This application relates generally to in-line label applicators for applying printed labels to containers and, more specifically, to an in-line label applicator that applies printed labels to containers moving along a conveyance path while at the same time identifying container helper codes and associating the container helper codes to label codes that are printed on the labels applied to the containers.
Government mandates to serialize pharmaceutical products are increasing around the globe. The Drug Supply Chain Security Act, enacted in November 2013, requires that manufacturers begin serializing all drug products at the saleable unit and case level for the U.S. market starting in November 2017. The EU, China and Brazil have all enacted similar mandates.
There are two predominant drivers behind these serialization mandates: (1) fighting grey market diversion and counterfeiting and (2) aid in government reimbursement programs. Details vary from region to region, but in general all mandates require marking the smallest unit of sale with lot and expiration information, as well as a serial number, creating a unique license plate for each unit. Typically, as suggested in
The lion's share of the effort required to implement Track & Trace is spent on data management. Tracking the chain of custody of each unit from manufacturing, through distribution, up to the point where it is administered is a monumental task. The data security to ensure that each unit can be authenticated adds to the complexity.
The first critical piece of the chain occurs right on the packaging line. Precise and consistent product handling, marking, inspection and data gathering are required to introduce accurate data into the front end of the system, where individual units (e.g., bottles or other containers) are labeled. In non-RFID systems, variable information printed on each label may include human readable Lot Number, Expiry Date, Serial Number and GTIN along with a 2D code (Label Code) representing the human readable data, along with other information. The GTIN is a code which is used to identify the product. The Serial number combined with the GTIN, uniquely identifies each bottle, throughout the supply chain, all the way to the end user. A label is typically applied to each bottle using a bottle wrap labeler, which wraps the label around the circumference of the product. Once the label is applied to the product, the Label Code can be located anywhere around the circumference of the bottle, making it difficult to scan.
On a typical serialization line, labeled bottles are transported on a conveyor and those bottles need to be identifiable at one or more points along the conveyor. As a bottle moves along the conveyor, it rotates, making it impractical to locate and read the Label Code with a single scanner. An array of scanners, typically four or six, located at angles to the conveyor (Scan Tunnel), can be used to scan images of the label from multiple angles. A sophisticated “stitching” algorithm can be used to piece the images together into a single image, which approximates the flat label. A second algorithm scans the stitched image to locate and read the 2D code.
To eliminate the need for a Scan Tunnel at every point along the line, where the bottle needs to be identified, a separate 2D code (Helper Code) is printed on either the top or the bottom surface of the bottle. The Helper Code is a serial number, assigned to each bottle, to uniquely identify the bottle during the packaging and aggregation process. Because the Helper Code is printed on a nominally flat surface, it can be easily read by a single scanner. The Label Code and the Helper Code need to be associated in a database, allowing access to the unique fixed and variable information printed on the label, by simply scanning the more easily read Helper Code.
In the past, the most commonly used existing technique for associating the Label Code to the Helper Code is to utilize a scan tunnel at a location downstream of the location where the label has been applied to the container. As this downstream station, the containers are passed through a scan tunnel to acquire the Label Code and the Label Code is entered into a FIFO device. A short distance downstream the Helper Code is then scanned and associated with the oldest Label Code in the FIFO device.
It would be desirable to provide a system and method that eliminates the need for a downstream scan tunnel and the associated capital cost, maintenance cost and points of failure.
In one aspect, an in-line label application system for applying printed labels to round container products includes a conveyance path along which round container products are moved in an upright orientation, each round container product having a respective unique helper code on a bottom side. A wrap label application arrangement applies wrap labels circumferentially onto the round container products and include a label printing device, a label scanner, a label application station and a helper code scanning device. The label printing device prints a label code onto each label passing thereby. The label scanner reads the label code on each label after printing and before application of the label to a round container product. At the label application station each label is moved into the conveyance path and applied to a respective round container product as the product is rotated. The helper code scanning device is positioned to scan the helper code of each round container product as a printed label is applied to the round container product, where the helper code scanning device located below the conveyance path.
