The present disclosure relates generally to bone fixation systems and, more particularly, to fixation devices and techniques for bone fusion to correct a hammertoe condition.
The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
Deformities of the fingers and toes are common conditions encountered by orthopedists and podiatrists. Patients with digital deformities often experience significant pain from structural abnormalities. Some of these abnormalities are acquired, caused by traumatic injuries, neuromuscular pathologies, systemic diseases, or mechanical problems secondary to extrinsic pressures. The deformities are popularly known as either mallet finger, jersey finger, coach's finger, hammer toe, as well as a host of others indicative of several different pathologies.
Hammer toe is generally described in medical literature as an acquired disorder, typically characterized by hypertension of the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ), hyperflexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ), and hypertension of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ). Although this condition can be conservatively managed such as through the use of orthotic devices, in certain instances surgical intervention is required.
To ensure success of a surgical procedure, a proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis is typically performed. Newer implants sued in hammertoe procedures fuse only the hammertoe joint but require the surgeon to distract the DIPJ in order to extend over the distal end of the implant after the first half of the implant has been inserted into PIPJ. It can be difficult to perform such steps in a minimally invasive fashion. In this regard, the distraction can cause issues with nerves and blood supply to the distal end of the toe.
This section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
An implant configured for fusing a first bone segment and a second bone segment during an operative procedure and constructed in accordance to one example of the present disclosure includes an implant body, a first bone interfacing portion and a second bone interfacing portion. The implant body can extend longitudinally between an insertion end and an opposite end. The first bone interfacing portion can be provided on the implant body and be configured to be implanted relative to the first bone segment. The second bone interfacing portion can be provided on the implant body and be configured to be implanted relative to the second bone segment. The first and second bone interfacing portions can be inserted dorsally into the first and second bone segments, respectively.
According to additional features, the first bone interfacing portion can further comprise a first insertion portion that generally tapers toward the insertion end. The first insertion portion can be conical. The second bone interfacing portion can further comprise a second insertion portion that generally tapers toward the insertion end. The second bone interfacing portion can be conical.
According to other features, the first bone interfacing portion can further comprise first and second engagement portions formed at the opposite end. The first insertion and engagement portions can be offset by a first connecting shaft. The second insertion and engagement portions can be offset by a second connecting shaft. The first engaging portion can extend along a first bone engaging axis. The second bone engaging portion can extend along a second bone engaging axis. In one configuration, the first and second axes can be parallel. In another configuration, the first and second axes can converge toward the insertion end. In another configuration, the first and second axes can diverge toward the insertion end.
According to still other features, the implant can further comprise a porous metal portion disposed between (i) the first insertion portion and the first engagement portion and (ii) the second insertion portion and the second engagement portion. The implant body can further comprise a wedge disposed between the first and second bone interfacing portions. The wedge can generally extend between and taper from the opposite end to the insertion end. The wedge can include (i) a first bone engaging face configured to engage the first bone segment and (ii) a second engaging face configured to engage the second bone segment. The first and second bone engaging faces can extend along converging planes. The first and second engagement portions can comprise a geometry that defines two intersecting circles.
An implant configured for fusing a first bone segment and a second adjacent bone segment during an operative procedure according to another example of the present disclosure includes an implant body, a first bone interfacing portion, a second bone interfacing portion and a wedge. The implant body can have a solid metal portion and a porous metal portion. The implant body can extend longitudinally between an insertion end and an opposite end. The first bone interfacing portion can be provided on the implant body and have a first tapered end. The first bone interfacing portion can be configured to be implanted relative to the first bone segment. The second bone interfacing portion can be provided on the implant body and have a second tapered end. The second bone interfacing portion can be configured to be implanted relative to the second bone segment. The wedge can be configured on the implant body between the first and second bone interfacing portions. The wedge can generally extend between and taper from the opposite end to the insertion end. The first and second bone interfacing portions can be inserted dorsally into the first and second bone segments, respectively.
According to other features, the wedge can include (i) a first bone engaging face configured to engage the first bone segment and (ii) a second bone engaging face configured to engage the second bone segment. The first and second bone engaging faces can extend along converging planes. The first and second engagement portions comprise a geometry that defines two intersecting circles. The first and second engagement portions can extend along longitudinal axes that converge. In another example, the first and second engagement portions can extend along longitudinal axes that diverge.
