Not Applicable
1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to implantable medical devices which deliver energy to stimulate tissue in an patient, and more particularly to highly efficient stimulation devices that use digital stimulation output for use in a medical device that is implanted adjacent to tissue or organ.
2. Description of the Related Art
A remedy for people with slowed or disrupted natural heart activity is to implant a cardiac pacing device which is a small electronic apparatus that stimulates the heart to beat at regular rates. The size of the implant is very much a function of the required energy to be stored. However, a traditional method of minimizing current drain from the battery is the use of high impedance leads, which have inherent I2*R losses, for which ironically no benefit is received, other than reduction of maximum current. What should be sought is a reduction of energy consumption, not absolute current. The consumed energy is proportional to the current, multiplied by the applied voltage, multiplied by the duration. In our embodiment we will show that by minimizing I2*R losses and by minimizing overall duration and a novel stimulation waveform, the overall energy consumption is reduced and by doing so enabling methods of stimulation, previously impractical due high power consumption. The overall effect is expected to be at least a factor of two for conventional pacing (2 . . . 5Volt) and up to an order of magnitude or more for higher voltage applications (10 . . . 50Volt).
Typically the stimulation device is implanted in an patient's chest and has sensor electrodes that detect electrical impulses associated with in the heart contractions. These sensed impulses are analyzed to determine when abnormal cardiac activity occurs, in which event a pulse generator is triggered to produce electrical pulses. Wires carry these pulses to electrodes placed adjacent specific cardiac muscles, which when electrically stimulated contract the heart chambers. It is important that the stimulation electrodes be properly located to produce contraction of the heart chambers.
Modern cardiac pacing devices vary the stimulation to adapt the heart rate to the patient's level of activity, thereby mimicking the heart's natural activity. The pulse generator modifies that rate by tracking the activity of the heart or by responding to other sensor signals that indicate body motion or respiration rate.
U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2008/0077184 describes an apparatus provided for artificially stimulating internal tissue of an patient by means of an implanted medical device adapted for implantation into the patient's blood vasculature. The implanted medical device comprises a power supply and first and second stimulation electrodes for contacting the tissue. A control unit governs operation of a stimulation signal generator connected to the first and second stimulation electrodes. The stimulation signal generator produces a series of electrical stimulation pulses and a selectable voltage intensifier increases the voltage, for applications requiring higher voltages such as transvascular neural stimulation, of each electrical stimulation pulse to produce an output pulse that is applied to the first and second stimulation electrodes. One version of the medical device includes a mechanism that is connected to the first and second stimulation electrodes for sensing physiological effects from the electrical stimulation pulse and producing a feedback signal indicating such effects. Although this stimulation apparatus offered several advantages over other types of stimulators, it required energy efficient systems and highly robust signal sensing to be developed. Such energy efficient stimulation systems meet clinical needs of implanted stimulation devices with internal or external energy sources. An energy efficient stimulation system minimizes requirements for battery recharging or replacement for external powered systems and it improves the battery lifetime of internally powered systems. It's efficiency may also enable therapies that are not practical with current systems. Moreover, robust signal sensing will improve the signal detection and signal analysis tasks due to very low artifact content in the sensed signal.
An implantable apparatus is provided for artificial electrical stimulation of tissue in a patient. That apparatus comprises a plurality of electrodes in contact with the tissue at one or more locations inside the patient and a power supply that furnishes energy for the artificial electrical stimulation. A control unit governs the artificial electrical stimulation by programmable selection of at least some of the plurality of electrodes. A stimulation signal generator, connected to the control unit, produces a segmented stimulation waveform that has positive segments, pause segments and negative segments, wherein the shape, duration and duty cycle of the segmented stimulation waveform is defined by the control unit.
In a preferred embodiment, the apparatus also comprises a voltage intensifier connected to stimulation signal generator for increasing the voltage of the segmented stimulation waveform and produce an output waveform that is applied to selected electrodes. The voltage intensifier may be a flying capacitor-type voltage doubler, bipolar mode voltage doubler, or a combination of a flying capacitor type and a bipolar mode voltage doubler.
