Patent Application
20100204697
The present disclosure relates to an electrosurgical forceps and more particularly, the present disclosure relates to an elongated endoscopic combination bipolar and monopolar electrosurgical forceps for sealing and/or cutting tissue.
Electrosurgical forceps utilize both mechanical clamping action and electrical energy to affect hemostasis by heating tissue and blood vessels to coagulate, cauterize and/or seal tissue. As an alternative to open forceps for use with open surgical procedures, many modern surgeons use endoscopes and endoscopic instruments for remotely accessing organs through smaller, puncture-like incisions. As a direct result thereof, patients tend to benefit from less scarring and reduced healing time.
Endoscopic instruments are inserted into the patient through a cannula, or port, which has been made with a trocar. Typical sizes for cannulas range from three millimeters to twelve millimeters. Smaller cannulas are usually preferred, which, as can be appreciated, ultimately presents a design challenge to instrument manufacturers who must find ways to make endoscopic instruments that fit through the smaller cannulas.
Many endoscopic surgical procedures require cutting or ligating blood vessels or vascular tissue. Due to the inherent spatial considerations of the surgical cavity, surgeons often have difficulty suturing vessels or performing other traditional methods of controlling bleeding, e.g., clamping and/or tying-off transected blood vessels. By utilizing an endoscopic electrosurgical forceps, a surgeon can either cauterize, coagulate/desiccate and/or simply reduce or slow bleeding simply by controlling the intensity, frequency and duration of the electrosurgical energy applied through the jaw members to the tissue. Most small blood vessels, i.e., in the range below two millimeters in diameter, can often be closed using standard electrosurgical instruments and techniques. However, if a larger vessel is ligated, it may be necessary for the surgeon to convert the endoscopic procedure into an open-surgical procedure and thereby abandon the benefits of endoscopic surgery. Alternatively, the surgeon can seal the larger vessel or tissue.
It is thought that the process of coagulating vessels is fundamentally different than electrosurgical vessel sealing. For the purposes herein, “coagulation” is defined as a process of desiccating tissue wherein the tissue cells are ruptured and dried. “Vessel sealing” or “tissue sealing” is defined as the process of liquefying the collagen in the tissue so that it reforms into a fused mass. Coagulation of small vessels is sufficient to permanently close them, while larger vessels need to be sealed to assure permanent closure.
In order to effectively seal larger vessels (or tissue) two predominant mechanical parameters must be accurately controlled—the pressure applied to the vessel (tissue) and the gap distance between the electrodes or tissue sealing surfaces—both of which are affected by the thickness of the sealed vessel. More particularly, accurate application of pressure is important to oppose the walls of the vessel; to reduce the tissue impedance to a low enough value that allows enough electrosurgical energy through the tissue; to overcome the forces of expansion during tissue heating; and to contribute to the end tissue thickness which is an indication of a good seal. It has been determined that a typical jaw gap for fusing vessel walls is optimum between 0.001 and 0.006 inches. Below this range, the seal may shred or tear and above this range the lumens may not be properly or effectively sealed.
With respect to smaller vessels, the pressure applied to the tissue tends to become less relevant whereas the gap distance between the electrically conductive surfaces becomes more significant for effective sealing. In other words, the chances of the two electrically conductive surfaces touching during activation increases as vessels become smaller.
Many known instruments include blade members or shearing members which simply cut tissue in a mechanical and/or electromechanical manner and are relatively ineffective for vessel sealing purposes. Other instruments rely on clamping pressure alone to procure proper sealing thickness and are not designed to take into account gap tolerances and/or parallelism and flatness requirements which are parameters which, if properly controlled, can assure a consistent and effective tissue seal. For example, it is known that it is difficult to adequately control thickness of the resulting sealed tissue by controlling clamping pressure alone for either of two reasons: 1) if too much force is applied, there is a possibility that the two poles will touch and energy will not be transferred through the tissue resulting in an ineffective seal; or 2) if too low a force is applied the tissue may pre-maturely move prior to activation and sealing and/or a thicker, less reliable seal may be created.
As mentioned above, in order to properly and effectively seal larger vessels or tissue, a greater closure force between opposing jaw members is required. It is known that a large closure force between the jaws typically requires large actuation forces which are necessary to create a large moment about the pivot for each jaw. This presents a design challenge for instrument manufacturers who must weigh the advantages of manufacturing an overly-simplified design against the disadvantages of a design that may require the user to exert a large closure force to effectively seal tissue. As a result, designers must compensate for these large closure forces by either designing instruments with metal pins and/or by designing instruments which at least partially offload these closure forces to reduce the chances of mechanical failure and reduce fatigue for the end user (i.e., surgeon).
Increasing the closure forces between electrodes may have other undesirable effects, e.g., it may cause the opposing electrodes to come into close contact with one another which may result in a short circuit and a small closure force may cause pre-mature movement of the tissue during compression and prior to activation. As a result thereof, providing an instrument which consistently provides the appropriate closure force between opposing electrode within a preferred pressure range will enhance the chances of a successful seal. As can be appreciated, relying on a surgeon to manually provide the appropriate closure force within the appropriate range on a consistent basis would be difficult and the resultant effectiveness and quality of the seal may vary. Moreover, the overall success of creating an effective tissue seal is greatly reliant upon the user's expertise, vision, dexterity, and experience in judging the appropriate closure force to uniformly, consistently and effectively seal the vessel. In other words, the success of the seal would greatly depend upon the ultimate skill of the surgeon rather than the efficiency of the instrument.
It has been found that the pressure range for assuring a consistent and effective seal is between about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2 and, preferably, within a working range of 7 kg/cm2 to 13 kg/cm2. Manufacturing an instrument which is capable of providing a closure pressure within this working range has been shown to be effective for sealing arteries, tissues and other vascular bundles.
Various force-actuating assemblies have been developed in the past for providing the appropriate closure forces to effect vessel sealing. For example, one such actuating assembly has been developed by Valleylab, Inc. of Boulder, Colo., a division of Tyco Healthcare LP, for use with Valleylab's vessel sealing and dividing instrument commonly sold under the trademark LIGASURE ATLAS®. This assembly includes a four-bar mechanical linkage, a spring and a drive assembly which cooperate to consistently provide and maintain tissue pressures within the above working ranges. Co-pending U.S. application Ser. Nos. 10/179,863 entitled “VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER” (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,101,371), 10/116,944 entitled “VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER” (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,083,618), 10/472,295 entitled “”VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER″ (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,101,372) and PCT Application Ser. Nos. PCT/US01/01890 entitled “VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER and PCT/US01/11340 entitled “VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER” all describe in detail various operating features of the LIGASURE ATLAS® and various methods relating thereto. The contents of all of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Other force-actuating mechanisms or assemblies are described in commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. Nos. 10/460,926 entitled “VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER FOR USE WITH SMALL TROCARS AND CANNULAS” and 10/953,757 entitled “VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER HAVING ELONGATED KNIFE STROKE AND SAFETY FOR CUTTING MECHANISM”, the entire contents of both are hereby incorporated by reference herein. As described therein, simpler and more mechanically advantageous actuating and drive assemblies are described therein which facilitate grasping and manipulating vessels and tissue and which reduce user fatigue.