A method of inserting an implant into a first bone segment and a second adjacent bone segment to fuse the first bone segment to the second bone segment is provided. An implant body is provided having a first and a second bone interfacing portion that extend longitudinally between an insertion end and an opposite end. A first bone hole is prepared generally inferiorly into the first bone segment. A second bone hole is prepared generally inferiorly into the second bone segment. The first and second bone interfacing portions are inserted dorsally into the respective first and second bone holes thereby fusing the first and second bone segments together.
According to additional features of the method, a first conically shaped insertion portion formed on the first bone interfacing portion is located into the first bone hole. A second conically shaped insertion portion formed on the second bone interfacing portion is located into the second bone hole. The first and second bone interfacing portions are concurrently advanced into the respective first and second bone holes. The implant can further comprise a wedge generally extending between the first and second bone interfacing portions. The wedge can include (i) a first bone engaging face configured to engage the first bone segment and (ii) a second bone engaging face configured to engage the second bone segment. The first and second bone engaging faces can extend along converging planes. The first bone engaging face can be slidably advanced along the first bone segment concurrently to the second bone engaging face slidably advancing along the second bone segment.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the description provided hereinafter. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The present teachings will become more fully understood from the detailed description, the appended claims and the following drawings. The drawings are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, its application, or uses. Examples are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough, and will fully convey the scope to those who are skilled in the art. Numerous specific details are set forth such as examples of specific components, devices, systems and/or methods, to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that specific details need not be employed, that examples shown herein may be embodied in many different forms and that neither should be construed to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The present teachings and related discussion is directed primarily to the treatment of a hammertoe condition, it is equally applicable to any situation where a first phalange and a second adjacent phalange, of either a toe or a finger, are to be joined or fused together. It will further be appreciated that while the following discussion is directed toward treatment of a hammertoe condition, the following implants may be additionally used in other bones. In this regard, the following disclosure is not limited to implants used in phalanges. In other examples, the following implants may be used on any adjacent bones or on a fractured bone. As used herein the term “bone segment” is used to refer to a bone or a bone portion resulting from a fracture.
With initial reference to
In one exemplary implementation, the porous metal structure 14 can be a formed from a titanium alloy using an additive Manufacturing process, such as with OsseoTi™, which is commercially available from Biomet Manufacturing, LLC (Warsaw, Ind., USA). Briefly, however, OsseoTi™ is highly biocompatible, has high corrosion resistance and includes a highly interconnected porous architecture that mimics the porous structure cancellous bone, which can enhance bone integration and in-growth. In one exemplary implementation, OsseoTi™ can include a porous construct with a porosity of 70%.
The implant 10 includes an implant body 20 that extends longitudinally between an insertion end 22 and an opposite end 24. The implant body 20 further includes a first bone interfacing portion 30 and a second bone interfacing portion 32. The first bone interfacing portion 30 extends along a first bone engaging axis 34 and is configured to be implanted relative to a first phalange. The second bone interfacing portion 32 extends along a second bone engaging axis 36 and is configured to be implanted relative to a second phalange. In the example shown in
The first bone interfacing portion 30 can include a first insertion portion 40. The first insertion portion 40 can generally be in the geometry of a cone having a conical profile that tapers toward the insertion end 20. Similarly, the second bone interfacing portion 32 can include a second insertion portion 42. The second insertion portion 42 can generally be in the geometry of a cone having a conical profile that tapers toward the insertion end 20.
The first bone interfacing portion 30 further first engagement portion 50 formed at an opposite end of the first insertion portion 40. The second bone interfacing portion 32 further includes a second engagement portion 52 formed at an opposite end of the second insertion portion 42. The first engagement portion 50 and the first insertion portion 40 can be connected and offset relative to each other by a first connecting shaft 54. Similarly, the second engagement portion 52 and the second insertion portion 42 can be connected and offset relative to each other by a second connecting shaft 56. In one configuration, the first and second engagement portions 50 and 52 can provide a surface for engaging during advancing the implant 10 into the respective first and second phalanges. In the example shown, the first and second engagement portions 50 and 52 have a geometry that defines two intersecting circles. Other configurations are contemplated. As shown in
With reference now to
The implant 110 can include an implant body 120 that extends longitudinally between an insertion end 122 and an opposite end 124. The implant body 120 further includes a first bone interfacing portion 130 and a second bone interfacing portion 132. The first bone interfacing portion 130 extends along a first bone engaging axis 134 and is configured to be implanted relative to a first phalange. The second bone interfacing portion 132 extends along a second bone engaging axis 136 and is configured to be implanted relative to a second phalange. In the example shown in
The first bone interfacing portion 130 can include a first insertion portion 140. The first insertion portion 140 can taper toward the insertion end 120. In another example, the first insertion portion 140 can have a conical profile similar to shown in
The first bone interfacing portion 130 further includes a first engagement portion 150 formed at an opposite end of the first insertion portion 140. The second bone interfacing portion 132 further includes a second engagement portion 152 formed at an opposite end of the second insertion portion 142. The first engagement portion 150 and the first insertion portion 140 can be connected and offset relative to each other by a first connecting shaft 154.
Similarly, the second engagement portion 152 and the second insertion portion 142 can be connected and offset relative to each other by a second connecting shaft 156. In one configuration, the first and second engagement portions 150 and 152 can provide a surface for engaging during advancing the implant 110 into the respective first and second phalanges. In the example shown, the first and second engagement portions 150 and 152 have a geometry that generally defines two converging teardrops. In this regard, the engagement portion 150 has a first pair of generally planar surfaces 156A, 156B and the second engagement portion 152 has a second pair of generally planar surfaces 158A and 158B. The corresponding first and second planar surfaces 156A and 158A intersect and the first and second planar surface 156B and 158B intersect.
As will be explained in greater detail herein, the first and second pairs of planar surfaces 156A, 156B and 158A, 158B can correspond to cuts made in the respective adjacent phalanges to accommodate the implant 110. Other configurations are contemplated. As shown in
With reference now to
The implant 210 can include an implant body 220 that extends longitudinally between an insertion end 222 and an opposite end 224. The implant body 220 further includes a first bone interfacing portion 230 and a second bone interfacing portion 232. The first bone interfacing portion 230 extends along a first bone engaging axis 234 and is configured to be implanted relative to a first phalange. The second bone interfacing portion 232 extends along a second bone engaging axis 236 and is configured to be implanted relative to a second phalange. As best illustrated in
The first bone interfacing portion 230 can include a first insertion portion 240. The first insertion portion 240 can taper toward the insertion end 222. In the example shown, first insertion portion 240 has a conical profile similar to shown in
The first bone interfacing portion 230 further includes a first engagement portion 250 formed at an opposite end of the first insertion portion 240. The second bone interfacing portion 232 further includes a second engagement portion 252 formed at an opposite end of the second insertion portion 242. In the example shown in
Similarly, the second engagement portion 252 and the second insertion portion 242 can be connected and offset relative to each other by a second connecting shaft 256. In one configuration, the first and second engagement portions 250 and 252 can provide a surface for engaging during advancing the implant 210 into the respective first and second phalanges. In the example shown, the first and second engagement portions 250 and 252 have a geometry that defines two disk shaped portions that converge into a central wedge 260. The wedge 260 includes first and second generally planar surfaces 262 and 264 (
As will be explained in greater detail herein, the first and second planar surfaces 262 and 264 are configured to slidably engage respective phalanges during insertion of the implant 210 to further encourage the phalanges to obtain a desired orientation. As shown in
With reference now to
The implant 310 can include an implant body 320 that extends longitudinally between an insertion end 322 and an opposite end 324. The implant body 320 further includes a first bone interfacing portion 330 and a second bone interfacing portion 332. The first bone interfacing portion 330 extends along a first bone engaging axis 334 and is configured to be implanted relative to a first phalange. The second bone interfacing portion 332 extends along a second bone engaging axis 336 and is configured to be implanted relative to a second phalange. As best illustrated in
The first bone interfacing portion 330 can include a first insertion portion 340. The first insertion portion 340 can taper toward the insertion end 322. In the example shown, first insertion portion 340 has a conical profile similar to shown in
The first bone interfacing portion 330 further includes a first engagement portion 350 formed at an opposite end of the first insertion portion 340. The second bone interfacing portion 332 further includes a second engagement portion 352 formed at an opposite end of the second insertion portion 342. In the example shown in
Similarly, the second engagement portion 352 and the second insertion portion 342 can be connected and offset relative to each other by a second connecting shaft 356. In one configuration, the first and second engagement portions 350 and 352 can provide a surface for engaging during advancing the implant 310 into the respective first and second phalanges. In the example shown, the first and second engagement portions 350 and 352 have a geometry that defines two teardrops that converge into a central wedge 360. The first engagement portion 350 has a first pair of generally planar surfaces 356A, 356B and the second engagement portion 352 has a second pair of generally planar surfaces 358A and 358B. The corresponding first and second planar surfaces 356A and 358A intersect and the first and second planar surface 356B and 358B intersect.
