This invention relates to implementing division in programmable integrated circuit devices such as, e.g., programmable logic devices (PLDs).
As applications for which PLDs are used increase in complexity, it has become more common to design PLDs to include specialized processing blocks in addition to blocks of generic programmable logic resources. Such specialized processing blocks may include a concentration of circuitry on a PLD that has been partly or fully hardwired to perform one or more specific tasks, such as a logical or a mathematical operation. A specialized processing block may also contain one or more specialized structures, such as an array of configurable memory elements. Examples of structures that are commonly implemented in such specialized processing blocks include: multipliers, arithmetic logic units (ALUs), barrel-shifters, various memory elements (such as FIFO/LIFO/SIPO/RAM/ROM/CAM blocks and register files), AND/NAND/OR/NOR arrays, etc., or combinations thereof.
One particularly useful type of specialized processing block that has been provided on PLDs is a digital signal processing (DSP) block, which may be used to process, e.g., audio signals. Such blocks are frequently also referred to as multiply-accumulate (“MAC”) blocks, because they include structures to perform multiplication operations, and sums and/or accumulations of multiplication operations.
For example, PLDs sold by Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif., as part of the STRATIX® family, include DSP blocks, each of which may include four 18-by-18 multipliers. Each of those DSP blocks also may include adders and registers, as well as programmable connectors (e.g., multiplexers) that allow the various components to be configured in different ways. In each such block, the multipliers can be configured not only as four individual 18-by-18 multipliers, but also as four smaller multipliers, or as one larger (36-by-36) multiplier. In addition, one 18-by-18 complex multiplication (which decomposes into two 18-by-18 multiplication operations for each of the real and imaginary parts) can be performed.
Larger multiplications can be performed by using more of the 18-by-18 multipliers—e.g., from other DSP blocks. For example, a 54-by-54 multiplier can be decomposed, by linear decomposition, into a 36-by-36 multiplier (which uses the four 18-by-18 multipliers of one DSP block), two 36-by-18 multipliers (each of which uses two 18-by-18 multipliers, for a total of four additional 18-by-18 multipliers, consuming another DSP block), and one 18-by-18 multiplier, consuming a portion of a third DSP block. Thus, using 18-by-18 multipliers, nine multipliers are required to perform a 54-by-54 multiplication.
One type of mathematical function that heretofore has not been easily implemented in a PLD or other programmable device is division. Division, especially double-precision floating point division, which may be required for High Performance Computing, is expensive and slow on current FPGAs. A common implementation in general-purpose programmable logic of an FPGA uses a network of 64 80-bit adders, typically requiring between 6,000 and 9,000 four-input look-up tables. Moreover, the resulting operation is slow, typically having a 150 MHz system speed and about 57 clock cycles of latency.
The present invention implements multiplier-based division in a programmable device. For example, convergence-type multiplier-based approaches offer the possibility of higher system speeds (on the order of about 300 MHz), lower latency (on the order of 10-20 clock cycles), and lower logic utilization (as most of the calculations are done in multipliers rather than in general-purpose programmable logic).
As described above, the DSP blocks provided on PLDs from Altera Corporation support, inter alia, a 36-bit-by-36-bit multiplier mode. In accordance with the present invention, such a DSP block may be modified to support also a 72-bit-by-18-bit multiplier mode. The resulting asymmetric multiplier can then be used to implement a recursive algorithm to perform division operations, as described in more detail below.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of configuring a programmable integrated circuit device to use multipliers to perform a division operation that provides a quotient of a dividend input value and a divisor input value, where the quotient has a first precision. The method includes configuring logic of the programmable integrated circuit device to use at least a first of the multipliers to operate on said divisor input value to provide an inverted divisor approximation having a second precision less precise than the first precision; configuring logic of the programmable integrated circuit device to recursively compute a remainder by initializing the remainder to said dividend input value at the first precision and then, in each recursive stage, subtracting from the remainder a product of (a) the remainder represented at the second precision, (b) the divisor input value represented at the first precision, and (c) the inverted divisor approximation. Logic of the programmable integrated circuit device is configured to compute a respective component of the quotient in each of the recursive stages, by computing a product of (1) the remainder represented at the second precision, and (2) the inverted divisor approximation. Logic of the programmable integrated circuit device is further configured to add the respective components of the quotient to provide the quotient.
A programmable logic device so configurable or configured, and a machine-readable data storage medium encoded with software for performing the method, are also provided.
Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages, will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
The following division problem:
can be broken down into the following recursive problem:
where:
As can be seen, in the first (0th) iteration, the partial quotient becomes the product of h bits of X and the inverse of h bits of Y, which will be close as a zeroth-order approximation of the result. At the same time, the remainder becomes the difference between (a) X and (b) the product of (i) h bits of X and (ii) the product of (1) Y and (2) the inverse of h bits of Y, which is the difference between (a) X and (b) the product of (i) h bits of X and (ii) a number close to 1, which is the difference between (a) X and (b) a number close to h bits of X, which is close to zero. In other words, as expected, in the 0th iteration, the result is that Q0 is the product of h bits of X and the inverse of h bits of Y which is close to the result, and R0 is close to zero. The result will converge in subsequent iterations, getting closer to the actual result where Qi is essentially equal to the result and Ri is essentially equal to zero.
The number of iterations required for convergence depends on how close to the actual result one wants to be, and on the value chosen for h. The value chosen for h cannot be so large that the inverse of Yh cannot be computed easily. In the 72-bit-by-18-bit embodiment described herein, an 18-bit inverse can be calculated relatively easily using, e.g., a Taylor series expansion. The Taylor series expansion can be performed using one 18-bit-by-18-bit multiplier, along with two lookup tables (which may be provided as read-only memories, or programmed into programmable logic in the case of a programmable device), as well as some additional logic such as adders.
In such an embodiment, the Ri partial remainder multiplications can then be 18-bits by the internal precision of the calculation, which may be 64 bits for double-precision arithmetic or 72 bits for extended double-precision arithmetic, which exceed the required mantissa sizes—52 bits and 64 bits respectively—in both cases, so that any errors accumulate to be less than the least-significant-bit position required in the final answer. The Qi partial quotient multiplications—Rh(1/Yh)—would be 18-bits-by-18-bits in either case. The result can be deemed to have converged when Ri falls below a predetermined value. In a programmable device, that predetermined value may be user-programmable.
A 72-bit-by-18-bit multiplication can use the same number of partial products as a 36-bit-by-36-bit multiplication, except that there are five unique 18-bit numbers.
As can be seen in block 50, 18-bit left-shifter 322 is replaced with 36-bit left-shifter 522. Preferably, left-shifter 522 is selectable (e.g., using a multiplexer) to shift by either 18 or 36 bits, so that the user can use block 50 in the manner of block 10 if desired.
Of the 144 input conductors 31, between 82 (in the case of a 64-bit-by-18-bit calculation for double-precision arithmetic) and 90 (in the case of a 72-bit-by-18-bit calculation for extended double-precision arithmetic) are used for inputs, while correspondingly 72 or 80 bits are used as outputs. The 72-bit-by-18-bit multiplication operation actually produces a 90-bit output, which cannot be handled by the routing structure in this embodiment, but as the input of each iteration can handle 72 bits, and as the overall division operation is only an iterative approximation, only the 72 most significant bits need be routed out. The precision lost by discarding the 18 least significant bits will not have much impact. Optionally, adder 34 can include a rounding mode to compensate for the discarding of the least significant bits. For example, rounding can occur at the 52nd bit for double precision calculations or at the 64th bit for extended double precision calculations.
In the calculation above for the partial remainder Ri+1, multiplicative term Rhi is a subset or truncation of the additive term Ri. Therefore, those h bits (e.g., 18 bits) need not be input twice, but rather simply routed twice within block 50. With 144 inputs, the partial remainder recurrence equation can be supported by the block 50. It is already known to provide additional input terms for compressor 33, which may be used, e.g., for accumulation, chaining or redundancy. In order to include the h bits of Rhi in the multiplication operation, all that would be needed is some additional multiplexing.
As a reminder, each term of the partial remainder recurrence subtracts (which is a form of addition) a product of Rhi (which is 18 bits wide) and Y(1/Yh) which itself is a 72-bit product. The structure of a DSP block 60 for performing this calculation is shown in
Chaining a number of these blocks allows calculation of a division operation. With an 18-bit “guess” for 1/Yh, each iteration should give about 15 “good” bits—i.e., bits that can be counted on to be correct. As discussed above, any errors can be expected to accumulate at bit positions less significant than the fifteenth bit of each iteration. Therefore, for double precision, which requires 52 bits, four iterations (60 “good” bits) should be sufficient, while for extended double precision, which requires 64 bits, five iterations (75 “good” bits) should be sufficient.
As shown below in
An embodiment of a divider structure 80 in accordance with the invention is shown in
A first DSP block 801 is used to provide an 18-bit approximation 1/Yh of the inverse of Y, using one 18-bit-by-18-bit multiplier plus additional logic as described above. This value 802 is multiplied by Y in DSP block 803 (configured as a 72-bit-by-18-bit multiplier to perform 64-bit-by-18-bit multiplication in a double-precision embodiment or 72-bit-by-18-bit multiplication in an extended double-precision embodiment) and the result 804, which approximates, but does not quite equal, one, is provided to each of DSP blocks 805, 806, 807 which perform respective stages of the remainder calculation. At each stage, 72 bits of the previous remainder 814 are multiplied by value 804, and that product is subtracted from the same previous remainder 814 by carry-lookahead adder 808. The subtraction can be facilitated either by negating inputs to some of the 18-bit multipliers or it can be done in compressor 11 (not shown in
For each stage of the quotient, value 802 (1/Yh) is multiplied at respective multiplier 809 by previous remainder 814 as input to that stage. All of these stages are then added together. The addition is represented symbolically at 819. However, while one big adder 819 could be provided, the addition alternatively could be carried out in steps, using, e.g., a chaining mode available in DSP blocks of the Altera Corporation products described above. In addition, because each stage provides about fifteen “good” bits of the final quotient, the result of each subsequent stage (except the first) preferably is right-shifted by about fifteen additional bits. Insofar as shifters are essentially simply wires, the shifters are not explicitly shown in
Thus, the method of the invention configures a programmable integrated circuit device, such as a PLD, to create the structures shown in
Instructions for carrying out the method according to this invention may be encoded on a machine-readable medium, to be executed by a suitable computer or similar device to implement the method of the invention for programming or configuring programmable integrated circuit devices to perform operations as described above. For example, a personal computer may be equipped with an interface to which a programmable integrated circuit device can be connected, and the personal computer can be used by a user to program the programmable integrated circuit device using a suitable software tool, such as the QUARTUS® II software available from Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif.
The magnetic domains of coating 602 of medium 600 are polarized or oriented so as to encode, in manner which may be conventional, a machine-executable program, for execution by a programming system such as a personal computer or other computer or similar system, having a socket or peripheral attachment into which the PLD to be programmed may be inserted, to configure appropriate portions of the PLD, including its specialized processing blocks, if any, in accordance with the invention.
In the case of a CD-based or DVD-based medium, as is well known, coating 702 is reflective and is impressed with a plurality of pits 703, arranged on one or more layers, to encode the machine-executable program. The arrangement of pits is read by reflecting laser light off the surface of coating 702. A protective coating 704, which preferably is substantially transparent, is provided on top of coating 702.
In the case of magneto-optical disk, as is well known, coating 702 has no pits 703, but has a plurality of magnetic domains whose polarity or orientation can be changed magnetically when heated above a certain temperature, as by a laser (not shown). The orientation of the domains can be read by measuring the polarization of laser light reflected from coating 702. The arrangement of the domains encodes the program as described above.
Thus it is seen that a method for efficiently carrying out division in a programmable integrated circuit device, a programmable integrated circuit device programmed to perform the method, and software for carrying out the programming, have been provided.
A PLD 90 programmed according to the present invention may be used in many kinds of electronic devices. One possible use is in a data processing system 900 shown in
System 900 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. PLD 90 can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, PLD 90 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 901. PLD 90 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resources in system 900. In yet another example, PLD 90 can be configured as an interface between processor 901 and one of the other components in system 900. It should be noted that system 900 is only exemplary, and that the true scope and spirit of the invention should be indicated by the following claims.