A preferred segmented stimulation waveform has a first segment with a first amplitude, and a second segment that is longer in duration than the first segment and that has a second amplitude which is opposite in polarity and lesser in absolute magnitude to the first amplitude.
An embodiment of the novel apparatus includes sensing unit for detecting at least one physiological parameter of the patient. That sensing unit comprises an electrode pair for implantation inside the patient, an instrumentation amplifier having an internal voltage reference, a passive filter coupling the electrode pair to the instrumentation amplifier.
An apparatus, comprising a highly efficient stimulator with digital output, can be employed to stimulate simultaneously one or more other areas of human physiology as shown in subsequent descriptions and examples. The stimulator may be implanted subcutaneously or intravascularily in the body to stimulate heart muscle, organ nerves, such as the cardiac vagal nerve which can be stimulated transvenously e.g. from the inferior vena cava or coronary sinus. In addition to cardiac applications, the stimulation apparatus can provide neural stimulation, for example treatment of Parkinson's disease or obsessive/compulsive disorder. The electrical stimulation also may be applied to muscles, the spine, the gastro/intestinal tract, the pancreas, and the sacral nerve. The apparatus may also be used for GERD treatment, endotracheal stimulation, pelvic floor stimulation, treatment of obstructive airway disorder and apnea, molecular therapy delivery stimulation, chronic constipation treatment, and electrical stimulation for bone healing. The current invention can provide stimulation for two or more clinical purposes simultaneously as will be described later.
Reference
When stimulation is desired, the control unit 56 issues a command to a stimulation signal generator 61, which are both part of a stimulation controller 59. Depending upon the desired treatment, the stimulation signal generator 61 applies an electrical pulse directly to a first set of output electrodes 57 or drives a voltage intensifier 58 to apply a more intense stimulation pulse to a second set of electrodes 60. The voltage intensifier 58 may use any of several techniques to increase the stimulation pulse voltage from the standard low voltage implant battery 53, e.g. a three volt battery, contained within the implanted stimulator 23. Preferably, flying capacitor type voltage doubling, bipolar mode doubling, or a combination of both is used, as will be described. The stimulation leads with plurality of electrodes are designed to be a very low impedance structure to minimize power losses in the leads.
By monitoring the physiological response in response to the stimulation from either output electrodes 57 or 60, a feedback loop is formed which can be used to optimize the treatment or therapy.
The software executed by the control unit 56 analyzes the electrocardiogram signals and other physiological characteristics from the sensor electrodes 50 to determine when to stimulate the patient's physiology according to the algorithm executed by the control unit 56. The output pulses from the stimulation signal generator 61 can be applied either directly to output electrodes 57 or via an optional voltage intensifier 58 to electrodes 60 for high voltage stimulation.
The voltage intensifier 58 preferably is a “flying capacitor” inverter that charges and discharges in a manner that essentially doubles the power. This type of device has been used in integrated circuits for local generation of additional voltage levels from a single supply.
Thus several mechanisms provide stimulation pulses over a wide range of voltage levels. First by using single or double driven signals, as described above and shown in
Determination of the voltage level, shape, and duty cycle of stimulation pulses shown in
When stimulation is occurring, the instrumentation amplifier 407 in
For stimulation verification, the control unit 56 analyzes the sensed parameters to calculate the actual heart rate to determine whether the heart is pacing at the desired rate in response to the stimulation. If the heart is being paced at the desired rate, the control unit 56 can decrease the stimulation energy in steps until stimulation is no longer effective. The stimulation energy then is increased to ensure maintenance of stimulation capture, thus ensuring a minimal excess of energy is being used. In common devices this threshold is set periodically in a doctor's office during a patient's visit. The proposed method is to automatically and continuously adjusts this for maximum efficiency, but only using as much energy as is needed, by constantly monitoring treatment efficacy. Energy reduction can be accomplished at least in two ways: (1) preferably, the duration of the stimulation pulse is reduced to linearly decrease that amount of energy dissipated in the tissue, or (2) the voltage amplitude is reduced in situations where energy dissipation might vary non-linearly because the tissue/electrode interface is unknown.
The stimulation is controlled by a functionally closed feedback loop. When stimulation commences, the sensed signal waveform can show a physiological response confirming effectiveness of that stimulation pulse. By stepwise increasing the stimulation pulse duration (duty cycle), a threshold can be reached in successive steps. When the threshold is reached, duration can be extended to provide a level of insurance that all pacing will occur above the threshold, or it may be sufficient to hold the stimulation pulse duration at the threshold. Again ensuring the limiting excess stimulation energy to a minimum and thus optimizing stimulation efficiency.
After each successful stimulation pulse, a determination is made regarding the difference in duration existing between the last non-effective pulse and the present effective pulse. That difference in duration is added to the present time. The system then senses the effectiveness of subsequent stimulation pulses and remains at the same level for either an unlimited duration or backs off one step in pulse duration. When the effectiveness is maintained again after a preset time window, which could be a number of beats, minutes or hours, the system backs off one decrement at a time. As soon as the effectiveness of the stimulation pulses is lost, the system increases the stimulation pulse duration until an effective pulse is obtained. In summary, the sensing and stimulation is a closed loop system with two feedback responses: the first response is following an effective pulse and involves gradual reduction of duration after a predetermined number of beats or a predetermined time interval; and the second response is to an ineffective pulse and is immediate with pulse duration adjustment occurring within one heart beat.
It is possible to combine stimulation output signals and use a single lead. However, the standard low voltage (2 . . . 5V) stimulation usually is used for muscle sites, whereas the higher (10 . . . 50V) signals are used to transvascularily stimulate nerve sites, such as the vagal nerve across the IVC (inferior Vena Cava) or CS (Coronary Sinus) fatpads.
Accordingly, the embodiment shown in
An important aspect of the preferred embodiment is its capability to provide stimulation for two or more clinical purposes simultaneously. For example, the system can be configured to provide concurrent treatment for atrial fibrillation (Afib) and backup pacing to get the heart rate up in cases where the heart rate may fall below a predetermined rate. As another example, the system can be configured to provide concurrent atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The control for these functions would reside in the control unit 56 which would receive inputs from the sensor electrodes 50, while standard (2-5 Volt) stimulation output would be provided by either the stimulation signal generator 61 via the first set of output electrodes 57, or higher voltage (10-40 Volt) stimulation would be provided via the intensifier 58 the output electrodes 60.
Another embodiment of a stimulator 148, shown in
The stimulators 148 and 168 in
The output line 162 of the ventricular sensing amplifier and DZD 155 and the output line 164 of the atrial sensing amplifier and DZD 156 result from analysis by a derivative zero detector (DZD) shown in
These stimulators 148 and 168 have a capability to provide stimulation for two or more clinical purposes simultaneously. For example, the medical device 10 can be configured to provide concurrent treatment for atrial fibrillation and backup pacing to increase the heart rate in cases where the heart rate falls below a predetermined rate. As another example, the medical device 11 can be configured to provide concurrent atrial defibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
In the subsequent paragraphs, each of the modules of the stimulation system is described in detail.
Referring again to the embodiment in
The control unit 56 stores the operational parameters, which are either preprogrammed or received via the first wireless signal 55, for use in controlling operation of a stimulation signal generator 61 that applies tissue stimulating segmented voltages pulses across the sets of output electrodes 57, 60 and 65. Preferably, the control unit 56 comprises a conventional microcomputer 69 that has analog and digital input/output circuits and an internal memory that stores a software control program 64 and data gathered and used by that program.
The control unit 56 also receives signals from a plurality of sensor electrodes 50 that detect electrical activity of an organ in the patient. When that organ is the heart, the electrodes sense conventional electrocardiogram signals which are utilized to determine when a stimulation therapy should occur. Additional sensors for other physiological characteristics, such as temperature, blood pressure or blood flow, may be provided and connected to the control unit 56 via amplifiers, if needed. The control unit 56 stores a histogram of pacing data related to usage of the medical device 10 and other information which can be communicated via a second wireless signal 67 to a device external to the patient.
