1. Technical Field
The present disclosure generally relates to operational amplifiers used in electrical and electronic circuitry and, in particular, to ways of adjusting operational amplifiers to compensate for variations in performance that arise in certain environments.
2. Description of the Related Art
Operational amplifiers (“op-amps”) are general purpose differential voltage amplifiers commonly used in electric circuits for many different applications. For example, op-amps are frequently used as building blocks in audio systems that involve complex signal processing circuitry to amplify sound. An idealized op-amp 100, shown in
If a fixed reference voltage Vref is applied to the non-inverting input, the op-amp acts as a comparator device 150, shown in
One way to test the accuracy of an op-amp used as a sensor or a comparator is to deliberately set the differential input voltage ΔV to zero (for example, by connecting the two inputs together, or grounding both of the inputs), and verifying that Vout is also zero. However, intrinsic errors in the various internal components of the op-amp can compound and cause a detectable zero error referred to as an input offset voltage Vos. If a non-zero potential Vos exists across the two inputs, Vos itself can be amplified, producing a significant erroneous non-zero voltage at the output. The zero error associated with an op-amp can be thought of as analogous to the zero error associated with a scale, which is evident when the scale registers a non-zero weight prior to an object being placed on the scale. Scales typically come equipped with mechanical zeroing adjustments to correct these zero errors. In a similar fashion, the input offset voltage Vos of an op-amp can be corrected, or nullified, by electrically coupling an “offset null” stage to the V− input of the op-amp.
With reference to
Fluctuations in either the input offset voltage ΔVos or in the input bias current ΔIbias, or both, can be caused by changes in environmental conditions such as, for example, temperature variation. These drifts in Vos and Ibias occur because material properties of electronic components internal to the op-amp (e.g., resistivity, mobility) are, in general, temperature-dependent properties. In consideration of these and other environmentally-dependent characteristics, the input offset voltage and the input bias current of an op-amp generally may vary depending on the operational environment of the amplifier. In most applications a temperature-induced drift may not be problematic because op-amps located inside electronic equipment are typically maintained at a moderate temperature that is close to room temperature, or at least in a controlled temperature environment. However, if the op-amp is to be used in vehicles, aircraft, spacecraft, ships, submarines, and the like, or if the op-amp is expected to function according to military and/or environmental specifications that generally include extreme temperatures or widely varying temperature or radiation conditions, it may be necessary to address the question of how best to control or adjust environmentally-dependent intrinsic errors, or to find an alternative way to correct them.
One way to avoid the effects of both ΔIbias and ΔVos is to increase the signal level to be so high that changes in the input bias current and the input offset voltage have less impact on the circuit performance. However, this approach can cause unnecessarily high stresses within the circuit and can lead to an excessive amount of electrical power dissipation. Another solution is to balance the impedance at each input (e.g., R+ and R− in
An operational amplifier that exhibits a variable input offset voltage and a variable input bias current that can arise due to fluctuations in temperature and other ambient energy levels can be corrected for both sources of error by using a dual compensation impedance that is a function of both Vos and Ibias. The dual compensation impedance can take the form of, for example, one or more resistors, potentiometers, thyristors, current sources, and voltage sources, or combinations of these. Various methods of determining Vos and Ibias provide ways to either offset or compensate for these errors in anticipation of operating the op-amp in different target environments that may subject the device to extreme or fluctuating environmental conditions.
In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elements are arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn are not intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various disclosed embodiments. However, one skilled in the relevant art will recognize that embodiments may be practiced without one or more of these specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures associated with operational amplifiers and associated circuits have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the embodiments.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is as “including, but not limited to.”
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
The headings and Abstract of the Disclosure provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the embodiments.
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Various embodiments of the compensated op-amps 500, 600, and 700 can further be distinguished by differences in methods of providing an accurate and useful value of the dual compensation impedance Z, that is derived from values of Vos and Ibias. To adjust the dual compensation impedance Z, values of Vos and Ibias are needed, which can be obtained from sensors, calculations, or extrapolations, or combinations of these. Moreover, in a fluctuating energy environment, or in a remote environment, the dual compensation impedance Z may need to be updated periodically. For example, a value for the dual compensation impedance Z can be set while the op-amp is in a laboratory, manufacturing facility, or other calibration environment, after which the op-amp can be installed in a vehicle and sent to its intended target operational environment. Or, determination of the dual compensation impedance Z can be made in-situ, in the target environment, based on either direct measurements or sensing environmental parameters and extrapolating the necessary compensation.
In one scenario, described in
According to one embodiment illustrated in
A method 950, illustrated in
Alternatively, an exemplary feedback control method 1000 can be used to maintain the dual compensation impedance Z at an accurate value throughout operation of the op-amp in a changing target environment 1001, as illustrated in
The feedback control method 1000 can be implemented as an automated method by using a processor-based system 1003, in which the determination of the dual compensation impedance Z is made according to programmed instructions and the resulting dual compensation impedance Z adjustment is applied directly to the op-amp in response to an output signal from the processor-based system 1003. One advantage of this automated feedback control method 1000 is that the procedure can be repeated as many times as needed to ensure that the dual compensation impedance Z remains optimally tuned to the present environment as the environment changes. A second advantage is that the feedback control method 1000 does not require human intervention. A third advantage is that the feedback control method 1000 is based on actual ambient conditions, instead of relying on an extrapolation of a representative set of calibration data.
In another embodiment, a periodic in-situ calibration method 1100 can be performed in the target environment at selected time intervals using an in-situ calibration apparatus 1101, as shown in
The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, schematics, and examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, schematics, and examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the present subject matter may be implemented via Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be equivalently implemented in conventional integrated circuits, as one or more computer programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on one or more controllers (e.g., microcontrollers) as one or more programs running on one or more processors (e.g., microprocessors), as firmware, or as virtually any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the code for the software and or firmware would be well within the skill of one of ordinary skill in the art in light of this disclosure.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that many of the methods or algorithms set out herein may employ additional acts, may omit some acts, and/or may execute acts in a different order than specified.
In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms taught herein, for example, calibration curves or lookup tables, are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that an illustrative embodiment applies equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing media used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of signal bearing media include, but are not limited to, the following: recordable type media such as floppy disks, hard disk drives, CD ROMs, digital tape, and computer memory.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. To the extent that they are not inconsistent with the specific teachings and definitions herein, all of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary, to employ systems, circuits and concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4128868 | Gamble | Dec 1978 | A |
4635002 | Riebeek | Jan 1987 | A |
4743835 | Bossé et al. | May 1988 | A |
4992919 | Lee et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5148357 | Paice | Sep 1992 | A |
5418502 | Ma et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430640 | Lee | Jul 1995 | A |
5481225 | Lumsden et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5521807 | Chen et al. | May 1996 | A |
5631822 | Silberkleit et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638262 | Brown | Jun 1997 | A |
5694303 | Silberkleit et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5774347 | Nakanishi | Jun 1998 | A |
5903504 | Chevallier et al. | May 1999 | A |
6043705 | Jiang | Mar 2000 | A |
6137373 | Mori | Oct 2000 | A |
6157180 | Kuo | Dec 2000 | A |
6335872 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343026 | Perry | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6456511 | Wong | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472852 | Lethellier | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6545534 | Mehr | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6643151 | Nebrigic et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6697955 | Malik et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6998901 | Lee | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7061212 | Phadke | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7183727 | Ferguson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7206210 | Harnett et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7286376 | Yang | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7339804 | Uchida | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7515005 | Dan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7564706 | Herbert | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7577539 | Hubanks et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579901 | Yamashita | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7602273 | Yoshikawa | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7730981 | McCabe et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742318 | Fu et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7847519 | Ho | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7884317 | Casper | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8040699 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8067992 | Chen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8358118 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8520415 | Krishnamoorthy et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8552589 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8649128 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20020015320 | Mochikawa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020071300 | Jang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040125523 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060039172 | Soldano | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060132105 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060220629 | Saito et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080031014 | Young | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090067206 | Oguchi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090167432 | van den Heuvel | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174381 | Ojanen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090237057 | Dishman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090256547 | Akyildiz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273431 | Hurst | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090302775 | Alexandrov | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014330 | Chang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100117715 | Ariyama | May 2010 | A1 |
