grand | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371708 | Nagasaka et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8407860 | Brennenstuhl et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8460153 | Rudolph et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8584770 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8827003 | Nagasaka et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8925645 | Harada et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8925646 | Seith et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961358 | Hirabayashi | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9114521 | Yoshikawa | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9272400 | Johnson | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9308638 | Kondo et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9321159 | May | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9393711 | Myrhum, Jr | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9415497 | Hecht et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9463566 | Yoshikane et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9566692 | Seith et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9643300 | Kumagai | May 2017 | B2 |
9849577 | Wyler | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10295990 | Dey, IV | May 2019 | B2 |
10654153 | Murakami | May 2020 | B2 |
20010004939 | Durmeyer | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020035876 | Donaldson, Jr. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20050121209 | Shimizu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070000676 | Arimura | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070209162 | McRoberts et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080078067 | Nicolantonio et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080099217 | Seith | May 2008 | A1 |
20090133894 | Mizuhara | May 2009 | A1 |
20100005629 | Di Nicolantonio | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100096155 | Iwata | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110011609 | Simm et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110073334 | Iimura | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079407 | Iimura | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110188232 | Friedman | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110315417 | Matsunaga | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120073846 | Hirai | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120199372 | Nishikawa | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234566 | Mashiko | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120279736 | Tanimoto | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120292065 | Hoshi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120292070 | Ito | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120318549 | Nagasaka | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120318550 | Tanimoto | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120319508 | Oomori | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000934 | Tadokoro | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130008679 | Nishikawa | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014967 | Ito | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025892 | Mashiko | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130062086 | Ito | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130062088 | Mashiko | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075121 | Nakamura | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130087355 | Oomori | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130126202 | Oomori | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133911 | Ishikawa | May 2013 | A1 |
20130139614 | Johnson | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130233584 | Mashiko | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130270932 | Hatfield et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270934 | Smith et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130333910 | Tanimoto | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140069672 | Mashiko | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140124229 | Takahashi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131059 | Verbrugge | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145524 | Tanimoto | May 2014 | A1 |
20140158388 | Johnson | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158390 | Mashiko | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140182869 | Kumagai et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224075 | Merrick | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140251649 | Kondo | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140371018 | Ito | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374130 | Nakamura | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150000946 | Amend | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150022125 | Takano | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150041169 | Kumagai | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150047866 | Sakai | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150075829 | Seith et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150083448 | Chen et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150083451 | Nishikawa | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150096775 | Chen | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150144365 | Hirabayashi | May 2015 | A1 |
20150209952 | Nishii et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150231770 | Kusakawa | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150231771 | Sakai | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150303842 | Takano | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150336249 | Iwata | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150343617 | Kondo | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150352699 | Sakai | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008961 | Takano | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160079887 | Takano | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160107297 | Ishikawa | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160129568 | Nishikawa | May 2016 | A1 |
20160250743 | Kikuchi | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160311102 | Ebner | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160325415 | Huber | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160354905 | Ely | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170021478 | Junkers | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170028537 | McClung | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170036327 | Murakami et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170057064 | Ishikawa | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170144278 | Nishikawa et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151657 | Nagasaka | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170173768 | Dey, IV | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170190027 | Koizumi | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170190028 | Howard | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170190032 | Leong | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170239801 | Kondo | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170246732 | Dey, IV et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170326712 | Li | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170326720 | Kuroyanagi | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170348835 | Skelly | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180001444 | Matsushita | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180117745 | Murakami et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180200872 | Leong | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180222022 | Kumagai | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190030692 | Harada | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190030696 | Seith | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190255687 | Schneider | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200009709 | Kumagai | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200122281 | Wierer | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200262037 | Schneider | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203944874 | Nov 2014 | CN |
106112921 | Nov 2016 | CN |
0249037 | Aug 1990 | EP |
1036635 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2045045 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2191941 | Mar 2012 | EP |
965516 | Jul 1964 | GB |
2462992 | Jan 2010 | GB |
2003220569 | Aug 2003 | JP |
03092964 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2009071376 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009092486 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2019/018403, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 12 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 19754944.7 dated Oct. 18, 2021 (11 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190255687 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62631986 | Feb 2018 | US |