The present invention relates to the field of concrete piling construction. More specifically, the present invention relates to the field of concrete piling construction using plasma blasting.
In the building trades, a deep foundation is a type of foundation that transfers building loads to the earth farther down from the surface than a shallow foundation does to a subsurface layer or a range of depths. One method of deep foundation is a pile. A pile or piling is a vertical structural element of a deep foundation, driven or drilled deep into the ground at the building site.
There are many reasons that a geotechnical engineer would recommend a deep foundation over a shallow foundation, such as for a skyscraper. Some of the common reasons are very large design loads, a poor soil at shallow depth, or site constraints like property lines. There are different terms used to describe different types of deep foundations including the pile (which is analogous to a pole), the pier (which is analogous to a column), drilled shafts, and caissons. Piles are generally driven into the ground in situ; other deep foundations are typically put in place using excavation and drilling.
When using Cast-in-Situ piles, a borehole is drilled into the ground, then concrete (and often some sort of reinforcing) is placed into the borehole to form the pile. Rotary boring techniques allow larger diameter piles than any other piling method and permit pile construction through particularly dense or hard strata. Construction methods depend on the geology of the site; in particular, whether boring is to be undertaken in ‘dry’ ground conditions or through water-saturated strata. Casing is often used when the sides of the borehole are likely to slough off before concrete is poured.
For end-bearing piles, drilling continues until the borehole has extended a sufficient depth (socketing) into a sufficiently strong layer. Depending on site geology, this can be a rock layer, or hardpan, or other dense, strong layers. Both the diameter of the pile and the depth of the pile are highly specific to the ground conditions, loading conditions, and nature of the project. Pile depths may vary substantially across a project if the bearing layer is not level.
However, piles must be sunk to a depth where a layer is found where the soil can support the load of the building. This can be quite expensive in locations where the bedrock is particularly deep. Methodologies for creating a base strong enough to support the building for a reasonable cost are needed in the industry.
Plasma blasting allows for the distribution of material at the bottom of a piling hole, and at different levels, spreading the load over a broader area, optimizing the shape of the piling, and allowing for increased weight on each piling.
The present invention eliminates the issues articulated above as well as other issues with the currently known products.
A method of creating a piling and/or anchor in soil, utilizing the steps of first creating a borehole in the soil, then filling the borehole with wet concrete (and in some cases, reinforcement steel rebar), and next inserting a plasma blasting probe into the borehole. The plasma blasting probe then creates a plasma explosion in the borehole, expanding the wet concrete into the surrounding soil. In some embodiments, rebar is also inserted. The plasma blasting probe is then removed from the borehole and additional concrete is added into the borehole to create the piling. For larger boreholes, the process can be repeated stepwise in increments from the bottom of the hole to approximately half way up the hole creating multiple wet concrete expansion areas.
In some embodiments, a plurality of boreholes are created in close proximity such that the concrete in at least two boreholes interconnects. This set of boreholes could form a lattice. The plasma explosion could be shaped to create a mushroom shape, and guy wire attachments could be inserted in the concrete. In some embodiments, the method also includes the step of calculating an amount of energy, a duration of energy and a gap between electrodes mounted in the plasma blasting probe to form a specific shape with the plasma explosion. This calculation could be performed by a special purpose microprocessor. This microprocessor could also calculate the depth of the plasma explosion. The microprocessor could electronically adjusting the amount of energy and the duration of energy. The plasma blasting probe could include a symmetrical cage, and could include a plurality of electrodes. The electrodes are connected to at least one capacitor. The electrodes are separated by a dielectric separator, and the dielectric separator and the electrodes constitute an adjustable probe tip with a maximum gap between the electrodes less than the gap between any of the electrodes and the cage enclosing the electrodes. The electrodes are on an axis with tips opposing each other.
A blast probe apparatus for forming shaped concrete pilings is also described herein. The blast probe apparatus includes a symmetrical cage and a plurality of electrodes. The electrodes are connected to at least one capacitor. The electrodes are separated by a dielectric separator, and the dielectric separator and the electrodes constitute an adjustable probe tip with a maximum gap between the electrodes less than the gap between any of the electrodes and the cage enclosing the electrodes. The electrodes are on an axis with tips opposing each other. The blast probe apparatus also includes at least one soil condition sensor attached to the symmetrical cage. The probe also includes a special purpose microprocessor in communication with the at least one soil condition sensor and the electrodes, wherein the special purpose microprocessor controls an amount of energy and a duration of energy sent through the electrodes.
The blast probe apparatus could also include wet concrete in the cage between the electrodes, and could include a motor attached to one of the electrodes and in communication with the special purpose microprocessor.