The wedge 360 includes first and second generally planar surfaces 362 and 364 that converge toward the insertion end 322. In one non-limiting example, the first and second planar surfaces 362 and 364 define an angle 366 of about 10 degrees. It will be appreciated that other angles may be provided. Moreover, it is contemplated that a kit of implants may be offered having a variety of geometries including various wedges 360 that may be selected intraoperatively according to a given patient's needs.
As will be explained in greater detail herein, the first and second planar surfaces 362 and 364 are configured to slidably engage respective phalanges during insertion of the implant 310 to further encourage the phalanges to obtain a desired orientation. As shown in
Turning now to
Once the proximal phalange B and the first metatarsal C are oriented in a preferred (generally linear) orientation, bone holes 280 and 282 may be drilled into the respective proximal phalange B and the first metatarsal C (see
Next, the surgeon locates the first and second insertion portions 340 and 342 onto the bone holes 290 and 292 and advances the first and second bone interfacing portions 330 and 332 of the implant 310 dorsally into the bone bones 390 and 392. Notably, during the dorsal advancement, the planar surfaces 362 and 364 of the wedge 360 can slidably negotiate along the respective proximal phalange B and the first metatarsal C to further encourage proper alignment of the bone. In the implanted position, the proximal phalange B and the first metatarsal C are fused and the hammertoe deformation is corrected.
Turning now to
While one or more specific examples or aspects have been described and illustrated, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalence may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the present teachings as defined in the claims. Furthermore, the mixing and matching of features, elements and/or functions between various examples may be expressly contemplated herein so that one skilled in the art would appreciate from the present teachings that features, elements and/or functions of one example may be incorporated into another example as appropriate, unless described otherwise above. Moreover, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the present teachings without departing from the essential scope thereof.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular example implementations only and is not intended to be limiting. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” may be intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. The method steps, processes, and operations described herein are not to be construed as necessarily requiring their performance in the particular order discussed or illustrated, unless specifically identified as an order of performance. It is also to be understood that additional or alternative steps may be employed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3855638 | Pilliar | Dec 1974 | A |
4708799 | Gerlach et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4853137 | Ersson | Aug 1989 | A |
5015248 | Burstein et al. | May 1991 | A |
5075222 | Hannum et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5359032 | Dayer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5443516 | Albrektsson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5571418 | Lee et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5585007 | Antanavich et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599558 | Gordinier et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5707331 | Wells et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5788662 | Antanavich et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792450 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5842477 | Naughton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6063297 | Antanavich et al. | May 2000 | A |
6096728 | Collins et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6214338 | Antanavich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6287558 | Lanza et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6337072 | Ford et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342076 | Lundborg | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6398972 | Blasetti et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6533454 | Kaikkonen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6599873 | Sommer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6623472 | Reincke et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6649072 | Brandt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6713246 | Reinecke et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6758849 | Michelson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6759188 | Reinecke et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790371 | Dolecek | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6811777 | Mishra | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835377 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6905612 | Dorian et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7011852 | Sukavaneshvar et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7166283 | Tsuji et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179391 | Leach et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7223346 | Dorian et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7291175 | Gordon | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7374678 | Leach et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7465293 | Reinecke et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470371 | Dorian et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7553413 | Dorian et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7608258 | Mishra | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7678385 | Reddi | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694828 | Swift et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708152 | Dorian et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7806276 | Leach et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7867765 | Faustman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7901344 | Yoo | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7901584 | Dorian et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914689 | Higgins et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7992725 | Leach et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8048297 | Leach et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8048321 | Leach et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8202539 | Behnam et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8753690 | Higgins et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8784457 | Graham | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9763800 | Finley et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10166022 | Early et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20010053764 | Sims et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020077276 | Fredeking et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020119179 | Rezania et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030040750 | Stoffella | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055511 | Schryver et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030091536 | Frisbie et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099650 | Ho et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030138910 | Reinecke et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139746 | Groiso | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030194397 | Mishra | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205538 | Dorian et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040092937 | Criscuolo et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040120942 | Mcginnis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040182795 | Dorian et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040219182 | Gomes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251217 | Leach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258671 | Watkins | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050084962 | Simon | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100536 | Mishra | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109716 | Leach et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124993 | Chappuis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152905 | Omoigui | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050186120 | Dorian et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050196874 | Dorian et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197293 | Mellis et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060046960 | Mckay et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060051865 | Higgins et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057223 | Dimauro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057693 | Simon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060121002 | Rolland et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060171948 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060175244 | Dorian et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060175268 | Dorian et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060273049 | Leach et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060273050 | Higgins et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278588 | Woodell-May | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070027082 | Hasty et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070075016 | Leach | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092494 | Higgins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093834 | Stevens et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070207161 | Ralph | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080011684 | Dorian et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019964 | Olmarker et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080064626 | Zanella | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080109018 | Martin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161808 | Fox | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167668 | Criscuolo et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080193424 | Mckale et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217263 | Higgins et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080268064 | Woodell-May | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269762 | Simon et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294195 | Egli et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306431 | Yoo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090014391 | Leach et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090047242 | Reinecke et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090101599 | Dorian et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105767 | Reiley | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112146 | Wratten et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090171394 | Abdou | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090181019 | Solinger | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191217 | De Wildt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192528 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090220482 | Higgins et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090221075 | Dorian et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236297 | Dorian et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090250413 | Hoeppner | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253566 | Chavarria | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090263319 | Wohabrebbi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090317439 | Turzi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008992 | Ichim | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015129 | Abramson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100055087 | Higgins