In certain surgical operations, a bipolar forceps is used in combination with a monopolar forceps or monopolar coagulator to treat tissue and control bleeding during the surgery. As such and during the course of a particular operation, a surgeon may be required to substitute a monopolar instrument for the bipolar instrument which would typically involve substitution through the trocar or cannula. As can be appreciated this may occur on more than one occasion over the course of the operation which can be quite time consuming and which may unnecessarily subject the instruments to possible non-sterile environments.
It would be desirous to develop a small, simple and cost effective combination bipolar and monopolar instrument which can be utilized with small cannulas. Moreover, it would be desirous to provide an instrument which includes an easily manipulatable handle and instrument body which includes a mechanically advantageous force-actuating assembly to reduce user fatigue.
The present disclosure relates to an endoscopic forceps having a housing with a shaft attached thereto, the shaft including a pair of jaw members disposed at a distal end thereof. The forceps also includes a drive assembly disposed in the housing which is configured to move the jaw members relative to one another from a first position wherein the jaw members are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another to a second position wherein the jaw members are closer to one another for manipulating tissue. A pair of handles is operatively connected to the drive assembly and the handles are configured to move relative to the housing to actuate the drive assembly to move the jaw members. Each jaw member is adapted to connect to a source of electrical energy such that the jaw members are capable of conducting energy for treating tissue.
A first switch is disposed on the housing and is activatable to selectively deliver energy of a first electrical potential to at least one jaw member for treating tissue in a monopolar fashion. A second switch is disposed on the housing and is activatable to selectively deliver energy of a first electrical potential to one jaw member and selectively deliver energy of a second electrical potential to the other jaw member for treating tissue in a bipolar fashion.
In one embodiment according to the present disclosure, the forceps also includes a knife assembly which is operatively associated with the housing. The knife assembly is selectively actuatable to advance a knife through tissue disposed between the jaw members when the jaw members are disposed in the second position. In yet another embodiment, at least one of the jaw members may include a monopolar extension which extends beyond the insulative housing of the jaw member to permit delicate dissection of tissue.
In one particularly useful embodiment, at least one of the handles includes a knife lockout which prevents the knife assembly from being actuated when the jaw members are disposed in the second position. The knife lockout mechanism may include a mechanical interface extending from at least one of the handles. The mechanical interface is dimensioned to impede movement of the knife assembly when the handles are disposed in a first (i.e., open) position relative to the housing and the mechanical interface is dimensioned to permit actuation of the knife assembly when the handles are disposed in a second position relative to the housing.
In another embodiment according to the present disclosure, the forceps includes a monopolar lockout which prevents activation of the first switch when the jaw members are disposed in the first position. In one particularly useful embodiment, the monopolar lockout includes a mechanical interface disposed on at least one of the handles which prevents activation of the first switch when the handles are disposed in a first position relative to the housing and permits activation of the first switch when the handles are disposed in a second position relative to the housing. The monopolar lockout may include a pressure activated switch disposed in the housing such that movement of the handles from a first position relative to the housing to a second position relative to the housing closes the pressure activated switch to allow activation of the first switch.
In still yet another embodiment according to the present disclosure, the handles of the forceps are disposed on opposite sides of the housing and are movable from a first, spaced position relative to the housing to a second closer position relative to the housing. The housing may also be configured to include a pair of slits defined on opposite sides of the housing and the handles may be dimensioned to move relative to the housing within the slits. In one particularly useful embodiment, the housing includes a longitudinal axis defined therethrough and the handles are disposed at an angle “α” relative to the longitudinal axis to facilitate handling.
In yet another embodiment according to the present disclosure, an intensity controller is included which regulates the intensity of electrosurgical energy to the forceps during activation. In a particularly useful embodiment, the intensity controller is a slide potentiometer and is operable only in a monopolar mode.
In still another embodiment, the forceps may include an electrical safety which regulates the forceps to operating in either a bipolar fashion or a monopolar fashion during any given time. In a particularly useful embodiment, the first switch and the second switch are independently and exclusively activatable relative to one another.
The present disclosure also relates to an electrosurgical system having an electrosurgical generator and an endoscopic forceps. The forceps includes a housing having a shaft attached thereto with a pair of jaw members disposed at a distal end thereof. The jaw members are adapted to connect to the electrosurgical generator. The forceps also includes a drive assembly disposed in the housing which moves the jaw members relative to one another from a first position wherein the jaw members are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another to a second position wherein the jaw members are closer to one another for manipulating tissue. A pair of handles is operatively connected to the drive assembly to actuate the drive assembly to move the jaw members.
A first switch is disposed on the housing and is activatable to selectively deliver energy of a first electrical potential to at least one jaw member for treating tissue in a monopolar fashion. A second switch is disposed on the housing and is activatable to selectively deliver energy of a first electrical potential to one jaw member and selectively deliver energy of a second electrical potential to the other jaw member for treating tissue in a bipolar fashion.
In one embodiment, the generator includes a control circuit having a safety circuit which permits independent and exclusive activation of the forceps in either a bipolar or monopolar fashion. The safety circuit may be electrical or electro-mechanical and activated upon movement to the pair of handles relative to the housing. The generator may also include a control circuit having an isolation circuit operably connected to the second switch which regulates the energy to the jaw members while bypassing the second switch to protect the integrity of the second switch from current overload.
The present disclosure also relates to an endoscopic forceps having a housing with a shaft attached thereto. The shaft includes a pair of jaw members disposed at a distal end thereof. Each jaw member is adapted to connect to a source of electrical energy such that the jaw members are capable of conducting energy for treating tissue. A drive assembly is disposed in the housing and is operable to move the jaw members relative to one another from a first position, wherein the jaw members are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another, to a second position, wherein the jaw members are closer to one another, for manipulating tissue. A pair of handles operatively connects to the drive assembly and is movable relative to the housing to actuate the drive assembly to move the jaw members.
A knife assembly is included which is operatively associated with the housing. The knife assembly is selectively actuatable to advance a knife through tissue disposed between the jaw members when the jaw members are disposed in the second position. The knife assembly includes at least one safety mechanism to prevent damaging the knife upon selective actuation thereof.