A novel ultra low resistance pacing lead circuit may be used in the present stimulation system. In
Upon activation of the stimulation system, the control unit 56 begins executing control program 64 that determines when and how to stimulate the patient's tissue. The control unit 56 receives signals form the from the sensor electrodes 50 that indicate the electrical activity of the heart or other body organ and analyzes those signals to detect irregular or abnormal activity. In response to detecting such activity, a command is sent to the stimulation signal generator 61 which causes that latter device to apply an electrical voltage pulse across the stimulation electrodes 57.
The waveform of that electrical voltage pulse, referred to as a composite pacing pulse, is illustrated in
The amplitude VS1 of the first segment 562 is at least three times greater than the amplitude VS2 of the second segment 564. The second segment 564 has a significantly longer duration TP2, e.g., at least three times the duration TP1 of the first segment 562. The integral of the first segment 562 is graphical depicted by area A1 under that segment of the pulse, and integral of the second segment 564 is depicted by area A2. Preferably, the integral of the first segment 562 is substantially equal to the integral of the second segment 564.
The amplitude VS1 of the first segment 562 of the composite pacing pulse is at least three times greater than the nominal amplitude VS0 of the conventional pulse CP in
It should be noted that in contemplated embodiments, the waveforms may be biphasic, triphasic, or multiphasic with pauses (zero amplitude sections) between the segments. An exemplary triphasic waveform is illustrated in
The height and width of the segments, or lobes, of the stimulation waveform can be set dynamically by the stimulator 23. With reference to
Occasionally the control unit 56 enters a configuration mode in which the duration of the segments of the pacing pulse are set. If the stimulator already has been configured, the control unit 56 repeatedly decreases the duration of the pacing pulse until capture does not occur, i.e., the pacing pulse does not produce a heart contraction. During this mode, the different lobes of the pacing pulse are decreased by the same proportion, however the width of each lobe could be varied independently. The pulse duration at with capture is lost is stored as the lower boundary of a duration window. Then, the control unit 56 repeatedly commands the application of pacing pulses that increases in duration until capture occurs. Typically, capture reoccurs at a pacing pulse having a longer duration that the pacing pulse at which capture was lost. The duration of the pulse when capture reoccurs is stored as the upper boundary of the duration window. Then the control unit 56 defines a duration setpoint as the average of the lower and upper boundaries of the duration window. Therefore, the present stimulator 23 maintains a constant stimulation voltage level, while compensating for physiological changes by adjusting the duration of the pacing pulse.
In some embodiments, the stimulated tissue may be cardiac muscle, or a nerve such as vagal nerve or a spinal nerve, bladder, brain, to name only a few. As mentioned earlier, in some embodiments, traditional devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators, pacemakers for vagal stimulation for atrial fibrillation therapy, and other types of pacers for bradycardia, resynchronization, vagal stimulation for central nervous system (CNS) conditions may benefit from the segmented composite stimulation waveforms.
Referring again to
There are a few considerations in a practical implementation of the sensing unit 63. First, there are DC considerations. Second, there is an internal reference consideration. The third one involves filtering considerations.
DC considerations: Referring to
The AC coupling capacitance 203 performs two functions. The first function is DC decoupling from the galvanic voltages 200 and 202, and the second function is to form a high pass filter with a corner frequency of FHP=½πRC, where R=Ra+Rb respectively resistances 205 and 206 and C is represented by capacitance 203.
The bias and offset currents are in the order of 10−9 to 10−8 A, and with path resistances of e.g. 100 kOhm, still yield 0.1 to 1.0 mV. Since source voltages are in order of 0.5-10 mV, these bias and offset voltages are not negligible. Therefore, in this invention, the amplifier specification selection should be such that these currents are low enough to allow for reasonably high input resistance values in the order of 100 kOhm or better for resistances 205 and 206 in
Appropriate selection of values for resistances (Ra and Rb) 205 and 206 yields an acceptable low bias current offset voltage component (Voffset=Ioffset×Ra, where Ra=Rb), and a proper FHP (high pass filter frequency). The traditional corner frequency range for FHP is in the order of 0.5 Hz to 2.0 Hz, but other values for capacitance 203 and resistances 205 and 206 can be selected depending on spectral regions of interest.
