Implants and methods for repair, replacement and treatment of disease

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8480757
  • Patent Number
    8,480,757
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 28, 2006
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 9, 2013
    10 years ago
Abstract
Implants comprising cartilage and trabecular metal, and methods of making the implants are disclosed. Further disclosed are therapeutic uses of the implants, which include methods of treatment or repair of an chondral or osteochondral defect, such as a chondral or osteochondral injury, lesion or disease. An implant comprises cartilage or chondrocytes and a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. An implant can comprise a geometric shape such as a cylinder or an anatomical shape such as a condyle, and can be used in conjunction with a positioning structure.
Description
BACKGROUND

Joint disease, defect, and injury are leading causes of pain and disability in the adult population. The morbidity associated with joint disease, defect, and injury and their spectrum of associated disorders are responsible for significant health care, economic and social costs. Current treatments for repairing or ameliorating a joint disease, defect, or injury, for example an osteochondral injury in which articular cartilage and underlying bone are damaged, can be expensive, inefficacious, painful, or lengthy. Alternative treatments are, therefore, needed.


SUMMARY

In view of these and related unmet needs, the present teachings disclose implants which can be used in the treatment, repair and/or partial or full replacement of a chondral or osteochondral defect, such as a chondral or osteochondral disease, defect, injury or lesion. The present teachings also provide methods of forming the implants, as well as methods of treating a chondral or osteochondral defect or injury in a patient in need of treatment, using implants as disclosed herein.


In various embodiments, an implant of the present teachings comprises cartilage and a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal, which can be a subchondral base comprising at least one trabecular metal component. In certain alternative embodiments, an implant comprises chondrocytes and a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal, which can be a subchondral base comprising at least one trabecular metal component. A trabecular metal used in an implant comprises at least one metal, which can be, in various aspects, tantalum, niobium, stainless steel, a chromium-cobalt alloy or titanium. In some aspects, a chromium-cobalt alloy can be a chromium-cobalt molybdenum alloy. Furthermore, a trabecular metal comprises a plurality of pores. A plurality of pores can have, in some aspects, a median diameter of from about 3 microns to about 800 microns. In addition, in certain aspects a subchondral base can further comprise at least one porous surface layer which comprises a plurality of pores of median diameter from about 3 microns to about 800 microns. In these aspects, the trabecular metal can have a “graded” porosity, i.e., the median diameter of the plurality of pores of a surface layer can be different from that of the plurality of pores comprising the core of the trabecular metal. Accordingly, in various configurations, a porous surface layer can comprise a plurality of pores of median pore diameter of from about 100 microns to about 800 microns, or, in alternative configurations, a porous surface layer can comprise a plurality of pores of median pore diameter of from about 3 microns to about 20 microns.


In some configurations of an implant, a subchondral base can comprises at least two surfaces. In these configurations, one surface can comprise trabecular metal having a plurality of pores, wherein the pores have a median pore diameter of from about 100 microns to about 800 microns, while a second surface can be a cartilage-adherent surface. In some aspects of these configurations, a cartilage-adherent surface (i.e., a surface adhesive to cartilage and/or chondrocytes) can comprise a plurality of pores having a median pore diameter of from about 3 microns to about 20 microns. Alternatively, a cartilage-adherent surface can comprise a cartilage adhesive, or a cartilage-adherent surface can comprise both a plurality of pores having a median pore diameter of from about 3 microns to about 20 microns as well as a cartilage adhesive. In various aspects of these configurations, a cartilage adhesive can comprise tissue trans-glutaminase, hyaluronic acid, collagen type I, collagen type II, a chemically cross-linked collagen, fibrin, albumin, gelatin, elastin, silk, demineralized bone matrix, polyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl alcohol, polypropylene fumarate or a combination thereof (Jurgensen et al., J. Bone and Joint Surg. 79A: 185-193, 1997; U.S. Pat. No. 6,893,466 to Trieu; U.S. Pat. No. 6,835,277 to Goldberg et al.) or a hydrogel. Furthermore, a cartilage adhesive can also be adhesive towards chondrocytes. In various aspects, a vertebrate-derived component of a cartilage adhesive, such as tissue trans-glutaminase, hyaluronic acid, collagen type I, collagen type II, fibrin, albumin, gelatin, or elastin, or demineralized bone matrix, can be autologous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic to a mammalian recipient of an implant, such as a human patient in need of treatment. Furthermore, a protein or polypeptide component of a cartilage adhesive such as tissue trans-glutaminase, hyaluronic acid, collagen type I, collagen type II, fibrin, albumin, gelatin, or elastin, can be obtained from a naturally-occurring source such as an animal or human donor, or can be produced using molecular biological methods well known to skilled artisans, such as expression of a gene or cDNA encoding the protein in transformed or transfected cells (see, e.g., Sambrook, J., et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 2001).


In some configurations, a region of a subchondral base comprising pores having a median pore diameter of about 100 microns to about 800 microns can provide a surface which can promote bone attachment and ingrowth, while a region comprising a cartilage-adherent surface can provide a surface which can promote chondrocyte and/or cartilage attachment and growth. In various configurations, a cartilage-adherent surface can be a region of a subchondral base comprising a plurality of pores having a median pore diameter of about 3 microns to about 20 microns, a cartilage adhesive, or a combination of a plurality of pores and a cartilage adhesive, and can comprise trabecular metal or a different material, such as a polymer. In certain configurations, an implant can further comprise a non-trabecular metal material which provides a surface for chondrocyte or cartilage attachment, such as, in non-limiting example, a chondrocyte-adherent ceramic or plastic. In addition, in some configurations, a trabecular metal component of an implant can have a geometry that promotes retention of chondrocytes, such as barbs, ridges or hooks.


In various aspects, the trabecular metal of an implant can comprise metal having a sintered, porous texture such as sintered, porous titanium or porous tantalum. Furthermore, the trabecular metal can be sintered and/or cancellous-structured. In addition, in some configurations, a porous surface layer can include a biocompatible porous metal sheet, such as a porous titanium sheet. In addition, in some configurations, a porous surface layer can include an absorbable biocompatible material such as polylactic/polyglycolic acid (PLA/PGA).


In various configurations of the present teachings, cartilage comprised by an implant can be juvenile cartilage, a cartilage formed in vitro such as neocartilage described in Adkisson, H. D. et al., Clin. Orthop. 391S: S280-S294, 2001; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,316 and 6,645,316 to Adkisson, minced cartilage, minced juvenile cartilage and/or devitalized cartilage. In various aspects, the cartilage can comprise chondrocytes. Chondrocytes comprising an implant can be, in various aspects, chondrocytes grown either in contact with a trabecular metal, separately from the trabecular metal, or in a combination of growth apart from the trabecular metal then in contact with the trabecular metal. The contact between the chondrocytes and the at least one trabecular metal can be established either in vivo or in vitro, and subsequent growth can occur in vivo, in vitro, or in a combination thereof. Chondrocytes in contact with trabecular metal can be, in some configurations, chondrocytes adherent to the trabecular metal. Chondrocytes used in various configurations of the implants, including chondrocytes comprised by cartilage, can be chondrocytes allogeneic to, autologous to, and/or xenogeneic to a mammalian recipient such as a human patient. A donor of the chondrocytes can be, in various configurations, a cadaver no older than about fourteen years of age at time of death. Accordingly, as used herein, the terms “juvenile chondrocytes” refers to chondrocytes obtained from a human donor less than about fourteen years of age at time of donation. Similarly, the term “juvenile cartilage” as used herein refers to cartilage formed from such chondrocytes. In some embodiments, chondrocytes comprising an implant can be chondrocytes differentiated from chondrocyte precursor cells such as mesenchymal stem cells, for example as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,811,094 to Caplan et al.


In various aspects of the present teachings, an implant can comprise cartilage affixed to a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. A subchondral base of these aspects can comprise a biocompatible metal sheet. A biocompatible metal sheet can be a biocompatible porous metal sheet or a biocompatible non-porous metal sheet An attachment between cartilage and a subchondral base of an implant can include, in non-limiting example, one or more sutures, one or more biocompatible adhesives, one or more biocompatible absorbable fasteners, a chemical cross-link, a polymer formed from subunits polymerized at a cartilage/trabecular metal juncture, and/or one or more laser welds. In these aspects, a biocompatible adhesive can include at least one biocompatible macromolecular adhesive such as a fibrin-based adhesive, a collagen-based adhesive or a combination thereof, and a biocompatible absorbable fastener can be, without limitation, a staple, a dart, a pin or a tack, and can comprise a biocompatible material such as, without limitation, polylactic/polyglycolic acid (PLA/PGA).


In various configurations, an implant of the present teachings can be substantially cylindrical in shape, or can be substantially a pyramidal wedge or substantially a frustoconical “mushroom” in shape (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,232 to Overaker et al.) Alternatively, an implant can have a shape more closely approximating an anatomical shape, such as that of a joint or a bone/joint combination, such as a shape of a human condyle, a human hemi-condyle, a human acetabular cup or a human femoral head.


Embodiments of the present teachings also include methods of forming an implant comprising cartilage and a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. Various configurations of these methods comprise growing a population of chondrocytes in vitro, and contacting the population of chondrocytes with a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. In these embodiments, contacting a population of chondrocytes with a trabecular metal can include coupling or attaching the chondrocytes to the trabecular metal. In some aspects, growing a population of chondrocytes in vitro can comprise growing the chondrocytes in a matrix. In these aspects, the matrix can later be attached to a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. In various aspects, the chondrocytes can be juvenile chondrocytes, and the trabecular metal can comprise a porous surface as described herein for an implant. In some configurations, chondrocytes can be grown in a scaffold-free environment. The chondrocyte population can also be grown in contact with a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. In these methods, contact between the chondrocytes and the subchondral base can be initiated prior to chondrocyte growth, during chondrocyte growth, or after chondrocyte growth. The chondrocyte growth can occur in vivo or in vitro. Accordingly, the contacting between a trabecular metal and the chondrocytes can occur subsequent to the growing, and/or simultaneously with the growing. As a result, the juvenile chondrocytes can grow in contact with the trabecular metal, or without contacting the trabecular metal.


In some configurations, methods of forming an implant can comprise growing chondrocytes in the presence of a trabecular metal component such that the chondrocytes adhere to a surface of the component. In some alternative configurations, methods of forming an implant can comprise coupling a cartilage tissue component to a surface of a trabecular metal component.


In certain configurations, methods of forming an implant include attaching cartilage to a subchondral base. The attaching can comprise applying one or more sutures, a biocompatible adhesive, and/or an absorbable fastener to the cartilage and/or the subchondral base. A biocompatible adhesive can be, in non-limiting example, a macromolecule such as a fibrin, a collagen, or a combination thereof. An absorbable fastener can be, in non-limiting example, a staple, a dart or a tack. The attaching can be accomplished by methods well known to skilled artisans.


In some configurations, a method of these embodiments can include applying a biocompatible adhesive, such as a fibrin, to a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal, prior to contacting the base with a population of chondrocytes such as juvenile chondrocytes. In some alternative configurations, a method of these embodiments can include applying a biocompatible adhesive, such as a fibrin glue, to a population of chondrocytes prior to contacting the subchondral base with the chondrocytes. In these configurations, the fibrin can be fibrin autologous to a mammalian recipient of the implant, fibrin allogeneic to a mammalian recipient of the implant, fibrin xenogeneic to a mammalian recipient of the implant, synthetic fibrin, or a combination of two or more of these types of fibrin. Furthermore, trabecular metal comprised by a subchondral base can comprise a porous surface as described for implants herein. In addition, in some aspects, a method of these embodiments can further comprise applying to a surface of a subchondral base a biocompatible absorbable polymer, such as polylactic/polyglycolic acid (PLA/PGA). The surface can be, in some aspects, a porous surface of the subchondral base.


Methods of forming an implant comprising cartilage and a subchondral base can include, in various configurations, growing a population of juvenile chondrocytes in vitro in a scaffold-free environment, and contacting the population of juvenile chondrocytes with a trabecular metal subsequent to the growing.


Some embodiments of the present teachings include methods of treating joint disease, defect or injury in a patient in need thereof. These methods can include introducing, into a patient in need, an implant of the present teachings. Introduction of an implant can comprise insertion or attachment of the implant into bone tissue of a recipient. Accordingly, in some configurations, a method can comprise introducing an implant comprising both cartilage and a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal as described herein into a patient at a site of joint disease, defect or injury. In some alternative configurations, a method can comprise introducing a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal into a patient, and attaching to base a component comprising cartilage or chondrocytes, including juvenile chondrocytes. In certain configurations, the subchondral base can be configured to receive chondrocytes such as juvenile chondrocytes comprised by neocartilage. In some aspects of these configurations, the former component can further comprise a surface which promotes chondrocyte attachment, such as a porous surface having a plurality of pores of median diameter of about 3 microns to about 20 microns, a biocompatible macromolecule, or a combination thereof. In some configurations, the present teachings disclose methods comprising introducing into a patient a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. In these configurations, the subchondral base can be configured for receiving chondrocytes. These methods further comprise adding, adjacent to subchondral base, chondrocytes such as juvenile chondrocytes which have been grown in vitro, thereby forming an implant of the present teachings. The chondrocytes in certain aspects can comprise juvenile chondrocytes grown in vitro but not organized into cartilage tissue, or can be juvenile chondrocytes comprised by neocartilage, and the subchondral base which is configured for receiving chondrocytes can comprise a porous surface region having a plurality of pores of median diameter of about 3 microns to about 20 microns, a biocompatible macromolecule, or a combination thereof. The subchondral base can further comprise a region having a plurality of pores of median diameter of about 100 microns to about 800 microns.


In some configurations of these embodiments, a method can further include introducing a non-trabecular metal positioning structure to a recipient patient. Such a positioning structure can aid in the positioning or physical stability of an implant in the patient. In various configurations, a positioning structure can comprise a biocompatible metal or a biocompatible polymer. In configurations of these embodiments, a trabecular metal portion of an implant can be configured to attach to the positioning structure, and/or the positioning structure can be configured to attach to the subchondral base. In certain aspects, the positioning structure can be configured for engaging the bone, and can be, in non-limiting example, a screw, a cylinder, a plat, a rod, or a washer. In addition, in various aspects, a positioning structure can also comprise trabecular metal, and/or can comprise a material other than trabecular metal, such as, in non-limiting example, a biocompatible polymer, or a metal that is non-trabecular.


In some configurations, an implant described herein can be used in the manufacture of a medicament for treatment of joint disease, repair, or injury.


Embodiments of the present teachings also encompass a kit comprising components of a disclosed implant. In these embodiments, a kit can include at least chondrocytes or cartilage, and a trabecular metal component of an implant. In some aspects of a kit, the chondrocytes or cartilage and the trabecular metal component can be packaged in separate containers, while in other aspects, a kit can comprise an implant comprising both cartilage or chondrocytes and a trabecular metal component of an implant. In some aspects, additional kit components can include culture medium for growing or maintaining chondrocytes or cartilage in vitro. In some configurations, a kit can further include instructions and/or reagents which can be used to assemble an implant, and/or tools and equipment which can aid in the assembly of an implant and/or installation of an implant into a recipient, such as, in non-limiting example, fasteners such as suturing thread, a staple, a dart, or a tack, such as a surgical grade staple, dart or tack,





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 illustrates replacement of a femoral head in a patient suffering from a femoral head fracture with an implant.



FIG. 2 illustrates attachment of neocartilage to a subchondral base in vitro.



FIG. 3 illustrates a screw-shaped positioning structure inserted into bone, and attachment of an implant to the structure.



FIG. 4 illustrates a trabecular metal base having receiving screw threads, a positioning structure comprising a screw and a “platform” to which neocartilage is attached, and formation of an implant comprising the trabecular metal and the positioning structure.



FIG. 5 illustrates attachment of cartilage to a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal.



FIG. 6 illustrates seeding of cells onto a trabecular metal component of a subchondral base.



FIG. 7 illustrates a variety of implant shapes useful for chondral or osteochondral repair.



FIG. 8 illustrates an anatomically-shaped implant as inserted into bone.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present teachings disclose implants which can be used in the treatment of joint disease, defect or injury, including chondral or osteochondral disease, as well as methods of forming the implants. In some alternative embodiments, the present teachings disclose methods of treating a patient in need of treatment with the implants.


In various configurations, an implant of the present teachings comprises a combination of cartilage and a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. “Cartilage,” as used herein, encompasses articular cartilage, hyaline cartilage, neocartilage (Adkisson, H. D. et al., Clin. Orthop. 391S: S280-S294, 2001; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,316 and 6,645,316), devitalized cartilage, auricular cartilage, cartilage comprising genetically modified chondrocytes, cartilage from an autogenous source, cartilage from an allogenic source, cartilage from a xenogeneic source, juvenile cartilage, or a combination thereof. In some configurations, cartilage can also comprise chondrocytes differentiated from precursor cells such as mesenchymal stem cells. “Trabecular metal,” as used herein, encompasses biocompatible, porous metal compositions, such as a porous tantalum biomaterial. Descriptions of trabecular metal, as well as various methods of making trabecular metal of various pore sizes and using trabecular metal in applications such as prosthetic devices are described in references such as Bobyn et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 16: 571-581, 1982; Bobyn et al., J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 81-B: 907-14, 1999; Bobyn et al., J. Arthroplasty 14: 347-354, 1999; Black, Clinical Materials 16: 167-173 (1994); Hacking et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 52: 631-638, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 4,863,475 to Andersen et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,479,271 to Bolesky et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,863,474 to Brown et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,535,810 and 6,544,472 to Compton et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,363 to Crowninshield et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,236,457, 5,387,243 and 5,571,187 to Devanathan; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,504,300, 5,672,284 and 5,723,011 to Devanathan et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,997,444 to Farling; U.S. Pat. No. 4,660,755 to Farling et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,740,186 to Hawkins et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,997,445 and 6,797,006 to Hodorek; U.S. Pat. No. 5,080,674 to Jacobs et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,734,959 and 5,926,685 to Krebs et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,566,138 to Lewis et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,320 to Otto et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,512 to Parr et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,685,987 and 6,395,327 to Shetty; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,198,308, 5,323,954 and 5,443,510 to Shetty et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,496,375 to Sisk et al.; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,336,930 and 6,447,514 to Stalcup et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,879,398 to Swarts et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,828 to Tersi et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,639,280 to Warner et al.; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,018,285 and 5,013,324 to Zolman et al.


In various configurations, an implant of the present teachings comprises a combination of chondrocytes and a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. The chondrocytes can be, in some aspects, chondrocytes included in hyaline cartilage such as, without limitation, neocartilage. In other aspects, the chondrocytes can be chondrocytes with the potential to generate hyaline cartilage, but not organized into histologically recognizable cartilage. In some aspects of these configurations, a chondrocyte donor can be a cadaver. Hence, the chondrocytes can be cadaver chondrocytes. These chondrocytes can be grown in vitro using cell culture techniques known to skilled artisans, for example as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/956,971 of Milliman and Adkisson. As used herein, the term “cadaver chondrocytes” refers to viable chondrocytes originally comprised by a human cadaver, as well as clonal descendants of such chondrocytes, such as chondrocytes grown in vitro. Cadaver chondrocytes for use in the various aspects of the present teachings can be obtained from tissues comprising chondrocytes from a cadaver, such as cartilage tissue. Such tissues can be dissected from a cadaver using standard dissection methods well known to skilled artisans. The cartilage tissue utilized in the present teachings can comprise hyaline cartilage, or chondrocytes with the potential to generate hyaline cartilage, such as, for example, articular joint cartilage, tracheal cartilage, laryngeal cartilage, costal cartilage, epiphyseal plate cartilage, and combinations thereof. In various aspects, the cartilage tissue or chondrocytes can be knee joint cartilage or chondrocytes, hip joint cartilage or chondrocytes, or cartilage or chondrocytes from any other articular joint. Viable chondrocytes can be obtained from cartilaginous tissues in a donor cadaver any time after donor death of the donor, for example, for up to about two weeks after death of the donor. Accordingly, in some configurations, the time interval from the time of death of a donor (as determined, for example, by a physician or a coroner) to the time of dissection of cartilage tissue from the donor can be any time from immediately following a pronouncement of death, to about two weeks following death, such as, without limitation, about one hour, greater than 24 hours, about two days, about three days, about four days, about five days, about six days, about seven days, about eight days, about nine days, about ten days, about eleven days, about twelve days, about thirteen days, about fourteen days after death, or longer. In addition, a donor cadaver can be of any chronological age at time of death. For example, a donor cadaver can be, at time of death, about fourteen years old or younger. A donor cadaver need not be a familial member of a recipient, or be otherwise matched immunologically. Without being limited by theory, it is believed that chondrocytes are an “immunologically privileged” cell type, so that chondrocytes transplanted to an allogeneic recipient are not subject to rejection by the recipient's immune system.


In the present teachings, cartilage tissue can be removed from a cadaver using any surgical or dissecting techniques and tools known to skilled artisans. Following cartilage removal from a cadaver, the cartilage tissue can be minced, dissociated into single cells or small groups of cells, and/or placed into tissue or cell culture and expanded using standard techniques and apparatuses well known to skilled artisans. Such techniques and apparatuses are described in the references such as, for example, Feder, J. et al. in: Tissue Engineering in Musculoskeletal Clinical Practice. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2004; Adkisson, H. D. et al., Clin. Orthop. 391S:S280-S294, 2001; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,316 and 6,645,316 to Adkisson.


Cadaver chondrocytes used in the various embodiments of the present teachings are all cadaver chondrocytes which express type II collagen. In addition, in some aspects, cadaver chondrocytes can comprise chondrocytes expressing other molecular markers such as a high molecular weight sulfated proteoglycan, such as, for example, chondroitin sulfate (Kato, Y., and Gospodarowicz, D., J. Cell Biol. 100: 477-485. 1985). Presence of such markers can be determined using materials and methods well known to skilled artisans, such as, for example, antibody detection and histological staining.


In some configurations, cadaver cartilage tissue can be extracted from a cadaver. The cartilage tissue can then be dissociated into individual cells (or small clusters of cells), grown in vitro, and can then be combined with a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal, thereby forming an implant of the present teachings. Accordingly, in some aspects, the chondrocytes can be included in neocartilage. In vitro expansion of chondrocytes, and formation of neocartilage, can be accomplished using cell culture techniques and apparatuses well known to skilled artisans, such as culture methods for neocartilage described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,316 and 6,645,316 to Adkisson, and other general laboratory manuals on cell culture such as Sambrook, J. et al., Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual (Third Edition), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 2001; and Spector, D. L., et al., Culture and Biochemical Analysis of Cells, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. 1998.


In some configurations, a cell culture can include trabecular metal within a cell culture chamber. In these configurations, chondrocytes can grow in direct contact with a subchondral base of the present teachings, such as a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal as presented herein. Furthermore, the subchondral base can further comprise a cartilage-adherent surface. In various configurations, chondrocytes and/or cartilage can adhere to such a surface. In various aspects, chondrocytes adhered to such surfaces can proliferate and/or form cartilage such as neocartilage. Accordingly, as used herein, a “cartilage-adherent surface” is a surface of a biocompatible material to which cartilage can adhere. Similarly, as used herein, a “chondrocyte-adherent surface” is a surface of a biocompatible material to which chondrocytes can adhere. Non-limiting examples of cartilage- and chondrocyte adherent surfaces include a porous surface such as a trabecular metal surface comprising pores of median diameter from about 3 microns to about 20 microns, a plastic or ceramic surface comprising a cartilage adhesive or a chondrocyte adhesive, or a porous surface comprising pores of median diameter from about 3 microns to about 20 microns and a cartilage adhesive or chondrocyte adhesive. As used herein, the terms “cartilage adhesive” and “chondrocyte adhesive” refer to molecular species or mixtures of species which promote adhesion of cartilage or chondrocytes to a surface, by acting as a glue and/or by promoting adhesion-forming activity of cells. In various embodiments, a cartilage or chondrocyte adhesive can be used as a glue at the interface between cartilage or chondrocytes and a cartilage- or chondrocyte-adherent surface.


In certain configurations, cartilage tissue can be harvested from a donor such as a cadaver and placed as explants in a cell culture chamber including a growth medium as disclosed in the above-cited references. In some aspects, a cell culture chamber can further include a subchondral base (which can comprise trabecular metal) and a chondrocyte-adherent surface. In these aspects, chondrocytes can migrate out from the explant and populate the chondrocyte-adherent surface. A subchondral base populated with chondrocytes can be used directly as an implant in a recipient, or can be cultured under conditions which promote chondrocyte or cartilage maintenance or growth, or neocartilage formation as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,316 and 6,645,316 to Adkisson or U.S. Pat. No. 5,041,138 to Vacanti et al.


In certain alternative configurations, a cartilage explant can be affixed directly to a subchondral base and a cartilage-adhesive surface to form an implant, using methods and materials disclosed herein, such as, for example, sutures, adhesives, and fasteners.


In various aspects, chondrocytes adhered to a cartilage-adherent surface can grow and/or form cartilage tissue such as neocartilage. In certain alternative aspects, a surface can comprise a cartilage adhesive such as a fibrin adhesive as described herein. In yet other aspects, a surface can comprise a both a plurality of pores having a median diameter of about 3 microns to about 20 microns and a cartilage adhesive. The surface can comprise, in non-limiting example, trabecular metal, plastic such as cell culture plastic or an absorbable biocompatible material such as polylactic/polyglycolic acid (PLA/PGA). In addition, in various aspects, chondrocytes such as juvenile chondrocytes can be grown separately from a subchondral base.


In some embodiments of the present teachings, a method of treating a patient can comprise transferring an implant into a recipient patient. In other embodiments, a subchondral base component of an implant can be implanted into a recipient patient, for example by surgically attaching the subchondral base to a bone, followed by addition of chondrocytes and/or cartilage adjacent to the subchondral base. In some configurations, a method can further comprise attaching a positioning structure to a patient, then attaching an implant to the positioning structure. As used herein, the term “positioning structure” refers to a structure configured for supporting, positioning and/or maintaining the position of an implant of the present teachings or a portion thereof in a recipient such as a human patient. In non-limiting example, a positioning structure can be a screw or a cylinder which attaches to an aperture introduced into a patient's bone. A positioning structure of these configurations can comprise a biocompatible material such as, for example, a biocompatible polymer or a biocompatible metal.


In certain configurations, a positioning structure can be configured for engaging the bone. In these configurations, a positioning structure can be introduced to a bone of a subject. A subchondral base can then be attached to the positioning structure. Chondrocytes or cartilage, such as, in non-limiting example, devitalized cartilage or neocartilage, can then be attached to the subchondral base. Alternatively, in some configurations, a positioning structure can be introduced into a patient, for example by attaching to a bone an implant comprising both chondrocytes and/or cartilage and a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal can then be attached to the positioning structure.


Trabecular metal comprised by the implants of the present teaching can comprise any form of trabecular metal that is compatible with viable cells or tissues. In various aspects, trabecular metal used in an implant can be trabecular metal described in publications such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,861 to Kaplan, U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,723 to Steinemann et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,087,553 to Cohen, or U.S. Pat. No. 6,840,960 to Bubb. In non-limiting examples, the trabecular metal can comprise tantalum, which can be substantially pure tantalum, niobium, titanium, which can be substantially pure titanium, stainless steel, a chromium-cobalt alloy, or a combination thereof. In some aspects, a chromium-cobalt alloy can be a chromium-cobalt-molybdenum alloy. In certain configurations, the trabecular metal can be porous throughout its structure, or substantially porous near the surface, and can comprise, in non-limiting example, a porous surface layer and a core, which can be porous or non-porous. Accordingly, in some configurations, a trabecular metal can include a core comprising a biocompatible material, such as, in non-limiting example, tantalum, niobium, titanium, a chrome-cobalt alloy or a ceramic, and a porous surface which can be, in non-limiting example, a porous titanium sheet or a cancellous-structured titanium layer.


In some configurations, an implant comprising a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal of the present teachings can further comprise one or more bioactive molecules, such as, in non-limiting example, a transforming growth factor-β family member protein such as a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), or other chondroinductive or osteoinductive molecules. Accordingly, in some aspects, a chondral-adhesive portion of an implant can comprise one or more chondroinductive molecules, while a subchondral base can comprise one or more osteoinductive molecules.


In some aspects of the present teachings, a surface for attachment of chondrocytes can comprise a plurality of pores. The pores can have a median pore diameter from about 3 microns to about 20 microns. The pores can be substantially homogeneous in diameter, or can be substantially heterogeneous in diameter. In some alternative aspects, the surface can comprise at least one biological macromolecule. A biological macromolecule can be, in some configurations, a macromolecule such as hyaluronic acid, collagen type I, collagen type II or fibrin. In various aspects, fibrin comprised by a surface layer can include fibrin that is autologous to a mammalian recipient of the juvenile chondrocytes, fibrin allogeneic to a mammalian recipient of the juvenile chondrocytes, fibrin xenogeneic to a mammalian recipient of the juvenile chondrocytes, synthetic fibrin, or a combination of two or more of these types of fibrin. In yet other aspects, a surface for attachment of chondrocytes can comprise both a plurality of pores and at least one biological macromolecule or biocompatible polymer. Such surfaces can be prepared using techniques known to skilled artisans, such as, for example, techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,740,186 to Hawkins. In some aspects, trabecular metal can be coated with or coupled to a biocompatible porous absorbable polymer, such as, for example, PLA/PGA to form a biocompatible surface layer to which chondrocytes can attach. Such a surface layer can promote juvenile chondrocyte growth in vivo or in vitro. In other aspects, trabecular metal can be coated with an osteoconductive or chondroconductive material such as, in non-limiting example, hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate.


In certain configurations, trabecular metal can be attached to biocompatible porous absorbable polymer such as PLA/PGA to form a reservoir or “cup” into which chondrocytes, cartilage and/or a biocompatible adhesive can be placed. In this connection, U.S. Pat. No. 4,997,445 to Hodorek discloses examples of methods for attaching a polyethylene polymer to a metal base which can be adapted to form the base of an implant of the present teachings.


In various aspects of the present teachings, trabecular metal comprising a porous surface can be made by any process known to skilled artisans, such as, in non-limiting example, etching methods or sputtering methods. In various aspects of the present teachings, a porous surface layer of a subchondral base used in an implant can comprise metal having a sintered, porous texture such as, for example, sintered, porous, cancellous-structured titanium. In addition, in some configurations, a porous surface layer can include a biocompatible porous metal sheet, such as a porous titanium sheet or a stainless steel sheet. Accordingly, in some configurations, an implant can comprise a trabecular metal which comprises a core material, which may or may not be porous, and a porous covering or sheet. In non-limiting example, the core material can be a chrome-cobalt alloy, such as, without limitation, a chrome-cobalt-molybdenum alloy, tantalum, niobium or titanium.


In various aspects, a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal can further comprise at least one biological macromolecule, a biocompatible polymer, a biocompatible ceramic, and/or an osteoconductive or chondroconductive material such as hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate. A biological macromolecule of these aspects can be, without limitation, hyaluronic acid, a transforming growth factor-β family member protein such as a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), or other chondroinductive or osteoinductive molecule. Without being limited by theory, it is believed that a biological macromolecule or biocompatible polymer can promote attachment of chondrocytes or cartilage to a trabecular metal surface by acting as a carrier and/or an adhesive. It is further believed that a biological macromolecule or biocompatible polymer, such as bioabsorbable polymer such as PLA/PGA can promote chondrocyte expansion when used as a coating of a surface such as a trabecular metal surface.


In various configurations of the present teachings, juvenile cartilage comprised by an implant can comprise cartilage formed in vitro, such as neocartilage described in Adkisson, H. D. et al., Clin. Orthop. 391S: S280-S294, 2001; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,316 and 6,645,316 to Adkisson. Chondrocytes comprising the cartilage can be grown either in contact with a subchondral base, separately from the subchondral base, or in a combination of growth apart from the base then in contact with the base. The contact between the chondrocytes and the subchondral base can be established either in vivo or in vitro, and subsequent growth can occur in vivo, in vitro, or a combination thereof. In non-limiting example, a culture chamber can be established comprising both chondrocytes and trabecular metal, under culture conditions that support formation of neocartilage. The neocartilage can then form directly on the surface of the at least one trabecular metal. The chondrocytes comprising the juvenile cartilage can be chondrocytes allogeneic to a mammalian recipient such as a human patient, or autologous to a recipient.


In certain aspects of the present teachings, an implant can include cartilage such as neocartilage comprising juvenile chondrocytes grown in contact with a subchondral base, either in vitro or in vivo, and can furthermore include neocartilage from juvenile cartilage attached to the subchondral base. As used herein, “chondrocyte growth” includes expansion of a population of chondrocytes or chondrocyte precursor cells such as mesenchymal stem cells, differentiation of chondrocyte precursor cells into chondrocytes, and/or accumulation and buildup of cartilaginous extracellular matrix during cartilage tissue formation. The attachment can include an attachment between the neocartilage and the base, and can aid in the establishment and/or retention of the shape of an implant. Accordingly, in some aspects, an implant can include at least one suture, which can attach the juvenile cartilage to the base. In non-limiting example, a series of sutures can be used to hold neocartilage to trabecular metal comprised by a subchondral base. Standard suturing instrumentation and techniques well-known to skilled artisans can be used to attach the neocartilage to the at least one trabecular metal. The sutures can be made of any known suture material, such as, for example, an absorbable material such as PLA/PGA. In alternative aspects, cartilage can be attached to a subchondral base using at least one biocompatible adhesive, such as, in non-limiting example, a fibrin-based adhesive, a collagen-based adhesive or a combination thereof. In yet other aspects, attachment of cartilage to a subchondral base can be effected using at least one absorbable fastener. In these aspects, an absorbable fastener can comprise a biocompatible material such as PLA/PGA, and can be, without limitation, a staple, a dart, or a tack, such as a surgical grade staple, dart or tack. A fastener can be applied to cartilage and a subchondral base using any technique known to skilled artisans. In some configurations, cartilage can be attached to a subchondral base by applying a chemical cross-linker such as, in non-limiting example, an aldehyde cross-linker such as formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde, or a homobifunctional or heterobifunctional cross-linker such as a cross-linker having amine-reactive and thiol reactive moieties, for example sulfosuccinimidyl 4-[N-maleimidomethyl]cyclohexane-1-carboxylate, supplied by Pierce Chemical, Rockford Ill.


In various configurations, an implant of the present teachings can be substantially cylindrical in shape. Cylindrically shaped implants comprising non-autologous chondrocytes can be used, for example, in mosaicplasty-type joint repairs (see, e.g., Minas, T. et al., Orthopedics 20: 525-538, 1997; Marcacci, M., et al., Arthroscopy 21: 462-470, 2005; Christel, P., et al., http://www.maitrise-orthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/mo76_mosaicplasty/index.shtml). Alternatively, one or more features of an implant can have a shape more closely approximating an anatomical shape, such as, for example, a feature of a joint. Without limitation, an implant of the present teachings can have, in some aspects, a substantially anatomical shape such as a shape of a human condyle, a hemi-condyle, an acetabular cup or a femoral head.


The present disclosure also includes methods of forming an implant of the present teachings. These methods comprise growing a population of chondrocytes in vitro, and contacting the population with a trabecular metal comprising a porous surface. In some configurations, the chondrocyte population can be grown in a scaffold-free environment. As used herein, the term “scaffold” refers to a support for chondrocytes or cartilage tissue onto which cells can attach, proliferate, and/or synthesize new tissue, other than a cell culture apparatus such as a plastic cell culture chamber. For example, chondrocytes obtained from a cadaver can be grown to increase cell numbers by about 1000 fold without any trabecular metal in a cell growth apparatus comprising the chondrocytes (e.g., a cell culture flask). The cells, which can be included within neocartilage, can then be attached to a piece of trabecular metal which can be of a shape appropriate for an osteochondral repair in a patient, and thereby form an implant which can be transplanted to the patient at a site of joint injury, defect or disease.


In some aspects, a chondrocyte population can be grown in contact with a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal. In these configurations, chondrocytes can be grown in an apparatus comprising the subchondral base. In various aspects of these configurations, the chondrocytes can attach and grow directly on the trabecular metal surface in vitro, and thereby form neocartilage directly on the trabecular metal. A resulting implant can then can then be transplanted to a recipient patient. Furthermore, in these configurations, chondrocytes can form neocartilage on the trabecular metal, and thereby form a layered structure comprising a layer of metal covered by a layer of neocartilage. Accordingly, implants can be formed of various shapes for transplantation into a patient. For example, an implant comprising trabecular metal shaped as an acetabular cup for a hip replacement can be covered on its rounded surface with cartilage by growing juvenile chondrocytes in the presence of the trabecular metal.


Accordingly, the present disclosure provides methods of treating joint disease, defect, or injury in a patient in need thereof. As used herein, “joint disease, defect or injury” includes physical conditions or diseases which can benefit from cartilage or osteochondral repair, replacement, or augmentation, such as, in non-limiting example, athletic injury, traumatic injury, congenital disorders, osteoarthritis and joint degeneration from aging. These methods include introduction of an implant of the present teachings into a recipient patient in need of treatment. In some embodiments, the methods comprise transplanting an implant comprising cartilage and/or chondrocytes and a subchondral base as described herein into the patient at a site of joint disease, defect or injury. In other embodiments, some methods comprise implanting into a patient an subchondral base comprising trabecular metal, and applying juvenile chondrocytes to the subchondral base subsequent to the implantation. In some configurations, a subchondral base can further comprise a chondrocyte attachment portion as described above. By temporally separating the attachment of the subchondral base to the bone and the attachment of the chondrocytes to the subchondral base, methods of these embodiments can reduce or eliminate trauma to the cells that can be associated with attaching a hard object to a bone of a patient. In additional embodiments, a positioning device can also be introduced into a patient. The positioning device can be attached to an appropriate site in a patient by a health professional such as a surgeon. In non-limiting example, a positioning device can be attached to a bone or introduced into an aperture in the bone. The positioning device can be configured for the attachment of the at least one trabecular metal base portion. The positioning device can be, in non-limiting example, a screw or a cylinder. A positioning device can comprise any material compatible with a patient's physiology, such as, for example, metal including non-trabecular metal, an absorbable polymer such as polylactic/polyglycolic acid (PLA/PGA) or a non-absorbable polymer. In certain configurations, the subchondral base can be configured to engage the positioning device, for example by comprising an internal screw thread which mates with the screw of the positioning device. Chondrocytes, which can be in the form of neocartilage, can then be applied to the prosthetic device. Alternatively, cartilage and/or chondrocytes can be applied to subchondral base before attaching the latter to the positioning device. In yet other configurations, a positioning device can comprise a surface for attaching chondrocytes and/or cartilage. In these configurations, chondrocytes or cartilage can be attached to the surface; a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal can be inserted into a patient (for example, by insertion of the base into an aperture introduced by a surgeon into a bone of the patient) and the positioning device, including the chondrocytes or cartilage, can then be attached to the subchondral base, thereby forming an implant comprising a subchondral base and chondrocytes and/or cartilage Accordingly, a wide variety of possible combinations comprising a subchondral base, chondrocytes and/or cartilage, and a positioning device are contemplated as within the scope of the present teachings.


EXAMPLES

Various embodiments of the present teachings can be illustrated by the following non-limiting examples. The following examples are illustrative, and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims. The description of a composition or a method in an example does not imply that a described article or composition has, or has not, been produced, or that a described method has, or has not, been performed, irrespective of verb tense.


Example 1

This example illustrates replacement of a femoral head in a patient suffering from a femoral head fracture with an implant.


In this example, as shown in FIG. 1, a porous femoral head prosthesis (2) comprising a rounded surface comprising pores of median diameter of about 10 microns, is placed in an in vitro cell growth chamber. Juvenile chondrocytes are seeded onto the rounded surface, and cultured as described in Adkisson, H. D. et al., Clin. Orthop. 391S: S280-S294, 2001; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,316 and 6,645,316). The chondrocytes are permitted to grow until a layer of neocartilage (1) forms on the surface of the prosthesis (FIG. 1a). A surgeon then drives a spike-shaped subchondral base (3) comprising trabecular metal into the proximal femur (4) of the patient (FIG. 1b). The surgeon then attaches the femoral head prosthesis comprising neocartilage (1) and trabecular metal (2) to the subchondral base (3), thereby forming an implant comprising cartilage and a subchondral base which replaces the patient's fractured femur head (FIG. 1c).


Example 2

This example illustrates attachment of neocartilage to a subchondral base in vitro.


In this example, as shown in FIG. 2, a subchondral base (5) comprising trabecular metal and shaped to replace a condyle (6) is rendered adherent for cartilage by application of a fibrin adhesive to the rounded surfaces of the trabecular metal. The rounded surfaces of the base is then contacted with neocartilage grown in vitro (7) (FIG. 2a). The neocartilage (9) adheres to the adhesive layer (8), providing a layer of neocartilage following the contours of the surface of the base (9), thereby forming an implant which can replace a diseased or injured condyle of a patient (FIG. 2b).


Example 3

This example illustrates use of a positioning structure to introduce an implant into a patient.


In this example, as shown in FIG. 3, a subchondral base (11) comprising trabecular metal and having an internal screw thread is seeded with chondrocytes which are cultured to form neocartilage (10), thereby providing an implant (FIG. 3a). A surgeon prepares a cylindrical-shape implant site which traverses the patient's cartilage and invades the bone in a condyle of the patient (13). The implant site has a depth and diameter corresponding to the implant. The surgeon then inserts a non-trabecular metal screw (14) into the site, leaving the screw partially exposed (FIG. 3b). The surgeon then lightly presses the implant into the site, thereby engaging the exposed screw (14) with the internal screw thread of the implant. The surgeon presses on the implant until the neocartilage (1) is flush with the patient's cartilage (FIG. 3c). The neocartilage can then heal smoothly with the patient's own condyle cartilage (12), and the trabecular metal can attach to the bone.


Example 4

This example illustrates another configuration that uses a positioning structure to introduce an implant into a patient.


In this example, as shown in FIG. 4, an intermediate positioning structure (16), which does not comprise trabecular metal, comprises a screw thread and a flat surface “platform” to which a fibrin adhesive is applied. Neocartilage (15) is applied to the platform, and cultured until it adheres (FIG. 4a). A surgeon then prepares a cylindrical-shape implant site which traverses the cartilage and invades the bone (19) in a patient, and inserts a cylindrical-shape subchondral base comprising trabecular metal and an internal screw thread (17), as in Example 3 (FIG. 4b). The surgeon then presses the intermediate positioning structure (16) into the subchondral base (17), until the neocartilage (15) is flush with the patient's cartilage (18). The neocartilage can then heal smoothly with the patient's own cartilage, and the trabecular metal can attach to the bone (FIG. 4c).


Example 5

This example, as shown in FIG. 5, illustrates attachment of cartilage to a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal.


In this example, FIG. 5a shows attachment of cartilage (20) to trabecular metal (22) using sutures (21). FIG. 5b shows attachment of cartilage (24) to trabecular metal (25) using staples, tacks or darts (23). FIG. 5c shows attachment of cartilage (26) to trabecular metal (28) using an adhesive such as fibrin, collagen, or hydrogel (27). These configurations can be transplanted to a patient without in vitro culture, and are particularly useful for forming an implant either in vivo or in the operating room.


Example 6

This example illustrates seeding of chondrocytes onto trabecular metal of a subchondral base.


In this example, as shown in FIG. 6, an implant is shown in which juvenile chondrocytes (29) allogeneic to a patient are seeded onto a surface of a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal (31). The surface for cell attachment comprises trabecular metal having a median pore diameter of from about 3 microns to about 20 microns. The surface for cell attachment is treated with sintered porous structured titanium to form a surface layer (30) prior to the seeding of cells.


In related configurations, the surface layer can also be formed with one or more of the following: a) trabecular metal fine pore phase; b) hyaluronic acid; c) collagen I; d) collagen II, e) fibrin (including autologous, allogeneic, xenogeneic, or synthetic); f) absorbable synthetic polymer such as PLA/PLG); synthetic or natural hydrogel; g) titanium screen or porous sheet. The configurations of this example, like those of Example 5, are also useful for forming an implant either in vivo or in the operating room.


Example 7

This example illustrates seeding of cells onto trabecular metal.


In this example, an implant as illustrated in FIG. 6 is prepared as described in Example 6, except that seeding and culturing of cells is performed in vitro such that tissue grows and cells attach to pores of the trabecular metal or surface layer. This example illustrates seeding of cells onto trabecular metal for formation of cartilage in vitro.


Example 8

This example, as shown in FIG. 7, illustrates a variety of useful implant shapes.



FIG. 7
a presents a cylindrical shape comprising a subchondral base comprising trabecular metal (33), and cartilage adherent on one surface (32).



FIG. 7
b presents an anatomical shape: the subchondral base comprising trabecular metal (35) comprises a contoured dual-hemispherical surface for cell attachment and two spikes (36) for insertion into bone (37), while the cartilage (34), which adopts the shape of the contoured surface, can replace the condyle of a distal femur.



FIG. 7
c presents a second anatomical shape: the subchondral base comprising trabecular metal comprises a contoured-hemispherical surface for cell attachment and a spike (39) for insertion into bone (40), while the cartilage (38), which adopts the shape of the contoured surface, can replace a hemi-condyle.


Example 9

This example, as shown in FIG. 8, shows additional anatomical shapes.



FIG. 8
a presents cartilage (41) attached to an anatomically shaped femoral head prosthesis, as presented in Example 1. The femoral head prosthesis attaches to a spike-shaped trabecular metal component (42) which, in turn, inserts into native bone (43). This shape can be used to repair a proximal femur.



FIG. 8
b presents an acetabular cup, which includes a cartilage component attached to a trabecular metal component, attached to native bone.


It is to be understood that particular formulations and processes of the present teachings are not limited to the descriptions of the specific embodiments presented, but rather the descriptions and examples should be viewed in terms of the claims that follow and their equivalents. While some of the examples and descriptions above may include some conclusions about the way the certain embodiments function, the inventors do not intend to be bound by those conclusions and functions, but put them forth only as possible explanations.


It is to be further understood that the specific embodiments of the present teachings as set forth are not intended as being exhaustive or limiting of the invention, and that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the foregoing examples and detailed description. Accordingly, the disclosed embodiments are intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the following claims.