In one embodiment, the safety mechanism includes a mechanical fuse which fractures upon exertion of excessive force (a force of about 9 lbf or greater) to actuate the knife assembly. In another embodiment, the knife assembly includes a pinion gear interdisposed between a set of gear teeth and a track which cooperate to advance the knife distally through the jaw members. The mechanical fuse may be operatively associated with the pinion gear, gear teeth and/or the track. In one particular embodiment, an axle of the pinion gear is designed to fracture upon excessive force to actuate the knife assembly. In another embodiment according to the present disclosure, first and second switches may be included to deliver energy to the jaw members as described mentioned above.
The present disclosure also relates to an endoscopic forceps having a housing with a shaft attached thereto. The shaft includes a pair of jaw members disposed at a distal end thereof, each jaw member adapted to connect to a source of electrical energy such that the jaw members are capable of conducting energy for treating tissue. A drive assembly is disposed in the housing and is operable to move the jaw members relative to one another from a first position, wherein the jaw members are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another, to a second position, wherein the jaw members are closer to one another, for manipulating tissue. A pair of handles is included which operatively connects to the drive assembly and is movable relative to the housing to actuate the drive assembly to move the jaw members.
A switch is included which is disposed on the housing and is activatable to selectively deliver energy of a first electrical potential to at least one jaw member for treating tissue. The switch is operatively coupled to an intensity control mechanism disposed within the housing which is selectively adjustable to regulate the level of electrosurgical energy to at least one jaw member. In one embodiment, the intensity control mechanism is selectively adjustable in discreet increments. In another embodiment, the intensity control mechanism includes a first mechanical interface (e.g., a detent) configured to engage a series of corresponding mechanical interfaces (e.g., recesses) defined in the housing to regulate the level of electrosurgical energy in discreet increments. The detent may be disposed in a cantilevered fashion atop the intensity control mechanism and the intensity control mechanism may be disposed atop a railway to facilitate movement thereof.
In yet another embodiment, the intensity control mechanism includes a second mechanical interface (e.g., a slide bump) that cooperates with the detent to mechanically engage a circuit board disposed within the housing at discreet locations when the detent engages a corresponding one of the series of recesses.
The present disclosure also relates to an endoscopic forceps having a housing with a shaft attached thereto. The shaft includes a pair of jaw members disposed at a distal end thereof, each jaw member adapted to connect to a source of electrical energy such that the jaw members are capable of conducting energy for treating tissue. A drive assembly is disposed in the housing and is operable to move the jaw members relative to one another from a first position, wherein the jaw members are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another, to a second position, wherein the jaw members are closer to one another, for manipulating tissue. A pair of handles operatively connects to the drive assembly and is movable relative to the housing to actuate the drive assembly to move the jaw members.
A switch is disposed on the housing and is activatable to selectively deliver energy of a first electrical potential to at least one jaw member for treating tissue. First and second toggle links are included which operatively connect each one of the pair of handles to the drive assembly. Each of the toggle links includes first and second anchoring elements, the first anchoring element operatively engaging the handle and the second anchoring element operatively engaging the drive assembly.
In one embodiment, the first and second anchoring elements each include a pair of tapered double tangs which operatively engage the handle and the drive assembly, respectively, in a snap-fit manner. Each pair of double tangs may include a step at a proximal end thereof for seating each pair of double tangs within a respective aperture defined within the handle and the drive assembly.
A slot may be defined between each pair double tangs. The slots may be oriented such that the greatest cross sectional area of the double tangs offsets an applied load on the forceps thereby preventing failure of the toggle links during actuation of the handles.
Various embodiments of the subject instrument are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein:
Turning now to
Forceps 10 includes a shaft 12 which has a distal end 16 dimensioned to mechanically engage the end effector assembly 100 and a proximal end 14 which mechanically engages the housing 20. Details of how the shaft 12 connects to the end effector are described in more detail below. The proximal end 14 of shaft 12 is received within the housing 20 and the connections relating thereto are also described in detail below. In the drawings and in the descriptions which follow, the term “proximal”, as is traditional, will refer to the end of the forceps 10 which is closer to the user, while the term “distal” will refer to the end which is further from the user.
Forceps 10 also includes an electrosurgical cable 310 which connects the forceps 10 to a source of electrosurgical energy, e.g., a generator 500 (See
As best show in
Handle assembly 30 includes two movable handles 30a and 30b disposed on opposite sides of housing 20. Handles 30a and 30b are movable relative to one another to actuate the end effector assembly 100 as explained in more detail below with respect to the operation of the forceps 10.
As best seen in the exploded view of
Rotating assembly 80 is mechanically coupled to housing 20 and is rotatable approximately 90 degrees in either direction about a longitudinal axis “A” (See
As mentioned above, end effector assembly 100 is attached at the distal end 16 of shaft 12 and includes a pair of opposing jaw members 110 and 120 (See
It is envisioned that the forceps 10 may be designed such that it is fully or partially disposable depending upon a particular purpose or to achieve a particular result. For example, end effector assembly 100 may be selectively and releasably engageable with the distal end 16 of the shaft 12 and/or the proximal end 14 of shaft 12 may be selectively and releasably engageable with the housing 20 and the handle assembly 30. In either of these two instances, the forceps 10 would be considered “partially disposable” or “reposable”, i.e., a new or different end effector assembly 100 (or end effector assembly 100 and shaft 12) selectively replaces the old end effector assembly 100 as needed. As can be appreciated, the presently disclosed electrical connections may have to be altered to modify the instrument to a reposable forceps.
