The present invention is in the field of surgical apparatuses used in the treatment of diseases, wounds and other abnormal conditions of the bodies of humans and lower animal (Class 128). Specifically, the present invention relates to orthopedic instrumentation designed for particular use in a surgical procedure on bone structure to correct a deformity, fracture, unwanted or diseased condition Class 606/subclass 53). More specifically, the present invention relates to an osteotomy jig for use in bone reparation, to align a cutting means in a desired orientation for severing or partially severing a bone at a knee/knee joint so that a prosthetic member fitted thereto to effect the repair of the bone (subclasses 86-88).
Total knee joint replacement surgery is now a common tool in the orthopedic surgeon's repertoire. However, there is a present controversy as to whether during a knee joint replacement surgery, the patella should be replaced as well. Some practitioners will replace the patella as well during the surgery if it is particularly worn. Other practitioners prefer to avoid replacing the patella at all costs. The controversy is difficult to resolve, because the patella replacement portion of a total knee replacement operation is the most poorly performed and understood aspect of the surgery. The standard full knee replacement surgery typically will balance the flexion gap and the extension gaps, but pay less attention to or overlook the patello-femoral gap.
The reason for this is at least in part because of the lack of appropriate alternative patellar jigs to guide the surgeon when replacing/resurfacing the patella. Typically, the patella is cut in isolation, i.e., separate and away from the femoral and tibial components of the replacement knee prosthesis. Because the patella is cut/resurfaced in isolation, it is difficult to easily assure the accuracy of the cutting/resurfacing of the patella to accommodate the flexion gap, the extension gap and the patello-femoral gap at the replacement knee joint.
It would be beneficial to the field to have an alternative patella jig that can not only be used in situ, but which also enables cutting of the patella with physical reference to the femoral prosthetic (or trial) component that it is to interface with. Additionally, it would be beneficial to have such alternative patella jig that can hold a range of patella sizes, without compromising accuracy of the physical interface alignment.
The present invention is a patellar fixing system for use, for example, in a total knee surgical procedure. The fixing system stabilizes a patella in situ in spatial/physical reference to the femoral prosthesis (or the femoral trial) to enable the appropriate cut to be made to the patella to assure the accuracy of the cutting/resurfacing of the patella to accommodate the patello-femoral gap at the replacement knee joint. The present system for resecting a patella in situ comprises a patella jig and a referencing component. The patella jig incorporates a patella clamp mechanism adapted to releaseably hold the patella. The femur referencing or engaging component provides a connection between the patella jig and an anchor point or landmark (i.e., a reference feature) on the femur. The connection to the anchor point or reference feature on the femur enables the patella jig to be oriented relative to the reference feature. Thus a patella held in the clamp mechanism can be fixed in an appropriate orientation relative to the femur during its resection. Cutting the patella while it is referenced to the patellar groove on the femur increases the accuracy of the resection relative to what otherwise may be accomplished.
The referencing feature on the femur can be accomplished in a number of manners. One is to install an artificial anchor point on the femur to serve as the reference feature via which the patella jig is connected to the femur. Another is to use the femoral prosthesis or trial which incorporate a feature that can be utilized as an anchor point. Additionally, a femur reference feature can be a natural surface feature of the femur itself, or can be a feature sculpted into the femur bone to serve this function.
Referring now to the drawings, the details of preferred embodiments of the present invention are graphically and schematically illustrated. Like elements in the drawings are represented by like numbers, and any similar elements are represented by like numbers with a different lower case letter suffix.
As exemplified in
As exemplified in
As can be seen in the figures, the clamp mechanism 14 of the patella resection jig 12 preferably includes a tool guide 50. The tool guide 50 may take various configurations selectable by the ordinary skilled artisan, but in the preferred embodiment exemplified, the tool guide is a miter slot through the jaws. The miter slot 50 is coplanar with and defines the resection plane of reversibly jig. The tool guide 50 is adapted to allow a cutting tool blade to pass through the jaws along the resection plane. The tool guide in the exemplified embodiment can be a closed miter slot 50 (see
In a preferred embodiment exemplifies by
Optionally, the patella resection jig 12 has a pivot assembly 40 for pivotably joining the first 61 and second 65 members together at the pivot point 68. In the embodiment illustrated (see
While the above description contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as exemplifications of one or another preferred embodiment thereof. Many other variations are possible, which would be obvious to one skilled in the art. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined by the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents, and not just by the embodiments.
The present application claims the benefit of prior filed U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 60/892,629, filed 2 Mar. 2007, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5021055 | Burkinshaw et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5129908 | Petersen | Jul 1992 | A |
5147365 | Whitlock et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5284482 | Mikhail | Feb 1994 | A |
5542947 | Treacy | Aug 1996 | A |
5643272 | Haines et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6645215 | McGovern et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
7488324 | Metzger et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7935151 | Haines | May 2011 | B2 |
20050149038 | Haines et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070233142 | Oliver | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080228190 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60892629 | Mar 2007 | US |