Patent Application
20090195261
The present invention relates to the measurement of electrical impedances and, in particular, to the measurement of the impedance of very reactive loads.
It is generally difficult to measure the impedance of very reactive loads because the value changes so rapidly with respect to frequency.
For example, solar cells may appear so capacitive that nearly any voltage applied by a test instrument will want to oscillate into the cell's highly reactive load. Making matters worse, the noise in the test voltage will also result in corresponding large noise currents in the low impedance of the cell. Batteries and “super” capacitors also have these issues.
A similar circumstance can occur, for example, in high efficiency motors, such as some rare-earth permanent magnet motors which may appear so inductive that nearly any current applied by a test instrument will produce analogous results.
A measurement instrument for measuring the impedance of a device under test (DUT) includes a first source of either a voltage or a current and a second source of either a voltage or a current, wherein the first source is connectable in a first feedback relationship with the DUT and the second source is connectable in a second feedback relationship with both the DUT and the first source. The first and second sources are operated respectively as a current source responsive to the current through the DUT and a voltage source responsive to the voltage across the DUT or operated respectively as a voltage source responsive to the voltage across the DUT and a current source responsive to the current through the DUT. The second feedback relationship has a narrower bandwidth than the first feedback relationship. The resulting voltage across the DUT and the current through the DUT establish the measured impedance of the DUT.
Referring to
The configuration of the instrument 10 results in the desired voltage being applied to the cell 50 without undesired oscillations and noise currents that would likely be present if the feedback loop 12 was not included. The desired voltage in combination with the resulting current through the cell 50 are then used to calculate the impedance of the cell 50.
It is advantageous for the second feedback loop 20 to have a smaller frequency bandwidth than that of the first feedback loop 12. The second loop 20 then effectively establishes the DC bias of the cell 50 and the first feedback loop 12 keeps the voltage stable as it is varied to produce different data points.
Referring to
The instrument 60 can be run in a mode similar to that of
If the bandwidth of the second feedback loop 68 is less than that of the feedback loop 62, then the second loop 68 effectively establishes the DC bias of the DUT 90 and the first feedback loop 62 keeps the voltage stable as it is varied to produce different data points. The voltage setpoint and the measured current through the DUT then establish a value for the DUT impedance.
The instrument 60 can also be run in an analogous mode. In this mode, the setpoint 80 is set to a desired current, the source 70 is set to source current, the source 66 is set to source voltage, the switches 82, 84 are open and the switches 86, 88 are closed. The current in the DUT 90 is then monitored by the source 70 and the voltage across the DUT 90 is monitored by the source 66. This mode is particularly useful for a DUT having a very large inductance such as a high-efficiency motor.
If the bandwidth of the second feedback loop 64 is less than that of the feedback loop 62, then the second loop 64 effectively establishes the DC bias of the DUT 90 and the first feedback loop 62 keeps the current stable as it is varied to produce different data points. The current setpoint and the measured voltage through the DUT then establish a value for the DUT impedance.
While the above description has focused on primarily analog implementation of the invention, it is also possible to implement the feedback and measurements in various digital techniques or combinations of digital and analog.
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