Turning now to the more detailed features of the present disclosure as described with respect to
As best illustrated in
As best illustrated in
As best seen in
In
In one envisioned embodiment, the toggle links, e.g., toggle link 35a′, are generally symmetrical and include snap-like mechanical interfaces at the distal ends thereof to facilitate manufacture and assembly. More particularly and as best shown in
As can be appreciated, the geometry of each respective double tang anchor elements 36b″ and 36d″ includes a pair of tapered double tangs 37a, 37b and 37c, 37d. Each pair of double tangs 37a, 37b and 37c, 37d, respectively, includes a step 39a′, 39b′ and 39c′ and 39d′, respectively, at a proximal end thereof. Each pair of opposing tangs 37a, 37b and 37c, 37d includes a slot 38a and 38b, respectively, defined therebetween to allow each tang 37a, 37b and 37c, 37d to deflect inwardly to reduce the cross section of the anchoring element 36d″ and 36b″. As can be appreciated, upon assembly into a corresponding aperture, e.g., 36d and 36b, the taper of each tang 37a, 37b and 37c, 37d forces each tang 37a, 37b and 37c, 37d inwardly to reduce the cross section of each anchoring element 36d″ and 36b″ to facilitate engagement of the anchoring elements 36d″ and 36b″ within a corresponding aperture 36d′ and 36b′. Once the double tangs 37a, 37b and 37c, 37d are engaged within the respective apertures 36d″ and 36b″ past steps 39a′, 39b′ and 39c′ and 39d′, the tangs 37a, 37b and 37c, 37d spring outwardly to engage and seat the respective anchoring element 36d″ and 36b″ within the corresponding apertures 36d′ and 36b′. Once assembled, the slots 38a and 38b are preferably oriented such that the greatest cross sectional area of each anchoring element 36d″ and 36b″, i.e., the area with the most material, resides in the direction of the load when applied to close the jaw members 110 and 120 (See
As can be appreciated, movement of the handles 30a and 30b from an open or spaced apart configuration to a closed position towards the housing forces the actuating collar 69 proximally against a spring 63 which, in turn, translates a drive shaft 17 proximally to close the jaw members 110 and 120 (see
The handles 30a and 30b force the toggle links 35a and 35b to rotate along the longitudinal axis “A” beyond a parallel orientation with shaft 17 or longitudinal axis “A” such that, upon release, the force of spring 63 maintains the toggle links 35a and 35b in an over center or an over-extended (or past parallel) configuration thereby locking the handles 30a and 30b (and therefore the jaw members 110 and 120) relative to one another (
Handle 30a also includes a locking flange 32 which is disposed between the distal and proximal ends 34a′ and 30a′, respectively, which extends towards the housing 20 and moves relative thereto when handle 30a is actuated. Locking flange 32 includes a lockout element 32′ (
Movable handles 30a and 30b are designed to provide a distinct lever-like mechanical advantage over conventional handle assemblies due to the unique position of the toggle links 35a and 35b which, when actuated, rotate along the longitudinal axis “A” to displace the actuation or drive collar 69. In other words, it is envisioned that enhanced mechanical advantage for actuating the jaw members 110 and 120 is gained by virtue of the unique position and combination of several inter-cooperating elements (i.e., opposing handles 30a, 30b, toggle links 35a, 35b and gear teeth located at the distal ends 34 and 37 of the handle members 30a, 30b, respectively) which reduce the overall user forces necessary to obtain and maintain the jaw members 110 and 120 under ideal operating pressures of about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2. In other words, it is envisioned that the combination of these elements and their positions relative to one another enables the user to gain lever-like mechanical advantage to actuate the jaw members 110 and 120 enabling the user to close the jaw members 110 and 120 with lesser force while still generating the required forces necessary to effect a proper and effective tissue seal. The details relating to the various movements of the above-identified elements are explained below with respect to the operation of the forceps 10.
As shown best in
A reciprocating drive sleeve 17 (See
Upon actuation of the drive assembly 60, the drive sleeve 17 reciprocates which, in turn, causes the drive pin 180 to ride within slots 181a and 181b to open and close the jaw members 110 and 120 as desired. The jaw members 110 and 120, in turn, pivot about pivot pin 185 disposed through respective pivot holes 186a and 186b disposed within flanges 113 and 123. As can be appreciated, squeezing handles 30a and 30b toward the housing 20 pulls drive sleeve 17 and drive pin 180 proximally to close the jaw members 110 and 120 about tissue 420 grasped therebetween and pushing the sleeve 17 distally opens the jaw members 110 and 120 for grasping purposes.
As best shown in
For example and as shown in
It is envisioned that the electrically conductive sealing surface 112 may also include an outer peripheral edge which has a pre-defined radius and the outer housing 114 meets the electrically conductive sealing surface 112 along an adjoining edge of the sealing surface 112 in a generally tangential position. At the interface, the electrically conductive surface 112 is raised relative to the outer housing 114. These and other envisioned embodiments are discussed in co-pending, commonly assigned Application Ser. No. PCT/US01/11412 entitled “ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT WHICH REDUCES COLLATERAL DAMAGE TO ADJACENT TISSUE” by Johnson et al. and co-pending, commonly assigned Application Ser. No. PCT/US01/11411 entitled “ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT WHICH IS DESIGNED TO REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF FLASHOVER” by Johnson et al., the entire contents of both of which being hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The electrically conductive surface or sealing plate 112 and the outer housing 114, when assembled, form a longitudinally-oriented slot 115a defined therethrough for reciprocation of the knife blade 190. It is envisioned that the knife channel 115a cooperates with a corresponding knife channel 115b defined in jaw member 120 to facilitate longitudinal extension of the knife blade 190 along a preferred cutting plane to effectively and accurately separate the tissue along the formed tissue seal. As best illustrated in
As explained above and as illustrated in
The electrically conductive sealing plate 112 of jaw member 110 also includes a monopolar extension 112a which allows a surgeon to selectively coagulate tissue when disposed in a monopolar activation mode as explained in more detail below with respect to the operation of the forceps 10. Monopolar extension 112a is preferably integrally associated with conductive sealing plate 112 but may also be selectively extendible depending upon a particular purpose. The shape and dimension of the monopolar extension 112a may be dimensioned to match the overall contour of the curving contour of the jaw member 110 or the jaw housing 114. The edges of the monopolar extension 112a may be dimensioned to include radii specifically dimensioned to reduce current density along the edges thereof, e.g., smooth curves and transition points. The thickness of the monopolar extension 112a is preferably within a range of about 0.010 inches +/−0.005 inches. The width of the monopolar extension 112a is preferably about 0.084 inches +/−0.010 inches to permit the creation of an enterotomy that the jaw member(s) may pass therethrough for the purposes of mechanically spreading tissue. The length is preferably about 0.040 inches +/−0.010 inches. Commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/970,307 entitled “BIPOLAR FORCEPS HAVING MONOPOLAR EXTENSION” and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/988,950 entitled “BIPOLAR FORCEPS HAVING MONOPOLAR EXTENSION” disclose various embodiments of a monopolar extension which may be configured for use with forceps 10 of the present disclosure. The entire contents of both of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Jaw member 120 includes similar elements to jaw member 110 such as jaw housing 124 which encapsulates a support plate 129, an insulator plate 129′ and an electrically conductive sealing surface 122. Likewise, the electrically conductive surface 122 and the insulator plate 129′, when assembled, include respective longitudinally-oriented knife channels 115a and 115a′ defined therethrough for reciprocation of the knife blade 190. As mentioned above, when the jaw members 110 and 120 are closed about tissue, knife channels 115a and 115b form a complete knife channel 115 to allow longitudinal extension of the knife 190 in a distal fashion to sever tissue along a tissue seal. It is also envisioned that the knife channel 115 may be completely disposed in one of the two jaw members, e.g., jaw member 120, depending upon a particular purpose. It is also envisioned that jaw member 120 may be assembled in a similar manner as described above with respect to jaw member 110.
