1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates to a device and method for measuring flow. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a device and method for measuring flow with decreased disturbance of the flow being measured.
2. Description of the Related Art
Traditional in-line flowmeters are mechanical in nature and require reading of an indicator at the location of the installed in-line flowmeter. One such traditional flowmeter is marketed as the FL500 Series In-Line of Flowmeters by Omega Engineering.
The general operation of the traditional flowmeter provides for a flowing fluid to enter at one end of a mechanical device housing installed in the flowing fluid tubing or pipe. The flowing fluid forces a piston to move within the flowmeter apparatus against a spring. The spring is compressed relative to the pressure generated by the flowing fluid. The piston also accommodates the flowing fluid, allowing it to pass around the piston periphery and continue through the outlet of the inline flowmeter.
A portion of the piston is visible through a transparent portion of the housing. The position of the piston is viewed under a scale printed on the transparent portion. The position of the piston relative to the scale gives the fluid flow rate. Accordingly, traditional mechanical flowmeters rely on indirect pressure measurement by the spring loaded piston.
The present disclosure provides a flow meter including a flow vessel having a lumen; a medium disposed in communication with the lumen, the medium holding an agent; an emission site proximate the medium and including at least one energy receiver configured to receive energy and provide for release of the agent from the medium; and a detection site spaced apart downstream from the emission site, the detection site including at least one detector providing for detection of the presence of the agent.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a method of detecting a flow rate in a flow vessel is provided including providing a medium having an agent bonded thereto, the medium and agent being disposed to be in communication with a lumen of the flow vessel; flowing matter through the flow vessel; providing energy to the flow vessel to un-bond the agent from the medium such that the agent intermixes with the matter flowing in the flow vessel; and detecting presence of the agent at a known point downstream from the medium.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a flow meter is provided including a sensor; a flow vessel having a lumen; an agent-infused-polymer disposed in communication with the lumen; an emission site proximate the medium and including at least one energy receiver configured to receive energy at the direction of the sensor and provide for release of the agent from the polymer; and a detection site spaced apart downstream from the emission site by a first distance, the first distance being provided to the sensor, the detection site including a light source projecting light across the lumen and at least one detector providing for detection of the presence of the agent by monitoring an amount of the projected light that is detected by the at least one detector.
The above-mentioned and other features of the present disclosure will become more apparent and the present disclosure itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the present disclosure taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Tube 10 is illustratively constructed from clear plastic tubing. Embodiments are also envisioned where tube 10 is constructed from fiber optic tubing. Still further, embodiments are envisioned where tube 10 is constructed from a combination of clear plastic tubing (or any other suitable tubing) and fiber optic tubing. The fiber optic portion of tube 10 is provided with a desired diffraction gradient. A diffraction gradient is an expression of the amount of light that is propagated (versus lost). For example, tubing can be provided that loses 10% of its energy every inch. Thus, the amount of light present five inches away from a source is approximately 59% the amount originally provided at the source.
Emitter location 12 includes polymer 20 disposed within lumen 16 of tube 10. Polymer 20 includes an optically detectable agent 22 linked by photolabile bonds to a polymer matrix. One such polymer 20 is discussed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0118696 (APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR THE CONTROLLABLE MODIFICATION OF COMPOUND CONCENTRATION IN A TUBE, filed Oct. 31, 2007) which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. Emitter location 12 further includes energy pathway 30. In the present example, polymer 20 is disposed within tube 10 to provide at least one lumen for fluid flow through polymer 20. Additional embodiments are envisioned where the lumen within polymer is of an equal size to lumen 16 and polymer 20 is provided in a portion of increased diameter. Still other embodiments are envisioned where polymer 20 is not within lumen 16, but rather sits outside tube 10 but that is still able to allow transfer of agents 22 into lumen 16.
In one embodiment, polymer 20 is a hydrogel, and detectable agents 22 are photolabily-linked to the molecules of the hydrogel. The photolabile linkages between agents 22 and the hydrogel are illustratively broken by exposing the photolabile bond with the proper wavelength of radiation to break the photolabile bond. In one embodiment, the source of radiation is a laser tuned to a band of wavelengths that is sufficient to break the photolabile links. However, the present invention also incorporates those embodiments in which the source of radiation includes lasers operating over wide ranges of wavelengths and also incoherent light.
Detector location 14 includes detector 32. As shown in
Pathways 30, 34, 36 are coupled to sensor 100. Pathways 30, 34, 36 are illustratively fiber optic strands. Illustratively, pathways 30, 34, 36 are end-glow fiber optic strands.
