The present invention generally relates to improved medical devices and methods for the reduction of elevated pressure in organs of the human body. More particularly, the present invention relates to the treatment of glaucoma by trabecular bypass surgery, which is a means for using an implant or seton, such as a micro stent, shunt or the like, to bypass diseased trabecular meshwork at the level of trabecular meshwork and use/restore existing outflow pathways.
About two percent of people in the United States have glaucoma. Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases that causes pathological changes in the optic disk and corresponding visual field loss resulting in blindness if untreated. Intraocular pressure elevation is the major etiologic factor in all glaucomas.
In glaucomas associated with an elevation in eye pressure the source of resistance to outflow is in the trabecular meshwork. The tissue of the trabecular meshwork allows the “aqueous” to enter Schlemm's canal, which then empties into aqueous collector channels in the posterior wall of Schlemm's canal and then into aqueous veins. The aqueous or aqueous humor is a transparent liquid that fills the region between the cornea at the front of the eye and the lens. The aqueous humor is constantly secreted by the ciliary body around the lens, so there is a continuous flow of the aqueous humor from the ciliary body to the eye's front chamber. The eye's pressure is determined by a balance between the production of aqueous and its exit through the trabecular meshwork (major route) or via uveal scleral outflow (minor route). The trabecular meshwork is located between the outer rim of the iris and the internal periphery of the cornea. The portion of the trabecular meshwork adjacent to Schlemm's canal causes most of the resistance to aqueous outflow (juxtacanilicular meshwork).
Glaucoma is grossly classified into two categories: closed-angle glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma. The closed-angle glaucoma is caused by closure of the anterior angle by contact between the iris and the inner surface of the trabecular meshwork. Closure of this anatomical angle prevents normal drainage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye. Open-angle glaucoma is any glaucoma in which the angle of the anterior chamber remains open, but the exit of aqueous through the trabecular meshwork is diminished. The exact cause for diminished filtration is unknown for most cases of open-angle glaucoma. However, there are secondary open-angle glaucomas which may include edema or swelling of the trabecular spaces (from steroid use), abnormal pigment dispersion, or diseases such as hyperthyroidism that produce vascular congestion.
All current therapies for glaucoma are directed at decreasing intraocular pressure. This is initially by medical therapy with drops or pills that reduce the production of aqueous humor or increase the outflow of aqueous. However, these various drug therapies for glaucoma are sometimes associated with significant side effects, such as headache, blurred vision, allergic reactions, death from cardiopulmonary complications and potential interactions with other drugs. When the drug therapy fails, surgical therapy is used. Surgical therapy for open-angle glaucoma consists of laser (trabeculoplasty), trabeculectomy and aqueous shunting implants after failure of trabeculectomy or if trabeculectomy is unlikely to succeed. Trabeculectomy is a major surgery which is most widely used and is augmented with topically applied anticancer drugs such as 5-flurouracil or mitomycin-c to decrease scarring and increase surgical success.
Approximately 100,000 trabeculectomies are performed on Medicare age patients per year in the United States. This number would increase if the morbidity associated with trabeculectomy could be decreased. The current morbidity associated with trabeculectomy consists of failure (10-15%), infection (a life long risk about 2-5%), choroidal hemorrhage (1%, a severe internal hemorrhage from pressure too low resulting in visual loss), cataract formation, and hypotony maculopathy (potentially reversible visual loss from pressure too low).
If it were possible to bypass the local resistance to outflow of aqueous at the point of the resistance and use existing outflow mechanisms, surgical morbidity would greatly decrease. The reason for this is that the episcleral aqueous veins have a backpressure that would prevent the eye pressure from going too low. This would virtually eliminate the risk of hypotony maculopathy and choroidal hemorrhage. Furthermore, visual recovery would be very rapid and risk of infection would be very small (a reduction from 2-5% to 0.05%). Because of these reasons surgeons have tried for decades to develop a workable surgery for the trabecular meshwork.
The previous techniques, which have been tried, are goniotomy/trabeculotomy, and other mechanical disruption of the trabecular meshwork, such as trabeculopuncture, goniophotoablation, laser trabecular ablation and goniocurretage. They are briefly described below.
Goniotomy/Trabeculotomy: Goniotomy and trabeculotomy are simple and directed techniques of microsurgical dissection with mechanical disruption of the trabecular meshwork. These initially had early favorable responses in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. However, long-term review of surgical results showed only limited success in adults. In retrospect, these procedures probably failed secondary to repair mechanisms and a process of “filling in”. The filling in is the result of a healing process which has the detrimental effect of collapsing and closing in of the created opening throughout the trabecular meshwork. Once the created openings close, the pressure builds back up and the surgery fails.
Trabeculopuncuture: Q-switched Neodymiun (Nd): YAG lasers also have been investigated as an optically invasive technique for creating full-thickness holes in trabecular meshwork. However, the relatively small hole created by this trabeculopuncture technique exhibits a filling in effect and fails.
