This application relates to implant packages and more particularly to an implantable sensor enclosure with thin sidewalls.
Implantable wireless sensors are useful in assisting diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. Examples of wireless sensor readers are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/737,306 entitled Wireless Sensor Reader, which is incorporated by reference herein. Delivery systems for wireless sensors are disclosed in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/45583 entitled Pressure Sensor, Centering Anchor, Delivery System and Method, which is also incorporated herein by reference. In particular, there are many applications where measuring pressure from within a blood vessel deep in a patient's body is clinically important. For example, measuring the pressure in the heart's pulmonary artery is helpful in optimizing treatment of congestive heart failure. In this type of application, a sensor may need to be implanted 10 to 20 cm beneath the surface of the skin.
Wireless sensors that use radiofrequency (RF) energy for communication and/or power have been found to be particularly useful in medical applications. However, a key challenge in successful commercialization of these implantable wireless sensors is the design tradeoff between implant size and the “link distance”, which is the physical distance between the implant and the external device communicating with the implant. From a medical standpoint, it is desirable for an implant to be as small as possible to allow catheter based delivery from a small incision, implantation at a desired location, and a low risk of thrombosis following implant. However, from a wireless communication standpoint, the smaller the implant, the shorter the link distance. This distance limitation is driven primarily by the size of the antenna that can be realized for a given overall implant size. A larger antenna is better able to absorb RF energy and transmit RF energy than a smaller antenna. For example, in the case of wireless communication via inductive coupling, a typical implant antenna has the form of a coil of wire. The coil's “axis” is the line that extends normal to the plane of the windings, i.e. the axis is perpendicular to the wire's length. As the area encircled by the coil increases, the amount of magnetic flux that passes through it generally increases and more RF energy is delivered to/received from the implant. This increase in flux through the implant antenna can result in an increase in link distance. Thus to achieve maximum link distance for a given implant size, the implant antenna should be of maximal size.
While antenna size is important, other implant architectures may benefit from maximizing the size of other internal components. An implant containing an energy storage device such as a battery, for example, would enjoy longer battery lifetime with a larger battery. In another example, a drug-eluting implant could hold a larger quantity of the drug. Other examples will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
Another challenge in commercialization of implantable wireless sensors is the need to protect the sensitive sensor electronics from potentially corrosive or damaging fluids of the body. For many implant applications, the sensor may need to record accurate measurements for a period of time exceeding 7 to 10 years. Small changes in electrical, chemical, or mechanical properties of the implant over this time period can result in inaccurate measurements. To prevent inaccurate measurements, a hermetic enclosure may be required to protect the sensitive electronics of the sensor from the transfer of liquids and gases from the bodily environment.
Hermetic enclosures for implants are typically constructed of metals, glasses, or other ceramics. Metals are malleable and machinable, capable of being constructed into thin walled hermetic enclosures such as the titanium enclosures of pacemakers. Unfortunately, the use of metals in hermetic enclosures may negatively impact the ability of the sensor to communicate wirelessly with an external device, especially when communication at low radiofrequencies is desired. While ceramics and glasses are compatible with wireless RF communication, it is difficult to machine ceramics to a thin walled hermetic enclosure. The brittleness of ceramics prevents the construction of thin wall hermetic enclosures from ceramic materials.
State of the art ceramic machining can produce walls of approximately 0.5-0.7 mm thickness. For implants whose length, width, and height dimensions are typically ones of millimeters, this can represent a significant reduction in available internal volume for components such as antennas.
Hermetic enclosures known in the art, particularly those made of ceramic and/or glass materials, do not lend themselves to efficient use of limited space. Non-metal hermetic enclosures known in the art are typically manufactured via planar processing technology, such as low temperature cofired ceramic processes, laser machining, ultrasonic machining, Electronic Discharge Machining (EDM), or Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) fabrication techniques. These techniques are capable of processing ceramics and glasses with tight control of feature resolution. However, sidewalls of an implant package made with these techniques often require use of a dicing saw or laser to separate the implant package from the remaining substrate. Due to manufacturing constraints and the need for mechanical strength, implant package sidewalls made by these methods are typically 0.3 mm-0.5 mm thick. Alternative manufacturing approaches, such as the molding or machining of ceramic, are typically limited to minimum sidewalls of 0.5-0.7 mm thick.
An example of a prior art hermetic implant package 10 is shown in
Other prior art exemplifies wireless implant architectures of the type shown in
To improve implantable wireless sensors, it is desirable to have a hermetic enclosure with thin walls outside the coil antenna perimeter, thus maximizing the internal dimension that most constrains antenna size.
This application relates to hermetically packaged wireless electronics and more particularly to implantable electronics enclosures with thin sidewalls to maximize an internal dimension.
In an embodiment, a wireless circuit includes a housing and at least one antenna coil wound about a coil axis within the housing. The coil axis may be substantially parallel to at least one wall of the housing, wherein the wall parallel to the coil axis is substantially thinner than other walls of the housing. The housing may be a hermetically sealed housing.
In an embodiment, the wireless circuit may be manufactured by forming a housing of a material with at least one open side. Electronics, including an antenna coil, may then be placed into the housing such that said antenna coil's axis is substantially parallel to the plane of at least one open side. A wall that is substantially thinner than the walls of the housing may then be bonded to the open side. The wall may be hermetically bonded or otherwise bonded as known in the art.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein:
Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural and functional changes may be made without departing from the respective scope of the invention.
This application relates to implant packages and more particularly to an implantable sensor enclosure with thin sidewalls. To facilitate maximum link distance for a given implant size, the enclosure should be constructed to maximize antenna coil area, while still providing ample protection.
The implant package may utilize thin membrane materials such as glass, quartz, sapphire, fused silica, alumina, titanium, diamond, or other materials known in the art, to increase the space available inside an implant package of a fixed outer size. Whereas in prior art implant packages the thin membrane is bonded to the top of the implant package, as in
In other embodiments the length of the implant housing may have values of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 mm long. The cross sections may have width×height values of 5×3 mm, 4.5×2.25 mm, 3.25×2.25 mm, 2.5×1.75 mm, or 2×1 mm.
In
The final implant produced by the process of
In the case where wireless implant 20 contains a pressure sensor, internal electronics 301 may include one or more pressure sensors known in the art, and thin walls 302 may be flexible membranes which communicate pressure to internal electronics 301 by means of an incompressible fluid or gel that fills the cavity formed by housing 300 and thin walls 302. In another embodiment, the thin walls 302 may be flexible membranes which are part of a sensing electronic circuit, thus transducing pressure directly into an electronic signal of a sensing circuit.
The walls of the housing other than the thin walls 302 may be greater than 0.3 mm. By comparison, in an embodiment, by using membranes as the thin sidewalls 302 of the implant package 20 each sidewall may have a thickness of less than 0.15 mm. In another embodiment, by using membranes as the thin sidewalls 302 of the implant package 20 each sidewall may have a thickness less than about 0.050 mm. In another embodiment, by using membranes as the thin sidewalls 302 of the implant package 20 each sidewall may have a thickness of about 0.025 mm. In another embodiment, by using membranes as the sidewalls of the implant package 302 each sidewall may have a thickness less than about 0.025 mm, such as about 0.020 mm, about 0.015 mm, about 0.010 mm, about 0.005 mm, about 0.001 mm and any sized thickness in between. Thus, the thin walls 302 may have one half or less of the thickness of the non-thin walls of the housing 20.
In a typical embodiment, thin walls 302 may be made of one or more thin film materials such as glass, quartz, fused silica, titanium, silicon, sapphire, diamond, or others. It may be thinned by polishing, etching, or other methods well known in the art. Thin walls 302 may be bonded to housing 300 by several means known in the art, including laser welding, glass frit bonding, or compression bonding by brazing, soldering, or eutectic bonding, following deposition of a metal braze ring on the two surfaces.
For bonding technologies that require a metal ring to be deposited around the perimeter of each diaphragm, on both the diaphragm and mating surfaces on the housing, the architecture of
The thin-walled housing or implant package 20 provides a significant improvement in the efficient use of space inside an implant package over prior art. By way of a non-limiting example, for a prior art implant package having an outer width of about 4 mm, the maximum available width for the antenna was approximately 3 mm. By contrast, in a thin-walled implant package 20 with an outer width of about 4 mm, the available width for the antenna is approximately 3.95 mm. Such an increase in antenna width for a given implant outer size may dramatically increase the wireless link distance of an implantable wireless sensor. This difference in antenna width of the thin-walled implant package 20 can translate into a catheter delivery system that is about 3 Fr sizes smaller for the present invention than for prior art systems.
The invention is thus particularly useful in wireless implants that have one axis longer than the others, which is generally the case for implants that are intended for placement in blood vessels, or intended for delivery through a catheter device. If the ratio of length to width of such an implant is x, then increasing the coil's width dimension by n microns creates more coil area than the same increase in the length dimension, by a factor of x. In such wireless implants, one can generally maximize coil area by placing the thinnest sidewalls parallel to the coil axis, and perpendicular to the shorter dimension, as in
It will be further appreciated that the implant architecture can be used to maximize the size of any internal component, substance, or combination thereof. These may include, but are not limited to, drugs, steroids, batteries, stimulus electrodes, pacing circuitry, flow sensors, chemical sensors, or other electronics.
It will be further appreciated that although the exemplary embodiments depict a rectangular coil, the coil 14 can be generally circular, ovular, rectangular, or can take the form of any polygon that encloses an area. Additionally, although a rectangular housing is shown in the exemplary embodiment figures, the concept of disposing the thin walls on the outer periphery of coil 14, parallel to coil axis 303, can be generalized to any polygonal shape.
The disclosed invention depicted in
While the thin-walled implant package 20 may be used with RF medical implants, the designs set forth herein are useful for any micro device or component where a non-metal hermetic enclosure is required and where it is desirable to minimize sidewall thickness. Examples include, but are not limited to, sensors, actuators, or transponders located in harsh chemical environments, in liquid immersion, in high temperature zones (such as engines), or in environments where sterility is critical. Other examples include applications where the internal electronics must be hermetically housed, but cannot tolerate shielding or eddy current losses imposed by metal housings or braze rings. The designs and methods described herein overcome the many challenges associated with wireless sensors that use radiofrequency.
There are also numerous variations of the embodiment shown in
The invention disclosed herein is particularly advantageous when the wireless implant is required to be long and narrow, as is typically the case with cardiovascular implants. With such geometries, any coil width gained in the short dimension has a dramatic impact on coil area and hence link distance.
Many of the embodiments disclosed herein may benefit from having the final sidewalls attached in a vacuum environment, to prevent internal pressures inside the housing from varying with temperature. Alternatively, the internal volume may be filled with an inert gas to limit corrosion of the internals.
It will also be appreciated that the implant housing embodiments disclosed herein can be made using all thick walls, and then post-processing the housing to thin portions of the walls that are parallel to the coil's axis. State of the art post-processing technologies such as grinding, polishing, etching, or laser ablation are some possible means for accomplishing this.
In all embodiments, the external housing may be surface treated with a biocompatible material to limit clot formation, control cell growth, or improve lubricity. Such materials may include heparin, silicone, parylene, cell tissue monolayers, or other coatings well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
While the apparatus and method of subject invention have been shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that changes and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the subject invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/594,155 filed on Oct. 7, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/837,075 filed on Dec. 11, 2017 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,433,764 and entitled “IMPLANTABLE SENSOR ENCLOSURE WITH THIN SIDEWALLS,” which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/129,725 filed on Feb. 21, 2014 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,867,552 and entitled “IMPLANTABLE SENSOR ENCLOSURE WITH THIN SIDEWALLS,” which is a U.S. National Phase Entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/044998 filed Jun. 29, 2012 and entitled “IMPLANTABLE SENSOR ENCLOSURE WITH THIN SIDEWALLS,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/502,982 filed Jun. 30, 2011 and entitled “IMPLANTABLE SENSOR ENCLOSURE WITH THIN SIDEWALLS,” each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4026276 | Chubbuck | May 1977 | A |
5454270 | Brown et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5510276 | Diem et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5840148 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6939299 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7174212 | Klehn et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7198603 | Penner et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7401521 | Bellini et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7574792 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7686762 | Najafi | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7763487 | Villa et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8132465 | Doelle et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8154389 | Rowland et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8493187 | Rowland et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
9305456 | Rowland et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20010018598 | Cruise et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020045921 | Wolinsky | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20060109188 | Ikeda et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060177956 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241354 | Allen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060287602 | O'Brien et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070163355 | Nassar et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070208390 | Von Arx et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070267708 | Courcimault | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080269573 | Najafi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269829 | Li et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090221885 | Hall et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110004076 | Janna et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046452 | Najafi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110063088 | Stevenson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106120 | Haselby et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20140028467 | Nagy et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140155710 | Rowland et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140306807 | Rowland et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160029956 | Rowland et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2840645 | Jan 2013 | CA |
1701464 | Nov 2005 | CN |
101128957 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101278439 | Oct 2008 | CN |
2000005136 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2002515278 | May 2002 | JP |
2003144417 | May 2003 | JP |
2005284511 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006522635 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006309582 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007512859 | May 2007 | JP |
2007516746 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007256287 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008022935 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2010538254 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2009146089 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2012015955 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2013003754 | Jan 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report, Application No. 12804636.4-1660 / 2725969, Endotronix, Inc., dated Jan. 20, 2015. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application PCT/US12/44998, dated Sep. 25, 2012, 9 pgs., International Searching Authority, US. |
Extended European Search Report for Application 14806873.7 PCT/US2014030661, dated May 20, 2016, 7 pp., European Patent Office, Germany. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application PCT/US/14/30661, dated Sep. 17, 2015, 8 pp., Interational Searching Authority, US. |
IL Notification No. 25, Notification of Defects in Patent Application No. 230193 in Israel, report issue date Jan. 26, 2017, State of Israel Ministry of Justice, The Patent Office. |
Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2018, dated Mar. 27, 2018, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230371842 A1 | Nov 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61502982 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16594155 | Oct 2019 | US |
Child | 18094537 | US | |
Parent | 15837075 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16594155 | US | |
Parent | 14129725 | US | |
Child | 15837075 | US |