The present invention relates to metal founding, and more particularly to a method of making a sand-based mold which improves the casting process by reducing the amount of materials and time necessary to produce the mold. It also includes molds made using the process.
Traditional foundry sand molding processes typically employ a two-part mold consisting of a lower half (drag) and an upper half (cope). These two halves are normally produced using the same process: a sand/binder mixture is poured onto a pattern which forms the molding or rigging cavities. When the sand binders have set, the mold and pattern are turned over and the pattern is extracted from the mold. During the mold closing process, the cope half is turned over again and placed on top the drag, forming a complete mold.
A more advanced molding technique, known as patternless molding, differs from the above in that two solid blocks of sand are molded without the use of a pattern. The mold and rigging cavities are then machined into the sand blocks forming the cope and drag. Again, the cope half is turned over and placed on top the drag during mold closing.
There are several inefficiencies inherent in both processes. First, the cope and drag sections must be thick enough to have sufficient strength to withstand the stresses produced during the turnover processes. The amount of sand and binder used for each mold is thus usually far greater than the amount needed otherwise for strength during the pouring process or that needed for thermal insulation. Second, the turnover and mold closing processes take time. And third, inaccuracies in the molding process (including dimensional changes during the binder curing) can create gaps between the cope and drag. During pouring, metal fills these gaps creating “flash” that must be removed by grinding the resulting casting.
Accordingly, a need exists to improve the efficiency of the casting process by reducing the amount of materials necessary to form the cope and reducing the time required to complete the full mold and reducing the amount of flash.
The process, hereinafter referred to as In-Place Cope Molding or “IPCM,” is designed to reduce or eliminate certain inefficiencies inherent in the traditional molding techniques, particularly during production of the cope half of a sand mold.
IPCM allows the cope half of a mold to be produced directly on top of the drag half of the mold by use of a separation barrier which supports the sand above the mold cavity in the drag. The introduction of the barrier, which supports the sand above the mold and rigging cavities in the drag, allows a thinner cope layer to be molded on top of the drag half, eliminating the need to handle the cope half separately.
The process known as In-Place Cope Molding (“IPCM”) is designed to reduce or eliminate certain of the inefficiencies of the traditional methods during production of the cope half 20 of a foundry sand mold 10. IPCM allows the cope half 20 of the mold 10 to be produced directly on top of the drag half 30 of the mold 10 by use of a separation barrier 40 which supports the cope layer 20 above the mold cavity 60 of the drag 30.
The mold 10 consists of a lower mold half or “drag” layer 30, which may be molded using traditional foundry techniques employing a pattern around which a chemically or thermally bonded sand (e.g. silica sand mixed with phenolic urethane binder and other additives) is packed. The drag 30 of the mold 10 may be formed by any traditional method. Once the sand has been cured, the pattern is removed and the resulting mold cavity forms a negative image of the part to be cast. Other molding techniques such as permanent molds or patternless molds where the mold cavity is produced by machining the cavity into a block of bonded sand, may also be employed.
In the prior art, using any of the existing molding techniques, a second, upper layer or “cope” layer 20 is then molded separately and must be “turned over” or “rolled over” and placed on top of the drag 30. In order to withstand the stresses of the turnover process, the drag 30 and cope 20 must be thick enough to provide sufficient strength. The amount of sand and binder used for each mold 10 is thus usually much greater than the amount needed otherwise for strength during the pouring process or that needed for thermal insulation. Traditional molding would typically require a cope 20 thickness of 6″ to 10.″
The IPCM process of the present invention provides increased advantages over the traditional methods described above by eliminating the time-consuming and costly turn-over process by allowing production of the cope 20 on top of the drag 30, and in turn necessitating the need for only a very thin cope 20. Copes 20 using the IPCM process may be made as thin as 1″ or less, as handling strength is no longer a consideration. This significantly thinner cope layer 20 requires a significantly smaller amount of sand and binder materials. This is important because sand and binder costs often represent a significant portion of the mold costs, particularly if expensive additives are used.
Important to the IPCM process is the introduction of a barrier 40 which supports the cope layer 20 above the mold cavity 60 in the drag 30. As seen in
Because the cope 20 can be relatively thin in the IPCM process, the barrier 40 can be made of relatively weak materials compared to those used in traditional molding processes. An appropriate barrier 40 is selected to suit the particulars of the mold 10 to be made. The material used for the barrier 40 is selected to have: 1) sufficient strength to support the sand in the cope 20 until the binders in the sand/binder mixture set; 2) adequate gas permeability to allow venting during pouring of the molten metal into the mold cavity 60; and 3) sufficient flexibility to form to the shape of the highest points of the drag 30. Examples of materials used successfully for this barrier 40 include paper, plastic film (
Once the barrier 40 has been affixed to the drag 30, sleeves forming the vents 70, sprues 72, flow-offs 74 or other rigging cavities are attached to or through the top of the barrier 40 as shown in
If a very thin cope 20 is used, sufficient weight and strength to resist the forces from the molten metal are provided by a cope plate 90, which is a steel plate placed on the cope 20 before the binder in the sand sets. The cope plate 90 is placed on top of the cope 20 and the sprue 72 and flow-off 74 sleeves are attached to the breaker cores 78, as shown in
Finally, as show in
In some cases, it may be advantageous to use a standard thickness cope 20. For example, a short production run may not justify the expense of creating a new configuration of cope plate 90. In such cases, a thin layer of a sand/binder mixture is distributed over the barrier 40 and allowed to cure, forming a thin cope 20. Once the thin cope 20 has sufficiently hardened, additional sand/binder mixture can be added to reach a traditional cope 20 thickness, obviating the need for a cope plate 90. For purposes of comparison,
As seen in the above detailed description and in the drawings, there are numerous advantages in using and in-place cope molding process. The cope 20 can be much thinner, as handling strength is no longer a consideration, resulting in much lower sand and binder costs. The labor required to mold the cope 20 is typically less than with traditional methods, and labor and equipment to turn over the cope 20 is eliminated. Additionally, because the barrier 40 may be selected to allow close conformance to the variations in height of the mold cavity 60 features, gaps between the cope 20 and drag 30 are reduced or eliminated, greatly reducing the occurrence of flash and subsequent requirements for grinding.
Although the invention has been herein described in what is perceived to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific embodiments set forth above. Rather, it is recognized that modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art of the invention without departing from the spirit or intent of the invention and, therefore, the invention it so be taken as including all reasonable equivalents to the subject matter of the appended claims and the description herein.
This application claims the benefit of provisional U.S. Application No. 60/949,984, filed Jul. 16, 2007, which is specifically incorporated herein by reference, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3554271 | Goss | Jan 1971 | A |
3730250 | Fellows | May 1973 | A |
3830279 | Arbenz | Aug 1974 | A |
4027717 | Mio | Jun 1977 | A |
4121646 | Rikker | Oct 1978 | A |
4641703 | Voss | Feb 1987 | A |
4693292 | Campbell | Sep 1987 | A |
4694879 | Feuring | Sep 1987 | A |
4791975 | Wuepper | Dec 1988 | A |
4836266 | Wuepper | Jun 1989 | A |
4976303 | Wuepper | Dec 1990 | A |
5503214 | Cribley | Apr 1996 | A |
5540871 | Uchida | Jul 1996 | A |
6349757 | Vorndran | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6386264 | Gustafson | May 2002 | B2 |
6637497 | Herron | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6892788 | Schreiner | May 2005 | B2 |
7082984 | Rizzo | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20050072551 | Sorokin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6-71379 | Mar 1994 | JP |
2004096425 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090020254 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60949984 | Jul 2007 | US |