Goniophotoablation/Laser Trabecular Ablation: Goniophotoablation is disclosed by Berlin in U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,172, and describes the use of an excimer laser to treat glaucoma by ablating the trabecular meshwork. This was not demonstrated by clinical trial to succeed. Hill et al. used an Erbium:YAG laser to create full thickness holes through trabecular meshwork (Hill et al., Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 11:341-346, 1991). This technique was investigated in a primate model and a limited human clinical trial at the University of California, Irvine. Although morbidity was zero in both trials, success rates did not warrant further human trials. Failure again was from filling in of created defects in trabecular meshwork by repair mechanisms. Neither of these is a valid surgical technique for the treatment of glaucoma.
Goniocurretage: This is an ab-interno (from the inside) mechanical disruptive technique. This uses an instrument similar to a cyclodialysis spatula with a microcurrette at the tip. Initial results are similar to trabeculotomy that fails secondary to repair mechanisms and a process of filling in.
Although trabeculectomy is the most commonly performed filtering surgery, Viscocamulostomy (VC) and non-penetrating trabeculectomy (NPT) are two new variations of filtering surgery. These are ab-externo (from the outside), major ocular procedures in which Schlemm's canal is surgically exposed by making a large and very deep scleral flap. In the VC procedure, Schlemm's canal is canulated and viscoelastic substance injected (which dilates Schlemm's canal and the aqueous collector channels). In the NPT procedure, the inner wall of Schlemm's canal is stripped off after surgically exposing the canal.
Trabeculectomy, VC, and NPT are performed under a conjunctival and scleral flap, such that the aqueous humor is drained onto the surface of the eye or into the tissues located within the lateral wall of the eye. Normal physiological outflows are not used. These surgical operations are major procedures with significant ocular morbidity. When Trabeculectomy, VC, and NPT are thought to have a low chance for success, a number of implantable drainage devices have been used to ensure that the desired filtration and outflow of aqueous humor through the surgical opening will continue. The risk of placing a glaucoma drainage implant also includes hemorrhage, infection and postoperative double vision that is a complication unique to drainage implants.
Examples of implantable shunts or devices for maintaining an opening for the release of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye to the sclera or space underneath conjunctiva have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,007,511 (Prywes), 6,007,510 (Nigam), 5,893,837 (Eagles et al.), 5,882,327 (Jacob), 5,879,319 (Pynson et al.), 5,807,302 (Wandel), 5,752,928 (de Roulhac et al.), 5,743,868 (Brown et al.), 5,704,907 (Nordquist et al.), 5,626,559 (Solomon), 5,626,558 (Suson), 5,601,094 (Reiss), RE. 35,390 (Smith), 5,558,630 (Fisher), 5,558,629 (Baerveldt et al.), 5,520,631 (Nordquist et al.), 5,476,445 (Baerveldt et al.), 5,454,796 (Krupin), 5,433,701 (Rubinstein), 5,397,300 (Baerveldt et al.), 5,372,577 (Ungerleider), 5,370,607 (Memmen), 5,338,291 (Speckman et al.), 5,300,020 (L'Esperance, Jr.), 5,178,604 (Baerveldt et al.), 5,171,213 (Price, Jr.), 5,041,081 (Odrich), 4,968,296 (Ritch et al.), 4,936,825 (Ungerleider), 4,886,488 (White), 4,750,901 (Molteno), 4,634,418 (Binder), 4,604,087 (Joseph), 4,554,918 (White), 4,521,210 (Wong), 4,428,746 (Mendez), 4,402,681 (Haas et al.), 4,175,563 (Arenberg et al.), and 4,037,604 (Newkirk).
All of the above embodiments and variations thereof have numerous disadvantages and moderate success rates. They involve substantial trauma to the eye and require great surgical skill by creating a hole over the full thickness of the sclera/cornea into the subconjunctival space. Furthermore, normal physiological outflow pathways are not used. The procedures are mostly performed in an operating room generating a facility fee, anesthesiologist's professional fee and have a prolonged recovery time for vision. The complications of filtration surgery have inspired ophthalmic surgeons to look at other approaches to lowering intraocular pressure.
The trabecular meshwork and juxtacanilicular tissue together provide the majority of resistance to the outflow of aqueous and, as such, are logical targets for surgical removal in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. In addition, minimal amounts of tissue are altered and existing physiologic outflow pathways are utilized. Trabecular bypass surgery has the potential for much lower risks of choroidal hemorrhage, infection and uses existing physiologic outflow mechanisms. This surgery could be performed under topical anesthesia in a physician's office with rapid visual recovery.
Therefore, there is a great clinical need for the treatment of glaucoma by a method that would be faster, safer and less expensive than currently available modalities. Trabecular bypass surgery is an innovative surgery which uses a micro stent, shunt, or other implant to bypass diseased trabecular meshwork alone at the level of trabecular meshwork and use or restore existing outflow pathways. The object of the present invention is to provide a means and methods for treating elevated intraocular pressure in a manner which is simple, effective, disease site specific and can be performed on an outpatient basis.
In some preferred embodiments, the seton has an inlet portion configured to extend through a portion of the trabecular meshwork of an eye, and an outlet portion configured to extend into Schlemm's canal of the eye, wherein the inlet portion is disposed at an angle relative to the outlet portion. In some embodiments, the outlet portion has a lumen with an oval cross-section having a long axis.
The outlet portion in certain embodiments has a longitudinal axis, such that the long axis of the oval cross-section and the longitudinal axis of the outlet portion define a plane, the inlet portion having a longitudinal axis which lies outside the plane at an angle θ (theta) thereto.
In some preferred arrangements, the seton comprises an inlet portion, configured to extend through a portion of the trabecular meshwork; an outlet portion, configured to extend into Schlemm's canal; and at least one protrusion on the outlet portion, configured to exert traction against an inner surface of Schlemm's canal. This protrusion can comprise at least one barb or ridge.
Some preferred embodiments comprise an inlet portion configured to extend through a portion of the trabecular meshwork, an outlet portion configured to extend into Schlemm's canal, and a one-way valve within the inlet and/or outlet portions.
A method for delivering a seton within an eye is disclosed, comprising providing an elongate guide member, advancing a distal end of the guide member through at least a portion of the trabecular meshwork of the eye, advancing the seton along the guide member toward the distal end, and positioning the seton to conduct aqueous humor between the anterior chamber of the eye and Schlemm's canal.
In certain embodiments, the advancing of the guide member comprises advancing it from the anterior chamber into the trabecular meshwork. In further embodiments, the positioning comprises positioning an end of the seton within Schlemm's canal adjacent to an aqueous collection channel.
Certain preferred embodiments include an apparatus for delivering a seton to the anterior chamber of an eye comprising an elongate tube having a lumen, an outer surface, and a distal end; a removable, elongate guide member within the lumen, configured to permit the seton to be advanced and to be positioned in the trabecular meshwork of the eye. This apparatus can further comprise a cutting member positioned at the distal end of the tube. The cutting member can be selected from the group consisting of a knife, a laser probe, a pointed guide member, a sharpened distal end of said tube, and an ultrasonic cutter. The apparatus can also further comprise an opening in the outer surface of the tube, configured to allow fluid infusion into the eye.
In further preferred embodiments, an apparatus for delivering a seton in an eye, comprises an elongate member adapted for insertion into an anterior chamber of the eye, the elongate member having a distal end portion configured to retain the seton therein, the distal end portion comprising a cutting member configured to form an opening in the trabecular meshwork of the eye for receipt of the seton, such that one end of the seton is in Schlemm's canal. The elongate member can further comprise a lumen which conducts fluid toward said distal end portion.
The preferred embodiment provides further surgical treatment of glaucoma (trabecular bypass surgery) at the level of trabecular meshwork and restores existing physiological outflow pathways. An implant bypasses diseased trabecular meshwork at the level of trabecular meshwork and which restores existing physiological outflow pathways. The implant has an inlet end, an outlet end and a lumen therebetween. The inlet is positioned in the anterior chamber at the level of the internal trabecular meshwork and the outlet end is positioned at about the exterior surface of the diseased trabecular meshwork and/or into fluid collection channels of the existing outflow pathways.
In accordance with a preferred method, trabecular bypass surgery creates an opening or a hole through the diseased trabecular meshwork through minor microsurgery. To prevent “filling in” of the hole, a biocompatible elongated implant is placed within the hole as a seton, which may include, for example, a solid rod or hollow tube. In one exemplary embodiment, the seton implant may be positioned across the diseased trabecular meshwork alone and it does not extend into the eye wall or sclera. In another embodiment, the inlet end of the implant is exposed to the anterior chamber of the eye while the outlet end is positioned at the exterior surface of the trabecular meshwork. In another exemplary embodiment, the outlet end is positioned at and over the exterior surface of the trabecular meshwork and into the fluid collection channels of the existing outflow pathways. In still another embodiment, the outlet end is positioned in the Schlemm's canal. In an alternative embodiment, the outlet end enters into fluid collection channels up to the level of the aqueous veins with the seton inserted in a retrograde or antegrade fashion.
According to the preferred embodiment, the seton implant is made of biocompatible material, which is either hollow to allow the flow of aqueous humor or solid biocompatible material that imbibes aqueous. The material for the seton may be selected from the group consisting of porous material, semi-rigid material, soft material, hydrophilic material, hydrophobic material, hydrogel, elastic material, and the like.
In further accordance with the preferred embodiment, the seton implant may be rigid or it may be made of relatively soft material and is somewhat curved at its distal section to fit into the existing physiological outflow pathways, such as Schlemm's canal. The distal section inside the outflow pathways may have an oval shape to stabilize the seton in place without undue suturing. Stabilization or retention of the seton may be further strengthened by a taper end and/or by at least one ridge or rib on the exterior surface of the distal section of the seton, or other surface alterations designed to retain the seton.
In one embodiment, the seton may include a micropump, one way valve, or semi-permeable membrane if reflux of red blood cells or serum protein becomes a clinical problem. It may also be useful to use a biocompatible material that hydrates and expands after implantation so that the seton is locked into position around the trabecular meshwork opening or around the distal section of the seton.
One of the advantages of trabecular bypass surgery, as disclosed herein, and the use of a seton implant to bypass diseased trabecular meshwork at the level of trabecular meshwork and thereby use existing outflow pathways is that the treatment of glaucoma is substantially simpler than in existing therapies. A further advantage of the invention is the utilization of simple microsurgery that may be performed on an outpatient basis with rapid visual recovery and greatly decreased morbidity. Finally, a distinctly different approach is used than is found in existing implants. Physiological outflow mechanisms are used or re-established by the implant of the present invention, in contradistinction with previously disclosed methodologies.
Additional objects and features of the present invention will become more apparent and the invention itself will be best understood from the following Detailed Description of Exemplary Embodiments, when read with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
For background illustration purposes,
The anterior chamber 20 of the eye 10, which is bound anteriorly by the cornea 12 and posteriorly by the iris 13 and lens 26, is filled with aqueous. Aqueous is produced primarily by the ciliary body 16 and reaches the anterior chamber angle 25 formed between the iris 13 and the cornea 12 through the pupil 14. In a normal eye, the aqueous is removed through the trabecular meshwork 21. Aqueous passes through trabecular meshwork 21 into Schlemm's canal 22 and through the aqueous veins 23 which merge with blood-carrying veins and into venous circulation. Intraocular pressure of the eye 10 is maintained by the intricate balance of secretion and outflow of the aqueous in the manner described above. Glaucoma is characterized by the excessive buildup of aqueous fluid in the anterior chamber 20 which produces an increase in intraocular pressure (fluids are relatively incompressible and pressure is directed equally to all areas of the eye).
As shown in
In a first embodiment, a method for increasing aqueous humor outflow in an eye of a patient to reduce the intraocular pressure therein. The method comprises bypassing diseased trabecular meshwork at the level of the trabecular meshwork and thereby restoring existing outflow pathways. Alternately, a method for increasing aqueous humor outflow in an eye of a patient to reduce an intraocular pressure therein is disclosed. The method comprises bypassing diseased trabecular meshwork at a level of said trabecular meshwork with a seton implant and using existing outflow pathways. The seton implant 31 may be an elongated seton or other appropriate shape, size or configuration. In one embodiment of an elongated seton implant, the seton has an inlet end, an outlet end and a lumen therebetween, wherein the inlet end is positioned at an anterior chamber of the eye and the outlet end is positioned at about an exterior surface of said diseased trabecular meshwork. Furthermore, the outlet end may be positioned into fluid collection channels of the existing outflow pathways. Optionally, the existing outflow pathways may comprise Schlemm's canal 22. The outlet end may be further positioned into fluid collection channels up to the level of the aqueous veins with the seton inserted either in a retrograde or antegrade fashion with respect to the existing outflow pathways.
In a further alternate embodiment, a method is disclosed for increasing aqueous humor outflow in an eye of a patient to reduce an intraocular pressure therein. The method comprises (a) creating an opening in trabecular meshwork, wherein the trabecular meshwork comprises an interior side and exterior side; (b) inserting a seton implant into the opening; and (c) transporting the aqueous humor by said seton implant to bypass the trabecular meshwork at the level of said trabecular meshwork from the interior side to the exterior side of the trabecular meshwork.
The main purpose of the seton implant is to assist in facilitating the outflow of aqueous in an outward direction 40 into the Schlemm's canal and subsequently into the aqueous collectors and the aqueous veins so that the intraocular pressure is balanced. In one embodiment, the seton implant 31 comprises an elongated tubular element having a distal section 32 and an inlet section 44. A rigid or flexible distal section 32 is positioned inside one of the existing outflow pathways. The distal section may have either a tapered outlet end 33 or have at least one ridge 37 or other retention device protruding radially outwardly for stabilizing the seton implant inside said existing outflow pathways after implantation. For stabilization purposes, the outer surface of the distal section 32 may comprise a stubbed surface, a ribbed surface, a surface with pillars, a textured surface, or the like. The outer surface 36, including the outer region 35 and inner region 34 at the outlet end 33, of the seton implant is biocompatible and tissue compatible so that the interaction/irritation between the outer surface and the surrounding tissue is minimized. The seton implant may comprise at least one opening at a location proximal the distal section 32, away from the outlet end 33, to allow flow of aqueous in more than one direction. The at least one opening may be located on the distal section 32 at about opposite of the outlet end 33.
In another exemplary embodiment, the seton implant 31 may have a one-way flow controlling means 39 for allowing one-way aqueous flow 40. The one-way flow controlling means 39 may be selected from the group consisting of a check valve, a slit valve, a micropump, a semi-permeable membrane, or the like. To enhance the outflow efficiency, at least one optional opening 41 in the proximal portion of the distal section 32, at a location away from the outlet end 33, and in an exemplary embodiment at the opposite end of the outlet end 33, is provided.
As shown in
In one embodiment, the means for forming a hole/opening in the trabecular mesh 21 may comprise an incision with a microknife, an incision by a pointed guidewire, a sharpened applicator, a screw shaped applicator, an irrigating applicator, or a barbed applicator. Alternatively, the trabecular meshwork may be dissected off with an instrument similar to a retinal pick or microcurrette. The opening may alternately be created by retrogade fiberoptic laser ablation.
For positioning the seton 31 in the hole or opening through the trabecular meshwork, the seton may be advanced over the guidewire or a fiberoptic (retrograde). In another embodiment, the seton is directly placed on the delivery applicator and advanced to the implant site, wherein the delivery applicator holds the seton securely during the delivery stage and releases it during the deployment stage.
In an exemplary embodiment of the trabecular meshwork surgery, the patient is placed in the supine position, prepped, draped and anesthesia obtained. In one embodiment, a small (less than 1 mm) self sealing incision is made. Through the cornea opposite the seton placement site, an incision is made in trabecular meshwork with an irrigating knife. The seton 31 is then advanced through the cornea incision 52 across the anterior chamber 20 held in an irrigating applicator 51 under gonioscopic (lens) or endoscopic guidance. The applicator is withdrawn and the surgery concluded. The irrigating knife may be within a size range of 20 to 40 gauges, preferably about 30 gauge.
From the foregoing description, it should now be appreciated that a novel approach for the surgical treatment of glaucoma has been disclosed for releasing excessive intraocular pressure. While the invention has been described with reference to a specific embodiment, the description is illustrative of the invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention. Various modifications and applications may occur to those who are skilled in the art, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention, as described by the appended claims.
This patent application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/889,254, filed Jul. 12, 2004, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/395,627, filed Mar. 21, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,780,164 B2, issued Aug. 24, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/549,350, filed Apr. 14, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,239 B1, issued Oct. 28, 2003. The entireties of all these priority documents are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3439675 | Cohen | Apr 1969 | A |
3788327 | Donowitz et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3915172 | Krejci et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4037604 | Newkirk | Jul 1977 | A |
4113088 | Binkhorst | Sep 1978 | A |
4168697 | Cantekin | Sep 1979 | A |
4175563 | Arenberg et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4402681 | Haas et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4428746 | Mendez | Jan 1984 | A |
4449974 | Messingschlager | May 1984 | A |
4501274 | Skjaerpe | Feb 1985 | A |
4521210 | Wong | Jun 1985 | A |
4554918 | White | Nov 1985 | A |
4578058 | Grandon | Mar 1986 | A |
4583224 | Ishii et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4604087 | Joseph | Aug 1986 | A |
4632842 | Karwoski et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634418 | Binder | Jan 1987 | A |
4718907 | Karwoski et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4722724 | Schocket | Feb 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4787885 | Binder | Nov 1988 | A |
4800870 | Reid, Jr. | Jan 1989 | A |
4804382 | Turina et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4820626 | Williams et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4846172 | Berlin | Jul 1989 | A |
4846793 | Leonard et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4853224 | Wong | Aug 1989 | A |
4863457 | Lee | Sep 1989 | A |
4883864 | Scholz | Nov 1989 | A |
4886488 | White | Dec 1989 | A |
4900300 | Lee | Feb 1990 | A |
4905667 | Foerster et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4936825 | Ungerleider | Jun 1990 | A |
4946436 | Smith | Aug 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4997652 | Wong | Mar 1991 | A |
5005577 | Frenkel | Apr 1991 | A |
5041081 | Odrich | Aug 1991 | A |
5073163 | Lippman | Dec 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5095887 | Leon et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098443 | Parel et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127901 | Odrich | Jul 1992 | A |
5129895 | Vassiliadis et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5164188 | Wong | Nov 1992 | A |
5171213 | Price, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180362 | Worst | Jan 1993 | A |
5207685 | Cinberg et al. | May 1993 | A |
5221255 | Mahurkar et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5246451 | Trescony et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5284476 | Koch | Feb 1994 | A |
5290295 | Querals et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300020 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5318513 | Leib et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334137 | Freeman | Aug 1994 | A |
5338291 | Speckman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346464 | Camras | Sep 1994 | A |
5360399 | Stegmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5370607 | Memmen | Dec 1994 | A |
5370641 | O'Donnell, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372577 | Ungerleider | Dec 1994 | A |
5380290 | Makower et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5397300 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5433701 | Rubinstein | Jul 1995 | A |
5443505 | Wong et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445637 | Bretton | Aug 1995 | A |
5454796 | Krupin | Oct 1995 | A |
5472440 | Beckman | Dec 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486165 | Stegmann | Jan 1996 | A |
5516522 | Peyman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520631 | Nordquist et al. | May 1996 | A |
5557453 | Schalz et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558629 | Baerveldt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558630 | Fisher | Sep 1996 | A |
5558637 | Allonen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562641 | Flomenblit et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
RE35390 | Smith | Dec 1996 | E |
5599534 | Himmelstein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601094 | Reiss | Feb 1997 | A |
5601549 | Miyagi | Feb 1997 | A |
5626558 | Susan | May 1997 | A |
5626559 | Solomon | May 1997 | A |
5629008 | Lee | May 1997 | A |
5639278 | Dereume et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651783 | Reynard | Jul 1997 | A |
5652014 | Galin et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5665114 | Weadock et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670161 | Healy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676679 | Simon et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681275 | Ahmed | Oct 1997 | A |
5681323 | Arick | Oct 1997 | A |
5702414 | Richter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702419 | Berry et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704907 | Nordquist et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713844 | Peyman | Feb 1998 | A |
5723005 | Herrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5741333 | Frid | Apr 1998 | A |
5743868 | Brown et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752928 | de Roulhac et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766242 | Wong et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766243 | Christensen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767079 | Glaser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785674 | Mateen | Jul 1998 | A |
5807244 | Barot | Sep 1998 | A |
5807302 | Wandel | Sep 1998 | A |
5810870 | Myers et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824072 | Wong | Oct 1998 | A |
5830139 | Abreu | Nov 1998 | A |
5830171 | Wallace | Nov 1998 | A |
5833694 | Poncet | Nov 1998 | A |
5836939 | Negus et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840041 | Petter et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5865831 | Cozean et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868697 | Richter et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879319 | Pynson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882327 | Jacob | Mar 1999 | A |
5886822 | Spitzer | Mar 1999 | A |
5891084 | Lee | Apr 1999 | A |
5893837 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5908449 | Bruchman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5932299 | Katoot | Aug 1999 | A |
5941250 | Aramant et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968058 | Richter et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980928 | Terry | Nov 1999 | A |
5981598 | Tatton | Nov 1999 | A |
6004302 | Brierley | Dec 1999 | A |
6007510 | Nigam | Dec 1999 | A |
6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
6033418 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6033434 | Borghi | Mar 2000 | A |
6036678 | Giungo | Mar 2000 | A |
6045557 | White et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050970 | Baerveldt | Apr 2000 | A |
6050999 | Paraschac et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059772 | Hsia et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059812 | Clerc et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063116 | Kelleher | May 2000 | A |
6063396 | Kelleher | May 2000 | A |
6071286 | Mawad | Jun 2000 | A |
6077299 | Adelberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102045 | Nordquist et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123668 | Abreu | Sep 2000 | A |
6142990 | Burk | Nov 2000 | A |
6165210 | Lau et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168575 | Soltanpour | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174305 | Mikus et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186974 | Allan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187016 | Hedges et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193656 | Jeffries et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197056 | Schachar | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203513 | Yaron et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217895 | Guo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228873 | Brandt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231597 | Deem et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241721 | Cozean et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251090 | Avery et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254612 | Hieshima | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261256 | Ahmed | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266182 | Morita | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268398 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287256 | Park et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287313 | Sasso | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299895 | Hammang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306120 | Tan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331313 | Wong et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342058 | Portney | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348042 | Warren, Jr. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375642 | Grieshaber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378526 | Bowman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6413540 | Yaacobi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416777 | Yaacobi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428501 | Reynard | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436427 | Hammang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450937 | Mercereau et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450984 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464724 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468283 | Richter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471666 | Odrich | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494857 | Neuhann | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6524275 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530896 | Elliott | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533768 | Hill | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544249 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548078 | Guo et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6561974 | Grieshaber et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579235 | Abita et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579256 | Hughes | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585680 | Bugge | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589203 | Mitrev | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595945 | Brown | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596296 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622473 | Becquerelle et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626858 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629981 | Bui et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638239 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6666841 | Gharib et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699211 | Savage | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726676 | Stegmann | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D490152 | Myall et al. | May 2004 | S |
6730056 | Ghaem et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6736791 | Tu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6780164 | Bergheim et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780165 | Kadziauskas et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783544 | Lynch et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6827699 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6827700 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6939298 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955656 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6981958 | Gharib et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7033603 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7094225 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7135009 | Tu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7163543 | Smedley et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186232 | Smedley et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7192412 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7220238 | Lynch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7273475 | Tu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7291125 | Coroneo | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297130 | Bergheim et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7331984 | Tu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7431710 | Tu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7488303 | Haffner et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7563241 | Tu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7678065 | Haffner et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708711 | Tu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7850637 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857782 | Tu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867186 | Haffner et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7879001 | Haffner et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020013546 | Grieshaber et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013572 | Berlin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026200 | Savage | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020072673 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099434 | Buscemi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133168 | Smedley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143284 | Tu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188308 | Tu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030055372 | Lynch et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060752 | Bergheim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030097151 | Smedley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030187384 | Bergheim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229303 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236483 | Ren | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024345 | Gharib et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040092548 | Embleton et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111050 | Smedley et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147870 | Burns et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040154946 | Solovay et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040254520 | Porteous et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049578 | Tu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050119737 | Bene et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050250788 | Tu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271704 | Tu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277864 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060032507 | Tu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060173397 | Tu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200113 | Haffner et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070149915 | Yablonski | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070191863 | De Juan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070293807 | Lynch et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080228127 | Burns et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200072059 | Dec 2000 | AU |
2244646 | Feb 1999 | CA |
198 40 047 | Mar 2000 | DE |
0 858 788 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 898 947 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1 114 627 | Jul 2001 | EP |
93 11476 | Mar 1995 | FR |
2 721 499 | Dec 1995 | FR |
2 296 663 | Jul 1996 | GB |
11-123205 | May 1999 | JP |
WO 8900869 | Feb 1989 | WO |
WO 9118568 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9219294 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9402081 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO 9413234 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9421205 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9508310 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9830181 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9823237 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9835639 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9926567 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9930641 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9938470 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0013627 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0064389 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0072788 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0150943 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0178631 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0178656 | Oct 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kim et al., Controlled Drug Release from an Ocular Implant: An Evaluation Using Dynamic Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Aug. 2004, vol. 45, No. 8, 2722-2731. |
Anselm Kampik and Franz Grehn, Nutzen und Risiken Augenarzticher Therapie, Hauptreferate der XXXIII. Essener Fortbildung fOr Augenarzte, Dec. 1998. (English translated version entitled Benefits and Risks of Onhthalmolocical Therapy.). |
Arthur L. Schwartz, MD, and Douglas R. Anderson, MD, Trabecular Surgery, Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 92, Aug. 1974, pp. 134-138. |
Cindy K. Bahler, BS, Gegrory T. Smedley, PhD, Jianbo Zhou, PhD, Douglas H. Johnson, MD., American Journal of Ophthalmology, Dec. 2004, vol. 138. |
Daniel A. Fletcher, Ph.D., Daniel V. Palanker, Ph.D., Philip Hule, M.D., Jason Miller, MS, Michael F. Marmor, M.D. and Mark S. Blumenkranz, M.D.; Intravascular Drug Delivery With a Pulsed Liquid Microjet; (Reprinted) Arch Ophthalmology; vol. 120, Sep. 2002, pp. 1206-1208. |
Detlev Spiegel, 7 Chirurgische Glaukomtherapie, pp. 79-88, Dec. 1998. |
Detlev Spiegel, M.D., Karin Kobuch, M.D., Richard A Hill, M.D., Ronald L. Gross, M.D., Schlemm's Canal Implant: A New Method to Lower Intraocular Pressure in Patients with POAG, Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 30, No. 6, Jun. 1999, pp. 492-494. |
Edited by Kevin Strange, Cellular and Molecular Physiology of Cell Volume Regulation, Library of Congress Cataloaina in-Publication Data, CRC Press, Inc., pp. 312-321, 1994. |
Grune & Stratton, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, edited by J.E. Cairns, Glaucoma, vol. 1, Chapter 14, Anatomy of the Aqueous Outflow Channels, by Johannes W. Rohen, pp. 277-296, 1986. |
Hans Hoerauf, Christopher Wirbelauer, Christian Scholz, Ralf Engelhardt, Peter Koch, Horst Laqua, and Reginald Birngruber, Slit-Lamp-Adapted Optical Coherence Tomography of the Anteriuor Segment, Graefe's Arch Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol, May 1999, vol. 238, pp. 8-18. |
I. Grierson, R.C. Howes, and Q. Wang, Age-related Changes in the Canal of Schlemm, Exp. Eye Res., 1984, vol. 39, pp. 505-512. |
Jianbo Zhou, PhD, Gregory T. Smedley, PhD., A Trabecular Bypass Flow Hypothesis, Feb. 2005, vol. 14 No. 1. |
L. Jay Katz, M.D., A Call for Innovative Operations for Glaucoma, Arch Ophthalmology, Mar. 2000, vol. 118, pp. 412-413. |
Luanna K. Putney, Cecile Rose T. Vibat, and Martha E. O'Donnell, Intracellular C1 Regulates Na-K-C1 Cotrenspott Activity in Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells, 1999 American Physiological Society, Sep. 1999, pp. C-373 through C-383. |
M. A. Johnstone, R. Stegmann and B. A. Smit, American Glaucoma Society, iz Annual Meeting, Cylindrical Tubular Structures Spanning from Trabecular Meshwork Across SC: Laboratory Studies with SEM, TEM & Tracers Correlated with Clinical Findings, p. 39, 2002. |
M. Bruce Shields, M.D., A Study Guide for Glaucoma: Aqueous Humor Dynamics, Copyright 1982, pp. 6-43. |
Maurice H. Luntz, MD, and D.G. Livingston, B.SC., Trabeculotomy AB Externo and Trabeculectomy in Congenital and Adult-Onset Glaucoma, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Feb. 1977, vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 174-179. |
Online encyclopedia article “Hyaluronan,” section on “Medical Applications” accessed Monday, Sep. 27, 2010. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyaluronic—acid. |
Philip C. Jacobi, MD, Thomas S. Dietlein, MD, and Gunter K. Krieglstein, MD., Bimanual Trabecular Aspiration in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma, Ophthalmology, 1998, vol. 105, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 886-894. |
Phillip C. Jacobi, MD, Thomas S. Dietlein, MD, and Gunter K. Krieglstein, MD., Goniocurettage for Removing Trabecular Meshwork: Clinical Results of a New Surgical Technique in Advanced Cronic Open-Angle Glaucoma, American Journal of Ophthalmology, May 1999, pp. 505-510. |
Phillip C. Jacobi, MD, Thomas S. Dietlein, MD, and Gunter K. Krieglstein, MD., Microendoscopic Trabecular Surgery in Glaucoma Management, Ophthalmology, 1999, vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 538-544. |
R.A. Hill, Q. Ren, D.D. Nguyen, L-H Liaw, and M.W. Berns, Free-Electron Laser (FEL) Ablation of Ocular Tissues, Lasesr Med Sci 1998, pp. 13:219-226. |
Richard A. Hill, MD, George Baerveldt, MD, Serdar A. Ozler, MD, Michael Pickford, BA, Glen A. Profeta, BS, and Michael W. Berns,PhD, Laser Trabecular Ablation (LTA), Laser in Surgery and Medicine, 1991, vol. 11, pp. 341-346. |
Robert W. Nickells, Apoptosis of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Glaucoma: An Update of the Molecular Pathways Involved in Cell Death, Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 43, Supplement 1, Jun. 1999, pp. S-151 through S-161. |
Rosenberg, et al., “Implants in Glaucoma Surgery”, The Glaucomas, 1996, Chapter 88, pp. 1783-1807 (27 pages). |
Sumita Radhakrishnan, Andrew M. Rollins, Jonathan E. Roth, S. Yazddanfar, Volker Westphal, David Bardenstein, and Joseph Izatt, Real-Time Optical Coherence Tomography of the Anterior Segment at 1310 nm, Arch Ophthalmology, Aug. 2001, vol. 119, pp. 1179-1185. |
Timothy W. Olson, MD; Xiao Feng, MD; Kathy Wabner, BA; Stanley R. Conston, BS; David H. Sierra, Ph.D.; David V. Folden, MD; Morton E. Smith, MD; and J. Douglas Cameron, MD, Cannulation of the Suprachoroidal Space: A Novel Drug Delivery Methodology to the Posterior Segment, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 142, No. 5, Nov. 2006, pp. 777-787.e2. |
Troncoso, Manuel U., Tantalum implants for inducing hypotony, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 1949, pp. 499-508 (11 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/452,963, filed Dec. 2, 1999. Title: Expandable/ Retractable Stent for Venous and Valvular Annulus Use. |
Vincente, L. Jocson, M.D.; Air Trabeculotomy; American Journal of Ophthalmolgy: vol. 79, No. 1, Jan.-Jun. 1975; pp. 107-111. |
W.G. Tatton, Apoptotic Mechanisms in Neurodegeneration: Possible Relevance to Glaucoma, European Journal of Ophthalmology, Jan.-Mar. 1999, vol. 9, Supplement 1, pp. S22 through S29. |
W.M. Grant, MD, Further Studies on Facility of Flow Through the Trabecular Meshwork, A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmololgy, Oct. 1958, vol. 60, pp. 523-533. |
William Tatton, Ruth M.E. Chalmers-Redman, Ajay Sud, Steven M. Podos, and Thomas Mittag, Maintaining Mitochondrial Membrane Impermeability: An Opportunity for New Therapy in Glaucoma, Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 45, Supplement 3, May 2001, pp. S277 through S283. |
Yasuhiro Matsumoto and Douglas H. Johnson, Trabecular Meshwork Phagocytosis in Glaucomatous Eyes, Ophthalmologica 1977, vol. 211, pp. 147-152. |
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Non-Infringement and Invalidity (May 10, 2013). |
Answer and Counterclaim (May 31, 2013). |
Plaintiff Transcend Medical Inc.'s Answer to Counterclaims (Jun. 24, 2013). |
Glaukos Corporation's Responses to Transcend Medical, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-11) (Aug. 15, 2013). |
G.B. Bietti, “The Present State of the Use of Plastics in Eye Surgery,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 33, No. 4 (1955), pp. 337-370 (34 pages). |
Cullen et al., “Anterior Chamber to Frontal Sinus Shunt for the Diversion of Aqueous Humor: A Pilot Study in Four Normal Dogs,” Veterinary Ophthalmology, vol. 1, No. 1 (1998), pp. 31-39 (9 pages). |
M. A. Coote, “Glaucoma Hollow Fiber Filters —A New Glaucoma Seton. Preliminary Results,” J. Glaucoma, vol. 8, No. 1, Supplement (1999), pg. S4 (1 page). |
L. Krejci, “Cyclodialysis with Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate Capillary Strip (HCS),” Opthalmologica, vol. 164 (1972), pp. 113-121 (9 pages). |
P.F. Lee and C.L. Schepens, “Aqueous-venous Shunt and Intraocular Pressure. Preliminary Report of Animal Studies,” Investigative Opthalmology, vol. 5, No. 1 (Feb. 1966), pp. 59-64 (6 pages). |
S. Odrich, “New Technique During Complex Tube-Shunt Implantation,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 9, No. 3 (2000), pp. 278-289 (2 pages). |
G.L. Portney, “Silicone Elastomer Implantation Cyclodialysis,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, No. 1 (Jan. 1973), pp. 10-12 (3 pages). |
M.U. Troncoso, “Cyclodialysis with Insertion of a Metal Implant in the Treatment of Glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 23 (1940), pp. 270-300 (31 pages). |
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Disclosures Pursuant to Default Discovery Rule 4(d) (Dec. 6, 2013) (341 pages). |
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Patent No. 8,579,846 (Mar. 3, 2014) (184 pages). |
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s First Supplemental Invalidity Contentions (Mar. 3, 2014) (107 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090137983 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10889254 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 12366242 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10395627 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10889254 | US | |
Parent | 09549350 | Apr 2000 | US |
Child | 10395627 | US |