In situ formation of metal-molybdate catalysts for methanol oxidation to formaldehyde

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6624332
  • Patent Number
    6,624,332
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 31, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 23, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
The method of the present invention involves the in situ formation of metal-molybdate catalyst particles active for methanol oxidation to formaldehyde, with iron as an example, the catalyst is made by mixing particulate forms of Fe2O3 and MoO3 which form an active Fe2(MoO4)3/MoO3 component inside the reactor during methanol oxidation.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a novel methodology for an in situ preparation of metal-molybdate catalysts that are useful for methanol oxidation to formaldehyde.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Iron-molybdate catalysts have been manufactured from the coprecipitation of aqueous solutions of FeCl


3


and ammonium heptamolybdate. Both of these reagents are expensive and significant amounts of water are required in the commercial manufacture of the iron-molybdate catalysts in accordance with prior manufacturing methods. In addition, during the calcination step required to form the active Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


and MoO


3


components, significant amounts of pollutants, such as nitrous oxides (NO


x


), ammonia (NH


3


) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) are formed.




Thus, the synthesis of iron-molybdate catalysts prior to the present invention has a number of significant problems. In view of these significant problems, there is a need for new methods of formation for these catalysts. More specifically, there is a need for methods of manufacture of iron-molybdate catalysts that involve more common and less expensive reagents, do not require water, and reduce the formation of pollutants. The present invention fulfills all of these needs. These and other benefits of the present invention are described below.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It has now been discovered that in situ formation of metal-molybdate catalysts can be achieved by beginning the methanol conversion process over a physical mixture comprising: (a) a particulate source of catalytically active metal oxide and (b) a source of molybdenum oxide such as molybdenum trioxide (MoO


3


). During the course of the methanol conversion reaction, catalytically active metal-molybdate/(MoO


3


) forms in situ and without the use of water.




For the formation of the preferred iron-molybdate catalysts, a combination of (a) a particulate source of iron oxide such as powdered forms of ferric oxide (Fe


2


O


3


), coprecipitated iron molybdate (Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


), or other metal oxide such as NiO; and (b) a source of molybdenum oxide such as molybdenum trioxide (MoO


3


) are loaded into a methanol conversion zone. During the course of the methanol conversion reaction at typical conversion conditions, catalytically active metal molybdate (e.g. (Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


)/(MoO


3


)) forms in situ and without the use of water.




Metal-molybdate catalysts formed by the present invention and the resulting methanol conversion process are comparable to metal-molybdate catalysts formed via the more expensive and polluting manufacturing methods of the prior art. These and other advantages will be readily recognized by those skilled in the art.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES





FIG. 1

is a spectra of a Raman analysis showing the formation of iron-molybdate from a physical mixture of molybdenum trioxide and ferric oxide contacted with methanol and oxygen under conventional methanol oxidation conversion conditions.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




The present invention is directed to the formation of compositions within a fixed bed reactor that are catalytically active for the oxidative conversion of alcohols to their corresponding aldehydes. Notably, the catalysts are formed in situ from a physical mixture of readily available or easily synthesized solids that are the source of a metal oxide and molybdenum oxide. While the precise mechanism is not exactly known, it is believed that catalytically active molybdenum trioxide (MoO


3


) is formed in the course of the conversion reaction at the conversion conditions, is transferred among the solid surfaces within the conversion bed, and thereby forms the present catalytically active composition. Notably, the present composition exhibits a higher conversion and selectivity for aldehyde production than each individual particulate type catalyst added to the conversion bed.




Suitable sources of catalytically active metal oxide include iron, lead, cadmium, zinc, bismuth, sodium, manganese, gadolinium, magnesium, copper, cobalt, tellurium, aluminum, chromium, nickel, and combinations thereof. Exemplary forms of catalytically active compositions that are formed by this process include Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


/MoO


3


, PbMoO


4


, CaMoO


4


, Bi


2


Mo


2


O


9


, Bi


3


(FeO


4


)(MoO


4


)


3


and other Bi—Mo—O family members, Na


2


MoO


4


, Na


2


Mo


2


O


7


, MnMoO


4


, Gd


2


(MoO


4


)


3


, MgMoO


4


, CuMoO


4


, CoMoO


4


, Te


2


MoO


7


, Al


2


(MoO


4


)


3


, Cr


2


(MoO


4


)


3


, NiMoO


4


, and ZnMoO


4


.




The invention is conveniently described with reference to the formation of the preferred iron-molybdate catalysts although it will be understood that the formation can be applied to the other metals identified above.




In the preferred method of the present invention, mixtures of inexpensive particulate forms of iron oxide and molybdenum oxide are useful for the oxidative conversion of methanol to formaldehyde under conventional methanol conversion conditions. Suitable conversion conditions generally include a temperature within the range from about 150°-500 C, preferably 250°-400° C., in a flowing stream of gas containing methanol, oxygen, and a carrier gas that is inert to the reaction. Useful gas streams contain these reactants in a molar ratio generally suitable for synthesis of formaldehyde, such as in a molar ratio of methanol/oxygen that is within the range of 1-4. A particularly useful stream contains 6 moles methanol to 13 moles oxygen to 81 moles of helium. Gas phase compositions suitable for synthesis of formaldehyde from methanol over metal molybdate catalysts are well known to those skilled in the art.




Particularly preferred catalysts according to the invention include a particulate mixture of: (a) Fe


2


O


3


(21.4 m


2


/g) and MoO


3


(5.0 m


2


/g); or (b) Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(9.6 m


2


/g) and MoO


3


(5.0 m


2


/g), in the form of finely divided, free flowing, intimately admixed powders that are initially loaded into a fixed catalyst bed and used to catalyze the oxidative conversion of methanol to formaldehyde at conventional conversion conditions. During the course of that process, a catalytically active Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


/MoO


3


component is formed in situ in the catalyst bed.





FIG. 1

illustrates the Raman analysis of the mixture MoO


3


and Fe


2


O


3


before (fresh catalyst) and after (used catalyst) the catalytic test at high methanol conversion. The Raman spectrum of the fresh sample shows the characteristic signals of MoO


3


at 996, 819 and 667 cm


−1


. Iron oxide gives a very weak signal that is not detectable at the scale of FIG.


1


.




After the reaction, new Raman bands at approximately 968 and 781 cm


−1


that belong to Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


along with those of molybdenum trioxide (MoO


3


) are detected. The analysis clearly demonstrates that the active phase Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


/MoO


3


was formed during the methanol reaction.




EXAMPLES




Molybdenum trioxide (MoO


3


), ferric oxide (Fe


2


O


3


), nickel oxide (NiO) and coprecipitated iron-molybdate (Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


) and various mixtures and combinations thereof, were screened for conversion of methanol and selectivity toward formaldehyde production. The iron-molybdate catalysts were made by coprecipitating an ammonium molybdate (e.g., (NH


4


)Mo


7


O


24


.4H


2


O)) with iron nitrate solution at appropriate temperature and pH for precipitation. The precipitated solids are then washed, dried, and calcined to make particulate catalysts for the oxidative conversion of methanol to formaldehyde. The “turnover frequency” (“TOF”) is the reaction rate divided by the number of surface active sites per surface area of catalyst. The number of active sites was determined by methanol chemisorption at 100° C.




The results of the screening tests are shown in the attached Tables I and II, and the following conclusions can be drawn:




1. By comparing the results obtained with the pure compounds MoO


3


, Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


, Fe


2


O


3


, and NiO and those belonging to the mixtures with an excess of molybdenum trioxide (No/Fe>1.5), it can be concluded that an excess of MoO


3


improves the catalytic activity and selectivity in the methanol oxidation process.




2. The same results of activity and selectivity are obtained by using a mixture of Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


/MoO


3


prepared by the traditional coprecipitation method and a mixture obtained by simple mechanical mixtures of Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


and MoO


3


, or Fe


2


O


3


and MoO


3


.




3. The catalytic activity and selectivity in the methanol oxidation process obtained with the mechanical mixtures is comparable with a well known industrial catalyst provided by Perstorp Polyols (Toledo, Ohio) with product designation KH-26L.




In Table III, the results of catalytic activity at high methanol conversion of the mechanical mixtures compared with the industrial catalyst described above are shown. This data was taken in a conventional flow reactor, operating at 380° C., with approximately 100 mg of catalyst in the form of powder, under a stream of 54 sccm of methanol/oxygen/helium in the molar ratio of 6/13/81. The results show that the mechanical mixtures are as active and selective to formaldehyde as the industrial catalyst at high methanol conversion.




While various alterations and permutations of the invention are possible, the invention is to be limited only by the following claims and equivalents.












TABLE I











Methanol Oxidation Tunover Frequencies of






Pure Compounds and Mixtures Prepared by Different Synthesis Methods

















TOF







S


BET







(380° C.)







(m


2


/g)




Synthesis




(sec


−1


)


a




















MoO


3






5.0




(Thermal Decomposition)




5.3






Fe


2


O


3






21.4




(Commercial)




26.9






NiO




34.4




(Thermal Decomposition)




53.1






Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(1.5)


b






9.6




(Inorganic Coprecipitation)




1.1






Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(1.5)




1.5




(Organic Coprecipitation)




1.8






Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(1.1)




3.9




(Inorganic Coprecipitation)




2.2






MoO


3


/Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3






3.0




(Inorganic Coprecipitation)




15.8






(2.2)






MoO


3


+ /Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3






3.5




(Mechanical Mixture)




14.8






(2.2)






MoO


3


/Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3






2.6




(Mechanical Mixture)




35.1






(3.97)






MoO


3


+ Fe


2


O


3


(2.2)




5.7




(Mechanical Mixture)




14.5






MoO


3


+ NiO (2.2)









(Mechanical Mixture)




4.2






Industrial Catalyst




7.8




(Coprecipitation)




29.6













a


The activity of the mixtures were obtained at 300° C. and extrapolated to 380° C.












b


(Mo/Fe molar ratio)





















TABLE II











Methanol Oxidation Selectivities of






Pure Compounds and Mixtures













Selectivity %















Sample




HCHO




DME




DMM




Others









MoO


3


(Thermal Decomposition)




84.1




12.0




3.9











Fe


2


O


3


(Commercial)




57.9




36.4




1.2




 4.5






NiO (Thermal Decomposition)




21.3














72.7






Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(1.5)


a


(Inorganic Coprecipitation)




56.1




43.8
















Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(1.5) (Organic Coprecipitation)




58.2




41.9
















Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(1.1) (Inorganic Coprecipitation)




64.9




35.1
















MoO


3


/Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(2.2) (Inorganic Coprecipitation)




85.3




11.7




3.2











MoO


3


+ /Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(2.2) (Mechanical Mixture)




85.3




11.7




3.0











MoO


3


/Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(3.97) (Mechanical Mixture)




85.1




11.7




3.2











MoO


3


+ Fe


2


O


3


(2.2) (Mechanical Mixture)




88.2




 8.6




3.2











MoO


3


+ NiO (2.2) (Mechanical Mixture)




80.9




16.5




2.6











Industrial Catalyst (Coprecipitation)




93.0




 7.0




2.0


















a


(Mo/Fe molar ratio)





















TABLE III











Activity of Mechanical Mixtures at High






Methanol Conversions













Selectivity %
















Conversion









Sample




%




HCHO




DME




Others


















Sample C (Industrial)




100.0




85.9




1.1




CO, Unknown






MoO


3


/Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(2.2)


a






92.4




84.5




2.7




CO, Unknown






MoO


3


/Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3


(3.97)




100.0




81.7




2.8




CO, Unknown






MoO


3


+ /Fe


2


(MoO


4


)


3






98.4




84.3




2.2




CO, Unknown






(2.2)













a


(Mo/Fe molar ratio)










Temperature = 380° C. (data obtained at this temperature)












Claims
  • 1. A method for forming formaldehyde from methanol and oxygen comprising:contacting a reactant stream containing methanol and oxygen at methanol conversion conditions with a fixed bed of particulate solids comprising a particulate source of iron oxide and a second particulate source of molybdenum oxide to form a catalyst composition and to convert said methanol into formaldehyde, wherein said first particulate source of iron oxide is different from said second particulate source of molybdenum oxide.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said methanol conversion conditions comprise a temperature within the range from about 150°-500° C.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1 wherein said particulate source of iron oxide comprises powdered ferric oxide.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1 wherein said particulate source of molybdenum oxide comprises molybdenum trioxide.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1 wherein said reactant stream further contains an inert gas.
  • 6. A method for forming formaldehyde from methanol and oxygen comprising: contacting a reactant stream containing methanol and oxygen at methanol conversion conditions with a fixed bed of particulate solids comprising a first particulate source of a metal oxide and a second particulate source of molybdenum oxide to form a catalyst composition and to convert said methanol to formaldehyde, wherein said first particulate source of metal oxide is different from said second particulate source of molybdenum oxide.
  • 7. A method according to claim 6 wherein said first particulate source of metal oxide is selected from oxides of iron, lead, cadmium, zinc, bismuth, sodium, manganese, gadolinium, magnesium, copper, cobalt, tellurium, aluminum, chromium, nickel, and combinations thereof.
  • 8. A method according to claim 6 wherein said methanol conversion conditions comprise a temperature within the range from about 150°-500° C.
  • 9. A method according to claim 7 wherein said particulate source of metal oxide comprises powdered ferric oxide.
  • 10. A method according to claim 6 wherein said particulate source of molybdenum oxide comprises molybdenum trioxide.
  • 11. A method according to claim 6 wherein said reactant stream further contains an inert gas.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional application prior filed U.S. application Ser. No. 09/287,021, filed Apr. 6, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,331,503 which application claims priority benefits from the U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 60/081,950 filed Apr. 15, 1998.

US Referenced Citations (21)
Number Name Date Kind
1913405 Meharg Jun 1933 A
2491695 Stiles Dec 1949 A
2812309 Allyn et al. Nov 1957 A
3152997 Natta et al. Oct 1964 A
3408309 Gessner Oct 1968 A
3415886 McClellan Dec 1968 A
3716497 Courty Feb 1973 A
3846341 Courty Nov 1974 A
3975302 Courty et al. Aug 1976 A
3983073 Trifiró et al. Sep 1976 A
3987107 McClellan et al. Oct 1976 A
4024074 Cairati et al. May 1977 A
4141861 Courty et al. Feb 1979 A
4181629 Cairati et al. Jan 1980 A
4208353 Webster et al. Jun 1980 A
4212766 Brazdil et al. Jul 1980 A
4306089 Webster et al. Dec 1981 A
4331567 Canavesi et al. May 1982 A
4343954 Hoene Aug 1982 A
4829042 Cavalli et al. May 1989 A
5217936 Sarup et al. Jun 1993 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0 199 359 Oct 1986 EP
0 732 146 Sep 1996 EP
1191143 May 1970 GB
2144049 Feb 1985 GB
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/081950 Apr 1998 US