et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100125236 | Bare et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100140182 | Chapman et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100198130 | Swift et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226909 | Hecker et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256595 | Leach et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110052561 | Hoeppner | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110059082 | Germer et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110059083 | Aigner et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110059084 | Osterroth et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093018 | Prasad et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110118796 | Reiley et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129441 | Lentz | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110189172 | Solinger et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110192804 | Landrigan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110268708 | Lin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120027746 | Dorian et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120093936 | Lindenberg et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120150086 | Cohen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172836 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130178425 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130259951 | O'Connell, Jr. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130325076 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140018812 | Graham | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140194999 | Orbay et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140358235 | Fox et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150088136 | Kotuljac et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160015437 | Elleby et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160270923 | Finley et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
748575 | Jun 2002 | AU |
101166485 | Apr 2008 | CN |
102048594 | May 2011 | CN |
102202611 | Sep 2011 | CN |
103767781 | May 2014 | CN |
105338990 | Feb 2016 | CN |
107072787 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107548296 | Jan 2018 | CN |
102008010476 | Aug 2009 | DE |
0417818 | Mar 1991 | EP |
1813825 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2186877 | May 2010 | EP |
2844445 | Mar 2004 | FR |
2011512894 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2012506264 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2013542775 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2018509987 | Apr 2018 | JP |
WO-9905989 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-9967277 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-03063799 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-03080104 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-03088905 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004009207 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2006043972 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2007121538 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007128973 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008021237 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2011031553 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2012030593 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012030593 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2014149301 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2016160372 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO-2016160372 | Oct 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/023094, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 28, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16741166.9, Response filed Jun. 20, 2018 to Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2016243847, First Examination Report dated Sep. 11, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,250, Final Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,250, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,250, Notice of Allowance dated May 17, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,250, Response filed May 8, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,250, Response filed Jul. 26, 2016 to Restriction Requirement dated May 27, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,250, Response filed Dec. 1, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,250, Restriction Requirement dated May 27, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“Bio-Rad Laboratories. Bio-Gel P Polyacrylamide Gel Instruction Manual”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <www.bio-rad.com/webmaster/pdfs/9154 Bio-Gel P.pdf>, (Jun. 20, 2012), 14 pgs. |
“GPS® II Platelet Concentrate System: The New Gold Standard”, Product Brochure, (Sep. 2006), 14 pgs. |
“GPS® II System, Gravitational Platelet Separation System”, User Manual-Cell Factor Technologies, Inc., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.cellfactortech.com/global _products.cfm,>, (Sep. 16, 2005), 13 pgs. |
“GPS® II System, Gravitational Platelet Separation System, Accelerating the Body's Natural Healing Process”, Cell Factor Technologies, Inc., [Online] retrieved form the internet: <http://www.cellfactortech.com/global_products.cfm>, printed Sep. 16, 2005, (2005), 16 pgs. |
“GPS® III Platelet Separation System, Leadership through Technology”, Biomet Biologics, Inc, (Jul. 2007), 8 pgs. |
“GPS® Platelet Concentrate System”, Cell Factor Technologies, Inc Biomet Orthopaedics, Inc., (Feb. 29, 2004), 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/016900, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 24, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/016900, International Search Report dated May 12, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/016900, Written Opinion dated May 12, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/023094, International Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/023094, Invitation to Pay Add'l Fees and Partial Search Report dated Aug. 31, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/023094, Written Opinion dated Nov. 3, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“Isolation of Granulocytes From Human Peripheral Blood by Density Gradient Centrifugation”, Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, (2008), 2 pgs. |
