This invention relates to tissue implant devices and methods of their use. In particular, the devices and methods concern systems for anchoring the implants in tissue so that they do not migrate after implantation.
There are a variety of applications for tissue implant devices in the human body. Such applications include electrical pacing leads or other tissue monitoring devices or tissue support structures such as endoluminal stents. A device implanted in tissue may experience migratory forces applied by movement of the surrounding tissue into which the device has been implanted. Migration is especially a problem in muscle tissue that regularly contracts and relaxes around the device. Because the device is static and is relatively inflexible, rather than absorbing the forces applied by the tissue, those forces act on the device to move it in the tissue. Migration of the device ultimately may lead to ejection of the device from the tissue. An ejected device could prove harmful to a patient if it enters the blood stream and blocks blood flow to a critical organ such as the brain.
Perhaps the most regular aggressive migratory forces created by muscle tissue may be experienced by implant devices which are placed in heart tissue. Because the heart muscle regularly contracts and relaxes in an exaggerated fashion to pump blood through the ventricle, implant devices located within that tissue have significant forces applied upon them. For example, the myocardial tissue comprising the exterior wall of the heart at the left ventricle may increase in thickness by forty to sixty percent with each contraction. Conventional methods of anchoring a device to tissue such as by stapling or suturing prove difficult in applications where there is exaggerated and constant movement of the subject tissue because it is difficult to accurately apply a suture or staple to the intended location.
Implant devices for the heart have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,144 (Wilk) and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,810,836 (Hussein et al.) for the purpose of restoring blood flow to the tissue of the heart. Conventional treatments of restoring blood flow to heart tissue such as coronary artery bypass grafting have been supplanted in recent years by various methods of transmyocardial revascularization (TMR). TMR methods include creating channels into tissue of the heart either by needle acupuncture or coring with a hypodermic tube or by laser or mechanical ablative methods. Hussein and Wilk attempt to maintain the patency of such channels by a placement of a mechanical implant device to the heart tissue to support an open pathway through which blood may flow. The Hussein patent discloses several stent embodiments that are delivered through the epicardium of the heart into the myocardium and positioned to be open to the left ventricle.
Due to the exaggerated migration forces experienced by an implant device in heart tissue as described above, it would be desirable to provide devices and methods for securely anchoring an implant in an associated dynamic region of tissue. It is a general object of the present invention to provide such an anchoring system for tissue implants, especially those intended for placement in the heart that may be useful for revascularization of the heart tissue by various mechanisms.
The present invention provides implant devices configured to become anchored within tissue so that they do not migrate despite experiencing aggressive migration forces applied by the highly dynamic movement of muscle tissue that surrounds them. Additionally, methods for placing the devices so that they remain securely anchored within the tissue are provided. The devices are comprised of a flexible body, preferably formed from a helical wound spring. In a preferred embodiment the spring is wound from a ribbon-like filament having series of barbs or ridges formed along the proximal facing edge of the wound ribbon.
The devices of the present invention may be delivered to the intended tissue location percutaneously, through a catheter based system, transthoracically or surgically. Although the inventive devices and methods can be applied to implants intended for use in any region of the body, it is believed that the anchor systems are especially useful as applied to implant devices for the heart configured to treat ischemia. Flexible implant devices may be configured to promote angiogenesis through a variety of mechanisms examples of which are described in detail in pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/164,173, 09/211,332 and 09/299,795.
Generally, the spring implant devices may be considered to have a body having proximal and distal portions. In the present application, proximal is understood to mean the direction leading external to the patient and distal is understood to mean any direction leading internally to the patient. The implant devices discussed herein are delivered into the tissue in a distal direction so that the body is implanted within the tissue and the proximal end of the device is approximately flush with the tissue surface or slightly submerged under the surface. The configuration of the barbs resists migration of the device proximally back out of the tissue. Additionally, the barbs may serve to resist rotational movement of the device so that it does not “unscrew” out of the tissue.
In an embodiment of the invention, a flexible implant device formed from a helical spring body may be formed from a filament having a non-circular cross-section. For example, a filament having a rectangular cross-section may serve to prevent migration through the tissue in the axial direction by several mechanisms. When the helical coil is wound such that the major axis of the rectangular cross-section is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the body of the device greater axial flexibility is imparted to the spring, while maintaining sufficient radial stiffness to resist crushing by the tissue, than would be possible with a round cross-sectional filament material. Increased axial flexibility of the device permits it to move with surrounding tissue, absorbing forces that would otherwise tend to push the device out of position in the tissue. Additionally, as surrounding tissue herniates through the individual coils of the device, the orientation of the major axis of the rectangular cross-section of the filament to be perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the device presents a larger surface area engaging the tissue to resist axial migration.