Sensor/controller 100 includes modules that are able to convert electric signals to optical signals used in pathways 30, 34, 36. Sensor 100 is shown as an integrated member to which pathways 30, 34, 36 directly connect. However, it should be appreciated that embodiments are envisioned where the modules are distinct from sensor 100 such that there are electronic leads between sensor 100 and the modules for communication therebetween. Sensor 100 includes electronic storage that knows various physical characteristics of the setup of tube 10, emitter locations 12, and detector location 14.
In use, tube 10 contains a flowing fluid, such as a liquid or a gas and can also be a flow of solid particulate matter such as an aerosol or solid microparticles. The fluid flows within tube 10 and through polymer 20 along direction 1000. According to a programmed setting or manual engagement, sensor 100 emits a signal that causes energy to be conducted along pathway 30.
The emitted energy travels along pathway 30 and is then emitted in tube 10 at emitter 12 such that polymer 20 is exposed thereto. As described in more detail in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0118696, exposure of the provided energy on polymer 20 causes release of agents 22. In the illustrated embodiment, the emitted energy is a pulse of light, such as that generated by a laser of a prescribed frequency.
Agents 22 are thereby released from bonds holding them in place. The release forms a bolus of agents 22. The size of the bolus of agents 22 is determined by the intensity of light provided at emitter location 12 and the diffraction gradient of tube 10. Initially, polymer 20 is full of agents 22. Accordingly, the intensity of the provided light is chosen such that the agents 22 within the first inch (or other desired length) will receive light having enough energy to break the photolabile bonds. Accordingly, agents 22 within the first inch will be released while agents 22 beyond the first inch will not be subjected to enough energy to break the bonds. A subsequent desired activation of the system will require increased light intensity such that, given the diffraction gradient, light will reach another section of polymer having agents 22 therein for release. In the provided example shown in
The release frees the bolus of agents 22 to be subjected to the forces presented by the fluid flowing in tube 10. Such forces carry agents 22 in direction 1000. Eventually, the flow causes agents 22 to arrive at detector location 14.
As previously noted, detector location 14 has pathways 34, 36. Pathway 34 delivers sensor light 200 to the outer tubing surface. This light 200 then proceeds through the tubing body through a clear portion of the tubing wall. Light 200 then enters the tubing lumen and provides a beam of light 206 which traverses the diameter of the tubing lumen, where flowing fluid exists, reaching the opposite side of the lumen. The exiting light 207 passes out of the tubing in a similar fashion as it entered on the opposite side of the tubing and is carried away through pathway 36. Both light entering the detector location 14 as light 200, and light exiting the detector location 14 as light 207 can easily be carried long distances from commonly available light energy sources, or to suitable commonly available light detectors for processing.
The laser light 200 has a base transference property that defines an amount of light expected to traverse tube 10 and the fluid and be received by pathway 36. The arrival of agents 22 provide that the amount of light received by pathway 36 is reduced.
A characteristic of agent 22 is that it can absorb and/or deflect light 200 supplied through the wall of tube 10. When the bolus of agent 22 passes through the beam 206, a portion of the light 200 will be absorbed/deflected before the remaining light exits as light 207. Light 207 can travel a substantial distance so that its intensity can be determined using standard light detectors.
Sensor 100 knows when energy was emitted along pathway 30, knows the amount of light expected to traverse tube 10 in the absence of agents 22 in the fluid, and detects the amount of light traversing tube 10 when agents 22 are present in the fluid. Sensor 100 detects agents 22 as they pass through detector location 14 using photonic absorbance/deflection differences. Sensor 100 further knows the distance between emitter location 12 and detector location 14.
Accordingly, the absorbance/deflection difference allows sensor 100 to determine the time between release t1 and arrival t2 of agents 22. By also knowing the distance between emitter location 12 and detector location 14 as well as by knowing other factors that impact flow of agents 22, a flow rate of the fluid within tube 10 can be determined.
Agents 22 can be considered in solution with a portion of fluid immediately surrounding polymer 20 after release at location 12. Polymer 20 is also in contact with the convective flowing fluid material. It is anticipated that free agents 22 in solution may take some time to fully merge with the convective fluid flow. If significant, this finite time-lag, t0, can be quantified from calibration measurements for various flowrates.
The linear distance along the tube or pipe between locations 12, 14 can be obtained/supplied as d1. The rate of the flowing fluid (length/time) can be calculated directly using the formula d1/(t2−(t0+t1)).
This type of flowmeter develops almost no resistance to fluid flow, thereby not affecting pressure gradients on either side of the new in-line flowmeter. Possible disturbance of the flowing fluids can result in increased turbulence as fluid passes through the traditional flowmeter thereby creating increased shearing energies within the fluid which may contribute to degradation of fluid characteristics sensitive to shear stresses.
The in-line flowmeter of the present disclosure also is linear in its operation and performs equally well at both relatively fast and slow flowrates. A mechanical in-line flowmeter is potentially limited by nonlinear spring action responses, thus potentially being insensitive to very slow and very fast flowrates. Additionally, the mechanical nature can wear out and change over time, while the new in-line flowmeter remains constant in its operation, as long as agent 22 is present. Mechanical flowmeters can cause increasing head pressure, or pressure on the inlet side as compared to the outlet side. These pressure differentials are additive so that multiple mechanical flowmeters placed in-line create greater differences in pressure when comparing the inlet pressure to the final exit pressure. In a large plant this can be a major factor in process control.
It should also be appreciated that there are no electrical components directly associated with the new in-line flowmeter. For remote sensing of the traditional in-line flowmeter electromechanical mechanisms are required, adding to the complexity, susceptibility to failure, and cost of remote sensing. Local sensing of the mechanical flowmeter is available by observing a window, either personally or possibly remotely by camera.
The advantages of not disturbing the flowing fluid mechanically can be exploited for fluids susceptible to clogging or shearing stresses, or very fast or very slow (iv infusions) flowrates.
The advantages of measuring flowrate with no mechanical mechanisms and no electromechanical elements allows measuring flowrates of explosive or volatile fluids (airplane/automobile fuel control and delivery). This allows for safer handling of fuel transport and handling relative to the traditional flowrate measuring. It should be appreciated that agent 22 is chosen such that its presence has minimal or no effect upon the purpose of the fluid (such as in fuel delivery, agent 22 is chosen such that it does not have a detrimental effect upon the fuel's ability to be used in an engine and so as to not leave undesired residues).
Additionally, the in-line flowmeter of the present disclosure provides no moving parts, thereby reducing failure points. Operation of the flowmeter also allows that very high and very low flow rates can be detected. Traditional flow meters often have to pick which of high and low flow rates they aim to accurately measure.
It should be appreciated that operation of flow meter tubing 10 relies on degradation/alteration of polymer 20 to release agent 22. Accordingly, each activation of emitter location 12 uses some of the discrete and finite amount of agent 22 present within polymer 20. Accordingly, while this presents little problem in instances where tube 10 is intended to be disposable, such as tubing 42, more permanent and long standing implementations may benefit from the ability to replenish agent 22 and polymer 20.
In addition to depletion of agents 22, the release response of polymer 20 can be affected by the distance that polymer 20 is located from the exact spot that energy is applied to tube 10. As noted, release of agents 22 is dependent upon provided energy coming into contact with the photolabile bonds with agents 22. The most likely bonds to interface with energy are those closest to the interface of pathway 30 with tube 10. Accordingly, agents 22 closest to pathway 30 are most likely to be broken. As more agent 22 is released, the location of the majority of viable agent 22 still available to be released becomes located farther from entry emitter disc pathway 30. Additionally, transmittance of energy along pathway 30 and tube 10 may degrade with increased distance (via the set diffraction gradient). Accordingly, it is envisioned that energy is supplied with increased intensity or magnitude to offset any expected losses. Accordingly, any expected reduction in response by polymer 20 due to distance can be offset by increased energy supply.
Embodiments are also envisioned where patterns in the signal of exiting light 207 are analyzed by sensor 100. Such signal analysis can then provide flow characteristics such as turbidity, viscosity, and turbulence. Additionally, embodiments are envisioned where more than one sensor is installed downstream to be able to determine wave front characterization and added accuracy.
While this invention has been described as having preferred designs, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
The present disclosure is a continuation application that claims priority to utility application Ser. No. 13/352,082, filed Jan. 17, 2012 titled In-Line Flow Meter, which claims priority to a provisional application, Ser. No. 61/433,408, filed Jan. 17, 2011, the disclosures of which is incorporated herein by reference. The priority of both applications is hereby claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2590830 | Williford | Mar 1952 | A |
3825346 | Rizzo | Jul 1974 | A |
3864044 | Lyshkow | Feb 1975 | A |
4487075 | Karidis | Dec 1984 | A |
4788125 | Davis | Nov 1988 | A |
4984604 | Nishimura | Jan 1991 | A |
5153665 | Weinstein | Oct 1992 | A |
20120059318 | Dewey | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150276448 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61433408 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13352082 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 14740002 | US |