Implants and methods for spinal fusion

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12016783
  • Patent Number
    12,016,783
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 19, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2024
    6 months ago
Abstract
An implant is provided for performing spinal fusion. The implant includes an implant body having a leading side and a trailing side at opposing ends along a longitudinal axis. Between the leading side and trailing side are an upper surface, a lower surface, an anterior side, and a posterior side. At least one keel structure is provided extending from the implant body for penetration into an adjacent vertebral body. A trial sizer and keel cutter may be utilized to form keel channels within the vertebral body to receive the keel structure.
Description
FIELD

This application relates generally to spinal fusion implants and methods for fusing spinal vertebrae.


BACKGROUND

Currently there are nearly 750,000 spine lumbar and cervical fusion procedures performed each year in the United States. These procedures are commonly performed to correct problems with displaced, damaged, or degenerated intervertebral discs due to trauma, disease, or aging. One of the most common of these procedures is spinal fusion, which involves removing some or the all of the diseased or damaged disc, inserting one or more intervertebral spacers to restore the natural height of the disc space, and allowing a bony bridge to form through the disc space fusing the adjacent vertebrae together. Increasingly, so-called “total disc replacement” (TDR) procedures are being utilized as an alternative to spinal fusion. Total disc replacements represent a new wave of spinal technology and generally involve implantation of mechanical devices designed to replace the functions of the intervertebral disc and thus preserve motion that is lost through a spinal fusion. While several different approaches may be used to access the target spine (the most common being anterior, posterior, and posterolateral approaches), the anterior approach is often utilized, especially for TDR, because it allows for greater exposure and a more complete excision of the damaged disc than the other common approaches.


Sometimes after a spinal fusion or TDR procedure it becomes necessary to remove and/or replace the previously implanted implant. During such revision surgeries it may be preferable, though not necessary, to access the spinal target site from a different approach than that used in the original surgery. This presents a challenge, however, when performing a revision of an anterior procedure because the implants deposited during an anterior procedure are generally too large to be removed through the smaller access corridors achievable with the other traditional spinal approaches (e.g. posterior and postero-lateral). As an alternative, recent advances in both technology and methodology have made the lateral approach to the spine a viable surgical option. The lateral approach has proven to be a safe and effective means for performing spinal fusion and, unlike the posterior and postero-lateral approaches, the lateral approach allows for access to the disc space which is comparable to that gained through the anterior approach.


One difficulty with utilizing a lateral approach for revision surgery is the absence of the Anterior Longitudinal Ligament (ALL) which is removed during the original procedure for the anterior approach to the spine. With the ALL barrier removed, the lateral implant may be more susceptible to expulsion. A need therefore exists for interbody implants configured for insertion through a lateral approach to the spine and resistant to anterior expulsion.


SUMMARY

Example embodiments of a fusion implant are described herein in accordance with aspects of the present invention. After insertion into a prepared disc space between adjacent vertebral bodies the fusion implant maintains a desired spatial arrangement between the adjacent vertebrae and facilitates the formation of a bony bridge between them. The embodiments shown herein are designed preferably for implantation into the disc space through a lateral approach. The implant may be comprised of any suitable bio-compatible material or a combination of multiple bio-compatible materials. Preferably, at least a portion of the spinal fusion implant may comprise a non-bone composition having radiolucent characteristics, including but not limited to polymer compositions (e.g. poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and/or poly-ether-ketone-ketone (PEKK)) or any combination of PEEK and PEKK. Other suitable materials used in the construction of implant may include but are not limited to ceramics and metals, such as titanium, by way of example only.


The fusion implants may be provided in any number of sizes by varying one or more of the implant height, width, and length. The dimensions of the implant may be altered according to proportions of the particular patient and/or further variation of the implant dimensions may be implemented to produce implants generally appropriate for implantation into either of the thoracic spine and the cervical spine.


Fusion may be facilitated or augmented by introducing or positioning various osteoinductive materials within the fusion implant and/or adjacent to the spinal fusion implant. Such osteoinductive materials may be introduced before, during, or after the insertion of the implant, and may include (but are not necessarily limited to) autologous bone harvested from the patient, bone allograft, bone xenograft, any number of non-bone implants (e.g. ceramic, metallic, polymer), bone morphogenic protein, and bio-resorbable compositions, including but not limited to any of a variety of poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) based polymers.


The implant generally comprises an implant body and a keel structure. The implant body has a leading side and a trailing side at opposing ends along a longitudinal axis. Between the leading side and trailing side are an upper surface, a lower surface, an anterior side, and a posterior side. To maintain the disc space according to the natural curvature of the spine, the anterior side of the implant may possess a greater height dimension than the posterior side, such that upper surface and lower surface converge toward one another at posterior side. An implant with this configuration (i.e. a taller anterior side) is tailored to accommodate the natural lordotic curvature found in the lumbar and cervical spine. Alternatively, the implant may have a posterior side possessing a greater height dimension than an anterior side so as to accommodate the natural kyphotic curvature of the thoracic spine. In another alternative, the implant may have anterior and posterior sides of approximately the same height. Each of the upper surface and lower surface may be one of, or a combination of, generally planar, concave, and convex.


The body of the implant may be configured with at least one large fusion aperture and preferably includes between two and four large fusion apertures. The fusion apertures may be separated by a medial and/or longitudinal support, extending in a vertical fashion between upper surface and lower surface. The fusion apertures function primarily as an avenue for bony fusion between adjacent vertebrae. The spinal fusion implant may also have a plurality of visualization apertures extending through the anterior side and posterior side, which allow a user to assess the degree of bony fusion through visual observations (via X-ray, fluoroscopy, or other imaging technology), un-obscured by anterior side or posterior side.


The fusion implant may include anti-migration features designed to increase the traction between the spinal fusion implant and the contact surface of the adjacent vertebral bodies to guard against movement or slippage of the implant after implantation. Anti-migration features may include angled ridges provided along the upper surface and/or lower surface. Other anti-migration features may include one or more spike members disposed at various locations along the implant. The implant may include a total of six spike members disposed along each of the upper surface and the lower surface. The spike members may be manufactured from any of a variety of suitable materials, including but not limited to a metal, ceramic, and/or polymer material. Spike members may be provided having radiopaque characteristics. When the spike members are provided having radiodense characteristics and at least a portion of the implant is manufactured from a radiolucent material (such as, by way of example only, PEEK and/or PEKK), the spike members will be readily observable under X-ray or fluoroscopy such that a surgeon may track the progress of the implant during implantation and/or the placement of the implant after implantation. The spike members of the implant may include a male element and a female element which threadably engage each other through the implant body and clamp keel structures to the implant body. Alternatively, the spike members may each comprise a unitary element extending through the upper surface and lower surface. The spike elements may include a threaded end that engages the holes through the implant body and/or keel structures to hold keel structures to the body. The spike members may comprise a shorter element which only extends through a single surface. Additionally, while referred to as spike elements and shown with pointed tips, the spike elements may include other shapes configured to engage the vertebral endplates.


Additional members in the form of keel structures augment the anti-migration features of the implant and further stabilize the position of the implant within the disc space. Keel structures may extend above the upper surface and/or below the lower surface along at least a portion of the longitudinal axis of implant between leading side and trailing side. Keel structures may be canted or generally perpendicular to the surface from which they extend. The keel structures may extend along the approximate centerline of the implant. Alternatively, the keels may be situated nearer to one of the anterior side and posterior side. During implantation the keel structures are inserted into keel channels formed in the adjacent vertebrae. Apertures may be provided along the length of the keel, or a portion thereof, to permit bony ingrowth through the keel structures.


The keel structures can be made from the same material as the implant body or they can be made from a different material, or combination of materials. By way of example, the keel structures may be comprised of a metal (e.g. titanium) and the implant body may be comprised of a polymer (e.g. PEEK or PEKK). Alternatively, the keel may be comprised of a polymer (e.g. PEEK or PEKK) and the implant may also be comprised of a polymer (e.g. PEEK or PEKK). Similarly, the implant body and keel structures may be formed as a single part, or as a combination of parts.


The leading side of the implant may be tapered to facilitate insertion of the implant into the disc space between adjacent vertebrae. The trailing side of the implant may possess mating structures configured for engagement with an insertion instrument. The mating structures may include a threaded receiving aperture and a pair of grooved purchase regions extending generally horizontally from either side of the receiving aperture. The receiving aperture may extend inwardly from the trailing side in a generally perpendicular fashion relative to the trailing side and may be dimensioned to threadably receive a threaded connector on the insertion instrument. The grooved purchase regions are dimensioned to receive corresponding distal head ridges on the insertion instrument, which collectively provide an enhanced engagement between the implant and insertion instrument.


According to one example, a trial sizer and keel cutter instrument may be provided. The trial sizer may be inserted into the interbody disc space to determine the appropriate size implant required to achieved the desired disc height. The keel cutter may be guided along grooves in the trial sizer and advanced into the interbody disc space to form channels in the vertebral bodies for receiving the keel structures. The inserter may releasably attaches at its distal end to an implant for advancement and depositing of the implant within the interbody disc space after the channels have been formed. A threadable attachment means is shown, but other means of releasable attachment are contemplated.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art with a reading of this specification in conjunction with the attached drawings, wherein like reference numerals are applied to like members and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a spinal fusion implant including a keel structure, according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is an exploded perspective view of the fusion implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a top view of the fusion implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 a frontal view of the leading side of the implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 a back view of the trailing side of the implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 6 is a side view of the anterior side of the implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 7 is a side view of the posterior side of the implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 8 an exploded side view of the posterior side of the implant of FIG. 1;



FIG. 9 is perspective view of a spinal fusion implant including a keel structure, according to a second embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 10 is an exploded perspective view of the fusion implant of FIG. 9;



FIG. 11 is a top view of the fusion implant of FIG. 9;



FIG. 12 is a frontal view of the leading side of the implant of FIG. 9;



FIG. 13 is a back view of the trailing side of the implant of FIG. 9;



FIG. 14 is an exploded perspective view of the trailing side of the implant of FIG. 9;



FIG. 15 is side view of the anterior side of the implant of FIG. 9;



FIG. 16 is an exploded side view of the posterior side of the implant of FIG. 9;



FIG. 17 is a perspective view of a spinal fusion implant with a keel structure, according to a third embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 18 is a top view of the fusion implant of FIG. 17;



FIG. 19 is a frontal view of the leading side of the implant of FIG. 17;



FIG. 20 is a back view of the trailing side of the implant of FIG. 17;



FIG. 21 is an exploded back view of the trailing side of the implant of FIG. 17;