Various technologies can be used to implement PLDs 90 as described above and incorporating this invention.
It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the various elements of this invention can be provided on a programmable integrated circuit device in any desired number and/or arrangement. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3473160 | Wahlstrom | Oct 1969 | A |
4156927 | McElroy et al. | May 1979 | A |
4179746 | Tubbs | Dec 1979 | A |
4212076 | Conners | Jul 1980 | A |
4215406 | Gomola et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4215407 | Gomola et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4422155 | Amir et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4484259 | Palmer et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4521907 | Amir et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4597053 | Chamberlin | Jun 1986 | A |
4623961 | Mackiewicz | Nov 1986 | A |
4682302 | Williams | Jul 1987 | A |
4718057 | Venkitakrishnan et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4727508 | Williams | Feb 1988 | A |
4791590 | Ku et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4799004 | Mori | Jan 1989 | A |
4823295 | Mader | Apr 1989 | A |
4839847 | Laprade | Jun 1989 | A |
4871930 | Wong et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4912345 | Steele et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4967160 | Quievy et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4982354 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4994997 | Martin et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5046038 | Briggs et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5122685 | Chan et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5128559 | Steele | Jul 1992 | A |
5175702 | Beraud et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5208491 | Ebeling et al. | May 1993 | A |
RE34363 | Freeman | Aug 1993 | E |
5267187 | Hsieh et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5296759 | Sutherland et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5338983 | Agarwala | Aug 1994 | A |
5349250 | New | Sep 1994 | A |
5357152 | Jennings, III et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5371422 | Patel et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381357 | Wedgwood et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5404324 | Colon-Bonet | Apr 1995 | A |
5424589 | Dobbelaere et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5446651 | Moyse et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451948 | Jekel | Sep 1995 | A |
5452231 | Butts et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452375 | Rousseau et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457644 | McCollum | Oct 1995 | A |
5465226 | Goto | Nov 1995 | A |
5465375 | Thepaut et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5483178 | Costello et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497498 | Taylor | Mar 1996 | A |
5500828 | Doddington et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5523963 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528550 | Pawate et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537601 | Kimura et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546018 | New et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550993 | Ehlig et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559450 | Ngai et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563526 | Hastings et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563819 | Nelson | Oct 1996 | A |
5570039 | Oswald et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570040 | Lytle et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572148 | Lytle et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581501 | Sansbury et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590350 | Guttag et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594366 | Khong et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594912 | Brueckmann et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596763 | Guttag et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606266 | Pedersen | Feb 1997 | A |
5617058 | Adrian et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5633601 | Nagaraj | May 1997 | A |
5636150 | Okamoto | Jun 1997 | A |
5636368 | Harrison et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640578 | Balmer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644522 | Moyse et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646545 | Trimberger et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648732 | Duncan | Jul 1997 | A |
5652903 | Weng et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655069 | Ogawara et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664192 | Lloyd et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5689195 | Cliff et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696708 | Leung | Dec 1997 | A |
5729495 | Madurawe | Mar 1998 | A |
5740404 | Baji | Apr 1998 | A |
5744980 | McGowan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744991 | Jefferson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754459 | Telikepalli | May 1998 | A |
5761483 | Trimberger | Jun 1998 | A |
5764555 | McPherson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768613 | Asghar | Jun 1998 | A |
5777912 | Leung et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784636 | Rupp | Jul 1998 | A |
5790446 | Yu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794067 | Kadowaki | Aug 1998 | A |
5801546 | Pierce et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805477 | Perner | Sep 1998 | A |
5805913 | Guttag et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812479 | Cliff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812562 | Baeg | Sep 1998 | A |
5815422 | Dockser | Sep 1998 | A |
5821776 | McGowan | Oct 1998 | A |
5825202 | Tavana et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838165 | Chatter | Nov 1998 | A |
5841684 | Dockser | Nov 1998 | A |
5847579 | Trimberger | Dec 1998 | A |
5859878 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5869979 | Bocchino | Feb 1999 | A |
5872380 | Rostoker et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874834 | New | Feb 1999 | A |
5878250 | LeBlanc | Mar 1999 | A |
5880981 | Kojima et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892962 | Cloutier | Apr 1999 | A |
5894228 | Reddy et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898602 | Rothman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5931898 | Khoury | Aug 1999 | A |
5942914 | Reddy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944774 | Dent | Aug 1999 | A |
5949710 | Pass et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951673 | Miyata | Sep 1999 | A |
5956265 | Lewis | Sep 1999 | A |
5959871 | Pierzchala et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960193 | Guttag et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961635 | Guttag et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963048 | Harrison et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963050 | Young et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968196 | Ramamurthy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970254 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978260 | Trimberger et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982195 | Cliff et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986465 | Mendel | Nov 1999 | A |
5991788 | Mintzer | Nov 1999 | A |
5991898 | Rajski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995748 | Guttag et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999015 | Cliff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999990 | Sharrit et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005806 | Madurawe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006321 | Abbott | Dec 1999 | A |
6009451 | Burns | Dec 1999 | A |
6020759 | Heile | Feb 2000 | A |