A natural feature that helps the implementation of the stimulator is the relatively low impedance of the patient tissues involved, typically 300 to 1200 Ohms between, for example, 5 mm spaced electrodes. Thus, in order to create a net 1.0 mV across such an impedance, energy density of 0.4 mW/m would be needed with the energy contained from 0-1 kHz.
Reference Considerations: In order to incorporate a floating AC coupled signal, such as shown in
Additional details for the internal reference are provided in
Filtering Considerations: Referring to
The details of this aspect of invention are disclosed in
Between the biological environment 400 and the instrumentation amplifier 407, three filters 401, 402/403, and 404 are provided to perform various functions. The first is a high pass filter 401 that essentially blocks DC and low frequencies up to a prespecified cut-off (e.g., 2.0 Hz). This high pass filter 401 consists of passive elements with capacitance and resistance, where resistance may be obtained by a combination of resistors, and source impedance in series. The second filter, formed by filtering component filters 402 and 403, suppresses common mode noise by providing a suitable low pass filter (LPF1). This filter consists of passive elements C and R and their symmetrical counter parts (LPF1′).
The third filter 404 rejects high frequency noise signals by using a low pass filter (LPF2) formed by passive elements capacitor and resistors in series. Broadband ambient electromagnetic (EM) noise from appliances and other equipment could swamp the input circuit and consume dynamic range, and thus needs to be filtered out. In one approach, a low pass filter LPF2 with a cut-off at 1.0 kHz frequency is selected since the EM noise is broad band, but its energy is rather low below 10 kHz and can be effectively filtered out.
Other Considerations: For ECG signals obtained by direct connection to the cardiac venous vessel wall or muscle tissue, the signal path between the two or more input electrodes should exclude any electromagnetic pickup loop, for example, by twisting the lead and or wire pairs. Therefore, symmetrical layouts are favored.
In summary, as noted above, absence of a traditional ground in the stimulator 23 is a significant departure from the prior implanted stimulation devices and has obviated the need for notch filtering and other kinds of signal degrading processes. Another aspect of the invention as already mentioned is passive filtering at the front end, before any active components. As a result, physiological signals are obtained without any degradation. Finally, if used with an implanted device with a metal exterior housing, the sensing electrodes would not be in a circuit with the housing as in prior devices of that type since the metal housing is in contact with patient's tissues. The electronics, such as the battery, transceiver, amplifier, detector, filters, signal generator and control circuits normally are all contained within the metal exterior housing. In the traditional implementation that electrically conductive housing forms a ground or signal reference by contact with the patient's body. This in itself is a source of unbalanced noise and greatly diminished the overall ability of the system to resolve signals from EMI noise, such as line (50 Hz, 60 Hz, 400 Hz) noise as is commonly found in home, office and aircraft or naval equipment. In general, this is resolved by having notch filters for these frequencies, at the expense of losing great physiological signal frequency detail, as the physiological signals are contained within those same frequency ranges. Even a sharp (60 dB/decade) 50 Hz filter, will still attentuate significantly at 25 Hz or 100 Hz, thus creating frequency distortion. As a result, conventional stimulation devices have difficulty separating EMI noise from fibrillation. The in this embodiment described, groundless signal conditioning does not have these issues and demonstrates accurate signal representation, allowing for improved accuracy and efficacy in pacing or stimulation treatment.
Signal Detector: With reference to
In a preferred embodiment, the signal detector comprises a signal transition detector followed by an event classifier algorithm contained within the program of the control unit 56. The derivative zero transition detector 655 as shown in
The signal detector can be implemented using a circuit using conventional operational amplifiers for frequencies less than 200 Hz. However, for higher frequencies, comparator operational amplifiers are preferred to provide a digital output signal with well defined slopes. The method is sensitive to the time delay value, which will separate the signals in time. There are a number of conditions to consider in choosing the time delay value. It should prevent setting off events from small random noise amplitudes. It could be set to exclude certain portions of the cardiac signal time sequence. For example, when a good QRS signal is detected, a larger delay can be chosen.
In
The output of the DZD 62 is a transformed signal which is discrete. It should be noted that this technique is immune to the variations in the input continuous signal unlike traditional methods. The discrete signal can be advantageously used for signal classification.
