Patent Grant
7481771
This invention relates to chronically implanted sensors for wirelessly sensing pressure, temperature and other physical properties within the human body. More particularly, the invention concerns a wireless, un-powered micromachined pressure sensor that can be delivered using endovascular techniques to the interior of the human heart.
The measurement of blood pressure within the human heart provides critical information regarding the organ's function. Many methods and techniques have been developed to give physicians with the ability to monitor heart function to properly diagnose and treat various diseases and medical conditions. For example, a sensor or transducer placed within the chambers of the heart can be used to record variations in blood pressure based on physical changes to a mechanical element within the sensor. This information is then transferred from the sensor to external device that is capable of translating the data from the sensor into a measurable value that can be displayed. The drawback of this type of sensor is that there must be a physical connection between the sensor and the external device, thus limiting its use to acute settings.
Many types of wireless sensors have been proposed that would allow implantation of the device into the body and then through the appropriate coupling means, pressure reading can be made over longer periods of interest. The primary limitation to these type of sensors are the fabrication methods used to manufacture them do not provide sufficient miniaturization to allow them to be introduced and implanted into the heart using non-surgical, catheter based techniques.
For a sensor that is designated to be placed within the heart, additional considerations are required. A feature must be provided that will allow the sensor to be permanently secured to the wall of the heart in a manner that will exclude any possibility of movement of the sensor or displacement out of the heart. Finally, an implantable sensor of this type must be assembled using the materials and fabrications methods that ensure appropriate biocompatibility and long term mechanical and electrical durability.
One method of manufacturing a sensor capable of measuring pressure is to use a capacitor that is assembled such that the capacitive plates will deform as a result of exposure externally applied stress. This deformation will result in a change in the capacitance that will be proportional to the applied stress. Various patents describe the fabrication and use of capacitor based pressure sensors. The primary limitation of many of these inventions is that the techniques used to fabricate the sensors do not lend themselves to miniaturization necessary for it to be configured as an implantable medical device.
The fabrications methodologies that have been developed in the field of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems, however, do specifically provide the means for assembling miniaturized sensors capable of measuring a variety of properties including pressure. MEMS devices as described in these patents traditionally use silicon as a substrate for construction of miniature electrical or mechanical structures. The resulting sensors are inherently rigid severely limiting the ability to manipulate them into temporarily small packages that would provide the means for non-surgical implantation into the human body.
A number of patents detail pressure sensors (some capacitive in nature, some manufactured using MEMS based technology) that are specifically designed for implantation into the human body. These sensors suffer from many of the limitations already mentioned with the additional concerns that they require either the addition of a power source to operate the device or the need for a physical connection to a device capable of translating the sensor output into a meaningful display of a physiologic parameter.
To overcome these two problems (power and physical connection), the concept of a externally modulated LC circuit has been applied to development of implantable pressure sensors. Of a number of patents that describe a sensor design of this nature, Chubbuck, U.S. Pat. No. 6,113,553 is a representative example. The Chubbuck patent demonstrates how a combination of a pressure sensitive capacitor placed in series with an inductor coil provides the basis of a wireless, un-powered pressure sensor that is suitable for implantation into the human body. Construction of an LC circuit in which variations of resonant frequency correlate to changes in measured pressure and which these variations can be detected remotely through the use of electromagnetic coupling are further described in Allen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,111,520, incorporated herein by reference.
The device embodied by the Chubbuck patent is manufactured using conventional techniques, thus requiring surgical implantation and thus limiting its applicability to areas that are easily accessible to surgery (i.e., skull).
Thus, the need exists for a biocompatible, wireless, un-powered pressure sensor that for the purposes of introduction and delivery within the human heart can be manipulated into a smaller shape and size by rolling or folding it into a cylindrical form and loaded into a small diameter catheter. Then upon positioning the catheter within the desired chamber of the heart, the sensor can be deployed and through the use super-elastic alloy components in the form of anchors or hooks secured to the interior wall of the heart.
It is an object of this invention to provide an implantable wireless sensor.
