In-situ solvent recycling process for solid phase peptide synthesis at elevated temperatures

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10239914
  • Patent Number
    10,239,914
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 18, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 26, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
An improvement of deprotection in solid phase peptide synthesis is disclosed. The method includes the steps of adding the deprotection composition in high concentration and small volume to the mixture of the coupling solution, the growing peptide chain, and any excess activated amino acid from the preceding coupling cycle; and without any draining step between the coupling step of the previous cycle and the addition of the deprotection composition for the successive cycle; and with the coupling solution at a temperature of at least 30° C.
Description

This application incorporates by reference the sequence listing submitted on Jun. 19, 2018 in ASCII text file format in accordance with 37 CFR 1.824(a) titled “20180619_amended_sequence_listing” created on Jun. 19, 2018 with a file size of 8 KB. The sequence listing is part of the specification and is herein incorporated by reference in its entirely. In accordance with 37 CFR 1.825(a), the sequence listing contains no new matter.


BACKGROUND

Bruce Merrifield's pioneering development of solid phase peptide synthesis created a useful process for synthesis peptide chains through its use of filtration to remove reagents between steps. The process has involved repetitive cycles which include coupling and deprotection with washing and filtration in-between each step (FIG. 1). It has commonly been assumed that washing is required between each step to completely remove the reagents previously used so that they don't undesirably participate in the next step. This typically involves “insertions” which refer to the incorporation of an extra amino acid. This is thought to occur through either residual base removing the protecting group (Fmoc) on an amino acid recently coupled thereby allowing a second amino acid to “insert”; or through residual activated amino acid left behind during the subsequent deprotection step which could couple to deblocked sites thereby “inserting” an extra amino acid from the previous step. It was recently shown, however, that washing after the coupling step was not required for the successful synthesis of peptides. In this work the coupling step was drained and the deprotection solution was subsequently added to the vessel (J. Collins, K. Porter, S. Singh and G. Vanier, “High-Efficiency Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis (HE-SPPS),” Org. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 940-943, 2014) (FIG. 2).


SUMMARY

The invention is a method of deprotection in solid phase peptide synthesis in which the improvement comprises adding the deprotection composition in high concentration and small volume to the mixture of the coupling solution, the growing peptide chain, and any excess activated amino acid from the preceding coupling cycle; and without any draining step between the coupling step of the previous cycle and the addition of the deprotection composition for the successive cycle; and with the coupling solution at least 30° C.


In another aspect the invention is a method of deprotection in solid phase peptide synthesis in which the improvement comprises adding the deprotection composition in high concentration and small volume to the mixture of the coupling solution, the growing peptide chain, and any excess activated amino acid from the preceding coupling cycle; and without any draining step between the coupling step of the previous cycle and the addition of the deprotection composition for the successive cycle which removes at least 50% of the volume of the previous cycle coupling solution; and with the coupling solution at a temperature of at least 30° C.


The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention and the manner in which the same are accomplished will become clearer based on the followed detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a traditional SPPS Cycle



FIG. 2 illustrates more recent SPPS Cycles for High Efficiency Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis (HE-SPPS)



FIG. 3 illustrates in-situ solvent recycling process for solid phase peptide synthesis.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This invention presents a novel process whereby the coupling and deprotection steps occur within the same solvent. In this process concentrated base is added directly to the resin coupling solution after a desired period of time for the coupling to occur. The deprotection step is then immediately started when the base is added. Therefore, the onset of the deprotection step is immediately after the coupling step without any time delay.


Additionally, only a small volume of base is required since it can use the solvent present from the coupling reaction. This requires a sophisticated reagent delivery system for the base that is accurate at very small volumes (0.5 mL) with rapid delivery. Typically, a 20% solution of base (piperidine) in solvent is used for the deprotection step. Excess base concentration can increase base-catalyzed side reactions and therefore significant solvent is required. This means that significant solvent can be saved from this process by adding concentrated base to the coupling solvent.


To demonstrate the effectiveness of this new process a batch of 24 peptides were assembled using an automated peptide synthesizer modified to perform the in-situ solvent recycling step during each cycle.