“Plasmax Plasma Concentrate”, Biomet Biologics, Inc, Brochure, (2006), 6 pgs. |
“Plasmax® Plasma Concentration System”, Biomet Biologics, (Mar. 2007), 18 pgs. |
“Shoulder Recovery with the GPS® Platelet Concentrate System, Rotator Cuff Surgical Techniques”, Biomet Biologics, Inc., (2004), 6 pgs. |
“Update for veterinarians”, Anonymous, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://vet.osu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/news/vmc/ovmaVeterinarianUp/documents/pdf /news/vmc/ovmaVeterinarianUp>, (Dec. 2012). |
“Vortech Concentration System Product”, Biomet Biologics, Inc., (Aug. 2005), 16 pgs. |
Alford, J Winslow, et al., “Cartilage Restoration, Part 1. Basic Science, Historical Perspective, Patient Evaluation, and Treatment Options”, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 33(2), (2005), 295-306. |
Anitua, Eduardo, et al., “Autologous platelets as a source of proteins for healing and tissue regeneration”, Thromb Haemost, vol. 91, (2004), 4-15. |
Arend, W, et al., “Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist: Role in Biology”, Annu. Rev. Immunol., vol. 16, (1998), 27-55. |
Baltzer, A W, et al., “Autologous conditioned serum (Orthokine) is an effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage”, (Feb. 1, 2009), 152-60. |
Becker, C, et al., “Efficacy of epidural perineural injections with autologous conditioned serum for lumbar radicular compression an Investigator-initiated, prospective, double-blind, reference-controlled study”, (2007), 1803-1808. |
Bendele, Alison M, et al., “Combination Benefit of Treatment With the Cytoki Ne Inhibitors interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist and Pegylated Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Type I in animal models of Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Arthritis & Rheumatism, Wiley, US, vol. 43, No. 1, (Dec. 1, 2000), 2648-2659. |
Bielecki, T, et al., “Antibacterial effect of autologous platelet gel enriched with growth factors and toher acive substances”, J Bone Joint Surg, vol. 89-B, No. 3, (Mar. 2007), 417-420. |
Burnouf, T, “Blood-derived, tissue engineering biomaterials”, Biomedical Engineering-Applications, Basis & Communications, val, 16, No. 6, (Dec. 6, 2004), 294-304. |
Carpenter, et al., “Long-term storage of proteins”, Current Protocols in Protein Science, (2002), 6 pgs. |
Carpenter, et al., “Rationale Design of stable protein formulations—theory and practice”, Rationale design of stable lyophilized protein formulations: theory and practice (2002), 109-133. |
Dallari, et al., “Enhanced Tibial Osteotomy Healing with Use of Bone Grafts Supplemented with Platelet Gel or Platelet Gel and Bone Marrow Stromal Cells”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 89, (2007), 2413-2420. |
Dinarello, C, “Interleukin-1 and Interleukin-1 Antagonism”, Blood, vol. 77, No. 8, (Apr. 1991), 1627-1652. |
Dinarello, C A, “Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases”, Blood, 2011, vol. 117(14),, (2011), 3720-3732. |
Eppley, et al., “Platelet Quantification and Growth Factor Analysis from Platelet-Rich Plasma: Implications for Wound Healing”, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 114(6), (Nov. 2004), 1502-1508. |
Evans, C H, “Novel biological approaches to the intra-articular treatment of osteoarthritis”, BioDrugs, (2005), 355-62. |
Fiotti, et al., “Atherosclerosis and Inftammation. Patterns of Cytokine Regulation in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease”, Atherosclerosis. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. IE, vol. 145, No. 1, (Jul. 1, 1999), 51-60. |
Floryan, K, et al., “Home Study Program: Intraoperative use of Autologous Platelet-Rich and Platelet-Poor Plasma for Orthopedic Surgery Patients”, AORN Journal: Home Study Program, 80(4), (Oct. 2004), 667-678. |
Hou, W H, et al., “Microftuidic Devices for Blood Fractionation”, Micromachines, (2011), 319-343. |
Juge-Aubry, C, et al., “Adipose Tissue is a Major Source of Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist: Upregulation in Obesity and Inflammation”, Diabetes, vol. 52, (May 2004), 1104-1110. |
Kaufman, A, et al., “Human macrophage response to UHMWPE, TiAIV, Coer, and alumina particles: Analysis of multiple cytokines using protein arrays”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, published online in Wiley InterScience, (Jul. 2007), 464-474. |
Kim, Seon Hee, et al., “Ex Vivo Gene Delivery of II-Lra and Soluble Tnf Receptor Confers a Distal Synergistic Therapeutic Effect in Antigen-Induced Arthritis”, Molecular Therapy, Nature Publishing Group, GB, vol. 6, No. 5, (Nov. 1, 2002), 591-600. |
King, William, et al., “A Simple Method to Correlate the Concentration of an Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine with White Blood Cells in an Autologous Protein Solution”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://prgmobileapps.com/AppUpdates/ors/Abstracts/abs391.html>, (Feb. 24, 2014). |
Klingenberg et al., “Treating inflammation in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Emerging Therapies”, European Heart Journal., vol. 30, No. 23, (Dec. 2009), 2838-2844. |
Lavi, Galia, et al., “Sustained delivery of IL-1 Ra from biodegradable microspheres reduces the No. Of murine 816 melanoma lung metastases”, Journal of Controlled Release, 123, (2007), 123-130. |
Lucarelli, E, et al., “Platelet-derived growth factors enhance proliferation of human stromal stem cells”, Biomaterials, vol. 24, (2003), 3095-3100. |
Matthews, J, et al., “Comparison of the response of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes from different donors to challenge with model polyethylene particles of known size and dose”, Biomaterials, vol. 21, (2000), 2033-2044. |