Alternatively, the major axis of the rectangular cross-section filament may be oriented at an angle that is acute to the longitudinal axis of the device, so that the filament is canted in the proximal direction, to facilitate insertion of the device in the distal direction during implantation into the tissue. The canted orientation of the rectangular cross-sectional filament still provides the flexibility benefits of the perpendicular orientation discussed above and may enhance anchoring capability by presenting a leading proximal facing edge that serves to grip into tissue.
Barbs formed on the proximally facing edge of the finished implant may be formed on the ribbon prior to winding into its coiled shape. Preferably, the ribbon is formed having barbed shapes along at least one edge of the ribbon by an etching process. A number of ribbons may be etched on a sheet of suitable material, such as stainless steel, at once. After the ribbons are formed on the sheet of material, they may be individually detached from the sheet and wound on a spring winding machine to form a coil by conventional spring winding techniques.
A variety of filament materials may be used such as surgical grade stainless steels. Other materials may be used to vary the modulus of elasticity of the filament. Additionally, flexibility of the coil implant may be varied along the length of the coil, not only by varying spacing between coils and diameter of the filament along its length, but also by using two or more different filament materials along the length of the filament that have different moduli of elasticity.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a tissue implant device that resists migration from the tissue into which it is implanted by offering improved anchoring capability.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a tissue implant device having an anchor mechanism that is easy to integrate into small mechanical devices.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an implant device that resists migration by its inherent flexibility and ability to absorb migratory forces exerted by surrounding tissue.
It is another object of the invention to provide an implant device that utilizes an anchoring mechanism that is submerged beneath the surface of the tissue into which the device is implanted.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a method of implanting a tissue implant device so that it remains anchored in the tissue.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention will be appreciated more fully from the following further description thereof, with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings wherein:
The implant devices of the present invention are particularly useful in treating ischemic tissue such as that which often occurs in a myocardium of the heart. The implant device may be inserted into the myocardium through the epicardial surface at an entry site such that the device extends the majority of the thickness of the myocardium towards endocardial surface.
Alternatively, as shown in
Ribbon material having integrally formed barbs may be formed by variety of methods; however, chemically etching of the ribbon having barbed shapes is preferred
The implant devices of the present invention may be delivered to their intended tissue location surgically.
In use, the intended tissue location is first accessed surgically, such as by a cut-down method. The obturator, with an implant device loaded on to segment 84, then may be advanced into the tissue to deliver the implant. The sharp tip pierces the tissue permitting the obturator and implant to be pushed inward into the tissue. In the example of delivery to the myocardium, the epicardial surface of the heart is accessed and penetrated by the obturator to deliver the implant. The shoulder 88 prevents proximal movement of the implant along segment 84 during delivery. Preferably, the distal end of the obturator is projected to, and slightly beyond, the endocardium to place the implant device. The obturator then may be unscrewed and separated from the implant device. If the obturator is configured without the pin 92, the obturator may be withdrawn directly from the device and the tissue. Simply applying light closure pressure to the epicardial puncture will cause the puncture hole to clot at the epicardium.
Generally, surgical grade stainless steels are used to fabricate the implant devices discussed above, but other materials having different moduli of elasticity such as nickel titanium alloys can be used.
From the foregoing it will be appreciated that the invention provides a novel approach to providing an anchoring system for implant devices. The devices and methods of the present invention are simple and easy to apply to a wide range of implant designs.
It should be understood however, that the foregoing description of the invention is intended merely to be illustrative thereof and that other modifications, embodiments and equivalents may be apparent to those who are skilled in the art without departing from its spirit.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US00/20574 | 7/28/2000 | WO | 00 | 5/2/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/08602 | 2/8/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3991750 | Vickery | Nov 1976 | A |
3995617 | Watkins et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4307722 | Evans et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4503569 | Dotter | Mar 1985 | A |
4546499 | Possis | Oct 1985 | A |
4562597 | Possis et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4580568 | Gianturco | Apr 1986 | A |
4582181 | Samson | Apr 1986 | A |
4641653 | Rockey | Feb 1987 | A |
4649922 | Wiktor | Mar 1987 | A |
4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
4658817 | Hardy | Apr 1987 | A |
4665918 | Garza et al. | May 1987 | A |
4681110 | Wiktor | Jul 1987 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4774949 | Fogarty | Oct 1988 | A |
4813925 | Anderson, Jr. et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4861330 | Voss | Aug 1989 | A |
4889137 | Kolobow | Dec 1989 | A |
4904264 | Scheunemann | Feb 1990 | A |
4917666 | Solar | Apr 1990 | A |
4920980 | Jackowski | May 1990 | A |
4950227 | Savin et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4995857 | Arnold | Feb 1991 | A |
4997431 | Isner et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5040543 | Badera et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042486 | Pfeiler et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047028 | Qian | Sep 1991 | A |
5049138 | Chevalier et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5056517 | Fenici | Oct 1991 | A |
5087243 | Avitall | Feb 1992 | A |
5092877 | Pinchuk | Mar 1992 | A |
5098374 | Othel-Jacobsen et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5114414 | Buchbinder | May 1992 | A |
5158548 | Lau et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167614 | Tessmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176626 | Soehendra | Jan 1993 | A |
5180366 | Woods | Jan 1993 | A |
5190058 | Jones et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5256146 | Ensminger et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5266073 | Wall | Nov 1993 | A |
5287861 | Wilk | Feb 1994 | A |
5290678 | Jackowski | Mar 1994 | A |
5312456 | Reed et al. | May 1994 | A |
5324325 | Moaddeb | Jun 1994 | A |
5366493 | Scheiner et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370683 | Fontaine | Dec 1994 | A |
5372600 | Beyar et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380316 | Aita et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389096 | Aita et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391199 | Ben-Haim | Feb 1995 | A |
5409004 | Sloan | Apr 1995 | A |
5409019 | Wilk | Apr 1995 | A |
5423885 | Williams | Jun 1995 | A |
5425757 | Tiefenbrun et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429144 | Wilk | Jul 1995 | A |
5441516 | Wang et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452733 | Sterman | Sep 1995 | A |
5453090 | Martinez et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458615 | Klemm | Oct 1995 | A |
5464404 | Abela et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5464650 | Berg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5466242 | Mori | Nov 1995 | A |
5476505 | Limon | Dec 1995 | A |
5480422 | Ben-Haim | Jan 1996 | A |
5487739 | Aebischer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514176 | Bosley, Jr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
5551427 | Altman | Sep 1996 | A |
5551954 | Buscemi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562619 | Mirarchi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562922 | Lambert | Oct 1996 | A |
5569272 | Reed et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571168 | Toro | Nov 1996 | A |
5593412 | Martinez et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593434 | Williams | Jan 1997 | A |
5602301 | Field | Feb 1997 | A |
5607445 | Summers | Mar 1997 | A |
5614206 | Randolph et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5643308 | Markman | Jul 1997 | A |
5653756 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5655548 | Nelson | Aug 1997 | A |
5662124 | Wilk | Sep 1997 | A |
5676850 | Reed | Oct 1997 | A |
5690643 | Wijay | Nov 1997 | A |
5709692 | Mollenauer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5735897 | Buirge | Apr 1998 | A |
5741330 | Brauker et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744515 | Clapper | Apr 1998 | A |
5755682 | Knudson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756127 | Grisoni et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762600 | Bruchman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769843 | Abela et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782823 | Mueller | Jul 1998 | A |
5785702 | Murphy-Chutorian et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792453 | Hammond et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797870 | March et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807384 | Mueller | Sep 1998 | A |
5810836 | Hussein | Sep 1998 | A |
5824071 | Nelson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830502 | Dong et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833699 | Chuter | Nov 1998 | A |
5840059 | March et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5868780 | Lashinski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5899915 | Saadat | May 1999 | A |
5971993 | Hussein et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980514 | Kupiecki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980548 | Evans et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6019779 | Thorud et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053924 | Hussein | Apr 2000 | A |
6053943 | Edwin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6197324 | Crittenden | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6248112 | Gambale et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251418 | Ahern et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263880 | Parker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277082 | Gambale | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6364904 | Smith | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425915 | Khosravi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432126 | Gambale et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447522 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6458092 | Gambale et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478818 | Taheri | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491707 | Makower et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494657 | Unsworth et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494907 | Bulver | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500172 | Panescu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6544275 | Teoh | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6620170 | Ahern | Sep 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19703482 | Jan 1997 | DE |
296 19 029 | Apr 1997 | DE |
0 490 459 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0 515 867 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0 714 640 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 717 969 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 732 089 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0 812 574 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0 830 873 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 876 803 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 953 320 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1.514.319 | Jan 1967 | FR |
2 725 615 | Oct 1994 | FR |
2026640 | Jan 1995 | RU |
2063179 | Jul 1996 | RU |
WO 8901798 | Mar 1989 | WO |
WO 9115254 | Oct 1991 | WO |
WO9405265 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9533511 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9620698 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9732551 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9744071 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9745105 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9747253 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9805307 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9808456 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9816644 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9823228 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9825533 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9829148 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9832859 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9846115 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9921510 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9938459 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9953863 | Oct 1999 | WO |