Implanted hidden interconnections in a semiconductor device for preventing reverse engineering

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6815816
  • Patent Number
    6,815,816
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 25, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 9, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A camouflaged interconnection for interconnecting two spaced-apart implanted regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device and a method of forming same. The camouflaged interconnection comprises a first implanted region forming a conducting channel between the two spaced-apart implanted regions, the conducting channel being of the same common conductivity type and bridging a region between the two spaced-apart regions, and a second implanted region of opposite conductivity to type, the second implanted region being disposed between the two spaced-apart implanted regions of common conductivity type and over lying the conducting channel to camouflage the conducting channel from reverse engineering.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates to semiconductor devices and their methods of manufacture wherein the semiconductor devices have implanted interconnections which are hidden and/or camouflaged so as to inhibit or prevent reverse engineering of the semiconductor device.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The design and development of semiconductor Integrated Circuits (ICs) tends to be rather expensive and, in fact, many hours of engineering talent are required to develop the complex structures, processes and manufacturing techniques involved in making modern semiconductor devices and ICs. Indeed, semiconductor ICs over the years have tended to become more complex and therefore the effort involved in achieving a successful design has become very expensive. Many man-hours of highly skilled professional time are required at considerable expense to design and develop a modem integrated circuit.




Others, in order to avoid not only the expense involved in the design and development of integrated circuits, but also to avoid the significant time involved in bringing a new integrated circuit design to the market place, resort to reverse engineering practices for existing integrated circuits to take apart, probe, and otherwise examine these existing ICs to try to determine the physical structures and methods used to make the integrated circuit for subsequent copying. This reverse engineering, which typically relies primarily on obtaining planar optical images of a circuit, in essence tries to bypass the typical product development cycles and expenses involved in producing integrated circuits.




Since the reverse engineer is trying to go for a “free ride” on the efforts of others, various approaches have been developed to try to thwart the reverse engineer, particularly in the field of semiconductor integrated circuits. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,583,011 wherein the device is given a depletion implant that is virtually invisible to a reverse engineer.




Integrated circuits typically comprise a large number of active devices, typically in the form of transistors, diodes, and the like, which are interconnected by the means of interconnects. The interconnects are often provided by metallic structures which are formed on various levels within an integrated circuit device. Since these metallic structures etch away in the presence of an appropriate etchant at a different rate compared to the other structures found in a semiconductor device (such as semiconducting material, insulating material, and the like), the reverse engineer can discover the presence and the structure of metallic conductors used to interconnect the active devices in an integrated circuit by putting the needed time and energy into the reverse engineering task. However, since this time and energy is less than that required to design a new IC, reverse engineering has its followers. Indeed, the reverse engineer's object is to make a working, slavish copy of the original IC and the reverse engineer cares little about how the original IC was designed. The reverse engineer does not seem to be deterred by the fact that in many countries existing ICs are legally protected against copying by some form of mask works protection. As such, in order to protect the considerable investment made in new IC designs, other or additional steps are needed to deter such slavish copying.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a method and apparatus for preventing reverse engineering of integrated circuits by hiding interconnects between various devices and structures (for example, diodes, transistors, input/output connections, power supply connections and the like) so as to make it much more difficult for the reverse engineer to determine how the devices and structures, which can be seen on an integrated circuit, are interconnected.




In one aspect, the present invention provides an interconnect for interconnecting two spaced-apart implanted regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device. The interconnect comprises a first implanted region forming a conducting channel between the two spaced-apart implanted regions, the conducting channel being of the same common conductivity type and bridging a region between the two spaced-apart regions, and a second implanted region of opposite conductivity type, the second implanted region being disposed between the two spaced-apart implanted regions of common conductivity type and being disposed over the conducting channel.




In another aspect the present invention provides a method of providing and camouflaging an interconnect between two adjacent implanted regions in an integrated circuit or device, the two adjacent implanted regions being of a common conductivity type. The method includes implanting a first region of the same common conductivity type, the first region being disposed between locations where said two adjacent implanted regions either have been or will be formed; and implanting a second region of opposite conductivity type to the common conductivity type, the second region over-lying the first region and having a concentration profile normal to a major surface of the integrated circuit or device with a concentration peak closer to the major surface of the semiconductor device than a concentration peak for the first implanted region.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a side sectional view through a semiconductor device or IC showing a portion of two active devices with a hidden implant providing an interconnect there between;





FIG. 2

is similar to

FIG. 1

, but the priority types of the devices and the interconnect have been reversed, compared to

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is similar to

FIG. 1

, but no interconnect is provided between the active areas of the two transistors;





FIG. 4

is similar to

FIG. 3

, but the camouflaging implant shown in

FIG. 3

has been omitted;





FIG. 5

is a plan view of a semiconductor device or IC having a number of implanted regions forming active regions of active devices therein, some of which are interconnected in accordance with the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1

is a cross sectional view through a portion of a two interconnected active devices


1


,


2


in an integrated circuit. Only a portion of two active devices are shown in

FIG. 1

since this invention is concerned with techniques for camouflaging the interconnections rather than with the structure of the devices per se. The depicted portion of active device


1


is a N-type region


11


that could provide the drain, for example, of a first FET transistor


1


and could be formed as an implanted region with a N-type dopant by techniques very well known in the art. Those skilled in the art will recognize, of course, that the N-type region


11


could alternatively form a portion of a diode, a portion of a bipolar transistor or a portion of some other semiconductor structure. The depicted portion of active device


2


is a N-type region


12


that could form the source, for example, of a second FET transistor


2


. The function or functions attributed to regions


11


and


12


are not particularly important to the present invention and they could represent any implanted semiconductor structure as a matter of design choice.




A complicated integrated circuit can literally comprise millions of active regions. Of course, not all active regions or devices are connected to an immediately adjacent active region or device although that is not infrequently the case. With respect to

FIG. 1

, it is assumed that active region


11


and active region


12


require, due to the design of the integrated circuit device in which they are used, interconnection. In the prior art, they might well have been interconnected by providing a thin layer of gold, aluminum or other metallic conductor on the presently exposed surface


15


between implanted regions


11


and


12


. However, according to the present invention, regions


11


and


12


are interconnected by a N-type implanted region


13


which provides a conduction channel that interconnects the two active regions


11


,


12


. In order to camouflage the N-type implant


13


, an implant of opposite conductivity type, for example, an implant of P-type conductivity is implanted in a shallower region


14


immediately above the conductive channel formed by region


13


.




Those skilled in the art will realize that, if the P-type implant


14


were not employed, the N-type implant


13


, which has a tendency to extend towards the surface


15


of the semiconductor device shown in

FIG. 1

, might be discoverable by stain and etch techniques. Depending on the type of implantation used, the concentration of the N-type dopant could be higher in regions below surface


15


compared to regions immediately adjacent surface


15


. The relatively deeper N-type implant


13


provides a conduction path and will most likely have a relatively high dose of dopant to form the implant (for example, the amount of dosage of the dopant in the conduction path implant


13


could be the same as the dosage used to implant the active regions


11


and


12


). The camouflaging implant, namely implant


14


, is also a relatively heavy implant, in order to camouflage the opposite conductivity type material in region


13


forming the conducting channel. However, the camouflaging implant


14


is relatively shallow compared to the depth of the conducting implant


13


.




Preferably the depth of the camouflaging implant


14


will be on the order of 0.1 μm while the depth of the conducting channel implant


13


will be on the order of 0.2 μm for FET transistor structures of the type partially depicted in FIG.


1


. In the case of FET transistor structures, those skilled in the art will appreciate that active regions


11


,


12


depicted in

FIG. 1

would often form source and drain contacts of such FET transistor structures.




Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the camouflaging implant


14


being a P-type implant between N-type region


11


and N-type region


12


will not provide a conducting path. The depth of the implants are controlled, as is well known in the art, by the energy used in the implanting process. Preferably, the camouflaging implant


14


is formed first and by a relatively lower energy level compared to the implant which will form the conducting channel implant


13


. Implanted region


14


should have the peak of its distribution range lying close to the surface. Thereafter, a relatively higher energy implant is performed to form region


13


. The second implant, having a higher energy, should have the peak of its distribution range lying at least 2σ distances away from the peak of the range distribution peak for implanted region


14


. The value a corresponds to the range profile distribution width for implant


14


.




Due to the fact that some reverse engineers have etch and/or stain processes that can differentiate between N-type and P-type implants, the reverse engineer with such capabilities might infer the presence of the hidden conducting channel


13


by noting the presence of camouflaging region


14


if the camouflaging region


14


only occurred when it was used to hide conducting channel


13


. The reverse engineer might observe region


14


(assuming the reverse engineer is able to differentiate it from regions


11


and


12


due to its different conductivity type) and, noting that it does not provide a conduction path itself, therefore conclude that region


14


has no purpose other than to hide an underlying implanted region


13


. Thus, the reverse engineer might infer the presence of a conducting channel between regions


11


and


12


by the presence of the camouflaging implant


14


. Thus, in order to thwart the reverse engineer with such capabilities, the relatively shallow implant


14


should be used in other places where no interconnect is desired to be formed between two adjacent active regions. See, for example,

FIG. 3

where there are active regions


21


and


22


associated with two different active devices. Those skilled in the art realize, of course, that when you have two adjacent active regions they may or may not be interconnected due to the particular design requirements of the circuit. In

FIG. 3

it is assumed that the two regions


21


,


22


are not interconnected, but nevertheless a camouflaging P-type implant region


24


is formed between them. By using the structure shown in

FIG. 1

in some areas (where interconnects are needed) and the structure shown in

FIG. 3

in other areas (where interconnects are not desired), the reverse engineer will not be able to infer the presence of an interconnect by the presence of the camouflaging implant


14


,


24


. Of course, camouflaging implants


14


and


24


can be formed at the same time, if desired. They are given different reference numerals simply for the ease of discussion and depiction.




The configurations shown in

FIGS. 1 and 3

will be repeated over and over again on a semiconductor chip, possibly more than a million times depending upon the complexity of the chip. Indeed, the camouflaging implant


14


,


24


may be used over essentially 100% of the area of the chip dedicated for use as interconnections and where interconnections between active regions could plausibly occur, but do not occur. As such, said camouflaging implant


14


,


24


preferably has a larger area, when viewed in a direction normal to a major surface of the integrated circuit or device, than the area of the conductive channels camouflaged thereby. If the reverse engineer can not infer the presence of a conductive channel merely by the presence of the camouflaging implant


14


,


24


, it makes the reverse engineer have to work all that much harder to try to determine just how the active regions in an integrated circuit are interconnected. Given the fact that there can be millions of interconnections and even more places where an interconnection could exist (but does not due to the particular requirements of the circuitry on the integrated circuit chip), this invention makes it impracticable for the reverse engineer to try to work out just where the interconnections do exist.




Of course, some practicing the present invention may elect not to use a camouflaging implant


14


,


24


in certain regions between two active devices, as is shown in

FIG. 4

, to confuse matters still further for the reverse engineer. Thus, in some places, the implanted channel


13


of

FIGS. 1 and 2

might be used without a camouflaging implant


14


.




The more you confuse a reverse engineer, the more apt you are to thwart him at reverse engineering any particular integrated circuit. Therefore, other interconnection schemes can also be used in a particular IC design to camouflage further how the active regions are interconnected. Since there are millions of active regions in a large modem IC, different methods of interconnection can be combined for use together on a single IC. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,933 a shallow implant is used to provide an interconnection between two active regions. Thus, some practicing the present invention for some interconnects on a chip may decide to use other inventions, including the invention of our prior U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,933 in order to provide other interconnections. The more you confuse the reverse engineer, the better chance you have of thwarting his efforts.




Those skilled in the art will realize that when the present invention is used in connection with the manufacture of semiconductor devices and ICs, the processes used to fabricate such ICs and devices may require additional processing steps to use the present invention or it may be possible to utilize the present invention, by modifying the masks for making a integrated circuit, without adding additional processing steps. It basically depends upon the fabrication processes used by a manufacturer of integrated circuits. Thus, for some manufacturers, they should be able to implement the present invention without adding to the cost of manufacturing semiconductor devices and integrated circuits. For others, additional processing steps will be involved, which will add to the cost of making a semiconductor device or IC. However, the additional cost of making the device or IC may well be justified in view of the fact that the resulting device will be more robust against reverse engineering.





FIG. 2

is similar to

FIG. 1

, but the conductivity types of the various regions have been reversed. While those skilled in the art will realize, of course, that the N-type regions


11


and


12


forming the drain of a first transistor


1


and the source of a second transistor


2


is a situation which will frequently arise in an integrated circuit, the configuration of

FIG. 2

can occur and therefore is depicted for the sake of completeness. P-type versions of the structures shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

are not included herein for the sake of brevity as those P-type structures are readily apparent to those skilled in the art.





FIG. 5

is a plan view of a small portion of an IC. Four FET transistors T


1


-T


4


are depicted together with the drains D


1


-D


4


, sources S


1


-S


4


and gates G


1


-G


4


. Drain D


3


and source S


4


are depicted as being interconnected by a buried implant


13


-


1


. Drain D


4


and source S


2


are depicted as being interconnected by a buried implant


13


-


2


. The regions in which interconnections could plausibly occur, but do not occur, and the regions overlying buried interconnects


13


-


1


and


13


-


2


are all covered with a camouflaging implant


14


,


24


. As previously indicated, camouflaging implant


14


,


24


is preferably implanted during a single implant process and is only given different numerals herein to differentiate when it overlies an interconnect ( labeled numeral


14


) and when it overlies regions where interconnections could plausibly occur, but do not occur (labeled numeral


24


). The regions where buried interconnection


13


do or do not occur are governed by the particular function or functions to be performed by the IC in question. In the embodiment of

FIG. 5

it is clear that the camouflaging implant


14


,


24


has a significantly larger area, when viewed in a direction normal to a major surface


15


(See

FIGS. 1 & 3

) of the IC, than the area of the conductive channels


13


-


1


and


13


-


2


camouflaged thereby.




Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the devices T


1


-T


4


, while they are identified here as FETs in this embodiment, can represent other types of semiconductor devices with active regions some of which are interconnected by a conducting channel such as the channel


13


-


2


between S


2


and D


4


or the conducting channel


13


-


1


between S


4


and D


3


. Of course, other or different interconnection patterns might well be used in practice. In any case, the conductivity type of regions


13


-


1


,


13


-


2


, D


1


, S


2


and S


4


(as well as the other active regions) would preferably be of a common conductivity type in this example and, for many integrated circuits, of N-type conductivity.




Having described the invention with respect to a preferred embodiment thereof, modification will now no doubt suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments except as required by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A camouflaged interconnection scheme for interconnecting two spaced-apart implanted regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device in a manner which inhibits reverse engineering thereof, the interconnection scheme comprising:a first implanted region in the integrated circuit or device forming a conducting channel between two spaced-apart implanted regions, the conducting channel being of said common conductivity type and bridging a region between said two spaced-apart regions; and a second implanted region of opposite conductivity type in the integrated circuit or device, said second implanted region being disposed between said two spaced-apart implanted regions of common conductivity type and overlying said conducting channel.
  • 2. The invention of claim 1 wherein said second implanted region overlying said conducting channel has a larger area, when viewed in a direction normal to a major surface of the integrated circuit or device, than has said conducting channel.
  • 3. The invention of claim 1 wherein said two spaced-apart implanted regions form source and/or drain contacts, respectively, of two separate field effect transistors (FETs).
  • 4. The invention of claim 1 wherein the second implanted region is provided in said integrated circuit or device over regions having no conducting channels formed therein.
  • 5. The invention of claim 1 wherein the second implanted region has a depth less than a depth of the first implanted region.
  • 6. A camouflaged interconnection scheme for interconnecting a plurality of spaced-apart implanted regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device, the interconnection scheme comprising:a plurality of interconnects each interconnecting selected implant regions of said plurality of spaced-apart implanted regions, each interconnect comprising a buried conducting channel bridging a region between the selected implant regions; and at least one implanted region of opposite conductivity type in the integrated circuit or device, the at least one implanted region of opposite conductivity type being disposed over at least a majority of said plurality of interconnects to camouflage said at least a majority of said plurality of interconnects.
  • 7. The invention of claim 6 wherein said at least one implanted region of opposite conductivity type has a larger area than a total area of a related at least one of said conducting channels, when viewed in a direction normal to a major surface of the integrated circuit or device.
  • 8. The invention of claim 6 wherein at least selected one of said spaced-apart implanted regions form source and/or drain contacts, respectively, of adjacent field effect transistors (FETs).
  • 9. The invention of claim 6 wherein the at least one implanted region of opposite conductivity type is provided in said integrated circuit or device over regions having no conducting channels formed therein.
  • 10. The invention of claim 6 wherein the at least one implanted region of opposite conductivity type has a depth less than a depth of each of said plurality of interconnects.
  • 11. A buried interconnection scheme for interconnecting two spaced-apart doped regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device in a manner which inhibits reverse engineering thereof, the integrated circuit or device having a plurality of spaced-apart regions arranged as transistors, said two spaced-apart doped regions each forming an active region in different ones of said transistors and each providing a different transistor function with respect to the transistor in which it forms an active region, the interconnection scheme comprising:a first region in the integrated circuit or device disposed laterally of and in direct contact with the two spaced-apart regions, the first region being of said common conductivity type, the first region providing a buried conducting channel for the two spaced-apart regions; and a second region of opposite conductivity type in the integrated circuit or device, said second region overlaying said first region to conceal the conducting channel.
  • 12. The interconnection scheme of claim 11 wherein said second region overlying said first region has a larger area, when viewed in a direction normal to a major surface of the integrated circuit or device, than has said first region.
  • 13. The interconnection scheme of claim 11 wherein said two spaced-apart regions form source and drain contacts, respectively, of two separate field effect transistors (FETs).
  • 14. The invention of claim 11 wherein the second region of opposite conductivity type has a depth less than a depth of said first region.
  • 15. The interconnection scheme of claim 11 wherein the transistor function of a first one of said two spaced-apart doped regions is a drain function and the transistor function of a second one of said two spaced-apart doped regions is a source function.
  • 16. A buried interconnection scheme for interconnecting two spaced-apart doped regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device in a manner which inhibits reverse engineering thereof, the integrated circuit or device having a plurality of spaced-apart regions arranged as transistors, said two spaced-apart done regions each forming an active region in different ones of said transistors, the interconnection scheme comprising:a first region in the integrated circuit or device disposed laterally of and in direct contact with the two spaced-apart regions, the first region being of said common conductivity type, the first region providing a buried conducting channel for the two spaced-apart regions; a second region of opposite conductivity type in the integrated circuit or device, said second region overlaying said first region to conceal the conducting channel; at least one additional spaced-apart region of the common conductivity type, said at least one additional spaced-apart region being spaced-apart from the two spaced-apart regions and forming an active region in yet another different one of said transistors; and at least one additional region of the opposite conductivity type is provided in said integrated circuit or device, said at least one additional region being disposed laterally of and in direct contact with one of the two spaced-apart regions and the at least one additional spaced-apart region of the common conductivity type, wherein the one of the two spaced-apart regions and the at least one additional spaced-apart region do not have the buried conducting channel formed therebetween.
  • 17. An interconnection scheme for interconnecting a plurality of spaced-apart regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device, the interconnection scheme comprising:a plurality of buried elongate conducting channels, each buried elongate conducting channel being of the common conductivity type, each buried elongate conducting channel being laterally disposed of and in direct contact with selected ones of the plurality of spaced-apart regions, each buried elongate conducting channel providing an electrical connection between said selected ones of the plurality of spaced-apart regions, each buried elongate conducting channel having a major axis which is arranged in a non-parallel relationship to each other elongate conducting channel of said plurality of buried elongate conducting channels; and at least one region of an opposite conductivity type in the integrated circuit or device, the at least one region of opposite conductivity type being disposed over at least a majority of said plurality of buried conducting channels to camouflage said at least a majority of said plurality of buried conducting channels.
  • 18. The interconnection scheme of claim 17 wherein said at least one region of opposite conductivity type has a larger area than a total area related to at least one of said buried conducting channels, when viewed in a direction normal to a major surface of the integrated circuit or device.
  • 19. The interconnection scheme of claim 17 wherein at least selected ones of said spaced-apart regions form source and/or drain contacts, respectively, of adjacent field effect transistors (FETs).
  • 20. The interconnection scheme of claim 17 further comprising at least one other region of the opposite conductivity type, the at least one other region of the opposite conductivity type being laterally disposed of and in direct contact with additional selected ones of the plurality of spaced-apart regions, wherein said additional selected ones of the plurality of spaced-apart regions are not electrically connected by one of said plurality of buried conducting channels.
  • 21. The invention of claim 17 wherein the at least one region of opposite conductivity type has a depth less than a depth of each of said plurality of buried conducting channels.
  • 22. A camouflaged interconnection scheme for interconnecting two spaced-apart implanted regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device in a manner which inhibits reverse engineering thereof, the interconnection scheme comprising:a first implanted region in the integrated circuit or device forming a conducting channel between two spaced-apart implanted regions, the conducting channel being of said common conductivity type and bridging a region between said two spaced-apart regions; and a second implanted region of opposite conductivity type in the integrated circuit or device, said second implanted region being implanted into a portion of the first implanted region so that the second implanted region includes dopants corresponding to both the common and other opposition conductivity types, said second implanted region being disposed between said two spaced-apart implanted regions of common conductivity type and overlying said conducting channel.
Parent Case Info

This application is related to a subsequently-filed application which is a Continuation in Part (CIP) of this application. The CIP application was filed on Apr. 24, 2002 under Ser. No. 10/132,523. This application is also related to U.S. patent applications Ser. No. 10/735,841, filed Dec. 12, 2003; and Ser. No. 09/882,892, filed on Jun. 15, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (107)
Number Name Date Kind
3673471 Klein et al. Jun 1972 A
3946426 Sanders Mar 1976 A
4017888 Christie et al. Apr 1977 A
4101344 Kooi et al. Jul 1978 A
4139864 Schulman Feb 1979 A
4164461 Schilling Aug 1979 A
4196443 Dingwall Apr 1980 A
4267578 Vetter May 1981 A
4291391 Chatterjee et al. Sep 1981 A
4295897 Tubbs et al. Oct 1981 A
4314268 Yoshioka et al. Feb 1982 A
4317273 Guterman et al. Mar 1982 A
4322736 Sasaki et al. Mar 1982 A
4374454 Jochems Feb 1983 A
4409434 Basset et al. Oct 1983 A
4435895 Parillo Mar 1984 A
4471376 Morcom et al. Sep 1984 A
4581628 Miyauchi et al. Apr 1986 A
4583011 Pechar Apr 1986 A
4603381 Guttag et al. Jul 1986 A
4623255 Suszko Nov 1986 A
4727493 Taylor, Sr. Feb 1988 A
4766516 Ozdemir et al. Aug 1988 A
4799096 Koeppe Jan 1989 A
4821085 Haken et al. Apr 1989 A
4830974 Chang et al. May 1989 A
4939567 Kenney Jul 1990 A
4962484 Takeshima et al. Oct 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
4998151 Korman et al. Mar 1991 A
5030796 Swanson et al. Jul 1991 A
5050123 Castro Sep 1991 A
5061978 Mizutani et al. Oct 1991 A
5065208 Shah et al. Nov 1991 A
5068697 Noda et al. Nov 1991 A
5070378 Yamagata Dec 1991 A
5101121 Sourgen Mar 1992 A
5117276 Thomas et al. May 1992 A
5121089 Larson et al. Jun 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5132571 McCollum et al. Jul 1992 A
5138197 Kuwana Aug 1992 A
5146117 Larson Sep 1992 A
5168340 Nishimura Dec 1992 A
5177589 Kobayashi et al. Jan 1993 A
5202591 Walden Apr 1993 A
5225699 Nakamura Jul 1993 A
5227649 Chapman Jul 1993 A
5231299 Ning et al. Jul 1993 A
5302539 Haken et al. Apr 1994 A
5308682 Morikawa May 1994 A
5309015 Kuwata et al. May 1994 A
5317197 Roberts May 1994 A
5336624 Walden Aug 1994 A
5341013 Koyanagi et al. Aug 1994 A
5345105 Sun et al. Sep 1994 A
5354704 Yang et al. Oct 1994 A
5369299 Byrne Nov 1994 A
5371390 Mohsen Dec 1994 A
5376577 Roberts et al. Dec 1994 A
5384472 Yin Jan 1995 A
5384475 Yahata Jan 1995 A
5399441 Bearinger et al. Mar 1995 A
5404040 Hshieh et al. Apr 1995 A
5412237 Komori et al. May 1995 A
5441902 Hsieh et al. Aug 1995 A
5468990 Daum Nov 1995 A
5475251 Kuo et al. Dec 1995 A
5506806 Fukushima Apr 1996 A
5531018 Saia et al. Jul 1996 A
5539224 Ema Jul 1996 A
5541614 Lam et al. Jul 1996 A
5571735 Mogami et al. Nov 1996 A
5576988 Kuo et al. Nov 1996 A
5611940 Zettler Mar 1997 A
5638946 Zavracky Jun 1997 A
5677557 Wuu et al. Oct 1997 A
5679595 Chen et al. Oct 1997 A
5719422 Burr et al. Feb 1998 A
5719430 Goto Feb 1998 A
5721150 Pasch Feb 1998 A
5783846 Baukus et al. Jul 1998 A
5821590 Lee et al. Oct 1998 A
5838047 Yamauchi et al. Nov 1998 A
5854510 Sur, Jr. et al. Dec 1998 A
5866933 Baukus et al. Feb 1999 A
5880503 Matsumoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5888887 Li et al. Mar 1999 A
5895241 Lu et al. Apr 1999 A
5920097 Horne Jul 1999 A
5930663 Baukus et al. Jul 1999 A
5930667 Oda Jul 1999 A
5973375 Baukus et al. Oct 1999 A
5977593 Hara Nov 1999 A
5998257 Lane et al. Dec 1999 A
6037627 Kitamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6046659 Loo et al. Apr 2000 A
6054659 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6057520 Goodwin-Johansson May 2000 A
6080614 Neilson et al. Jun 2000 A
6117762 Baukus et al. Sep 2000 A
6137318 Takaaki Oct 2000 A
6154388 Oh Nov 2000 A
6215158 Choi Apr 2001 B1
6294816 Baukus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6326675 Scott et al. Dec 2001 B1
6503787 Choi Jan 2003 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
0 186 855 Jul 1986 EP
0 364 769 Apr 1990 EP
0 463 373 Jan 1992 EP
0 528 302 Feb 1993 EP
0 585 601 Mar 1994 EP
0 764 985 Mar 1997 EP
0 883 184 Dec 1998 EP
0 920 057 Jun 1999 EP
1 193 758 Apr 2002 EP
1 202 353 May 2002 EP
2486717 Jan 1982 FR
58-190064 Nov 1983 JP
61-147551 Jul 1986 JP
63 129647 Jun 1988 JP
02-046762 Feb 1990 JP
02-237038 Sep 1990 JP
10-256398 Sep 1998 JP
9821734 May 1998 WO
9857373 Dec 1998 WO
0044012 Jul 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
Document No. 63129647, dated Jun. 2, 1988, Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 012, No. 385 (E-668), Oct. 14, 1998.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 016, No. 197 (p-1350) May 12, 1992 & JP-A-40 28 092 (Toshiba Corp), abstract.
Fredericksen, T.M., “A Multiple-Layer-Metal CMOS Process,” Intuitive CMOS Electronics, Revised Edition, Section 5.6, pp. 134-146 (1989).
Hodges and Jackson, Analysis and Design of Digital Integrated Circuits, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, p. 353 (1988).
Larson, L.E., et al., “Microactuators for GaAs-based Microwave Integrated Circuits,” IEEE, pp. 743-746 (1991).
Lee, “Engineering a Device for Electron-beam Probing,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, pp. 36-49 (1989).
Sze, S.M., ed. VLSI Technology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 99, 447, and 461-465 (1983).
Blythe, et al., “Layout Reconstruction of Complex Silicon Chips,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, pp. 138-145 (Feb. 1993).
Ng, K.K., Complete Guide to Semiconductor Devices, McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp 164-165 (1995).
Sze, S.M., ed., “Silicides for Gates and Interconnections,” VLSI Technology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 372-380 (1983).
IBM_TDB, “Double Polysilicon Dynamic Memory Cell with Polysilicon Bit Line,” pp 3828-3831 (Feb. 1979).
IBM_TDB, “Static Ram Double Polysilicon Process,” pp 3683-3686 (Jan. 1981).
Abstract of JP 02-237038, Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 014, No. 550 (Dec. 6, 1990).
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/882,892, Baukus et al., filed Jun. 15, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/132,523, Clark, Jr. et al., filed Apr. 24, 2003.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/735,841, Chow et al., filed Dec. 12, 2003.