It is also an object of this invention to provide a wireless, unpowered micromechanical, flexible sensor that can be delivered endovascularly to a heart chamber.
It is a further object of this invention to provide an implantable, wireless, unpowered sensor that can be delivered endovascularly to a heat chamber to measure pressure and/or temperature.
These and other objects of the invention will become more apparent from the discussion below.
The present invention describes a sensor that can be fabricated using micro-machining techniques and can be implanted into the human body using non-surgical methods for the measurement of physical parameters. This sensor is fabricated using MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) technology, which allows the creation of a flexible device that is small, accurate, precise, durable, robust, biocompatible, radiopaque and insensitive to changes in body chemistry, biology or external pressure. This device will not require the use of wires to relay pressure information externally nor need an internal power supply to perform its function.
The MEMS approach to sensor design lends itself to the fabrication of small, flat sensors that can be formed using biocompatible polymers as substrate materials. The pressure sensor described above can then be manipulated into a smaller shape and size by rolling, bending, or folding it into a cylindrical form. This smaller object can then be introduced into the chambers of the human heart using endovascular catheter techniques. Once positioned within the heart, the device unfurls into a preferred flat shape. Super-elastic alloy components may be incorporated into the device such as hooks, anchors, harpoons or coils are designed to secure the pressure sensor to the wall of the heart and resist displacement due to movement of the heart wall or from the interaction of blood being pumped through the heart. In addition, appropriately biocompatible coatings may be applied to the surface of the sensor in order to prevent adhesion of biological substances to the sensor that could interfere with it proper function.
The pressure sensor can be manufactured using Micro-machining techniques that were developed for the integrated circuit industry. An example of this type of sensor features an inductive-capacitive (LC) resonant circuit with a variable capacitor and is described in Allen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,111,520 incorporated herein by reference. In this sensor, the capacitance varies with the pressure of the environment in which the capacitor is placed. Consequently, the resonant frequency of the LC circuit of the pressure sensor varies depending on the pressure of the environment. The pressure sensor is made of completely passive components having no active circuitry or power sources such as batteries. The pressure sensor is completely self-contained having no leads to connect to an external circuit or power source. Furthermore, these same manufacturing techniques can be used to add additional sensing capabilities, such as the ability to measure temperature by the addition of a resistor to the basic LC circuit.
When introduced into heart, the pressure sensor can provide pressure related data by use of an external measuring device. As disclosed in the Allen et al. patent, several different excitation systems can be used. For example, the sensor can be electromagnetically coupled to a transmitting antenna. Consequently, a current is induced in the sensors, which oscillates at the resonant frequency of the sensor. This oscillation causes a change in the frequency spectrum of the transmitted signal. From this change, the bandwidth and resonant frequency of the particular sensor may be determined, from which the corresponding change in pressure can be calculated.
Accordingly, the present invention provides for an impedance system and method of determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor. The system includes a transmitting antenna, which is coupled to an impedance analyzer. The impedance analyzer applies a constant voltage signal to the transmitting antenna scanning the frequency across a predetermined spectrum. The current passing through the transmitting antenna experiences a peak at the resonant frequency of the sensor. The resonant frequency and bandwidth are thus determined from this peak in the current.
The method of determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth using an impedance approach may include the steps of transmitting an excitation signal using a transmitting antenna and electromagnetically coupling a sensor having a resonant circuit to the transmitting antenna thereby modifying the impedance of the transmitting antenna. Next, the step of measuring the change in impedance of the transmitting antenna is performed, and finally, the resonant frequency and bandwidth of the sensor circuit are determined.
In addition, the present invention provides for a transmit and receive system and method for determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor. According to this method, an excitation signal of white noise or predetermined multiple frequencies is transmitted from a transmitting antenna, the sensor being electromagnetically coupled to the transmitting antenna. A current is induced in the resonant circuit of the sensor as it absorbs energy from the transmitted excitation signal, the current oscillating at the resonant frequency of the resonant circuit. A receiving antenna, also electromagnetically coupled to the transmitting antenna, receives the excitation signal minus the energy which was absorbed by the sensor. Thus, the power of the received signal experiences a dip or notch at the resonant frequency of the sensor. The resonant frequency and bandwidth are determined from this notch in the power.