In another aspect, an in-line label applicator includes a label printer to print variable data on each label and a label application station that moves the printed labels into a container conveyance path for application to containers moving along the path. One scanner scans the label code of each printed label before the label reaches the conveyance path, and another scanner scans the helper code of each container as the label is being applied during movement of the container along the conveyance path.
In another aspect, an in-line label application system for applying printed labels to round container products includes a conveyance path along which round container products are moved in an upright orientation. A wrap label application arrangement applies wrap labels circumferentially onto the round container products, the arrangement including a label printing device, a label scanner, a label application station and a container scanner. The label printing device prints a unique label code onto each label passing thereby. The label scanner reads the label code on each printed label after printing and before application of the label. At the label application station each printed label is moved into the conveyance path and applied to a respective round container product as the round container product is rotated. The container scanner is positioned to read a helper code of each round container product at the label application station. A control system coordinates operation of the label printing device, the label scanner and the container scanner. The control system is configured to: receive label code data for each printed label from the label scanner and sequentially load the label code data into one of a shift register, a FIFO device or other logical mechanism; and during application of a given printed label to a given round container product at the label application station, output the label code data associated with the given printed label from the shift register, FIFO or other logical mechanism to a database in coordination with output of helper code data for the given round container product from the container scanner to the database such that the label code data of the given printed label is associated with the helper code data of the given round container product.
In another aspect, a method for applying labels to containers involves: a—conveying containers along a conveyance path; b—setting a defined container spacing as containers enter a label application station; c—utilizing a label applicator to dispense a given label from a backing web and to move the label into the conveyance path to apply the label to a given container, where the given container includes a helper code thereon and the given label includes a label code thereon; d—utilizing a first scanner located along a label stock feed path to capture the label code of the given label prior to the given label being moved into the conveyance path; e—utilizing a second scanner located at the label application station to capture the helper code of the given container as the given label is being applied to the given container; and f—linking the scanned label code with the scanned helper code.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Referring to
The label web 109 with labels is delivered along a label stock feed path from a label supply roll 120 past the label printer 112, past the label scanner 114 and toward the conveyance path 106 to a merge point 122 of a label application station 124 where the labels are pealed from the web and moved into the conveyance path to be applied to containers.
In most cases, Helper Codes are printed on either the top surface or the bottom surface of each product, upstream from the bottle wrap labeler 110. Helper Codes are printed using an inkjet coder, a laser coder or similar printing technology 150. UV inkjet, which is invisible to the human eye, may be used in applications where concealing the helper code from the end user is preferred. A container scanner 152 directly downstream from the helper code printer 150, inspects the printed code. A reject device (not shown) removes products with invalid or poor quality codes prior to entering the labeler 110. In an alternate configuration, the spacing device (mentioned below) at the infeed to the labeler 110 can be designed to accommodate Helper Code printing and inspection process. In another alternative, the Helper Code may be printed on the product at the label application station.
For clarity, the bottle wrap labeler 110 can be considered as a collection of subsystems, namely product handling, labeling head and wrap applicator. In the simplest configuration, the product handling subsystem is comprised of a conveyor arrangement that makes up the portion of the conveyance path 106 through the labeler 110 to transport products and a spacing device 126 to create an appropriate, desired space between products 104 for label application.
The labeling head 128 unwinds the web of labels from the label roll 120, separates each label 108 from the web 109 for application to a product 104 (e.g., via a sharp turn around a peel bar at merge point 122) and rewinds the remaining web liner 109 onto a rewind roll 130. The labeling head 128 performs additional functions prior to separating the label from the liner for the purpose of serialization, including printing variable data on each label 108 via label printer 112 and inspecting the fixed and/or variable data on each label 108 using the label inspection scanner 114.
A wrap applicator at the label application station 124 rotates each product (e.g., by using a moving wrap belt 132 and spaced apart plate or wall 134 on opposite lateral sides of the conveyance path) to wrap a label 108 around the circumference of the product 104 as the label is dispensed from the labeling head at the application or merge point 122. As products 104 pass the application point 122, the labeling head 128 advances the label web 109 in an intermittent fashion, one label 108 for each product 104 that passes.
