Patent Application
20130038657
This disclosure relates generally to calibrations of printheads in an imaging device, such as an inkjet printer having one or more printheads, and, more particularly, to adjustments to the operation of ink ejectors in the one or more printheads to produce images with uniform optical densities.
Inkjet printers have printheads that operate a plurality of inkjets to eject liquid ink onto an image receiving member. The ink may be stored in reservoirs located within cartridges installed in the printer. Various forms of ink include aqueous, oil, solvent-based, UV curable inks, or ink emulsions. Other inkjet printers receive ink in a solid form and then melt the solid ink to generate liquid ink for ejection onto the imaging member. In these solid ink printers, the solid ink may be pellets, ink sticks, granules, pastilles, or other forms. The solid ink pellets or ink sticks are typically placed in an ink loader and delivered through a feed chute or channel to a melting device that melts the ink. The melted ink is then collected in a reservoir and supplied to one or more printheads through a conduit or the like. In other inkjet printers, ink may be supplied in a gel form. The gel is also heated to a predetermined temperature to alter the viscosity of the ink so the ink is suitable for ejection by a printhead.
A typical full width inkjet printer uses one or more printheads. Each printhead typically contains an array of individual nozzles for ejecting drops of ink across an open gap to an image receiving member to form an image. The image receiving member may be a continuous web of recording media, a series of media sheets, or the image receiving member may be a rotating surface, such as a print drum or endless belt. Images printed on a rotating surface are later transferred to recording media by mechanical force generated in a transfix nip that is formed by the rotating surface and a transfix roller. In an inkjet printhead, individual piezoelectric, thermal, or acoustic actuators generate mechanical forces that expel ink from a pressure chamber through an orifice in response to an electrical signal, also referred to as a firing signal. The amplitudes, or voltage levels, of the signals affect the amount of ink ejected in each drop. The firing signal is generated by a printhead controller in accordance with image data. An inkjet printer forms a printed image in accordance with the image data by printing a pattern of individual ink drops at particular locations on the image receiving member. The locations where the ink drops landed are sometimes called “ink drop locations,” “ink drop positions,” or “pixels.” Thus, a printing operation can be viewed as the placement of ink drops on an image receiving member in accordance with image data.
In order for the colors of printed images to correspond closely to the image data, the ink drops ejected onto the media for each ink color should form uniform colors for a given density of the color as specified in the image data. For example, if a region of a media sheet includes a region where 50% of the surface of the sheet should be covered in yellow ink, then the resulting ink image should appear to have a uniform yellow color in the specified region. To achieve the uniform color, the average sizes and masses of individual ink drops that form the ink image should be substantially uniform. In practical embodiments, the ink ejectors in an individual printhead may eject ink drops of various sizes leading to non-uniform colors in the ink images. Additionally, variances in the drop masses of ink drops ejected by different printheads also result in undesirable non-uniformity in color reproduction. One example of artifacts that occur in printed images where the drop masses of different printheads are not uniform are “lawn mower tracks.” This term refers to streaks of color from one printhead that appear to be darker than streaks of color from another printhead. To reduce or eliminate the image artifacts, the ejectors in each printhead and multiple printheads are calibrated to enable the printheads to eject ink drops with uniform masses.
Existing techniques for calibrating printheads to eject ink drops with uniform masses are carried out in an offline manner, such as during the manufacturing process of the printhead or in a specially configured calibration device. The offline calibration process is time consuming and requires that printheads be removed from an imaging device to undergo the calibration procedure. During printing operations, the drop mass of ink drops ejected by a printhead may change due to changes in the operational parameters of the printhead caused by use of the printhead over time. The printhead must then be removed from the imaging device for another calibration process. A procedure for calibrating the printheads in situ where one or more printheads are calibrated to eject ink drops with uniform masses while the printheads are operatively configured in the imaging device would be beneficial.
In one embodiment, a method for calibrating printheads in an imaging device has been developed. The method includes operating a plurality of printheads in the imaging device with a first plurality of electrical signals, each electrical signal in the first plurality of electrical signals operating only one printhead to eject ink drops onto an image receiving member to enable each printhead in the plurality of printheads to produce a portion of a first test pattern on the image receiving member, identifying a first reflectance measurement of light for each printhead in the plurality of printheads with reference to the portion of the first test pattern produced by each printhead, identifying an average for the first reflectance measurements, identifying a difference between each first reflectance measurement and the average for the first reflectance measurements, and adjusting a first portion of each electrical signal in the first plurality of electrical signals used to operate each printhead in the plurality of printheads having an identified first reflectance measurement that is outside a predetermined range about the average of the first reflectance measurements.
In another embodiment, a method for calibrating printheads in an imaging device has been developed. That method includes operating one printhead in a plurality of printheads in the imaging device with an electrical signal to eject ink drops onto an image receiving member to enable the one printhead in the plurality of printheads to produce a portion of a first test pattern on the image receiving member, spreading the first test pattern on the image receiving member, identifying a first reflectance measurement for the one printhead with reference to the portion of the first test pattern produced by the one printhead, the first reflectance measurement corresponding to an optical density of the ink ejected by the one printhead to form the portion of the first test pattern, identifying a difference between the first reflectance measurement for the one printhead and a predetermined optical density for a predetermined area coverage percentage of a color of ink ejected by the one printhead, adjusting a first portion and a second portion of the electrical signal for the one printhead with reference to the identified difference in response to the identified difference exceeding a predetermined range about the predetermined optical density, and storing the adjusted electrical signal for the one printhead in a memory as a firing signal for the one printhead.
In another embodiment, an imaging device has been developed that enables in situ calibration of multiple printheads. The imaging device includes a media transport configured to move an image receiving member through a print zone in a process direction, a plurality of heated printheads arranged in the print zone to enable printing with a single color of phase change ink across the image receiving member in a cross-process direction, a first optical sensor located in the process direction from the plurality of heated printheads in the print zone, the first optical sensor being configured to generate signals corresponding to light reflected from ink drops ejected onto the image receiving member by the plurality of heated printheads, a spreader roller located in the process direction from the print zone, the spreader roller being configured to engage the image receiving member to spread ink drops ejected onto the image receiving member, a second optical sensor located in the process direction from the spreader roller, the second optical sensor being configured to generate signals corresponding to light reflected from spread ink drops on the image receiving member, and a controller operatively connected to the plurality of heated printheads, the first optical sensor, and the second optical sensor, the controller being configured to: operate one heated printhead in a plurality of heated printheads in the imaging device with one electrical signal in a plurality of electrical signals to eject ink drops onto the image receiving member to enable the one heated printhead in the plurality of heated printheads to produce a portion of a test pattern having a predetermined area coverage percentage on the image receiving member, identify an optical density measurement for the one heated printhead with reference to the portion of the test pattern produced by the one heated printhead and the signals generated by the second optical sensor, identify a difference between the optical density measurement for the one heated printhead and a predetermined optical density for the predetermined area coverage percentage of the test pattern and a color of ink ejected by the one heated printhead, and adjust the one electrical signal for the one heated printhead with reference to the identified difference in response to the identified difference exceeding a predetermined range about the predetermined optical density.
The foregoing aspects and other features of a printer, which is configured to calibrate printheads for uniform color imaging between ejectors in each printhead and between multiple printheads in the printer, are described in connection with the accompanying drawings.
For a general understanding of the environment for the system and method disclosed herein as well as the details for the system and method, reference is made to the drawings. In the drawings, like reference numerals have been used throughout to designate like elements. As used herein, the term “imaging device” refers to any printer, copier, multi-function device, or the like that is configured to form ink images on an image receiving member. As used herein, the term “image receiving member” refers to a print medium, such as paper, or may be an intermediate imaging member, such as a print drum or endless belt, which holds ink images formed by inkjet printheads. As used herein, the term “process direction” refers to a direction in which an image receiving member moves relative to one or more printheads during an imaging operation. The term “cross-process direction” refers to a direction that is perpendicular to the process direction along the surface of the image receiving member.
When one or more printheads eject ink drops onto the image receiving member, a percentage of the image receiving member area receiving the ink is covered by ink while the remaining portion of the area is free of ink. The term “coverage area percentage” refers to the percentage of a given area of the image receiving member that is covered in ink, with 100% meaning the area is fully covered in ink and 0% meaning the area is free of ink. When forming an image with a coverage area percentage of less than 100%, a printing system dithers the ink drops to form an image with the predetermined coverage area percentage. As used herein, the term “dither” refers to an operation for ejecting ink drops in a pattern that interleaves with blank portions of the receiving member. A common example of a dithered pattern is a “checkerboard” pattern where ink drops are placed on the image surface as alternating pixels that are interleaved with blank areas. Various dither patterns can be used to generate images with different coverage area percentages.
The term “optical density” refers to a measurement of light reflected from the image receiving member and ink formed on the image receiving member. The spectrum of the light at various wavelengths is used to identify the perceived color of ink on a portion of the image receiving member. A predetermined optical density is a predetermined reflected light intensity associated with a particular wavelength of light and, hence, a particular color and coverage area percentage. For example, a patch of cyan ink with a coverage area percentage of 50% has a different predetermined optical density than another patch of cyan ink with a coverage area percentage of 100%. As described below, printheads are calibrated to eject ink drops having an appropriate size to generate the predetermined optical densities for various coverage area percentages during operation.
The term “reflectance” refers to a proportion of light reflected from a surface of an object in response to shining light on the surface. In one example, the surface of a white image receiving member has a higher reflectance value than a portion of the image receiving member that is covered in black ink. Changes in the coverage area percentage also affect the reflectance value, with the reflectance value decreasing as the coverage area percentage increases in embodiments where the image receiving member has a higher reflectance value than the ink. The reflectance value increases as the coverage area percentage increases in embodiments where the ink has a higher reflectance value than the underlying image receiving member.
As used herein, the term “test pattern” refers to an ink image formed by a predetermined arrangement of ink drops on an image receiving member that enables one or more optical sensors to detect light reflected from the test pattern for the purposes of printhead calibration. One example of a test pattern is a rectangular area formed by operating each inkjet in a single printhead to eject a predetermined number of ink drops onto an image receiving member. Various other test patterns include dashes and geometric patterns formed by one or more inkjets on the image receiving member.
As used herein, the term “printhead” refers to a group of inkjet ejectors arranged in fixed physical relationship to one another. The term “print bar” as used in this document refers to a linear arrangement of printheads that are configured for linearly movement as a group. The printhead group collectively referred to as a print bar is operatively connected to an actuator to enable the movement of the entire group in the cross-process direction. Some or all of the printheads in a print bar may be operatively connected to actuators that enable the printheads to move in a cross-process direction independently with respect to the other printheads in the print bar. In a staggered print bar arrangement, printheads are arranged in two groups or print bars that are positioned relative to one another in a staggered pattern. The staggered configuration enables the printheads on the two print bars to emit ink drops in a continuous line across an image receiving member in the cross-process direction. Two or more print bars with printheads in the staggered arrangement are referred to as a “print bar array.”
Some printing systems include print bar arrays with printheads that are configured to emit drops of a single color of ink. In one embodiment described below, a first print bar array enables ink printing at a resolution of 300 dots per linear inch (DPI) in the cross-process direction while a second print bar array has an offset with respect to the inkjet ejectors of the first print bar that is one half of the distance between inkjet ejectors and also prints at 300 DPI in the cross-process direction. In combination, the two print bar arrays print pixels with a resolution of 600 DPI in the cross-process direction.
Any arrangement of printheads that is configured to print ink having a single color across the width of the image receiving member may be referred to as a “color station.” A color station may include one or more sets of printheads arranged on print bars as described above. Multi-color printers may arrange a plurality of color stations along a portion of a media path known as a “print zone.” As an image receiving member passes through the print zone, ink drops from different color stations form images on the print medium.
In printing system 100, each print module 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, and 112 in this embodiment provides an ink of a different color. In the example of
Controller 152 is configured to control various subsystems, components and functions of printing system 100. The controller 152 may be implemented with general or specialized programmable processors that execute programmed instructions. Controller 152 is operatively connected to memory 154 to enable the controller 152 to read instructions and read and write data required to perform the programmed functions in memory 154. These components may be provided on a printed circuit card or provided as a circuit in an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). Each of the circuits may be implemented with a separate processor or multiple circuits may be implemented on the same processor. Alternatively, the circuits may be implemented with discrete components or circuits provided in VLSI circuits. Also, the circuits described herein may be implemented with a combination of processors, ASICs, discrete components, or VLSI circuits.
Controller 152 is operatively coupled to the print modules 102-112 and controls the timing of ink drop ejection from the print modules 102-112 onto the media web 114. Controller 152 is further operatively coupled to the IOWA sensor 166 prior to the media web 114 reaching the spreader roll 132, and to the ILS 168 after the media web passes through the spreader 132. The spreader roll 132 applies a combination of heat and pressure to the ink drops on the media web 114. The ink drops flatten and spread on the media web 114 to form finished ink images. During the spreading process, ink drops that are located in close proximity to one another on the media web 114 may merge together forming a continuous area of ink on the media web 114.
The IOWA sensor 166 is a full width image sensor, which monitors the ink on the web 114 as the web 114 passes under the IOWA sensor 166. In the embodiment of
The ILS 168 is positioned after the spreader in most embodiments because the spread ink drops better indicate the optical density of the color presented by the ink on the media to the human eye. The ILS 168 is also configured to measure reflected light intensity for different colors over at least the visible spectrum of light reflected from the surface of the media web 114. The ILS detects levels of reflected light corresponding to various wavelengths and is configured to generate an intensity measurement for each color of light reflected from the media web 114. In particular, when ink having a single color is ejected onto the media web 114, the ILS generates signals that correspond to the intensity of light reflected from the colored ink on the media web. The intensity of the reflected light measured by the ILS from the light reflected from a predetermined area on the surface of the media web 114 is compared by the controller 152 to a predetermined optical density for the color of the ink ejected in the predetermined area of the media web 114 to determine whether the color produced by the ink for a particular coverage percentage corresponds to the predetermined optical density.
In operation, the controller 152 generates a plurality of electrical signals, also referred to as firing signals, which operate inkjets in one or more of the print units 102-112. Each generated firing signal operates an actuator in a single inkjet ejector to eject an ink drop onto the image receiving member. In some embodiments, one or more electrical amplifiers (not shown) amplify the electrical signal generated by the controller 152 to a power level that is appropriate for operating the ink ejectors.
In the printing system 100, the values of Vpp, Vss, and Vt are configurable on a per-printhead basis. Thus, the firing signals generated for each inkjet ejector in a single printhead share a single Vpp, Vss, and Vt value. As described below, the printing system 100 calibrates different printheads with various values of Vpp, Vss, and Vt to enable the printheads to form ink patterns with uniform optical densities. Within each printhead, individual inkjets may emit ink drops having different masses that result in variations in the optical density of ink emitted from a single printhead. The controller 152 is further configured to adjust the relative values of Vpp, Vss, and Vt for one or more of the individual inkjets in each printhead. The controller 152 selects a relative reduction in the value of Vpp from the predetermined value of Vpp and Vss selected for the printhead. In the printing system 100, the magnitude of the reduction can range from zero volts up to a value corresponding to the voltage difference between Vpp 408 and the inflection voltage value 404. The same relative reduction is applied to the Vss portion of the waveform. The controller 152 is configured to apply another relative reduction in magnitude to Vt with the magnitude of the voltage reduction ranging from zero volts up to a value corresponding to the voltage difference between Vt 436 and the tail inflection voltage 432.
In the printing system 100, the relative adjustment to the voltages in firing signals for individual inkjets always reduces the magnitude of a firing signal from the values of Vpp, Vss, and Vt for the printhead. Thus, Vpp, Vss, and Vt selected for a printhead are the maximum voltage magnitudes for firing signals that operate inkjets, and individual ink ejectors within the printhead may operate with voltages having smaller magnitudes. As seen in
Process 200 selects test patterns that have either a high coverage area percentage or low coverage area percentage. The high coverage area percentage is typically above 90% ink coverage, with one configuration of system 100 using a value of 100% ink coverage. In system 100, the high coverage area percentage test patterns are used to calibrate the tail voltage Vt for each printhead. The low coverage area percentage is typically less than 35% ink coverage, with one configuration of the system 100 using a value of 25% ink coverage. In system 100, the low coverage area percentage test patterns are used to calibrate the peak voltages Vpp and Vss.
Once the test pattern is printed on the image receiving member, process 200 measures the average reflectance of ink drops in the test pattern from the reference printhead (block 208). In system 100, the IOWA sensor 166 is configured to measure the reflectance of the ink drops prior spreading the ink drops. The IOWA sensor 166 is configured measure the reflectance of ink drops from each ejector individually. The controller 152 averages the reflectance values of ink drops corresponding to the inkjets in reference printhead to generate average reflectance measurement for the test pattern formed by the reference printhead. In an alternative embodiment, the IOWA sensor 166 or an equivalent sensor is configured to detect the reflectivity of ink drops after the ink drops are spread on the image receiving member.
Process 200 continues by measuring the average optical density of ink ejected from a single reference printhead after the test patterns are spread on the image receiving member (block 212). In system 100, the ILS 168 is positioned in the process direction P after the spreader 132. The spreader 132 flattens the individual ink drops from the reference printhead and produces a color test pattern with reduced image noise due to variations in the drop size and drop placement of individual ejectors in the printhead. The ILS 168 measures the average optical density of the light reflected by the spread ink formed in a test pattern at particular wavelength for the color of ink ejected by the single printhead.
After measurement of the optical density of the test pattern generated by the reference printhead, process 200 compares the measured optical density to a predetermined optical density (block 216). The predetermined optical density corresponds to an expected reflectance measurement for the particular wavelength and the coverage area percentage for the ink ejected to print the test pattern. For example, a coverage area percentage of 100% of magenta ink has one predetermined optical density, while a coverage area percentage of 25% has a different predetermined optical density. In the system 100, the memory 154 holds a plurality of predetermined optical density values 162 that correspond to different ink colors and different coverage area percentages. The controller 152 compares the measured optical density to the predetermined optical density corresponding to the ink color and the coverage area percentage.
If the value of the measured optical density falls outside of a predetermined range of optical density values with respect to the predetermined optical density, then process 200 adjusts the electrical signal supplied to the inkjets in the reference printhead (block 220). The portion of the electrical signal that is adjusted is selected based on the coverage area percentage of the test pattern. The values of Vpp and Vss are adjusted when measuring the optical density of the low coverage area percentage test pattern, and the value of Vt is adjusted when measuring the optical density of the high coverage area percentage test pattern. System 100 implements a proportional—integral (PI) control system to select a new electrical signal voltage based on the measured difference between the optical density of the test pattern and the predetermined optical density, as well as an accumulated optical density error measured in one or more previous iterations of the process 200. The memory 154 stores an error history 161 that contains a value corresponding to one or more previously detected optical density errors corresponding to the ink color and coverage area percentage for the reference printhead.
Process 200 operates the printing system as described in blocks 204-220 in an iterative manner until the measured optical density of the reference printhead is within the predetermined range of the predetermined optical density (block 216). Process 200 then operates each of the other printheads in the print module that contains the reference printhead to form the same test pattern with the same predetermined coverage area percentage that was formed by the reference printhead (block 228). The printing system 100 measures the average reflectance for the portions of the test pattern formed by each printhead using the IOWA 166 (block 232).
Process 200 compares the average reflectance value measured for each printhead that generated the test patterns in block 228 to the average reflectance value measured for the reference printhead (block 236). Process 200 adjusts a portion of the electrical signal for any printhead having a reflectance value that falls outside of a predetermined range about the reflectance of the reference printhead (block 240). For example, if the reference printhead has a measured reflectance value of 60% with a ±5% tolerance range, then one of the other printheads in the print module with a reflectance value of 70% is considered outside of the reflectance range of the reference printhead.
The portion of the firing signal that is adjusted for printheads having reflectance values outside of the range of the reference printhead is selected based on the coverage area percentage of the test pattern. In the example of printing system 100, if the test pattern has a low image area coverage percentage, then Vpp and Vss are adjusted, and if the test pattern has a high image area coverage percentage then Vt is adjusted. System 100 implements a PI control system to adjust the electrical signals for each printhead based on the magnitude of difference between the reflectance value of each printhead and the reflectance value of the reference printhead, as well as accumulated error values identified in previous iterations of process 200. The memory 154 contains a reflectance error history 163 that stores previously measured errors in the reflectance of each printhead that are used for adjusting the electrical signals for each printhead.
Process 200 iterates blocks 228-240 until the adjusted firing signals for each printhead generate a portion of the test pattern with a reflectance value that is within the predetermined range of the reference printhead (block 236). Process 200 stores the adjusted firing signal values for each printhead in the module, including the reference printhead and the non-reference printheads, in the memory 144 for use during imaging operations (block 244). In printing system 100, the Vss value has the same magnitude as Vpp, and the controller 152 is configured to generate waveforms similar to the waveform depicted in
If the reflectance value for any printhead falls outside the predetermined range, then the electrical signals corresponding to each printhead outside of the range are adjusted (block 240). As with the reference printhead, the portion of the electrical signal that is adjusted for each printhead is selected based on the coverage area percentage of the test patterns. The values of Vpp and Vss are adjusted when measuring the optical density of the low coverage area percentage test pattern, and the value of Vt is adjusted when measuring the optical density of the high coverage area percentage test pattern.
Process 200 is an iterative process. If either or both of the average optical density of the reference printhead or the average reflectance values for any of the printheads fall outside of predetermined ranges, process 200 returns to block 204 by printing test patterns using the adjusted electrical firing signals. Process 200 completes when both the average optical density of the reference printhead (block 216) and the average reflectance value of all the printheads (block 236) are within their respective predetermined ranges. Process 200 then stores the adjusted Vpp and Vt values corresponding to each printhead in memory for use in imaging operations. In system 100, the controller 152 stores a Vpp value 156 and Vt value 158 in the memory 154 for each of the H printheads in the system 100.
In printing system 100, the IOWA 166 identifies an average reflectance value corresponding to the ink drops that are ejected by each of the printheads (block 258). The controller 152 identifies an average reflectance value for all of the printheads in the print module, and compares the reflectance value measured for each printhead to the average (block 262). The controller 152 adjusts the firing signals supplied to any printheads having average reflectance values that fall outside of a predetermined range (block 266).
The portion of the firing signal that is adjusted for printheads having reflectance values outside of the range of the average reflectance value for the print module is selected based on the coverage area percentage of the test pattern. In the example of printing system 100, if the test pattern has a low image area coverage percentage, then Vpp and Vss are adjusted, and if the test pattern has a high image area coverage percentage then Vt is adjusted. System 100 implements a PI control system to adjust the electrical signals for each printhead based on the magnitude of difference between the reflectance value of each printhead and the average reflectance value of the print module, as well as accumulated error values identified in previous iterations of process 200. The memory 154 contains a reflectance error history 163 that stores previously measured errors in the reflectance of each printhead that are used for adjusting the electrical signals for each printhead.
The printing system 100 performs process blocks 254-266 iteratively until the average reflectance value of each printhead is within the predetermined range of the average reflectance value for the entire print module (block 262). Process 250 continues by operating a single reference printhead to eject ink drops with the same test pattern having the predetermined coverage area percentage (block 270). The ILS 168 measures the optical density of the ink drops from the reference printhead (block 274), and the controller 152 compares the measured optical density to a predetermined optical density that is stored in the optical density data 162 in the memory 154 (block 278). If the measured optical density of the test pattern generated by the reference printhead is outside of a predetermined range of the predetermined optical density, a portion of the firing signal for the reference printhead is adjusted (block 282). Process blocks 270, 274, 278, and 282 of process 250 are performed in substantially the same manner as process blocks 204, 212, 216, and 220, respectively, of process 200.
Once the firing signal for the reference printhead is adjusted, process 250 performs a corresponding adjustment to the firing signals for each of the other printheads in the print module (block 286). For example, if the printing system 100 generates a high coverage percentage test pattern, then the value of Vt for the reference printhead is adjusted in process blocks 270-282. The corresponding adjustment value for Vt that is applied to the firing signal for the reference printhead is also applied to the Vt portion of the firing signals for the other printheads in the print module. In one example, performing the processing described in blocks 270-282 results in the controller 152 increasing the Vt value of the firing signal for the reference printhead by one volt to enable the reference printhead to generate a test pattern that causes the ILS to produce an optical density measurement for the test pattern color that is within the predetermined range about the predetermined optical density. In this example, the controller 152 also increases the Vt values for each of the other printheads by one volt. The absolute Vt voltages for each printhead may still be different, but the same relative adjustment is applied to each firing signal. The controller 152 is configured to store the adjusted firing signal values for each of the printheads in the memory 154 (block 290).
Either or both of processes 200 and 250 are performed for both high and low coverage area parameters and for each of the print modules to generate calibrated Vpp and Vt values for each printhead in the printer. In one configuration, each iteration of process 200 or 250 alternates between a high coverage area percentage test pattern and a low coverage area percentage test pattern to enable the processes 200 and 250 to generate electrical signals that produce uniform optical densities for both high and low coverage area patterns. During operation, the calibration processes 200 and 250 are repeated when one or more printheads or print sub-modules are replaced. Additionally, one or more print modules may be calibrated periodically to account for changes in the performance of different printheads that occur during printing operations.
In addition to calibration of multiple printheads, the inkjets in a single printhead can also be calibrated so that the ejectors emit ink drops having masses within a predetermined range of the average value for the entire printhead.
Process 300 begins by ejecting ink drops from each ejector in a printhead to form a test pattern having a predetermined coverage area percentage on the image receiving member (block 304). In one embodiment, the test pattern is either a high coverage area percentage test pattern in the range of 90% to 100% coverage, or a low coverage area percentage test pattern with less than 35% coverage. In printing system 100, the controller 152 generates electrical signals to operate each ejector in a single printhead to form the high and low coverage area test patterns. In some configurations, the test patterns formed during process 200 may also be used in process 300. When generating the test pattern, some or all of the ejectors in the printhead operate with effective Vpp or Vt values that are reduced from the nominal Vpp and Vt values used for the printhead.
Once the test pattern is formed on the image receiving member, process 300 measures reflectance values for ink drops ejected from each inkjet in the printhead (block 308). In a typical embodiment, each ejector emits multiple ink drops in the process direction and the measured reflectance value for each inkjet is an average of the reflectance of the ink drops. In system 100, the IOWA sensor 166 is configured to detect reflectance values that correspond to ink drops ejected from each of the inkjets in the printhead. Process 300 identifies an average reflectance value for the printhead by generating an average reflectance value from each of the reflectance values measured for each ejector (block 312).
Process 300 continues by comparing the reflectance value measured for each inkjet to the average reflectance value for the printhead, and identifying inkjets with measured reflectance values falling outside of the predetermined range (block 320). For example, if the average reflectance value for a printhead is 50% with a range of ±5%, then an ejector with a measured reflectance value of 40% falls outside of the predetermined range.
Process 300 adjusts the electrical signals that are used to operate each ejector that is identified to have a reflectance value falling outside of the predetermined range of the average reflectance value of the printhead (block 324). The portion of the electrical signal that is adjusted is selected with reference to the coverage area percentage of the test pattern formed in block 304. For a low coverage area percentage test pattern, process 300 adjusts the relative magnitude of Vpp and the corresponding Vss, and process 300 adjusts the relative magnitude of Vt for a high coverage area percentage test pattern.
Process 300 performs a relative adjustment to the electrical signal used to operate each ejector. That is, the value of Vpp and Vt used to operate the entire printhead remains unchanged, but a relative adjustment that decreases the magnitude of Vpp or Vt used to operate an individual inkjet in the printhead is adjusted. The magnitude of the adjustment is made using a PI control system. In system 100, the relative voltage adjustment selected for either Vpp or Vt is an integer number that corresponds to a number of voltage levels having magnitudes between the nominal maximum magnitude of Vpp or Vt, and a corresponding inflection voltage level. Referring to
Process 300 iterates when the relative voltage values for one or more ink ejectors are adjusted, returning to block 304. When all of the inkjets in the printhead are calibrated to produce ink drops with reflectance values within the predetermined range of the average reflectance (block 320), the relative voltage adjustment values for each inkjet in the printhead are stored in memory for later use (block 328). In the system 100, the memory 154 stores the relative adjustment values for both Vpp and Vt of each ejector, which are kept in a lookup table 160. During imaging operations, the controller 152 generates electrical signals used to operate each ejector with the stored modified values 160 corresponding to each inkjet.
The in situ method and system of calibration is well-suited for use in printing systems that use phase change inks. Phase change inks require heated printheads to maintain the ink in a liquid phase and the ink needs to be fixed to media with a spreader to produce the best quality image. Over the life of a heated printhead, the inkjet ejectors eject drops that have less mass than the ink drops ejected earlier in the life of the printheads. Consequently, the optical density of the colored ejected ink produced by the heated printheads changes over the life of the phase change imaging system and needs to be evaluated and adjusted in situ to ensure proper image quality. In order to provide data regarding the placement of ink drops ejected by printheads in a solid ink or phase change ink printing system, the image on web array (IOWA) optical system is positioned prior to the spreader so individual ink drops can be imaged and the positional data of the image data corresponding to the drops analyzed to evaluate inkjet ejector performance in the printheads. These image data, however, cannot effectively provide information on the optical density of the ejected colored ink because the media temperature affects the optical density obtained from the reflectance measurements generated by the IOWA system. To ensure more accurate optical density measurements, the inline spectrophotometer (ILS) is positioned after the spreader. This sensor is more immune to image noise produced by varying media temperatures. Additionally, the system and method required above require only one ILS sensor as the other printheads are calibrated to be within a predetermined range about the ink ejected by the printhead measured by the ILS sensor. Because a single ILS sensor that spans the width of the media or the inclusion of one ILS sensor for each printhead would be relatively expensive, the system and method described above provide a cost effective manner for the production of usable optical density data in a phase change ink imaging system.
It will be appreciated that variants of the above-disclosed and other features, and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art, which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
