This invention relates to an impact tool. Specifically, the present invention relates to an ergonomic impact tool.
Impact tools, such as dent pullers, have a variety of uses. As one example, an impact tool can assist with the disassembly of an industrial gas turbine (IGT) during an overhaul. During an overhaul, a technician must remove the various flanges from the outside of the case. However, the heat and expansion cycles encountered during use of the IGT can make the removal of these flanges difficult. One conventional method uses an impact tool to dislodge the flanges from the IGT case.
Despite using the impact tool, removing the flanges can prove difficult. The technician often must actuate the impact tool a significant number of times (e.g. 20–80) to dislodge the flange. Repeating this process for each flange on the IGT case (e.g. 6 flanges per case) could take approximately one hour.
The use of conventional impact tools has several drawbacks. First, conventional impact tools the impact force to transfer from the tool to the technician. Specifically, the impact forces transfer from the tool to the hand, forearm and elbow of the technician. Given the number of repetitions and the number of flanges, these impact forces may create discomfort in the hand, forearm or elbow of the technician.
Second, conventional impact tools require the technician to orient the hand and forearm in an awkward position. This awkward position prevents the technician from applying the maximum possible amount of force to the impact tool. This requires the technician to actuate the impact tool a greater number of times to dislodge the flanges. Furthermore, the awkward position may also have an effect on the aforementioned discomfort with the technician.
Third, conventional impact tools can also pinch the technician. When grasping the impact tool, part of the technician's hand could extend past the slider. This portion of the technician's hand could contact the stop during actuation of the impact tool. Since the slider is weighted, this pinching can also cause discomfort with the technician.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved impact tool.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an ergonomic impact tool.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an impact tool that isolates impact forces from the user.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an impact tool that allows the user to actuate the tool from a less awkward position.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an impact tool that allows the user to actuate the tool from a normal position.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an impact tool that does not tend to pinch the user.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an impact tool that allows the user to apply a greater amount of force thereto.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an impact tool that allows the user to reduce the number of actuation repetitions.
These and other objects of the present invention are achieved in another aspect by an impact tool. The impact tool comprises: a shaft; a stop on the shaft; a slider movable on the shaft for striking the stop and creating an impact force; and a handle on the slider to allow a user to move the slider. The handle is isolated from the impact force.
These and other objects of the present invention are achieved in one aspect by an impact tool. The tool comprises: a shaft; a stop on the shaft; a slider movable on the shaft for striking the stop to create an impact force; and a handle movably attached to the slider to allow a user to move the slider.
These and other objects of the present invention are achieved in another aspect by a slider for an impact tool. The slider comprises: a sleeve; and a handle movably attached to the sleeve to allow a user to move the slider.
Other uses and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reference to the specification and the drawings, in which:
The tool 10 also includes a slider 17 that can move along the shaft 11 between the stop 13 and the head 15 along arrow T. The user grasps the slider 17 to actuate the tool 10. The slider 17 has sufficient mass to provide an impact force to the tool 10 when the user drives the slider 17 against the stop 13.
As discussed above, the tool 10 several drawbacks. First, the tool 10 allows the transfer of the impact force to the user through the slider. Since the user grasps the slider 17 during actuation, the impact force travels directly to the hand, forearm and elbow of the user.
Second, the tool 10 places the hand and forearm of the user in an awkward position. The position is awkward since the hand and forearm are not in a normal orientation. In essence, the hand and forearm of the user extend in a direction perpendicular to the actuation direction (i.e. arrow T) of the slider 17. Although not shown, the user typically stands at a location behind the stop 13 to actuate the tool 10.
Third, the hand of the user can pinch between the slider 17 and the stop 13 (or even the head 15) during actuation.
Differently than the conventional tool 10, the tool 50 of the present invention includes a handle 59 movably attached to the slider 57. The user grasps the handle 59 to actuate the tool 50.
The handle 59 could be made from wire, with a pair of legs 61, 63 and a central section 65 connecting the legs 61, 63. The central section 65 extends in a direction transverse to the actuation direction (i.e. arrow T) of the slider 57. When grasping the central section 65, the hand and forearm of the user is in a natural position.
The handle 59 can pivotally mount to the slider 57 in any known manner. Preferably, the handle 59 rotatably mounts to the slider 57. For example, the legs 61, 63 can extend into openings (not shown) in the slider 57. The handle 59 can move relative to the slider 57 along arrow R. Alternatively, each leg 61, 63 of the handle 59 could attach to a boss (not shown) on the slider 57 (similar to a paint can). The end of each leg 61, 63 could encircle a fastener (not shown) secured to the slider 57. Finally, the handle 59 could be clamped (not shown) to the slider 57.
Since the handle 59 does not rigidly mount to the slider 57, the impact force created when the slider 57 impacts the stop 53 does not reach the user. In other words, the handle 59 is impact isolated from the rest of the tool 50.
Also note that the central section 65 of the handle 59 is located a distance away from the slider 57. This arrangement helps prevent pinching of the hand of the user between the slider 57 and the stop 53.
The user continues to pull the handle 59 until the slider 57 collides with the stop 53. Since the handle 59 pivotally mounts to the slider 57, the force of the impact will neither transfer to the handle 59 nor to the user.
To return the tool 50 to the initial position shown in
As desired, the user can repeat the above process any number of times to achieve a desired result. As discussed earlier, a desired result could be the successful removal of a flange (not shown) from an IGT case (not shown).
The present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments of the various figures. It is to be understood that other similar embodiments may be used or modifications and additions may be made to the described embodiment for performing the same function of the present invention without deviating therefrom. Therefore, the present invention should not be limited to any single embodiment, but rather construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the recitation of the appended claims.
This Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/319,413, filed on 22 Jul. 2002, herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
299086 | Over | May 1884 | A |
3050095 | Prather | Aug 1962 | A |
3712389 | Smoak | Jan 1973 | A |
4681171 | Kee et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4924056 | Bevilacqua | May 1990 | A |
5088174 | Hull et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5323519 | Cloud | Jun 1994 | A |
5398773 | Baker | Mar 1995 | A |
5495878 | McKenen, Jr. | Mar 1996 | A |
5542479 | Stachler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5845719 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6035946 | Studley et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040129437 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60319413 | Jul 2002 | US |