The present invention relates generally to implants, tools, devices, systems, and related methods for treating pelvic conditions including but not limited to incontinence and prolapse conditions in men and women.
Pelvic health for men and women is a medical area of increasing importance, at least in part due to an aging population. Examples of common pelvic ailments include incontinence (e.g., fecal and urinary), pelvic tissue prolapse (e.g., female vaginal prolapse), and conditions of the pelvic floor.
Urinary incontinence can further be classified as including different types, such as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, among others. Other pelvic floor disorders include cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, and prolapse such as anal, uterine and vaginal vault prolapse. A cystocele is a hernia of the bladder, usually into the vagina and introitus. Pelvic disorders such as these can result from weakness or damage to normal pelvic support systems.
Urinary incontinence can be characterized by the loss or diminution in the ability to maintain the urethral sphincter closed as the bladder fills with urine. Male or female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) generally occurs when the patient is physically stressed.
In its severest forms, vaginal vault prolapse can result in the distension of the vaginal apex outside of the vagina. An enterocele is a vaginal hernia in which the peritoneal sac containing a portion of the small bowel extends into the rectovaginal space. Vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele represent challenging forms of pelvic disorders for surgeons. These procedures often involve lengthy surgical procedure times.
Tension of an implant is typically adjusted during an implantation procedure sufficiently to take up any slack in the sling and impart at least a degree of increased and efficacious tension or desired positioning of supported tissue. Typically, implants such as urethral tapes or slings are fabricated of a loose weave sling fabric or mesh that engages tissue and encourages tissue ingrowth along the pathway through mesh pores to achieve chronic stabilization or “self-fixation.” Tissue ingrowth can take about 2-3 weeks in a typical patient in the absence of any significant intentional or unintentional movement of the mesh. During this post-operative time, the patient monitors the degree of success achieved in ameliorating symptoms of incontinence (e.g., urinary leakage) and any discomfort that might occur if the applied tension is so high as to unduly slow voluntary urination (for treating urinary incontinence). If any such problems occur it may be necessary to reopen the original surgical incisions to access and pull on the implant ends to tighten the central portion around the urethra (or other tissue being supported) or to on the implant central support portion to loosen the central support portion around the urethra. Several approaches have been taken to simplify or reduce the need for such post-operative adjustments.
Although effective in alleviating incontinence (e.g., anal, SUI), improvements in urethral and anal slings and other pelvic floor implants to post-operatively adjust tension applied to the urethra, anus, or other pelvic floor tissue, are desirable.
Devices, systems, and methods as described can be applied to treat pelvic conditions such as incontinence (various forms such as fecal incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, urge incontinence, mixed incontinence, etc.), vaginal prolapse (including various forms such as enterocele, cystocele, rectocele, apical or vault prolapse, uterine descent, etc.), levator defects, and other conditions caused by muscle and ligament weakness, hysterectomies, and the like.
Described devices and methods involve improvements in pelvic implants, including elongated incontinence slings that include a central support portion and end portions extending from the central portion to sling ends. Herein, the terms “sling,” “implant,” and “incontinence sling” without further qualification are used interchangeably to include various forms of pelvic implants for supporting different pelvic tissues, and specifically include urethral slings adapted to be placed through a tissue pathway in a male or female patient, disposing the central support portion below the urethra or bladder neck (hereafter collectively referred to as the urethra for convenience) (and above the vaginal wall in a female patient) to alleviate urinary incontinence, and fecal slings adapted to be placed through a tissue pathway disposing the central support portion inferior to the anus, the anal sphincter, or the lower rectum (hereafter collectively referred to as the anus for convenience) to alleviate fecal incontinence.
In accordance with the present description, such slings are improved to enhance post-operative sling adjustment of the tension applied to the urethra, anus, or other supported tissue, to enhance efficacy of the implant and method of treatment, and for improved patient comfort. Various specific embodiments of the implants and methods are described herein. The various embodiments are applicable to both male and female patients to address issues of incontinence in both, to address issues of prolapse repair in female patients, and to address perineal floor descent and fecal incontinence in both. Also, surgical techniques such as forming suprapubic, retropubic, transobturator, “inside-out” and “outside-in” tissue pathways between two incisions, or a tissue pathway formed from a single incision through the vagina or perineal floor (in male or female patients) are also contemplated for passage of a sling therethrough.
In various embodiments, one or two sling tension adjusting mechanisms can be located at distal ends of extension portions of a sling. In use, the adjusting mechanisms, preferably two adjusting mechanisms located at opposed ends of an implant, can be implanted in a patient at a locate near a skin surface for improved post-surgical access. With the implant installed to support tissue, the adjusting mechanisms can be sufficiently close to a skin surface to allow post-operative engagement, communication with, or actuation of the adjusting mechanism. In certain embodiments, the post-operative communication can be performed by opening or re-opening an incision in the skin adjacent to a subcutaneously-implanted adjusting mechanism, to allow direct contact with the subcutaneously-implanted adjusting mechanism through the incision in the skin. In other embodiments the post-operative communication can be performed through the intact skin tissue without opening or re-opening an incision in the skin; in these embodiments, the subcutaneously-implanted adjusting mechanism can be controlled by an external adjustment tool that communicates with the adjusting mechanism through the intact skin, to actuate the adjusting mechanism to tighten or loosen the implant within the patient.
Various adjustment tools and techniques can be used to actuate the adjusting mechanisms to decrease or increase the length of a sling end portion and to thereby increase or decrease, respectively, the tension applied by the central support portion to supported tissue (e.g., the urethra or anus). Adjusting mechanisms are disposed at distal ends of the end portions and can be placed subcutaneously so as to be disposed sufficiently near the patient's skin to enable application of an adjustment tool against the skin or through the skin and underlying tissues to operate the adjusting mechanisms.
According to certain embodiments, an external adjustment tool can be used to communicate with and actuate an adjusting mechanism through intact skin tissue, without creating an incision in the skin. The adjustment tool can include a signal transmitter capable of generating an adjustment command that passes transcutaneously (through the intact skin), and the adjusting mechanism includes a receiver for receiving the transmitted commands. An adjusting mechanism of such an implant can be manipulated post-operatively without invasive means by using the external adjustment tool transcutaneously to activate the adjusting mechanism. The external adjustment tool can include a mechanical, magnetic, or electromagnetic coupling that communicates with the internal adjusting mechanism, and the external adjustment tool can be used to activate the internal adjusting mechanism to add or reduce the tension on a component of the implant.
In certain embodiments an external adjustment tool can alternately or additionally include a magnetic field generator or permanent magnet that can be used to generate a magnetic field representing a sling adjustment command that passes transcutaneously through the skin, and the adjusting mechanism includes a magnetic field-responsive element that responds to the magnetic field of the external adjustment tool.
In yet alternate embodiments an external adjustment tool can alternately or additionally include a frictional engagement that can be used to engage a complementary engagement surface of the adjusting mechanism, transcutaneously, through intact skin.
In still another embodiment, the adjustment tool is used by inserting a portion of the adjustment tool percutaneously (penetrating the skin) to engage and operate the adjusting mechanism. An adjustment tool can actuate the adjustment tool by any mode, such as by a mechanical engagement, magnetic engagement, an electromechanical mechanism, or the like.
According to preferred devices and methods, an implant can include two adjusting mechanisms, one at each of two opposing ends of an implant. The use of two adjusting mechanisms on opposite sides of the implant (and patient) allows the implant to be adjusted in a balanced fashion that prevents supported tissue from being pulled to one side or the other upon adjustment. Devices and methods that involve two adjusting mechanisms allow the implant to be adjusted on both sides, thereby allowing the implant to be adjusted to not just increase tension, but to increase tension and simultaneously adjust the position of (approximate) the tissue being supported exclusively along a medial axis of the patient; in other words, the tissue being supported is not pulled in a left or a right direction relative to a midline of the patient during adjustment but remains in an anatomically correct manner at a location on the midline.
The adjusting mechanisms can be used in situations where the location or tension on an implant is desirably revised or adjusted after implantation, post-surgically, such as if the patient is in retention or if the results achieved by the surgical procedure are not satisfactory. Such tension adjustment procedure can advantageously be performed immediately after surgery (e.g., within 1 or 2 hours) or at a later time such as during recovery from original surgery (e.g., within 1, 2, or 3 days or within 1, 2, or 3 weeks).
In one aspect, the invention relates to a combination that includes a pelvic implant and an adjusting tool, the combination being useful to treat a pelvic condition. The implant includes a tissue support portion, an extension portion, and an adjusting mechanism at a distal end of the extension portion. The adjusting tool includes a surface capable of engaging the adjusting mechanism while the adjusting mechanism is implanted subcutaneously in a patient.
In another aspect the invention relates to a method of treating a pelvic condition. The method includes: providing a pelvic implant useful to treat a pelvic condition, the implant including a tissue support portion, an extension portion, and an adjusting mechanism at a distal end of the extension portion, the adjusting mechanism capable of being actuated to adjust a length of the extension portion; providing an adjusting tool capable of engaging the adjusting mechanism while the adjusting mechanism is implanted subcutaneously in a patient; placing the implant in a patient to support tissue with the adjusting mechanism located subcutaneously; and post-operatively engaging the adjusting tool with the adjusting mechanism to actuate the adjusting mechanism and adjust a length of the extension portion.
All drawings are not to scale.
Pelvic floor disorders include urinary and fecal incontinence, prolapse, cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, uterine and vaginal vault prolapse, levator defects, and others, in male and female patients. These disorders typically result from weakness or damage to normal pelvic support systems. Common etiologies include childbearing, removal of the uterus, connective tissue defects, prolonged heavy physical labor and postmenopausal atrophy.
Vaginal vault prolapse is the distension of the vaginal apex, in some cases to an orientation outside of the vagina. An enterocele is a vaginal hernia in which the peritoneal sac containing a portion of the small bowel extends into the rectovaginal space. Vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele represent challenging forms of pelvic disorders for surgeons.
Vaginal vault prolapse is often associated with a rectocele, cystocele, or enterocele. It is known to repair vaginal vault prolapse by suturing to the supraspinous ligament or to attach the vaginal vault through mesh or fascia to the sacrum. Many patients suffering from vaginal vault prolapse also require a surgical procedure to correct stress urinary incontinence that is either symptomatic or latent.
Sling procedures for treating urinary incontinence include surgical methods that place a supportive implant such as a sling to stabilize or support the bladder neck or urethra. Various supportive implants and sling procedures are known. Slings and methods can differ based on the type of sling material and anchoring methods used, and placement and technique for placing and supporting the sling, including tissue to be supported. According to some past procedures, a sling is placed under the bladder neck and secured via suspension sutures to a point of attachment (e.g. bone) through an abdominal or vaginal incision. Other techniques place a supportive portion of a sling below a urethra or bladder neck, and support the sling by placement of ends at or through obturator foramen tissue. Examples of sling procedures are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,112,344; 5,611,515; 5,842,478; 5,860,425; 5,899,909; 6,039,686, 6,042,534 and 6,110,101.
In accordance with other methods and devices of the invention, implants as described can be useful for treating vaginal prolapse, such as vaginal vault prolapse. Accordingly, an implant having an adjustable length, e.g., comprising an adjusting mechanism as described herein, can be pre-attached to a vagina at one end, and at or near a sacrum (i.e., a component of sacral anatomy) at a second end. The end located at or near the sacrum can include an adjusting mechanism as described herein. A physician can adjust the tension and length of the implant between a vagina and sacrum, when securing the vagina to the sacrum through a single vaginal incision. Post-operatively, e.g., within 1, 2, or 3 days, to 1, 2, or 3 weeks after the surgical procedure, a physician can again adjust the tension by actuating the adjusting mechanism.
As used herein, the terms “anchor,” “tissue fastener,” and “self-fixating tip,” refer interchangeably and non-specifically to any structure that can connect an implant to supportive tissue of a pelvic region. The supportive tissue may preferably be a soft tissue such as a muscle, fascia, ligament, tendon, or the like. The anchor may be any known or future-developed structure useful to connect an implant to such tissue, including but not limited to a clamp, a suture, a soft tissue anchor such as a self-fixating tip, and the like.
An implant can include a tissue support portion (or “support portion” or “center support portion”) that can be used to support tissue as desired, e.g., a urethra (including a bladder neck), bladder, vagina, levator, rectum, sphincter, or other pelvic tissue. Supporting a “urethra” refers to supporting tissue that includes the urethra (which can refer to the bladder neck), and that can optionally include tissue adjacent to a urethra such as bulbospongiosus muscle, corpus spongiosum, or both. According to specific methods involving treatment of urinary incontinence, a support portion may be placed below bulbospongiosus muscle to support both bulbospongiosus muscle and corpus spongiosum (along with the urethra), or alternately bulbospongiosus muscle may be dissected and a support portion may be placed to contact corpus spongiosum tissue (to support the urethra).
An implant can additionally include one or more extension portion (otherwise known as an “end” portion or “arm”) attached or attachable to the tissue support portion. Normally, for treating incontinence, an implant can include two opposing extension portions. Extension portions are elongate pieces of material (e.g., mesh, molded implant material, suture, or biologic material) that extend from the tissue support portion and either are or can be connected to the tissue support portion, and are useful to attach to anatomical features or “supportive tissue” in the pelvic region (e.g., using an anchor such as a self-fixating tip or another form of tissue fastener, or an adjusting mechanism as described here) to thereby provide support for the tissue support portion and the supported tissue. Generally for treating incontinence, two extension portions can extend from opposite ends of a tissue support portion as elongate “ends,” “arms,” or “extensions,” and may attach to supportive tissue in the pelvic region by extending through a tissue path to an internal anchoring point (see, e.g., Applicant's copending United States Patent Application Publication number US 2010/256442, filed Aug. 8, 2008, by Ogdahl, entitled SURGICAL ARTICLES AND METHODS FOR TREATING PELVIC CONDITIONS, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference), or may extend to an external incision, such as through an obturator foramen and through an external incision at a groin or inner thigh (see, e.g., Applicant's copending United States Patent Publication Number US 2006/0287571, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference). Also see U.S. Patent Publication number US 2011/0034759 and WO 2010/093421, PCT/US2010/057879, filed Nov.23, 2010, and PCT/US2010/059739, filed Dec. 9, 2010, the entireties of which are incorporated hereby by reference.
In exemplary uses, each extension portion can extend from the location of attachment with the tissue support portion of the implant, through pelvic tissue, and to a location of supportive tissue within the pelvic region, preferably near the patient's skin. The supportive tissue can be at an end of a tissue path used to perform a desired implant procedure, such as at a location near an external incision in the skin used to perform the procedure, e.g., at a location at or near an end of an extension portion placed according to a retropubic procedure or a transobturator procedure for placing a sling for treating urinary or fecal incontinence.
An implant may include portions, pieces, or sections that are synthetic or of biologic material (e.g., porcine, cadaveric, etc.). Extension portions may be, e.g., a synthetic mesh such as a polypropylene mesh, a suture, a biodegradable suture, a molded implant material, or the like. The tissue support portion may be synthetic (e.g., a polypropylene mesh or a molded material) or biologic. Examples of implant products that may be similar to those useful according to the present description include those sold commercially by American Medical Systems, Inc., of Minnetonka Minn., under the trade names Apogee®, Perigee®, and Elevate® for use in treating pelvic prolapse (including vaginal vault prolapse, cystocele, enterocele, etc.), and Sparc®, Bioarc®, Monarc®, MiniArc®, InVance™, and AdVance™ for treating urinary incontinence.
An example of a pelvic implant that may be useful according to this description is the type that includes supportive portions including or consisting of a tissue support portion and two or four extension portions extending from the tissue support portion. An implant that has exactly two or four extension portions can be of the type useful for treating urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, or a combination of vaginal prolapse and urinary or fecal incontinence. The term “supportive portions” refers to portions of an implant that function to support tissue after the implant has been implanted and specifically includes extension portions and tissue support portions, and does not include optional or appurtenant features of an implant such as a sheath, tensioning suture, tissue fastener, or self-fixating tip or other type of connector for attaching the implant to an insertion tool.
Dimensions of a tissue support portion can be any dimensions useful to support a specific tissue, e.g., urethral or vaginal tissue, for treating a pelvic condition such as incontinence, prolapse, or another pelvic condition. A tissue support portion for use in treating incontinence can be of sufficient length to support and optionally partially surround a urethra or urethra-supporting tissue. A width of a tissue support portion may optionally and preferably be greater than a width of extension portions and can be sufficiently wide to increase contact area and frictional forces between a tissue support portion and a tissue in contact with the tissue support portion. Exemplary lengths of a tissue support portion can be in the range from 0.5 to 2 inches, such as from 0.75 to 1.5 inches. Exemplary widths of a tissue support portion can be in the range from 0.4 or 0.5 to 4 centimeters, such as from 1 to 2.5 or 3 centimeters.