As best seen in
Jaw member 120 is connected to a second electrical lead 325b extending from circuit board 170 or generator 500 (See
Jaw members 110 and 120 are electrically isolated from one another such that electrosurgical energy can be effectively transferred through the tissue to form a tissue seal. For example and as best illustrated in
As mentioned above, jaw members 110 and 120 are engaged to the end of rotating shaft 18 by pivot pin 185 such that rotation the rotating assembly 80 correspondingly rotates shaft 18 (along with sleeve 17 and knife drive rod 71) which, in turn, rotates end effector assembly 100 (See
Rotating shaft 18 and drive shaft 17 are fixed to the rotating assembly 80 by two rotating tabs which are engaged through slot 18c in the rotating shaft 18 such that rotating of the rotating member correspondingly rotates the rotating shaft 18. It is envisioned that the drive shaft and the rotating shaft may be affixed to the rotating assembly in other ways known in the art, snap-fit, friction fit, etc.
Housing 20 includes housing halves 20a and 20b which, when mated, form housing 20. As can be appreciated, housing 20, once formed, forms an internal cavity 25 which houses the various assemblies identified above which will enable a user to selectively manipulate, grasp, seal and sever tissue in a simple, effective, and efficient manner. Each half of the housing, e.g., half 20b, includes a series of mechanical interfacing components, e.g., 205 which align and/or mate with a corresponding series of mechanical interfaces (not shown) to align the two housing halves 20a and 20b about the inner components and assemblies. The housing halves 20a and 20b may then be sonic welded or otherwise matingly engaged to secure the housing halves 20a and 20b once assembled.
As mentioned above, the handle assembly 30 includes two movable handles 30a and 30b which each cooperate with a toggle link 35a and 35b, respectively, to actuate the actuating or drive collar 69 of the drive assembly 60. The drive collar, in turn, reciprocates drive sleeve 17 to open and close the jaw members 110 and 120 as described above. Movable handles 30a and 30b are designed to provide a distinct lever-like mechanical advantage over conventional handle assemblies due to the unique position of the toggle links 35a and 35b which, when actuated, rotate along the longitudinal axis “A” to displace the actuation collar 69. More particularly and as mentioned above, it is envisioned that enhanced lever-like mechanical advantage for actuating the jaw members 110 and 120 is gained by virtue of the unique position and combination of various inter-cooperating elements such as the toggle links 35a and 35b and the gear teeth 34a and 34b at the distal end of the handles 30a and 30b which cooperate to reduce the overall user forces necessary to obtain and maintain the jaw members under ideal operating pressures of about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2.
As mentioned above, movement of the handles 30a and 30b from an open or spaced apart configuration to a closed position towards the housing 20 forces the actuating collar 69 proximally against spring 63 which, in turn, translates drive sleeve 17 proximally to close the jaw members 110 and 120. Moreover, as the handles 30a and 30b rotate to a closed position, the handles 30a and 30b force the toggle links 35a and 35b to rotate along the longitudinal axis “A” beyond a parallel orientation with longitudinal axis “A” such that upon release of the handles 30a and 30b from a closed position, the force of spring 63 maintains the toggle links 35a and 35b in an over-extended/over-centered (i.e., past parallel) configuration thereby locking the handles 30a and 30b (and therefore the jaw members 110 and 120) relative to one another (See
As mentioned above, handle 30a also includes a locking flange 32 which is dimensioned to prevent actuation of the knife assembly 70 when handle 30a is disposed in a spaced-apart or open configuration. Actuation or movement of the handle 30a towards the housing 20 disengages the lockout element 32 to allow movement of the knife assembly 70 to separate tissue as explained in more detail below.
As best seen in
As best seen in
As mentioned above, the jaw members 110 and 120 may be opened, closed and rotated to manipulate tissue until sealing is desired. This enables the user to position and re-position the forceps 10 prior to activation and sealing. It is envisioned that the unique feed path of the cable leads 325a and 325b through the rotating assembly 80, along shaft 18 and, ultimately, to jaw members 110 and 120 enables the user to rotate the end effector assembly 100 about 170 degrees in both the clockwise and counterclockwise direction without tangling or causing undue strain on cable leads 325a and 325b.
As best shown in
The knife assembly may be configure to include a mechanical fuse to prevent excessive actuation of the knife assembly. For example, pinion gear 77 may be configured to include one or more frangible or break-away elements to prevent over extension of the finger actuator in the proximal direction. As can be appreciated, configuring the pinion gear 77 in this fashion will prevent the user from overloading and damaging the delicate knife blade 190 disposed between the jaw members 110 and 120. In one embodiment, the axle of the pinion gear 77 will fracture when an excessive force of about 9 lbf or greater is applied in the direction “F” (as shown in
It is also contemplated that other elements may be configured in a similar fashion to limit overloading of the instrument and damaging delicate parts associated with the forceps 10. For example, the teeth 72a on the rack could be dimensioned to fracture upon excessive force or the track 75a may fracture as well. Moreover, the handles 30a and 30b may be equipped with a similar overloading safety mechanism which prevents over compression of the handles 30a and 30b and the drive assembly 60 or handle assembly 30. For example, links 35a and 35b may be configured to fracture upon an overloading condition or drive collar 69.
As mentioned above, the knife assembly TO is prevented from being actuated when the jaw members 110 and 120 are opened by virtue of flange 32 disposed on handle 30a being positioned to prevent distal activation of the collar 74 when handles 30a and 30b are opened. Upon movement of the handles 30a and 30b to a closed position, the flange 32 is positioned to allow distal translation of collar 74 to actuate the knife bar 71.
The operating features and relative movements of the internal working components of the forceps 10 are shown by phantom representation in the various figures. As the handles 30a and 30b are squeezed, the drive collar 69, through the mechanical advantage of the in-line toggle links 35a and 35b, is moved proximally which, in turn, compresses a spring 63 against the locking nuts 62a and 62b. As a result thereof, the drive collar 69 reciprocates locking sleeve 62 proximally which, in turn, reciprocates drive sleeve 17 proximally to closes jaw members 110 and 120. Once the jaw members 110 and 120 are closed about tissue the user can selectively energize the electrically conductive sealing plates for either monopolar activation or bipolar activation to treat tissue.
