Implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11944495
  • Patent Number
    11,944,495
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 31, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
An implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor for implantation at a fixed location within a vessel, comprising at least one ultrasound transducer, a transducer drive circuit, and means for wirelessly transmitting ultrasound data from the at least one ultrasound transducer.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

WO2016/131020 and WO2017024051 are filed by the present Assignee and are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.


FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure generally relates to the field of medical devices and methods for monitoring patient blood vessels (or “vascular lumen”), such as the inferior vena cava (“IVC”).


INTRODUCTION

Conditions which May be Monitored by IVC or Other Blood Vessel Monitoring


Heart failure is one of the most significant chronic conditions afflicting adult populations. In the United States, 5.7 million Americans have heart failure, with 870,000 new cases annually. As the population ages, this number is growing, as approximately 10% of the population over 80 suffers from heart failure.


In patients with chronic heart failure, significant costs are due to hospitalization to manage acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Each re-hospitalization can last up to a week. ADHF is very often a result of some combination of a downturn in the heart's performance, a downturn in the kidney's removal of fluid from the bloodstream, and/or excessive intake of fluids and/or salt. This leads to a buildup of fluid in the vascular system, resulting in increased blood volume in the left atrium at higher pressure. This eventually leads to fluid filling the lungs and an inability to breathe. Managing these patients to prevent the need for re-hospitalization is extremely challenging. Non-invasive approaches to monitoring patients have been tried, such as weighing patients daily to detect fluid weight gain, or having a nurse call them daily to assess their health status, but these approaches have only modest effectiveness.


Although measurement of left atrial pressure, typically by measuring pulmonary artery wedge pressure, is commonly considered the most direct way to measure congestion in heart failure, there are other areas where congestion can be detected. When additional blood volume is added to the circulatory system, the IVC is one of the first places for that added volume to have an effect. The diameter of the IVC has demonstrated correlation with central venous pressure and right atrial pressure (as a proxy for left atrial pressure) as it flows directly into the right atrium (and by extension left atrial pressure through the connection through the pulmonary circulation), and it may correlate with renal function and renal sodium retention, which are also very important prognostic factors of heart failure. Therefore, increasing IVC volume and/or pressure may be a very effective early indicator of worsening heart condition.


In addition to heart failure patients, hemodialysis patients have a chronic need for careful volume management. Since their kidneys aren't excreting fluid, they are constantly becoming overloaded with fluid. Furthermore, large volumes of fluid are involved in the hemodialysis process, and managing patients so that they don't end up hypovolemic or overloaded with fluid requires careful management.


There are other groups of patients who might benefit from such a monitor. For example, patients in septic shock or acute shock due to trauma are subject to hypoperfusion.


Current Approaches to Monitoring the IVC or Other Blood Vessels


Prior studies of IVC dimensions have been conducted using external ultrasound imaging. This typically requires a highly trained physician or ultrasound technician to manage the ultrasound machine, ensure an appropriate connection of the transducer to the skin, position the ultrasound transducer in the appropriate location, identify the IVC, and take accurate measurements. This is not something that heart failure patients or their caregivers could typically be trained to do predictably and accurately with existing equipment. Moreover, these systems typically include large, complex, and expensive pieces of equipment which are not suitable for use outside of a specialized medical facility and are therefore not designed for serial measurements for chronic monitoring purposes.


Recent studies have indicated that the variation in IVC diameter over the respiratory cycle may be a more sensitive measurement of fluid overload and/or heart failure than simple measurement of average IVC diameter, volume, or pressure. During inspiration, intrathoracic pressure decreases, thereby increasing venous return and causing collapse of the IVC. During expiration, intrathoracic pressure increases, decreasing venous return and causing an increase in the diameter of the IVC.


While vessel dimensions may be measurable using external ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized axial tomography, or other technologies, these imaging procedures must be administered in a hospital or other specialized facility. Furthermore, such procedures do not permit continuous monitoring, and do not allow for monitoring of the patient at their home or other remote location. As a result, the condition of a heart failure patient can worsen into a critical state before care providers become aware of it, dramatically increasing the mortality risk and cost of treatment for the patient.


PCT publication numbers WO2016/131020 and WO2017/024051, assigned to the assignee of the present disclosure, describe approaches involving implanted and catheter-based devices for real time monitoring of IVC dimensions for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure and other conditions.


The present disclosure is directed towards providing improved apparatus for blood vessel dimension monitoring.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

According to the present invention there is provided an implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor for implantation at a fixed location within a vessel, comprising:

    • at least one ultrasound transducer;
    • a transducer drive circuit; and
    • means for wirelessly transmitting ultrasound data from the at least one ultrasound transducer.


The at least one ultrasound transducer may comprise a first transducer for transmitting an ultrasound wave and a second transducer for receiving an ultrasound echo.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may be configured for untethered retention in a vessel. In other words, there is no catheter attached to the implant after implantation. By “implantation at a fixed location” it is meant that the sensor is an implant, not a catheter.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor is intended for retention in a vessel following withdrawal of a deployment catheter.


The at least one ultrasound transducer may comprise means for supporting the first transducer and the second transducer opposite one another.


The at least one ultrasound transducer may comprise means for supporting the first transducer and the second transducer adjacent each other.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may comprise means for supporting the first transducer and the second transducer back to back.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may further comprise a passive reflector attachable to a vessel wall.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may comprise a plurality of pairs of first and second transducers.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may further comprise means for supporting the plurality of pairs of first and second transducers for measuring across different chords of a vessel.


The or each transducer may be configured to transmit an ultrasound wave and receive an ultrasound echo.


The at least one transducer may be configured to provide an ultrasound wave having a beam width of between 5° and 14°.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may be configured to operate in real time for real time vessel monitoring.


The transducer drive circuit and at least one transducer may be configured to operate at a frequency in the range of 4 MHz to 20 MHz.


The transducer drive circuit and at least one transducer may be configured to operate at a frequency in the range of 7 MHz to 15 MHz.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may comprise a plurality of transducers. The drive circuit may configured to time multiplex operation of the transducers.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may further comprise a support structure for supporting the or each transducer within a vessel.


The support structure may have a stent-like configuration for engaging a vessel wall around its periphery.


At least one transducer may be longitudinally separated from a main portion of the support structure.


At least one transducer may be mounted on a strut extending longitudinally from the support structure main portion.


The strut may be mechanically biased to lie against a vessel wall.


Preferably the support structure has little impact on physiological expansion or contraction of the vessel at a sensing site. In other words, in use, the support structure and the transducer(s) move with the vessel wall. A movement of the vessel wall in a radial direction would impart a corresponding movement of the transducer(s) in a radial direction.


The strut may comprise an anchor for direct anchoring to a vessel wall.


The anchor may extend from a tip of the strut.


The strut may comprise a coating to promote adhesion to a vessel wall.


The at least one transducer may include a piezoelectric element and associated electrodes.


The at least one transducer may comprise a matching layer on an ultrasonic signal path side of the piezoelectric element and having a thickness of approximately a quarter of the wavelength of operation of the piezoelectric element.


The at least one transducer may comprise an active piezoelectric layer with a thickness of approximately a half wavelength.


The at least one transducer may have a backing material for attenuation of emitted ultrasonic waves in a direction opposed to a preferred signal direction.


The backing material may comprise a carrier material with embedded particles.


The at least one ultrasound transducer may comprise:

    • a piezoelectric layer and first and second opposed electrodes on said piezoelectric layer;
    • a backing material configured to attenuate ultrasound waves and minimize reflection thereof in a direction away from a vessel volume; and
    • a matching layer having acoustic properties for optimizing ultrasound waves between said matching layer and blood in contact therewith;
    • wherein the transducer is configured to be positioned along a wall of the vessel with the matching layer exposed to blood and facing an opposing wall of the vessel.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may further comprise means for measuring an acoustic wave time of flight between an ultrasound transmitter and an ultrasound receiver.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may further comprise means for calculating the distance between the ultrasound transmitter and the ultrasound receiver based on the measured time of flight.


In accordance with the present invention there is further provided a blood vessel monitoring system comprising at least one implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor as described above, and a remote processor configured to receive the transmitted ultrasound data and calculate distance between the ultrasound transmitter and the ultrasound receiver based on the measured time of flight.


The blood vessel monitoring system may further comprise means for determining at least one blood vessel dimension from the received data.


The blood vessel monitoring system may further comprise means for recognizing a plurality of diffuse ultrasound echo wave responses and means for determining a value representing vessel diameter or diameter changes from said responses.


The blood vessel monitoring system may further comprise means for determining at least one parameter value derived from a blood vessel dimension.


The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor may comprise a plurality of transducers arranged to transmit and receive across different chords, and the signal processing circuit may be configured to use data from said transducers to determine blood volume and/or vessel shape.


The signal processing circuit may be configured to operate according to a desired user pattern such as intermittent or continuous or a hybrid of intermittent and continuous.


The blood vessel monitoring system may comprise a component configured to be mounted internally in the patient and an external component outside the patient's body, and said components are configured to wirelessly communicate.


The blood vessel monitoring system may comprise a subcutaneous component arranged to communicate with the implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor provide the communication link to an external component.


The blood vessel monitoring system may further comprise a discrete power source arranged to be implanted subcutaneously at a remote location separated from the vascular implant.


The blood vessel monitoring system may further comprise a discrete power source arranged to be implanted subcutaneously at a location separated from the implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor.


In accordance with the present invention there is further provided a vascular monitoring method comprising:

    • implanting at least one ultrasound transducer within a vessel;
    • providing a drive signal to the at least one ultrasound transducer;
    • generating and transmitting an ultrasound wave;
    • detecting an ultrasound echo;
    • recording a time delay between the transmission of the ultrasound pulse and the detection of the ultrasound echo; and
    • wirelessly transmitting ultrasound data from the at least one ultrasound transducer.


Implanting at least one ultrasound transducer within a vessel may comprise implanting at least one ultrasound transducer within an inferior vena cava, IVC.


The ultrasound wave may have a beam width of between 5° and 14°.


The at least one transducer may be operating at a frequency in the range of 4 MHz to 20 MHz.


The at least one transducer may be operating at a frequency in the range of 7 MHz to 15 MHz.


The method may further comprise calculating the distance between an ultrasound transmitter and an ultrasound receiver based on the time delay and wirelessly transmitting the distance.


The method may further comprise receiving the transmitted ultrasound data at a remote processor and calculating the distance between the ultrasound transmitter and the ultrasound receiver based on the time delay.


The method may further comprise determining at least one blood vessel dimension from the received data.


The method may further comprise recognizing a plurality of diffuse ultrasound echo wave responses and determining a value representing vessel diameter or diameter changes from said responses.


The method may further comprise determining at least one parameter value derived from a blood vessel dimension.


The method may further comprise using data from multiple transducers to determine blood volume and/or vessel shape.


The method may further comprise operating according to a desired user pattern such as intermittent or continuous or a hybrid of intermittent and continuous.


We describe a system for monitoring a blood vessel, the system comprising:

    • an implantable support structure configured to engage a blood vessel wall,
    • an ultrasonic sensor including one or more transducers mounted on or to the support structure at an orientation to direct ultrasonic waves across the vessel, and to receive ultrasonic waves,
    • a drive circuit for driving the transducer, and
    • a signal processing circuit for processing sensor outputs to monitor vessel width dimension and/or changes in dimension.


Preferably, the support structure has a stent-like configuration for engaging a vessel wall around its periphery. Preferably, at least one transducer is longitudinally separated from a main portion of the support structure, so that the structure main portion is substantially not in the path of ultrasonic waves and has little impact on physiologic expansion or contraction of the vessel at a sensing site.


Preferably, at least one transducer is mounted on a strut extending longitudinally from the support structure main portion.


In one example, the strut comprises an anchor for direct anchoring to a vessel wall in addition to being supported by the support structure. In one embodiment, the anchor extends from a tip of the strut.


In one example, the strut comprises a coating to promote adhesion to a vessel wall.


In some embodiments, the system comprises a passive reflector having an ultrasonic mismatch from blood, and being attachable to a vessel wall.


Preferably, the system comprises separate transducers for transmitting and receiving, in which at least one pair of transmit and receive transducers are arranged on the implant to be on opposite sides of the vessel. The system may comprise transmit and receive transducers which are separate or integrated, in which at least one transducer or transducer pair is arranged at approximately the same radial position in order to transmit an ultrasonic wave and receive a corresponding echo. In one embodiment, the sensor comprises a plurality of physically separate transducers mounted on a longitudinal strut extending from the support structure.


Preferably, the sensor comprises a plurality of pairs of transmit and receive transducers, arranged for measuring across different chords such as relatively orthogonal diameters of a vessel.


Preferably, at least one transducer includes a piezoelectric element and associated electrodes.


In one example, at least one transducer comprises a matching layer on an ultrasonic signal path side of the piezoelectric element and having a thickness of approximately a quarter of the wavelength of operation of the piezoelectric element.


Preferably, at least one transducer has an active piezoelectric layer with a thickness of approximately a half wavelength.


In one embodiment, at least one transducer has a backing material for attenuation of emitted ultrasonic waves in a direction opposed to a preferred signal direction.


Preferably, the backing material comprises a carrier material with embedded particles so that a wave emanating from the vibrating piezoelectric layer back surface in an unintended direction, such as away from a target and into the backing material, is absorbed and does not reflect back into a blood vessel in use.


In one example, at least one transducer comprises:

    • a piezoelectric layer and first and second opposed electrodes on said piezoelectric layer,
    • a backing material configured to attenuate ultrasound waves and minimize reflection thereof in a direction away from a vessel volume;
    • and
    • a matching layer having acoustic properties for optimizing ultrasound waves between said matching layer and blood in contact therewith;
    • wherein the transducer is configured to be located along a wall of the vessel with the matching layer exposed to blood and facing an opposing wall of the vessel.


Preferably, the transducer provides an ultrasound wave having a beam width of between 5° and 14°.


Preferably, the sensor and the circuit are configured to operate in real time for real time vessel monitoring.


In one example, the circuits comprise a component configured to be mounted internally in the patient and an external component outside the patient's body, and said components are configured to wirelessly communicate.


Preferably, the system comprises a subcutaneous component arranged to communicate with the sensor and provide the communication link to an external component.


Preferably, the system comprises a discrete power source arranged to be implanted subcutaneously at a location separated from the vascular implant.


Preferably, the drive circuit and at least one transducer are configured to operate at a frequency in the range of 4 MHz to 20 MHz, and preferably at least 7 MHz.


In one example, the drive circuit and at least one transducer are configured to operate at a frequency in the range of 7 MHz to 15 MHz.


Preferably, the sensor comprises a plurality of transducers and the drive circuit is configured to time multiplex operation of the transducers.


Preferably, the signal processing circuit is configured to recognize a plurality of diffuse ultrasound echo wave responses and to determine a value representing vessel diameter or diameter changes from said responses.


Preferably, the signal processing circuit is configured such that received waveform undergoes a Hilbert transform, whereby the timers stop when an echo waveform envelope exceeds a certain level.


In one example, the signal processing circuit is configured to determine at least one parameter value derived from a blood vessel dimension, such as blood volume.


Preferably, the sensor comprises a plurality of transducers arranged to transmit and receive across different chords, and the signal processing circuit is configured to use data from said transducers to determine blood volume and/or vessel shape.


Preferably, the signal processing circuit is configured to operate according to a desired user pattern such as intermittent or continuous or a hybrid of intermittent and continuous.


The disclosure also provides a non-transitory computer readable medium comprising software code for performing by a digital processor operations of a drive circuit and/or a signal processing circuit of a system of any embodiment.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure will be more clearly understood from the following description of some embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an intravascular ultrasound measurement system having an implantable device or “implant” and a bedside console for communication with the implant, data logging, data processing, and for upload of data to local and/or remote servers;



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view showing the multiple layers of an ultrasound transducer of the implant;



FIGS. 3 and 4 are sketches showing modes of operation of a transducer;



FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an implant having dedicated transmit and receive ultrasonic transducers mounted on diametrically opposed struts;



FIG. 6 is a diagram showing separate transmit and receive transducers mounted side-by-side on a single strut;



FIG. 7 shows an implant arrangement having two pairs of opposed transducers;



FIGS. 8 and 9 are circuit block diagrams for systems of two embodiments; and



FIGS. 10(a) to 10(d) are plots showing ultrasound responses which are processed by a signal processor of a system of the disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In various embodiments, blood vessel monitoring systems are described which include an implant with a sensor having at least one ultrasonic transducer, a data processing subsystem, a communications subsystem, and a battery power source. The transducers are supported by a stent-like support structure for both anchoring and positioning the device within a vessel such as the IVC. The support structure is flexible, elastic and highly compliant, having little influence on the normal movement and shape of the IVC.


In this specification the term “transducer” is intended to mean an ultrasound device including actively vibrating material such as a piezoelectric material and also including associated parts such as a matching layer and a backing layer. A “sensor” is an assembly of one or more transducers and all components involved for ultrasound transmitting and receiving including in some embodiments a passive reflector, as described in more detail below. The specific transducing part in which an applied voltage is transformed into mechanical vibrations is referred to as the piezoelectric material or layer.


Referring to FIG. 1, a system 1 comprises an implant 2-6 with a stent-like support structure 2 with a wave pattern 3 forming a hoop, and supporting an electronics housing 4. A longitudinal strut 5 extends from the structure 2, and is mechanically biased to be against a vessel wall (V), in use. An ultrasound transducer 6, comprising a piezoelectric active layer, is mounted on the strut 5, so that it is longitudinally spaced-apart from the structure 2, thereby having an unimpeded path across to the opposite side of the blood vessel and being spatially separated from the structure 2 so that the vessel is measured at a point which is not at risk of being constrained or distorted by the structure 2. The longitudinal strut 5 is configured to maintain the transducer 6 against the vessel wall while allowing the transducer 6 to move radially inwardly and outwardly with the wall during vessel contraction and expansion respectively. The transducer 6 is supported to be against the wall, and hence the strut 5 could in various embodiments be bowed, straight, angled, wavy, spring-loaded or have any other configuration to bias the transducer 6 against the vessel wall.


The system 1 also comprises a bedside console 7 wirelessly linked with the electronics housing 4 of the implant via a wireless transmitter in electronics housing and also linked with cloud servers 8, or any other data collection and processing equipment.


Support Structure 2 and Transducer Strut 5


The support structure 2 is sufficiently flexible and elastic to have little influence on the normal movement and shape of a blood vessel such as the IVC while still remaining in a fixed location in the vessel. Additionally, the longitudinal separation of the transducer 6 from support structure 2 helps to isolate it from any distortion of the vessel caused by support structure 2.


The strut 5 has a Nitinol spine alongside which are insulated electrical leads for the transducer 6.


In some embodiments, the transducer 6 and/or longitudinal strut 5 may be configured to be fixed to the vessel wall to ensure that the transducer moves with it. For example, the transducer 6 and/or the longitudinal strut, and/or the support structure 2 may have barbs, hooks, or other features on its outer side that penetrate or engage the wall tissue. The transducer 6 and/or longitudinal strut 5 may alternatively or additionally be coated with a material that adheres to tissue or encourages tissue growth around or into these components. In other embodiments the longitudinal strut 5 may have a tip extending beyond the transducer 6 and configured to penetrate into the vessel wall.


The structure 2 diameter is preferably in the range of 5 mm to 40 mm, and the length is preferably in the range of 10 mm to 40 mm. In one example the transducer 6 has a width of 4 mm, a thickness of 3 mm, and a length of 3 mm, and the tubular electronics housing 4 with domed ends, has a diameter of 5 mm and a length of 10 mm.


The ultrasound transducer 6 is positioned such that it lies on the endothelium of the IVC wall, directing ultrasound pressure waves towards the diametrically opposing side of the IVC interior wall. Due to the acoustic impedance difference between the vessel wall and blood, the IVC wall is a significant reflector of ultrasound waves. Hence, the ultrasound waves are reflected from the opposing IVC wall, returning back to the ultrasound transducer where they are detected. The time delay between the transmitted ultrasound pulse and the received echo signal is recorded, allowing for the IVC diameter to be calculated.


In various embodiments, the support structure 2 may have one, two, or more rings or hoops and interconnecting longitudinal members or struts between the hoops, the hoops being resiliently biased radially outwardly in a stent-like manner to engage the vessel wall and securely anchor the device 2-6 in the vessel. The rings or hoops may have a sinusoidal, zig-zag, or other radially collapsible configuration to facilitate delivery through the vessel to the desired location of placement and to impart a relatively consistent radial fixation force against the vessel wall over a wide range of diameters.


Ultrasound Transducer


Referring to FIG. 2 the transducer 6 is shown diagrammatically in section. There is a piezoelectric layer 10 at its core, with electrodes 11 and 12 above and below, and a backing material 15 mounted between the active layer 10 and the transducer housing 18. There is also a matching layer 16 over the electrode 11. These layers are mounted within a sealed housing 18 of biocompatible polymeric material. The matching layer 16 is for direct contact with the blood in the vessel.


The piezoelectric material might be a piezoelectric ceramic, a piezoelectric single crystal or a piezoelectric composite material. The piezoelectric material may be diced in one direction or in orthogonal directions for reduction of lateral mode oscillations, due to lateral dimensions which approach a full wavelength.


In one embodiment, the piezoelectric layer is suitable to be driven at 4 MHz and has a thickness of 1.0 mm, and the other layers of the transducer raise this to a total thickness value in the range of 4 to 6 mm. In various embodiments the piezoelectric material might need to be in excess of 3 mm in width, and might preferably be made in a composite to break up lateral modes.


Up to limits, higher drive frequencies are preferred because a sharper beam is created, increasing signal strength and decreasing the possibility of echoes from parts of the vessel other than the diametrically opposed side. Higher frequencies have their limit, however. Blood attenuation is approximately 0.15 dB/MHz/cm. So, for a 2 cm diameter vessel, at 5 MHz, the attenuation is 3 dB, while at 20 MHz it is 12 dB. In the 30 MHz range, echoes from blood begin to compete in amplitude from those of tissue, and wall determination becomes yet more difficult. Therefore the preferred range of drive frequency is 4 MHz to 20 MHz, and more preferably 7 MHz to 15 MHz.


In general, the piezoelectric material thickness scales inversely proportionately to the frequency of operation.


The transducer may have a single piezoelectric crystal, or a composite “pillar” structure. The pillar transducer construction may provide a lower noise signal with better signal to noise ratio, and a relatively small aperture. A single crystal piezoelectric layer would have better amplitude conversion (voltage to displacement, and reverse) but would draw a higher current.


The matching layer 16 preferably has a thickness of a quarter wavelength.


The overall transducer may be mounted with an air gap or backing material 15 on the back side. This feature is to ensure that the waves emanating from the vibrating piezoelectric material in the unintended direction (i.e. away from the target and into the backing material), is absorbed and does not reflect back into the piezoelectric material. As shown in FIG. 2, in this embodiment there is backing material 15 of an epoxy with cork particles, chosen to have a thickness for good attenuation.


The ultrasound transducer beam profile is mainly dependent on excitation pulse frequency. For example, 4 MHz with a 3 mm aperture gives a 6 dB beam width of 24°, 8 MHz gives 12°, and 10 MHz gives 9°. When targeting non planar surfaces, this can significantly affect sensor operation. There is a trade-off between beam width and angle-to-target and signal-to-noise ratio, with narrower beams providing higher signal-to-noise ratio.



FIG. 3 shows a narrow beam of 10 MHz giving a 9° beam width normal to target, and therefore a good signal response. However, as shown in FIG. 4, a beam with these parameters results in the echo being missed in some circumstances. The transducer is preferably oriented such that the transmit signal is perpendicular to the opposing vessel wall to ensure that a maximum reflected signal is received by the transducer. However, perfect orientation may be challenging, and with vessel distension/contraction and other motion the angle of the vessel wall may change relative to the transducer. For this reason, a wider beam width may be more important to ensure a signal is received by the transducer.


Alternatively, as described in more detail below it may be preferred to rely on the echo structure from within the vessel wall to make measurements, as the strong specular reflection of the blood/wall interface may not always be achievable as compared to the diffuse echoes from within the vessel wall.


The following are exemplary aspects of the ultrasonic transducer for advantageous use in the application of monitoring width dimension of a blood vessel such as the IVC.

    • The matching layer 16 is preferably ¼λ thick
    • The electrodes 11 and 12 are of gold or nickel, applied with In:Ag solder
    • The backing material 15 is lamination epoxy, Epotek 301
    • The piezoelectric layer has a thickness of ½λ, and an impedance of Zc˜33 M Rayles
    • The backing material has a thickness and a composition to be attenuative enough to prevent reflection with an impedance to shape waveform. This may alternatively be of a rubber material, preferably embedded with particles.
    • It is sub optimal if the width-to-thickness ratio of the transducer is in the range of 0.7<W/T<5.0
    • Matching layer material 16 may be Henkle Loctite Stycast 3103 epoxy, Zm˜4.6 M Rayls.


By way of example, for operation at 7.5 MHz, a CTS 3202HD piezoelectric ceramic with a thickness of approximately 0.3 mm (half wavelength) a surface dimension of 2.5 mm square, facing into the vessel was used. The ceramic was plated on both sides with approximately 0.2 microns of gold. The front surface matching layer material was a Henkel Loctite Stycast 3103 filled epoxy with an acoustic impedance of 4.6 MRayls, which was cast, adhesively bonded to the ceramic using EpoTek 301 epoxy, and lapped to one quarter wavelength thickness, as determined by impedance measurements. The backing material was alternatively air or a silicone rubber loaded with cork powder (acoustic impedance approximately 1.7 MRayls). 0.05 mm diameter copper leads were soldered to the opposing electrodes on the ceramic with 97:3::In:Ag solder. At approximately 30 mm from the ceramic, the leads were attached to either twisted pair wires or 50 Ohm coaxial cable for connection to the electronics.


Alternative Transducer Mounting Arrangements



FIG. 5 shows an implant 20 with a support structure 21, electronics housing 22, two longitudinal struts 25 and 23 on which are transmit and receive transducers 26 and 24, respectively. In this arrangement, the acoustic wave time of flight between transmitter and receiver is only half of that for a single combined transmitter/receiver for which the ultrasound waves traverse a round trip. Further, the signal to noise ratio is better since there is no reliance on a weak echo from a tissue/blood interface. Signal processing is required to compensate for the thickness of both the transmitter and the receiver, and it is necessary to ensure that both struts 25 and 23 keep the respective transducer parts against the vessel wall. If the transmit and receive functions are separate, at opposite sides of a vessel such as in FIG. 5, the system processors do not need to take account of the quality of reflection from the vessel wall.


A major advantage of using separate transducers for transmit and receive functions is to isolate transmit ring-down noise from the received signal. This noise would make it extremely difficult to set a meaningful threshold. Note in particular the noise on the waveforms of FIGS. 10(a)-(d), immediately to the right of the transmit burst. With transmit ring-down noise, the time system would have to electronically clamp the signal to zero after transmission, and then open up sufficiently before wall echoes are anticipated.



FIG. 6 shows an implant 30 with a support structure 31, electronic housing 32, a strut 33, and separate transmit and receive transducers 34 and 35 mounted adjacent to each other or linearly spaced apart on the same strut 33 on one side of the vessel. This arrangement allows a greater signal to noise ratio for signal processing with the avoidance of interference in the received echo signal from the transmit burst. Where the transmit and receive functions are separate and on the same strut, (FIG. 6) it is preferable that they are about 0.5 mm to 5 mm apart.


A system with two transducers deployed at a longitudinal distance from each other, either supported by the same or different support structures, may also be implemented to measure a Doppler shift in the received signal. This would allow an estimate of volume flow.



FIG. 7 shows a further configuration 40 having two pairs of transmit/receive transducers 41, 42 oriented at 90° relative to each other. This allows determination of diameters in two orthogonal directions. Advantageously this configuration allows both the anterior-posterior dimension and medial-lateral dimension to be monitored, allowing the processor to determine IVC geometry and blood volume. Also, it allows a digital processor to perform modelling of the vessel cross-section, for example to monitor major and minor axes. Such axes may be used to model the vessel cross-section as a parallelogram and possible ellipse. The circuits may be configured to perform data correction with parallelogram edge and diagonal correction, by averaging opposed parallelogram sides. Also, the circuits may be configured to perform ellipse reconstruction to model a vessel shape, based on chordal lengths such as parallelogram side calculations, and they may be configured to apply a correction to compensate for change from a round to elliptical shape of the support structure in end view.


It is envisaged that there may be more than two transmitter/receiver transducer pairs, e.g. up to four or more pairs of transducers, and the above benefits therefore also apply, providing even further data concerning the full volume and shape of the vessel.


It is also possible to position two transducers back-to-back near the middle of the vessel lumen. Then one transducer could be used to measure the distance to one wall, and the other could be used to measure the distance to the opposite wall. The sum of those distances is the diameter of the vessel.


A passive reflector may be provided to provide a strong reflection. This may be embedded within or individually anchored to the vessel wall opposite the transmit/receive transducer. Alternatively, a passive reflector may be mounted on a longitudinal strut attached to the support structure to which the transducer is coupled. Any such passive reflector provides increased reflectivity as compared to a blood/tissue interface.


In other embodiments there may be a co-implanted passive reflector or a second receive transducer on or within the opposing wall of the vessel. This reflector would serve to ensure a strong, perpendicular reflected signal back to the transducer. This reflector would need to be mounted so as not to impact the motion of the wall but remain in contact with it. The reflector may be on a longitudinal strut extending from the opposite side of the support structure 2, 180° apart from and parallel to the strut supporting the transmitter and receiver components. Alternatively a passive reflector may be mounted to or implanted within the wall of the vessel opposite the location of transducer. The passive reflector will be composed of a material having an impedance mismatch with vessel wall tissue and/or blood, causing a strong reflection of the transmitted ultrasound signal back to the transducer. The passive reflector may comprise a staple, button, barb, or rivet configured to penetrate or fasten to the inner wall of the vessel. Alternatively the passive reflector may comprise an injectable substance such as a flowable material, pellets, or beads which can be injected into the wall tissue.


Transducer Drive and Signal Processing



FIG. 8 shows a transducer drive circuit, in which there are components as follows: P (pulser), L (limiter), P (pre-amplifier), F (band-pass filter), LA (linear amplifier), TGC (time gain compensation), and C (compression amplifier). The transducer 6 is located immediately after the pulser P, the received signals being initially handled by the limiter L, followed by the pre-amplifier, band-pass filter, linear amplifier, time gain compensation, and the compression amplifier.


These components are within the implant electronics housing 4. The signal processor provides the wireless signals to the console 7 using Bluetooth, or an alternative local area wireless protocol. There may alternatively be a separate wireless communication interface or other wireless transceiver.



FIG. 9 shows a circuit which is suitable if integrated on a single chip, and the same annotation is used as in FIG. 8. The component C is a compression amplifier, and a digital input/output function provides time of flight and other data to the external console.


Power is provided by an implantable battery source, of a type known in the art, which is encapsulated within the housing 4. Alternatively an extra vascular power source could be used, this could be located within a subcutaneous pocket, as per implanted pacemakers, and connected to the electronics unit via a lead.


The received ultrasound signals provide data which can be processed to give a complete and accurate measurement of the IVC dimensions and further, measurements of the blood flow, blood volume, blood pressure, and possibly blood chemistry including hematocrit and oxygenation. The ultrasound echo provides data representing a diameter of the blood vessel, and from this basic data a range of derived values may be calculated as noted above.


Signal processing may involve a full waveform analysis, preferably with averaging. It may include a comparator, implemented by a System on Chip (“SOC”) or a microprocessor. The wiring may be twisted pairs or shielded coax. Alternatively, the signal processor may simply have a threshold signal intensity detector, which might require less electrical processing power.


Operation of the System and Data Analysis


The IVC contracts and expands with each respiration as well as with each cardiac cycle. Periodic IVC diameter measurements may thus be taken over multiple respiratory cycles, allowing for the recording of maximum and minimum diameters, from which a measure of collapsibility can be determined. The system may measure at any other desired intervals.


The recorded data is transmitted via radio frequency (RF) communication to the external console 6. In an alternative embodiment, some or all of the data may be locally stored on the implant. In general, the data processing, memory, and storage resources may be distributed in any suitable manner between the implant and the external equipment, provided the implant electronics unit is not excessively large, physically.


In another embodiment a subcutaneous monitor device may be provided to communicate with the implant, store the data, and to then transmit it to outside the body.


In one embodiment, the drive circuit sets a threshold, starts a timer on the transmit burst, and stops the timer on the first waveform crossing of the threshold. This number is then transmitted to the external processor. Alternatively, the received waveform undergoes a Hilbert transform, whereby the timers stop when the echo waveform envelope exceeds a certain level. This type of processing has significant advantages in signal-to-noise improvements.


Monitoring may be performed continuously or for intermittent periods, depending upon the desired trade-off between data intensity and battery life. It might be most efficient and physiologically relevant to take measurements only at night, when the patient is lying down and at rest. It might be desirable to intermittently measure IVC dimensions at random, or at specific time intervals. Although measurements may start and stop at random or preconfigured points along the respiratory cycle, it is intended that the measurement period cover multiple breathing cycles to enable IVC maxima and minima be identified.


Alternatively, the device may intermittently take continuous measurements over one or more entire cardiac and/or respiratory cycles, to get an effective measurement of the maximum and minimum IVC volumes. The difference between those minimum and maximum volumes may be an important prognostic indicator. If the overall IVC diameter is large and or there is only a small variation between minimum and maximum IVC diameters, that may be an indicator of congestion.


Referring to FIGS. 10(a)-(d), time moves from left to right, and it can be seen that a transmit pulse on the left is followed on the right by a number of receive echoes in some cases. Ideally one would like to see a strong well-defined received echo from the IVC wall, as seen in FIG. 10(a). However, we have found that most often ultrasound reflection from a vessel wall is in the form of multiple reflections, each from within the vessel wall. These layers are individual tissue mis-matches within the vessel wall.


A strong, well-defined received echo as in FIG. 10(a) results from a normal reflection off the vessel wall, and is not always achievable with the dynamic variations of the vessel. More commonly, a string of diffuse echoes as in FIGS. 10(b), 10(c), and 10(d) is achieved, wherein these weaker echoes result from the cellular structure of the vascular wall.


The signal processing of either the electronics on the implant, the bedside console, or the cloud server recognise such weaker sub-responses and may use for example edge detection (especially for diameter measurement) and/or averaging (especially for diameter variation tracking) to more accurately determine vessel diameter and/or collapsibility.


By way of background regarding diffuse reflection and specular reflection, IVUS images, and even echo cardiograms, rely on diffuse echoes, and where a normal reflection occurs (in cardiology, typically at the apex of the heart), a bright ring appears on the display. It would be preferable to have more specular reflections as shown in FIG. 10(a), but diffuse reflections, as shown in FIGS. 10(b) to (d), are more common.


Alternatives


There are embodiments where multiple, separate transducers are used as dedicated transmit and receive transducers in order to reduce noise in the system. These could also be used to measure the vessel in multiple planes, thus generating a more complex and accurate shape of the vessel rather than a simple single diameter. These transducers could also be longitudinally disposed along the length of the device to provide more predictable send receive response by limiting the curvature and angulation of the vessel at the target location.


The disclosure is not limited to the embodiments described but may be varied in construction and detail.

Claims
  • 1. An implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor configured to be implanted in a patient's inferior vena cava (IVC) at a fixed location within the IVC in contact with the IVC wall, comprising: at least one ultrasound transducer;a transducer drive circuit;an implantable support structure configured to move with physiological expansion and contraction of the IVC wall in response to changes in patient fluid volume, wherein said at least one transducer and transducer drive circuit are supported on the support structure, said at least one ultrasound transducer is supported to move with said expansion and contraction of the IVC wall when the support structure moves therewith; andmeans for wirelessly transmitting ultrasound data from the at least one ultrasound transducer.
  • 2. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 1 wherein the at least one ultrasound transducer comprises a first transducer for transmitting an ultrasound wave and a second transducer for receiving an ultrasound echo.
  • 3. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 2, comprising a plurality of pairs of first and second transducers.
  • 4. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 3, further comprising means for supporting the plurality of pairs of first and second transducers for measuring across different chords of a vessel.
  • 5. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 1, wherein the at least one transducer is configured to provide an ultrasound wave having a beam width of between 5° and 14°.
  • 6. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 1, wherein the transducer drive circuit and at least one transducer are configured to operate at a frequency in the range of 4 MHz to 20 MHz.
  • 7. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 1, wherein at least one transducer is mounted on a strut extending longitudinally from a support structure main portion.
  • 8. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 7, wherein the strut is mechanically biased to lie against a vessel wall, wherein said at least one transducer is positioned to monitor a width dimension of the vessel by detecting the opposite vessel wall with a reflected ultrasound signal.
  • 9. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 8, wherein the strut comprises an anchor for direct anchoring to a vessel wall.
  • 10. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 1, wherein the at least one transducer comprises a matching layer on an ultrasonic signal path side of the piezoelectric element and having a thickness of approximately a quarter of the wavelength of operation of the piezoelectric element.
  • 11. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 1, wherein the at least one transducer has a backing material for attenuation of emitted ultrasonic waves in a direction opposed to a preferred signal direction.
  • 12. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 1, wherein the at least one ultrasound transducer comprises: a piezoelectric layer and first and second opposed electrodes on said piezoelectric layer;a backing material configured to attenuate ultrasound waves and minimize reflection thereof in a direction away from a vessel volume; anda matching layer having acoustic properties for optimizing ultrasound waves between said matching layer and blood in contact therewith;wherein the transducer is configured to be positioned along a wall of the vessel with the matching layer exposed to blood and facing an opposing wall of the vessel.
  • 13. A vascular monitoring method, comprising: implanting a support structure supporting at least one ultrasound transducer within a patient's IVC in contact with the IVC wall, wherein said support structure moves, expands and collapses with physiological expansion and contraction of the IVC wall in response to changes in patient fluid volume;providing a drive signal to the at least one ultrasound transducer;generating and transmitting an ultrasound wave;detecting an ultrasound echo;recording a time delay between the transmission of the ultrasound pulse and the detection of the ultrasound echo; andwirelessly transmitting ultrasound data from the at least one ultrasound transducer.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the ultrasound wave has a beam width of between 5° and 14°.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the at least one transducer is operating at a frequency in the range of 4 MHz to 20 MHz.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, further comprising receiving the transmitted ultrasound data at a remote processor and calculating with the processor the distance between the ultrasound transmitter and the ultrasound receiver based on the time delay.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising recognizing a plurality a diffuse ultrasound echo wave responses and determining with the processor a value representing IVC diameter or diameter changes from said responses.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, further comprising determining with the processor at least one IVC dimension from the received data, or at least one parameter value derived from an IVC dimension.
  • 19. The method of claim 16, further comprising using data from multiple transducers to determine with the processor blood volume and/or IVC shape.
  • 20. The implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor of claim 1, wherein: at least one transducer is disposed on a portion of the support structure mechanically biased to lie against the IVC wall and move with said physiological expansion and contraction of the IVC wall; andsaid at least one transducer is configured to monitor a change in width dimension of the vessel due to said physiological expansion and contraction in response to changes in patient fluid volume by detecting the opposite vessel wall with a reflected ultrasound signal.
  • 21. An implantable ultrasonic vascular sensor configured to be implanted in a patient's inferior vena cava (IVC) at a fixed location within the IVC, comprising: at least one ultrasound transducer;a transducer drive circuit;an implantable support structure configured to be implanted within the IVC in contact around a wall of the IVC and to move with physiological expansion and contraction of the IVC wall, wherein said at least one transducer and transducer drive circuit are supported on the support structure, said at least one ultrasound transducer supported to move with said physiological expansion and contraction of the IVC wall when the support structure moves therewith;at least one passive reflector to reflect a signal from the at least one ultrasound transducer supported by said implantable support structure; andmeans for wirelessly transmitting ultrasound data from the at least one ultrasound transducer.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2018/064383 5/31/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/220143 12/6/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (526)
Number Name Date Kind
3568661 Franklin Mar 1971 A
3838683 Kolin Oct 1974 A
4142412 McLeod Mar 1979 A
4638252 Bradshaw Jan 1987 A
RE32361 Duggan Feb 1987 E
4733669 Segal Mar 1988 A
4926875 Rabinovitz et al. May 1990 A
4947852 Nassi et al. Aug 1990 A
5127404 Wyborny et al. Jul 1992 A
5205292 Czar et al. Apr 1993 A
5316001 Ferek-Petric et al. May 1994 A
5339816 Akamatsu et al. Aug 1994 A
5363848 Spani et al. Nov 1994 A
5476484 Hedberg Dec 1995 A
5495852 Stadler et al. Mar 1996 A
5630836 Prem et al. May 1997 A
5752522 Murphy May 1998 A
5872520 Siefert et al. Feb 1999 A
5902308 Murphy May 1999 A
5967986 Cimochowski Oct 1999 A
5971933 Gopakumaran Oct 1999 A
6010511 Murphy Jan 2000 A
6012457 Lesh Jan 2000 A
6015386 Kensey et al. Jan 2000 A
6025725 Gershenfeld et al. Feb 2000 A
6039701 Sliwa et al. Mar 2000 A
6053873 Govari et al. Apr 2000 A
6111520 Allen et al. Aug 2000 A
6115633 Lang et al. Sep 2000 A
6115636 Ryan Sep 2000 A
6164283 Lesh Dec 2000 A
6206835 Spillman, Jr. et al. Mar 2001 B1
6231516 Keilman May 2001 B1
6261233 Kantorovich Jul 2001 B1
6278379 Allen et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287253 Ortega et al. Sep 2001 B1
6325762 Tjin Dec 2001 B1
6339816 Bausch Jan 2002 B1
6354999 Dgany et al. Mar 2002 B1
6398734 Cimochowski et al. Jun 2002 B1
6434411 Duret Aug 2002 B1
6503202 Hossack et al. Jan 2003 B1
6574510 Von Arx et al. Jun 2003 B2
6673020 Okada et al. Jan 2004 B2
6699186 Wolinsky et al. Mar 2004 B1
6738671 Christophersom et al. May 2004 B2
6776763 Nix Aug 2004 B2
6802811 Slepian Oct 2004 B1
6855115 Fonseca Feb 2005 B2
6895265 Silver May 2005 B2
6926670 Rich et al. Aug 2005 B2
6972553 Petrovich et al. Dec 2005 B2
7065409 Mazar Jun 2006 B2
7077812 Naghavi Jul 2006 B2
7082330 Stadler et al. Jul 2006 B2
7147604 Allen Dec 2006 B1
7149587 Wardle et al. Dec 2006 B2
7191013 Miranda et al. Mar 2007 B1
7225032 Schmeling et al. May 2007 B2
7233821 Hettrick et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236821 Cates et al. Jun 2007 B2
7245117 Joy Jul 2007 B1
7284442 Fleischman et al. Oct 2007 B2
7367984 Kulcinski et al. May 2008 B2
7423496 Scheuermann Sep 2008 B2
7432723 Ellis Oct 2008 B2
7439723 Allen Oct 2008 B2
7444878 Pepples Nov 2008 B1
7452334 Gianchandani et al. Nov 2008 B2
7454244 Kassab et al. Nov 2008 B2
7466120 Miller Dec 2008 B2
7479112 Sweeney et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481771 Fonseca Jan 2009 B2
7492144 Powers Feb 2009 B2
7498799 Allen Mar 2009 B2
7550978 Joy Jun 2009 B2
7574792 O'Brien Aug 2009 B2
7595647 Kroh Sep 2009 B2
7618363 Yadav Nov 2009 B2
7621036 Cros Nov 2009 B2
7621876 Hoctor et al. Nov 2009 B2
7647831 Corcoran Jan 2010 B2
7647836 O'Brien Jan 2010 B2
7662653 O'Brien Feb 2010 B2
7667547 Ellis Feb 2010 B2
7677107 Nunez Mar 2010 B2
7678135 Maahs et al. Mar 2010 B2
7679355 Allen Mar 2010 B2
7699059 Fonseca Apr 2010 B2
7710103 Powers May 2010 B2
7725160 Weber May 2010 B2
7748277 O'Brien Jul 2010 B2
7778684 Weber et al. Aug 2010 B2
7786867 Hamel et al. Aug 2010 B2
7812416 Courcimault Oct 2010 B2
7829363 You Nov 2010 B2
7839153 Joy Nov 2010 B2
7848813 Bergelson et al. Dec 2010 B2
7854172 O'Brien Dec 2010 B2
7908002 Hoijer Mar 2011 B2
7908018 O'Brien Mar 2011 B2
7909770 Stern Mar 2011 B2
7932732 Ellis Apr 2011 B2
7936174 Ellis May 2011 B2
7955269 Stahmann Jun 2011 B2
7966886 Corcoran Jun 2011 B2
7988719 Alt et al. Aug 2011 B2
8016766 Goedje et al. Sep 2011 B2
8021307 White Sep 2011 B2
8025625 Allen Sep 2011 B2
8026729 Kroh Sep 2011 B2
8060214 Larson et al. Nov 2011 B2
8078274 Kassab Dec 2011 B2
8082032 Kassab et al. Dec 2011 B2
8099161 Kassab Jan 2012 B2
8107248 Shin et al. Jan 2012 B2
8111150 Miller Feb 2012 B2
8114143 Kassab et al. Feb 2012 B2
8118749 White Feb 2012 B2
8154389 Rowland Apr 2012 B2
8159348 Ellis Apr 2012 B2
8185194 Kassab May 2012 B2
8209033 Zhang et al. Jun 2012 B2
8221405 Whisenant et al. Jul 2012 B2
8237451 Joy Aug 2012 B2
8264240 Park Sep 2012 B2
8267954 Decant, Jr. et al. Sep 2012 B2
8278941 Kroh Oct 2012 B2
8298147 Huennekens et al. Oct 2012 B2
8298148 Furman Oct 2012 B2
8353841 White Jan 2013 B2
8355777 White Jan 2013 B2
8356399 Kaplan Jan 2013 B2
8360984 Yadar Jan 2013 B2
8374689 Gopinathan et al. Feb 2013 B2
8432265 Rowland Apr 2013 B2
8442606 Furman May 2013 B2
8442639 Walker et al. May 2013 B2
8465436 Griswold Jun 2013 B2
8465452 Kassab Jun 2013 B2
8467854 Lewis et al. Jun 2013 B2
8493187 Rowland Jul 2013 B2
8500660 Buchwald et al. Aug 2013 B2
8521282 Czygan et al. Aug 2013 B2
8527046 Connelly et al. Sep 2013 B2
8556929 Harper et al. Oct 2013 B2
8570186 Nagy Oct 2013 B2
8600517 Forsell Dec 2013 B2
8613705 Scheurer Dec 2013 B2
8632469 Kassab Jan 2014 B2
8644941 Rooney et al. Feb 2014 B2
8665086 Miner Mar 2014 B2
8669770 Cros Mar 2014 B2
8696584 Kassab Apr 2014 B2
8702613 Kassab Apr 2014 B2
8706208 Chiao et al. Apr 2014 B2
8706209 Kassab Apr 2014 B2
8706219 Feldman Apr 2014 B2
8728012 Braido May 2014 B2
8784338 Wallace Jul 2014 B2
8798712 Gopinathan et al. Aug 2014 B2
8814798 Corbucci et al. Aug 2014 B2
8818507 Liu et al. Aug 2014 B2
8825151 Gopinathan et al. Sep 2014 B2
8827929 O'Dea Sep 2014 B2
8855783 Dagan et al. Oct 2014 B2
8864666 Kassem Oct 2014 B2
8870787 Yadav Oct 2014 B2
8874203 Kassab et al. Oct 2014 B2
8886301 Kassab Nov 2014 B2
8894582 Nunez Nov 2014 B2
8896324 Kroh Nov 2014 B2
8909351 Dinsmoor et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918169 Kassab et al. Dec 2014 B2
8938292 Hettrick et al. Jan 2015 B2
8951219 Gerber et al. Feb 2015 B2
9049995 Blomqvist et al. Jun 2015 B2
9060798 Harper et al. Jun 2015 B2
9061099 Gerber et al. Jun 2015 B2
9066672 Kassab et al. Jun 2015 B2
9162065 Karst et al. Oct 2015 B2
9198706 Kassab et al. Dec 2015 B2
9265428 O'Brien et al. Feb 2016 B2
9289132 Ghaffari et al. Mar 2016 B2
9289229 Kassab Mar 2016 B2
9305456 Rowland Apr 2016 B2
9314169 Kassab Apr 2016 B2
9326728 Demir et al. May 2016 B2
9332914 Langston May 2016 B2
9332916 Kassab May 2016 B2
9333365 Zhao May 2016 B2
9351661 Kassab May 2016 B2
9393416 Rooney et al. Jul 2016 B2
9445743 Kassab Sep 2016 B2
9489831 Nagy et al. Nov 2016 B2
9526637 Dagan et al. Dec 2016 B2
9545263 Lenihan Jan 2017 B2
9603533 Lading et al. Mar 2017 B2
9662066 Ledet et al. May 2017 B2
9675257 Kassab Jun 2017 B2
9675315 Song et al. Jun 2017 B2
9721463 Rowland Aug 2017 B2
9814395 Stahmann et al. Nov 2017 B2
9820673 Feldman Nov 2017 B2
9872948 Siess Jan 2018 B2
9878080 Kaiser et al. Jan 2018 B2
9901722 Nitzan et al. Feb 2018 B2
9996712 Sundaram et al. Jun 2018 B2
10080528 BeBusschere et al. Sep 2018 B2
10092247 Taylor Oct 2018 B2
10105103 Goldshtein et al. Oct 2018 B2
10194808 Thompson Feb 2019 B1
10195441 Kaiser Feb 2019 B2
10201285 Sawanoi Feb 2019 B2
10210956 Lavi Feb 2019 B2
10213129 Kassab Feb 2019 B2
10219704 Avi Mar 2019 B2
10219720 Kassab Mar 2019 B2
10219724 Stern Mar 2019 B2
10226203 Stigall Mar 2019 B2
10226218 Rowland Mar 2019 B2
10231659 Vanslyke Mar 2019 B2
10231701 Ryan Mar 2019 B2
10236084 Grady Mar 2019 B2
10238311 Kassab Mar 2019 B2
10238322 Vanslyke Mar 2019 B2
10238323 Vanslyke Mar 2019 B2
10238324 Vanslyke Mar 2019 B2
10240994 Xu Mar 2019 B1
10265024 Lee Apr 2019 B2
10271797 Zhang Apr 2019 B2
10335042 Schoenie et al. Jul 2019 B2
10390714 Wolinsky Aug 2019 B2
10433736 Karlovsky et al. Oct 2019 B2
10537281 Thompson et al. Jan 2020 B2
10542887 Sarkar et al. Jan 2020 B2
10660577 Thakur et al. Jan 2020 B2
10548535 Zhang et al. Feb 2020 B2
10555704 Averina et al. Feb 2020 B2
10582866 Badie et al. Mar 2020 B2
10588528 Banet et al. Mar 2020 B2
10595734 Thakur et al. Mar 2020 B2
10596381 Averina et al. Mar 2020 B2
10638980 Gyllensten et al. May 2020 B2
10687715 Jansen et al. Jun 2020 B2
10702213 Sharma et al. Jul 2020 B2
10806352 Sweeney et al. Oct 2020 B2
10905393 Gifford, III et al. Feb 2021 B2
11006845 Kuraguntla et al. May 2021 B2
11039813 Gifford, III et al. Jun 2021 B2
11272840 Rothfuss Mar 2022 B2
11445924 Joseph Sep 2022 B2
11452497 Garza Sep 2022 B2
20020120205 Ferek-Petric Aug 2002 A1
20020188207 Richter Dec 2002 A1
20030037591 Ashton et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030100940 Yodfat May 2003 A1
20030158584 Cates et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030199938 Smits et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040054287 Stephens Mar 2004 A1
20040106871 Hunyor et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040116992 Wardle Jun 2004 A1
20040133092 Kain Jul 2004 A1
20040140939 Haller et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167596 Richter Aug 2004 A1
20040176672 Silver et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040215235 Jackson et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225326 Weiner Nov 2004 A1
20050137481 Sheard et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050148903 Diamantopoulos Jul 2005 A1
20050154321 Wolinsky Jul 2005 A1
20060047327 Colvin et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060056161 Shin Mar 2006 A1
20060079793 Mann et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060100522 Yuan May 2006 A1
20060106321 Lewinsky et al. May 2006 A1
20060122522 Chavan et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149166 Zvuloni Jul 2006 A1
20060174712 O'Brien Aug 2006 A1
20060177956 O'Brien Aug 2006 A1
20060178695 Decant Aug 2006 A1
20060253160 Benditt et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271119 Ni et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060280351 Luping et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287602 Obrien et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287700 White Dec 2006 A1
20070088214 Shuros Apr 2007 A1
20070129637 Wolinsky et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070158769 You Jul 2007 A1
20070199385 O'Brien Aug 2007 A1
20070249950 Piaget et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070274565 Penner Nov 2007 A1
20070282210 Stern Dec 2007 A1
20070292090 Alphonse et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080015569 Saadat Jan 2008 A1
20080033527 Nunez et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080077016 Sparks Mar 2008 A1
20080097227 Zdeblick et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080177186 Slater et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080275350 Liao Nov 2008 A1
20080294041 Kassab Nov 2008 A1
20090007679 Nunez Jan 2009 A1
20090009332 Nunez Jan 2009 A1
20090011117 Nunez Jan 2009 A1
20090024042 Nunez Jan 2009 A1
20090024177 Shuros et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030291 O'Brien Jan 2009 A1
20090036776 Masuda et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062684 Gregersen et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090105799 Hekmat et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090149766 Shuros et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177225 Nunez et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090189741 Rowland Jul 2009 A1
20090198293 Cauller Aug 2009 A1
20090270729 Corbucci Oct 2009 A1
20090299427 Liu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100056922 Florent Mar 2010 A1
20100063375 Kassab et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076398 Scheurer Mar 2010 A1
20100094328 O'dea et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100113939 Mashimo et al. May 2010 A1
20100121398 Bjorling et al. May 2010 A1
20100222786 Kassab Sep 2010 A1
20100262206 Zdeblick et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274217 Da Silva et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100324432 Bjorling et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110054333 Hoffer Mar 2011 A1
20110105863 Kroh May 2011 A1
20110144967 Adirovich Jun 2011 A1
20110160844 Haselby Jun 2011 A1
20110178383 Kassab Jul 2011 A1
20110184301 Holmstrom et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110201990 Franano Aug 2011 A1
20110224582 Spence Sep 2011 A1
20110265908 Clerc et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110306867 Gopinathan et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016207 Allen Jan 2012 A1
20120029598 Zhao Feb 2012 A1
20120136385 Cully May 2012 A1
20120203090 Min Aug 2012 A1
20120203113 Skerl et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120291788 Griswold et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120296222 Griswold et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130030295 Huennekens et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130041244 Woias et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130041251 Bailey et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130041269 Stahmann et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130060139 Richter Mar 2013 A1
20130073025 Kassab Mar 2013 A1
20130085350 Schugt Apr 2013 A1
20130096409 Hiltner et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130178750 Sheehan et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130178751 Min Jul 2013 A1
20130184545 Blomqvist et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130218054 Sverdlik et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130222153 Rowland et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130245469 Yadav Sep 2013 A1
20130245745 Vong et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130261655 Drasler et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130274705 Burnes et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130281800 Saroka et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130296721 Yadav et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130303914 Hiltner et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130303915 Barnard et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130310820 Fernandez et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130317359 Wilson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130324866 Gladshtein Dec 2013 A1
20130331678 Lading et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338468 Kassab Dec 2013 A1
20140028467 Nagy Jan 2014 A1
20140051965 Zdeblick et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140066738 Kassab Mar 2014 A1
20140073935 Rodriguez-Llorente Mar 2014 A1
20140084943 Kroh Mar 2014 A1
20140088994 Kroh Mar 2014 A1
20140094697 Petroff et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140107768 Venkatasubramanian Apr 2014 A1
20140155710 Rowland Jun 2014 A1
20140155768 Orion et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140155769 White Jun 2014 A1
20140180118 Stigall Jun 2014 A1
20140200428 Kassab Jul 2014 A1
20140236011 Fan et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140243640 O'Dea Aug 2014 A1
20140266935 Tankiewicz Sep 2014 A1
20140275861 Kroh Sep 2014 A1
20140276011 Schmitt et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276067 Neasham Sep 2014 A1
20140276110 Hoseit Sep 2014 A1
20140276121 Kassab Sep 2014 A1
20140276191 Kassab Sep 2014 A1
20140288085 Yadav Sep 2014 A1
20140288459 Yadav Sep 2014 A1
20140306807 Rowland Oct 2014 A1
20140330143 Kroh et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140350348 Tee et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150031966 Ward et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150045649 O'Dea et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150051467 Corbucci et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150065835 Kassab Mar 2015 A1
20150065897 Bomzin et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150088100 Oborn Mar 2015 A1
20150133796 Yadav May 2015 A1
20150141863 Kassab et al. May 2015 A1
20150157268 Winshtein et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150208929 Rowland Jul 2015 A1
20150216425 Gladshtein et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150223702 Vanney et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150238121 Tu et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150257732 Ryan Sep 2015 A1
20150282720 Goldshtein et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150282875 Harper et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150290373 Rudser et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150297110 Kassab Oct 2015 A1
20150297111 Kassab Oct 2015 A1
20150297112 Kassab et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150297113 Kassab Oct 2015 A1
20150297818 Matsubara et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150305808 Ku et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150313479 Stigall et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150327786 Lading et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160000403 Vilkomerson Jan 2016 A1
20160015507 Johnson et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160022216 Goldshtein et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160022447 Kim et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160029956 Rowland Feb 2016 A1
20160029995 Navratil et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160038087 Hunter Feb 2016 A1
20160045184 Courtney Feb 2016 A1
20160081657 Rice Mar 2016 A1
20160095535 Hettrick et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160135787 Anderson et al. May 2016 A1
20160135941 Binmoeller et al. May 2016 A1
20160166232 Merritt Jun 2016 A1
20160198981 Demir et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160210846 Rowland et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160324443 Rowland et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160345930 Mizukami Dec 2016 A1
20170055048 Nagy et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170055909 Schibli et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170065186 Joseph Mar 2017 A1
20170071501 Kassab Mar 2017 A1
20170127975 Bozkurt May 2017 A1
20170164840 Matsumoto Jun 2017 A1
20170181677 Varsavsky et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170065824 Dagan et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170216508 Zilbershlag et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170224279 Cahan Aug 2017 A1
20170238817 Lading Aug 2017 A1
20170290686 Sirhan et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170319096 Kaiser Nov 2017 A1
20170332945 Gopinathan et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170340440 Ratz Nov 2017 A1
20170360312 Joseph Dec 2017 A1
20180014829 Tal et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180064931 Clements Mar 2018 A1
20180092631 Liou Apr 2018 A1
20180172785 Leussler et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180177486 Gifford et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180220992 Gifford et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180228951 Schwammenthal et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180247095 Sundaram et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180268941 Lavi et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180269931 Hershko et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180271371 Ziaie et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180289488 Orth et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180289536 Burnett Oct 2018 A1
20180293409 Sundaram et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180326151 Halpert et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180344917 Inhaber et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190029639 Gifford et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190046047 Haase Feb 2019 A1
20190053720 Sawado Feb 2019 A1
20190053767 Yamada Feb 2019 A1
20190069784 Mukkamala Mar 2019 A1
20190069842 Rothberg Mar 2019 A1
20190069851 Sharma Mar 2019 A1
20190070348 Frost Mar 2019 A1
20190076033 Sweeney et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190082978 Van der Horst Mar 2019 A1
20190083030 Thakur Mar 2019 A1
20190090760 Kinast Mar 2019 A1
20190090763 Woerlee Mar 2019 A1
20190090856 Van der Horst Mar 2019 A1
20190099087 Cros Apr 2019 A1
20190099088 Whinnett Apr 2019 A1
20190110696 Benkowski Apr 2019 A1
20190126014 Kapur et al. May 2019 A1
20190150884 Maharbiz et al. May 2019 A1
20190167188 Gifford et al. Jun 2019 A1
20200000364 Doodeman et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200013510 Despenic et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200022588 Wariar et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200022589 Banet et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200029829 Banet et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200029857 Rowland et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200030612 Song et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200037888 Thakur et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200037892 Banet et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200046299 An et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200069857 Schwammenthal et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200121187 Sarkar et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200129087 Sweeney et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200146577 Badie et al. May 2020 A1
20200170515 Wen et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200170711 Hendriks et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200187864 Sharma Jun 2020 A1
20200187865 Sharma et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200196876 Minor et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200196899 Higgins et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200196943 Minor et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200196944 Minor et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200196948 Cho et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200197178 Vecchio Jun 2020 A1
20200254161 Schwammenthal et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200289257 Marquez Sep 2020 A1
20210038094 Sweeney et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210060298 Arndt et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210177277 Cros et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210216733 Chronos et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210244381 Sweeney et al. Aug 2021 A1
20220071488 Andersen et al. Mar 2022 A1
20220125312 Nazari et al. Apr 2022 A1
20220233084 Valdez Jul 2022 A1
20220240792 Wetterling Aug 2022 A1
20220265157 Charthad Aug 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (208)
Number Date Country
110613449 May 2020 CN
102005035022 Nov 2006 DE
0399059 May 1989 EP
0538885 Apr 1993 EP
0897285 Feb 1999 EP
1162914 Dec 2001 EP
1311210 May 2003 EP
0904009 Sep 2003 EP
1545303 Jun 2005 EP
1677852 Jul 2006 EP
1847217 Oct 2007 EP
1851524 Nov 2007 EP
1851791 Nov 2007 EP
1868496 Dec 2007 EP
1871224 Jan 2008 EP
1893080 Mar 2008 EP
1893081 Mar 2008 EP
1893085 Mar 2008 EP
2091426 Jun 2008 EP
1948007 Jul 2008 EP
1993438 Nov 2008 EP
2012658 Jan 2009 EP
2046242 Apr 2009 EP
2117423 Nov 2009 EP
2197344 Jun 2010 EP
2265164 Dec 2010 EP
2021757 Apr 2011 EP
2391263 Dec 2011 EP
1921983 Jan 2012 EP
2060014 Jan 2012 EP
1902529 Jun 2012 EP
1876945 Dec 2012 EP
2330968 Apr 2013 EP
2601633 Jun 2013 EP
2449960 Oct 2013 EP
2725969 May 2014 EP
1993436 Jun 2014 EP
3027109 Feb 2015 EP
2076170 Apr 2015 EP
2895059 Jul 2015 EP
2898470 Jul 2015 EP
2922465 Sep 2015 EP
2317912 Nov 2015 EP
1817593 Dec 2015 EP
2967432 Jan 2016 EP
2268218 Feb 2016 EP
2456502 Apr 2016 EP
2702578 Aug 2016 EP
3057075 Aug 2016 EP
2417590 May 2017 EP
2986252 Jul 2018 EP
3359021 Aug 2018 EP
3435847 Feb 2019 EP
3435862 Feb 2019 EP
3437000 Feb 2019 EP
3448330 Mar 2019 EP
3448487 Mar 2019 EP
3457911 Mar 2019 EP
3457924 Mar 2019 EP
3457928 Mar 2019 EP
3463082 Apr 2019 EP
3468462 Apr 2019 EP
3591663 Jan 2020 EP
3609392 Feb 2020 EP
3256043 Mar 2020 EP
3629921 Apr 2020 EP
3629937 Apr 2020 EP
3630275 Apr 2020 EP
3634206 Apr 2020 EP
3654835 May 2020 EP
3496808 Jun 2020 EP
2654560 Jul 2020 EP
3326524 Jul 2020 EP
3367884 Jul 2020 EP
3678539 Jul 2020 EP
3681389 Jul 2020 EP
3684260 Jul 2020 EP
3684464 Jul 2020 EP
2155307 Mar 2021 EP
4039173 Aug 2022 EP
2473529 Mar 2011 GB
2011234884 Nov 2011 JP
1997042871 Nov 1997 WO
1998029030 Dec 1997 WO
1998035611 Aug 1998 WO
2000055579 Sep 2000 WO
2000056210 Sep 2000 WO
2001012092 Feb 2001 WO
2001013792 Mar 2001 WO
2002015823 Feb 2002 WO
2002076289 Oct 2002 WO
2003061467 Jul 2003 WO
2003061504 Jul 2003 WO
2003092495 Nov 2003 WO
2004014456 Feb 2004 WO
2004073796 Sep 2004 WO
2006049796 May 2006 WO
2006086113 Aug 2006 WO
2006086114 Aug 2006 WO
2005027998 Sep 2006 WO
2006094273 Sep 2006 WO
2006096582 Sep 2006 WO
2006102905 Oct 2006 WO
2006110798 Oct 2006 WO
2006025215 Nov 2006 WO
2007002185 Jan 2007 WO
2007002224 Jan 2007 WO
2007002225 Jan 2007 WO
2007008493 Jan 2007 WO
2007028035 Mar 2007 WO
2007035332 Mar 2007 WO
2007047571 Apr 2007 WO
2007047794 Apr 2007 WO
2007061841 May 2007 WO
2007106490 Sep 2007 WO
2007106533 Sep 2007 WO
2007130628 Nov 2007 WO
2008031011 Mar 2008 WO
2008031095 Mar 2008 WO
2008051907 May 2008 WO
2008066569 Jun 2008 WO
2009006602 Jan 2009 WO
2009006608 Jan 2009 WO
2009006610 Jan 2009 WO
2009006615 Jan 2009 WO
2009025648 Feb 2009 WO
2009039174 Mar 2009 WO
2009111255 Sep 2009 WO
2009131879 Oct 2009 WO
2011060359 Nov 2009 WO
2009146089 Dec 2009 WO
2009146090 Dec 2009 WO
2009149462 Dec 2009 WO
2010011612 Jan 2010 WO
2010088279 Aug 2010 WO
2010117597 Oct 2010 WO
20100117356 Oct 2010 WO
2011011104 Jan 2011 WO
2012015954 Feb 2012 WO
2012015955 Feb 2012 WO
2012019191 Feb 2012 WO
2012090206 Jul 2012 WO
2012140147 Oct 2012 WO
2012145187 Oct 2012 WO
2012149008 Nov 2012 WO
2013003754 Jan 2013 WO
2013142387 Sep 2013 WO
2013163605 Oct 2013 WO
2014006471 Jan 2014 WO
2014012670 Jan 2014 WO
2004014456 Feb 2014 WO
2014047528 Mar 2014 WO
2014054045 Apr 2014 WO
2014070316 May 2014 WO
2014076620 May 2014 WO
2014081958 May 2014 WO
2014145531 Sep 2014 WO
2014145712 Sep 2014 WO
2014162181 Oct 2014 WO
2014170771 Oct 2014 WO
2014179739 Nov 2014 WO
WO-2014188430 Nov 2014 WO
2014197101 Dec 2014 WO
2015074018 May 2015 WO
2015109028 Jul 2015 WO
20150157712 Oct 2015 WO
2016011309 Jan 2016 WO
2016025430 Feb 2016 WO
2016131020 Aug 2016 WO
2016156446 Oct 2016 WO
2016178196 Nov 2016 WO
2016178197 Nov 2016 WO
2017024051 Feb 2017 WO
2017143198 Aug 2017 WO
2017198867 Nov 2017 WO
2017222964 Dec 2017 WO
2018013725 Jan 2018 WO
2018031714 Feb 2018 WO
2018081314 May 2018 WO
2018102435 Jun 2018 WO
2018146690 Aug 2018 WO
2018150314 Aug 2018 WO
2018156930 Aug 2018 WO
2018187582 Oct 2018 WO
2018220143 Dec 2018 WO
2018220146 Dec 2018 WO
2019050831 Mar 2019 WO
2019051007 Mar 2019 WO
2019051108 Mar 2019 WO
2019051007 Apr 2019 WO
2019063521 Apr 2019 WO
2019079364 Apr 2019 WO
2019232213 Dec 2019 WO
2020023839 Jan 2020 WO
2020121221 Jun 2020 WO
2020131247 Jun 2020 WO
2020132460 Jun 2020 WO
2020132668 Jun 2020 WO
2020132669 Jun 2020 WO
2020132670 Jun 2020 WO
2020132671 Jun 2020 WO
2020132678 Jun 2020 WO
2020144075 Jul 2020 WO
2020153765 Jul 2020 WO
2021217055 Oct 2021 WO
2021236756 Nov 2021 WO
2022055920 Mar 2022 WO
2022167382 Aug 2022 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (58)
Entry
E. Y. Chow et al., “Fully Wireless Implantable Cardiovascular Pressure Monitor Integrated with a Medical Stent,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 1487-1496, Jun. 2010 (Year: 2010).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2020, in connection with PCT/IB2019/060669 filed Dec. 11, 2019.
Voroneanu et. al., “The relationship between chronic volume overload 3 and elevated blood pressure in hemodialysis patients: 4 use of bioimpedance provides a different perspective 5 from echocardiography and biomarker methodologies,” Int Urol Nephrol, Sep. 2010; 42(3):789-97.
Cannesson et al., “Respiratory Variations in Pulse Oximetry Plethysmographic Waveform Amplitude to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room,” Anesthesiology 2007; 106:1105-11.
Abraham et al., “The Role of Implantable Hemodynamic Monitors to Manage Heart Failure,” Heart Failure Clin 11 (2015) 183-189.
Tallaj et al., “Implantable Hemodynamic Monitors,” Cardiol Clin 29 (2011) 289-299.
Tang et al., “Measuring impedance in congestive heart failure: Current options and clinical applications,” American Heart Journal 157 (3) 402-411.
Merchant et al., “Implantable Sensors for Heart Failure,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2010; 3:657-667.
Unadkat, Jignesh V., et al. “The Development of a Wireless Implantable Blood Flow Monitor,” Ideas and Innovations, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 136:199 (2015).
Steinhouse, David et al., “Implant Experience with an Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor for the Management of Symptomatic Heart Failure,” PACE (Aug. 2005) vol. 28, pp. 747-753.
Braunschweig, Frieder et al. “Dynamic changes in right ventricular pressures during haemodialysis recorded with an implantable haemodynamic monitor,” Nephrol Dial Transplant (2006) 21:176-183.
Karamanoglu, Mustafa et al., “Estimation of cardiac output in patients with congestive heart failure by analysis of right ventricular pressure waveforms,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2011, 10:36.
Spiliopoulos, Sotirios et la., “Beneficial aspects of real time flow measurements for the management of acute right ventricular heart failure following continuous flow ventricular assist device implantation,” Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery (2012) 7:119.
Sharma, Arjun D. et al., “Right Ventricular Pressure During Ventricular Arrhythmias in Humans: Potential Implications for Implantable Antitachycardia Devices,” JACC vol. 15, No. 3, Mar. 1, 1990, pp. 648-655.
Kjellstrom, Barbo et al., “Changes in Right Ventricular Pressures Between Hemodialysis Sessions Recorded by an Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor,” The American Journal of Cardiology, 2009, 103:119-123.
Zile, Michael R. et al., “Transition From Chronic Compensated to Acute Decompensated Heart Failure,” Circulation, American Heart Association (2008) 118:1433-1441.
Plicchi, G. et al., “Pea I and Pea II Based Implantable Haemodynamic Monitor: Pre Clinical Studies in Sheep,” Europace (2002) 4, 49-54.
Vanderheyden, Marc et al., “Continuous Monitoring of Intrathoracic Impedance and Right Ventricular Pressures in Patients With Heart Failure,” Circulation Heart Failure (2010) 3:370-377.
Jacobs, Donald L. et al., “Bedside vena cava filter placement with intravascular ultrasound: A simple, accurate, single venous access method,” Technical Note, Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1284-1286, Dec. 2007.
Muller, Laurent et al., “Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use,” Critical Care 2012, 16:R188.
Blehar, David J. et al., “Identification of congestive heart failure via respiratory variation of inferior vena cava diameter.” American Journal of Emergency Medicine (2009) 27, 71-75.
Miller, Joseph B., et al., “Inferior vena cava assessment in the bedside diagnosis of acute heart failure,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine (2012) 30, 778-783.
Corl, Keith et al., “Bedside sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava caval index is a poor predictor of fluid responsiveness in emergency department patients,” Emergency Medicine Australasia (2012) 24, 534-539.
Feissel, et al. “The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy,” Intensive Care Med (2004) 30: 1834-1837.
Nakao, Shoichiro et al., “Effects of Positional Changes on Inferior Vena Caval Size and Dynamics and Correlations with Right-Sided Cardiac Pressure,” American Journal of Cardiology (1987; 59:125-132).
Saha, Narayan M., et al., “Outpatient Use of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound to Assess the Inferior Vena Cava in Patients With Heart Failure,” American Journal of Cardiology (2015).
Ishizaki, et al. “Measurement of inferior vena cava diameter for evaluation of venous return in subjects on day 10 of a bed-rest experiment,” J Appl Physical 96: 2179-2186, 2004.
Carbone et al. “Inferior Vena Cava Parameters Predict Re-admission in Ischaemic Heart Failure”, European Journal of Clinical Investigations, 2014, 44(4): 341-349.
Bertram, C.D. et al., “Cross-sectional area measurement in collapsed tubes using the transformer principle”, Med. & Biol, Eng. & Comput, 1989, 27, 357-364.
Moreno, Augusto et al., “Mechanics of Distension of Dog Veins and Other Very Thin-Walled Tubular Structures”, Circulation Research, vol. XXVII, Dec. 1970, pp. 1069-1080.
Tafur, Emilio et al., “Simultaneous Pressure, Flow and Diameter of the Vena Cava with Fright and Exercise”, Circulation Research, vol. XIX, Jul. 1966., pp. 42-50.
Guntheroth, Warren G., et al., “Effect of Respiration on Venous Return and Stroke Volume in Cardiac Tamponade”, Circulation Research, vol. XX, Apr. 1967, pp. 381-390.
Bartels, Lambertus et al., “Improved Lumen Visualization in Metallic Vascular Implants by Reducing RF Artifacts”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 47:171-180 (2002).
Guntheroth, Warren G., “in Vivo Measurement of Dimensions of Veins with Implications Regarding Control of Venous Return”, IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, Oct. 1969; pp. 247-253.
Kivelitz, Dietmar et al., “A Vascular Stent as an Active Component for Locally Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging”, Investigative Radiology, vol. 38, No. 3, 147-152 (2003).
Reddy, Reddy R.V., et al., “A Catheter-Tip Probe for Dynamic Cross-Section Area Measurement”, pp. 149-158. (1973).
Stegall, H. Fred, “Survey of Dimension Transducers”, Chronically Implanted Cardiovascular Instrumentation, pp. 107-115 (1973).
D. H. Bergel, “The Measurement of Lengths and Dimensions”, Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics, vol. 1. pp. 91-114 (1972).
Baan, Jan et al., “Dynamic Local Distensibility of Living Arteries and its relation to Wave Transmission”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 14, (1974); pp. 343-362.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in connection with PCT/US2016/017902, dated Jul. 27, 2016.
Reems, Miryam et al., Central Venous Pressure: Principles, Measurement, and Interpretation, Vetlearn.com, Jan. 2012, Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians, pp. E1-E10.
Yamauchi, Hideko et al., “Correlation Between Blood Volume and Pulmonary Artery Catheter Measurements”, Department of Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, University of Hawaii, 2005.
Abraham, William T. et al., “Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial”; www.thelancet.com, vol. 377, Feb. 19, 2011, pp. 658-666.
Guiotto, Giovanna et al., “Inferior vena cava collapsibility to guide fluid removal in slow continuous ultrafiltration: a pilot study”, Intensive Care Med (2010) 36:696-696.
Martens, Pieter et al., “Current Approach to Decongestive Therapy in Acute Heart Failure”, Curr Heart Fail Rep (2015) 12:367-378.
Dupont, Matthias et a., “Impact of Systemic Venous Congestion in Heart Failure”, Curr Heart Fail Rep (2011) 8:233-241.
Marik, Paul E. et al., “Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy”, Annals of Intensive Care 2011, 1:1; http://www.annalsofintensivecare.com/content/1/1/1.
Silverberg, Donald et al., “The association between congestive heart failure and chronic renal disease”, Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 13: 163-170, 2004.
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2020, in connection with EP20163433.4.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 3, 2020, in connection with PCT/US2019/066589 filed Dec. 16, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 27, 2018, in connection with PCT/US2017/063749.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 29, 2018, in connection with PCT/EP2018/064386.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2018, in connection with PCT/EP2018/064383.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2019, in connection with PCT/US2019/034657, filed May 30, 2019.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 19, 2017, in connection with PCT/US2017/046204.
Brennan, J.M., “Handcarried Ultrasound Measurement of the Inferior Vena Cava for Assessment of Intravascular Volume Status in the Outpatient Hemodialysis Clinic”; Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology; pp. 749-753; Jan. 23, 2006.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 20, 2016, in connection with PCT/US2016/045385 filed Aug. 3, 2016.
Horizon Scanning Research & Intelligence Centre; Furosemide sc2Wear micro-pump patch for oedema in heart failure; National Institute for Health Research; NIHR HSRIC ID: 11808; Mar. 2016; pp. 1-10; www.hsric.nihr.ac.uk.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200253583 A1 Aug 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62513013 May 2017 US