All publications, patents, patent applications and other references cited in this application are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each individual publication, patent, patent application or other reference were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Claims
  • 1. An implant for administering to a patient in need of treatment for joint disease, defect or injury, the implant comprising: minced juvenile cartilage tissue from a human cadaveric donor; anda subchondral base comprising at least one trabecular metal.
  • 2. The implant of claim 1 wherein the cartilage tissue comprises articular cartilage.
  • 3. The implant of claim 2 wherein the cartilage tissue and the subchondral base are attached.
  • 4. The implant of claim 1, wherein the subchondral base further comprises at least one porous surface layer and a porous core, the at least one porous surface layer comprising a plurality of pores of median diameter from about 3 microns to about 800 microns wherein the median diameter of the plurality of pores of the at least one porous surface layer is different from that of the plurality of pores of the core of the subchondral base.
  • 5. The implant of claim 1, wherein the subchondral base comprises at least two surfaces, wherein a first surface comprises trabecular metal comprising a plurality of pores having a median pore diameter of from about 100 microns to about 800 microns, and a second surface which is a cartilage-adherent surface.
  • 6. The implant of claim 5, wherein the cartilage-adherent surface comprises a plurality of pores of median diameter from about 3 microns to about 800 microns.
  • 7. The implant of claim 5, wherein the cartilage-adherent surface comprises a cartilage adhesive.
  • 8. The implant of claim 7, wherein the cartilage adhesive comprises a hydrogel.
  • 9. The implant of claim 7, wherein the cartilage-adhesive comprises trans-glutaminase, hyaluronic acid, collagen, fibrin, albumin, elastin or silk.
  • 10. The implant of claim 9, wherein the cartilage adhesive comprises fibrin.
  • 11. The implant of claim 1 wherein the trabecular metal comprises tantalum, niobium, stainless steel, chromium-cobalt alloy or titanium.
  • 12. The implant of claim 11 wherein the trabecular metal comprises tantalum.
  • 13. The implant of claim 1 wherein the subchondral base is cylindrical.
  • 14. The implant of claim 1 wherein the subchondral base approximates the anatomical shape of a human condyle, hemi-condyle, acetabulum or femoral head.
  • 15. A kit for forming the implant of claim 1, the kit comprising: an amount of the cartilage tissue;the subchondral base comprising at least one trabecular metal; andpackaging for the cartilage tissue and the subchondral bone.
  • 16. The kit of claim 15 further comprising a cartilage adhesive.
  • 17. The kit of claim 15 wherein the subchondral base is packaged separately from the cartilage tissue and cartilage adhesive.
  • 18. A method of treating joint disease, defect or injury in a patient in need thereof comprising: introducing into the patient a subchondral base comprising at least one trabecular metal, wherein the subchondral base is configured to receive cartilage tissue; andapplying minced juvenile cartilage tissue from a human cadaveric donor to the subchondral base.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the cartilage tissue is applied to the subchondral base after introducing the subchondral base into the patient.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein applying comprises attaching the cartilage tissue to a surface of the subchondral base.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein attaching comprises applying a cartilage adhesive to an interface between a surface of the subchondral base and a surface of the cartilage tissue prior to contacting the cartilage tissue with the surface of the subchondral base.
  • 22. The method of claim 18 wherein the cartilage tissue comprises articular cartilage.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, further comprising coupling the subchondral base to a positioning structure.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the positioning structure comprises a non-trabecular metal.
  • 25. The method of claim 23, wherein the positioning structure comprises a biocompatible polymer.
  • 26. The method of claim 23, wherein the positioning structure comprises a screw, cylinder, plat, rod or washer.
  • 27. The method of claim 18 wherein the subchondral base comprises at least one porous surface layer comprising a plurality of pores of median diameter from about 3 microns to about 800 microns and wherein the median diameter of the plurality of pores of the at least one porous surface layer is different from that of the plurality of pores of the subchondral base.
  • 28. The method of claim 27 wherein the at least one porous surface layer comprises a plurality of pores of median pore diameter of about 100 microns to about 800 microns.
  • 29. The method of claim 18, wherein the subchondral base comprises at least two surfaces, wherein a first surface comprises the trabecular metal having a plurality of pores there through, the pores having a median pore diameter of from about 100 microns to about 800 microns, and a second surface which is a cartilage-adherent surface.
  • 30. The method of claim 18, wherein applying comprises attaching the cartilage tissue to a surface of the subchondral base with a fibrin adhesive.
  • 31. The method of claim 18, wherein the subchondral base is cylindrical.
  • 32. The method of claim 18, wherein the at least one trabecular metal comprises tantalum.
  • 33. A method of forming an implant comprising cartilage and a subchondral base comprising: obtaining a subchondral base comprising at least one trabecular metal; andcontacting the subchondral base with minced juvenile cartilage tissue from a human cadaveric donor.
  • 34. The method of claim 33, further comprising coupling the cartilage tissue to a surface of the subchondral base.
  • 35. The method of claim 34, wherein coupling comprises applying a cartilage adhesive to an interface between a surface of the subchondral base and a surface of the cartilage tissue prior to contacting the cartilage tissue with the subchondral base.
  • 36. The method of claim 34, wherein coupling comprises attaching the cartilage tissue to a surface of the subchondral base with a fibrin adhesive.
  • 37. The method of claim 33 wherein the implant further comprises at least one porous surface layer comprising a plurality of pores of median diameter from about 3 microns to about 800 microns wherein the median diameter of the plurality of pores of the at least one porous surface layer is different from that of the plurality of pores of the subchondral base.
  • 38. The method of claim 33 wherein the subchondral base comprises at least two surfaces, wherein a first surface comprises trabecular metal comprising a plurality of pores having a median pore diameter of from about 100 microns to about 800 microns, and a second surface which is a cartilage-adherent surface comprising a plurality of pores having a median diameter from about 3 microns to about 20 microns.
  • 39. The method of claim 38 wherein the cartilage-adherent surface comprises a resorbable polymer.
  • 40. The method of claim 33, wherein the cartilage tissue comprises articular cartilage.
  • 41. The method of claim 33, wherein the at least one trabecular metal comprises tantalum.
  • 42. The method of claim 33, wherein the subchondral base is cylindrical.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a U.S. National of PCT/US2006/33687 filed Aug. 28, 2006 which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/712,004 filed on Aug. 26, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2006/033687 8/28/2006 WO 00 12/10/2008
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2007/025290 3/1/2007 WO A
US Referenced Citations (592)
Number Name Date Kind
1347622 Deininger Jul 1920 A
2533004 Ferry et al. Dec 1950 A
2621145 Sano Dec 1952 A
3400199 Balassa Sep 1968 A
3476855 Balassa Nov 1969 A
3478146 Balassa Nov 1969 A
3772432 Balassa Nov 1973 A
RE28093 Balassa Jul 1974 E
3966908 Balassa Jun 1976 A
4440680 Cioca Apr 1984 A
4453939 Zimmerman et al. Jun 1984 A
4479271 Bolesky et al. Oct 1984 A
4522096 Niven, Jr. Jun 1985 A
4566138 Lewis et al. Jan 1986 A
4587766 Miyatake et al. May 1986 A
4609551 Caplan et al. Sep 1986 A
4627879 Rose et al. Dec 1986 A
4640834 Eibl et al. Feb 1987 A
4641651 Card Feb 1987 A
4642120 Nevo et al. Feb 1987 A
4656137 Balassa Apr 1987 A
4660755 Farling et al. Apr 1987 A
4714457 Alterbaum Dec 1987 A
4773418 Hettich Sep 1988 A
4818633 Dinwoodie et al. Apr 1989 A
4846835 Grande Jul 1989 A
4851354 Winston et al. Jul 1989 A
4863474 Brown et al. Sep 1989 A
4863475 Andersen et al. Sep 1989 A
4904259 Itay Feb 1990 A
4911720 Collier Mar 1990 A
4928603 Rose et al. May 1990 A
4952403 Vallee et al. Aug 1990 A
4963489 Naughton et al. Oct 1990 A
4997444 Farling Mar 1991 A
4997445 Hodorek Mar 1991 A
5002071 Harrell Mar 1991 A
5002582 Guire et al. Mar 1991 A
5013324 Zolman et al. May 1991 A
5018285 Zolman et al. May 1991 A
5030215 Morse et al. Jul 1991 A
5032508 Naughton et al. Jul 1991 A
5041138 Vacanti et al. Aug 1991 A
5053050 Itay Oct 1991 A
5067963 Khouri et al. Nov 1991 A
5067964 Richmond et al. Nov 1991 A
5069881 Clarkin Dec 1991 A
5080674 Jacobs et al. Jan 1992 A
5092887 Gendler Mar 1992 A
5130418 Thompson Jul 1992 A
5139527 Redl et al. Aug 1992 A
5189148 Akiyama et al. Feb 1993 A
5198308 Shetty et al. Mar 1993 A
5206023 Hunziker Apr 1993 A
5217954 Foster et al. Jun 1993 A
5219363 Crowninshield et al. Jun 1993 A
5226914 Caplan et al. Jul 1993 A
5236457 Devanathan Aug 1993 A
5254471 Mori et al. Oct 1993 A
5269785 Bonutti Dec 1993 A
5270300 Hunziker Dec 1993 A
5281422 Badylak et al. Jan 1994 A
5282861 Kaplan Feb 1994 A
5290552 Sierra et al. Mar 1994 A
5290558 O'Leary et al. Mar 1994 A
5312417 Wilk May 1994 A
5323954 Shetty et al. Jun 1994 A
5326357 Kandel Jul 1994 A
5345927 Bonutti Sep 1994 A
5356629 Sander et al. Oct 1994 A
5368858 Hunziker Nov 1994 A
5372821 Badylak et al. Dec 1994 A
5387243 Devanathan Feb 1995 A
5403317 Bonutti Apr 1995 A
5405607 Epstein Apr 1995 A
5410016 Hubbell et al. Apr 1995 A
5443454 Tanabe et al. Aug 1995 A
5443510 Shetty et al. Aug 1995 A
5443512 Parr et al. Aug 1995 A
5445833 Badylak et al. Aug 1995 A
5456723 Steinemann et al. Oct 1995 A
5456828 Tersi et al. Oct 1995 A
5461953 McCormick Oct 1995 A
5475052 Rhee et al. Dec 1995 A
5482929 Fukunaga et al. Jan 1996 A
5496375 Sisk et al. Mar 1996 A
5504300 Devanathan et al. Apr 1996 A
5510396 Prewett et al. Apr 1996 A
5514536 Taylor May 1996 A
5516532 Atala et al. May 1996 A
5516533 Badylak et al. May 1996 A
5535810 Compton et al. Jul 1996 A
5545222 Bonutti Aug 1996 A
5549704 Sutter Aug 1996 A
5549904 Juergensen et al. Aug 1996 A
5554389 Badylak et al. Sep 1996 A
5556429 Felt Sep 1996 A
5565519 Rhee et al. Oct 1996 A
5571187 Devanathan Nov 1996 A
5577517 Bonutti Nov 1996 A
5578492 Fedun Nov 1996 A
5585007 Antanavich et al. Dec 1996 A
5605887 Pines et al. Feb 1997 A
5612028 Sackier et al. Mar 1997 A
5618925 Dupont et al. Apr 1997 A
5624463 Stone et al. Apr 1997 A
5639280 Warner et al. Jun 1997 A
5643192 Hirsh et al. Jul 1997 A
5650494 Cerletti et al. Jul 1997 A
5654166 Kurth Aug 1997 A
5655546 Halpern Aug 1997 A
5656587 Sporn et al. Aug 1997 A
5662710 Bonutti Sep 1997 A
5669544 Schulze et al. Sep 1997 A
5672284 Devanathan et al. Sep 1997 A
5673840 Schulze et al. Oct 1997 A
5673841 Schulze et al. Oct 1997 A
5680982 Schulze et al. Oct 1997 A
5681353 Li et al. Oct 1997 A
5692668 Schulze et al. Dec 1997 A
5694951 Bonutti Dec 1997 A
5695998 Badylak et al. Dec 1997 A
5709854 Griffith-Cima et al. Jan 1998 A
5713374 Pachence et al. Feb 1998 A
5714371 Ramanathan et al. Feb 1998 A
5723010 Yui et al. Mar 1998 A
5723011 Devanathan et al. Mar 1998 A
5723331 Tubo et al. Mar 1998 A
5734959 Krebs et al. Mar 1998 A
5735875 Bonutti et al. Apr 1998 A
5736132 Juergensen et al. Apr 1998 A
5736396 Bruder et al. Apr 1998 A
5749968 Melanson et al. May 1998 A
5753485 Dwulet et al. May 1998 A
5755791 Whitson et al. May 1998 A
5769899 Schwartz et al. Jun 1998 A
5770194 Edwardson et al. Jun 1998 A
5782835 Hart et al. Jul 1998 A
5782915 Stone Jul 1998 A
5786217 Tubo et al. Jul 1998 A
5788662 Antanavich et al. Aug 1998 A
5795571 Cederholm-Williams et al. Aug 1998 A
5795780 Cederholm-Williams et al. Aug 1998 A
5811094 Caplan et al. Sep 1998 A
5824093 Ray et al. Oct 1998 A
5826776 Schulze et al. Oct 1998 A
5827217 Silver et al. Oct 1998 A
5830741 Dwulet et al. Nov 1998 A
5842477 Naughton et al. Dec 1998 A
5853746 Hunziker Dec 1998 A
5853976 Hesse et al. Dec 1998 A
5864016 Eibl et al. Jan 1999 A
5866415 Villeneuve Feb 1999 A
5866630 Mitra et al. Feb 1999 A
5876208 Mitra et al. Mar 1999 A
5876451 Yui et al. Mar 1999 A
5876452 Athanasiou et al. Mar 1999 A
5879398 Swarts et al. Mar 1999 A
5888219 Bonutti Mar 1999 A
5888491 Mitra et al. Mar 1999 A
5890898 Wada et al. Apr 1999 A
5891455 Sittinger et al. Apr 1999 A
5899936 Goldstein May 1999 A
5902741 Purchio et al. May 1999 A
5919702 Purchio et al. Jul 1999 A
5921987 Stone Jul 1999 A
5922027 Stone Jul 1999 A
5922846 Cerletti et al. Jul 1999 A
5926685 Krebs et al. Jul 1999 A
5928945 Seliktar et al. Jul 1999 A
5935131 Bonutti Aug 1999 A
5944754 Vacanti Aug 1999 A
5944755 Stone Aug 1999 A
5948384 Filler Sep 1999 A
5952215 Dwulet et al. Sep 1999 A
5962405 Seelich Oct 1999 A
5964752 Stone Oct 1999 A
5964805 Stone Oct 1999 A
5968556 Atala et al. Oct 1999 A
5985315 Patat et al. Nov 1999 A
5989269 Vibe-Hansen et al. Nov 1999 A
5989888 Dwulet et al. Nov 1999 A
6022361 Epstein et al. Feb 2000 A
6025334 Dupont et al. Feb 2000 A
6041723 Peterson Mar 2000 A
6045990 Baust et al. Apr 2000 A
6048966 Edwardson et al. Apr 2000 A
6051249 Samuelsen Apr 2000 A
6059198 Moroi et al. May 2000 A
6060053 Atala May 2000 A
6077989 Kandel et al. Jun 2000 A
6080194 Pachence et al. Jun 2000 A
6080579 Hanley, Jr. et al. Jun 2000 A
6083383 Huang et al. Jul 2000 A
6087553 Cohen et al. Jul 2000 A
6107085 Coughlin et al. Aug 2000 A
6110209 Stone Aug 2000 A
6110210 Norton et al. Aug 2000 A
6110212 Gregory Aug 2000 A
6110482 Khouri et al. Aug 2000 A
6120514 Vibe-Hansen et al. Sep 2000 A
6129761 Hubbell Oct 2000 A
6132465 Ray et al. Oct 2000 A
6132472 Bonutti Oct 2000 A
6140123 Demetriou et al. Oct 2000 A
6140452 Felt et al. Oct 2000 A
6143214 Barlow Nov 2000 A
6150163 McPherson et al. Nov 2000 A
6152142 Tseng Nov 2000 A
6162241 Coury et al. Dec 2000 A
6171610 Vacanti et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174313 Bonutti Jan 2001 B1
6179871 Halpern Jan 2001 B1
6183737 Zaleske et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187329 Agrawal et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200330 Benderev et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203526 McBeth et al. Mar 2001 B1
6224893 Langer et al. May 2001 B1
6235316 Adkisson May 2001 B1
6242247 Rieser et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248114 Ysebaert Jun 2001 B1
6264659 Ross et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271320 Keller et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274090 Coelho et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280993 Yamato et al. Aug 2001 B1
6294656 Mittl et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306169 Lee et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306177 Felt et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312668 Mitra et al. Nov 2001 B2
6322563 Cummings et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327257 Khalifa Dec 2001 B1
6336930 Stalcup et al. Jan 2002 B1
6338878 Overton et al. Jan 2002 B1
6358266 Bonutti Mar 2002 B1
6361565 Bonutti Mar 2002 B1
6368298 Beretta et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368784 Murray Apr 2002 B1
6370920 Overton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378527 Hungerford et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395327 Shetty May 2002 B1
6417320 Otto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6423063 Bonutti Jul 2002 B1
6425704 Voiers et al. Jul 2002 B2
6436143 Ross et al. Aug 2002 B1
6437018 Gertzman et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443988 Felt et al. Sep 2002 B2
6444228 Baugh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447514 Stalcup et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464713 Bonutti Oct 2002 B2
6468289 Bonutti Oct 2002 B1
6468527 Austin et al. Oct 2002 B2
6472162 Coelho et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475764 Burtscher et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482235 Lambrecht et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485723 Badylak et al. Nov 2002 B1
6492163 Yoo et al. Dec 2002 B1
6497903 Hennink et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503267 Bonutti et al. Jan 2003 B2
6503277 Bonutti Jan 2003 B2
6504079 Tucker et al. Jan 2003 B2
6511958 Atkinson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514514 Atkinson et al. Feb 2003 B1
6514522 Domb Feb 2003 B2
6528052 Smith et al. Mar 2003 B1
6533817 Norton et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534084 Vyakarnam et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534591 Rhee et al. Mar 2003 B2
6543455 Bonutti Apr 2003 B2
6544472 Compton et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551355 Lewandrowski et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559119 Burgess et al. May 2003 B1
6575982 Bonutti Jun 2003 B1
6576265 Spievack Jun 2003 B1
6579538 Spievack Jun 2003 B1
6582960 Martin et al. Jun 2003 B1
6592531 Bonutti Jul 2003 B2
6596180 Baugh et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599515 Delmotte Jul 2003 B1
6607534 Bonutti Aug 2003 B2
6610033 Melanson et al. Aug 2003 B1
6620169 Peterson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626859 Von Segesser Sep 2003 B2
6626945 Simon et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626950 Brown et al. Sep 2003 B2
6630000 Bonutti Oct 2003 B1
6632246 Simon et al. Oct 2003 B1
6632648 Kampinga et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637437 Hungerford et al. Oct 2003 B1
6638309 Bonutti Oct 2003 B2
6645316 Brouwer et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645764 Adkisson Nov 2003 B1
6649168 Arvinte et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652532 Bonutti Nov 2003 B2
6652872 Nevo et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652883 Goupil et al. Nov 2003 B2
6653062 DePablo et al. Nov 2003 B1
6662805 Frondoza et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663616 Roth et al. Dec 2003 B1
6676971 Goupil et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685987 Shetty Feb 2004 B2
6697143 Freeman Feb 2004 B2
6705790 Quintero et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713772 Goodman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719803 Bonutti Apr 2004 B2
6719901 Dolecek et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730299 Tayot et al. May 2004 B1
6733515 Edwards et al. May 2004 B1
6736853 Bonutti May 2004 B2
6737072 Angele et al. May 2004 B1
6740186 Hawkins et al. May 2004 B2
6743232 Overaker et al. Jun 2004 B2
6773458 Brauker et al. Aug 2004 B1
6773713 Bonassar et al. Aug 2004 B2
6776938 Bonutti Aug 2004 B2
6797006 Hodorek Sep 2004 B2
6800663 Asgarzadeh et al. Oct 2004 B2
6818008 Cates et al. Nov 2004 B1
6830762 Baugh et al. Dec 2004 B2
6833408 Sehl et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835198 Bonutti Dec 2004 B2
6835277 Park Dec 2004 B2
6840960 Bubb Jan 2005 B2
6852330 Bowman et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860904 Bonutti Mar 2005 B2
6884428 Binette et al. Apr 2005 B2
6886568 Frondoza et al. May 2005 B2
6893466 Trieu May 2005 B2
6905517 Bonutti Jun 2005 B2
6919067 Filler et al. Jul 2005 B2
6919172 DePablo et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921633 Baust et al. Jul 2005 B2
6942880 Dolecek Sep 2005 B1
6949252 Mizuno et al. Sep 2005 B2
6965014 Delmotte et al. Nov 2005 B1
6979307 Beretta et al. Dec 2005 B2
6990982 Bonutti Jan 2006 B1
6991652 Burg Jan 2006 B2
7009039 Yayon et al. Mar 2006 B2
7045601 Metzner et al. May 2006 B2
7067123 Gomes et al. Jun 2006 B2
7081125 Edwards et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083964 Kurfurst et al. Aug 2006 B2
7087227 Adkisson Aug 2006 B2
RE39321 MacPhee et al. Oct 2006 E
7134437 Bonutti Nov 2006 B2
7147471 Frey et al. Dec 2006 B2
7217294 Kusanagi et al. May 2007 B2
7235255 Austin et al. Jun 2007 B2
7273756 Adkisson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7276235 Metzner et al. Oct 2007 B2
7276481 Golembo et al. Oct 2007 B2
7299805 Bonutti Nov 2007 B2
7316822 Binette et al. Jan 2008 B2
7375077 Mao May 2008 B2
7468192 Mizuno et al. Dec 2008 B2
7488348 Truncale et al. Feb 2009 B2
7537780 Mizuno et al. May 2009 B2
7720533 Behravesh et al. May 2010 B2
7824711 Kizer et al. Nov 2010 B2
7838040 Malinin Nov 2010 B2
7875296 Binette et al. Jan 2011 B2
7879604 Seyedin et al. Feb 2011 B2
RE42208 Truncale et al. Mar 2011 E
7897384 Binette et al. Mar 2011 B2
7901457 Truncale et al. Mar 2011 B2
7901461 Harmon et al. Mar 2011 B2
8017394 Adkisson, IV et al. Sep 2011 B2
8025901 Kao et al. Sep 2011 B2
8137702 Binette et al. Mar 2012 B2
8163549 Yao et al. Apr 2012 B2
20010006634 Zaleske et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010014473 Rieser et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010014475 Frondoza et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010051834 Frondoza et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010055621 Baugh et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020004038 Baugh et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020009805 Nevo et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012705 Domb Jan 2002 A1
20020028192 Dimitrijevich et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020029055 Bonutti Mar 2002 A1
20020045940 Giannetti et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020055755 Bonutti May 2002 A1
20020062151 Altman et al. May 2002 A1
20020064512 Petersen et al. May 2002 A1
20020082623 Osther et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095160 Bonutti Jul 2002 A1
20020099401 Bonutti Jul 2002 A1
20020099448 Hiles et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106625 Hung et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123142 Hungerford et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020128683 Epstein Sep 2002 A1
20020133235 Hungerford et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020150550 Petersen Oct 2002 A1
20020151974 Bonassar et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159982 Bonassar et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159985 Baugh et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020183850 Felt et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198490 Wirt et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198599 Haldimann Dec 2002 A1
20030009147 Bonutti Jan 2003 A1
20030009235 Manrique et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030039695 Geistlich et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040113 Mizuno et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065389 Petersen Apr 2003 A1
20030069605 Bonutti et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030077244 Petersen Apr 2003 A1
20030099620 Zaleske et al. May 2003 A1
20030114936 Sherwood et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030134032 Chaouk et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030151974 Kutty et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030153078 Libera et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030176602 Schmidt et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030181939 Bonutti Sep 2003 A1
20030187387 Wirt et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195628 Bao et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030211073 Goupil et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030223956 Goupil et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040030404 Noll et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030406 Ochi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040033212 Thomson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042960 Frey et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044408 Hungerford et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040048796 Hariri et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059416 Murray et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064192 Bubb Apr 2004 A1
20040064193 Evans et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073308 Kuslich et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078073 Bonutti Apr 2004 A1
20040078077 Binette et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078090 Binette et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040092946 Bagga et al. May 2004 A1
20040097714 Maubois et al. May 2004 A1
20040097829 McRury et al. May 2004 A1
20040117033 Frondoza et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127987 Evans et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040134502 Mizuno et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138522 Haarstad et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040151705 Mizuno et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172045 Eriksson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040175690 Mishra et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176787 Mishra et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040181240 Tseng et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040191900 Mizuno et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193181 Bonutti Sep 2004 A1
20040219182 Gomes et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040228901 Trieu et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230303 Gomes et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230309 DiMauro et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050026133 Nakatsuji et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038520 Binette et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043805 Chudik Feb 2005 A1
20050043814 Kusanagi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050054595 Binette et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050064042 Vunjak-Novakovic et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050079159 Shastri et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050095235 Austin et al. May 2005 A1
20050095666 Jhavar et al. May 2005 A1
20050113736 Orr et al. May 2005 A1
20050113937 Binette et al. May 2005 A1
20050119754 Trieu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050124038 Aguiar et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125077 Harmon et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136046 Pines et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137600 Jacobs et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050139656 Arnouse Jun 2005 A1
20050152882 Kizer et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152886 Baugh et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152961 Austin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171470 Kucklick et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175657 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175704 Petersen Aug 2005 A1
20050175711 Kralovee et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050177249 Kladakis et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186247 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186283 Geistlich et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186673 Geistlich et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192532 Kucklick et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196387 Seyedin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196460 Malinin Sep 2005 A1
20050203342 Kucklick et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209601 Bowman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209602 Bowman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050222687 Vunjak-Novakovic et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050226856 Ahlfors Oct 2005 A1
20050234298 Kucklick et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234485 Seegert et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050244454 Elson et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250697 Maubois et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250698 Maubois et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251268 Truncale Nov 2005 A1
20050265980 Chen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267584 Burdulis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273129 Michels et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050287218 Chaouk et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288796 Awad et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060008530 Seyedin et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009779 Collins et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060019389 Yayon et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060024373 Shahar et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060024826 Bonassar et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060029679 Dolecek Feb 2006 A1
20060041270 Lenker et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060073588 Adkisson et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060078872 Taguchi et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060099706 Massey et al. May 2006 A1
20060111738 Wenchell May 2006 A1
20060111778 Michalow May 2006 A1
20060128016 Tokushima et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060134093 Ronfard Jun 2006 A1
20060134094 Delmotte et al. Jun 2006 A2
20060147547 Yayon Jul 2006 A1
20060153815 Seyda et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060183224 Aerts et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195188 ODriscoll et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060210643 Truncale et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060216822 Mizuno et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060228391 Seyedin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240064 Hunter et al. Oct 2006 A9
20060240555 Ronfard Oct 2006 A1
20060251631 Adkisson, IV et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060264966 Armstrong Nov 2006 A1
20060275273 Seyedin et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060281173 Fukuda et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060292131 Binette et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070014867 Kusanagi et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031471 Peyman Feb 2007 A1
20070038299 Stone et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041952 Guilak et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070077236 Osther Apr 2007 A1
20070087032 Chang et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070098759 Malinin May 2007 A1
20070106394 Chen May 2007 A1
20070128155 Seyedin et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070191781 Richards et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070212389 Weiss et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213660 Richards et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070250164 Troxel Oct 2007 A1
20070292945 Lin et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299517 Davisson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009942 Mizuno et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031934 MacPhee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033331 MacPhee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033332 MacPhee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033333 MacPhee et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039940 Hashimoto et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039954 Long et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051624 Bonutti Feb 2008 A1
20080065210 McKay Mar 2008 A1
20080071385 Binette et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081369 Adkisson, IV et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103564 Burkinshaw et al. May 2008 A1
20080113007 Kurihara et al. May 2008 A1
20080153157 Yao et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154370 Mathies Jun 2008 A1
20080199429 Hollander et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080274157 Vunjak-Novakovic et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080299214 Seyedin et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090012629 Yao et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090069901 Truncale et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090143867 Gage et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090149893 Semler et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155229 Yayon Jun 2009 A1
20090181092 Thorne et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090181093 Thorne et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090181892 Thorne et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090214614 Everland et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090291112 Truncale et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090319045 Truncale et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100015202 Semler et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100086594 Amit et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100121311 Seegert et al. May 2010 A1
20100168856 Long et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100209397 Maor Aug 2010 A1
20100209408 Stephen et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100274362 Yayon et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100303765 Athanasiou et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322994 Kizer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110009963 Binnette et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110052705 Malinin Mar 2011 A1
20110070271 Truncale et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110091517 Binette et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110097381 Binette et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110166669 Truncale et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110177134 Harmon et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110196508 Truncale et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110256095 Seyedin et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120009224 Kizer et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120009270 Kizer et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120107384 Yao et al. May 2012 A1
20120156265 Binette et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120183586 Yao et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120239146 Kizer et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (185)
Number Date Country
199871003 Apr 1998 AU
2006282754 Aug 2006 AU
2261292 Jul 1997 CA
2261292 Jul 1997 CA
2441994 Mar 2002 CA
2445356 Oct 2003 CA
2445356 Oct 2003 CA
2445558 Oct 2003 CA
2445558 Oct 2003 CA
2449227 Nov 2003 CA
2449227 Nov 2003 CA
2522133 Apr 2004 CA
2522133 Apr 2004 CA
2475905 Jul 2004 CA
2475905 Jul 2004 CA
2480712 Sep 2004 CA
2487029 Nov 2004 CA
2487042 Nov 2004 CA
2496184 Feb 2005 CA
2563082 Mar 2005 CA
2570521 Dec 2006 CA
2631520 Dec 2006 CA
2708147 Dec 2008 CA
2717725 Mar 2009 CA
0006216 Jan 1980 EP
0133934 Jul 1984 EP
0341007 Apr 1989 EP
0493387 Jul 1990 EP
1142581 Nov 1991 EP
0610423 Oct 1992 EP
0654078 Jun 1993 EP
0592242 Oct 1993 EP
0592242 Oct 1993 EP
0641007 Jan 1994 EP
0669138 Feb 1995 EP
0906069 Nov 1996 EP
0877632 Sep 1997 EP
1003568 Aug 1998 EP
0867193 Sep 1998 EP
01010356 Jun 2000 EP
1303184 May 2001 EP
1387703 May 2001 EP
1132061 Sep 2001 EP
1471140 Jan 2003 EP
1538196 Aug 2003 EP
1410810 Oct 2003 EP
1410810 Oct 2003 EP
1410811 Oct 2003 EP
1410811 Oct 2003 EP
1433423 Oct 2003 EP
1433423 Oct 2003 EP
1599126 Mar 2004 EP
1618178 Apr 2004 EP
1506790 Aug 2004 EP
1512739 Sep 2004 EP
1537883 Dec 2004 EP
1537883 Dec 2004 EP
1537883 Dec 2004 EP
1691727 Dec 2004 EP
1958651 Dec 2004 EP
2335650 Dec 2004 EP
2338441 Dec 2004 EP
2338442 Dec 2004 EP
2338533 Dec 2004 EP
1561481 Feb 2005 EP
1561481 Feb 2005 EP
1561481 Feb 2005 EP
1753860 Feb 2005 EP
1535578 Jun 2005 EP
1535633 Jun 2005 EP
1788077 Nov 2006 EP
0920490 Feb 2008 EP
2101681 Aug 2011 EP
2335650 Oct 2012 EP
2105198 Mar 1983 GB
2175507 May 1985 GB
2404607 Sep 2005 GB
59135054 Aug 1984 JP
10036534 Feb 1998 JP
2002233567 Aug 2002 JP
2004136096 May 2004 JP
2006230749 Sep 2006 JP
2003102755 Apr 2008 JP
8002501 Nov 1980 WO
8505274 Dec 1985 WO
9000060 Jan 1990 WO
9101711 Feb 1991 WO
9209697 Jun 1992 WO
9603112 Feb 1996 WO
9603160 Feb 1996 WO
9639170 Dec 1996 WO
9711090 Mar 1997 WO
WO-9726847 Jul 1997 WO
9804681 Feb 1998 WO
9804681 Feb 1998 WO
9844874 Oct 1998 WO
9907417 Feb 1999 WO
9951164 Oct 1999 WO
WO-0006216 Feb 2000 WO
0029484 May 2000 WO
WO-0048837 Aug 2000 WO
0056251 Sep 2000 WO
WO-0062832 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0074741 Dec 2000 WO
WO-0074741 Dec 2000 WO
0102030 Jan 2001 WO
0105443 Jan 2001 WO
WO-0110356 Feb 2001 WO
WO-0123014 Apr 2001 WO
0167961 Sep 2001 WO
0168811 Sep 2001 WO
0168811 Sep 2001 WO
0185225 Nov 2001 WO
0185225 Nov 2001 WO
0197872 Dec 2001 WO
0224244 Mar 2002 WO
02067856 Sep 2002 WO
02076285 Oct 2002 WO
02080991 Oct 2002 WO
02089868 Nov 2002 WO
03077794 Sep 2003 WO
03093433 Nov 2003 WO
03093433 Nov 2003 WO
03100417 Dec 2003 WO
2004028547 Apr 2004 WO
2004028584 Apr 2004 WO
2004028584 Apr 2004 WO
2004078032 Sep 2004 WO
2004078032 Sep 2004 WO
2004078955 Sep 2004 WO
WO-2004078035 Sep 2004 WO
2004096983 Nov 2004 WO
2004105576 Dec 2004 WO
2004110512 Dec 2004 WO
2004110512 Dec 2004 WO
WO-2005011765 Feb 2005 WO
2005018491 Mar 2005 WO
2005044326 May 2005 WO
2005092208 May 2005 WO
2005058207 Jun 2005 WO
2005060987 Jul 2005 WO
2005060987 Jul 2005 WO
2005061018 Jul 2005 WO
2005065079 Jul 2005 WO
2005081870 Sep 2005 WO
2005081870 Sep 2005 WO
2005092405 Oct 2005 WO
2005110278 Nov 2005 WO
2005113751 Dec 2005 WO
2006002253 Jan 2006 WO
WO-2006002253 Jan 2006 WO
2006017176 Feb 2006 WO
2006033698 Mar 2006 WO
2006033698 Mar 2006 WO
2006039484 Apr 2006 WO
2006039484 Apr 2006 WO
2006068972 Jun 2006 WO
2006090372 Aug 2006 WO
2006090372 Aug 2006 WO
2006113642 Oct 2006 WO
2006121612 Nov 2006 WO
2007025290 Mar 2007 WO
2007025290 Mar 2007 WO
2007054939 May 2007 WO
2007067637 Jun 2007 WO
2007067637 Jun 2007 WO
2007089942 Aug 2007 WO
2007089948 Aug 2007 WO
2007089948 Aug 2007 WO
2007102149 Sep 2007 WO
2007115336 Oct 2007 WO
2007143726 Dec 2007 WO
2008019127 Feb 2008 WO
2008019128 Feb 2008 WO
2008019129 Feb 2008 WO
2008021127 Feb 2008 WO
2008079194 Jul 2008 WO
2008079194 Jul 2008 WO
WO-2008079613 Jul 2008 WO
2008106254 Sep 2008 WO
2008128075 Oct 2008 WO
2009039469 Mar 2009 WO
2009076164 Jun 2009 WO
2009111069 Sep 2009 WO
2010078040 Jul 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (592)
Entry
Adkisson H.D. et al, In Vitro Generation of Scaffold Independent Neocartilage, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001, pp. S280-S294, No. 391S.
Black, J, Biological Performance of Tantalum, Clinical Materials, 1994, pp. 167-173, vol. 16.
Bobyn, J.D. et al, Tissue Response to Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cups, J. Arthroplasty, 1999, pp. 347-354, vol. 14, No. 3.
Bobyn, J.D. et al, Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1982, pp. 571-584, vol. 16.
Bobyn, J.D. et al, Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial, JBJS (Br), 1999, pp. 907-914, vol. 81-B, No. 5.
Christel, P. et al, Osteochondral Grafting using the Mosaicplasty Technique, www.maitrise-orthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/mo76—mosaicplasty/index.shtml, 20 pages.
Feder, J. et al, Tissue Engineering in Musculoskeletal Clinical Practice: The Promise of Chondral Repair Using Neocartilage, Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., 2004, pp. 219-226, Chapter 22.
Hacking, S.A. et al, Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2000, pp. 631-638, vol. 52, No. 4.
Jurgensen, K. et al, A New Biological Glue for Cartilage-Cartilage Interfaces: Tissue Transglutaminase, JBJS (Am), 1997, pp. 185-193, vol. 79.
Kato, Y. et al, Sulfated Proteoglycan Synthesis by Confluent Cultures of Rabbit Costal Chondrocytes Grown in the Presence of Fibroblast Growth Factor, J. Cell Biology, 1985, pp. 477-485, vol. 100.
Marcacci, M. et al, Multiple Osteochondral Arthroscopic Grafting (Mosaicplasty) for Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Prospective Study Results at 2-Year Follow-up, J. Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2005, pp. 462-470, vol. 21, No. 4.
Minas, T. et al, Current Concepts in the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects, Orthopedics, 1997, pp. 525-538, vol. 20.
Stockwell, R.A., The cell density of human articular and costal cartilage, J. Anat, 1967, pp. 753-763, vol. 101, No. 4.
Thilly, W.G. and Levine, D.W., Microcarrier Culture: A Homogeneous Environment for Studies of Cellular Biochemistry, Methods in Enzymology, 1979, pp. 184-194, vol. LVIII, ISBN 0-12-181958-2, Academic Press, Inc., New York, New York, United States.
Thilly, W.G. et al, Microcarriers and the problem of high density cell culture, From Gene to Protein: Translation in Biotechnology, 1982, pp. 75-103, vol. 19, Academic Press, Inc., New York, New York, United States.
Trattnig, S. et al, Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: noninvasive monitoring by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2005, pp. 779-787, vol. 23.
Trattnig, S. et al, Quantitative T2 Mapping of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation at 3 Tesla An in vivo Cross-Sectional Study, Investigative Radiology, 2007, pp. 442-448, vol. 42, No. 6.
Trattnig, S. et al, Differentiating normal hyaline cartilage from post-surgical repair tissue using fast gradient echo imaging in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) at 3 Tesla, Eur Radiol, 2008, pp. 1251-1259, vol. 18.
Tuan, R.S., A second-generation autologous chondrocytes implantation approach to the treatment of focal articular cartilage defects, Arthritis Research & Therapy, 2007, pp. 109-112, vol. 9.
Vacanti, C.A. et al, Synthetic Polymers Seeded with Chondrocytes Provide a Template for New Cartilage Formation, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1991, pp. 753-759, vol. 88, No. 5.
Vanderploeg, E.J. et al, Articular chondrocytes derived from distinct tissue zones differentially respond to in vitro oscillatory tensile loading, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2008, pp. 1228-1236, vol. 16.
Venkat, R.V. et al, Study of Hydrodynamics in Microcarrier Culture Spinner Vessels: A Particle Tracking Velocimetry Approach, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1996, pp. 456-466, vol. 49.
Vishwakarma, G.K, et al, Isolation & cryo-preservation of human foetal articular chondrocytes, Indian J. Med Res, 1993, pp. 309-313, vol. 98.
Von Schroeder, H.P. et al, The use of polylactic acid matrix and periosteal grafts for the reconstruction of rabbit knee articular defects, J. Biomedical Materials Research, 1991, pp. 329-339, vol. 25.
Oldshue, J.Y. et al, Comparison of Mass Transfer Characteristics of Radial and Axial Flow Impellers, Mixing Proceedings of the 6th European Conference, Pavia, Italy, 1988, pp. 345-350.
Wei, X. et al, The Effect of Sodium Selenite on Chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture, Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1986, pp. 660-664, vol. 29, No. 5.
Willers, C. et al, Articular cartilage repair: procedures versus products, Expert Rev Med Devices, 2007, pp. 373-392, vol. 4, No. 3.
Yoshihashi, Y., Tissue Reconstitution by Isolated Articular Chondrocytes in vitro, J. Japanese Orthopaedic Surgical Society, 1983, pp. 629-641, vol. 58.
Zalzal, G. H. et al, Cartilage Grafts-present status, Head & Neck Surgery, 1986, pp. 363-374, vol. 8.
Ze'Ev, A.B. et al, Protein synthesis requires cell-surface contact while nuclear events respond to cell shape in anchorage-dependent fibroblasts, Cell, 1980, pp. 365-372, vol. 21.
Zheng, M.H. et al, Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): Biological and Histological Assessment, Tissue Engineering, 2007, pp. 737-746, vol. 13, No. 4.
Zimber, M.P. et al, TGF-β Promotes the Growth of Bovine Chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture and the Formation of Cartilage Tissue on Three-Dimensional Scaffolds, Tissue Engineering, 1995, pp. 289-300, vol. 1, No. 3.
English translation of Abstract for CA2285382, published Oct. 15, 1998, one page.
English translation of Abstract of AU7100398, published Oct. 30, 1998, one page.
English translation of Abstract of JP2001519700, published Oct. 23, 2001, one page.
English translation of Abstract of JP 2006230749, published Feb. 25, 2005, one page.
Bartlett, W. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee, A Prospective, Randomised Study, JBJS, 2005, pp. 640-645, vol. 87-B.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Meniscal repair using engineered tissue, J. Orthop Res, 2001, pp. 278-285, vol. 19, No. 2.
Spangenberg, K.M. et al, Histomorphometric Analysis of a Cell-Based Model of Cartilage Repair, Tissue Engineering, 2002, pp. 839-846, vol. 8, No. 5.
Guilak, F. et al, Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics in articular cartilage repair, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, pp. S295-S2305, vol. 391S.
“Pulverize”, Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, Retrieved Jul. 13, 2011 from URL: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pulverize, 2 pages.
“Combine”, Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, Retrieved Jul. 13, 2011 from URL: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/combine, 2 pages.
“Morsel”, Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, Retrieved Jul. 13, 2011 from URL: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/morsel, 2 pages.
Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, issued Feb. 22, 2011, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, issued Apr. 10, 2008, 8 pages.
Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, issued Apr. 17, 2009, 16 pages.
Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, issued Apr. 19, 2010, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, issued Sep. 22, 2010, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 10/874,402, issued Oct. 27, 2009, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/413,419, issued Jun. 26, 2008, 11 pages.
Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/413,419, issued Aug. 25, 2009, 13 pages.
Adkisson, H.D. et al, In Vitro Generation of Scaffold Independent Neocartilage, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001, pp. S280-S294, vol. 391S.
Adkisson, H.D. et al, The Potential of Human Allogeneic Juvenile Chondrocytes for Restoration of Articular Cartilage, the American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010, pp. 1324-1333, vol. 38, No. 7.
Akens, M.K. et al, In Vitro Studies of a Photo-oxidized Bovine Articular Cartilage, J. Vet. Med. A., 2002, pp. 39-45, vol. 49.
Alfredson, H. and Lorentzon, R., Superior results with continuous passive motion compared to active motion after periosteal transplantation: A retrospective study of human patella cartilage defect treatment, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol Athrosc, 1999, pp. 232-238, vol. 7.
Aston, J. E. and Bentley, G., Repair of articular surfaces by allografts of articular and growth-plate cartilage, Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1986, pp. 29-35, vol. 68-B, No. 1.
Augenstein, D.C. et al, Effect of Shear on the Death of Two Strains of Mammalian Tissue Cells, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1971, pp. 409-418, vol. XIII.
Aulthouse, A.L. et al, Expression of the human chondrocyte phenotype in vitro, In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, 1989, pp. 659-668, vol. 25, No. 7.
Azizkhan, J.C. and Klagsbrun, M., Chondrocytes contain a growth factor that is localized in the nucleus and is associated with chromatin, PNAS, 1980, pp. 2762-2766, vol. 77, No. 5.
Bacsich, P. and Wyburn, G.M., XXXVIII—The Significance of the Mucoprotein Content on the Survival of Homografts of Cartilage and Cornea, P.R.S.E., 1947, pp. 321-329, vol. LXII, Part III.
Bartlett, W. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation at the knee using a bilayer collagen membrane with bone graft, A Preliminary Report, J. Bone and Joint Surgery, 2005, pp. 330-332, vol. 87-B.
Bassleer, C. et al, Human Chondrocytes in tridimensional culture, In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, 1986, pp. 113-119, vol. 22, No. 3, Part I.
Behrens, P. et al, Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI)-5-year follow up, The Knee, 2006, pp. 194-202, vol. 13.
Bentley, G. and Greer, R., Homotransplantation of Isolated Epiphyseal and Articular Cartilage Chondrocytes into Joint Surfaces of Rabbits, Nature, 1971, pp. 385-388, vol. 230.
Binette, F. et al, Terminally redifferentiated human articular chondrocytes express hyaline cartilage markers without hypertrophy, 43rd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, 1997, pp. 520.
Boumediene, K. et al, Modulation of rabbit articular chondrocyte (RAC) proliferation by TGF-β isoforms, Cell Prolif, 1995, pp. 221-234, vol. 28.
Brighton, C.T. et al, Articular Cartilage Preservation and Storage, I. Application of Tissue Culture Techniques to the Storage of Viable Articular Cartilage, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1979, pp. 1093-1101, vol. 22, No. 10.
Buckwalter, J.A., Articular Cartilage Injuries, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002, pp. 21-37, No. 402.
Bujia, J. et al, Synthesis of Human Cartilage Using Organotypic Cell Culture, ORL, 1993, pp. 347-351, vol. 55.
Bujia, J. et al, Effect of Growth Factors on Cell Proliferation by Human Nasal Septal Chondrocytes Cultured in Monolayer, Acta Otolaryngol, 1994, pp. 539-543, vol. 114.
Chawla, K. et al, Short-term retention of labeled chondrocyte subpopulations in stratified tissue-engineered cartilaginous constructs implanted in vivo in mini-pigs, Tissue Engineering, 2007, pp. 1525-1538, vol. 13, No. 7.
Chen, F.S. et al, Repair of articular cartilage defects: Part II. Treatment options, The American Journal of Orthopedics, 1999, pp. 88-96.
Cherry, R.S. and Papoutsakis, E.T., Hydrodynamic effects on cells in agitated tissue culture reactors, Bioprocess Engineering, 1986, pp. 29-41, vol. 1.
Cherry, R.S. and Papoutsakis, E.T., Physical mechanisms of cell damage in microcarrier cell culture bioreactors, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1988, pp. 1001-1014, vol. 32.
Cherry, R.S. and Papoutsakis, E.T., Understanding and Controlling Fluid-Mechanical Injury of Animal Cells in Bioreactors, Animal Cell Biotechnology, vol. 4, 1990, pp. 72-121, ISBN 0-12-657554-1, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, United States.
Cherubino, P. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: A preliminary report, J. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2003, pp. 10-15, vol. 11, No. 1.
Choi, Y.C. et al, Effect of Platelet Lysate on Growth and Sulfated Glycosaminoglycan Synthesis in Articular Chondrocyte Cultures, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1980, pp. 220-224, vol. 22, No. 2.
Cooke, M.E. et al, Manuscript-Structured three-dimensional co-culture of mesenchymal stem cells with chondrocytes promotes chondrogenic differentiation without hypertrophy, pp. 1-19.
Coutts, R.D. et al, Section III Basic Science and Pathology Rib periochondrial autografts in full-thickness articular cartilage defects in rabbits, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989, pp. 263-273, No. 275.
Craigmyle, M.B.L., Studies of cartilage autografts and homografts in the rabbit, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1955, pp. 93-100.
Croughan, M. S. et al, Hydrodynamic effects on animal cells grown in microcarrier cultures, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1987, pp. 130-141, vol. XXIX.
Delbruck, A. et al, In vitro culture of human chondrocytes from adult subjects, Connective Tissue Research, 1986, pp. 155-172, vol. 15.
Dewey, C.F. et al, The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress, J. Biomechanical Engineering, 1981, pp. 177-185, vol. 103.
Dogterom, A.A. et al, Matrix depletion of young and old human articular cartilage by cultured autologous synovium fragments: a chondrocyte-independent effect, Rheumatol Int, 1985, pp. 169-173, vol. 5.
Dowthwaite, G.P. et al, The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population, J. of Cell Science, 2004, pp. 889-897, vol. 117.
Drobnic, M. et al, Comparison of four techniques for the fixation of a collagen scaffold in the human cadaveric knee, OsteoArthritis and Cartilage, 2006, pp. 337-344, vol. 14.
Elima, K. and Vuorio, E., Expression of mRNAs for collagens and other matrix components in dedifferentiating and redifferentialting human chondrocytes in culture, FEBS letters, 1989, pp. 195-198, vol. 258, No. 2.
Evans, R.C. and Quinn, T.M., Solute diffusivity correlates with mechanical properties and matrix density of compressed articular cartilage, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2005, pp. 1-10, vol. 442.
Farmer, S.R. et al, Altered Translatability of Messenger RNA from Suspended Anchorage-Dependent Fibroblasts: Reversal upon Cell Attachment to a Surface, Cell, 1978, pp. 627-637, vol. 15.
Feder, J. and Tolbert, W.R., The Large-Scale Cultivation of Mammalian Cells, Scientific American, 1983, pp. 36-43, vol. 248, No. 1.
Folkman, J. and Moscona, A., Role of cell shape in growth control, Nature, 1978, pp. 345-349, vol. 273.
Frangos, J.A. et al, Flow effects on prostacyclin production by cultured human endothelial cells, Science, 1985, pp. 1477-1479, vol. 227.
Freed, L.E. et al, Neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo using cells cultured on synthetic biodegradable polymers, J. of Biomedical Materials Research, 1993, pp. 11-23, vol. 27.
Freed, L.E. et al, Cultivation of Cell-Polymer Cartilage Implants in Bioreactors, J. Cellular Biochemistry, 1993, pp. 257-264, vol. 51.
Freed, L.E. et al, Composition of Cell-Polymer Cartilage Implants, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1994, pp. 605-614, vol. 43.
Freed, L.E. and Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Tissue Engineering of Cartilage, Tissue Engineering, published 1995, pp. 1788-1806, Chapter 120, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida United States.
Freed, L.E. and Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Cultivation of Cell-Polymer Tissue Constructs in Simulated Microgravity, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1995, pp. 306-313, vol. 46.
Freed, L.E. et al, Tissue engineering of cartilage in space, PNAS, 1997, pp. 13885-13890, vol. 94.
Fry, D.L, Acute Vascular Endothelial Changes Associated with Increased Blood Velocity Gradients, Circulation Research, 1968, pp. 165-197, vol. 22.
Fub, M. et al, Characteristics of human chondrocytes, osteoblasts and fibroblasts seeded onto a type I/III collagen sponge under different culture conditions, A light, scanning and transmission electron microscopy study, Annals of Anatomy, 2000, pp. 303-310, vol. 182.
Galera, P. et al, Effect of Transforming Growth Factor-β1 (TGF-β1) on Matrix Synthesis by Monolayer Cultures of Rabbit Articular Chondrocytes during the Dedifferentiation Process, Experimental Cell Research, 1992, pp. 379-392, vol. 200.
Gelse, K. et al, Paracrine Effect of Transplanted Rib Chondrocyte Spheroids Supports Formation of Secondary Cartilage Repair Tissue, J. Orthopaedic Research, 2009, pp. 1216-1225, vol. 27.
Gibson, T. et al, The Long-term survival of cartilage homografts in man, British J. Plastic Surgery, 1958, pp. 177-187, vol. 11.
Gille, J. et al, Migration pattern, morphology and viability of cells suspended in or sealed with fibrin glue: A histomorphologic study, Tissue and Cell, 2005, pp. 339-348, vol. 37.
Girotto, D. et al, Tissue-specific gene expression in chondrocytes grown on three-dimensional hyaluronic acid scaffolds, Biomaterials, 2003, pp. 3265-3275, vol. 24.
Gooch, K.J. et al, Effects of Mixing Intensity on Tissue-Engineered Cartilage, Biotechnol Bioeng, 2001, pp. 402-407, vol. 72.
De Haart, M. et al, Optimization of chondrocyte expansion in culture, Effect of TGFβ-2, bFGF and L-ascorbic Acid on bovine articular chondrocytes, Acta Orthop Scand, 1999, pp. 55-61, vol. 70, No. 1.
Han, E. et al, Shaped, Stratified, Scaffold-free Grafts for Articular Cartilage Defects, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, pp. 1912-1920, vol. 466.
Harrison, E.T. et al, Osteogenin promotes reexpression of cartilage phenotype by dedifferentiated articular chondrocytes in serum-free meduim, Experimental Cell Research, 1991, pp. 340-345, vol. 192.
Harrison, E.T. et al, Transforming growth factor-beta: Its effect on phenotype reexpression by dedifferentiated chondrocytes in the presence and absence of osteogenin, In Vitro Cell, Dev. Biol, 1992, pp. 445-448, vol. 28A.
He, Q. et al, Repair of flexor tendon defects of rabbit with tissue engineering method, Chin J Traumatol (English edition), 2002, pp. 200-208, vol. 5, No. 4.
Hiraki, Y. et al, Effect of transforming growth factor β on cell proliferation and glycosaminoglycan synthesis by rabbit growth-plate chondrocytes in culture, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1988, pp. 91-99, vol. 969.
Hollander, A.P. et al, Maturation of tissue engineered cartilage implanted in injured and osteoarthritic human knees, Tissue Engineering, 2006, pp. 1787-1798, vol. 12, No. 7.
Hollinger, J.O. and Leong, K., Poly(α-hydroxy acids): carriers for bone morphogenetic proteins, Biomaterials, 1996, pp. 187-194, vol. 17, No. 2.
Homminga, G. N. et al, Perichondral grafting for cartilage lesions of the knee, J. Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1990, pp. 1003-1007, vol. 72-B, No. 6.
Horton, W.E. et al, Transforming growth factor-beta and fibroblast growth factor act synergistically to inhibit collagen II synthesis through a mechanism involving regulatory DNA sequences, J. Cellular Physiology, 1989, pp. 8-15, vol. 141.
Hu, W.S., Bioreactors for animal cell cultivation, Recent Advances in Biotechnology, 1992, pp. 243-261, ISBN 0-7923-1632-0, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Iwasa, J. et al, Clinical application of scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthorsc, 2008, pp. 561-577, vol. 17, No. 6.
Jin, C.Z. et al, Human amniotic membrane as a delivery matrix for articular cartilage repair, Tissue Engineering, 2007, pp. 693-703, vol. 13, No. 4.
Jones, C.W. et al, Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in sheep: objective assessments including confocal arthroscopy, J. Orthopaedic Research, 2008, pp. 292-303, vol. 26.
Kandel, R.A. et al, Fetal bovine serum inhibits chondrocyte collagenase production: interleukin 1 reverses the effect, Biochimica et Biophysics Acta, 1990, pp. 130-134, vol. 1053.
Kavalkovich, K.W. et al, Chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells within an alginate layer culture system, In vitro Cell Dev Biol Animal, 2002, pp. 457-466, vol. 38.
Kimura, T. et al, Basic Science and Pathology, Chondrocytes embedded in collagen gels maintain cartilage phenotype during long-term cultures, Clinical Orthopaedic and Related Research, 1984, pp. 231-239, No. 186.
Klagsbrun, M. et al, The stimulation of DNA synthesis and cell division in chondrocytes and 3T3 cells by a growth factor isolated from cartilage, Experimental Cell Research, 1977, pp. 99-108, vol. 105.
Klagsbrun, M. and Smtih, S., Purification of a cartilage-derived growth factor, J. Biological Chem, 1980, pp. 10859-10866, vol. 255, No. 22.
Klein, T.J. et al, Tissue engineering of stratified articular cartilage from chondrocyte subpopulations, OsteoArthritis and Cartilage, 2003, pp. 595-602, vol. 11.
Klein, T.J. et al, Tailoring secretion of proteoglycan 4 (PRG4) in tissue-engineered cartilage, Tissue Engineering, 2006, pp. 1429-1439, vol. 12, No. 6.
Kon, E. et al, Arthroscopic second generation autologous chondrocyte implantation at 48 months follow up, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2007, pp. B44 45, vol. 15, Suppl. B.
Kon, E. et al, Arthroscopic Second-generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Compared with Microfracture of Chondral Lesions of the Knee, Am J. of Sports Medicine, 2009, pp. 33-41, vol. 37, No. 1.
Kon, E. et al, Second generation issues in cartilage repair, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2008, pp. 221-229, vol. 16, No. 4.
Krueger, J.W. et al, An in vitro study of flow response by cells, J. Biomechanics, 1971, pp. 31-36, vol. 4.
Kuettner, K.E. et al, Synthesis of Cartilage Matrix by Mammalian Chondrocytes In Vitro I. Isolation, Culture Characteristics, and Morphology, J. Cell Biology, 1982, pp. 743-750, vol. 93.
Kujawa, M.J. et al, Hyaluronic acid bonded to cell culture surfaces inhibits the program of myogenesis, Developmental Biology, 1986, pp. 10-16, vol. 113.
Kujawa, M.J. et al, Substrate-bonded hyaluronic acid exhibits a size-dependent stimulation of chondrogenic differentiation of stage 24 limb mesenchymal cells in culture, Developmental Biology, 1986, pp. 519-528, vol. 114.
Kujawa, M.J. and Caplan, A.I., Hyaluronic acid bonded to cell-culture surfaces stimulates chondrogenesis in stage 24 limb mesenchyme cell cultures, Developmental Biology, 1986, pp. 504-518, vol. 114.
Lee, J.D. et al, Primary cultured chondrocytes of different origins respond differently to bFGF and TGF-β, Life Sciences, 1997, pp. 293-299, vol. 61, No. 3.
Leopold, G., Experimental Studies into the Etiology of Tumors, Achiv f. path. Anat., 1881, pp. 283-324, vol. LXXXV, No. 2.
Libera, J. et al, Cartilage Engineering, Fundamentals of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Chapter 18, pp. 233-242, ISBN: 978-3-540-77754-0, le-lex publishing Services, oHG, Leipzip, Germany.
Lin, Z. et al, Gene Expression Profiles of Human Chondrocytes during Passaged Monolayer Cultivation, J. Orthopaedic Research, 2008, pp. 1230-1237, vol. 26.
Liu, L.S. et al, an osteoconductive collagen/hyaluronate matrix for bone regeneration, Biomaterials, 1999, pp. 1097-1108, vol. 20.
Lui, X. et al, In vivo ectopic chondrogenesis of BMSCs directed by mature chondrocytes, Biomaterials, 2010, pp. 9406-9414, vol. 31.
Loeb, L., Autotransplantation and homoiotransplantation of cartilage in the guinea-pig, Am J. Pathology, 1926a, pp. 111-122, vol. 2.
Lucas, P.A. et al, Ectopic induction of cartilage and bone by water-soluble proteins from bovine bone using a collagenous delivery vehicle, J. Biomed Mater Res: Applied Biomaterials, 1989, pp. 23-39, vol. 23, No. A1.
Luyten, F.P. And Reddi, A.H., Articular cartilage repair: potential role of growth and differentiation factors, Biological Regulation of the Chondrocytes, pp. 227-236, Chapter 9, ISBN: 0-8493-6733-6, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, United States.
Mackay, A. M. et al, Chondrogenic Differentiation of Cultured Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Marrow, Tissue Engineering, 1998, pp. 415-430, vol. 4, No. 4.
Malemud, C. J. and Sokoloff, L., The effect of chondrocyte growth factor on membrane transport by articular chondrocytes in monolayer culture, Connective Tissue Research, 1978, pp. 1-9, vol. 6.
Mandl, E.W. et al, Serum-free medium supplemented with high-concentration FGF2 for cell expansion culture of human ear chondrocytes promotes redifferentiation capacity, Tissue Engineering, 2002, pp. 573-582, vol. 8, No. 4.
Mandl, E.W. et al, Multiplication of human chondrocytes with low seeding densities accelerates cell yield without losing redifferentiation capacity, Tissue Engineering, 2004, pp. 109-120, vol. 10, No. 1/2.
Maracacci, M. et al, Articular Cartilage Engineering with Hyalograft C, 3-year clinical results, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005, pp. 96-105, No. 435.
Marlovits, S. et al, Early postoperative adherence of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2005, pp. 451-457, vol. 13.
Marlovits, S. et al, Changes in the ratio of type-I and type-II collagen expression during monolayer culture of human chondrocytes, JBJS, 2004, pp. 286-295, vol. 86-B.
Mathiowitz, E. et al, Biologically erodable microspheres as potential oral drug delivery systems, Letters to Nature, 1997, pp. 410-414, vol. 386.
Mcdermott, A.G.P. et al, Fresh Small-Fragment Osteochondral Allografts Long-term Follow up Study on First 100 cases, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1985, pp. 96-102, No. 197.
McKibbin, B., Immature Joint Cartilage and the Homograft Reaction, JBJS, 1971, pp. 123-135, vol. 53B, No. 1.
McNickle, A.G. et al, Overview of Existing Cartilage Repair Technology, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2008, pp. 196-201, vol. 16, No. 4.
McQueen, A. et al, Flow effects on the viability and lysis of suspended mammalian cells, Biotechnology Letters, 1987, pp. 831-836, vol. 9, No. 12.
Merchuk, J.C., Shear Effects on Suspended Cells, Advances in Biochemical Engineering Biotechnology, 1988, pp. 1988-1995, vol. 44, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
Merchuk, J.C., Why use air-lift bioreactors?, TIBTECH, 1990, pp. 66-71, vol. 8.
Mienaltowski, M.J. et al, Differential gene expression associated with postnatal equine articular cartilage maturation, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008, pp. 149-162, vol. 9.
Mow, V.C. et al, Experimental Studies on Repair of Large Osteochondral Defects at a High Weight Bearing Area of the Knee Joint: A Tissue Engineering Study, Transactions of the ASME, 1991, pp. 198-207, vol. 113.
Nixon, A.J. et al, Isolation, propagation, and cryopreservation of equine articular chondrocytes, Am J Vet Res, 1992, pp. 2364-2370, vol. 53, No. 12.
Nixon, A.J. et al, Temporal matrix synthesis and histologic features of a chondrocyte-laden porous collagen cartilage analogue, AM J Vet Res, 1993, pp. 349-356, vol. 54, No. 2.
Nixon, A.J. and Fortier, L.A., New Horizons in Articular Cartilage Repair, AAEP Proceedings, 2001, pp. 217-226, vol. 47.
Obradovic, B. et al, Integration of engineered cartilage, J. Orthopaedic Research, 2001, pp. 1089-1097, vol. 19.
O'Driscoll, S. W. and Salter, R.B., The Repair of Major Osteochondral Defects in Joint Surfaces by Neochondrogenesis with Autogenous Osteoperiosteal Grafts Stimulated by Continuous Passive Motion an experimental investigation in the rabbit, J. Orthopaedic Research, 2001, pp. 1089-1097, vol. 19.
Papoutsakis, E.T., Fluid-mechanical damage of animal cells in bioreactors, TIBTECH, 1991, pp. 427-437, vol. 9.
Pavesio, A. et al, Hyaluronan-based scaffolds (Hyalograft C) in the treatment of knee cartilage defects: preliminary clinical findings, Tissue engineering of cartilage and bone, 2003, pp. 203-217, Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, England.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Bonding of Cartilage Matrices with Cultured Chondrocytes: An Experimental Model, JBJS, 1998, pp. 89-95, vol. 16.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Cell-based bonding of articular cartilage: An extended study, J Biomed Mater Res A, 2003, pp. 517-524, vol. 64, No. 3.
Pieter, A. et al, Effect of purified growth factors on rabbit articular chondrocytes in monolayer culture, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1982, pp. 1217-1227, vol. 25, No. 10.
Reginato, A.M. et al, Formation of nodular structures resembling mature articular cartilage in long-term primary cultures of human fetal epiphyseal chondrocytes on a hydrogel substrate, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1994, pp. 1338-1349, vol. 37, No. 9.
Robinson, D. et al, Regenerating Hyaline Cartilage in Articular Defects of Old Chickens Using Implants of Embryonal Chick Chondrocytes Embedded in a New Natural Delivery Substance, Calcif Tissue Int, 1990, pp. 246-253, vol. 46.
Ronga, M. et al, Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of a chondral defect in the tibial plateau of the knee, J. Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 2004, pp. 79-84, vol. 20, No. 1.
Ronga, M. et al, Tissue engineering techniques for the treatment of a complex knee injury, J. Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 2006, pp. 576.e1-576.e3, vol. 22, No. 5.
Rosier, R.N. et al, Transforming growth factor beta: an autocrine regulator of chondrocytes, Connective Tissue Research, 1989, pp. 295-301, vol. 20.
Rosselot, G. et al, Development of a serum-free system to study the effect of growth hormone and insulinlike growth factor-I on cultured postembryonic growth plate chondrocytes, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol, 1992, pp. 235-244, vol. 28A.
Russlies, M. et al, A cell-seeded biocomposite for cartilage repair, Ann Anat, 2002, pp. 317-323, vol. 184.
Saini, S. and Wick, T.M., Concentric cylinder bioreactor for production of tissue engineered cartilage: Effect of sedding density and hydrodynamic loading on construct development, Biotechnol Prog, 2003, pp. 510-521, vol. 19.
Salter, R. B., The biological concept of continuous passive motion of synovial joints: The first 18 years of basic research and its clinical application, CPM of Synovial Joints, 1990, pp. 335-353, Chapter 23, Raven Press Ltd, New York, United States.
Schmidt, T.A. et al, Synthesis of proteoglycan 4 by chondrocyte subpopulations in cartilage explants, monolayer cultures, and resurfaced cartilage cultures, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2004, pp. 2849-2857, vol. 50, No. 9.
Schwan, B.L., Human Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease, Human Amniotic Membrane Transplantation, 2002, pp. 1-7.
Schwarz, R.P. et al, Cell Culture for Three-Dimensional Modeling in Rotating-Wall Vessels: An Application of Simulated Microgravity, J. Tiss. Cult. Meth., 1992, pp. 51-58, vol. 14.
Shahgaldi, B.F. et al, Repair of Cartilage Lesions Using Biological Implants, JBJS, 1991, pp. 57-64, vol. 73-B.
Smtih, R.L. et al, Effects of Fluid-Induced Shear on Articular Chondrocyte Morphology and Metabolism In Vitro, JBJS, 1995, pp. 824-831, vol. 13.
Sokoloff, L. et al, Sulfate Incorporation by Articular Chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1970, pp. 118-124, vol. 13, No. 2.
Sokoloff, L. et al, In vitro culture of articular chondrocytes, Federation Proc, 1973, pp. 1499-1502, vol. 32.
Song, C.X. et al, Formulation and characterization of biodegradable nanoparticles for intravascular local drug delivery, J. Controlled Release, 1997, pp. 197-212, vol. 43.
Specchia, N. et al, Fetal chondral homorgrafts in the repair of articular cartilage defects, Bulletin Hospital for Joint Disease, 1996, pp. 230-235, vol. 54, No. 4.
Stathopoulos, N.A. and Hellums, J.D., Shear Stress Effects on Human Embryonic Kidney Cells In Vitro, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1985, pp. 1021-1026, vol. XXVII.
Stewart, M.C. et al, Phenotypic stability of articular chondrocytes in vitro: the effects of culture models, bone morphogenetic protein 2, and Serum Supplementation, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2000, pp. 166-174, vol. 15, No. 1.
Stiles, C.D. et al, Dual control of cell growth by somatomedins and platelet-derived growth factor, PNAS, 1979, pp. 1279-1283, vol. 76, No. 3.
Langer, F. and Gross, A.E., Immunogenicity of Allograft Articular Cartilage, JBJS, 1974, pp. 297-304, vol. 56-A, No. 2.
Langer, F. et al, The Immunogenicity of Fresh and Frozen Allogeneic Bone, JBJS, 1975, pp. 216-220, vol. 57-A, No. 2.
Lavrishcheva, G.I., Filling Bone Cavities with Minced Cartilage, Ortopediia travmatologiia I protezirovanie, 1955, pp. 80, vol. 1.
Lee, J.W., Preplanned correction of enophthalmos using diced cartilage grafts, British J. Plastic Surg, 2000, pp. 17-23, vol. 53.
Lemperg, R., et al, Transplantation of diced rib cartilage to the hip joint. Experimental study on adult dogs, Acta Soc Med Ups, 1965, pp. 197-212, vol. 70, No. 3.
Lennert, K.H. and Haas, H.G., Fibrin Adhesive in the Surgical Treatment of the Pseudoarthrosis of the Scaphoid Bone—Methods and Results, Unfallchirurgie, 1988, pp. 158-160, vol. 14, No. 3.
Leopold, G., XIV. Experimental Studies into the Etiology of Tumors, Archiv f. path. Anat., 1881, pp. 283-324, vol. LXXXV, No. 2.
Limberg, A.A., Supporting and Contour Plastic Repair by Needle Administration of Minced Carthage, Vestnik khirurgii imeni I.I. Grekova, 1957, pp. 68-73, vol. 78, No. 4.
Limberg, A.A., The use of diced cartilage by injection with a needle. Part 1. Clinical investigations, Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull., 1961, pp. 523-536, vol. 28.
Limberg, A.A., The use of diced cartilage by injection with a needle. Part 2. Morphologic Changes in the Diced Human Cartilage After Auto- and Homoplasty, Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull., 1961, pp. 649-655, vol. 28.
Loeb, L, Autotransplantation and Homoiotransplantation of Cartilage in the Guinea-Pig, Am. J. Pathology, 1926, pp. 111-122, vol. II.
Lu, Y. et al, Minced Cartilage without Cell Culture Serves as an Effective Intraoperative Cell Source for Cartilage Repair, J Orthop Res., 2006, pp. 1261-1270, vol. 24, No. 6.
Lucht, U. et al, Fibrin sealant in bone transplantation. No effects on blood flow and bone formation in dogs, Acta Orthop Scand., 1986, pp. 19-24, Vol. 57, No. 1.
Mahomed, M.N. et al, The long-term success of fresh, small fragment osteochondral allografts used for intraarticular post-traumatic defects in the knee joint, Orthopedics, 1992, pp. 1191-1199, vol. 15, No. 10.
Maletius, W. and Lundberg, M., Refixation of large chondral fragments on the weight-bearing area of the knee joint: a report of two cases, Arthroscopy., 1994, pp. 630-633, vol. 10, No. 6.
Mankin, H.J., Localization of Tritiated Thymidine in Articular Cartilage of Rabbits: II. Repair in Immature Cartilage, JBJS, 1962, pp. 688-698, vol. 44.
Mankin, H.J., Localization of Tritiated Thymidine in Articular Cartilage of Rabbits: III. Mature Articular Cartilage, JBJS, 1963, pp. 529-540, vol. 45.
Mankin, H.J., Current Concepts Review, The Response of Articular Cartilage to Mechanical Injury, JBJS, 1982, pp. 460-466, vol. 64, No. 3.
Marcacci, M. et al, Articular cartilage engineering with Hyalograft C: 3-year clinical results, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 2005, pp. 96-105, No. 435.
Marcacci, M. et al, Use of autologous grafts for reconstruction of osteochondral defects of the knee, Orthopedics, 1999, pp. 595-600, vol. 22, No. 6.
Marchac, D. and Sandor, G., Face lifts and sprayed fibrin glue: an outcome analysis of 200 patients, Br J Plast Surg., 1994, pp. 306-309, vol. 47, No. 5.
Marchac, D. et al, Fibrin glue fixation in forehead endoscopy: evaluation of our experience with 206 cases, Plast Reconstr Surg., 1997, pp. 713-714, vol. 100, No. 3.
Matras, H., Fibrin Seal: The State of the Art, J. Oral Maxilofac Surg, 1985, pp. 605-611, vol. 43.
Matsusue, Y. et al, Biodegradable Pin Fixation of Osteochondral Fragments of the Knee, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1996, pp. 166-173, No. 322.
McDermott, A.G.P. et al, Fresh Small-Fragment Osteochondral Allografts, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 1985, pp. 96-102, No. 197.
McKibbin, B, Immature Joint Cartilage and the Homograft Reaction, JBJS, 1971, pp. 123-135, vol. 53B, No. 1.
Meachim, G. and Roberts, C., Repair of the joint surface from subarticular tissue in the rabbit knee, J Anat., 1971, pp. 317-327, vol. 109, Part 2.
Meyers, M.H. and Herron, M., A Fibrin Adhesive Seal for the Repair of Osteochondral Fracture Fragments, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1984, pp. 258-263, No. 182.
Mitchell, N. and Shepard, N., The resurfacing of adult rabbit articular cartilage by multiple perforations through the subchondral bone, JBJS, 1976, pp. 230-233, vol. 58, No. 2.
Mithofer, K. et al, Functional outcome of knee articular cartilage repair in adolescent athletes, Am J Sports Med., 2005, pp. 1147-1153, vol. 33, No. 8.
Miura, Yet al, Brief exposure to high-dose transforming growth factor-beta1 enhances periostea1 chondrogenesis in vitro: a preliminary report, JBJS, 2002, pp. 793-799, vol. 84-A, No. 5.
Murray, M.M. and Spector, M, The migration of cells from the ruptured human anterior cruciate ligament into collagen-glycosaminoglycan regeneration templates in vitro, Biomaterials, 2001, pp. 2393-2402, vol. 22.
Nageotte, J., The Organization of Matter in its Connections with Life. Studies of General Anatomy and Experimental Morphology on teh Connective Tissue and the Nerve, L'Organisation De La Matiere, 1922, pp. 95-98.
Niekisch, V.R., English Summary only of Possible methods of using fibrin-glue protection in maxillo facial surgery, Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl, 1980, pp. 555-561, vol. 68, No. 6.
Nixon, A.J., et al, Isolation, propagation, and cryopreservation of equine articular chondrocytes, AM J Vet Res, 1992, pp. 2364-2370, vol. 53, No. 12.
Nixon, A.J., and Fortier, L.A, New Horizons in Articular Cartilage Repair, AAEP Proceedings, 2001, pp. 217-226, vol. 47.
O'Driscoll, S.W. et al, The chondrogenic potential of free autogenous periosteal grafts for biological resurfacing of major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion. An experimental investigation in the rabbit, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1986, pp. 1017-1035, vol. 68, No. 7.
O'Driscoll, S.W. and Salter, R.B., The Repair of Major Osteochondral Defects in Joint Surfaces by Neochondrogenesis with Autogenous Osteoperiosteal Grafts Stimulated by Continuous Passive Motion, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1986, pp. 131-140, No. 208.
Oegema, T.R. and Thompson, R.C. Jr, Characterization of a hyaluronic acid-dermatan sulfate proteoglycan complex from dedifferentiated human chondrocyte cultures, J Biol Chem., 1981, pp. 1015-1022, vol. 256, No. 2.
Ohlsen, L. and Widenfalk, B., The Early Development of Articular Cartilage After Perichondrial Grafting, Scand J. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1983, pp. 163-177, vol. 17.
Outerbridge, H.K. et al, The Use of a Lateral Patellar Autologous Graft for the Repair of a Large Osteochondral Defect in the Knee, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 1995, pp. 65-72, vol. 77, No. 1.
Paar, O. et al,Cartilage Adhesion at the Knee Joint, Clinical Follow up Examination, Akt. Traumatol, 1984, pp. 15-19, vol. 14.
Paccola, C.A. et al, Fresh Immature Articular Cartilage Allografts—A Study on the Integration of Chondral and Osteochondral Grafts Both in Normal and in Papain-Treated Knee Joints of Rabbits, Arch Orthop Traumat Surg., 1979, pp. 253-259, vol. 93.
Park, J.J. et al, Comparison of the Bonding Power of Various Autologous Fibrin Tissue Adhesives, Am J Otology, 1997, pp. 655-659, vol. 18, No. 5.
Park, M.S., Tympanoplasty using autologous crushed cartilage, Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol, 1995, pp. 365-368, vol. 116, No. 5.
Pascone, M. and Dioguardi, D., Fibrin Sealant in Plastic Surgery of the Head, Plastic Surgery Nerve Repair Burns, Fibring Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields, 1995, pp. 11-15, vol. 3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Passl, R. et al, Problems of Pure Homologous Articular Cartilage Transplantation, Verh Anat Ges, 1976, pp. 675-678, vol. 70.
Punzet, G. et al, Morphological and Therapeutic Aspects of Osteochondrosis dissecans and Aseptic Bone Necroses, Acta Medica Austriaca, 1978, pp. 17-18, Suppl. No. 11.
Passl, R. et al, Fibrin Gluing of Cartilage Surfaces—Experimental Studies and Clinical Results, Med. u. Sport, 1979, pp. 23-28, vol. 19 (1/2).
Passl, R. et al, Homologous Cartilage Transplants in Animal Experiments, 4th Orthopedics Symposium, Heidelberg, 1981, pp. 102-105, Horst Cotta and Arnim Braun (eds), Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York.
Schaffer, D.J. et al, English abstract only of foreign patent No. WO00/74741 A2, international filing date, Jun. 8, 2000, one page.
Schaffer, D.J. et al, English abstract only of foreign patent No. WO00/74741 A3, international filing date, Jun. 8, 2000, one page.
Cherubine, P. et al, English abstract only of Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: a preliminary report, J. Orthop Surg (Hong)Kong), 3002, pp. 10-5, vol. 11, No. 1.
Yamamoto, K, et al, English abstract only of Japanese publication No. 2006230749A, publication date Sep. 7, 2006, one page.
Verwerd, C.D.A. et al, Wound Healing of Autologous Implants in the Nasal Septal Cartilage, ORL, 1991, pp. 310-314, vol. 53.
Wilflingseder, P., Cancellous Bone Grafts, S Afr Med J., 1957, pp. 1267-1271, vol. 31, No. 50.
Wilfingseder, P., Treatment of Mandibular Facial Dysostosis, S Afr Med J., 1957, pp. 1296-1298, vol. 31, No. 51.
Pirsig, W., English Abstract only of Regeneration of septal cartilage in children after septoplasty. A histological study, Acta Otolaryngol, 1975, pp. 451-459, vol. 79, No. 5-6.
Passl, R. et al, Homologous articular cartilage transplantation in animal experiments. Preliminary studies on sheep (author's transl), Arch Orthop Unfallchir., 1976, pp. 243-256, vol. 86, No. 2.
Hunter, W., VI. Of the Structure and Difeafes of Articulating Cartilages, Academiae Grypeswaldensis Bibliotheca, 1775, pp. 514-521, vol. 1.
Wikipedia print out of website—http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha-2-Macroglobulin, 8 pages.
Kallio, K.E., Arthroplastia Cutanea, Discussion by T. Heirtom, ACTA Orhtopaedica Scandinavica, 1957, pp. 327-328, vol. 26.
Peer, L.A., Transplanation of Tissues—Cartilage, Bone, Fascia, Tendon, and Muscle, The Williams & Wilkins Company, 1955, pp. 69-137 and 392-393, vol. 1, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mannhelm, A., Abstract—Free Autoplastic Cartilage Transplantation, J. Am Med Assoc., 1926, pp. 2132, vol. 87, No. 25.
Nehrer, S. and Minas, T., Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects, Investigative Radiology, 2000, pp. 639-646, vol. 35, No. 10.
Prudden, T.M., Experimental studies on the transplantation of cartilage, Am. J. M. Sc., 1881, pp. 360-370, vol. 82.
Shands, A.R., Jr., The regeneration of hyaline cartilage in joints. An experimental study, Arch. Surg., 1931, pp. 137-178, vol. 22.
Cheung, H.S. and Haak, M.H., Growth of osteoblasts on porous calcium phosphate ceramic: an in vitro model for biocompatibility study, Biomaterials, 1989, pp. 63-67, vol. 10.
Sittinger, M. et al, Engineering of cartilage tissue using bioresorbable polymer carriers in perfusion culture, Biomaterials, 1994, pp. 451-456, vol. 15, No. 6.
Polettini, B., English abstract only Experimental Grafts of Cartilage and Bone, J.A.M.A., 1923, p. 360, vol. 80.
Braun, A and Heine, W.D., Abstract of The Use of Fibrin Adhesive In Fixation of Osteochondral Fragments, Year unknown, Canadian Orthopaedic Research Society, pp. 215-216.
Rohrbach, JM et al, Abstract only of Biological corneal replacement an alternative to keratoplasty and keratoprosthesis? A pilot study with heterologous hyaline cartilage in the rabbit model, 1995, Klin Monatsbl. Augenheilkd., pp. 191-196, vol. 207, No. 3.
Fontana, A et al, Abstract only of Cartilage chips synthesized with fibrin glue in rhinoplasty, Aestetic Plast Surg, 1991, pp. 237-240, vol. 15, No. 3.
Mainil-Varlet, P et al, Abstract only of Articular cartilage repair using a tissue engineered cartilage like implant: an animal study, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2001, pp. s:6-15, vol. 9.
Erol, Oo, the Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty, Plast Reconstro Surg, 2000, pp. 2229-2241, vol. 105, No. 6.
DeGroot, J. et al, Age related decrease in Proteoglycan synthesis of human articular chondrocytes, 1999, Arthritis & Rheumatism, pp. 1003-1009, vol. 42, No. 5.
Feder, J. et al, The promise of chondral repair using neocartilage, 2004, Tissue engineering in musculoskeletal clinical practice, 1st Edition, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, pp. 219-226, Chapter 22, Section 3.
Morales, T.I., Review: Chondrocyte moves: clever strategies?, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2007, pp. 861-871, vol. 15.
Namba, R.S. et al, Spontaneous repair of superficial defects in articular cartilage in a fetal lamb model, 1998, JBJS, pp. 4-10, vol. 80, No. 1.
Williamson, A.K., et al, Compressive properties and function composition relationships of developing bovine articular cartilage, J. Orthopaedic Research, 2001, pp. 1113-1121, vol. 19.
Specchia, N. et al, Fetal chondral homografts in the repair of articular cartilage defects, Bulletin Hospital for Joint Diseases, 1996, pp. 230-235, vol. 54, No. 4.
Brown, K.R. et al, English Abstract of Japanese publication No. 2003-102755, 1 page.
Lapchinsky, A.G., et al., English abstract only of Apparatus for grinding cartilage in plastic surgery, 1960, primenenija Moskva, pp. 209-213, No. 4.
Imbert, L. et al, English translated Abstract only of Research on cartilage grafts hetero-plastic, 1916, Rev. de chir., pp. 111-128, vol. 52.
Iwamoto, Y. et al, English abstract of WO2005/011765, published Feb. 10, 2005, 1 page.
Ochi, M. et al, English abstract of Japanese publication No. 2002-233567, 1 page.
Sengupta, S. and Lumpur, K, The fate of transplants of articular cartilage in the rabbit, 1974, JBJS, pp. 167-177, vol. 56B, No. 1.
Didier R., English translated Abstract only of the production of cartilage and bone grafts in living and dead rabbits, 1928, Compt. rend. Soc de biol, pp. 443-445, vol. 98.
Egkher, E., Indications and Limits of Fibrin Adhesive Applied to Traumatological Patients, Traumatology and Orthopaedics, 1986, pp. 144-151, vol. 7, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Erikson, U. et al, English abstract only, A roentgenological method for the determination of renal blood flow. A preliminary report, Acta Soc Med Ups, 1965, pp. 213-216, vol. 70, No. 3.
Erol, O.O., The Turkish Delight: A Pliable Graft for Rhinoplasty, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2000, pp. 2229-2241, vol. 105.
Evans, C.H., et al, Experimental Arthritis Induced by Intraarticular Injection of Allogenic Cartilageinous Particles into Rabbit Knees, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1984, pp. 200-207, vol. 27, No. 2.
Farrior, R.T., Implant Materials in Restoration of Facial Contour, Laryngoscope, 1966, pp. 934-954, vol. 76, No. 5.
Feldman, M.D., et al, Compatibility of Autologous Fibrin Adhesive With Implant Materials, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1988, pp. 182-185, vol. 114.
Fontana, A., et al, Cartilage Chips Synthesized with Fibrin Glue in Rhinoplasty, Aesth Plast Surg, 1991, pp. 237-240, vol. 15.
Furukawa, T. et al, Biochemical Studies on Repair Cartilage Resurfacing Experimental Defects in the Rabbit Knee, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1980, pp. 79-89, vol. 62, No. 1.
Gaudernak, T., et al, Clinical Experiences Using Fibrin Sealant in the Treatment of Osteochondral Fractures, Fibrin Sealant in Operative Medicine-Traumatology and Orthopaedics, 1986, pp. 91-102, vol. 7, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Gerngross, H. et al, Experimental Studies on the Influence of Fibrin Adhesive, Factor XIII, and Calcitonin on the Incorporation and Remodeling of Autologous Bone Grafts, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1986, pp. 23, 31, vol. 106.
Gersdorff, M.C.H., and Robillard, T.A., “How I Do It”—Otology and Neurotology. A Specific Issue and Its Solution. A New Procedure for Bone Reconstruction in OTO-Microsurgery: A Mixture of Bone Dust and Fibrinogen Adhesive, Laryngoscope, 1985, pp. 1278-1280, vol. 95.
Ghadially, J.A. and Ghadially, F.N., Evidence of Cartilage Flow in Deep Defects in Articular Cartilage, Virchows Arch B. Cell Path, 1975, pp. 193-204, vol. 18.
Ghadially, J.A. et al, Long-Term Results of Deep Defects in Articular Cartilage, Virchows Arch B. Cell Path, 1977, pp. 125-136, vol. 25.
Ghazavi, M.T. et al, Fresh Osteochondral Allografts for Post-Traumatic Osteochondral Defects of the Knee, JBJS, 1997, pp. 1008-1013, vol. 79-B.
Gibson, T. et al, The Long-Term Survival of Cartilage Homografts In Man, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1958, pp. 177-187, vol. 11.
Gooding, C.R. et al, Abstract only of A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered, Knee, 2006, pp. 203-210, vol. 13, No. 3.
Greco, F. et al, Experimental Investigation into Reparative Osteogenesis With Fibrin Adhesive, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1988, pp. 99-104, vol. 107.
Hamra, S.T., Crushed Cartilage Grafts over Alar Dome Reduction in Open Rhinoplasty, Plast Reconstr Surg., 1993, pp. 352-356, vol. 92, No. 2.
Hangody, L. et al, English Abstract only, Autogenous Osteochondralf Craft Technique for Replacing Knee Cartilage Defects in Dogs, Autogenous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty, Orthop Int, 1997, pp. 175-181, vol. 5, No. 3.
Hangody, L. and Fules, P., Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Full-Thickness Defects of Weght-Bearing Joints: Ten Years of Experimental and clinical Experience, JBJS, 2003, pp. 25-32, vol. 85.
Hangody, L. et al, Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Articular Defects of the Knee and Ankle, Clin Orthopaedics and Rel Res, 2001, pp. S328-S336, No. 391S.
Harbin, M. and Moritz, A.R., Autogenous Free Cartilage Transplanted into Joints, Archives of Surgery, 1930, pp. 885-896, vol. 20, No. 6.
He, Q. et al, Repair of flexor tendon defects of rabbit with tissue engineering method, Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 2002, pp. 200-208, vol. 5, No. 4.
Helidonis, E. et al, Laser Shaping of Composite Cartilage Grafts, Am. J. Otolaryngology, 1993, pp. 410-412, vol. 14, No. 6.
Homminga, G.N. et al, Perichondral Grafting for Cartilage Lesions of the Knee, British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1990, pp. 1003-1007, vol. 72B.
Homminga, G.N., Repair of Chrondral Lesions of the Knee with a Perichondrial Graft, Fibrin Sealant in Operative Medicine-Orthopedic Surgery Maxillofacial Surgery, 1986, pp. 61-69, vol. 4, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Hoover, N. W. et al, Skin Arthroplasty of the Hip, An Experimental Study in Dogs, JBJS, 1961, pp. 1155-1166, vol. 43-A, No. 8.
Horas, U. et al, Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Osteochondral Cylinder Transplantation in Cartilage Repair of the Knee Joint: A Prospective, Comparative Trial, JBJS, 2003, pp. 185-192, vol. 85.
Horton, W.A. et al, Characterization of a type II collagen gene (COL2A1) mutation identified in cultured chondrocytes from human hypochondrogenesis, PNAS, 1992, pp. 4583-4587, vol. 89.
Hunziker, E.B., Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2001, pp. 432-463, vol. 10.
Hurtig, M.B. et al, Effects of Lesion Size and Location on Equine Articular Cartilage Repair, Can J. Vet Res, 1988, pp. 137-146, vol. 52.
Hurtig, M.B., Use of autogenous cartilage particles to create a model of naturally occurring degenerative joint disease in the horse, Equine Vet J Suppl, 1988, pp. 19-22, No. 6.
Imhoff, A.B., et al, English Abstract only of Autologous Osteochondral transplantation on various joints, Orthopade, 1999, pp. 33-44, vol. 28, No. 1.
Ishida, T., English Abstract only of The Use of a Fibrin Adhesive for a Cartilage Graft Basic and Clinical Studies, Japanese J. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1990, pp. 215-230, vol. 33, No. 1.
Ishizaki, Y. et al, Autocrine Signals Enable Chondrocytes to Survive in Culture, J. Cell Biol. 1994, pp. 1069-1077, vol. 126, No. 4.
Ito, Y. et al, Localization of chondrocyte precursors in periosteum, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2001, pp. 215-223, vol. 9.
Ittner, G. et al, English Abstract only of Treatment of flake fracture of the talus, Z. Orthop lhre Grenzgeb, 1989, pp. 183-186, vol. 127, No. 2.
Jakob, R.P. et al, Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee: Indication, Results and Reflections, Clinical Orthopaedics and Rel Res, 2002, pp. 170.184, No. 401.
Jin, C.Z. et al, Human Amniotic Membrane as a Delivery Matrix for Articular Cartilage Repair, Tissue Engineering, 2007, pp. 693-702, vol. 13, No. 4.
Johnson, L.L., Arthroscopic Abrasion Arthroplasty Historical and Pathologic Perspective: Present Status, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 1986, pp. 54-69, vol. 2, No. 1.
Kanzaki, J. et al, Use of Fibrin Glue in Intracranial Procedures Following Acoustic Neuroma Surgery: Application in Facial Nerve Reconstruction and Prevention of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields-Neurosurgery Ophthalmic Surgery Ent, 1994, pp. 162-168, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Kaplonyi, G. et al, The use of fibrin adhesive in the repair of chondral and osteochondral injuries, Injury, 1988, pp. 267-272, vol. 19.
Kawamura, M. and Urist, M.R., Human Fibrin Is a Physiologic Delivery System for Bone Morphogenetic Protein, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1988, pp. 302-310, No. 235.
Keller, J. et al, Fixation of osteochondral fractures, Acta Orthop Scand, 1985, pp. 323-326, vol. 56.
Kettunen, K.O., Skin Arthroplasty In The Light Of Animal Experiments With Special Reference To Functional Metaplasia of Connective Tissue, Acta Ortho Scand, 1958, pp. 9-69, Suppl. XXIX.
Kirilak, Y. et al, Fibrin sealant promotes migration and proliferation of human articular chondrocytes: possible involvement of thrombin and protease-activated receptors, Int. J. Mol. Med, 2006, pp. 551-558, vol. 17, No. 4.
Knutsen, G. et al, Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Compared with Microfracture in the Knee. A Randomized Trial, JBJS, 2004, pp. 455-464, vol. 86.
Kon, E. et al, Second Generation Issues in Cartilage Repair, Sports Med Arthrosc Rev., 2008, pp. 221-229, vol. 16.
Korhonen, R.K. et al, Importance of the superficial tissue layer for the indentation stiffness of articular cartilage, Medical Eng. Phys, 2002, pp. 99-108, vol. 24.
Lane, J.M. et al, Joint Resurfacing in the Rabbit Using an Autologous Osteochondral Graft, JBJS, 1977, pp. 218-222, vol. 59-A, No. 2.
Wagner, P.D. and Westen, E., et al, Improved blood buffering in high-altitude natives?, J Appl Physiol, 2002, pp. 2214-2215, vol. 93.
Wakitani, S., et al, Repair of Rabbit Articular Surfaces With Allograft Chondrocytes Embedded in Collagen Gel, JSJS, 1989, pp. 74-80, vol. 71-B.
Wei, X., et al, The Effect of Sodium Selenite on Chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1986, pp. 660-664, vol. 29, No. 5.
Welsh, F., The alar cartilage morseler: a new instrument, Br. J. Plastic Surgery, 1983, pp. 483-484, vol. 36.
Wilfilingseder, P., Cranioplasties by means of diced cartilage and split rib grafts, Min Chir, 1983, pp. 837-843, vol. 38, No. 12.
Wischhofer, E., et al, English abstract only of The Behaviour of Autologous Spongiosa Transplants from the Dial Crest With and Without Fibrinadhesive in the Canine Femoral Epiphysis, Unfallheilkunde, 1982, ppl. 250-252, vol. 85.
Xu, J.W. et al, Injectable Tissue-Engineered Cartilage with Different Chondrocyte Sources, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2004, pp. 1361-1371, vol. 113.
Yamamoto, E. et al, Use of Micro-Sliced Homograft Cartilage Plates in Tympanoplasty, Acta Otolaryngol, 1985, pp. 123-129, vol. 419.
Yamashita, F. et al, The Transplantation of an Autogeneic Osteochondral Fragment for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1985, pp. 43-50, vol. 201.
Yilmaz, S. et al, Viability of Diced, Crushed Cartilage Grafts and the Effects of Surgicel (Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose) on Cartilage Grafts, Plast. Reconstru. Surg. 2001, pp. 1054-1060, vol. 108.
Young, F., Autogenous Cartilage Grafts, An Experimental Study, Surgery, 1941, pp. 7-20, vol. 10.
Young, F., The use of autogenous rib cartilage grafts to repair surface defects in dog joints, Surgery, 1940, pp. 254-263, vol. 7.
Zahn, F., On the Fate of Tissues Implanted in the Organism, Int. Med. Congr. in Geneva, Biology Section—Meeting of Sep. 11, 1877, pp. 1-4.
Zalzal, G.H. et al, Cartilage Grafts-Present Status, Head and Neck Surgery, 1986, pp. 363-374, vol. 8.
Zilch, V.H. and Talke, M., Gluing Small Osteochondral Fragments with Fibrin Glue in Hand Surgery. Clinical Experiences, Handchirurgie, 1980, pp. 77-81, vol. 12.
Zilch, V.H., Animal Experiments Investigating the Fixation of Small Osteochondral Fragments by Means of Fibrin Glue, Handchirurgie, 1980, pp. 71-75, vol. 12.
Zilch, H. and Friedebold, G., English summary only of Fixing of Osteochondral Fragments with Fibrinogen Clue. Clinical Experiences, Akt. Traumatol., 1981, pp. 136, vol. 11.
Zilch, H. and Talke, M., English summary only of Fibrin sealant in cases of little osteochondral fragments of the upper limb, Ann. Chir. Main, 1987, pp. 173-176, vol. 6, No. 2.
Zilch, H. and Talke, M., English summary only of Fixation of Small Osteochondral Fragments with the Fibrinogen Adhesive, Clinical Report, Ann. Chir. Main, 1980, pp. 77-81, vol. 12.
Adkisson, H.D., IV et al, In Vitro Generation of Scaffold Independent Neocartilage, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 2001, pp. S280-S294, No. 391S.
Caruso, E. et al, Repopulation of Laser-Perforated Chondroepiphyseal Matrix with Xenogeneic Chondrocytes: An Experimental Model, JBJS, 1996, pp. 102-107, vol. 14.
Cheng, N.C. et al, Chondogenic Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Adult Stem Cells by a Porous Scaffold Derived from Native Articular Cartilage Extracellular Matrix, Tissue Engineering, Part A, 2009, pp. 231-241, vol. 15, No. 2.
Davis, J.S., Some of the Problems of Plastic Surgery, Ann Surg., 1917, pp. 88-94, vol. 66, No. 1.
Davis, W.B. and Gibson, T., Absorption of Autogenous Cartilage Grafts In Man, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1957, pp. 177-185, vol. 9.
Gelse, K. et al, Paracrine Effect of Transplanted Rib Chondrocyte Spheroids Supports Formation of Secondary Cartilage Repair Tissue, J. Ortho Res, 2009, pp. 1216-1225, vol. 27.
Hendrickson, D.A. et al, Chondrocyte-Fibrin Matrix Transplants for Resurfacing Extensive Articular Cartilage Defects, J. Ortho Res, 1994, pp. 485-497, vol. 12 No. 4.
Homminga, G.N. et al, Chondrocyte behavior in fibrin glue in vitro, Acta Orthop Scand, 1993, pp. 441-445, vol. 64, No. 4.
Howard, R.D., et al, Long-term fate and effects of exercise on sternal cartilage autografts used for repair of large osteochondral defects in horses, Am J Vet Res, 1994, pp. 1158-1167, vol. 55, No. 8.
Hutchinson, J., Observations on bone transplants in the anterior chamber of the eye, Glasgow Med J., 1949, pp. 357-363, vol. 30, No. 10.
Jeffries, D.J.R., and Evans, P.H.R., Cartilage regeneration following septal surgery in young rabbits, J. Laryngology and Otology, 1984, pp. 577-583, vol. 98.
Gu, J.D., et al, True Denisity of Normal and Enzymatically Treated Bovine Articular Cartilage, Trans Orthop Res Soc., 1999, pp. 642, vol. 24.
Kim, M.K. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee using fibrin, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc., 2010, pp. 528-534, vol. 18.
Libera, J., et al, Cartilage Engineering, Fundamentals of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2009, pp. 233-242, Chapter 18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Liu, X., et al, In vivo ectopic chondrogenesis of BMSCs directed by mature chondrocytes, Biomaterials, 2010, pp. 9406-9414, vol. 31.
Longacre, J.J. et al, Further observations of the behavior of autogenous split-rib grafts in reconstruction of extensive defects of the cranium and face, Plas Reconstr Surg, 1957, pp. 281-296, vol. 20, No. 4.
Marmotti, A., et al, One-Step osteochondral repair with cartilage fragments in a composite scaffold, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc., Feb 21, 2012, [Epub ahead of print], 12 pages.
McKibbin B. and Holdsworth, F.W., The dual nature of epiphysial cartilage, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 1967, pp. 351-361, vol. 49, No. 2.
Medawar, P.B., Immunity to homologous grafted skin; the fate of skin homografts transplanted to the brain, to subcutaneous tissue, and to the anterior chamber of the eye, Br J Exp Pathol., 1948, pp. 58-69, vol. 29, No. 1.
Munirah, S. et al, Articular cartilage restoration in load-bearing osteochondral defects by implantation of autologous chondrocyte-fibrin constructs: an experimental study in sheep, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 2007, pp. 1099-1109, vol. 89, No. 8.
Nehrer, S. et al, Three-year clinical outcome after chondrocyte transplantation using a hyaluronan matrix for cartilage repair, Eur J Radiol., 2006, pp. 3-8, vol. 57, No. 1.
Obradovic, B., et al, Integration of engineered cartilage, J Orthop Res., 2001, pp. 1089-1097, vol. 19, No. 6.
Verwoerd, C.D.A. et al, Stress and woundhealing of the cartilaginous nasal septum, Acta Otolaryngol., 1989, pp. 441-445, vol. 107, No. 5-6.
Pierce, A. et al, Surgicel: macrophage processing of the fibrous component, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg., 1987, pp. 338-345, vol. 16, No. 3.
Roemhildt, M.L. et al, Material properties of articular cartilage in the rabbit tibial plateau, J. Biomech, 2006, pp. 2331-2337, vol. 39, No. 12.
Schubert, T. et al, Long-term effects of chondrospheres on cartilage lesions in an autologous chondrocyte implantation model as investigated in the SCID mouse model, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 2009, pp. 455-460, vol. 23.
Selktar, D., Lecture Bulletin Nature's Healing Matrix, Technion Focus, May 2006, 1 page.
Silverman, R.P., et al, Adhesion of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage to Native Cartilage, Plast. Reconstr Surg, 2000, pp. 1393-1398, vol. 105.
Sin, Y.M. et al, Studies on the mechanism of cartilage degradation, J Pathol., 1984, pp. 23-30, vol. 142, No. 1.
Van Susante, J.L.C. et al, Resurfacing potential of heterologous chondrocytes suspended in fibrin glue in large full-thickness defects of femoral articular cartilage: an experimental study in the goat, Biomaterials, 1999, pp. 1167-1175, vol. 20, No. 13.
Dupertuis, S.M., Growth of Young Human Autogenous Cartilage Grafts, Plast Reconstr Surg, 1946, pp. 486-493, vol. 5, No. 6.
Albrecht, F. et al, Closure of Osteochondral Lesions Using Chondral Fragments and Fibrin Adhesive, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1983, pp. 213-217, vol. 101.
Albrecht, F., English Abstract of German article Closure of joint cartilage defects using cartilage fragments and fibrin glue, Fortschr Med., 1983, pp. 1650-1652, vol. 101, No. 37.
Dupertuis, S.M., Actual Growth of Young Cartilage Transplants in Rabbits, Archives of Surgery, 1941, pp. 32-63, vol. 43.
Eberlin, J.L. et al, Osteocartilagenous Reconstruction, Plastic Surgery Nerve Repair Burns, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields, 1995, pp. 20-24, vol. 3 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
De Kleine, E.H., The Chondrojet, A Simplified Method for Handling of Diced Cartilage, Plast Reconstr Surg, 1946, pp. 95-102, vol. 3, No. 1.
Aston, J.E. and Bentley G., Repair of Articular Surfaces By Allografts of Articular and Growth-Plate Cartilage, J Bone Joint Surg Br.,1986, pp. 29-35, vol. 68, No. 1.
Bacsich, P. and Wyburn, G.M., XXXVIII. The Significance of the Mucoprotein Content on the Survival of Homografts of Cartilage and Cornea, 1947, P.R.S.E., pp. 321-327, vol. LXII, B, Part III.
Bayliss, M.T. and Roughley, P.J., The properties of proteoglycan prepared from human articular cartilage by using associative caesium chloride gradients of high and low starting densities, Biochem. J., 1985, pp. 111-117, vol. 232.
Bently, G. and Greer, R.B. III, Homotransplantation of Isolated Epiphyseal and Articular Cartilage Chondrocytes into Joint Surfaces of Rabbits, Nature, 1971, pp. 385-388, vol. 230.
Berlet, G.C. et al, Treatment of Unstable Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee Using Autogenous Osteochondral Grafts (Mosaicplasty), J. Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 1999, pp. 312-316, vol. 15, No. 3.
Decher, H., Reduction of Radical Cavities by Means of Homologous Cartilage Chips, Larying. Rhinol. Otol., 1985, pp. 423-426, vol. 64.
Bodo, G. et al, Arthroscopic Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Subchondral Cystic Lesion in the Medial Femoral Condyle in a Horse, Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, 2000, pp. 343-354, vol. 48, Vo. 3.
Craigmyle, M.B.L., Cellular Survival in Long-Term Cartilage Grafts in the Rabbit, Transplantation Bulletin, 1958, pp. 123, vol. 5, No. 1.
Craigmyle, M.B.L., An Autoradiographic and Histochemical Study of Long-Term Cartilage Grafts in the Rabbit, J. of Anatomy, 1954, pp. 467-473, vol. 92, Part 3.
Coster, D.J. and Galbraith, J.E.K., Diced cartilage grafts to correct enophthalmos, British J. Ophthalmology, 1980, pp. 135-136, vol. 64.
Cooke, M.E. et al, Manuscript entitled Structured three-dimensional co-culture of mesenchymal stem cells with chondrocyts promotes chondrogenic differentiation without hypertrophy, pp. 1-19.
Chesterman, P.J. et al, Homotransplantation of Articular Cartilage and Isolated Chondrocytes, An Experimental Study in Rabbits, JBJS, 1968, pp. 184-197.
Breadon, G.E., et al, Autografts of Uncrushed and Crushed Bone and Cartilage, Bone and Cartilage Autografts, 1979, pp. 75-80, vol. 105.
Brighton, C.T., et al, Articular Cartilage Preservation and Storage I. Application of Tissue Culture Techniques to the Storage of Viable Articular Cartilage, Arthritis Rheum., 1979, pp. 1093-1101, vol. 22, No. 10.
Brittberg, M. et al, Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee With Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation, The New England Journal of Medicine, 1994, pp. 889-895, vol. 331, No. 14.
Brittberg, M. Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1999, pp. S147-S155, No. 367S.
Brittberg, M. et al, Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation, N Engl J Med., 1994, pp. 889-895, vol. 331, No. 14.
Brodkin, H.A. and Peer, L.A., Diced Cartilage for Chest Wall Defects, 1954, pp. 97-102, vol. 28, No. 1.
Brown, B.L. et al, Transplantation of Fresh Allografts (Homografts) of Crushed and Uncrushed Cartilage and Bone: A 1-Year Analysis in Rabbits, The Laryngoscope, 1980, pp. 1521-1532, vol. 90.
Bruns, J. et al, Long-Term Follow up Results after Gluing Osteochondral Fragments in Patients with Osteochondrosis Dissecans Langenbecks Arch Chir, 1993, pp. 160-166, vol. 378.
Bruns, J. et al, Autologous rib perichondrial grafts in experimentally induced osteochondral lesions in the sheep-knee joint: morphological results, Virchows Archiv A. Pathol Anat, 1992, pp. 1-8, vol. 421.
Bruns, J. and Henne-Bruns, D., Autologous Perichondrial Transplantation for the Repair of Experimentally Induced Cartilage Defects in the Sheep Knee—Two Glueing Techniques, Orthopedic Surgery Maxillofacial Surgery, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical fields, Oct. 27, 1994, pp. 50-60, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Buckwalter, J.A., Articular Cartilage Injuries, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002, pp. 21-37, vol. 402.
Bujia, J. et al, Culture and Cryopreservation of Chondrocytes from Human Cartilage Relevance for Cartilage Allografting in Otolaryngology, ORL, 1992, pp. 80-84, vol. 54.
Bujia, J., Determination of the Viability of Crushed Cartilage Grafts: Clinical Implications for Wound Healing in Nasal Surgery, Ann Plast Surg, 1994, pp. 261-265, vol. 32.
Cherubino, P. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: A preliminary report, J. Ortho Surg, 2003, pp. 10-15, vol. 11, No. 1.
Calandruccio, R. A. and Gilmer, W.S., Proliferation, Regeneration, and Repair of Articular Cartilage of Immature Animals, JBJS, 1962, pp. 431-455, vol. 44A, No. 3.
Chen, F.S. et al, Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects: Part II. Treatment Options, Am. J. Ortho, 1999, pp. 88-96.
Passl, R. and Plenk, H. Jr, Histological observations after replantation of articular cartilage, Unfallchirurgie, 1986, pp. 194-199, vol. 12, No. 4.
Passl, R. and Plenk, H. Jr, Fibrin Sealing of Cartilage Surfaces, Beitr. Orthop. Traumatol, 1989, pp. 503-507, vol. 36, No. 10.
Pech, A., et al, Tissuecol in Septorhinoplasties, Ann. Oto-Laryng., 1988, pp. 629-634, vol. 105.
Peer, L.A., Extended Use of Diced Cartilage Grafts, Meeting of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons, Apr. 21, 23, 1954, pp. 178-185.
Peer, LA., The Fate of Living and Dead Cartilage Transplanted in Humans, Surg, Gynec, and Obst., 1939, pp. 603-610, vol. 68.
Peer, L.A., Fate of Autogenous Septal Cartilage After Transplantation in Human Tissues, Archv of Otolaryngology, 1941, pp. 696-709, vol. 34, No. 4.
Peer, LA., The Neglected Septal Cartilage Graft (With Experimental Observations on the Growth of Human Cartilage Grafts), Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.,1945, pp. 384-396, vol. 42, No. 5.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Bonding of Cartilage Matrices with Cultured Chondrocytes: An Experimental Model, J. Orthopaedic Res, 1998, pp. 89-95, vol. 16.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Biomechanical Analysis of a Chondrocyte-Based Repair Model of Articular Cartilage, Tissue Engineering, 1999, pp. 317-326, vol. 5, No. 4.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Cell-Based Tissue-Engineered Allogeneic Implant for Cartilage Repair, Tissue Engineering, 2000, pp. 567-576, vol. 6, No. 5.
Peretti, G.M. et al, Cell-Based bonding of articular cartilage: An extended Study, J. Biomed Mater Res, 2003, pp. 517-524, vol. 64A.
Peretti, G.M. et al, In vitro bonding of pre-seeded chondrocytes, Sport Sci Health, 2007, pp. 29-33, vol. 2.
Phemister, D.B. and Miller, E.M., The Method of New Joint Formation in Arthroplasty, Surgery, Gynecology and Ostetrics, 1918, pp. 406-447, vol. 26.
Pierce, G.W. and O'Connor, G.B., XXXVI. Reconstruction Surgery of the Nose, Ann. Otol. Rhin. And Laryng., 1938, pp. 437-452, vol. 47.
Piragine, F. et al, Use of Bovine Heterologous Cartilage and Fibrin Sealant in Middle Ear Reconstructive Surgery, Neurosurgery Ophthalmic Surgery ENT, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields, 1994, pp. 193-198, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
Pitman, M.I. et al, the Use of Adhesives in Chondrocyte Transplantation Surgery: In-Vivo Studies, Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst., 1989, pp. 213-220, vol. 49, No. 2.
Plaga, B.R. et al, Fixation of osteochondral fractures in rabbit knees. A comparison of Kirschner wires, fibrin sealant, and polydioxanone pins, J Bone Joint Surg Br., 1992, pp. 292-296, vol. 74, No. 2.
Plenk, H. Jr and Passl, R., Trans- and Replantation of Articular Cartilage Using the Fibrinogen Adhesive System, Gastpar, H. (ed.): Biology of the articular cartilage in health and disease, 1980, pp. 439-447, Schattauer, Stuttgart- New York, USA.
Plenk, H. Jr and Passl, R., Articular Cartilage Transplants in Experiments and Clinical Practice, ACA, Acta Chirurgica Austriaca 21st Seminar of the Austrian Association of Surgical Research, Nov. 13 to 15, 1997, pp. 1-4, vol. 29, Suppl. No. 137.
Pridie, K.H., A method of resurfacing osteoarthritic knee joints, JBJS, 1959, pp. 618-619, vol. 41B, No. 3.
Prin, A. et al, Effect of purified growth factors on rabbit articular chondrocytes in Monolayer Culture, I. DNA Synthesis, Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1982, pp. 1217-1227, vol. 25, No. 10.
Prudden, T., Article IV., Experimental Studies on the Transplantation, American Journal of the Medical Sciences: Oct. 1881, pp. 360-370, vol. 82, No. 164.
Vachon, A., et al, Neochondrogenesis in free intra-articular, periosteal, and perichondrial autografts in horses, Am J Vet Res, 1989, pp. 1787-1794, vol. 50, No. 10.
Redl, H. et al, Methods of Fibrin Seal Application, Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surgeon, 1982, pp. 223-227, vol. 30.
Roberts, S. et al, Autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: monitoring its success by magnetic resonance imaging and histology, Arthritis Res and Therapy, 2003, pp. R60-R73, vol. 5.
Robinson, D. et al, Regenerating hyaline cartilage in articular defects of old chickens using implants of embryonal chick chondrocytes embedded in a new natural delivery substance, Calcif Tissue Int., 1990, pp. 246-253, vol. 46, No. 4.
Ruano-Ravina, A. and Diaz, M.J., Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2006, pp. 47-51, vol. 14.
Rudderman, R.H., et al, The Fate of Fresh and Preserved, Noncrushed and Crushed Autogenous Cartilage in the Rabbit Model, Ann Plast Surg, 1994, pp. 250-254, vol. 32.
Rupp, G. et al, Fibrin Adhesion of Transposed Autologous Cartilage Bone Grafts to Repair Knee-Joint Defects, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 1978, pp. 676-677, vol. 347, No. 1.
Saidi, K. et al, Articular Knee Transplant in the Rabbit: Experimental Study and Clinical Projections, Union Medicale du Canada, 1971, pp. 88-99, vol. 100, No. 1.
Salter, R.B., et al, The Biological Effect of Continuous Passive Motion on the Healing of Full-Thickness Defects in ARticular Cartilage, JBJS, 1980, pp. 1232-1251, vol. 62-A, No. 8.
Sampath, T.K., et al, In vitro transformation of mesenchymal cells derived from embryonic muscle into cartilage in response to extracellular matrix components of bone, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1984, pp. 3419-3423, vol. 81, No. 11.
Schlag, G. and Redl, H., Fibrin Sealant in Orthopedic Surgery, Clin Ortho Rel Res, 1988, pp. 269-285, vol. 227.
Schlag, G. and Redl, H., Fibrin adhesive system in bone healing, Acta Orthop Scand., 1983, pp. 655-658, vol. 54, No. 4.
Schobel, H., Compound Prosthesis and Cartilage Layer: Two New Applications of Fibrin Sealing in Reconstructive Middle Ear Surgery, Neurosurgery Ophthalmic Surgery ENT, Fibrin Sealing in Surgical and Nonsurgical Fields, 1994, pp. 186-192, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA
Schreiber, R.E. et al, A Method for Tissue Engineering of Cartilage by Cell Seeding on Bioresorbable Scaffolds, Ann N Y Acad Sci., 1999, pp. 398-404, vol. 875.
Schwam, B.L., Human Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease, Northeast Florida Medicine Journal, http://www.dcmsonline.org/jax-medicine/2002journals/augsept2002/amniotic.htm, 2002, print date Mar. 3, 2009, pp. 1-7.
Schwartz, E.R., et al, Sulfate Metabolism in Human Chondrocyte Cultures, J. Clin Investigation, 1974, pp. 1056-1063, vol. 54.
Schwarz, N., et al, The Influence of Fibrin Sealant on Demineralized Bone Matrix-Dependent Osteoinduction, Clin Ortho Rel Re, 1989, pp. 282-287, No. 238.
Shoemaker, S. et al, Effects of fibrin sealant on incorporation of autograft and xenograft tendons within bone tunnels. A preliminary study, JAm J Sports Med., 1989, pp. 318-324, vol. 17, No. 3.
Silverman, R.P., et al, Injectable Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Using a Fibrin Glue Polymer, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 1999, pp. 1809-1818, vol. 103, No. 7.
Simms, G.F., et al, Diced Homologous Cartilage in Hernioplasty, Jour. Med. Soc. J.J., 1952, pp. 406-407, vol. 49, No. 9.
Sosna, A. and Vavra, J., Use of Fibrin Glue in Orthopedics, Acta Chir. Orthop. Traum., 1984, pp. 8-91, vol. 51, No. 2.
Specchia, N. et al, Fetal chondral homografts in the repair of articular cartilage defects, Blletin Hospital for Joint Diseases, 1996, pp. 230-235, vol. 54, No. 4.
Stoksted, P. and Ladefoged, C., Crushed cartilage in nasal reconstruction, J. Laryngology and Otology, 1986, pp. 897-906, vol. 100.
Tanaka, H. et al, A Study on Experimental Homocartilage Transplantation, Arch Orthop Traumat Surg, 1980, pp. 165-169, vol. 96.
Tanaka, H. and Shinno, N., Histochemical Studies on Regeneration of Articular Cartilage, Tokushima J Exp Med., 1971, pp. 63-73, vol. 18.
Temenoff, J.S. and Mikos, A.G., Review: Tissue engineering for regeneration of articular cartilage, Biomaterials, 2000, pp. 431-440, vol. 21, No. 5.
Tuan, R.S., A second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation approach to the treatment of focal articular cartilage defects, Arthritis Res Ther., 2007, pp. 109 (1-4), vol. 9, No. 5.
Peretti, G.M. et al, A Biomechanical Analysis of an Engineered Cell-Scaffold Implant for Cartilage Repair, 2001, Ann Plast Surg, pp. 533-537, Vol. 46.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/374,772, 1.132 Declaration of Julia Hwang filed Jan. 5, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/374,772, Response filed Jan. 6, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2008”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,799, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Apr. 5, 2010”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Examiner Interview Summart mailed Dec. 7, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2010”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 8, 2010”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Response filed Feb. 12, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 12, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Response filed Apr. 19, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2010”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Response filed Jul. 15, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2009”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Response filed Dec. 3, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2009”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/010,779, Restriciton Requirement mailed Jan. 12, 2009”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Advisory Action mailed Jul. 9, 2008”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed May 28, 2009”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2007”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2010”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2009”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 23, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Jan. 16, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Jan. 19, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2010”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Mar. 23, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Jun. 16, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2008”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Aug. 28, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 28, 2009”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Response filed Sep. 28, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,250, Reponse filed Dec. 20, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2007”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 19, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2012”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Information Disclosure Statement mailed Mar. 20, 2007”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Information Disclosure Statement mailed Jun. 30, 2008”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Information Disclosure Statement mailed Sep. 3, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Information Disclosure Statement mailed Dec. 20, 2007”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 29, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Jan. 26, 2009 to Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 26, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Jan. 26, 2010 to Advisory Action mailed Jan. 19, 2010”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Reponse filed Mar. 29, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 29, 2011”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Reponse filed Jun. 11, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Sep. 17, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2012”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Response filed Dec. 7, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,319, Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 26, 2008”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Advisory Action mailed Aug. 11, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2009”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 23, 2009”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2009”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 19, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Response filed Apr. 3, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 23, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Response filed Aug. 4, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Response filed Nov. 6, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 7, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Response filed Dec. 7, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 11, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,456, Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 7, 2008”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Response filed Aug. 15, 2011 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 13, 2011”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2011”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Response filed May 9, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2011”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,553, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 13, 2011”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,230, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 1, 2010”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,230, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 31, 2010”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,230, Response filed Jul. 30, 2010 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 21, 2010”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,230, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 21, 2010”, 53 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,404, Non Final Office Action mailed May 16, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,404, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 23, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,689, Non Final Office Action mailed May 17, 2012”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Nov. 15, 2012”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Response filed Aug. 29, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed May 29, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Response filed Dec. 3, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 4, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Restriciton Requirement mailed May 29, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,711, Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 4, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 2, 2013”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 1, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Response filed Dec. 7, 2012 to Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 7, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,238, Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 7, 2012”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2013”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Non Final Offie Action mailed Apr. 2, 2012”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Response filed Sep. 4, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2012”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2013”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/327,265, Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 1, 2012”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Response filed Oct. 17, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 18, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 18, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,873, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 23, 2012”, 6 pgs.
“Application Serial No. 2008240191, First Examination Report mailed Sep. 21, 2012”.
“Australian Application Serial No. 2006282754, Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2011”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Extended European Search Report mailed Apr. 8, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2009”, 5 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 04813849.9, Response filed Aug. 20, 2009 to Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2009”, 18 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 07862720.5, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 25, 2011”, 6 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 07862720.5, Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 07862720.5, Response filed Sep. 1, 2010 to Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2010”, 10 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154746.9, Response filed Dec. 14, 2012 to Office Action mailed Nov. 15, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154746.9, Search Report mailed May 23, 2011”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Response filed Dec. 14, 2012 to Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2012”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154747.7, Search Report mailed May 23, 2011”, 4 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 11154748.5, Search Report mailed May 24, 2011”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/60078, International Search Report mailed Sep. 3, 2008”, 1 pg.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2004/041591, Written Opinion mailed Jun. 12, 2006”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/33687, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 26, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/33687, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 8, 2007”, 6 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/025252, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 8 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/025252, International Search Report mailed Aug. 18, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/025252, International Search Report mailed Apr. 18, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/025252, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 18, 2008”, 7 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/086468, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jun. 23, 2009”, 10 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/086468, International Search Report Jun. 5, 2008”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/086468, Written Opinion mailed Jun. 20, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-528250, Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2012”, 5 pgs.
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2008-528250, Response filed Nov. 22, 2012 to Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2012”, 9 pgs.
Alston, et al., “New Method to prepare autlogous fibron glue on demand”, Translational Research vol. 149, (2007), 187-195.
Chang, et al., “Cartilage-Derived Morphogenetic Proteins”, J. Biol. Chem., 269, (1994), 28227-28234.
Convery, F.R., et al., “The Repair of Large Osteochondral Defects”, An Experimental Study in Horses, Clin. Orthrop. 82., (1972), 253-262.
Craigmyle, M B, “Studies of Cartilage autografts and homografts in the rabbit”, British Journal of Plastic Surgery 8 , (1955), 93-100.
Didier, R, et al., “Production de cartilage et d'os, au sein de greffes vivantes et mortes, chez le lapin”, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires, (1928), 5 pp.
Gibble, et al., “Fibrin glue: the perfect operative sealant”, Transfusion, 1990, vol. 30, No. 8., 741-747.
Huang, et al., “Tissue Engineering”, vol. 8, No. 3, (2002), 469-481.
Hunziker, E.B., et al., “Quantitative structural organization of normal adult human articular cartilage”, Osteoarthritis and Cartliage 10, (2002), 564-572.
Kim, et al., “OsteoArthritis and Cartilage”, vol. 11, (2003), 653-664.
Langer , F, et al., “Immunogenicity of Allograft Articular Cartiliage”, JBJS, vol. 46-A, No. 2, (1974), 297-304.
Langer, F, et al., “The Immunogenicity of Fresh and Frozen Allogenic Bone”, JBJS, vol. 57-A, No. 2, (1975), 216-220.
Lapchinsky, A G, et al., “Instrument for Shredding Cartilage in Plastic Surgeries”, New Surgical Machines and Instruments and their usage, No. 4, Moscow, (1960), 209-213.
Mannheim, A, “Free Autoploastic Cartilage transplantation—Uber freie autoplastische Knorpeltransplantation”, Arch. F klin Chir, (1926), 668-672.
Marvin, H M, “The Value of the Xanthine Diuretics in Congestive Heart Failure”, The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 87, No. 25, Abstract only, (Dec. 18, 1926), 2131-2132.
Peer, Lyndon, “Diced Cartilage Grafts—New Method for Repair of Skull Defects, Mastoid Fistula and Other Deformities”, Archives of Otolaryngology, vol. 38, No. 2, (1943), 156-165.
Polettini, Bruno, “Su neoformazioni carilaginee ed ossee determinate da innesti di frammenti di cartilaginee e d'osso fissati”, (1922), 179-192.
Verwoerd, C.D.A., et al., “Wound Healing of Aurologous Implants in the Nasal Septal Cartilage”, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Pathology, ORL vol. 53, (1991), 310-314.
Wikipedia, “Alpha-2-Macroglobulin”, 8 pp.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090143867 A1 Jun 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60712004 Aug 2005 US