In plane deflection coupon for monitoring and controlling of laser shock peening

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6183882
  • Patent Number
    6,183,882
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 29, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 6, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A test coupon is formed from a metallic strip having opposite first and second sides that generally define a plane of the strip and the strip includes a laser shock peened patch of the strip that has first and second laser shock peened surfaces on the first and second sides, respectively, first and second laser shocked regions having deep compressive residual stresses imparted by the laser shock peening extending into the strip from the first and second laser shock peened surfaces, respectively, and a deflection of a portion of the strip from a position of the portion before the laser shock peening. The deflection is formed by the laser shock peening such that at least a part and preferably substantially all of the deflection lies in the plane and the test coupon preferably includes an indicating means to indicate the deflection.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to quality assurance methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture used for quality assurance of surface treatment of a substrate surface such as peening and, more particularly, to using in plane coupon deflection or bending of a metal coupon or strip for quality assurance of laser shock peening processes.




2. Description of Related Art




Laser shock peening or laser shock processing, as it is also referred to, is a process for producing a region of deep compressive residual stresses imparted by laser shock peening a surface area of a workpiece. Laser shock peening typically uses one or more radiation pulses from high power pulsed lasers to produce shock waves on the surface of a workpiece similar to methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,850,698, entitled “Altering Material Properties”; U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,477, entitled “Laser Shock Processing”; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,131,957, entitled “Material Properties”. Laser shock peening, as understood in the art and as used herein, means utilizing a pulsed laser beam from a laser beam source to produce a strong localized compressive force on a portion of a surface by producing an explosive force by instantaneous ablation or vaporization of a painted or coated or uncoated surface. Laser peening has been utilized to create a compressively stressed protection layer at the outer surface of a workpiece which is known to considerably increase the resistance of the workpiece to fatigue failure as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,421, entitled “Laser Peening System and Method”. These methods typically employ a curtain of water flowed over the workpiece or some other method to provide a confining medium to confine and redirect the process generated shock waves into the bulk of the material of a component being LSP'D to create the beneficial compressive residual stresses.




Laser shock peening is being developed for many applications in the gas turbine engine field, some of which are disclosed in the following co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/362,362 entitled “ON THE FLY LASER SHOCK PEENING”, filed Dec. 22, 1994; and U.S. Pat. Nos.: 5,591,009, entitled “Laser shock peened gas turbine engine fan blade edges”; 5,569,018, entitled “Technique to prevent or divert cracks”; 5,531,570, entitled “Distortion control for laser shock peened gas turbine engine compressor blade edges”; 5,492,447, entitled “Laser shock peened rotor components for turbomachinery”; 5,674,329, entitled “Adhesive tape covered laser shock peening”; and 5,674,328, entitled “Dry tape covered laser shock peening”, all of which are assigned to the present Assignee. These applications, as well as others, are in need of efficient quality assurance testing during production runs using laser shock peening.




Laser shock peening processes have been developed to simultaneously LSP pressure and suction sides of leading and trailing edges of fan and compressor airfoils and blades as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,009 entitled “Laser shock peened gas turbine engine fan blade edges” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,531,570 entitled “Distortion control for laser shock peened gas turbine engine compressor blade edges”. Single sided shot peened Almen strips are well known for use in the field of shot peening quality control, see U.S. Pat. No. 2,620,838. Though relatively inexpensive and easy to use, such a process is not suitable because it relies on out of plane bending of the strip. Out of plane bending essentially would not occur with a dual sided and/or simultaneous LSP process because there would be substantially equal compressive residual stresses imparted to both sides of such an Almen strip.




Typically, a flat Almen strip is secured in a holder which constrains the strip to prevent the strip from bending. The strip is subjected to a shot peening regimen after which the strip is removed from the holder. Stresses induced in the strip by the surface shot peening cause the strip to curve out of the plane of the flat strip when removed from the constraints of the holder. Hence, the terms out of plane and in plane as used herein. The curved strip is then typically placed in a peening-intensity gage which measures the amount of out of plane deflection or bending of the strip also referred to as the curvature of the strip. This deflection gives a qualitative indication of the amount of residual stress that is in the Almen strip, though there is no direct quantitative correlation to the residual stress measurement from the measured deflection.