For example, the DZD 62 in conjunction with software executed by the control unit 56 determine the heart rate and use that information in an algorithm for pacing a patient's heart. The heart rate detection is based on the number of transitions counted over a predefined time interval. If the heart rate goes out of range for a given length of time and the frequency of the transitions remain in the non-fibrillation range, cardiac pacing can be initiated to pace the patient's heart. When the transition frequency indicates atrial fibrillation stimulation for atrial defibrillation can be initiated.
Referring to
For stimulation verification, the control unit 56 analyzes the sensed parameters to calculate the actual heart rate to determine whether the heart 13 is pacing at the desired rate in response to the stimulation. If the heart is pacing at the desired rate, the control unit can decrease the stimulation energy in steps until stimulation is no longer effective. The stimulation energy then is increased until the desired rate is achieved. Energy reduction can be accomplished at least in two ways: (1) preferably, the duty cycle is reduced to linearly decrease that amount of energy dissipated in the tissue, or (2) the voltage amplitude is reduced in situations where energy dissipation might vary non-linearly because the tissue/electrode interface is unknown.
The stimulation is controlled by a functionally closed feedback loop. When stimulation commences, the sensed signal waveform can show a physiological response confirming effectiveness of that stimulation pulse. By stepwise increasing the stimulation pulse duration (duty cycle), a threshold can be reached in successive steps. When the threshold is reached, an additional duration can be added to provide a level of insurance that all pacing will occur above the threshold, or it may be sufficient to hold the stimulation pulse duration at the threshold.
After each successful stimulation pulse, a determination is made regarding the difference in duration existing between the last non-effective pulse and the present effective pulse. That difference in duration is added to the present time. The medical device 10 then senses the effectiveness of subsequent stimulation pulses and remains at the same level for either an unlimited duration or backs off one step in pulse duration. When the effectiveness is maintained again after a preset time window, which could be a number of beats, minutes or hours, the system backs off one decrement at a time. As soon as the effectiveness of the stimulation pulses is lost, the system keeps incrementing the duration until an effective pulse is obtained. In summary, the sensing and stimulation is a closed loop system with two feedback responses: the first response is following an effective pulse and involves gradual reduction of duration after a predetermined number of beats or a predetermined time interval; and the second response is to an ineffective pulse and is immediate with pulse duration adjustment occurring within one beat.
Having described the complete stimulation system, an exemplary clinical application can now be described to illustrate the utility of the stimulation technique.
Vagal Stimulation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation with Backup Pacing:
Atrial fibrillation rate control is carried out by stimulation of the vagus nerve near the proximal coronary sinus (CS). The literature on atrial fibrillation has demonstrated that it is a clinical possibility, however existing pacing systems cannot realistically perform atrial fibrillation treatment because of the energy that would be required for such stimulation with a continuous 20 Hz, 20 volt waveform. Using the current stimulation system, an efficient digital waveform based stimulation protocol consuming less energy makes atrial fibrillation treatment practical with a conventional pacemaker battery or an external RF power source. Additionally, segmented waveforms in conjunction low impedance leads and the flying capacitor voltage intensifier enable the desired therapy to be achieved. In one embodiment, atrial fibrillation treatment can be achieved in a metal housing, or “can”, such as is used for a traditional pacemaker. The modules of the stimulator 23 described previously permit compact implementation of this novel therapeutic device, which can be implanted in a similar manner as a traditional pacemaker.
An apparatus for vagal stimulation to treat atrial fibrillation using energy efficient digital stimulation system comprises two or more electrodes that are programmably selectable, waveforms that are programmably selectable, and the technique optimized to avoid ventricular fibrillation. The stimulation apparatus further comprises a backup pacemaker to raise the heart rate if it falls below a predetermined threshold during atrial fibrillation treatment.
During a treatment procedure, stimulation electrodes are placed near the vagal nerve in the patient, wherein one or more electrodes from a plurality of electrodes is programmably selected for optimal vagal stimulation. The stimulation waveforms are programmed with respect to shape, duration and duty cycle for maximizing energy conservation and minimizing stimulation sensation to patient. The atrial fibrillation sensing and stimulation further involves sensing left atrium (LA) and left ventricle (LV) and detecting when LA rate is faster than LV rate. This detection may be done by the DZD detector.
