One attribute of normal knee flexion is that, as the knee flexes, the contact points of the femur on the tibia move posteriorly. This posterior movement of the contact points is known as rollback. Also, normal knee rollback is much more pronounced on the lateral side of the knee than the medial side, which results in femoral external rotation during knee flexion. Rollback is facilitated by the natural posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). With prosthetic knees, as the knee flexes, the PCL causes a femoral implant of a prosthesis and femur to move in a posterior direction.
Other prosthetic knees currently on the market do not use two separate fully guided motion paths, and as a consequence may not reproduce normal knee kinematics and need to use wear components made of polyethylene, or similar material, to accommodate the less-guided sliding that occurs during knee flexion. These existing methods and procedures may not be as effective as desired. There is a need to have a tibial insert of a prosthetic knee roll back on a medial pivot axis causing greater rollback on the lateral side than the medial side, like a normal, non-prosthetic knee.
Various embodiments of the present device will now be discussed with reference to the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the device and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. It is further understood that individual characteristics of the various embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments without departing from the scope of the device.
The application relates to systems and methods used in orthopaedic surgery, and in particular, to total knee arthroplasty. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the systems and methods described herein may be readily adapted for any total joint arthroplasty procedure. Those of skill in the art will also recognize that the following description is merely illustrative of the principles of the device, which may be applied in various ways to provide many different alternative embodiments. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the principles of this device and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts in the appended claims.
Referring to
Referring to
For any of the parts of the prosthetic knee any biocompatible material may be used, including but not limited to stainless steels, titanium and its alloys, cobalt-chrome and its alloys, ceramics, composite materials, and polymers.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The tibial insert 16 can be comprised of many biocompatible materials. Polymers may be preferred but metals and ceramics may also be used.
Referring to
Referring to
The bone-facing side 70 may have a bone-facing surface 66 which may comprise a porous material to encourage bone in-growth. A gap 68 may extend between the condyles 58, 59 from the posterior end 62 and may be a fixed height, but the condyles 58, 59 may be of various widths, sizes and curvatures depending on the specific anatomy of the patient or tibial insert 16. The surface curvature of the condyles 58, 59 may also vary to match the curvature of the specific tibial insert 16 chosen for the patient's mobility requirements.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The cam post core 18 may be made of cobalt-chrome or its alloys, titanium or its alloys, stainless steel or any other biocompatible metal, ceramic or polymer or a combination of the preceding. The outer sleeve 20 may be preferably made of polymer; however, it may also be comprised of many other biocompatible materials including ceramics and metals and combinations thereof. In addition the cam post core 18 and the sleeve 20 may be one piece instead of two pieces.
Referring back to
The femoral implant 12 is secured to the resected femur 1. The cam post is then positioned within the opening 74 of the femoral implant 12 engaging the cam feature 64 during knee flexion. The cam feature 64 provides rollback and femoral external rotation during knee flexion. The cam post 19 after engaging the cam feature 64 allows two fully guided rotational axes and provides anterior and posterior stabilization features. The cam post 19 engages the cam feature 64 resisting posterior tibial translation. The cam post 19 also engages the tibial insert channel 26 to restrict anterior displacement of the tibial insert 16 and the tibia as well.
One fully guided rotational axis is between the femoral implant 12 and the tibial insert 16 by engagement of the condyles 58, 59 with the articulating surfaces 46, 47. A second fully guided rotational axis is between the tibial insert 16 and the tibial baseplate 14 by aligning the tibial baseplate facing side 54 with the flat superior surface 28 of the tibial baseplate 14. The second rotational axis is accomplished by the positioning of the boss 24 within the cavity 22. The first and second rotational axes closely match the motion of the natural knee and are suitable for hard-on-hard bearing contact surfaces, such as the use of cobalt-chrome, ceramic, composite or other hard materials for the femoral implant 12, tibial insert 16 and tibial baseplate 14, which may lead to longer durability of the prosthetic knee. The potential advantage of using exclusively hard materials is that polyethylene debris can be eliminated and wear particle generation can be reduced, reducing the chance of osteolysis and implant loosening. However, to be able to use exclusively hard materials requires a fully guided motion conforming mobile bearing design—meaning a design in which relative motion between any two parts occurs along only one path.