Conventional high cycle fatigue (HCF) testing of blades which are LSP'd and notched before testing has been tried as a quality assurance technique. Measurement of the diameter and volume of a single LSP spot on a flat coupon by optical interferometry has also been tried for QA purposes. Both of these methods are fairly expensive and time consuming to carry out and significantly slows production and the process of qualifying LSP'd components. An improved quality assurance apparatus and method of measurement and control of LSP is required which is inexpensive, accurate, and quick. LSP is a process that, as any production technique, involves machinery and is time consuming and expensive. Therefore, any techniques that can reduce the amount or complexity of production machinery and/or production time are highly desirable.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A test coupon formed from a metallic strip has opposite first and second sides that generally define a plane of the strip. The strip includes a laser shock peened patch of the strip that has first and second laser shock peened surfaces on the first and second sides, respectively. The first and second laser shocked regions having deep compressive residual stresses imparted by the laser shock peening extending into the strip from the first and second laser shock peened surfaces, respectively. These laser shock induced compressive residual stresses cause a change in the shape of the strip or a deflection of a portion of the strip from a position of the portion before the laser shock peening. The term deflection, for the purpose of this patent, is defined as bending or displacement of at least part of the strip. The deflection is formed by the laser shock peening and at least a part and preferably substantially all of the deflection lies in the plane. Preferably, the first and second laser shock peened surfaces and regions respectively are substantially identical such that the deflection is substantially only in the plane. The first and second laser shock peened surfaces are preferably simultaneously laser shock peened. The test coupon may further include an indicating means to indicate the deflection.




The patch may be asymmetrically disposed on the strip and the deflection includes a bending of at least a portion of the strip. The strip and sides may be rectangular and have a length and width such that the length is longer than the width, and the patch is disposed asymmetrically with respect to a lengthwise centerline of the strip. The patch may be disposed lengthwise along a lengthwise edge of the strip and extend widthwise inwardly from the lengthwise edge. The deflection is a bending of the strip in the plane of the strip. The indicating means is a displacement of a corner of the strip along the first lengthwise edge of the strip with respect to a centerpoint of the strip along the first lengthwise edge of the strip at a widthwise extending centerline of the strip.




In another embodiment, the strip and sides may be rectangular having a length and width and lengthwise and widthwise edges. The length and lengthwise edges are longer than the width and the widthwise edges, respectively. A slit extends lengthwise a portion of the length from one of the widthwise edges forming lengthwise bifurcated and non-bifurcated portions of the strip. The bifurcated portion includes two branches separated by the slit of the strip and the patch is disposed on the non-bifurcated portion of the strip wherein the patch extends lengthwise away from the slit. The slit is preferably formed along a lengthwise centerline of the strip. The deflection is a bending of the branches in the plane of the strip. The indicating means is a displacement of a corner of one of the branches along the first lengthwise edge of the strip with respect to a second corner of the strip along the first lengthwise edge of the strip on the non-bifurcated portion of the strip.




In another embodiment, the strip and sides are rectangular and have a length and width such that the length is longer than the width, the deflection includes a lengthwise elongation of the strip, two parallel lengthwise extending slots are disposed through the strip, and the patch is centered between the slots. Strain gauges may be operably disposed on non-laser shock peened portions of the first and second sides and the non-laser shock peened portions are preferably between the slots and the lengthwise edges.




Alternatively, the rectangular strip may be used without any slots and the patch is centered lengthwise and widthwise and may extend across the entire width of the strip. The lengthwise elongation of the strip may be directly measured.




ADVANTAGES




Advantages of the present invention are numerous and include lowering the cost, time, man power and complexity of performing quality assurance tests during laser shock peening processes. Another advantage of the present invention is that it allows performing quality assurance tests during laser shock peening processes at the site of the process and in real time with respect to the processing. The present invention can help greatly reduce the amount of down time for performing quality assurance tests during laser shock peening. The present invention replaces the tedious, costly and time consuming process of notched high cycle fatigue testing presently used for QA. It also allows the coupons to be processed with the same energy, spot pattern, double sided laser shock peening configuration, and number of layers, if desired, as the workpieces (such as gas turbine engine blades). The QA can be performed in tandem with an actual component or workpiece, thus, allowing a coupon to be reproduced which exactly matches the state of the process for each specific component performed (or components can be qualified on a lot-by-lot basis if desired).











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing aspects and other features of the invention are explained in the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings where:





FIG. 1

is a schematic perspective view of a test coupon in accordance with an exemplary first embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic two dimensional view of the test coupon in

FIG. 1

illustrating a deflection in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 3

is a schematic view of a test coupon in accordance with an exemplary second embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 4

is a schematic view of a test coupon in accordance with an exemplary third embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 4A

is a schematic view of a test coupon in accordance with a variation of the exemplary third embodiment of the present invention illustrated in FIG.


4


.





FIG. 5

is a schematic view of the test coupon of

FIG. 1

fixtured to illustrate measuring a deflection of the coupon during a quality assurance inspection.





FIG. 6

is a perspective view of a fan blade exemplifying a workpiece for which the test coupon of the present invention may be used in a quality assurance inspection.