6021423 | Nag et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029187 | Verbauwhede | Feb 2000 | A |
6031763 | Sansbury | Feb 2000 | A |
6041340 | Mintzer | Mar 2000 | A |
6052327 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052755 | Terrill et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064614 | Khoury | May 2000 | A |
6065131 | Andrews et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066960 | Pedersen | May 2000 | A |
6069487 | Lane et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072994 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073154 | Dick | Jun 2000 | A |
6075381 | LaBerge | Jun 2000 | A |
6084429 | Trimberger | Jul 2000 | A |
6085317 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6091261 | DeLange | Jul 2000 | A |
6091765 | Pietzold, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094726 | Gonion et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097988 | Tobias | Aug 2000 | A |
6098163 | Guttag et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107820 | Jefferson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107821 | Kelem et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107824 | Reddy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130554 | Kolze et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140839 | Kaviani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154049 | New | Nov 2000 | A |
6157210 | Zaveri et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163788 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167415 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175849 | Smith | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6215326 | Jefferson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226735 | Mirsky | May 2001 | B1 |
6242947 | Trimberger | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243729 | Staszewski | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246258 | Lesea | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6279021 | Takano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286024 | Yano et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314442 | Suzuki | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314551 | Borland | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321246 | Page et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323680 | Pedersen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351142 | Abbott | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359468 | Park et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362650 | New et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366944 | Hossain et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367003 | Davis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407576 | Ngai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407694 | Cox et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438570 | Miller | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453382 | Heile | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467017 | Ngai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480980 | Koe | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483343 | Faith et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6531888 | Abbott | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538470 | Langhammer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542000 | Black et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556044 | Langhammer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6557092 | Callen | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571268 | Giacalone et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573749 | New et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6574762 | Karimi et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591283 | Conway et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591357 | Mirsky | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600788 | Dick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628140 | Langhammer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6700581 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725441 | Keller et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728901 | Rajski et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731133 | Feng et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732135 | Samudrala et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744278 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6745254 | Boggs et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6774669 | Liu et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781408 | Langhammer | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781410 | Pani et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788104 | Singh et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6836839 | Master et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6874079 | Hogenauer | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6904471 | Boggs et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6924663 | Masui et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6971083 | Farrugia et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
20010029515 | Mirsky | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020089348 | Langhammer | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030088757 | Lindner et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040064770 | Xin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083412 | Corbin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040178818 | Crotty et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193981 | Clark et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050144215 | Simkins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166038 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187999 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070185951 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185952 | Langhammer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080133627 | Langhammer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 158 430 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 380 456 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 411 491 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 461 798 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0 498 066 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0 555 092 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 606 653 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0 657 803 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 660 227 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 668 659 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 905 906 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 909 028 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0 927 393 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0 992 885 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1 031 934 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 058 185 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 220 108 | Jul 2002 | EP |
2 283 602 | May 1995 | GB |
2 286 737 | Aug 1995 | GB |
2 318 198 | Apr 1998 | GB |
61 237133 | Oct 1986 | JP |
7-135447 | May 1995 | JP |
WO9527243 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO9628774 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO9708606 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO9812629 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9832071 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO9838741 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO9922292 | May 1999 | WO |
WO9931574 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO9956394 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0051239 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0052824 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0113562 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO2005101190 | Oct 2005 | WO |