An implant (e.g., sling) for placement against a corpus spongiosum for treatment of urinary incontinence in a male patient may optionally and preferably include a widened central support to provide increased contact and frictional engagement with the corpus spongiosum. See, for example, Assignee's copending United States Patent Publication Number US 2006/0287571 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,422,557, the entireties of these applications being incorporated herein by reference.
Dimensions of extension portions can allow the extension portion to reach between a tissue support portion placed to support a pelvic tissue such as tissue of a urethra, vagina, anal sphincter, levator, etc., (at an end of the extension portion connected to the tissue support portion) and a location at which the distal end of the extension portion attaches to an adjusting mechanism that can be actuated to increase or decrease the length of the extension portion. The adjusting mechanism is preferably located at tissue of the patient's pelvic region, preferably at a subcutaneous location adjacent to the patient's skin. As used herein, “subcutaneous” refers to a location that is below the skin of the patient, but near an external surface of the skin, such as within two inches, one inch, or a half inch of the outer surface of the patient's skin. Exemplary lengths of an extension portion for use in treating incontinence, for example, measured between a connection or boundary between the extension portion and the tissue support portion, and a distal end of the extension portion that connects to the adjusting mechanism, can be, e.g., from 0.5 to 3 inches, preferably from 1.0 to 2.5 inches, the length being adjustable as described herein. These or other lengths will be useful for implants designed to treat other conditions. For example, lengths of a sling for treating anal incontinence may be longer.
Implants as described can alternately include a dilator, connector, tissue fastener, or an adjusting mechanism as described, at a distal end or a distal portion of an extension portion, which is the end or portion not attached to a tissue support portion. (The term “distal” as used in this context generally refers to location at an end of an extension portion away from a tissue support portion.) A dilator, connector, or tissue fastener can be any of various types, including: a dilator or connector that facilitates passage of the extension portion through a tissue path, e.g., by connecting to an end of an insertion tool; a self-fixating tip that facilitates passage of the extension portion through a tissue path (using an insertion tool) and that can be secured to supportive tissue. Useful examples of dilators, connectors, and tissue fasteners are well known. Generally preferred tissue fasteners include those referred to as “self-fixating” tips, which can be inserted into soft tissue and frictionally retained. Others include other forms of soft tissue anchors; biologic adhesive; a soft tissue clamp that can generally include opposing, optionally biased, jaws that close to grab tissue; and opposing male and female connector elements that engage to secure an end of an extension portion to tissue. (See International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/014120, entitled “Surgical Implants, Tools, and Methods for Treating Pelvic Conditions, filed Jun. 15, 2007; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/223,846, filed Aug. 8, 2008, entitled SURGICAL ARTICLES AND METHODS FOR TREATING PELVIC CONDITIONS; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/669,099, filed Jan. 14, 2010, entitled PELVIC FLOOR TREATMENTS AND RELATED TOOLS AND IMPLANTS; and WO 2009/075800, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.)
According to various systems as described, one or more instrument, insertion tool, adjustment tool, or the like, may be used with an implant or method as described. Examples of useful tools include those that generally include one or more (stationary or moveable) thin elongate, relatively rigid shaft or needle that extends from a handle. The handle is located at a proximal end of the tool and attaches to one end (a proximal end) of the shaft. An exemplary shaft of an insertion tool can be useful to form or pass through a tissue path between a location of placement of a tissue support portion, and a location of placement of an end of an extension portion, e.g., a location of placement of an adjusting mechanism. According to some embodiments, a distal end of one or more shaft can be adapted to engage a distal end of an extension portion or a component thereof, such as a tissue fastener (e.g., a self-fixating tip), a dilator, or an adjusting mechanism, in a manner that allows the insertion tool to either push or pull the tissue fastener (e.g., a self-fixating tip), dilator, or adjusting mechanism, through a tissue path used for placement of an extension portion of an implant.
Examples of insertion tools that may be useful for forming a tissue path or placing an extension portion, optionally with modification, for treating vaginal prolapse, are described, e.g., in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/834,943, 10/1306,179; 11/347,553; 11/398,368; 10/840,646; PCT application number 2006/028828; PCT application number 2006/0260618; WO 2010/093421, and US Patent Publication No. 2010-0256442 the entireties of these documents being incorporated herein by reference.
One general form of implant useful for treatment of urinary or fecal incontinence as described herein is a suburethral or retropubic sling, e.g., as marketed by American Medical Systems under various trade names including MONARC™, SPARC™, INVANCE, ADVANCE™. Devices and methods as described can be suitable for these and similar slings in the treatment of male and female urinary and fecal incontinence and to effect pelvic floor, perineal floor, and pelvic prolapse repairs that involve a variety of surgical approaches. For example, female pelvic floor repair slings may be implanted by techniques that involve transvaginal, transobturator, suprapubic, pre-pubic, or transperineal exposures or pathways. Male urinary incontinence slings may be implanted by techniques that involve transobturator, suprapubic, or transperineal pathways. Embodiments of the described devices and methods may be useful in treating fecal incontinence, by use of a transvaginal, transobturator, suprapubic or perineal floor pathway. In fecal incontinence applications, the disclosed embodiments can be used to correct the anorectal angle in the rectum to re-establish continence in patients. The above methods can, but are not necessarily limited to, use of helical needles of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,911,003 or C-shaped needles or elongate needles of the type used to perform suprapubic procedures.
Referring to
Sling 20 is designed to be implanted and then left in place chronically, and includes an elongated, rectangular (in this depicted embodiment) braided or preferably knitted, mesh strip or simply mesh 30. Sling 20 and mesh 30 are subdivided into a central support portion 40 adapted to be placed below tissue to be supported, such as a urethra. In a female patient, support portion 40 can be placed between the urethra or bladder neck and the vaginal wall. End portions 42 and 44 extend from the central support portion 40 to the mesh ends 32 and 34. In
In use, sling ends 32, 34 and adjusting mechanisms 12 can be placed in a desired tissue path, optionally by connecting (separately) either or both adjusting mechanism to an implantation tool and drawing each adjusting mechanism through a tissue pathway in which an extension portion will be located. Central support portion 40 is adapted to draw against tissue to support urethra, bladder neck, anal sphincter, or other tissue of a pelvic region after end portions 42 and 44 are drawn through tissue pathways between the central support portion and external incisions adjacent to opposing locations of subcutaneously placed adjusting mechanisms 12. As an example, using an insertion tool, adjusting mechanisms 12 may be drawn from a location near a medial incision (e.g., vaginal or perineal), away from the medial incision, toward two opposed external lateral incisions in the patient's skin. The external lateral incisions may be at locations of an abdomen or a groin, e.g., to allow for retropubic or transobturator tissue paths, respectively. The adjusting mechanism can be placed and retained at tissue at a subcutaneous location, below the surface of the skin at the location of the external lateral incision. The lateral incisions are closed and sling 20 remains in place. Post-operative adjustment of the tension or length of sling 20 can be made to provide ongoing urethral or anal resistance to leakage.
Referring to
At this point, the tension T that sling 20 applies against the urethra 58 or anus 67 is adjusted as schematically illustrated in
In various embodiments of described devices and methods, a length or tension of sling 20 can be adjusted in a post-operative step to adjust tension applied to a urethra 58 or anus 67 to enhance efficacy and patient comfort. Referring to
In a similar but not identical fashion,
In a similar but not identical fashion,
Referring to
Referring to
The mechanical engagement can include relatively smooth and rounded surfaces such as hemispheres or other curved surfaces that can engage through the skin with sufficient mechanical force to allow the external adjustment tool 13 to mechanically manipulate internal adjusting mechanism 12. Desirably, the mechanical engagement does not include any sharp surfaces that would damage the patient's internal or external tissue. The mechanical engagement can be one that can allow an operative connection between a surface of internal adjusting mechanism 12 and a surface of external adjustment tool 13, with sufficient intimacy and strength that when the engagement is made through the patient's intact skin, movement of the external adjustment tool causes desired, predictable, dependable, and effective movement of the internal adjusting mechanism in a desired direction (e.g., turning clockwise or counterclockwise) to effect a dependable turning motion of spool 90 within casing 96 to either wind or unwind mesh or suture 42 or 44 through the patient's tissue.