After being unwound from the supply roll 120, the web of labels passes the label printer 112, where variable information (including the Label Code (LC in
After scanning by the label code scanner 114, the Label Code LC is entered into a shift register 140 or other logical mechanism. As the web advances, the Label Code is tracked in the shift register. When a product 104 reaches the application point 122, it is captured between the wrap belt 132 and a fixed high friction back-up plate 134. This causes the product 104 to rotate as it continues down the conveyance path 106. The labeling head 128 dispenses the label 108 into the pinch point between the product 104 and the wrap belt 132. The surface speed of the wrap belt and the labeling head dispense speed are synchronized such that the label is wrapped around the circumference of the product as it is dispensed from the labeling head 128.
While the label 106 is being wrapped around the product, a scanner 116 reads the Helper Code HC. The control system 102 associates the Label Code LC for the label being dispensed with the Helper Code HC scanned at the dispense point (e.g., by outputting the proper label code LC from the shift register to the database at the same time as the helper code HC is scanned and sent to the database) and records the association in a database. For this purpose, the stack size of the shift register is generally sized to correspond to the number of labels on the portion of the web liner between the label printer 112 and the label application point 122. For a given web distance between those two locations, the stack size will generally be larger for smaller length labels as compared to larger length labels (assuming equal spacing between labels as between the different label sizes).
As mentioned above, the Helper Code can be printed on either the top surface or the bottom surface of the product. When the helper code is printed on top of the product—14, the Helper Code scanner 116 may be mounted on an adjustable bracket, located over the wrap belt 132, such that the Helper Code is scanned as the label is applied to the product. As suggested in
The word scanner is used throughout the discussion above. In most applications, both the Label Code and the Helper Code are 2D codes. Image capture type scanners or machine vision cameras may be used for this scanner functionality. In addition to reading the codes, these cameras may provide other functionality such as print quality inspection for the human readable variable data as well as the 2D codes. Additional cameras or other sensors, located along the conveyor can be used to inspect products to ensure that a label has been properly applied to each product.
In most applications, the control system 102 includes a PLC to control the physical functionality of the labeler, along with a Management Execution System (MES), having of one or more computers to manage the data sent to the printers, the data received from the cameras and the database that associates Label Codes with Helper Codes. The MES provides additional functionality including aggregation of products to bundles, bundles to cases and cases to pallets. Most MES implementations also provide rework capability to allow for dis-aggregation and re-aggregation for quality assurance and other purposes.
The above-described in-line label application system advantageously eliminates the need for a scan tunnel downstream of the label application station, reducing equipment cost and reducing overall line footprint.
The labeler control system 102 may also include functionality for tracking products through the system and rejecting products that fail inspection at any of the inspection points. Reject verification sensors and logic ensures that only products that pass all inspections are delivered to the next downstream process. For example, if a printed label 108 does not pass the label code inspection via scanner 114 a record of the failure is made. The defective label will still be applied to a product 104 and associated with a helper code in the database, along with a reject indicator. Downstream of the label application the product with the defective label can be rejected out of the processing path by scanning the associated helper code to identify which products have associated reject indicators and should be rejected.
Alternatively, the in-line label applicator itself can incorporate the reject functionality without requiring additional helper code scanning. In particular, and referring to
While the above described variants contemplate Helper Code printing upstream of the label application station, it is recognized that the Helper Code could in fact be printed at the label application station as well. In this regard, reference is made to
It is to be clearly understood that the above description is intended by way of illustration and example only, is not intended to be taken by way of limitation, and that other changes and modifications are possible.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3536550 | von Hofe | Oct 1970 | A |
4029537 | Kish | Jun 1977 | A |
4080239 | Real et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4242167 | Hoffmann | Dec 1980 | A |
4261788 | McClung | Apr 1981 | A |
4390390 | Margraf et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4558653 | Horton et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4619726 | Cook et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4944827 | Lilly et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5587043 | Hying et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6378588 | Nixon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6511569 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6768502 | Milton | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7469736 | Fries et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7757739 | Fries et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8033312 | Fries et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8186408 | Fries et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8756124 | Sayers, III et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8936841 | Katarya et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9008815 | Popp | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9195228 | Popp | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9483496 | Washburne et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
20020096261 | Yang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20060277269 | Dent | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2012048324 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT, International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2016/063928; dated Feb. 2, 2017, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170152070 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62261600 | Dec 2015 | US |