The transmit and receive method of determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a sensor circuit includes the steps of transmitting a multiple frequency signal from transmitting antenna, and, electromagnetically coupling a resonant circuit on a sensor to the transmitting antenna thereby inducing a current in the sensor circuit. Next, the step of receiving a modified transmitted signal due to the induction of current in the sensor circuit is performed. Finally, the step of determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth from the received signal is executed.
Yet another system and method for determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor includes a chirp interrogation system. This system provides for a transmitting antenna which is electromagnetically coupled to the resonant circuit of the sensor. An excitation signal of white noise or predetermined multiple frequencies is applied to the transmitting antenna for a predetermined period of time, thereby inducing a current in the resonant circuit of the sensor at the resonant frequency. The system then listens for a return signal which radiates from the sensor. The resonant frequency and bandwidth of the resonant circuit are determined from the return signal.
The chirp interrogation method for determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor includes the steps of transmitting a multi-frequency signal pulse from a transmitting antenna, electromagnetically coupling a resonant circuit on a sensor to the transmitting antenna thereby inducing a current in the sensor circuit, listening for and receiving a return signal radiated from the sensor circuit, and determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth from the return signal.
In addition, the present invention provides an analog system and method for determining the resonant frequency of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor. The analog system comprises a transmitting antenna coupled as part of a tank circuit which in turn is coupled to an oscillator. A signal is generated which oscillates at a frequency determined by the electrical characteristics of the tank circuit. The frequency of this signal is further modified by the electromagnetic coupling of the resonant circuit of a sensor. This signal is applied to a frequency discriminator which in turn provides a signal from which the resonant frequency of the sensor circuit is determined.
The analog method for determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor includes the steps of generating a transmission signal using a tank circuit which includes a transmitting antenna, modifying the frequency of the transmission signal by electromagnetically coupling the resonant circuit of a sensor to the transmitting antenna, and converting the modified transmission signal into a standard signal for further application.
The above methods lend themselves to the creation of small and simple to manufacture hand-held electronic devices that can be used without complication.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional features and advantages be included herein within the scope of the present invention, as defined by the claims.
Thus, this patent discloses a simple method of monitoring the pressure within the human heart by inserting a pressure transducer using a catheter and using a small, hand-held read device to measure the pressure easily, safely, inexpensively and accurately. It also includes a method of introducing the sensor into the body by using the steps of folding or rolling the sensor into a cylinder, loading it into a catheter and deploying into the heart by allowing it to unroll or unfold, either by itself or facilitated by the incorporation of a super-elastic alloy component. The same super-elastic element also provides the means to permanently securing the device to the interior of the heart.
Delivery of the device of the invention to a heart chamber may be accomplished as follows: Using the standard Seldinger technique, the physician gains access to the patient's jugular artery and places a vessel introducer with a hemostatic valve. Under direct fluoroscopic visualization, a flexible guidewire is inserted through the introducer catheter and maneuvered such that its tip is stationed within a chamber of the heart. In a preferred delivery system a catheter has a “daisy shape” sensor folded into its distal end, so that the middle, flat section of the sensor is essentially normal to the longitudinal axis of the catheter. A solid or hollow cylindrical rod or member is pushed distally to push the sensor from the distal end of the catheter and, optionally, to attach to an inner wall of the heart chamber with an anchor member.
Optionally, a coaxial delivery catheter consisting of two hollow extruded polymeric catheters, the smaller of the two disposed inside the larger one, is inserted over the guidewire and through the introducer and advanced distally until its tip is within the heart chamber. The smaller catheter has an annular space to hold a folded sensor, which is released when the outer catheter is withdrawn proximally.
In a preferred delivery procedure, a sensor is attached to a small diameter, proximally extending “safety” or tether wire. The sensor and safety wire are also positioned in a lumen in a catheter or in the annular space between two coaxial catheters, but the safety wire runs the entire length of the delivery catheter and extends proximally past the proximal end of that catheter outside the patient. In this configuration, the sensor remains secured to the tether wire after the coaxial delivery catheter is removed from the patient. The sensor is detached from the tether wire using any of the methods known in the art, and the wire is removed.
In a further alternative delivery procedure the sensor can be loaded into the annular space between the inner and outer catheters by inserting the sensor into a longitudinal slit cut into the outer catheter and attaching a tab on the sensor's surface into a slot cut into the inner coaxial catheter. By rotation of the inner tube, the sensor will be retracted through the slit and positioned in the annular space between the two tubes. To deploy the device, the rotation of the inner tube is reversed and the sensor emerges through the slit of the outer catheter. There are two specific advantages to this deployment mechanism. First, the sensor can be packaged and stored in a flat configuration. This is desirable since long term storage in a pre-loaded curved geometry could make it more difficult for the sensor to re-establish the flat arrangement that is optimal for effective electromagnetic inductive coupling with the external read-out unit. The second advantage is that by cutting the longitudinal slit at angle
A safety wire system can also be used with this mechanism, although the wire may be external to the outer coaxial tube. As described above, the wire will remain attached to the sensor during the deployment process and will stay within the heart chamber while the delivery catheter is removed. Subsequent to insertion and deployment of the stent-graft, the wire will be detached from the sensor and pulled out of the body.
The detachment of the wire from the sensor can be accomplished in several ways. The wire may be simply glued to the sensor using an adhesive. To separate the sensor from the wire, a thin-walled, metal or polymer tube is passed along the length of the wire and positioned at the adhesive joint. While holding this tube steady, the wire is then retracted into the tube. Sufficient traction can be applied to the segment of the wire that remains outside of the body to cause the adhesive to joint to fail and allow removal of the wire.
An alternative method would rely on a mechanical connection between the wire and sensor such as adding threads to the end of the wire which could then be connected to a matching threaded female receptacle on the sensor. To separate the wire from the sensor, counter-rotation would be applied to the wire until the threads disengage. One could envision many variations of this design that would involve the mechanical locking and un-locking of two mating components.
The invention can perhaps be better understood by referring to the drawings. One embodiment of a sensor according to the invention is shown in
In
The size of the circular sensors of the invention will vary according to factors such as the intended application, the delivery system, etc. The circular sensors are intended to be from about 0.5 to about 3 cm in diameter, with a thickness of from about 0.05 to about 0.30 in. When a ring 32 is employed, the thickness of the ring, i.e., the width of the outside surface 38, will preferably be from about 1.5 to about 3.5 times the thickness of the sensor.
The pressure sensor of the invention can be manufactured using Micro-machining techniques that were developed for the integrated circuit industry. An example of this type of sensor features an inductive-capacitive (LC) resonant circuit with a variable capacitor, as is described in Allen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,111,520, all of which is incorporated herein by reference. The sensor contains two types of passive electrical components, namely, an inductor and a capacitor. The sensor is constructed so that the fluid pressure at the sensor's surface changes the distance between the capacitor's parallel plates and causes a variation of the sensor's capacitance.
In a preferred embodiment the sensor of the invention is constructed by laminating several layers of material together, as shown, for example, in
The sensor exhibits the electrical characteristics associated with a standard LC circuit. An LC circuit is simply a closed loop with only two elements, a capacitor and an inductor. If a current is induced in the LC loop, the energy in the circuit is shared back and forth between the inductor and capacitor. The result is an energy oscillation that will vary at a specific frequency. This is termed the resonant frequency of the circuit and it can be easily calculated as its value is dependent on the circuit's inductance and capacitance. Therefore, a change in capacitance will cause the frequency to shift higher or lower in linear proportion to the change in the value of capacitance.
As noted above, the capacitor in the assembled pressure sensor consists of the two circular conductive segments separated by an air gap. If a pressure force is exerted on these segments it will act to deform the outer polyimide sheet and move the two conductive segments closer together. This will have the effect of reducing the air gap between them which will consequently change the capacitance of the circuit. The result will be a shift in the circuit's resonant frequency that will be in direct proportion to the force applied to the sensor's surface.
Because of the presence of the inductor, it is possible to electromagnetically couple to the sensor and induce a current in the circuit. This allows for wireless communication with the sensor and the ability to operate it without the need for an internal source of energy such as a battery. Thus, if the sensor is located within the chamber of the heart, it will be possible to determine the pressure within the chamber in a simple, non-invasive procedure by remotely interrogating the sensor, recording the resonant frequency and converting this value to a pressure measurement. The readout device generates electromagnetic energy that penetrates through the body's tissues to the sensor's implanted location. The sensor's electrical components absorb a fraction of the electromagnetic energy that is generated by the readout device via inductive coupling. This coupling induces a current in the sensor's circuit oscillates at the same frequency as the applied electromagnetic energy. Due to the nature of the sensor's electromechanical system there exists a frequency of alternating current at which the absorption of energy from the readout device is at a minimum. This frequency is a function of the capacitance of the device. Therefore, if the sensor's capacitance changes, so will the frequency at which it minimally absorbs energy from the readout device. Since the sensor's capacitance is mechanically linked to the fluid pressure at the sensor's surface, a measurement of this frequency by the readout device gives a relative measurement of the fluid pressure. If calibration of the device is performed, then an absolute measurement of pressure can be made. See, for example, the extensive discussion in the Allen et al. patent, again incorporated herein by reference, as well as Gershenfeld et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,025,725, incorporated herein by reference.
The pressure sensor is made of completely passive components having no active circuitry or power sources such as batteries. The pressure sensor is completely self-contained having no leads to connect to an external circuit or power source. Furthermore, these same manufacturing techniques can be used to add additional sensing capabilities, such as the ability to measure temperature by the addition of a resistor to the basic LC circuit.
Several altemative configurations of the LC circuit design can be considered to address specific biological and manufacturing issues. For example, in one embodiment of the sensor the capacitor element consists of two plates that are separated by a suitable dielectric material, such as air, inert gas, fluid or a vacuum. To ensure the long term integrity of the sensor, various coatings could be applied to the surface or between the polymeric layers used to form the sensor. These coating can be used to provide a hermetic seal that will prevent leakage of body fluids into the cavity or permeation of the cavity material (gas, vacuum or fluid) out of the sensor. In an another embodiment of the invention, shown in
It is within the scope of the invention that the frequency response to the sensor will be in the range of from about 1 to about 200 MHz, preferably from about 1 to about 100 MHz, and more preferably from about 2 to about 90 MHz, with a Q factor from about 5 to about 80, preferably from about 10 to about 70, more preferably from about 10 to 60.
In a further embodiment of the invention there is no direct electrical connection between the two sides of the LC circuit. Referring again to the sensor described in the Allen et al. patent, the device is constructed using multiple layers upon lie the necessary circuit elements. Disposed on the top and bottom layer are metal patterns constructed using micro-machining techniques which define a top and bottom conductor and a spiral inductor coil. To provide for an electrical contact between the top and bottom layers small vias or holes are cut through the middle layers. When the layers are assembled, a metal paste is forced into the small vias to create direct electrical connections or conduits. However, experimentation has shown that due to parasitic capacitance that is created between the top and bottom inductor coils, a vialess operational LC circuit can be created. This absence of via holes represents a significant improvement to the sensor in that it simplifies the manufacturing process and, more importantly, significantly increases the durability of the sensor making it more appropriate for use inside the human body.
The design of the sensor is not limited to a specific geometric configuration. In the specific example noted above the inductor component is described as a spiral coil. Other embodiments of the sensor could utilize oval, rectangular or an amorphous shape. Specific electrical, mechanical and biologic advantages could be obtained by employing these various geometric designs. By way of example, a rectangular shaped sensor in which the ratio of length to width was greater than four would greater lend itself to catheter based delivery as is would minimize the radius of curvature required to position the folded device within a small diameter catheter. Alternatively, a more elaborate shape, such as one resembling the petals of a flower, would lend itself to more complex folding patterns that could facilitate delivery to specific areas of a chamber of the heart.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention a foldable sensor is delivered to the chamber of a patient's heart in the distal end of a delivery catheter. The sensor can be regularly or irregularly shaped so that outer portions of the sensor can fold to about a 90° angle as compared to a relatively flat, middle portion of the sensor. For example, in
It is especially preferred that rod member 322 will be temporarily affixed to sensor 308 for at least two purposes. First, rod member 322 functions as a safety or tether wire. And second, rod member 322 will be capable of twisting or otherwise maneuvering sensor 308 so that anchor 368 will attach to the heart chamber wall. Once sensor 308 is attached, rod member 322 is disengaged from sensor 308 and withdrawn proximally.
Another, embodiment of a sensor is shown in
The flexible cut-outs 352 facilitate, among other things, folding of sections of sensor 370 for placement in, or arrangement upon, a delivery catheter, such as in
While a preferred delivery system is described above, it is within the scope of the invention that other delivery systems could be employed. Other such delivery systems are described in, for example, co- pending, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/054,672, filed Jan. 22, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,855,115, issued Feb. 15, 2005, incorporated herein by reference.
Further, the invention is not limited to the implantation of a single sensor. Since the biological environment within a patient's heart is not necessarily homogeneous, multiple pressure sensors may be introduced into a patient's heart, each being positioned at different locations. In this situation, each sensor may be designed with a unique signature (obtained by changing the resonant frequency of the sensor), so that the pressure measurement derived from one sensor can be localized to its specific position within the heart.
When introduced into the chamber of a patient's heart, the pressure sensor can provide pressure related data by use of an external measuring device. As disclosed in the Allen et al. patent, several different excitation systems can be used. The readout device generates electromagnetic energy that can penetrate through the body's tissues to the sensor's implanted location. The sensor's electrical components can absorb a fraction of the electromagnetic energy that is generated by the readout device via inductive coupling. This coupling will induce a current in the sensor's circuit that will oscillate at the same frequency as the applied electromagnetic energy. Due to the nature of the sensor's electromechanical system there will exist a frequency of alternating current at which the absorption of energy from the readout device is at a minimum. This frequency is a function of the capacitance of the device. Therefore, if the sensor's capacitance changes so will the frequency at which it minimally absorbs energy from the readout device. Since the sensor's capacitance is mechanically linked to the fluid pressure at the sensor's surface, a measurement of this frequency by the readout device can give a relative measurement of the fluid pressure. If calibration of the device is performed then an absolute measurement of pressure can be made
The circuitry used to measure and display pressure is contained within a simple to operate, battery powered, hand-held electronic unit 400, as shown in
Accordingly, the present invention provides for an impedance system and method of determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor. The system includes a transmitting antenna, which is coupled to an impedance analyzer. The impedance analyzer applies a constant voltage signal to the transmitting antenna scanning the frequency across a predetermined spectrum. The current passing through the transmitting antenna experiences a peak at the resonant frequency of the sensor. The resonant frequency and bandwidth are thus determined from this peak in the current.
The method of determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth using an impedance approach may include the steps of transmitting an excitation signal using a transmitting antenna and electromagnetically coupling a sensor having a resonant circuit to the transmitting antenna thereby modifying the impedance of the transmitting antenna. Next, the step of measuring the change in impedance of the transmitting antenna is performed, and finally, the resonant frequency and bandwidth of the sensor circuit are determined.
In addition, the present invention provides for a transmit and receive system and method for determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor. According to this method, an excitation signal of white noise or predetermined multiple frequencies is transmitted from a transmitting antenna, the sensor being electromagnetically coupled to the transmitting antenna. A current is induced in the resonant circuit of the sensor as it absorbs energy from the transmitted excitation signal, the current oscillating at the resonant frequency of the resonant circuit. A receiving antenna, also electromagnetically coupled to the transmitting antenna, receives the excitation signal minus the energy which was absorbed by the sensor. Thus, the power of the received signal experiences a dip or notch at the resonant frequency of the sensor. The resonant frequency and bandwidth are determined from this notch in the power.
The transmit and receive method of determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a sensor circuit includes the steps of transmitting a multiple frequency signal from transmitting antenna, and, electromagnetically coupling a resonant circuit on a sensor to the transmitting antenna thereby inducing a current in the sensor circuit. Next, the step of receiving a modified transmitted signal due to the induction of current in the sensor circuit is performed. Finally, the step of determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth from the received signal is executed.
Yet another system and method for determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor includes a chirp interrogation system. This system provides for a transmitting antenna which is electromagnetically coupled to the resonant circuit of the sensor. An excitation signal of white noise or predetermined multiple frequencies is applied to the transmitting antenna for a predetermined period of time, thereby inducing a current in the resonant circuit of the sensor at the resonant frequency. The system then listens for a return signal which radiates from the sensor. The resonant frequency and bandwidth of the resonant circuit are determined from the return signal.
The chirp interrogation method for determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor includes the steps of transmitting a multi-frequency signal pulse from a transmitting antenna, electromagnetically coupling a resonant circuit on a sensor to the transmitting antenna thereby inducing a current in the sensor circuit, listening for and receiving a return signal radiated from the sensor circuit, and determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth from the return signal.
A representative block diagram of an electrical circuit that can be used to interrogate the sensor and determine the resonant frequency is shown in
The present invention also provides an analog system and method for determining the resonant frequency of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor. The analog system comprises a transmitting antenna coupled as part of a tank circuit which in turn is coupled to an oscillator. A signal is generated which oscillates at a frequency determined by the electrical characteristics of the tank circuit. The frequency of this signal is further modified by the electromagnetic coupling of the resonant circuit of a sensor. This signal is applied to a frequency discriminator which in turn provides a signal from which the resonant frequency of the sensor circuit is determined.
The analog method for determining the resonant frequency and bandwidth of a resonant circuit within a particular sensor includes the steps of generating a transmission signal using a tank circuit which includes a transmitting antenna, modifying the frequency of the transmission signal by electromagnetically coupling the resonant circuit of a sensor to the transmitting antenna, and converting the modified transmission signal into a standard signal for further application.
The invention further includes an alternative method of measuring pressure in which a non-linear element such as a diode or polyvinylidenedifloride piezo-electric polymer is added to the LC circuit. A diode with a low turn-on voltage such as a Schottky diode can be fabricated using micro-machining techniques. The presence of this non-linear element in various configurations within the LC circuit can be used to modulate the incoming signal from the receiving device and produce different harmonics of the original signal. The read-out circuitry can be tuned to receive the particular harmonic frequency that is produced and use this signal to reconstruct the fundamental frequency of the sensor. The advantage of this approach is two-fold; the incoming signal can be transmitted continuously and since the return signal will be at different signals, the return signal can also be received continuously.
The above methods lend themselves to the creation of small and simple to manufacture hand-held electronic devices that can be used without complication.
One additional concern regarding devices designated for long term implantation in the human body is maintenance of electrical stability over time as the environment the sensor has been placed in changes. Under this scenario the sensor's accuracy may drift from its original baseline. It would thus be desirable to have available to the user of the device, a method for determining if the sensor is functioning properly and also to be able to recalibrate the device anytime after it has been implanted. This invention therefore also includes a method of using acoustic energy to challenge the sensor and determining to what degree (if any) sensor performance has been degraded. In this method, energy in the ultrasound range is directed towards the sensor and a measurement is made of the mechanical resonance of the sensor membrane. This same measurement can be made at point after the sensor has been implanted. By comparing the values of these two measurements a determination of the degree of change in mechanical resonance frequency can be established. This value can then be used to create a calibration factor that can be applied to the pressure reading taken post-implantation in order to adjust the measured value to reflect the actual pressure within the heart chamber.
The preceding specific embodiments are illustrative of the practice of the invention. It is to be understood, however, that other expedients known to those skilled in the art or disclosed herein, may be employed without departing from the spirit of the invention of the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of co-pending, commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/054,672, filed Jan. 22, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,855,115, issued Feb. 15, 2005, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2796863 | von Wittern | Jun 1957 | A |
| 3867950 | Fischell | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3942382 | Hok | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3958558 | Dunphy et al. | May 1976 | A |
| 4026276 | Chubbuck | May 1977 | A |
| 4127110 | Bullara | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4206762 | Cosman | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4207903 | O'Neill | Jun 1980 | A |
| RE30366 | Rasor et al. | Aug 1980 | E |
| 4237900 | Schulman et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4354506 | Sakaguchi et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4378809 | Cosman | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4485813 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4494950 | Fischell | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4521684 | Gilby et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4596563 | Pande | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4713540 | Gilby et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4718425 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4796641 | Mills et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4815472 | Wise et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4846191 | Brockway et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4890623 | Cook et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4899752 | Cohen | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4913147 | Fahlstrom et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4934369 | Maxwell | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4987897 | Funke | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5113868 | Wise et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5115128 | Cook | May 1992 | A |
| 5129394 | Mehra | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5131399 | Sciarra | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5165289 | Tilmans | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5181423 | Philipps et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5192314 | Daskalakis | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5207103 | Wise et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5265606 | Kujawski | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5353800 | Pohndorf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5367376 | Lagakos et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5373852 | Harrison et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5411551 | Winston et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5431171 | Harrison et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5440300 | Spillman, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5487760 | Villafana | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5497099 | Walton | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5515041 | Spillman, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
| 5535752 | Halperin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538005 | Harrison et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5551427 | Altman | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5566676 | Rosenfeldt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5583474 | Mizoguchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593430 | Renger | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600245 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5626630 | Markowitz et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5686841 | Stolarczyk et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5695155 | Macdonald et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702427 | Ecker et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5703576 | Spillman, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5713917 | Leonhardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5722414 | Archibald et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5723791 | Koch et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5743267 | Nikolic et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5796827 | Coppersmith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807265 | Itoigawa et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5836886 | Itoigawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5860938 | Lafontaine et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5899927 | Ecker et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5935084 | Southworth | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942991 | Gaudreau et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5967986 | Cimochowski et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6015386 | Kensey et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6015387 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019729 | Itoigawa et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024704 | Meador et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6025725 | Gershenfeld et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030413 | Lazarus | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033366 | Brockway et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6053873 | Govari et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6076016 | Feierbach | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6111520 | Allen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6113553 | Chubbuck | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6134461 | Say et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140740 | Porat et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6159156 | Van Bockel | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6198965 | Penner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6201980 | Darrow et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206835 | Spillman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6229190 | Bryzek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6237398 | Porat et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6239724 | Doron et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6277078 | Porat et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278379 | Allen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287253 | Ortega et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6373264 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6400974 | Lesho | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6409674 | Brockway et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6442413 | Silver | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6454720 | Clerc et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6645143 | Van Tassell et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6667725 | Simons et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6682490 | Roy et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6765493 | Lonsdale et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6855115 | Fonseca et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6923769 | Nishii et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6926670 | Rich et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6939299 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 20020077556 | Schwartz | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151816 | Rich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188207 | Richter | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030031587 | Hu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030136417 | Fonseca et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139677 | Fonseca et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040122494 | Eggers et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20050075697 | Olson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085703 | Behm | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154321 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 158 061 | Jun 1983 | CA |
| 196 44 858 5 | Oct 1996 | DE |
| 0257801 | Mar 1988 | EP |
| 0 337 035 | Nov 1993 | EP |
| 0 646 365 | Apr 1995 | EP |
| WO 8303348 | Oct 1983 | WO |
| WO 9006723 | Jun 1990 | WO |
| WO 9533517 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO 9709926 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| WO 9732518 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO 9732519 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO 9733513 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO9934731 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 9942176 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 9962587 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0016686 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0100089 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO0187137 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO0197908 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 02058551 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 03061467 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO03061504 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 03096889 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050015014 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10054672 | Jan 2002 | US |
| Child | 10886829 | US |