As best shown in
In one particularly useful embodiment and as best shown in
As shown in
If switch 260 (monopolar activation) is depressed, the circuit board 172 configures the forceps as a monopolar forceps and lead 325a caries a first electrical potential to jaw member 110 to coagulate or otherwise treat tissue in a monopolar fashion. As mentioned above, jaw member 110 includes a monopolar extension which facilitates monopolar treatment of various tissue types, e.g., avascular tissue structures, and/or allows quick dissection of narrow tissue planes. Activation of the monopolar extension may be controlled by an activation circuit which allows the user to selectively apply monopolar energy or bipolar energy as needed during surgery. One envisioned activation circuit is disclosed in commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/970,307 entitled “BIPOLAR FORCEPS HAVING MONOPOLAR EXTENSION” and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/1988,950 entitled “BIPOLAR FORCEPS HAVING MONOPOLAR EXTENSION”, the entire contents of both of these applications being hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Alternatively and as best shown in
In a bipolar mode, the circuit 510 (schematically-illustrated in
As best shown in
For example, flex circuit 170 may include a safety switch 171 which is activated when lockout mechanism 255 physically engages safety switch 171 to close the circuit to permit electrosurgical activation. In other words, the safety switch 171 is deflected or physically engaged (i.e., by virtue of the movement of lockout mechanism 255 when the handles 30a and 30b are closed) to close the electrical path and permit electrosurgical activation. Further details with respect to various embodiments of the safety switch are described below with respect to
As can be appreciated, locating the switches 250 and 260 on the housing 20 is advantageous during operating conditions since this positioning reduces the amount of electrical cable in the operating room and eliminates the possibility of activating the wrong instrument or wrong switch during a surgical procedure due to “line-of-sight” activation. An automatic safety circuit or an electro-mechanical or mechanical safety lock (not shown) may be employed which prevents the switches 250 and 260 from energizing the jaw members 110 and 120 in a different mode (i.e. bipolar or monopolar mode) without de-activating a safety circuit or other safety mechanism, i.e., independent and exclusive activation. For example, it may be desirable to configure the switch assembly 70 such that it must be re-set before switching between electrical modes. Re-setting may be accomplished by re-grasping tissue, re-opening the handles 30a and 30b, a reset switch or re-set lever, or other ways customary in the art.
As can be appreciated various switching algorithms (See
The safety switch 171 when assembled (and when the handles 30a′ and 30b and jaws 110 and 120 are opened) is secured against an interior wall or ledge 173 of housing 20b as shown in
As best shown in FIGS. 14 and 23-27, the switching assembly may include an intensity control 150 which electromechanically connects to the circuit board 172 and which is configured to allow the user to selectively regulate the intensity of the electrosurgical energy during operating conditions. It is envisioned that the intensity control 150 is particularly configured to regulate the intensity control when the forceps is configured in a monopolar mode. In one particularly useful embodiment, intensity control 150 is elongated and includes a contact 154 which extends transversally therefrom to electro-mechanically interface with the circuit board 172 through the housing 20. An actuating knob 151 extends transversally from the opposite side of the intensity control 150 and is dimensioned to protrude from the side of housing 20 when assembled (see
It is envisioned that the intensity control 150 may be configured to slide along the housing 20 in a discreet or continuous manner depending upon a particular purpose. For example and as best shown in
The detent 155′ is selectively moveable (by selectively actuating the intensity knob 150′) to engage various recesses 163a′, 163b′, 163c′, 163d′ and 163e′ disposed in the track 161′ to lock the intensity control knob 150′ at a discreet intensity setting as desired for a particular surgical purpose. It is envisioned that the track 161′ may include one or more larger recesses, e.g., recess 163c′, to facilitate returning the intensity control 150′ to a central (as shown), proximal-most or distal-most position.
The opposing end of the intensity control 150′ opposite detent 155′ includes a slider bump or other mechanical interface 167′ which is operatively engaged atop the flexible circuit board 170 and 170′. The slide bump 167′ is configured to deflect the flexible circuit board 170 (or 170′) at varying positions as the intensity control 150′ is moved. Deflecting the circuit board 170 (or 170′) at different locations adjusts the intensity settings by controlling the impedance of the flexible printed circuit 170 or 170′ as described below. In other words, the slide bump 167′ creates enough depression force to switch the flexible circuit 170 to a different control setting. The switch occurs when one conductive layer on the flexible circuit board 170 flexes to touch another conductive layer to create an electrical connection. As can be appreciated this allows the user to selectively regulate the intensity of the electrosurgical energy during operating conditions. As shown, the forceps 10 includes five (5) different intensity settings.
As best shown in
Various types of indicia 155 and/or tactile feedback elements (not shown) may be utilized to denote the position and/or intensity level of the electrical energy, e.g., numbers, graphical indicia, mechanical interfaces, etc. It is also envisioned that the user may configure the initial intensity level on the generator 500 (See
Intensity controller 150 may be configured to function as a slide potentiometer, sliding over and along the flexible or printed circuit board (which may be configured to function as a voltage divider network or “VDN”). For example, the intensity controller 150 may be configured to have a first position wherein knob 151 is disposed at a proximal-most position (e.g., closest to the user) which corresponds to a relative low intensity setting, a second position wherein knob 151 is disposed at a distal-most position (e.g., furthest from the user) corresponding to a relative high intensity setting, and a plurality of intermediate positions wherein knob 151 is disposed at varying positions therebetween corresponding to various intermediate intensity settings. As can be appreciated, the intensity settings from the proximal end to the distal end may be reversed, e.g., high to low. One embodiment of an intensity controller 150 is disclosed in commonly-owned U.S. patent Ser. No. 11/337,990 entitled “ELECTROSURGICAL PENCIL WITH ADVANCED ES CONTROLS”, the entire contents of which being incorporated by reference herein.
As illustrated in
Intensity controller 150 may also be configured and adapted to adjust the power parameters (e.g., voltage, power and/or current intensity) and/or the power verses impedance curve shape to affect the perceived output intensity. For example, the greater intensity controller 150 is displaced in a distal direction the greater the level of the power parameters transmitted to the jaw members 110 and 120 (or simply jaw member 110 when disposed in a monopolar configuration). When the forceps is disposed in a monopolar mode, current intensities can range from about 60 mA to about 240 mA with tissue having an impedance of about 2 k ohms. An intensity level of 60 mA may provide very light and/or minimal cutting/dissecting/hemostatic effects. An intensity level of 240 mA provides very aggressive cutting/dissecting/hemostatic effects.
Intensity settings are typically preset and selected from a look-up table based on a desired surgical effect, surgical specialty and/or surgeon preference. The selection may be made automatically or selected manually by the user.
It is envisioned that when the forceps 10 is changed from one mode to another mode, the intensity controller 150 may be configured such that it must be reset (e.g., the knob 151 is re-positioned to the proximal-most end of guide channels 157 thus re-setting the intensity level to the preset configuration. After being reset, intensity controller 150 may be adjusted as needed to the desired and/or necessary intensity level for the mode selected.
It is envisioned and contemplated that the circuit board 172 or generator 500 may also include an algorithm which stores the last intensity level setting for each mode. In this manner, intensity controller 150 does not have to be reset to the last operative value when the particular mode is re-selected.
The present disclosure also relates to a method for treating tissue with electrosurgical energy from the electrosurgical generator 500 which includes the steps of: providing an endoscopic forceps 10 including a housing 20 having a shaft 12 affixed thereto. The shaft 12 includes first and second jaw members, 110 and 120, respectively, attached proximate a distal end of the shaft 12. An actuator or handle assembly 30 is included for moving jaw members 110 and 120 relative to one another from a first position wherein the jaw members 110 and 120 are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another to a second position wherein the jaw members 110 and 120 cooperate to grasp tissue therebetween. The switch assembly 170 is included on the housing 20 which permits the user to selectively energize the jaw members 110 and 120 in a monopolar or bipolar mode to treat tissue.
As can be appreciated and as mentioned above, the switch assembly 170 includes switches 250 and 260, printed circuit board 172 and connectors 176a-d. An intensity control 150 may also be included with the switch assembly 170 to regulate the intensity level of the electrosurgical energy when disposed in either mode. In this particular method, the steps further include: grasping tissue between the jaw members 110 and 120; selectively activating the jaw members 110 and 120 to treat tissue disposed between the jaw members 110 and 120 in a bipolar or monopolar fashion; and selectively regulating the intensity of the electrosurgical energy by controlling the intensity control 150.
Other steps of the method may include the steps of: providing a knife assembly 70 which is configured for selective actuation of a knife and the step of selectively actuating the knife assembly 70 to advance the knife 190 to divide tissue after tissue treatment. Still other steps may include: adjusting the intensity of the electrosurgical energy as needed during operating conditions; unlocking the knife assembly 70 prior to actuation or unlocking the knife assembly 70 simultaneously when actuating the handles 30a and 30b from the first and second positions.
As best shown in
Switches 250 and 260 are typically push-button-type and ergonomically dimensioned to seat within respective apertures 250′ and 260′ of housing 20 (once assembled). It is envisioned that the switches 250 and 260 permit the user to selectively activate the forceps 10 for surgical treatment of tissue. More particularly, when either switch 250 or 260 is depressed, electrosurgical energy is transferred through leads 325a and/or 325b to respective jaw members 110 and 120.
Again and as noted above, a safety switch 255 (or circuit or algorithm (not shown)) may be employed such that one or both of the switches 250 and 260 cannot fire unless the jaw members 110 and 120 are closed and/or unless the jaw members 110 and 120 have tissue held therebetween. In the latter instance, a sensor (not shown) may be employed to determine if tissue is grasped between jaw members. In addition, other sensor mechanisms may be employed which determine pre-surgical, concurrent surgical (i.e., during surgery) and/or post surgical conditions. These sensor mechanisms may also be utilized with a closed-loop feedback system coupled to the electrosurgical generator to regulate the electrosurgical energy based upon one or more pre-surgical, concurrent surgical or post surgical conditions. Various sensor mechanisms and feedback systems are described in commonly-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,832 entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING OUTPUT OF RF MEDICAL GENERATOR”, the entire contents of which being hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Turning back to
It is envisioned that the opposing jaw members 110 and 120 may be rotated and partially opened and closed without unlocking the knife assembly 70 which, as can be appreciated, allows the user to grip and manipulate the tissue without premature activation of the knife 190. As mentioned below, only a substantially fully closed position of the handles 30a and 30b will unlock the knife assembly 70 for actuation.
Once the desired position for the sealing site is determined and the jaw members 110 and 120 are properly positioned, handles 30a and 30b may be squeezed to actuate the drive assembly 60 to close the jaw members 110 and 120 about tissue. As mentioned above, when the handles 30a and 30b are fully closed about tissue the toggle links 35a and 35b over-rotate past parallel with the longitudinal axis “A” such that slightly releasing the handles 30a and 30b biases the spring 63 to lock the handles 30a and 30b relative to one another. As can be appreciated, when the handles 30a and 30b lock relative to one another, the jaw members 110 and 120, in turn, lock and secure about tissue within a pressure range of about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2 and, preferably, with a pressure range of about 7 kg/cm2 to about 13 kg/cm2. The forceps 10 is now ready for selective application of electrosurgical energy and subsequent separation of the tissue (if desired).
It is envisioned that the combination of the mechanical advantage gained by the disposition of the toggle links 35a and 35b relative to the longitudinal axis “A” along with the mechanical advantage gained by configuring the distal ends 34a′ and 34b′ as inter-engaging gear teeth will facilitate and assure consistent, uniform and accurate closure pressure about the tissue within the desired working pressure range of about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2 and, in one particularly useful embodiment, about 7 kg/cm2 to about 13 kg/cm2. By controlling the intensity, frequency and duration of the electrosurgical energy applied to the tissue, the user can either cauterize, coagulate/desiccate, seal and/or simply reduce or slow bleeding by activating either or both switches 250 and 260.
In one or more particularly useful embodiments, the electrically conductive sealing surfaces 112, 122 of the jaw members 110, 120, respectively, are relatively flat to avoid current concentrations at sharp edges and to avoid arcing between high points. In addition and due to the reaction force of the tissue when engaged, jaw members 110 and 120 are preferably manufactured to resist bending. For example, the jaw members 110 and 120 may be tapered along the width thereof which is advantageous since the thicker proximal portion of the jaw members 110 and 120 will resist bending due to the reaction force of the tissue.
As mentioned above, at least one jaw member, e.g., 120, may include one or more stop members 90 which limit the movement of the two opposing jaw members 110 and 120 relative to one another. The stop member(s) 90 may be dimensioned to extend from the sealing surface 122 a predetermined distance according to the specific material properties (e.g., compressive strength, thermal expansion, etc.) to yield a consistent and accurate gap distance “G” during sealing. The gap distance between opposing sealing surfaces 112 and 122 during sealing ranges from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches and, in one particularly useful embodiment, between about 0.002 and about 0.003 inches. The non-conductive stop member(s) 90 may be molded onto the jaw members 110 and 120 (e.g., overmolding, injection molding, etc.), stamped onto the jaw members 110 and 120 or deposited (e.g., deposition) onto the jaw members 110 and 120. For example, one technique involves thermally spraying a ceramic material (or the like) onto the surfaces of one or both jaw members 110 and 120 to form the stop member(s) 90. Several thermal spraying techniques are contemplated which involve depositing a broad range of heat resistant and insulative materials on various surfaces to create stop members 90 for controlling the gap distance between electrically conductive surfaces 112 and 122.
As energy is being selectively transferred to the end effector assembly 100, across the jaw members 110 and 120 and through the tissue, a tissue seal forms isolating two tissue halves. At this point and with other known vessel sealing instruments, the user must remove and replace the forceps 10 with a cutting instrument (not shown) to divide the tissue halves along the tissue seal. As can be appreciated, this is both time consuming and tedious and may result in inaccurate tissue division across the tissue seal due to misalignment or misplacement of the cutting instrument along the ideal tissue cutting plane.
As explained in detail above, the present disclosure incorporates knife assembly 70 which, when activated via the trigger knob 76, progressively and selectively divides the tissue along an ideal tissue plane in precise manner to effectively and reliably divide the tissue into two sealed halves with a tissue gap therebetween. The knife assembly 70 allows the user to quickly separate the tissue immediately after sealing without substituting a cutting instrument through a cannula or trocar port. As can be appreciated, accurate sealing and dividing of tissue is accomplished with the same forceps 10.
It is envisioned that knife blade 190 may also be coupled to the same or an alternative electrosurgical energy source to facilitate separation of the tissue along the tissue seal. Moreover, it is envisioned that the angle of the knife blade tip 192 may be dimensioned to provide more or less aggressive cutting angles depending upon a particular purpose. For example, the knife blade tip 192 may be positioned at an angle which reduces “tissue wisps” associated with cutting. More over, the knife blade tip 192 may be designed having different blade geometries such as serrated, notched, perforated, hollow, concave, convex etc. depending upon a particular purpose or to achieve a particular result. It is also contemplated that the forceps 10 may be activated in a monopolar mode to divide tissue after formation of a tissue seal.
Once the tissue is divided into tissue halves, the jaw members 110 and 120 may be opened by re-grasping the handles 30a and 30b moving each handle 30a and 30b outwardly relative to the housing 20. It is envisioned that the knife assembly 70 generally cuts in a progressive, uni-directional fashion (i.e., distally).
As best shown in
As best shown in schematic illustration of
It is envisioned that the safety switch 171′ may be configured to allow both bipolar and monopolar activation once closed or configured in a more restrictive fashion, e.g., only permit one type of electrical activation at a time without re-setting the safety switch 171′ (i.e., opening and re-grasping the handles 30a′ and 30b, a separate toggle switch (not shown), etc.). Moreover, it is also envisioned that the safety switch 171′ may be configured to simply safeguard against the activation of one of the modes (i.e., the monopolar mode) depending upon a particular purpose and the other mode (i.e., the bipolar mode) is not restricted by the safety switch 171′.
From the foregoing and with reference to the various figure drawings, those skilled in the art will appreciate that certain modifications can also be made to the present disclosure without departing from the scope of the same. For example, it may be preferable to add other features to the forceps 10, e.g., an articulating assembly to axially displace the end effector assembly 100 relative to the elongated shaft 12.
It is also contemplated that the forceps 10 (and/or the electrosurgical generator used in connection with the forceps 10) may include a sensor or feedback mechanism (not shown) which automatically selects the appropriate amount of electrosurgical energy to effectively seal the particularly-sized tissue grasped between the jaw members 110 and 120. The sensor or feedback mechanism may also measure the impedance across the tissue during sealing and provide an indicator (visual and/or audible) that an effective seal has been created between the jaw members 110 and 120. Examples of such sensor systems are described in commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,832 entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING OUTPUT OF RF MEDICAL GENERATOR”, the entire contents of which being incorporated by reference herein.
Moreover, it is contemplated that the knife assembly 70 may include other types of recoil mechanisms which are designed to accomplish the same purpose, e.g., gas-actuated recoil, electrically-actuated recoil (i.e., solenoid), etc. It is also envisioned that the forceps 10 may be used to cut tissue without sealing. Alternatively, the knife assembly 70 may be coupled to the same or alternate electrosurgical energy source to facilitate cutting of the tissue.
Although the figures depict the forceps 10 manipulating an isolated vessel, it is contemplated that the forceps 10 may be used with non-isolated vessels as well. Other cutting mechanisms are also contemplated to cut tissue along the ideal tissue plane.
It is envisioned that the outer surface of the end effector assembly 100 may include a nickel-based material, coating, stamping, metal injection molding which is designed to reduce adhesion between the jaw members 110 and 120 with the surrounding tissue during activation and sealing. Moreover, it is also contemplated that the conductive surfaces 112 and 122 of the jaw members 110 and 120 may be manufactured from one (or a combination of one or more) of the following materials: nickel-chrome, chromium nitride, MedCoat 2000 manufactured by The Electrolizing Corporation of OHIO, Inconel 600 and tin-nickel. The tissue conductive surfaces 112 and 122 may also be coated with one or more of the above materials to achieve the same result, i.e., a “non-stick surface”. As can be appreciated, reducing the amount that the tissue “sticks” during sealing improves the overall efficacy of the instrument.
One particular class of materials disclosed herein has demonstrated superior non-stick properties and, in some instances, superior seal quality. For example, nitride coatings which include, but not are not limited to: TiN, ZrN, TiAlN, and CrN are preferred materials used for non-stick purposes. CrN has been found to be particularly useful for non-stick purposes due to its overall surface properties and optimal performance. Other classes of materials have also been found to reducing overall sticking. For example, high nickel/chrome alloys with a Ni/Cr ratio of approximately 5:1 have been found to significantly reduce sticking in bipolar instrumentation. One particularly useful non-stick material in this class is Inconel 600. Bipolar instrumentation having sealing surfaces 112 and 122 made from or coated with Ni200, Ni201 (˜100% Ni) also showed improved non-stick performance over typical bipolar stainless steel electrodes.
While the drawings show one particular type of monopolar lockout or safety mechanism 255 for use with the presently disclosed forceps,
While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0106297, filed on Nov. 8, 2006, entitled “IN-LINE VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER” by Patrick L. Dumbauld et al., which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0078456, filed on Sep. 29, 2006, entitled “IN-LINE VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER” by Patrick L. Dumbauld et al., which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/722,177, filed on Sep. 30, 2005, entitled “IN-LINE VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER” by Patrick L. Dumbauld, the entire contents of each of these applications being incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60722177 | Sep 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11594396 | Nov 2006 | US |
| Child | 12762482 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11540335 | Sep 2006 | US |
| Child | 11594396 | US |
