The present invention relates to orthopedic methods, systems and devices and more particularly, to joint implants and methods for manufacture.
Joint implants are well known in the art. For example, one of the most common types of joint prosthetic devices is a knee implant including a femoral component and a tibial component. Other common joint implants are associated with, for example, the hip and shoulder.
The shape and size of various joint implants are becoming increasingly more complex and may include, for example, one or more concavities and/or convexities, as described in above-mentioned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/997,407. Traditional implant manufacturing processes, which may even include manual steps, and which may be satisfactory for less complex shaping, are becoming inadequate.
Furthermore, joint implants, such as a knee implant that includes tibial and femoral components, often require a relatively large cut on, for example, the tibia. This is due, in part, to the needed thickness (for strength and/or reliability) of the polyurethane tibial component. The cut on the tibia, upon which the tibial component rests, provides space for the needed thickness of the polyurethane tibial component, without overstuffing the joint. Such cuts are highly invasive, resulting in loss of bone stock, and over time, osteolysis frequently leads to loosening of the prosthesis. Further, the area where the implant and the bone mate degrades over time, requiring that the prosthesis be replaced. Since the patient's bone stock is limited, the number of possible replacement surgeries is also limited for joint arthroplasty.
One embodiment provides a method for making an implant suitable for a joint includes providing a blank with a (i.e., at least one) dimension smaller than the implant, and material is added to the blank so as to form surface detail on the implant. In related embodiments, adding material to the blank may include laser sintering and/or electron beam melting. Adding material to the block may include adding ceramic(s), metal(s) and/or ceramic-metal composite(s). The material added to the blank may be polished, also. In further embodiments, the blank may be made of, e.g., polymer(s), metal(s), cross-linked polymer(s), ceramic(s), ceramic-metal composite(s), and/or alloy(s); or use-appropriate combinations thereof. Providing the blank may include forming the blank by casting and/or milling. In still further embodiments, a three-dimensional shape of a (i.e., at least one, or a portion of at least one) surface of the joint is determined. Determining the three-dimensional shape may include the use of imaging, such as MRI, CT, ultrasound, digital tomosynthesis, and/or optical coherence techniques. The material added to the blank may be, in embodiments, such that a surface of the implant is a mirror image of a corresponding surface of the joint. The implant may be, e.g., a cartilage repair, unicompartmental knee, bicompartmental knee, total knee replacement, hip, shoulder, or interpositional joint implant. An interpositional joint implant may be associated with, e.g., a knee, hip or shoulder.
Another embodiment provides a method for making an implant suitable for a joint including providing a blank having a dimension that is different from the implant. The blank is modified using, at least in part, a laser, and/or electron beam melting to form the implant. The formed surfaces may desirably be polished. In related embodiments, the blank may include a dimension that is larger than the implant, and wherein modifying the blank includes cutting the blank with the laser. Laser-cut surfaces may desirably be polished. In further related embodiments, the blank may include a dimension that is smaller than the implant, and wherein modifying the blank includes adding material by laser sintering. The added material may be desirably polished. The blank may be made of polymer(s), metal(s), cross-linked polymer(s), ceramic(s), ceramic-metal composite(s), and/or alloy(s); or use-appropriate combinations thereof. The blank may be formed by casting and/or milling. In related embodiments, a three-dimensional shape of a (i.e., at least one, or a portion of at least one) surface of the joint may be determined. Determining the three-dimensional shape may include the use of imaging, such as MRI, CT, ultrasound, digital tomosynthesis, and/or optical coherence techniques. The blank may be desirably modified such that a surface of the implant is a mirror image of a corresponding surface of the joint.
In accordance with another embodiment, a method for making an implant suitable for a joint includes providing a blank with at least one dimension larger than the implant. A laser, polishing, etching, milling and/or an abrading process is used to cut the blank so as to form surface detail of the implant. In related embodiments, the blank may be made of polymer(s), metal(s), cross-linked polymer(s), ceramic(s), ceramic-metal composite(s), and/or alloy(s); or use-appropriate combinations thereof. Providing the blank may include forming the blank by casting and/or milling.
In still further embodiments, a three-dimensional shape of a (i.e., at least one, or a portion of at least one) surface of the joint is determined. Determining the three-dimensional shape may include the use of imaging, such as MRI, CT, ultrasound, digital tomosynthesis, and/or optical coherence. The blank may be desirably cut such that a surface of the implant is a mirror image of a corresponding surface of the joint. The implant may be, e.g., a cartilage repair, unicompartmental knee, bicompartmental knee, total knee replacement, hip, shoulder, or interpositional joint implant. An interpositional joint implant may be associated with, e.g., a knee, hip or shoulder.
In accordance with another embodiment, a knee implant includes a femoral component having first and second femoral component surfaces. The first femoral component surface is for securing to a surgically prepared compartment of a distal end of a femur. The second femoral component surface is configured to replicate the femoral condyle. The knee implant further includes a tibial component having first and second tibial component surfaces. The first tibial component surface is for contacting a proximal surface of the tibia that is substantially uncut subchondral bone (which may further include overlying articular cartilage.) At least a portion of the first tibial component surface is a mirror image of a corresponding proximal tibial surface. The second tibial component surface articulates with the second femoral component surface. In related embodiments, the second femoral component surface may include at least one of a ceramic and a metal, and the second tibial component surface may include ceramic(s) and/or metal(s). Both the second femoral component surface and the second tibial surface may include metal(s). Both the second femoral component surface and the second tibial surface may include ceramic(s).
The second femoral component surface may include one of a ceramic and a metal, and the second tibial surface may include the other of the one of a ceramic and a metal, e.g., the second femoral component surface may be ceramic, and the second tibial surface may be metal. The tibial component may have a thickness of 3 mm or less.
In related embodiments, the tibial component may include an anchoring mechanism, such as a peg and/or a keel. Alternatively, the tibial component may be an interpositional implant that does not include a physical anchoring mechanism.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention is directed to methods for making joint implants that leverage additive or subtractive manufacturing methods including laser sintering and electron beam melting, and to non-invasive joint implants which may be advantageously made by the methods described herein. Such implants may feature a surface of the implant that is advantageously a mirror image of the joint surface. In another embodiment, non-invasive joint implants that rest on substantially uncut subchondral bone are described. The invention is now described in further detail, below.
As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a device” includes a plurality of such devices and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. Similarly, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. Also, the terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having” can be used interchangeably.
It is to be understood that the implants described herein may be associated with a wide variety of joints, including, without limitation, joint implants used in a knee, shoulder, hip, vertebrae, elbow, ankle, hand, foot and wrist.
Suitable materials for use in joint implants and methods described herein can include metals and metal alloys including CoCrMo, CoCr, titanium alloys and commercially pure TI (cpTi), medical grade stainless steels, tantalum and tantalum alloys, and Nitinol (“NiTi”). Particularly advantageous materials are those well-suited, or specifically designed, for laser sintering or electron-beam melting manufacturing techniques, e.g., ASTM F-75 CoCr alloy, or Arcam Ti6Al4V ELI titanium alloy (available from Stratasys, Eden Prairie, Minn.) Ceramic materials, e.g., aluminum oxide or alumina, zirconium oxide or zirconia, compact of particulate diamond, and/or pyrolytic carbon may be used.
In various embodiments, the blank is dimensioned to be, in one or more portions, only slightly larger than that of the implant. For example, the blank may be milled or cast such that all, or certain portions of the blank, are only slightly larger than the implant. Providing a blank from which material will be removed to arrive at the precise implant size, geometry and surface characteristics, simplifies manufacturing processing and is believed to ensure reproducibility. The blank may be provided, e.g., by casting, milling, forging, compression molding, extruding or injection molding.
In various embodiments, a library of blanks may be kept of varying size and shapes. Upon determining an implant size, an appropriately sized blank may then be chosen.
Upon providing the blank, the blank is cut with a laser so as to form surface detail of the implant, step 105. Separately, or in addition to laser cutting, the blank may also be cut using precision milling or grinding, or other abrading processes known in the art. For example, after cutting the blank with the laser, the surface of the blank may desirably be polished.
In various embodiments, the method may further include determining a three-dimensional shape of at least one surface of the joint, step 103. Using the three-dimensional shape, the blank may be cut in step 105 such that a surface of the implant, or a portion thereof, is a mirror image of the corresponding joint surface (or portion thereof). For example, the implant surface may comprise a surface that is a mirror image of the joint surface to which the implant surface is designed to mate, so that the implant surface conforms to the joint surface, ensuring that the device fits the joint surface in precisely the correct location. The implant surface may alternately comprise more than one such mirror image surfaces, e.g., to assist in placement in the device, i.e., the implant surface need not comprise one contiguous mirror image of the joint surface. A series or pattern of smaller implant mirror image surfaces, each corresponding to or matching an area of the joint surface, can be provided. Without limitation, one application of this would be to provide grooves in which cement for affixing the device may be applied, so the device may be attached to the joint surface without flowing onto other areas of the implant surface. Another non-limiting application would be where a continuous conforming surface were not necessary, e.g., where the device may be properly seated by matching two, three, four or more conforming “reference surfaces” to corresponding areas of the joint surface. The area of the mirror image surface desirably should be sufficient to ensure that the device is located properly. Where there are more than one of these “reference surfaces”, the area of each should be use- and application-appropriate, but a range of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 cm2 or more for each reference surface is contemplated. Where there is one implant surface with a mirror image, smaller areas comprising a mirror image are possible, as well as the entire implant surface. The joint surface may include at least one concavity and/or convexity.
Using the approach generally outlined in
Determining the three-dimensional shape of the joint surface may include a wide variety of imaging methodologies. For example, the imaging may include MRI, CT, ultrasound, digital tomosynthesis, and/or optical coherence. Reference is made to the above-mentioned U.S. application Ser. Nos. 10/997,407 and 10/728,731 for how imaging technologies are used to derive the three-dimensional shape of the joint surface. The 3-D information is then used in the CAD/CAM system to form the implant shape, geometry, and surfaces to make the desired implant.
The material may be added to the block using additive manufacturing technologies including laser sintering and/or electron beam melting. In laser sintering, a high power laser, such as a carbon dioxide laser, is used to fuse small particles of plastic, metal, or ceramic powders into a mass representing a desired three-dimensional object. Generally, the laser selectively fuses powdered material by scanning cross-sections generated from a 3-D digital description of the part (e.g., from a CAD file or scan data) on the surface of a powder bed. After each cross-section is scanned, the powder bed is lowered by one layer thickness, a new layer of material is applied on top, and the process is repeated until the part is completed. Laser sintering can produce parts from a relatively wide range of commercially available powder materials, including polymers, ceramics, and metals (such as steel, titanium, alloys and composites)
Full melting, partial melting, or liquid-phase sintering may be used. Electron beam melting involves melting or fusing metal, ceramic or other various powders, so as to build the part layer by layer. Exemplary electron beam melting systems are available from Stratasys, Eden Prairie, Minn.
After adding material to the blank, the surface of the blank may be desirably polished. Furthermore, and similar to above-described embodiments, the method may further include determining a three-dimensional shape of at least one surface of the joint, step 203. Using the three-dimensional shape, material may be added to the blank in step 205 such that at least one surface of the implant is a mirror image of at least one surface of the joint. The implant may be, for example, a cartilage repair implant, a unicompartmental knee implant, a bicompartmental knee implant, a total knee replacement implant, a hip implant, and a shoulder implant. The implant may also be an interpositional implant, such as the implant described in above-mentioned U.S. Application No. 60/784,255.
Determining the three-dimensional shape of the joint surface may include a wide variety of imaging methodologies. For example, the imaging may include MRI, CT, ultrasound, digital tomosynthesis, and/or optical coherence. Reference is made to the above-mentioned U.S. application Ser. Nos. 10/997,407 and 10/728,731 for how imaging technologies are used to derive the three-dimensional shape of the joint surface. The 3-D information is then used in the CAD/CAM system to form the implant shape, geometry, and surfaces to make the desired implant.
In accordance with another embodiment, a joint implant is presented wherein at least one surface of the implant rests on subchondral bone, and advantageously does not require invasive cutting of bone. These implants may be advantageously made by the methods described hereinabove. While an exemplary knee implant is described, it is to be understood that the joint implant may be associated with, for example, a shoulder, a hip, a vertebrae, an elbow, an ankle, a hand, a foot or a wrist.
A tibial component 311 includes a first tibial component surface 313 for resting on and contacting a proximal surface of the tibia. The proximal surface of the tibia may advantageously include substantially uncut subchondral bone. In illustrative embodiments, at least a portion of the first tibial component surface 313 is a mirror image of the proximal surface. For example, a three-dimensional image of the proximal surface may be obtained as described above, with the first tibial component surface 313 manufactured based on the three-dimensional image. A second tibial component surface 317 articulates with the second femoral component surface 307. It is to be understood that in a total knee joint implant, the tibial component(s) cover both the medial and lateral plateau. In various embodiments, the tibial component may be a single component that covers both the medial and lateral plateau (and may or may not leave the tibial spines intact), or may include two components (i.e., a tibial component for the medial side and a tibial component for the lateral side). In other embodiments, for example, a unicondylar knee implant, the tibial component may cover either only the medial or lateral plateau.
In an exemplary embodiment, the femoral component 301 and the tibial component 311 may each be approximately 2-3 mm thick. The thickness may be, for example, similar to the thickness of cartilage removed in preparing the joint for implantation. Thus, overstuffing of the joint is minimized while providing a non-invasive alternative to traditional invasive knee surgery. Heretofore, such implants having the requisite dimensions and strength were not easily achievable. Some or all of the cartilage on the femoral and/or tibial articular surfaces may be removed to prepare the joint for receiving an implant (i.e., to expose some or all of the subchondral bone) as necessary, depending on the progression of cartilage wear, disease, etc. The interior surfaces of the femoral and/or tibial component may be accordingly designed so the implant may be affixed directly to the desired exposed area(s) of subchondral bone. The thickness and/or shape of the femoral and/or tibial components may be determined (e.g., so as to reconstruct the thickness of the originally present articular cartilage) from an image-derived subchondral bone shape of the joint surfaces, as described in the above-mentioned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/305,652.
To provide the required strength (e.g., for biomechanical loading) and reliability, and still be thin enough to avoid overstuffing the joint, the first tibial surface 313 and/or the second tibial surface 317 includes, without limitation, a metal and/or a ceramic. For example, the second femoral component surface 307 may includes at least one of a ceramic and a metal, and the second tibial component surface 317 includes at least one of a ceramic and a metal. In another example, both the second femoral component surface 307 and the second tibial surface 317 include a metal. In still another example, both the second femoral component surface 307 and the second tibial surface 317 include a ceramic. In yet another example, the second femoral component surface 307 includes one of a ceramic and a metal, and the second tibial surface 317 includes the other of the one of a ceramic and a metal.
In various embodiments, the knee implant includes an anchoring mechanism 330. The anchoring mechanism 330 may be, without limitation, a peg and a keel protruding from the first tibial surface 313.
The foregoing description of embodiments of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention and the various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/031,239, filed on Feb. 14, 2008, entitled “Implant Device and Method for Manufacture,” which in turn claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Application No. 60/889,859, filed on Feb. 14, 2007, entitled “Implant Device and Method for Manufacture.” U.S. application Ser. No. 12/031,239 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/681,749 filed Oct. 7, 2003, entitled “Minimally Invasive Joint Implant with 3-Dimensional Geometry Matching the Articular Surfaces”, which in turn claims priority to U.S. Application 60/416,601 filed Oct. 7, 2002, entitled “Minimally Invasive Joint Implant With 3-Dimensional Geometry Matching the Articular Surfaces,” and U.S. Application 60/467,686 filed May 2, 2003, entitled “Joint Implants”. U.S. application Ser. No. 12/031,239 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/997,407 filed Nov. 24, 2004, entitled “Patient Selectable Knee Joint Arthroplasty Devices”; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/752,438 filed Jan. 5, 2004, entitled “Patient Selectable Knee Joint Arthroplasty Devices”; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/724,010 filed Nov. 25, 2003, entitled “Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools Facilitating Increased Accuracy, Speed and Simplicity in Performing Total and Partial Joint Arthroplasty”; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/305,652 filed Nov. 27, 2002, entitled “Methods and Compositions for Articular Repair”; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/160,667 filed May 28, 2002, entitled “Methods and Compositions for Articular Resurfacing”; which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Application No. 60/293,488 filed May 25, 2001, entitled “Methods To Improve Cartilage Repair Systems”, U.S. Application No. 60/363,527 filed Mar. 12, 2002, entitled “Novel Devices For Cartilage Repair”, U.S. Application No. 60/380,695 filed May 14, 2002, entitled “Methods And Compositions for Cartilage Repair”, and U.S. Application No. 60/380,692 filed May 14, 2002, entitled “Methods for Joint Repair”. The above-mentioned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/997,407 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/681,750 filed Oct. 7, 2003, entitled “Minimally Invasive Joint Implant with 3-Dimensional Geometry Matching the Articular Surfaces”. All of the above patent applications, as well as patent applications and other references mentioned herein below, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3314420 | Smith et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3605123 | Hahn | Sep 1971 | A |
3694820 | Scales et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3798679 | Ewald | Mar 1974 | A |
3808606 | Tronzo | May 1974 | A |
3816855 | Saleh | Jun 1974 | A |
3843975 | Tronzo | Oct 1974 | A |
3852830 | Marmor | Dec 1974 | A |
3855638 | Pilliar | Dec 1974 | A |
3938198 | Kahn et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3987499 | Scharbach et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
3991425 | Martin et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4052753 | Dedo | Oct 1977 | A |
4055862 | Farling | Nov 1977 | A |
4085466 | Goodfellow et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4098626 | Graham et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4164793 | Swanson | Aug 1979 | A |
4178641 | Grundei et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4203444 | Bonnell et al. | May 1980 | A |
4207627 | Cloutier | Jun 1980 | A |
4211228 | Cloutier | Jul 1980 | A |
4213816 | Morris | Jul 1980 | A |
4219893 | Noiles | Sep 1980 | A |
4280231 | Swanson | Jul 1981 | A |
4309778 | Buechel et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4340978 | Buechel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4344193 | Kenny | Aug 1982 | A |
4368040 | Weissman | Jan 1983 | A |
4436684 | White | Mar 1984 | A |
4459985 | McKay et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4502161 | Wall | Mar 1985 | A |
4575805 | Moermann et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4586496 | Keller | May 1986 | A |
4594380 | Chapin et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4601290 | Effron et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4609551 | Caplan et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4627853 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4655227 | Gracovetsky | Apr 1987 | A |
4662889 | Zichner et al. | May 1987 | A |
4673409 | Van Kampen | Jun 1987 | A |
4699156 | Gracovetsky | Oct 1987 | A |
4714472 | Averill et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4714474 | Brooks, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4769040 | Wevers | Sep 1988 | A |
4813436 | Au | Mar 1989 | A |
4822365 | Walker et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823807 | Russell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4846835 | Grande | Jul 1989 | A |
4865607 | Witzel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872452 | Alexson | Oct 1989 | A |
4880429 | Stone | Nov 1989 | A |
4883488 | Bloebaum et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4888021 | Forte et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4936853 | Fabian et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936862 | Walker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4944757 | Martinez et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5019103 | Van Zile et al. | May 1991 | A |
5021061 | Wevers et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5041138 | Vacanti et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047057 | Lawes | Sep 1991 | A |
5059216 | Winters | Oct 1991 | A |
5067964 | Richmond et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5099859 | Bell | Mar 1992 | A |
5108452 | Fallin | Apr 1992 | A |
5123927 | Duncan et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129908 | Petersen | Jul 1992 | A |
5133759 | Turner | Jul 1992 | A |
5150304 | Berchem et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152797 | Luckman et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5154178 | Shah | Oct 1992 | A |
5162430 | Rhee et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171244 | Caspari et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171322 | Kenny | Dec 1992 | A |
5197985 | Caplan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5206023 | Hunziker | Apr 1993 | A |
5226914 | Caplan et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234433 | Bert et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245282 | Mugler, III et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246013 | Frank et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246530 | Bugle et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5270300 | Hunziker | Dec 1993 | A |
5274565 | Reuben | Dec 1993 | A |
5282868 | Bahler | Feb 1994 | A |
5288797 | Khalil et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5303148 | Mattson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306307 | Senter et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306311 | Stone et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314478 | Oka et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314482 | Goodfellow et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320102 | Paul et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326363 | Aikins | Jul 1994 | A |
5326365 | Alvine | Jul 1994 | A |
5344459 | Swartz | Sep 1994 | A |
5360446 | Kennedy | Nov 1994 | A |
5365996 | Crook | Nov 1994 | A |
5368858 | Hunziker | Nov 1994 | A |
5403319 | Matsen, III et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405395 | Coates | Apr 1995 | A |
5413116 | Radke et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423828 | Benson | Jun 1995 | A |
5433215 | Athanasiou et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5445152 | Bell et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448489 | Reuben | Sep 1995 | A |
5468787 | Braden et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5478739 | Slivka et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489309 | Lackey et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501687 | Willert et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503162 | Athanasiou et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507820 | Pappas | Apr 1996 | A |
5510121 | Rhee et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522900 | Hollister | Jun 1996 | A |
5523843 | Yamane et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5541515 | Tsujita | Jul 1996 | A |
5549690 | Hollister et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554190 | Draenert | Sep 1996 | A |
5556432 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560096 | Stephens | Oct 1996 | A |
5564437 | Bainville et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571191 | Fitz | Nov 1996 | A |
5571205 | James | Nov 1996 | A |
5609640 | Johnson | Mar 1997 | A |
5611802 | Samuelson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616146 | Murray | Apr 1997 | A |
5632745 | Schwartz | May 1997 | A |
5671741 | Lang et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681354 | Eckhoff | Oct 1997 | A |
5682886 | Delp et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683466 | Vitale | Nov 1997 | A |
5683468 | Pappas | Nov 1997 | A |
5684562 | Fujieda | Nov 1997 | A |
5687210 | Maitrejean et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690635 | Matsen, III et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702463 | Pothier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5723331 | Tubo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728162 | Eckhoff | Mar 1998 | A |
5735277 | Schuster | Apr 1998 | A |
5749362 | Funda et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749874 | Schwartz | May 1998 | A |
5749876 | Duvillier et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759205 | Valentini | Jun 1998 | A |
5768134 | Swaelens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769899 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772595 | Votruba et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779651 | Buschmann et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786217 | Tubo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5810006 | Votruba et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824085 | Sahay et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824102 | Buscayret | Oct 1998 | A |
5827289 | Reiley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832422 | Wiedenhoefer | Nov 1998 | A |
5835619 | Morimoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842477 | Naughton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847804 | Sarver et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853746 | Hunziker | Dec 1998 | A |
5871018 | Delp et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871540 | Weissman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871542 | Goodfellow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871546 | Colleran et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879390 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880976 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885296 | Masini | Mar 1999 | A |
5885298 | Herrington et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897559 | Masini | Apr 1999 | A |
5899859 | Votruba et al. | May 1999 | A |
5900245 | Sawhney et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906643 | Walker | May 1999 | A |
5906934 | Grande et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913821 | Farese et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916220 | Masini | Jun 1999 | A |
5928945 | Seliktar et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5939323 | Valentini et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961523 | Masini | Oct 1999 | A |
5968051 | Luckman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968099 | Badorf et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972385 | Liu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995738 | DiGioia, III et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002859 | DiGioia, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013103 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6046379 | Stone et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057927 | Levesque et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078680 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081577 | Webber | Jun 2000 | A |
6082364 | Balian et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090144 | Letot et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093204 | Stone | Jul 2000 | A |