FIG. 7

is a cross-sectional view of the processed fan blade in FIG.


6


.





FIG. 8

is a schematic perspective view illustration of the test coupon of

FIG. 1

mounted in a laser shock peening system in accordance with an exemplary use of the present invention.





FIG. 9

is a partial cross-sectional and a partial schematic view of the setup in

FIG. 8

particularly illustrating a portion around the patch of the coupon in

FIGS. 1 and 2

.





FIG. 10

is a schematic illustration of a pattern of laser shocked peened circular spots on a laser shock peened surface of the coupon in

FIGS. 1 and 2

.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Illustrated in

FIG. 1

is a schematic representation of a test coupon


10


having a metal strip


12


with flat first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively. The metal strip


12


is preferably rectangularly-shaped and has first and second lengthwise edges L


1


and L


2


and first and second widthwise edges W


1


and W


2


, respectively. The rectangularly-shaped metal strip


12


has a pre laser shock peened strip length L′ and a strip width WS such that the strip length is longer than the strip width. A patch


14


of the metal strip


12


is preferably laser shock peened on both the first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively, forming two substantially identical back to back and equally treated first and second laser shock peened surfaces


24


and


25


, respectively, and first and second pre-stressed (laser shock peened) regions


34


and


36


having deep compressive residual stresses imparted by laser shock peening (LSP), which is illustrated in

FIG. 5

, extending into the patch


14


from the laser shock peened surfaces. The substantially identical back to back laser shock peened patch


14


causes the coupon to bend in a plane P defined by the flat first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively. This is in contrast to Almen strips that bend out of or perpendicular to such a plane.




One configuration of the exemplary test strip illustrated in

FIGS. 1 and 2

is about 3 inches long, 0.75 inches wide, and 0.08 inches thick. The patch


14


has a patch length XL


1


that is about 2 inches long along the first lengthwise edge L


1


and has a patch width XW that is about 0.38 inches wide as measured inwardly from the first lengthwise edge. The metal strip


12


has two non-laser shock peened lengths XL


2


, respectively, that are about 0.5 inches long on either side of the patch


14


. The metal strip


12


is made of a Titanium alloy, referred to in the industry as Ti 6-4, that is used in gas turbine engine fan blades for which the present invention was initially developed. Other metallic materials may be used but it is preferred to use the same material as the workpiece for which the quality assurance is being performed. Two stacked rows of overlapping laser shocked peened circular spots


158


having a diameter D are illustrated. This pattern is exemplary of one used for gas turbine engine blade leading edge.




The dimensions of the coupon, patch, and patch location may be optimized for a particular workpiece with the aid of finite element models of the residual stresses induced in the coupon to provide a consistently measurable deflection, preferably >0.005 inches, with the laser shock peening processing parameters used in production of the workpieces. Lower modulus metals will give more deflection for a given residual stress, but use of the actual metal being processed is preferred to match the response of the coupon to the LSP process with that of the actual workpiece.




A corner


42


of the strip


12


, as illustrated in

FIG. 2

, serves to illustrate how in plane deflection or bending causes a deflection δ of a first portion (illustrated as corner


42


) of the strip


12


from a position of the portion before the laser shock peening. The term deflection, for the purpose of this patent, is defined as bending or displacement of at least part of the strip. The deflection δ is very small having an order of magnitude on the order of 10 mils (0.01 inches) and the phantom line shape PH illustrates in an exaggerated manner the shape of the test coupon


10


after the patch


14


has been laser shock peened and how the corner


42


is deflected from its position before the coupon is laser shock peened by an amount equal to that of the deflection δ. The deflection δ is formed by the laser shock peening and at least a part and preferably substantially all of the deflection lies in the plane P.




Different methods may be used to measure the deflection δ. One of these methods includes measuring the amount of the deflection δ of the corner


42


from a centerpoint


44


of the first lengthwise edge L


1


. The patch


14


is preferably centrally located about a mid-line


46


that is perpendicular to the first lengthwise edge L


1


of the strip


12


and the coupon bends symmetrically about the mid-line.





FIG. 5

illustrates how the deflection δ may be measured by placing the laser shock peened coupon


10


into a fixture


50


having pins


52


or other suitable means for centering and supporting the coupon evenly and symmetrically with respect to a reference surface such as a table top


56


so that the mid-line


46


is perpendicular to the table top. Measuring the deflection δ in the plane P is illustrated in

FIG. 5

using the exaggerated is shape of the coupon


10


. Next, an electronic digital or other type of height gauge


58


is used to measure a first height Hi of the corner


42


and a second height H


2


of the centerpoint


44


with respect to the table top


56


. A difference between the first height H


1


of the corner


42


and the second height H


2


corner


42


is generally equal to the deflection δ because the strip


12


bends substantially symmetrically about the mid-line


46


. The first height H


1


of the corner


42


and the second height H


2


corner


42


may both be measured and used either individually or averaged together. This method of measuring the deflection δ provides an accurate, fast, inexpensive, and real time procedure for quality assurance during production laser shock peening processes.




