Particular embodiments generally relate to video compression.
Video compression systems employ block processing for most of the compression operations. A block is a group of neighboring pixels and may be treated as one coding unit in terms of the compression operations. Theoretically, a larger coding unit is preferred to take advantage of correlation among immediate neighboring pixels. Various video compression standards, e.g., Motion Picture Expert Group (MPEG)-1, MPEG-2, and MPEG-4, use block sizes of 4×4, 8×8, and 16×16 (referred to as a macroblock (MB)). The standards typically use a fixed transform size (e.g., 4×4 or 8×8) in a macro block. However, if more than one transform size is used, then a macroblock level parameter may be required to indicate which transform size to use. Including this parameter increases the overhead as the macroblock level parameter needs to be encoded.
High efficiency video coding (HEVC) is also a block-based hybrid spatial and temporal predictive coding scheme. HEVC partitions an input picture into square blocks referred to as largest coding units (LCUs). Each LCU can be partitioned into smaller square blocks called coding units (CUs).
A quadtree data representation is used to describe how LCU 100 is partitioned into CUs 102.
A node 106-1 includes a flag “1” at a top CU level because LCU 100 is split into 4 CUs. At an intermediate CU level, the flags indicate whether a CU 102 is further split into four CUs. In this case, a node 106-3 includes a flag of “1” because CU 102-2 has been split into four CUs 102-5-102-8. Nodes 106-2, 106-4, and 106-5 include a flag of “0” because these CUs 102 are not split. Nodes 106-6, 106-7, 106-8, and 106-9 are at a bottom CU level and hence, no flag bit of “0” or ‘1” is necessary for those nodes because corresponding CUs 102-5-102-8 are not split. The quadtree data representation for quadtree 104 shown in
HEVC uses a block transform of either a square or non-square. Each CU 102 may include one or more prediction units (PUs). The PUs may be used to perform spatial prediction or temporal prediction. PU type specifies size of a PU in relation with CU size. For example, a PU with PU type 2N×2N has the same size as its corresponding CU.
In one embodiment, a method includes receiving a size of a coding unit (CU) for a block of video content. Information associated with a prediction unit (PU) type for a prediction unit of the coding unit is also received. The method then applies the size of the coding unit and the information associated with the prediction unit type to a function to determine a size of at least one transform unit for the prediction unit. The size of the at least one transform unit is outputted for use in a transform operation.
In one embodiment, an apparatus includes one or more computer processors and a computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions for controlling the one or more computer processors to be operable to: receive a size of a coding unit (CU) for a block of video content; receive information associated with a prediction unit (PU) type for a prediction unit of the coding unit; apply the size of the coding unit and the information associated with the prediction unit type to a function to determine a size of at least one transform unit for the prediction unit; and output the size of the at least one transform unit for use in a transform operation.
In one embodiment, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium is provided comprising instructions for controlling the one or more computer processors to be operable to: receive a size of a coding unit (CU) for a block of video content; receive information associated with a prediction unit (PU) type for a prediction unit of the coding unit; apply the size of the coding unit and the information associated with the prediction unit type to a function to determine a size of at least one transform unit for the prediction unit; and output the size of the at least one transform unit for use in a transform operation.
The following detailed description and accompanying drawings provide a more detailed understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention.
Described herein are techniques for a video compression system. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous examples and specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present invention. Particular embodiments as defined by the claims may include some or all of the features in these examples alone or in combination with other features described below, and may further include modifications and equivalents of the features and concepts described herein.
Particular embodiments reduce overhead by using a function to determine a size of a transform unit (TU) based on a prediction unit (PU) type and a coding unit (CU) size. In one embodiment, using the function avoids encoding of a residual quadtree (RQT) data representation for the TU partitioning.
Encoder 300 and decoder 301 use an implicit transform unit representation to determine the TU size instead of using the RQT data representation. The implicit transform unit representation may remove the overhead and complexity associated with the RQT data representation. In one example, TU size analyzer 302 uses a relationship between the size of the CU and the PU type to determine the TU size. For example, TU size analyzer 302 applies a variable T to a function to determine the TU size without using the RQT. Using the function and the variable T may reduce the overhead and complexity. A transform block then uses the TU size in a transform operation, which is described in more detail below. The TU size analysis may be performed by both encoder 300 and decoder 301.
A general operation of encoder 300 will now be described. It will be understood that variations on the encoding process described will be appreciated by a person skilled in the art based on the disclosure and teachings herein.
For a current PU, x, a prediction PU, x′, is obtained through either spatial prediction or temporal prediction. The prediction PU is then subtracted from the current PU, resulting in a residual PU, e. A spatial prediction block 304 may include different spatial prediction directions per PU, such as horizontal, vertical, 45-degree diagonal, 135-degree diagonal, DC (flat averaging), and planar.
A temporal prediction block 306 performs temporal prediction through a motion estimation operation. The motion estimation operation searches for a best match prediction for the current PU over reference pictures. The best match prediction is described by a motion vector (MV) and associated reference picture (refldx). The motion vector and associated reference picture are included in the coded bit stream.
Transform block 306 performs a transform operation with the residual PU, e. Transform block 306 outputs the residual PU in a transform domain, E. The transform process using the TU size outputted by TU size analyzer 302 will be described in more detail below.
A quantizer 308 then quantizes the transform coefficients of the residual PU, E. Quantizer 308 converts the transform coefficients into a finite number of possible values. Entropy coding block 310 entropy encodes the quantized coefficients, which results in final compression bits to be transmitted. Different entropy coding methods may be used, such as context-adaptive variable length coding (CAVLC) or context-adaptive binary arithmetic coding (CABAC).
Also, in a decoding process within encoder 300, a de-quantizer 312 de-quantizes the quantized transform coefficients of the residual PU. De-quantizer 312 then outputs the de-quantized transform coefficients of the residual PU, e′. An inverse transform block 314 receives the de-quantized transform coefficients, which are then inverse transformed resulting in a reconstructed residual PU, e′. The reconstructed PU, e′, is then added to the corresponding prediction, x′, either spatial or temporal, to form the new reconstructed PU, x″. A loop filter 316 performs de-blocking on the reconstructed PU, x″, to reduce blocking artifacts. Additionally, loop filter 316 may perform a sample adaptive offset process after the completion of the de-blocking filter process for the decoded picture, which compensates for a pixel value offset between reconstructed pixels and original pixels. Also, loop filter 306 may perform adaptive loop filtering over the reconstructed PU, which minimizes coding distortion between the input and output pictures. Additionally, if the reconstructed pictures are reference pictures, the reference pictures are stored in a reference buffer 318 for future temporal prediction.
An entropy decoding block 330 performs entropy decoding on the input bitstream to generate quantized transform coefficients of a residual PU. A de-quantizer 332 de-quantizes the quantized transform coefficients of the residual PU. De-quantizer 332 then outputs the de-quantized transform coefficients of the residual PU, e′. An inverse transform block 334 receives the de-quantized transform coefficients, which are then inverse transformed resulting in a reconstructed residual PU, e′. TU size analyzer 302 is used to output a TU size to a transform block 306. TU size analyzer 302 receives a CU size and a PU type. The size of the CU and PU type is based on information in the bitstream being decoded. TU size analyzer 302 in decoder 301 performs the implicit determination similar to as described in the encoding process. In one embodiment, an RQT may not be used to determine the TU size.
The reconstructed PU, e′, is then added to the corresponding prediction, x′, either spatial or temporal, to form the new reconstructed PU, x″. A loop filter 336 performs de-blocking on the reconstructed PU, x″, to reduce blocking artifacts. Additionally, loop filter 336 may perform a sample adaptive offset process after the completion of the de-blocking filter process for the decoded picture, which compensates for a pixel value offset between reconstructed pixels and original pixels. Also, loop filter 336 may perform adaptive loop filtering over the reconstructed PU, which minimizes coding distortion between the input and output pictures. Additionally, if the reconstructed pictures are reference pictures, the reference pictures are stored in a reference buffer 338 for future temporal prediction.
The prediction PU, x′, is obtained through either spatial prediction or temporal prediction. A spatial prediction block 340 may receive decoded spatial prediction directions per PU, such as horizontal, vertical, 45-degree diagonal, 135-degree diagonal, DC (flat averaging), and planar. The spatial prediction directions are used to determine the prediction PU, x′.
A temporal prediction block 342 performs temporal prediction through a motion estimation operation. A decoded motion vector is used to determine the prediction PU, x′. Interpolation may be used in the motion estimation operation.
Referring back to the TU size determination, TU size analyzer 302 may determine which TU size to use in the transform operation of transform block 306.
Different TU sizes may be determined based on the PU type used.
