Patent Grant
8543218
The present application is generally related to adapting the electrical contacts within the header of a pulse generator to mitigate or limit current induced in an MRI environment.
Neurostimulation systems are devices that generate electrical pulses and deliver the pulses to nerve tissue to treat a variety of disorders. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an example of neurostimulation in which electrical pulses are delivered to nerve tissue in the spine for the purpose of chronic pain control. While a precise understanding of the interaction between the applied electrical energy and the nervous tissue is not fully appreciated, it is known that application of an electrical field to spinal nervous tissue can effectively mask certain types of pain transmitted from regions of the body associated with the stimulated nerve tissue. Specifically, applying electrical energy to the spinal cord associated with regions of the body afflicted with chronic pain can induce “paresthesia” (a subjective sensation of numbness or tingling) in the afflicted bodily regions. Thereby, paresthesia can effectively mask the transmission of non-acute pain sensations to the brain.
Neurostimulation systems generally include a pulse generator and one or more leads. The pulse generator is typically implemented using a metallic housing that encloses circuitry for generating the electrical pulses. The pulse generator is usually implanted within a subcutaneous pocket created under the skin by a physician. The leads are used to conduct the electrical pulses from the implant site of the pulse generator to the targeted nerve tissue. The leads typically include a lead body of an insulative polymer material with embedded wire conductors extending through the lead body. Electrodes on a distal end of the lead body are coupled to the conductors to deliver the electrical pulses to the nerve tissue.
There are concerns related to the compatibility of neurostimulation systems with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI generates cross-sectional images of the human body by using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The MRI process begins with positioning the patient in a strong, uniform magnetic field. The uniform magnetic field polarizes the nuclear magnetic moments of atomic nuclei by forcing their spins into one of two possible orientations. Then an appropriately polarized pulsed RF field, applied at a resonant frequency, forces spin transitions between the two orientations. Energy is imparted into the nuclei during the spin transitions. The imparted energy is radiated from the nuclei as the nuclei “relax” to their previous magnetic state. The radiated energy is received by a receiving coil and processed to determine the characteristics of the tissue from which the radiated energy originated to generate the intra-body images.
Neurostimulation systems are designated as being contraindicated for MRI, because the time-varying magnetic RF field causes the induction of current which, in turn, can cause significant heating of patient tissue due to the presence of metal in various system components. The induced current can be “eddy current” and/or current caused by the “antenna effect.”
“Eddy current” refers to current caused by the change in magnetic flux due to the time-varying RF magnetic field across an area bounding conductive material (i.e., patient tissue). As shown in a simplified form in
Also, the “antenna effect” can cause current to be induced which can result in undesired heating of tissue. Specifically, depending upon the length of the stimulation lead and its orientation relative to the time-varying magnetic RF field, the wire conductors of the stimulation lead can each function as an antenna and a resonant standing wave can be developed in each wire. A relatively large potential difference can result from the standing wave thereby causing relatively high current density and, hence, heating of tissue adjacent to the electrodes of the stimulation lead.
A number of proposals have been published that attempt to mitigate MRI induced current in a stimulation system. For example, it has been proposed to couple each wire conductor of a stimulation lead to an inductor. The frequency-dependent characteristic of the inductor tends to limit the higher frequency MRI currents. The typical approach to implement the inductor involves wrapping a wire multiple times around the stimulation lead. Additionally, the lead can be specifically adapted to accommodate the wire windings for the inductor. For example, “bobbin” structures can be placed over the stimulation lead to accommodate the wire windings.
In one embodiment, a pulse generator for generating electrical stimulation for delivery to a patient, comprises: a hermetically sealed housing containing pulse generating circuitry; a header coupled to the housing for receiving one or more stimulation leads, wherein feedthrough wires are provided to conduct electrical pulses from the pulse generating circuitry to the header; the header comprising a plurality of connectors for electrically connecting to each terminal of the one or more stimulation leads, wherein an inductive winding is disposed around or adjacent to each of the connector structures and is electrically connected between the respective connector structure and a corresponding feedthrough wire to limit MRI induced heating of a respective electrode of the one or more stimulation leads.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly certain features and/or technical advantages in order that the detailed description that follows may be better understood. Additional features and/or advantages will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The novel features, both as to organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the appended claims.
Stimulation leads are typically connected to a pulse generator through a “header” that contains various connector structures. The connector structures are contained within a suitable housing of epoxy and/or various polymers. The connector structures mechanically and electrically typically couple to the terminals of the stimulation lead(s). Also, the connector structures are electrically connected to feedthrough wires. The feedthrough wires extend into the hermetically sealed metallic housing that contains the pulse generating circuitry. The term “header” is used in the art, because the header is usually disposed on an upper surface of the metallic housing (although the header can be disposed anywhere on the device as long as it is reasonably accessible).
Other designs for electrical contacts for use in the header of a pulse generator are known. For example,
The multiple windings of wire 401 about ring 410 provide inductance that is utilized to suppress MRI induced current. Specifically, the inductance of the winding provides an impedance that limits the current that can be passed from the “can” of the pulse generator through the feedthrough wires to the electrodes of the stimulation lead. The number of turns of the wire 401 and the material for wire 401 can be selected to achieve an impedance at stimulation frequencies (e.g., below 5000 Hz) that is relatively low and provides significant attenuation at MRI frequencies (e.g., 64 MHz).
The inductance of the winding is related the value of μ0N2A/L, where μ is the electrical permeability of free space, N is the number of turns of the winding, A is the cross section area bounded by the windings, and L is the length of windings. The actual inductance will vary from the calculated value to some degree due to the inclusion of conductive material within ring of the connector upon which windings of wire 401 are wrapped. The actual inductance of a winding of wire 401 about a connector can be readily measured utilizing suitable electronic equipment (e.g., a vector network analyzer). Also, to the extent sufficient attentuation of MRI is achieved, it is preferred to minimize the length of the winding of wire 401, because the resistance of the wire 401 is related to its length.
There are a number of advantages to disposing wire windings in the header of a pulse generator rather than within or on the lead itself. One particular advantage is the diameter of the winding is not unduly limited by the diameter of the stimulation lead. Specifically, stimulation leads usually possess relatively minimal outside diameters to facilitate their implantation within a patient. Accordingly, windings applied to the lead are somewhat cumbersome to produce. Also, the use of “bobbins” or other structures on stimulation leads to facilitate the winding process increases the outside diameter and generally prevents an isodiametric profile for the lead. Additionally, the use of the wire windings in the header of a pulse generator reduces the number of windings necessary to achieve the same amount of inductance as would be required for a smaller diameter. Also, lower stray capacitance is achieved.
In an alternative embodiment as shown in
The pulse generation circuitry (not shown) within metallic housing 510 can be any suitable pulse generation circuitry now known or later developed. The pulse generating circuitry can be voltage or current pulse generating circuitry. Also, the pulse generating circuitry can include one pulse source or multiple pulse sources that independently produce output pulses. An examples of pulse generating circuitry may be found in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20060170486, entitled “Pulse generator having an efficient fractional voltage converter and method of use,” which is incorporated herein by reference (now abandoned). Also, the pulse generator can be adapted for any particular medical application such as for spinal cord stimulation, peripheral nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, cortical stimulation, cardiac pacing or defibrillation, etc. Lead 701 can be any suitable stimulation lead that is capable of being received within a header of a stimulation system either now existing or later developed. Lead 701 can be a percutaneous lead or a paddle-style lead. Suitable commercially available leads include Axxess® and Lamitrode® leads available from Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. of Plano, Tex.
In another alternative embodiment, header 500 can be disposed within lead extension connector 801 that is utilized to electrically couple two leads 701 as shown in
Although representative embodiments and advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure that processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/540,361, filed Jul. 2, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,315,715, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/356,147, filed Jan. 23, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,214,055, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/109,866, filed Apr. 25, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,103,347, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/913,908, filed Apr. 25, 2007.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5217010 | Tsitlik et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 6985775 | Reinke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7174219 | Wahlstrand et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7363090 | Halperin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7853324 | Stevenson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 8103347 | Erickson | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8214055 | Erickson | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 20030083726 | Zeijlemaker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144716 | Reinke et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144720 | Villaseca et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20050027340 | Schrom et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222656 | Wahlstrand et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222657 | Wahlstrand et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222658 | Hoegh et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222659 | Olsen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060229693 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247747 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247748 | Wahlstrand et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070088416 | Atalar et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112398 | Stevenson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185556 | Williams et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208383 | Williams | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299490 | Yang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009905 | Zeijlemaker | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033497 | Bulkes et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080116997 | Dabney et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080119919 | Atalar et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243218 | Bottomley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262584 | Bottomley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090171421 | Atalar et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Bhachu, Dewinder S., et al., “Implantable Pulse Generators (Pacemakers) and Electrodes: Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner Environment,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 12:201-204 (2000). |
| Buchli R., et al., “Heating Effects of Metallic Implants by MRI Examinations,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 7, 255-261 (1988). |
| Finelli, Daniel, et al.“MR Imaging-Related Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes: In Vitro Study,” Am. J. Neuroradiol, 23:1795-1802, Nov./Dec. 2002. |
| Ho, Henry S., “Safety of Metallic Implants in Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 14: 472-477 (2001). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130116753 A1 | May 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60913908 | Apr 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13540361 | Jul 2012 | US |
| Child | 13663145 | US | |
| Parent | 13356147 | Jan 2012 | US |
| Child | 13540361 | US | |
| Parent | 12109866 | Apr 2008 | US |
| Child | 13356147 | US |
