This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/262,077 filed Oct. 27, 2005 and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/148,022 filed Jun. 9, 2005.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to optical transmitters and receivers, and in particular to electronic circuits that generates a nonlinear signal with adjustable phase and frequency dependence that can be used to cancel the distortion of electronic or electro-optical devices, such as semiconductor lasers or photodiodes, when connected either at the input or at the output of the device that needs to be linearized.
2. Description of the Related Art
Analog electro-optical devices such as lasers and photodiodes used in CATV and FTTH systems require a high degree of linearity. Pre-distortion and post-distortion circuits are commonly employed to correct the nonlinear behavior of opto-electronic and electronic devices by adding a nonlinear signal that cancels the undesired distortion introduced by the non-linear laser or photodiode. In order to achieve good cancellation, the added distortion needs to match in phase, magnitude and frequency content that is introduced by the nonlinear device. Among pre-distortion and post-distortion techniques, in-line circuits, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,854, generally provide sufficient degree of linearization at a low cost. However, while pre- and post-distortion circuits described in the prior art are able to achieve sufficient degree of pre-distortion for some applications, they do not provide enough flexibility to create different frequency and phase characteristics. For example, RF amplifiers operated with low supply voltage for lower power dissipation require a large amount of distortion
Some distortion circuits disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,854 can introduce high RF loss in the transmission path and create undesired reflections when large amounts of distortion need to be generated. There are requirements that will enable large distortion with low loss and low reflection that are not satisfied by the prior art design. Moreover, some distortion circuits, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,854 that are designed to correct second order distortion also produce undesired third order distortion, and such designs do not allow tuning of both second and third order distortion simultaneously.
1. Objects of the Invention
It is an object of the present invention to provide a distortion cancellation circuit for use in non-linear opto-electronic device such as lasers and photodiodes used in fiber optical systems.
It is an object of the present invention to provide circuits that allow simultaneous tuning of the phase and frequency response of the second order distortion.
It is also another aspect of the present invention to provide a circuit that generates high amounts of distortion with low insertion loss and good return loss.
It is also another aspect of the present invention to provide a circuit that allows tuning of both second and third order distortion simultaneously.
2. Features of the Invention
Briefly, and in general terms, the present invention provides an optical receiver having a photodetector coupled to an external optical fiber for receiving an optical communications signal and converting it into an electrical signal; an RF amplifier coupled to the electrical output of the photodetector and generating an output signal with distortion; a post-distortion circuit connected to the output of the RF amplifier for canceling the distortion in the output signal produced by the RF amplifier, propagation in the optical fiber, the photodiode or the laser transmitter, including a Schottky or varactor diode with the bias of the diode adjusted to control the magnitude, phase and frequency content of the distortion cancellation.
In another aspect, the present invention provides an optical transmitter for transmitting an optical signal over a fiber optic link to a remote receiver including a laser coupled to an external optical fiber for transmitting an optical communications signal; a pre-distortion circuit connected to the input of the laser for canceling the distortion in the optical signal at the remote receiver produced by the laser, including a Schottky or varactor diode with the bias of said diode of the magnitude, phase and frequency content of the distortion cancellation.
In another aspect, the present invention provides an in-line pre-distortion circuit for generating frequency dependent pre-distortion having a sign opposite to distortion produced by a nonlinear device and having substantially the same magnitude as the distortion produced by the nonlinear device including an input for receiving an RF signal for the nonlinear device; a nonlinear element in-line with the input for generating pre-distortion; and a bias input to control the real and imaginary part of the pre-distortion produced by the nonlinear element.
Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure, including the following detailed description as well as by practice of the invention. While the invention is described below with reference to preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. Those of ordinary skill in the art having access to the teachings herein will recognize additional applications, modifications and embodiments in other fields, which are within the scope of the invention as disclosed and claimed herein with respect to which the invention could be of utility.
These and other features of the present invention will be better understood and more fully appreciated by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a) is a pre-distortion circuit with ideal Shottky diode according to the prior art, and
a) is a pre-distortion circuit with ideal Shottky diode and reactive elements according to the prior art, and
a) is a pre-distortion circuit with ideal Shottky diode and reactive elements according to the prior art, and
a) is a pre-distortion circuit with ideal varactor according to the prior art and 4(b) is a graph of the real and imaginary components of second order distortion (CSO) associated with such circuit;
a and 6b are typical real and imaginary second order distortion (CSO) respectively generated by the circuit in
a) through (d) are typical application circuits where the circuit according to the present invention would be used.
The present invention is directed to a distortion correaction circuit that extends the notion of distortion correaction as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,854. The above noted patent discloses an in-line predistortion circuit for reducing distortion in the transmission of analog signals. The distortion so generated by such a circuit, or predistortion, is fixed for a given circuit to be substantially equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to the second or higher order intermodulation product distortion inherent in a nonlinear modulation device such as a laser diode to which the signal is applied. The real component of the predistortion signal is produced by a first device such as an amplifier, and is selected in amplitude to match the amplitude of the distortion by the nonlinear device. The imaginary component of the predistortion signal is selected through introduction of a distortion signal out phase with the real component of the predistortion signal on the in-line electrical path. The real and imaginary components are combined to produce a single modulation signal including inter-modulation product distortion for application to the nonlinear device. The in-line predistortion circuit linearizes the transmission of modulating signals by cancelling distortion inherent in nonlinear transmitting devices.
The distortion in the signal generated by a nonlinear device can be represented as a complex quantity with amplitude and phase. Using conventional phasor notation, the distortion at some frequency ω can be expressed as Aei(ωt+Φ), where A is the amplitude and Φ is the phase of the signal. Equivalently, one can separate the distortion into two components, A cos(Φ), which is represented by the real part, and A sin(Φ), which is represented by the imaginary part. Amplitude and phase can be uniquely derived from real and imaginary part, so both notations are equivalent. For the distortion circuits that are going to be described hereunder, it is more convenient to express distortion in terms of real and imaginary part, since some of the circuits create mainly real distortion, while others create mainly imaginary distortion. In general, the pre- or post-distortion circuits must be able to generate both components, that is both real and imaginary distortion, in order to equalize the nonlinearity of the device. To do so several distortion circuits might be needed and cascaded so as to produce different types of distortion.
A typical pre-distortion circuit according to previous art is displayed in
If one needs to produce imaginary distortion, one can add some reactive elements such as a capacitor as shown in
The previous art represented by circuits shown in
The first aspect of the present invention consists of using one or more varactors as variable capacitors to adjust the phase and frequency content of the distortion. Varactors should be selected such that their response is as linear as possible, as described below.
A second nonlinear device D2 is different from the first nonlinear device D1 and is coupled to the first nonlinear device D1 to modify the first signal and produce an output second signal OUTPUT. The second nonlinear device D2 has a second bias level at a cathode of the second nonlinear device D2. A bias control means D1BIAS, D2BIAS is provided for adjusting said first and said second bias levels so that the magnitude, phase and frequency of the output second signal can be adjusted.
Within the circuit of
The amount of second order distortion generated by the Schottky diode D1 is controlled by a voltage D1BIAS. The phase and frequency response is controlled by D2BIAS, where D2 behaves as a variable capacitor. Other possible embodiments would include a varactor acting as a variable capacitor in parallel with R1, either in addition or without D2, and reversing diode D1 to produce the opposite sign of distortion. Other reactive or resistive components can be added to introduce phase and frequency shifts. The circuits are shown with the diodes in a shunt configuration with the RF path. Alternatively, the diodes could we configured in series with the RF path.
In the circuit in
In general, the distortion circuit of
Depending on the degree of linearization required by a particular application, and on the degree of repeatability of the nonlinear device, the distortion settings could be fixed, tuned for each batch of parts, tuned at manufacturing for each individual part, or tuned in real time as a function of some measured parameter in a feed-back loop.
Another way to produce distortion that has strong frequency dependence is to use a reverse-biased Shottky diode, as depicted in
The circuit depicted in
The nonlinear capacitance of a varactor is usually modeled as
where V is the voltage applied across the varactor. It can be shown that the amount of distortion produced by the varactor is inversely proportional to the ratio Vj/M. For the application in the previous section, one has to select a varactor with large Vj/M ratio. For the circuit in
For some applications, like equalization of distortion introduced by fiber dispersion, a circuit producing mainly imaginary distortion and linear with frequency is needed. In that case, the circuit in
The final part of this invention deals with the fact that circuits that generate second order distortion also generate third order distortion. As shown in
All circuits previously disclosed produce second order distortion that is relatively independent of the input frequencies, and only dependent on the beat frequency. For example, distortion at 60 MHz generated by a pair of tones at 61.25 MHz and 121.25 MHz is the same as distortion generated at 60 MHz generated by a pair of tones at 481.25 MHz and 541.25 MHz. However, some nonlinear devices produce distortion that is dependent on the input frequencies, and previously disclosed distortion circuits might not be able to compensate the composite second order distortion.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4075474 | Straus et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4178559 | Nichols | Dec 1979 | A |
4255724 | Bergero | Mar 1981 | A |
4277763 | Ward, Jr. | Jul 1981 | A |
4633197 | Vanderspool, II | Dec 1986 | A |
4700151 | Nagata | Oct 1987 | A |
4752743 | Pham et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4890300 | Andrews | Dec 1989 | A |
4902983 | Fujiki et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4992754 | Blauvelt et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4998012 | Kruse | Mar 1991 | A |
5013903 | Kasper | May 1991 | A |
5038113 | Katz et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5049832 | Cavers | Sep 1991 | A |
5105165 | Bien | Apr 1992 | A |
5113068 | Burke, Jr. | May 1992 | A |
5132639 | Blauvelt et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138275 | Abbiati et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146079 | Lisco | Sep 1992 | A |
5146177 | Katz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5161044 | Nazarathy et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5179461 | Blauvelt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5202553 | Geller | Apr 1993 | A |
5239402 | Little et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5252930 | Blauvelt | Oct 1993 | A |
5321710 | Cornish et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5347389 | Skrobko | Sep 1994 | A |
5363056 | Blauvelt | Nov 1994 | A |
5373384 | Hebert | Dec 1994 | A |
5378937 | Heidemann et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381108 | Whitmarsh et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5418637 | Kuo | May 1995 | A |
5424680 | Nazarathy et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428314 | Swafford et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430568 | Little et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5430569 | Blauvelt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436749 | Pidgeon, Jr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5453868 | Blauvelt et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5477367 | van der Heijden | Dec 1995 | A |
5477370 | Little et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481389 | Pidgeon et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5517035 | Krijntjes | May 1996 | A |
5523716 | Grebliunas et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5589797 | Gans et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600472 | Uesaka | Feb 1997 | A |
5606286 | Bains | Feb 1997 | A |
5646573 | Bayruns et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5699179 | Gopalakrishnan | Dec 1997 | A |
5710523 | Kobayashi | Jan 1998 | A |
5768449 | Fuse et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5798854 | Blauvelt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812294 | Wilson | Sep 1998 | A |
5850305 | Pidgeon | Dec 1998 | A |
5852389 | Kumar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5939920 | Hiraizumi | Aug 1999 | A |
5963352 | Atlas et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6018266 | Wu | Jan 2000 | A |
6028477 | Gentzler | Feb 2000 | A |
6055278 | Ho et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6122085 | Bitler | Sep 2000 | A |
6133790 | Zhou | Oct 2000 | A |
6140874 | French et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144706 | Sato et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6204718 | Pidgeon, Jr. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204728 | Hageraats | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6232836 | Zhou | May 2001 | B1 |
6255908 | Ghannouchi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278870 | Davie et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288610 | Miyashita | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288814 | Blauvelt | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313701 | Mussino et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6400229 | Tran et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6462327 | Ezell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466084 | Ciemniak | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6509789 | Ciemniak | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519374 | Stook et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542037 | Noll et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549316 | Blauvelt | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570430 | Zhou | May 2003 | B1 |
6577177 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6674967 | Skrobko et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6724253 | Hau et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6806778 | Kobayashi | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6946908 | Sun et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6985020 | Zhou | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7200339 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7202736 | Dow et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7208992 | Mukherjee et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7251290 | Rashev et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7327913 | Shpantzer et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7426350 | Sun et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7466925 | Iannelli | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20030117217 | Matsuyoshi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040047432 | Iwasaki | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050068102 | Hongo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050195038 | Neenan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060034622 | Day | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070008033 | Okazaki | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070098417 | Peral et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070247220 | Sorrells et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247222 | Sorrells et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248156 | Sorrells et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070297803 | Peral | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080095264 | Deng et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 370 608 | May 1990 | EP |
0524758 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0620661 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1732209 | Dec 2006 | EP |
10126284 | May 1998 | JP |
WO9532561 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 0143278 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070297803 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |