This application is the U.S. National Phase of PCT/GB2016/050867 filed Mar. 29, 2016, which claims priority of United Kingdom Patent Application 1505467.9 filed Mar. 30, 2015.
This invention relates to stairlifts and, in particular, to a method of and/or system for controlling the speed of a stairlift.
Stairlifts typically comprise a rail following the contour of a staircase; a carriage mounted to move along the rail; and a chair mounted on the carriage, upon which the stairlift user sits during movement of the carriage along the rail. The rail of a curved stairlift will typically include bends in a vertical plane (called transition bends) and bends in a horizontal plane (called inside/outside bends). The rail may also include bends that combine vertical and horizontal elements (called helical bends).
The speed of a stairlift is limited, by regulation. Under EU regulations stairlift speed is limited to a maximum of 0.15 m/s but this limit may vary in other jurisdictions. The reference point at which speed is measured is a point on the surface of the stairlift chair, at a position forward of the rear edge.
In the case of curved stairlifts, when the carriage is moving through a negative transition bend (a bend in which the angle of inclination reduces in the uphill direction) the speed of the reference point on the chair will accelerate relative to the carriage. Similarly, as will be described in greater detail below, when the carriage is moving through certain types of inside/outside bend, the reference point on the chair will typically proscribe a greater arc than the arc through which the carriage is moving and, accordingly, the reference point will accelerate relative to the carriage.
To ensure that the speed at the reference point does not exceed the prescribed upper limit, the stairlift carriage is typically slowed as it moves through bends. The changes of speed may be effected by placing switches along the rail, each switch serving to trigger a speed change in the carriage as the carriage moves past the switch. One alternative is to ‘map’ the rail in the broad manner described in our European Patent 0 738 232. In this case, the positions on the rail at which the carriage should be slowed or accelerated, are stored in an electronic memory. The position of the carriage on the rail is then monitored and the carriage speed then adjusted to that which is appropriate for the position on the rail.
Further factors may influence the speed of a stairlift, two being battery voltage and motor current draw. These are typically limited, empirically, to avoid damaging the batteries, it being recognized that demand on the batteries will vary according to factors such as passenger weight, carriage speed, initial state of charge of the battery, whether the carriage is moving up the rail or down the rail, and whether the carriage is moving through a transition bend necessitating operation of a levelling motor to maintain the chair level.
In order to accommodate these various factors, the speed of the stairlift is set somewhat arbitrarily, and based on experience, to ensure not only that the maximum permissible speed is not exceeded but also that battery voltage and current draw are maintained within limits. Invariably this means that the total time taken for the carriage to travel between the ends of the rail is longer than is necessary, and than is possible.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of controlling the speed of a stairlift, and/or a stairlift so controlled, which goes at least some way to addressing the problems identified above; or which at least offers a novel and useful choice.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the invention provides a method of controlling the speed of a stairlift, the stairlift having:
Preferably said method further includes generating one or more third signals representative of the speed of a reference point on said chair, said one or more third signals being combined with said first and second signals as controls over the speed of said carriage drive motor.
Preferably said carriage is rotatable with respect to said chair, said method including generating a signal representative of the relative angular velocity between said carriage and said chair as said carriage moves through a transition bend in said rail.
Preferably said method further includes comparing said relative angular velocity with the speed of said carriage drive motor and, if necessary, adjusting the speed of said carriage drive motor to ensure said chair is maintained substantially level.
Preferably said method includes generating a signal representative of the angular velocity of said carriage as said carriage moves through a horizontal bend in said rail.
Preferably measurement of the rotational velocities of said carriage are effected using one more gyroscopes mounted in or on said carriage and/or said chair.
Preferably signals from said one or more gyroscopes are processed to establish the speed of said reference point on said chair.
Preferably said method further comprises adjusting the speed of said carriage pre-emptively having regard to the position of said carriage on said rail.
Preferably said method comprises learning and storing in a memory, acceptable speed changes at various positions on said rail.
In a second aspect the invention provides a stairlift, including:
Preferably said speed control facility is further configured to generate one or more third signals representative of the speed of a reference point on said chair, and to apply said one or more third signals, along with said first and second signals as controls over the speed of said carriage motor.
Preferably said speed control facility includes one or more gyroscopes mounted on or in said carriage and/or said chair to generate said one or more first signals.
Preferably said speed control facility includes a 3-axis gyroscope mounted in said carriage.
In a third aspect the invention provides a stairlift when controlled according to the method set forth above
Many variations in the way the invention may be performed will present themselves to those skilled in the art upon reading the following description.
The description which follows should not be regarded as limiting but rather, as an illustration only of one manner of performing the invention. Where possible any element or component should be taken as including any or all equivalents thereof whether or not specifically mentioned.