20100176755 | Hoadley et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100253309 | Xi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110241637 | Parker | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130020867 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021008 | Hume et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021009 | Waltman et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021108 | Hughes | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021702 | Waltman et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140016356 | Furmanczyk et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103582997 | Feb 2014 | CN |
2001-320250 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-76799 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2007-263944 | Oct 2007 | JP |
5030216 | Sep 2012 | JP |
10-2008-0019196 | Mar 2008 | KR |
10-2008-0101784 | Nov 2008 | KR |
2011123680 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012116263 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2014039982 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nguyen et al., “Nulling Input Offset Voltage of Operational Amplifiers,” Mixed Signal Products, Texas Instruments—Application Report SLOA045, Aug. 2000, pp. 1-15. |
eCircuit Center, “Op Amp Input Offset Adjustment,” URL=http://www.ecircuitcenter.com/Circuits/op—voff/op—voff2.htm, 2002, 3 pages. |
eCircuit Center, “Op Amp Input Offset Voltage,” URL=http://www.ecircuitcenter.com/Circuits/op—voff/op—voff.htm, 2002, 3 pages. |
International Search Report, mailed Dec. 20, 2013, for PCT/US2013/058784, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion, mailed Dec. 20, 2013, for PCT/US2013/058784, 4 pages. |
“Application Guide: Theory of Operation,” MicroPower Direct, URL=http://micropowerdirect.com/PDF%20Files/Application%20Notes/Power%20Supply%20Theory%20of%20Operation.pdf, download date Apr. 18, 2012, 6 pages. |
“Buck converter,” URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck—converter, download date Jun. 23, 2011, 14 pages. |
“Maximum Flexible Power (MFP) Single Output Point of Load: Technical Preview-3-6 VDC IN, 7 AMP, Non-Isolated DC/DC Converter,” Crane Aerospace & Electronics Power Solutions, 2010, 17 pages. |
“Step-gap “E” core swing chokes: Improved regulation and higher efficiency are possible when operating at minimum current levels,” Technical Bulletin: Bulletin FC-S4, Magnetics Division, Spang & Company, Butler, Pennsylvania, 2001, 4 pages. |
“Synchronous Rectification Aids Low-Voltage Power Supplies,” Maxim Integrated Products, URL=http://www.maxim-ic.com/app-notes/index.mvp/id/652, download date Jun. 22, 2011, 6 pages. |
Hughes, “Oscillator Apparatus and Method With Wide Adjustable Frequency Range,” Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,152, 17 pages. |
Hughes, “Oscillator Apparatus and Method With Wide Adjustable Frequency Range,” Amendment filed Oct. 7, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,152, 15 pages. |
Hughes, “Oscillator Apparatus and Method With Wide Adjustable Frequency Range,” Office Action mailed Jan. 28, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,152, 15 pages. |
Hughes et al., “Self Synchronizing Power Converter Apparatus and Method Suitable for Auxiliary Bias for Dynamic Load Applications,” Notice of Allowance mailed May 14, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,217, 10 pages. |
Hume et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Method With Compensation for Light Load Conditions,” Office Action mailed Nov. 6, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,142, 11 pages. |
International Search Report, mailed Oct. 14, 2011, for PCT/US2011/030778, 3 pages. |
Kristjansson et al., “Solutions to Today's Low Voltage Power Design Challenges Using High-Efficiency, Non-Isolated Point of Load Converters: A Discussion of the Interpoint™ MFP Series™ Point of Load Converter,” Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Power Solutions—Interpoint Products, Redmond, WA, Oct. 2011, Revised Jan. 2012, 25 pages. |
Merriam-Webster, “Directly,” retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/directly, on Nov. 6, 2012, 1 page. |
Ng, “Implementing Constant Current Constant Voltage AC Adapter by NCP1200 and NCP4300A,” On Semiconductor, Application Note, Publication Order Number: AND8042/D, Feb. 2001, 12 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 16 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Amendment filed Jul. 30, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 18 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Office Action mailed Nov. 16, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 20 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Amendment filed Jan. 16, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 15 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Amendment filed Feb. 15, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 15 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 18 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Amendment filed Oct. 30, 2013 , for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 19 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 3, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 11 pages. |
Pascu, “Error Amplifier with Forced Equilibrium Adaptor,” Kepco, Inc., retrieved from http://www.kepcopower.com/equibm2.htm#fig2, dated May 22, 2014, 8 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Method With Compensation for Current Limit/Current Share Operation,” Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,172, 15 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Method With Compensation for Current Limit/Current Share Operation,” Amendment filed Mar. 17, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,172, 16 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Method With Compensation for Current Limit/Current Share Operation,” Notice of Allowance mailed May 8, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,172, 10 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Methods,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/508,937, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 139 pages. |
Written Opinion, mailed Oct. 14, 2011, for PCT/US2011/030778, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140070887 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |