This invention relates generally to the field of ceramic components used in high temperature applications, and in one embodiment, to a load-bearing component of a gas turbine engine formed of a ceramic matrix composite material.
The ongoing demand for improved efficiency has resulted in the design of modern gas turbine engines operating at increasingly high temperatures. Generally, when the combustion gas temperature exceeds a value at which a structural material begins to degrade, the designer is forced to select a different material having a higher safe operating temperature, to provide a cooling mechanism for the material, and/or to coat the structural material with a non-structural thermal barrier coating. Special superalloy and ceramic materials have been developed for use at the high temperatures generated by hot combustion gasses in a gas turbine engine. For example, A-N720 is an oxide-oxide ceramic matrix composite (CMC) material available from COI Ceramics, Inc. that can safely function without significant degradation at temperatures up to about 1,200° C. For temperatures exceeding this value, active or passive cooling techniques may be used to protect the material. Alternatively or in combination with cooling, a thermal barrier coating may be applied to protect the material from the environment. U.S. Pat. No. 6,013,592, commonly assigned with the present invention, describes one such ceramic thermal barrier coating material applied to a ceramic matrix composite substrate.
The use of a thermal barrier coating creates a new set of concerns for the designer. First, the coating process adds cost and the coating adds weight to the component. Furthermore, failure of the coating can lead to failure of the component, thus potentially detracting from the statistical reliability of the system. A thermal barrier coating must remain firmly bonded to the substrate in order to be effective. One mode of coating failure is spalling due to differential thermal expansion between the coating and the substrate. U.S. Pat. No. 6,013,592 addresses this problem by varying the composition of ceramic spheres within the coating to adjust the coefficient of thermal expansion to a desired value. Nonetheless, thermal barrier coatings with improved reliability and reduced cost are desired.
The invention is explained in following description in view of the drawings that show:
The present inventors have innovatively recognized the possibility of using a ceramic component at temperatures beyond the ceramic material's normal design temperature limit by allowing the ceramic material to be transformed/degraded by the high temperature environment into an effective thermal barrier coating layer that functions to protect an underlying load-bearing portion of the component. One such component is the airfoil 10 of
This concept is explained further with reference to
Advantageously, the thermal barrier portion 20 retains the same composition and coefficient of thermal expansion as the inner load-carrying portion 18. Unlike the simplifying assumption used for
The present concept of in-situ formed thermal barrier layers is preferably embodied in an oxide ceramic material, since metals and non-oxide ceramic materials may exhibit chemical and physical changes during thermal aging that are not complimentary with the underlying non-aged material. Typical ceramic oxide materials useful in the present invention include but are not limited to mullite, alumina, yttria, zirconia, ceria and yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG), in both monolithic and composite forms.
Metals will oxidize under high temperature combustion environments to form an oxide coating that may passivate against further oxidation. However, these coatings are inherently unstable due to a mismatch of coefficients of thermal expansion and/or sintering of the coating, resulting in spallation of the coating after a critical thickness is formed. Furthermore, the critical thickness is far less than that required to form an effective thermal barrier. Also, metal oxides are formed via diffusion of subsurface species to the surface to form the outer layer, thus depleting the substrate of alloying elements and degrading the substrate properties.
Non-oxide ceramics and non-oxide ceramic matrix composites suffer from severe oxidation and corrosion if exposed in gas turbine environments above 1,200° C. For example, SiC-based ceramic matrix composites will oxidize to form a protective oxide layer of SiO2. However, this layer is susceptible to volatilization from a water vapor corrosion mechanism. Furthermore, these oxide layers are also of insufficient thickness to protect the substrate thermally.
Because the surface layer 20 formed in an oxide ceramic remains the same in composition and thermal expansion as the underlying load-carrying material, the embodiment of the present invention using an oxide ceramic is uniquely different from any other material class wherein the surface is fundamentally changed through an oxidation or other process. The change that does occur in the surface layer 20 is not an abrupt change and it results in no interface between the coating 20 and the substrate 18, as is the case with metals and non-oxide ceramics. The resulting structure 10 is a true functionally graded material that is graded in-situ and is formed of a single material system, whereas most functionally graded materials are formed with graded materials of differing compositions. Furthermore, the formation of the heat-affected zone thermal barrier coating 20 has no adverse impact on the properties of the underlying structural material layer 18.
The through-thickness thermal gradient imposed on the component surface will dictate the thermal degradation profile during the in-situ formation of the thermal barrier layer 20 as well as the stress profile during this process and during normal operation of the component 10. Cooling schemes can be devised to balance these effects to result in a desired applied stress vs. retained strength relationship; for example the use of cooling passages 22 formed in the load-carrying portion 18 proximate the protective outer layer 20.
Curve 32 of
The outer portion 20 of material may be aged using any variety of heat sources, for example, infrared lamps, laser energy, burner, oven, etc. The aging may be accomplished in whole or in part during normal operation of a gas turbine engine in which the component is installed, or the component may be pre-aged in a special engine set up for such operations. Upon the initial heating of the airfoil 10, the hot external environment and the cooling provided by coolant in the cooling passages 22 generate surface compressive stresses and subsurface tensile stresses. Densification and the associated local shrinkage of the material would tend to mitigate these stresses somewhat. Over time, creep relaxation of the hot surface results in a low thermal stress state at steady-state temperature conditions. The elevated temperature conditions gradually degrade the surface layer 20. Upon a subsequent cool down, a stress reversal takes place, with the surface layer going into residual tension and the subsurface material going into compression at ambient temperature. If the residual tensile stress at the surface exceeds the degraded strength of the surface material, small cracks normal to the surface will develop. The cracks result in stress relief and the depth of the cracks will be determined by the relationship of the retained strength verses stress profile into the thickness T of the upper layer 20. Such surface cracks have been found to be advantageous and to increase the useful life in thermal barrier coatings. For embodiments where reinforcing fibers extend to proximate the surface 26, as illustrated in
In one embodiment, the heat affected zone thermal barrier layer of the present invention may have a thickness perpendicular to its surface 26 of at least 0.25 mm. A typical ply of CMC material is about 0.25 mm thick, so a design incorporating the present invention may accommodate the need for sacrificial material by the addition of as little as a single additional ply of material. In other embodiments, the heat affected zone thermal barrier layer may be at least 0.5 mm thick, or at least 3 mm thick, or at least 5 mm thick.
One may appreciate that the thickness of the heat affected material and the conductivity of the material both affect the heat flux passing through the thermal barrier layer 20 into the structural material 18 for a given temperature differential. This relationship is expressed by the equation Q=(k/t)ΔT, where Q is heat flux (W/m2K), k is thermal conductivity (W/mK), t is thickness (m), and ΔT is temperature differential (° K.). The present inventors have found the relationship kit to be a useful parameter for specifying a desired degree of protection afforded by an outermost layer of heat-affected material. “Effective k/t” is used herein to denote the cumulative effect of conductivity integrated over the entire heat affected zone of material. For multiple discrete layers, this may be determined using the series equation
where the summation is for all individual layers, i. In one embodiment, the effective k/t value for a thermally grown heat-affected zone thermal barrier layer is less than 5,000 W/m2. By growing the heat-affected zone to have an effective value of k/t of less than 5,000 W/m2, a useful degree of protection is afforded to the underlying structural material for a wide range of environments that are typically experienced in modern gas turbine engines. In other embodiments the effective k/t of the heat-affected zone may be less than 2,500 W/m2, or less than 1,000 W/m2, or less than 500 W/m2, or less than 250 W/m2.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/002,028, filed Dec. 2, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,153,096.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3619077 | Wile | Nov 1971 | A |
4314794 | Holden et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4464097 | Schultz | Aug 1984 | A |
5110652 | Allaire et al. | May 1992 | A |
5856027 | Murphy | Jan 1999 | A |
6013592 | Merrill et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6197424 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6235370 | Merrill et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6277448 | Strutt et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6478535 | Chung et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6521053 | Grylls et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6609894 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6635124 | Stowell et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641907 | Merrill et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6689487 | Murphy | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6706319 | Seth et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7066717 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060121296 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11002028 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 11031796 | US |