As illustrated at
Optionally, (for any such transcutaneous engagement) additional engagement force can be provided by opposing magnets present on external adjustment tool 13 and adjusting mechanism 12. Receiving spool 90 can include a magnet that rotates when the external magnet is rotated. The non-mechanical, magnetic engagement could be used in combination with a mechanical engagement.
Adjusting mechanism 124 can be placed at a subcutaneous location in a patient, with implant 120 supporting tissue as described. Adjusting mechanism 124 is capable of winding or otherwise reducing the length of filament 126. Tissue fastener 112 is attached directly to mesh 128. In use, tissue fastener 122 can be installed at supportive tissue at one side of a patient. Adjusting mechanism 124 can be installed at the opposite side of the patient. Mesh 128 is positioned to support tissue 58 (e.g., a urethra, bladder, vaginal tissue, or another tissue) (see
Referring to
To shorten the length of implant 150, motor 166 is activated to cause rotation of a component of the adjusting mechanism (e.g., a central core) to wind up or “spool” mesh 154 within housing 160 until a desired tightness of implant 150 within the patient is achieved. Such a system can additionally or alternately allow for lengthening of implant 150 to provide more “slack” or to loosen implant 150 within a patient. To accomplish this, motor 160 can be activated to unwind mesh 154, such as by causing rotation in an opposite direction from the direction in which the adjusting mechanism rotates to shortening mesh 154. Motor 166 can provide for rotation in only a single direction (e.g., counterclockwise rotation), or can alternately provide for movement of the motor housing in two directions (e.g., clockwise and counterclockwise rotation). Movement of the motor housing in two opposing directions will allow for both tightening and loosening of the implant, such as if the original implantation procedure provided for a mesh that is too loose or tight or if the procedure of tightening the mesh within the motor housing caused excessive tension in the mesh material.
Adjusting mechanism 152 can be provided with exterior holding or anchoring structure 162, such as suture hoops, stays, barbs, anchors, or other structure or devices on exterior surfaces that can be used to secure adjusting mechanism 152 to tissue or to strengthen a grip between adjusting mechanism 152 and adjacent tissue, to provide compensating torque or force on housing 160 during adjustment. When, for example, suture hoops are provided, sutures or devices can be attached to the suture hoops to provide motor housing rotation control. Other devices or systems can be used in addition to or as a replacement for the suture hoops to provide compensating torque or force. To measure or monitor the force on material 156, adjusting mechanism 152 can further be provided with torque or force transducers to measure a tensioning force. Such transducers can be used on the implant itself or the motor to provide the surgeon with feedback regarding the relative degree of tension or positioning of the implant within the patient.
Activation of adjusting mechanism 152 to reduce or increase a length of implant 150, by activating motor 160, may be performed in any useful manner. For example, an external tool can be inserted through the tissue (e.g., epidermis), i.e., through an incision, such as with a device (e.g., a needle) that allows for minimally invasive entry into the area of the body in which an adjusting mechanism. In this way, engagement of an internal adjusting mechanism can be accomplished by inserting the adjustment tool through the skin and into the patient, and can include smooth surfaces such as hemispheres or other curved surfaces that can engage through the skin with sufficient mechanical force to allow the external tool to engage and mechanically manipulate the internal adjusting mechanism. In another example, an adjusting mechanism can be activated externally from the patient's body, transcutaneously, through intact skin, thereby further minimizing patient trauma.
The patient may additionally or alternately be provided with a shunt-like access hole through the skin, which can allow the surgeon to have relatively easy access to an adjusting mechanism after the adjusting mechanism is implanted is placed subcutaneously in the patient. Such an access hole can be temporary or permanent, as desired. With this type of access, the system can include a spool that is implanted in the patient and a motor that is located outside the patient, wherein the motor is connected to the spool or other winding components within the patient via the access hole. The use of an external motor can thereby reduce the number of components that are implanted within a patient and minimize the corresponding bulk of the overall system. Attachment of the motor to the internally implanted components can be accomplished via electronic or mechanical connection of components.
An adjusting mechanism as described can be constructed of various biocompatible or biodegradable materials. A devices or device component can be made of any biologically safe material for implantation (tissue contact greater than 30 days), such as stainless steel, polycarbonate, polypropylene, PET, polyurethane, silicone, polysulphone, and Uitem, or the like, or combinations thereof. However, any suitable material is considered to be within the scope of the invention. For example, the motor housing can be made of a material that will eventually dissolve. Excess mesh (e.g., mesh that is wound within the motor housing) can eventually dissolve, thereby resulting in a lower volume of material remaining within the patient. Electrical power for a motor of an adjusting mechanism can be built up with a rechargeable system. With such a system, a battery can be relatively small and can optionally be rechargeable at some time after a surgical implantation procedure, such as at an office visit after the surgery is complete.
The disclosed systems, their various components, structures, features, materials and methods may have a number of suitable configurations as shown and described in the previously-incorporated references. Various methods and tools for introducing, deploying, anchoring and manipulate device, implants, and the like as disclosed in the previously-incorporated references are envisioned for use with the present invention as well.
All patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if individually incorporated, and include those references incorporated within the identified patents, patent applications and publications.
The present non-provisional patent Application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/432,632, filed Mar. 28, 2012, which claims priority under 35 USC §119(e) from U.S. Provisional Patent Application having Ser. No. 61/468,069, filed Mar. 28, 2011, entitled “IMPLANTS, TOOLS, AND METHODS FOR TREATMENTS OF PELVIC CONDITIONS,” and United States Provisional Patent Application having serial number 61/496,125, filed Jun. 13, 2011, entitled “IMPLANTS, TOOLS, AND METHODS FOR TREATMENTS OF PELVIC CONDITIONS,” all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2738790 | Todt et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
3124136 | Usher | Mar 1964 | A |
3182662 | Shirodkar | May 1965 | A |
3311110 | Singerman et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3384073 | Van Winkle, Jr. | May 1968 | A |
3472232 | Earl | Oct 1969 | A |
3580313 | McKnight | May 1971 | A |
3613679 | Bijou | Oct 1971 | A |
3763860 | Clarke | Oct 1973 | A |
3789828 | Schulte | Feb 1974 | A |
3815576 | Balaban | Jun 1974 | A |
3858783 | Kapitanov et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3924633 | Cook et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
4019499 | Fitzgerald | Apr 1977 | A |
4037603 | Wendorff | Jul 1977 | A |
4128100 | Wendorff | Dec 1978 | A |
4172458 | Pereyra | Oct 1979 | A |
4235238 | Ogiu et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4246660 | Wevers | Jan 1981 | A |
4441497 | Paudler | Apr 1984 | A |
4509516 | Richmond | Apr 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4775380 | Seedhom et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4857041 | Annis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865031 | O'Keeffe | Sep 1989 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4920986 | Biswas | May 1990 | A |
4932962 | Yoon et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969892 | Burton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5007894 | Enhorning | Apr 1991 | A |
5012822 | Schwarz | May 1991 | A |
5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
5032508 | Naughton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036867 | Biswas | Aug 1991 | A |
5053043 | Gottesman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
5123428 | Schwarz | Jun 1992 | A |
5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5149329 | Richardson | Sep 1992 | A |
5188636 | Fedotov | Feb 1993 | A |
5209756 | Seedhom et al. | May 1993 | A |
5250033 | Evans et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5281237 | Gimpelson | Jan 1994 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5362294 | Seitzinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5368595 | Lewis | Nov 1994 | A |
5370650 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376097 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5383904 | Totakura et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386836 | Biswas | Feb 1995 | A |
5403328 | Shallman | Apr 1995 | A |
5413598 | Moreland | May 1995 | A |
5439467 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474518 | Velazquez | Dec 1995 | A |
5474543 | McKay | Dec 1995 | A |
5518504 | Polyak | May 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520703 | Essig | May 1996 | A |
5527342 | Pietrzak et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571139 | Jenkins, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582188 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5591206 | Moufarrege | Jan 1997 | A |
5611515 | Benderev et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628756 | Barker, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633286 | Chen | May 1997 | A |
5643320 | Lower et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669935 | Rosenman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683349 | Makower et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5709708 | Thal | Jan 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732475 | Sacks et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5782916 | Pintauro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785640 | Kresch et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836315 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840011 | Landgrebe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842478 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860425 | Benderev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919232 | Chaffringeon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5925047 | Errico et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5934283 | Willem et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935122 | Fourkas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944732 | Raulerson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954057 | Li | Sep 1999 | A |
5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980558 | Wiley | Nov 1999 | A |
5984927 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988171 | Sohn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
6027523 | Schmieding | Feb 2000 | A |
6030393 | Corlew | Feb 2000 | A |
6031148 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036701 | Rosenman | Mar 2000 | A |
6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042583 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050937 | Benderev | Apr 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056688 | Benderev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071290 | Compton | Jun 2000 | A |
6074341 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099538 | Moses | Aug 2000 | A |
6099551 | Gabbay | Aug 2000 | A |
6099552 | Adams | Aug 2000 | A |