Quality assurance is typically a go or no go, pass or fail, accept or reject type of analysis. The technique of the present invention involves quality assurance of the laser shock peening process on a production workpiece such as an exemplary aircraft turbofan gas turbine engine fan blade


108


illustrated in

FIGS. 6 and 7

. The fan blade


108


includes an airfoil


134


extending radially outward from a blade platform


136


to a blade tip


138


. The fan blade


108


includes a root section


140


extending radially inward from the platform


136


to a radially inner end


137


of the root section


140


. At the radially inner end


137


of the root section


140


is a blade root


142


which is connected to the platform


136


by a blade shank


144


. The airfoil


134


extends in the chordwise direction between a leading edge LE and a trailing edge TE of the airfoil. A chord C of the airfoil


134


is the line between the leading edge LE and trailing edge TE at each cross-section of the blade as illustrated in

FIG. 7. A

pressure side


146


of the airfoil


134


faces in the general direction of rotation as indicated by an arrow V and a suction side


148


is on the other side of the airfoil and a mean-line ML is generally disposed midway between the two sides in the chordwise direction.




The fan blade


108


has a leading edge section


150


that extends along the leading edge LE of the airfoil


134


from the blade platform


136


to the blade tip


138


. The leading edge section


150


includes a predetermined first width W such that the leading edge section


150


encompasses an area where nicks and tears that may occur along the leading edge of the airfoil


134


during engine operation. The airfoil


134


subject to a significant tensile stress field due to centrifugal forces generated by the fan blade


108


rotating during engine operation. The airfoil


134


is also subject to vibrations generated during engine operation and the nicks and tears operate as high cycle fatigue stress risers producing additional stress concentrations around them.




To counter fatigue failure of portions of the blade along possible crack lines that can develop and emanate from the nicks and tears at least one and preferably both of the pressure side


146


and the suction side


148


have laser shock peened blade surfaces


154


and a pre-stressed blade region


156


having deep compressive residual stresses imparted by laser shock peening (LSP) extending into the airfoil


134


from the laser shock peened surfaces as seen in FIG.


7


. The laser shock peened blade surfaces


154


and pre-stressed blade region


156


are referred to as a laser shock peened patch. The pre-stressed blade regions


156


are illustrated along only a portion of the leading edge section


150


but may extend along the entire leading edge LE or longer portion thereof.




One particular embodiment of the present invention includes a correlation between the deflection δ and a predetermined failure mode of the production type of workpiece such as the blade


108


. One correlation for the example presented herein is between the deflection δ and high cycle fatigue (HCF) of the blades


108


which are laser shock peened and notched before the HCF testing may be used to establish pass/fail criteria. A number of blades


108


or just one blade


108


may be notched and subjected to high cycle fatigue tests to establish the correlation. For each test, one laser shock peened blade


108


has a notch


152


placed in the leading edge LE about a predetermined position of the pre-stressed blade regions


156


after the blade is laser shock peened. The test coupon


10


is preferably also laser shock peened when the blade


108


is laser shock peened and, preferably, with the same pattern used on the blade. Then, the blade


108


is vibrated at high frequencies until it fails under HCF. The predetermined position of the notch


152


along the leading edge LE should correspond to where the blade fails under HCF during a resonant mode of failure of most concern to the blade designers such as the first, second or third resonant mode. If the blade does not fail within predetermined testing parameters or conditions, then, the deflection δ measured after the test coupon


10


is laser shock peened is an acceptable level for production and if it fails then it is not. Other laser shock peened blades and associated test coupons may also be similarly tested using varying laser shock peening parameters to establish bands of acceptable and unacceptable values for the deflection δ. These results can then be used during production runs for qualify assurance of the laser shock peening process. It is contemplated that one calibration can be used for an entire production run as long as the production laser shock peening parameters do not change.




Illustrated in

FIG. 8

is a laser shock peening system


101


for laser shock peening the workpiece and with the test coupon


10


. The test coupon


10


is mounted in a coupon holder


88


which is attached to a five-axis computer numerically controlled (CNC) manipulator


127


, commercially available from the Huffman Corporation, having an office at 1050 Huffman Way, Clover, S.C. 29710. The five axes of motion that are illustrated in the exemplary embodiment are conventional translational axes X, Y, and Z, and conventional rotational axes A and C that are well known in CNC machining. The manipulator


127


is preferably used to move and position the test coupon


10


(as well as the blade


108


not shown in this FIG.) and to effect laser shock peening “on the fly” in accordance with a laser shock peening method and of the present invention. The manipulator


127


is used to continuously move and position the blade to provide laser shock peening “on the fly” in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Laser shock peening may be done in a number of various ways using paint or tape as an ablative medium (see—in particular U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,329 entitled “Adhesive Tape Covered Laser Shock Peening”. The same laser shock peening apparatus is used in the laser shock peening process of the leading edge section


150


of the blade


108


.




In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the patch of the coupon


10


and the first and second laser shock peened surfaces


24


and


25


, respectively, of the test coupon


10


are covered with an ablative coating such as paint or preferably adhesive tape


159


to form a coated surface


155


as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,674,329 and 5,674,328 to form laser shock peening coated surfaces


155


on the test coupon


10


. In the exemplary embodiments illustrated herein, layers of adhesive tape


159


are used as the ablative coating. Other laser shock peening processes may paint the first and second laser shock peened surfaces


24


and


25


of the patch


14


for each sequence of laser shock peening firings. The paint and tape provide an ablative medium preferably over which is a clear containment medium which may be a clear fluid curtain such as a flow of water.




The laser beam shock induced deep compressive residual stresses may be produced by repetitively firing two high energy laser beams


102


, each of which is defocused±a few mils with respect to the coated surfaces


155


on both the first and second sides S


1


and S


2


of the test coupon


10


. Each of the laser beams is preferably fired through a curtain of flowing water


121


that is flowed over the coated surfaces


155


. The paint, tape, or other ablative layer


161


is ablated generating plasma which results in shock waves on the surface of the material. Other ablative materials may be used to coat the surface as suitable alternatives to paint. These coating materials include metallic foil or adhesive plastic tape as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,674,329 and 5,674,328. These shock waves are re-directed towards the coated surface


155


by the curtain of flowing water


121


to generate travelling shock waves (pressure waves) in the material below the coated surface. The amplitude and quantity of these shockwaves determine the depth and intensity of compressive stresses. The ablative coating is used to protect the target surface and also to generate plasma. The laser beam shock induced deep compressive residual stresses in the compressive pre-stressed regions


156


are generally about 50-150 KPSI (Kilo Pounds per Square Inch) extending from the first and second laser shock peened surfaces


24


and


25


to a depth of about 20-50 mils into the pre-stressed regions


156


.




The test coupon


10


is continuously moved while continuously firing the stationary laser beams


102


through a curtain of flowing water


121


on the coated surfaces


155


and forming the spaced apart laser shock peened circular spots


158


(just as the blade


108


is laser shock peened during production and HCF testing and correlation). The curtain of water


121


is illustrated as being supplied by a conventional water nozzle


123


at the end of a conventional water supply tube


119


. The laser shock peening system


101


has a conventional generator


131


with an oscillator


133


and a pre-amplifier


139


A and a beam splitter


143


which feeds the pre-amplified laser beam into two beam optical transmission circuits each having a first and second amplifier


139


and


141


, respectively, and optics


135


which include optical elements that transmit and focus the laser beam


102


on the coated surfaces


155


. A controller


124


may be used to modulate and control the laser shock peening system


101


to fire the laser beams


102


on the coated surfaces


155


in a controlled manner. Ablated coating material is washed out by the curtain of flowing water


121


.




The present invention provides that the surface to be laser shock peened be adhesively covered with at least one layer of the tape


159


to provide the taped coated surface


155


, though more than one layer is certainly contemplated by the present invention. Preferably, the tape


159


is self adhesive having an adhesive layer


160


of adhesive material and an ablative layer


161


of ablative material as illustrated in FIG.


9


. Suitable materials for the ablative layer include plastic such as vinyl plastic film and foil. One suitable source for the tape


159


is SCOTCH BRAND NO. 471 PLASTIC FILM TAPE which can be had with a black pigmented vinyl plastic backing, about 4 mils thick, and has a rubber adhesive layer, about 1 mil thick. The ablative medium in the form of the tape


159


without an adhesive layer may also be used with a suitable adhesive material applied directly to the first and second laser shock peened surfaces


24


and


25


. The tape


159


should be rubbed or otherwise pressed against the metallic material of the patch


14


to remove bubbles that may remain between the tape and the first and second laser shock peened surfaces


24


and


25


.




The preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention includes continuously moving the blade while continuously firing the laser beam on the taped surface and adjacent laser shock peened circular spots may be hit in different sequences. However, the laser beam may be moved instead just so long as relative movement between the beam and the surface is effected.




In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention the first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively, of the patch


14


of the coupon


10


and the laser shock peened blade surface


154


(before it is laser shock peened) of the blade are covered by a layer of the adhesive tape


159


and then laser shock peened forming overlapping laser shocked peened circular spots


158


as illustrated in

FIGS. 8 and 10

. The preferred laser shock peening processes includes coating or taping the first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively, of the patch


14


for each sequence of laser shock peening firings. The paint and tape provide an ablative medium, preferably, over which is a clear containment medium which may be a clear fluid curtain such as a flow of water


121


.





FIG. 10

illustrates an exemplary pattern of stacked rows of overlapping laser shocked peened circular spots


158


(indicated by the circles). All the laser shocked peened circular spots


158


with their corresponding centers X lie along a row centerline


162


. The pattern of sequences entirely covers the laser shock peening coated surface


155


. The laser shocked peened circular spots


158


have a diameter D in a row


164


of overlapping laser shock peened circular spots. The pattern may be of multiple overlapping rows


164


of overlapping shock peened circular spots on the laser shock peening coated surface


155


. A first exemplary overlap, illustrated as about 30%, is between adjacent laser shock peened circular spots


158


in a given row. The overlap is typically defined by a first offset O


1


between centers X of the adjacent laser shock peened circular spots


158


and though illustrated as 30% it can vary from about 30%-50% or more of the diameter D. A second overlap is between adjacent laser shock peened circular spots


158


in adjacent rows and is generally defined by a second offset O


2


between adjacent row centerlines


162


and though illustrated as 30% it can vary from about 30%-50% of the diameter D depending on applications and the strength or fluency of the laser beam. The pattern is referred to as stacked because the centers X of adjacent spots


158


in adjacent rows are all linearly aligned. Other patterns are disclosed in the references, see U.S. Pat. Nos.: 5,591,009, 5,674,329, and 5,674,328.




Several sequences may be required to produce the entire pattern and re-taping of the first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively, of the patch


14


is done between each sequence of laser firings. The workpiece blade


108


and the test coupon


10


are preferably laser shock peened in the same manner to form the same sequences and patterns of laser shock peened circular spots


158


. The laser firing each sequence has multiple laser firings or pulses with a period between firings that is often referred to a “rep”. During the rep, the part is moved so that the next pulse occurs at the location of the next laser shocked peened circular spot


158


. Preferably, the part is moved continuously and timed to be at the appropriate location at the pulse or firing of the laser beam. One or more repeats of each sequence may be used to hit each laser shocked peened circular spot


158


more than once. This may also allow for less laser power to be used in each firing or laser pulse.




Referring briefly back to

FIGS. 6 and 7

, the fan blade


108


typically may have an airfoil about 11 inches long, a chord C about 3.5 inches, and laser shock peening blade surfaces


154


about 2 inches long along the leading edge LE. The laser shock peened blade surfaces


154


are about 0.5 inches wide (W). A first row


164


of laser shocked peened circular spots


158


nearest the leading edge LE extends beyond the leading edge by about 20% of the laser spot diameter D which is about 0.27″ thus imparting deep compressive residual stresses in the pre-stressed blade region


156


below the laser shock peening blade surfaces


154


which extend about 0.5 inches from the leading edge.




Another embodiment of the test coupon


10


is also rectangularly-shaped and includes the strip


12


as illustrated in

FIG. 3

having an alternative configuration. The metal strip


12


also has the flat first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively, the first and second lengthwise edges L


1


and L


2


, and the first and second widthwise edges W


1


and W


2


, respectively. A slit


200


extends lengthwise along an end portion EP of the length from the first widthwise edge W


1


forming lengthwise bifurcated and non-bifurcated portions


202


and


204


, respectively, of the strip


12


. The bifurcated portion


202


includes first and second branches


206


and


208


, respectively, separated by the slit


200


. The patch


14


is disposed on the non-bifurcated portion


204


such that the patch extends lengthwise away from the slit


200


. The slit


200


is preferably formed along a lengthwise strip centerline CL of the strip


12


. The patch


14


of the metal strip


12


is preferably laser shock peened on both the first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively, forming two substantially identical back to back and equally treated first and second laser shock peened surfaces


24


and


25


, respectively, and first and second pre-stressed regions


34


and


36


having deep compressive residual stresses imparted by laser shock peening (LSP) as is the configuration in FIG.


3


. The patch


14


is preferably immediately adjacent to the slit


200


. The deep compressive residual stresses imparted by laser shock peening cause the first and second branches


206


and


208


to deflect away from each other in the plane P of the test coupon


10


. The phantom line shape PH illustrates in an exaggerated manner the shape of the test coupon


10


after the patch


14


has been laser shock peened.




Measuring the deflection δ in the plane P is illustrated in

FIG. 3

using the exaggerated shape of the coupon


10


. The deflection δ is preferably measured as a difference between the first height H


1


of a first corner


242


, in the phantom line shape PH position, of the first branch


206


and the second height H


2


of a second corner


244


of the non-bifurcated portion


204


along the first lengthwise edge L


1


with respect to a reference surface such as the table top


56


in

FIG. 5. A

difference between the first height H


1


and the second height H


2


is generally equal to the deflection δ because only the first and second branches


206


and


208


bend substantially. The deflection δ is preferably formed by the simultaneous and identical laser shock peening of both sides of the strip


12


such that substantially all of the deflection δ lies in the plane P.




A third embodiment of the rectangularly-shaped test coupon


10


is illustrated in FIG.


4


and includes the strip


12


having another alternative configuration. The metal strip


12


includes the flat first and second sides S


1


and S


2


, respectively, the first and second lengthwise edges L


1


and L


2


, and the first and second widthwise edges W


1


and W


2


, respectively. Parallel slots


250


extend lengthwise along a middle portion MP of the strip


12


and are disposed inwardly of the first and second lengthwise edges L


1


and L


2


, thus, forming first and second lengthwise extending bridges


252


and


254


, respectively, between the first and second lengthwise edges and slots, respectively. The laser shock peened patch


14


is centered between the slots first and second lengthwise extending bridges


252


and


254


. The phantom line shape PH illustrates in an exaggerated manner the elongated shape of the test coupon


10


after the patch


14


has been laser shock peened. The laser shock peened region causes a strain in the bridges because the deflection δ is a change in the length of the strip


12


, a lengthwise elongation (either positive or negative) of the strip. Strain gauges


260


may be operably disposed on non-laser shock peened portions of the first and second sides S


1


and S


2


which is preferably on both the first and second lengthwise extending bridges


252


and


254


for a total of


4


strain gauges. It is contemplated that a pair or only one of the strain gauges


260


may used on only one of the first and second sides S


1


and S


2


. Again a correlation for a QA process is established between HCF data on the type of workpiece and strain gauge measurements of the test coupons which indicates the deflection δ in the plane P. Once the correlation is established, then, the laser shock peening process may be run using the production workpieces with QA tests run on the test coupons periodically during the production run.




A variation of the third embodiment of the rectangularly-shaped test coupon


10


is illustrated in FIG.


4


A and includes the strip


12


having another alternative configuration. The metal strip


12


has no slots and the laser shock peened patch


14


is centered on the strip. The deflection δ is measured directly by measuring the change in the length of the strip


12


, lengthwise elongation (either positive or negative) of the strip. The deflection δ is equal to the difference between the (post) laser shock peened strip length L and a pre laser shock peened strip length L′. L is the length of the phantom line shape PH. The patch


14


may extend across the entire width of the strip


12


.




While the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described fully in order to explain its principles, it is understood that various modifications or alterations may be made to the preferred embodiment without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A test coupon comprising:a metallic strip having opposite first and second sides that generally define a plane of said strip, a patch of said strip having first and second laser shock peened surfaces on said first and second sides respectively, first and second laser shocked regions having deep compressive residual stresses imparted by laser shock peening extending into said strip from said first and second laser shock peened surfaces respectively, and a deflection of a first portion of said strip from a position of said first portion before said laser shock peening wherein said deflection is formed by said laser shock peening and at least a part of said deflection lies in said plane.
  • 2. A test coupon as claimed in claim 1 wherein said first and second laser shock peened surfaces are substantially identical and said first and second laser shocked regions are substantially identical such that said deflection is substantially only in said plane.
  • 3. A test coupon as claimed in claim 1 wherein said first and second laser shock peened surfaces are simultaneously laser shock peened to form said first and second laser shocked regions.
  • 4. A test coupon as claimed in claim 3 wherein said first and second laser shock peened surfaces are substantially identical and said first and second laser shocked regions are substantially identical so as to produce a deflection substantially only in said plane.
  • 5. A test coupon as claimed in claim 4 further comprising an indicating means to indicate said deflection.
  • 6. A test coupon as claimed in claim 5 wherein said indicating means is a displaced corner of said strip, wherein said corner has been deflected from a position of said corner before the laser shock peeninq.
  • 7. A test coupon as claimed in claim 4 wherein said patch is asymmetrically disposed on said strip.
  • 8. A test coupon as claimed in claim 7 wherein:said strip and sides are rectangular and have a length and width such that said length is longer than said width, and said patch is disposed asymmetrically with respect to a lengthwise centerline of said strip.
  • 9. A test coupon as claimed in claim 8 wherein said strip further comprises a lengthwise edge of said strip and said patch is disposed lengthwise along said lengthwise edge and extends widthwise inwardly from said lengthwise edge.
  • 10. A test coupon as claimed in claim 4 further comprising an asymmetry in said strip.
  • 11. A test coupon as claimed in claim 4 wherein:said strip and sides are rectangular and have a length and width, said strip has lengthwise and widthwise edges, said length and lengthwise edges are longer than said width and said widthwise edges, and said strip further comprises a slit extending lengthwise a lengthwise portion of said length from one of said widthwise edges forming lengthwise bifurcated and non-bifurcated portions of said strip.
  • 12. A test coupon as claimed in claim 11 wherein said bifurcated portion includes two branches separated by said slit of said strip and said patch is disposed on said non-bifurcated portion of said strip.
  • 13. A test coupon as claimed in claim 12 wherein said patch extends lengthwise away from said slit.
  • 14. A test coupon as claimed in claim 13 wherein said slit is formed along a lengthwise centerline of said strip.
  • 15. A test coupon as claimed in claim 4 wherein:said strip and sides are rectangular and have a length and width such that said length is longer than said width, said deflection includes a lengthwise elongation of said strip, two parallel lengthwise extending slots are disposed through said strip, and said patch is centered between said slots.
  • 16. A test coupon as claimed in claim 15 further comprising strain gauges operably disposed on non-laser shock peened portions of said first and second sides.
  • 17. A test coupon as claimed in claim 16 wherein said non-laser shock peened portions are between said slots and lengthwise edges of said strip.
  • 18. A test coupon as claimed in claim 4 wherein:said strip and sides are rectangular and have a length and width such that said length is longer than said width, said deflection includes a lengthwise elongation of said strip, and said laser shock peened patch is centered on said strip extending at least substantially across said width.
  • 19. A test coupon comprising:a metallic strip having opposite first and second sides that generally define a plane of said strip, said strip and sides are rectangular and have a length and width wherein said length is longer than said width, said strip has lengthwise and widthwise edges, said lengthwise edges are longer than said widthwise edges, two parallel lengthwise extending slots disposed through said strip, a patch for laser shock peening centered between said slots, and a means to measure a deflection formed by laser shock peening, said means operably disposed on at least one portion of said first and second sides not in said patch and said deflection lies in said plane.
  • 20. A test coupon as claimed in claim 18 wherein said means to measure deflection is disposed between said slots and said lengthwise edges.
  • 21. A test coupon as claimed in claim 18 wherein said means to measure deflection comprises strain gauges operably disposed on at least one portion of said first and second sides between said slots and said lengthwise edges.
  • 22. A test coupon as claimed in claim 18 wherein said means to measure deflection comprises strain gauges operably disposed on both said first and second sides between said slots and said lengthwise edges.
RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

The present Application deals with related subject matter in co-pending U.S. Pat. No. 5,951,790 entitled “METHOD OF MONITORING AND CONTROLLING LASER SHOCK PEENING USING AN IN PLANE DEFLECTION TEST COUPON”.

US Referenced Citations (18)
Number Name Date Kind
2620838 Huyett et al. Dec 1952
2958925 Roberts Nov 1960
3695091 Smith Oct 1972
4937421 Ortiz, Jr. et al. Jun 1990
5160822 Aleshin Nov 1992
5297418 Champaigne Mar 1994
5492447 Mannava et al. Feb 1996
5531570 Mannava et al. Jul 1996
5569018 Mannava et al. Oct 1996
5591009 Mannava et al. Jan 1997
5625664 Berkley Apr 1997
5674328 Mannava et al. Oct 1997
5674329 Mannava et al. Oct 1997
5730811 Azad et al. Mar 1998
5735044 Ferrigno et al. Apr 1998
5741559 Dulaney Apr 1998
5948293 Sommers et al. Sep 1999
5951790 Mannava et al. Sep 1999
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
“The Development of New Type Almen Strip for Measurement of Peening Intensity on Hard Shot Peening”, by Y. Watanabe, K. Namiki, Sep., 1992, 6 pages.
“New Results In Measuring The Shot Peen Interface In Ti6A14V”, by Eddy Current, Jul., 1991, 11 pages.
“X-Ray Diffraction Characterization of Residual Stresses Produced by Shot Peening”, by Paul S. Prevey, pp. 82-93.
“Full Assurance Shot Peening Of Aircraft Gas Turbine Engine Components”, by PG Bailey, DR Lombardo, HG Popp, RA Thompson, 1996, pp. 320-327.
“Residual Stress Measurement For Quality Control Of Shot Peening”, by Lambda Research, 2 pages.