Materials and Methods:


All peptides were synthesized using a LIBERTY BLUE™ PRIME™ system (CEM Corp., Matthews, N.C., USA) allowing for automated in-situ solvent recycling and evaporation based washing. The peptides were synthesized at 0.05 mmol scale with 10 equivalents of amino acid using CarboMAX™ coupling with amino acid/carbodiimide/ethyl 2-cyano-2-(hydroxyimino)acetate (AA/DIC/Oxyma) (1:2:1) based activation for 100 sec at 90° C. (E. Atherton, N. L. Benoiton, E. Brown, R. Sheppard and B. J. Williams, “Racemization of Activated, Urethane-protected Amino-acids by p-Dimethylaminopyridine. Significance in Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis,” J.C.S. Chem. Comm., pp. 336-337, 1981). ProTide resins (CEM Corp.) based on TentaGel® technology were used for synthesis with either a Rink Amide linker or a Cl-TCP(Cl) linker with unactivated loading of the first amino acid with DIEA at 90° C. for 5 min. The deprotection step was performed for 50 sec at 95° C. and initiated by adding 0.5 mL of 50% pyrrolidine directly to the coupling solution. A single 1×4 mL wash was used in between the deprotection and coupling steps. Peptides were cleaved with Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)/triisopropylsilane/water/2,2′-(ethylenedioxy)diethanethiol (TFA/TIS/H2O/DODt) (92.5:2.5:2.5:2.5) for 30 min at 38° C. using a RAZOR™ cleavage system (CEM Corp.).




embedded image


Results and discussion:









TABLE 1







Automated Sequential Batch Synthesis of 24 Peptides















Resin
UPLC
Synthesis


#
Peptide
Disease Area
Used
Purity
Time















 1
GRP (SEQ ID NO: 1)
Regulates
RA
81
1:22




VPLPAGGGTVLTKMYPRGNHWAVGHLM-NH2

Gastrin Release
ProTide







 2
Glucagon (SEQ ID NO: 2)
Hypoglycemia
RA
75
1:28



H-HSQGTFTSDYSKYLDSRRAQDFVQWLMNT-NH2

ProTide







 3
Bivalirudin (SEQ ID NO: 3)
Blood thinner
Cl-2-Cl-
71
1:05



H-fPRPGGGGNGDFEEIPEEYL-OH

Trt







 4
Angiotensin (SEQ ID NO: 4)
Vasoconstrictor
Cl-2-Cl-
82
0:30



H-NRVYVHPF-OH

Trt







 5
PTH 1-34 (SEQ ID NO: 5)
Osteoporosis
RA
70
1:43



H-SVSEIQLMHNLGKHLNSMERVEWLRKKLQDVHNF-

ProTide





NH2
























 6
Gonadorelin (SEQ ID NO: 6)
Fertility
RA
91
0:35



pEHWSYGLRPG-NH2

ProTide







 7
Triptorelin (SEQ ID NO: 7)
Breast Cancer,
RA
73
0:35



pEHWSYwLRPG-NH2
Prostrate
ProTide






Cancer,








 8
Liraglutide (SEQ ID NO: 8)
Diabetes
RA
80
1:31



H-HAEGTFTSDVSSYLEGQAAK(Y-E-

ProTide





palmitoyl)EFIAWLVRGRG-NH2









 9
Exenatide (SEQ ID NO: 9)
Diabetes
RA
74
1:58



H-

ProTide





HGEGTFTSDLSKQMEEEAVRLFIEWLKNGGPSSGAPPPS-







NH2









10
MOG (35-55) (SEQ ID NO: 10)
Multiple
RA
71
1:05



H-MEVGWYRSPFSRVVHLYRNGK-NH2
Sclerosis
ProTide







11
Secretin (SEQ ID NO: 11)
Osmoregulation
RA
70
1:19



H-HDGTFTSELSRLRDSARLQRLLQGLV-NH2

ProTide







12
Teriparatide (SEQ ID NO: 12)
Osteoporosis
RA
60
1:43



H-SVSEIQLMHNLGKHLNSMERVEWLRKKLQDVHNF-

ProTide





NH2









13
GLP-1 (7-37) (SEQ ID NO: 13)
Diabetes
RA
74
1:34



H-HAEGTFTSDVSSYLEGQAAKEFIAWLVKGRG-NH2

ProTide







14
Magainin 1 (SEQ ID NO: 14)
Antibiotic
RA
79
1:11



H-GIGKFLHSAGKFGKAFVGEIMKS-NH2

ProTide







15
Tetracosactide (SEQ ID NO: 15)
Adrenal Cortex
RA
77
1:13



H-SYSMEHFRWGKPVGKKRRPVKVYP-NH2
stimulant
ProTide







16
[Arg8]-Vasopressin (SEQ ID NO: 16)
Hormone (blood
RA
94
0:32



H-CYFQNCPRG-NH2
vessel
ProTide







17
Ubiquitin (SEQ ID NO: 17)
Protein
RA
≥60
3:44



MQIFVKTLTGKTITLEVEPSDTIENVKAKIQDKEGIPPDQ
signaling agent
ProTide





QRLIFAGKQLEDGRTLSDYNIQKESTLHLVLRLRGG-NH2









18
Parasin I (SEQ ID NO: 18)
Antibiotic
RA
87
0:59



H-KGRGKQGGKVRAKAKTRSS-NH2

ProTide







19
Dynorphin A (SEQ ID NO: 19)
Opioid
RA
71
0:53



H-YGGFLRRIRPKLKWDNQ-NH2
Research
ProTide







20
ACP (SEQ ID NO: 20)
Fatty Acid
RA
92
0:32



H-VQAAIDYING-NH2
Synthesis
ProTide







21
BAM 3200 (SEQ ID NO: 21)
Opioid
RA
70
1:16



H-YGGFMRRVGRPEWWMDYQKRYGGFL-NH2
Research
ProTide







22
HIV-TAT  (47-57) (SEQ ID NO: 22)
HIV/AIDS
RA
93
0:31



Fmoc-YGRKKRRQRRR-NH2
Research
ProTide







23
HIV-TAT (48-60) (SEQ ID NO: 23)
HIV/AIDS
RA
88
0:39



Fmoc-GRKKRRQRRRPPQ-NH2
Research
ProTide







24
Pramlintide (SEQ ID NO: 24)
Diabetes
RA
72
1:52



KCNTATCATQRLANFLVHSSNNFGPILPPTNVGSNTY--

ProTide





NH2









All peptides synthesized in Table 1 gave the desired target as the major peak with a standard cycle time of 2 minutes and 58 seconds. The in-situ solvent recycling process allowed for 0.5 mL of a concentrated pyrrolidine (BP 87° C.) solution to be added to the end of the coupling step (without draining). An advantage of this setup was that the deprotection immediately proceeded very close to the desired temperature (95° C.) because the coupling solution was already at 90° C. During the deprotection process a vacuum was applied and the pyrrolidine was evaporated and subsequently condensed in the waste container. This allowed only a single wash step (1×4 mL) to be required at the end of the deprotection step.


Total synthesis time for entire batch: 32.6 hours


This new process provided a significant reduction in standard cycle time (2 minutes 57 seconds) from (a)—elimination of the coupling drain time, (b)—elimination of the deprotection delivery time between steps, and (c)—elimination of the temperature ramp time for the deprotection step thereby allowing a shorter deprotection time to be used. Additionally, significant solvent savings were possible with the complete elimination of the deprotection solvent during each cycle.


In the drawings and specification there has been set forth a preferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms have been employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being defined in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of deprotection in batch solid phase peptide synthesis in which the improvement comprises: adding a base deprotection composition to a mixture of a coupling solution, a growing peptide chain, and any excess activated amino acid from a preceding coupling step;wherein the deprotection composition has a concentration of at least 50% base by volume and is added to the mixture of the coupling solution, the growing peptide chain, and any excess activated amino acid from the preceding coupling step in an amount that is less than ⅓ of the volume of the coupling solution;without any draining step between the coupling step of the preceding coupling cycle and the addition of the deprotection composition for the successive cycle; andwith the coupling solution at least 30° C.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the deprotection composition is an organic base.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1 using Fmoc solid phase peptide chemistry.
  • 4. A method of deprotection in batch solid phase peptide synthesis in which the improvement comprises: adding a base deprotection composition to a mixture of a coupling solution, a growing peptide chain, and any excess activated amino acid from the preceding coupling cycle step;wherein the deprotection composition is added to the mixture of the coupling solution, the growing peptide chain, and any excess activated amino acid from the preceding coupling step in a concentration of at least 50% base by volume and an amount that is less than ⅓ of the volume of the coupling solution;without any draining step between the coupling step of the preceding coupling cycle and the addition of the deprotection composition for the successive cycle which removes at least 50% of the volume of the preceding coupling cycle coupling solution; andwith the coupling solution at a temperature of at least 30° C.
  • 5. A method according to claim 4 wherein the deprotection composition is an organic base.
  • 6. A method according to claim 4 using Fmoc solid phase peptide chemistry.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
PCT/US2016/058181 Oct 2016 WO international
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 15/299,931, filed Oct. 21, 2016, for “Improvements in Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis.”