6102916 | Masini | Aug 2000 | A |
6102955 | Mendes et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110209 | Stone | Aug 2000 | A |
6112109 | D'Urso | Aug 2000 | A |
6120541 | Johnson | Sep 2000 | A |
6120543 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126690 | Ateshian et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139578 | Lee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146422 | Lawson | Nov 2000 | A |
6151521 | Guo et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152960 | Pappas | Nov 2000 | A |
6156069 | Amstutz | Dec 2000 | A |
6161080 | Aouni-Ateshian et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162208 | Hipps | Dec 2000 | A |
6165221 | Schmotzer | Dec 2000 | A |
6171340 | McDowell | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175655 | George, III et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178225 | Zur et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187010 | Masini | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197064 | Haines et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197325 | MacPhee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200606 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203576 | Afriat et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205411 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206927 | Fell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214369 | Grande et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217894 | Sawhney et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219571 | Hargreaves et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224632 | Pappas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235060 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249692 | Cowin | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251143 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254639 | Peckitt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261296 | Aebi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277151 | Lee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280478 | Richter et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281195 | Rueger et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283980 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289115 | Takeo | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289753 | Basser et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299645 | Ogden | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299905 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302582 | Nord et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310477 | Schneider | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310619 | Rice | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316153 | Goodman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319712 | Meenen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322588 | Ogle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328765 | Hardwick et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334006 | Tanabe | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334066 | Rupprecht et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342075 | MacArthur | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344043 | Pappas | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344059 | Krakovits et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352558 | Spector | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358253 | Torrie et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365405 | Salzmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371958 | Overaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373250 | Tsoref et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375658 | Hangody et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379367 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379388 | Ensign et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382028 | Wooh et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6383228 | Schmotzer | May 2002 | B1 |
6387131 | Miehlke et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402786 | Insall et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6429013 | Halvorsen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443988 | Felt et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6443991 | Running | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444222 | Asculai et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450978 | Brosseau et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459948 | Ateshian et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468314 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6479996 | Hoogeveen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482209 | Engh et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510334 | Schuster et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514514 | Atkinson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520964 | Tallarida et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6533737 | Brosseau et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540786 | Chibrac | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556855 | Thesen | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558421 | Fell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560476 | Pelletier et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575980 | Robie et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591581 | Schmieding | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592624 | Fraser et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6623526 | Lloyd | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626945 | Simon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632235 | Weikel et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632246 | Simon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652587 | Felt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679917 | Ek | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690816 | Aylward et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692448 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702821 | Bonutti | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712856 | Carignan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719794 | Gerber et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6770078 | Bonutti | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772026 | Bradbury et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6799066 | Steines et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816607 | O'Donnell et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835377 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6855165 | Fell et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6873741 | Li | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893463 | Fell et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893467 | Bercovy | May 2005 | B1 |
6902582 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6905514 | Carignan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911044 | Fell et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916341 | Rolston | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923831 | Fell et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932842 | Litschko et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6964687 | Bernard et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6966928 | Fell et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978188 | Christensen | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6984981 | Tamez-Peña et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998841 | Tamez-Peña et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7001672 | Justin et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020314 | Suri et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7050534 | Lang | May 2006 | B2 |
7058159 | Lang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058209 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060101 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7105026 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115131 | Engh et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7172596 | Coon et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7174282 | Hollister et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184814 | Lang et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7204807 | Tsoref | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238203 | Bagga et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7239908 | Alexander et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7244273 | Pedersen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245697 | Lang | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7292674 | Lang | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7326252 | Otto et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7368065 | Yang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379529 | Lang | May 2008 | B2 |
7438685 | Burdette et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445640 | Despres, III et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467892 | Lang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468075 | Lang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7517358 | Petersen | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7520901 | Engh et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534263 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7572293 | Rhodes et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7603192 | Martin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611519 | Lefevre et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7611653 | Elsner et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7615054 | Bonutti | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7618451 | Berez et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632575 | Justin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634119 | Tsougarakis et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7718109 | Robb et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7796791 | Tsougarakis et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799077 | Lang et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806896 | Bonutti | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7842092 | Otto et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7881768 | Lang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914582 | Felt et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7935151 | Haines | May 2011 | B2 |
7981158 | Fitz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983777 | Melton et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8036729 | Lang et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062302 | Lang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066708 | Lang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070821 | Roger | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077950 | Tsougarakis et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083745 | Lang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086336 | Christensen | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8094900 | Steines et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105330 | Fitz et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8112142 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
RE43282 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2012 | E |
8192498 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8211181 | Walker | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234097 | Steines et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236061 | Heldreth et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8265730 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8306601 | Lang et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8311306 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8337501 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337507 | Lang et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337508 | Lavallee et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343218 | Lang et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361076 | Roose et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366771 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8369926 | Lang et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8377073 | Wasielewski | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8377129 | Fitz et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380471 | Iannotti et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8407067 | Uthgenannt et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8439926 | Bojarski et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457930 | Schroeder | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460304 | Fitz et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473305 | Belcher et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480754 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486150 | White et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8500740 | Bojarski et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521492 | Otto et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529568 | Bouadi | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529630 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8532807 | Metzger | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545569 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551099 | Lang et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551102 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551103 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551169 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556906 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556907 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556971 | Lang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556983 | Bojarski et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561278 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562611 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562618 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568479 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568480 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8617172 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617242 | Philipp | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623026 | Wong et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634617 | Tsougarakis et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638998 | Steines et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8641716 | Fitz et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657827 | Fitz et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8682052 | Fitz et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690945 | Fitz et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8709089 | Lang et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8735773 | Lang | May 2014 | B2 |
8768028 | Lang et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8771365 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9408686 | Miller et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9439767 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9517134 | Lang | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20010001120 | Masini | May 2001 | A1 |
20010010023 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010039455 | Simon et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020013626 | Geistlich et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016543 | Tyler | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022884 | Mansmann | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020045940 | Giannetti et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052606 | Bonutti | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059049 | Bradbury et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067798 | Lang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020068979 | Brown et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072821 | Baker | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079601 | Russell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082703 | Repicci | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082741 | Mazumder et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087274 | Alexander et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106625 | Hung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111694 | Ellingsen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115647 | Halvorsen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120274 | Overaker et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120281 | Overaker | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127264 | Felt et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133230 | Repicci | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147392 | Steines et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151986 | Asculai et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156150 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173852 | Felt et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177770 | Lang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183850 | Felt et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030015208 | Lang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031292 | Lang | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035773 | Totterman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045935 | Angelucci et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055500 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055501 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055502 | Lang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060882 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060883 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060884 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060885 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063704 | Lang | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069591 | Carson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080957 | Stewart et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100953 | Rosa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030158606 | Coon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030216669 | Lang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225457 | Justin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236473 | Dore | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006393 | Burkinshaw | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040062358 | Lang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081287 | Lang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098132 | Andriacchi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098133 | Carignan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102851 | Saladino | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102852 | Johnson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102866 | Harris et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117015 | Biscup | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117023 | Gerbec et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122521 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133276 | Lang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138754 | Lang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138755 | O'Connor et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147927 | Tsougarakis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153079 | Tsougarakis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153162 | Sanford et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153164 | Sanford et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167390 | Alexander et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167630 | Rolston | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193280 | Webster et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204644 | Tsougarakis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204760 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204766 | Siebel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236424 | Berez et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050010106 | Lang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015153 | Goble et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021042 | Marnay et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033424 | Fell | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043807 | Wood | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055028 | Haines | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078802 | Lang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107883 | Goodfried et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107884 | Johnson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119664 | Carignan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125029 | Bernard et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148843 | Roose | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154471 | Aram et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171612 | Rolston | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203384 | Sati et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216305 | Funderud | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226374 | Lang et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234461 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244239 | Shimp | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267584 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278034 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009853 | Justin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060069318 | Keaveny et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060111722 | Bouadi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111726 | Felt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129246 | Steffensmeier | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136058 | Pietrzak | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149374 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190086 | Clemow et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210017 | Lang | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210018 | Lang | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241776 | Brown et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265078 | McMinn | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070005143 | Ek et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070015995 | Lang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070047794 | Lang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067032 | Felt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083266 | Lang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100462 | Lang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118055 | McCombs | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118222 | Lang | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118243 | Schroeder et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142914 | Jones et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156171 | Lang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070190108 | Datta et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198022 | Lang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203430 | Lang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226986 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233156 | Metzger | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233269 | Steines et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239165 | Amirouche | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250169 | Lang | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255288 | Mahfouz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274444 | Lang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276224 | Lang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276501 | Betz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282451 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004709 | O'Neill et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009950 | Richardson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015433 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025463 | Lang | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031412 | Lang et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058613 | Lang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058945 | Hajaj et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080119938 | Oh | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119940 | Otto et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147072 | Park et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080170659 | Lang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172125 | Ek | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195108 | Bhatnagar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195216 | Philipp | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208348 | Fitz | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215059 | Carignan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219412 | Lang | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243127 | Lang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255445 | Neubauer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262624 | White et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275452 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281328 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281329 | Fitz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281426 | Fitz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319448 | Lavallee et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090076371 | Lang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076508 | Weinans et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090118830 | Fell | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131941 | Park et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149977 | Schendel | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090222103 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090226068 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228111 | Otto | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228113 | Lang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270868 | Park et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276045 | Lang | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090306676 | Lang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312805 | Lang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326666 | Wyss et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100054572 | Tsougarakis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100217270 | Polinski et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100274534 | Steines et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100303313 | Lang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100303317 | Tsougarakis et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100303324 | Lang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100305708 | Lang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100305907 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329530 | Lang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331991 | Wilkinson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022179 | Andriacchi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029091 | Bojarski et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110029093 | Bojarski et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046735 | Metzger et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066245 | Lang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071645 | Bojarski et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071802 | Bojarski et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087332 | Bojarski et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087465 | Mahfouz | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092804 | Schoenefeld et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125009 | Lang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110144760 | Wong et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110218635 | Amis et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264097 | Hodorek et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110266265 | Lang | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288669 | Sanford et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295378 | Bojarski et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305379 | Mahfouz | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120022659 | Wentorf | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120093377 | Tsougarakis et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116203 | Vancraen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120191205 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191420 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197408 | Lang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201440 | Steines et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209394 | Bojarski et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232669 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232670 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232671 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120265496 | Mahfouz | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130006598 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035766 | Meridew | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130071828 | Lang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130103363 | Lang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110471 | Lang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144570 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158671 | Uthgenannt et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165939 | Ries et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130197870 | Steines et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130199259 | Smith | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130203031 | Mckinnon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211531 | Steines et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130245803 | Lang | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130297031 | Hafez | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140005792 | Lang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140029814 | Fitz et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039631 | Bojarski et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140086780 | Miller et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140115872 | Steines et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153798 | Tsougarakis et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172111 | Lang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194996 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140250677 | Lang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86209787 | Nov 1987 | CN |
2305966 | Feb 1999 | CN |
101288597 | Oct 2008 | CN |
2306552 | Aug 1974 | DE |
3516743 | Nov 1986 | DE |
8909091 | Sep 1989 | DE |
3933459 | Apr 1991 | DE |
44 34 539 | Apr 1996 | DE |
19803673 | Aug 1999 | DE |
19926083 | Dec 2000 | DE |
10055465 | May 2002 | DE |
10135771 | Feb 2003 | DE |
102006037067 | Feb 2008 | DE |
0528080 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0600806 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0672397 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 704 193 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0626156 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0613380 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1074229 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1077253 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1120087 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1129675 | Sep 2001 | EP |
0732091 | Dec 2001 | EP |
0896825 | Jul 2002 | EP |
0814731 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1234552 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1234555 | Aug 2002 | EP |
0809987 | Oct 2002 | EP |
0833620 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1327423 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1329205 | Jul 2003 | EP |
0530804 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1437101 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1070487 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1683593 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1754457 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1886640 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2324799 | May 2011 | EP |
2173260 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2589720 | Nov 1985 | FR |
2740326 | Apr 1997 | FR |
1451283 | Sep 1976 | GB |
2291355 | Jan 1996 | GB |
2304051 | Mar 1997 | GB |
2348373 | Oct 2000 | GB |
56-083343 | Jul 1981 | JP |
61-247448 | Nov 1986 | JP |
1-249049 | Oct 1989 | JP |
05-184612 | Jul 1993 | JP |
7-236648 | Sep 1995 | JP |
8-25487 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8-173465 | Jul 1996 | JP |
9-169056 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9-206322 | Aug 1997 | JP |
11-19104 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-276510 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2004-166802 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2005-532089 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007-521881 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-236926 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2010-538882 | Dec 2010 | JP |
WO 8702882 | May 1987 | WO |
WO 9009769 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 9203108 | Mar 1992 | WO |