In some embodiments, the plasma blasting system 100 comprises a power supply 106, an electrical storage unit 108, a voltage protection device 110, a high voltage switch 112, transmission cable 114, an inductor 116, a blasting probe 118 and a blasting media 104. In some embodiments, the plasma blasting system 100 comprises any number of blasting probes and corresponding blasting media. In some embodiments, the inductor 116 is replaced with the inductance of the transmission cable 114. Alternatively, the inductor 116 is replaced with any suitable inductance means as is well known in the art. The power supply 106 comprises any electrical power supply capable of supplying a sufficient voltage to the electrical storage unit 108. The electrical storage unit 108 comprises a capacitor bank or any other suitable electrical storage means. The voltage protection device 110 comprises a crowbar circuit with voltage-reversal protection means as is well known in the art. The high voltage switch 112 comprises a spark gap, an ignitron, a solid state switch, or any other switch capable of handling high voltages and high currents. In some embodiments, the transmission cable 114 comprises a coaxial cable. Alternatively, the transmission cable 114 comprises any transmission cable capable of adequately transmitting the pulsed electrical power.
In some embodiments, the power supply 106 couples to the voltage protection device 110 and the electrical storage unit 108 via the transmission cable 114 such that the power supply 106 is able to supply power to the electrical storage unit 108 through the transmission cable 114 and the voltage protection device 110 is able to prevent voltage reversal from harming the system. In some embodiments, the power supply 106, voltage protection device 110 and electric storage unit 108 also couple to the high voltage switch 112 via the transmission cable 114 such that the switch 112 is able to receive a specified voltage/current from the electric storage unit 108. The switch 112 then couples to the inductor 116 which couples to the blasting probe 118 again via the transmission cable 114 such that the switch 112 is able to selectively allow the specified voltage/amperage received from the electric storage unit 108 to be transmitted through the inductor 116 to the blasting probe 118.
The adjustment unit 120 comprises any suitable probe tip adjustment means as are well known in the art. Further, the adjustment unit 120 couples to the adjustable tip 130 such that the adjustment unit 120 is able to selectively adjust/move the adjustable tip 130 axially away from or towards the end of the ground electrode 124, thereby adjusting the electrode gap 132. In some embodiments, the adjustment unit 120 adjusts/moves the adjustable tip 130 automatically. The term “electrode gap” is defined as the distance between the high voltage and ground electrode 126, 124 through the blasting media 104. Thus, by moving the adjustable tip 130 axially in or out in relation to the end of the ground electrode 124, the adjustment unit 120 is able to adjust the resistance and/or power of the blasting probe 118. Specifically, in an electrical circuit, the power is directly proportional to the resistance. Therefore, if the resistance is increased or decreased, the power is correspondingly varied. As a result, because a change in the distance separating the electrodes 124, 126 in the blasting probe 118 determines the resistance of the blasting probe 118 through the blasting media 104 when the plasma blasting system 100 is fired, this adjustment of the electrode gap 132 is able to be used to vary the electrical power deposited into the solid 102 to be broken or fractured (or into the wet concrete to push the concrete into the borehole wall. Accordingly, by allowing more refined control over the electrode gap 132 via the adjustable tip 130, better control over the blasting and breakage yield is able to be obtained (or for shaping the borehole).
Another embodiment, as shown in
In one embodiment, water is used as the blasting media 104. The water could be poured down the bore hole 122 before or after the probe 118 is inserted in the borehole 122. In some embodiments, such as horizontal boreholes 122 or boreholes 122 that extend upward, the blasting media 104 could be contained in a balloon or could be forced under pressure into the hole with the probe 118. In another embodiment, wet concrete is used as the blasting media 104.
As shown in
The method and operation 400 of the plasma blasting system 100 will now be discussed in conjunction with a flow chart illustrated in
During the first microseconds of the electrical breakdown, the blasting media 104 is subjected to a sudden increase in temperature (e.g. about 5000 to 10,000° C.) due to a plasma channel formed between the electrodes 124, 126, which is confined in the borehole 122 and not able to dissipate. The heat generated vaporizes or reacts with part of the blasting media 104, depending on if the blasting media 104 comprises a liquid or a solid respectively, creating a steep pressure rise confined in the borehole 122. Because the discharge is very brief, and the rate of temperature increase very quick, a plasma ball on the size of a ping pang ball forms, starting a shock wave with high pressures greater than the material strengths of the solid (on the order of 2.5 GPa) forcing the uncured concrete into the neighboring soils and compacting such soil. The plasma blasting system 100 described herein is able to provide pressures well above the tensile strengths of common rocks (e.g. granite=10-20 MPa, tuff=1-4 MPa, and concrete=7 MPa). Thus, the major cause of the fracturing or breaking of the solid 102 is the impact of this shock wave front which is comparable to one resulting from a chemical explosive (e.g. dynamite) without forming any gases, which prevent wet concrete from filling the space.
As the reaction continues, the blast wave begins propagating outward toward regions with lower atmospheric pressure. As the wave propagates, the pressure of the blast wave front falls with increasing distance. This finally leads to cooling of the plasma and the wet concrete from the upper part of the borehole fills the space created by the blast.
To illustrate the level of generated pressure during testing, the blast probe of the blasting system described herein was inserted into solids comprising either concrete or granite with cast or drilled boreholes having a one inch diameter. A capacitor bank system was used for the electrical storage unit and was charged at a low current and then discharged at a high current via the high voltage switch 112. Peak power achieved was measured in the megawatts. Pulse rise times were around 10-20 μsec and pulse lengths were on the order of 50-100 μsec. The system was able to produce pressures of up to 2.5 GPa and break concrete and granite blocks with masses of more than 850 kg.
The probe connector 501 is mechanically connected to the shaft connector 502 with screws, welds, or other mechanical connections. The shaft connector 502 is connected to the probe shaft 503. The connection to the probe shaft 503 could be through male threads on the top of the probe shaft 503 and female threads on the shaft connector 502. Alternately, the shaft connector 502 could include a set screw on through the side to keep the shaft 503 connected to the shaft connector 502. The shaft connector 502 could be a donut shape and made of stainless steel, copper, aluminum, or another conductive material. Electrically, the shaft connector 502 is connected to the ground side of the wires 114. An insulated wire from the probe connector 501 to the high voltage electrode 602 passes through the center of the shaft connector 502. For a 2 inch borehole 122, the shaft connector could be about 1.75 inches in diameter.
The shaft 503 is a hollow shaft that may be threaded 507 at one (or both) ends. The shaft 503 made of stainless steel, copper, aluminum, or another conductive material. Electrically, the shaft 503 is connected to the ground side of the wires 114 through the shaft connector 502. An insulated wire from the probe connector 501 to the high voltage electrode 602 passes through the center of the shaft 503. Mechanically, the shaft 503 is connected to the shaft connector 502 as described above. At the other end, the shaft 503 is connected to the cage 506 through the threaded bolt 508 into the shafts threads 507, or through another mechanical connection (welding, set screws, etc). The shaft 503 may be circular and 1.5 inches in diameter in a 2 inch borehole 122 application. The shaft may be 40 inches long, in one embodiment. At several intervals in the shaft, blast force inhibitors 504a, 504b, 504c may be placed to inhibit the escape of blast wave and the blasting media 104 during the blast. The blast force inhibitors 504a, 504b, 504c may be made of the same material as the shaft 503 and may be welded to the shaft, machined into the shaft, slip fitted onto the shaft or connected with set screws. The inhibitors 504a, 504b, 504c could be shaped as a donut.
The shaft 503 connects to the cage 506 through a threaded bolt 508 that threads into the shaft's threads 507. This allows adjustment of the positioning of the cage 506 and the blast. Other methods of connecting the cage 503 to the shaft 506 could be used without deviating from the invention (for example, a set screw or welding). The cage 506 may be circular and may be 1.75 inches in diameter. The cage 506 may be 4-6 inches long, and may include 4-8 holes 604 in the side to allow the blast to impact the side of the blast hole 122. These holes 604 may be 2-4 inches high and may be 0.5-1 inch wide, with 0.2-0.4 inch pillars in the cage 506 attaching the bottom of the cage 506 to the top. The cage 506 could be made of high strength steel, carbon steel, copper, titanium, tungsten, aluminum, cast iron, or similar materials of sufficient strength to withstand the blast. Electrically, the cage 506 is part of the ground circuit from the shaft 503 to the ground electrode 601.
In an alternative embodiment, a single blast cage could be made of weaker materials, such as plastic, with a wire connected from the shaft to the ground electrode 601 at the bottom of the cage 506.
The details of the cage 506 can be viewed in
The wire that runs down the shaft 503, as connected to the wires 114 at the probe connector 501, is electrically connected to the high voltage electrode 602. A dielectric separator 603 keeps the electricity from coming in contact with the cage 506. Instead, when the power is applied, a spark is formed between the high voltage electrode 602 and the ground electrode 601. In order to prevent the spark from forming between the high voltage electrode 602 and the cage 506, the distance between the high voltage electrode 602 and the ground electrode 601 must be less than the distance from the high voltage electrode 602 and the cage 506 walls. The two electrodes 601, 602 are on the same axis with the tips opposing each other. If the cage is 1.75 inches in diameter, the cage 506 walls will be about 0.8 inches from the high voltage electrode 602, so the distance between the high voltage electrode 602 and the ground electrode 601 should be less than 0.7 inches. In another embodiment, an insulator could be added inside the cage to prevent sparks between the electrode 602 and the cage when the distance between the high voltage electrode 602 and the ground electrode 601 is larger.
This cage 506 design creates a mostly cylindrical shock wave with the force applied to the sides of the bore hole 122. In another embodiment, additional metal or plastic cone-shaped elements may be inserted around lower 601 and upper electrodes 602 to direct a shock wave outside the probe and to reduce axial forces inside the cage.
The method of and apparatus for plasma blasting described herein has numerous advantages. Specifically, by adjusting the blasting probe's tip and thereby the electrode gap, the plasma blasting system is able to provide better control over the power deposited into the specimen to be broken. Consequently, the power used is able to be adjusted according to the parameters of the soil and of the wet concrete instead of using the same amount of power regardless of the soil and material conditions. As a result, the plasma blasting system is more efficient in terms of energy, safer in terms of its inert qualities, and requires smaller components thereby dramatically decreasing the cost of operation.
While one embodiment of the plasma blasting probe was used to fracture rock or concrete, this new probe design can also be used “down hole” in an uncured (“wet”) concrete piling during construction.
The purpose of this plasma blast in this application is to push the portion of the concrete outward. In a soft silty environment this process compacts the soil and shapes the bottom of the concrete into a more anchor like shape. This process can be repeated multiple times by adding more concrete and repeating the blast further “up hole”.
Looking to
This procedure can be repeated, as seen in
It is envisioned that through shaped plasma blasting to force wet concrete into boreholes could create various underground structures for supporting buildings. In one embodiment, the holes could be shaped such that adjacent pilings could be connected underground by expanding the bottom of the boreholes until they interconnect. By connecting the pilings above ground, the pilings will then be connected above ground and below ground, preventing the pilings from tipping over.
In another embodiment, and lattice could be created underground connecting a grid of boreholes. Each of these structures allow for building weight to be distributed across a broad area of soil that would not normally support the weight of the building. In another embodiment, concrete guy wire anchors could be created in a mushroom shape underground structure to prevent the weight of a radio tower from pulling the guy wires out of the ground.
This embodiment allows four new features to be added to customized shaping of the piling anchor.
The first feature is a mechanism that adjusts the spark gap remotely and electronically. In
The second feature is to arrange the electrodes in a groups of three 120 degrees apart or four 90 degrees apart or any number with an equal number of opposing electrodes on the same axis on the other side of the probe. In this embodiment, multiple sets of electrodes 601, 602 are mounted in the cage 506, and fired either synchronously or asynchronously in order to shape the blast wave. In another embodiment, the cage 506 could be designed with holes 604 only in certain directions to push the force of the blast in the director of the openings 604.
The third feature is an in situ recognition and sensing of soil conditions surrounding the probe. With this embodiment, sensors could be mounted in the cage 506 or in the shaft 503 to sense the characteristics of the soil surrounding the borehole 112. These sensors could report the soil conditions back to an operator to allow the operator to determine the energy used in the blast, the distance between the electrodes 601B, 602B, and the direction of the blast.
The fourth feature is a smart algorithm which analyzes and synthesizes the soil information and desired shape and adjusts the spark gap and determines which electrodes will fire. The smart algorithm also can adjust the amount of energy (electricity) used in the blast. This embodiment would require a special purpose microprocessor designed to interface with the capacitor bank 108 and the high voltage, high speed switch 112. The special purpose microprocessor may also take input from the soil sensors and operate the mechanism to adjust the gap between the electrodes 601, 602. The algorithm takes the desired shape of the resulting hole 702 and the soil conditions from the sensors in the probe 500, and calculates the direction and power of the blast waves required to create the desired shape. The special purpose microprocessor then automatically adjusts the gap between the electrodes 601, 602, and the direction of the blast through which electrodes fire and with what power. The special purpose microprocessor then determines how deep in the borehole 122 that the probe 500 should be inserted. The special purpose microprocessor then determines the amount of electrical energy and the time of discharge.
The result is a customizable in-situ shaping of the concrete piling which can be asymmetric in shape to match the varying soil conditions as a function of depth.
The present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments incorporating details to facilitate the understanding of principles of construction and operation of the invention. Such reference herein to specific embodiments and details thereof is not intended to limit the scope of the claims appended hereto. It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that other various modifications may be made in the embodiment chosen for illustration without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
The foregoing devices and operations, including their implementation, will be familiar to, and understood by, those having ordinary skill in the art.
The above description of the embodiments, alternative embodiments, and specific examples, are given by way of illustration and should not be viewed as limiting. Further, many changes and modifications within the scope of the present embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit thereof, and the present invention includes such changes and modifications.
This patent application is a non-provisional application of, and claims the benefit of the filing dates of, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/632,833, “In-situ Piling and Anchor Shaping using Plasma Blasting”, filed on Feb. 20, 2018. The disclosures of this provisional patent application is incorporated herein by reference. This provisional application draws from U.S. Pat. No. 8,628,146, filed by Martin Baltazar-Lopez and Steve Best, issued on Jan. 14, 2010, entitled “Method of and apparatus for plasma blasting”. The entire patent incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3324665 | Robichaux | Jun 1967 | A |
3553969 | Chamberlin et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3628146 | Beckman | Dec 1971 | A |
3679007 | O'Hare | Jul 1972 | A |
3763610 | Ballew | Oct 1973 | A |
3896917 | Taplin | Jul 1975 | A |
4074758 | Scott | Feb 1978 | A |
4169503 | Scott | Oct 1979 | A |
4222684 | Rosenstock | Sep 1980 | A |
4268192 | Colle | May 1981 | A |
4345650 | Wesley | Aug 1982 | A |
4465401 | Stoddord | Aug 1984 | A |
4479680 | Wesley | Oct 1984 | A |
4653697 | Codina | Mar 1987 | A |
4741405 | Moeny | May 1988 | A |
4806153 | Sakai | Feb 1989 | A |
5004050 | Sizonenko | Apr 1991 | A |
5106164 | Kitzinger | Apr 1992 | A |
5301169 | Baria | Apr 1994 | A |
5388521 | Coursen | Feb 1995 | A |
5397961 | Ayers | Mar 1995 | A |
5416391 | Correa | May 1995 | A |
5425570 | Wilkinson | Jun 1995 | A |
5482357 | Wint | Jan 1996 | A |
5573307 | Wilkinson | Nov 1996 | A |
5773750 | Jae | Jun 1998 | A |
5980446 | Loomis | Nov 1999 | A |
6012874 | Groneck | Jan 2000 | A |
6227293 | Huffman | May 2001 | B1 |
6283555 | Arai | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6457778 | Chung | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490527 | Utt | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499536 | Ellingsen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6597632 | Khan | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6761416 | Moeny | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6772105 | Heck, Sr. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6935702 | Okazaki | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7562740 | Ounadjela | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7849919 | Wood | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8616302 | Moeny | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8628146 | Baltazar-Lopez | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8789772 | Moeny | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9181788 | Ageev | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9719302 | Linyaev | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9739574 | Vijay | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9770724 | Vijay | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9816356 | Ageev | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9896917 | Sizonenko | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10060195 | Moeny | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10254499 | Cohen | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10280723 | Ageev | May 2019 | B2 |
10407995 | Moeny | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20010011590 | Thomas | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20060038437 | Moeny | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070292215 | Kim | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100270038 | Looney | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110139441 | Zolezzi Garreton | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110227395 | Baltazar-Lopez | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120043075 | Abramova | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140027110 | Ageev | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140251599 | Linetskiy | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160168815 | Kemp | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170002535 | Surjaatmadja | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2144980 | Jan 2000 | RU |
2184221 | Jun 2002 | RU |
2194846 | Dec 2002 | RU |
2199659 | Feb 2003 | RU |
2213860 | Oct 2003 | RU |
2261986 | Oct 2005 | RU |
2272128 | Mar 2006 | RU |
2282021 | Aug 2006 | RU |
2283950 | Sep 2006 | RU |
2295031 | Mar 2007 | RU |
2298641 | May 2007 | RU |
2298642 | May 2007 | RU |
2314412 | Jan 2008 | RU |
2317409 | Feb 2008 | RU |
2327027 | Jun 2008 | RU |
2007101698 | Jul 2008 | RU |
2335658 | Oct 2008 | RU |
2520672 | Apr 2014 | RU |
Entry |
---|
Eric P. Koehler, “Thixotropy of SCC and Its Effects on Formwork Pressure”, Apr. 14, 2013, https://www.concrete.org/portals/0/files/pdf/webinars/koehler1.pdf (Year: 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190177944 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62632833 | Feb 2018 | US |