US Referenced Citations (9)
Number Name Date Kind
6288379 Greene Sep 2001 B1
7393920 Collins Jul 2008 B2
7803351 Sharma Sep 2010 B2
20040238794 Karandikar Dec 2004 A1
20070270573 Collins Nov 2007 A1
20120041173 Collins Feb 2012 A1
20130034547 Kelly Feb 2013 A1
20140275481 Simon Sep 2014 A1
20170226152 Collins Aug 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
WO-2014033297 Mar 2014 WO
2015028599 Mar 2015 WO
2017070512 Apr 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (36)
Entry
J. Collins, K. Porter, S. Singh and G. Vanier, “High-Efficiency Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis (HE-SPPS),” Org. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 940-943, 2014.
M. Beyermann, P. Henklein, A. Klose, R. Sohr and M. Bienert, “Effect of tertiary amine on the carbodiimide-mediated peptide synthesis,” Int. J. Peptide Protein Res., vol. 37, pp. 252-256, 1991.
L. Carpino, El-Faham and A., “The Diisopropylcarbodiimide/1-Hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole System: Segment Coupling and Stepwise Peptide Assembly,” Tetrahedron, vol. 55, pp. 6813-6830, 1999.
E. Atherton, N. L Benoiton, E. Brown, R. Sheppard and B. J. Williams, “Racemization of Activaterd, Urethane-protected Amino-acids by p-Dimethylaminopyridine. Significance in Solid-phase Peptide Synthesis,” J.C.S. Chem. Comm., pp. 336-337, 1981.
S. Wang, J. Tam, B. Wang and R. Merrifield, “Enhancement of peptide coupling reactions by 4-dimethylaminopyridine,” Int. J. Peptide Protein Res., vol. 18, pp. 459-467, 1981.
M. Pennington, “Procedures to Improve Difficult Couplings,” in Peptide Synthesis Protocols, Vols. Methods in Molecular Biology—vol. 35, Totowa, NJ, Humana Press, 1995, p. 10.
X. Shangjie, I. Held, B. Kempf, H. Mayr, W. Steglich and H. Zipse, “The DMAP-Catalyzed Acetylation of Alcohols—A Mechanistic Study,” Chemistry, vol. 11, pp. 4751-4757, 2005.
P. White, J. Collins and Z. Cox, “Comparative study of conventional and microwave assisted synthesis,” in 19th American Peptide Symposium, San Diego, CA, 2005.
A. Tofteng, S. Pedersen, D. Staerk and K. Jensen, “Effect of Residual Water and Microwave Heating on the Half-Life of the Reagents and Reactive Intermediates in Peptide Synthesis,” Chemistry, vol. 18, pp. 9024-9031, 2012.
K. Wehrstedt, P. Wandrey and D. Heitkamp, “Explosive properties of 1-hydroxybenzotriazoles,” J. Hazard Mater, vol. 126, pp. 1-7, 2005.
M. Itoh, “Peptides. IV. Racemization Suppression by the Use of Ethyl-2-Hydroximino-2- cyanoacetate and Its Amide,” Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., vol. 46, pp. 2219-2221, 1973.
J. Perich, N. Ede, S. Eagle and a Bray, “Synthesis of phosphopeptides by the Multipin method: Evaluation of coupling methods for the incorporation of Fmoc-Tyr(PO3Bzl,H)-OH, Fmoc- Ser(PO3Bzl,H)-OH and Fmoc-Thr(PO3Bzl,H)-OH,” Lett. Pept. Sci., vol. 6, pp. 91-97, 1999.
L. Carpino and A. El-Faham, “Effect of Teriary Bases on O-Benzotriazolyuronium Salt-Induced Peptide Segment coupling;” J. Org. Chem., vol. 59, pp. 695-698, 1994.
T. Lescrinier, R. Busson, H. Winter, C. Hendrix, G. Janssen, C. Pannecouque, J. Rozenski, A. Aerschot and P. Herdewijn, “a-Amino acids derived from omithine as building blocks for peptide synthesis,” J. Pept. Res., vol. 49, pp. 183-189, 1997.
S. Nozaki, “Delay of coupling caused by excess additives,” J. Pept. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 147-153, 2006.
R. Subirós-Funosas, R. Prohens, R. Barbas, A. El-Faham and F. Albericio, “Oxyma: An Efficient Additive for Peptide Synthesis to Replace the Benzotriazole-Based HOBt and HOAt with a Lower Risk of Explosion,” Chemistry, vol. 15, pp. 9394-9403, 2009.