WO 9304710 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO 9309819 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9325157 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9527450 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9528688 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9530390 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9532623 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9624302 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9725942 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9727885 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9729703 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9738676 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9746665 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9808469 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9812994 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9820816 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9830617 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9852498 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9902654 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9908598 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9908728 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9942061 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9947186 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9951719 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0009179 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0015153 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0019911 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0035346 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0048550 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0059411 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0068749 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0074554 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0074741 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0076428 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0110356 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0117463 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0119254 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0135968 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0145764 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0168800 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0170142 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0177988 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0182677 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0191672 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0202021 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0209623 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0222013 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0222014 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0223483 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0234310 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 0236147 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 0237423 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02061688 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02096268 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03007788 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03013373 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03037192 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03047470 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03051210 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03061522 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03094782 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03099106 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004006811 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004032806 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043305 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004047688 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004049981 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004051301 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004073550 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002473 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005016175 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005020850 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005051239 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005051240 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005067521 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076974 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006012370 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006058057 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006060795 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006065774 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006092600 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2007041375 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007062079 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007092841 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007106172 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007109641 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008021494 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008055161 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008101090 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008117028 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008157412 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009039159 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009068892 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009140294 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2010099231 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010099353 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010099359 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010140036 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010151564 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011028624 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011056995 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011072235 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011075697 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011101474 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2012027150 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012027185 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012112694 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012112698 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012112701 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012112702 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013020026 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO 2013025814 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO 2013056036 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013131066 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013152341 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2013155500 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014035991 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Adam et al., “NMR tomography of the cartilage structures of the knee joint with 3-D volume image combined with a rapid optical-imaging computer,” ROFO Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. Nuklearmed., 150(1): 44-48 (1989) Abstract Only. |
Adam et al., “MR Imaging of the Knee: Three-Dimensional Volume Imaging Combined with Fast Processing,” J. Compt. Asst. Tomogr., 13(6): 984-988 (1989). |
Adams et al., “Quantitative Imaging of Osteoarthritis,” Semin Arthritis Rheum, 20(6) Suppl. 2: 26-39 (Jun. 1991). |
Ahmad et al., “Biomechanical and Topographic Considerations for Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee,” Am J Sports Med, 29(2): 201-206 (Mar.-Apr. 2001). |
Alexander, “Estimating the motion of bones from markers on the skin,” University of Illinois at Chicago (Doctoral Dissertation) (1998). |
Alexander et al., “Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems,” Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Meeting, San Diego, CA (1998). |
Alexander et al., “Internal to external correspondence in the analysis of lower limb bone motion,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, Montana (1999). |
Alexander et al., “State estimation theory in human movement analysis,” Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress (1998). |
Alexander et al., “Optimization techniques for skin deformation correction,” International Symposium on 3-D Human Movement Conference, Chattanooga, TN, (1998). |
Alexander et al., “Dynamic Functional Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System,” ASME Winter International Congress and Exposition, Nashville, TN (1999). |
Allen et al., “Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy 5 factors affecting the knee after operations,” J Bone Joint Surg 66B: 666-671 (1984). |
Alley et al., “Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three dimensional MR Aagiography: State of the art,” Radiographics 18: 273-285 (1998). |
Andersson et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Acta. Orthrop. Scand. 45(2):245-259 (1974). |
Andriacchi, “Dynamics of knee Malalignment,” Orthop Clin North Am 25: 395-403 (1994). |
Andriacchi, et al., “A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: Applied to a study of knee kinematics,” J. Biomech Eng 120(12): 743-749 (1998). |
Andriacchi, et al., “Methods for evaluating the progression of Osterarthiritis,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 37(2): 163-170 (2000). |
Andriacchi et al., “Gait analysis as a tool to assess joint kinetics biomechanics of normal and pathological human articulating joints,” Nijhoff, Series E 93: 83-102 (1985). |
Andriacchi et al., “In vivo measurement of six-degrees-of-freedom knee movement during functional testing,” Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society 698 (1995). |
Argenson et al., “Is There a Place for Patellofemoral Arthroplasty?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 321, pp. 162-167 (1995). |
Aro et al., “Clinical Use of Bone Allografts,” Ann Med 25:403-412 (1993). |
Bashir, “Validation of Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of FAF Measurement in Human Cartilage,” Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med. (1998). |
Beaulieu et al., “Glenohumeral relationships during physiological shoulder motion and stress testing: Initial experience with open MRI and active Scan-25 plane registration,” Radiology (1999). |
Beaulieu et al., “Dynamic imaging of glenohumeral instability with open MRI,” Int. Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Sydney, Australia (1998). |
Beckmann et al., “Noninvasive 3D MR Microscopy as Tool in Pharmacological Research: Application to a Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Magn Reson Imaging 13(7): 1013-1017 (1995). |
Billet, Philippe, French Version—“Gliding Knee Prostheses—Analysis of Mechanical Failures”, Thesis, Medical School of Marseilles, 1982, 64 pages. |
Billet, Philippe, Translated Version—“Gliding Knee Prostheses—Analysis of Mechanical Failures”, Thesis, Medical School of Marseilles, 1982, 93 pages. |
Blazina et al., “Patellofemoral replacement: Utilizing a customized femoral groove replacement,” 5(1)53-55 (1990). |
Blum et al., “Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” ANN. Rheum. Dis. 33 (1): 1-11 (1974). |
Bobic, “Arthroscopic osteochondral autogaft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study,” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(4): 262-264 (1996). |
Boe et al., “Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients aged over 50,” J. Bone Joint Surg 68B: 707 (1986). |
Bogoch, et al., “Supracondylar Fractures of the Femur Adjacent to Resurfacing and MacIntosh Arthroplasties of the Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Clin. Orthop. (229):213-220 (Apr. 1988). |
Borthakur et al., “In Vivo Triple Quantum Filtered Sodium MRI of Human Articular Cartilage,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:549 (1999). |
Brandt et al., In German: “CRIGOS—Development of a Compact Robot System for Image-Guided Orthopedic Surgery,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 645-649 (Jul. 2000). |
Brandt et al., English Translation with Certification: “CRIGOS—Development of a Compact Robot System for Image-Guided Orthopedic Surgery,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 645-649 (Jul. 2000). |
Bregler et al., “Recovering non-rigid 3D shape from image streams,” Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Jun. 2000). |
Brett et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Biomedical Images,” Univ. of Manchester, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, IBM UK, http://www.wiau.man.ac.uk/˜ads/imv (1998). |
Brittberg et al., “A critical analysis of cartilage repair,” Acta Orthop Scand 68(2): 186-191 (1997). |
Brittberg et al., “Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chrondrocyte transplantation,” N Engl J Med 331(14): 889-895 (1994). |
Broderick et al., “Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs. arthroscopy,” AJR 162: 99-103 (1994). |
Brown, Ph.D., et al., “MRI Basic Principles and Applications”, Second Ed., Mark A. Brown and Richard C. Semelka, 1999, Wiley-Liss Inc., Title page and Table of Contents Pages Only (ISBN 0471330620). |
Burgkart et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Cartilage Loss in Severe Osteoarthritis,” Arth Rheum; 44(9): 2072-2077 (Sep. 2001). |
Butterworth et al., “A T1O2 Dielectric-Filled Toroidal Resonator,” Depts of Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, Neurology, & Center for Nuclear Imaging Research, U. of Alabama at Birmingham, USA, 1 Page (1999). |
Butts et al., “Real-Time MR imaging of joint motion on an open MR imaging scanner,” Radiological Society of North America, 83rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL (1997). |
Cameron, et al., “Review of a Failed Knee Replacement and Some Observations on the Design of a Knee Resurfacing Prosthesis,” Arch. Orthop Trauma Surg. 97(2):87-89 (1980). |
CAOS, “MIS meets CAOS Spring 2005 Symposium Schedule”, CAOS Spring 2005 Symposium, pp. 1-9, May 19, 2005. |
Carano et al., “Estimation of Erosive Changes in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Temporal Multispectral Analysis,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:408 (1999). |
Carr et al., “Surface Interpolation with Radial Basis Functions for Medical Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE, Inc. New York, vol. 16, pp. 96-107 (Feb. 1997). |
Castriota-Scanderbeg et al., “Precision of Sonographic Measurement of Articular Cartilage: Inter-and Intraobserver Analysis,” Skeletal Radiol 25: 545-549 (1996). |
Chan et al., “Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Comparison of Radiography, CT and MR Imaging to Asses Extent and Severity,” AJR Am J Roentgenol 157(4): 799-806 (1991). |
Chelule et al., “Patient-Specific Template to Preserve Bone Stock in Total Knee Replacement: Preliminary Results”, 15th Annual ISTA Symposium, Sep. 2002, 1 page. |
Clarke et al., “Human Hip Joint Geometry and Hemiarthroplasty Selection,” The Hip. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis 63-89 (1975). |
Clary et al., “Experience with the MacIntosh Knee Prosthesis,” South Med. J. 65(3):265-272 (1972). |
Cohen et al., “Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 7: 95-109 (1999). |
Cohen et al., “Computer-Aided Planning of Patellofemoral Joint OA Surgery: Developing Physical Models from Patient MRI”, MICCAI, Oct. 11-13, 1998, 13 pages. |
Conaty, et al., “Surgery of the Hip and Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 55(2):301-314 (1973). |
Creamer et al., “Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: A Method of Measuring Response to Intra-Articular Treatments,” Ann Rheum Dis. 378-381 (1997). |
Daniel et al., “Breast cancer-gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging with a 0.5T open imager and three-point Dixon technique,” Radiology 207(1): 183-190 (1998). |
Dardzinski et al., “Entropy Mapping of Articular Cartilage”, ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA (1999) T. 41, V. II. |
Dardzinski et al., “T1-T2 Comparison in Adult Articular Cartilage,” ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA (May 22-28, 1999). |
De Winter et al., “The Richards Type II Patellofemoral Arthroplasty”, Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (5): 487-490. |
Delp et al., “A Graphics-Based Software System to Develop and Analyze Models of Musculoskeletal Structures,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 21-34, 1995. |
Disler, “Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage,” AJR 169: 1117-1123 (1997). |
Disler et al., “Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy,” AJR 167: 127-132 (1996). |
Disler et al., “Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy,” AJR 165: 377-382 (1995). |
Doherty et al., Osteoarthritis, Oxford Textbook of Rheumatology, Oxford University Press 959-983 (1993). |
Dougados et al., “Longitudinal radiologic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee,” J Rheumatol 19: 378-384 (1992). |
Du et al., “Vessel enhancement filtering in three-dimensional MR angiography,” J. Magn Res Imaging 5: 151-157 (1995). |
Du et al., “Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR Angiography,” J Magn Res Imaging 4: 733-741 (1994). |
Dufour et al., “A Technique for the Dynamical Evaluation of the Acromiohumeral Distance of the Shoulder in the Seated Position under Open-field MRI,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:406 (1999). |
Dumoulin et al., “Real-time position monitoring of invasive devises using magnetic resonance,” Magn Reson Med 29: 411-5 (1993). |
Dupuy et al., “Quantification of Articular Cartilage in the Knee with Three-Dimensional MR Imaging,” Acad Radiol 3: 919-924 (1996). |
Eckstein et al., “Determination of Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness Using Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (3D MR-CCM),” Magn. Reson. Med. 36(2):256-265, (1996). |
Eckstein et al., “Effect of Gradient and Section Orientation on Quantitative Analyses of Knee Joint Cartilage,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 11: 161-167 (2000). |
Eckstein et al., “Effect of Physical Exercise on Cartilage Volume and Thickness In Vivo: An MR Imaging Study,” Radiology 207: 243-248 (1998). |
Eckstein et al., “Functional Analysis of Articular Cartilage Deformation, Recovery, and Fluid Flow Following Dynamic Exercise In Vivo,” Anatomy and Embryology 200: 419-424 (1999). |
Eckstein et al., “In Vivo Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Cartilage Volume and Thickness Measurements With MR Imaging”, AJR 170(3): 593-597 (1998). |
Eckstein et al., “New Quantitative Approaches With 3-D MRI: Cartilage Morphology, Function and Degeneration”, Medical Imaging International, Nov.-Dec. 1998. |
Eckstein et al., “Side Differences of Knee Joint Cartilage Volume, Thickness, and Surface Area, and Correlation With Lower Limb Dominance—An MRI-Based Study,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 10: 914-921 (2002). |
Eckstein et al., Accuracy of Cartilage Volume and Thickness Measurements with Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clin. Orthop. 1998; 352: 137-148 T. 60 V. II. |
Eckstein et al., “Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (MR CCM): A Method for Accurate Determination of Articular Cartilage Thickness?” Magn. Reson. Med. 35: 89-96 (1996). |
Eckstein et al., “The Influence of Geometry on the Stress Distribution in Joints—A Finite Element Analysis,” Anat Embryol, 189: 545-552 (1994). |
Eckstein et al., “The Morphology of Articular Cartilage Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reproducibility and Anatomical Correlation,” Sur. Radiol Anat 16: 429-438 (1994). |
Elting et al., “Unilateral frame distraction: proximal tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthritis,” Contemp Orthrop 27(6): 522-524 (1993). |
Faber et al., “Gender Differences in Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness, Volume and Articular Surface Areas: Assessment With Quantitative Three-Dimensional MR Imaging,” Skeletal Radiology 30 (3): 144-150 (2001). |
Faber et al., “Quantitative Changes of Articular Cartilage Microstructure During Compression of an Intact Joint,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:547 (1999). |
Falcao et al., “User-steered image segmentation paradigms. Live wire and live lane,” Graphical Models and Image Processing 60: 233-260 (1998). |
Felson et al., “Weight Loss Reduces the risk for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in women: the Framingham study,” Ann Intern Med 116: 535-539 (1992). |
Gandy et al., “One-Year Longitudinal Study of Femoral Cartilage Lesions in Knee Arthritis,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1032 (1999). |
Garrett, “Osteochondral allografts for reconstruction of articular defects of the knee,” Instr Course Lect 47: 517-522 (1998). |
Gerscovich, “A Radiologist's Guide to the Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip,” Skeletal Radiol 26: 447-456 (1997). |
Ghelman et al., “Kinematics of the Knee After Prosthetic Replacements”, Clin. Orthop. May 1975: (108): 149-157. |
Ghosh et al., “Watershed Segmentation of High Resolution Articular Cartilage Images for Assessment of Osteoarthritis,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Philadelphia, (1999). |
Glaser et al., “Optimization and Validation of a Rapid Highresolution T1-W 3-D Flash Waterexcitation MR Sequence for the Quantitative Assessment of Articular Cartilage Volume and Thickness,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 19: 177-185 (2001). |
Goodwin et al., “MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Striations in the Radial Layer Reflect the Fibrous Structure of Cartilage,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:546 (1999). |
Gouraud, “Continuous shading of curved surfaces,” IEEE Trans on Computers C-20(6) (1971). |
Graichen et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Width of the Subacromial Space in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Impingement Syndrome,” American Journal of Roentgenology 172: 1081-1086 (1999). |
Hafez et al., “Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Could a Two-Piece Custom Template Replace the Complex Conventional Instrumentations?” Session 6: Novel Instruments; Computer Aided Surgery, Session 6, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 93-94 (Jun. 2004). |
Hafez et al., “Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-specific Templating,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 444, pp. 184-192 (Mar. 2006). |
Hall et al., “Quantitative MRI for Clinical Drug Trials of Joint Diseases; Virtual Biopsy of Articular Cartilage” NIH-FDA Conf. on Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints: Advancing Clinical Research and Applications (1998). |
Hardy et al., “Measuring the Thickness of Articular Cartilage From MR Images,” J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13: 120-126 (2001). |
Hardy et al., “The Influence of the Resolution and Contrast on Measuring the Articular Cartilage Volume in Magnetic Resonance Images” Magn Reson Imaging. 18(8): 965-972 (Oct. 2000). |
Hargreaves et al., “MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage Using Driven Equilibrium,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42(4): 695-703 (Oct. 1999). |
Hargreaves et al., “Technical considerations for DEFT imaging,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998). |
Hargreaves et al., “Imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998). |
Harryson et al., “Custom-Designed Orthopedic Implants Evaluated Using Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific Computed Tomoraphy Data: Femoral-Component Case Study”, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 8(91), Sep. 2007, 10 pages. |
Hastings et al., “Double Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” A Survey of Fifty Consecutive Cases, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 55(1):112-118 (1973). |
Haubner M, et al., “A Non-Invasive Technique for 3-Dimensional Assessment of Articular Cartilage Thickness Based on MRI Part @: Validation Using CT Arthrography,” Magn Reson Imaging; 15(7): 805-813 (1997). |
Haut et al., “A High Accuracy Three-Dimensional Coordinate Digitizing System for Reconstructing the Geometry of Diarthrodial Joints,” J. Biomechanics 31: 571-577 (1998). |
Hayes et al., “Evaluation of Articular Cartilage: Radiographic and Cross-Sectional Imaging Techniques,” Radiographics 12: 409-428 (1992). |
Henderson et al., “Experience with the Use of the Macintosh Prosthesis in Knees of Patients with Pheumatoid Arthritis,” South. Med. J. 62(11):1311-1315 (1969). |
Henkelman, “Anisotropy of NMR Properties of Tissues”, Magn Res Med. 32: 592-601 (1994). |
Herberhold et al., “An MR-Based Technique for Quantifying the Deformation of Articular Cartilage During Mechanical Loading in an Intact Cadaver Joint,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 39(5): 843-850 (1998). |
Herberhold, “In Situ Measurement of Articular Cartilage Deformation In Intact Femorapatellar Joints Under Static Loading”, Journal of biomechanics 32: 1287-1295 (1999). |
Herrmann et al., “High Resolution Imaging of Normal and Osteoarthritic Cartilage with Optical Coherence Tomogrqaphy,” J. Rheumatoil 26: 627-635 (1999). |
High et al., “Early Macromolecular Collagen Changes in Articular Cartilage of Osteoarthritis (OA): An In Vivo MT-MRI and Histopathologic Study,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:550 (1999). |
Hohe, “Surface Size, Curvature Analysis, and Assessment of Knee Joint Incongruity With MR Imaging In Vivo”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47: 554-561 (2002). |
Holdsworth et al., “Benefits of Articular Cartilage Imaging at 4 Tesla: An In Vivo Study of Normal Volunteers,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1028 (1999). |
Hughes et al., “Technical Note: A Technique for Measuring the Surface Area of Articular Cartilage in Acetabular Fractures,” Br. J. Radiol; 67: 584-588 (1994). |
Husmann et al., “Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Proximal Femur,” J. Arthroplasty; 12(4): 444-450 (Jun. 1997). |
Hyhlik-Durr et al., “Precision of Tibial Cartilage Morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence,” European Radiology 10(2): 297-303 (2000). |
Ihara H., “Double-Contrast CT Arthrography of the Cartilage of the Patellofemoral Joint,” Clin. Orthop.; 198: 50-55 (Sep. 1985). |
Iida et al., “Socket Location in Total Hip Replacement: Preoperative Computed Tomography and Computer Simulation” Acta Orthop Scand; 59(1): 1-5 (1998). |
Irarrazabal et al., “Fast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging,” Mag Res. Med. 33: 656-662 (1995). |
Jessop et al., “Follow-up of the MacIntosh Arthroplasty of the Knee Joint,” Rheumatol Phys. Med. 11(5):217-224 (1972). |
Johnson et al., “The distribution of load across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic measurements,” J. Bone Joint Surg 62B: 346-349 (1980). |
Johnson, “In vivo contact kinematics of the knee joint: Advancing the point cluster technique,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota (1999). |
Johnson et al., “Development of a knee wear method based on prosthetic in vivo slip velocity,” Transaction of the Orthopedic Research Society, 46th Annual Meeting (Mar. 2000). |
Jonsson et al., “Precision of Hyaline Cartilage Thickness Measurements,” Acta Radiol 1992; 33(3): 234-239 (1992). |
Kaneuji et al., “Three Dimensional Morphological Analysis of the Proximal Femoral Canal, Using Computer-Aided Design System, in Japanese Patients with Osteoarthrosis of the Hip,” J. Orthop Sci; 5(4): 361-368 (2000). |
Karvonen et al., “Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Gross Pathology,” Ann Rheum Dis. 49: 672-675 (1990). |
Kass et al., “Snakes: Active contour models.,” Int J Comput Vision 1: 321-331 (1988). |
Kates, et al., “Experiences of Arthroplasty of the Rheumatoid Knee Using MacIntosh Prostheses,” Ann. Rheum. Dis. 28(3):328 (1969). |
Kaufman et al., “Articular Cartilage Sodium content as a function of compression” Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1022, 1999 T. 105, V. III. |
Kay et al., The MacIntosh Tibial Plateau Hemiprosthesis for the Rheumatoid Knee, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 54(2):256-262 (1972). |
Kidder et al., “3D Model Acquisition, Design, Planning and Manufacturing of Orthopaedic Devices: A Framework,” Proceedings of the SPIE—Advanced Sensor and Control-System Interface, Boston, MA, vol. 2911, pp. 9-22, 21 (Nov. 1996). |
Klosterman et al., “T2 Measurements in Adult Patellar Cartilage at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla,” ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, (May 22-28, 1999). |
Knauss et al., “Self-Diffusion of Water in Cartilage and Cartilage Components as Studied by Pulsed Field Gradient NMR,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 41:285-292 (1999). |
Koh et al., “Visualization by Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Focal Cartilage Lesions in the Excised Mini-Pig Knee,” J. Orthop. Res; 14(4): 554-561 (Jul. 1996). |
Korhonen et al., “Importance of the Superficial Tissue Layer for the Indentation Stiffness of Articular Cartilage,” Med. Eng. Phys; 24(2): 99-108 (Mar. 2002). |
Korkala et al., “Autogenous Osteoperiosteal Grafts in the Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Joint Surface Defects,” Int. Orthop.; 15(3): 233-237 (1991). |
Kshirsagar et al., “Measurement of Localized Cartilage Volume and Thickness of Human Knee Joints by Computer Analysis of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Images,” Invest Radiol. 33(5): 289-299 (May 1998). |
Kwak et al., “Anatomy of Human Patellofemoral Joint Articular Cartilage: Surface Curvature Analysis,” J. Orthop. Res.; 15: 468-472 (1997). |
LaFortune et al., “Three dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking,” J. Biomechanics 25: 347-357 (1992). |
Lam et al., “X-Ray Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach”, Editor Lam, 1998, Springer-Verlag publishers, Title page and Index Only (ISBN 9813083247). |
Lang et al., “Functional joint imaging: a new technique integrating MRI and biomotion studies,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver (Apr. 18-24, 2000). |
Lang et al., Risk factors for progression of cartilage loss: a longitudinal MRI study. European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, 6th Annual Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland (1999). |
Lang et al., Cartilage imaging: comparison of driven equilibrium with gradient-echo, SPAR, and fast spin-echo sequences. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, (Apr. 17-24, 1998). |
Ledingham et al., “Factors affecting radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis,” Ann Rheum Dis 54: 53-58 (1995). |
Leenslag et al., “A Porous Composite for Reconstruction of Meniscus Lesions,” Biological and Biomechanical Perform. of Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers Amsterdam pp. 147-152 (1986). |
Lefebvre et al., “Automatic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Characterization of Articular Cartilage from High-Resolution Ultrasound Acquisitions,” Ultrasound Med. Biol.; 24(9): 1369-1381 (Nov. 1998). |
Li et al., A Boundary Optimization Algorithm for Delineating Brain Objects from CT Scans: Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference 1993 IEEE Conference Record, San Francisco, CA (1993). |
Lin et al., “Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Cartilagenous and Bony Components of Dysplastic Hips in Children: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantitative Analysis,” J. Pediatr. Orthop.; 17: 152-157 (1997). |
Lombardi, Jr. et al., “Patient-Specific Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty”, Orthopedics, vol. 31, Issue 9, Sep. 2008, 8 pages. |
Lorensen et al., “Marching cubes: a high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm,” Comput Graph 21: 163-169 (1987). |
Losch et al., “A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI part 1: development of a computational method,” Magn Res Imaging 15(7): 795-804 (1997). |
Lu et al., “Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using globals optimization with joint constraints,” J Biomechanics 32: 129-134 (1999). |
Lu et al., “In vitro degradation of porous poly(L-lactic acid) foams”, Biomaterials, 21(15):1595-1605, Aug. 2000. |
Lucchetti et al., “Skin movement artefact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee-joint kinematics,” J Biomechanics 31: 977-984 (1998). |
Lusse et al., “Measurement of Distribution of Water Content of Human Articular Cartilage Based on Transverse Relaxation Times: An In Vitro Study,” Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1020 (1999). |
Lynch et al., “Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRI scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours,” Proc. SPIE 3979 Medical Imaging, San Diego pp. 925-935 (Feb. 2000). |
MacIntosh, “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Proceedings and Reports of Councils and Assotions, J. Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 48B No. (1): 179 (Feb. 1966). |
MacIntosh et al., “The Use of the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis for Advanced Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Knee,” J. of Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 54B, No. 2, pp. 244-255 (1972). |
MacIntosh, “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis,” Synovectomy and Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis pp. 79-80, Second Int'l. Symposium, Jan. 27-29, 1967 (Basle, Switzerland). |
MacIntosh, “Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee Using a Space Occupying Prosthesis for Painful Varus and Valgus Deformities,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. Dec. 1958:40-A:1431. |
Maki et al., “SNR improvement in NMR microscopy using DEFT,” J Mag Res; pp. 482-492 (1988). |
Marler et al., “Soft-Tissue Augmentation with Injectable Alginate and Syngeneic Fibroblasts”, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 105(6):2049-2058, May 2000. |
Marshall et al., “Quantitation of Articular Cartilage Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction,” J. Orthop. Res.; 13: 814-823 (1995). |
Matsen, III et al., “Robotic Assistance in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Proof of Principle Using Distal Femoral Arthroplasty”, Clinical Ortho. and Related Research, 296:178-186 (1993). |
Mattila et al., “Massive Osteoarticular Knee Allografts: Structural Changes Evaluated with CT,” Radiology; 196: 657-660 (1995). |
McCollum et al., “Tibial Plateau Prosthesis in Arthroplasty of the Knee,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1970 52(4):827-8 (Feb. 1996). |
McKeever, “The Classic Tibial Plateau Prosthesis,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (192):3-12 (1985). |
Merkle et al., “A Transceiver Coil Assembly for Hetero-Nuclear Investigations of Human Breast at 4T,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:170 (1999). |
Meyer et al., “Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation,” Magn Res Med 15: 287-304 (1990). |
Mills et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: Evaluation of Meniscal Disease,” Curr. Opin. Radiol. 4(6): 77-82 (1992). |
Milz et al., “The Thickness of the Subchondral Plate and Its Correlation with the thickness of the Uncalcified Articular Cartilage in the Human Patella,” Anat. Embryol.; 192: 437-444 (1995). |
Minas, “Chondrocyte Implantation in the Repair of Chondral Lesions of the Knee: Economics and Quality of Life”, Am. J. Orthop. Nov. 1998; 27: 739-744. |
Modest et al., “Optical Verification of a Technique for In Situ Ultrasonic Measurement of Articular Cartilage Thickness,” J. Biomechanics 22(2): 171-176 (1989). |
Mollica et al., “Surgical treatment of arthritic varus knee by tibial corticotomy and angular distraction with an external fixator,” Ital J Orthrop Traumatol 18(1): 17-23 (1992). |
Moussa, “Rotational Malalignment and Femoral Torsion in Osteoarthritic Knees with Patellofemoral Joint Imvolvement: A CT Scan Study,” Clin. Orthop.; 304: 176-183 (Jul. 1994). |
Mumtaz et al., “Selective Laser Melting of Inconel 625 Using Pulse Shaping”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 16, Iss. 4, pp. 248-257, 2010. |
Mundinger et al., “Magnetic Resonance Tomography in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Joints,” Schweiz Med. Wochenschr. 121(15): 517-527 (1991) (Abstract Only). |
Myers et al., “Experimental Assessment by High Frequency Ultrasound of Articular Cartilage Thickness and Osteoarthritic Changes,” J. Rheumatol; 22: 109-116 (1995). |
Nelson et al., “Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis of the Knee Joint,” Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2 (1): 245-64 (1971). |
Nieminen et al., “T2 Indicates Incompletely the Biomechanical Status of Enzymatically Degraded Articular Cartilage of 9.4T,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:551 (1999). |
Nishii et al., “Three Dimensional Evaluation of the Acetabular and Femoral Articular Cartilage in the Osteoarthritis of the Hip Joint,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1030 (1999). |
Nizard, “Role of tibial osteotomy in the treatment of medical femorotibial osteoarthritis,” Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65(7-9): 443-446 (1998). |
Noll et al., “Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging,” IEEE Trans Med Imag 10(2): 154-163 (1991). |
Ogilvie-Harris et al., “Arthroscopic management of the degenerative knee,” Arthroscopy 7: 151-157 (1991). |
Overhoff et al., “Total Knee Arthroplasty: Coordinate System Definition and Planning Based on 3-D Ultrasound Image Volumes”, CARS 2001, pp. 283-288. |
Parkkinen et al., “A Mechanical Apparatus With Microprocessor Controlled Stress Profile for Cyclic Compression of Cultured Articular Cartilage Explants,” J. Biomech.; 22 (11-12): 1285-1290 (1989). |
Pearle et al., “Use of an external MR-tracking coil for active scan plane registration during dynamic Musculoskeletal MR imaging in a vertically open MR unit,” American Roentgen Ray Society, San Francisco, CA (1998). |
Peterfy et al., “Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging,” AJR 165: 371-375 (1995). |
Peterfy et al., “MR Imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed TI-weighted sequences,” Radiology 191(2): 413-419 (1994). |
Peterfy et al., “Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation,” Radiology 192(2): 485-491 (1994). |
Peterfy et al., “Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Articular Cartilage,” Radiol Clin North Am.; 34(2): 195-213 (Mar. 1996). |
Petrovic et al., “Additive Manufacturing Solutions for Improved Medical Implants”, Biomedicine, INTECH, pp. 148-180, Mar. 2012. |
Pilch et al., “Assessment of Cartilage Volume in The Femorotibial Joint With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 3D Computer Reconstruction,” J. Rheumatol. 21(12): 2307-2319 (1994). |
Piplani et al., “Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semi-automated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images,” Radiology 198: 855-859 (1996). |
Platt et al., “Mould Arthroplasty of the Knee: A Ten-Yr Follow-up Study,” Oxford Regional Rheumatic Diseases Resch. Ctre, J. of Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 51B, pp. 76-87 (1969). |
Porter et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Review,” J. R. Coll. Surg. Edin. (192):199-201 (1988). |
Portheine et al., “CT-Based Planning and Individual Template Navigation in TKA”, Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery, Springer, 48:336-342 (2004). |
Portheine et al., “Development of a Clinical Demonstrator for Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery with CT Image Based Individual Templates.” In Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K (eds). Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Amsterdam, Elsevier 944-949, 1997. |
Potter, “Arthroplasty of the Knee With Tibial Metallic Implants of the McKeever and MacIntosh Design,” Sug. Clin. North Am. 49(4):903-915 (1969). |
Potter et al., “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis: A Follow-up Study After Implantation of the McKeever and MacIntosh Prostheses,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 54(1):1-24 (1972). |
Potter et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee: an evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging,” J Bone Joint Surg 80-A(9): 1276-1284 (1998). |
Potter et al., “Sensitivity of Quantitative NMR Imaging to Matrix Composition in Engineered Cartilage Tissue” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:552 (1999). |
Probst et al., “Technique for Measuring the Area of Canine Articular Surfaces,” Am. J. Vet. Res. 48(4): 608-609 (1987). |
Prodromos et al., “A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy,” J Bone Joint Surg 67A: 1188-1194 (1985). |
Radermacher et al., “Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery by Means of Individual Templates •Aspects and Analysis of Potential Applications •” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 1: Sessions I—III, MRCAS '94, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 42-48 (Sep. 22-24, 1994). |
Radermacher, English Translation: Helmholtz Institute of Biomedical Technology, “Computer-Assisted Planning and Execution of Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Surgical Templates”, May 18, 1999. |
Radermacher, German Version: Helmholtz Institute of Biomedical Technology, “Computer-Assisted Planning and Execution of Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Surgical Templates”, May 18, 1999. |
Radermacher et al., “Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery With Image Based Individual Templates” Clinical Orthopaedics, Sep. 1998, vol. 354, pp. 28-38. |
Radermacher et al., “Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of the Development of a Demonstrator for Pelvis Surgery.” In Troccaz J. Grimson E., Mosges R (eds). Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Springer-Verlag 606-615, 1997. |
Radermacher et al., “Computer Integrated Orthopedic Surgery—Connection of Planning and Execution in Surgical Inventions.” In Taylor, R., Lavallee, S., Burdea G. Mosges, R. (eds). Computer Integrated Surgery. Cambridge, MIT press 451-463, 1996. |
Radermacher et al., “Technique for Better Execution of CT Scan Planned Orthopedic Surgery on Bone Structures.” In Lemke Hw, Inamura, K., Jaffe, CC, Vannier, MW (eds). Computer Assisted Radiology, Berlin, Springer 933-938, 1995. |
Radermacher et al., “CT Image Based Planning and Execution of Interventions in Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of Clinical Applications.” In Nolte LP, Ganz, R. (eds). CAOS—Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Bern, Hans Huber (In Press) 1998. |
Radin et al., “Mechanical Determination of Osteoarthrosis,” Sem Arthr Rheum 21(3): 12-21 (1991). |
Radin et al., Characteristics of Joint Loading as it Applies to Osteoarthrosis in: Mow VC, Woo S.Y., Ratcliffe T., eds. Symposium on Biomechanics of Diathrodial Joints, vol. 2, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 437-451 (1990). |
Ranawat et al., “MacIntosh Hemiarthroplasty in Rheumatoid Knee,” Acta Orthop Belg., 39 (1): 1-11 (1973). |
Recht et al., “Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities,” Radiology 198: 209-212 (1996). |
Recht et al., “MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions,” AJR 163: 283-290 (1994). |
Reiser et al., “Magnetic Resonance in Cartilaginous Lesions of the Knee Joint With Three-Dimensional Gradient-Echo Imaging,” Skeletal Radiol. 17(7): 465-471, (1988). |
Ritter et al., “Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement,” Clin Orthop 299: 153-156 (1994). |
Robarts Research Institute, Abstract #1028 (1999). |
Robinson et al., “The Early Innovators of Today's Resurfacing Condylar Knees”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 20, No. 1, Suppl. 1, 2005. |
Robson et al., “A Combined Analysis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique for Computerized Automatic Measurement of Cartilage Thickness in Distal Interphalangeal Joint,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13(5): 709-718 (1995). |
Rushfeldt et al., “Improved Techniques for Measuring In Vitro the Geometry and Pressure Distribution in the Human Acetabulum—1. Ultrasonic Measurement of Acetabular Surfaces, Sphericity and Cartilage Thickness,” J. Biomech; 14(4): 253-260 (1981). |
Saied, “Assessment of Articular Cartilage and Subchondral Bone: Subtle and Progressive Changes in Experimental Osteoarthritis Using 50 MHz Echography In Vitro”, J. Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12(9): 1378-1386. |
Saito et al., “New algorithms for Euclidean distance transformation of an—dimensional digitized picture with applications,” Pattern Recognition 27(11): 1551-1565 (1994). |
Schiffers et al., In German: “Planning and execution of orthopedic surgery using individualized templates,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 636-640, (Jul. 2000). |
Schiffers et al., English Translation with Certification: “Planning and execution of orthopedic surgery using individualized templates,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 636-640, (Jul. 2000). |
Schipplein et al., “Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking,” J Orthop Res 9: 113-119 (1991). |
Schorn et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Rheumatol Rehabil. Aug. 1978:17(3):155-163. |
Schouten et al., “A 12 year follow up study in the general population on prognostic factors of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis of the knee,” Ann Rheum Dis 51: 932-937 (1992). |
Shapiro et al., “In-Vivo Evaluation of Human Cartilage Compression and Recovery using 1H and 23Na MRI,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:548 (1999). |
Sharif et al., “Serum hyaluronic acid level as a predictor of disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee,” Arthritis Rheum 38: 760-767 (1995). |
Sharma et al., “Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronic acid level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism 41(7): 1233-40 (1998). |
Shoup et al., “The driven equilibrium Fourier transform NMR technique: an experimental study,” J Mag Res p. 298-310 (1972). |
Sittek et al., “Assessment of Normal Patellar Cartilage Volume and Thickness Using MRI: an Analysis of Currently Available Pulse Sequences”, Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 55-61. |
Slemenda et al., “Lower extremity lean tissue mass strength predict increases in pain and in functional impairment in knee osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Rheum 39(suppl): S212 (1996). |
Slemenda et al., “Lower extremity strength, lean tissue mass and bone density in progression of knee osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Rheum 39(suppl): S169 (1996). |
Slone et al., “Body CT: A Practical Approach”, Editor Slone, 1999 McGraw-Hill publishers, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 007058219). |
Solloway et al., “The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images,” Mag Res Med 37: 943-952 (1997). |
Soslowsky et al., “Articular Geometry of the Glenohumeral Joint,” Clin. Orthop.; 285: 181-190 (Dec. 1992). |
Spoor et al., “Rigid body motion calculated from spatial coordinates of markers,” J. Biomechanics 13: 391-393 (1980). |
Stammberger et al., “A Method for Quantifying Time Dependent Changes in MR Signal Intensity of Articular Cartilage as a Function of Tissue Deformation in Intact Joints” Medical Engineering & Physics 20: 741-749 (1998). |
Stammberger et al., “A New Method for 3D Cartilage Thickness Measurement with MRI, Based on Euclidean Distance Transformation, and its Reproducibility in the Living,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 6:562 (1998). |
Stammberger et al., “Elastic Registration of 3D Cartilage Surfaces From MR Image Data for Detecting Local Changes of the Cartilage Thickness,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44: 592-601 (2000). |
Stammberger et al., “Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living,” Mag Res Med 41: 529-536 (1999). |
Stammberger et al., “Interobserver to reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: Comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation,” Mag Res Imaging 17: 1033-1042 (1999). |
Stauffer et al., “The MacIntosh Prosthesis. Prospective Clinical and Gait Evaluation,” Arch. Surg. 110(6):717-720 (1975). |
Steines et al., Segmentation of osteoarthritic femoral cartilage using live wire, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 8:220 (2000). |
Steines et al., “Segmentation of osteoarthritis femoral cartilage from MR images,” CARS—Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp. 578-583, San Francisco (2000). |
Steines et al., “Measuring volume of articular cartilage defects in osteoarthritis using MRI,” ACR 64th Annual Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, (Oct. 2000). |
Stevenson et al., “The fate of articular cartilage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs,” J. Bone Joint Surg 71(9): 1297-1307 (1989). |
Stout et al., “X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide”, 2nd Ed. Editors Stout and Jensen, 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 0471607118). |
Taha et al., “Modeling and Design of a Custom Made Cranium Implant for Large Skull Reconstruction Before a Tumor Removal”, Phidias Newsletter No. 6, pp. 3, 6, Jun. 2001. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.materialise.com/medical/files/pdf. |
Tamez-Pena et al., MRI Isotropic Resolution Reconstruction from two Orthogonal Scans:, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SOIE-OMT. vol. 4322, pp. 87-97, 2001. |
Tebben et al., “Three-Dimensional Computerized Reconstruction. Illustration of Incremental Articular Cartilage Thinning,” Invest. Radiol. 32(8): 475-484 (1997). |
Thoma et al., In German: “Use of a New Subtraction Procedure Based on Three-Dimensional CT Scans for the Individual Treatment of Bone Defects in the Hip and Knee,” Journal DGPW, No. 17, pp. 27-28 (May 1999). |
Thoma et al., English Translation with Certification: “Use of a New Subtraction Procedure Based on Three-Dimensional CT Scans for the Individual Treatment of Bone Defects in the Hip and Knee,” Journal DGPW, No. 17, pp. 27-28 (May 1999). |
Thoma et al., In German: “Custom-made knee endoprosthetics using subtraction data of three-dimensional CT scans—A new approach,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 641-644, (Jul. 2000). |
Thoma et al., English Translation with Certification: “Custom-made knee endoprosthetics using subtraction data of three-dimensional CT scans—A new approach,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 641-644, (Jul. 2000). |
Tieschky et al., “Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three-dimensional data processing,” J. Orthop Res 15(6): 808-813 (1997). |
Tomasi et al., “Shape and motion from image streams under orthography—a factorization method,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 90(21): 9795-9802 (1993). |
Tsai et al., “Application of a flexible loop-gap resonator for MR imaging of articular cartilage at 3.TO,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver (Apr. 24-28, 2000) 8:2127. |
Tsai et al., “Accurate Surface Voxelization for Manipulating Volumetric Surfaces and Solids with Application in Simulating Musculoskeletal Surgery”, Inst. of Information and Computer Engineering, pp. 234-243, 2001. |
Tyler et al., “Detection and Monitoring of Progressive Degeneration of Osteoarthritic Cartilage by MRI,” Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 Suppl. 266: 130-138 (1995). |
Van Leersum et al., “Thickness of Patellofemoral Articular Cartilage as Measured on MR Imaging: Sequence Comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation,” Skeletal Radiol 1995; 24: 431-435 (1995). |
Vandeberg et al., “Assessment of Knee Cartilage in Cadavers with Dual-Detector Sprial CT ARthrography and MR Imaging”, Radiology, Feb. 2002: 222(2): 430-435 T. 195, V.V. |
Van der Linden et al., “MR Imaging of Hyaline Cartilage at 0.5 T: A Quantitative and Qualitative in vitro Evaluation of Three Types of Sequences” pp. 297-305 (Jun. 1998). |
Velyvis et al., “Evaluation of Articular Cartilage with Delayed Gd(DTPA)2-Enhanced MRI: Promise and Pitfalls,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:554 (1999). |
Wang et al., “The influence of walking mechanics and time on the results of proximal tibial osteotomy,” J. Bone Joint Surg 72A: 905-909 (1990). |
Warfield et al., “Automatic Segmentation of MRI of the Knee,” ISMRM Sixth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition p. 563, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998). |
Warfield et al., “Adaptive Template Moderated Spatially Varying Statistical Classification,” Proc. First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted, MICCAI, pp. 231-238 (1998). |
Warfield et al., “Adaptive, Template Moderated Spatially Varying Statistical Classification,” Medical Image Analysis 4(1): 43-55 (2000). |
Waterton et al., “Diurnal variation in the femoral articular cartilage of the knee in young adult humans,” Mag Res Med 43: 126-132 (2000). |
Waterton et al., “Magnetic Resonance Methods for Measurement of Disease Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Mag. Res. Imaging; 11: 1033-1038 (1993). |
Watson et al., “MR Protocols for Imaging the Guinea Pig Knee,” Mag. Res. Imaging 15(8): 957-970 (1997). |
Wayne et al., “Measurement of Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Articulated Knee,” ANN Biomed Eng.; 26(1): 96-102 (1998). |
Wayne et al., “Finite Element Analyses of Repaired Articular Surfaces,” Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng.; 205(3): 155-162 (1991). |
Wiese et al., “Biomaterial properties and biocompatibility in cell culture of a novel self-inflating hydrogel tissue expander”, J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 54(2):179-188, Nov. 2000. |
Wolff et al., “Magnetization transfer contrast: MR imaging of the knee,” Radiology 179: 623-628 (1991). |
Wordsworth et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty for the Rheumatoid Knee: A 10-year Follow Up,” Ann. Rheum. Dis. 44(11):738-741 (1985). |
Worring et al., “Digital curvature estimation. CVGIP,” Image Understanding 58(3): 366-382 (1993). |
Yan, “Measuring changes in local volumetric bone density,” new approaches to quantitative computed tomography, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University (1998). |
Yao et al., “Incidental magnetization transfer contrast in fast spin-echo imaging of cartilage,” J. Magn Reson Imaging 6(1): 180-184 (1996). |
Yao et al., “MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5T,” AJR 158(2): 339-345 (1992). |
Yasuda et al., “A 10 to 15 year follow up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthritis,” Clin Orthop 282: 186-195 (1992). |
Yusof et al., “Preparation and characterization of chitin beads as a wound dressing precursor”, J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 54(1):59-68, Oct. 2000. |
Zimmer, Inc., “There's a New Addition to the Flex Family! The Zimmer® Unicompartmental Knee System”, pp. 1-8 (2004). |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US02/16945, dated Mar. 26, 2003, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 03713907.8, dated Dec. 6, 2006, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, Supplementary Partial European Search Report—Application No. 02737254.9, dated Mar. 2, 2007, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US03/38158, dated Feb. 23, 2005, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. EP 03790194, dated Jul. 13, 2006, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US03/32123, dated Mar. 17, 2004, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US03/36079, dated Apr. 15, 2004, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US04/39714, dated May 13, 2005, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2005/042421, dated May 18, 2006, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 04812273.3, dated Oct. 8, 2007, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees—International Application No. PCT/US2007/064349 dated Aug. 7, 2007, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2007/064349, dated Oct. 12, 2007, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 20 pages. |
European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 04812273.3-2310, dated Dec. 10, 2007, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US06/45131, dated Jul. 11, 2007, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US06/38212, dated Apr. 22, 2008, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability—International Application No. PCT/US2006/045131, dated Jun. 5, 2008, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2009/043656, dated Jul. 9, 2009, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2006/045131 dated Mar. 3, 2010, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/025459, dated Apr. 20, 2010, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 15 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/039587, dated Aug. 19, 2010, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 15 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—European Application No. 06815884.9-2310, dated Sep. 14, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/025274, dated Sep. 20, 2010, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 18 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/046868, dated Jan. 7, 2011, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 11 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—European Application No. 10012404.9-2310, dated Apr. 1, 2011, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/055483, dated Jul. 28, 2011, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/059910 dated Oct. 25, 2011, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/061141, dated Aug. 31, 2011, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/025269 dated Aug. 31, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 14 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/049472 dated Oct. 16, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/050964 dated Oct. 22, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 13 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. 12170854.9-1526 dated Oct. 9, 2012, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US12/59936 dated Jan. 9, 2013, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 11 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 10792589.3-2310 dated Feb. 7, 2013, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. 10192339.9-1257 dated Jan. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 10746859.7-1654 dated Mar. 4, 2013, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 12192903.8-1654 dated Apr. 17, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/025280, dated Oct. 25, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 11 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2009/036165, dated May 7, 2009, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/025274, dated Oct. 25, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/025277, dated Oct. 25, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. 10829105.5-1654 dated Nov. 5, 2013, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 10838327.4-1654 dated Nov. 14, 2013, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Great Britain Search and Examination Report—Application No. GB1201112.8 dated Feb. 3, 2014, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2013/035536 dated Jul. 18, 2013, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2013/028762 dated Jun. 21, 2013, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 13 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2013/061042 dated Jan. 10, 2014, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US13/56841 dated Feb. 12, 2014, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 9 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 10836760.9-1654 dated Apr. 11, 2014, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,318, 56 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response dated Aug. 27, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, 22 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, 8 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response dated Jul. 27, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, 26 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (U.S. Pat. No. 2004/0167390), 11 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (U.S. Pat. No. 2004/0167390), 25 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (U.S. Pat. No. 2004/0167390), 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,667, 5 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment dated Jan. 11, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,667, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,749, 6 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,749, 18 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,750, 21 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,750, 17 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,750, 21 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, 23 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response dated Oct. 26, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, 17 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, 10 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Request for Continued Examination dated May 24, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 21 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 6 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 6 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 17 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Supplemental Response dated May 2, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 10 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment After Final Rejection dated Aug. 26, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 17 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,325, 11 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,325, 15 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated May 17, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,325, 20 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,416, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,667, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,472, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated May 26, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/602,713, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,340, 15 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,318, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,318, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, 13 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Preliminary Amendment dated Jul. 31, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, 19 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, 13 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, 22 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated May 17, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, 12 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated May 17, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, 21 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, 11 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,472, 15 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,416, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/602,713, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,472, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,763, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 5, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,599, 11 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,599, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 14, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,599, 9 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Preliminary Amendment dated Aug. 22, 2006, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 32 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment dated Jun. 30, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 18 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Supplemental Amendment dated Aug. 26, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 11 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Supplemental Amendment dated Sep. 21, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 43 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment dated Jun. 28, 2010 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2010 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 20 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment dated Apr. 6, 2011 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 12 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Preliminary Amendment dated Jul. 31, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,434, 44 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2010 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,434, 83 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment dated Feb. 2, 2011 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,434, 44 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Preliminary Amendment dated Aug. 12, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/017,886, 13 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 13 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2008/05377, dated Sep. 30, 2008, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 17 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2013/036505 dated Jul. 29, 2013, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees—International Application No. PCT/US2008/053977, dated Jul. 11, 2008, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 13775348.9-1654 dated Mar. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2012, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,857, 12 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment to Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2012, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,857, 10 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated May 10, 2013, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,857, 6 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response filed Nov. 11, 2013, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,857, 11 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2014, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,857, 5 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2014, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, 10 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment to Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2014, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, 9 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated May 28, 2015, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,667, filed May 28, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,750, filed Oct. 7, 2003. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, filed Nov. 7, 2003. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, filed Nov. 24, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,318, filed Sep. 29, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,340, filed Mar. 20, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/602,713, filed Nov. 21, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,871, filed Mar. 5, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,880, filed Mar. 5, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,763, filed May 12, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,809, filed May 11, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,506, filed May 12, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,518, filed May 12, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,299, filed Apr. 21, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,355, filed Apr. 22, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,641, filed Apr. 28, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,493, filed Dec. 10, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,564, filed Nov. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,573, filed Nov. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,579, filed Nov. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,617, filed Nov. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,623, filed Nov. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,457, filed Feb. 15, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/399,378, filed Feb. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,696, filed Jul. 30, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,840, filed Aug. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,717, filed Dec. 18, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,735, filed Dec. 18, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,742, filed Jan. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/761,818, filed Feb. 7, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,863, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,040, filed May 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, filed May 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/938,081, filed Jul. 9, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/017,176, filed Sep. 3, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/040,890, filed Sep. 30, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/051,003, filed Oct. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/051,087, filed Oct. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/148,511, filed Jan. 6, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/157,707, filed Jan. 17, 2014. |
European Patent Office, Partial Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 13771863.1-1654, dated Apr. 26, 2016, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/033,095, filed Sep. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/033,350, filed Sep. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/216,473, filed Mar. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/285,151, filed May 22, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/389,987, filed on Apr. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/390,829, filed Apr. 13, 2013. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response filed Nov. 30, 2015, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, 10 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2016, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, 11 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2016, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, 9 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2016, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, 10 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,239, 13 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment to Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,239, 13 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,239, 8 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response filed Dec. 2, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,239, 15 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2012, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,239, 8 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment to Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2012, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,239, 7 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 12, 2012, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,239, 11 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,742, 7 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,742, 10 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2016, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,742, 5 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2015, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/285,151, 8 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2015, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/285,151, 9 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2016, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/285,151, 7 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2016, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/285,151, 8 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 5, 2016, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/285,151, 5 pages. |
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment to Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2015, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/051,003, 8 pages. |
United States Patent & Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2016, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/051,003, 5 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action pertaining to Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-505970 dated Nov. 24, 2015, 2 pages ( in Japanese). |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action pertaining to Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-505970 dated Nov. 24, 2015, 4 pages (English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140109384 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60889859 | Feb 2007 | US | |
60416601 | Oct 2002 | US | |
60467686 | May 2003 | US | |
60293488 | May 2001 | US | |
60363527 | Mar 2002 | US | |
60380695 | May 2002 | US | |
60380692 | May 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12031239 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 14134064 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10681749 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 12031239 | US | |
Parent | 10997407 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 10681749 | US | |
Parent | 10752438 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 10997407 | US | |
Parent | 10724010 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 10752438 | US | |
Parent | 10305652 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 10724010 | US | |
Parent | 10160667 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 10305652 | US | |
Parent | 10681750 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 10997407 | US |