FIG. 22 is a side view of the anterior side of the implant of FIG. 17;



FIG. 23 is a side view of the posterior side of the implant of FIG. 17;



FIG. 24 is an exploded side view of the anterior side of the implant of FIG. 17;



FIG. 25 is a perspective view of a spinal fusion implant with a keel structure, according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 26 is a perspective view of the trailing and anterior sides of the implant of FIG. 25;



FIG. 27 is a perspective top view of the implant of FIG. 25;



FIG. 28 is a top view of the implant of FIG. 25;



FIG. 29 is a front view of the leading side of FIG. 25;



FIG. 30 is a back view of the trailing side of FIG. 25;



FIG. 31 is a side view of the anterior side of FIG. 25;



FIG. 32 is a side view of the posterior side of FIG. 25;



FIG. 33 is a perspective view of a spinal fusion implant with a keel, according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 34 is a side view of the anterior side of the implant of FIG. 33;



FIG. 35 is a top view of the implant of FIG. 33;



FIG. 36 is a front view of the leading side of the implant of FIG. 33;



FIG. 37 is a back view of the trailing side of the implant of FIG. 33;



FIG. 38 is an exploded side view of the anterior side of the implant of FIG. 33;



FIG. 39 is a perspective view of a keel cutter assembly, according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 40 is an exploded view of the keel cutter assembly of FIG. 39;



FIG. 41 is a perspective view of a trial sizer, according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 42A-C are a series of perspective views of the blades of the keel channel cutter mating with the grooves of the trial sizer according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 43 is a side view of a keel cutter assembly and trial sizer, according to another embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 44 is a side view of the blades of the keel channel cutter mating with the grooves of the trial sizer of FIG. 43;



FIG. 45 is a perspective view of the blades of the keel channel cutter mating with the grooves of the trial sizer of FIG. 43;



FIG. 46 is a perspective view of the inserter shaft and the blades of the keel channel cutter of FIG. 43;



FIG. 47 is a perspective view of the trial sizer, inserter shaft of FIG. 43, together with a detachable Hudson connector forming part of the trial sizer, according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 48 is a perspective view of the insertion instrument according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 49 is frontal perspective view of the insertion instrument of FIG. 48;



FIG. 50 is an exploded perspective view of the insertion instrument of the insertion instrument of FIG. 48;



FIGS. 51-53 are a series of figures depicting the operation of a keel channel cutter according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 54 is a side view of the intervertebral space containing keel channels formed by the operation of the keel channel cutter in FIGS. 51-53.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with implant-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. The implants disclosed herein boasts a variety of inventive features and components that warrant patent protection, both individually and in combination.


Example embodiments of a fusion implant are described herein in accordance with aspects of the present invention. After insertion into a prepared disc space between adjacent vertebral bodies the fusion implant maintains a desired spatial arrangement between the adjacent vertebrae and facilitates the formation of a bony bridge between them. The embodiments shown herein are designed for implantation into the disc space through a lateral (e.g. trans-psoas) access corridor. The implant may be comprised of any suitable bio-compatible material or a combination of multiple bio-compatible materials. Preferably, at least a portion of the spinal fusion implant may comprise a non-bone composition having radiolucent characteristics, including but not limited to polymer compositions (e.g. poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and/or poly-ether-ketone-ketone (PEKK)) or any combination of PEEK and PEKK. Other suitable materials used in the construction of the implants may include but are not limited to ceramics and metals, such as titanium, by way of example only.


The fusion implants may be provided in any number of sizes by varying one or more of the implant height, width, and length. By way of example only, the implant may be provided with a length dimension ranging from 30 mm to 60 mm. By way of further example, the implant may be provided with a width dimension ranging from 15 mm to 22 mm. By way of still further example, the implant may be provided with a height dimension ranging from 5 mm to 22 mm. The size ranges described are those generally appropriate for implantation into the lumbar spine. The dimensions of the implant may be altered according to proportions of the particular patient and/or further variation of the implant dimensions may be implemented to produce implants generally appropriate for implantation into either of the thoracic spine and the cervical spine.


Fusion may be facilitated or augmented by introducing or positioning various osteoinductive materials within the fusion implant and/or adjacent to the spinal fusion implant. Such osteoinductive materials may be introduced before, during, or after the insertion of the implant, and may include (but are not necessarily limited to) autologous bone harvested from the patient, bone allograft, bone xenograft, any number of non-bone implants (e.g. ceramic, metallic, polymer), bone morphogenic protein, and bio-resorbable compositions, including but not limited to any of a variety of poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) based polymers.



FIGS. 1-8 depict an example of a spinal fusion implant 10 according to a first example embodiment. The implant 10 generally comprises an implant body 12 and a keel structure 36. The implant body 12 has a leading side 14 and a trailing side 16 at opposing ends along a longitudinal axis 17. As best illustrated in FIGS. 4-5, between the leading side 14 and trailing side 16 are an upper surface 18, a lower surface 20, an anterior side 22, and a posterior side 24. To maintain the disc space according to the natural curvature of the spine, the anterior side 22 of the implant may possess a greater height dimension than the posterior side 24, such that upper surface 18 and lower surface 20 converge toward one another at posterior side 24. By way of example only, the heights of anterior side 22 and posterior side 24 may be configured to provide a degree of curvature within a range of 1.degree.-20.degree. An implant with this configuration (i.e. a taller anterior side) is tailored to accommodate the natural lordotic curvature found in the lumbar and cervical spine. In another embodiment (not shown), an implant may have a posterior side 24 possessing a greater height dimension than an anterior side 22 so as to accommodate the natural kyphotic curvature of the thoracic spine. Each of the upper surface 18 and lower surface 20 may be one of, or a combination of, generally planar, concave, and convex.


As illustrated in FIG. 2, the body 12 of the implant 10 may be configured with at least one large fusion aperture 26. As shown, implant 10 has two large fusion apertures 26, separated by a medial support 28, extending in a vertical fashion between upper surface 18 and lower surface 20. The fusion apertures 26 function primarily as an avenue for bony fusion between adjacent vertebrae. Fusion apertures 26 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally rectangular shape best viewed in FIG. 3, or a generally circular, oblong, polygonal, and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof. As seen in FIG. 1, the spinal fusion implant 10 may also have a plurality of visualization apertures 30 situated between the anterior side 22 and posterior side 24, which allow a user to assess the degree of bony fusion through visual observations (via X-ray, fluoroscopy, or other imaging technology), un-obscured by anterior side 22 or posterior side 24. The visualization apertures 30 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally oblong shape best viewed in FIG. 1, or a generally circular, rectangular and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof.


As best illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 3, the fusion implant 10 may include anti-migration features designed to increase the traction between the spinal fusion implant 10 and the contact surface of the adjacent vertebral bodies to guard against movement or slippage of the implant 10 after implantation. Anti-migration features may include angled ridges 32 provided along the upper surface 18 and/or lower surface 20. The angled ridges 32 may be oriented such that they do not resist movement in the direction of insertion (i.e. the leading side 14 entering the intradiscal space first) but do resist movement in the opposing direction. This allows the implant 10 to be inserted without the need for excessive force that may cause damage to the vertebrae and/or the implant, while still preventing the implant from moving in a direction where natural barriers (e.g. the annulus fibrosis or surrounding ligaments) have been removed for access to the disc space for implant insertion.


Other anti-migration features may include one or more spike members 34 disposed at various locations along the implant 10, as best illustrated in FIGS. 2-3. The implant 10 may include a total of six spike members 34 disposed along each of the upper surface 18 and the lower surface 20. The spike members 34 may be manufactured from any of a variety of suitable materials, including but not limited to a metal, ceramic, and/or polymer material. Spike members 34 may be provided having radiopaque characteristics. When the spike members 34 are provided having radiodense characteristics and at least a portion of the implant 10 is manufactured from a radiolucent material (such as, by way of example only, PEEK and/or PEKK), the spike members 34 will be readily observable under X-ray or fluoroscopy such that a surgeon may track the progress of the implant 10 during implantation and/or the placement of the implant 10 after implantation.


Additional members in the form of keel structures 36 augment the anti-migration features of implant 10 and further stabilize the position of the implant 10 within the disc space. Keel structures 36 may extend above the upper surface 18 and/or below the lower surface 20 along at least a portion of the longitudinal axis 17 of implant 10 between leading side 14 and trailing side 16. By way of example only, keel structures may rise approximately 2.5 mm from the upper and/or lower surfaces 18, 20. As best pictured in FIGS. 4-5, keel structures 36 may be canted and offset from the centerline of implant 10 such that the keel is positioned nearer to one of the anterior side 22 or posterior side 24 (as pictured). During implantation the keel structures 36 are inserted into keel channels formed in the adjacent vertebrae. Apertures 38 provided along the length of the keel, or a portion thereof, permit bony ingrowth through the keel structures. This serves to further integrate the implant 10 into the vertebrae. Alternatively (or in addition), the keel structures may be roughened and/or coated with bone growth promoting materials to further enhance the fusion process.


The keel structures 36 can be made from the same material as implant body 12 or they can be made from a different material, or combination of materials. In this first embodiment, by way of example, the keel structures 36 are comprised of a metal (e.g. titanium) and the implant body is comprised of a polymer (e.g. PEEK or PEKK). It will be appreciated, however, that both the implant body 12 and keel structures 36 could be made from a polymer material or, both could be made of a metal material. Similarly, the implant body 12 and keel structures 36 may be formed as a single part, or as a combination of parts. By way of example, as illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 8, the implant 10 is formed by two keel structures 36 mated to the implant body 12 via spike members 34. The keel structure 36 includes a sextet of mating arms 40 configured to rest on mating shelves 41 of body 12. Spike bores 47 situated on the mating arms 40 are aligned with corresponding holes 42 formed through implant body 12. Spike members 34 are placed through the holes 47 and 42 along the upper surface. Bores 47 in the lower keel structure (and optionally the upper keel structure and holes 42 of implant 10) may be threaded. The spike members 34 include a threaded region 34a, that is threadedly advanced through the bores 47. Ridges 44 on spike member 34 engage the keel structure around spike bores 47 prevent the spike member 34 from passing all the way through the upper keel structure and thus drawing and holding the keel structures and implant together as the spike 34 is threadedly engaged thereto.


