The present invention relates to semiconductor devices and their methods of manufacture wherein the semiconductor devices have implanted interconnections which are hidden and/or camouflaged so as to inhibit or prevent reverse engineering of the semiconductor device.
The design and development of semiconductor Integrated Circuits (ICs) tends to be rather expensive and, in fact, many hours of engineering talent are required to develop the complex structures, processes and manufacturing techniques involved in making modern semiconductor devices and ICs. Indeed, semiconductor ICs over the years have become more complex and therefore the effort involved in achieving a successful design has become very expensive. Many man-hours of highly skilled professional time are required at a considerable expense to design and develop a modem integrated circuit.
Others, in order to avoid not only the expense involved in the design and development of integrated circuits, but also to avoid the significant time involved in bringing a new integrated circuit design to the market place, resort to reverse engineering practices for existing integrated circuits to take apart, probe, and otherwise examine these existing ICs to try to determine the physical structures and methods used to make the integrated circuit for subsequent copying. This reverse engineering, which typically relies primarily on obtaining planar optical images of a circuit, in essence tries to bypass the typical product development cycles and expenses involved in producing integrated circuits.
Since the reverse engineer is trying to go for a “free ride” on the efforts of others, various approaches have been developed to try to thwart the reverse engineer, particularly in the field of semiconductor integrated circuits. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,583,011 wherein the device is given a depletion implant that is virtually invisible to a reverse engineer.
Integrated circuits typically comprise a large number of active devices, typically in the form of transistors, diodes, and the like, which are electrically connected by the means of interconnects. The interconnects are often provided by metallic structures which are formed on various levels within an integrated circuit device. Since these metallic structures etch away in the presence of an appropriate etchant at a different rate compared to the other structures found in a semiconductor device (such as semiconducting material, insulating material, and the like), the reverse engineer can discover the presence and the structure of metallic conductors used to interconnect the active devices in an integrated circuit by putting the needed time and energy into the reverse engineering task. However, since this time and energy is less than that required to design a new IC, reverse engineering has its followers. Indeed, the reverse engineer's object is to make a working, slavish copy of the original IC, caring little about how the original IC was designed. The reverse engineer does not seem to be deterred by the fact that in many countries existing ICs are legally protected against copying by some form of mask works protection. As such, in order to protect the considerable investment made in new IC designs, other or additional steps are needed to deter such slavish copying.
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for preventing reverse engineering of integrated circuits by hiding interconnects between various devices and structures (for example, diodes, transistors, input/output connections, power supply connections and the like) so as to make it much more difficult for the reverse engineer to determine how the devices and structures, which can be seen on an integrated circuit, are interconnected.
In one aspect, the present invention provides an interconnect for interconnecting two spaced-apart implanted regions of a common conductivity type in an integrated circuit or device. The interconnect comprises a first implanted region forming a conducting channel between the two spaced-apart implanted regions, the conducting channel being of the same common conductivity type and bridging a region between the two spaced-apart regions, and a second implanted region of opposite conductivity type, the second implanted region being disposed between the two spaced-apart implanted regions of common conductivity type and being disposed over the conducting channel.
In another aspect the present invention provides a method of providing and camouflaging an interconnect between two adjacent implanted regions in an integrated circuit or device, the two adjacent implanted regions being of a common conductivity type. The method includes forming a first region of the same common conductivity type, the first region being disposed between locations where said two adjacent implanted regions either have been or will be formed; and forming a second region of opposite conductivity type to the common conductivity type, the second region over-lying the first region and having a concentration profile normal to a major surface of the integrated circuit or device with a concentration peak closer to the major surface of the semiconductor device than a concentration peak for the first region.
A complicated integrated circuit can literally comprise millions of active regions. Of course, not all active regions or devices are connected to an immediately adjacent active region or device although that is not infrequently the case. With respect to
Those skilled in the art will realize that if the P-type implant 14 were not employed, the N-type implant 13, which has a tendency to extend towards the surface 15 of the semiconductor device shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the action regions 11 and 12, for example, may be formed before, after or concurrently with the formation of the conduction path 13.
Preferably the depth of the camouflaging implant 14 will be on the order of 0.1 μm while the depth of the conducting channel implant 13 will be on the order of 0.2 μm for FET transistor structures of the type partially depicted in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the camouflaging implant 14 being a P-type implant between N-type region 11 and N-type region 12 will not provide a conducting path. The depth of the implants are controlled, as is well known in the art, by the energy used in the implanting process. Preferably, the camouflaging implant 14 is formed first and by a relatively lower energy level compared to the implant which will form the conducting channel implant 13. Implanted region 14 should have the peak of its distribution range lying close to the surface. Thereafter, a relatively higher energy implant is performed to form region 13. The second implant, having a higher energy, should have the peak of its distribution range lying at least 2σ distances away from the peak of the range distribution peak for implanted region 14. The value σ corresponds to the range profile distribution width for implant 14.
While implanting the conduction path 13 and the camouflaging region 14 is the preferable method of practicing the invention, one skilled in the art will appreciate that there are other semiconductor manufacturing methods that may be used to achieve the same or similar results. For example, instead of (or in addition to) using implantation to form the active regions 11, 12, conduction path 13 and the camouflaging region 14, any one or more of these regions may be formed by diffusion. Diffusion makes use of dopant atoms which span a wide range of concentrations. These dopant atoms may be introduced into the substrate 10 in ways well known to those skilled in the art, such as 1) diffusion from a chemical source in a vapor form at high temperatures, 2) diffusion from a dopant-oxide source, or 3) diffusion and annealing from an ion implanted layer.
The depths of the regions 11, 12, 13 or 14, if formed through diffusion, are controlled by the dopant atoms and the temperatures used in the diffusion process. When a diffusion process is used, the conduction path 13 is preferably formed before the camouflaging region 14. The camouflaging region 14 may then be formed either through the diffusion process or by the implantation, as discussed above. One skilled in the art will appreciate that there are well known techniques used in modern processes relating to diffusion depths and lateral extents that are preferably followed so that the conductivity of the various regions is controlled.
Due to the fact that some reverse engineers have etch and/or stain processes that can differentiate between N-type and P-type regions, the reverse engineer with such capabilities might infer the presence of the hidden conducting channel 13 by noting the presence of camouflaging region 14 if the camouflaging region 14 only occurred when it was used to hide conducting channel 13. The reverse engineer might observe region 14 (assuming the reverse engineer is able to differentiate it from regions 11 and 12 due to its different conductivity type) and, note that it does not provide a conduction path itself, therefore enabling the reverse engineer to conclude that region 14 has no purpose except to hide an underlying implanted region 13. Thus, the reverse engineer might also infer the presence of a conducting channel between regions 11 and 12 by the presence of the camouflaging region 14. In order to thwart the reverse engineer with such capabilities, the relatively shallow implant 14 should be used in other places where no interconnect is desired to be formed between two adjacent active regions. See, for example,
The configurations shown in
Of course, some practicing the present invention may elect not to use a camouflaging implant 14, 24 in certain regions between two active devices, as is shown in
The more you confuse a reverse engineer, the more apt you are to thwart him at reverse engineering any particular integrated circuit. Therefore, other interconnection schemes can also be used in a particular IC design to further camouflage how the active regions are interconnected. Since there are millions of active regions in a large modern IC, different methods of interconnection can be combined for use together on a single IC. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,933 a shallow implant is used to provide an interconnection between two active regions. Thus, some practicing the present invention for some interconnects on a chip may decide to use other inventions, including the invention of our prior U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,933 in order to provide other interconnections. The more you confuse the reverse engineer, the better chance you have of thwarting his efforts.
Those skilled in the art will realize that when the present invention is used in connection with the manufacture of semiconductor devices and ICs, the processes used to fabricate such ICs and devices may require additional processing steps to use the present invention or it may be possible to utilize the present invention, by modifying the masks for making a integrated circuit, without adding additional processing steps. It basically depends upon the fabrication processes used by a manufacturer of integrated circuits. Thus, for some manufacturers, they should be able to implement the present invention without adding to the cost of manufacturing semiconductor devices and integrated circuits. For others, additional processing steps will be involved, which will add to the cost of making a semiconductor device or IC. However, the additional cost of making the device or IC may well be justified in view of the fact that the resulting device will be more robust against reverse engineering.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the devices T1–T4, while they are identified here as FETs in this embodiment, can represent other types of semiconductor devices with active regions some of which are interconnected by a conducting channel such as the channel 13-2 between S2 and D4 or the conducting channel 13-I between S4 and D3. Of course, other or different interconnection patterns might well be used in practice. In any case, the conductivity type of regions 13-1, 13-2, D1, S2 and S4 (as well as the other active regions) would preferably be of a common conductivity type in this example and, for many integrated circuits, of N-type conductivity.
Having described the invention with respect to a preferred embodiment thereof, modification will now no doubt suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments except as required by the appended claims.
This application in a continuation in part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/696,826 filed Oct. 25, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,815,816 the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3673471 | Klein et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3946426 | Sanders | Mar 1976 | A |
3983620 | Spadea | Oct 1976 | A |
4017888 | Christie et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4101344 | Kooi et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4139864 | Schulman | Feb 1979 | A |
4145701 | Kawagoe | Mar 1979 | A |
4164461 | Schilling | Aug 1979 | A |
4196443 | Dingwall | Apr 1980 | A |
4267578 | Vetter | May 1981 | A |
4291391 | Chatterjee et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4295897 | Tubbs et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4314268 | Yoshioka et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4317273 | Guterman et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4322736 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4374454 | Jochems | Feb 1983 | A |
4393575 | Dunkley et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4409434 | Basset et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4435895 | Parillo | Mar 1984 | A |
4471376 | Morcom et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4493740 | Komeda | Jan 1985 | A |
4530150 | Shirato | Jul 1985 | A |
4581628 | Miyauchi et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4583011 | Pechar | Apr 1986 | A |
4603381 | Guttag et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4623255 | Suszko | Nov 1986 | A |
4636822 | Codella et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4727038 | Watabe et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4727493 | Taylor, Sr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4729001 | Haskel | Mar 1988 | A |
4753897 | Lund et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4766516 | Ozdemir et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4771012 | Yabu et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4799096 | Koeppe | Jan 1989 | A |
4821085 | Haken et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829356 | Arndt | May 1989 | A |
4830974 | Chang et al. | May 1989 | A |
4860084 | Shibata | Aug 1989 | A |
4912053 | Schrantz | Mar 1990 | A |
4939567 | Kenney | Jul 1990 | A |
4962484 | Takeshima et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4975756 | Haken et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4998151 | Korman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5015596 | Toyoda et al. | May 1991 | A |
5030796 | Swanson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5050123 | Castro | Sep 1991 | A |
5061978 | Mizutani et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5065208 | Shah et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068697 | Noda et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070378 | Yamagata | Dec 1991 | A |
5073812 | Shimura | Dec 1991 | A |
5101121 | Sourgen | Mar 1992 | A |
5117276 | Thomas et al. | May 1992 | A |
5120669 | Schrantz | Jun 1992 | A |
5121089 | Larson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5121186 | Wong et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5132571 | McCollum et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138197 | Kuwana | Aug 1992 | A |
5146117 | Larson | Sep 1992 | A |
5168340 | Nishimura | Dec 1992 | A |
5177589 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5202591 | Walden | Apr 1993 | A |
5210437 | Sawada et al. | May 1993 | A |
5225699 | Nakamura | Jul 1993 | A |
5227649 | Chapman | Jul 1993 | A |
5231299 | Ning et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5302539 | Haken et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308682 | Morikawa | May 1994 | A |
5309015 | Kuwata et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317197 | Roberts | May 1994 | A |
5336624 | Walden | Aug 1994 | A |
5341013 | Koyanagi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345105 | Sun et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354704 | Yang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5369299 | Byrne et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371390 | Mohsen | Dec 1994 | A |
5376577 | Roberts et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5378641 | Cheffings | Jan 1995 | A |
5384472 | Yin | Jan 1995 | A |
5384475 | Yahata | Jan 1995 | A |
5399441 | Bearinger et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404040 | Hshieh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412237 | Komori et al. | May 1995 | A |
5441902 | Hsieh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5468990 | Daum | Nov 1995 | A |
5475251 | Kuo et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5506806 | Fukushima | Apr 1996 | A |
5531018 | Saia et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539224 | Ema | Jul 1996 | A |
5541614 | Lam et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5571735 | Mogami et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576988 | Kuo et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5611940 | Zettler | Mar 1997 | A |
5638946 | Zavracky | Jun 1997 | A |
5677557 | Wuu et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679595 | Chen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5719422 | Burr et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719430 | Goto | Feb 1998 | A |
5721150 | Pasch | Feb 1998 | A |
5783375 | Twist | Jul 1998 | A |
5783846 | Baukus et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5821147 | Kizilyali | Oct 1998 | A |
5821590 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838047 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854510 | Sur, Jr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858843 | Doyle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866933 | Baukus et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880503 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888887 | Li et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895241 | Lu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5920097 | Horne | Jul 1999 | A |
5930663 | Baukus et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930667 | Oda | Jul 1999 | A |
5933737 | Goto | Aug 1999 | A |
5973375 | Baukus et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977593 | Hara | Nov 1999 | A |
5998257 | Lane et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010929 | Chapman | Jan 2000 | A |
6037627 | Kitamura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044011 | Marr et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046659 | Loo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054659 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057520 | Goodwin-Johansson | May 2000 | A |
6064110 | Baukus et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080614 | Neilson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093609 | Chuang | Jul 2000 | A |
6117762 | Baukus et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137318 | Takaaki | Oct 2000 | A |
6153484 | Donaton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154388 | Oh | Nov 2000 | A |
6215158 | Choi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6261912 | Hsaio et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6294816 | Baukus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326675 | Scott et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6365453 | Deboer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373106 | Maki et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6410413 | Scott et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6479350 | Ling et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503787 | Choi | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6740942 | Baukus et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6825530 | Brown et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6911694 | Negoro et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6933560 | Lee et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
20020058368 | Tseng | May 2002 | A1 |
20020173131 | Clark, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030057476 | Morita et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030173622 | Porter et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040061186 | Chow et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075147 | Ueda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099912 | Chow et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 186 855 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0 364 769 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 463 373 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 528 302 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 585 601 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 764 985 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 883 184 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 920 057 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 193 758 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 202 353 | May 2002 | EP |
58-190064 | Nov 1983 | JP |
61-147551 | Jul 1986 | JP |
63 129647 | Jun 1988 | JP |
02-046762 | Feb 1990 | JP |
2 188 944 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-237038 | Sep 1990 | JP |
10-256398 | Sep 1998 | JP |
9821734 | May 1998 | WO |
9857373 | Dec 1998 | WO |
0044012 | Jul 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020173131 A1 | Nov 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09696826 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 10132523 | US |