M. Cezari and L. Juliano, “Studies on lactam formation during coupling procedures of N alpha-N omega-protected arginine derivatives,” J. Pept. Res., vol. 9, pp. 88-91, 1996.
Sampson, JH et al. An epidermal growth factor receptor variant III-targeted vaccine is safe and immunogenic in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009; 8: 2773-2779.
Li G, Siddhartha M, Wong AJ. The epidermal growth factor variant III peptide vaccine for treatment of malignant gliomas. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2010; 21: 87-93.
Li G, Wong AJ. EGF receptor variant III as a target antigen for tumor immunotherapy. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2008; 7:977-985.
R. B. B Merrifield; Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis. I. The Synthesis of a Tetrapeptide; J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1963, 85(14), pp. 2149-2154.
Chan and White, Fmoc Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis, Oxford University Press 2000, p. 1.
Collins, Microwave-enhanced solid-phase peptide synthesis. Chemlnform, 39(46) i. 2008.
Bacsa et al., Rapid solid-phase peptide synthesis using thermal and controleld microwave irradiation; Journal Peptide Science, 2006, 12(10), 633-638.
Amblard et al., Methods and protocols of modern solid phase peptide synthesis, Molecular Biotechnology, 2006, 239-254.
Coin et al., Solid-phase peptide synthesis: from standard proccedures to the synthesis of difficult sequences; Nature Protocols, 2007, 2(12), 3247-3256.
International Search Report of counterpart Application No. PCT/US2016/058181 dated Jan. 31, 2017.
Finneman et al., “Novel approach for optimization of a ‘difficult’ peptide synthesis by utilizing quantitative reaction monitoring assays,” J. Pept. Sci., 2012; 18: 511-518.
CEM Corporation, Microwave Synthesis of ‘difficult’ peptide EGFRvIII; 2013; 3 pages.
I. Friligou, E. Papadimitriou, D. Gatos, J. Matsoukas and T. Tselios, “Microwave-assisted solid-phase peptide synthesis of the 60-110 domain of human pleiotrophin on 2-chlorotrityl resin,” Amino Acids, vol. 40, pp. 1431-1440, 2011.
R Subirós-Funosas, “Use of Oxyma as pH modulatory agent to be used in the prevention of base-driven side reactions and its effect on 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin,” Pept. Sci., vol. 98, pp. 89-97, 2012.
International Search Report of counterpart Application No. PCT/US2017/028254 dated Aug. 1, 2017.
Palasek, et al., Limiting racemization and aspartimide formation on microwave-enhanced Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis; J. Pept. Sci., 2006; 13: 143-148.
J. Collins, “Microwave-Enhanced Synthesis of Peptides, Proteins, and Peptidomimetics,” in Microwaves in Organic Synthesis' 3rd Ed., Weinheim, Germany, Wiley-VCH Verlag & Co KGaA, 2013, pp. 897-960.
Counterpart International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/028254 filed Apr. 19, 2017 for “In-situ Solvent Recycling Process for Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis at Elevated Temperatures”.
Methods for determining enantiomeric purity of amino acids; accessed Oct. 4, 2017 at http://cat-online.com/enantiomeric%20purity.html.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170369524 A1 Dec 2017 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62245484 Oct 2015 US
62383397 Sep 2016 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15299931 Oct 2016 US
Child 15490090 US