As illustrated in FIGS. 6-7, the leading side 14 of implant 10 may be tapered to facilitate insertion of the implant 10 into the disc space between adjacent vertebrae. With reference to FIG. 5, the trailing side 16 of implant 10 may possess mating structures configured for engagement with an insertion instrument (described below). According to the embodiment shown, the mating structures include a threaded receiving aperture 48 and a pair of grooved purchase regions 50 extending generally horizontally from either side of the receiving aperture 48. The receiving aperture 48 extends inwardly from the trailing side 16 in a generally perpendicular fashion relative to the trailing side 16 and is dimensioned to threadably receive a threaded connector 522 on the insertion instrument 500, as shown in FIG. 49, described below. The grooved purchase regions 50 are dimensioned to receive corresponding distal head ridges 508 on the insertion instrument 500, which collectively provide an enhanced engagement between the implant 10 and insertion instrument 500. After keel channels have been formed in the vertebrae neighboring the affected disc space, the implant 10 is releasably attached to the insertion instrument 500, the keels 36 are aligned with the keel channels, and the implant inserted into position. Thereafter the insertion instrument is detached from the implant 10 and removed from the patient.



FIGS. 9-16 depict an example of a spinal fusion implant 110 according to a second embodiment of the present invention. The implant 110 generally comprises an implant body 112 and a keel structure 136. The implant body 112 has a leading side 114 and a trailing side 116 at opposing ends along a longitudinal axis 117. Between the leading side 114 and trailing side 116 is an upper surface 118, a lower surface 120, an anterior side 122, a posterior side 124. The upper surface 118 and lower surface 120 are configured for contact with neighboring vertebrae. Each of the upper surface 118 and lower surface 120 may be one of, or a combination of, generally planar, concave, and convex.


The body 112 of the implant 110 may be configured with at least one large fusion aperture 126. As shown in FIG. 11, implant 110 has two large fusion apertures 126, separated by a medial support 128, extending between upper surface 118 and lower surface 120. The fusion apertures 126 function primarily as an avenue for bony fusion between adjacent vertebrae. Fusion apertures 126 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally rectangular shape best viewed in FIG. 11, or a generally circular, oblong, polygonal, and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof. The spinal fusion implant 110 may also have a plurality of visualization apertures 130, as illustrated in FIG. 9, extending between anterior side 122 and posterior side 124, which allow a user to assess the degree of bony fusion through visual observations (via X-ray, fluoroscopy, or other imaging technology), un-obscured by anterior side 122 or posterior side 124. The visualization apertures 130 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally oblong shape best viewed in FIG. 15, or a generally circular, rectangular and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof.


As best illustrated in FIG. 9, the fusion implant 110 may include anti-migration features designed to increase the traction between the spinal fusion implant 110 and the adjacent vertebral bodies, preventing movement or slippage of the implant 110 after implantation. Anti-migration features may include angled ridges 132 provided along the upper surface 118 and/or lower surface 120. The angled ridges 132 may be oriented such that they do not resist movement in the direction of insertion (i.e. the leading side 114 entering the intradiscal space first) but do resist movement in the opposing direction. This allows the implant 110 to be inserted without the need for excessive force that may cause damage to the vertebrae and/or the implant, while still preventing the implant from moving back along the path of insertion where natural barriers (e.g. the annulus fibrosis, or surrounding ligaments) were removed in order to access to the disc space for implant insertion. Other anti-migration features may include one or more spike members 134 disposed at various locations along the implant 110. By way of example, the implant 110 as illustrated includes a total of six spike members 134 disposed along each of the upper surface 118 and the lower surface 120. The spike members 134 may be manufactured from any of a variety of suitable materials, including but not limited to a metal, ceramic, and/or polymer material. Spike members 134 may be provided having radiopaque characteristics. When the spike members 134 are provided having radiodense characteristics and at least a portion of the implant 110 is manufactured from a radiolucent material (such as, by way of example only, PEEK and/or PEKK), the spike members 134 will be readily observable under X-ray or fluoroscopy such that a surgeon may track the progress of the implant 110 during implantation and/or the placement of the implant 110 after implantation. As illustrated in FIG. 10, the spike members 134 of implant 110 may comprise a male element 134a and a female element 134b which threadably engage each other through the implant body 112 and clamp keel structures 136 to the implant body 112.


As illustrated in FIGS. 11-13, additional members in the form of keel structures 136 augment the anti-migration features of implant 110 and further stabilize the position of the implant 110 within the disc space. Keel structures 136 may extend above the upper surface 118 and/or below the lower surface 120 along at least a portion of the longitudinal axis 117 of implant 110 between leading side 114 and trailing side 116. By way of example only, keel structures 136 may rise approximately 2.5 mm from the upper and/or lower surfaces 118, 120. Keel structures 136 may be positioned such that the keels run along the approximate centerline of implant 110. During implantation the keel structures 136 are inserted into keel channels formed in the adjacent vertebrae. As illustrated in FIG. 15, apertures 138 provided along the length of the keel, or a portion thereof, permit bony ingrowth through the keel structures. This serves to further integrate the implant 110 into the vertebrae. Alternatively (or in addition), the keel structures may be roughened and/or coated with bone growth promoting materials to further enhance the fusion process.


The keel structures 136 can be made from the same material as implant body 112 or they can be made from a different material, or combination of materials. In this second embodiment, by way of example, the keel structures 136 are comprised of a metal (e.g. titanium) and the implant body is comprised of a polymer (e.g. PEEK or PEKK). It will be appreciated, however, that both the implant body 112 and keel structures 136 could be made from a polymer material, or both could be made of a metal material. Similarly, the implant body 112 and keel structures 136 may be formed as a single part, or as a combination of parts. By way of example, as best illustrated in FIG. 16, the implant 110 is formed by two keel structures 136 mated to the implant body 112 via spike members 134a and 134b. As best illustrated in FIG. 10, the keel structure includes a sextet of mating arms 140 configured to rest on mating shelves 141 of body 112. Spike bores 147 situated on the mating arms 140 are aligned with corresponding holes 142 formed through implant body 112. Female spike members 134b are placed through the holes 147 and 142 along one of the upper or lower surfaces 118, 120. From the opposite surface, male spike members 134a are then placed through the spike holes 147 and into an interior threaded portion (not shown) of female spike members 134b. As male spike members 134a are threaded into female spike members 134b, ridges 144a on male spike member 134a and ridges 144b on female spike member 134b engage the keel structures around spike bores 147 prevent the male spike member 134a and female spike member 134b from passing all the way through the keel structures and thus drawing and holding the keel structures and implant together as the male and female spike members are threadedly engaged to one another.


As illustrated in FIG. 15, the leading side 114 of implant 110 may include a slight taper to facilitate insertion of the implant 110 into the disc space between adjacent vertebrae. The trailing side 116 of implant 110 may possess mating structures configured for engagement with an insertion instrument (described below). According to the embodiment shown in FIGS. 13-15, the mating structures include a threaded receiving aperture 148 and a pair of grooved purchase regions 150 extending generally horizontally from either side of the receiving aperture 148. The receiving aperture 148 extends inwardly from the trailing side 116 in a generally perpendicular fashion relative to the trailing side 116 and is dimensioned to threadably receive a threaded connector 522 on the insertion instrument 500, as illustrated in FIG. 49 and described below. The grooved purchase regions 150 are dimensioned to receive corresponding distal head ridges 508 on the insertion instrument 500, which collectively provide an enhanced engagement between the implant 110 and insertion instrument 500. After keel channels have been formed in the vertebrae neighboring the affected disc space, the implant 110 is releasably attached to the insertion instrument 500, the keels 136 are aligned with the keel channels, and the implant inserted into position. Thereafter the insertion instrument is detached from the implant 110 and removed from the patient.



FIGS. 17-24 depict an example of a spinal fusion implant 210 according to a third embodiment of the present invention. The implant 210 generally comprises an implant body 212 and a keel structure 236. The implant body 212 has a leading side 214 and a trailing side 216 at opposing ends along a longitudinal axis 217. As best illustrated in FIGS. 19-20, between the leading side 214 and trailing side 216 is an upper surface 218, a lower surface 220, an anterior side 222, and a posterior side 224. The upper surface 218 and lower surface 220 are configured for contact with neighboring vertebrae. Each of the upper surface 218 and lower surface 220 may be one of, or a combination of, generally planar, concave, and convex. The anterior side 222 of the implant may possess a greater height dimension (not shown) than the posterior side 224, such that upper surface 218 and lower surface 220 converge toward one another at posterior side 224. By way of example only, the heights of anterior side 222 and posterior side 224 may be configured to provide a degree of curvature within a range of 1.degree.-20.degree. An implant with this configuration (i.e. a taller anterior side) is tailored to accommodate the natural lordotic curvature found in the lumbar and cervical spine. It will be appreciated as within the scope of the present invention to provide an implant with a posterior side 224 possessing a greater height dimension than an anterior side 222, as illustrated in FIG. 19, so as to accommodate the natural kyphotic curvature of the thoracic spine. It should also be appreciated that the implant 210 may have anterior and posterior sides 222, 224 of equal height.


As illustrated in FIGS. 22-24, the leading side 214 of implant 210 may include a slight taper to facilitate insertion of the implant 210 into the disc space between adjacent vertebrae. The trailing side 216 of implant 210 may possess mating structures configured for engagement with an insertion instrument (described below). As illustrated in FIGS. 20-21, the mating structures include a threaded receiving aperture 248 and a pair of grooved purchase regions 250 extending generally horizontally from either side of the receiving aperture 248. The receiving aperture 248 extends inwardly from the trailing side 216 in a generally perpendicular fashion relative to the trailing side 216 and is dimensioned to threadably receive a threaded connector 522 on the insertion instrument 500, as illustrated in FIG. 49 and described below. The grooved purchase regions 250 are dimensioned to receive corresponding distal head ridges 508 on the insertion instrument 500, which collectively provide an enhanced engagement between the implant 210 and insertion instrument 500.


As shown in FIG. 18, the body 212 of the implant 210 may be configured with at least one large fusion aperture 226. The implant 210 may have two large fusion apertures 226, separated by a medial support 228, extending in a vertical fashion between upper surface 218 and lower surface 220. The fusion apertures 226 function primarily as an avenue for bony fusion between adjacent vertebrae. Fusion apertures 226 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally rectangular shape best viewed in FIG. 18, or a generally circular, oblong, polygonal, and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof. The spinal fusion implant 210 may also have a plurality of visualization apertures 230 extending between the anterior side 222 and posterior side 224, which allow a user to assess the degree of bony fusion through visual observations (via X-ray, fluoroscopy, or other imaging technology), un-obscured by anterior side 222 or posterior side 224. The visualization apertures 230 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally oblong shape best viewed in FIG. 17, or a generally circular, rectangular and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof.


To protect against movement or slippage of the implant 210 after implantation, the fusion implant 210 may include anti-migration features designed to increase the traction between the spinal fusion implant 210 and the adjacent vertebral bodies. These anti-migration features may include angled ridges 232 provided along the upper surface 218 and/or lower surface 220. The angled ridges 232 may be oriented such that they do not resist movement in the direction of insertion (i.e. towards the leading end) but do resist movement in the opposing direction. This allows the implant 210 to be inserted without the need for excessive force that may cause damage to the vertebrae and/or the implant, while still preventing the implant from moving back along the path of insertion where natural barriers (e.g. the annulus fibrosis, or surrounding ligaments) were removed in order to access to the disc space for implant insertion.


Additional anti-migration features in the form of keel structures 236 further stabilize the position of the implant 210 within the disc space. Keel structures 236 may extend above the upper surface 218 and/or below the lower surface 220 along at least a portion of the longitudinal axis 217 of implant 210 between leading side 214 and trailing side 216. By way of example only, keel structures 236 may rise approximately 2.5 mm from the upper and/or lower surfaces 218, 220. As best pictured in FIGS. 18-20, keel structures 236 may be canted and offset from the centerline of implant 210 such that they are positioned nearer to one of the anterior side 222 and posterior side 224 (not shown). During implantation, the keel structures 236 are inserted into keel channels formed in the adjacent vertebrae. As shown in FIG. 17, apertures 238 provided along the length of the keel, or a portion thereof, permit bony ingrowth through the keel structures. This serves to further integrate the implant 210 into the vertebrae. Alternatively (or in addition), the keel structures may be roughened and/or coated with bone growth promoting materials to further enhance the fusion process.


As illustrated in FIGS. 18 and 24, other anti-migration features may include one or more spike members 234 disposed at various locations along the implant 210. The implant 210 may include a total of three spike members 234 extending between the upper surface 218 and the lower surface 220. The spike members 234 may be manufactured from any of a variety of suitable materials, including but not limited to a metal, ceramic, and/or polymer material. Spike members 234 may be provided having radiopaque characteristics. When the spike members 234 are provided having radiodense characteristics and at least a portion of the implant 210 is manufactured from a radiolucent material (such as, by way of example only, PEEK and/or PEKK), the spike members 234 will be readily observable under X-ray or fluoroscopy such that a surgeon may track the progress of the implant 210 during implantation and/or the placement of the implant 210 after implantation. Spike members 234 each comprise a unitary element extending through the upper surface 218 and lower surface 220 (best viewed in FIGS. 21 and 24). Alternatively, each spike member 234 could comprise a shorter element which only extends through a single surface (not shown).


The keel structures 236 can be made from the same material as implant body 212 or they can be made from a different material, or combination of materials. In this third embodiment, by way of example, the keel structures 236 are comprised of a metal (e.g. titanium) and the implant body is comprised of a polymer (e.g. PEEK or PEKK). It will be appreciated that both the implant body 212 and keel structures 236 could be made from a polymer material, or both could be made of a metal material. Similarly, the implant body 212 and keel structures 236 may be formed as a single part, or as a combination of parts. By way of example only, as shown in FIG. 24, the implant 210 may be formed by injection molding the implant body 212 to surround a keel frame 237 having two keel structures 236.


As illustrated in FIGS. 22-24, the leading side 214 of implant 210 may be tapered to facilitate insertion of the implant 210 into the disc space between adjacent vertebrae. As shown in FIGS. 20-21, the trailing side 216 of implant 210 may possess mating structures configured for engagement with an insertion instrument (described below). According to the embodiment shown, the mating structures include a threaded receiving aperture 248 and a pair of grooved purchase regions 250 extending generally horizontally from either side of the receiving aperture 248. The receiving aperture 248 extends inwardly from the trailing side 216 in a generally perpendicular fashion relative to the trailing side 216 and is dimensioned to threadably receive a threaded connector 522 on the insertion instrument 500 described below. The grooved purchase regions 250 are dimensioned to receive corresponding distal head ridges 508 on the insertion instrument 500, as shown in FIG. 49, which collectively provide an enhanced engagement between the implant 110 and insertion instrument 500. After keel channels have been formed in the vertebrae neighboring the affected disc space, the implant 210 is releasably attached to the insertion instrument 500, the keels 236 are aligned with the keel channels, and the implant inserted into position. Thereafter the insertion instrument is detached from the implant 210 and removed from the patient.



FIGS. 25-32 depict an example of a spinal fusion implant 310 according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention. The implant 310 generally comprises an implant body 312 and a keel structure 336. The implant body 312 has a leading side 314 and a trailing side 316 at opposing ends along a longitudinal axis 317. Between the leading side 314 and trailing side 316 is an upper surface 318, a lower surface 320, an anterior side 322, a posterior side 324. The upper surface 318 and lower surface 320 are configured for contact with neighboring vertebrae. Each of the upper surface 318 and lower surface 320 may be one of, or a combination of, generally planar, concave, and convex. The anterior side 322 of the implant may possess a greater height dimension (not shown) than the posterior side 324, such that upper surface 318 and lower surface 320 converge toward one another at posterior side 324. By way of example only, the heights of anterior side 322 and posterior side 324 may be configured to provide a degree of curvature within a range of 1.degree.-20.degree. An implant with this configuration (i.e. a taller anterior side) is tailored to accommodate the natural lordotic curvature found in the lumbar and cervical spine. It will be appreciated as within the scope of the present invention to provide an implant with a posterior side 324 possessing a greater height dimension than an anterior side 322 so as to accommodate the natural kyphotic curvature of the thoracic spine. It should also be appreciated that the implant 310 may have anterior and posterior sides 322, 324 of equal height.


As shown in FIG. 28, the body 312 of the implant 310 may be configured with at least one large fusion aperture 326. Implant 310 has two large fusion apertures 326, separated by a medial support 328, extending in a vertical fashion between upper surface 318 and lower surface 320. The fusion apertures 326 function primarily as an avenue for bony fusion between adjacent vertebrae. Fusion apertures 326 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally rectangular shape and generally square shape best viewed in FIG. 28, or a generally circular, oblong, polygonal, and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof. The spinal fusion implant 310 may also have a plurality of visualization apertures 330 extending between the anterior side 322 and posterior side 324, which allow a user to assess the degree of bony fusion through visual observations (via X-ray, fluoroscopy, or other imaging technology), un-obscured by anterior side 322 or posterior side 324. The visualization apertures 330 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally oblong shape best viewed in FIG. 25, or a generally circular, rectangular and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof.


To protect against movement or slippage of the implant 310 after implantation, the fusion implant 310 may include anti-migration features designed to increase the traction between the spinal fusion implant 310 and the adjacent vertebral bodies. These anti-migration features, best viewed in FIG. 26, may include angled ridges 332 provided along the upper surface 318 and/or lower surface 320. The angled ridges 332 may be oriented such that they do not resist movement in the direction of insertion (i.e. towards the leading end) but do resist movement in the opposing direction. This allows the implant 310 to be inserted without the need for excessive force that may cause damage to the vertebrae and/or the implant, while still preventing the implant from moving back along the path of insertion where natural barriers (e.g. the annulus fibrosis, or surrounding ligaments) were removed in order to access to the disc space for implant insertion. Other anti-migration features may include one or more spike members 334 disposed at various locations along the implant 310. The implant 310 may include a total of six spike members 334 extending between the upper surface 318 and the lower surface 320. The spike members 334 may be manufactured from any of a variety of suitable materials, including but not limited to a metal, ceramic, and/or polymer material. Spike members 334 may be provided having radiopaque characteristics. When the spike members 334 are provided having radiodense characteristics and at least a portion of the implant 310 is manufactured from a radiolucent material (such as, by way of example only, PEEK and/or PEKK), the spike members 334 will be readily observable under X-ray or fluoroscopy such that a surgeon may track the progress of the implant 310 during implantation and/or the placement of the implant 310 after implantation. Spike members 334 may each comprise a unitary element extending through the upper surface 318 and lower surface 320. Alternatively, each spike member 334 could comprise a shorter element which only extends through a single surface (not shown).


Additional members in the form of keel structures 336 augment the anti-migration features of implant 310 and further stabilize the position of the implant 310 within the disc space. Keel structures 336 may extend above the upper surface 318 and/or below the lower surface 320 along at least a portion of the longitudinal axis 317 of implant 310 between leading side 314 and trailing side 316. By way of example only, keel structures 336 may rise approximately 2.5 mm from the upper and/or lower surfaces 318, 320. As best pictured in FIGS. 28-30, keel structures 336 may be positioned along the centerline of implant 310. During implantation the keel structures 336 are inserted into keel channels formed in the adjacent vertebrae. Apertures 338 provided along the length of the keel, or a portion thereof, permit bony ingrowth through the keel structures. This serves to further integrate the implant 310 into the vertebrae. Alternatively (or in addition), the keel structures may be roughened and/or coated with bone growth promoting materials to further enhance the fusion process.


The keel structures 336 can be made from the same material as implant body 312 or they can be made from a different material, or combination of materials. In this fourth embodiment, by way of example, the keel structures 336 are comprised of a metal (e.g. titanium) and the implant body is comprised of a polymer (e.g. PEEK or PEKK). It will be appreciated that both the implant body 312 and keel structures 336 could be made from a polymer material, or both could be made of a metal material. Similarly, the implant body 312 and keel structures 336 may be formed as a single part, or as a combination of parts. By way of example only, as shown in FIGS. 31-32, the implant 310 is formed by a keel frame 337 that is snap-fit around the implant body 312. According to one method of use, the keel frame may be inserted into position within keel channels formed in the vertebrae and thereafter the implant body 312 may be inserted into the keel frame 337. The keel frame 337 comprises two keel structures 336 attached via a tapered leading end 339. The keel structures 336 are unattached at the trailing end 340 such that the keel structures 336 can flex to allow passage of the implant body 312 into the frame 337. As shown in FIG. 27, an attachment groove 342 is disposed along the upper surface 318 and lower surface 320 from leading side 314 to trailing side 316. When attached, the interior edges of the keel structures 336 and the interior portion of the leading end 339 are captured in the attachment groove 342. Tabs 344 on the trailing end 340 snap around the edges of the trailing side 316 and prevent the implant body 312 from backing out of the keel frame 337.


As illustrated in FIGS. 31-32, the leading side 314 of implant 310 may be tapered to facilitate insertion of the implant 310 into the disc space between adjacent vertebrae. As shown in FIG. 30, the trailing side 316 of implant 310 may possess mating structures configured for engagement with an insertion instrument. According to the embodiment shown, the mating structures include a threaded receiving aperture 348 and a pair of grooved purchase regions 350 extending generally horizontally from either side of the receiving aperture 348. The receiving aperture 348 extends inwardly from the trailing side 316 in a generally perpendicular fashion relative to the trailing side 316 and is dimensioned to threadably receive a threaded connector 522 on the insertion instrument 500, as shown in FIGS. 49-50, described below. The grooved purchase regions 350 are dimensioned to receive corresponding distal head ridges 508, as shown in FIG. 49, on the insertion instrument 500, which collectively provide an enhanced engagement between the implant 310 and insertion instrument 500. After keel channels have been formed in the vertebrae neighboring the affected disc space, the implant 310 is releasably attached to the insertion instrument 500. Next, the keels 336 are aligned with the keel channels, and the implant 310 inserted into position. Thereafter the insertion instrument is detached from the implant 310 and removed from the surgical corridor, leaving the implant 310 in place between the vertebrae. Alternatively, the keel frame 337 may be inserted into the keel channels prior to insertion of the implant 310. With the keel frame in position, the implant may be aligned with the keel frame and thereafter advanced into position until the implant snaps completely into the keel frame.



FIGS. 33-38 depict an example of a spinal fusion implant 710 according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention. The implant 710 generally comprises an implant body 712 and a keel structure 736. The implant body 712 has a leading side 714 and a trailing side 716 at opposing ends along a longitudinal axis 717. Between the leading side 714 and trailing side 716 are an upper surface 718, a lower surface 720, an anterior side 722, and a posterior side 724. To maintain the disc space according to the natural curvature of the spine, the anterior side 722 of the implant may possess a greater height dimension than the posterior side 724, such that upper surface 718 and lower surface 720 converge toward one another at posterior side 724. By way of example only, the heights of anterior side 722 and posterior side 724 may be configured to provide a degree of curvature within a range of 1.degree.-20.degree. An implant with this configuration (i.e. a taller anterior side) is tailored to accommodate the natural lordotic curvature found in the lumbar and cervical spine. In another embodiment (not shown), an implant 710 may have a posterior side 724 possessing a greater height dimension than an anterior side 722 so as to accommodate the natural kyphotic curvature of the thoracic spine. The implant 710 may also have anterior and posterior sides 722, 724 of equal height. Each of the upper surface 718 and lower surface 720 may be one of, or a combination of, generally planar, concave, and convex.


As illustrated in FIG. 35, the body 712 of the implant 710 may be configured with at least one large fusion aperture 726. As shown, implant 710 has four fusion apertures 726, separated by a medial support 728 and a lateral support 729, each extending in a vertical fashion between upper surface 718 and lower surface 720. The fusion apertures 726 function primarily as an avenue for bony fusion between adjacent vertebrae. Fusion apertures 726 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally rectangular shape best viewed in FIG. 35 or a generally circular, oblong, polygonal, and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof. The spinal fusion implant 710 may also have a plurality of visualization apertures 730 extending between the anterior side 722 and posterior side 724, which allow a user to assess the degree of bony fusion through visual observations (via X-ray, fluoroscopy, or other imaging technology), un-obscured by anterior side 722 or posterior side 724. The visualization apertures 730 may be provided in any of a variety of suitable shapes, including but not limited to the generally oblong shape best viewed in FIGS. 45 and 47, or a generally circular, rectangular and/or triangular shape, or any combination thereof.


As illustrated in FIGS. 33-38, keel structures 736 may extend above the upper surface 718 and/or below the lower surface 720 along at least a portion of the longitudinal axis 717 of implant 710 between leading side 714 and trailing side 716. By way of example only, keel structures may rise approximately 2.5 mm from the upper and/or lower surfaces 718, 720. During implantation the keel structures 736 are inserted into keel channels formed in the adjacent vertebrae. As illustrated in FIG. 34, apertures 738 provided along the length of the keel, or a portion thereof, permit bony ingrowth through the keel structures. This serves to further integrate the implant 710 into the vertebrae and to stabilize the position of the implant 710 within the disc space. Alternatively (or in addition), the keel structures may be roughened and/or coated with bone growth promoting materials to further enhance the fusion process. The keel structures 736 are preferably composed from the same material as implant body 712. By way of example, the keel structures 736 and the implant body 712 are comprised of a polymer (e.g. PEEK or PEKK). The keel structures 736 and implant body 712 are preferably formed together as one unit, and may be formed, for example, by machining or molding.


As illustrated in FIG. 34, the leading side 714 of implant 710 may be tapered to facilitate insertion of the implant 710 into the disc space between adjacent vertebrae. As shown in FIG. 37, the trailing side 716 of implant 710 may possess mating structures configured for engagement with an insertion instrument. According to the embodiment shown, the mating structures include a threaded receiving aperture 748. The receiving aperture 748 extends inwardly from the trailing side 716 in a generally perpendicular fashion relative to the trailing side 716 and is dimensioned to threadably receive a threaded connector 522 on the insertion instrument 500, as shown in FIG. 49. After keel channels have been formed in the vertebrae neighboring the affected disc space, the implant 710 is releasably attached to the insertion instrument 500, the keels 736 are aligned with the keel channels, and the implant inserted into position. Thereafter the insertion instrument is detached from the implant 710 and removed from the patient.



FIGS. 39-42 illustrate a trial sizer and keel cutter instrument 400 according to one example embodiment. The trial sizer and keel cutter instrument 400 includes an inserter 470, an inserter holder 430, and keel channel blades 450. As illustrated in FIGS. 39-40, the inserter 470 includes an inserter shaft 405 that releasably attaches at its distal end to a trial sizer 411. A threadable attachment means is shown, but other means of releasable attachment are contemplated. As best illustrated in FIG. 39, the inserter shaft 405 fits within the width of the inserter holder 430 so that it can freely slide along the inserter holder 430. As shown in FIG. 41, the trial sizer 411 may have insertion grooves 350 along the sides that run generally parallel to the distal-proximal axis of the inserter 470. The insertion grooves help the trial sizer 411 travel in a straight path while the trial sizer 411 is being inserted into the intervertebral space.


For trial sizing, the trial sizer 411 is releasably attached to the inserter 470. The trial sizer 411 is progressed into the intervertebral space by sliding the inserter shaft 405 distally in relation to the inserter holder 430 until the trial sizer 411 is received into the intervertebral space. To remove the trial sizer 411, the inserter shaft 405 slides proximally in relation to the inserter holder 430 until the trial sizer 411 is free of the surgical corridor.


As illustrated in FIGS. 39-40, the inserter holder 430 includes a cover 420 that encloses a portion of the inserter shaft 405 by attaching to the inserter holder 430, providing the user with a handle. The distal end of the inserter holder 430 includes two blade holders 453, situated generally parallel to each other along the distal-proximal axis of the inserter holder 430. Two keel channel blades 450 attach to the blade holders 453 by handles 451 which insert into a channel (not shown) within the blade holder 453. As illustrated in FIG. 42A, the keel channel blades 450 attach to the blade holders 453 in a fixed orientation, so that the teeth 455 of the keel channel blades 450 point outwardly away from the trial sizer 411. The trial sizer 411 attaches to the inserter 470 in a fixed orientation, so that the keel channel blades 450 are able to slide across the trial sizer 411 and into keel channels 460 located on opposing outer surfaces of the trial sizer 411. As illustrated in FIGS. 42A-C, the keel channel blades 450 slide distally across the trial sizer 411 through the keel channels 460 to a final position spanning some portion of the trial sizer 411. When the trial sizer 411 is positioned within the intervertebral space, sliding the keel channel blades 450 distally from the inserter holder 430 so that the keel channel blades span a portion of the trial sizer 411 will cause the teeth 455 to cut a channel into the endplates or cancellous core of each vertebra. It should be appreciated that the keel channel blades may cut deeper or shallower channels into the adjacent vertebra to correspond to the size of the keels selected. When the channel is formed, the keel channel blades 450 can be removed by sliding the inserter 470 in a proximal direction until the keel channel blades 450 are clear of the trial sizer 411.



FIGS. 43-47 illustrate another example embodiment of a trial sizer and keel cutter assembly. As illustrated in FIG. 43, an inserter shaft 870 is releasably connected to a trial sizer 810. A threadable attachment or other means of releasable attachment between the trial sizer 810 and the inserter shaft 870 are contemplated. Alternatively, the inserter shaft 870 and sizer 810 may be permanently connected. Vertical extensions 851 at the proximal end of the sizer 810 will engage the faces of the upper and lower vertebra to prevent over insertion of the trial sizer (and keel cutter). As shown in FIG. 47, the trial sizer 810 may have insertion grooves 820 along the sides that run generally parallel to the distal-proximal axis of the inserter shaft 870. The insertion grooves 820 help the trial sizer 810 travel in a straight path while the trial sizer 810 is being inserted into the intervertebral space.


As best illustrated in FIG. 46, two keel channel blades 850 are connected by a blade holder 853. Keel channel blades 850 may have ridged teeth (not shown). The keel channel blades 850 are connected to the blade holder 853 in a fixed orientation, so that the cutting edges 855 of the keel channel blades 850 point outwardly away from the trial sizer 810. The blade holder 853 comprises a cylindrical tube dimensioned to pass over the inserter shaft 870. As the blade holder 853 is advanced over the inserter shaft 870, the keel channel blades 850 slide across the trial sizer 810 and into blade channels 860 located on opposing outer surfaces of the trial sizer 810, as illustrated in FIG. 45. As illustrated in FIGS. 43-45, the keel channel blades 850 slide distally across the trial sizer 810 through the blade channels 860 to a final position spanning some portion of the trial sizer 810. When the trial sizer 810 is positioned within the intervertebral space, sliding the keel channel blades 850 distally along the inserter shaft and into the insertion grooves 820 will cause the keel channel blades 850 to cut a channel into the endplates or cancellous core of each adjacent vertebra. It should be appreciated that the keel channel blades 850 may cut deeper or shallower channels into the adjacent vertebra to correspond to the size of the keels selected. When the channel is formed, the keel channel blades 450 can be removed by sliding the blade holder 853 in a proximal direction until the keel channel blades 450 are clear of the intervertebral space. The inserter shaft includes a connector 890 for releasably attaching various handles or other instruments (e.g. T-handles, gear-shift handles, etc.) to aid in manipulating the trial sizer during insertion and removal. By way of example, the connector 890 is a Hudson connector. The connector 890 is preferably detachable, allowing the keel cutter to slide over the inserter shaft. According to this example, the inserter shaft includes threading on the distal end that engages interior threading on the Hudson connector.



FIGS. 48-50 detail an insertion instrument 500 according to one example embodiment of the present invention. The insertion instrument 500 includes an elongate tubular element 502 and an inserter shaft 504. The elongate tubular element 502 is constructed with a distal head 506 at its distal end, distal head ridges 508 on the distal end of the distal head 506, a thumbwheel housing 518 near its proximal end, a thumbwheel 530 within the thumbwheel housing 518, and a handle 520 at its proximal end. The elongate tubular element 502 is generally cylindrical and of a length sufficient to allow the device to span from the surgical target site to a location sufficiently outside the patient's body so that the handle 520 and thumbwheel housing 518 can be easily accessed by a clinician or a complimentary controlling device.


The elongate tubular element 502 is dimensioned to receive a spring 524 and the proximal end of the inserter shaft 504 into the inner bore (not shown) of the elongate tubular element 502. The inserter shaft 504 is dimensioned such that the threaded connector 522 at the distal end of the inserter shaft 504 protrudes from the inner bore, past the distal head ridges 508 to allow engagement with, by way of example only, the receiving aperture 148 of the spinal fusion implant 110 or trial sizer. It should be appreciated by one skilled in the art that such a construction allows the inserter shaft 504 to be able to rotate freely within the elongate tubular element 502 while stabilized by a spring 524 to reduce any slidable play in the insertion instrument 500. The distal head ridges 508 are dimensioned to fit slidably into the purchase regions 150 with low friction to allow accurate engagement of the threaded connector 522 to the receiving aperture 148 of the spinal fusion implant 110 or trial sizer. In the presented embodiment, the outer dimension of the threaded connector 522 is smaller than the largest outer dimension of the distal head 506 and elongate tubular element 502. Alternatively, other methods of creating a gripping surface are contemplated including but not limited to knurling or facets.


As illustrated in FIG. 50, the handle 520 is generally disposed at the proximal end of the insertion instrument 500. The handle 520 is fixed to the thumbwheel housing 518 allowing easy handling by the clinician. Because the handle 520 is fixed, the clinician has easy access to the thumbwheel 530 and can stably turn the thumbwheel 530 relative to the thumbwheel housing 518. Additionally, the relative orientation of the thumbwheel housing 518 to the distal head 506 orients the clinician with respect to the distal head 506 and an attached implant (not shown). By way of example, the thumbwheel housing 518 holds a thumbwheel 530 a set screw 532 and a spacer 534. The inserter shaft 504 is attached to the thumbwheel 530 and is freely rotatable with low friction due to the spacer 534. One skilled in the art can appreciate myriad methods of assembling a housing similar to the above described.


A clinician can utilize the secured implant in either an open or minimally invasive spinal fusion procedure. In either type of procedure, a surgical corridor is created in a patient that reaches the targeted spinal level. After the creation of that corridor, the intervertebral space may be prepared via any number of well known preparation tools, including but not limited to kerrisons, rongeurs, pituitaries, and rasps. Alternatively, if the intervertebral space already contains an implant to be replaced, that implant will be removed. After preparation, various trial sizers may be temporarily placed in the intervertebral space to determine the appropriate size of the final implant. With the appropriate trial sizer in place, keel channels 630 may be cut into the endplates or beyond the endplates into the cancellous bone of the adjacent vertebrae as needed to accommodate the desired keel structures 36. First, the trial sizer is inserted into the disc space, as in FIG. 51. When the appropriate size is determined, the trial sizer 810 remains positioned in the disc space between a top vertebra 600 and a bottom vertebra 610. The keel channel blades 850 are moved distally toward the vertebrae. The keel channel blades 850 advance into the intervertebral space above and below the trial sizer 810, cutting a groove into each vertebra corresponding to the approximate dimensions of the keel structures. The trial sizer 810 and keel channel blades 850 are then removed from the intervertebral space. FIG. 54 illustrates the keel channels 630 left in the upper and lower vertebral bodies when the trial sizer and keel cutter have been removed. The implant may then be attached to the insertion instrument 500, as described above, and advanced to the disc space with the keel structures aligned with the keel channels.


While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined herein.