6106545 | Egan | Aug 2000 | A |
6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117067 | Gil-Vernet | Sep 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142968 | Pigg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6168611 | Risvi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174279 | Girard | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241736 | Sater et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264676 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273852 | Lehe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302840 | Benderev | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322492 | Kovac | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328686 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328744 | Harari et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334446 | Beyar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352553 | van de Burg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382214 | Raz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406480 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414179 | Banville | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423080 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432074 | Ager et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451024 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475139 | Miller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478727 | Scetbon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482214 | Sidor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491703 | Ulmsten | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494906 | Owens | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502578 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530943 | Hoepffner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6575897 | Ory | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592515 | Thierfelder | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592610 | Beyar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596001 | Stormby et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599235 | Kovac | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599323 | Melican et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602260 | Harari et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612977 | Staskin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638210 | Berger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638211 | Suslian et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638284 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641524 | Kovac | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6641525 | Rocheleau | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648921 | Anderson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652450 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673010 | Skiba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682475 | Cox et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685629 | Therin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689047 | Gellman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691711 | Raz | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699175 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702827 | Lund | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6752814 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755781 | Gellman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6802807 | Anderson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6830052 | Carter et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881184 | Zappala | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884212 | Thierfelder et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908425 | Luscombe | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908473 | Skiba et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911002 | Fierro | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911003 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932759 | Kammerer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936052 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953428 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960160 | Browning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971986 | Staskin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974462 | Sater | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981944 | Jamiolkowski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6981983 | Rosenblatt et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6991597 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7014607 | Gellman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025063 | Snitkin | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025772 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037255 | Inman | May 2006 | B2 |
7048682 | Neisz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056333 | Walshe | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070556 | Anderson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7070558 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083568 | Neisz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083637 | Tannhauser | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7087065 | Ulmsten et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112210 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121997 | Kammerer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131943 | Kammerer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7131944 | Jacquetin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7175591 | Kaladelfos | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198597 | Siegel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226407 | Kammerer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7226408 | Harari et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229404 | Bouffier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229453 | Anderson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235043 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261723 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7285103 | Nathanson | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299803 | Kovac | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303525 | Watschke et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326213 | Benderev et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347812 | Mellier | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351197 | Montpetit et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357773 | Watschke et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364541 | Chu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371245 | Evans et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7387634 | Benderev | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393320 | Montpetit et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407480 | Staskin | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410460 | Benderev | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413540 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422557 | Arnal | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431690 | Merade et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7494495 | Delorme et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500945 | Cox | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513865 | Bourne et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527588 | Zaddem et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7588598 | Delorme et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601118 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611454 | De Leval | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621864 | Suslian et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637860 | MacLean | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686759 | Sater | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691050 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722527 | Bouchier et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722528 | Arnal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740576 | Hodroff | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753839 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762942 | Neisz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766926 | Bosley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789821 | Browning | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8172745 | Rosenblatt | May 2012 | B2 |
8808162 | Gindele et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20010049467 | Lehe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007222 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020028980 | Thierfelder et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020128670 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151909 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161382 | Neisz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004581 | Rousseau | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036676 | Scetbon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065402 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015057 | Rocheleau et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073235 | Lund | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040225181 | Chu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267088 | Krammerer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000523 | Beraud | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004427 | Cervigni | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004576 | Benderev | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038451 | Rao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055104 | Arnal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050131391 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131393 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050199249 | Karram | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245787 | Cox et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256530 | Petros | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277806 | Cristalli | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278037 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283189 | Rosenblatt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015010 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060053903 | Berenyi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058578 | Browning | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089524 | Chu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089525 | Mamo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122457 | Kovac | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060028828 | Cox et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173237 | Jacquetin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195007 | Anderson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195011 | Arnal | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217589 | Wan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229493 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229596 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252980 | Arnal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287571 | Gozzi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015953 | MacLean | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078295 | Iandgrebe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070162120 | Bouffier | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173864 | Chu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080039678 | Montpetit et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072404 | Wetter | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080251002 | Burleigh | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300607 | Meade et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005634 | Rane | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012353 | Beyer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090192346 | Rosenblatt | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221868 | Evans | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100261950 | Lund | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110124954 | Ogdahl et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110297161 | Deitch | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002241673 AU | Nov 2005 | AU |
2404459 CA | Aug 2005 | CA |
2305815 | Feb 1973 | DE |
4220283 | May 1994 | DE |
19544162 | Apr 1997 | DE |
10211360 | Sep 2003 | DE |
20016866 | Mar 2007 | DE |
0248544 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0470308 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0650703 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0643945 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0632999 | Jan 1995 | EP |
1093758 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1060714 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1342450 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2787990 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2852813 | Jan 2004 | FR |
223297 | Apr 1989 | GB |
2268690 | Jan 1994 | GB |
2353220 | Oct 2000 | GB |
1299162 | Apr 1998 | IT |
1225547 | Apr 1986 | SU |
1342486 | Oct 1987 | SU |
WO9317635 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO9319678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO9511631 | May 1995 | WO |
WO9525469 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO9716121 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9747244 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9819606 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9835606 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835632 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9842261 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9853746 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO9916381 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9937217 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9952450 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9953844 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9959477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0064370 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO0013601 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0018319 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0027304 | May 2000 | WO |
WO0040158 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0027812 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0066030 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074613 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0106951 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0126581 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0139670 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145588 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145589 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0156499 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO0228312 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0228315 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0230293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0232284 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0234124 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0238079 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0239890 | May 2002 | WO |
WO02058563 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02062237 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02069781 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02071953 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02078552 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02089704 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03017848 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03028585 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03303778 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03037215 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03041613 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03047435 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO03068107 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO03075792 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03092546 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO03096929 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004012626 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004017862 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004034912 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2005037132 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005079702 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005122954 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006015031 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006108145 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2007011341 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007014241 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007016083 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007027592 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007059199 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007081955 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007097994 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007137226 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007146784 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007149348 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007149555 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008057261 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008124056 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO200905714 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009017680 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“We're staying ahead of the curve” Introducing the IVS Tunneller Device for Tension Free Procedures, Tyco Healthcare, 3 pages (2002). |
Advantage A/T™, Surgical Mesh Sling Kit, Boston Scientific, 6 pages (2002). |
Albert H, Aldridge, B.S., M.D., F.A.C.S., Transplantation of Fascia for Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, V. 44, pp. 398-411, (1948). |
Amundsen, Cindy L. et al., Anatomical Correction of Vaginal Vault Prolapse by Uterosacral Ligament Fixation in Women Who Also Require a Pubovaginal Sling, The Journal of Urology, vol. 169, pp. 1770-1774, (May 2003). |
Araki, Tohru et al., The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties After Stamey Suspension of the Vesical Neck, The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, pp. 319-323 (Aug. 1990). |
Asmussen, M. et.al., Simultaneous Urethro-Cystometry With a New Technique, Scand J Urol Nephrol 10, p. 7-11 (1976). |
Beck, Peter R. et al., Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence With Anterior Colporrhaphy, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59 (No. 3), pp. 269-274 (Mar. 1982). |
Benderev, Theodore V., MD, A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System, Journal of Urology, vol. 152, pp. 2316-2320 (Dec. 1994). |
Benderev, Theodore V., MD, Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension, Urology, vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 409-418 (Nov. 1992). |
Bergman, Arieh et al., Three Surgical Procedures for Genuine Stress Incontinence: Five-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Randomized Study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 173 No. 1, pp. 66-71 (Jul. 1995). |
Blaivas, Jerry et al., Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 145, pp. 1214-1218 (Jun. 1991). |
Blaivas, Jerry et al., Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment, Surgical Forum, pp. 473-475, (1984). |
Blaivas, Jerry, Commentary: Pubovaginal Sling Procedure, Experience with Pubovaginal Slings, pp. 93-101 (1990). |
Boyles, Sarah Hamilton et al., Procedures for Urinary Incontinence in the United States, 1979-1997, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 189, n. 1, pp. 70-75 (Jul. 2003). |
Bryans, Fred E., Marlex Gauze Hammock Sling Operation With Cooper's Ligament Attachment in the Management of Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 133, pp. 292-294 (Feb. 1979). |
Burch, John C., Urethrovaginal Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Correction of Stress Incontinence, Cystocele, and Prolapse, Am. J. Obst. & Gyn, vol. 31, pp. 281-290 (1961). |
Capio™ CL—Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device—Transvaginal Suture Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Sling Procedures, Boston Scientific, Microvasive®, 8 pages, (2002). |
Cervigni, Mauro et al., The Use of Synthetics in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Voiding Dysfunction and Female Urology, vol. 11, pp. 429-435 (2001). |
Choe, Jong M. et al., Gore-Tex Patch Sling; 7 Years Later, Urology, vol. 54, pp. 641-646 (1999). |
Cook/Ob Gyn®, Urogynecology, Copyright Cook Urological Inc., pp. 1-36 (1996). |
Dargent, D. et al., Insertion of a Suburethral Sling Through the Obturator Membrane in the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, vol. 30, pp. 576-582 (2002). |
Das, Sakti et al., Laparoscopic Colpo-Suspension, The Journal of Urology, vol. 154, pp. 1119-1121 (Sep. 1995). |
Debodinance, Philipp et al, “Tolerance of Synthetic Tissues in Touch With Vaginal Scars: Review to the Point of 287 Cases”, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 87 (1999) pp. 23-30. |
Decter, Ross M., Use of the Fascial Sling for Neurogenic Incontinence: Lessons Learned, The Journal of Urology, vol. 150, pp. 683-686 (Aug. 1993). |
Delancey, John, MD, Structural Support of the Urethra As It Relates to Stress Urinary Incontinence: The Hammock Hypothesis, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 170 No. 6, pp. 1713-1723 (Jun. 1994). |
Delorme, Emmanuel, Trans-Obturator Sling: A Minimal Invasive Procedure to Treat Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, pp. 1306-1313 (2001) English Abstract attached. |
Diana, et al., Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse With Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy Using Prolene Mesh, American Journal of Surgery, vol. 179, pp. 126-128, (Feb. 2000). |
Eglin et al, Transobturator Subvesical Mesh. Tolerance and short-term results of a 103 case continuous series, Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite, vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 14-19 (Jan. 2003). |
Enzelsberger, H. et al., Urodynamic and Radiologic Parameters Before and After Loop Surgery for Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69, pp. 51-54 (1990). |
Eriksen, Bjarne C. et al., Long-Term Effectiveness of the Burch Colposuspension in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69, pp. 45-50 (1990). |
Falconer, C. et al., Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism After Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinence Women, International Urogynecology Journal, pp. 133-137 (1966). |
Falconer, C. et al., Influence of Different Sling Materials of Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent Women, International Urogynecology Journal, Supp. 2, pp. S19-S23 (2001). |
Farnsworth, B.N., Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty (Infracoccygeal Sacropexy) for Sever Posthysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse—A Preliminary Report on Efficacy and Safety, Int Urogynecology J, vol. 13, pp. 4-8 (2002). |
Farquhar, Cynthia M. et al., Hysterectomy Rates in the United States 1990-1997, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 99, n. 2, pp. 229-234 (Feb. 2002). |
Fidela, Marie R. et al., Pelvic Support Defects and Visceral and Sexual Function in Women Treated With Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension and Pelvic Reconstruction, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, n. 6 (Dec. 1996). |
Flood, C.G. et al., Anterior Colporrhaphy Reinforce With Marlex Mesh for the Treatment of Cystoceles, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, pp. 200-204 (1998). |
Gilja, Ivan et al., A Modified Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Operation (Transvaginal Burch), The Journal of Urology, vol. 153, pp. 1455-1457 (May 1995). |
Gittes, Ruben F. et al., No-Incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 138 (Sep. 1987). |
Guner, et al., Transvaginal Sacrospinous Colpopexy for Marked Uterovaginal and Vault Prolapse, Inter J of Gynec & Obstetrics, vol. 74, pp. 165-170 (2001). |
Gynecare TVT Tension-Free Support for Incontinence, The tension-free solution to female Incontinence, Gynecare Worldwide,6 pages, (2002). |
Handa, Victoria L. et al, Banked Human Fascia Lata for the Suburethral Sling Procedure: A Preliminary Report, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88 No. 6, 5 pages (Dec. 1996). |
Heit, Michael et al., Predicting Treatment Choice for Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 101, n. 6, pp. 1279-1284 (Jun. 2003). |
Henriksson, L et al., A Urodynamic Evaluation of the Effects of Abdominal Urethrocystopexy and Vaginal Sling Urethroplasty in Women With Stress Incontinence, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. vol. 131, No. 1, pp. 77-82 (Mar. 1, 1978). |
Hodgkinson, C. Paul et.al., Urinary Stress Incontinence in the Female, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Henry Ford Hospital, vol. 10, No. 5, p. 493-499, (Nov. 1957). |
Holschneider, C. H., et al., The Modified Pereyra Procedure in Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 15-year Review, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 573-578 (Apr. 1994). |
Horbach, Nicollette S., et al., Instruments and Methods, A Suburethral Sling Procedure with Polytetrafluoroethylene for the Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence in Patients with Low Urethral Closure Pressure, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 648-652 (Apr. 1998). |
Ingelman-Sunberg, A. et al., Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence, Contr. Gynec. Obstet., vol. 10, pp. 51-69 (1983). |
IVS Tunneller—A Universal instrument for anterior and posterior intra-vaginal tape placement, Tyco Healthcare, 4 pages (Aug. 2002). |
IVS Tunneller—ein universelles Instrument fur die Intra Vaginal Schlingenplastik, Tyco Healthcare, 4 pages (2001). |
Jeffcoate, T.N.A. et al., The Results of the Aldridge Sling Operation for Stress Incontinence, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, pp. 36-39 (1956). |
Jones, N.H.J. Reay et al., Pelvic Connective Tissue Resilience Decreases With Vaginal Delivery, Menopause and Uterine Prolapse, Br J Surg, vol. 90, n. 4, pp. 466.472 (Apr. 2003). |
Julian, Thomas, The Efficacy of Marlex Mesh in the Repair of Sever, Recurrent Vaginal Prolapse of the Anterior Midvaginal Wall, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, n. 6, pp. 1472-1475 (Dec. 1996). |
Karram, Mickey et al., Patch Procedure: Modified Transvaginal Fascia Lata Sling for Recurrent for Severe Stress Urinary Incontinence, vol. 75, pp. 461-463 (Mar. 1990). |
Karram, Mickey M. et al., Chapter 19 Surgical Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse, Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, (Walters & Karram eds.) pp. 236-256 (Mosby 1999). |
Kersey, J., The Gauze Hammock Sling Operation in the Treatment of Stress Incontintence, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 90, pp. 945-949 (Oct. 1983). |
Klutke, Carl et al., The Anatomy of Stress Incontinence: Magentic Resonance Imaging of the Female Bladder Neck and Urethra, The Journal of Urology, vol. 143, pp. 563-566 (Mar. 1990). |
Klutke, John James et al., Transvaginal Bladder Neck Suspension to Cooper's Ligament: A modified Pereyra Procedure, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 294-296 (Aug. 1996). |
Klutke, John M.D. et al, The promise of tension-free vaginal tape for female SUI, Contemporary Urology, 7 pages (Oct. 2000). |
Korda, A. et al., Experience With Silastic Slings for Female Urinary Incontience, Aust NZ J. Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 29, pp. 150-154 (May 1989). |
Kovac, S. Robert, et al, Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 624-627 (Apr. 1997). |
Kovac, S. Robed, et al, Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: A Long Term Cure for SUI?, Contemporary OB/GYN, 10 pages (Feb. 1998). |
Kovac, S. Robert, Follow-up of the Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling Operation for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence (Kovac Procedure), Journal of Pelvic Surgery, pp. 156-160 (May 1999). |
Kovac, Stephen Robert, M.D., Cirriculum Vitae, pp. 1-33 (Jun. 18, 1999). |
Leach, Gary E., et al., Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel Report on Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, American Urological Association, vol. 158, pp. 875-880 (Sep. 1997). |
Leach, Gary E., MD, Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension, Urology vol. XXXI, No. 5, pp. 388-390 (May 1988) |
Lichtenstein, Irving L. et al, The Tension Free Hernioplasty, The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 157 pp. 188-193 (Feb. 1989). |
Loughlin, Kevin R. et al., Review of an 8-Year Experience With Modifications of Endoscopic Suspension of the Bladder Neck, for Female Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Uroloyg, vol. 143, pp. 44-45 (1990). |
Luber, Karl M. et al., The Demographics of Pelvic Floor Disorders; Current Observations and Future Projections, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 184, n. 7, pp. 1496-1503 (Jun. 2001). |
Mage, Technique Chirurgicale, L'Interpostion D'un Treillis Synthetique Dans La Cure Par Voie Vaginale Des Prolapsus Genitaux, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol. 28, pp. 825-829 (1999). |
Marchionni, Mauro et al., True Incidence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse—Thirteen Years of Experience, Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 44, n. 8, pp. 679-684 (Aug. 199). |
Marinkovic, Serge Peter et al., Triple Compartment Prolapse: Sacrocolpopexy With Anterior and Posterior Mesh Extensions, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 110, pp. 323-326 (Mar. 2003) |
Marshall, Victor Fray et al. The Correction of Stress Incontinence by Simple Vesicourethral Suspension, Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 88, pp. 509-518 (1949). |
McGuire, Edward J. et al., Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 119, pp. 82-84 (Jan. 1978). |
McGuire, Edward J. et al., Abdominal Procedures for Stress Incontinence, Urologic Clinics of North America, pp. 285-290, vol. 12, No. 2 (May 1985). |
McGuire, Edward J. et al., Experience With Pubovaginal Slings for Urinary Incontinence At the University of Michigan, Journal of Urology, vol. 138, pp. 90-93(1987). |
McGuire, Edwared J. et al., Abdominal Fascial Slings, Slings, Raz Female Urology, p. 369-375 (1996). |
McGuire™ Suture Buide, The McGuire™ Suture Guide, a single use instrument designed for the placement of a suburethral sling, Bard, 2 pages (2001). |
McIndoe, G. A. et al., The Aldridge Sling Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence, Aust. N Z Journal of Obstet Gynecology, pp. 238-239 (Aug. 1987). |
McKiel, Charles F. Jr., et al, Marshall-Marchetti Procedure Modification, vol. 96, pp. 737-739 (Nov. 1966). |
Migliari, Roberto et al., Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Repair for Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse, Eur Urol, vol. 38, pp. 151-155 (Oct. 1999). |
Migliari, Roverto et al., Treatment Results Using a mixed Fiber Mesh in Patients With Grade IV Cystocele, Journal of Urology, vol. 161, pp. 1255-1258 (Apr. 1999). |
Moir, J. Chassar et.al., The Gauze-Hammock Operation, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of British Commonwealth, vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 1-9 (Jan. 1968). |
Morgan, J. E., A Sling Operation, Using Marlex Polypropylene Mesh, for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Incontinence, Am. J. Obst. & Gynecol, pp. 369-377 (Feb. 1970). |
Morgan, J. E et al., The Marlex Sling Operation for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 16-Year Review, American Obstetrics Gynecology, vol. 151, No. 2, pp. 224-226 (Jan. 1998). |
Morley, George W. et al., Sacrospinous Ligament Fixations for Eversion of the Vagina, Am J Obstet Gyn, vol. 158, n. 4, pp. 872-881 (Apr. 1988). |
Narik, G. et.al., A Simplified Sling Operation Suitable for routine use, Gynecological and Obstetrical Clinic, University of Vienna, vol. 84, No 3, pp. 400-405, (Aug. 1, 1962). |
Natale, F. et al., Tension Free Cystocele Repair (TCR): Long-Term Follow-Up, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 11, supp. 1, p. S51 (Oct. 2000). |
Nichols, David H., The Mersilene Mesh Gauze-Hammock for Severe Urinary Stress Incontinence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 41, pp. 88-93 (Jan. 1973). |
Nicita, Giulio, A New Operation for Genitourinary Prolapse, Journal of Urology, vol. 160, pp. 741-745 (Sep. 1998). |
Niknejad, Kathleen et al., Autologous and Synthetic Urethral Slings for Female Incontinence, Urol Clin N Am, vol. 29, pp. 597-611 (2002). |
Norris, Jeffrey P. et al., Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach, Journal of Endourology, vol. 10, pp. 227-230 (Jun. 1996). |
O'Donnell, Pat, Combined Raz Urethral Suspension and McGuire Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal Arkansas Medical Society, vol. 88, pp. 389-392 (Jan. 1992). |
Ostergard, Donald R. et al., Urogynecology and Urodynamics Theory and Practice, pp. 569-579 (1996). |
Paraiso et al., Laparoscopic Surgery for Enterocele, Vaginal Apex Prolapse and Rectocele, Int. Urogynecol J, vol. 10, pp. 223-229 (1999). |
Parra, R. O., et al. Experience With a Simplified Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, British Journal of Urology, pp. 615-617 (1990). |
Pelosi, Marco Antonio III et al., Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advaned Surgical Techniques, vol. 9, No. 1 pp. 45-50 (1999). |
Pereyra, Armand J. et al, Pubourethrel Supports in Perspective: Modified Pereyra Procedure for Urinary Incontinence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 643-648 (May 1982). |
Pereyra, Armand J., M.D., F.A.C.S., A Simplified Surgical Procedure for Correction of Stress Incontinence in Women, West.J.Surg., Obst. & Gynec, p. 223-226, (Jul.-Aug. 1959). |
Peter E. Papa Petros . et al., Cure of Stress Incontinence by Repair of External Anal Sphincter, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand vol. 69, Sup 153, p. 75 (1990). |
Peter Petros et al., Anchoring the Midurethra Restores Bladder-Neck Anatomy and Continence, The Lancet, vol. 354, pp. 997-998 (Sep. 18, 1999). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Anatomical Basis for Success and Failure of Female Incontinence Surgery, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 55-60 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Analysis of Rapid Pad Testing and the History for the Diagnosis of Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 71, pp. 529-536 (1992). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Integral Therory of Female Urinary Incontinence, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 69 Sup. 153, pp. 7-31 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Pape et al., Bladder Instability in Women: A Premature Activation of the Micturition Reflex, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 163, pp. 235-239 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Cough Transmission Ratio: An Indicator of Suburethral Vaginal Wall Tension Rather Than Urethral Closure, Acta Com Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 163, pp. 37-39 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Cure of Urge Incontinence by the Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 81-82 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS III—(With Midline “Tuck”) Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, p. 69-71 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Medium-Term Follow-Up of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation Indicates Minimal Deterioration of Urinary Continence With Time, (3 pages) (1999). |