Programmable parameter initiates vagal stimulation based on LV heart rate. By setting an upper heart rate limit, vagal stimulation is employed when the limit is exceeded. It should be noted that in patients with known chronic atrial fibrillation, an atrial electrode may not be necessary and just the ventricular rate sensing may be used. This is also the case in other supraventricular tachycardias as well.
Ensuring patient safety during vagal stimulation: Atrial fibrillation treatment is characterized by high voltage (110 . . . 40 Volts) pacing from proximal coronary sinus (CS) location at 20 to 200 Hz. During this stimulation care needs to be exercised to ascertain that the LV not being paced from the CS location. This feature is needed because high voltage rapid pacing (such as 20 Hz stimulation) of the ventricle may induce a rapid life threatening ventricular arrhythmia. It is, therefore, desirable to confirm prior to such stimulation of the vagal nerve that the electrode has not unintentionally moved where the ventricle might be stimulated.
Safety can be ensured by one or more ways including controlling the rate of stimulation and real-time analysis of results of stimulation. From the stimulation control approach, high voltage pacing at more modest heart rates that are unlikely to induce life threatening arrhythmias may be used to confirm that the ventricle is not being stimulated. In an analysis-based approach, comparing morphology of electrograms from distal CS (LV) before and during pacing and noting that the morphology would not change if LV is not being paced. Further the heart rate detected from the LV would not be the same as the paced rate. A preferred method may utilize both stimulation and analysis approaches, wherein the heart is paced at rates near the ventricular rate prior to the vagal stimulation, and a comparison of the electrocardiogram before and after such pacing is performed. The comparison results would show no change in morphology electrogram if the ventricle is not being stimulated. Moreover, if pacing is performed at a rate moderately faster than the heart rate prior to vagal stimulation, the heart rate would not change if there was no stimulation or “capture” of the ventricular muscle.
Backup Left Ventricle pacing for vagal stimulation treatment: Backup left ventricle pacing is performed if heart rate becomes too slow due to excessive vagal stimulation. In order to protect the patient if the heart rate is excessively slowed (bradycardia) beyond a desired rate, for example 60 beats/min, demand pacing (pacing which occurs when a predetermined time interval passes without electrical activity) would occur and continue until the intrinsic heart rate exceeds a predefined lower limit rate. Note that the afore mentioned vagal stimulation with LV bradycardia pacing as a backup also may be used to reduce or obviate the need for medication.
As the previously, a high efficiency digital stimulation device enables a number of functionalities that improves upon existing techniques. By way of examples, one embodiment of such applications involves a bradycardia pacing treatment from an implanted stimulator 23. In this application, the high efficiency system provides extended battery life with fewer battery changes thereby resulting in less frequent surgeries. In another embodiment of clinical applications, a high efficiency device can improve the battery utilization since resynclronization pacing for congestive heart failure requires pacing devices to be used continuously. In addition, demand for power is higher for this application when compared to traditional bradycardia pacing since more sites need to be stimulated including both ventricles as well as the atrium. Again referring back to atrial fibrillation treatment, high efficiency may permit therapies now limited because of the relative inefficiency of prior art. As yet another example, in an intravascular stimulation system a higher efficiency permits longer times between recharging cycles and smaller intravascular storage components
In addition to the energy efficiency, robust sensing provides further advantages beyond the systems described herein. For example, in bradycardia pacing, robust sensing translates into less inhibition due to inappropriate tracking resultant from internal and external electromagnetic interference. In another example, for implantable cardioverter defibrillators, a robust sensing module may reduce the risk of inappropriate shock therapy resultant from EM interference or internal noise such as those that occur from lead fractures and defective header connections.
The foregoing description was primarily directed to a preferred embodiment of the invention. Although some attention was given to various alternatives within the scope of the invention, it is anticipated that one skilled in the art will likely realize additional alternatives that are now apparent from disclosure of embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined from the following claims and not limited by the above disclosure.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/915,981 filed May 4, 2007.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60915981 | May 2007 | US |