Cobalt-chrome and its alloys are not the only hard-on-hard material that may be used, other examples include, but are not limited to, stainless-steel, titanium and its alloys, titanium carbide, titanium nitride, ion-implantation of titanium, diffusion hardened metals, diamond like coatings, diamond-like carbon, zirconium nitride, niobium, oxinium or oxidized zirconium, ceramics such as alumina and zirconia, and many other biocompatible materials and coatings.
Another advantage of the features recited herein is that this design provides knee motion during flexion closer to the natural knee. Two other benefits of these novel features is that (1) the cam post 19 can provide both anterior and posterior rotational stops for the tibial insert 16, and (2) the cam post 19 can independently provide anterior and posterior translation stops for the femoral implant 12. These benefits of the design contribute to the overall stability of the prosthetic knee, eliminate the risk of bearing spin out, and limit anterior tibial translation which is provided by the anterior cruciate ligament in the normal knee.
In alternative embodiments, the various components shown and described herein may have different sizes, configurations (such as size of the keel, shape and size of the cam post, the width of tibial insert, and the like) material properties, and other variations to adapt them to variations in patient anatomy. If desired, multiple versions of each of the femoral implant, tibial baseplate, and tibial insert components may be provided together in a single kit to enable a surgeon to interoperatively select the best set of components for a patient.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The cam post 118 decreases in width from the inferior end 154 to the superior end 152. Between the superior end 152 and the inferior end 154 is a groove 150 passing from a medial to lateral direction on the posterior side of the cam post 118. The groove 150 is shaped to engage the cam feature 120 of the femoral implant 112 during flexion of the prosthesis 110. An anterior side of the cam post 118 may sloop gradually from the superior end 152. The gradual sloop may allow for easier flexion and extension of the prosthesis when the cam post 118 is engaged with the cam feature.
The interaction of each the components may be similar to the previous embodiment with differences in structure only (refer to
Referring to
The components are substantially similar to the previous embodiments. The tibial insert has a tibial insert channel 215 (similar to those channels 26 and 130 in the two previous embodiments) and a boss 217 (similar to those bosses 24 and 132 of the previous embodiments). However, referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
One method that may be used in placing the prosthesis 10 (any of the embodiments will be similar) is to attach the femoral implant 12 and tibial baseplate 14 first to the resected femur 1 and tibia 2 respectively. The order in which either of these is done is left to the preference of the surgeon. After each of the femoral implant 12 and tibial baseplate 14 is secured a trial tibial insert (not shown) with an attached trial cam post (not shown) is positioned on the tibial baseplate to determine the correct size of post and tibial insert to provide for the patients anatomy. The trial cam post is not rigidly connected to the trial insert and can move within the trial tibial insert channel. The trial tibial insert and cam post are removed and the tibial insert 16 is attached to the tibial baseplate 14 through use of the tibial insert boss 24 and the tibial baseplate cavity 22. The knee is then placed in deep flexion to allow the cam post 19 to be passed through the tibial insert channel 26 and secured to the tibial baseplate 14 in the tibial baseplate hole 30. The knee is then extended to position the cam post 19 in the femoral implant opening 74.
While this method is specifically recited herein, other methods may also be performed such as first attaching the cam post 19 to the tibial baseplate 14 and then passing the tibial insert 16 over the cam post 19. The tibial insert 16 may then be secured to the tibial baseplate 14 and the knee extended to engage the cam post 19 with the femoral implant opening 74.
Referring to
Similarly as was previously described, the tibial baseplate 14 may comprise a tibial baseplate notch 40 positioned along a posterior side 44, of the periphery 38. The tibial baseplate notch 40 may allow room for retention of the PCL or another ligament posterior to the tibial baseplate 14.
Referring to
Referring to
Similar to the tibial inserts already disclosed herein this tibial insert also comprises a tibial baseplate facing side 454 and a tibial insert boss 424 extending inferiorly, and positioned toward the medial side of the tibial insert 416. The tibial insert boss 424 may rotationally mate with the cavity 22 of the tibial baseplate 14. In this, and other embodiments, the axis of rotation of the tibial insert 416 is located in the first articulating surface 446. A tibial insert channel 426 may pass through a geometric center of the tibial insert 416. The tibial insert channel may pass at least partially through the tibial insert 416 and may pass entirely there through. The tibial insert channel 426 may be arc-like shaped and may be centrally located extending from the tibial baseplate facing side 454 and is shaped to slidably fit over the post 419. The post 419 provides stops for the rotation of the tibial insert 416 as it rotates about the rotational axis 23. The tibial insert 416 is preferentially made of either a cobalt-chromium alloy or polyethylene; however any other metal, polymer, ceramic, or composite, or combination may also be used.
Rollback is facilitated by the natural PCL. With the current prosthesis 410, as the knee flexes, the PCL causes the femoral implant 412 and the femur 1 to move in a posterior direction. Because of the conforming contact between the condyles 58, 59 and the articulating surfaces 446, 447 on the tibial insert 416, the tibial insert 416 also rotates in a posterior direction. This produces a knee motion very similar to the motion observed in the normal knee.
Referring to
Referring to
Another possible insertion method of the post 519 into the tibial insert 516 is that the feature 521 may not deflect and the tibial insert 516 is turned at an angle to allow passage of the post 519 and feature 521 without engaging the slot 525. After the post enters the tibial insert channel 526 the tibial insert 516 may be rotated into alignment with the tibial baseplate 14 wherein the feature 521 engages the slot 525. In either of the two aforementioned embodiments, the feature may alternately engage the tibial insert 516 on the superior facing surface of the tibial insert 516 between the articulating surfaces 446, 447 instead of engaging a defined slot.
Within the tibial insert channel 526 lies the at least one slot 525 for receiving the snap feature 521. The slot 525 may extend into the body of the tibial insert 516 in a medial or lateral direction, complimentary to the feature 521 to provide a capture for the feature 521 extending from the post 519. The slot may be elongated in a posterior-anterior orientation within the tibial insert channel 526 to allow the post to slidably engage the tibial insert channel 526 to allow some arc-like rotation of the tibial insert 516 during rotation of the tibial insert 516 about the axis of rotation 23; the post 519 providing a stop for the rotation of the tibial insert 516.
The feature 521 may be reversibly engaged to the tibial insert 516 as well and the tibial insert 516 can be disengaged from the tibial baseplate 14 if necessary. To remove the tibial insert 516 from the tibial baseplate 14 a user may pull on the tibial insert 516 to overcome the feature 521, or a removal tool may be inserted in the tibial insert channel 526 in the top of the tibial insert 516 to facilitate removal of the tibial insert 516 alone or removal of the post 519 along with the tibial insert 516. If removal of the post 519 is necessary, similar to the previous embodiment of the post 419, a threaded removal tool may be screwed into the post bore 417. The taper 478 may work as an anti-rotation feature on the post 519, with a complimentary feature on the tibial baseplate 14, to aid in removal.
One other embodiment may include how the feature 521 interacts with the slot 525. The slot 525 may instead include projections which extend into the tibial insert channel 526 and the feature 521 on the post 519 may comprise grooves that interact with the projections in a similar manner as previously described but simply reversed.
One alternate embodiment of each of the aforementioned embodiments is that posts 419 and 519 may also be integrated into the body of the tibial baseplate thus making the post 419, 519 and tibial baseplate 14 one component instead of two components.
One potential advantage of all the embodiments of the above described embodiments is the use of exclusively hard materials such that wear particle generation can be reduced, reducing the chance of implant loosening. However, to be able to use exclusively hard materials requires a fully guided design—meaning a design in which relative motion between any two parts occurs along only one path which is provided in this disclosure. This is achieved with what is disclosed herein by creating two independent motion paths, in each of which motion occurs about only one axis. The first motion path is along the condylar axis 413 between the femoral implant 412 and the tibial insert 416; the second is along the rotation axis 23 in the cavity 22 of the tibial baseplate 14 as the cavity 23 interacts with the tibial insert boss 424.
Many alternative embodiments and variations exist and can be used in different combinations. One alternate embodiment is to vary the shapes of the contact surfaces, the articulating surfaces and the condyles, between the femoral implant 412 and the tibial insert 416, and/or the shapes of the contact surfaces, the superior surface and the tibial baseplate facing side, between the tibial insert 416 and the tibial baseplate 14. One alteration may be to apply a posterior slope to one or more of these surfaces, either over the entire surface or a portion. If a slope is applied to a portion of one of these surfaces, it is expected that sloping the lateral portion will be more effective in assisting natural knee motion. These sloping surfaces can be planar, curved, helical, or another shape. The methods previously described may be used with the embodiments described and illustrated in
Other embodiments of this device would include the use of different materials and/or coatings. In addition to the materials of the those embodiments disclosed herein—cobalt chrome alloys and polyethylene—materials such as titanium and titanium alloys, nitinol, stainless steel, PEEK, and other metals, polymers or composites could be used, in any combination, in any of the embodiments of this device. Also, surface treatments to improve the wear and friction properties of wear surfaces may be added. One example of this type of surface treatment is titanium nitride; other coatings could have the same beneficial effect. Surface treatments to encourage bony attachment such as porous coatings, hydroxyapatite, and TCP may also be included in any of the aforementioned embodiments. Furthermore, surface treatments or additives in one or more of the materials used in this device could be used to provide beneficial effects such as anti-microbial, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, or other therapeutic properties.
The present device may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. It is appreciated that various features of the above described examples and embodiments may be mixed and matched to form a variety of other combinations and alternatives; for example, using the cam post 19 with the tibial insert 116 or using tibial insert 516 with post 419. It is also appreciated that this system should not be limited simply to total knee prosthesis. As such, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the device is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/606,326 filed 27 Oct. 2009, and is entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MOBILE BEARING PROSTHETIC KNEE, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, which claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/233,081, and is entitled MOBILE BEARING PROSTHETIC KNEE, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/255,566 filed 28 Oct. 2009, and is entitled CRUCIATE RETAINING MOBILE BEARING PROSTHETIC KNEE, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1372918 | Udgaard | Mar 1921 | A |
4211228 | Cloutier | Jul 1980 | A |
4213209 | Insall | Jul 1980 | A |
4224697 | Murray | Sep 1980 | A |
4634444 | Noiles | Jan 1987 | A |
4714472 | Khowaylo | Dec 1987 | A |
4936853 | Fabian et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5047058 | Roberts | Sep 1991 | A |
5071438 | Jones | Dec 1991 | A |
5071738 | Mizikura | Dec 1991 | A |
5330533 | Walker | Jul 1994 | A |
5330534 | Herrington | Jul 1994 | A |
5370701 | Finn | Dec 1994 | A |
5387240 | Pottenger | Feb 1995 | A |
5413604 | Hodge | May 1995 | A |
5480446 | Goodfellow | Jan 1996 | A |
5658342 | Draganich | Aug 1997 | A |
5702464 | Lackey et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5755801 | Walker | May 1998 | A |
5755804 | Schmotzer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5824102 | Buscayret | Oct 1998 | A |
5879392 | McMinn | Mar 1999 | A |
5879394 | Ashby | Mar 1999 | A |
5906643 | Walker | May 1999 | A |
5928286 | Ashby | Jul 1999 | A |
5976147 | LaSalle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013103 | Kaufman | Jan 2000 | A |
6039764 | Pottenger | Mar 2000 | A |
6080195 | Colleran | Jun 2000 | A |
6099570 | Livet et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6159216 | Burkinshaw et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165223 | Cox | Dec 2000 | A |
6203576 | Afriat | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214052 | Burkinshaw | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6296666 | Gardner | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6387111 | Barber | May 2002 | B1 |
6413279 | Cox | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428577 | Evans | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6558427 | Leclercq | May 2003 | B2 |
6592588 | Bobic | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620168 | Lombardo et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629999 | Serafin, Jr. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645215 | McGovern et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6764516 | Pappas | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773461 | Meyers et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797005 | Pappas | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6972039 | Metzger | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974481 | Carson | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6986791 | Metzger | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7001394 | Gundlapalli | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7105027 | Lipman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7232465 | Keller | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7328634 | Greenberg et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7422605 | Burstein et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7572292 | Crabtree | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7658767 | Wyss | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7691150 | Cronin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8137407 | Todd et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010003803 | Leclercq | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20030009229 | Pappas | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009232 | Hoeppner | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030153980 | Brack | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030199985 | Masini | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040097951 | Steffensmeier | May 2004 | A1 |
20040243244 | Ries | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021039 | Cusick et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050149045 | Elliott | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050203528 | Couture et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209701 | Kuramoto | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209702 | Todd | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060064104 | Kana et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060149276 | Grimm | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161259 | Huang | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184176 | Straszheim-Morley et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190086 | Clemow | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070100462 | Lang | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100463 | Aram | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129808 | Justin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135925 | Walker | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135926 | Walker | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173848 | Lennox et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173856 | Parker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080009950 | Richardson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021566 | Peters | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027555 | Hawkins | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080097616 | Meyers | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114464 | Barnett | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119940 | Otto | May 2008 | A1 |
20080188943 | Smith | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195109 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243259 | Lee | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300690 | Burstein | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090043395 | Takano | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043396 | Komistek | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088861 | Tuke | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090090220 | Kimberly | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090149964 | May | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090210066 | Jasty | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090299482 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326665 | Gomaa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326666 | Bennett | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326668 | Dun | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010635 | Straszheim-Morley et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016978 | Gomaa | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016979 | Gomaa | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042224 | Garino | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049200 | Re | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100312351 | Belcher | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202010000037 | Mar 2010 | DE |
1378216 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2008062030 | Mar 2008 | JP |
WO9525484 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO9603097 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO9613233 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9846171 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO0113825 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0182842 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0234156 | May 2002 | WO |
03059203 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO2006118822 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2008045863 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO2011059759 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dennis; Douglas A., et al. A Multicenter Analysis of Axial Femorotibial Rotation after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 428, pp. 180-189 (2004). |
Dennis; Douglas A. et al: Factors Affecting Flexion After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, No. 464, pp. 53-60 (2007). |
Argenson; Jean-Noel A.: In Vivo Kinematic Evaluation and Design Considerations Related to High Flexion in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Biomechanics 38 (2005) pp. 227.284. |
Halloran; Jason P. et al.: Explicit Finite Element Modeling of Total Knee Replacement Mechanics, Journal of Biomechanics 38 (2005) pp. 323-331. |
Morra; Edward A., et al.: The Influence of Contemporary Knee Design on High Flexion II: A Kinematic Comparison with the Normal Knee. Orthopaedic Research Laboratories Cleveland, Ohio, (2009). |
Greenwald; Seth A., et al.: Mobile-Bearing Knee Systems: Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Wear and Design Issues. AAOS Instructional Course Lectures, vol. 54 (2005) pp. 195-205. |
Vertullo; Christopher J., et al.: Mobile Bearing in Primary Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 9, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001 pp. 335-364. |
Morra, Edward A., et al.: Polymer Insert Stress in Total Knee Designs During High Flexion Activities. A Finite Element Study, Orthopaedic Research Laboratories (2005) AAOS. |
Catani, Fabio, et al.: In Vivo Kinematics of Guided Motion Total Knee Arthroplasty. Smith & Nephew, Poster # 1987 at the 2008 ORS Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. |
Smith & Nephew: Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Knee System Journey Knee (2006) www.journeyknee.com. |
Biomet AGC Total Knee System: Product Brochure May (2009) http://www.biomet.com. |
Biomet Europe: ALPINA APR Total Knee Prosthesis (2007) http://www.biomet.co.uk/index.php?id=17313. |
Biomet Europe: Oxford TMK (2007) http://www.biomet.co.uk/index.php?id=185&PHPSESSID=3b5253f8b4. |
Biomet Europe: Vanguard Complete Knee System. Product Brochure (May 2009) http://www.biomet.co.uk. |
Consensus Orthopedics: Mobile Bearing Knee. Product Brochure (2009) www.consensusortho.com. |
Corin Group: Total Knee Replacement. Product Brochure (Jan. 20, 2011) http://www.coringroup.com/medical—professionals/products/knees/. |