TU size analyzer 302 determines which of the above TU sizes should be used in a transform operation based on a function.
At 504, TU size analyzer 302 receives a PU type. For example, the PU type may be one of 2N×2N, 2N×N, N×2N, or N×N, which describe the shape of PU 408. The type may depend on if PU 408 is a square block or a rectangular block. Also, the type depends on the partitioning of PUs 408 within the CU 404, such as PU 408 may be the same size as CU 404, partitioned into 2 PUs 408, or partitioned into 4 PUs 408. As will be described below, a variable may be received that is derived based on PU type.
At 506, TU size analyzer 302 determines a TU size based on the CU size and PU type. For example, if CU size is 16×16 and the PU type is 2N×2N, then TU size may be 2N×2N=16×16. Also, if CU size is 16×16 and the PU type is N×N, then TU size may be N×N=8×8.
As described above, TU size analyzer 302 may use a function to determine the TU size. One embodiment of the function used by TU size analyzer 302 will be described; however, it will be understood that other functions may be used. In one example, TU analyzer 302 may use the function of:
size (TU)=size (CU)>>T,
where >> is a right shift operation and T is a non-negative integer.
A right shift by one means that a size of the CU is partitioned one level. The right shift may shift a bit sequence to the right by one bit. A level of partitioning may be splitting a square block into four blocks. The T value may be based on PU type. The T value may be set to 0 if the CU has only one PU type of the same size 2N×2N. If the value of T is set to 0, then size (TU)=size (CU). This means that the size of TU 408 is the same size as CU 402. This may be similar to having an RQT with a tree depth equal to 1. That is, there is no splitting of PUs into multiple TUs.
The T value is set to 1 if CU 402 has more than one PU of a size 2N×N, N×2N, or N×N. The size of TU 408 is similar to TUs 408 shown in
Accordingly, the T value represents the level of partitioning for TU size within each CU. The T value may be defined at a sequence, picture, slice, LCU, or CU level. In one embodiment, only 1 bit needs to be encoded (e.g., the T value) to determine the TU size. Decoder 301 then uses the bit to determine the TU size implicitly without using an RQT. In another embodiment, encoder 300 and decoder 301 use rules to determine the T value separately. For example, the PU type is applied to the rule to determine the T value that is used.
Encoder 300 and decoder 301 may both include the function to determine the TU size. The 1 bit associated with the T value may be encoded and included in the compressed video or determined separately using rules. The decoder then uses the T value to determine the TU size based on the CU size and the T value. Accordingly, an overhead of 1 bit is used to determine the TU size instead of encoding the RQT data representation or the 1 bit may be saved using the rules. Further, the use of the function reduces the complexity for determining the TU size.
Particular embodiments may be implemented in a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, system, or machine. The computer-readable storage medium contains instructions for controlling a computer system to perform a method described by particular embodiments. The instructions, when executed by one or more computer processors, may be operable to perform that which is described in particular embodiments.
As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, “a”, “an”, and “the” includes plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The above description illustrates various embodiments of the present invention along with examples of how aspects of the present invention may be implemented. The above examples and embodiments should not be deemed to be the only embodiments, and are presented to illustrate the flexibility and advantages of the present invention as defined by the following claims. Based on the above disclosure and the following claims, other arrangements, embodiments, implementations and equivalents may be employed without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional App. No. 61/439,659 for “Implicit Transform Unit Representation” filed Feb. 11, 2011, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The present application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/328,948 for “Efficient Transform Unit Representation” filed concurrently, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4774574 | Daly et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5068724 | Krause et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5091782 | Krause et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5121216 | Chen et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5146324 | Miller et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5224062 | McMillan, Jr. et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5235623 | Sugiyama et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5260782 | Hui | Nov 1993 | A |
5274442 | Murakami et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5341440 | Earl et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5422963 | Chen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5444800 | Kim | Aug 1995 | A |
5635938 | Komoto | Jun 1997 | A |
5737020 | Hall et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5767908 | Choi | Jun 1998 | A |
5872866 | Strongin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5903669 | Hirabayashi | May 1999 | A |
6108383 | Miller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115501 | Chun et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134350 | Beck | Oct 2000 | A |
6167161 | Oami | Dec 2000 | A |
6408025 | Kaup | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6522783 | Zeng et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522784 | Zlotnick | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6683991 | Andrew et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6819793 | Reshetov et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6917651 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6934419 | Zlotnick | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7266149 | Holcomb et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7292634 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7492823 | Lee et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7894530 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7912318 | Nakayama | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7936820 | Watanabe et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8000546 | Yang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8094950 | Sasagawa | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8582656 | Lin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8687699 | Wen | Apr 2014 | B1 |
20020168114 | Valente | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196983 | Kobayashi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030048943 | Ishikawa | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030146925 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040057519 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040125204 | Yamada | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040179820 | Kashiwagi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184537 | Geiger et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050053151 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050147163 | Li et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050249291 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060045368 | Mehrotra | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098738 | Cosman | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115168 | Kobayashi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133682 | Tu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060210181 | Wu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239575 | Abe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251330 | Toth | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070036223 | Srinivasan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070078661 | Sriram et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070140349 | Burazerovic | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070183500 | Nagaraj et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201554 | Sihn | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211953 | Sasagawa | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223583 | Nagai et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080008246 | Mukherjee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043848 | Kuhn | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080084929 | Li | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080123736 | Sekiguchi et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123947 | Moriya et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123977 | Moriya et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080253463 | Lin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080310512 | Ye | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090041128 | Howard | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049641 | Pullins et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067503 | Jeong et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090122864 | Palfner | May 2009 | A1 |
20090123066 | Moriya et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090228290 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090274382 | Lin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100020867 | Wiegand et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100086049 | Ye | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100246951 | Chen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290520 | Kamisli et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309286 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110032983 | Sezer | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110090959 | Wiegand | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110182352 | Pace | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110206135 | Drugeon | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110268183 | Sole | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274162 | Zhou | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286516 | Lim et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293009 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008683 | Karczewicz | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120057630 | Saxena et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120128066 | Shibahara et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120163455 | Zheng et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177116 | Panusopone et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120230418 | Sole Rojals et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130003859 | Karczewicz | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034152 | Song et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070845 | Lim | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130089138 | Guo | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140010295 | Lu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140092956 | Panusopone | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010199959 | Sep 2010 | JP |
WO2010039015 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010039288 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2011049397 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
B. Bross, W.-J Han, J.-R. Ohm, G. J. Sullivan, T. Wiegand: “High efficiency video coding (HEVC) text specification draft 7”, Document of Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding, JCTVC-|1003-d4, Apr. 27-May 7, 2012. |
Bankoski et al. “Technical Overview of VP8, an Open Source Video Codec for the Web”. Dated Jul. 11, 2011. |
Bankoski et al. “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide” Independent Submission. RFC 6389, Dated Nov. 2011. |
Bankoski et al. “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide; draft-bankoski-vp8-bitstream-02” Network Working Group. Internet-Draft, May 18, 2011, 288 pp. |
Chen J et al. “Description of scalable video coding technology proposal by Qualcomm (configuration)”, 11. JCT-VC Meeting; 102. MPEG Meeting; Oct. 10, 2012 Oct. 19, 2012; Shanghai; (Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG.16); URL:HTTP://WFTP3.ITU.INT/AV-ARCH/JCTVC-SITE/, No. JCTVC-K0035, Oct. 2, 2012, all pages. |
Chen J. et al., “TE:Simulation results for various max. number of transform quadtree depth,” MPEG Meeting, Guangzhou, Chima; No. M18236; Oct. 28, 2010. |
Chen P. et al., “Video coding using extended block sizes,” VCEG Meeting, San Diego, US; No. VCEG-AJ23, Oct. 15, 2008. |
Guo L et al.: “Transform Selection for Inter-Layer Texture Prediction in Scalable Video Coding”, 11. JCT-VC Meeting; 102; MPEG Meeting; Oct. 10-19, 2012; Shanghai; (Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding of ISO/IEC JTC1/WG11 and ITU-T SG.16); URL:HTTP://WFTP3.ITU.INT/AV-ARCH/JCTVC-SITE/,, No. JCTVC-K0321, Oct. 7, 2012, all pages. |
Han et al., “Jointly Optimized Spatial Prediction and Block Transform for Video and Image Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, No. 4 (Apr. 2012). |
Han et al., “Toward Jointly Optimal Spatial Prediction and Adaptive Transform in Video/Image Coding,” ICASSP 2010 (Dallas, TX, Mar. 14-19, 2010). |
Implementors' Guide; Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Coding of moving video: Implementors Guide for H.264: Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. H.264. International Telecommunication Union. Version 12. Dated Jul. 30, 2010. |
ISR and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, for Int'l Application No. PCT/US2012/020167; Mar. 29, 2012. |
ISR, & Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. ISR/US2013/062216 (cs39797), Dec. 12, 2013, 12 pages. |
Krit Panusopone, et al. “Efficient Transform Unit Representation,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of UTU-T SG16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 4nd Meeting: Daegu, KR, Jan. 22, 2011. |
Lee B. et al., “Hierarchical variable block transform,” JCT-VC Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland; No. JCTVC-B050; Jul. 24, 2010. |
Lee T et al.: “TE12.1: Experimental results of transform unit quadtree/2-level test”, 3 JCT-VC Meeting; 94. MPEG Meeting; Jul. 10-15, 2010; Guangzhou; (Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG.16); URL:HTTP://WFTP3.ITU.INT/AV-ARCH/JCTVC-SITE/,, No. JCTVC-C200, Oct. 2, 2010, all pages. |
VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide. WebM Project. Google On2. Dated: Dec. 1, 2010. |
Mozilla, “Introduction to Video Coding Part 1: Transform Coding”, Video Compression Overview, Mar. 2012, 171 pp. |
Overview; VP7 Data Format and Decoder. Version 1.5. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Mar. 28, 2005. |
Rath G. et al.: “Improv pred & transform for spatial scalability”, 20. JVT Meeting; 77. MPEG Meeting, Jul. 15-21, 2006; Kalgenfurt, AT; (Joing Video Team of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-TSG.16), No. JVT-T082, Jul. 16, 2006, all pages. |
Saxena A et al.: “On secondary transforms for Intra BVL residue”, 13. JCT-VC Meeting; 104. MPEG Meeting; Apr. 18-26, 2013; Incheon; (Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG.16); URL:HTTP://WFTP3.ITU.INT/AV-ARCH/JCTVC-SITE/, No. JCTVC-M0033, Apr. 9, 2013, all pages. |
Saxena A et al.: “On secondary transforms for intra/inter prediction residual”, 9. JCT-VC Meeting; 100. MPEG Meeting; Apr. 27-May 7, 2012; Geneva; (Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG.16); URL:HTTP://WFTP3.ITU.INT/AV-ARCH/JCTVC-SITE/,, No. JCTVC-10232, Apr. 17, 2012, all pages. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. International Telecommunication Union. Version 11. Dated Mar. 2009. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. International Telecommunication Union. Version 12. Dated Mar. 2010. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video. H.264. Amendment 2: New profiles for professional applications. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Apr. 2007. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. Version 8. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Nov. 1, 2007. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. H.264. Amendment 1: Support of additional colour spaces and removal of the High 4:4:4 Profile. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Jun. 2006. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. H.264. Version 1. International Telecommunication Union. Dated May 2003. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. H.264. Version 3. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Mar. 2005. |
Sikora, T. et al., Shape-adaptive DCT for generic coding of video, Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on vol. 5, Issue 1, p. 59-62, Feb. 1, 1995. |
VP6 Bitstream & Decoder Specification. Version 1.02. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Aug. 17, 2006. |
VP6 Bitstream & Decoder Specification. Version 1.03. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Oct. 29, 2007. |
Wiegand et al. “BoG report: residual quadtree structure” JCTVC-C319—r1, Guangzhou, CN Oct. 2010. |
Mccann K. et al.; “Video coding technology proposal by Samsung (and BBC),” JCT-VC Meeting; Dresden, Germany, Apr. 15, 2010. |
Panusopone et al., “Efficient transform unit representation,” MPEG Meeting ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 No. m19013, Jan. 22, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” for Int'l Application No. PCT/US2012/021475; Mar. 29, 2012. |
T. Wiegand, H. Schwarz, B. Brozz, A. Fuldseth, X. Wang, W.-J. Han, “BoG report: residaul quadtree structure,” JCTVC-C319—r1, Guangzhou, CN, Oct. 2010. |
B. Bross, H. Kirchoffer, H. Schwarz, T. Wiegand, “Fast intra encoding for fixed maximum depth of transform quadtree,” JCTVC-C311—r1, Guangzhou, CN, Oct. 2010. |
T. Wiegand, B. Bross, J. Ohm, G. Sullivan, “WD1: Working Draft 1 of High-Efficiency Video Coding,” JCTVC-C403, Guangzhou, CN, Oct. 7-15, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120201298 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61439659 | Feb 2011 | US |