Claims
  • 1. An implant for spinal fusion, the implant comprising: a body comprising a top surface, a bottom surface, a distal side, a proximal side, a first side wall, a second side wall, and a fusion aperture that extends between the top and bottom surfaces,the body further including an upper guide path on the top surface andan upper penetration structure configured to couple with the upper guide path and extend above the top surface, wherein the upper penetration structure extends beyond the proximal side of the implant, andwherein the upper penetration structure comprises a flexible tab configured to engage the body to lock the upper penetration structure to the body of the implant.
  • 2. The implant of claim 1, wherein the upper guide path is parallel to a centerline of the body.
  • 3. The implant of claim 1, wherein the upper penetration structure extends at least partly into the fusion aperture when coupled with the upper guide path.
  • 4. The implant of claim 1, wherein the body further comprises a lower guide path on the bottom surface.
  • 5. The implant of claim 4, further comprising a lower penetration structure configured to couple with the lower guide path and extend beyond the bottom surface, wherein the lower penetration structure extends beyond the proximal side of the implant.
  • 6. The implant of claim 5, wherein the upper penetration structure and the lower penetration structure are made from a material different than that of the body of the implant.
  • 7. The implant of claim 1, further comprising at least one side aperture extending through the first sidewall into the fusion aperture.
  • 8. The implant of claim 1, wherein the first sidewall has a height dimension greater than that of the second sidewall.
  • 9. The implant of claim 1, further comprising anti-migration features comprising one of angled ridges formed along the top surface, angled ridges formed along the bottom surface, or one or more spike members disposed along the body.
  • 10. The implant of claim 1, wherein the flexible tab is configured to snap around the proximal side of the body.
  • 11. The implant of claim 1, wherein the first sidewall defines an anterior side when said implant is positioned within an interbody space, and the second side wall defines a posterior side when the implant is positioned within the interbody space.
  • 12. An implant for spinal fusion, the implant comprising: a body comprising a top surface, a bottom surface, a distal side, a proximal side, a first side wall, a second side wall, and a fusion aperture that extends between the top and bottom surfaces,the body further including an upper guide path on the top surface for matingly engaging an upper penetration structure and a lower guide path on the bottom surface for matingly engaging a lower penetration structure, wherein the upper penetration structure and the lower penetration structure are formed as a single component and coupled via a tapered end, andwherein the upper penetration structure comprises a flexible tab configured to engage the body to lock the upper penetration structure to the bodywherein the first sidewall has a height dimension greater than that of the second sidewall.
  • 13. The implant of claim 12, wherein the flexible tab extends beyond the distal side of the implant when the body of the implant is positioned within an interbody space.
  • 14. The implant of claim 12, wherein the upper penetration structure extends at least partly into the fusion aperture when the upper penetration structure is coupled with the upper guide path.
  • 15. The implant of claim 12, further comprising at least one side aperture extending through the first sidewall into the fusion aperture.
  • 16. The implant of claim 12, further comprising one or more anti-migration features comprising angled ridges formed along the top surface, angled ridges formed along the bottom surface, or one or more spike members disposed along the body of the implant.
  • 17. The implant of claim 12, wherein the upper penetration structure and the lower penetration structure are made from a material different than that of the body of the implant.
  • 18. The implant of claim 12, wherein the flexible tab is configured to snap around the proximal side of the body of the implant.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/906,534 filed Feb. 27, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/924,490 filed Oct. 27, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/337,967 filed Nov. 27, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/380,693 filed Mar. 2, 2009, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/067,700 filed Feb. 29, 2008, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/105,796 filed Oct. 15, 2008, the entire contents of which are each incorporated by reference as if set forth herein in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (415)
Number Name Date Kind
3486505 Morrison Dec 1969 A
3518993 Blake Jul 1970 A
3604487 Gilbert Sep 1971 A
3745995 Kraus Jul 1973 A
3848601 Ma et al. Nov 1974 A
3867728 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
4026304 Levy May 1977 A
4026305 Brownlee et al. May 1977 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4454374 Pollack Jun 1984 A
4501269 Bagby Feb 1985 A
4545374 Jacobson Oct 1985 A
4646738 Trott Mar 1987 A
4657550 Daher Apr 1987 A
4697586 Gazale Oct 1987 A
4743256 Brantigan May 1988 A
4781591 Allen Nov 1988 A
4834757 Brantigan May 1989 A
4877020 Vich Oct 1989 A
4878915 Brantigan Nov 1989 A
4932975 Main et al. Jun 1990 A
4950296 McIntyre Aug 1990 A
4961740 Ray et al. Oct 1990 A
4962766 Herzon Oct 1990 A
5015247 Michelson May 1991 A
5026373 Ray et al. Jun 1991 A
5047055 Bao et al. Sep 1991 A
5055104 Ray Oct 1991 A
5062845 Kuslich et al. Nov 1991 A
5071437 Steffee Dec 1991 A
5092572 Litwak et al. Mar 1992 A
5133717 Chopin Jul 1992 A
5133755 Brekke Jul 1992 A
5171278 Pisharodi Dec 1992 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5217497 Mehdian Jun 1993 A
5263953 Bagby Nov 1993 A
5269785 Bonutti Dec 1993 A
5284153 Raymond et al. Feb 1994 A
5290494 Coombes et al. Mar 1994 A
5300076 Leriche Apr 1994 A
5304210 Crook Apr 1994 A
5306307 Senter et al. Apr 1994 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5322505 Krause et al. Jun 1994 A
5334205 Cain Aug 1994 A
5336223 Rogers Aug 1994 A
5364400 Rego, Jr. et al. Nov 1994 A
5395372 Holt et al. Mar 1995 A
5397363 Gelbard Mar 1995 A
5397364 Kozak et al. Mar 1995 A
5401269 Büttner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5405391 Henderson et al. Apr 1995 A
5413602 Metz-Stavenhagen May 1995 A
5425772 Brantigan Jun 1995 A
5431658 Moskovich Jul 1995 A
5443514 Steffee Aug 1995 A
5443515 Cohen et al. Aug 1995 A
5445639 Kuslich et al. Aug 1995 A
5454811 Huebner Oct 1995 A
5458638 Kuslich et al. Oct 1995 A
5484403 Yoakum et al. Jan 1996 A
5484437 Michelson Jan 1996 A
5489307 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5489308 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5514180 Heggeness et al. May 1996 A
5522879 Scopelianos Jun 1996 A
5522899 Michelson Jun 1996 A
5524624 Tepper et al. Jun 1996 A
5527312 Ray Jun 1996 A
5534030 Navarro et al. Jul 1996 A
5540688 Navas Jul 1996 A
5545222 Bonutti Aug 1996 A
5545688 Huang Aug 1996 A
5562736 Ray et al. Oct 1996 A
5565005 Erickson et al. Oct 1996 A
5571190 Ulrich et al. Nov 1996 A
5571192 Schonhoffer Nov 1996 A
5593409 Michelson Jan 1997 A
5607424 Tropiano Mar 1997 A
5609636 Kohrs et al. Mar 1997 A
5611800 Davis et al. Mar 1997 A
5611810 Arnold et al. Mar 1997 A
5632747 Scarborough et al. May 1997 A
5645596 Kim et al. Jul 1997 A
5645598 Brosnahan, III Jul 1997 A
5653761 Pisharodi Aug 1997 A
5653762 Pisharodi Aug 1997 A
5658336 Pisharodi Aug 1997 A
5658337 Kohrs et al. Aug 1997 A
5662710 Bonutti Sep 1997 A
5665122 Kambin Sep 1997 A
5669909 Zdeblick et al. Sep 1997 A
5676703 Gelbard Oct 1997 A
5683394 Rinner Nov 1997 A
5683400 McGuire Nov 1997 A
5683464 Wagner et al. Nov 1997 A
5683465 Shinn et al. Nov 1997 A
5690629 Asher et al. Nov 1997 A
5700264 Zucherman et al. Dec 1997 A
5700291 Kuslich et al. Dec 1997 A
5700292 Margulies Dec 1997 A
5702449 McKay Dec 1997 A
5702451 Biedermann et al. Dec 1997 A
5702453 Rabbe et al. Dec 1997 A
5702454 Baumgartner Dec 1997 A
5702455 Saggar Dec 1997 A
5703451 Yamamichi Dec 1997 A
5707373 Sevrain et al. Jan 1998 A
5711957 Patat et al. Jan 1998 A
5716415 Steffee Feb 1998 A
5720748 Kuslich et al. Feb 1998 A
5720751 Jackson Feb 1998 A
5722977 Wilhelmy Mar 1998 A
5728159 Stroever et al. Mar 1998 A
5741253 Michelson Apr 1998 A
5741261 Moskovitz et al. Apr 1998 A
5755797 Baumgartner May 1998 A
5766252 Henry et al. Jun 1998 A
5772661 Michelson Jun 1998 A
5775331 Raymond et al. Jul 1998 A
5775797 Henstra Jul 1998 A
5779642 Nightengale Jul 1998 A
5782830 Farris Jul 1998 A
5782832 Larsen et al. Jul 1998 A
5782919 Zdeblick et al. Jul 1998 A
5785710 Michelson Jul 1998 A
5797909 Michelson Aug 1998 A
5800549 Bao et al. Sep 1998 A
5800550 Sertich Sep 1998 A
5814084 Grivas et al. Sep 1998 A
5814550 Wolcott Sep 1998 A
5851084 Nishikawa Dec 1998 A
5851208 Trott Dec 1998 A
5860973 Michelson Jan 1999 A
5865845 Thalgott Feb 1999 A
5865848 Baker Feb 1999 A
5885299 Winslow et al. Mar 1999 A
5888219 Bonutti Mar 1999 A
5888224 Beckers et al. Mar 1999 A
5893889 Harrington Apr 1999 A
5893890 Pisharodi Apr 1999 A
5904719 Errico et al. May 1999 A
5910315 Stevenson et al. Jun 1999 A
5942698 Stevens Aug 1999 A
5954769 Rosenlicht Sep 1999 A
5968098 Winslow Oct 1999 A
5989291 Ralph et al. Nov 1999 A
5993474 Ouchi Nov 1999 A
6003426 Kobayashi et al. Dec 1999 A
6004326 Castro et al. Dec 1999 A
6008433 Stone Dec 1999 A
6015436 Schönhöffer Jan 2000 A
6033405 Winslow et al. Mar 2000 A
6033438 Bianchi et al. Mar 2000 A
6039761 Li et al. Mar 2000 A
6042582 Ray Mar 2000 A
6045580 Scarborough et al. Apr 2000 A
6045582 Prybyla Apr 2000 A
6048342 Zucherman et al. Apr 2000 A
6059829 Schlapfer et al. May 2000 A
6063088 Winslow May 2000 A
6063121 Xavier et al. May 2000 A
6080155 Michelson Jun 2000 A
6083225 Winslow et al. Jul 2000 A
6090143 Meriwether et al. Jul 2000 A
6096080 Nicholson et al. Aug 2000 A
6102948 Brosnahan, III Aug 2000 A
6120503 Michelson Sep 2000 A
6120506 Kohrs et al. Sep 2000 A
6132472 Bonutti Oct 2000 A
6143033 Paul et al. Nov 2000 A
6159211 Boriani et al. Dec 2000 A
6159215 Urbahns et al. Dec 2000 A
6193756 Studer et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200347 Anderson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6224607 Michelson May 2001 B1
6224631 Kohrs May 2001 B1
6241769 Nicholson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6241770 Michelson Jun 2001 B1
6241771 Gresser et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245108 Biscup Jun 2001 B1
6251140 Marino et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258125 Paul et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277149 Boyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6304487 Pawletko et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309421 Pisharodi Oct 2001 B1
6319257 Carignan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6368350 Erickson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371989 Chauvin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383221 Scarborough et al. May 2002 B1
6409766 Brett Jun 2002 B1
6413278 Marchosky Jul 2002 B1
6425772 Bernier et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426772 Yoneyama et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432140 Lin Aug 2002 B1
6440142 Ralph et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442814 Landry et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447546 Bramlet et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447547 Michelson Sep 2002 B1
6454806 Cohen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6468311 Boyd et al. Oct 2002 B2
6491724 Ferree Dec 2002 B1
6527773 Lin et al. Mar 2003 B1
D472634 Anderson Apr 2003 S
D473650 Anderson Apr 2003 S
6547823 Scarborough et al. Apr 2003 B2
6558424 Thalgott May 2003 B2
6562072 Fuss et al. May 2003 B1
6595998 Johnson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599294 Fuss et al. Jul 2003 B2
6626905 Schmiel et al. Sep 2003 B1
6635086 Lin Oct 2003 B2
6648895 Burkus et al. Nov 2003 B2
6666888 Jackson Dec 2003 B1
6666889 Commarmond Dec 2003 B1
6672019 Wenz Jan 2004 B1
6676703 Biscup Jan 2004 B2
6706067 Shimp et al. Mar 2004 B2
6723097 Fraser et al. Apr 2004 B2
6743255 Ferree Jun 2004 B2
6746484 Liu et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755841 Fraser et al. Jun 2004 B2
6761739 Shepard Jul 2004 B2
6767367 Michelson Jul 2004 B1
6802863 Lawson et al. Oct 2004 B2
6824564 Crozet Nov 2004 B2
6830570 Frey et al. Dec 2004 B1
6835208 Marchosky Dec 2004 B2
6843804 Bryan Jan 2005 B2
D503801 Jackson Apr 2005 S
6923814 Hildebrand et al. Aug 2005 B1
6942697 Lange et al. Sep 2005 B2
6942698 Jackson Sep 2005 B1
6964687 Bernard et al. Nov 2005 B1
6974480 Messerli et al. Dec 2005 B2
6979353 Bresina Dec 2005 B2
6984245 McGahan et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986788 Paul et al. Jan 2006 B2
6989031 Michelson Jan 2006 B2
7018412 Ferreira et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018416 Hanson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7056344 Huppert et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060073 Frey et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060097 Fraser Jun 2006 B2
7060099 Carli et al. Jun 2006 B2
7083651 Diaz et al. Aug 2006 B2
D530423 Miles et al. Oct 2006 S
7115144 Diaz et al. Oct 2006 B2
7125425 Foley et al. Oct 2006 B2
7192447 Rhoda Mar 2007 B2
7201776 Ferree et al. Apr 2007 B2
7235101 Berry Jun 2007 B2
7244258 Burkus et al. Jul 2007 B2
7303583 Schär et al. Dec 2007 B1
7326251 McCombe et al. Feb 2008 B2
7361193 Frey et al. Apr 2008 B2
7442211 de Villiers et al. Oct 2008 B2
7611538 Belliard et al. Nov 2009 B2
7815682 Peterson et al. Oct 2010 B1
7832409 Richelsoph et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842088 Rashbaum et al. Nov 2010 B2
7867277 Tohmeh Jan 2011 B1
7918891 Curran et al. Apr 2011 B1
7951203 McCombe et al. May 2011 B2
8021427 Spoonamore Sep 2011 B2
8021430 Michelson Sep 2011 B2
8187334 Curran et al. May 2012 B2
8246686 Curran et al. Aug 2012 B1
8251997 Michelson Aug 2012 B2
8287572 Bae Oct 2012 B2
8361156 Curran et al. Jan 2013 B2
8425612 Perez-Cruet et al. Apr 2013 B2
8506630 Wardlaw Aug 2013 B2
8506636 Dye Aug 2013 B2
8574301 Curran et al. Nov 2013 B2
8579909 Burkus et al. Nov 2013 B2
8591589 McCombe et al. Nov 2013 B2
8608804 Curran et al. Dec 2013 B2
8900307 Hawkins et al. Dec 2014 B2
8979927 Huntsman Mar 2015 B2
9907672 Raiszadeh Mar 2018 B1
10779816 Goldstein Sep 2020 B2
20010016741 Burkus et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010016777 Biscup Aug 2001 A1
20020019637 Frey et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020035400 Bryan et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020058950 Winterbottom et al. May 2002 A1
20020068936 Burkus et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077702 Castro Jun 2002 A1
20020111687 Ralph et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116008 Lin et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020165550 Frey et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020165613 Lin Nov 2002 A1
20030023306 Liu et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028249 Baccelli et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040802 Errico et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030074076 Ferree et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030100950 Moret May 2003 A1
20030105527 Bresina Jun 2003 A1
20030105528 Shimp et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030109928 Pasquet et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030139812 Garcia et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139813 Messerli et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149438 Nichols et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030153975 Byrd, III et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167091 Scharf Sep 2003 A1
20030208273 Eisermann et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220691 Songer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030233146 Grinberg et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002759 Ferree Jan 2004 A1
20040024408 Burkus et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040024460 Ferree Feb 2004 A1
20040024461 Ferree Feb 2004 A1
20040030398 Ferree Feb 2004 A1
20040093087 Ferree et al. May 2004 A1
20040117020 Frey et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117022 Marnay et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127990 Bartish, Jr. et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040127991 Ferree Jul 2004 A1
20040127994 Kast et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143332 Krueger et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148028 Ferree et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153155 Chung et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040158254 Eisermann Aug 2004 A1
20040158328 Eisermann Aug 2004 A1
20040176775 Burkus et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186572 Lange et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193273 Huang Sep 2004 A1
20040199251 McCombe et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215198 Marnay et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220567 Eisermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220668 Eisermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220670 Eisermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225365 Eisermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225366 Eisermann et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230307 Eisermann Nov 2004 A1
20040243240 Beaurain et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260286 Ferree Dec 2004 A1
20040267364 Carli et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021146 de Villiers et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038516 Spoonamore Feb 2005 A1
20050043802 Eisermann et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043803 Schultz et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050059971 Michelson Mar 2005 A1
20050060034 Berry Mar 2005 A1
20050065611 Huppert et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050125062 Biedermann et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149192 Zucherman Jul 2005 A1
20050149193 Zucherman et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187625 Wolek et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197702 Coppes et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203538 Lo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060041314 Millard Feb 2006 A1
20060058876 McKinley Mar 2006 A1
20060069440 Zucherman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074488 Abdou Apr 2006 A1
20060085071 Lechmann et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060089714 Liu et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095132 Kirschman May 2006 A1
20060111783 Aflatoon et al. May 2006 A1
20060116768 Krueger et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142864 Cauthen Jun 2006 A1
20060155377 Beaurain et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167549 Mathys, Jr. et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060190084 Doubler et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060235526 Lemaire Oct 2006 A1
20060259144 Trieu Nov 2006 A1
20070043442 Abernathie et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070179612 Johnson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191945 Yu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070233262 Arnin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239278 Heinz Oct 2007 A1
20070260320 Peterman et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270951 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276495 Aaron Nov 2007 A1
20070276499 Paul et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288007 Burkus et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009946 Douget et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015701 Garcia et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027550 Link et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080058838 Steinberg Mar 2008 A1
20080058940 Wu et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065219 Dye Mar 2008 A1
20080082173 Delurio et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080119937 McCombe et al. May 2008 A1
20080183296 Ferree Jul 2008 A1
20090036927 Vestgaarden Feb 2009 A1
20090069895 Gittings et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076610 Afzal Mar 2009 A1
20090143859 McClellan, III et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090198339 Kleiner et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204219 Beaurain et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090222099 Liu et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100036497 Lechmann et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100106250 Abdou Apr 2010 A1
20100152853 Kirschman Jun 2010 A1
20100211176 Greenhalgh Aug 2010 A1
20100249936 Bertagnoli Sep 2010 A1
20100262246 Attia Oct 2010 A1
20110054617 Sekhon et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082552 Wistrom et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112642 Tohmeh May 2011 A1
20110160866 Laurence Jun 2011 A1
20110196496 McCombe et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120078374 Villiers et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120158141 Johnson et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179261 Soo Jul 2012 A1
20120191190 Trieu Jul 2012 A1
20120209388 Curran et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215317 Curran et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130006363 Ullrich, Jr. et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130138216 Curran et al. May 2013 A1
20130144390 Curran et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130245771 Michelson Sep 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
2015507 Jan 1999 CA
0369603 May 1990 EP
0667127 Aug 1995 EP
0706876 Apr 1996 EP
0716840 Jun 1996 EP
0517030 Sep 1996 EP
0737448 Oct 1996 EP
0796593 Sep 1997 EP
0809974 Apr 1998 EP
0809975 Apr 1998 EP
0811356 Apr 1998 EP
0880938 Dec 1998 EP
1990000037 Jan 1990 WO
1991006261 May 1991 WO
1992014423 Sep 1992 WO
1993001771 Feb 1993 WO
1994004100 Mar 1994 WO
1994010928 May 1994 WO
1995001810 Jan 1995 WO
1995008306 Mar 1995 WO
1996008205 Mar 1996 WO
1996017564 Jun 1996 WO
1996041582 Dec 1996 WO
1997020513 Jun 1997 WO
1997033525 Sep 1997 WO
1997037620 Oct 1997 WO
1998009586 Mar 1998 WO
1998014142 Apr 1998 WO
1998017208 Apr 1998 WO
1998025539 Jun 1998 WO
1999008627 Feb 1999 WO
1999038461 Aug 1999 WO
2000044288 Aug 2000 WO
2000045712 Aug 2000 WO
2000045713 Aug 2000 WO
2001041681 Jun 2001 WO
2001049333 Jul 2001 WO
2004098380 Nov 2004 WO
2005058141 Jun 2005 WO
2007003437 Jan 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
Alleyne et al., “Current and future approaches to lumbar disc surgery: A literature review”, MedGenMed, 1999, 1, No. 1.
Baulot et al., “Complementary anterior spondylodesis by thoracoscopy. Technical note regarding an observation”, Lyon Surg., 1994, pp. 347-351, 90, No. 5.
Benini et al., “Undercutting decompression and posterior fusion with translaminar facet screw fixation in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Technique and results”, Neuro-Orthopedics, 1995, pp. 159-172, 17/18.
Berry et al., “A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae”, Spine, 1987, pp. 362-367, 12, No. 4.
CoRoent® XL & XLR Marketing Brochure (9004225 B.0), NuVasive, Inc., 2006, 2 pgs.
CoRoent® XL & XLR Marketing Brochure (9004225 C.0), NuVasive, Inc., 2007, 2 pgs.
CoRoent® XL Marketing Brochure (9500039 A.0), NuVasive, Inc., 2006, 8 pgs.
CoRoent™ Marketing Brochure (9004001 A.0), NuVasive, Inc., 2004, 2 pgs.
CoRoent™ Marketing Brochure (9004001 C.0), NuVasive, Inc., 2005, 2 pgs.
CoRoent™ XL & XLR Marketing Brochure (9004225 A.0), NuVasive, Inc., 2005, 2 pgs.
Counterclaim Defendants' Corrected Amended Invalidity Contentions re U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,000,782; 8,005,535; 8,016,767; 8,192,356; 8,187,334; 8,361,156, D. 652,922; D. 666,294 re Case No. 3:12-cv-02738-CAB(MDD), dated Aug. 19, 2013, 30 pgs.
Crock, “A short practice of spinal surgery”, 1993, Springer-Verlag/Wein, New York, 251 pgs.
Crock, “Anterior lumbar interbody fusion”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982, pp. 157-163, 165.
Decision denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in IPR2013-00504, dated Feb. 13, 2014, 9 pgs.
Decision denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in IPR2013-00506, dated Feb. 13, 2014, 21 pgs.
Decision denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in IPR2013-00507, dated Feb. 13, 2014, 15 pgs.
Decision denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in IPR2013-00508, dated Feb. 13, 2014, 14 pgs.
Declaration of Dr. Hansen A. Yuan from IPR2013-00506, dated May 21, 2014, 63 pgs.
Declaration of Dr. Hansen A. Yuan from IPR2013-00507, dated May 21, 2014, 85 pgs.
Declaration of Dr. Hansen A. Yuan from IPR2013-00508, dated May 21, 2014, 85 pgs.
Declaration of Mary Phelps regarding Telamon Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Spacer, dated Aug. 13, 2013, 9 pgs.
Declaration of Richard A. Hynes, M.D. regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,187,334, dated Aug. 14, 2013, 74 pgs.
Declaration of Richard A. Hynes, M.D. regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,361,156, dated Aug. 14, 2013, 74 pgs.
Declaration of Steven D. DeRidder regarding U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0165550, dated Jul. 30, 2013, 5 pgs.
Edeland, “Some additional suggestions for an intervertebral disc prosthesis”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1985, pp. 57-62, 7.
Final Written Decision in Medtronic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., Case IPR2013-00507, dated Feb. 11, 2015, 14 pgs.
Final Written Decision in Medtronic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., Case IPR2013-00508, dated Feb. 11, 2015, 19 pgs.
Kambin et al., “History and current status of percutaneous arthroscopic disc surgery”, Spine, 1996, pp. 57S-61S, 21, No. 24S.
Kemp et al., “Anterior fusion of the spine for infective lesions in adults”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1973, pp. 715-734, 55 B, No. 4.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek Boomerang brochure, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2003, 6 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “Boomerang I Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Brochure,” 2003, 6 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “Boomerang I Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Spacer Implant,” Apr. 26, 2001, 8 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “Boomerang II Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Spacer Brochure,” 2004, 4 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “Boomerang II Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Spacer Implant,” Dec. 17, 2003, 9 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “Boomerang Prototype Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Spacer Implant,” May 7, 2000, 8 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “PCR PEEK Cement Restrictor Brochure,” 2001, 2 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “PCR PEEK Cement Restrictor Implant,” Oct. 2, 2001, 17 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “Telamon Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Spacer Brochure I,” 2003, 2 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “Telamon Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Spacer Brochure II,” 2003, 10 pages.
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. “Telamon Verte-Stack PEEK Vertebral Body Spacer Implant,” Oct. 2, 2001, 6 pages.
NuVasive Inc's Patent Owner Response in IPR2013-00506, dated May 21, 2014, 66 pgs.
NuVasive Inc's Patent Owner Response in IPR2013-00507, dated May 21, 2014, 50 pgs.
NuVasive Inc's Patent Owner Response in IPR2013-00508, dated May 21, 2014, 66 pgs.
Nuvasive, Inc., Corrected Final Invalidity Contentions Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 5,860,973, U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,586 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,945,933 filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of California on Jun. 14, 2010 (and 23 appendices).
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc.'s Preliminary Response in IPR2013-00504, dated Nov. 25, 2013, 40 pgs.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc.'s Preliminary Response in IPR2013-00506, dated Nov. 25, 2013, 38 pgs.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc.'s Preliminary Response in IPR2013-00507, dated Nov. 25, 2013, 29 pgs.
Patent Owner NuVasive Inc.'s Preliminary Response in IPR2013-00508, dated Nov. 25, 2013, 38 pgs.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,187,334 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 311-319, 37 C.F.R. 42, dated Aug. 14, 2013, 64 pgs.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,361,156 Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 311-319, 37 C.F.R. 42, dated Aug. 14, 2013, 64 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210030558 A1 Feb 2021 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61067700 Feb 2008 US
61105796 Oct 2008 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 15906534 Feb 2018 US
Child 17073891 US
Parent 14924490 Oct 2015 US
Child 15906534 US
Parent 13337967 Dec 2011 US
Child 14924490 US
Parent 12380693 Mar 2009 US
Child 13337967 US