Petros, Peter E, Papa et al., Non Stress Non Urge Female Urinary Incontinence—Diagnosis and Cure: A Preliminary Report, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 69-70 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part I: Theoretical, Morphological, Radiographical Correlations and Clinical Perspective, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 5-28 1993. |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part II: The Biomechanics of Vaginal Tissue and Supporting Ligaments With Special Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 29-40 plus cover sheet (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part III: Surgical Principles Deriving From the Theory, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 41-52 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part IV: Surgical Appliations of the Theory—Development of the Intravaginal Sling Pklasty (IVS) Procedure, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 53-54 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Pinch Test for Diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 33-35 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Pregnancy Effects on the Intravaginal Sling Operation, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 77-79 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Autogenic Ligament Procedure: A Technique for Planned Formation of an Artificial Neo-Ligament, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 43-51 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation an Ambulatory Procedure for Cure of Stress and Urge Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 53-59 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS II—(With Bilateral “TUCKS”), Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 61-67 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Free Graft Procedure for Cure of the Tethered Vagina Syndrome, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 85-67(1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS IV—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and “Free” Vaginal Tapes), Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology. And Urodynamics, Sup 153, p. 73-75 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS V—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and Permanent Sling)., Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 77-79 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation, A Minimally Invasive Technique for Cure of Urinary Incontinence in the Female, Aust. NZ J Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 36, n. 4, pp. 453-461 (1996). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS VI—Further Development of the “Double Breasted” Vaginal Flap Repair—Attached Flap, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 81-84 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Posterior Fornix Syndrome: A Multiple Symptom Complex of Pelvic Pain and Abnormal Urinary Symptoms Deriving From Laxity in the Posterior Fornix of Vagina, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 89-93 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Role of a Lax Posterior Vaginal Fornix in the Causation of Stress and Urgency Symptoms: A Preliminary Report, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 71-73 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Tethered Vagina Syndrome, Post Surgical Incontinence and I-Plasty Operation for Cure, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 83-67 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Tuck Procedure: A Simplified Vaginal Repair for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 41-42 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Urethral Pressure Increase on Effort Originates From Within the Urethra, and Continence From Musculovaginal Closure, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, pp. 337-350 (1995). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, Development of Generic Models for Ambulatory Vaginal Surgery—Preliminary Report,lnternational Urogynecology Journal, pp. 20-27 (1998). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, New Ambulatory Surgical Methods Using an Anatomical Classification of Urinary Dysfunction Improve Stress, Urge and Abnormal Emptying, Int. Urogynecology Journal Pelvic Floor Dystfunction, vol. 8 (5), pp. 270-278, (1997). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, Vault Prolapse II; Restoration of Dynamic Vaginal Supports by Infracoccygeal Sacropexy, An Axial Day-Case Vaginal Procedure, Int Urogynecol J, vol. 12, pp. 296-303 (2001). |
Rackley, Raymond R. et al., Tension-Free Vaginal Tape and Percutaneous Vaginal Tape Sling Procedures, Techniques in Urology, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 90-100 (2001) |
Rackley, Raymond R. M.D., Synthetic Slings: Five Steps for Successful Placement, Urolo Times, p. 46,48,49 (Jun. 2000). |
Raz, Shlomo, et al., The Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Results in 206 Patients, The Journal of Urology, pp. 845-846 (1992). |
Raz, Shlomo, Female Urology, pp. 80-86, 369-398, 435-442 (1996). |
Raz, Shlomo, MD, Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress Incontinence Urology, vol. XVII, No. 1, pp. 82-85 (Jan. 1981). |
Richardson, David A. et al, Delayed Reaction to the Dacron Buttress Used in Urethropexy, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, pp. 689-692, vol. 29, No. 9 (Sep. 1984). |
Richter, K., Massive Eversion of the Vagina: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapy of the “True” Prolapse of the Vaginal Stump, Clin obstet gynecol, vol. 25, pp. 897-912 (1982). |
Ridley, John H., Appraisal of the Goebell-Frangenheim-Stoeckel Sling Procedure, American Journal Obst & Gynec., vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 741-721 (Jul. 1, 1986). |
Roberts, Henry, M.D., Cystourethrography in Women, Deptment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, May 1952, vol. XXXV, No. 293, pp. 253-259. |
Sabre™ Bioabsorbable Sling, Generation Now, Mentor, 4 pages (May 2002). |
Sabre™ Surgical Procedure, Mentor, 6 pages (Aug. 2002). |
Sanz, Luis E. et al., Modification of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Using a Suture Anchor System. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 48, n. 7, pp. 496-500 (Jul. 2003). |
Seim, Arnfinn et al., A Study of Female Urinary Incontinence in General Practice—Demography, Medical History, and Clinical Findings, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 30, pp. 465-472 (1996). |
Sergent, F. et al., Prosthetic Restoration of the Pelvic Diaphragm in Genital Urinary Prolapse Surgery: Transobturator and Infacoccygeal Hammock Technique, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol. 32, pp. 120-126 (Apr. 2003). |
Sloan W. R. et al, Stress Incontinence of Urine: A Retrospective Study of the Complications and Late Results of Simple Suprapubic Suburethral Fascial Slings, The Journal of Urology, vol. 110, pp. 533-536 (Nov. 1973). |
Spencer, Julia R. et al., A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck With Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 137, pp. 411-415 (Mar. 1987). |
Stamey, Thomas A., M.D., Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females, Ann. Surgery, vol. 192 No. 4, pp. 465-471 (Oct. 1980). |
Stanton, Stuart L., Suprapubic Approaches for Stress Incontinence in Women, Journal of American Geriatrics Society, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 348-351 (Mar. 1990). |
Stanton, Stuart, Springer-Veglag, Surgery of Female Incontinence, pp. 105-113 (1986). |
Staskin, David R, et al., The Gore-Tex Sling Procedure for Female Sphincteric Incontinence: Indications, Technique, and Results, World Journal of Urology, vol. 15, pp. 295-299 (1997). |
Studdiford, William E., Transplantation of Abdominal Fascia for the Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 764-775 (1944). |
Subak, Leslee L. et al., Cost of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the United States, Obstetrics & Gyncology, vol. 98, n. 4, pp. 646-351 (Oct. 2001). |
Sullivan, Eugene S. et al., Total Pelvic Mesh Repair a Ten-Year Experience, Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 857-863 (Jun. 2001). |
Swift, S.E., et al., Case-Control Study of Etiologic Factors in the Development of Sever Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Int Urogynecol J, vol. 12, pp. 187-192 (2001). |
TVT Tension-free Vaginal Tape, Gynecare, Ethicon, Inc., 23 pages (1999). |
Ulmsten, U. et al., A Multicenter Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) for Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, pp. 210-213 (1998). |
Ulmsten, U. et al., An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 7, pp. 81-86 (May 1996). |
Ulmsten, U., Female Urinary Incontinence—A Symptom, Not a Urodynamic Disease. Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects on the Diagnosis a Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 6, pp. 2-3 (1995). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., A Three Year Follow Up of Tension Free Vaginal Tape for Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 106, pp. 345-350 (1999). |
Ulmstein, Ulf et al., Different Biochemical Composition of Connective Tissue in Continent, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, pp. 455-457 (1987). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 29, pp. 75-82 (1995). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., The Unstable Female Urethra, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 144 No. 1, pp. 93-97 (Sep. 1, 1982). |
Vesica® Percutaneous Bladder Neck Stabilization Kit, A New Approach to Bladder Neck Suspenison, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 4 pages (1995). |
Vesica® Sling Kits, Simplifying Sling Procedures, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 4 pages (1998). |
Villet, R., Reponse De R. Villet A L'Article De D. Dargent et al., Gynécolgie Obstétrique & Fertilité, vol. 31, p. 96 (2003). |
Walters, Mark D., Percutaneous Suburethral Slings: State of the Art, Presented at the conference of the American Urogynecologic Society, Chicago, 29 pages (Oct. 2001). |
Waxman, Steve et al., Advanced Urologic Surgery for Urinary Incontinence, The Female Patient, pp. 93-100, vol. 21 (Mar. 1996). |
Weber, Anne M. et al., Anterior Vaginal Prolapse: Review of Anatomy and Techniques of Surgical Repair, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 89, n. 2, pp. 311-318 (Feb. 1997). |
Webster, George et al, Voiding Dysfunction Following Cystourethropexy: Its Evaluation and Management, The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, pp. 670-673 (Sep. 1990). |
Winter, Chester C., Peripubic Urethropexy for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women, Urology, vol. XX, No. 4, pp. 408-411 (Oct. 1982). |
Winters et al., Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Abdominal Enterocele Repair in the Management of Vaginal Vault Prolapse, Urology, vol. 56, supp. 6A, pp. 55-63 (2000). |
Woodside, Jeffrey R. et al., Suprapubic Endoscopic Vesical Neck Suspension for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Myelodysplastic Girls, The Journal of Urology, vol. 135, pp. 97-99 (Jan. 1986). |
Zacharin, Robert et al., Pulsion Enterocele: Long-Term Results of an Abdominoperineal Technique, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 141-148 (Feb. 1980). |
Zacharin, Robert, The Suspensory Mechanism of the Female Urethra, Journal of Anatomy, vol. 97, Part 3, pp. 423-427 (1963). |
Zimmern, Phillippe E. et al., Four-Corner Bladder Neck Suspension, Vaginal Surgery for the Urologist, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 29-36 (Apr. 1994). |
Mouly, Patrick et al., Vaginal Reconstruction of a Complete Vaginal Prolapse: The Trans Obturator Repair, Journal of Urology, vol. 169, p. 183 (Apr. 2003). |
Pourdeyhimi, B, Porosity of Surgical Mesh Fabrics: New Technology, J. Biomed. Mater. Res.: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 23, No. A1, pp. 145-152 (1989). |
Drutz, H.P. et al., Clinical and Urodynamic Re-Evaluation of Combined Abdominovaginal Marlex Sling Operations for Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 1, pp. 70-73 (1990). |
Petros, Papa PE et al., An Integral Theory and Its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Supplement 153: p. 1 (1993). |
Mentor Porges, Uralape, ICS/IUGA Symp, Jul. 2002. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140357940 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61468069 | Mar 2011 | US | |
61496125 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13432632 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14462154 | US |