Meijer, H, et al., “The production of antiinflammatory cytokines in whole blood by physico-chemical induction”, Inftamm. Res. vol. 52, (Oct. 2003), 404-407. |
Morizaki, et al., “The Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Transplants for Tendon Healing in Vitro”, J. Hand Surg. Am., vol. 35, No. 11, (Nov. 2010), 1833-1841. |
Murphy, Michael P, et al., “Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Therapy is Safe and Promotes Amputation-Free Survival in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia”, Journal of Vascular Surgery, C.V. Mosby CO., St. Louis, MO, US, vol. 53, No. 6, (Jan. 28, 2011), 1565-1574. |
Muzio, M, et al., “Interleukin-13 Induces the Production of Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1ra) and the Expression of the mRNA for the Intracellular (Keratinocyte) Form of IL-1ra in Human Myelomonocy1ic Cells”, Blood, vol. 83, No. 7, (Apr. 1994), 1738-1743. |
Nursen, Duzgun, et al., “Cytokine inhibitors: soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in Behcet's disease”, Rheumatology International ; Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Springer, Berlin, DEvol. 25, No. 1, (Jan. 2005), 1-5. |
O'Shaughnessey, Krista M, et al., “Blood-derived anti-inflammatory protein solution blocks the effect of IL-1 beta on human macrophages in vitro”, Imflammation Research, vol. 60, No. 10,, (Oct. 1, 2011), 929-936. |
Rader, C, et al., “Cytokine Response of Human Macrophage-like Cells After Contact With Polyethylene and Pure Titanium Particles”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 14, No. 7, (Oct. 1999), 840-848. |
Sorbera, L A, “Pegsunercept. Pegylated Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Type 1 Peg-Stnf-RI”, Drugs of the Future, Prous Science, ES, vol. 28, No. 12, (Jan. 1, 2003), 1182-1188. |
Swift, Matthew J, “Characterization of Grow1h Factors in Platelet Rich Plasma”, Cell Factor Technologies, Inc, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: www.cellfactortech.com/global_products.cfm, (Sep. 16, 2005), 1 pg. |
Tateishi-Yuyama, E, et al., “Therapuetic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone-barrow cells: a pilot study and randomised controlled trial”, The Lancet, (2002), 427-435. |
Ulich, Thomas R, et al., “Intratrachael Administration of Endotoxin and Cytokines: IV. The Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Type 1 Inhibits Acute Inflammation”, American Journal of Pathology; vol. 142, No. 5, (May 1993). |
Vangsness, Thomas, et al., “Stimulation of IL-1ra production from platelet-rich plasma”, Poster No. 488 presented at 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society, Mar. 2-5, 2008), 1 pg. |
Woodell-May, J, et al., “Effect of Incubation Time on Production of IL-1ra and sTNF-RI from Platelet-Rich Plasma”, Paper No. 200, 55th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, (Feb. 2009). |
Woodell-May, J, et al., “Elution of IL-1ra from a concentrated-plasma matrix—An in vitro study”, Poster Presentation at 8th World Congress of the International Cartilage Repair Society, (May 2009), 1 pg. |
Woodell-May, J, et al., “Producing Accurate Platelet Counts for Platelet Rich Plasma: Validation of a Hematology Analyzer and Preparation Techniques for Counting”, Scientific Foundation. Journal of Carniofacial Surgery, vol. 16, No. 5, (Sep. 2005), 749-756. |
Woodell-May, Jennifer, et al., “Autologous Protein Solution Inhibits Mmp-13 Production by II-L[Beta] and Tnf[Alpha]-Stimulated Human Articular Chondrocytes”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 29, No. 9, (Sep. 1, 2011), 1320-1326. |
Wright-Carpenter, T, “Treatment of Muscle Injuries by Local Administration of Autologous Conditioned Serum: A Pilot Study on Sportsmen with Muscle Strains”, Int J Sports Med, vol. 25, (Oct. 2004), 588-593. |
Yang, et al., “Protective effects of IL-1Ra or vIL-10 gene transfer on a murine model of wear debris-included osteolysis”, Gene Therapy 11, (2004), 483-491. |
Yang, T, et al., “Recent Applications of Polyacrylamide as Biomaterials”, Recent Patents on Materials Science, vol. 1, (2008), 29-40. |
Yoshida, S, et al., “Elevation of serum soluble tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor and IL-1 receptor antagonist levels in bronchial asthma”, Clinical and Experimental Immunology, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. vol. 106, No. 1, (Oct. 1, 1996), 73-78. |
Zhang, et al., “IL-1ra alleviates inflammatory hyperalgesia through preventing phosphorylation of NMDA receptor NR-1 subunit in rats”, Pain, vol. 135, No. 3, (Mar. 5, 2008), 232-239. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2016243847, Response filed Nov. 13, 2019 to First Examination Report dated Sep. 11, 2019”, 23 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2016243847, Subsequent Examiners Report dated Dec. 5, 2019”, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201680023978.7, Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2019”, W/English Translation, 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201680023978.7, Response filed Dec. 10, 2019 to Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2019”, w/ English Claims, 9 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2017-549201, Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Jan. 21, 2020”, with English translation, 11 pages. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2016243847, Response filed Feb. 25, 2020 Subsequent Examiners Report dated Dec. 5, 2019”, 22 pages. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201680023978.7, Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2020”, with English translation, 16 pages. |
“European Application Serial No. 16741166.9, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 1, 2020”, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170354509 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14661250 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15686286 | US |