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc: Finsbury; Dual Bearing Knee (DBK) (2010) (http://www.finsbury.org/printer—friendly—version.asp?contentID=50. |
DePuy: LCS Complete Knee System. (2011) pp. 1-2 http://www.depuy.com/healthcare-professionals/product-details/lcs-complete-knee-system. |
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc: Sigma Rotating Platform Knee System. © 2008-2009 DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Product Brochure. (May 2009) http://www.depuy.com/healthcare-professionals/product-details. |
Akagi; Masao: A Mechanical Comparison of 2 Posterior-Stabilizing Designs; Insall/Burstein 2 Knee and Bisurface Knee. The Journal of Arthroplasty vol. 17 No. 5 pp. 627-634 (2002). |
Smith & Nephew: Journey Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Knee System. Product Brochure May 2009. |
Sonstegard; DA: The Spherocentric Knee: Biomechanical Testing and Clinical Trial. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (1977) vol. 59 pp. 602-616 Website: www.jbjs.org. |
Stryker Orthopaedics: Scorpio NRG (The Evolution of a High Performance Knee System) Product Brochure (2007) Website: www.stryker.com. |
Wright Medical: Advance Knee System. Family Product Brochure (2006) Website: www.wmt.com |
Zimmer: Comprehensive Natural-Knee Family. (2006) Website: http://www.zimmer.co.uk/z/ctl/op/global/action/1/id/7802/template/MP. |
Zimmer: Gender Solutions Natural-Knee Flex System. Product Brochure (2007) Website: www.zimmer.com. |
Zimmer: The Comprehensive Natural-Knee Family (2007) Website: http://www.zimmer.co.uk/z/ctl/op/global/action/1/id/7802/template/MP |
Zimmer: NexGen Complete Knee Solutions. Product Brochure: #97-5972-205 (2000-2001). |
Zimmer: NexGen LPS-Flex Mobile and LPS-Mobile Bearing Knee. Advertisement (2008) #97-5964-017-00. |
Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,073. |
Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,073. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 26, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,073. |
Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 20, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/951,832. |
Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/951,832. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 12, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/951,832. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 1, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,326. |
Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,326. |
Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 7, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,103. |
Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,103. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,103. |
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,103. |
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 9, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,153. |
Office Action dated May 22, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,153. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 22, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,153. |
Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 20, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,153. |
Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,699. |
Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,699. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,699. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 29, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,699. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 21, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2011/045019. |
Written Opinion dated Oct. 21, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2011/045019. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 21, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2011/045019. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 14, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2012/036289. |
Written Opinion dated Feb. 14, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2012/036289. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 14, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2012/036289. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2010/054534. |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 2, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2010/054534. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 1, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2010/054534. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 18, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2010/057231. |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2010/057231. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 22, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2010/057231. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 22, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2010/057642. |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 22, 2011 in Application No. PCT/US2010/057642. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 30, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2010/057642. |
Walker; Peter s.: Biomechanical Principles of Total Knee Replacement Design. Basic Orthpaedic Biomechanics 2nd edition, 1997, pp. 1-493. |
Pria; P. Dalla, et al.: Ceramic Knee Design 11th Symposium Session 4.3, 2006, pp. 115-124. |
Orthopedics, Feature Article; Sep. 2006 vol. 29, No. 9 Supplement, pp. S17-S22. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,326. |
Banks; Scott, et al.: Knee Motions During Maximum Flexion in Fixed and Mobile-Bearing Arthroplasti;cs. Clinical Orthopeadics and Related Research No. 410, 2003, pp. 131-138. |
Exam Report dated Dec. 3, 2014 in European Application No. 11738916.3. |
Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,326. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 27, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,326. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110270403 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61233081 | Aug 2009 | US | |
61255566 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12606326 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 12914799 | US |