One form of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring firstly to
Mounted on, and extending above, the carriage 12 is a chair 16. As is well known in the art, the chair is mounted in such a manner that, when the carriage 12 moves through a transition bend in the rail, the chair remains horizontal. In some stairlifts, the chair and carriage are rotated as a unit with respect to the rail but, in the embodiment described herein, the chair is fixed to the upper end of arm 17, the lower end of arm 17 being pivotally mounted to the carriage along axis 18. A levelling gear 19 is fixed to the arm about axis 18, the gear 19 meshing with pinion 20 mounted on the output of a levelling motor 21. Thus, as the carriage 12 moves through transition bends in the rail 11 (later described with reference to
In the form shown the chair 16 comprises a seat surface 25, a backrest 26, and spaced armrests 27. A user-operated control 28 is mounted on one of the armrests to allow a user seated in the chair to control the movement of the carriage along the rail. Although not shown for reasons of clarity, the chair will also typically include a footrest to support the user's feet during operation of the stairlift.
Control of the carriage drive motor 13 and the levelling motor 21 is effected by an electronic control unit (ECU) 30 mounted within the carriage. The ECU 30 receives inputs from the hand control 28 as well as from various sensors mounted on the carriage 12 and/or the chair 16 to ensure appropriate operation of the levelling motor 21 to maintain the seat 25 level at all times. These sensors preferably include a gyroscope 31 mounted in the carriage and arranged to provide an output representative of the speed of rotation of the carriage in transition bends (roll). The gyroscope 31 may also have the functionality to measure the speed of rotation as the carriage moves through horizontal bends (yaw), this being so if the gyroscope is a 3-axis gyroscope. However the speed of rotation in yaw could also be measured using a gyroscope mounted on the chair. The sensors further include a carriage accelerometer 32, a carriage encoder 33 operable to monitor the rotation of the drive pinion 14, and a chair encoder 34 operable to monitor the rotation of the chair leveling gear 19.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that means of measuring rates of angular rotation other than gyroscopes could be used in reducing the invention to practice without departing from the scope of the invention.
The present invention describes a method and/or system to improve the overall speed at which a stairlift carriage moves between the ends of the stairlift rail. This will invariably, though not necessarily, require monitoring of the maximum overall speed of the stairlift chair to ensure that the permitted maximum speed is not exceeded. One method of monitoring the speed of a reference point on the chair is therefore described.
As stated above, the maximum allowable speed of a stairlift is regulated. European Standard EN 81-40:2008 (E) establishes the position of a speed reference point indicated by 35 in the drawings. This point is located on the longitudinal centerline of the seat 25, 250 mm forward of a vertical line down through the forward face of the backrest 26. The standard prescribes that the speed of the reference point 35 shall not exceed 0.15 m/s in any direction. In other jurisdictions the speed limit may be some other figure.
Turning now to
When the carriage is moving along a straight section of rail, as shown at position (D) in
When the carriage is moving through the outside bend (F) as shown, the reference point 35 moves through a shorter arc than the carriage and V6<VC6. Returning to
When the chair is levelling upon the carriage traversing a transition curve in the rail (in reality, the chair maintaining level as the carriage displaces), the chair surface is assumed to be moving in a partial circle of radius Rsh while the leveling arm supporting the chair surface is also rotating about a radius of Rpiv.
A basic form of speed control according to the invention may be effected as follows:
Output signals from the 3-axis gyroscope are monitored by the ECU 30. Should the signals in either roll or yaw (generated by the carriage moving through a transition bend or horizontal bend respectively) exceed pre-determined thresholds, the ECU triggers the carriage drive motor 13 to slow down to a prescribed lower speed. The thresholds applied to the gyroscope outputs, and the carriage drive motor speeds, are set to ensure that the speed of the reference point 35 on the chair does not exceed the prescribed limit in both transition bends or horizontal bends.
The speed control method described above contemplates the carriage moving at two defined speeds only, a higher speed when traversing straight sections of rail and a lower speed when traversing bends. However the use of gyroscopes or similar electronic devices provides an opportunity to incorporate a more sophisticated reactive speed control system wherein the speed of the reference point 35 is continually calculated and the speed of the carriage drive motor 13 controlled to maintain a higher overall speed. To this end the speed of the reference point in rail bends is first established.
Simplified equations to describe the relative motion aligned to the stairlift rail for transition or roll curves is:
Roll Component Speed=((2πR piv)×({acute over (Ø)} gyro roll Sec−1/360)×(cos {acute over (Ø)} gravity))+((2π(R sh−R piv))×({acute over (Ø)} gyro roll Sec−1/360))
Where {acute over (Ø)} gyro roll Sec−1 is the carriage gyro output. {acute over (Ø)} gravity is the carriage accelerometer angle versus gravity.
There is an extra term to describe the additional speed caused by inside/outside or yaw curves:
Yaw Component Speed=(2πRscd)×({acute over (Ø)} gyro yaw Sec−1/360)
So the complete equation is:
Chair True Speed=Carriage Speed along rail+((2πR piv)×({acute over (Ø)} gyro roll Sec−1/360)×(cos {acute over (Ø)} gravity))+((2π(R sh−Rpiv))×({acute over (Ø)} gyro roll Sec−1/360))+(2πRscd)×({acute over (Ø)} gyro yaw Sec−1/36
This set of equations is simple enough for an on-board microcontroller to calculate in real time, based on the accelerometer and gyroscopic data from the chair and carriage. This means that at any point the chair seat speed can be calculated and the speed of the carriage motor 13 controlled, reactively, to maintain the speed of the reference point 35 at the desired level. Ignoring other limitations, this speed level may be the maximum permitted by the regulations.
It will be appreciated that the system for calculating true chair speed is entirely reactive and, accordingly, the carriage takes time to change speed when entering and exiting bends. To improve system efficiency and/or passenger comfort it is advantageous to include some form of pre-emptive speed adjustment around those positions on the rail where significant changes of speed occur. A further advantage of pre-emptively adjusting the speed is that excessive changes of speed, which could and invariably would arise in a purely reactive system attempting to maximize speed, can be removed.
These adjustments are made depending on the position of the carriage on the rail and may vary according to the nature and angle of the bend being negotiated. The pre-emptive adjustment facility is preferably ‘self-learning’, and compiles a set of speed settings (or change in speed settings) at particular positions along the rail which will ensure comfortable changes in speed while maintaining optimum overall speed.
In addition to the maximum speed setting described above, other factors influence speed setting and thus influence the overall time taken for the carriage to move up and down the rail.
Turning now to
In this implementation the Statutory Top Speed is the maximum permissible speed at which the reference point on the chair may travel. As a first step the True Chair Speed is monitored in real time, in the manner described above, compared with the Statutory Top Speed and, if necessary adjustment made to the Carriage Speed to maintain True Chair Speed below the permissible maximum.
As indicated in
As described above, merely establishing maximum speeds by looking at True Chair Speed, has the potential to subject a passenger to uncomfortable speed changes as the carriage enters and exits bends. Accordingly Pre-emptive braking and acceleration may be applied. This function limits carriage speed against changes in chair speed due to the chair rotating about the carriage. It does this by monitoring the True Chair Speed during a journey, looking for rapid speed changes, commonly referred to as speed deltas. These speed deltas are stored in a memory bank against the positions on the rail at which they occurred. On the next run the ECU scans the memory bank for upcoming speed deltas and pre-emptively applies them as a speed limit, due to the fact that it takes time to change speed as acceleration/deceleration is limited. This allows the carriage to smoothly slow as it enters a bend and so maintain comfort for the user.
A further factor to be added into the determination of Carriage Speed is levelling under-speed. This takes into account the fact that as the carriage moves through a transition bend in the rail, the levelling motor 21 operates to maintain the chair level. If the carriage motor speed is not matched appropriately to the levelling motor speed, the chair could go ‘off level’ to an impermissible extent.
Turning now to
As a starting point a Maximum Permitted Carriage Speed is prescribed which may be the maximum speed permitted prescribed by regulation or may be another maximum speed programmed into the ECU. The first factor shown in
In the next step the ECU looks at Battery Voltage and, if necessary, adjusts the Maximum Permitted Carriage Speed to bring the battery voltage within permissible limits. Similarly the ECU looks at Battery Current and, if necessary, reduces Maximum Permitted Carriage Speed to bring the battery current within limit.
Finally the ECU looks at speed deltas as the carriage moves along the rail, in the manner described above, and adjusts the Maximum Permitted Carriage Speed to maintain speed deltas at levels which ensure passenger comfort.
The resultant output Carriage Speed can be applied to a conventional PID loop (not shown) to rotate the motor 13 at the speed demanded. In this case feedback control is provided by encoder 33.
It will thus be appreciated that the present invention provides a novel method and system for controlling stairlift speed in which the speed at any point along the rail is not set arbitrarily or to fixed limits but, rather, is determined in real time in response to a number of continually varying parameters. The system can continually adapt to these varying parameters to output varying speeds and thus allow a reduced overall journey time to be realized.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1505467.9 | Mar 2015 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2016/050867 | 3/29/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/156822 | 10/6/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20030222607 | Simizu | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20080128213 | Harris | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20130231814 | Sarokhan | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130282174 | Xi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140299416 | Jakes | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201647771 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102259780 | Nov 2011 | CN |
0738232 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1772412 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2216284 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2014098574 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180072537 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |